TO CONVENE AS A SUB COMMITTEE
HERE.
YES SUBCOMMITTEE OF ONE PLEASE
WE GO I WANT SOME [inaudible]
SO -- BE
HAVE ONE MEASURE BEFORE US TODAY
IS CA.
TWENTY THREE SENATOR DELEON
WELCOME SENATOR.
LITERATURE I WANT TO THANK YOU
VERY MUCH AND I KNOW WE HAVEN'T
ESTABLISHED QUORUM [inaudible]
THE SUB [inaudible] ONE AND LOOK
FOR IT OBVIOUSLY TO OUR
COLLEAGUES ATTENDING NATURALLY
THEREAFTER.
WELL BUT I DO WANT THINK YOU --
MISTER CHAIR --
AND OUR ARE MEMBERS WHO WERE
ABSENT AT THIS MOMENT FOR THE UP
TO THE PRESENT SENATE
CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT NUMBER.
TWENTY THREE AS YOU WELL KNOW
LATE LAST YEAR --
IN CONGRESS OF THE COMMERCIAL
LEADERS.
FROM BOTH THE LEGISLATIVE HOUSES
OF RUSHED THROUGH --
EIGHT A GROSSLY IRRESPONSIBLE
TAX PLAN THAT GIVES THE
WEALTHIEST OF AMERICANS AND
CORPORATIONS MORE THAN A ONE
TRILLION DOLLAR A TAX BREAK AT
WORKING FAMILIES EXPENSE.
BUT THIS SIR AND ENOUGH --
TO BE OVERLY PARTISAN BUT THAT
THIS REPUBLICAN ATTACKS GAM A
DELIBERATELY TARGETS AMERICANS
IN BLUE STATES THAT QUITE SIMPLY
DIDN'T VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP.
AND COULD CAUSE CALIFORNIANS --
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
IF FACT THE AVERAGE CALIFORNIA
TAXPAYERS --
OF THE TAKES ADVANTAGE OF WHAT
WE CALL THE SALT.
STATE AND LOCAL TAX EXEMPTION
THE AVERAGE A EXEMPTION IS
ROUGHLY BETWEEN EIGHTEEN AND
TWENTY TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS THAT
IS THE AVERAGE.
A IN THEIR FEDERAL RETURNS THAT
DEDUCTION NOW HAS BEEN CAPPED BY
THIS PRESIDENT'S AND BY A BOTH
PAUL RYAN IS WAS MITCH MCCONNELL.
TO TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS WE HAVE
A HARD CAP WE DIDN'T HAVE A
CAPITAL NOW WE HAVE A HARD CAP.
MEANING THAT APPROXIMATELY THREE
MILLION --
CALIFORNIA --
A TAXPAYERS A WILL LOSE OUT ON
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OF
AVAILABLE DEDUCTIONS EACH YEAR
ON THE FEDERAL TAXES SO.
OF MY MEASURE WHICH IS NOT BEING
HEARD TODAY WHICH IS ALREADY ON
THE SUMMIT SITE WHICH IS YOU ARE.
NOT SUPPORTIVE OF AND I THINK
YOU SENATE BILL.
TWO TWO SEVEN IS DESIGNED TO
ENSURE THAT CALIFORNIANS DON'T
HAVE TO FOOT THE BILL FOR THIS --
AGREE JUST TAX GIVEAWAY BY
GIVING THEM A CHARVEL OUTLET
THEY'LL HELP THEM TO HELP OUR
SCHOOLS.
BUT SYMBOL TO DO SO WOULD CREATE
A FUND THAT TAXPAYERS CAN
CONTRIBUTE TO WHICH WOULD THEY
WOULD TAKE AND 85% TAX CREDIT.
ON EVERY DOLLAR THAT THEY
CONTRIBUTE BUT I'M HERE.
TIONAL AMENDMENT NUMBER TWENTY
THREE WHICH PROTECTS ALL OF OUR
EDUCATIONAL FUNDING FORMULAS
MAKING SURE WE MEET ALL THE
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS.
BEFORE BEFORE ADMINISTERING --
THIS CREDIT.
ULTIMI IT WOULD BENEFIT THE
STATE AND IF TAXPAYERS OF WE
OFFERED A MENU OF TRAVEL OPTIONS
SO THEY CAN CHOOSE HOW THEY WANT
TO PUT.
THEIR TROUBLE --
A GIVING TO WORK.
TAKEN TOGETHER THIS AMENDMENT IS
PAIRED WITH TWO TWO SEVEN SO
THEY ARE IN JOINED TOGETHER --
THAT IN ANOTHER MEASURE WHICH IS
S. B. FIVE THIRTY NINE WILL
OFFER COMFORT TAXPAYERS THAT
MENU OF OPTIONS HELPING TO
BECAUSE BUT TO THE BECAUSE A
CHOICE NOW.
I DO KNOW THAT --
THAT QUITE CONSISTENTLY --
WE'VE HAD --
ONE VOICE OF OPPOSITION WHICH
WILL COME UP --
SURELY I'M --
WE'VE HAD --
NO DOUBT A VERY CONSTRUCTIVE --
DIALOGUE --
THROUGHOUT TO WIN THAT.
EXACTLY WHERE --
THE ME ONE IS TO BE RIGHT NOW
BUT WE'RE WORKING TO THE BEST OF
MY ABILITY TO GET THERE.
UP SCA TWENTY THREE A WE BELIEVE
MAKES THE MEASURE --
FOR PROP NINETY EIGHT BECAUSE IT
GIVES US THE IRONCLAD A
CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES THAT
THERE'S NO HARM TO TO NINETY
EIGHT THAT IS NOT OF THE GOAL
AND WITH ANY POTENTIAL
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE THAT'S
WHY WE'RE MOVING AS CA --
TWENTY THREE TO MAKE SURE THAT
ALL PROP NINETY EIGHT AND IT WAS
ARGUED YESTERDAY I THINK
RIGHTFULLY SO THAT.
A NINETY IT SHOULD NEVER BE A A
A CEILING BUT RATHER --
BE VIEWED.
AS AS OF FLOOR SO OBVIOUSLY --
AS AS YOU MOVE ON FORD WITH
EUROPE --
YOUR COURAGE AS A STATE SENATE
REPRESSING YOUR CONSTITUENTS.
OF YOU'LL HAVE PLENTY OF
OPPORTUNITY TO ADD TO MAKE SURE
THAT IT'S NOT OF A CAP BUT IN
FACT.
OF FOR SO WITH THAT --
MISTER CHAIR --
STAFF MEMBERS.
BASICALLY ES WHENEVER.
THANK YOU HAVE DO WE HAVE ANY
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT TODAY
[inaudible]
SUPPORT [inaudible]
SEEM.
SEEING NONE --
THOSE IN OPPOSITION.
GOOD MORNING GOOD MORNING
JENNIFER BAKER WITH THE
CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
RIGHT APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY
TO BE ABLE TO SHARE PERSPECTIVE
ON THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
AND WHILE WE DO AGREE WITH THE
OVERALL PHILOSOPHY OF OF WEIGHT
AND CENTER DELEON IS TRYING TO
ACHIEVE --
TO TRY TO TACT NOT CALIFORNIA
TAXPAYERS ON FROM WHAT'S BEEN
HAPPENING WITH THE FEDERAL
ADMINISTRATION --
WE WANT TO ENSURE THAT THE
FUTURE TAXPAYERS OF CALIFORNIA
DON'T PAY AND PRICE ODDS FOR ANY
CHANGES THAT ARE MADE SO --
IN THE LETTER THAT WE SENT --
WE DID HAVE TO NOTE THAT IN
AREAS WHERE WE DISAGREE WITH NOT
ONLY A C. TWENTY THREE BUT ALS
AS BE TO TWENTY SEVEN BECAUSE
THEY ON HAVE BEEN.
JOINT WHICH WE DO APPRECIATE THE
FACT JOINT BY THE A THERE ARE
FUND SOME FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS
THAT -- WE
STILL DO DISAGREE WITH WE THINK
THAT THIS MIGHT BE AN ISSUE
WHERE WE AGREED TO DISAGREE AND
WE APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT THE
CENTER AND HIS STAFF HAVE BEEN
TRYING TO WORK IS COLLABORATIVE
BELIEVE.
CORRECT COLLABORATIVELY IT'S
POSSIBLE I STILL HAVEN'T HAD
ENOUGH COFFEE AT THIS MORNING --
BIT AT WE DON'T THINK THAT THERE
MIGHT BE AN ALTERNATE PATH
FORWARD THAT WOULD NOT DO LONG
TERM HARM TO PROP NINETY EIGHT
IN CALIFORNIA STUDENTS HOT ONE
IN THE ASPECTS THAT HAS NOT BEEN
DISCUSSED --
AS MUCH BUT DOES NEED TO BE
NOTED IS THE ANTICIPATED --
PUSH BACK FROM THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT IF THIS WERE TO PASS
AND WHAT WOULD BE DOT PASSED
FORWARD BY SOMETHING WERE TO
HAPPEN AND THIS WOULD BE STRUCK
DOWN OR IT WOULD NOT HAPPEN IN
THE ULTIMATE WEIGHT THAT IT WAS
INTENDED.
TO WHAT WOULD BE THE ULTIMATE
IMPACT TO CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS IN
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FUNDING SO WE
DO NOT WE DO BELIEVE THAT NOT
ALL THEY SCENARIOS HAVE BEEN
TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WE JUST
WANNA MAKE SURE AT THE END OF
THE DAY.
THAT PROP NINETY EIGHT AND OUR
KIDS EDUCATIONAL FUNDING IT'S
NOT GOING TO SUFFER AND SO WE DO
OPPOSE THE MEASURE.
ANTI WE ENCOURAGE YOU KNOW VOTE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH ANY OTHERS
IN OPPOSITION.
SEEING --
NINE THE BACK TO THE GUYS I JUST.
WHILE WE'RE HERE.
YOU GUYS WENT THROUGH SOME OF
THE DEAL POINTS YESTERDAY AND IT
SOUNDED LIKE YOU.
KNOCKED OFF A FEW ON THE LIST
BUT THEN THERE ARE FEW
OUTSTANDING CAN YOU BRIEFLY JUST
SUMMARIZE FOR US SORT OF
PROGRESS MADE.
YESTERDAY BECAUSE WE'RE GONNA BE
ADOPT THEIR THEY'RE GOING TO BE
THIS BILL MOVES THROUGH TODAY
THERE'LL BE AMENDMENTS.
ADOPTED IN APPROPRIATIONS I
BELIEVE.
I THINK SO
.
I HAVE A SEAT [inaudible]
OKAY.
SO WHAT STILL OF STANDING UP ON
THE FIRST ISSUE IS FAILING TO
RECONCILE SP TWO TWENTY SEVENTHS
TAX YEAR BASIS WOULD PROP NINETY
EIGHT FISCAL YEAR BASIS SO THEY
ARE PRIMARY AYE I SHOULD NOTE
THAT THEY ARE PRIMARILY.
APPLICABLE TO S. B. --
TWO TWENTY SEVEN ADDITIONALLY
FAILURE TO CONSTITUTIONAL
PROTECT SCHOOLS RIGHT TO
SUPPLEMENTAL.
SUB ACCOUNT FUNDS AND THEN THE
OVERALL ASPECT THAT I DIDN'T
MENTION IS THE FAILURE TO
PROVIDE FOR WHAT HAPPENS IN THE
AIR AYE EVENT THAT THE IRS
CHALLENGES THE POLICY.
AYE IN HEIGHT SO THAT WOULD
OBVIOUSLY BE APPLICABLE TO SCA
TWENTY THREE AS WELL AND WE DO
APPRECIATE THAT TWO OF THE FIVE
HAVE BEEN ANDROS AND FORTUNATELY
FOR US EACH ONE OF THESE ASPECTS
IS IS A LINE ON THE SAN SO
UNLESS THEY WERE.
ALL ADDRESS WHICH WE DON'T KNOW
IF THERE'S A PATH FORWARD TO DO
THAT -- WE
WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THE
MEASURES.
SENATOR DO YOU MIND JUST
RESPONDING IN TERMS OF THE THIS
ISSUE OF IT IRIS GUIDANCE.
DO INDULGES SO.
PLAY THAT SCENARIO OUT FOR US
AND I I WOULD ASSUME THEY'RE
GOING TO COME FOR US IN SOME WAY --
THIS THAT THAT'S AND SO IT'S A
BIG QUESTION --
DE IT'S IT'S A LITTLE DIFFICULT --
TO ACKERLEY ASCERTAIN JOURNAL
REVENUE SERVICE WILL ACTUALLY.
COME AFTER --
THIS MEASURE.
THE IMMEDIATE MORE BLUSTER --
BUT WE DON'T KNOW.
WHICH IS VERY DIFFICULT.
WELL.
THE REASON I SAY THIS IS THAT
WE'VE ALREADY ESTABLISHED A
SINISTER TO CALIFORNIA --
HAVE A MEASURE OF A REMEMBER THE
TOP OF THE NUMBER OF THE TOP OF
MY HEAD THAT'S BEEN COULD FIGHT
INTO LAW.
THAT ALLOWS A TAXPAYERS IN
CALIFORNIA AB TAX CREDIT THAT'S
NOT VALUED AT 85% SUCH AS THIS.
ONE BUT VALUE AT 50% THAT ALLOWS
TAXPAYERS TO CONTRIBUTE.
A A TWO THE ARE ARE CAL GRANTS
PROGRAM.
AND THAT'S A 50% TAX GREAT THAT
IS THE LAW OF THE LAND OF
CALIFORNIA WE WORKED VERY
CLOSELY WITH THE F. T. BE.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD LAWS SO
THAT -- A IS
LAW OF CALIFORNIA ON THEIR OTHER
STATES --
PRIMARILY AT THE TOP OF MY HEAD --
ARIZONA ALABAMA FLORIDA.
THAT HAVE A A VERY SIMILAR TAX
CREDIT SCHEME --
A UNFORTUNATELY --
THIS WHAT WE CAN.
WITHOUT A DOUBT ALL OF US I
THINK AGREED [inaudible]
TO IS.
DOES DOLLARS OF ANY PRIVATE
CITIZEN WHO WISHES A TAX CREDIT
ARE CONTRIBUTED TO A TAXPAYER
FUNDED VOUCHERS.
SECULAR OR SECTARIAN SCHOOL.
SO IN THIS CASE --
THE IRIS WOULD.
IT WOULD BE VERY VERY DIFFICULT
THE THREAD THAT NEEDLE.
SAY WE'RE GOING TO COME AFTER
CALIFORNIA ANDTHIS LAW WHICH
WOULD HAVE LOST AB IS WITH A 50%
TAX CREDIT FOR CAL GRANTS --
AND WE'RE NOT GONNA AND TO
ALABAMA FLORIDA AND ARIZONA.
IN TAXPAYERS INDIVIDUAL
TAXPAYERS THEIR ABILITY TO
CONTRIBUTE A TO THE STATE
RECEIVE A TAX CREDIT.
AND MAKE THAT CONTRIBUTION --
TO A IT PRIVATE.
SECTARIAN A SECULAR SCHOOL OF
THEIR CHOICE ARM [inaudible]
UP.
IT WOULD BE A AN INCREDIBLE
EFFORT OBVIOUSLY AT THE TREASURY
STEVEN KNEW CHEN AND THE WHITE
HOUSE TO GO OUT OF THE WAY TO A
A AGREE JUSTLY DIRECT THAT THE
IRS -- TO
MOVE FORWARD ON THIS
[inaudible]
BUT INTERESTINGLY.
IT'S ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISH NOW
JUST IN CALIFORNIA BUT
THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES IN
THOSE SPECIFIC STATES THAT I
JUST MENTIONED.
OF WHAT THE IRS HAS NOT TOUCH
THEM AT ALL ITS DIRECTION TO GO
OUT OF THE WAY TO DO THIS.
IT WOULD BE.
PLEASE DOUBLE VALIDATION THAT
THERE HAVE POLITICIZED THE IRIS
NOT IRIS NOW HAS POLITICIZED
THIS PROCESS.
THROUGH A DIRECTION FOR THE
WHITE HOUSE TO COME AFTER
CALIFORNIA.
WE ARE HERE ORIGINALLY FOR THE
FOLLOWING THESE.
DURING THE GOP TAX SCALE IN
DECEMBER.
WHAT MITCH MCCONNELL PAUL RYAN
AND THIS PRESIDENT OBVIOUSLY --
THE PRESENT I TRIED ON NUMEROUS
OCCASIONS TO MOVE FORWARD HIS
AGENDA WAS UNSUCCESSFUL THEY
NEEDED OF SOME POLITICAL WHEN.
AND AS A RESULT THERE WERE GET
TO SECURE ONE THE SECURED ONE
FINALLY IN DECEMBER LATE
DECEMBER RUSHING UP THIS MEASURE --
IT'S VERY SIMILAR [inaudible]
TO WHAT.
WE HAVE WITNESSED SO FAR WITH
REGARDS ATTEMPTS TO EAVIS RATE
THE CLEAN AIR ACT.
THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT --
THE CLEAN WATER ACT UMD
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AS WE
KNOW ONE OF YOUR MEASURES THAT
HAVE PASSED WHICH WAS.
A PROACTIVE PREEMPTIVE STRIKE
ATTEMPT TO ENSHRINED FEDERAL
LAWS IN THIS CASE OF FEDERAL
PROPERTIES OU KNOW --
SENATE BILL --
FORTY NINE JUST --
LATELY LAST WEEK --
THE ATTEMPT TO UNDO TO
CALIFORNIA FUEL EFFICIENCY
STANDARDS THAT OUR NATIONAL
[inaudible]
SCOPE.
THAT THE PRESIDENT OF BARACK
OBAMA THEN IN TWO THOUSAND
ELEVEN NATIONALIZE.
THEN WITH YOUR FORMER --
BOSS YOU KNOW THEN SENATOR
FRIEND PALPABLY.
UP THE SANCTUARY STATE MEASURE --
WITH WITH LITIGATION A AGAINST
YOU AGAINST IT A CALIFORNIA
WHERE AS AS YOU KNOW ONE KNOWS
WHICH RECENTLY WON THE THE PAGE
LEGAL --
MEMO FROM A U. S. FEDERAL JUDGE
THAT ARE LAWS IN FACT
CONSTITUTIONAL THE LAW OF THE
LAND OF CALIFORNIA SO THIS SORT
OF KINDA LIKE.
WHETHER IT'S IMMIGRANTS WITH ITS
THE AIR WE BREATHE WITH FEDERAL
LANDS WITH ITS WITH FUEL
EFFICIENCY STANDARDS WITH ITS
CLIMATE CHANGE WITH ITS
CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS.
THESE ARE THIS THE CONCERTED
EFFORT TO COME AFTER CALIFORNIA
AND EVERY WHICH WAY IMAGINABLE
SO THIS IS THE LARGER PICTURE
AND THIS IS OBVIOUSLY THE
ATTEMPT.
THE GOING TO THE THE THAT THAT
THAT THAT THE RITUAL QUESTION
WITH REGARD TO THE IRS.
AND IT'S HARD FOR ME TO TO SORT
OF ASCERTAIN I WOULDN'T BE
SHOCKED AND SURPRISED IF THE
POLITICIZE ARIS.
AN ATTEMPTED TO UNDO THIS IF
AFFECTED DO SO THEN THE WE MET
IN A COURT OF LAW THROUGH
LITIGATION AND TO DATE.
ARM QUITE FRANKLY I LIKE OUR
TRACK RECORD AND THE LIKE OUR
ODDS AGAINST THIS ADMINISTRATION
WHEN IT COMES TO A FEDERAL JUDGE
[inaudible]
THANK YOU.
WELCOME WE STILL DON'T HAVE A
QUORUM.
THANK YOU SENATOR GO QUARREL
WITH US IN A LIVE WE NEED ONE
MORE.
WE'LL BLAME ALAN WE'RE GOING
ALLEN ARE HERTZBERG.
IF ANY OF ON THE ONE YEAH JUST
COMING IN EXACTLY DON'T KNOW WHY --
CERTAIN SURE YES IT [inaudible]
PLEASE [inaudible]
THE AUDIENCE WE HAVE --
ANOTHER PRETEND WE HAVE THE
FIRST LADY [inaudible]
OF THE COUNTY OF KAWAIHAE.
IN THE ISLAND THOUGH WHAT WE JOY --
KOCHI --
WHO'S WITH US HERE TODAY.
AT JOY AND WE HAVE HEARD THE
SIGNIFICANT OTHER WHO ACTUALLY
YOU KNOW JUST A YOU KNOW A BOMB
TO RIDE IN ON THE PLANE THE
COMMITTEE CALIFORNIA.
WE HAVE THE PRESIDENT --
PRO TEM OF THE LEADER OF THE
WHOLE Y. IN A STATE SENATE OF
THE HONORABLE SENATOR AROUND
COACHES SAY IS ONE OF THE
WELCOME WE'RE HONORED TO HAVE
YOU HERE TODAY.
AND THANK YOU FOR BRINGING YOUR
LESSER HALF HERE.
COUNTIES.
WE YEAH WE GO MOST LABOR MISTER
YEAH DID WE HAVE ANY OTHER
QUESTIONS FROM THE DIZER.
AND WHILE WE'RE WAITING FOR A
QUORUM FROM CT A ANY FURTHER
COMMENTS IN TERMS OF THIS
CONSEQUENCE I MEAN.
HOW DO YOU JUST FROM A TECHNICAL
PERSPECTIVE HOW DO YOU SEE IT
ACTUALLY PLAYING OUT IF --
IF THERE IS A RULING OTHERWISE
THINGS CENTERS IT WILL HAVE TO
MEET THEM IN COURT.
BUT IF YOU LOOK AT IT PRECEDENT
ON THIS KIND OF ISSUE I MEAN I
KNOW THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY YOUR
SOLE CONCERN HERE BUT ARE THERE
ANY OTHERS.
AMONG THIS LIST OF THREE LEFT
THAT YOU FEEL LIKE THERE'S
DAYLIGHT ON THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY.
WORK THROUGH HERE I KNOW THERE
WERE.
YEAH WELL IF IT IF I COULD KNOW
NAY APPRECIATE US CENTERS
REFERENCE --
TO CURRENT LAW IN REGARD TO TAX
CREDITS FOR CAL GRANTS I DID
WANT TO NOTE THAT WE'VE ALSO
OPPOSE PROVIDING TAX CREDITS AS
WELL BECAUSE EVERY TIME YOU'RE
PASSING TAX CREDITS THAT'S LESS
REVENUE THAT GOES INTO PROP
NINETY EIGHT SO WE HAVE HAD.
AYE I WOULD CALL THEM
PHILOSOPHICAL FISCAL DIFFERENCES --
pON WHAT --
WHAT THE LEGISLATURE BELIEVES
WHAT'S BEST FOR THE FISCAL STATE
OF CALIFORNIA WE LOOK AT IT IN
THE MICROCOSM OF EDUCATION AND
SO THROUGH THE OUTLANDS WE TRY
TO ANTICIPATE ANYTHING THAT
MIGHT BE A LONG TERM SYSTEMIC
FISCAL THREAT? TO THE STATE OF
EDUCATION IN SO THIS IS WHY
WE'VE ALSO OFTEN HAD TO HAD
COMPLICATED DISCUSSIONS ON THIS
AND THEN AND SOON GONNA HAVE
ANOTHER KANT'S LA COMPLICATED
DISCUSSION ON OUR ASSEMBLYMEMBER
BURKESVILLE --
ACROSS THE HALL --
WEED OUT THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE
OUR BIGGEST --
EXPERTISE WITH THE IRS BUT WE WE
ARE ENCOURAGED BY OUR STATE'S
TRACK RECORD ON WHAT HAS BEEN
HAPPENING THAT AS YOU ALL KNOW
WE LIVE IN A VERY CHAOTIC STATE
OF POLITICAL AFFAIRS.
AND SO WHILE YOU CAN BE
SUCCESSFUL IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT
THEY'RE STILL COULDN'T BE HARM
OR LONG TERM DAMAGE DONE WE WANT
TO ENSURE THAT IF THERE IS HARM
IT'S NOT OUR CHILDREN'S.
FISCAL SECURITY WHEN IT COMES TO
MAINTAINING AN EDUCATION BECAUSE
WORK JUST NOW GETTING TO A POINT
EVEN WITH THIS YEAR'S BUDGET
WHICH I HAVE TO SAY THANK YOU
VERY MUCH WE'RE VERY
APPRECIATIVE. FOR WHAT HAS
HAPPENED IN THIS YEAR'S BUDGET
STILL IN THE MID FORTIES WHEN IT
COMES TO OVERALL FUNDING AND SO
ANY LITTLE SHIP.
THAT SLOW WE WINDOWS THAT AWAY
WOULD ALSO WAY OF LONG TERM
OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENTS TO BE
ACADEMICALLY SUCCESSFUL SO
THAT'S THE NUANCE IN WHICH WE
APPROACH ALL OF THESE ISSUES.
SO WE DO APPRECIATE THEIR
MONUMENTAL TASKS THAT YOU AND
CENTER DELEON DO YOU HAVE TO TRY
TO LOOK AT SOME OF THE MORE
MACRO ISSUES --
IT STILL DOESN'T MEAN THAT --
WERE ALL GOING T BE ABLE TO
AGREE WHEN IT COMES TO SOME OF
THE MICRO ISSUES THIS IS WHAT WE
BELIEVE ARE ONE OF THOSE ISSUES
WHERE WE MAY HAVE TO FUNDAMENTAL
LEAD DISAGREE.
EVEN THOUGH WE APPRECIATE AND
UNDERSTAND THE APPROACH IT JUST
MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT WE MIGHT
BE NOT BE ABLE TO WRAP HER HANDS
RUN AT THE END OF THE DAY.
THANK YOU --
WE DO HAVE A QUORUM NOW SO I'D
LET'S ESTABLISH THAT. FIFTY
WOULD YOU MIND CALL THE ROLL
STERN.
YOUR STERN HERE ANDERSON ALLEN.
ALLEN HERE HERTZBERG LEYVA
[inaudible]
LEYVA HERE.
MEMBERS DID YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN
AND YOU ALL HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM THE DIES WE WE'VE
WE'VE GONE THROUGH OPENING IN
OPPOSITION --
AND I HAD THAT OPPORTUNITY TO
HEAR THE YEAH YESTERDAY AND YOU
KNOW WE WERE ALL TOGETHER AND
IT'S AND IT'S THE IT'S MY
OPINION THAT THE THAT --
THIS SCA IS.
MOVING ASSN IMPORTANT ERECTION
TOWARD PROTECTING EDUCATION
FUNDING --
WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT THE
PRETEND AND MANY OF US ARE
TRYING TO DO WHICH IS.
TO MITIGATE THE REALLY A
PUNITIVE IMPACTS THE PETTY
IMPACT OF THE FEDERAL TAX LAW ON
CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS AND SO I I
CERTAINLY.
HAVE A GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIP
GOING TO CONTINUE TO WORK OUT
AND DIFFERENCES TO MAKE SURE
THAT WE CAN PROTECT.
CAPITAL FUNDING.
I THAT'S A PRIORITY FOR
EVERYBODY INVOLVED BY THE TIME I
THINK THIS IS AN IMPORTANT STEP
TOWARDS FACILITATING THE PASSAGE
IMPLEMENTATION OF OF SP TWO TWO
SEVEN SUCCESSFULLY WE DON'T KNOW
WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN THE FEDERAL
LEVEL BUT I DO KNOW THAT WE DO
WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH THE
NUMBER.
OF LAW PROFESSORS. TO ENSURE
THAT THE THAT THE LAWS WRITTEN
IN SUCH A WAY THAT IF THE IRS
DOES WANT THROUGHOUT.
OUR OUR IDEA THEY WERE THAT
WOULD THEN IMPLICATE A WHOLE
SLEW OF VERY POPULAR.
TAX REBATES AND CREDITS FROM ALL
OVER THE COUNTRY AND SO I
WITHOUT I'M UNTIL YOU SUPPORT
THIS ITEM MOVE WHEN APPROPRIATE.
AND WE CAN ENTERED TAIN EMOTION --
SO [inaudible]
ALL.
HAS YOUR CLOTHES EXCEPT THAT IS
IN MOTION.
THERE LEYVA ANY COMMENTS WE
PROCEED HERE OKAY.
MOTION FROM CENTER ALLEN IS --
BE ADOPTED AND REFERRED TO
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE --
CLOSES BEEN ACCEPTED.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
STERN AYE STERN AYE ANDERSON.
ALLEN AYE ALLEN AYE HERTZBERG
LEYVA.
ALRIGHT VERY GOOD HOW WE WILL BE
THE MEASURE ON CALL THANKS SO
MUCH FOR YOUR INDULGENCE THANK
WRITTEN.
RTL AT UNISOM.
YOU MAKE THAT HARD TO CONVINCE
[inaudible]
YEAH YEAH [inaudible]
BOB [inaudible]
AMERICAN [inaudible]
SENATOR [inaudible]
THIS IS
--
WE WILL OPEN THE ROLES TERRY
PLEASE CALL THE ABSENT MEMBERS.
OUR MOTION IS BE ADOPTED A REFER
TO SENATE APPROPRIATIONS
COMMITTEE CRIME VOTE IS TO AYE
IS KNOWN KNOWS WITH THE CHAIR
VOTING I AM.
HERTZBERG BOB HERTZBERG AYE.
RIGHT WE HAVE --
THREE TO NOTHING THANK YOU --
AND WITH THAT WE WILL ADJOURN