HAVE FIFTY FIVE BILLS TO HEAR
SEVEN OF WHICH ARE DUE PASS
RECOMMENDATIONS.
AND ALL OF THE REST ARE SUSPENSE
ITEMS.
WE HAVE TWO BILLS ON FILE THAT
WERE APPROVED AS TWENTY EIGHT
EIGHT THEN GO DIRECTLY TO THE
FLOOR THOSE ARE AB NINETEEN
EIGHTY ONE BY LIMON.
AND AB TWENTY SIXTY THREE BY
AGAR CURRY.
AS A REMINDER AT LIKE TO
REITERATE --
THAT TESTIMONY SHOULD BE LIMITED
TO FISCAL ASPECTS OF THE BILL.
AND PLEASE REFRAIN FROM PLENTY
POLICY DISCUSSIONS --
IN YOUR COMMENTS --
AND WE ARE GONNA TAKE THE ROLE.
WE HAVE ACCORDING TO THE WILL DO
THAT PORTANTINO.
HERE PORTANTINO HERE BATES BATES
HERE BAO.
HERE FELL HERE BRADFORD BRADFORD
HARE HILL.
HILL HERE NIELSEN WIENER.
SO WE HAVE A QUORUM.
DO WE HAVE WE HAVE --
MS LOW MOAN AS OUR FIRST AUTHOR
TO WALK IN THE ROOM.
AND AND YOU HAVE.
AB NINETEEN SEVENTY SIX TO
PRESENT.
HERE OTHER ONE NINETEEN FIFTY
SIX IS GOING TO SUSPEND SENIOR
WAVING PRESENTATION ON THAT
WONDERFUL SO PLEASE TELL US
ABOUT.
AB NINETEEN SEVENTY SIX THANK
YOU TURN MEMBERS WOMEN WHO WORK
OUTSIDE THE HOME ARE LESS LIKELY
TO INITIATE BREAST FEEDING AND
TEND TO BREASTFEED FOR A SHORTER
LENGTH OF TIME.
WOMEN OFTEN SAY IN AND
SUPPORTIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT
INCLUDING THE LACK OF PRIVACY
AND UNHYGIENIC SPACES AS A
REASON FOR DISCONTINUING
BREASTFEEDING.
AB NINETEEN SEVENTY SIX REQUIRES
THAT SPACE.
MAY BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR WOMEN
TO EXPRESS BREAST MILK IN THE
WORKPLACE.
THAT SPACE NOT BEING A BATHROOM
RECENT AMENDMENTS ESTABLISH A
PROCESS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS REVIEW
EMPLOYER.
UNDUE HARDSHIP EXEMPTION CLAIMS
AB NINETEEN SEVENTY SIX IS A
SMALL CHANGE TO PROVIDE
MOTHERS AND HELPS REDUCE A
SIGNIFICANT BARRIER THAT
PREVENTS WOMAN FROM CONTINUE TO
BREASTFEED.
UPON RETURNING TO WORK.
THANK YOU AN ASPECT LAST WHEN I
VOTE WONDERFUL YEAH WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING MR TURNED MEMBERS
MITCHELL BLOCK WITH THE
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
WITH THE SPONSORS OF THE BILL
AND HERE IN SUPPORT AND LIKE TO
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
TODAY AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
THANK YOU SIR ANY OPPOSITION TO
THE BILL.
SEEING NONE FINANCE GOOD MORNING
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIR AND
MEMBERS SOLELY ON A DARE WITH
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.
THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS ESTIMATES COSTS OF ONE
HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
IN THE FIRST YEAR AND ONE
HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ON
GOING FROM THE LABOR ENFORCEMENT
AND COMPLIANCE FUND. TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS BILL THANK
YOU THINK ANY QUESTIONS
COLLEAGUES.
WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE BILL
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE.
AIRSTRIKE LAST MINUTE.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO THE
SENATE FLOOR PORTANTINO.
OUR PORTANTINO AYE BATES BATES
AYE BELL.
BELL AYE BRADFORD BRADFORD AYE
HILL HILL AYE NIELSEN
[inaudible]
WIENER. FIVE ZERO WILL HOLD THAT
OPEN AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH
THANK YOU.
WE HAVE SERGEANT SHIRT ROUNDING
US UP SOME FOLKS WILL GO TO S.
B. FOURTEEN FORTY THREE WHILE
WE'RE HERE.
MR THERE TO CLAIMS BUT YOU COULD
CHINA.
WELL MR STONES AB.
FOURTEEN FORTY THREE TOURNEY
SUPPORT [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION.
SEEING NONE FINANCE.
THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ESTIMATES BECAUSE OF TWO HUNDRED
NINETY NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS NON
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT GENERAL
FUND PER YEAR.
OVER A TWO YEAR PERIOD FOR
STAFFING COSTS IN A CONSULTING
CONTRACT. TO DETERMINE THE
SUCCESS OF THE PILOT PROGRAM.
ADDITIONALLY THIS BILL
APPROPRIATES ONE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GENERAL FUND TO THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF EDUCATION IS
A COUNTY RECEIVES NINE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS IN DONATIONS.
I FINALLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THE
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS THAT THE
PROGRAM BE EXPANDED TO OTHER
COUNTIES THIS BILL COULD CREATE
ON QUANTIFY PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT GENERAL FUND COST
PRESSURES.
ANY QUESTIONS OF FINANCE.
ANY SUPPORT PROPOSITION.
ON FOURTEEN FORTY THREE SEEING
NONE.
SHE KNOW QUESTIONS WITHOUT
OBJECTION SP FOURTEEN FORTY
THREE WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
AND I SEE MISS EGGMAN CAME IN.
PLEASE COME UP AND TELL US ABOUT
AB TWENTY FIVE SIXTEEN WHICH IS
A DO PASSED WITH.
SUPPORT RECOMMENDED ON BOTH
SIDES THINK YOU VERY MUCH
MEMBERS GOOD MORNING --
AB TWENTY FIVE SIXTEEN IS A DAMN
ACCOUNTABILITY SAFETY BILL ON
THIS CAME ABOUT AFTER THE THE
ISSUE IN ORVILLE THAT WE ALL
DISCOVERED.
UPON -- WE
DID AT THAT REALLY LOOK AT THAT
I DIDN'T OVERSIGHT AND LOOK AT
SOME OF THE ISSUES AROUND THAT --
ABOUT 50% OF OUR DAM --
THE CONDITION ATTACHED TO THEM
AND THE SIMPLY SAYS THAT BIG THE
NEED TO POST THAT WANTS TO HEAR
WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE WHAT
THEY'RE DOING TO MEET THAT.
AND WE ACCEPTED THE AMENDMENTS
IN.
RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR ABOUT TO
GERMANY WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
ANY WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FINANCES NEUTRAL ON THIS
BILL.
YOUR QUESTION ABOUT ALONE.
NEWMAN I THINK THAT THE MEMBERS
WERE INDUCTED.
FROM THE MOMENT TORTILLA ADOPTED
OKAY.
MAKING SURE ANY QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT THIS BILL IS --
RECOMMENDED THE PAST WE HAVE A
MOTION.
WE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO THE
SENATE FLOOR PORTANTINO AYE
PORTANTINO AYE BATES BATES AYE
BELL AYE BELL AYE BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL HILL AYE
NIELSEN WIENER.
WELL KEEP THAT OPEN FOR MR
WINNER AND THE COMMUNITY PEOPLE
OUT THANKS [inaudible]
ALRIGHT.
SEEING NO OTHER MEMBERS WILL GO
BACK TO OUR AND SEE --
SEAD. TWENTY THREE IT'S GONNA GO
THIS IS A SUSPENSE KENNEDY
ANYBODY HERE IN FAVOR OF IT CA.
TWENTY THREE ANYBODY HERE
OPPOSED TO CA [inaudible]
TWENTY THREE FINANCE.
THE COMPANION MEASURE TO THIS
BILL SP TO TWENTY SEVEN CREATES
A NEW TAX CREDIT WITH A FORTY
FIVE BILLION DOLLAR CAP.
INCREASED GAS TAX CREDIT
UTILIZATION DUE TO THAT NEW
PROGRAM WILL REDUCE GENERAL FUND
REVENUE AND ALSO THE PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GUARANTEE.
THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS
INTENDED TO HOLD PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT HARMLESS BY
INCLUDING THE PROCEEDS OF THE
BASELINE SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES
SUB ACCOUNT IN THE PROPOSITION
NINETY CALCULATION.
INCLUDING THE MAINTENANCE FACTOR
CALCULATION THANK YOU.
AND THE QUESTION.
SCENE NINE WITHOUT OBJECTION SCA
TWENTY THREE WILL GO THE
SUSPENSE --
AB FIVE FIVE THREE MISTER DALY
IS ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK IN
FAVOR OF MAYBE. FIVE FIVE THREE
THEY'RE RUNNING TO THE
MICROPHONE.
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS BARRY
BROUGHT ON BEHALF THE TEACHERS
THE SPONSOR OF THE BILL VERY
QUICKLY.
OF BACK WIND MISTER STEINBERG
WAS THE PRO TEM AND WE DID
WORKERS COMP REFORM THEY SET UP
A FUND THAT WAS SUPPOSED --
TO GIVE A HUNDRED AND TWENTY
MILLION DOLLARS IN EXTRA
BENEFITS TO INJURE TO INJURED
WORKERS WHO ARE SO SEVERELY
INJURED THEY CAN'T EVER WORK
AGAIN.
AND THE WAY IT'S BEEN
INTERPRETED.
IS THAT THEY HAVEN'T BEEN GIVING
ACTUALLY THE WHOLE AMOUNT TO WAY
THIS BILL WOULD ENSURE THAT THE
FULL AMOUNT OF THAT WAS AGREED
TO IN THAT WORKERS COMP AND FOR
REFORM WOULD GO TO ENTERED
WORKERS.
A VIRGIN AYE VOTE THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE ANY OPPOSITION
[inaudible]
FINANCE.
THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS ESTIMATES COSTS OF
FOUR HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS INITIALLY AND FOUR
HUNDRED AND TWENTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS ON GOING FROM THE
WORKERS COMPENSATION
ADMINISTRATION REVOLVING FUND.
FOR ADDITIONAL STAFF RESOURCES
[inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
FIVE FIVE THREE WILL GO TO
SUSPENSE.
AB SIX TWO SIX MR GARCIA IS
THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK IN
FAVOR OF AB SIX TO SIX VERY ONE
HERE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF
A. B. SIX TWO SIX YOU COME INTO
THE MICROPHONE.
GOOD MORNING SHOT EVANS AT THE
COUNTY HEALTH EXECUTIVES
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
REPRESENTING LOCAL HEALTH
DEPARTMENTS THERE AT OUR STATE
AND WE RESPECT WE MUST OPPOSE
THIS BILL.
OF OUR CONCERNS ARE MAINLY I'M
IN TERMS OF THE FISCAL AROUND
THE COST OF INVESTIGATIONS OF
FOOD BORNE ILLNESSES THIS BILL
WOULD EXPAND THE ALLOWABLE FOODS
TO BE COOKED AND SOLD FROM THE
HOME TO INCLUDE THE POTENTIALLY
HAZARDOUS FOODS WHICH ARE MORE.
AS THEIR WHICH ARE MORE LIKELY
TO CAUSE FOOD BORNE ILLNESS TO
PROVIDE SOME CONTEXT AND ONE
EXAMPLE THAT CD PEACH PROVIDED
TO US WAS A RECENT CASE OF
BOTULISM POISONING THAT.
THAT HAVE.
STEMMED FROM HOME KITCHEN ONE
INVESTIGATION REQUIRED AS CP AGE
TO SPEND OVER A HUNDRED AND
THIRTY HOURS INVESTIGATING WHICH
OCCURRED I'VE ROUGHLY TEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS IN PERSONNEL
COSTS.
AND THIS IS SIMILAR TO WHAT
WOULD HAPPEN AT THE LOCAL LEVEL
IN TERMS OF OUR PERSONNEL COSTS
FOR INVESTIGATION NOT INCLUDING
EPIDEMIOLOGY IN MY CAPACITY AS
WELL SO FOR THESE REASONS WE
RESPECTFULLY OPPOSE.
THANK YOU ANY OTHERS IN
OPPOSITION OF AB --
SIX TWO SIX SEEING NONE FINANCE.
FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS BILL
BECAUSE IT RESULTS IN GENERAL
FUND COSTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE
TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BUDGET.
THE DEPARTMENT PUB PUBLIC HEALTH
ESTIMATES GENERAL FUND COSTS OF
TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX THOUSAND
DOLLARS IN 201-819-20030 TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS AND TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY AND ONE HUNDRED
SIXTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS
ANNUALLY THEREAFTER TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS BILL
[inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
AB SEVEN THIRTY FOUR MISTER
BONTA.
TEAR ANYONE SPEAKING IN FAVOR.
ANYONE SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OF
SEVEN THREE FOUR FINANCE.
THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD
ESTIMATES COSTS OF ONE HUNDRED
SEVENTY THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS
FOR WORKLOAD ASSOCIATED WITH
THIS BILL.
AND WHILE FINANCES NOT HAVE A
POSITION ON THIS BILL A WE KNOW
THAT MODIFICATIONS TO STREAMLINE
THE SEQUEL PROCESS SHOULD BE
MADE ON A COMPREHENSIVE BASIS
RATHER THAN PROVIDING SPECIAL
EXEMPTIONS FOR CPAS FOR SPECIFIC
PROJECTS.
THANK YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT AB.
SEVEN THREE FOUR SEEING NONE
WITHOUT OBJECTION A. B. SEVEN
THREE FOUR WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
AB -- NINE
TWO FOUR INDIAN TRIBAL
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS.
SO ANYONE IN FAVOR OF AB
NINE TWO FOUR ANYONE OPPOSED TO
A. B..
NINE TWO FOUR SEE NO RUSH WILL
GO TO FINANCE.
I AT THE TIME IS THIS ANALYSIS
THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER
AFFAIRS HAD NOT PROVIDED FISCAL
ESTIMATE OF THIS BILL.
OF FINANCE DOES KNOW THAT WHILE
THIS BILL DOES NOT APPEAR TO
RESULT IN ANY DIRECT STATE COSTS
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT FUTURE
TRIBAL CANNABIS REGULATORY
AGREEMENTS AUTHORIZED IN THIS
BILL.
COULD RESULT IN UNKNOWN STATE
COSTS.
ANY QUESTIONS ON NINE TWO FOUR
SEEN NONE.
WITHOUT OBJECTION THAT BILL WILL
GO TO SUSPENSE.
AB EIGHT THIRTEEN HOLDEN
MULTISTATE TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS
AS ANYBODY IN SUPPORT
[inaudible]
ANYBODY OPPOSITION.
GOOD MORNING HONORABLE MEMBERS
OF THE COMMITTEE.
MICHAEL GEARY IS MY NAME.
I REPRESENT THE IMPERIAL
IRRIGATION DISTRICT.
THE DEFECTS OF THIS BILL ARE
ACCUMULATED.
AND A NEW PROS PROPOSED SECTION
EIGHTY THREE NINETY ONE EIGHT
THROUGH Q..
THE C. E. C. IS SUPPOSED TO GO
THROUGH.
AND DO A CHECK OFF OF EACH ONE
OF THOSE ITEMS.
THAT WILL TAKE MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS TO ACTUALLY DO IT
CORRECTLY.
AND C. E. SEUS SAYING THEY'RE
ONLY GONNA SPEND THIRTY SEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS.
THAT IS A BIG RED FLAG.
THANK YOU PLEASE DO NOT SUPPORT
THIS BILL.
HE WAS DOING DO MAJOR INDUSTRY
KOREAN INJURY TO OUR WONDERFUL.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA IF THIS BILL
PASSES THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS VERY
BROAD WITH THE TEAMSTERS OPPOSED
TO ON POLICY GROUNDS THANK YOU.
AND MISTER CHAIRMAN WAS BRIGHT
WHITE HERE ON BEHALF LOS ANGELES
PARTLY WATER AND POWER WE HAVE
IN THE POLLS IN THIS AMEND THE
POSITION THE BILL.
WHEN THE PROSTHETIC MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS AND THE ENGINE BALLOTS
MARKET WE WILL THIS BILL IMPACTS
THAT POTENTIAL TO PARTICIPATE IN
A VOLUNTARY MARKETS WITH ACTS
WERE NIMITZ?
ALSO LARGER POLICY GROUNDS WHERE
POST BILL LIKE.
AS CHAIR MEMBERS CREEK COOK
RIVERS INTO THE CALIFORNIA POWER
AGENCY IN STRONG OPPOSITION TO
THIS LEGISLATION.
BETTER GO TO THE CALIFORNIA
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SENSATION
ALSO IN OPPOSITION.
ALL RIGHT SAYING NO ONE ELSE
FINANCE.
AND THEN FILE ON THIS MEASURE
THE QUESTIONS ON EIGHT THIRTEEN
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
EIGHT THIRTEEN WILL GO TO
SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY THREE SEVENTY OF AYE
MR HOLDEN LEAD EXPOSURE ANY
SUPPORT.
AB.
TWENTY THREE SEVENTY ANY
OPPOSITION AB.
TWENTY THREE SEVENTY SEEING NONE
FINANCE.
HOW FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS
MEASURE AS A CREATES NEW AN ON
GOING GENERAL FUND COSTS NOT
INCLUDED IN THE TWO THOUSAND
EIGHTEEN BUDGET ACT?
A GENERAL FUND COSTS OF UP TO
TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS IN TWENTY EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN AND UP TO TWO HUNDRED
FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS ANNUALLY
THEREAFTER. FOR NEW REGULATORY
WORKLOAD AT THE DEPARTMENT OF
SOCIAL SERVICES AND FOR
INCREASED LOAN ADMINISTRATION
WORKLOAD AT THE DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION COULD BE INCURRED.
AREN'T ANY QUESTIONS ON TWENTY
THREE SEVENTY SEEING NON.
WITHOUT OBJECTION THAT WILL GO
TO SUSPENSE.
AMY -- NINE
SIXTEEN SUPPORT.
BRIEFLY MISTER CHAIR ON THE
FISCAL CHRIS MCKAY WE ON BEHALF
OF THE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY NETWORK I JUST WANT
TO PUT THE REVENUE LOSS
ESTIMATED BY THE FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD IN CONTEXT.
A EARLIER IN TWENTY TWELVE WHEN
THE GOVERNOR SPONSORED
LEGISLATION TO REPEAL THE
ENTERPRISE ZONE PROGRAM THAT WAS
SUPPOSED TO BE A REVENUE NEUTRAL
PACKAGE.
THERE WERE THREE PROVISIONS. TO
OFFSET THE REVENUE GAIN TO THE
STATE BY ELIMINATING EASY'S
SALES TAX EXEMPTION FOR
MANUFACTURING IN OUR AND
EQUIPMENT.
CAL COMPETES WHICH YOU
APPROPRIATE MONEY FOR EACH YEAR
AND THEN THE NECK AT ANY SEE THE
NEW EMPLOYMENT CREDIT AND BASED
UPON DATA FROM THE FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD.
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE LA O.
ISSUED IN MARCH OF THIS YEAR.
THAT PROGRAM HAS GENERATED ABOUT
A MILLION DOLLARS.
IN CREDITS TO THE TAXPAYER THE
ORIGINAL ESTIMATE WAS SUPPOSED
TO BE ANYWHERE FROM EIGHTY FIVE
TO A HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS
ANNUALLY.
SO TAXPAYERS HAVE NEVER REALLY.
SO THAT ANY SEE THAT'S WHY
ASSEMBLY WOMAN QUIRK SILVA HAS
PROPOSED AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE
NEC WHICH IS THIS.
SO TO LOOK AT IT FROM A PURELY
THIS BILL RESULTS IN A REVENUE
LOSS WOULDN'T PUT THE BILL IN
THE CONTEXT OF TAXPAYERS WERE
SUPPOSED TO BE GETTING EIGHTY
TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS.
IN ANNUAL TAX BENEFITS THAT
THEY'VE NEVER SEEN TO THIS POINT
THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER SUPPORTERS.
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
TO NINE SIXTEEN FINANCE.
FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS BILL
DUE TO ITS GENERAL FUND REVENUE
LOSSES AND SIGNIFICANT
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES THAT THIS BILL WOULD
REDUCE GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY
TWENTY ONE MILLION DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN FORTY
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY AND SEVENTEEN
MILLION DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE
ADDITIONALLY THE EMPLOYMENT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ESTIMATES
ITS COST TO BE THREE MILLION
DOLLARS IN TWENTY EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN AND TWO POINT SIX
MILLION DOLLARS EACH YEAR
THEREAFTER THAT THE CREDIT IS IN
EFFECT [inaudible]
THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT ANY QUESTIONS ON NINE
NINE SIXTEEN SEEING NONE OF THAT
WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
I SEE MISTER O'DONNELL IS IN THE
HOUSE [inaudible]
WITH WHAT THE SHOOTERS.
HALFWAY THROUGH THE MIDDLE.
POLARIS AB.
TWENTY SIX SEVENTY NINE PLEASE
TELL US ABOUT A BIT WHICH IS A
DO PASS WHAT SUPPORT ON BOTH
SIDES.
BUT THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR GOOD
MORNING I TO YOU AND THE
COMMITTEE MEMBERS I AM PLEASED
TO PRESENT AB.
TWENTY SIX SEVENTY NINE WHICH
WILL UPDATE CALIFORNIA'S THIRTY
THREE YEAR OLD STANDARDS FOR
PROCESSING MEDICAL LINEN AND
IMPROVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN OUR
MEDICAL LAUNDRY FACILITIES.
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
US RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULATING
HOW HOSPITAL LINENS SHOULD BE
CLEANED PRIOR TO REUSE AS PART
OF THEIR DUTY TO REGULATE HEALTH
FACILITIES.
UNFORTUNATELY THE DEPARTMENT HAS
NOT UPDATED THEIR RULES FOR
PROCESSING MEDICAL LIMON SINCE.
NINETEEN EIGHTY FIVE SINCE THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THESE REGULATIONS
NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND CLEANING
METHODS HAVE LED TO MORE ENERGY
EFFICIENT WORSE OPERATIONS AT
OTHER STATES THAT CALIFORNIA
REPLICATE. TO ENSURE THESE
COMPANIES HAVE ACCESS TO THE
MOST UP TO DATE METHODS AND
TECHNOLOGIES AB TWENTY SIX
SEVENTY NINE TIES ARE STANDARDS
FOR PROCESSING MEDICAL LINENS.
TO THE LATEST GUIDELINES
DEVELOPED BY THE CENTERS FOR
DISEASE CONTROL AND THE CENTERS
FOR MEDICARE.
AND MEDICAID SERVICES.
THE DEPARTMENT INDICATES THE
COSTS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE
STANDARDS WILL BE MINOR.
AND OF SORREL AND I HAVE A
WITNESS WITH ME HERE TODAY RJ
CERVANTES IS HERE REPRESENTING
THE TEXTILE RENTAL SERVICES
ASSOCIATION FUTURE.
CHAIR MEMBERS ARTIST ON THE
SUMMIT HALF THE TEXTILE RENTAL
SERVICES ASSOCIATION WE'RE VERY
PROUD TO WORK WITH A MISTER
O'DONNELL ON THIS MEASURE THAT
WILL ALLOW US.
TO MODERNIZE OUR LEAD IN
PROCESSING STANDARDS HERE IN
CALIFORNIA THE CURRENT STANDARD
IS WE HAVE TO LAUNDER --
THESE TEXTILES AND HUNDRED AND
SIXTY BUT WITH TODAY'S
TECHNOLOGY WE CAN WE CAN GREATLY
REDUCE THAT SAVE ON ENERGY AND
WATER AND WE HEARD YOUR I THE
THING [inaudible]
OTHERS [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC HEALTH ESTIMATES BECAUSE
OF THIS MEASURE TO BE MINOR AN
OBSERVABLE.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER
O'DONNELL.
I JUST HAVE ONE COMMENT MY
GRANDMOTHER. EIGHTY TO NINETY
YEARS AGO USED TO STAY UP ALL
NIGHT AND DO THE HOSPITAL LINEN
SINCE HER.
AS HER JOB AND SHE WOULD NOT
ONLY WATCH THEM BUT THEN WOULD
HAVE.
TO SO MANY HOLES THAT RANDOM.
AND HOSPITAL PROBABLY NINETY TWO
HUNDRED YEARS AGO.
TOUGH WORK TOUGH WORK AND THANK
YOU FOR MAKING IT SAFE A THIS IS
EIGHT TO PASS I'VE EVER READ --
MOTION.
I HAVE A MOTION PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL.
PORTANTINO'S AYE PORTANTINO AYE
BATES BATES AYE BELL.
BELL AYE BRADFORD BRADFORD AYE
HILL HILL AYE NIELSEN WIENER.
AYE WIENER AYE.
KEEP THAT PHONE CALL YOUR BILL
IS OUT BT WILL ADD ONE MORE
MEMBER WHEN HE COMES BACK IN.
THANK YOU MEDICARE YOU YOUR
COMMITTEE UNDERSTAFFED BUT THANK.
ALRIGHT WE HAVE NO OTHER MEMBERS
HERE.
GO TO A MEAN NINE EIGHTY SEVEN
KAMLAGER-DOVE OF ON SEQUEL AND
THE SPORTS ARENA SIR ANYONE HERE
IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING JUST TO THE GATES
OF BEHALF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
HERE IN SUPPORT [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION.
THE MORNING SENATORS MARIA
HOYLAKE THEM AND LOCK CANS FOR A
MYSTERY FORUM.
AB NINE EIGHTY SEVEN IS
UNNECESSARY THE CLIPPERS HAVE
PLENTY OF TIME TO USE EXISTING
LAW THAT FASTRACK SEQUEL
LITIGATION.
AND THERE IS NO REASON TO DELAY
THE TRAFFIC REDUCTION MEASURES
FOR SIX YEARS AFTER THE ARENA
OPENS.
THAT IS AN EXTREME BURDEN TO
IMPOSE ON THE ADJACENT WORKING
CLASS NEIGHBORHOOD AND OTHER
BUSINESSES LIKE THE FORUM AND
THE NEW NFL STADIUM.
THE CLIPPERS SAY THEY NEED THE
EXTRA TIME BECAUSE INGLEWOOD IS
TRANSIT POOR.
BUT NEW METRO LINES ARE OPENING
IN THE AREA NEXT YEAR AND
INGLEWOOD'S MAYOR WHO SITS ON
THE MTA BOARD HAS SAID THAT
INGLEWOOD IS EXPERIENCING A
QUOTE.
HISTORIC RIGHT REVITALIZATION
AND BENEFITS FROM METRO'S MAJOR
TRANSIT INVESTMENTS.
THIS BILL SHOULD NOT MOVE
FORWARD.
IF IT DOES MOVE FORWARD THERE
ARE FOUR THINGS THAT MUST BE
CORRECTED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S DIRECTION.
FIRST NO HOMES SHOULD BE
INCLUDED AND THE AREA COVERED BY
THE BILL SHOULD BE THE THIRTY
ACRES REPRESENTED TO THE PRIOR
COMMITTEES.
THE CURRENT DRAFT INCLUDES TO
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND ABOUT
FIVE EXTRA ACRES.
THESE ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES ARE
NOT PART OF THE OFFICIAL NOTICE
OF PREPARATION ISSUED BY THE
CITY FOR THE CLIPPERS PROJECT.
SECOND THE BILL'S ENVIRONMENTAL
STANDARDS THE LEAD GOLDEN THE
TRAFFIC REDUCTION MEASURES ARE
TO APPLY TO THE ENTIRE PROJECT
NOT JUST THE ARENA.
THIRD THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
GOVERNOR CERTIFICATION IN AB
NINE HUNDRED SHOULD BE FULLY
INCLUDED IN AB.
NINE EIGHTY SEVEN CURRENTLY
THERE SOME SENTENCES MISSING.
FOURTH THE BILL'S AUTHOR SAID
SHE WOULD BE ADDING PROVISIONS
RELATED TO LABOR AND
RESTRICTIONS ON GAMING AND THOSE
SHOULD BE INCLUDED.
THESE ALL SHOULD BE NON
CONTROVERSIAL AMENDMENTS AS THE
BILL'S AUTHOR AND
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CLIPPERS
AGREED TO THEM AND PRIOR
COMMITTEES [inaudible]
THANK YOU [inaudible]
BUT GOOD MORNING HONORABLE CHAIR
AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS MY NAME IS
DOUGLAS CARSTENS I'M ATTORNEY
WHAT CHETAN BROWNING CARSTENS ON
HERE ON BEHALF OF THE INGLEWOOD
RESIDENTS AGAINST TAKING SEND
EVICTIONS.
WE SUBMITTED A LETTER ALONG WITH
THE PLANNING AND CONSERVATION
LEAGUE TO OPPOSE THIS BILL IT IS
UNNECESSARY IT IS --
UNWISE AND UNFAIR THIS WOULD
FACILITATE THE DISPOSAL OF
PUBLIC LAND THIS IS THE FISCAL
IMPACT I WANTED TO CONCENTRATE
ON FOR THIS COMMITTEE.
IT WOULD FACILITATE THE DISPOSAL
OF PUBLIC LAND IN A DEAL THAT'S
ALREADY BEEN LOCKED IN WITHOUT --
ENTERTAINING CONSIDERATION OF
ALTERNATIVES OR BETTER OFFERS
IT'S A BAD DEAL FOR THE PUBLIC.
AND WE ASK THAT ANY BILL THAT
WOULD --
MODIFY THE CALIFORNIAN FIREMAN
TOOK IN FAVOR OF MORE --
COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION IF
NECESSARY WE ARE A IN STRONG
OPPOSITION WE ASK YOUR NO VOTE
AND THINK YOU.
THANK YOU SEEN NO ONE ELSE AT
THE MICROPHONE FINANCE.
THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD
ESTIMATES COSTS A HUNDRED AND
SEVENTY THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS
FOR THE WORKLOAD ASSOCIATED WITH
THIS BILL.
OF FINANCES NOT HAVE A POSITION
ON THIS BILL HOWEVER NOTES THAT
MODIFICATIONS TO STREAMLINE THE
SECRET PROCESS SHOULD BE MADE ON
A COMPREHENSIVE BASIS.
RATHER THAN PROVIDING SPECIAL
EXEMPTIONS.
FOR PROJECTS THANK YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON AB
NINE EIGHTY SEVEN MISTER
BRADFORD GETS THINK YOU MISTER
CHAIRMAN AND I'M --
AS INDIVIDUAL WHO REPRESENTS
THAT DISTRICT IN NO IT FAR
BETTER THAN THE FOLKS WHO
TESTIFIED IN OPPOSITION --
FILL THIS BILL IS NO DIFFERENT
THAN ME THE SECRET BILLS THAT WE
HAVE BROUGHT BEFORE THIS
LEGISLATIVE BODY I OF AS ONE
HAVE VOTED ON PRETTY PRETTY MUCH
FIVE OF THEM AS A MEMBER OF THE
LEGISLATURE IN THIS ONE IS.
AS TIGHT AND IT'S CONFORMING AS
ANY OF THOSE THAT HAVE COME
BEFORE HIS WEATHERED SACRAMENTO
WHETHER IT'S STILL OPEN PROJECTS
SAN FRANCISCO YOU NAME IT LA
LIVE AND WE AND I KNOW.
RICH ORIGINAL ATTEMPT AT THE
STADIUM AS AS WELL AS TO THE ONE
OUT IN THE CITY CITY OF AN INCH
INDUSTRIES.
THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL HOMES IN
THE DEVELOP AND MADE CLEAR ON
MORE THAN ONE OCCASION SO AT THE
APPROPRIATE TIME.
WE AYE WHEN IT'S TIME TO REMOVE
OFF SUSPENSE OUT THE PORT TO A
SUPPORT THANK YOU.
THANK YOU MISTER BRADFORD
PASSING KNOW WHETHER MISTER
HILLIARD LIKE PAYING ACCOUNTANTS
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR AND AND
IS A MEMBER OF THE EQ COMMITTEE
WHEN THAT THAT WHEN THIS BILL
CAME BEFORE HIM WE SUPPORTED
MOVING IT FORWARD THERE WERE A
NUMBER OF ISSUES THAT WERE
RAISED IN QUESTIONS --
AND I THOUGHT SOME AGREEMENTS
THAT -- WERE
WERE MADE IN --
ONE I BELIEVE WAS THAT THE EQ.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP
STANDARDS THAT WERE.
WERE PROPOSED WOULD BE FOR THE
ENTIRE PROJECT --
AND DID NOT JUST FOR PARTS OF IT
SO HOPEFULLY THE COMMITTEE WILL
LOOK AT THAT THE THAT WHEN YOU
EVALUATE THAT GOING FORWARD
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU MISTER HILL ANY OTHER
COMMENTS.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
NINE EIGHTY SEVEN WILL GO TO
SUSPEND SEND MISTER FLORA.
IS HERE SO WE WILL HAVE YOU COME
UP AND TALK ABOUT AB
[inaudible]
NINETEEN FOURTEEN UNDERGROUND
INSTALLATIONS [inaudible]
YES.
I THINK YOU MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS
SO I CAN MAKE COMMENTS BRIEF BUT
I'M HERE TODAY TO PRESENT AB.
NINETEEN FOURTEEN WHICH WOULD
ALLOW EXCAVATORS AND OPERATORS
TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT ON THE
USE OF PNEUMATIC HAND TOOLS
WHILE DIGGING IN LOCATIONS WITH
UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS AB
NINETY FOUR TO MIDDLE EXCAVATORS.
TO TEMPORARILY USE INDUSTRY BEST
PRACTICES UNTIL JANUARY.
TWENTY TWENTY THE COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL WOULD
ALLOW.
THE FACT THAT WOULD ALLOW
SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS ON THE
BOARD TO MEET HIM ESTABLISH LONG
TERM SAFE PRACTICAL STANDARDS
FOR EVERYBODY TO FOLLOW.
RESPECTFULLY ASK HER I HOPE.
YOU HAVE WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE VALERIE
TRAIL OF LAJOS PACIFIC GAS AND
ELECTRIC COMPANY I'M HERE IN
SUPPORT AND ADDS I'M A CO
SPONSOR --
APPRECIATE ON THE WORK THAT ON
MISTER HILLS COMMITTEE HAS DONE --
TO FIND -- A
PASS FOR THE BOARD TO HAVE THE
FEDERATIONS --
NOT TO THROW A LOOP IN THIS BUT
IN FULL TRANSPARENCY ON THE
EXCAVATION BIRD --
ADOPTED SOME PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
THAT --
ACTUALLY WOULD NOT ALLOW ANY
ACTIVITY TO OCCUR UNTIL
REGULATIONS ARE ADOPTED.
I'M SO IT'S A SLIGHT NUANCE FROM
THIS LANGUAGE BUT IT IS A
CONCESSION ON THAT WE ARE
WILLING TO MAKE --
SO I JUST WANTED --
TO THE PUT THAT OUT THERE THINK
THE COMMITTEES --
AND AUTHO --
AND POLICY COMMITTEES --
WORK ON THIS ON NOTE THAT ON
THESE COSTS ARE --
PRETTY NEGLIGIBLE AND COUPLE
WITH A LOT OF THE WORK THAT ON
THE BOARD IS ALREADY DOING ON
MANY REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT
THIS LAW.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AS MY NAME IS
BRET PARA WITH UNITED
CONTRACTORS THE NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
ASSOCIATION TO WESTERN LINE
CONSTRUCTORS AND CALIFORNIA
LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE
PLUMBING PIPING INDUSTRY WE'RE
IN SUPPORT OF THIS BILL THIS
ISN'T BILL JUST FOR CONVENIENCE.
IT ACTUALLY BEST PRACTICES OF
PLAY BEFORE THIS LEGISLATION IN
PLACE THERE ARE SAFE USES OF
ASSISTED TOOLS TO HELP US IN THE
POLLS AND TOUGH CITY TOUGH SOIL
SO WITH THAT WE SUPPORT THIS
BILL MAHER DRIVE VOTE THANK YOU.
OTHERS IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIR ISRAEL
SALAS ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS
AND ELECTRIC AND SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY IN
SUPPORT.
SURE ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE.
THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SAFE
EXCAVATION BOARD ESTIMATES COSTS
APPROXIMATELY SEVENTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS FROM THE SAFE ENERGY
INFRASTRUCTURE AN EXCAVATION
FUND.
IN TWENTY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN AND
ONE HUNDRED THIRTY NINE THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND TWENTY NINETEEN
TWENTY TO DEVELOP THE GUIDELINES
AND REGULATIONS REQUIRED BY THIS
BILL.
INSTEAD HILL MEASURE THANK YOU
AND I APPRECIATE THE THE AUTHOR
AND THEY AT THE SPONSORS AND
SUPPORTERS BECAUSE I THINK THIS
BILL IS NECESSARY AND IMPORTANT.
TO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T
OVER EXTEND OUR OVER REACH WOULD
WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IS A SAFE
ENVIRONMENT AND SAY.
FOR THE OPERATIONAL TOOLS AND IN
NATURAL THINK A OVER REACHING BY
JUST LEAVING IT TO HAND TOOLS
ONLY THERE ARE SOME MECHANICAL
TOOLS THAT CAN BE USED SAFELY.
AND I THINK THIS WILL PROVE THAT
OUT IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER SHOW
THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH
PROPER SAFE EXCAVATIONS WILL BE
HAPPY TO MOVE THE BILL.
THANK YOU SEEN OTHER QUESTIONS
WE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE CALL TO
REFLECT CLUB.
BEDS OR SAY THANK YOU TO THE
CHAIR HALF FOR LOUDEST ON THIS
SENATOR HILL AND IT'S BEEN A
PRIVILEGE WORKING WITH YOU AND
YOUR STAFF MAKING SURE THAT THIS
IS THE BEST BILL WE CAN MOVE
OVER SO THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR
SUPPORT YOUR TIME.
THANK YOU [inaudible]
IT'S KALRA.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO THE
SENATE FLOOR PORTANTINO AYE
PORTANTINO AYE BATES.
BATES AYE BELL.
BELL AYE BRADFORD BRADFORD AYE
HILL HILL AYE NIELSEN WIENER AYE
WIENER AYE.
BUT WE HAVE ONE MORE TO ADD ON
THAT PHILOSOPHICAL BUT THE CALL
LATER THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT SEEING NO MEMBERS WE
WILL GO TO A. B. TEN EIGHTY FIVE
MISTER CALDERON.
SURE ANYONE HERE IN FAVOR OF AB.
TEN EIGHTY FIVE SO ANY
OPPOSITION TO A. B. [inaudible]
TEN EIGHTY FIVE FINANCE WHEN
IT'S IS OPPOSED TO THIS BILL DID
WHICH GENERAL FUND REVENUE
LOSSES.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
INDICATES GENERAL FUND REVENUE
LOSSES OF EIGHTEEN MILLION
DOLLARS IN TWENTY EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN THIRTY ONE MILLION
DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY AND
THIRTY TWO MILLION DOLLARS IN
TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE THANK
YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT A V. TEN
EIGHTY FIVE SEEN NINE WITHOUT
OBJECTION THAT BILL WILL GO TO
SUSPENSE.
BABY THIRTEEN NINETY FIVE BY ME
CHOOSE STATE HIGHWAYS IS
[inaudible]
PORT.
A BABY THIRTEEN NINETY FIVE IS
THERE ANYBODY IN OPPOSITION.
AB THIRTEEN NINETY FIVE SEEN NON
WITHOUT FINANCE FINANCE IS
OPPOSED TO THIS BILL OF FINANCE
ESTIMATES THIS BILL WILL CREATE
AN IMPACT OF AT LEAST ONE POINT
FIVE MILLION DOLLARS BASED ON
THE COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE
ASSESSMENTS.
THANK YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS ON THIRTEEN NINETY
FIVE SEEING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION I'LL GO THE SUSPENSE.
AB.
TWENTY TWO NINETY NINE SO ANY
SUPPORT MISTER CHIU MEDI CAL.
ANY OPPOSITION BABY [inaudible]
TWENTY TWO NINETY NINE FINANCE.
FINANCE OPPOSES THIS BILL AS A
RESULT IN GENERAL FUND COSTS NOT
INCLUDED IN THE ADMINISTRATION'S
FISCAL PLAN.
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE
SERVICES ESTIMATES COSTS OF FOUR
POINT FIVE MILLION DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY ONE POINT
THREE MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND ONE POINT
TWO MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
TWENTY ONE TWENTY TWO AN ON
GOING.
HALF OF WHICH WOULD BE BORNE BY
THE GENERAL FUND.
MOREOVER CONTRA COSTA MEDI CAL
MANAGED CARE PLANS ARE
INDETERMINATE AT THIS TIME BUT
WOULD BE SIGNIFICANT GIVEN THE
VOLUME OF DOCUMENTS AND NUMBER
OFFICIAL LANGUAGES.
ALRIGHT ANY QUESTIONS ON TWENTY
TWO NINETY NINE SEEING NONE.
WITHOUT OBJECTION THAT WILL GO
TO CSUS SPENCE.
WILL MOVE ON AB FIFTEEN SEVENTY
SEVEN MISTER GIPSON.
ON DRINKING WATER IS THERE
ANYBODY IN FAVOR OF FIFTEEN
SEVENTY SEVEN JUST TO THE GATES
ON BEHALF OF LA COUNTY IN STRONG
SUPPORT OF THE MEASURE THANK.
ANY OPPOSITION.
TO FIFTEEN SEVENTY SEVEN SEEING
NONE FINANCE THIS BILL
APPROPRIATES TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM THE
GENERAL FUND TO THE STATE WATER
RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD.
ON A ONETIME BASIS FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGERIAL
COST TO THE WATER DISTRICT.
HOWEVER FINANCE NOTES THAT THE
TOTAL COSTS MAY INCREASE IN
ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGERIAL
SERVICES ARE REQUIRED FOR MORE
THAN ONE YEAR.
THEREBY RESULTING IN ONGOING
GENERAL FUND COST PER --
ANY QUESTIONS ON FIFTEEN SEVENTY
SEVEN SEEING NONE.
AB FIFTEEN SEVENTY SEVEN WILL GO
TO SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION.
AB EIGHTEEN FOR MR FUHRMAN ON
SEQUEL AN INFILL DEVELOPMENT.
AND A SUPPORT ANY OPPOSITION.
FINANCE THE OFFICE OF PLANNING
AND RESEARCH INDICATES COSTS OF
TWO HUNDRED ELEVEN THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND TWENTY EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN AND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY
ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY TO CARRY OUT THE
WORK LOAD INCLUDED TO INCLUDE
THIS CATEGORIC EXCEPTION IN THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS.
ADDITIONALLY THE NATURAL
RESOURCES AGENCY INDICATES COSTS
OF UP TO TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS ONE TIME TO
CERTIFY AND ADOPT THE GUIDELINES
OF THIS BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS ON EIGHTEEN OH
FOUR SEEM NON THAT THE WHEELS OF
THE SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION.
AB.
TWENTY NINE OH EIGHT MISTER
BERMAN TIRE RECYCLING ANYBODY IN
SUPPORT.
ANYBODY IN OPPOSITION FINANCE.
FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS MEASURE.
CAL RECYCLE ESTIMATES COST OF
EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY ONE
THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM THE
CALIFORNIA TIRE RECYCLING
MANAGEMENT FUND.
A IN. 201-819-80060 SEVEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR FISCAL
YEARS TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY
UNTIL TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE
AND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY THREE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ANNUALLY
THEREAFTER.
A AND ALTHOUGH THE TIRE FUND IS
CURRENTLY PROJECTING OUT ITS AND
ALTHOUGH THE REGULATORY COSTS OF
FOR THIS PROGRAM ARE ESTIMATED
TO BETWEEN. TO BE BETWEEN TWENTY
FIVE AND THIRTY MILLION DOLLARS --
FINANCE WOULD NOTE THAT THE TIRE
FUND IS CURRENTLY PROJECTING
LOWER REVENUES ON BEGINNING IN
TWENTY SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN AND
HAS A STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE OF
THIRTY NINE DOLLARS THIRTY NINE
MILLION DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN ANY
QUESTIONS COMMENTS COLLEAGUE
SEEING NONE AB TWENTY NINE OH
EIGHT WILL GO.
SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
EIGHTEEN SIXTY THREE JONES
SAWYER [inaudible]
INCOME TAX COMMERCIAL CANNABIS.
ANYBODY IN SUPPORT.
ANY OPPOSITION FINANCE FINANCES
NEUTRAL ON THIS BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS ON A. B..
EIGHTEEN SIXTY THREE SEEM NON
WITHOUT OBJECTION AB SINCE.
EIGHTEEN SIXTY THREE WILL GO TO
SUSPENSE.
WE WILL MOVE DOWN.
TO AB THIRTY ONE TWENTY BY MS
GONZALEZ FLETCHER.
CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ASSAULT.
ANYONE IN SUPPORT OF THIRTY ONE
TWENTY ANYONE IN OPPOSITION OF
THIRTY ONE TWENTY SEEING NONE
FINANCE.
BY INCREASING THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS TO
COMMENCE AN ACTION FOR DAMAGES
SUFFERED AS A RESULT OF
CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ASSAULTS.
THIS BILL WOULD LIKELY INCREASE
THE NUMBER CIVIL CASES IN THE
COURT SYSTEM.
THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL WASN'T ABLE
TO ESTABLISH A PRECISE FISCAL
ESTIMATE.
AND UNLESS THIS PARTICULAR CASE
WOULD BECOME SIGNIFICANT AND CAN
BE DOCUMENTED IT IS LIKELY TO BE
ABSORBED.
SIMILARLY IT IS DIFFICULT TO
ESTIMATE THE FISCAL IMPACT ON
LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT
COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH NEW LITIGATION
AND SOME ADJUSTMENT.
CIVIL JUDGMENTS RESULTING FROM
THIS BILL.
ANY ASSOCIATED COSTS WOULD BE
ABSORBED WITHIN EXISTING LOCAL
EDUCATIONAL AGENCY RESOURCES
BECAUSE THE COSTS ARE UNLIKELY
TO BE FUNDED STATE REIMBURSABLE
MANDATE. TO THE EXTENT THAT A
LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY INCURS
A SIGNIFICANT.
A JUDGMENT THAT AFFECTS THE
FISCAL STABILITY OF THE AGENCY.
SUCH A SCENARIO COULD CREATE A
COST PRESSURE FOR THE STATE TO
PROVIDE RESOURCES TO STABILIZE
THE AFFECTED LOCAL EDUCATIONAL
AGENCY [inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS [inaudible]
WELL [inaudible]
OF SINCE I DID STATURE
LIMITATIONS BILL THE PAST THAT
WERE.
ALL VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR.
OF I WANTED TO STATE THAT --
THIS PARTICULAR BILL PROBABLY
WILL LEAD --
TO MORE PEOPLE ARRESTED FOR
CHILD ABUSE THERE BY.
REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF POTENTIAL
CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
IF IT PASSES.
THIS IS A STATURE LIMITATION
BILL WHICH SHOULD.
HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON CHILD
ABUSE IN CALIFORNIA [inaudible]
BAKER SPELLS.
SEEING NO OTHER COMMENTS WITHOUT
OBJECTION MAYBE THIRTY ONE
TWENTY WILL VOTER SUSPENSE
WITHOUT OBJECTION.
WE WILL MOVE DOWN TO AB NINETEEN
FIFTY THREE MISTER WOULD.
ON SKILLED NURSING ANYBODY IN
SUPPORT OF IN.
FIFTY THREE ANY OBJECTION ARE TO
ME ANY OPPOSITION.
TO NINETEEN FIFTY THREE SEEING
NONE FINANCE.
THE OFFICE OF STATEWIDE HEALTH
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
ESTIMATES COSTS OF SIX HUNDRED
THIRTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND
TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY AND ONE
HUNDRED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND
TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND I'M
GOING. TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THIS BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS ON NINETEEN FIFTY
THREE A COMMENT SAYING NINE
WITHOUT OBJECTION AB NINETEEN
FIFTY THREE WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
AB. TWENTY TO SIXTY SEVEN TWENTY
TO SIXTY SEVEN ANYBODY IN
SUPPORT [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION.
FINANCE OF FINANCE NOTICES BILL
HAVE NO FISCAL IMPACT ON THE
STATE [inaudible]
ALL RIGHT.
SEEING ANY COMMENTS WITHOUT
OBJECTION AB TWENTY TWO SIXTY
SEVEN BY MISTER WOODWARD OTHER
SUSPENSE.
MOVING ON AB NINETEEN FIFTY SIX
BY MS LOW MOAN ON FIRE
PREVENTION.
ANYBODY IN SUPPORT OF NINETEEN
FIFTY SIX ANY OPPOSITION OF
NINETEEN FIFTY SIX FINANCE.
HELLFIRE IS NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE
AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL
BECAUSE HE LEVEL OF RESOURCES
NEEDED TO ADMINISTER THE PROGRAM
IS DEPENDENT UPON THE AMOUNT OF
FUNDING APPROPRIATED BY THE
LEGISLATURE FOR GRANTS.
OF FINANCE NOTES HOWEVER THE
REGARDLESS OF THE LEVEL OF
FUNDING PROVIDED IT IS LIKELY
THAT STAFF RESOURCES WILLBE
REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THE
PROGRAM.
ANY COMMENTS QUESTIONS SAYING
NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
NINETEEN FIFTY SIX WILL GO THE
SUSPENSE.
MOVING ON TO AB TWENTY FIFTY BY
MISS CAVELL GYRO ON SMALL SYSTEM
WATER AUTHORITY.
AB TWENTY FIFTY ANY SUPPORTERS.
ANY OPPOSITION FINANCE.
FINANCE IS OPPOSED TO THIS BILL
WHILE THE ADMINISTRATION IS
SUPPORTIVE OF THE INTENT TO
PROVIDE SAFE DRINKING WATER THIS
BILL IS PREMATURE GIVEN ONGOING
DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN THE
ADMINISTRATION AND THE
LEGISLATURE.
ON A COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGE TO
ADDRESS SAFE DRINKING WATER
ISSUES.
THE STATE WATER RESOURCES
CONTROL BOARD ESTIMATES COST OF
APPROXIMATELY ONE HUNDRED SIXTY
ONE MILLION DOLLARS GENERAL FUND.
AND UP TO TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY
PERMANENT POSITIONS OVER THE
FIRST FIVE YEARS OF
IMPLEMENTATION.
THE WATER BOARD ALSO ESTIMATES A
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
RANGING IN THE TENS TO HUNDREDS
OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO
COMPENSATE OWNERS AND ACQUIRE
THE ASSETS OF SMALL PRIVATE
WATER SYSTEMS.
THAT ARE NOT DELIVERING SAFE
DRINKING WATER AS REQUIRED BY
THE BILL.
OF FINANCING CURVES OF THIS BILL
WILL REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT GENERAL
FUND RESOURCES BUT NO
SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTY AS TO
THE SCOPE OF RESOURCE NEEDS.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON
TWENTY FIFTY SEEING NINE WITHOUT
OBJECTION AB TWENTY FIFTY WILL
NOT A SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY TWO FIFTY EIGHT BY
MISS CAVELL EURO.
ON A LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION ANY.
SUPPORTERS ANY OPPOSITION
FINANCE A FINANCE OPPOSE THIS
BILL WHICH APPROPRIATES ONE
POINT FIVE MILLION DOLLARS FROM
THE GENERAL FUND. TO THE TO
STRATEGIC GROWTH COUNCIL FOR
PURPOSES OF A GRANT PROGRAM FOR
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSIONS.
A DISTRICT YOU GROWTH COUNCIL
WILL INCREASE SPECIAL FUND COSTS
ESTIMATED AT ONE HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS PER YEAR. TO
ADMINISTER THE GRANT PROGRAM.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS SEEN
NINE AB.
TWENTY TWO FIFTY EIGHT WHERE GO
TO SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION.
I SEE MR LACKEY.
WALKS INTO THE ROOM.
WHERE ARE YOU?
WELL THERE YOU ARE.
MISTER LACKEY OF A SUSPENSE
CANDIDATE.
YES ARE YOU WANT TO PRESENT THAT.
YOU DON'T WANT AWAY PRESENTATION.
HE WANTED PRESENTED COME UP BUT
IT IS A STATUS.
SLATED FOR SUSPENSE IT'S UP TO
YOU.
YOU CAN PRESENT IT COME ON I
THINK I HEAR HERE [inaudible]
COMMA.
TELL US ABOUT.
AB.
TWENTY FIVE FORTY FOUR ALRIGHT
WELL THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
RESIGNED TO BE VERY VERY QUICK --
PRESENTING AB TWENTY FIVE FORTY
FOUR YOU JUST INDICATED I
APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY.
TO SURE IF YOU BRIEFLY WHAT IT.
DOES.
IT CLARIFIES THE INTENT OF LAST
YEAR'S AB FIVE OR THREE WHICH IS
TO MAKE ALL PARKING TICKETS
ISSUED TO INDIGENT INDIVIDUALS.
ELIGIBLE FOR THE PARKING TICKET
PROGRAM WAS CREATED LAST YEAR.
EVEN IF THEY'RE ISSUE PRIOR TO
JULY FIRST.
TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ON THAT
PARTICULAR COMPLAINT STATE WITH
ME TODAY TO OFFER SUPPORT IS
MIKE HERALD --
WITH THE WESTERN CENTER.
ON LAW AND POVERTY.
I'M MISTER CHAIR MICRO WESTERN
SARAH LAW AND POVERTY WE'RE IN
SUPPORT OF THE BILL TO MAKE SURE
THAT ALL CALIFORNIANS HAVE A
REMEDY IF THEY GET. TOO MANY
PARKING TICKETS AND MAKE SURE
THEY GET THEIR CAR READ CERTAIN
SAY SAFE AND LEGAL ON THE ROAD
THANK YOU.
THERE ARE OTHERS IN SUPPORT.
AYE ENGRAM A OF CALIFORNIA ARE
COMMON SENSE BUT SOON CENTER IN
STRONG SUPPORT THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS DAVID
JONES ABOUT THE CITIES OF
STOCKTON SACRAMENTO IN
OPPOSITION --
WE THINK OF AS WELL SIGNIFICANT
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS CLEARLY FOR
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BY MAKING THIS
PROGRAM RETROACTIVE FIVE A THREE
WAS NOT RETROACTIVE AND THEN
THEY NEED FOR THIS BILL.
WOULD WAIVE PENALTIES FOR PRIOR
PER SACRAMENTO SEVEN POINT TWO
MILLION DOLLARS IN DELINQUENT
FEES.
AND WE THINK THAT THIS BILL IS A
GIANT OVERREACH AND MAKING
SOMETHING THATWAS.
WE THOUGHT VERY CLEAR WAS GOING
FORWARD GIVING AN EASY PAYMENT
PLAN MAKING IT RETROACTIVE --
GOING BACK AS FAR AS YOU KNOW
FOR DECADES SO WE CONTINUE TO
THINK THAT'S ONE OF A A MAJOR
IMPLICATION ON THE STATE.
BECAUSE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WILL
NO LONGER BE USING THE DMP
PROCESS OF WHICH THE INDIANS
PAID FOUR DOLLARS FOR CITATION.
SO WOULD GIVE US A GREAT
INCENTIVE TO USE COLLECTION
AGENCIES AND OTHER ROUTES TO GET
UP GARGLING WITH PARKING TICKETS
SO.
WE THINK THE STATE HAS MAJOR
RAMIFICATIONS OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS CERTAINLY DOES THANK.
ANY OTHERS IN OPPOSITION
[inaudible]
FINANCE.
THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR MOTOR
VEHICLES DOES NOT ANTICIPATE A
FISCAL IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH
THIS BILL.
A LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MAY
INCUR REVENUE LOSSES AND
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS BILL
THE MAGNITUDE OF WHICH IS
UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME.
LACKEY WHICH ELECT CLOSE IT'S
GONE THE SUSPENSE.
YES CERTAINLY --
AB TWENTY FIVE FIFTY FOUR WILL
ALLOW INDIVIDUALS TO GET ON A
PAYMENT PLAN.
AND PAY OFF THEIR TICKETS.
WHILE ALSO PROVIDING CITIES TO
WORK WITH THE DMV TO PLACE A
HOLD ON REGISTRATION.
PEOPLE ARE LOSING THEIR CARS.
AND THUS ALLEVIATE INDIA OF THE
WORKLOAD AGAIN THIS IS A
CLARIFYING MEASURE TO LAST
YEAR'S BILL RECEIVED UNANIMOUS
SUPPORT IN BOTH HOUSE.
THANK YOU ANY QUESTIONS.
MISTER BELL [inaudible]
OF JUST.
I LIKE TO ASK YOU A QUESTION IF
I COULD.
OF PEOPLE THAT DON'T PAY THEIR
PARKING TICKETS THEN AND THEY
GET PULLED OVER AND THERE'S A
WARRANT OUT WHAT HAPPENS --
IF THERE'S A WARRANT ISSUED FOR
THAT THEY CAN BE THEY CAN BE
ARRESTED AND JAILED [inaudible]
SO -- PEOPLE
CAN BE PUT IN THE COUNTY JAILS.
BUT IN ADDITION TO LOSING THEIR
VEHICLES CORRECT SO THIS THIS
BILL WOULD REDUCE THAT.
YES BECAUSE IT WOULD PROVIDE AN
OPTION FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE.
TO GET THEIR CAR REGISTERED AND
GET CLEAN WITH THE CITY AND
THEREFORE NO TICKET AND NO OF
EACH CARTOON.
YES I THINK I THINK WE HAVE A NO
DOUBT MISTER CHAIRMAN I THINK
THE COSTA COUNTY --
JAILS WOULD BE REDUCED.
IF THEY HAD ALTERNATE TO PAY
THEIR PARKING TICKETS.
A COMMISSION IS ONE POINT I
THINK.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
SEEING NONE --
THIS BILL THAT IS COMING OUT OF
SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION SUCH
THANK YOU THANK YOU SIR.
ALRIGHT WE WILL MOVE I DON'T SEE
ANY OTHER AUTHORS HERE.
WE WILL MOVE BACK TO AB.
THIRTY THIRTY BY MOST COWBOY
HERO.
ON SEQUEL.
ANYBODY IN SUPPORT OF AB
[inaudible]
THIRTY THIRTY ANY OPPOSITION
[inaudible]
FINANCE THE DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC
SUBSTANCES CONTROL ESTIMATES
ANNUAL COSTS OF ONE HUNDRED
FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM THE
HAZARDS WAYS CONTROL ACCOUNT TO
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS
BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS AND AB.
THIRTY THIRTY SEEING NONE THAT
THERE WERE OTHER SUSPENSE
WITHOUT OBJECTION.
AB TWENTY ONE EIGHTY NINE BY
MISTER SANTIAGO [inaudible]
LEAD CLEANUP.
ANYBODY IN SUPPORT.
ANY OPPOSITION FINANCE.
FINANCE OPPOSES THIS BILL
BECAUSE IT IS DUPLICATIVE OF
EXISTING EFFORTS HAS THE
DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
CONTROL IS ALREADY UNDERTAKING
TESTING AND CLEAN UP EFFORTS FOR
PARKWAY'S NEAR EXCITED.
WITH FUNDING PROVIDED IN THE
BUDGET ACT OF TWO THOUSAND
EIGHTEEN FURTHER BY
APPROPRIATING TWELVE MILLION
DOLLARS FROM THE LEAD ACID
BATTERY CLEANUP FUND.
THIS BILL EXACERBATES THE FUNDS
INSOLVENCY WHICH IS PROJECTED IN.
TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY ANY
QUESTIONS ON TWENTY ONE EIGHTY
NINE SEEING NONE THAT FILLED OUT
OF SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION --
AB TWENTY TWO SEVENTEEN BY MS
BEFORE.
ANYBODY HERE IN SUPPORT OF
TWENTY TWO SEVENTEEN ANY
OPPOSITION FINANCE FINANCES
OPPOSED TO THIS BILL AS GIVEN
THIS BILL HAS NO CREDIT CAP IT
COULD SIGNIFICANTLY DISRUPT THE
STATE'S CASH FLOWS.
RESULT IN GENERAL FUND REVENUE
LOSSES IN THE SHORT RUN AND MAKE
FORECASTING THE STATE'S CASH
FLOWS AND REVENUES SUBJECT TO
INCREASED VARIANCE ANSWER AND
UNCERTAINTY.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS --
C. NINE WITHOUT OBJECTION TWENTY
TWO SEVENTEEN WILL GO TO
SUSPENSE AB --
TWENTY THREE FORTY EIGHT ANYBODY
SUPPORT.
ANY OPPOSITION TWENTY THREE
FORTY EIGHT FINE AS I YOUR CURRY.
SEEING NO SUPPORTER OPPOSITION
FINANCE A FINANCES NEUTRAL ON
THIS BILL BUT NOTES CONCERN AND
THAT IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE
TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BUDGET ACT
APPROPRIATION OF FIVE MILLION
DOLLARS GENERAL FUND. FOR THE
CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL HABITAT
PROGRAM MAY BE USED TO
ADMINISTER THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THIS BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS COMMENTS SEEN NONE.
AB TWENTY THREE FORTY EIGHT WILL
GROWTH SUSPENSE WITHOUT
OBJECTION.
WILL MOVE ON TO AB TWENTY FOUR
FIFTY NINE BY MISS FRIEDMAN
[inaudible]
SIR SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS BETH
PALIN TO HAVE HEALTHAXIS
CALIFORNIA WERE PLEASED TO BE
THE SPONSORS OF THIS MEASURE.
WE WOULD NOTE THAT THE
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS YOU KNOW
HELP MILLIONS OF CALIFORNIANS
AFFORD COVERAGE BUT IT DOES NOT
HELP PEOPLE WHO MAKE MORE THAN
4100% OF POVERTY.
WHICH IS ABOUT FIFTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS FOR AN INDIVIDUAL OR
SIXTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR
A COUPLE MARRIED COUPLE.
IN YOUR DISTRICT MISTER CHAIR.
A MARRIED COUPLE IN THEIR EARLY
SIXTIES WOULD NEED TO SPEND
THIRTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS TO
EIGHTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS TO PAY
PREMIUMS FOR COVERAGE WITH
DEDUCTIBLES OF SIX THOUSAND
DOLLARS EACH.
IN SENATOR PELL AND SENATOR
WINNERS DISTRICT IT WOULD BE
CLOSER TO FIFTEEN TO TWENTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR THAT SAME
COVERAGE THIS BILL WOULD GIVE A
LIMITED TAX CREDIT FOLKS
410026100% OF POVERTY IT IS
CAPPED.
AT THE ACTUAL COST OF THE
PREMIUM FOR THAT COVERAGE
WITHOUT SIX THOUSAND DOLLAR
DEDUCTIBLE.
AND IT IS CONTINGENT ON BEING
FUNDED AND ANY OTHER SUPPORTERS
ANY OPPOSITION ON TWENTY FOUR
FIFTY NINE FINANCE THE FRANCHISE
TAX BOARD ESTIMATES THIS BILL
WOULD REDUCE GENERAL FUND
REVENUES BY FORTY MILLION
DOLLARS.
IN TWENTY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
SEVENTY MILLION DOLLARS IN
TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY AND
SEVENTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE
ALTHOUGH AN ESTIMATE OF THE
BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS WAS
NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF
THIS ANALYSIS.
THE BOARD IS STATED THE
ANTICIPATED TO BE SIGNIFICANT.
THANK YOU ANY QUESTIONS ANY
COMMENTS.
WITHOUT OBJECTION TWENTY FOUR
FIFTY NINE WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
I AB TWENTY SIX SIXTY THREE BY
MS FRIEDMAN ON PROPERTY TAXES
FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS
[inaudible]
ANY SUPPORT [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE A FINANCES OPPOSED TO
THIS BILL BECAUSE IT WILL
INCREASE THE STATE'S PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GENERAL FUND COSTS
TO AN UNKNOWN EXTENT.
THE BILL ALSO SETS A
QUESTIONABLE PRESIDENT UP BY
PROVIDING IMPACTED TAXPAYERS
WITH RETROACTIVE PROPERTY TAX
REFUNDS.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
SEEING NONE AB TWENTY SIX SIXTY
THREE WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY NINE ELEVEN IS
FRIEDMAN ON FIRE SAFETY IS THEIR
SUPPORT [inaudible]
THERE IS.
IT'S CHAIR MEMBERS GREG COOK
RIVERS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
POWER AGENCY HAS YOUR ANALYSIS
CLEARLY POINTS OUT IS A VERY
IMPORTANT BILL AND WE URGE YOUR
SUPPORT THANK YOU [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE.
THE TOTAL COST OF HELLFIRE AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPLOYMENT
THIS BILL ARE ESTIMATED AT
APPROXIMATELY ONE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS AND TWENTY
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN TWO POINT ONE
MILLION DOLLARS IN. TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY ONE POINT EIGHT
MILLION DOLLARS AND TWENTY
TWENTY TWENTY ONE AND ONE POINT
SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS ON GOING.
ADDITIONALLY IT IS ANTICIPATED
THAT THE BILL WILL RESULT AND
COSTS OF APPROXIMATELY SEVEN
HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
GENERAL FUND EVERY FIVE YEARS
STARTING IN. TWENTY NINETEEN
TWENTY FOR THE BOARD TO CONDUCT
A SURVEY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
THANK YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS ON TWENTY NINE
ELEVEN COMIC SEEM NINE AB TWENTY
NINE ELEVEN WILL GO TO SUSPEND
ITS WITHOUT OBJECTION.
AB TWENTY FIVE ELEVEN BY MISTER
CHAO INTERNET ACCOUNTABILITY
[inaudible]
ANY SPORT.
ANY OPPOSITION FINANCE.
FINANCE ESTIMATES THE COST OF
ENFORCING THIS BILL TO BE MINOR
IN ABSORBABLE.
AB TWENTY FIVE SEVENTY SEVEN BY
MISTER GRAY.
NO I'M SORRY I PROTECT SENATE
JUST SPENCE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB
TWENTY FIVE ELEVEN WITH OTHER
SUSPENSE.
GETTING AHEAD OF MYSELF MISTER
BLOOM WALKED IN.
WALK UP TO THE MICROPHONE.
IT'S TIME FOR AB [inaudible]
TWENTY NINE THIRTY EIGHT
BICYCLES YES SIR THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR AND COMMITTEE
MEMBERS SAID THIS IS AB TWENTY
NINE THIRTY EIGHT WHICH WOULD
ALLOW THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA.
TWO YEARS TO ALIGN AND JUST IT'S
TAX ELECTION A BETTER MATCH TAX
COLLECTIONS OF OTHER BIKE SHARE
SYSTEMS IN LA COUNTY.
I'M SURE YOU ALL KNOW HOW
POPULAR BIKE SHARE SYSTEMS ARE
TODAY IN THE CASE OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY WE HAVE EIGHTY EIGHT
JURISDICTIONS AND AT THIS POINT
TIME THERE'S TWO COMPETING BIKE
SHARE SYSTEMS --
THE THIS IS A UNFORTUNATELY PUT
SANTA MONICA IN A SITUATION
WHERE THERE TAX COLLECTIONS --
I MADE IT DIFFICULT FOR THEM AND
WITH ME I HAVE SYLVIA SHAW
REPRESENTED THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA WHO SPEAK MORE ABOUT THE
BILL AND CAN ANSWER ANY OF YOUR
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS SYLVIA'S
ALICIA ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA THE CITY WAS ONE OF
THE EARLY ADOPTERS OF A BIKE
SHARE PROGRAM IN CALIFORNIA --
WE DIDN'T REALLY HAVE A LOT OF
RESOURCES TO TURN TO IN TERMS OF
TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE MOST
APPROPRIATE --
ELECTION FOR THIS TYPE OF
PROGRAM HOWEVER THE PROGRAM HAS
BEEN WILD LEASES SUCCESSFUL COST
TO THE STATE WOULD BE MINIMAL.
AND THE STATE WOULD HAVE
SOMETHING TO GAIN WITH THE
INCREASE IN ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION AND REDUCTION IN
GI A GREENHOUSE GAS.
EMISSIONS THROUGHOUT SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA.
BETTER INTEGRATE OUR PROGRAM
WITH NEIGHBORING CITIES AND UCLA
THANK YOU [inaudible]
OTHERS [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE.
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX
AND FEE ADMINISTRATION ESTIMATES
THIS BILL RESULTS IN STATE AND
LOCAL REVENUE LOSSES OF ONE
HUNDRED THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED
SEVENTY DOLLARS PER YEAR.
BASED ON THE STATE NEWS TAX
BICYCLE RENTAL RECEIPTS THAT THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA ACTUALLY
PAID IN.
TWO THOUSAND SEVENTY THANK YOU
RICHARD LOOM IS LIKE CLOSE.
RESPECTFULLY ASK HER ABOUT US
MANY QUESTIONS ON AB TWENTY NINE
THIRTY EIGHT WHICH IS A DO PASS.
RECOMMENDATION WE HAVE A MOTION
BY MISTER BELL.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
MOTION IS TO PASS TO THE SENATE
FLOOR PORTANTINO AYE AYE
PORTANTINO AYE BATES.
BATES AYE BELL.
BELL AYE BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL.
HILL AYE NIELSEN WIENER AYE
WIENER AYE.
THE BILL IS OUT BUT ON CALL IN
YOUR WAITING PRESENTATION ON
TWENTY NINE NINETY EIGHT SO
THANK SIR YOU'RE WELCOME THANK
YOU VERY MUCH.
ALRIGHT I AM GOING TO GO DOWN
AND PERCENT.
I HAVE TO BILLS TO PRESENT MISS
BATES WOULD YOU [inaudible]
TAKE OVER
.
SO I HAVE A S. B. NINE THIRTY
NINE WHICH IS A STATE CLAIMS
BILL UM'S ONE OF THE BILL'S
CARRIED BY THE CHAIRS OF
APPROPRIATIONS EACH YEAR TO
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY.
APPROPRIATION AUTHORITY FOR
LEGAL SETTLEMENTS.
THIS URGENCY BILL APPROPRIATES
PRACTICALLY SIX POINT TWO
MILLION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE FOR THE PAYMENT.
OF THREE STATE CLAIMS THE
SETTLEMENTS WERE ENTERED INTO-LAWFULLY BY THE STATE UPON
ADVICE OF COUNSEL.
AND ARE BINDING STATE
OBLIGATIONS ANY.
FUNDS APPROPRIATE AND ACCESS TO
THE AMOUNT OF REVERT BACK TO THE
STATE.
WE WILL BE OFFERING AND AUTHORS
AMENDMENT TODAY TO CHANGE THE
FUNDS SOURCE ON THE WALLS THE
CLAIM FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO A
SPECIAL FUND.
SINCE THE CASE IN QUESTION DEALS
WITH FEES ILLEGALLY CHARGE BY
THE DMV.
WITH ME TODAY IS CERRADA AT A
PET WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE TO ANSWER ANY TECHNICAL
QUESTIONS AND I RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR IT I WOULD.
WITNESSES AND SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING UC CHAIR AND I'M
COMMITTEE MEMBERS SOUGHT OUT TO
PITCH WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS AND ALSO ASK FOR AN
AYE VOTE[inaudible]
COMMITTEE MEMBERS [inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY OPPOSITION WE HAVE A MOTION.
BY JUST NOTE FOR THE RECORD I
WILL BE OPPOSING ON NOW TO
ACCOUNTS OF THE SPECIAL FUND.
LOG BEING THAT OUR MEAL MOTOR
VEHICLE --
COUNTY IS SAW SORE LEAVE
STRESSED AT THE MOMENT HOUSE DMB
TRIES TO CATCH UP WITH THE UP.
OUR APPLICATIONS FOR OF RENEWAL
OF DRIVER'S LICENSE A LOT WAS
DISCUSSED IN THE OUR MEETING
LAST WEEK I THINK THAT THAT'S AN
APPROPRIATE --
TO TAX THAT OR CHARGE THAT FUND
AND SECONDLY ON THE ON THE OF
SETTLEMENT WITH ON THIS THOMPSON.
OF BEING THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE DID DO AN INVESTIGATION
AND FOUND ALL ABOUT THE
ALLEGATIONS I HAD NO MERIT ó I
WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING OUR
EITHER ONE OF THOSE ITEMS.
BECAUSE IF WE COULD DIVIDE AT
THAT WOULD BE GOOD THIS OUR
MOTION TO DO THAT WE NEED A
MOTION DON'T DOING FUN BILL
RIGHT WITH HIM IT'S ONE MONEY
ALSO CAMPAIGN BY FRIDAY.
THE MOTION STEP.
SO IS THE REMOTE AT THERE'S A
MOTION TO APPROVE.
WHAT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SORRY?
A WITH THE AUTHORS OF AMENDMENTS
FINANCES SUPPORT OF THIS MEASURE
[inaudible]
WELL CALDERON.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS AS AMENDED
TO THE SENATE FLOOR PORTANTINO.
PORTANTINO AYE BATES NO BATES
NOBEL BELL AYE BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL HILL AYE
NIELSEN WIENER.
WIENER AYE [inaudible]
BILLS OUT.
FINACLE ON CARS [inaudible]
OKAY.
MISTER NIELSEN WILL NOT BE HERE
FOR APPROPRIATIONS.
NO ALL ARE ALERTED US THAT.
BILL IS OUT [inaudible]
YEAH. FIVE TWO ONE ALRIGHT.
I'M GOING TO THE NEXT.
ONE I HAVE A BE --
EIGHTEEN NINETY SEVEN ON BEHALF
OF MISS GONZALEZ FLETCHER.
ARE GOOD MORNING COLLEAGUES THIS
BILL WOULD APPROPRIATE
APPROXIMATELY NINETY TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM THE
GENERAL FUND. TO THE VICTIMS
COMPENSATION BOARD FOR THE
PAYMENT OF STATE CLAIMS.
RELATED TO THE RUN ITS
CONVICTION OF ZEDD RETURN BRO --
SETEMBRO WAS FOUND FACTUALLY
INNOCENT BY THE COURTS ON ONE
CHARGE FOR WHICH YOU SERVE SIX
HUNDRED AND FIFTY NINE DAYS.
AND HE IS ENTITLED TO A HUNDRED
FORTY ALL IRV. FOR THIS
ERRONEOUS CONVICTION EXISTING
LAW REQUIRES A VICTIM
COMPENSATION BOARD TO RECOMMEND
AN APPROPRIATION WITHOUT HOLDING
A HEARING TO COVER ANY CLAIMS
WHEN THERE'S A FINDING OF
FACTUAL INNOCENCE THE DEPARTMENT
FINANCES APPROVED THE PAYMENT.
OF THIS CLAIM AND I HAVE
REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE VICTIMS
COMPENSATION BOARD I BELIEVE
NEIL IN ITS TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
AND I WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
AN AYE VOTE Q. ON WITNESSES AND
SUPPORT.
THE MORNING MEAL AND US WITH THE
VICTIM COMPENSATION BOARD
HEARING ANSWERED QUESTIONS I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR AYE VOTE.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION THEIR
NON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
FINANCES IN SUPPORT OF THIS
MEASURE.
WILLOW XIN LIU BUILT.
THE MOTIONIS TO PASS TO THE
SENATE FLOOR PORTANTINO.
PORTANTINO AYE BATES.
BATES NOBEL AYE FELL AYE
BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL HILL AYE
NIELSEN WIENER [inaudible]
WIENER AYE.
BILL IS OUT [inaudible]
FIVE TWO ONE PLUS.
BUT WITH THE CALL ON THE BILLS
THAT ARE GONNA CALL.
YOU CAN READ IT WHICH ONE AB
NINETEEN SEVENTY SIX THE MOTION
IS TO PASS TO THE SENATE FLOOR
NIELSEN.
WIENER AYE WIENER AYE.
BILL WAS OUCH. SIX TO ONE STEP
SIX DESERVE HIS ME.
AB NINETEEN FOURTEEN THE MOTION
IS TO PASS TO THE SENATE FOR
NIELSEN.
THAT BILL IS AT SIX TO ZERO AB
TWENTY FIVE SIXTEEN THE MOTION
IS TO PASS TO THE SENATE FLOOR
NIELSEN.
WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
OF THOSE OUT.
SIX ZERO AB TWENTY SIX SEVENTY
NINE THE MOTION IS DUE PASSED TO
THE SENATE FLOOR NIELSEN.
THE BILL IS OUT.
SIX ZERO AB TWENTY NINE THIRTY
EIGHT THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO
THE SENATE FLOOR.
NIELSEN.
THE BILL IS OUT.
SIX ZERO AND THOSE ARE ALL THE
BILL'S ON CALL --
EVERYONE HAS A WAVE PRESENTATION
EXCEPT.
WE HAVE NOT HEARD FROM MISTER
MULLIN YET SO START OVER THERE
YOU ARE.
I LOOK THAT AY AND YOU STUCK IN.
THIS IS A SUSPENSE CANDIDATE I
UNDERSTAND ONE PRESENTED --
SO PLEASE DO.
THE COMMISSION.
FAMOUS SURE I WILL BE BRIEF
THANK YOU CHAIR MEMBERS
CALIFORNIA IS THE ONLY STATE IN
THE COUNTRY THAT DOES NOT
REGULATE THE PROFESSION OF
ATHLETIC.
TRAINING SO I'M PRESENTING AB
THIRTY ONE TEND TO THE COMMITTEE.
WHICH CREATES THE BOARD OF
ATHLETIC TRAINING AND A
REGISTRATION MECHANISM TO
REGULATE ATHLETIC TRAINERS IT
ALSO RESERVES THE ATHLETIC
TRAINER TITLE FOR THOSE WHO ARE
NATIONALLY CERTIFIED. TO
MINIMIZE THE STATE'S COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH CREATING THIS
NEW BOARD THE BILL ALLOWS THE
BOARD TO ACCEPT PRIVATE FUNDS
HELP COVERED START UP COSTS.
IT PRIVATE FUNDS ARE UNAVAILABLE
A GENERAL FUND OR SPECIAL FUND
LOAN MAY BE USED AND MUST BE
REPAID WITH FEE REVENUES.
THE CALIFORNIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS
ASSOCIATION IS PREPARED TO HELP
COVER THE INITIAL COST OF
CREATING THE ATHLETIC TRAINER
BOARD I HAVE WITH ME HERE TODAY
MY CHIPS ARE THE ATHLETIC
TRAINER PHYSICAL THERAPISTS
REPRESENTING.
THE CALIFORNIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS
ASSOCIATION TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING CHAIR PORTANTINO
ASSEMBLY MEMBER EARNED SANDERS
AND STAFF AS THE ASSEMBLY MEMBER
SAID MY NAME IS MIKE SHIPS ARE
ANIMATIC TRAILER PHYSICAL
THERAPISTS REPRESENTING THE
CALIFORNIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS
ASSOCIATION.
AND WE WORKED VERY HARD ON THE
SPILL OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS.
AND PROVIDING INFORMATION TO
COMMITTEE STAFF REGARDING HARM
THAT HAS OCCURRED BOTH IN
CALIFORNIA AND NATIONALLY --
WORKED WITH OPPOSITION TO
ADDRESS OUR CONCERNS WHERE WE
COULD --
WORKED WITH COMMITTEE STAFF.
TO AND MAKE SURE THE BILL WAS
CONSISTENT WITH THE EDUCATION
AND TRAINING OF ATHLETIC
TRAINERS.
IN LINE WITH THE FORTY NINE
OTHER STATES THAT DO REGULATE
THE PROFESSION.
AND PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM HARM.
WE HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE CMA
AND FOUR OTHER NATIONAL AND
STATE PHYSICIAN GROUPS.
AS WELL AS A COALITION OF OVER
THIRTY SIX ORGANIZATIONS.
IT WE DO ALL THIS WELL MANDATING
THAT THERE BE NO COST TO THE
GENERAL FUND.
A AM AND PROVIDE HYPE PROTECTION
TO THE PUBLIC.
AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK TO MOVE
THE BILL OF SUSPENSE I'M HERE TO
ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU
MAY HAVE.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES AND SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS BOB NANO
REPRESENTING STANFORD UNIVERSITY
IN SUPPORT [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION.
THERE'S MORE SUPPORT OUT LET THE
SUPPORTERS COME COME ON UP.
WHEN I COME TO THE BIG TABLE?
COME TO THE BIG TABLE.
HA HA COME ON COME TO THE BIG
TABLE YEAH.
THE RIGHT TO GET UP.
DON'T GET UP.
BUT TO HELP MAKE THAT DECISION.
TELL US WHO YOU ARE [inaudible]
SENATE.
PRESS THE GREEN BUTTON.
GO AHEAD.
CLAIM IS JUST SKETCHES SORRY ME
YOUNG ATHINA I'M IN STRONG
SUPPORT OF THE BILL.
THANK YOU JESSICA I AM IS JOSH
HUTCHERSON AND I MEAN ASK ME MY
I GET ORDER AND LIKE TO BE
PROTECTED SIMON JOHNSON PUT IN
THIS BILL.
YOUR MONEY BY TAKING PICTURES
LIKE INSIDE THAT YOUR FATHER.
RIGHT THAT I KNOW FIVE MOVE OVER
TO PUT THAT.
THERE YOU GO.
I'M ALWAYS A DEAD SO THERE WE GO
[inaudible]
LOOK HERE.
GOTCHA.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
YOUR TESTIMONY.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU VERY PROUD DAD.
WE'LL GO TO THE OPPOSITION NOW
BE NICE THE KIDS WERE CUTE.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS SAID
CARL LONDON HERE ON BEHALF
CALIFORNIA PHYSICAL THERAPY
ASSOCIATION I'M.
WILLING TO HAVE MY PHOTO TAKEN
HER DECIDED THE BIG TABLES WELL --
INVITES YOU TO THE BIG TABLE
SPEC.
BUT WE KNOW THAT WE WE HAVE
WORKED ON THIS --
WE ARE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE BILL
I FACT AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN
MADE THE SENATE THAT BROADNESS
WE BELIEVE INAPPROPRIATELY.
AND TO A POINT WHERE IT NO
LONGER ADDRESSES THE CARE OF A
ATHLETES ANYMORE BUT RATHER THE
BROADER POPULATION OF PATIENTS --
IN* --
HEALTH CARE --
DECISION MAKING PROCESS WE
BELIEVE THE BILL DOES NOT --
IS NOT NEAR ON THAT POINT IT
SHOULD BE AND WE SECONDLY --
BELIEVE THAT THERE'S A NEED TO
TIGHTEN UP THE SUPERVISION
REQUIREMENTS --
FOR POSITION OVERSIGHT WE RAISE
THAT BOTH IN COMMITTEE IN THE
POLICY COMMITTEE I THINK IS
PRETTY.
CLEAR THAT MOST MEMBERS WILL
VOTE IN THE BILL THROUGH THAT
CALL FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION THAT.
WE HAVEN'T HAD THAT WHERE THERE
ARE NO FURTHER AMENDMENTS WE'VE
SEEN THEY'RE GOING TO NARROW
THAT WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS
MEASURE URGE YOU. TO NOT PASS
THIS BILL THANK YOU THANK YOU
OTHERS.
MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS IVAN ALL
TOMORROW ON BEHALF OF THE
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION
OF CALIFORNIA AND THE AMERICAN
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION.
WHAT WE'RE --
IS OPPOSED TO THE BILL ECHO THE
COMMENTS MADE BY MY COLLEAGUE
BOB PRECEDING ME WE WERE IN AN
OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED POSITION
AFTER THE AMENDMENTS THAT WERE
TAKEN IN ASSEMBLY BEING PAY.
HOWEVER AFTER A PRIOR TO THE
SENATE BUSINESS IMPRESSIONS --
COMMITTEE HEARING WHEN THOSE --
AMENDMENTS WERE GOT IT FROM THE
BILL WE MOVE BACK TO NOT --
NOW OPPOSE POSITION AND THE BILL
WE ARE NOT OPPOSED --
TO SOME FORM OF OVERSIGHT BY THE
BY CALIFORNIA ON ATHLETIC
TRAINERS AND BELIEVE THAT THAT
THAT IS APPROPRIATE.
BUT IT'S CLEARLY THE DEVIL'S IN
THE DETAILS AND WE'RE GETTING
LATE THE PROCESS AND AND SO WE
I'M MORE THAN MORE THAN WILLING
TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH
ATHLETIC TRAINERS BUT THIS POINT
WE'RE STILL OPPOSE AND WOULD ASK
FOR YOUR JOBS BILL TO BE HELD ON
SUSPENSE.
HI GOOD MORNING I'M BRENT YOU
WERE ON BEHALF OF CROSSFIT INK
HAS THE LARGEST JIM CHAIN IN
CALIFORNIA AND THE WORLD --
WE RESPECTFULLY OPPOSE THIS BILL
ON POLICY GROUNDS UNLESS IT'S
AMENDED TO NO LONGER CAPTURE
FITNESS TRAINERS THANK YOU AND
WE URGE A NO VOTE [inaudible]
ANY OTHERS.
SEEN OTHER OPPOSITION FINANCE A
FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS MEASURE
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER
AFFAIRS ESTIMATES COSTS OF
APPROXIMATELY ONE POINT SIX
MILLION DOLLARS IN. TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY ONE POINT THREE
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
TWENTY ONE AND ONE POINT TWO
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
ONE TWENTY TWO AND I'M GOING. TO
BE SUPPORTED THROUGH A
COMBINATION OF FEES PRIVATE
FUNDS OR POTENTIALLY A GENERAL
FUND OR SPECIAL FUND LOAN.
ADDITIONALLY THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE ANTICIPATES COSTS.
OF THIRTY ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS
IN 201-819-60000 DOLLARS AND
201-928-0060 FIVE THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY
ONE AND ONE POINT FIVE MILLION
DOLLARS IN.
TWENTY TWENTY ONE TWENTY TWO HUB
FOR INCREASED REFERRALS IN
LITIGATION RELATED TO THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW
REGISTRATION BOARD THANK YOU
[inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS.
ASTRONOMERS LIKE CLOSE.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR I WILL
BRIEFLY CLOSE I DO WANT TO
ADDRESS --
SOME THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
CONCERNS --
THAT WERE --
IN A LETTER SUBMITTED ABOUT
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF THAT THE
BILL IS NEEDED --
I WOULD ASK WHAT CONSTITUTES
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THROUGHOUT
THIS PROCESS WE'VE HEARD REAL
STORIES FROM FAMILIES WHO BEEN
HARMED INCLUDE THE STORY OF A
YOUNG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT NAMED
IS USE SUSTAINED A SEVERE HEAD
INJURY DURING A SOCCER GAME IS
MISSED.
AND WAS MISTREATED BY NON
QUALIFIED ATHLETIC TRAINER HIS
HE SPENT ONE WEEK IN HOSPITAL
SUFFER FROM SIGNIFICANT MEMORY
LOSS AND WAS STUCK AT HOME FOR
pDAMAGES LIKE THESE ARE
INSUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY
LEGISLATIVE ACTION OF THE
GOVERNOR'S APPROVAL I DON'T KNOW
WHAT IS AGAIN CALIFORNIA TO
CLOSE AS THE ONLY STATE THAT
DOESN'T SAID SET MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS FOR ATHLETIC
TRAINERS PROVIDE SERVICES
BECAUSE TIME FOR THE COUNTRY'S
MOST POPULOUS STATE TO FINALLY
JOIN THE RANKS OF ALL.
OF THE STATES THAT REGULATE
ATHLETIC LET'S GET IT BUT I
CERTAINLY APPRECIATE YOUR
CONSIDERATION AS CHAIR.
THANK YOU MISTER MULLIN SING NO
QUESTIONS --
WITHOUT OBJECTION THAT BILL WILL
GO TO SUSPENSE WHICH OBVIOUSLY
YOU KNOW.
THURSDAY IS THE DAY --
I WISH YOU WELL BETWEEN NOW AND
THURSDAY [inaudible]
ALRIGHT.
AB THIRTY ONE TEN GOES TO
SUSPENSE WILL MOVE BACK --
TO OUR REGULAR OUR LIST WHICH
STARTS WE LEFT OFF IN AB.
TWENTY FIVE SEVENTY SEVEN BY
MISTER GRAY MEMBERS THAT. TO SEE
ALL KNOW EVERYTHING THAT WAS
SAID TO PASS AND EVERYTHING THAT
PEOPLE HAVE NOT WAIVED.
PRESENTATION WE HAVE TAKEN CARE
OF SO ALL WE HAVE LEFT OF THE
SUSPENSE CANDIDATES BUT NO
PRESENTATION SO.
ANYBODY IN FAVOR.
TWENTY FIVE SEVENTY SEVEN NOBODY
OPPOSED FINANCE FINANCES OPPOSED
TO THIS BILL DIVERT SUBSTANTIAL
REVENUE LOSSES.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES TOTAL REVENUE LOSSES
OF TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION
DOLLARS IN 201-819-10070 MILLION
DOLLARS IN TWENTY NINETEEN
TWENTY AND ONE HUNDRED ONE
HUNDRED EIGHTY MILLION DOLLARS
IN [inaudible]
TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE THE
QUESTIONS.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION
TWENTY FIVE SEVENTY SEVEN WILL
GO TO SUSPENSE.
MOVE ON TO AB TWENTY FIVE NINETY
THREE BY MISTER GRAYSON AIR
AMBULANCE ANYBODY IN SUPPORT
[inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS
MEASURE AS THE AIR AMBULANCE
RATE PROVISIONS OF THIS BILL
WERE CONSIDERED DURING THE
BUDGET PROCESS AND WERE
ULTIMATELY NOT INCLUDED IN THE
TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN BUDGET ACT.
AT THE TIME OF THIS ANALYSIS THE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE
SERVICES WASN'T ABLE TO PROVIDE
A FISCAL ESTIMATE BUT IT IS
ANTICIPATED THAT COSTS UP WILL
LIKELY RANGE.
FROM TWENTY FIVE TO THIRTY
MILLION DOLLARS GENERAL FUND
ANNUALLY.
ANY QUESTIONS ON TWENTY FIVE
NINETY THREE SEEN NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION IT WILL GO THE
SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY SIX TWENTY SEVEN BY
KALRA.
ON MIGRATORY BIRDS.
ANYBODY IN SUPPORT.
I CAN'T TELL IF YOU'RE JUST
MOVING OR IF YOU'RE COMING TO
THE MICROPHONES.
AS THEIR OPPOSITION.
TO TWENTY SIX TWENTY SEVEN GOOD
MORNING NO WELL KRAMER'S THE
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU
FEDERATION.
WE ARE PRIMARILY CONCERNED WITH
TIME FOR POLICY REASONS HOWEVER
I DO WANT TO POINT OUT.
THAT WE THINK THAT THE FISCAL
ANALYSIS IS LOW AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
HAS HISTORICALLY.
COMPLAINED ABOUT THE LACK OF
FUNDING IT RECEIVES FOR THE
MANDATES THAT ARE PROVIDED TO A
BY THE LEGISLATURE AND WE THINK
THAT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR
THE LEGISLATURE TO CAREFULLY
CONSIDER ANY NEW MANDATES.
AND WITHOUT PROPER COSTS TO
COVER THOSE MANDATES AND FUNDS
TO COVER THOSE MANDATES.
THE DEPARTMENT WAS PROVIDED
ADDITIONAL FUNDING AND THIS
YEAR'S BUDGET HOWEVER THAT WILL
GO TOWARDS TRYING TO ALLEVIATE
THE BACKLOG DEPARTMENT HAS NOW.
SO WE THOUGHT WE WOULD REQUEST
THAT THE BILL BE HELD ON
SUSPENSE.
MR MEMBERS BRIAN WHITE HERE WE
HAVE TO THE CALIFORNIA LICENSE
FORCES SOCIALIZATION THE FORCE
THEM OUT OF CALIFORNIA WE SHARE
SIMILAR CONCERNS.
A WE ARE TO GO TO A CURRENT
TIMBER HARVEST PLAN PROCESS WE
THINK THIS BILL DOES NOT
RECOGNIZE THE CURRENT READY TO
PROCESS THAT WE GO THROUGH AND
EXPENSE OF TIME AND EFFORT IT
TAKES DO THAT AND WE THINK THIS
BILL SHOULD BE HELD IN SUSPENSE.
THANK.
STERN MEMBERS JACOB MOSS ON
BEHALF OF THE SOLAR IN AND IT'S
ENERGY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION.
PER SOLAR AND A DIFFERENT OVALS
I WOULD JUSTLIKE TO ECHO MIGHT
BE COMMENTS OF THE PREVIOUS
SPEAKERS AND OPPOSITION THANK.
IT'S SHERMAN MEMBERS ARE ALSO
GONZALEZ ON BEHALF OF NEXT ERA
ERA NEXT THEIR ENERGY AND ALSO
LIKE TO AYE --
ASSOCIATE MYSELF THE PREVIOUS
COMMENTS WE OPPOSED [inaudible]
FINANCE FINANCE IS OPPOSED TO
THIS BILL A WHILE THE FISCAL
IMPACT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AND WILDLIFE TO IMPLEMENT THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS BILL IS
UNCLEAR.
OF FINANCE KNOW THIS BILL WILL
LIKELY RESULT IN A NEED FOR
ADDITIONAL GENERAL FUND
RESOURCES NOT INCLUDED IN THE
ADMINISTRATION'S OFFICE PLAN --
ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY COMMENTS SEEING NOW AND AB
TWENTY SIX TWENTY SEVEN WILL GO
TO SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION
[inaudible]
OKAY
.
OKAY WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON AB
TWENTY SIX NINETY SEVEN MISTER
GALLAGHER.
ANY SUPPORT ANY OPPOSITION
FINANCE FINANCE OPPOSES THIS
BILL AS IT ESTABLISHES A NEW
PROGRAM WHEN IT MAY BE MORE
EFFICIENT TO EXPAND OR ENHANCE
SIMILAR EXISTING PROGRAMS.
FURTHER THIS BILL DOES NOT
IDENTIFY STABLE ON GOING FUNDING
SOURCE.
THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD
ESTIMATES COST OF TWO HUNDRED
FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS.
I IN TO TWENTY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
AND TWO HUNDRED NINE THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND TWENTY NINETEEN
TWENTY THANK YOU.
ANY QUESTIONS ANY COMMENTS.
WITHOUT OBJECTION AB TWENTY SIX
NINETY SEVEN WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY SEVENTH THE NINE BY
COOPER [inaudible]
ANY SUPPORT [inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION.
FINANCE YOUR FILE --
WITHOUT ANY QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS AB TWENTY SEVEN SIXTY
NINE BY MISTER COOPER.
WILL GO TO SUSPENSE --
AB TWENTY EIGHT THIRTY TWO BY
MISTER DALI IS HER SUPPORT
[inaudible]
OPPOSITION.
ANY FINANCE TWENTY EIGHT THIRTY
TWO MINUTES IS NEUTRAL ON THIS
BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON
TWENTY EIGHT THIRTY TWO SEEING
NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB TWENTY
THIRTY TWO WILL GO TO SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY EIGHT SIXTY ONE BY
MISTER SALAS SON MEDI CAL ANY
SUPPORT.
AND RULING WE ON BEHALF OF THE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND SPORT
[inaudible]
ANY OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE.
THIS BILL RESULTS IN INCREASED
GENERAL FUND COSTS POTENTIALLY
IN THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
ANNUALLY ASSOCIATED WITH
INCREASED UTILIZATION AND
CLAIMING OF SPECIFIED SUBSTANCE
USE DISORDER SERVICES.
PROVIDED VIA TELEHEALTH
ADDITIONALLY THIS FISCAL IMPACT
IS DEPENDENT UPON FEDERAL
APPROVAL OF THE STATE PLAN
AMENDMENT.
OF HOWEVER FINANCE NOTES IT IS
UNCLEAR WHETHER SUCH APPROVAL
WOULD BE GRANTED.
SEEING NO QUESTIONS I DON'T SEE
ON TWENTY EIGHT SIXTY ONE AB
TWENTY EIGHT SIXTY ONE WE'RE
GONNA SUSPENSE WITHOUT OBJECTION.
AB TWENTY EIGHT SIX A FIVE AYE
MR CHIU --
AS YOUR SUPPORT [inaudible]
OPPOSITION FINANCE OTHER
POTENTIAL REVENUES ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS MEASURE ARE CURRENTLY
UNKNOWN AND ANY REVENUE SPLIT
WOULD NOT BE KNOWN UNTIL AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES IS
NEGOTIATED.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AND
TWENTY EIGHT SIXTY FIVE SEEING
NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION AB TWENTY
EIGHT SIXTY FIVE ABOUT A
SUSPENSE.
AB TWENTY NINE TWENTY THREE BY
MISTER CHIU.
A SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING WITHIN THOUGHTS ON
BEHALF OF THE SILICON VALLEY
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT.
MORNING SURE MEMBERS CLAIMS LIST
BRONTE WITH CALIFORNIAN BE I
WOULD JUST DIE ECHO THE
COMMITTEES ANALYSIS THAT.
ANY FISCAL IMPACT FROM ARE THE
BILL WOULD BUT PROBABLY BE
NEGATED BY THE FACT THAT PART
HAS FEE AUTHORITY.
MEANING IT BE ABLE TO COLLECT
FOR ANY --
FOR ANY MANDATE THAT THE STATE
WOULD IMPOSE TO TWENTY AND
TWENTY THREE THANK YOU.
FINANCE OR ANY OPPOSITION.
GOOD MORNING A MEMBERS CHAIR ON
DEBORAH ALLEN I AM ME ABOARD
DIRECTOR FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT --
I STRONGLY OPPOSE AB TWENTY NINE
TWENTY THREE SHOULD HAVE MY
LETTER SIGNED BY TWO OF MY
FELLOW DIRECTORS ALSO OPPOSING
OF THIS BILL SHIFT ZONING
AUTHORITY IN SEEK A SEQUEL
OVERSIGHT AWAY FROM CITIES AND
COUNTIES AND GIVE IT TO THE BART
BOARD. FOR DEVELOPMENT OF IT'S
OWN PARKING LOTS --
INTO HIGH DENSITY HOUSING IN
SUBURBAN AREAS.
THIS BILL PROMPT AN INCREASE IN
BART'S OPERATING CAPITAL BUDGETS
TO EXPAND EXPERTISE IN LAND USE
AND SEQUEL OVERSIGHT.
AND DO A COMEDY FAST TRACKING OF
PROJECTS AT A TIME WHEN TRANSIT
FUNDING IS SPREAD THIN.
ARTS TOTAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING
BUDGETS A ARE FUNDED 70% FROM
FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL TAX
DOLLARS.
THE BILL COULD HAVE AN IMPACT ON
REQUEST THE BART MAKES TO THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR FUNDING.
THE BILL OR CREEK ALSO CREATE A
DANGEROUS PRECEDENT IN THIS
STATE FOR ALL SPECIAL DISTRICTS.
TO REQUEST THE SAME AUTHORITY
OVER THEIR OWN LANDS ERODING THE
LOCAL CONTROL.
OF CITIES UNDER DEVELOPMENT THE
BILL FURTHER --
THE MISSION DRAFT OF BART OUR
MISSION IS SAFE RELIABLE CLEAN
QUALITY TRANSIT SERVICES IT'S
NOT HOUSING.
I POSE AND I ASK YOU FOR NO VOTE
THANKS.
ANY OTHER OPPOSITION FINANCE
FINANCES NEUTRAL ON THIS BILL
[inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS YES SIR.
BUT I THINK GERMANIZED AND NO I
RESPECTFULLY TO THE DIRECTOR OF
THAT THAT YOU AYE AYES AYE
INCENTIVES NOT WITH THE VIEW OF
A PART ITSELF.
HIGH AND I WASN'T EXPRESS MY
STRONG -- MY
VERY STRONG SUPPORTER OF FOR
THIS BILL --
FORMER ROLE IN AS A COMMISSIONER
ON THE METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND
NOW IN THE SENATE.
BUT WE HAVE --
OF COURSE TERRIBLE HOUSING
CRISIS AND THE BAY AREA IS THAT
THE TIP OF THE SPEAR IN A BAD
WAY ON THAT.
A CRISIS AND WE'RE SEEING
HOMELESSNESS COOPER SAYING YOUNG
FAMILIES NOT BEING ABLE TO STAY
HERE WERE SAYING CHILDREN NOT
BEING.
ABLE -- TO
MOVED BACK TO WHERE THEY GREW UP
WHETHER THAT IS A WRITTEN THAT
WERE LAFAYETTE SAN FRANCISCO OR
ANYWHERE ELSE.
AND WE HAVE TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT
THIS AND THE REALITY IS A PARK --
HAS BY NO SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF
LANDS THAT IS OF COURSE.
DIRECTLY NEXT TO ACROSS THE
STREET FROM A RAIL STATION
EXACTLY WHERE WE SHOULD BE
PUTTING HOUSING AND THIS IS TRUE
IN SAN FRANCISCO IT'S TRUE IN
EAST BAY.
HIGH AND UNFORTUNATELY LOCAL
COMMUNITIES INCLUDING MY OWN
HAVE STYMIED BAR FROM BEING ABLE
TO ACTUALLY DEVELOP ABOUT
PROPERTY.
I AND I DON'T AGREE THAT --
TRANSIT.
PART YES YOUR BAR IS A TRANSIT
OPERATOR BUT TRANSIT AND HOUSING
ARE TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN.
I AND SO I I WHO DO BELIEVE THAT
WE SHOULD GIVE PART DISABILITY.
THIS IS NOT A BEING DONE*
NILLY WE HAVE THREE YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE SEEM THAT PARK --
HAS NOT BEEN ABLE.
HOUSING TIME SO WE HAVE TO DO IT
DIFFERENTLY.
SEEING NO OTHER COMMENTS FINEST
WE YOU HAD NO FILE RIGHT NOW
[inaudible]
NEUTRAL --
SEEING NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS AB TWENTY NINE TWENTY
THREE WILL GO TO SUSPENSE
WITHOUT OBJECTION.
WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON TO AB TWENTY
NINE NINETY EIGHT BY MISTER
BLOOM ON PRODUCTS AND FLAME
RETARDANT MATERIALS.
SIR SUPPORT.
MISTER JIM MEMBERS MORE ASSEMBLE
WITH SHUTTER AND THREE ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO AND THE CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL IN
SUPPORT [inaudible]
OPPOSITION.
BERMAN MEMBERS ATTENTION STICK
WELL WITH THE AMERICAN CHEMISTRY
COUNCIL WE ARE OPPOSED TO THIS
BILL.
AYE WE DO BELIEVE THAT COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION
ARE UNNECESSARY --
GIVEN OF THE BUREAU OF HOME
FURNISHINGS CURRENT
IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGULATORY
PROGRAM .ERNING
PRODUCTS AS WELL AS THE
DEPARTMENT TOXICS ONGOING
IMPLEMENTATION OF THEIR GREEN
CHEMISTRY PROGRAM.
THE LEGISLATURE JUST RECENTLY
APPROPRIATE ONE POINT TWO
MILLION DOLLARS A TO DTS SEE TO
EXPEDITE REVIEW OF CHEMISTRIES
IN CERTAIN CONSUMER PRODUCTS
BODIES CHEMISTRIES ARE ALREADY
ON DTS CAESAR.
PRIORITY PRODUCT WATCH LIST SO
FOR THOSE REASONS WE WOULD URGE
AT OPPOSITION THIS BILL THANK
YOU [inaudible]
THANK YOU.
ANYBODY ELSE FINANCE.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
ESTIMATES COSTS OF THREE HUNDRED
TWENTY SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS AND
201-922-0070 NINE THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND TWENTY TWENTY ONE
AND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX
THOUSAND DOLLARS ANNUALLY
THEREAFTER. FOR THE BUREAU OF
ELECTRONIC AN APPLIANCE REPAIR
HOME FURNISHINGS AND THERMAL
INSULATION TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS BILL.
THE BUREAU ASSUMES ANY FINES
COLLECTED FROM THE CITATIONS
ISSUED FROM THE NON COMPLIANCE
OF THE PROPOSED PROVISIONS WILL
OFFSET ENFORCEMENT COSTS.
ADDITIONALLY A WHILE THE FISCAL
IMPACT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
TALKS AT SUCH AND SUBSTANCES
CONTROL IS UNKNOWN.
THE DEPARTMENT KNOWS THAT ANY
COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF
THIS BILL WOULD BE REIMBURSABLE
BY THE BUREAU [inaudible]
THE QUESTIONS.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION
TWENTY NINE NINETY EIGHT WILL GO
TO SUSPENSE.
I AB TWENTY NINE SEVENTY SIX BY
MR QUIRK [inaudible]
SUPPORT [inaudible]
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
INDICATES COSTS OF THREE HUNDRED
SEVENTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND
201-819-2019 TWENTY AND TWENTY
TWENTY ONE FROM THE CHILDHOOD
LEAD POISONING PREVENTION FUND.
TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS
BILL [inaudible]
THEY QUESTIONS.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION
TWENTY NINE SEVENTY SIX WILL GO
TO SUSPENSE. THIRTY SIXTY ONE BY
MISTER GLORIA [inaudible]
SUPPORT [inaudible]
OPPOSITION [inaudible]
FINANCE.
IF A NEW LEASES LED UNDER THIS
BILLS AUTHORITY CALTRANS
ESTIMATES LOWER GENERAL FUND
RESOURCES OF APPROXIMATELY
EIGHTY SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS
ANNUALLY.
OF FINANCE OPPOSE THIS BILL.
OF A WELL THIS POLICY MAY HAVE
MERIT ANY EXEMPTIONS TO FAIR
MARKET VALUE REQUIREMENTS LIKE
THIS ONE SHOULD BE PART OF A
BROADER STATEWIDE APPROACH
[inaudible]
ANY QUESTIONS [inaudible]
COMMENTS.
WITHOUT OBJECTION AB THIRTY
SIXTY ONE WE'RE GONNA SUSPENSE.
MISTER FRASIER THIRTY ONE THIRTY
FIVE OFFICER SUPPORT.
I SEE RUN AND MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS A HEARING READ REPRESENT
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
HIGHWAY PATROLMAN.
OUT HERE TO POINT OUT THAT IN
THE LAST TEN YEARS.
THE CHP HAS EIGHTY THREE FEWER
OFFICERS TODAY THAN THEY HAD TEN
YEARS AGO I DON'T KNOW OF
ANOTHER STATE DEPARTMENT
ANYWHERE THAT HAS LESS STAFF
TODAY.
AND THEY HAD TEN YEARS AGO AND
AT THE SAME TIME THE WORKLOAD
HAS INCREASED DRAMATICALLY
THERE'S AN INCREASE IN THE
NUMBER OF DRIVERS REGISTERED
VEHICLES.
VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL IS
INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY.
AND THE DEATH RATE HAS INCREASED
OVER 25% SO IT'S BECOMING A
SERIOUS ISSUE STAFFING IS
IMPORTANT THE LEGISLATURE HAS
PASSED SENATOR BELLS.
I SP ONE WHICH REQUIRE
ADDITIONAL --
OFFICERS TO OF STAFF SOME OF
THOSE HAS SERIOUSLY A DANGEROUS
CONSTRUCTION ZONES SO THIS IS A
SMALL ATTEMPT TO GAIN BACK.
THE OFFICERS WE ACTUALLY HAD IN
IN TWENTY ELEVEN AND TWELVE SIX
HUNDRED ALMOST SIX HUNDRED MORE
OFFICERS AND WE SO WE'VE GONE
DOWN IT WE LOST THOSE SIX
HUNDRED OFFICERS HAD NEVER BEEN
REPLACED.
SINCE THE GOVERNOR OPPOSED A 5%
STAFF CUT IN ELEVEN TWELVE AND
THIRTEEN FOURTEEN BUDGET YEARS
[inaudible]
THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER SPORT ANY OPPOSITION
FINANCE FINANCE IS OPPOSED TO
THIS BILL AS IT WILL CREATE A
STRUCTURAL DEFICIT FOR THE MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCOUNT AND A GAP IN
FUNDING FOR OTHER ACTIVITIES.
BY RE PRIORITIZING MOTOR VEHICLE
ACCOUNT FUNDING TO FOCUS MORE
HEAVILY ON INCREASED NUMBERS OF
OFFICERS.
THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
ESTIMATES THIS BILL AT TWENTY
FIVE POINT EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS
FOR THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACCOUNT.
A EACH YEAR ASSUMING COST OF TWO
HUNDRED FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS
PER OFFICER.
A STARTING IN TWENTY TWENTY
THREE TWENTY FOUR THE ONGOING
COSTS ARE ESTIMATED AT ONE
HUNDRED TWENTY NINE MILLION.
DOLLARS ANNUALLY.
THE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS SEEN
NONE AB THIRTY ONE THIRTY FIVE
ABOUT A SUSPENSE.
AND I BELIEVE THIS IS OUR FINAL
BILL AB THIRTY TWO FIFTY SEVEN A
NATURAL RESOURCES FILL.
AB THIRTY TO FIFTY SEVEN ANY
SUPPORT.
OPPOSITION FINANCE SENATE IS
NEUTRAL ON THIS BILL.
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS SEEING
NON AB.
THIRTY TO FIFTY SEVEN WILL GO TO
SUSPENSE --
JUST.
I DIDN'T MISS ANYTHING RIGHT
WE'RE GOOD MISTER NIELSEN THANK
YOU FOR BEING COOPERATIVE.
APPRECIATE IT --
MEMBERS OBVIOUSLY.
WE GOT A BIG DAY COMING UP ON
THURSDAY.
AND THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE
AND AND THIS MEETING IS
ADJOURNED