ELIGIBLE FOR IT TO PASS MOTION.
CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYBODY WHO
GOT TO DO PASSED TODAY.
THE REMAINING BILLS ARE
SUSPENSE ITEMS.
AS A AS A REMINDER WE WILL.
.
KEEP OUR TESTIMONY TO THE FISCAL
ASPECTS BECAUSE WE HAVE. SEVEN A
BILLS.
IF SARS COULD PLEASE CALL THE
ABSENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS I AND
IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE.
A QUORUM WILL JUST WITH A COUPLE
MINUTES BOOK.
BEFORE WE ESTABLISH KERN WHEN WE
HAVE SENATOR LEYVA COME FORWARD.
SHE COULD PREPARE SINNER LEVI
HAS.
DO PASS ITEM MEMBERS THAT IS.
SP TWELVE EIGHTY EIGHT.
.
BUT WE HAVE SECRETARY AS SALAS A
QUORUM FOR THE COMMITTEE
SECRETARY PLEASE.
CALL THE ROLL. FLORA HERE FLORA
HERE BATES BELL. BRADFORD
BRADFORD HERE HILL.
HILL HERE NIELSEN NIELSEN HERE
WIENER.
THE. WINNER HERE.
IT CERTAINLY RELATES TO YOUR TO
PASS FIRST AND THEN WE'LL GO TO
YOUR TEN SEMI TOOLS OKAY BIGOT
YET AFFECT PROPOSERS.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIR GOOD
MORNING MEMBERS I WOULD LIKE TO
BEGIN BY NOTING THAT I'M WAVING
PRESENTATION ON S. B. TENS OF
A TWO AND ELEVEN FIFTY SIX.
AND THINK THE APPROPRIATIONS
STAFF FOR THEIR HARD WORK ON ALL
OF MY BILLS MUCH APPRECIATED.
S. B. TWELVE EIGHTY EIGHT
EMPOWERS THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH CDP
AGE TO ENSURE PATIENT SAFETY BY
ENFORCING NURSE TO PATIENT
RATIOS. AND FINING HOSPITALS AND
THAT REPEATEDLY BREAK THE
STANDARDS DESPITE MANDATED AND
LONGSTANDING NURSE PATIENT
RATIOS.
SPITTLE CONTINUE TO VIOLATE
THESE VITAL REQUIREMENTS
FROM TWO THOUSAND EIGHT TO TWO
THOUSAND SEVENTEEN THERE WERE A
TOTAL OF SIX HUNDRED AND THIRTY
TWO ALLEGATIONS MADE
SPECIFICALLY IN REGARDS TO OUT
OF RATIO DEFICIENCIES. REPORTED
TO THE CDP EACH AND TWO THOUSAND
SEVENTEEN ASCII YOU WANT TO ONE
ARE AND A UNION WHICH REPRESENTS
NURSES AT TWENTY SIX PRIVATE
HOSPITALS. COMPILED TWO HUNDRED
AND SEVENTEEN NURSE GENERATED
COMPLAINT FORMS CALLED
ASSIGNMENT DESPITE OBJECTION
BDO'S.
THESE FORMS DETAILED INSTANCES
WHERE NURSES VOICE THEIR
CONCERNS THAT THEIR ASSIGNMENTS
EXCEEDED AND VIOLATED NURSERY
SURE REQUIREMENTS AND PUT
PATIENTS AT RISK.
S. B. TWELVE EIGHTY EIGHT WOULD
ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM BY
REQUIRING THAT DEPARTMENTS
CONDUCT UNANNOUNCED VISITS TO
HOSPITALS TO INSPECT FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH NURSE STAFFING
RATIOS.
THIS MEASURE WHAT OUGHT MEASURE
WHAT ALSO EMPOWER THE DEPARTMENT
TO TRULY ENFORCED NURSE STAFFING
RATIOS WITH FINES IN CASES WHERE
STAFFING RATIOS ARE VIOLATED. SB
TWELVE EIGHTY EIGHT IS VITALLY
IMPORTANT SO THAT CALIFORNIA
WEEK IN CALIFORNIA WE CAN
CONTINUE TO PROTECT PATIENT
HEALTH SAFETY. HERE IN SUPPORT
AND FOR TECHNICAL QUESTIONS IS
MARK FUHRMAN DOES NOT FROM SEIU
STATES COUNCIL THINKING MYSTERY
TO WIN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
BUT THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
WELL THIS ISN'T SUPPORT I GROUPS
GET TOGETHER PEOPLE.
OVERALL. FLOCKS CALIFORNIA LABOR
FEDERATION IN SUPPORT THE CARE.
WELL THIS IS IN OPPOSITION HALF
NOT DISCOUNT THE CALIFORNIA
HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION WOULD HAVE
CONCERNS ABOUT THE DUPLICATIVE
NATURE OF THE BILL AS WELL AS.
THAT.
.
ABILITY TO OVERRIDE THE CURRENT
PENALTY PROCESS WHICH USES PANEL
TERRACE HOUSES PENALTIES BASED
ON PATIENT HARM SO FOR THOSE
REASONS WERE AND REMAIN IN
OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU. ADDITIONAL WITNESSES
IN OPPOSITION. FINANCE IT
MORNING MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS
JULIAN ADAIR WITH THE DEPARTMENT
OF FINANCE I HAVE NO FILE ON
THIS MEASURE.
THANK YOU COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
FROM COMMITTEE.
SING NOW AND THIS DOES ENJOY A
DO PASS RECOMMENDATION.
THANK YOU SIRHELL THERE'S A TO
PASS A MOTION BY SENATOR HEALTH.
CENTER LEYVA WOULD YOU LIKE TO
CLOSE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR NIGHT
VOTE PICK YOU SENATOR PLEASE
CALL THE ROLL. LARA.
I LARA AYE BATES. BATES NOBEL.
BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL. HILL AYE
NIELSEN.
NIELSEN NO WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
WE ARE FOR TO TO.
CENTER LIBERAL WILL OUR LEAVE
THEM OPEN TO A LOT OF SIMILAR TO
AND I THINK YOU MISTER CHAIR
THANK YOU MEMBERS THEY KILL.
BECAUSE HE SENATOR STONE TO
STONE PLEASE COME FORWARD.
GOOD MORNING ON A WHEELCHAIR AND
FELLOW MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE
ON PRESENTING SP TWELVE FIFTY
FOUR WHICH REQUIRE A PHARMACIST
TO THE HOSPITAL PHARMACY TO
OBTAIN AN ACCURATE MEDICATION
PROFILE FOR EACH HIGH RISK
PATIENT. UPON ADMISSION FOR THAT
RESPECT A PATIENT. IT STARTLING
THAT UP TO SEVENTY PERCENT OF
PATIENTS HAVE AIRS ON THEIR
MEDICATION LISTS UPON ADMISSION
TO A HOSPITAL AND UP TO FIFTY
NINE PERCENT OF THESE ERRORS
HAVE A POTENTIAL TO CAUSE
MODERATE TO SEVERE HARM.
THERE'S CURRENTLY A LACK OF
OVERSIGHT FOR ENSURING THAT SUCH
MEDICAL LISTS ARE ACCURATE UPON
HOSPITAL ADMISSION THIS LACK OF
DEFINED RESPONSIBILITY RESULTS
AND ERRORS IN THE LISTS AND
ERRORS AND MEDICATION ORDERS ON
THE PAGES ARE IN THE HOSPITAL.
AND WHEN THEY ARE IN FACT THIS
CHARGE NOT ONLY DOES THIS LEAD
TO SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE
PATIENT BUT STUDIES HAVE SHOWN
THAT THIS PROBLEM ALSO COST
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS DUE TO
MEDICATION RELATED RE ADMISSIONS.
AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS THIS
BILL WILL BETTER ENSURE THE
ACCURACY OF WHAT A PATIENT
MEDICATION PROFILE IS THAT
ADMISSION THEREBY POTENTIALLY
STOPPING ERRORS. WHICH WILL
ENHANCE PATIENT SAFETY AND
REDUCE PHYSICIAN HOSPITALIZED
ABILITY INCLUDING AND AFTER THE
PATIENT DISCHARGE THANK YOU AND
AYE COACH AYE VOTE.
THANK YOU BYE WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS A IN SUPPORT.
THE EMBARRASSED ON BEHALF OF
CALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES
ASSOCIATION AND SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
WEBMAIL THANK YOU SIR BATES IS
DOES ENJOY A DO PASS
RECOMMENDATION TO THE SENATE
FLOOR. SENATOR PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL.
HEALTH CENTER SO WOULD YOU LIKE
TO CLOSE BUCKLEY ASTRONAUT WILL
TAKE CARE.
LARA AYE LARA AYE BATES
BATES AYE BELL. BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL HILL AYE
NIELSEN.
NIELSEN AYE WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
SIX ZERO LEAVE THE ROLE BUT TO
LOWER ABSENT MEMBERS SAT ON TAKE
YOU CENTER STONE.
CENTER WIENER I DON'T SEE ANY
OTHER AUTHOR IF YOU'RE PREPARED.
CENTER WIENER AYE ENJOYS A DO
PASS RECOMMENDATION ON S. B. TEN.
TWENTY ONE.
AND ARE YOU PRESENTING ON S. B.
FOURTEEN SIXTY FOURS OR.
I AM.
AND MISTER CHAIRMAN IF I IT
WILL BE POSSIBLE TO DO THAT ONE
FIRST OKAY YOU'LL.
OKAY SO WE'LL DO FOURTEEN SIXTY
FOUR FIRST.
YOUR SUSPENSE ITEM. WHENEVER
YOU'RE READY.
OKAY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH IT'S
DETERMINE A COLLEAGUES. SP
FOURTEEN SIXTY FOUR. I WILL
INCREASE ACCESS TO ORAL HEALTH
CARE PRETEND TO KILL PATIENTS
WITH SPECIAL NEEDS BY REQUIRING
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE
SERVICES. BUT TO REIMBURSE
STATUS FOR THE EXTRA TIME AND
RESOURCES AYE THEY SPEND ON
THESE PATIENTS BODIES ARE.
INDIVIDUALS WITH.
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ARE
PEOPLE WITH ALZHEIMER'S AND
DEMENTIA BY PEOPLE WHO CAN DIE.
SIT STILL NECESSARILY OR HAVE A
TRADITIONAL SHORT A DENTAL
CLEANING LIKE MANY OF US CAN.
DENTAL CARE IS AN INCREDIBLE
HURDLE AFTER THIS POPULATION AND.
BECAUSE DANTE CAL ONLY
REIMBURSES FOR A TYPICAL
CLEANING THAT YOU OR I MIGHT
HAVE.
AND NOT FOR EXTRA TIMER THE
EXTRA EFFORT REQUIRED ON THESE
INDIVIDUALS TO KNOCKED AT THE
DENTAL CARE THEY NEED.
A STUDY OF FORTY SEVEN HUNDRED
ADULTS WITH INTELLECTUAL AND
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES.
FOUND OUT ABOUT THIRTY TWO POINT
TWO PERCENT OF THIS POPULATION
HAVE UNTREATED CAVITIES.
EIGHTY PERCENT HAVE SEVERE GONE
INFECTION.
AND TEN ALMOST ELEVEN PERCENT
ARE MISSING TEETH.
AND NEARLY FORTY PERCENT OF
THIS POPULATION REQUIRES SOME
FORM OF BEHAVIORAL ASSISTANCE IN
ORDER TO RECEIVE DENTAL DOCTRINE
WHICH IS NOT COVERED BY DENSE
ACCOUNT.
WHILE.
AND WEALTH THAT CALIFORNIA DOES
HAVE DONE TO CAL FEWER THAN HALF
OF CALIFORNIA'S PATIENTS CAN
ACTUALLY FIND A DENTIST ONE TO
TAKE THEM. BECAUSE OF OUR LOW
REIMBURSEMENT RATES AND I
CHALLENGES EVEN MORE DIFFICULT
FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL OR
ARE AYE INTELLECTUAL AYE
DISABILITIES.
.
SO COLLEAGUES I THIS BILL WILL
ENSURE THAT SOME OF THE MOST
VULNERABLE RESIDENTS OF THE
STATE CAN ACTUALLY GET ACCESS TO
DENTAL CARE THEY NEED WHETHER
IT'S EXTRA TIME.
SOME SORT OF SEDATION OR ON
EXTRA PEOPLE WHO ARE INVOLVED.
SO THAT THEY AYE CAN LEAD A
HEALTHY LIVES I RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR AN AYE VOTE.
AND.
MISTER CHAIRMAN WITH ME TODAY.
HAVE.
DJ AND HIS MOTHER.
TANEL CAN WHERE THE.
TO TALK ABOUT.
THERE CHALLENGES IN THE SYSTEM
THANK YOU WITNESSES APART
WELCOME TO YOUR.
YEAH PICK.
I.
.
WE'RE REALLY HERE TO ASK YOU TO
PASS THIS BILL SENATE BILL
FOURTEEN SIXTY FOUR TO HELP
PEOPLE LIKE MY SON AS WELL AS MY
MOTHER IN LAW WHO HAS
ALZHEIMER'S.
AND THAT WE HAVE RECENTLY TAKEN
ON HER CARE DJS TWENTY THREE
YEARS OLD AND HE HAS DOWN
SYNDROME AUTISM AND A HOST OF
MEDICAL CHALLENGES THESE INCLUDE
HEART LUNG AND GASTRIN TEST.
INTESTINAL ISSUES HE'S HAD TO
OPEN HEART SURGERIES WHEN HE HAS
DENTAL CARE HE HAS TO HAVE AN
ANESTHESIOLOGIST THERE TO
MONITOR HIS CARE.
HE CANNOT EAT BEAT BY MOUTHY HAS
A G. TO. AND THIS PUTS HIM AT
RISK FOR MORE PLAQUE ON HIS
TEETH AND FOR INFECTIONS THAT
CAN GO THROUGHOUT HIS BODY.
THAT WOULD CAUSE INFECTIONS TO
HIS HEART AND OTHER ORGANS.
HE HAS DEVELOPMENTAL AND
BEHAVIORAL CHALLENGES AND IS
CONSIDERED NON VERBAL HE CANNOT
TELL US WHEN HE'S IN PAIN. WE
WATCH FOR TIMES WHEN HE TAKES
HIS NOISY TOYS AND HOLDS THEM TO
HIS EARS AND ROCKS CONSTANTLY
ALL DATE TO TELUS HE'S IN PAIN
AND HE NEEDS HELP.
THERE'S NOT ENOUGH PROVIDERS TO
PROVIDE CARE FOR CLIENTS LIKE DJ
OR MY MOTHER IN LAW THERE ARE
NOT ADEQUATE SUPPORTS TO PROVIDE
CARE FOR DJ AND OTHERS LIKE HIM.
AND PATIENTS AND FAMILIES ARE
MADE TO WAIT SOME OF MY FRIENDS
HAVE WAIT HAD HAD TO WAIT MONTHS
AND MONTHS TO GET CARE WHILE
INFECTION AND PAIN RAGED IN
THEIR CHILDREN'S MOUTHS.
IT COSTS MORE WHEN DENTAL CARE
IS NOT PROVIDED IN A TIMELY
MANNER.
THAT PUTS PEOPLE LIKE DJ AT RISK
IT BECAUSE THESE INFECTIONS CAN
DAMAGE HIS INTERNAL ORGANS THIS
BILL WOULD HELP TO ADDRESS THIS
NEED IT WOULD ATTRACT MORE
NEEDED PROVIDERS IT WOULD
DECREASE THE RISKS OF GREATER
COSTS DUE TO UNCHECKED
INFECTIONS. AND POOR MOUTH
HEALTH AND WE CREATE BETTER
ACCESS TO NEEDED DENTAL CARE FOR
PEOPLE LIKE DJ I WOULD
APPRECIATE IF YOU WOULD PASS
THAT THANK YOU.
THANK YOU ADDITIONAL WHEN THIS
ISN'T SUPPORT.
KAT GRAHAM SPENCER PATTED THE
WEST HEALTH INSTITUTE THAT THE
SPONSORS OF THE BILL IN SUPPORT.
THEY IS THAT YOU ADDITIONAL
WITNESSES AND UP AND SUPPORT
WHAT IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE
FILE.
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE.
SAID ANSWER WE'RE WOULD LIKE TO
CLOSE FACT LAST FOR AN AYE VOTE
IF THIS COMES OFF SUSPENSE THANK
YOU THANK YOU WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILL THIS ITEM TO SUSPENSE FILE
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.
LET'S MOVE TO YOUR S. B. TEN
TWENTY ONE.
GRAY I THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
AND.
BALK COLLEAGUES IS BE TEN
TWENTY ONE.
EXTENDS AND EXPANDS UPON THE
CRITICAL CONSUMER PROTECTION
PROVISIONS OF AB THREE THIRTY
NINE. A BILL THAT WAS AUTHORED
BY DENNIS I'M REMEMBER RICH
GORDON. AND THAT WAS SIGNED INTO
LAW IN TWENTY THIRTEEN AND THAT
WILL EXPIRE AT THE END OF NEXT
YEAR. BY THIS BILL MAINTAINS A
TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLAR
COPAY COP PER MONTHS SUPPLY OF A
SINGLE PRESCRIPTION DRUG.
I S. B. TEN TWENTY ONE ALSO
RETAIN STANDARDS GOVERNING WHICH
DRUGS CAN BE PLACED ON WHICH
HERE OF INSURANCE FORMULARY. AND
GUARANTEES THAT ALL OF THE DRUGS
FOR A SINGLE CONDITION SUCH AS
HIV. I CANNOT BE PLACED ON THE
HIGHEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE TIER
OF A FORMULARY.
I WILL NOTE THAT I FIRST.
BECAME AWARE. EXCUSE ME OF THIS
ISSUE BY WHEN I WAS ON THE SAN
FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BY AND THE COVER CALIFORNIA
PLANS HAD AYE ESSENTIALLY PLACED
ALL OR ALMOST ALL HIV DRUGS. ON
THE SO CALLED SPECIAL TO TEAR
AYE AND I STARTED HAVING
CONSTITUENTS COMING TO ME SAYING
I WANT TO HAVE MY HIV MEDS
REFILL THEY TOLD ME I HAD TO PAY.
A THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR A MONTH'S
SUPPLY.
AND I'M GOING TO DIE DOT SO I
BECAME AWARE OF THIS ISSUE. BY
AND SO E. B. THREE THIRTY NINE
UP PUT A TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
DOLLAR CAP LOTS OF THE PEOPLE
DON'T HAVE TO DIE.
AND WE ARE RIDE EXTENDING THAT.
COP ARE TODAY.
DID BILL ALSO MAKES SEVERAL
TARGETED IMPROVEMENTS.
TO THE EXISTING LAW INCLUDING
ADDITION A PREVENTIVE TREATMENTS
TO THE DEFINITION.
OUT OF EACH OF YOU DRUG
COCKTAIL PROP.
I CODIFYING ON AN EXISTING
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGED HEALTHCARE
REGULATION CAPPING A DRUGS DRUGS
CHO PAY AT ITS RETAIL PRICE. AND
LIMITING INSURERS FORMULAR IS TO
ONLY FOR TWO YEARS.
THE RECENT POT SUBURBAN ALICE'S
I SHOWED THAT PASSAGE ABOUT
SPEED TEN TWENTY ONE WILL HAVE
LITTLE TO NO IMPACT ON PREMIUMS.
BUT WILL ENSURE THAT CONSUMERS
LIVES ARE NOT PUT AT RISK BY AYE
DRUG COSTS.
AS WE SAW IN THE PAST.
ADDITIONALLY AS ITS COMMITTEES
ANALYSIS SHOWS OF THE COST TO
STATE WILL BE OBSERVABLE AND
MANY WILL BE ENTIRELY AVOIDABLE.
SHOULD.
THIS BILL BE EXTENDED PAST.
ITS PROPOSED EXPIRATION TOM
AUTHORS AMENDMENTS ARE SIMPLY
CORRECTED DRAFTING ERROR.
TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS
OF THIS BILL DO NOT COVER MEDI
CAL.
PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS
WHICH ARE OF COURSE SUBJECT EVEN
MORE STRINGENT PROTECTIONS AND
THE AMENDMENTS.
WITHOUT THE AMENDMENTS IT IS A
SUSPENSE CANDIDATE WHAT THE
AMENDMENTS IT IS NOT JUST TO BE
CLEAR ON THE ANALYSIS SO YOU ARE
TAKING THE AMENDMENTS YES PINKY
ABSOLUTELY AND THANK YOU MISTER
CHAIRMAN FOR YOUR AND TOOK ME
FOR WORKING WITH US. ON THA.
DRAFTING ARE NOT SO THIS IS AN
IMPORTANT CONSUMER PROTECTION.
AND.
RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR I GO OUT
WITH ME TODAY IN SUPPORT OF THE
BILL ARE MERE IN VALDEZ OF
HEALTH ACCESS AND AARON FOX OF
THE LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER. AQ
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING MR CHEN MEMBERS
MARY VALDEZ WITH HEALTHAXIS
CALIFORNIA WHERE THE SPONSORED
SB TEN TWENTY ONE WHICH CONTAINS
IMPORTANT CONSUMER PROTECTION SO
THAT CONSUMERS AREN'T CAUGHT IN
THE MIDDLE. BETWEEN DRUG
COMPANIES AND HEALTH PLANS AS
THE SENATOR SAID IT EXTENDS THE
SUNSET ON THE EXISTING TWO
HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLAR COPAY CAP.
AND THE EXISTING REQUIREMENT
THAT HEALTH PLANS COVER THE
SINGLE TABLET REGIMEN FOR
TREATMENT OF HIV AND AIDS. IT
ALSO INCLUDES A REQUIREMENT THAT
THE SINGLE TABLET TREATMENT FOR
PREVENTION OF HIV IS COVERED BY
HEALTH PLANS. THIS TREATMENT FOR
PREVENTION WAS NOT AVAILABLE
BEFORE TWENTY FIFTEEN WHEN THE
BILL WAS ENACTED AS THE ANALYSIS
INDICATES I WITH THE AMENDMENTS
TEN TWENTY ONE HAS MINOR COSTS.
AND WE ASK I RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR YOUR SUPPORT. BECKY
ADDITIONAL WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
COMMITTEE MEMBERS AARON FOX THE
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ALSO ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA EACH OF
THE ALLIANCE S. B. TEN TWENTY
ONE FURTHER CODIFIES LONG
ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC BEST
PRACTICES. IN UNIVERSALLY
ACCEPTED STANDARD OF CARE FOR
THE TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF
HIV AIDS WHICH IS A SINGLE
TABLET REGIMEN ONE PILL.
THIS WILL NOT COST THE STATE.
VERY MUCH MONEY IF AT ALL AND WE
BELIEVE THAT OVERALL THIS WILL
SAVE THE STATE DOLLARS AS IT
WILL PREVENT NEW HIV INFECTIONS
IN CALIFORNIA.
SAVING OUR OVERALL HEALTH CARE
SYSTEM DOLLARS.
THE CHARGE THAT WE'RE TRYING TO
PROTECT MARKET SHARE FOR
SPECIFIC PART FOR PHARMACEUTICAL
COMPANY IS AN AFFRONT TO THOSE
LIVING WITH HIV AND THOSE AT
RISK FOR IT. AND WE WOULD LIKE
TO KOW THAT.
FOR THE RECORD FOR THE
COMMUNITY FOR THE COMMITTEE.
THAT WE BELIEVE THAT THIS
CHARGE IS SPECIFICALLY INSULTING
TO ARKHAM.
PIC HERE DISH AWARENESS ISN'T
SUPPORT QUICKLY.
BETH HELEN TO HAVE A FELT
ACCESSED YOUR STEERED ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
DIGITAL WITH THIS ISN'T SUPPORT
THE EMBARRASSED ON BEHALF OF
CALIFORNIA LIFE SCIENCES
ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT.
BETSY IMPOSSIBLY HALF OF
CONSUMERS UNION THE ADVOCACY
DIVISION OF CONSUMER REPORTS AND
SUPPORT.
STEVEN SCHULTZ WITH ARTHRITIS
FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT.
DELORES DURAN FLOORS WITH THE
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT.
RAND MORE NUMBER HAVE THE AIDS
HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT.
TIM EDWARD HARRINGTON THAT
REPRESENT CALIFORNIA
RHEUMATOLOGY ALLIANCE IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIR AND
MEMBERS CRISTINA CARO
REPRESENTING THE CALIFORNIA
CHRONIC CARE COALITION.
THANK YOU ADDITIONAL WITNESSES
AND SUPPORT WHEN THIS IS AN
OPPOSITION PEOPLE FOR.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
TERESA STARK WITH KAISER
PERMANENTE A WE DO HAVE AN
OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED POSITION
ON THIS BILL WE HAVE A CONCERN
WITH ONE PROVISION OF THE BILL
WOULD ERECT. A INAPPROPRIATE
BARRIERS TO USE OF THE GENERIC
EQUIVALENT OF TO BOTTOM WHEN IT
IS AVAILABLE AND THE AUTHOR HAS
COMMITTED TO WORKING WITH US TO
ADDRESS THAT CONCERN WE
UNDERSTAND THAT IS NOT ITS
INTENT. AND WOULD LIKE TO
CONTINUE TO WORK WITH HIM BUT WE
ARE POSTED I THINK.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN BURRS
NICKEL RESULTS ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION HEALTH
PLANS ARE WE ARE TO POSE TO THE
BILL WE DON'T THINK THE AUTHORED
A STAFF OF FOR THE LEVEL OF
CONVERSATION. UPON THIS BILL AS
WELL AS THE SPONSORS.
YOU KNOW IT JUST TO POINT OUT
VIA ANNOUNCES DOES STATE THAT.
THIS DOES MEET THE CRITERIA FOR
THE SUSPENSE FILE WHAT LITTLE WE
KNOW OF THE AMENDMENTS TODAY
WHICH WE JUST GOT THIS MORNING
IS THAT. WE DO NOT APPEAR AT
LEAST AT FIRST GLANCE TO DRESS
OF THE ENTIRE FISCAL IMPACT OF
THE BILL. SO I WE THINK THAT.
IS SOMETHING THAT WE'D LIKE YOU
KNOW TO HAVE SOME FOR THE
CONVERSATIONS ARE EXPLANATION ON
FROM THE AUTHOR IN A STAFF
THANKS.
DAPHNE WATKINS ON BEHALF OF THE
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA LIFE
AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES
WE TO LIKE THINK THE AUTHOR FOR
WORKING WITH US WITH AN OPPOSING
LOS AMENDED BUT HOPE TO WORK. AS
A MEMO START THINKING.
JOHN WINGER ON BEHALF AMERICA'S
HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS ALSO LIKE
TO THANK THE AUTHOR AND SPONSORS
AND LOOK FOR DO FOR THE
CONVERSATIONS.
CLICK HERE.
OKAY JUST TO CLARIFY FROM SOME
OF THE. OPPOSITION OF THE
CONVERSATION ABOUT. THE
ADDITIONAL CLASSES ARE SPECIAL
FUND COST.
THAT WE IDENTIFIED AND THEY DO
NOT MEET OUR THRESHOLD FOR
SUSPENSE JUST TO CLARIFY IN OUR
ANALYSIS.
HOW SO FINANCE?
A FILE.
SENATOR BATES YES OF.
ON THE AMENDMENT THAT ELIMINATES
MEDI CAL THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT
CORRECTLY.
SENATOR WIENER IT'S IT WOULD
NOT WITH THE INTENT TO INCLUDE
MEDI CAL MEDI CAL HAS.
EXCEPTIONALLY STRINGENT COPEI OF
LIMITATIONS.
SO THE BILL IS REALLY ABOUT THE
MEN ON MEDI CAL MARKET.
BUT DOES THAT AFFECT THE QUALITY
OF CARE FOR THOSE WHO ARE MEDI
CAL PATIENTS.
REGARDING THE KIND OF DRUG.
ACTIONS OFFER PHARMACEUTICAL
ACCESS ARE SO IT IT'S REALLY
PEOPLE WHO WERE AND PARTICULARLY
COVER CALIFORNIA BUT THE PRIVATE
MARKER THAT REALLY BEING HARMED
HERE NOT MEDI CAL.
SO LET MEDI CAL WILL BE ABLE TO
pSIR RIGHT NOW JUST TO BE CLEAR
THERE IS TO.
ONE.
DRUG FOR PRE EXPOSURE
PROPHYLAXIS OR PROP.
WHICH IS A ONE TO ONE PILL A
DAY THAT ALMOST ENTIRELY
ELIMINATES THE RISK OF HIV
INFECTION FIVE WITH ONE PILL
DISTILLING ONE MANUFACTURER
RIGHT NOW.
AND MEDI CAL IT'S COVERED IT'S
IT'S COVERED IN GENERAL.
IN WE ANTICIPATE THAT PROBABLY
BY TWENTY TWENTY ONE THERE WILL
BE A GENERIC.
AND WE ALL LOVE GENERIC SOME OF
YOU MAKING SURE THAT WE CAN
REDUCE COSTS TO OUR HEALTH PLANS
ABOUT SO THAT WE CAN HAVE OUR
EXPANDED COVERAGE. ON DE THE
DISPUTE HERE IS A RIGHT NOW I
CHU BOUGHT A WHICH IS THE BRAND
NAME.
IT IS TO DRUGS THAT ARE
COMBINED INTO ONE PILL.
AND I THINK WHAT THE INSURERS
HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR IS THEY
WANT THE ABILITY OUGHT TO SAY
WE'RE GONNA HAVE.
TO KILL.
TWO PILLS INSTEAD OF IT WE HOPE
THAT THERE WILL BE A GENERIC
THAT IS STILL ONE HELL COMBINED.
BUT IF THERE IS NOT BAY ONE
DEBILITY TO FORCE PEOPLE ON TO
THE TO KILL OUR REGIMENT THE
PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THAT.
AND THIS IS GOING I DON'T THINK
THE SPEED OR WHEN YOU GO FROM
SAYING ONE TOLL DAY TO TWO PILLS
A DAY THAT HEARINGS GOES DOWN
AND MORE PEOPLE WILL BECOME
INFECTED WITH HIV.
AND SO WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT
TO STICK WITH THE ONE PILL
REGIMEN THAT'S WHAT THE DISPUTE
DOES.
I HOPE.
THANK YOU MEMBERS ADDITIONAL
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS WILL
COMMIT TERRORIST. COULD COULD
LET US IN.
BONUS TO RESPOND TO THAT TO THAT.
SURE.
IF WE CAN HAVE WHICH IS MAKE
SOME ROOM FOR. THE POOR MISTER
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU MEMBERS THANK YOU
SENATOR NELSON.
I'M I I WANT TO BE CLEAR ACT
KAISER PERMANENTE AND AND
FRANKLY EVERY OTHER HEALTHCARE
SERVICE PLAN COVERS TRUE FATAH.
FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION
RIGHT NOW ACCORDING TO THE
CHURCH PERP SUBURBAN ALICE'S SO
IT'S A HUNDRED PERCENT COVERED.
RIGHT NOW. AND THE LANGUAGE IN
THE BILL THAT WE HAVE CONCERNS
ABOUT.
WOULD REQUIRE US TO ONLY COVER
THE SINGLE TABLET REGIMENT.
UNLESS WE CAN PROVE THAT TAPE TO
TABLET REGIMENT THIS IS JUST TWO
TABLETS ONE TIME PER DAY INSTEAD
OF ONE TABLET.
IS MORE LIKELY TO RESULT IN
ADHERENCE.
THE GENERIC.
GENERIC AVAILABLE BUT THERE MAY
ALSO BE A TWO TABLETS GENERIC
BUT IS AVAILABLE. WHICH WILL BE.
A THOUSAND DOLLARS LESS A MONTH.
WE'D LIKE TO BE ABLE TO OFFER
THAT AS WELL.
OUR INTENT IS TO COVER BOTH IF
ONE OF MY HIV PHYSICIANS HAS A
CONCERN. THAT THERE WOULD BE AN
ADHERENCE ISSUE THEY WILL
PROVIDE THE SINGLE TABLET
REGIMENT WHETHER IT'S THE BRAND
NAME OR THE GENERIC.
BUT WE ALSO WANT TO BE ABLE IN
ADDITION TO OFFER IT TO TABLETS
GENERIC WHEN IT BECOMES
AVAILABLE THAT STATUTORY
LANGUAGE WILL MAKE THAT
IMPOSSIBLE. THAT IS OUR ONLY
CONCERN AND WE UNDERSTOOD
SENATOR WIENER WAS WILLING TO
WORK WITH US ON THAT I'M NOT
SURE IN HEARING THAT TODAY.
WE'RE HAPPY TO HAVE MORE
CONVERSATIONS BUT. USING THE
STATUTE TO ERECT BARRIERS TO A
USE OF A MUCH CHEAPER
ALTERNATIVE THAT BY THE WAY WILL
REDUCE OUT OF POCKET COSTS FOR
CONSUMERS AS WELL.
IT'S NOT JUST HEALTHCARE COSTS
TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INSURERS.
YOU REQUIRING THEM TO HAVE THE
SINGLE TABLET BRAND NAME VERSION.
INCREASES THEIR OUT OF POCKET
COSTS AS WELL.
THANK YOU A BLUE CHAIRPERSON WE
LIVE THANK YOU MISTER IT AND
JUST TO BE CLEAR WE ARE IT IS
NOT OUR INTENT. TO BUY TO
PROHIBIT COVERAGE OF THE TWO
PILLS OUR INTENT IS TO SAY THAT
THE HEALTH PLAN SHOULD NOT BE
ABLE TO FORCE PEOPLE ONTO THE TO
PULL REGIMEN. BY SAYING WE WILL
COVER THE TWO PILL. BUT NOT THE
ONE PILL I'M SO IT WE HAVE I
THINK A DISAGREEMENT OUR ABOUT
THE READING OF THE.
OF THE LANGUAGE OF THE BILL BY
I'M WE'RE COMMITTED TO
CONTINUING TO WORK WITH THE
HEALTH PLANS.
TO IT TO PICK CENTER IS ANY
AMBIGUITY TO RESOLVE THAT ISSUE
WE'RE NOT TRYING TO PREVENT.
PHYSICIANS FROM PRESCRIBING THE
TO BILL AS LONG AS WE'RE NOT
ALONE FORCING PEOPLE ON THE TO
POOR REGIMENT DOTS ARE IN TOWN.
THANK YOU.
THE GIMMICK.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OF COURSE
FROM COMMITTEE SEEN. HISTORICAL
HAVING LABORED I THINK I'M GONNA
STAY IN THE OPPOSE COLUMN TODAY
JUST TIED TO ENSURE THAT.
THE CONVERSATION GOES FORWARD HA
I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT
THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUFFERING.
IT'S VERY ARE DEVASTATING
ILLNESS HAVE THE HIGHEST OF CARE
BUT I THINK THAT THE COST ISSUE.
FOR THOSE YOU KNOW COVERED OR
NOT IS SIGNIFICANT SO I THINK
MORE WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE AND
SO TODAY I THINK YOU'RE ON THE
RIGHT TRACK. SENATOR WINNER OF
THAT I THINK YOU NEED TO EXPRESS
SO I MEAN TO BE OPPOSED. WITHOUT
UNLESS AMENDED MAYBE.
BUT SO WANT TO HOPE THAT YOU
CONTINUE TO WORK AND THEN STAY
INVOLVED ENOUGH BECAUSE I THINK
ARE. VERY VERY IMPORTANT TAUGHT
AND WHEN YOU HAVE DRUGS THAT
WILL REALLY ARREST SOMETHING
LIKE THERE'S.
THAT'S PRICELESS LET'S SAY THAT
IN TERMS OF PEOPLE HAVING TO CRY
HAVE A HIGHER COPAY AND MAYBE
FOR GO ON THE TREATMENT THAT
THEY NEED THAT'S.
AND THAT'S A REAL PROBLEM TO
SOME.
THANK YOU THANK YOU.
MEMBERS IS DOES HAVE A TO PASS
AS AMENDED RECOMMENDATION TO TO
SUFFER. THANK YOU SIR BRADFORD
THERE'S A MOTION CENTER WE DON'T
CHECK TO CLOSE BECKWITH'S.
CENTERPIECE KALRA.
FLORA AYE FLORA AYE BATES BATES
NOBEL.
BELL I BRADFORD. BRADFORD AYE
HILL HILL AYE NIELSEN. NIELSEN
NO WIENER AYE. WIENER AYE.
I'VE TO TO PERFECT WEATHER. OF
BY THE TO ALLOW HER.
WILL ALLOW THE WILL KEEP THE
ITEM OPEN TO LIVE TO REVERSE AND
I'M THINKING ABOUT.
AS THE FULL COMMITTEE.
IT TOOK.
OH WAIT WORST.
HOPE.
I. APOLOGIZE FOR THAT
FIVE WHO TO THAT ITEM IS OUR ARE
YOU SORRY YOU COLLEAGUES.
OR.
PROMOTING FINAL PRODUCTION LOOK
AT IT MEMBERS I KNOW WE HAVE
SEVERAL CENTERS WENT ON FILE
ORDER JUST TO BE FAIR. PATENT
CENTER ROTH. HAS TWO ITEMS.
GODDESS FELT SORRY SENATOR DODD.
SENATOR DODD'S RESULT IN THAT
ORDER.
BUT THE NUMBERS LIKE.
IT TOOK A FEW. THAT SENATOR DODD
YOU HAVE S. B. TEN EIGHTY EIGHT
WHICH IS SUSPENSE ITEM FOR FRITO.
START WHENEVER YOU'RE READY YES
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS IN
THE LAST TWO DECADES
CALIFORNIA'S BECOME TOO FAMILIAR
WITH THE WILDLAND FIRES THAT
HAVE SCORCHED HUNDREDS OF
THOUSANDS OF ACRES. AND
DESTROYED HUNDREDS EVEN
THOUSANDS OF HOMES AND
BUSINESSES. THE REASON WHY
COUNTRIES WILDFIRES CAUSED AN
ESTIMATED TEN BILLION DOLLARS IN
PROPERTY DAMAGE.
AND COST OVER FORTY LIVES.
STATE FIRE FIGHTING BECAUSE
COUPLED WITH THE COST RECOVERY.
TOTAL IN THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
WHERE WILD LANDS? ABOUT URBAN
DEVELOPMENT THE SO CALLED
WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE DOWN
DARKWING POWER LINES AND OFTEN
HAVE OFTEN BEEN IDENTIFIED.
THAT'S THE POINT OF WILD FIRE
IGNITION.
S. B. TEN EIGHTY EIGHT WOULD
ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
UTILITIES TO REDUCE THE RISK. OF
IGNITING WILDFIRES BY INVESTING
IN UPGRADES.
TO THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECT
AGAINST DAMAGE FROM OTHER
NATURAL DISASTERS.
NOT WITHSTANDING APPROVING COST
SAVINGS OF AT LEAST THREE TO ONE.
THE CPUC IS NOT ESTABLISHED
ADEQUATE STANDARDS FOR UTILITIES
TO REDUCE THE RISK OF WILDFIRES
CAUSED BY UTILITY EQUIPMENT.
AND TO MAKE YOUR EQUIPMENT MORE
RESILIENT AND RESISTANT TO
DAMAGE FROM MAJOR DISASTER YOU
VETS.
S. B. TEN EIGHTY EIGHT WOULD
REQUIRE THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY
SERVICES BUT WE S.. IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE CPUC CAL
FIRE AND OTHER AGENCIES TO
ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR
UTILITIES TO HARDEN THEIR GRAD.
S. B. TEN EIGHTY EIGHT REQUIRED
UTILITIES THE FILE SAFETY
RELIABILITY RESILIENCE PLANTS
WITH THE CPUC SPECIFY HOW THE
UTILITY WILL MEET THE STANDARDS
SET BY OH YES.
MEMBERS IN A WORLD A DRAMATIC
CLIMATE CHANGE WERE WILDFIRE
THREATENS ALL YOUR LONG AND
WE'RE DEVELOPMENT IS PUSHING
FURTHER INTO THE HINTERLANDS. WE
MUST REQUIRE UTILITIES TO MEET
THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO PRO
ACTIVELY INVEST IN THEIR SYSTEMS
TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBILITY OF
IGNITING ANOTHER DIP DEVASTATING
FIERY VAT. WITHOUT ACTING
PROACTIVELY TO REDUCE THE RISK.
OF UTILITY BECAUSE WILDFIRES
STATE COSTA FIGHT IN RECOVER
FROM DEVASTATING WILDFIRES WILL
CONTINUE TO RAISE. RISE SKEWS ME
A CROWD OUT OTHER STATE BUDGET
PRIORITIES.
LAST NIGHT WE MET WITH BOB
REPRESENTED THE DISTRIBUTED
ENERGY COALITION. AND RESOLVED
THEIR CONCERNS I'M REALLY
PLEASED THAT.
WE ARE ABLE TO DO THAT. AND.
WE WILL TRY TO GET AMENDMENTS
TO THE COMMITTEE BY TWO PM TODAY.
BUT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER I AM
PROMISING THAT THE AGREED UPON
AMENDMENTS WILL MAKE IT TO THE
BILL I RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR AN
AYE VOTE WITH ME HERE TODAY ARE.
REPRESENTS A COALITION FOR
CALIFORNIA TO FUTILELY EMPLOYEES
AND OTHER WITNESSES
BUT THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN REMEMBER SCOTT
WHAT SHOULDN'T BE HALF THE
CALIFORNIA COALITION OF UTILITY
EMPLOYEES.
SPONSOR OF THE BILL WILL KEEP
OUR COMMENTS TO THE FISCAL
NATURE OF THE BILL.
.
THIS BILL IS ABOUT
ACCOUNTABILITY IN ABOUT FORCING
THE TP YOU SEE TO FOCUS MORE.
LASER LIKE ON ITS CORE
RESPONSIBILITY OF SAFETY AND
RELIABILITY.
.
ONE OF THE CRITIQUES WE HAVE OF
THE OF THE COST ESTIMATES FROM
THE CPUC IS WE DON'T BELIEVE
THAT THEY LOOKED AT.
THE SAVINGS IT WILL BE A CRUDE
FROM TAKING THESE ISSUES OF
SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SAFETY
OUT OF THE GENERAL RATE CASES.
AND PUTTING THEM INTO A SEPARATE.
A SEPARATE PROCEEDING WE
BELIEVE THAT THAT'S IT'S A
STATIC ANALYSIS AND THEY DIDN'T
GO IN AND ACTUALLY LOOK AT.
WHAT THE SAVINGS WOULD BE IN
THE GENERAL RATE CASE PROCESS
SOME OF THE OPPONENTS ARE GOING
TO TESTIFY THAT THAT THE BILL?
IS GONNA PUT UPWARD PRESSURE ON
RATES.
AND I WOULD AGREE WITH THEM
SIMILARLY WHEN SENATOR HILL IN
THE LEGISLATURE.
DUG INTO THE SAFETY ISSUES OF
OUR GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. BUT
IT CAUSED A. IDENTIFIED A VERY
GREAT NEED FOR INVESTMENT IN
THAT SYSTEM AND THAT'S WHY WE
HAVE A A SAFE GAS SYSTEM TODAY.
IN SO WEAK AGREE WITH THAT WE
THINK IT'S AN ISSUE OF
PRIORITIES AND WE WOULD URGE AN
AYE VOTE THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SIR WHAT CHARLIE'S
THAT WHEN PEOPLE COME
APPROPRIATELY DRESSED.
NICE TIE.
SO SENATOR WAKES. WORLD BUT SOME
PEOPLE THINK IS THE SENATE.
PASSED THE HIGH.
MISTER SCOTT.
THAT'S RIGHT GO AHEAD.
MISTER CHAIR OF A HUNTER STERN
ON BEHALF IBEW LOCAL TWELVE
FORTY FIVE WE REPRESENT THE
WORKERS AT PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC
AND MANY OTHER UTILITIES IN THE
NORTHERNS CENTRAL CALIFORNIA.
WERE FOCUSED ON THE SAFETY SIDE
OF THIS.
PROPOSAL.
WE ARE MOST CONCERNED WHEN OUR
MEMBERS ARE OUT WORKING AND
WE'RE FIVE AND WHEN THEIR WRISTS
IT RESPONDING AND AND.
DEALING WITH UNSAFE CONDITIONS.
WE DON'T THINK THE FUNDING HAS
BEEN THERE MAKE IT LEVEL OF
ACCOUNTABILITY THAT THE
UTILITIES NEED.
IN THE OVERSIGHT THAT THEY NEED.
TUNE IT IS NOT AVAILABLE
THROUGH GENERATE CASE PROCESS OF
THIS IS BEEN REPEATED OVER AND
OVER AGAIN IN THEM RECENT
RECYCLES OF. WE WANT THIS
PROCESS OUTSIDE IN CLEAR AND
TRANSPARENT AND AT THE SAME TIME
AND ALSO GIVES ACCESS TO PEOPLE
WHO CURRENTLY DO NOT HAVE ACCESS.
TO THE GENERATE CASE
SO WE URGE OF YES VOTE THANK YOU.
THIS AWARENESS IS.
GOOD MORNING RITUAL CASA BEHALF
OF CAT COALITION OF CALIFORNIA
UTILITY EMPLOYEES HERE IN
SUPPORT AND TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS BAKER ADDITIONAL WAS
AT THE PARTY SO YOUR NAME APES.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND OTHER
MEMBERS POLYATOMIC
POLYACRYLAMIDE HALF OF SHUTTER
INTO IN A BG CHUNK CENTER DOES
DISTRICT BOARDS TO RISE IN
CINEMA NAPA COUNTY IT'S FOR THE
BILL THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS CAITLIN
BAKER FOR THE CALIFORNIA LABOR
FEDERATION AND FOR MR DOTS
DISTRICT
I HEAR IN SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS THEO
PAILS FOR BUSINESS AND YOU GAS.
AND ELECTRIC HERE IN STRONG
SUPPORT.
CHRIS CON REPRESENTING SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON AND SUPPORT.
STIR CHAIR CHRIS PATTERSON
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC IN
STRONG SUPPORT.
THANK YOU WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION TO COME FORWARD.
DOCTOR AND IT AND BRAD HAD DRAWN
THE POLICY DIRECTOR OF
CALIFORNIA SOLAR AND STORAGE
ASSOCIATION FORMALLY CALATHEA.
ALSO RESIDENT SANTA ROSA AND I
KNOW DOZENS AND DOZENS OF PEOPLE
WHO LOST EVERYTHING IN THOSE
FIRES. DEAR FRIENDS OF MINE FLAG
MILLEN NIGHT IN RETURN TO ASHES.
I AM DEEPLY OFFENDED THAT THE
UTILITY OF EMPLOYEES COALITION
HAS ATTEMPTED TO USE MY
COMMUNITIES TRAGEDY TO STIFLE
INNOVATION AND MODERNIZATION THE
POWER SECTOR.
THIS BILL AS PRINT IN PRINT THIS
MORNING WOULD UNDERCUT EFFORTS
THE LEGISLATURE SET FOR FIVE
YEARS AGO. WHEN YOU DIRECTED THE
UTILITIES TO CONSIDER LESS
EXPENSIVE DECENTRALIZED
SOLUTIONS TO GRID NEEDS
TO BE INCREDIBLY WASTEFUL OF
PUBLIC RESOURCES IF YOU WERE TO
CUT OFF THAT THOSE EFFORTS.
YOU EFFECTIVELY BE USING DE
REQUIRED IF YOU SEE TO CREATE A
PROCESS THAT NOBODY USES IF THIS
BILL DICTATES A CONTRACT
LANGUAGE.
SO I UNDERSTAND THAT THE
AMENDMENTS ARE COMING FORWARD WE
EXPECT TO GO TO A NEUTRAL
POSITION.
ONCE THOSE.
THOSE AMENDMENTS ARE IMPRINTS
BUT AS IT'S WRITTEN THIS MORNING.
WE.
ARE ARE STILL IN IN OPPOSITION.
AND.
WE DON'T WANT TO CONTINUE
BUILDING MORE EXPENSIVE.
CENTRALIZE INFRASTRUCTURE AS
MUCH AS POSSIBLE WIN WIN A
COMPETITIVE MARKETPLACE FOR GRID
SERVICES IS ABSOLUTELY NEEDED AS
WE HEAD GREATER PENETRATION SO
IMMIGRANT. THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS MY
NAME'S ED SMELL OFF I'M THE US
SENIOR DIRECTOR FOR GREATER
INTEGRATION FOR VOTE SOLAR WE
ARE OPPOSED TO THE BILL AS IT IS
IN PRINT. BUT WE ARE VERY
SUPPORTIVE OF THE AUTHOR'S A
EFFORTS TO TO MEET OUR CONCERNS
AND TO. ANNA INTRODUCE
AMENDMENTS THAT WILL RESOLVE THE
ISSUE ABOUT.
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES IS
PART OF THE SOLUTION FOR
PREVENTING AND MITIGATING.
THESE DEVASTATING WILDFIRES BY
WORKING TOGETHER WITH ELECTRIC
UTILITIES AND WITH THE ELECTRIC
UTILITY EMPLOYEES D. E. R.
PROVIDERS. IN A COMPETITIVE
MARKET CAN OFFER SOLUTIONS THAT
ARE LOWER COSTS AND CAN BAY AND
CAN KEEP. THE COST OF ADDRESSING
THE SOLUTIONS ARE TO A
REASONABLE LEVEL SO WE CONTINUE
TO BE IN OPPOSITION BUT WE LOOK
FORWARD TO REMOVING THAT
OPPOSITION ONCE WE SEE THE
AMENDMENTS AND GRANT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS STILL
MANY HUNTER BEHALF OF SOLAR
ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION WE
UP TO OUR FORMALLY OPPOSED TO
THE BILL IN PRINT. WHEN THANK
SENATOR DODD AND HIS TEAM FOR
WORKING HARD WITH US TO TRY TO.
RESOLVE OUR CONCERNS ALSO AND I
THINK.
SENATOR WIENER AND HIS TEAM FOR
HELPING THOSE EFFORTS
WE LOOK FOR TO REMOVING
OPPOSITION WANT TO SEE IT IN
PRINT.
MISTER KAREN MEMBERS JOHN A
PRICE ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA LEGAL CONSERVATION
VOTERS AN EMAIL OR WORK SOMEONE
ECHO THAT STATEMENTS BEFORE ME.
THANK YOU TO.
SIR DODD AND STAFF FOR WORKING
SO DILIGENTLY WITH THE D. OUR
COALITION OF COURSE.
ADD TO THOSE WHO.
THE PRESSURE ON ARE IN THE DR
PEACEWE ARE REMOVING OUR
OPPOSITION CONTINGENT OFF OF THE
ADOPTION OF THAT LANGUAGE THANK
YOU. DO WE JUSTSO YOU YOU WERE
THANKING EVERYBODY THAT'S GREAT
JUST TELL ME YOUR POSITION AND.
WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. GOOD
MORNING THIS IS BORING TO BORROW
AT EDF WE ARE CURRENTLY IN
OPPOSITION TO THE BILL. TO THE
BILL IN PRINT BUT WILL BE
REMOVING OUR OPPOSITION AS SOON
AS WE SEE IS VERY PROMISING
LANGUAGE ON D. E. R. COME INTO
PRINT.
WE THINK IT'S AN IMPORTANT TOOL
TO HELP FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE AS
EFFORTS HAD SAID THAT HELPS WITH
THE WILD FIRES TO. SO THANK YOU
ARE AND HAVE A GOOD DAY.
GOOD MORNING SENATORS MY NAME IS
MONA ATTORNEY LLOYD I'M HERE ON
BEHALF OF AND ARE NOT WE ARE
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE
PROVIDER OF THE BILL AND FRIENDS
WOULD PREVENT US FROM PROVIDING
RELIABLE SERVICES.
TO BOTH CONSUMERS AND TO THE
GRID THAT ARE MORE COST
EFFECTIVE AND RELIABLE. OF WE
ARE CURRENTLY OPPOSED TO THE
BILL AS IT IT IS IN PRINT BUT WE
LOOK FORWARD TO REMOVING OUR
OPPOSITION WANTS THE AMENDMENTS
ARE. AND.
IN PREP IN PLACE THANK YOU.
HI THERE I RACHEL BIRD WITH
PERREGAUX SOLAR ONE ECHO THE
FOLKS WHO CAME BEFORE ME WE HAVE
STRONG CONCERNS ABOUT THE BILL
IN PRINT BUT ONE I THINK SENATOR
DIED FOR AT THE AMENDMENTS THAT
HAVE BEEN PUT FORWARD AND LOOK
FOR TERM MOVING THAT.
HELLO I ALLEY DE TRIO WITH ANGIE
A WE ARE CURRENTLY OPPOSE THE
BILL AND PRINT TO LOOK FORWARD
TO SEEING THE NEW AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED BY THE SENDER AND THANK
HIM FOR HIS WORK.
GOOD MORNING AMERICA'S TRICHARDT
CAPITAL CITIES SOLAR.
ECHO ALL THE PREVIOUS
OPPOSITION IS PRINTED LOOKING
FOR TO THE AMENDMENTS THANK YOU.
GOOD MORNING I'M COURTNEY KORDA
FROM COURT A SOLAR WE ARE SMALL
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
INSTALLER OF SOLAR SYSTEMS IN
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY.AND AS THE
OTHERS BEFORE ME HAVE SAID
SIMILARLY I'M OPPOSED TO THE
BILL AS IT IS CURRENTLY PRINTED
BUT WILL. SUPPORT IT OUT WHEN
THE AMENDMENTS ARE MADE THAT
WOULD STIFLE INNOVATION BY
COMPANIES LIKE MY OP MINE AND
OTHERS THANK YOU.
HELLO EVEN JIMENEZ WITH. I'M
HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF BRIGHT
LINE DEFENSE AND ALSO A
CALIFORNIA MY MENTAL JUSTICE
ALLIANCE.
AND WE REMAIN OPPOSED TO THE
BILL DUE TO CONCERNS OF THE
IMPACT OF HAVE ON REPAIRS AND
PARTICULARLY. LOW INCOME
CUSTOMERS THANK YOU.
GOOD MORNING BLACK SHEPHERD
REPRESENTING THE SILICON VALLEY
LEADERSHIP GROUP WE ARE POSING
LESS AMENDED AND THAT ABSENT
SEEING IT THE AMENDMENTS AND IT.
HAS FAILED YEARS IDENTIFIED A
SECTION IN THE BILL REGARDING
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES IS
A MAJOR PROBLEM FOR OUR AND
MEMBER COMPANIES AND WE LOOK
FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE
AUTHOR AND SEEN THE AMENDMENTS
THINK IF.
EMILY PAPPAS WITH ME MILLER
PAPPAS ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF
CAL CCAB ASSOCIATIONS OF CCA'S
IN THE STATE. WE'VE WORKED
REALLY CLOSELY WITH THE SENATOR
AND STAFF AND APPRECIATE IT AND
ONE OF OUR TWO CONCERNS HAS BEEN
ADDRESSED WITH THOUGHTS
SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS REGARDING.
THE DOUBLE.
PROCURING FOR RELIABILITY AND
THEN THE END RESULT OF OUR
CUSTOMERS.
PAYNE TWICE SO HOPE WE CAN
CONTINUE TO WORK WITH YOU ON
THAT SECTION THANK YOU.
CATHERINE BRANDENBURGER
PRESENTING CINEMA CLAIM POWER WE
REPRESENT MENDOCINO AND CINEMA
COUNTY RESIDENTS WE ARE ALSO
OPPOSED TO THE BILL WE AND HAVE
SEEN THE AMENDMENT AND WE
APPRECIATE AMENDMENT THAT'S
TAKEN THAT. RESULTS ONE OF OUR
ISSUES THE OTHER ITS RELIABILITY
AND BEING CHARGED TWICE SO THAT
IS A CONCERN AND WE DO NOT WANT
OUR CUSTOMERS TO HAVE TO PAY
DOUBLE THANK YOU.
I'M NOT SURE HERNANDEZ ON BEHALF
OF THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK OR
TURN OUR OPPOSITION IS NOT
ADDRESSED AT ALL BY THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS.
AND OUR OPPOSITION STUPID
WHENEVER AND ALSO HAS SPOKENTHE
FINAL PARAGRAPH IN THE BILL.
CONTINUES TO SHIFT.
LIABILITY AND COSTS TO
RATEPAYERS.
EVEN IF UTILITY ACTED
NEGLIGENTLY. AND BECAUSE IN A
WILDFIRE S'UTILISE WOULD NOT
HAVE TO PAY AS LONG AS A SUBMIT
A PLAN BAR IN SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLIANCE BUT NOT FULL
COMPLIANCE.
WITH THE PLAN THAT THEY SUBMIT.
AS A RESULT RATEPAYERS WILL HAVE
TO PAY FOR IT IN THE ME BE CLEAR
IT IS THE RATE PAYERS WHO ARE
WHO ARE IMPACTED.
BY THE WILDFIRES WILL HAVE TO
PAY. INSTEAD OF THE UTILITIES
SIMPLY BECAUSE THE PLAN WAS
SUBMITTED AND SUBSTANTIALLY BUT
NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH WE LOOK
FORWARD TO GETTING RID OF THAT
LANGUAGE.
I'M GOING FOR HOPEFULLY.
SHARE MEMBERS THE COMMITTEE
MICHAEL TALK CALIFORNIA
MANUFACTURES AND TECHNOLOGY
ASSOCIATION WE REMAIN OPPOSED S.
B. TEN EIGHTY EIGHT. A BECAUSE
OF THE IMPACT IT TO REPAIRS
PARTICULARLY IN THE INDUSTRIAL
SIDE.
HISTORICALLY WE SEEN A SHIFTING
COSTS FROM RESIDENTIAL TO
INDUSTRIAL RATEPAYERS AND SIMPLY
OFFERING A.
I'D SUBJUGATED PROCESS AWAY
FROM THE GENERAL RATE CASE FOR
ALL THREE UTILITIES TO BE DONE
IN A VERY XCELERATED TIMEFRAME.
WE THINK.
IS AN ATTEMPT TO PUT THE
COMMISSION IN ABOUT A POSSIBLE
ADDITION DO YOU BUT POSSIBLY.
REJECTING THOSE PLANS AND THE
COSTS THAN BEING BUILT INTO THE
GENERAL RATE CASE THAT WOULD BE
CONSIDERED AT A LATER TIME.
THE HISTORICAL A TREND IN
ELECTRICITY RATES HAS BEEN TO
JOB RAPIDLY INCREASING ON
INDUSTIAL SIDE WILL HOLDING
RELATIVELY STEADY ON THE
RESIDENTIAL SIDE.
AND THAT CLEARLY. REPRESENTS A
COST SHIFT SO BECAUSE OF THAT
HOW WE'RE OPPOSED TO SB TEN
MEDIA.
MARGOT PART OF THE HALF THE
WESTERN STATES PETROLEUM
ASSOCIATION I WANT TO ECHO THE
COMMENTS MADE BY TURNING THE
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS IN
TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION CONCERNS
OVER. ON THE SHIP TO REPAIRS AND
SO IMPOSSIBLE THINKING.
SHARON VAUGHN CHERYL VON I'M AN
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR SOLAR
RICHMOND WE TRAIN FOLKS IN LOW
INCOME COMMUNITIES AND
COMMUNITIES OF COLOR. ABOUT
ABOUT INSTALLING SOLAR PANELS IN
THIS BILL IN PRINT WOULD
SEVERELY SUPPORT OUR EFFORTS TO
GET FOLKS WORKING
SO WE'RE HOPEFUL THAT THE
AMENDMENTS WILL MAKE A BIG
DIFFERENCE THANK YOU.
GOOD MORNING NO I MEAN THEY ARE
THE WITH SON RUN NETWORK
CURRENTLY OPPOSED TO LANGUAGE IN
PRINT BUT WILL MOVE TO A NEW TO
POSITION WITH THE DE ARMOND.
MET CLUB SCENE ON BEHALF OF THE
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS IN
THE CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE
ENERGY I WE WANT OUR COMMENTS
WITH THE OTHER OUT CLEAN ENERGY
PROVIDERS IN THE QUARTER MOVING
OUR OPPOSITION WHEN THE MINUTES
GO THROUGH. THANK YOU.
THINK AND MEMBERS NIKITA CRIED
WITH THE NATURAL RESOURCES
DEFENSE COUNCIL PREVIOUSLY
OPPOSED TO THE DR LANGUAGE STILL
REVIEWING THE AMENDMENTS AND
HOPE TO REASSESS OUR POSITION
THANK YOU.
KAREN MILLS FOR THE CALIFORNIA
FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
REPRESENTING AGRICULTURAL
RATEPAYERS AND CONCERNS ARE
SIMILAR TO THOSE EXPRESSED BY C.
MTA THANK YOU.
THE OBVIOUS ALICIA BEHALF OF
ADVANCED ENERGY ECONOMY WE ALSO
LOOK FORWARD TO REVIEWING THE D.
ARE RELATED AMENDMENTS ONCE THE
COMMAND TO PRINT OUT WE THINK
THE AUTHOR. VERY MUCH FOR HIS
WORK.
A GROUP BUT CURRENTLY OPPOSED
THINKS.
GOOD MORNING JUST OF HIS ALL
BEHALF OF TECHNO THINKS TO
EVERYBODY SENATOR BASED ON YOUR
COMMENTS WE WILL BE REMOVING
OPPOSITION WITH A PRINT THINK.
GOOD MORNING I AM DAN JACOBSON
WITH THE ENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA
SPEAKING ALL SHOW FOR THREE
FIFTY BAY AREA AND FOR PHOSPHOR
CALIFORNIA CURRENTLY OPPOSE WE
LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THE
AMENDMENTS. TAKING THEM OFF WE
HAVE CONCERNS WITH RATE PAYERS
AS WELL THANK YOU SENATOR.
CENTERS SENATORS ALEX MORRIS
WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY
STORAGE LINES WERE CURRENTLY
OPPOSE BUT WOULD GO TO NEUTRAL
PENDING THE ENTITY OUR LANGUAGE
THING.
TO USE OF THE CALIFORNIA LEAGUE
FREE PRODUCERS REPRESENTING THE
FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY IN
CALIFORNIA IN OPPOSITION TO THE
BILL.
THANK YOU FINANCE.
WHILE NO FILE CENTER DONNA ASAL
ALSO LOOK FOR LOOKING. OUT TO
THOSE AMENDMENTS AS WELL. BUT
SOME HAD ME ON TO THAT LIST.
THINK YOU'RE SEEING THE
COMMITTEE WITH A LOT LONGER THAN
THAT.
WE'VE COME A LONG WAY I'D LIKE
TO THINK AS SENATOR WIENER A
FIRST.
THANK YOU.
CONSEQUENCES FOR COMMITTEE
CENTER WE. THANK.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN AND.
I WANT TO THANK OUR OF THE
AUTHOR FOR WORKING WITH US.
WE ARE.
Y. LAS WE WEEK MADAM HAD DIED
BOATS IDEA.
DE ARE.
REPRESENTATIVES AS WELL AS
OTHER SPONSORS OF THE BILL TO
TALK THROUGH.
SOME OF THE ISSUES AROUND.
DISTRIBUTED ENERGY.
AND.
AYE YOU BEFORE THESE AMENDMENTS.
I WAS.
NOT GOING TO BE SUPPORTIVE.
OF OF THIS BILL I THOUGHT THAT
THE LANGUAGE WAS GOING TO ARE
BADLY DAMAGED.
CALIFORNIA'S MOVE TOWARDS A
CLEAN ENERGY AND DISTRIBUTED.
ENERGY AND SO I WAS VERY VERY
VERY CONCERNED.
AND I'M REALLY THRILLED.
THAT THE.
RESPECTIVE PARTIES AND OUGHT
THERE WERE ABLE TO WORK TOGETHER
AND I COME UP WITH WHAT I THINK
IS.
A GOOD.
RESOLUTION OF THE D. R. ISSUE
AND SO WITH THOSE AMENDMENTS ARE
I WILL BE SUPPORTIVE OF THE BILL.
OF THE DDR ITEMS ON THE SIDE I
THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT DOT
BILL.
IN TERMS OF HARDENING THE
SYSTEM AND I I'M APPRECIATIVE OF
THE AUTHOR BRING IT FORWARD. ON
I DO WANT TO SAY I THINK IT IS.
VERY IMPORTANT FOR THESE
AMENDMENTS TO BE IMPRINT.
IF THE BILL COMES OFF SUSPENSE
ARE ON FRIDAY.
I THINK.
THERE ARE.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE
PUBLIC.
TO SEE THAT THESE ARE FIXTURES
ARE ACTUALLY IN THE BILL WHEN IT
GOES TO THE FLOOR FOR A VOTE
NEXT WEEK AND SO. I AND I I'M
JUST REQUESTING BOTH THE AUTHOR
AND THE COMMITTEE IF WE COULD DO
EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO GET THEM.
AYE INTO PRINT.
DOT SCI AT A VERY IMPORTANT.
THANK YOU.
SENATOR WIENER WE WILL TOUR
PASSENGERS WERE THINKING
EVERYBODY WHEN WE THANK OUR
APPROPRIATIONS STAFF WILL HAVE
TO DEAL WITH PARTY'S AMENDMENTS
THAT WE'RE YET TO SEE.
I.
SO.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
SENATOR NIELSEN.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN AND.
SENATE DIED I HAVE NO QUESTION
THAT THESE AMENDMENTS WILL PROVE.
PROPERLY BE BE INSERTED. BUT
THEY ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR A YES
VOTE FOR ME AND I'VE. GOT A
POLICY THAT DIEBOLD FOR WHAT'S
BEFORE ME HAD SO I WILL BE A NO
VOTE TODAY. BUT WITH CONFIDENCE
THAT THIS WILL GET WORKED OUT
AND WE CAN LOOK AT DIFFERENT ON
THE FLOOR.
BECAUSE.
THIS IS SO MUCH CONFIDENCE.
BECUZ SENATOR DOLE SAID. OF
TURNER DOT WOULD LIKE TO CLOSE.
YEAH I I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE
TO BE ABLE TO WORK WITH SENATOR
WIENER AYE YA IN IN ALL BILLS
ARE MANY BILLS THERE'S.
AND ATTEND A CONSEQUENCES AND
THAT'S WHAT COMMITTEE PROCESS
FOR. I APPRECIATE THAT THE CHAIR
AND I.
AND STAFF AND OTHERS CENTERS
THAT'S GOT THIS BILL TO A TWO
WORD IS TODAY THANK YOU THANK
YOU FIGURE GETS HER DAUGHTER
AGAIN.
AS I TOLD ALL THE MEMBERS
ENOUGH COME BEFORE THAT HAVE
HAVE TO DEAL WITH THESE FIRES
WHEN IT THANK YOU FOR YOUR
LEADERSHIP.
YOU KNOW WE WERE ALL PART OF
YOUR DISTRICT TRYING TO GO
THROUGH THIS TOGETHER SO
APPRECIATE THE WORK YOU'VE DONE
AND NOW. LET YOUR CONSTITUENTS
KNOW THAT WE'RE WORKING HARD TO
MAKE SURE THAT WE GET SOME SORT
OF REPARATIONS FOR THE. TRUMP
TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE THAT THEY
VIRTUALLY HAVE TO LIVE THROUGH.
WITHOUT I WE WILL WITHOUT
OBJECTION TO MOVE THIS ITEM TO
SUSPENSE FILE THINK YOU SIR
ABOUT. THAT HERNANDEZ.
SENATE HERNANDEZ YOU HAVE. ONE
DO PASS ITEM IT HAS BE FOURTEEN
FIFTY SEVEN.
FLOOR IS YOURS FAMOUS SUCH.
ON SHARON'S CONTRIBUTE TO THE
ACCURACY OF NATIONAL DATA. AND
PROMOTE MORE PARTICIPATION RATE
APARTMENT MANAGE HEALTH CARE AT
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS. TO
ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL
REQUIREMENTS THIS BILL IS
MINIMAL BECAUSE YOUR ANALYSIS
INDICATES CROSSES LOW THOUSANDS
FOR D. MHC WORKLOAD THIS BILL
WILL ENSURE THAT THE MHC
PARTICIPATES IN NATIONAL
DISCUSSION AND IN A I SEE AND I
ASK YOUR ABOUT. YOUR MEMBERS.
WHAT IS THE SUPPORT PLEASE COME
FORWARD?
INSURANCE WE HAVE NO OFFICIAL
POSITION ON THE BILL HAVE
REACHED OUT TO BOTH THE AUTHOR
AND SPONSOR ABOUT SOME CONCERNS
ABOUT. THE LANGUAGE IN THE ANY I
SEE PORTION OF THE BILL IN
SECTION ONE LOOK FOR TO CONTINUE
TO WORK WITH THEM ON THOSE
ISSUES THANK YOU.
THANK YOU.
WELL THIS IS AN OPPOSITION
FINANCE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SEEING NONE THIS DOES ENJOY DO
PASS RECOMMENDATION.
WAS A MOTION BY SENATOR HEALTH
CENTER HERNANDEZ WOULD LIKE TO
CLOSE AS FROM HAVE A MIXTURE
THINK CAPTURE PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL. FLORA AYE FLORA AYE BATES
BATES AYE BELL. BELL AYE
BRADFORD.
HILL.
HILL AYE NIELSEN NIELSEN AYE
WIENER.
SIX ZERO BUT A BILL IS I THINK
IT WAS SHARE OF.
WHO'S MISSING BRADFORD.
I DON'T PURSUIT.
.
WHAT WE DO?
BY MY APOLOGIES WERE GONNA LEAVE
THAT ITEM OPEN TO ALLOW OUR
SENATOR PRESSURE TIED ON A
PROJECT I THOUGHT HE WAS.
HERE.
THANK YOU CENTER HERNANDEZ.
CENTER SKINNER.
TAKE.
SKINNER YOU HAVE TWO ITEMS YOU
LIKE TO PRESENT ON TO THE BOAT
SUSPENSE ITEMS ARE TO BEGIN WE
BEGIN WITH S. B. FOURTEEN TWENTY
ONE.
THANKS SO MUCH MISTER CHAIR
MEMBERS. FOURTEEN TWENTY ONE
ALLOWS.
THE PUBLIC TO ACCESS
INVESTIGATION RECORDS RELATED TO
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS USE OF.
WHAT BASICALLY FOR THREE NARROW
ITEMS?
USE O DEADLY FORCE INCLUDING
DISCHARGE OF A FIREARM.
ON THE JOB SEXUAL ASSAULT OR
WORK RELATED DISHONESTY.
AND MEMONS I'VE TAKEN IN.
THE PROBES COMMITTEE.
ONCE IN PRINT WILL ALLOW ARE.
CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
ASSOCIATION TO BECOME NEUTRAL.
AND THOSE AMENDMENTS ELIMINATE
THE HARD DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND
GIVE AGENCIES THE FLEXIBILITY IN
DELAYING THE RELEASE OF
INFORMATION IN ORDER TO PROTECT
AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION ARE
PROCEEDING.
NOW AS.
WE KNOW AGENCIES ACROSS THE
STATE ALREADY ARE IMPACTED BY
THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
ACT
AND THEY ARE READY RESPOND TO
PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS AND I
BRING THIS UP IN TERMS OF THE
COST OF THE BILL. SO GIVING
THESE ADDITIONAL RECORDS PUBLIC
ACCESS IMPOSES NO NEW BURDEN.
DEPARTMENTS ALREADY HANDLE THESE
TYPES OF REQUESTS
S. B. FOURTEEN TWENTY ONE AS I
MENTIONED ADDS.
THREE NERO CATEGORIES OF
RECORDS.
THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER STATUTE
DENIED. AND.
IF WE BROUGHT REMEMBER PROP
FORTY TWO WHICH WAS APPROVED BY
THE VOTERS IN TWENTY FOURTEEN.
IT MADE IMPLEMENTING AND
RESPONDING TO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
A CORE GOVERNMENTAL
RESPONSIBILITY AND ENSURED THAT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE A DUTY TO
PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS ON
REQUEST.
AND ELIMINATED THE DENIAL OF A
P. R. A. BASED SOLELY ON COSTS.
SO THAT'S I AM ADDRESSING THE
OUR COST AT ASPECTS OF THE BILL.
I THINK THE FOURTEEN TWENTY ONE
WOULDGO ALONG WAY TO RESTORING
TRUST BETWEEN OUR LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN OUR
COMMUNITIES. AND I HAVE
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT WITNESSES
IN SUPPORT.
MORNING MISTER CHAIR NIKKI
MARTHA CALIFORNIA NEWS
PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION HERE IN
SUPPORT OF SB FOURTEEN TWENTY
ONE.
WOULD LIKE TO US EXPRESS
APPRECIATION TO STOP FOR THE
ANALYSIS AND POINT OUT THAT THE
COST BURDEN IS. IT IS MINIMAL
THAT IS RECOGNIZED IN THE
ANALYSIS AND THAT ANY COST
BURDEN SHOULD.
IS CLEARLY OUTWEIGHED BY THE
PUBLIC INTEREST IN GETTING
ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND
KNOWING ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT
ACTIVITY IN THESE INSTANCES OF.
HIGH PUBLIC INTEREST AND AS.
SENATOR SKINNER RECOGNIZE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN
TWENTY FOURTEEN RECOGNIZE THAT
AGENCIES SHOULD IMPLICITLY
ABSORB THESE BECAUSE. AS PART OF
THEIR OPERATIONS BECAUSE IT'S
REALLY ABOUT THE FILLING THE
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF ACCESS
ANOTHER. VOTER APPROVED
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.
AND THAT THAT OUTWEIGHS ANY
COSTS.
BUT THE AGENCY MUST BEAR WE ARE
DRIVE A BIG YOU DECIDE AWARENESS
IS IN SUPPORT.
LIZZY BEACON WITH THE ACLU
COSPONSORED IN SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS SYLVIA
SOLELY SHAUN BEHALF OF THE
TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND MEMBERS OF
THE CALIFORNIA FACULTY
ASSOCIATION WE'RE HAPPY TO BE CO
SPONSORS OF THE MEASURE WE
BELIEVE IT'S A VERY REASONABLE
APPROACH TO ACCESSING THESE
RECORDS AND WE ASK FOR YOUR
SUPPORT THANK YOU.
JIM WONDERED ON BEHALF OF THE
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION
THE CALIFORNIA AND STRONG
SUPPORT.
TAYLOR JACKSON WITH THE
CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION IN
STRONG SUPPORT.
THANK YOU A DISH THAT WAS ISN'T
SUPPORT WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION TO COME FORWARD.
WHEN MISTER CHAIRMAN WAS
COURCELLES ALONG WE HAVE THE
CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS
ASSOCIATION WE'VE NOT SEEN THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BUT IN AS
MUCH AS THEY ARE PURPORTED TO
CONTINUE TO INCLUDE A. HARD CAP
STORY A LIMITATION ON WIN THOSE
RECORDS MUST BE TO CLICK
DISCLOSE BALL FROM A POLICY
PERSPECTIVE WE REMAIN OPPOSED TO
THE BILL. WE WOULD ACKNOWLEDGE
THE COST.
RAISED BY THE ANALYSIS AS
RELATES TO.
FULFILLING PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
REQUEST IRRESPECTIVE OF OF THE
CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS IF WE ARE
REQUIRED TO.
PROVIDE MORE PUBLIC RECORDS
THAT WILL BE COSTS OF THAT FOR
BETTER OR WORSE.
BUT AGAIN LARGELY BASED ON
POLICY GROUNDS THANK YOU.
JOHN LEVEL CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND LOS
ANGELES COUNTY PROFESSIONAL
PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION.
OPPOSITION TO THE BILL IN ITS
CURRENT FORM ON POLICY GROUNDS.
MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS NOT YOU
CYBERLINK ON BEHALF OF THE
ASSOCIATION FOR LOS ANGELES
DEPUTY SHERIFFS THE LOS ANGELES
POLICE PROTECTIVE LEAGUE I LOOK
FORWARD TO REVIEWING THE
AMENDMENTS BUT AT THIS TIME ARE
OPPOSED TO THE BILL THANK YOU.
CHU REMEMBERS RANDY PICKER THERE
AND REDUCE SO SYSTEM HALF OF
POOR I CAN CALPERS CESSATION HOW
ARBITRON OPPOSITION.
MORNING MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS
SHAUNA HOFFMAN THE CALIFORNIA
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION
AS SKIN SENATOR SKINNER AYE
INDICATED WE'VE WORKED WITH THEM
AND.
ARE PREPARED TO BE NEUTRAL ON
THE BILL IF AND WHEN THESE
AMENDMENTS GOING TO PRINT. I
WOULD CLARIFY THAT.
IF THE OFFICER IS SUBJECT TO
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION THE
AMENDMENTS AS WE UNDERSTAND THEM
STILL PROVIDE A HARD CAP OF
EIGHTEEN MONTHS.
WHICH IS.
UP SIGNIFICANTLY LONGER THAN
WHAT IT BEEN PROPOSED INITIALLY.
ARM BUT I THINK IT'S AN
IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION BUT. IF
AND WHEN THOSE AMENDMENTS ARE IN
PRINT WE WILL BE REMOVING
OPPOSITION MOVING TO NEUTRAL.
AS CHAIR MEMBERS RANGE FROM WITH
THE RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S
ASSOCIATION I'M LIKE TO ECHO THE
COMMENTS OF MY COLLEAGUE FROM
THE DISK TURNS ASSOCIATION. AND
WILL HOPEFULLY BE TO OFFICIALLY
REMAINING NEUTRAL AS WELL LIKE
YOU.
THANK YOU FINANCE NO FILE
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE.
SEEING NONE SENATOR SKINNER
WOULD LIKE TO CLOSE.
FROM MY OWN.
ASK FOR THE. MURDER BILL THANK
YOU SINCERELY FOR WORK ON THE
SUPPORT ISSUE.
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS
ITEM TO SUSPENSE FILE FOURTEEN SIXTEEN NOT FOURTEEN
SIXTEEN AND WE WANT.
WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.
THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS SP
FOURTEEN SIXTEEN NINE. BY
RECOGNIZES AS THE LEGISLATURE
HAS IN THE PAST UNDER THE
LEADERSHIP OF OUR COLLEAGUE FROM
FREMONT SENATOR WHY CASKEY.
THAT USING EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTIES
TO ADD UNITS
SPECIFICALLY.
EIGHTY USE SUCCESS REDOING
UNITS AND. JD USE JUNIOR EXCESS
REDRAWING UNITS IS AN EFFECTIVE
EFFICIENT AND FAST WAY TO
INCREASE THE HOUSING SUPPLY. IN
OUR STATE GIVEN THIS HOUSING
CRISIS THAT WE ARE IN. WHAT SB
FOURTEEN SIXTY NINE DOES IS
BUILDS ON SENATOR WHITE CAO SKIS
PASSED EDU LEGISLATION THREE AB
BUT REDUCES SOME OF THE
REMAINING BARRIERS TO AID YOU
DEVELOPMENTS? IT COMPLIMENTS
ANOTHER BILL THAT IS BEFORE YOU
WITCHES FROM MY COLLEAGUE FROM
FREMONT IT COMPLIMENTS THAT
CURRENT BILL BUT GOES A FEW
STEPS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY IT
ALLOWS MINISTERIAL APPROVAL. OF
A SOME EIGHTY USE ON EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ALLOWS
ALSO EIGHTY USE IN MULTI FAMILY
BUILDINGS WHICH HAS NOT YET BEEN
ADDRESSED.
IT DIRECTS OUR HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO ESTABLISH A SMALL BUILDING
CODE STANDARD BY TWENTY TWENTY
TO HELP OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN
ADDRESSING THESE.
GIVEN THAT MANY OF THE CD USER
SEPARATELY STANDING AND PREVENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM REQUIRING
A MINIMUM LOT COVERAGE WHICH IS
NOW BEEN AN OBSTACLE.
BUT MY BILL ALSO DOES SOMETHING
I THINK THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT IT
ADDRESSES THE POSSIBLE
SPECULATIVE IMPACTS UNINTENDED
CONSEQUENCES THAT ARE EXPANSION
OF ALLOWING EDIE USE MIGHT OCCUR.
WE KNOW THAT IN THE RECESSION
THERE WERE A NUMBER OF
CORPORATIONS THAT BEGAN TO BUY
UP SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND IN
FACT ACROSS THE COUNTRY THEY
BROUGHT UP SOME TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
NOT THAT MEANING CALIFORNIA BUT
STILL A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER THOSE
CORPORATIONS ARE STILL IN
EXISTENCE.
AND THEY ARE STILL BUYING UP
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THOUGH NOT
QUITE IN THE SAME NUMBER. BUT
THEY MAY BE FURTHER MOTIVATED TO
DO SO. WHEN WE IN FACT ALLOW FOR
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TO ADD
ADDITIONAL UNITS.
AND SO WHAT MY BILL ADDRESSES IS
ALLOWING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHO
ARE CONCERNED THAT. THESE.
.
THESE PATHWAYS MAY HAVE A
SPECULATIVE IMPACT.
THE LOCALGOVERNMENT COULD
IMPOSE AN OWNER OCCUPANCY THERE
HAVE BEEN OTHER ALTERNATIVE
SUGGESTED FOR EXAMPLE IMPOSING
INSTEAD. AND AGAIN THIS WOULD BE
ELECTED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT THAT
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LIMIT THESE.
EIGHTY USE TO OWNERSHIP
PROPERTIES OF FOUR OR FEWER
SINGLE FAMILY UNITS AGAIN THE
MOTIVATION TO TRY TO MINIMIZE
THAT INCENTIVE FOR THESE LARGE
CORPORATIONS FROM BUYING UP
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN
CALIFORNIA.
SO THAT'S WHAT I HAD THE BILL
DOES WE TOOK AMENDMENTS AN
APPROACH THAT WERE COST SAVINGS
BY ALLOWING BUT NOT REQUIRING
OUR HOUSING COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO NOTIFY
A LOCAL AGENCY.
AND.
WITHOUT I ASK FOR SUPPORT THANK
YOU WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
MORNING ASSISTANCE ON THE OFF
THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
BY KEITH DONE FOR THE CALIFORNIA
APARTMENT ASSOCIATION ASKING FOR
YOUR SUPPORT FOR THIS IMPORTANT.
PIECE OF LEGISLATION THANK YOU.
THANK YOU WHAT IS IN OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS TOM DUFFY FOR THE
COALITION FOR ADEQUATE SCHOOL
HOUSING.
WE ARE OPPOSED TO THIS
LEGISLATION. BOB BUT.
SENATOR WE DO HAVE A MEETING
WITH YOUR STAFF ON THURSDAY I
WAS ASKED TO MEET ON THE BILL.
AND AND WE WILL BE DOING THAT
ARE OPPOSITION IS IS BASED ON
SEVERAL THINGS ONE IS THAT WE
BELIEVE THAT.
THE BILL VIOLATES THE
PROVISIONS OF PROPOSITION FIFTY
ONE WHICH IS A STATEWIDE BOND WE
PLACED ON THE BALLOT IN TWO
THOUSAND SIXTEEN. BOB THE
PROVISIONS OF PROP FIFTY ONE
IDENTIFIED THAT STATUTE THAT
INVOLVES THE SCHOOL I CAPITAL
FUNDING. MAY NOT CHANGE UNTIL WE
HAVE EXHAUSTED THE US SEVEN
BILLION DOLLARS IN IN K. TWELVE
FUNDS THAT ARE.
PROVIDED THROUGH PROP FIFTY ONE
SO THAT THAT'S ONE. ARE WE WE
ALSO WOULD BRING TO YOUR
ATTENTION. THAT YEAR IT IN A.
SENATOR YOU'RE TRYING TO SOLVE
HOUSING CRISIS YOU'RE. RIGHT WE
DO NOT WANT TO CREATE A
CLASSROOM CRISIS
SO WHAT WHAT THIS BILL WOULD DO
AND IN THE OTHERS THE THE.
THE WIECKOWSKI BILL ALTHOUGH
THAT WAS MODIFIED WITH THIS BILL
WOULD DO WOULD LIMIT. DEVELOPER
FEES THAT WOULD BE CHARGED BY
SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO BASICALLY DO
WHAT THE IMPACTS OF OF. CHILDREN
COMING INTO THEIR SCHOOL
DISTRICT YOU YOU I BELIEVE AS AS
A COMMITTEE ARE AWARE THAT IF A
CHILD LIVES IN A SCHOOL DISTRICT.
THAT DISTRICT IS OBLIGATED TO
SERVE THEM NO MATTER IF THEY
HAVE NO SEATS AVAILABLE OR NO
CLASSROOMS AVAILABLE. SO WHAT WE
ARE OPPOSED TO THIS BILL. I'VE
BEFORE THAT SECOND REASON
BECAUSE WE BELIEVE THAT THIS
NEGATIVELY IMPACTS TO SCHOOL
DISTRICTS ABILITY TO RESPOND TO
GROWTH.
THIRDLY WE ARE OPPOSED BECAUSE
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS BILL COULD
BE APPLIED TO LARGE SCALE
DEVELOPMENTS WORD DEVELOPER OF A
THOUSAND HOMES COULD CHOOSE TO
HAVE THIS IS AN OPTION.
AND THEN LIMIT THE FEES THAT
THAT DEVELOPER WOULD PAY AGAIN
IMPACTING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S
ABILITY TO RESPOND TO GROWTH.
THANK YOU.
FINANCE NO FILE. COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SAID
ABOUT.
OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS WE'VE
HEARD MUCH DISCUSSION AND NAM.
TRANSPORTATION HOUSING COMMITTEE
AND.
WE FULLY SUPPORT THESE SO.
LAWS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED.
ONCE ONE ASPECT IT PROBABLY
ISN'T SO.
APPARENT I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK
AT IT. IS WE ALREADY HAVE A LOT
OF.
ALTERNATIVE DWELLING UNIT.
CONSTRUCTION.
IN CALIFORNIA ACCEPTED THE
CONSTRUCTION IS.
LIKENED SAN JOSE I KNOW
CONSTRUCTION IS DONE ILLEGALLY.
SO THERE'S A LOT OF.
UNITS THAT ARE BEING BUILT.
RIGHT NOW.
.
NOT CONFORMING TO ALL THE OF THE
BUILDING CODES AND SO FORTH.
AND KNOW I THINK THESE LAWS SET
UP A PROCESS WHEREBY WE CAN. NOT
ONLY GOOD TO GO LEGALIZATION OF
EXISTING.
UNITS THAT ARE ALREADY BUILT
BUT.
GET THEM TO CONFORM TO ALL OUR
BUILDING CODES ARE OUR LAWS.
.
AND SO FORTH LE AND.
BILL DO.
.
SAFE SANITARY CLEAN.
ALTERNATE GOING ON IS A
SUPPOSED TO SOME OF THE UNITS
THAT DO EXIST.
SO I THINK IT'S IT'S IT'S ALSO
AN ASPECT.
OF REHABILITATION AND AND AND
CONFORMING TO LAWS THAT WE
SHOULD. CONSIDER WHEN WE LOOK AT
THE FINANCIAL COST.
OF THIS AN.
THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED.
GREAT THANK YOU.
US SENATOR SKINNER WOULD LIKE TO
CLOSE.
BY CLOSED IN MY OPENING. THANK
YOU AYE WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIRE SENATOR ROBB.
SIR RAFI DO HAVE AT DO PASS
RECOMMENDATION ON S. B. TWELVE
THIRTY EIGHT THE FIRST HORSE.
FAMOUS CHAIRED COLLEAGUES OF THE
BILL IS DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT
PATIENTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO
RETRIEVE AND PRESERVE THEIR
MEDICAL RECORDS PRIOR TO RECORDS
DESTRUCTION.
IF THEY DECIDE TO DO SO.
THAT'S THE GENERAL NATURE THE
BILL SPECIFICALLY THE BILL ONE
ALLOWS HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS TO
DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO DESTROY
A PATIENT'S MEDICAL RECORDS
AFTER THE.
STATUTORY OR REGULATORY
RETENTION PERIOD AM AND WHEN TO
DO SO TO THE BILL ALLOWS A
HEALTHCARE PROVIDER. TO DECIDE
HOW TO ARRANGE FOR THE
DESTRUCTION OF A PATIENT'S
MEDICAL RECORDS INCLUDING THE
BATCHING OF SUCH TO ENSURE THAT
THE WRECKAGE DESTRUCTION. IS
ACCOMPLISHED IN THE MOST
EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT MANNER
AND THREE ALLOWS THE HEALTH CARE
PROVIDER TO DECIDE WHEN. TO
PROVIDE NOTICE OF RECORD
DESTRUCTION TO THE PATIENT SO
LONG AS THE PATIENT RECEIVES
SUCH NOTICE AT LEAST SIXTY DAYS
PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL RECORDS
DESTRUCTION.
THANK YOU WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING BETSY M. HALTS FOR
CONSUMERS UNION THE ADVOCACY
DIVISION OF CONSUMER REPORTS A
IN SUPPORT OF THIS BILL. SP
TWELVE THIRTY EIGHT WOULD HAVE
VERY LITTLE TO NO FISCAL IMPACT
ON THE STATE OF PROVIDE
IMPORTANT PROTECTION FOR
CONSUMERS AND BENEFIT FOR THE
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.
THE BILL MAY IN FACT CREATE
SAVINGS CONSUMERS TODAY MAY FIND
THEMSELVES SUBJECT TO MORE
CHANGES IN COVERAGE AND
PROVIDERS THAN EVER. AND WITHOUT
A SHIRT ACCESS TO THEIR MEDICAL
RECORDS IT'S LIKELY PATIENTS.
AS THEY SHIFT COVERAGE IN CARE
MAY BE EXPOSED TO DUPLICATION
AND TREATMENTS AND TESTS.
AND PROCEDURES ON IN ADDITION
TO THE MEDICAL REX A RISKS THAT
SUCH DUPLICATION PROVIDES. ON IT
ALSO CREATES A TREMENDOUS COST
FOR PATIENTS M. FOR THE HEALTH
CARE SYSTEM.
ON PRESERVING THE MEDICAL
RECORDS AS THIS BILL WOULD.
REQUIRE WOULD HELP AVOID
UNNECESSARY CARE IMPROVE PATIENT
SAFETY AND REDUCED HEALTH CARE
COST INDIVIDUALS AND THE WHOLE
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. INFECTED
VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW ARE FOUND
A ADMINISTRATIVE FEES COULD
CREATE REVENUES FOR THE STATE
THAT WOULD OFFSET ANY OF THE
MINIMAL COST SO WE URGE YOUR
SUPPORT THANK YOU THINK YIDDISH
AWARENESS ISN'T SUPPORT.
PAGE PLAYING BOARD AS A
CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES HERE TODAY
ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH
UNDERWRITERS. WE ARE VERY
GRATEFUL TO THE AUTHOR FOR HIS
WORK ON THIS CRITICAL ISSUE THIS
BILL WILL ENSURE THAT PATIENTS
HAVE BETTER ACCESS TO THEIR FULL
AND COMPLETE MEDICAL HISTORIES
WHICH IS VERY VALUABLE WHEN
FEEDING FUTURE KAREN COVERAGE
OPTIONS. AT MEDICAL NECESSITY IN
COVERAGE OPTIONS CHANGE BECAUSE
WHO MEMBERS PROVIDE ONGOING
SERVICE TO YOUR SUPPORT FOR
THEIR CLIENTS THAT HELP THEM
ADJUSTER UTILIZED THE HEALTH
CARE COVERAGE OPTIONS. DO THESE
EFFORTS WE SEE FIRSTHAND THE
IMPORTANCE OF OUR CLIENTS HAVING
ACCESS TO THEIR MEDICAL RECORDS
TO ENSURE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
INFORMATION IS USED WHEN MAKING
MEDICAL COVERAGE DECISIONS. WE
THINK THAT THE FILM WILL
MITIGATE AND ACCURATE DIAGNOSES
ARE UNNECESSARY DUPLICATIVE
COSTS
WITH FOR CARE BASED ON THE
CHALLENGES OF A COMPLETE MEDICAL
HISTORY AND WISH TO THANK THE
AUTHOR FOR HIS LEADERSHIP
.
ADDITIONAL WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
MADAM CHAIR DILLER STRAND FLORA
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION WERE HERE ALSO IN
SUPPORT.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS. THEY WERE
FEDERATION IN SUPPORT.
DEAR JACKSON THE CALIFORNIA
NURSES ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT.
PROPER CMOS OF THE MEDICAL BOARD
OF CALIFORNIA WE SUPPORT THE
CONCEPT OF THE STONE OF RESULT
MINIMAL AND FISCAL IMPACT TO THE
BOARD THANK YOU.
ANY ADDITIONAL WITNESSES ON
SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
MORNING MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS
MAKE IT ALRIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
HERE THIS MORNING. AMBER ROUGHLY
OPPOSING WAS AMENDED TO SENATE
BILL TWELVE THIRTY EIGHT FOR
MULTIPLE POLICY IN FISCAL
REASONS.
I BRIEFLY THE SECOND NOTICE
PRIOR TO DESTRUCTION OF MEDICAL
RECORDS IN THE BILL REASONS MANY
OPERATIONAL ISSUES. THAT HAVE
YET TO BE CLARIFIED AND CREATES
MASSIVE ADMINISTRATIVE AND
FISCAL BURDEN ON MEDICAL
PRACTICES IN AFTER FACILITIES
WHICH WILL INCREASE THE COST OF
PROVIDING CARE.
CREEK COST PRESSURES THROUGHOUT
THE ALREADY STRAINED HEALTH CARE
SYSTEM ARE ANGRY BECAUSE
PURCHASED OUT THE ARTESIAN
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. AND THEREFORE
WE CONTINUE TO REQUEST REMOVAL
OF THE SECOND NOTICES IN THE
BILL AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO
MAKE EVEN THE NON PROBLEMATIC
PROVISIONS IN THE BILL.
IMPLEMENTABLE ABSENT THOSE
AMENDMENTS WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY
ASK YOUR KNOW ABOUT.
ADDITIONAL WITNESSES OPPOSITION
YES MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS MY
NAME ZACHARY COR BONE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DON'T ASSOCIATION WE
ARE CURRENTLY IN OPPOSITION TO
THIS BILL.
FOR POLICY REASONS HOWEVER WE DO
LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE
AUTHOR TO. MEANT
SOME OF THE CONCERNS ADDRESSED
HER COLLEAGUES TO SEE AND I.
UNDER ANY OTHER OF WITNESSES SAW
IN OPPOSITION.
I DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE KNOW
FILE.
IT'S REALLY DIFFICULT FOR.
THIS IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEEP HOUSE
WE HAVE A MOTION.
THE COMMENTS ARE AMONG COMMITTEE
MEMBERS.
QUESTIONS.
SENATOR RADFORD LIVE THE BILL.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE FINISH
ROCKED BOTH THINK ABOUT A VICE
CHAIR OF JUST VERY SENSITIVE
OBVIOUSLY TO THE COST OF HEALTH
CARE WE DO WITHOUT A LOT HERE.
A BUT IF THE SERBS. RATHER
SIMPLE NOTICES SAVES AND THAT'S
UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE OR IN SOME
CASES SAVED ALIVE OF LIFE WE
THINK IT'S CERTAINLY WORTH. SOME
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO GET THE
NOTICE OUT RESPECTFULLY AS FOR
YOUR IPHONE.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
LARA.
BATES AYE BATES AYE BELL. BELL
AYE BRADFORD BRADFORD AYE HILL.
HILL AYE NIELSEN. NIELSEN AYE
WIENER.
ON CALL THAT HAS FIVE VOTES.
THEY COMMITTED BY SURE THANK YOU
KELLY THREE PATIENTS.
SENATOR JACKSON'S.
READY TO HEAR YOURS.
TWELVE FIFTY THREE.
SENATOR AFTERNOON OF FIFTY THREE
THAT IS CORRECT TWELVE FIFTY
THREE GOOD GOOD MORNING STILL.
MADAM A VICE CHAIRMAN MEMBERS.
THIS BILL ADDRESSES THE NEED
FOR MORE LOW INCOME HOUSING IN
OUR STATE AND TARGETS THE
SIGNIFICANT SHORTFALL IN
FINANCING FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING.
ACCORDING TO THE CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ONLY
THIRTY ONE PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLDS
CAN AFFORD TO PURCHASE A MEDIAN
PRICED HOME HERE. WHILE IN THE
RENTAL MARKET THERE IS A
SIGNIFICANT SHORTAGE OF RENTAL
PROPERTIES FOR MODERATE AND LOW
INCOME PEOPLE.
SO S. B. FIFTEEN AT TWELVE FIFTY
THREE. ADDRESSES THE FACT THAT
WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT HOUSING
SHORTAGE
AND AT THE SAME TIME RECOGNIZES
THAT ONE OF THE BEST WAYS ONE OF
THE TOOLS IN THE TOOLBOX TO
ADDRESS THIS. IS TO ACCESS AS
MUCH FEDERAL MONEY AS WE CAN TO
MATCH THE AMOUNTS THAT WE ARE
GOING TO ENCOURAGE.
FOR PURPOSES OF BUILDING THAT.
HOUSING STOCK THAT IS SO BADLY
NEEDED SO THIS MEASURE DOUBLES
THE FUNDING FOR THE STATE'S LOW
INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT
PROGRAM OVER A PERIOD OF TWELVE
YEARS.
ADMINISTERED BY THE TEACHER TO
TEACH EXCUSE ME T. CAC THE TAX
CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE.
THIS PROGRAM IS CURRENTLY A
MAINSTAY FOR AFFORDABLE BUILDERS
IN THIS STATE AND CRITICAL FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MUCH NEEDED
LOW INCOME HOUSING.
EXCUSE ME.
RESEARCH SHOWS THAT KIDS LIVING
IN POOR.
QUALITY HOUSING HAVE LOWER MATH
AND READING SCORES AND HIGHER
INCIDENCE OF HEALTH BEHAVIORAL
AND EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS.
THE DATA GOES ON WE CAN TALK
ABOUT IT IN TERMS OF
HOMELESSNESS IN THE COST TO OUR
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OUR PUBLIC
SAFETY SYSTEM. WHEN PEOPLE DO
NOT HAVE ACCESS TO A THE STABLE
HOME SITUATIONS AND WE
DISCOVERED THAT IT IN A RECENT
REPORT BY T. CAC. THE DEMAND FOR
THE STATE HOUSING TAX CREDIT NOW
EXCEEDS OF THE SUPPLY AVAILABLE
FOR THESE CREDITS BY OVER TWO TO
ONE.
SO MEANING WE ARE RIGHT NOW
LEAVING MILLIONS OF FEDERAL
DOLLARS ON THE TABLE AND ONLY
CONSTRUCTING A PORTION OF NEW
AFFORDABLE PROJECTS. THAT WE
COULD IN FACT BE BUILDING TO DAY.
I IN THEIR LETTER OF SUPPORT BY
THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION AND THE BUILDING OF
BUSINESS PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSOCIATION THEY HIGHLIGHT.
THIS HAI MEDIAN PRICE OF HOUSING
AT FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE
THOUSAND DOLLARS AND THE RENT
THE HIGH RENT OF THE IN THIS
STATE AVERAGING. ALMOST TWENTY
FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS A MONTH.
THIS IS UNSUSTAINABLE. SO THE
STATE TAX CREDIT PROGRAM NOT
ONLY PROVIDES DIRECT FINANCING
FOR AFFORDABLE PROJECTS IT
LEVERAGES MATCHING FEDERAL TAX
CREDITS AS WELL AS PRIVATE
DOLLARS.
CREATE A FUNDING PACKAGE THAT
MAXIMIZES THE FINANCIAL
POTENTIAL OF OUR STATE
INVESTMENT AND BASED ON RECENT
DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA HOUSING
PARTNERSHIP.
FOR EVERY DOLLAR OF STATE
FUNDING INVESTED IN AN
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT THAT
PROJECT RECEIVES ROUGHLY ROUGHLY
TWICE AS MUCH IN FEDERAL FUNDS
AND WHEN COMBINED WITH PRIVATE
FUNDING. THIS TURNS INTO
APPROXIMATELY THREE TO ONE MATCH.
FOR EVERY DOLLAR WE PUT OUT WE
GET THREE DOLLARS BACK IN THE
KINDS OF PROGRAMMING THAT WE SO
DESPERATELY NEED IN THE HOUSING.
MARKET AND IF THE DOLLAR SPENT
TURNS IN THREE THAT SOUNDS LIKE
A GOOD DEAL MOST OF US I THINK
WE GRABBED.
AND HOPEFULLY THAT'S WHAT WE'LL
DO HERE WITH THIS BILL OF THESE
ARE FUNDS WHICH ARE SIMPLY
CANNOT AFFORD TO LEAVE ON THE
TABLE. I AM WORKING WITH MEMBERS
FROM THE BUDGET COMMITTEE TO
HELP EASE THE FINANCIAL IMPACT
OF THIS MEASURE AND GET SUPPORT
FOR THIS PROGRAM.
THE SO THERE ARE COMPLICATED
FIXES AS WE ALL KNOW TO OUR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHORTAGE AND
THEIR OBVIOUS ONES I WOULD PUT
THIS IN THE CATEGORY OF OBVIOUS
ONCE IF WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY
TO GET FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS. TO A
TAX CREDITS RATHER TO UNDERWRITE
OUR LOW INCOME HOUSING
CONSTRUCTION WE SHOULD DO IT.
AND WITH THAT I WOULD LIKE TO
INTRODUCE OUR ALYSSA STINSON.
WITH THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION HERE IN
SUPPORT OF THIS MEASURE THANK
YOU WITNESSES IN SUPPORT NQ
GOVERNING MISTER CHAIR AND
MEMBERS WHEN HE WAS ASSISTANCE
AND HERE AT THE CALIFORNIA
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION.
WE'RE HERE TODAY TO VOICE OUR
SUPPORT FOR SENATOR JACKSON'S SP
TWELVE FIFTY THREE A MEASURE
THAT WOULD EXPAND THE
CALIFORNIA'S EXISTING LOW INCOME
HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM BY A
HUNDRED PERCENT.
AS WE ARE ALL WELL AWARE THE
STATE IS IN THE DEPTHS OF A
SEVERE HOUSING CRISIS BOTH IN
TERMS OF SUPPLY AND
AFFORDABILITY.
AND IT IS MORE CRITICAL NOW THAN
EVER TO GET FUNDING FOR THESE
PROJECTS.
IN TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN THE
HOW CALIFORNIA HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
RELEASED A REPORT TITLED
CALIFORNIA'S HOUSING FUTURE
WHICH STATED THAT CALIFORNIA
NEEDS EIGHT AT LEAST A HUNDRED
OR ONE POINT EIGHT MILLION.
HOMES TO ADDRESS THE HOUSE WILL
TAX GROWTH BETWEEN TWO HUNDRED
TRIGGERED SORRY. TWENTY FIFTEEN
AND TWENTY TWENTY FIVE IS THE
PARKS MILLION HUNDRED AND EIGHTY
THOUSAND HOMES PER YEAR.
CALIFORNIA HAS CERTAINLY NOT
BEEN KEEPING PACE WITH DEMAND
AND THE LOW PERCENTAGES OF
HOUSING CONSTRUCTION COMPARED TO
THE NEED OUTLINED IN THIS REPORT
IS ESPECIALLY TRUE FOR HOUSE.
I FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY.
AND LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS.
AS NEEDED AS INDICATED IN THE
POLICY COMMITTEE ANALYSIS LOW
INCOME HOUSING PROJECTS FACE
MANY BARRIERS IN CALIFORNIA HIGH
COSTS OF LAND LABOR AND CAPITAL
RESISTANCE FOR AND RESISTANCE.
FROM LOW LOCAL RESIDENTS AND
STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND
POLICIES PROTECTING THE
ENVIRONMENT AMONG OTHERS.
ENCOURAGING MORE HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT AT ALL LEVELS CAN
PROVIDE SOME RELIEF TO LOW
INCOME HOUSEHOLDS THAT ARE
UNABLE TO SECURE ASSISTANCE
BECAUSE OF. BECAUSE IN OUR MINDS
A RISING TIDE LIFTS ALL SHIPS
AGAIN WE ARE PLEASED TO SUPPORT
SENATOR JACKSON'S SP TWELVE
FIFTY THREE AM RESPECTFULLY
ACROSS YOUR SUPPORT OF THEM IF
THAT PARTICULAR ADDITIONAL
WITNESSES AND SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES GENERAL FUND REVENUE
GAINS AT SEVENTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS IN TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN.
A DUE TO THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF
CREDIT SAILING USAGE.
SUBSEQUENTLY THE FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD ESTIMATES REVENUE LOSSES
OF FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS IN
TWENTY NINETEEN TWENTY. EIGHT
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
TWENTY ONE AND INCREASING
ANNUALLY TO A LOSS OF NINETY
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY THIRTY
THIRTY ONE.
THE CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT
ALLOCATION COMMITTEE STATES THAT
IT WILL REQUIRE ONE ADDITIONAL
ASSOCIATE GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM
ANALYST LEVEL STAFF.
TO SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL
ADMINISTRATIVE WORKLOAD
ASSOCIATED WITH CONSIDERING
PROJECTS IN FEDERALLY DESIGNATED
OPPORTUNITY SOUNDS.
AT ANY REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES WILL BE EVALUATED AS
PART OF THE ANNUAL BUDGET
PROCESS
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU COLORS OR QUESTIONS
FROM COMMITTEE.
CENTER ABOUT.
YES I I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS IS
PART OF THE.
.
PINTS OF DO WE HAVE IN OUR
CENTER HOUSING PACKAGE.
INTERNS WHO THE FISCAL IMPACT
MISTER CHAIRMAN I THINK GO.
BEFORE GOING TO PROJECT OUT TO
TWENTY THIRTY I THINK WE OUGHT
TO LOOK AT THE OF.
PROPERTY VALUES THAT ARE CREATED
BY AND TAXES TAXATION PROPERTY
TAXES.
THAT ARE CREATED BY THE
CONSTRUCTION OF. OF THE HOUSING
UNITS THAT WE ARE WE ARE
ENABLING BY THE HOUSING TAX
CREDIT PROGRAM. THESE WILL BE.
AN INCREASE IN PROPERTY VALUES.
AND IT SHOULD BE TABULATED AND
AND AND CONDUCTED. THERE'S ALSO.
JOB CREATION ASPECT TO THIS
THIS IS.
AND ECONOMIC INVESTMENT AND I
THINK THAT. THE BENEFIT OF JOB
CREATION CREATING JOBS AND THE
BENEFIT OF.
THOSE JOBS ON.
STATE LOCL GOVERNMENT SHOULD
BE CONSIDERED IN TERMS OF THE OF
FISCAL IMPACT SO ALL TOLD.
HOUSING IS A GOOD INVESTMENT IT
WILL HAVE A GOOD POSITIVE STRONG.
IMPACT ON.
.
TAXES COLLECTED DUE TO THE
PROPERTY VALUES THAT ARE CREATED
BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSING
SOMETHING YOU.
THANK YOU ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF
COURSE WHO COMMITTEE.
SEEING THE ANSWER JACKSON WOULD
YOU LIKE TO CLOSE.
A I APPRECIATE THE SUPPORT OF
AND OBSERVATIONS OF SENATOR BELL
THIS IS A CHANCE TO WIN WIN
SITUATION WE HAVE A DIRE NEED
THIS IS ONE OF THE TOOLS IN THE
TOOLBOX.
A REAL BENEFIT TO THE STATE I
BELIEVE TO BE ABLE TO MAXIMIZE
THOSE ADDITIONAL DOLLARS AND
WITH THAT I WOULD.
OF REQUEST THIS MATTER TO COME
OFF THE SUSPENSE FILE THE
APPROPRIATE TIME THANK YOU
WITHOUT OBJECTION WITH THE
SILENCE THE SUSPENSE FILE THINKS
MAKE YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN PERCENT
OF GLAZER.
SURVEYS ARE HAS TWO ITEMS BOTH
TENANTS FOR SUSPENSE.
THIRD GLAZER WHAT WE START WITH
S. B. THIRTEEN SIXTEEN.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN HOT
MEMBERS AT THIS BILL SIMPLY
GIVES THE PARKS DEPARTMENT THE
OPTION AND I OR REITERATE THE
OPTION TO SELL.
A PROPOSED OFF HIGHWAY
EXPANSIONARY THAT'S IN MY
DISTRICT.
IF THEY DECIDE IT'S IN THE
PUBLIC'S BEST INTERESTS AND THEN
RETURN THAT MONEY TO THE OFF
HIGHWAY VEHICLE FUND FROM WHERE
IT ORIGINATED.
THE ONLY CONDITION IS THAT THE
LAND BE PUT IN PERMANENT
PRESERVATION
THE BILL HAS NO GENERAL FUND
COSTS.
NO POTENTIAL LOSS OF GENERAL
FUND REVENUE.
THE ONLY GROUP CONCRETE COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE BILL ARE
NEGLIGIBLE STEPPING COSTS.
.
AGAIN THE BILL SIMPLY ALLOWS THE
STATE DEPARTMENT A PARKS TO SELL
THIS LAND IF THEY SO CHOSE SUCH
ISSUES IN DATA.
LEE SAYS OF YESTERDAY I THOUGHT
THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE TWENTY
EIGHT POINT EIGHT EIGHT I GUESS
THERE'S A NEW IT I THE PERSON
THAT WAS ALLIES IT AS.
IT'S BEST WHICH OVER OF SOME
KIND BUT I WOULD JUST REITERATE
TO KEEP MISTER CHAIR THAT. SARS
I CAN TELL THIS BILL HAS
NEGLIGIBLE COSTS BUT THANK YOU
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION RECUSE
HER GLAZER WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING ELEANOR TEAMS ON
BEHALF OF THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
IN SUPPORT THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
ADDITIONAL WHAT IS THE POINT
WHERE THIS IS AN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE NO FILE.
NO FILE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS
FROM COMMITTEE.
SEEING NONE CLEANERS DAYS OR
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE THANK
YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
BOB THANK YOU WITHOUT OBJECTION
WITH THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FOUND NEXT YOU HAVE SCA TWENTY.
MISTER CHAIRMAN THANK YOU AND I
HEARD YOUR ADMONITION EARLIER
TODAY ABOUT THAT TRYING TO KEEP
IT MATTERS TO FISCAL.
IS THE FISCAL COMMITTEE NOT THE
POLICY COMMITTEE.
SO I. I TAKE IT OUT MY CHECKBOOK
HERE.
AS THE STATEOF CALIFORNIA. AND
I'M GONNA WRITE A CHECK FOR.
ONE BILLION DOLLARS TO THE
BIGGEST COMPANIES IN AMERICA IF
NOT THE WORLD.
BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'RE
PROVIDING EVERY YEAR UNDER OUR
TAX HERE TODAY WERE GIVING UP TO
A BILLION DOLLARS.
TO THESE COMPANIES WHO HAVE
FIGURED OUT A WAY TO TAKE CAR
TAX.
CODE AND MANIPULATE IT TO THEIR
ADVANTAGE.
AND SO RIGHT NOW.
THAT IS THE CASE MY BILL WOULD
REVERSE THAT.
IT WOULD TAKE THE POWER FROM
THESE CORPORATIONS WHO ARE
CURRENTLY.
USING THE TAX CODE.
TO MAKE AYE CHOICES.
TO.
GET RID OF THAT ADVANTAGE
AND GIVE ALL THE CITIES AND
COUNTIES OF OUR STATE THE SAME.
UP APPROPRIATE. OUT RIGHT TO
RECEIVE US BRADLEY BURNS SALES
TAX DOLLARS THAT THEY CURRENTLY
ARE GETTING.
BECAUSE OF THIS MANIPULATION OF
THE.
THERE'S MORE TO SAY ON THIS
BILL AND I PERHAPS UP PUT IT IN
MY CLOTHES. BUT RIGHT NOW WE
HAVE A SYSTEM OF SOME WINNERS
AND MANY MANY LOSERS IN OUR
STATE. IN TERMS OF WHERE
CORPORATIONS DESIGNATE. THE SALE
OF THE OF A GOOD TO HAVE
OCCURRED WHETHER IT'S WHERE IT
WAS SOLD OR WHETHER IT WAS
DISTRIBUTED.
UP MY BILL WOULD SIMPLY SAY THAT.
THE TAXATION WOULD OCCUR FOR
THE PERSON ORDERING IT FROM
WORSE DISTRIBUTED NOT ON THE
MANIPULATION AWARE THAT SALE
TAKES PLACE.
AND SO WE HAVE A FEW CITIES THAT
HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THIS
ARRANGEMENT WITH THESE BIG
COMPANIES AND THEY'LL WANT TO
CHANGE IT.
AND.
I HAVE SOME AMENDMENTS THAT
WE'VE SUBMITTED TO TRY TO SOFTEN
THAT BLOW INSENSITIVE TO IT.
BUT FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF
CITIES WITH THE RESIDENTS ORDER
THESE ITEMS OFF THE INTERNET AND
GET THE IMPACTS IN THEIR
COMMUNITIES THEY GET NOTHING.
UNDER THE CURRENT TAX CODE MISS
WOULD REVERSE THAT THANK YOU
CONSIDER AQ WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS MORE TALK ON BEHALF OF
THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF
THE MEASURE. I THINK A LOT OF
PEOPLE THINK THIS ISSUE IS A
CITY VERSUS CITY ISSUE.
BUT THERE IS A SMALL PORTION OF
THE BRADLEY BURNS SALES TAX CUT
THE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND.
AND THAT DOES FUND TRANSIT IN
ORANGE COUNTY IT TRANSIT FUNDS
ABOUT FIFTY PERCENT OF OUR
TRANSIT ACTIVITIES.
SO IN TWENTY SEVENTEEN OC TO
SPONSORED AN AUDIT REQUESTS.
WE HAD BEEN NOTICING THAT.
THE GROWTH RATE OF OUR LTO OFF.
OR TRANSIT DOLLARS WAS NOT
KEEPING PACE WITH OUR LOCAL
SALES TAX MEASURE.
THAT POINT WE THEORIZED THAT
THIS WAS DUE TO THE
PROLIFERATION OF ONLINE SALES.
AND THE UNIQUE CITI'S RULES FOR
BRADLEY BURNS.
I WHICH DIRECT REVENUES TO THE
PLACE A DISTRIBUTION RATHER THAN
THE PLACE OF SALE.
THE STATE AUDITOR'S FINDINGS
LAST NOVEMBER CONFIRMED THE
TREND.
NOTING THAT STE ONLINE SALES ARE
LIKELY TO INCREASE EXPONENTIALLY
IN THE YEAR IN THE COMING YEARS.
THE KEY FINING FROM THE AUDIT
WAS THAT CITI'S RULES FOR
BRADLEY BURNS SALES TAX SHOULD
BE CHANGED TO THE PLACE OF
DESTINATION.
CONFORMING TO MOST SALES TAXES
AND ALLOWING A MORE EQUITABLE
DISTRIBUTION OF REVENUES.
IF THE SITE S. RULES ARE NOT
CHANGED IT WILL DETRIMENTALLY
IMPACT.
CTA'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE
SUSTAINABLE TRANSIT SERVICES.
WE ESTIMATE THAT WE WOULD LIKELY
RECEIVE TWO THREE MILLION
DOLLARS LAST IN TRANSIT FUNDS
ANNUALLY.
WHEN BRADLEY BURNS SALES TAX
AUTHORITY WAS CREATED THERE WAS
NO WAY THE LEGISLATURE COULD
HAVE PROTECTED THE CREATION LET
ALONE THE IMPACT.
OF ONLINE SALES.
WE BELIEVE BASED I CA TWENTY ONE
SIR THAT THIS CRITICAL FUNDING
STREAM IS EQUITABLY DISTRIBUTED.
CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL AND
LEGISLATIVE INTACT WE ASK FOR A
VOTE.
IF YOU ADDITIONAL ONE THIS IS A
SUPPORT.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR OF MY.
NAME IS CHRISTOPHER DAWSON I'M
SENIOR STAFF COUNSEL THE STATE
AUDITOR. AND I'D LIKE TO
DESCRIBE OR. A REPORT OUR
FINDINGS.
BLESS YOUR OFFICE WAS ASKED TO
LOOK AT THE BRADLEY BURNS TAX
INCLUDING HOW IT'S ASSESSED AND
DISTRIBUTED TO LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION FUNDS.
WHATEVER MAIN FINDINGS WAS THAT
BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE BRADLEY
BURNS TAX LAW AND REGULATIONS RE
CURRENTLY SOME LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
RECEIVED DISPROPORTIONATE
DISTRIBUTIONS FROM THE TAXES
COLLECTED ON ONLINE SALES.
THIS IS BECAUSE BRADLEY BURNS IS
A SIDE TO SPACE TAX WHICH MEANS
IT'S DISTRIBUTED BASED UPON
WHERE THE SALE TOOK PLACE.
FOR PHYSICAL SALES THAT MEANS
THE BRICK AND MORTAR STORE BUT
FOR ONLINE SALES IT COULD MEAN A
NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PLACES. AND
DEPENDS.
ON THE ONLINE RETAILERS
BUSINESS MODEL. IN MANY CASES IT
MEANS A WAREHOUSE OR
DISTRIBUTION CENTER.
AS PART F OUR TESTING WE
COMPARED BRADLEY BURNS TAX
ALLOCATIONS FOR CERTAIN
RETAILERS AGAINST THEIR DISTRICT
TAX ALLOCATIONS.
WHICH ARE DESTINATION BASED.
IN ONE EXAMPLE WE FOUND THAT A
RETAILER ATTRIBUTED
TWENTY NINE PERCENT OF ITS
BRADLEY BURNS TAXES TO THE
LOCATION OF ITS WAREHOUSE. BUT
JUST EIGHT PERCENT OF ITS
DISTRICT TAXES TO THE SAME
LOCATION.
WE CONCLUDED THAT BRADLEY BURNS
CONCENTRATES IN CITIES AND
COUNTIES WERE RETAILERS STORE
AND SHIP THEIR GOODS.
EVEN THOUGH THE ACTUAL
PURCHASERS ARE DISTRIBUTED
ACROSS THE STATE.
THIS CREATES AN INCENTIVE FOR
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO COMPETE
WITH ONE ANOTHER AND TO PROVIDE
INCENTIVES
TO ATTRACT COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT TO THEIR LOCATION AS
THE SENATOR MENTIONED.
WE ALSO NOTE THAT AS ONLINE
SALES CONTINUE TO INCREASE THIS
CONCENTRATION WILL INCREASE
UNLESS THE LAWS AMENDED.
SO BASED ON OUR FINDINGS WE
THINK MORT EQUIPMENT A MORE
EQUITABLE DESK DISTRIBUTION
WOULD BE TO ASSIGN BRADLEY BURNS
TAXES ON ONLINE SALES. TO THE
SHIPPING DESTINATION RATHER THAN
A RETAILER'S WAREHOUSE OR
DISTRIBUTION CENTER. AND THUS WE
RECOMMENDED TO THE LEGISLATURE
THAT IT AMEND THE RALLY BURNS
TAX ALLOCATE REVENUES FROM
INTERNET SALES BASED ON THE
DESTINATION OF GOODS RATHER THAN
THE PLACE OF SALE.
AS CA TWENTY IS CONSISTENT WITH
OUR RECOMMENDATION.
THANK YOU.
PICK YOUR DISH AWARENESS ISN'T
SUPPORT WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE NO FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS HELP OPPOSITION PLEASE
REFER
.
GO AHEAD.
ARMED LEAVE GRAND.
WHERE THE CITY OF FRESNO?
I'D LIVED IN FRESNO FOR OVER
SIXTY YEARS I PUT THE GRAMMAR
SCHOOL FINISHED HIGH SCHOOL.
CREDIT FROM FRESNO STATE MARRIED
THIRTY EIGHT YEARS AFFECT FOR
CHILDREN AND FOUR GRANDCHILDREN.
BUT A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS.
THAT CITY FOR THIRTY EIGHT YEARS.
I'M VESTED NET CITY THAT'S MY
CITY AND I'M CONCERNED ABOUT IT.
FRESNO SEVEN NARRATIVE OF
GENERATIONAL POVERTY.
HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT HIGH CRIME
RATE HIGH SCHOOL DROP OUT RATE.
MY VISION IS TO CHANGE THAT
NARRATIVE TO BE. ECONOMIC
PROSPERITY.
JOB CREATION.
TO DO THAT WE SET A MODEL.
ABOUT A THOUSAND ACRES IN
INDUSTRIAL AREA WE INVESTED
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN
INFRASTRUCTURE.
TO CHANGE FRESNO'S NARRATIVE.
SO FAR WE HAVE. LANDED.
AMAZON. VOLTA IN THE GAP.
FOUR THOUSAND JOBS FOR FRESNO IN
THE LAST EIGHTEEN MONTHS MY GOAL
FOR EIGHT YEARS.
WAS TEN THOUSAND JOBS.
WE'LL BE HALFWAY THERE.
WITHIN TWO YEARS NEWS BECAUSE OF
THE CHANGE IN INCENTIVES WE GOT.
WE OFFER PERFORMANCE BASED
INCENTIVES HE'S OUR GIVEAWAY SAY
HALF TO ACHIEVE THE MILESTONE
FIVE HUNDRED JOBS A THOUSAND
JOBS.
IS A NET ECONOMIC BENEFIT TO THE
CITY OF FRESNO.
SO WHAT'S HAPPENED.
WERE TRANSFERRED MORE CITY OF
FRESNO WE WANT FROM ELEVEN
PERCENT UNEMPLOYMENT A LITTLE
OVER FIVE PERCENT IN TWO YEARS.
NINETY PERCENT OF OUR POPULATION
CAN QUALIFY FOR JOBS
THE MEAN FRESNO TO PEOPLE MAKING
FIFTEEN DOLLARS PER HOUR.
UNQUALIFIED BY MEDIUM PRICED
HOME.
ALL THREE OF THOSE BUT HE
COMMERCE SINGERS ALSO WORK WITH
THE NEIL PROGRAMME WELFARE TO
WORK WE ARE LEGALLY TAKING
PEOPLE OUT OF POVERTY.
IN GIVING THEM JOBS GIVE THEM A
CHANCE TO GREET TO RECALL
REALIZE. THE AMERICAN DREAM.
AND YOU ANNA CONTRAST FRESNO
STATISTICALLY TO THE THRUST OF
THE STATE.
THIRTY PERCENT OF OUR
POPULATIONS IN POP IT'S ONE IN
THREE PEOPLE IS NOT A POPULAR
PARTY IT'S AN OCEAN OF POVERTY.
OR MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME WAS
FORTY ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED
IS LESS THAN HALF THE STATE
AVERAGE WE'RE CHANGING THAT
NARRATIVE.
AND THIS BASICALLY IS A.
A CHANGE OF SHIFTING MONEY FROM
ONE AREA TO THE OTHER IT'S
BASICALLY THE RICH GETTING
RICHER THE POOR GETTING POORER.
AND THE CONSEQUENCES.
THIS CA TWENTY ARE DEVASTATING
CITY OF FRESNO.
WOULD LOSE NINETY ONE MILLION
DOLLARS OVER THIRTY YEARS THAT'S
ON EXISTING CONTRACTS.
THEY MIMIC SENATOR GLAZERS
PROVIDED. THE ONLY BE A SLOW
DEATH WOULD SIMPLY EXTEND OVER
TEN YEARS WE CANNOT ACCEPT THAT.
SO.
IN A STATE THAT PRIDES ITSELF.
SOCIAL JUSTICE DESERVES A MAJOR
ECONOMIC INJUSTICE. YOU'VE GOT A
PART OF THE STATE.
THOSE PROSPEROUS INTO DOING WELL
IN A PART OF THE STATE LIKE IN
THE VALLEY. IT'S
STRUGGLING WITH POTTERY WE
FINALLY HAVE A DOOR THAT WAS
CLOSE FOR NET ME YEARS IS NOW
OPEN FOR PEOPLE IN FRESNO TO
CHANGE THEIR LIVES.
I ASK YOU.
I IMPLORE YOU TO OPPOSE THIS
MAJOR. AND I THINK IT'S SO
COMPLEX FROM APPRECIATE WHAT
SENATOR GLAZERS DOING ITS GOT TO
BE ADDRESSED.
THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO DO WE
NEED MORE TIME TO FULLY THAT
THIS ISSUE. THANK YOU FIGURE
THAT I'M REPUBLICAN MY MY
COLLEAGUES THE DEMOCRATS HAVE.
THANK YOU OF MY NAME'S JOHN
BAUERS THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
EMERYVILLE CALIFORNIA ALAMEDA
COUNTY.
AND THIS IS A NON PARTISAN
ISSUE THIS IS AN ECONOMIC ISSUE.
AND A MUCH LIKE WHAT MAYOR BRAND
IS TRYING TO DO IN THE CITY OF
FRESNO TWENTY FIVE YEARS AGO THE
CITY OF M. REVOLVE TO MANY
PEOPLE WAS REGARDED. AS AN
INDUSTRIAL WASTELAND IN THE BAY
AREA.
IT HAS A GEOGRAPHIC NEXUS WITH
COMMERCE THOUGH WE'RE LOOKING AT
THE FOOT OF THE BAY BRIDGE WE
ARE LOOKING AT THE AT THE END OF
THE PORT OF OAKLAND.
THE HIGHEST.
TRAFFIC PART OF I EIGHTY IN THE
HIGHEST TRAFFIC PART OF THE
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD IN
CALIFORNIA ALL IN ONE SQUARE
MILE.
WE WE RE ENVISION OURSELVES AS
AN ECONOMIC CENTER YEARS AGO AND
RELIED ON THE USE OF
MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS AND
FACILITIES TO ACTUALLY MASS
PRODUCE THINGS THAT WOULD BE
CONSUMED BY PEOPLE IN THE BAY
AREA. ON THAT IS SERVED TO
FURTHER THE STATE'S CLIMATE PLAN
THAT IS SERVED TO FURTHER THE
INTERESTS OF TRANSPORTATION
AGENCIES IN THE BAY AREA. I SIT
ON THE ALAMEDA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ON WE
SEE THE VALUE IN HAVING A LOCUS
FOR DISTRIBUTION CLOSE TO WHERE
PEOPLE CONSUME. I'M IN OUR CASES
A ONE SQUARE MILE CITY WHICH IS
TWELVE THOUSAND RESIDENTS THE
CHANGES THAT ARE PROPOSED UNDER
A CA TWENTY WOULD DRAMATICALLY
IMPACT THE WAY BUSINESS IS DONE
IN THE BAY AREA. IN OUR
PARTICULAR SITUATION WE ARE ABLE
TO HAVE LOWER BUSINESS TAX RATES
BECAUSE WE HAVE SALES TAX
REVENUE MANY OF THE BUSINESSES
THAT WORK IN THE CITY OF
EMERYVILLE DO NOT HAVE STORE
FRONT FACING. RETAIL WE MAKE
SUSPENDERS WE MAKE PUPPETS WE
HAVE OUR FURNITURE STORES THAT
ALL DO NOT HAVE A STOREFRONT BUT
TO DISTRIBUTE ACROSS THE THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. IN THE
NATION.
ON THE CHANGES THAT ARE PROPOSED
HERE WOULD SLOWLY.
DWINDLE AWAY TWENTY FOUR
PERCENT OF OUR JAPANESE GENERAL
REVENUE FUND A SALES TAX BASE IN
THAT WOULD IS THAT WOULD REQUIRE
US TO MAKE OTHER CHANGES THAT
WOULD PROBABLY INCENTIVIZE
BUSINESSES TO LOCATE FARTHER
AWAY FROM WHERE PEOPLE ARE
CONSUMING THEIR GOODS.
WE WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A
NEED TO HAVE A CONVERSATION
ABOUT TAX REFORM.
WE FULLY SUPPORT HAVING A
CONVERSATION THIS IS A VERY
RUSHED MEASURE IS NOT
INCORPORATED THE FEEDBACK OF ALL
CITIES OF THE LEAGUE HAS
DISCUSSED HAVING HAD A
CONVERSATION WITH SOME MEMBERS
THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE THOSE OF
US SITTING AT THIS TABLE. AND
OTHER PARTNER CITIES WHO ARE
OPPOSED TO AS CA TWENTY AND WE
THINK THAT FOR THOSE REASONS
THAT THE COMMITTEE WOULD BE GOOD
TO HOLD THIS AND SAVE IT FOR
ANOTHER DAY.
THANK YOU ADDITIONAL WHEN THIS
IS IN OPPOSITION. YES CHAIR
MEMBERS ESCAPE VALVE CAPITAL
ADVOCACY ON BEHALF CALIFORNIA
RETAILERS ASSOCIATION ALSO IN
OPPOSITION.
WELL MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS CHRIS
MCKAY WE ON BEHALF OF THE
COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION IN OPPOSITION.
AND RICHARD DARMAN BEHALF OF THE
CITY DANUBE IN OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU.
FINANCE.
NO FILE.
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE.
SEEING NONE SENATOR GLAZERS LIKE
TO CLOSE THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR
COUPLE THINGS JUST IN SUMMARY.
FIRST AS YOU HEARD THIS CAME OUT
OF THE AUDITOR'S WORK.
IN TERMS OF HOW OUR TAX CODE IS
CURRENTLY WORKING AND WHERE
INEQUITY EXISTS.
SECONDLY THIS IS ABOUT INTERNET
SALES SOMETHING THAT IS GROWING
AND IS GOING TO GROW EVEN
GREATER AND SO THE DISPARITIES
IN THAT CONFLICTS AND PROBLEMS
ARE ONLY GONNA GET BIGGER. WITH
ANY FURTHER DELAY.
THIRD MIKE GREATEST RESPECT TO
THE THE MAYOR OF FRESNO WHEN
THAT LEADERSHIP FROM THE CITIES
THAT CURRENTLY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF
THIS I UNDERSTAND WHY THEY DO IT.
AND.
.
AND.
I HAVE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS OF
THIS BILL THAT I THINK SOFTEN
THE IMPACT DRAMATICALLY.
TO THESE COMMUNITIES AYE AS THE
MAYOR INDICATED HIS CALCULATIONS
A NINETY ONE MILLION DOLLAR COST
OVER THIRTY YEARS. THAT'S THREE
MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR
APPROXIMATELY ON A BUDGET THAT
ALMOST APPROACH IS A BILLION
DOLLARS.
OKAY SO LET'S KEEP ALL THIS IN
CONTEXT.
I AND FINALLY THE AMENDMENTS
THAT I PUT ACROSS THE DESK ALLOW
FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS
MEASURE OVER TEN YEARS.
OVER TEN YEARS NOT AN IMMEDIATE
IMPACT BECAUSE THE VOTERS
APPROVED IT. AT THE NEXT BALLOT
AS YOU KNOW THIS WOULD GO ON THE
BALLOT. BUT ALLOWS FOR A
SOFTENING OF IMPACTS.
OVER TEN YEARS AND I THINK
THAT'S OUT THAT SIGNIFICANT
WITHOUT OF. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
CONSIDERATION.
THANK YOU LET OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FILE
THANK YOU FOR CURRENT THANK YOU.
SENATOR HILL.
MCGUIRE SLOPES ARE MCGUIRE AND
SEE.
THROUGH OF WIRE YOU DO HAVE A TO
PASS AS AMENDED RECOMMENDATION
ON YOUR ESCAPE.
EIGHTY SIX.
THANK YOU SO MUCH MISTER CHAIR
AND DESPITE THE CHEERS OBJECTION
SO WILL NOT HERE'S S. B.
THIRTEEN OH NINE THE FISH ON THE
BEST BILL IS WELL AS A SB
THIRTEEN TEN ON DUNGEONS CRAP SO.
YES.
THERE WE GO IT WAS A GOOD BIT
OF CHRISTY.
ISSUE THERE.
BE HERE ALL NIGHT MISTER CHAIR.
SENATOR.
MCGUIRE AS B. THIRTEEN EIGHTY
SIX THANK YOU SO MUCH.
AS HE THIRTEEN THE SIX WOULD BE
AN IMPORTANT STEP TO INCREASING
ACCESS TO CARE FOR THE MILLIONS
CONSUMERS IN RURAL. AND
UNDERSERVED AREAS IN GREAT
LEASES SMALL FAMILY OWNED
OPTOMETRISTS COMPETING INCREASE
IN THE CORPORATE OPTOMETRIC
WORLD.
THE CURRENT BRANCH OFFICE
LIMITATIONS LAW IS ANTIQUATED
WHICH IS BEEN ON THE BOOKS HERE
IN CALIFORNIA SINCE NINETEEN
FIFTY NINE. WHICH ALLOWS AN
INDIVIDUAL LICENSE OPTOMETRIST
TO TWO STORES ONLY. FIFTY
THIRTEEN EIGHTY SIX WILL
MODERNIZE CALIFORNIA'S I CARE
INDUSTRY FOR OPTOMETRISTS OWNED
BUSINESSES BY ELIMINATING AN
OUTDATED REQUIREMENT THAT
PREVENTS THEM ONCE AGAIN FROM
OWNING MORE THAN TWO OFFICES.
THE BILL ALSO MAKES OPTOMETRISTS
AND ENTITIES THAT CONTRACTOR
EMPLOYEE OF TOM TRYS MORE
RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING
INDUSTRY STANDARDS PROFESSIONAL
CONDUCT BOB WHICH WILL GREATLY
BENEFIT PATIENTS.
REGARDING THE FIFTH SCHOOL AT
THE REDUCTION IN LICENSE REVENUE
FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER
AFFAIRS WOULD BE MINOR
ADDITIONALLY THE WORK LOAD FOR
THE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY. WOULD BE
ABSORBED ONE THE BOARD IS
SUPPORTIVE OF THIS BILL AND
WE'LL HEAR FROM THEM IN JUST A
MOMENT. I HAVE HAD THE HONOR TO
BE TO WORK WITH MANY
STAKEHOLDERS INCLUDING THE
OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION IN MISTER
CHAIR THAT TO BE TO THANK THEM
PUBLICLY. UP FORWARD THEIR
CONVERSATIONS LEADING INTO TODAY
WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO WORK
WITH HIM AS WE MOVE THIS BILL
FORWARD UP PER BY YOUR BLESSING.
HAVE WITH ME TODAY.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER WITH THE
COMPANY STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY
ANYONE THINKER VERY MUCH FOR ALL
OF OUR WORK IN AUSTIN TO THE
CHAIR OF BEAN P. FOR ALL OF HIS
EFFORTS LEADING INTO TODAY'S
HEARING. WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR AN AYE VOTE THANK YOU
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
BUT I JUST GOT THE FERMENT IN
THE CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF
OPTOMETRY WE ARE IN STRONG
SUPPORT WE THANK SENATE REQUIRES
WORK WITH US ON THIS BILL. AND
IT IS MINOR AND ABSORB ALL THAT
HADN'T DCA ALSO PLAY TAG TO
TWELVE THOUSAND DOLLARS TO IN IT
COSTS JUST A CLARIFICATION
THAT'S NOT GOING TO IMPACT THE
ACTUAL FUND THAT'S REDIRECTED
RESOURCES. FOR THEM UPDATING THE
BREEZE SYSTEM SO IT'S NOT GONNA
BE AN ADDITIONAL TEN TWELVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS AS EXISTING
STAFF.
THANK YOU YOU ARE TAKING THE
AMENDMENTS CRACKED IT SIR THANK
YOU VERY MUCH AN APOLOGIST
SHOULD MENTION IT YES.
WHAT THIS IS ABOUT THIS
AWARENESS OF THE PARK?
WELL THIS IS AN OPPOSITION.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS I'D
JAMES JACK ON BEHALF OF NATIONAL
VISION.
WE APPRECIATE THE AUTHOR'S.
WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT THE
AMENDMENT LISTED IN THE ANALYSIS
AND WE WILL BE REMOVING OUR
OPPOSITION TO THE BILL ONE THAT
DOESN'T PRINT THANK YOU.
HALF OFF SCOTLAND'S COPTERS I
EXAM ALSO APPRECIATE THE
AUTHOR'S WORK WILLINGNESS TO
WORK WITH US AND GO.
VERY MUCH.
BURKE JENNIFER TANNAHILL WITH
AARON READ AN ASSOCIATES ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION WANT
THANK THE AUTHOR FOR FOR WORKING
WITH US WE SIGNED UP AND OPPOSE
POSITION ON THE BILL BUT WE LOOK
FORWARD TO FURTHER CONVERSATIONS.
THANK YOU.
OF FINANCE NO FILE CONSEQUENCES
FROM COMMITTEE.
THIS DOES INJURED DO PASS
RECOMMENDATION AS AMENDED TO THE
SENATE FLOOR.
THANK YOU THERE'S A MOTION BY
SENATOR HELL.
SENATOR PLEASE KALRA.
LARA AYE AYE LARA AYE BATES.
BELL.
BELL I BRADFORD. BRADFORD AYE
HILL.
HILL AYE NIELSEN.
WIENER.
THERE YOU WILL LEAVE THE ITEM
OPEN TAUGHT UPS MEMBERS SAT ON.
THANK YOU.
SUTTER HEALTH. WHEN YOU KNOW
HE'S GOT ONE OF THE EARLIER YOU
PRESIDING START.
SOME OF WHERE YOU HAVE S. B.
FOURTEEN FIFTY THREE WHICH HAS A
KIND OF FOR SUSPENSE CLOSERS.
HE SIR INTO A MAKE THIS QUICK
THANK YOU SO MUCH RICHER IN
MEMBERS.
SD FOURTEEN FIFTY THREE
EXTENSIVE STATURE LIMITATIONS
FOR ILLEGAL FORCE CONVERSIONS
BUT WHICH HAS DECIMATED
CALIFORNIA'S FORCE. FROM ONE
YEAR TO THREE YEARS WHEN IT
COMES TO A LEGAL AGRICULTURE
CONVERSIONS ESPECIALLY WITH THE
ISSUE OF CANNABIS.
THIS WILL BRING IT IN LINE WITH
FISH AND WILDLIFE SET YOU
LIMITATIONS FOR SUMMER
VIOLATIONS RELATED TO STREAMBED
ALTERATIONS SP FOURTEEN FIFTY
THREE WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY
ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR CAL FIRE.
PER AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES
REGARDING POTENTIAL INCREASES IN
COURT SYSTEM COSTS WE'VE ALREADY
BEEN SEEN UPTICK IN COURT CASE
THOSE RELATED TO ILLEGAL
CONVERSIONS SINCE THE PASSAGE OF
PROPOSITION SIXTY FOUR WHICH
LEGALIZE CANNABIS HERE. IN
CALIFORNIA THE TOTAL VIOLATIONS
HAVE GONE FROM THIRTY IN TWO
THOUSAND FIFTEEN. TO NINETY NINE
IN TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN IN
CASE THOSE WILL LIKELY CONTINUE
TO RISE EVEN WITHOUT SP FOURTEEN
FIFTY THREE. FURTHERMORE THE
ALTERNATIVE TO ADVANCING SP
FOURTEEN FIFTY THREE IS WORSE
DUE TO THE FACT THERE ARE
THOUSANDS ITALY THOUSANDS OF
ACRES THAT HAD BEEN ILLEGALLY
CLEARED FOR CANNABIS GROWS.
STREAMS ILLEGALLY DAMNED IN THE
STATE WILL ALSO NEED TO SPEND
MORE ON REMEDIATION WITHOUT
GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE
PROBLEM
STOPPING ILLEGAL CONVERSIONS OF
TIMBERLAND. I HAVE WITH ME TODAY
AND MISTER CHAIR SHAWN HOFFMAN
BUT WITH THE CONFERENCE RETURNS
ASSOCIATION AS WELL AS PAUL
MASON.
PACIFIC FORCE TRUST.
WITNESSES AND SUPPORT MORNING
THAT MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS ARE
SHAUNA HOFFMAN WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
ASSOCIATION.
.
THE CIRCUIT PROSECUTOR PROJECT
AT CTA HOUSES WHICH PROSECUTES
ONE OF THESE MARK. ISSUES
THROUGHOUT THE STATE IN SMALL
AND ROCK RURAL COUNTIES. IT
ABOUT TWENTY CASES IN THE LAST
SEVERAL YEARS THAT THEY WERE
UNABLE TO PROSECUTE.
DO TO THE ONE YEAR STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS NOW SENATOR MCGUIRE
MENTIONED.
THIS WOULD BRING THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS FOR THESE PARTICULAR
VIOLATIONS IN LINE WITH SOME OF
THE STREAMBED DIVERSION. AND
POLLUTION.
STATUTES THAT WE HAVE.
I WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COURT
COSTS THREE TO MEAN ALICE'S MOST
OF THESE CASES.
WHERE WE HAVE SOME ILLEGAL
CONVERSION THERE NOT HAPPENING
IN A VACUUM THERE'S ALSO SOME
ELEMENT OF STREAMBED DIVERSION
OR?
WATER POLLUTION WHERE THERE IS
A THREE YEAR STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS SO.
I DON'T KNOW THAT EXTENDING THE
STATUTE LIMITATIONS IS GOING TO
RESULT IN A NUMBER OF NEW CASES
THAT ARE SOLELY. BASED ON THE
ILLEGAL CONVERSION I THINK IT'S
MORE ATTACHING THIS TO. A A CASE
THAT'S ALREADY BEEN FILED SO I
DON'T KNOW THAT WE'LL SEE THAT
MANY NEW CASES FILED. UP BUT
CERTAINLY EXTENDING THE STATUTE
LIMITATIONS TO MATCH UP WITH
SOME OF THESE OTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS THAT WE
SEE.
ALLOWS US TO MORE APPROPRIATELY.
ENFORCE THE THE STATE'S
ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS SUFFERED THAT
REASON WOULD ASK YOUR SUPPORT
THE APPROPRIATE TIME.
PARTICULAR ADDITIONAL WITNESSES
DEFINITE PAUL MASON FOR PACIFIC
FORCE TRUST WE VERY MUCH
APPRECIATE THE SENATE TO BRING
THIS FORWARD BECAUSE THIS REALLY
IS AN ENORMOUS PROBLEM OPTICAL
AND THE NORTH COAST AND.
THROUGHOUT THE DAY IN ONE OF THE
INLAND SIERRA REGION'S
WHERE YOU HAVE.
.
FOR ITS BEING CLEAR CUT DURING
THE POT FARMS.
AND THE ANALYSIS NOTES DEFER
PROSECUTING MORE OF THESE GOING
TO COST MORE AND SO THEREFORE
THE COST PRESSURE. SHORT THAT IS
UNDOUBTEDLY TRUE BUT WILL ALSO
EARLY SIT MAY BE TRUE HOW MY
UNDERMINE MY CO IN THIS HERE.
.
THESE ARE NOT HARD CASES TO.
TO FEED ON AND THEN GENERATE THE
THE FINES THAT ARE THEN GOING TO
MORE THAN PAY FOR THE COST OF
THESE CASES THESE ARE LITERALLY
AREAS WHERE YOU CLERK AT THE
FOREST INPUT OF GREENHOUSES.
SO. WE VERY MUCH.
THE IT'S IMPORTANT TO BE ABLE
TO BRING THESE CASES AND NOT BE
PREVENTED JUST BECAUSE HE DIDN'T
DISCOVER THEM UNTIL AFTER THE
STATUTE HAD ALREADY.
PRECLUDE YOU FROM GOING FORWARD
SO WE ARE TO GET THIS SUBDOMAIN
FORWARD BY AT THE PROPER TIME.
THANK YOU THIS IT WASN'T SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING ELEANOR TEAS ON
BEHALF OF SAVE THE REDWOODS
LEAGUE THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
THE WILDLANDS CONSERVANCY AND
TROUT UNLIMITED AND SUPPORT
THANK YOU.
MR MEMBERS BRIAN WHITE HERE FOR
THE CALIFORNIA LICENSE FORCES
ASSOCIATION IN THE FORCE AND
OBSERVE CALIFORNIA AWESOME
SUPPORT.
THANK YOU WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION ON THE FIRE.
FINANCE THE FILE.
OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE.
THEATER UNANSWERED MCGUIRE WHICH
I TO CLOSE FUTURE CONSIDERATION
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS WHO
WOULD ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND
APPROPRIATE TIME THANK YOU THANK
YOU WITHOUT OBJECTION IT WILL
THIS TIME TO THE SUSPENSE FILE.
SENATOR HILL WHO'S WINNING
PATIENTLY.
WE KNOW THAT A VERY VOICE OF MAN.
FULLER HILL YOU DO HAVE A DO
PASS RECOMMENDATION ON S. B. TEN
TWENTY EIGHT. FLOORS OURS THANK
YOU VERY MUCH REFER AND THANK
YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF
THIS AND FOR YOUR WONDERFUL
STEPS CONSIDERATIONS WELL AS BE
TEN TWENTY EIGHT SIMPLY INSURES.
ANY RECENT FEDERAL TAX SAVINGS
PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES
RECEIVE ARE PASSED ON TO RATE
PAYERS.
UTILITIES FILE STATE AND FEDERAL
TAXES LIKE ANY CORPORATION BUT
UTILITIES TAXES ARE PAID THROUGH
RATE.
pBY RATE PAYERS
THUS ANY SAVINGS FROM FEDERAL
TAXES GIVEN TO THE UTILITY
SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE RATE
PAYERS. THROUGHOUT THE LAST FEW
MONTHS THE FEW SHE HAS CALLED ON
MANY UTILITIES TO TRACK FEDERAL
TAX CHANGES IN MOOD AND IT TOO
IN.
IN MEMORANDUM ACCOUNTS
S. B. TEN TWENTY EIGHT STATES
THAT ANY SAVINGS FROM UTILITIES
TAXES SHOULD BE RETURNED TO RATE
PAYERS. I ASK YOUR AYE VOTE
MEMBERS THANK YOU.
THANK YOU COMMENTS OR I'M SORRY
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION
FINANCE NO FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
THERE'S A MOTION BY SENATOR
BRADFORD THIS IS A TO PASS AS
AMENDED TO THE SENATE FLOOR
SENATOR PLEASE HOLD.
LARA AYE LARA AYE BATES. BATES
AYE BELL.
WELL I BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE HILL. HILL AYE
NIELSEN. NIELSEN AYE WIENER.
OKAY PERFECT.
MEMBERS THAT CONCLUDES OUR THE
DO PASS RECOMMENDATIONS WE ARE
GONNA DO OF.
PASSED THROUGH OF THE OPEN
ITEMS TO ALLOW OUR MEMBERS TO
ADD ON. AB BEFORE WE MOVE TO
LEAVE AGENDA AS QUICKLY AS
POSSIBLE LET'S BEGIN. WITH.
LET'S BEGIN WITH S. B. TWELVE
FIFTY FOUR BY SENATOR STONE.
THAT'S A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION
SEARCHER PLEASE CALL THE ABSENT
MEMBERS.
WELL.
WELL I.
SEVEN ZERO THAT ITEM IS OUT.
MOVING ON TO S. B. TWELVE EIGHTY
EIGHT BY SENATOR LEYVA TO DO
PASS RECOMMENDATION SECRETARY
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
WELL.
WELL I.
FIVE TO TO THAT ITEM IS OUT.
MOVING ON TO S. B. TWELVE THIRTY
EIGHT BY SENATOR ROTH.
TO DO PASS RECOMMENDATION
SENATOR PLEASE.
LARA.
BY LARA AYE WIENER.
SIX ZERO OR OF REPLACE THAT ITEM
ON THE CALL. BULLARD TO SP
FOURTEEN FIFTY SEVEN BY SENATOR
HERNANDEZ SENATOR PLEASE CALL
THE ABSENT MEMBERS.
BRADFORD.
BRADFORD I.
SEVEN ZERO THAT ITEM IS OUT.
MOVING ONTO A SB THIRTEEN EIGHTY
SIX BY SENATOR MCGUIRE TORTURE
PLEASE CALL THE ABSENT MEMBERS.
BATES.
NIELSEN.
WIENER.
OKAY WILL REPLACE THAT ITEM ON
THE CALL.
THE BETTER THAT WAY.
PERFECT.
OKAY MEMBERS WERE TO CONTINUE ON
WITH THE AGENDA.
FUN SUSPENSE ITEMS.
IF YOU CAN PLEASE BEFORE FOLKS
IN THE GALLERY AND. ARE IN THE
AREA OF THE COMPY READY TO.
EITHER SUPPORT OR OPPOSE A
PARTICULAR ITEM THAT YOU'RE HERE
TODAY. QUOTED BEGIN WITH MY
ITEMS BEGINNING WITH S. B. EIGHT
TWENTY FOUR WHEN THIS IS IN
SUPPORT.
WITNESSES AND OPPOSITION
FINANCING FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE THING
HEARING NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIVE. MOVING ON TO S. B. NINE
SEVENTY FOUR WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION
FINANCE WILL FILE COMMENTS OF
COURSE WHO COMMITTEE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WHEN WILL THIS ITEM TO
SUSPEND FILE. MOVING NOT TO SB
ONE THOUSAND WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SEEING
NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION WE WILL
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPEND FILE.
WILL BE NINE TO S. B.TEN
THIRTEEN WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE THE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SING
NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
WE NOT TO S. B. TWELVE TWENTY
EIGHT WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION FIND
A FILE.
COMES OF COURSE FROM COMMITTEE
SEEING HEARING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS I DON'T
THE SUSPENSE FILE. MOVING ON TO
CENTER WINTERS I DON'T SB EIGHT
THIRTY ONE WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS A. PUMPS ARIF'S HER
WAY CAL SKI
FEDERAL WAY KOWSKI.
WHEN THIS IS IN SUPPORT.
CRIED.
CHAIRMAN POWERS THIS CUBA AFTER
DECEMBER DESCUBRIR RAPID TRANSIT
DISTRICT SUPPORT.
AGAIN TOM DUFFY FOR THE
COALITION FOR ADEQUATE SCHOOL
HOUSING IN IN OPPOSITION TO THIS
MEASURE. FOR NUMBER THE REASONS
THAT ARTICULATED WHEN I WAS
DISCUSSING THE.
.
YEAH OTHER BILL THAT HAD TO DO
WITH THE DO YOU CENTERS GONNA
SPELL THERE YES JAMIE SINCE
THANK YOU BAKER.
I DON'T I DON'T HAVE THE
CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WERE IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL.
GREAT THANK YOU.
FINANCE
WHILE. CONSEQUENCES AND
COMMITTEE.
SEEING AND HEARING THERE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS ITEM TO
SUSPENSE FILE. MOVING ON TO
SENATOR HERTZBERG TANDEMS
BEGINNING WITH S. B. EIGHT NINE
EIGHT WHEN THIS IS IN SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SEEING
HEARING NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
WILL THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIVE.
MOVING ON TO S. B.. NINE THIRTY
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE THE FILE. COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SEEN HERE NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION
WE WILL THIS ITEM TO THE
SUSPENSE FILE. MOVING ON TO SB
ELEVEN THIRTY ONE. WHEN THIS
ISN'T SUPPORT. WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE THING
HEARING NINE WITHOUT OBJECTION
WE WILL THIS ITEM TO THE
SUSPECT'S FILE.
MOVING NOW TO SENATOR ATKINS AYE
THOSE BEGINNING WITH S. B. NINE
FORTY FIVE. WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE THEATER
NINE WITHOUT OBJECTION WE WILL
THIS ITEM TO SUSPENSE FILE.
MOVING ON TO SB ELEVEN TWENTY
FIVE
WHEN THIS IS A SUPPORT.
JASON LAST WEEK ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA PARAPSYCHOLOGY IN
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE THE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SINGING
NAM WITHOUT OBJECTION WHEN WILL
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
MOVING ON TO SENATOR ALLEN'S
ITEMS BEGINNING WITH S. B. NINE
SIXTY ONE ONE ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE NO FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SITTING
HERE NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
WILL THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FOR. MOVING ON TO S. B. TEN
FIFTEEN WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS AN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD
ESTIMATES.
COST OF TWO HUNDRED FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS IN THE FIRST
YEAR AND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY SIX
THOUSAND DOLLARS ON GOING FOR
THREE POSITIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE
CLIMATE RESILIENCY PROGRAM.
FINANCE NOTES THAT THIS BILL
WILL DRIVE COSTS IN WORKLOAD FOR
THE CONSERVANCY'S THAT OPT TO
PARTICIPATE TO DEVELOP AND
IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM.
ADDITIONALLY THE BILL REQUIRES
THAT THE BOARD AND PARTICIPATING
CONSERVANCY'S CONSULT WITH THE
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH.
AND ANY STATE ENERGY
IMPLEMENTING A CLIMATE CHANGE
INITIATIVE WHICH COULD RESULT IN
ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR OPR AND ANY
ENTITY THAT IS CONSULTED DURING
THE DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM.
ALTHOUGH THE BILL IDENTIFIES
POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE
PROGRAM. THESE FUNDING
MECHANISMS ARE ONE TIMER LIMITED
TERM IN NATURE. A INCLUDING THE
GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND
BONDS SETTLEMENTS AND OTHER
REVENUE SOURCES. AND FINANCE
NOTES THAT THE BILL FAILS TO
IDENTIFY PERMANENT ONGOING
FUNDING SOURCE TO SUPPORT THE
PROGRAM.
ADDITIONALLY EACH BOND SUPPORT THE PROGRAM.
PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO THE
REGIONAL PROGRAMS PROPOSED.
CONSEQUENTLY THIS BILL WILL
CREATE COST PRESSURES FOR
ANOTHER FUND YET TO BE
IDENTIFIED TO SERVICE THE
PERMANENT FUNDING SOURCE FOR THE
PROGRAM.
I ANY REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR
THE ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS THANK
YOU.
THANK YOU BECAUSE OF COURSE FROM
COMMITTEE.
SEARING NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIVE. MOVING ON TO SB THIRTEEN
THIRTY FIVE WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
AND RIGHTLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN
OPPOSITION THANKS THANK YOU.
FINANCE AND FILE COMES OF COURSE
ISN'T COMMITTEE SINGING NOW WITH
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO
SCA EIGHTEEN. WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMES A QUESTION
FROM COMMITTEE.
SING A NON WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIVE. MOVING ON TO SCA TWENTY
TWO. WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SENIOR NON WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILL THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FILE.
SIR WINTERS BACK WHEN WE OPEN UP
THE REMAINING ITEMS SO THAT WE
CAN.
PROCESS TOLD AS QUICKLY AS
POSSIBLE.
MEMBERS WE'RE GONNA OPEN UP ON
THE TWO REMAINING ITEMS THAT WE
HAVE. A THREE REMAINING ITEMS SP
TEN TWENTY EIGHT. BY SENATOR
HEALTH SECRETARY PLEASE CALL THE
ABSENT MEMBERS.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO THE
SENATE FLOOR WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
THROUGH ZERO THAT ITEM WITHOUT
MOVING ON TO S. B. TWELVE THIRTY
KATE THAT'S A DO PASS
RECOMMENDATION.
SENATOR PLEASE CALL THE ABSENT
MEMBERS
WIENER. AYE WIENER AYE.
SO ZERO THAT ITEM IS OUT.
MOVING ON TO SB THIRTEEN EIGHTY
SIX BY THURMOND QUIET.
THE TO PASS AS AMENDED. SENATOR
PLEASE HURRY UP SOME MEMBERS.
BATES.
NIELSEN.
NIELSEN NO.
WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
FIVE TO ONE THAT ITEM FIFTH OUT.
THINK YOU MEMBERS AND THAT IS
ALL THE DO PASS ITEMS ARE WE
HAVE. WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON ALONG
WITH OUR AGENDA.
BEGINNING WITH THE HIGH SENATOR
SKIP PARA CONTINUE WITH CENTER
SCANNERS ITEMS SP NINETY EIGHTY
FOUR WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCING FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
THINK HEARING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WHEN WILL THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FIVE. YES.
EIGHTY SIX I.
SIX.
MCGUIRE. WORKED CLOSELY.
THE BOSS THREE HUNDRED. THIRTEEN
RECONSIDERATION.
WE WILL HAVE TO DO A
RECONSIDERATION OF VOTES BRING
UP THE ITEM.
AGAIN.
SERVO I AM.
WE DON'T BRADFORD GETTING.
THAT WE CAN HAVE SERGEANTS
BECAUSE SENATOR BRADFORD.
LEO. IS ONLY IMPROVE IT'S PART
OF.
WHAT IS?
OKAY OKAY.
FISHER.
OKAY PROFESSOR PROBABLY STARTED
WITH RAPPER BACK.
SURE OKAY THAT'S FINE.
THANK YOU PRETTY SOON OF SOME
PART.
A. CONTINUE ARE WHAT SENATOR
SCANNERS ITEM S. B. THIRTEEN
SIXTY NINE. WITNESSES IN SUPPORT
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE AND FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SITTING HERE NOW WITHOUT
OBJECTION WILL THIS ITEM TO
SUSPENSE FILE.
FOR THAT'S THE REAL WINNERS AND
I'M A SB THIRTEEN NINETY NINE.
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE COMES A QUESTIONS
FROM COMMITTEE.
THINKING NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION
WE.
PRESIDENT AMONG THE SUSPENSE
FILE.
BUDGET.
MOVING ON TO CENTER HILLS ITEMS
BEGINNING WITH SB THIRTEEN
SEVENTY SIX WHEN IT'S ISN'T
SUPPORT WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE THE FILE CONSEQUENCES IN
COMMITTEE SCENE HEARING NOW
WITHOUT OBJECTION WITH THIS ITEM
TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
MOVING ON TO SP FOURTEEN FORTY
EIGHT WHEN ASSISTANCE APART.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE THING
VERY NON WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
WILL THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIVE.
MOVING ON TO S. B. FOURTEEN
SIXTY FIVE WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHAT IS IS IN OPPOSITION?
FINANCE THE FILE COMES OF
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SENATOR NUNN WITHOUT OBJECTION
WILL THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FILE MOVING ON TO S. B. FOURTEEN
EIGHTY.
WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN WHICH OF THE
COMMITTEE MY NAME IS SOLOMON
STILL ON BEHALF OF BELIEVE THE
NICHE AT THE FOR BETTER
PROTECTION IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND
STAFF I'M AND OTHER MEMBERS ARM
REBEKAH MITCHELL WITHIN AFTER
PATH MEDICINE COMMITTEE AND WE
ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS BILL
THANK YOU THANK YOU. WHIZZES IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCING FILE.
COMMENTS OF COURSE ISN'T
pCOMMITTEE SEEM HEARING THEM
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FILE.
MOVING ON TO SB FOURTEEN EIGHTY
ONE WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE PROMISE OF
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE THING
HERE NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO A SUSPENSE
FILE. MOVING ON TO SB FOURTEEN
EIGHTY TWO WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT. WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION FINANCE A FILE.
COMMENTS OF COURSE ISN'T
COMMITTEE SEEING HEARING NONE
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FILE.
MOVING ON TO S. B. FOURTEEN
EIGHTY THREE WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT.
WELL THIS IS AN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE.
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE THING HEARING NOW
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE WILL THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
WE LIKE TO SENATOR BOWS ITEMS
BEGINNING WITH S. B. TEN FIFTY
SIX WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE AND FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS IN COMMITTEE.
SITTING HERE NOW WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS ITEMS
WITH SUSPENSE FOR. MOVING ON TO
SB THIRTEEN OH ONE.
WHEN IS ISN'T SUPPORT.
YOU CAN MEMBERS MONICA MILLER
BEHALF OF THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT WHERE THE SPONSOR
WE THINK THE SENATOR FOR
CARRYING THE BILL. WE WANT TO
KNOW THAT THE BILL ACTUALLY
HOUSE FEES AND IT TO COVER THE
COST OF EXPEDITING THESE PERMITS
FOR THESE AYE LIFE SAFETY
PROJECTS WE REALLY HOPE YOU
CONSIDER THAT WHEN LOOKING AT
SUSPENSE THANK YOU* YOU.
WHEN THIS IS AN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE CONSEQUENCES FROM
COMMITTEE.
SEEN HEARING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WILL THIS ITEM TO THE
SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO S.
B. FOURTEEN FOURTEEN WHEN THIS
ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION
FINANCE HAVE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SEEING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION
WITH THIS ITEM TO SUSPENSEFUL.
WE WANT TO SENATOR LABELS ITEMS
BEGINNING WITH S. B. TEN SEVENTY
TWO. WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SAYING
NO WITHOUT OBJECTION WE WILL
THIS ITEMS THE SUSPENSE FILE.
MOVING ON TO SB ELEVEN FIFTY SIX
WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE SO FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. SAYING
HEY NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FILE MOVING ON TO SENATOR DODD'S.
BEGINNING WITH S. B. TWELVE
NINETY ONE WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE PROMISE REQUESTED
FROM COMMITTEE.
SEE HIM NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO SUSPEND FILE.
MOVING ON TO SENATOR STONE'S
ITEMS BEGINNING WITH S. B. TEN
NINETY ONE WHEN THIS IS IN
SUPPORT. WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. SEEING
HEARING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION
WE MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE
SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO SB
THIRTEEN FIFTY TWO WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE.
SEE HIM NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION
WHEN WILL THIS ITEMS THE
SUSPENSE ARE FILE.
MOVING ON TO SENATOR WESSELS
ITEM BEGINNING WITH.
SP TEN NINETY FIVE SEVEN. WHICH
ISN'T SUPPORT WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE WILL FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SINGING
NUN WITHOUT OBJECTION WITH THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
MOVING ON TO SENATOR MORE NOTS
ITEM S. B. ELEVEN SIXTEEN. WHEN
THIS ISN'T SUPPORT WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION. FINANCE
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES GENERAL FUND REVENUE
LOSSES OF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY
MILLION DOLLARS AND TWENTY
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN SEVENTY FIVE
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY AND SEVENTY FIVE
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
TWENTY ONE. OF THE FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD SAID ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
HAVE NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED
THANK YOU THANK YOU GUY WAS OF
COURSE IS FROM COMMITTEE SINGING
NUN WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FILE.
MOVING ON TO CENTER BRADFORD
TITLE BEGINNING WITH S. B.
ELEVEN THIRTY FIVE WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
HE WHEN HE MINUTES HERE MAY HAVE
BRADLEY DEFENSE IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE NO FILE COMES A QUESTION
COMMITTEE SINGING I WANTED TO
OBJECTION WITH THIS ITEM TO
SUSPENSE FILE. MOVING ON TO SP
TWELVE SIXTY EIGHT WHEN THIS IS
IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE CONSEQUENCES WHEN
COMMITTEE SINGING NAM WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
MOVING ON TO SENATOR
PORTANTINO'S ITEMS SP ELEVEN
FIFTY FOUR. WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE SO FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SEATING
NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FOR.
MOVING ON TO SB TWELVE FOURTEEN
WITNESSES AND SUPPORT. WHEN THIS
IS IN OPPOSITION. FINANCE TO
FILE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE THEORY KNOWN WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO
SP TWELVE SIXTY THREE WITTICISM
SUPPORTER. WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE THING
HEARING NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION
WAS ITEM TO SUSPENSEFUL.
MOVING ON TO SB THIRTEEN
SEVENTEEN WHEN THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION
FINANCE WHILE CONSEQUENCES FROM
COMMITTEE SEEN HEARING NONE
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE WILL THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
MOVING ON TO SB FOURTEEN TWENTY
TWO WITNESSES AND SUPPORT.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE FILE COMES OF COURSE
FROM COMMITTEE THINKING NOW
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE WILL THIS
ITEM TO SUSPEND FOR. PUTTING ON
A SENATOR ANDERSON'S ITEMS
BEGINNING WITH SB ELEVEN SIXTY
NINE. WITNESSES AND SUPPORT.
WHAT IS IN OPPOSITION?
AT THE COURT ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA TAX REFORM
ASSOCIATION IN OPPOSITION THINK.
THANK YOU A. FINANCE NO FILE.
BECAUSE OF COURSE ISN'T
COMMITTEE SINGING THEM WITHOUT
OBJECTION WITH THIS ITEM TO THE
SUSPENSE FOUND MOVING ON TO SB
TWELVE AND TWELVE ELEVEN WHEN
THIS ISN'T SUPPORT. WHEN THIS IS
IN OPPOSITION.
THAT THE COURT AND WITH THE
COVERAGE TAX FROM ASSOCIATION
ALSO IN A POSITION ON THIS
MISSION.
WELL THIS IS ABOUT FINANCE NO
FILE COMES REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
THING HEARING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WILL THIS ITEM TO THE
SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO S.
B. TWELVE TWELVE WHEN THIS IS IN
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS BILL
DUE TO ITS SUBSTANTIAL GENERAL
FUND REVENUE LOSSES.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES TOTAL REVENUE LOSSES
OF TWO HUNDRED NINETY MILLION
DOLLARS IN TWENTY NINETEEN
TWENTY. AND THREE HUNDRED
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
TWENTY ONE. OF THE FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD SO ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
DIET BEEN DETERMINED THANK YOU.
THANK YOU CONSEQUENCE FROM
COMMITTEE SINGING NUN WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS ITEM TO
SUSPENSE FOR. MOVING ON TO SB
ELEVEN EIGHTY TWO BY SENATOR
GLAZER WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
FINANCES OPPOSED TO THIS BILL DO
IT SIGNIFICANT GENERAL FUND
REVENUE LOSSES
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES TOTAL REVENUE LOSSES
OF FORTY FOUR MILLION DOLLARS IN
TWENTY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN. SIXTY
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY AND SEVENTY FIVE
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
TWENTY ONE. FURTHER REVENUE
LOSSES ARE ESTIMATED TO INCREASE
IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS
OF THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ANTICIPATES THIS BILL WOULD NOT
SIT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THEIR
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
BUT YOU CONSEQUENCES FROM
COMMITTEE SINGING NAM WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO
SENATOR DENOUNCE ITEM S. B.
TWELVE OH SIX WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT. WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE TO FILE COMES OF COURSE
FROM COMMITTEE THING HEARING
NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM TO SUSPENSEFUL. MOVING
ON TO SENATOR GAINES ADAMS
BEGINNING WITH SP TWELVE
EIGHTEEN WITNESSES AND SUPPORT.
WHEN THE SAYS IN OPPOSITION.
AT THE CORPORATE WITH PROPERTY
TAX REFORM ASSOCIATION IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES TOTAL GENERAL FUND
REVENUE LOSSES OF ONE HUNDRED
FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTYEIGHTEEN NINETEEN. ONE HUNDRED
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY AND ONE HUNDRED
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY TWENTY
TWENTY ONE.
OF THE FRANCHISE TAX PORTS
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS NOT YET
BEEN DETERMINED THANK YOU.
GARMENTS WORSE FROM COMMITTEE
SENIOR NON WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO SUSPENSE FOR.
MOVING ON TO SCA NINETEEN. WHEN
THIS IS IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
AT THE CORE OF THE CALIFORNIA
TAX REFORM ASSOCIATION IN
OPPOSITION.
FOR VIOLENCE FILE.
COMES A GORGEOUS WHO COMMITTEE
THEORY NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FIVE.
MOVING ONTO SENATOR HERNANDEZ
HAS ITEMS BEGINNING WITH S. B.
TWELVE FIFTY FIVE WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE NEW FILE. COMES REPORTS
FROM COMMITTEES THEATER NON
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS
ITEM TO SUSPENSE FOR. MOVING ON
TO SB FOURTEEN FORTY SEVEN WHEN
THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WELL THIS IS IN OPPOSITION
FINANCE A FILE CONSEQUENCES FROM
COMMITTEE THING HEARING NONE
WITHOUT OBJECTION REMOVE THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FILE.
MOVING ON TO SB FOURTEEN EIGHTY
FOUR WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX
AND FEE ADMINISTRATION ESTIMATES
THAT EXTENDING THE EXEMPTION
WOULD RESULT IN STATE AND LOCAL
REVENUE LOSSES OF ONE POINT ONE
MILLION DOLLARS.
ANNUALLY FOUR HUNDRED NINETY
THREE THOUSAND OF WHICH IS
GENERAL FUND.
OF THE CITY TFA ESTIMATES THAT
THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS WOULD
BE MINOR ABSORBABLE.
THANK YOU.
COMES OF COURSE FROM COMMITTEE
SEEING HEARING THEM WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FIVE. MOVING ON TO
SENATOR BATES ITEM S. B. TWELVE
NINETY WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE WILL FILE CONSEQUENCES
FROM COMMITTEE SEEING HEARING
NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WILL MOVE
THIS ITEM SUSPENSE FILE. MOVING
ON TO CENTER MCGUIRE IS AN ARMS
SB THIRTEEN OH NINE. WITNESSES
IN SUPPORT. WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE.
FINANCE KNOWS THE DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND WILDLIFE WOULD LIKELY
NEED ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO
ESTABLISH THE DUNGENESS CRAB
TRAP RETRIEVAL PROGRAM. BUT
BECAUSE THE BILL REQUIRES A
PERMIT FEE TO FULLY RECOVER ALL
REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE AN
IMPLEMENTATION COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE PROGRAM. THESE FEES ARE
ESTIMATED TO ITEM.
OFFSET ANY INCREASED COSTS OF
FINANCE ALSO NOTES UNKNOWN BUT
POTENTIAL ONE TIME COST
IMPLEMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRED
BY THE BILL. HOWEVER THESE COSTS
ARE LIKELY MINOR INEXORABLE
THANK YOU. PICK YOU.
I WAS A PERSON COMMITTEE SINGING
NUN WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FIVE.
MOVING ON THE SENATE MCGUIRE IS
ITEM S. B. THIRTEEN TEN
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT. WITNESSES
IN OPPOSITION FINANCE A FILE.
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM
COMMITTEE.
SEEN YOU KNOW WITHOUT OBJECTION
WE MOVE THIS I DON'T OF SUSPENSE
FOR. MOVING ON TO CENTER BY NEXT
ISSUE SP THIRTEEN THIRTY SEVEN
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
THREE THE COURT ON BEHALF OF THE
COVERAGE TAX REFORM ASSOCIATION
IN OPPOSITION
THANK YOU OF FINANCE FILE. COMES
OF COURSE ISN'T COMMITTEE SEEING
AND HEARING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS I DON'T
THE SUSPENSE FILE. WE WANT TO
SENATOR STERN'S ITEMS SB
THIRTEEN THIRTY NINE WHEN HIS
HASN'T SUPPORT.
WITNESSES SUPPORT.
MON ATTORNEY LLOYD WITH AND ARE
NOT SUPPORTIVE AMENDED TO
INCLUDE THIRD PARTY OWNERSHIP OF
MICROGRAMS THANK YOU. THANK YOU
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
FIND THE FILE.
QUESTION THE CUMBERSOME
COMMITTEE SINGING NON WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS ITEM TO
THE SUSPENSE FOR. MOVING ON TO
SB THIRTEEN FORTY SEVEN
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
PROPERLY A SOLUTION ON BEHALF OF
ADVANCED ENERGY ECONOMY IN
SUPPORT.
WITH THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
FINANCE WILL FILE CONSEQUENCES
FROM COMMITTEE THING HEARING
NONE WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE
THIS ITEM FOR SUSPENSE FOR.
WE'RE GOING TO SB FOURTEEN
SEVENTY SEVEN.
WHEN THIS IS IN SUPPORT.
IN ARGUMENT SOME HAVE BRAYLON
DEFENSE IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
FINANCE WILL FILE COMMENTS OF
COURSE ISN'T COMMITTEE SAYING NO
WITHOUT OBJECTION WE MOVE THIS
ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE FOR. MOVING
ON TO SB FOURTEEN EIGHTY SEVEN
WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WELL THIS IS AN OPPOSITION
FINANCE A FILE COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE SEEING
HEARING NOW WITHOUT OBJECTION WE
MOVE THIS ITEM TO THE SUSPENSE
FILE. MOVING ON TO S. B.
FOURTEEN SEVENTEEN BY SENATOR
CANNELLA WHEN THIS ISN'T SUPPORT.
WHEN THIS IS IN OPPOSITION.
THAT THE COURT ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA TAX REFORM
ASSOCIATION IN OPPOSITION.
QUESTIONS ARE CAR I'M TIRED
FINANCE THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
ESTIMATES GENERAL FUND REVENUE
LOSSES OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY
MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN. THREE HUNDRED
TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS IN TWENTY
NINETEEN TWENTY THREE HUNDRED
AND THIRTY MILLION DOLLARS IN
TWENTY TWENTY TWENTY ONE.
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD COST
IMPLEMENT DISABILITY YET TO BE
DETERMINED.
I WAS OF COURSE IN COMMITTEE
SEEING AND HEARING NONE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WE WILL THIS ITEM TO
SPENCE FIVE. MOVING ON TO OUR
FINAL ITEM TODAY.
p SP FOURTEEN TWENTY FOUR BY
SENATOR PENN WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT. WHEN THIS IS IN
OPPOSITION.
SAMANTHA CORPORATE ON BEHALF OF
THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER
FOUNDATION THE OPPOSITION THINK
YOU. PICK YOU FINANCE A FILE
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS COMMITTEE
SEEN HEARING NINE WITHOUT
OBJECTION WHEN WILL THIS ITEM.
TO THE SUSPENSE FILE THAT IS THE
FINAL ITEM OVER JENNIFER TODAY.
WE WILL ADJOURN COMMITTEE
HEARING. TODAY AND WILL STAY
TUNED FOR YOU LATER ON THIS WEEK