IT'S STILL MORNING SO GOOD
MORNING THIS IS BUDGET
SUBCOMMITTEE NUMBER FOUR AS
ALWAYS IF YOU'RE IN THE WRONG
ROOM NOW'S THE TIME.
JUDGING FROM THE.
STANDING ROOM ONLY CROWD WE MUST
GET GOOD RATINGS. BUDGETS OF
COMMITTEE.
OKAY WE'RE GONNA MOVE THROUGH
pTHE AGENDAS IN ORDER PART A AND
PART. B..
DID YOU WANT TO DO BIG. IS
BETTER.
OKAY IT DOESN'T MATTER SO WE'RE
GONNA DO A AND B. WILL FIRST
ESTABLISH A QUORUM SINCE WE ARE
ALL HERE.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
IRAQ HERE SOON LEISURE CENTER
WILL. PRESENT.
OKAY SO LET'S TAKE THE.
NOT ONLY AGENDA FOR HEARD A
HUMMING SEE IF I CAN GET THIS
RIGHT.
WE GOING TO SEPARATE OUT FOR
VOTES ON ZERO SIX NINE ZERO
ISSUES THREE AND FOUR WILL TAKE
THOSE TOGETHER.
WE WILL DO A SEPARATE VOTE ON
ITEM SEVEN SEVEN SIX ZERO ISSUE
NUMBER TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE
SERVICE EQUIPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
ASSESSMENT FACILITY. MANNED ON
ITEM EIGHT NINE FIVE FIVE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS ISSUE ONE
CAPITAL OUTLAY. I WOULD NOTE
THERE'S A TYPO IN THE AGENDA AND
WE SHOULD CHANGE MARCH THIRTY
ONE TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN. TO
MARCH THIRTY ONE TWO THOUSAND
AND NINETEEN.
TO MAKE THAT SENTENCE RELEVANT.
SO WHAT WE WILL BE TAKING FIRST
ON THE VOTE ONLY. AGENDA FOR
PART A.
ARE THE FOLLOWING.
IN A BLOCK.
ZERO SIX FIVE ZERO ISSUE NUMBER
ONE.
ITEM. ZERO SIX NINE ZERO OFFICE
OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ISSUES ONE
TWO FIVE SIX AND SEVEN.
ITEM ZERO EIGHT FOUR FIVE ISSUE
NUMBER ONE INSURANCE
COMMISSIONER OFFICES SPACE TBL
ISSUE TO RE AUTHORIZATION OF
CORN.
ITEM ZERO EIGHT NINE ZERO
SECRETARY OF STATE ISSUE ONE
VOTING SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT. ITEM
ONE ONE ONE ONE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
ITEM TWO THREE TWO ZERO
DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE.
EXCUSE ME ISSUE ONE. ITEM TWO
TWO FOUR ZERO DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT ISSUE ONE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA DISASTER PLANNING
ASSISTANCE. ITEM SEVEN SEVEN SIX
ZERO DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
SERVICES ISSUE ONE ONLY CAPITAL
OUTLAY PROPOSALS.
ITEM EIGHT NINE FOUR ZERO
CALIFORNIA MILITARY DEPARTMENT
ISSUE ONE STARBASE.
AND ITEM EIGHT NINE FIVE FIVE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF%
VETERANS AFFAIRS ISSUE ONE
CAPITAL OUTLAY.
VH SEE YOUNG PHIL.
EVERYONE CLEAR ON WHAT WE'RE
GOING TO BE TAKING AS A BLOCK ON
NOT ONLY IN PER DAY IS OUR
MOTION SO. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
SERA. SERA GLAZIER CENTER WILL.
WE WILL NOW CONTINUE ON WITH THE
VOTE ONLY ITEMS AND WE'RE GOING
TO TAKE ITEMS ZERO SIX NINE ZERO
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
ISSUES THREE AND FOUR TOGETHER
AS A BLACK.
ISSUE THREE REGIONAL HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL RESPONSE PROGRAM AN
ISSUE FOR CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
SAFETY MICROWAVE NETWORK.
ISSUES THREE AND FOUR IS THERE A
MOTION.
SO THAT IT'S BEEN MOVED PLEASE
CALL THE ROLL.
SERA FIVE SIR GLAZIER CENTER
WITH NO.
WE'RE GONNA TAKE IT NOW ITEM
SEVEN SEVEN SIX ZERO DEPARTMENT
OF GENERAL SERVICES ISSUE NUMBER
TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE SERVICE
EQUIPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
ASSESSMENT FACILITY DEVELOPMENT.
IS THERE A MOTION.
I WOULD SO MOVE IT'S BEEN MOVED
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
SARAH SINNER GLAZIER CENTER WILL
GO.
OKAY.
SINCE. WE ARE ON A ROLL WHY
DON'T WE GO AHEAD AND TAKE THE
VOTE ONLY CALENDAR AND. BE AS
WELL.
WE HAVE A COUPLE OF ADJUSTMENTS
OTHERWISE WE WILL TAKE CARE OF
THE ITEMS IN BLOCK BUT FOR THE
ADJUSTMENTS WE WERE GOT WE'RE
GOING TO BE PULLING FOR
DISCUSSION.
AND POTENTIAL VOTE ISSUE NUMBER
ONE.
CONTROL SECTION TWELVE STATE
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WILL PULL
THAT FOR DISCUSSION AND PERHAPS
THE VOTE IF WE HAVE A MOTION.
AND WE ARE GOING TO PULL.
FROM ITEM SEVEN SEVEN THREE ZERO
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD ISSUE NUMBER
TWO EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT.
THEN REFER THAT TO THE FULL
BUDGET COMMITTEE FOR HEARING AND
DISCUSSION ON TO NEXT TUESDAY.
SO.
FOR VOTE ONLY ON MISTER CHAIR.
I'M SORRY. I'D LIKE YOU TO PULL
ONE OTHER. AND IT IS.
UNDER.
WHICH IS THE THE LEGISLATIVE OR.
UNDER LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
ISSUE ONE.
THE LAST ITEM ON THE PHOTO.
YOU WANT THE WHOLE LEGISLATIVE
PROPOSALS. ENGINES.
FOR DISCUSSION VOTE.
NOT A DISCUSSION JUST ABOUT. ALL
YOU WANNA DO IT SEPARATELY AT AN
ICY.
OKAY.
SO WE'RE GONNA PULL FOR A
DISCUSSION AND VOTE ISSUE ONE
CONTROL SECTION TWELVE WHICH IS
THE STATE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
WE'RE GOING TO POLL FOR. A
SEPARATE VOTE ONLY.
UNDER ITEM.
ITS LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS ISSUE
NUMBER ONE. AND WE'RE GOING TO
HOLD SEVEN SEVEN THREE ZERO
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD ISSUE NUMBER
TO SELL WHAT WE WILL BE VOTING
ON. IF THERE'S A MOTION. IS
CONTROL SECTION THREE FIVE POINT
FIVE BUDGET STABILIZATION
ACCOUNT ISSUE ONE.
ITEM ZERO EIGHT SIX ZERO BOARD
OF EQUALIZATION ISSUE ONE BOARD
MEMBER STAFFING.
ITEM ZERO ONE ONE ZERO AND ZERO
ONE TWO ZERO STATE LEGISLATURE
ISSUE ONE CONSTITUTIONAL
ADJUSTMENT. ITEM ZERO FIVE ZERO
NINE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF
ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT ISSUE ONE CALIFORNIA
COMPETES TAX CREDIT PROGRAM.
ITEM NINE TWO ONE ZERO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT FINANCING ISSUE
NUMBER ONE PROPERTY TAX BACK
PHIL. ITEM SEVEN SIX ZERO ZERO
DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE
ADMINISTRATION ISSUES ONE TWO
AND THREE.
ITEM SEVEN SEVEN THREE ZERO
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD ISSUE ONE
ONLY REPEAL DATE FOR TAX DATA
EXCHANGE. ITEM ZERO EIGHT FOUR
ZERO STATE COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE
ISSUES ONE AND TWO.
SECURE CHOICE RETIREMENT SAVINGS
INVESTMENT BOARD ISSUE ONE
TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE. ITEM ZERO
NOW CAN WE I'M SORRY I THOUGHT
WE'RE FEELING NOW AS WELL.
FOR A A SEPARATE VOTE SEPARABLE
PLEASE OKAY.
SO OF ITEMS ZERO NINE EIGHT FOUR
SECURE CHOICE RETIREMENTS INVEST
MORE ISSUE ONE TRAILER BILL
LANGUAGE WILL BE.
HOLD FOR A SEPARATE VOTE.
ITEM ZERO NINE EIGHT ONE
CALIFORNIA ABLE ACT BOARD ISSUES
NUMBER ONE ITEM ZERO EIGHT SEVEN
ZERO OFFICE OF TAX APPEALS ISSUE
ONE.
ITEM ZERO NINE FIVE ZERO STATE
TREASURER'S OFFICE ISSUE ONE.
ITEM ZERO NINE EIGHT NINE
CALIFORNIA EDUCATIONAL
FACILITIES AUTHORITY ISSUE
NUMBER ONE.
EVERYONE CLEAR ON WHAT WE'RE
GOING TO BE VOTING ON AS A BLOCK
IF THERE'S A MOTION SO MOVED
IT'S BEEN MOVED PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL. CENTER ROCK.
IN A GLACIER CENTER WILL.
LET'S GO BACK TO THE SEPARATE
VOTE ITEMS LET'S TAKE THE FIRST
ONE ZERO NINE EIGHT FOUR SECURE
CHOICE RETIREMENT SAVINGS
INVESTMENT BOARD. ISSUE NUMBER
ONE TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE. IS
THERE A MOTION.
IT'S BEEN MOVED PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL. SERA.
ACCIDENT LATER SOONER WILL KNOW.
AND THE FINAL. ITEM THAT WE'RE
GOING TO CONSIDER SEPARATELY AS
PART OF OF ONLY THE LEGISLATIVE
PROPOSALS THAT ARE SET FORTH IN
THE AGENDA ON PAGE TWELVE ISSUE
NUMBER ONE PREVIOUSLY HEARD IS
THERE A MOTION.
I KNOW THAT IT'S BEEN MOVED
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. CENTER
ROTH CENTER LATER. CENTER WORK.
GOOD.
OKAY ARE WE NOT VOTING ON THE
END OF THE DAY. WE'RE GONNA PULL
UP FOR DISCUSSION AND WE HAVE.
SO LET'S RETURN TO.
.
PART A OF THE AGENDA FOR.
DISCUSSION AND VOTE ITEMS THE
FIRST ITEM IS.
.
ITEM TWO TWO FOUR ZERO
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ISSUE
NUMBER ONE OFFICE OF MIGRANTS
SERVICES FIRM WORKER HOUSING.
THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR PATIENCE.
FEAR THAT IF I YOURSELVES FOR
THE RECORD PLEASE MA'AM GOOD TO
SEE YOU AGAIN CAMP. LISA BASS
WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STATES.
YEAH. DANIEL BRANDED WITH PART
OF FINANCE.
MAKING THE KANAGA DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE.
GRANULAR LEVEL YOU ARE GOOD TO
SEE YOU ALL BACK FOR ANOTHER DAY.
MISS BETSY YOU PRESENTING.
OKAY HAS OFTEN OKAY.
THIS TRAILER BILL AMENDS
REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THE
LOCATION OF RESIDENTS IN THE
POOL OPERATORS FOR OFFICE OF
MIGRANT SERVICES OMS FARMER FOR
HOUSING CENTERS. THE DEPARTMENT
OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT OPERATES TWENTY FOUR
OMS CENTERS TO PROVIDE SEASONAL
LOW COST HOUSING TO AGRICULTURAL
WORKERS.
CURRENTLY FAMILIES ARE ONLY
ELIGIBLE TO RESIDE AT A CENTER
IF THEY HAVE RESIDED OUTSIDE OF
A FIFTY MILE RADIUS FOR THREE
OUT OF THE SIX PRIOR MONTHS.
PARENTS MUST RELOCATE THEIR
CHILDREN OUTSIDE OF THIS RADIUS
IN ORDER TO QUALIFY.
THIS ROLE THIS WRAPS SCHOOL
ATTENDANCE AND PREVENTS CHILDREN
FROM STAYING WITH NEARBY
RESIDENTS IN ORDER TO TO
COMPLETE THE YEAR AT ONE SCHOOL.
THIS TRAILER BILL AMENDS THE
FIFTY MILE RULE TO ONLY APPLY TO
THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD RATHER
THAN TO IMMEDIATE FAMILY WHICH
WOULD ALLOW SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN
TO REMAIN WITHIN THIS FIFTY MILE
RADIUS. THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.
AND THE TRAILER WILL ALSO ALLOWS
FOR PROPOSALS TO SET ASIDE
SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT OF THE
UNITS IN A CENTER FOR FAMILIES
WITH SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN
REGARDLESS OF THE LOCATION OF
THE RESIDENCE.
IN ADDITION THE TRAILER BILL
ALLOWS THE DEPARTMENT TO
CONTRACT WITH FOR PROFIT
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ENTITIES AND
THE ABSENCE OF WILLING AND ABLE.
NONPROFIT OR PUBLIC ENTITIES
CURRENTLY THE DEPARTMENT CANNOT
CONTRACT WITH FOR PROFIT
OPERATORS DESPITE A FREQUENT
LACK OF ENTITIES WITH ADEQUATE
EXPERIENCE IN RURAL AREAS.
THIS TRAILER BILL WILL EXPAND
THE POOL OF POTENTIAL OMS
OPERATORS TO FACILITATE
SUCCESSFUL OPERATION.
OKAY.
HELLO.
THERE ARE A A COLLECTION OF.
KIND OF COMPLICATED POLICY
ISSUES THAT ARE RAISED BY THIS
TRAILER BILL.
IN THE THE COMMITTEE MIGHT
CONSIDER ASKING THE
ADMINISTRATION ABOUT THE URGENCY
FOR THIS TO BE INTROVERTS IS
GOING TO THE POLICY COMMITTEE
PROCESS IF THERE ISN'T. A CLEAR
NEED FOR THIS TO. BE APPROVED
URGENTLY IT SEEMS LIKE SOMETHING
THAT IS. MORE APPROPRIATE TO GO
THROUGH THE POLICY COMMITTEES.
WELL I WOULD LIKE SOMEONE TO
ADDRESS THIS I MEAN THIS IS
SOMEWHAT UNUSUAL AS YOU'VE
PROBABLY SEEN THE AGENDA WE HAVE
A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO
REJECT THE PROPOSAL BUT ON THE
OTHER HAND.
AND.
WE'RE DEALING WITH THEM.
MIGRANT HOUSING.
WHICH IS SOMEWHAT DIFFICULT
ISSUE FOR US.
CERTAINLY WHEN THERE'S A
RECOMMENDATION TO NOT.
THE DOCTOR PUSHED FORWARD A
PROPOSAL SO COULD SOMEONE.
CLARIFY FOR ME AND PERHAPS MY
COLLEAGUES WHY WE'RE IN THIS
PICKLE.
CERTAINLY I THINK THE URGENCY OF
THIS ISSUE HAS TO DO WITH THE
TIMING OF THE SCHOOL YEAR I'M IF
THE TBL IS APPROVED IT WILL TAKE
EFFECT THIS SUMMER BEFORE THE
NEXT SCHOOL YEAR BEGINS. WHICH
WILL ALLOW FAMILIES TO HAVE
SUFFICIENT NOTICE SO THAT THEIR
CHILDREN CAN STAY IN THE SAME
COMMUNITY AND THEY CAN PLAN
ACCORDINGLY.
COLLEAGUES MAY BEFORE WE TAKE.
FOR I TAKE QUESTIONS THERE MUST
BE SOME PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
ISSUE SO. WHY DON'T WE HEAR FROM
THE PUBLIC AND?
GOOD MORNING OUT MISTER CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS PRIOR TO GUEST ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA RURAL
LEGAL. ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION.
ARE WE DO HAVE CONCERNS WITH THE
TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE.
SOMEBODY'S LEANING AGAINST THE
LIGHT SWITCH.
PROBABLY SOMEBODY BACK BY THE
BACK DOOR.
MY WALLET.
I WON'T CALL ANYBODY OUT BACK BY
THE DOOR BUT YOU KNOW WHO YOU
ARE.
I THOUGHT IT WAS I THOUGHT
SOMEBODY.
IS CONCERNED THAT WE NEEDED MOOD
LIGHTING.
YEAH WE LOOK BETTER WHEN.
I DIDN'T MEAN TO. INTERRUPT YOUR
PRESENTATION SERVE OUT ALTERNATE
IT'S ACTUALLY YOU KNOW I DON'T%
RESTRICT COMMENT ANYWAY BUT I I
WOULD LIKE SOME. A LITTLE BIT OF
COMMENT ON THIS FROM SOME VERY
SURE I'M HAPPY TO PROVIDE THAT
SO.
AGAIN ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION OUR
CLIENTS ARE FARM WORKERS BOTH
MIGRANT AND ON MY GRANT. WE ARE
CONCERNED ODD WE UNDERSTAND THE
CONCERN BEING RAISED BY THE
ADMINISTRATION AND BY EIGHT
ADVOCATES IN THE COMMUNITY ABOUT
ENSURING.
THAT.
THE SCHOOLING OF SCHOOL AGE
CHILDREN IS NOT DISRUPTED.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT HAVE SOME
CONTEXT HERE MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS. THE ISSUE HERE IS. THAT
THESE CENTERS ARE CREATED TO
PROVIDE HOUSING TEMPORARY
HOUSING NOT YOU'RE AROUND
HOUSING FOR FAMILIES THAT ARE
MIGRANT FARM WORKERS WHICH WOULD
MEAN THAT THEY COME. TO THE AREA.
FORM FARM LABOR DURING PART OF
THE GROWING SEASON AND THEN GO
BACK TO. HOME WHEREVER HOME IS
AND THAT'S WHY THESE CENTERS
WERE CREATED. THE WORK FORCE AS
POSSIBLY CHANGE IN SOME AREAS
WHERE THERE'S MORE DEMAND FOR
YEAR ROUND OUSING BUT THESE ARE
STILL TEMPORARY CENTERS. THAT
ARE OPEN ONLY OPEN PARTY HERE
AND REALLY ONLY INTENDED TO BE
BUILT. TO BE OPEN PART OF THE
YEAR.
IN ADDITION IF WE MAKE THAT
HOUSING AVAILABLE TO FAMILIES
THAT ARE NOT. MARGARET
HOUSEHOLDS WE WILL FOR CLOSE
THOSE UNITS BEING ACCESSIBLE TO
FAMILIES THAT ARE MIGRANT
HOUSEHOLDS. SO WE HAVE A
COMPLICATED SITUATION HERE WHICH
IS A LONG STANDING ONE ABOUT HOW
WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH THE
FACT THAT SOME OF THESE CENTERS
ARE OCCUPIED BY FAMILIES WHO ARE
REALLY. IN THE COUNTY YEAR ROUND
WORKING AROUND.
ARE WE HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH
THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY
ABOUT AT THIS ISSUE OVER THE
LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AND THOSE
ON THOSE ARE GOING ON GOING
THROUGH TODAY. ARE CONCERNED
WITH THE CURRENT LANGUAGE IS
THAT IT WOULD DO THREE THINGS
THAT WERE CONCERNED WITH NUMBER
ONE. THE UNRELATED IT.
ISSUE TO WHICH I WAS JUST
DESCRIBING WHICH IS ABOUT. WHO
CAN MANAGE THE CENTERS WE WOULD
WANT TO ENSURE THAT THE CENTERS
ARE NOT MANAGED BY?
FARM LABOR CONTRACTOR OR AN
EMPLOYER WHO IS ALSO THE
EMPLOYER OF THE. OF SOME MEMBER
OF THE HOUSEHOLD WHO IS LIVING
IN HOUSING THAT PROVIDES. UNDUE
INFLUENCE OVER BUT THEIR WORK
AND THEIR HOUSING SO WE WOULD
WANT TO ENSURE THAT ANY
MANAGEMENT IS.
COMPLETELY SECURE FIREWALL OFF
FROM THAT. SECONDLY TO MY
EARLIER POINTS.
THE LANGUAGE THAT'S PROPOSED
WOULD SHIFT AS FROM BEING.
PRIMARILY MIGRANT HOUSING OR AS
THE LAW REQUIRES NOW EXCLUSIVELY
MIGRANT HOUSING TO.
ACTUALLY A MAJORITY POTENTIALLY
BEING ON HIGHER GROUND. ARM
THAT'S REALLY NOT THE INTENTION
OF THIS HOUSING AND WE WOULD
EXCLUDE ADDITIONAL MIGRANT
FAMILIES WERE ALSO CHANGING WHAT
WE CALL THEM FIFTY MILE RULE IN
A WAY THAT WOULD. FUNDAMENTALLY
CHANGE WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF
MARGARET. HOUSEHOLD I THINK IF
THERE'S ANY INTEREST IN TRYING
TO. FIGURE OUT A SOLUTION ON A
COUNTY BY COUNTY BASIS THAT
WOULD BE REALLY WHERE WE WOULD
WANNA SEE THIS DISCUSSION GO IS
THERE'S A PARTICULAR CENTER.
WHERE IT'S APPROPRIATE TO SORT
OF MODIFIED THE RULE? THAT
PERHAPS THERE IS A DISCUSSION
ABOUT WHAT ARE THE CIRCUMSTANCES
FOR FOR THE RULE BEING CHANGED
IN THAT CENTER BUT THAT'S THE
LANGUAGE STANDS OUR.
VERY BROAD ST WHY CHANGE THAT A
YOUR STAFF NOTES HAS NOT BEEN
VETTED THROUGH POLICY COMMITTEE
SO FOR THAT REASON WE SUPPORT
THE PROPOSED REJECTION BUT WE
ARE VERY INTERESTED IN THE
ONGOING CONVERSATION IF IT
HAPPENS IN THE BUDGET WE WANT TO
BE PART OF THAT CONVERSATION IF
IT. HAPPENS IN A POLICY
COMMITTEE WILL DEFINITELY BE
PART OF THAT CONVERSATION. THOSE
ARE CONCERNS MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS.
WELL THANK YOU AND I WAS JUST
TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHY I
REALIZE I'M PRETTY OLD AND MY
BRAIN DOESN'T ALWAYS OPERATE BUT
I DO TRY TO READ EVERYTHING THAT
I'VE GIVEN AND I WAS WONDERING
WHY THIS WAS.
TAKE ME A BIT BY SURPRISE I
THOUGHT WELL MAYBE IT WAS TOO
LATE LAST NIGHT AND I DIDN'T
REMEMBER BUT THE FACT OF THE
MATTER IS.
THIS IS BECAUSE OF A LATE ADD TO
AN AGENDA BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY
YOU'VE HEARD ME TALK ABOUT A
ROLLER COASTER THINGS ARE MOVING
QUICKLY AROUND HERE BUT THERE
APPARENTLY MOVING EVEN FASTER
THAN I THOUGHT THEY WERE MOVING.
SINCE IT WASN'T ON THE AGENDA
THAT IREAD SO WHAT I'M GOING
PREPARED TO DO IS I'M. PREPARED
TO.
HOLD.
HE'S LAUGHING.
FOR GOOD REASON. I'LL HOLD THIS
ITEM WE'RE GONNA TAKE PUBLIC
COMMENT I'M GOING TO HOLD THIS
ITEM OVER.
SO THAT I CAN GET MORE INTO IT
A LITTLE BIT AND WE CAN SEE IF
WE CAN SORT THIS OUT OF THERE'S
AN OPPORTUNITY TO. VOTE ON THIS
ONE WAY OR THE OTHER ON TUESDAY
AND I WILL MAKE SURE THAT THAT
HAPPENS IF.
WE COME TO SOME.
WELL ONE WAY OR THE OTHER HAVE
DEVOTED SO IT'LL EITHER BE VOTE
TO REJECT THE PROPOSAL OR THE
PROPOSAL WILL BE MODIFIED TO.
ACCOMMODATE THE STAKE HOLDERS.
EVEN THOUGH IT IS POLICY SO
WE'LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS BUT SIR.
HURON.
NICOLAS CHAVEZ ON BEHALFOF THE
UNITED FARM WORKERS UNITED
FARMWORKERS OPPOSES THAT PROPOSE
TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE.
RELATING TO THE OFFICE OF
MIGRANTS SERVICES FARM WORKER
HOUSING.
THIS BILL AUTHORIZES PRIVATE OR
PRIVATIZE IS FORMER HOUSING. AND
ALLOWS.
FOR EMPLOYER CONTROLLED HOUSING
AND DEREK STYLE HOUSING.
ALL CALIFORNIA FOR CALIFORNIA
FARM WORKERS DESERVE THE SAME
DECENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS ALL
OTHER CALIFORNIANS AND THEIR
FAMILIES.
THIS TAKES US BACK TO THE
COMPANY TOWN. COMPANY STORE. AND
GENDER DISCRIMINATION THANK YOU.
CAN ANYBODY ELSE FOR PUBLIC
COMMENT.
TELL US YOUR MANY QUESTIONS.
LASER.
LAST ONE I MEAN THE LAST A
WITNESS INDICATED THAT TO.
DOESN'T LIKE THE IDEA FOR PROFIT
ENTITIES UP WHEN I READ THIS
RIPPLES THAT SAYS THAT IF YOU
CAN FIND NO SUITABLE NONPROFIT
PROVIDER.
SO I JUST HAS CLARIFICATION ON
THAT.
.
THIS IS.
IS THIS GOING TO CREATE ERIC
STYLE PROFIT MAKING HOUSING. FOR
FARM WORKERS IS THAT THE BUT
THIS PLEASURE DOES.
WE KNOW THAT THE TRAILER REAL
LIMITS THE USE OF FOR PROFIT
ENTITIES AS YOU MENTIONED ONLY
WHEN.
THERE'S AN ABSENCE OF NON
PROFIT OR PUBLIC ENTITIES THAT
ARE WILLING AND ABLE IN ADDITION
THE TRAILER BILL ONLY ALLOWS FOR
CERT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANIES WITH EXPERIENCE IN
AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND WE DON'T
BELIEVE THAT WOULD RESULT IN
EMPLOYER OPERATED CENTERS
BECAUSE WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY
AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYERS THAT FIT
THIS CATEGORY.
WHAT ABOUT THE PUSH AND PULL
WITH RESPECT TO THE MIGRANT
VERSUS NON MIGRANT OCCUPANCY OF
THE HOUSING UNITS?
SOME OF THAT. CERTAINLY WE SAID
WE'RE GOING TO OBVIOUSLY HAVE A
POLICY HEARING HERE FOR A COUPLE
MINUTES I WOULD JUST MENTION
THAT.
.
THE PROPOSAL.
ALLOWS FOR INDIVIDUAL CENTERS TO
REQUEST TO SET ASIDE UNITS THAT
ARE EXEMPT TO THIS FIFTY MILE
RULE.
HOWEVER THAT PROPOSAL NEEDS TO
BE PREPARED AND PRESENTED TO THE.
.
THE TENANTS IN THERE.
.
THE NAME THAT THE RESIDENT
COUNCIL OF THE CENTERS AND SO
IT'S NOT A BLANKET POLICY IT'S
AN ALLOWANCE FOR INDIVIDUAL
CENTERS TO READ THEIR LOCAL
NEEDS AS THEY SEE FIT.
SO FOR THE DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR
APPROVAL.
OKAY. OIL ANYTHING FURTHER HERE
WILL GET QUESTIONS.
NOT A QUESTION JUST A COMMENT ON
VICE CHAIR OF AGONY LAST YEAR
WENT WITH SENATOR DODD AND DID A
TOUR OF MIGRANT FARM WORKER
HOUSING SO I KNOW IT'S A
CHALLENGE. I JUST DON'T LIKE
DOING THESE AND TRAILED THIS IS
THIS IS POLICY AND I I REALLY
DON'T LIKE DOING THIS AND
OBVIOUSLY I HAVE A LOT OF WORK
CUT OUT BETWEEN NOW AND TUESDAY
BUT. SO I APPRECIATE YOUR
HOLDING IT OPEN BECAUSE IT'S NOT
SUPPORTABLE AT PRESENT.
OKAY WELL WE'RE GONNA HOLD THIS
SO IF THERE'S NO OTHER PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THIS WE'RE GONNA HOLD
THIS OPEN IDEAS BUDGET STAFF TO.
.
TO COORDINATE WITH THE PA THE
APPROPRIATE POLICY COMMITTEE
STAFF ON THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE
TO.
GATHER SOME ADDITIONAL
BACKGROUND MATERIAL.
FOR ME AND FOR MY TWO COLLEAGUES
ON THESE ISSUES AND WE'LL FIGURE
OUT. HOW WE'RE GOING TO HANDLE
THIS WHETHER? WE COME BACK AS A
BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE OR WHETHER.
IT GOES TO THE BIG BUDGET TO
COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY SO THAT'S
HOW WE'LL HANDLE THIS.
AND I THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
THAT PRESENTATION.
THE. NEXT IS ITEM EIGHT TWO SIX
ZERO CALIFORNIA ARTS COUNCIL
ISSUE ONE LOCAL PROGRAMMING
AUGMENTATION.
I HAVE BEEN IN THE THE ITEMS.
THERE WILL.
ANY DISCUSSION.
YES SO YOU WERE GONNA HAVE
CONVERSATIONS OFFLINE WITH WITH
THE.
WITH THE ASSEMBLY.
MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE IS A.
WELL.
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THERE IS
THERE ARE THERE IS AT LEAST ONE
PROPOSAL IN THE ASSEMBLY. AS OF
I GUESS THIS MORNING THAT HAS
NOT BEEN VOTED ON YET.
OF WE ARE FREE TO DO WHATEVER
YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO NOW THERE'S
BEEN. A MOTION.
BY MY COLLEAGUE SENATOR GLAZER
BUT YOU EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN
MAKING A MOTION BEFORE WE
ADJOURN WELL I LIKE TO WORK
COLLABORATIVELY SO I.
I'M HOPING I MEAN I'D LIKE TO
SEE IT OF LARGER THAN THIS AND
THE. GOVERNOR CAN ALWAYS BLUE
PENCIL IT OR WE CAN LEAVE IT
OPEN. LET'S SEE WHAT THEY DO ON
THE OTHER SIDE WHAT'S YOUR
PROPOSAL. I'D LIKE TO GO TO TEN.
CENTER LASER IS THAT. ARE YOU
WILLING TO. MODIFY YOUR MOTION
TO INCLUDE THE CHAIR WOULD LIKE
THAT LIST. OF IT SURE WILL
ENTERTAIN THAT SO THE MOTION IS
TO.
BUT A ONE TIME LOG INFORMATION.
RIGHT PROVIDE A ONETIME
AUGMENTATION OF TEN MILLION AS
OPPOSED TO FIVE MILLION THAT'S
THE MOTION MISTER CHAIR IF I MAY.
YES WE WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE SOCIAL
AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS THAT COME
FROM INCREASED FUNDING TO THE
ARTS COUNCIL AND WHAT THAT CAN
ACHIEVE FOR CALIFORNIA
COMMUNITIES. I'M WE BELIEVE THE
FIVE MILLION DOLLARS IS
APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME WE'RE
CONCERNED THAT A SIGNIFICANT.
INFLUX OF FINDING MAY STRAIN THE
ARTS COUNCIL'S CURRENT PERSONAL
RESOURCES.
INCREASED FUNDING MEANS AN
INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF
APPLICATIONS MEANS AN INCREASE
IN APPROVALS NEEDING TO BE
PROCESSED. IT MEANS AN INCREASE
IN THE FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
THE GRANTEES AND AN INCREASE IN
THE NUMBER OF EVALUATIONS OF
PROGRAMS AND GRANTEES SO. WE
THINK THERE FOR THE FIVE MILLION
DOLLARS IS APPROPRIATE AT THIS
TIME. CHRIS EVERYTHING EXCEPT
MAYBE THE PERSONNEL STRAINING IS
A GOOD THING RIGHT CAN YOU TELL
ME WHAT. WHAT LEVEL? WE WERE
FUNDED AT IN PRIOR YEARS.
CAN SOMEONE AT THE TABLE PLEASE
INTRODUCE YOURSELF FOR THE
RECORD IS GOOD MORNING AT ALL
IT'S IT'S STILL MORNING ANYWAY
I'M A YOUNG KEEP LAURIE AND THE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE
CALIFORNIA ARTS COUNCIL.
KRISTIN MARGOLIS DIRECTOR OF
LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS.
AND BOUND CRAWFORD EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR OF THE ARTS COUNCIL.
AND TO ANSWER THE QUESTION
REGARDING WHAT OUR CURRENT
BUDGET IS FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE
WE HAVE SIXTEEN POINT THREE
MILLION DOLLARS IN OUR BUDGET
FOR GRANTS. DIRECT GRANTS TO THE
COMMUNITIES AND THIS ARGUMENT IS
TO INCREASE IT CURRENTLY AT FOUR
TO FIVE MILLION. OCCUR INSIDE
INCREASE IT BY FIVE MILLION WITH
THE TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY
THOUSAND WHICH IS FIVE PERCENT
OF THAT AUGMENT THAT WOULD GO TO
A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF
OUR GRANT PROGRAMS WHAT DO WE DO
LAST YEAR FOR YOU. LAST GIVEN.
WHAT I WAS ACTUALLY MY QUESTION
SO TWO YEARS AGO WE RECEIVED AN
ADDITIONAL? SIX MILLION DOLLARS
IN FUNDING THAT WAS ONETIME
FUNDING AND THEN LAST YEAR THAT
FINDING WAS MADE PERMANENT.
OKAY.
YES PLEASE.
IT'S BEEN SUGGESTED THAT THAT
THIS WOULD CREAE A HUGE BURDEN
ON THAT CURRENT EXISTING STAFF
DO YOU FEEL THAT WOULD BE THE
CASE HERE. WERE TO BE AUGMENTED.
SO THE CURRENT PROPOSAL IS THAT
IT IS ONE TIME FUNDING.
AND I THINK THAT WITH ONE TIME
FUNDING WE COULD ABSORB THE
ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE STRAIN.
WITH POTENTIALLY WORKING WITH
SOMETHING TO POSITIONS AND ALSO
REALLOCATING STAFF THAT
CURRENTLY ARE IN PLACE TO TAKE
UP THE LOAD ESSENTIALLY WHAT IT
MEANS IS THAT THERE'S MORE
GRANTS GOING OUT THE DOOR AND WE
HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY.
TO DO THAT.
THEY'RE WORKING QUESTIONS I'M
GOOD TO GO OHIO ANY COMMENT.
I THINK BEYOND OUR COMMENTS FROM
TUESDAY OKAY.
SO THE MOTION IS TO.
APPROVAL ONETIME AUGMENTATION OF
TEN MILLION INSTEAD OF FIVE
MILLION THAT THE MOTION.
OKAY A SPIN MOVE ANY PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THIS AGAIN.
OKAY SPIN MOVE PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL.
SARAH I FIGURED LATER CENTER
WELL I.
OKAY.
THANK YOU SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH
THANK YOU VERY MUCH SOME STRAIN
YOUR STAFF.
OKAY WE HAVE CANNABIS.
SAYS VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS ISSUE
NUMBER ONE CANNABIS REGULATION
IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT.
ANY. SO ELOQUENTLY ON DEPARTMENT
OF FINANCE I'VE BEEN ASKED TO
GIVE AN OVERVIEW SINCE THERE'S
SO MANY AFFECTED ENTITIES OUT
WILL LEAVE THE TABLE OPEN UNTIL
AFTER THE END OF MY PRESENTATION
IF YOU HAVE MORE DETAILED
QUESTIONS WE HAVE MANY
DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES HERE
TOO. ON FOLLOW UP YOUR MY
CONDOLENCES OKAY THANK YOU. AND
SO I THINK I WOULD DIRECT YOUR
ATTENTION MAINLY TO THE FIRST
PAGE OF THE AGENDA HERE THAT
LAYS OUT SORT OF.
THE FISCAL EFFECTS THE THE.
ADMINISTRATION'S MAY REVISION
CAMPUS PROPOSALS.
THERE'S THIRTY THREE MILLION
DOLLARS ACCEPT A PROPOSAL MAYOR
VISION. THAT'S MAINLY COMING
FROM TWO MAIN FIND SOURCES THE
CAMPUS CONTROL FIND AND THE
CANNABIS TAX ON. THE CAMPUS
CONTROL FUND RECEIVES ITS
REVENUES FROM REGULATORY FEES
AND THE CAMPUS TAX FUND RECEIVES
ITS MONIES FROM AN EXCISE AND
CULTIVATION TAX ON CANNABIS.
AS THE IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN THE
TOTAL EXPENDITURES PLANNED FROM
THE CAMPUS CONTROL FINDER ABOUT
FORTY EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY SIX
MILLION AND SIXTY SEVEN MILLION
PROPOSE FROM THE CANNABIS TAX
FIND.
WANTING IT TO NOTE HERE IS THAT
ALL THE IMPLEMENTATION.
EXPENDITURES PROPOSED AND THE
NON STATUTORILY ALLOCATED.
PROPOSALS ARE WE'RE PROPOSING
TO DO IN A TWO YEAR LIMIT TERM
BASIS AND THAT'S REALLY BECAUSE
AT THIS TIME THERE'S NOT ENOUGH
INFORMATION TO DETERMINE WHAT
THE ONGOING NEED IS THAT THESE
PROGRAMS.
IT'S ANOTHER KIND OF HIGHLIGHTED
A HIGH LEVEL THE EXPENDITURES
ALL GET INTO THE REVENUE.
WE WERE OUT FOR CASTING A FOR
CANADA'S TAX REVENUES.
AT A HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE
MILLION IN SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN.
AND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY MILLION
IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN. HOWEVER
THAT WAS BEFORE WE RECEIVED OUR
FIRST AD TAX COLLECTION ON WHICH
WAS THIRTY FOUR MILLION AT THE
END OF APRIL. AND THAT NUMBER
SUGGESTS THAT.
TAX PROCEEDS MIGHT BE COMING IN
A LITTLE SLOWER THAN WE HAVE
FORECASTED.
AND JUST I THINK AS THAT IS IT
BEEN THE CASE MUCH OF THE CASE
IN THIS WORLD THAT PROJECTIONS
ARE KIDS SUBJECT TO CONSIDERABLE
AND UNCERTAINTY AS ARE THE
ACTIVITIES THAT BE NECESSARY TO
BE FUNDED SO.
THE CANVAS CONTROL FIND THE
REGULATORY REVENUE WE'RE
EXPECTING AN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
IS ABOUT A HUNDRED NINETY
MILLION DOLLARS.
WE ARE A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED
IN THE EARLY PART OF THE FISCAL
YEAR HAVING CASH ON HAND TO
SPEND SO WE'RE PROPOSING A FIFTY
NINE MILLION DOLLAR GENERAL FUND
LOAN WHICH SHOULD BE REPAID IN
NINETEEN TWENTY FROM. CANNABIS
TAX FUND.
THAT BRINGS ME TO.
OUR GENERAL FUND LOAN REPAYMENT
TO DATE WE HAVE ABOUT A HUNDRED
TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS
OUTSTANDING IN GENERAL FUND
LOANS THAT A FRIEND OF THIS
ACTIVITY SO FAR. WE PLAN TO
REPAY THOSE LOANS IN EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN USING THE CANNABIS TAX
FUND.
SO NOW THAT I'VE KIND OF GIVEN A
HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF THE
EXPENDITURES AND.
.
REVENUE I THINK I'LL JUST
HIGHLIGHT SOME AS DEPARTMENT
SPECIFIC DETAILS BUT NOT EVERY
COMPONENT. AND.
THAT MEANS THREE LICENSING
ENTITIES THE BEER OF CANADA'S
CONTROL. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN THE
ALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
HEALTH AND THEIR PROPOSALS
MAINLY INCLUDE RESOURCES RELATED
TO THINGS THAT WERE AND APPROVED
IN SP NINETY FOUR. THE
HIGHLIGHTS OF THOSE ARE THE
LOCAL LIAISON UNITS AND TO
FACILITATE THE LOCAL
AUTHORIZATION PROCESS THAT WAS
INCLUDED IN NINETY FOUR. I'M
VARYING LEVELS OF RESOURCES TO
ESTABLISH A NORTH COAST OFFICE
AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE. AND.
SOME RESOURCES FOR THE
COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE THREE
ENTITIES AS IT RELATES TO MICRO
BUSINESSES AND SOME OF THE
CHANGES THAT WERE INCLUDED IN SP
NINETY FOUR.
SPECIFIC HIGHLIGHTS THAT ARE
UNIQUE TO THE BEER OF CANS
CONTROL THERE WAS ONE POINT
EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS FOR
QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING
TEAMS THAT WERE. ORIGINALLY AND
CONTEMPLATED AND AS BEING NINETY
FOUR IN THE IDEA BEHIND THAT IS
SORT OF IN SEVEN FORCE MANNER
LICENSING THESE ARE REALLY TEAMS
TO SORT OF BRING PEOPLE UP TO
SPEED TO BECOME COMPLIANT IN
THEIR NEW REGULATORY STRUCTURE.
THIRTY ONE POINT THREE MILLION
DOLLARS FOR A PUBLIC AWARENESS
CAMPAIGN. THE CAMPAIGN IS
SOURCES TO FOLD FOR UNREGULATED
I'M LICENSE OR PEOPLE IN THE
INDUSTRY THAT UNREGULATED SORT
OF EXPLAINING THE BENEFITS OF
WHY YOU WOULD WANT TO BE IN A
REGULATED MARKET. AND
SECONDARILY.
COMPONENT FOR CANNABIS USERS TO
SORT OF INFORM THE BENEFITS OF
USING THEIR REGULATED MARKET SO
WE THINK THIS IS ANOTHER WAY OF
WHERE WE CAN SORT OF HOPE
STRENGTH AND THEN REINFORCE
PEOPLE'S USE OF THE REGULATED
MARKET.
AND CDS PHASE PROPOSAL INCLUDES
ABOUT SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS FOR A DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
APPELLATIONS INCOMPATIBLE
ORGANICS PROGRAM. AND THEY HAVE
TWO POINT THREE MLLION DOLLARS
RELATED TO THEIR ROLE AND SEE
WHAT AN ATHLETE.
IN THE APPLICATION REVIEW.
AND COMPLIANCE WORK PROCESS.
I AM.
MOVING ON FROM THE MAIN THREE
LICENSING ENTITIES AND.
WE HAVE THAT THAT TAX AGENCIES
ARE REQUESTING OUR WILL WILL BE
PROVIDED ABOUT SIX POINT TWO
MILLION DOLLARS SO THAT INCLUDES
THE CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF
TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION A
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD IN
EMPLOYMENT AND EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT IN THOSE ARE MAINLY
RELATED TO CASH COLLECTION
ACTIVITIES ARE GONNA TAKE PLACE
SINCE MUCH. OF THESE TAXES ARE
COLLECTED IN CASH. AND FOUR
pSECRETARY OF STATE RELATED TO
BUSINESS FILINGS IN TRADEMARK
WORKLOAD THAT'S INCREASED I'M
RELATED TO CANVASS BUSINESSES.
AND THEN WE HAVE SOME.
RESOURCES FOR THE CAMPUS
CONTROL APPEALS PANEL ABOUT ONE
POINT FOUR MILLION AND THAT'S
MAINLY RELATED TO TWO NEW PANEL
MEMBERS MEMBERS THAT WERE
ESTABLISHED IN SP NINETY FOUR.
ASSOCIATED MEANT ADMINISTRATIVE
STAFF AND A LEGAL SUPPORT PERSON.
THERE'S ALSO MONEY IN EACH OF
THE THREE MAIN ENTITIES LICENSE
AT LICENSING ENTITIES BUDGET OUR
PROPOSALS FOR.
THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
PROCESS THAT WILL BE SORT OF THE
FIRST STEP IF.
LICENSEE CHOOSES TO DENY APPEAL
A DECISION ON AN APPLICATION OR
AN ENFORCEMENT EFFORT.
AND.
THE LAST SORT OF IMPLEMENTATION
PEACE OR ACTIVITY IS RELATED TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND
FOURTEEN MILLION DOLLARS.
TO ESTABLISH FOR INVESTIGATIVE
TEAMS WON AND READING SACRAMENTO
FRESNO IN LOS ANGELES TO LOOK
INTO. COMPLEX ORGANIZED CRIMINAL
ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE ACTUALLY
STILL.
.
INVOLVED IN THE CAMPUS INDUSTRY
AND SORT OF COME AT IT FROM AN
ENFORCEMENT EFFORT OF FINANCIAL
TAXATION.
.
CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL
VIOLATIONS AND THERE WILL ALSO
BE ONE INTERDICTION TEAM LOCATED
ON THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND
SORT OF FOCUSING ON THE MAJOR
MALE DEPOTS AND SORT OF HOUSE
TIME CANDICE IS ACTUALLY BEING
TRAFFICKED KID. THROUGHOUT THE
STATE IN TWO OTHER STATES
THROUGH THAT EFFORT AND WE DO
HAVE TRAILER BILL RIGHT
ASSOCIATED WITH THAT I'M AND I
WOULD ACTUALLY ALLOW THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO RECIEVE
CAMPUS TAX PROCEEDS. FROM THE
CANNABIS TAX FUND AND.
AND ALSO IT LAYS OUT SORT OF
SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES WE EXPECT
THE DEPARTMENT JUSTICE TO DO
WITH THE MONEY.
THERE'S THAT ACTUALLY.
PRIORITY TO PROGRAMS AS WE CALL
THEM SORRY IN THAT PROPOSITION
SIXTY FOUR AND ACTUALLY A
SPECIFIED DOLLAR AMOUNTS TO GO
TO VARIOUS ACTIVITIES SO THAT'LL
BE INCLUDED IN THE EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN BUDGET. TEN MILLION
DOLLARS FOR GOBIZ I'M TO AWARD
GRANTS TO LOCAL HEALTH PROGRAMS
AND COMMUNITY BASED
ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE LEGAL
SERVICES JOB ASSISTANCE MENTAL
HEALTH. SERVICES SUBSTANCE USE
DISORDER TREATMENT AND TO
COMMUNITIES THAT WERE SORT OF.
DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECTED BY
PRIOR AND DRUG LAWS TWO MILLION
DOLLARS FOR THE UC SAN DIEGO
CENTER FOR HIM. CENTER FOR
MEDICINAL CANNABIS RESEARCH TO
FURTHER THE.
ACTIVITY IS AT THE CENTER AND
TEN MILLION DOLLARS WILL GO TO A
UNIVERSITY OR UNIVERSITIES
CHOSEN BY THE BUREAU OF CAMPUS
TRICK CONTROLLED SYSTEM.
RESEARCH AND THE EFFECTS OF
PROPOSITION SIXTY FOUR AND BRING
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THE
ADMINISTRATION ABOUT POTENTIAL
CHANGES. AND THREE MILLION
DOLLARS TO THE CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY PATROL TO ESTABLISH AN
ADULT PROOCOLS RELATED TO.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
UNDER CANNABIS AND SORT OF THE
RECOGNITION OF THAT AND THAT SO
CONTINUATION OF THREE MILLION
DOLLARS THAT WAS PROVIDED LAST
YEAR AS WELL.
AS WE HIGHLIGHT IN THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET.
THAT PRIORITY THREE PROGRAMS WE
DON'T EXPECT TO BE RECEIVE
FUNDING UNTIL NINETEEN TWENTY WE
CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THAT'S THE
CASE SINCE. THE WAY THE
INITIATIVE WAS WRITTEN IT'S
ACTUALLY BASED ON REVENUE
RECEIVED IN THE PRECEDING FISCAL
YEAR AFTER PAYING THE PRIORITY
ONE INTO PROGRAMS AND GIVEN THAT
WE HAVE ONLY RECEIVED THIRTY
FILM DORK THIRTY FOUR MILLION
DOLLARS TODAY IT'S. IT'S NOT
REASONABLE THAT WE'RE GONNA HAVE
ENOUGH MONEY TO DO PROVIDE
ANYTHING IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
THE FIRST YEAR FUNDING FOR THOSE
PROGRAMS WILL BE IN NINETEEN
TWENTY.
AND ONE THING WE'RE ALSO WE HAVE
TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE AND
RELATED TO AN FBI BACKGROUND
CHECK AUTHORIZATIONS WE'VE
ACTUALLY BROUGHT THIS ISSUE TO.
THE SENATE AND I THINK EARLY.
MARCH AND WE'VE HAD SOME
DIFFICULTY ACTUALLY GIVING THEM
TO AUTHORIZE BACKGROUND CHECKS
FOR THE. DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND
AGRICULTURE AND DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC HEALTH TOO SO WE CAN
ACTUALLY FACILITATE OUR ANNUAL
LICENSE PROCESS. AND WE MADE A
STATUTORY CHANGE AT THE TIME
THAT WE THOUGHT WE WOULD FIX THE
ISSUE WITH INCENSE ACTUALLY GOT
DIRECT FEEDBACK FROM THE FBI ON
THE LANGUAGE THAT IS NECESSARY.
AND SO WE HAVE TRAILER BILL
LANGUAGE AROUND THAT ISSUE THAT
WE WOULD ACTUALLY.
HOPEFULLY FIX THIS ISSUE.
SOMETIME LATE IN THE FALL AND
WE WOULD HAVE AN INTERNAL
PROCESS WHERE WE WOULD DO STATE
ONLY BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THOSE
TWO ENTITIES SO WE CAN ACTUALLY
START ISSUING ANNUAL LICENSES IN
THE MEANTIME. I'M WITH ADD THAT
INTO MY PRESENTATION IF YOU
MAYBE HAVE THE L. L. SPEAK AND
WE HAVE DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTATIVES HERE SO IF YOU
HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS WE
COULD FOLLOW UP. ON THAT LAST
POINT IF YOU'RE DOING STATE ONLY
BACKGROUND CHECKS OR. IS THERE A
PROCESS BY WHICH YOU WILL THEN
GO BACK AND.
RE CHECK FOLKS YOU'VE ALREADY
ISSUED A LICENSE TO TO DO DO A
FULL NATIONAL BACKGROUND CHECK
WHAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO. US
DOJ'S DATABASE RIGHT SO OUR
UNDERSTANDING TODAY IS ONE SIDE
ABOUT FINGERPRINTS AS NECESSARY
WELL PROCESS THE STATE ONLY
BACKGROUND CHECKS IN THE
MEANTIME THEY CAN USE THOSE SAME
FINGERPRINTS ONCE THE-AUTHORIZATIONS AVAILABLE TO
RECHECK THAT INDIVIDUAL. ALSO AS
PART OF THEIR APPLICATION
PROCESS THEY'RE REQUIRED TO LIST
ANY PRIOR CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS
REGARDLESS IF THEY HAPPEN IN
CALIFORNIA OR IN OTHER STATES SO
THAT WOULD BE IT IT REALLY THE
BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE CHECK
POINT FOR THAT APPLICATION AND
WE WOULD GO BACK AND DO THOSE
CHECKS ONCE. THE AUTHORIZATIONS
AVAILABLE WE KNOW FOLKS ARE
ALWAYS HONEST SO.
DEFINITELY OKAY ILIO.
TELLING YOU WHAT THE LEGISLATIVE
ANALYST'S OFFICE WE JUST HAVE A
FEW COMMENTS OVERALL IT DOES
APPEAR THAT THE AD THAT
GENERALLY THE PROPOSALS ARE
REASONABLE ON BASE YOUR PROBLEM
BASED ON OUR PRELIMINARY REVIEW.
WITHOUT THERE'S BEEN A LIMITED
AMOUNT OF TIME TO REVIEW THESE
PROPOSALS.
WE WOULD NOTE THAT THERE IS
QUITE A BIT OF UNCERTAINTY AS
FINANCE NOTED ABOUT REALLY
ULTIMATELY WHAT RESOURCES WILL
BE NEEDED FOR THIS PROGRAM IS A
BRAND NEW PROGRAM.
AND.
A BRAND NEW SET OF INDUSTRY
THAT WERE REGULATING SO WE THINK
IT'S VERY APPROPRIATE THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION GENERALLY A
PROPOSED TO YOUR LIMITED TERM
FUNDING. AND WE THINK THAT'LL BE
VERY CRITICAL FOR THE
LEGISLATURE BECAUSE WE'LL WANT
TO COME BACK PROBABLY. AT THAT
TIME AND ASSESS REALLY WHAT THE
ON COMING NATURE OF THAT
WORKLOAD IS.
SO REALLY IT'S ABOUT THINKING
ABOUT WHAT KIND OF INFORMATION
GONNA NEED AT THAT POINT TO MAKE
A GOOD DECISION ABOUT HOW MANY
RESOURCES ARE GOING TO BE NEEDED
ON AN ONGOING BASIS. I'M JUST
WANTED TO FLAG A COUPLE ISSUES
OF THE LEGISLATURE THAT WE'VE
IDENTIFIED.
WHEN IS REALLY THE USE OF THE
TAX FUNDS.
I THINK YOU FOLKS MAY HAVE
HEARD FROM SOME SOME OTHER FOLKS
WHO HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT.
DOJ AND WHETHER OR NOT.
THOSE ACTIVITIES CAN BE FUNDED
FROM THE TAX FUND ALSO WE WOULD
FIGHT FOR YOU THAT.
EDT A PORTION OF EDIE'S
PROPOSAL RELATES TO WORK FORCE
RELATED ACTIVITIES SO THAT
THINGS LIKE HELPING BUSINESSES
AS THEY LOOKED TO HIRE. I CAN
SIMPLY USE OUR JOB SEEKERS WHO
ARE LOOKING FOR WORK IN THIS
INDUSTRY. ON IT WASN'T
IMMEDIATELY CLEAR TO US WHETHER
THAT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR PROP
SIXTY FOUR FUNDS.
WHICH ARE GENERALLY RESTRICTED
UNDER THE MEASURE THE RESTRICTED
TO APPLYING IN ENFORCING LABOR
LAWS. US ABOUT SOMETHING THAT
ALSO THE LEGISLATURE MAY WISH TO
CONSIDER FOLLOWING UP ON TO SEE.
TO SEE IF THAT'S AN ALLOWABLE
USE I SO THAT WAS ONE ISSUE THAT
WE IDENTIFIED ANOTHER ISSUE IS
RELATED TO THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND THE
ADMINISTRATION.
WE WOULD NOTICE PART OF LAST
YEAR'S TRAILER BILL. ONE OF THE
ONE OF THE TWO
CHANGES OF WAS THE NUMBER OF
TAXPAYERS WHO ARE ACTUALLY GOING
TO BE.
AT.%
LIMITING TAXES TO CD TFA
ORIGINALLY WAS ANTICIPATED IT
WOULD BE IN THE LOW TENS OF
THOUSANDS NOW IT'S ANTICIPATED.
ANTICIPATED TO BE MORE LIKE FIVE
HUNDRED SO IT'S A SUBSTANTIAL
DECREASE IN THEIR NUMBER. OF AT
TAXPAYERS.
AND THE P. C. P. THAT WE THAT WE
SEE HERE IN MAY MAKE SOME
REDUCTION TO MAKE SO I THINK A
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR
REDUCTION. ON BASED ON THAT
SMALLER NUMBER OF TAXPAYERS BUT
WE THINK.
BASED ON OUR ANALYSIS THAT.
I HAVE A MORE SUBSTANTIAL
REDUCTION TO TO THAT PORTION
WOULD BE MERITED.
SPECIFICALLY ADDITIONAL FOUR
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS WORTH
OF PRODUCTION AND THEY WOULD
STILL GET AN. OVERALL
AUGMENTATION BECAUSE THAT'S ONLY
ONE VERY SMALL PIECE OF THEIR
PROPOSAL.
BUT THAT WAS ONE PIECE THAT WE
IN FACT.
FOR AN INSTANT COMMON. RESPONSE
I AM SO AND IF I COULD MAYBE
HAVE MY CD TFA COLLEAGUES.
COME UP FOR IT TO HELP ANSWER
THAT QUESTION BUT AS FAR AS THE
EASY.
QUESTION IT DOES SAY THAT APPLY
IN FORCED LABOR LAWS AND WITHIN
THE LABOR LAWS INCLUDES.
IN EDIE'S RESPONSIBILITIES A
CITY JOB ASSISTANCE TRAINING SO
WE DO THINK IT MEETS THE
CRITERIA LAID OUT IN. THE. THE
PROPOSITION.
HELLO THERE KATIE HAGENS CB TFA
CHIEF DEPUTY I'M SO WE HAVE.
I HAVE PAGES OF. DETAILS ON.
RBC P. I'VE I THINK THE KEY WAS
TO MAYBE RESPOND TO ONE OF THE
ONLY CONTESTS FOR HUNDRED
THOUSAND AND. WE ARE AND WHERE
WE FIND A SIGNIFICANT. INCREASE
IN OUR RESOURCES NEEDED. IS
REALLY AROUND THE PHYSICAL
SECURITY OF OUR FIELD OFFICES
WHERE WE'RE ACCEPTING CASH. AND
WE WANT TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF
OUR EMPLOYEES AND OUR TAXPAYERS
AND.
WHEN YOU'RE BRINING IN A
LITERALLY BAGS OF MONEY.
SEVERAL TIMES A MONTH AND
QUARTER.
IT'S A IT'S A RISKY SITUATION
AND WE'RE ACTIVELY TRYING TO
ADDRESS MITIGATE THAT RISK.
AS A RESULT WE HAVE INCREASED
CHP COSTS.
HIGHER MUCH HIGHER THAN WE HAD
ORIGINALLY ANTICIPATED ON WE'RE
WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH CHP TO
EFFECTIVELY MANAGE.
RESOURCES THERE AND MAKE THE
MOST OF THEIR TIME WHILE THEY'RE
AT OUR SITE.
PROTECTING STATE RESOURCES AND
WE ALSO HAVE SEEN AN INCREASE IN
COSTS AND FOR GUARD AT OUR OUR
COMPANY THAT HELPS US WITH CASH
PICK UP.
AND THEN WE WOULD REALLY LIKE
TO HARDEN.
OUR OFFICES AND WHERE WE ARE
ACCEPTING CASH. DOING THINGS
LIKE INSTALLING SAFES AND.
OTHER AT SAFETY ISSUES SO SO
THAT'S PRIMARILY WHY THE
INCREASING COSTS THERE.
OKAY.
ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU OPEN UP
THE PUBLIC ON THE.
SO A QUESTION YOU MAY NOT EVEN
HAVE AN ANSWER FOR THIS TO THINK
ABOUT HOW YOU STRUGGLE WITH WHEN
WE GOVERN IS EVERYTHING'S IN
SILOS WE DON'T TAKE ANYTHING
HOLISTICALLY. SO OBVIOUSLY A
WRECK OUR REVENUE AROUND IS NOT
MET THE FORECAST SO I'M JUST
CURIOUS IF YOU HAVE A TAKE ON
WHY THAT IS IS BECAUSE WE DON'T
HAVE ENOUGH.
THEN USE LICENSED YET IS
BECAUSE THE TAXES TOO HIGH NO
STATE OF WASHINGTON'S REDUCE
THEIR TAX. TRYING TO ELIMINATE
YOU KNOW THE BLACK MARKET IF IF
YOU GOT THOUGHTS ON THAT I I'D
LIKE TO HEAR HIM WE I MEAN
ANYTHING WE WOULD OFFER AT THIS
POINT WOULD BE SPECULATION I
WOULD SAY EVEN THE THIRTY FOUR
MILLION DOLLAR NUMBER WE HAVE
COMES WITH QUESTIONS. I THINK
THE SALES AND USE TAX NUMBER
REPORTED FOR THE FIRST QUARTER
WAS ACTUALLYLOWER THAN THE
FOURTH QUARTER OF TWO THOUSAND
SEVENTEEN. AND GIVEN THAT WE
LEGALIZE IN JANUARY THAT SEEMS.
SO I SORT OF SURPRISING I THINK
THERE'S ALSO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
CULTIVATION NUMBER IN COMPARISON
EXCISED PASS AT. NUMBER SO IT'S
A NEW INDUSTRY.
DEFINITELY IT APPEARS THAT
MONEY ISN'T FLOWING AS EXPECTED
AND THAT COULD BE FOR A
MULTITUDE OF REASONS BUT AT THIS
POINT I THINK OF THE PREMATURE
TO GUESS.
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINANCE
CRITIC YOU'VE JOINING US. FROM
THE FANS OUT. THERE YEAH MOST OF
SOMETHING TO SAY.
I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY REALLY
QUICKLY THAT. THE SALES TAX
WASN'T LAUER WAS SLIGHTLY HIGHER
IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF EIGHTEEN.
BY ABOUT A MILLION DOLLARS.
SO FOURTH QUARTER SEVENTEEN WAS
ABOUT A TWENTY FOUR AND A HALF.
MILLION DOLLARS AND THEN FOURTH
QUARTER FIRST QUARTER OF
EIGHTEEN SORRY WAS AT TWENTY SIX.
PERFECT.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
PARTICULAR ITEM.
YES SIR PLEASE STEP UP.
HI GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN
COMMITTEE IS AN APPROPRIATE TIME
TO COMMENT ON THE DOJ.
.
SPENDING YOU MAY COME IN ON THIS.
PROPOSAL FOR THE COMMITTEE AS
WITH ANYTHING I WOULD ADVISE
CANVAS THAT'S BEEN DISCUSSED SO
FAR HI MY NAME'S GOING BACK AS
AND I REPRESENT DRUG POLICY
ALLIANCE. RC FOR PARTNER WAS THE
SECOND LARGEST DONOR TO PROP
SIXTY FOUR. AND WE ARE PART OF
THE MANY. PEOPLE CONTRIBUTE TO
THE DRAFT.
I WANNA BE CLEAR THE DRUG POLICY
ALLIANCE DOESN'T OPPOSE SPENDING
GENERAL FUND FOR ENFORCEMENT AS
DESCRIBED WE OPPOSE HOWEVER. TO
THE TRAILER BILLLANGUAGE AND
USING PROP SIXTY FOUR TO FIND
THE OJ.
.
BUT IF YOU FORCE ALONG
INITIATIVE INCLUDES FUNDING FOR
SOME LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES
THAT ARE SPECIFIED.
IT ALSO PRIORITIZES THAT WE
SPEND MONEY ON. DRUG TREATMENT
FOR YOUTH.
DRUG PREVENTION FOR YOUTH
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION
PROTECTIONS RE PRIORITIZE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT SPENDING INCLUDING
AGAINST LAW ENFORCEMENT'S BUT.
AND WE PRIORITIZE ME
REINVESTMENT.
DOJ HAS HISTORICALLY RECEIVE
FUNDS GENERAL FUNDS. TO DO THIS
TYPE OF ENFORCEMENT.
WE SUPPORT THAT CONTINUING. WE
DON'T WANT DOJ OR OTHER LAW
ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES NOT
SPECIFIED IN THE ACT.
TO COMPETE WITH THE REVENUE THAT
WAS INTENDED. FOR TREATMENT
PREVENTION ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION.
THANK ME REINVESTMENT.
THIS AS WRITTEN.
BLOWS A HOLE IN THE INTENT. AND
CREATES A DOORWAY.
WHICH MANY OTHERS COULD SHOW UP
AND SAY WE HAVE MRIJUANA COSTS
TO. WE WANT SOME MONEY.
WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO STAY
WITH WHAT THE VOTERS SUPPORTED
WHICH WITH AN EMPHASIS ON PUBLIC
HEALTH PROGRAMS. THANK YOU THANK
YOU SIR.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS ROBERT
HARRIS ON BEHALF SEIU CALIFORNIA.
WE FEEL THE SAME WAY ABOUT THE
FUNDS ARE OUR FOLKS WORK IN THE
ENFORCEMENT UNDER THIS. AND THAT
REVENUE COLLECTION INTO THE US
IN THE LOCAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT
MEANT MAKING SURE PEOPLE ARE
SAFE OUT OF IT. AND THEY WORK A
LOT NO TREATMENT FIELD WE'VE
BEEN WAITING FOR THESE TREATMENT
FUNDS FOR CHILDREN AND
PREVENTION FUNDS FOR CHILDREN
FOREVER.
AND WE CAN NOW PUT SOMETHING
ELSE THAT WAS FUNDED A DIFFERENT
WAY OF PRINT HEADED THAT. IS
REALLY DISCONCERTING TO US WE WE
DON'T LIKE IT WE THINK THERE ARE
OTHER WAYS TO DO IT IN ESSENCE.
WITH THE BORROWING YOU'RE DOING
RIGHT NOW YOU'RE ACTUALLY
FINDING. THE DOJ FROM FROM A
BORROW FROM THE GENERAL FUND. IT
MAKES MORE SENSE TO JUST PAY FOR
IT OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND AND
NOT MESS WITH THE INITIATIVE.
I ALSO WILL I AM HERE ON BEHALF
OF THE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF
ADDICTION MEDICINE WHO WROTE THE
TREATMENT PREVENTION EARLY
INTERVENTION LANGUAGE FOR KIDS.
WHO WORKED?
FOR A LONG TIME TO SAY IF WE'RE
GONNA LEGALIZE MARIJUANA. LET'S
DO SOMETHING THAT HELPS CHILDREN.
THAT WE HAVEN'T DONE BEFORE IN
THE STATE AND THERE ARE EVEN
MORE UPSET THAN I SEE ARE YOU
BECAUSE BECAUSE THIS WAS WHAT
THEY WOTE THIS LANGUAGE. HELP
CALIFORNIA'S KIDS AND PREVENT
BAD IMPACTS ON KIDS FROM THE
LEGALIZATION.
SO BOTH OF BOTH OF THOSE CLIENTS
ARE OPPOSED TO DOJ GETTING
FUNDED. FROM THE TREATMENT MONEY.
THANK YOU OKAY SO LET ME MAKE A
STATEMENT HERE WHICH MAY ASSIST
THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE LINED UP TO.
PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT AND SOME
OF US SITTING UP HERE SO THE
ITEMS THAT ARE BEING.
DISCUSSED IN PUBLIC COMMENT IS
THE ONE ITEM HAVING TO DO WITH.
OF JUSTICE AUTHORIZATION TO.
SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF
ILLEGAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES AND
THE EXPENDITURES THIRTY
REQUESTED. TRAIL OF THOSE
FOURTEEN MILLION FORTY SEVEN
POSITIONS.
THEN USE SHOULD NOTE THOSE OF
YOU IN THE AUDIENCE THAT THE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION HERE THAT
WE WILL BE CONSIDERING SHOULD
THERE BE A MOTION.
IS TO APPROVE THE MAY REVISION
PROPOSALS AS OFFERED BUT TO FUND
THE DOJ ENFORCEMENT REQUEST FROM
THE GENERAL FUND. AND TO ADOPT
PLACEHOLDER TRAILER BILL
LANGUAGE WITH RESPECT TO THAT IN
ADDITION TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
FOUR POSITIONS TO THE BUREAU OF
CANNABIS CONTROL.
TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
TO LOCAL EQUITY ACT APPLICANTS
AND PROGRAMS IN AN ADDITIONAL
TEN MILLION DOLLARS TO GO BIZ.
FOR NO OR LOW INTEREST LOANS OR
GRANTS TO SUPPORT SMALL
BUSINESSES WITHIN LOCAL EQUITY
PROGRAMS SO.
HOPEFULLY THAT WILL HELP SOME
SIR.
YOU WERE GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS
LIKE SAY A PRETTY MURPHY WITH
WEED MAPS CLINT DID A GREAT JOB.
SOUNDED VAGUELY FAMILIAR FROM AT
THE STYLE HE'S LAST YEAR.
WELL THAT'S THE WAY YOU'RE IT'S
RARE THAT OCCURRED. ACTUALLY
IMAGINE THAT.
I'D LIKE SEE FULL SUPPORT FOR
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WHICH
IS.
WHERE I WAS HEADED? FIGURE A
STAFF OF BUT JUST AFTER THE
GREAT JOB AND KIND OF ATTEMPTING
TO ANALYZE WE HAVE MANY OF THE
SAME CONCERNS. FOR THE WAY THAT
THE DOJ FUNDING HAS BEEN LAID
OUT AS THE SPEAKERS BEFORE ME.
ARE THE OTHER PIECE OF THIS THAT-I WOULD LOVE TO SAY IS IT AN
ABSOLUTELY GREAT IDEA FOR THE
INDUSTRY'S THE EQUITY PIECE.
ON DESPERATELY NEED WAYS TO FIND
NEW LEGAL BUSINESSES IN THE
STATE.
THE ONLY THING OTHER THING I
WILL ASK IS TO THE EXTENT THAT
ALL THE MEMBERS HERE HAVE A.
REALIZATION. THAT THE INDUSTRY
REVENUES AND EVERYTHING IS THERE
ARE LOWER RIGHT NOW BECAUSE YOU
HAVE EIGHTY PERCENT OF THE
COUNTIES AND CITIES IN THE STATE
NOT LICENSING CANNABIS.
THAT'S THE REALITY.
SO IF YOU DON'T HAVE A LOCAL
LICENSING STRUCTURE TO DO A
LICENSING METHODOLOGY YOU'RE NOT
GOING TO SEE THE REVS. SO. NO
MATTER WHAT WE DO ON ENFORCEMENT
IT'S GOING TO BE A WHACK A MOLE
STRATEGY RIGHT NOW BECAUSE YOU
DON'T HAVE ENOUGH LOCAL LICENSES.
TO BE LEGAL IN THE INDUSTRY.
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOUR
COMMENTS AND YOUR PRAYER OPEN
THIS BY THE WAY.
YES SIR MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS
RAND MARTIN ON BEHALF OF KHALIFA
BASED IN SAN JOSE AND BLACKBIRD
LOGISTICS WHICH IS A
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY ACROSS THE
STATE. I'M WE STRONGLY SUPPORT
THE.
THE FOURTEEN MILLION DOLLARS TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
WHEREVER YOU COME FROM.
IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO
UNDERSTAND THAT. DESPITE ALL THE
GLOWING.
SPECULATION ABOUT WHAT WAS
GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THIS
INDUSTRY COME JANUARY FIRST. IT
HAS CONTRADICTED BY OUR
EXPERIENCE ON THE GROUND WHICH
IT IS IT IS NOT AS ROBUST AS WE
HAD HOPED FOR IN THE FIRST
QUARTER OF THIS YEAR FIRST TWO
QUARTERS SO FAR. AND THE REASON
FOR THAT IN LARGE PART IS THE
FACT THAT THE ILLICIT MARKET
CONTINUES TO BE INCREDIBLY
HEALTHY. WE BELIEVE THAT THE
FOURTEEN MILLION GOING TO DOJ AS
WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL MONEY IS
GOING TO THE THREE REGULATORY
BODIES WILL HELP WITHOUT
ENFORCEMENT. GET THE ILLICIT
MARKET OFF THE OFF THE LANDSCAPE
AND ALLOW THE LEGAL MARKET THE
ONES WHO STEP P TO BE REGULATED
AND TO BE LICENSED TOCA FLOURISH
AND PROVIDE THE KIND OF LEGAL.
SERVICES THAT YOU ALL AS THE
LEGISLATURE AND THE GOVERNOR.
ANTICIPATED AND PASSING US
THANK YOU VERY MUCH THANK YOU
FOR YOUR COMMENTS SIR.
ONE BACK AT HER DRUG POLICY
ALLIANCE SUPPORTS THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING BCC
AUGMENTATION I WAS JUST PUT ON
THE RECORD THE CALIFORNIA URBAN
PARTNERSHIP ALSO STRONGLY
SUPPORTS THE EQUITY MEASURES
THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS.
.
MATTER.
OKAY CALLINGS YOU HEARD THE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THERE A
MOTION ON MOVE IT.
I. JUST ONE MOMENT ON THE ON THE
RECOMMENDATION SINCE I DIDN'T
HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE OUR
POSITION CLEAR THE INTENT BEHIND.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION SEEMS
FINE IT'S JUST THE TWENTY
MILLION DOLLARS IN GENERAL FUND
WOULD BE A CONCERN FOR THE
ADMINISTRATION SINCE THAT
DEVIATE FROM OUR FISCAL PLAN
THANK YOU.
OKAY THANK YOU FOR THAT SIR OKAY
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION HAS
BEEN MOVED UP PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL.
SENATOR ROBB FIRE CENTER LATER
CENTER WILL.
THANK YOU ALL.
EXCELLENT PRESENTATION BY THE
WAY.
THE NEXT ITEM.
.
ALWAYS AN ITEM OF INTEREST
CONTROL SECTION SIX POINT ONE
ZERO. ISSUE NUMBER ONE STATE
WIDE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE.
NOBODY WANTS TO STAY FOR
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE.
I GET IT.
THIS IS. FOR. THEM. ANY TO ANY
PRISON ANY ANY PRESENTERS AND
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE.
AMERICAN.
MOVE THE NIGHT.
YEAH.
ONLY A BILLION DOLLARS YEAH.
AS YOU KNOW THIS IS AN ANNUAL
FAVORITE OF THIS BUDGET
SUBCOMMITTEE SO.
THOSE ONE THIRTY ONE.
OKAY.
YOU'LL NEED A MOMENT ARE YOU
SAID NO WE'RE GOOD FIGHTING YOUR
WAY TO THE.
IT WAS QUITE AN EXODUS THERE FOR
IF YOU WOULD.
IDENTIFY YOURSELVES FOR THE
RECORD PLEASE DURING MY LEFT TO
WRITE THEM. SALLY WE CAN BUILD
APARTMENT FINANCE LOOK LOOK GOOD
TO SEE YOU AGAIN.
AND THAT'S OUR DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE SIR THANK YOU FOR COMING.
OKAY SO.
LET'S START OKAY.
BY THE WAY YOU ALSO HAVE
NOTICED THE VARIOUS COMMENTS AND
THE STAFF ANALYSIS SO AT SOME
POINT YOU CAN ADDRESS THOSE
HOPEFULLY I WILL I WILL BE
ADDRESSING US THANK YOU.
THE MAIN REVISION PROPOSAL
BEFORE YOU TODAY DEMONSTRATES
THE ADMINISTRATION'S CONTINUED
COMMITMENT TO ADDRESSING
INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES.
CONTROL SECTION SIX POINT ONE OH
WOULD PROVIDE ONE POINT NO
BILLION IN ONE TIME FUNDING TO
ADDRESS A SIGNIFICANT BACKLOG OF
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE STATEWIDE
IF THE CROSS TWENTY TWO
DEPARTMENTS. OF THE PROPOSAL
REPRESENTS THE THIRD TIME THE
ADMINISTRATION HAS PROPOSED A
CONCERT FOR CONTROL SECTION FOR.
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AND THE
LEGISLATURE PROVE CONTROL
SECTION SIX POINT ONE OUT FOUR
HUNDRED TWENTY MILLION IN
FIFTEEN SIXTEEN AND.
FOUR HUNDRED NINETY FIVE
MILLION SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN. AND
THE TWO THOUSAND EGHTEEN
NINETEEN PROPOSAL IS MUCH LARGER
THAN PREVIOUS CONTROL SECTIONS
AS YOU CAN SEE BUT IS VERY
SIMILAR. IN ITS STRUCTURE.
CONSISTENT WITH THE SIXTEEN
SEVENTEEN CONTROL CONTROL
SECTION THE PROPOSAL. INCLUDES
THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE
NOTIFICATIONS.
NOTIFICATION OF THE FINAL
PROJECT LIST FOR EACH DEPARTMENT
LISTED IN THE CONTROL SECTION
PRIOR TO THE ALLOCATION OF ANY
FUNDS. AND A THIRTY DAY REVIEW
PERIOD FOR COMMENT.
ACCORDINGLY NOTIFICATION
REGARDING ANY CHANGES THIRTY DAY NOTICE PRIOR TO
ADDING ANY PROJECT WITH
ESTIMATED COST OVER A MILLION
DOLLARS.
ALSO IS IN ADDITION THIS YEAR
WE'VE INCLUDED LANGUAGE THAT
ALLOWS STATE AGENCIES TO USE A
PORTION OF THEIR ALLOCATION TO
ASSESS THEIR EXISTING FACILITIES.
TO HELP STATE BETTER MANAGE ITS
INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE RESILIENT
TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE FUTURE.
OF WEIRD ALSO INCREASE THE
NUMBER OF YEARS UP FOR
DEPARTMENTS TO ENCUMBER. FUNDS
FOR THE PROJECTS FROM ABOUT TWO
YEARS TO THREE DUE TO THE LARGE
NUMBER OF PROJECTS IT
DEPARTMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO
MANAGE WE ANTICIPATE THAT THE
FUNDS WILL. BE USED TO MANAGE
BETWEEN TWENTY FIVE TWENTY FIVE
HUNDRED AND THREE THOUSAND
PROJECTS.
WE PROVIDED THE ONLY.
WITH LARGER DRAFT DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE LIST NEEDS LESS.
THAT WERE SUBMITTED BY
DEPARTMENTS. TO FINANCE LAST
FALL AND WE STARTED TO SEND OVER
PROJECT LIST FOR THE MORE
REFINED.
NUMBERS THAT THAT MATCH THEIR
ALLOCATION AND.
WE STUCK WITH SUCH ABOUT SIX OF
THOSE LISTS OVER AND WE. EXPECT
TO SEND THE BALANCE OF THOSE IN
THE NEXT DAY OR SO.
AS WE ARE RECEIVING THEM WERE
REVIEWING THEM FOR. UP EACH
PROJECT ENSURE THAT IT.
IT'S THE DEFINITION OF DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE. AND THAT. IT
MATCHES THE DEPARTMENT'S
PRIORITIES.
I'D LIKE TO EMPHASIZE THESE
PROJECTS AT THIS POINT.
OUR PRELIMINARY AND.
THEY WILL BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
AS WE GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS.
OVERALL SIX POINT ONE NO. HAS.
WORKED WELL FOR THE ALLOCATION
OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE.
AS OF MARCH THIS YEAR.
APPROXIMATELY A HUNDRED AND
FORTY. OF TWO HUNDRED PROJECTS
APPROVED INTO TWO THOUSAND
FIFTEEN SIXTEEN HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED IN THE BALLOTS ARE
NEARING COMPLETION.
AND OVER THREE HUNDRED OF THE
ELEVEN HUNDRED PROJECTS APPROVED
IN SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN. ART HAVE
BEEN COMPLETED WITH THE BALLOTS
IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DESIGN OR
CONSTRUCTION.
AS FOR LEGISLATIVE
NOTIFICATIONS UP FOR FIFTEEN
SIXTEEN FUNDS WE'VE SUBMITTED
FIVE QUARTERLY NOTIFICATIONS AND
FOR SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN. FIVE A
QUARTERLY NOTIFICATIONS AND ONE
THIRTY DAY NOTIFICATION.
WE ALSO REGULARS REGULARLY SENT
US SOLICIT.
GET UPDATES FROM THE VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS. AND FROM WHAT WE
HAVE SEEN FROM THOSE UPDATES
APARTMENTS ARE MOVING ALONG VERY
WELL MAKING SUBSTANTIAL PROGRESS
ON THEIR PROJECTS. AND WE ALSO.
RECENTLY SHARED A RECENT STATUS
UPDATE WITH THE CLEANUP.
I ATE REALIZE THE ONLY.
IT CONTINUES TO HAVE CONCERNS.
ABOUT THE USE OF. A CONTROL
SECTION FOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
FUNDING AND I'D LIKE TO RESPOND
TO SOME OF THOSE. CONCERNS
RAISED NONE ELSE'S. ON WHATEVER
THEY'RE NOT THE ONLY ONE OKAY.
I WILL I WILL.
TAKE THEM ONE AT A TIME AND
ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
YOU MIGHT HAVE.
THERE'S CONCERN THAT THE
PROPOSED PROJECTS OR NOT AND
IDENTIFIED THERE'S NO CLEAR
BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED
ALLOCATIONS.
I WOULD NOTE THAT AS AS I
STATED PREVIOUSLY THERE THAT THE
LEAK OF HER DRESSING THE.
PROJECT LIST BY SENDING MORE
FIND PROJECTS NOW AND THEN THEY
ALSO HAVE THE LARGER OF DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE PROJECTS BY
DEPARTMENT.
AS TO ALLOCATIONS LEVELS WE'VE
ALWAYS KIND OF STATED THAT THIS
IS MORE OF AN ART THAN A SCIENCE.
AND.
THAT. BUTWE DO LOOK AT CERTAIN
THINGS WHEN WE'RE IDENTIFYING
WHICH DEALT WITH HOW THE
ALLOCATION SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED.
UP WE LOOK FOR A.
HELLO DEAR PROJECTS THE TYPE OF
PROJECTS. INVOLVE TYPE OF
FACILITIES INVOLVED SPECIAL
NEEDS OF THE DEPARTMENT'S
WHETHER THEY HAVE OTHER FUNDING
SOURCES AND WHAT THEIR CAPACITY
MIGHT BE TOO TO HANDLE THIS
NUMBER PROJECTS.
THERE'S ALSO A CONCERN THAT'S
BEEN EXPRESSED THAT THE
NOTIFICATION PROCESS HINDERS
LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT. AND I
WOULD JUST AGAIN POINT OUT THAT.
THE UP PROJECT LISTS ARE
AVAILABLE OF FOR LEGISLATIVE.
REVIEW AND COMMENT. AND.
AND THEN THE LEGISLATURE ALSO
HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY WHEN WE
SUBMIT OUR FINALISTS.
IN SHOULD BE THE BEGINNING OF
JULY. TO REVIEW AND COMMENT AND
COURSE ANY CONCERNS AS IN AS IN
PAST PRACTICE ANY CONCERNS THAT
ARE RAISED.
IN THAT REVIEW PROCESS WILL BE
ADDRESSED AROUND. YOU KNOW TO
THE BEST OF OUR BILITY.
AND THEN I I SEE THAT THEY'RE
THE ONLY I WAS RECOMMENDED THIS
TIME ONE TIME FOR ME MAINTENANCE
FUNDING BE DEPOSITED INTO A
SEPARATE COUNT. ON THAT WOULD BE
MADE AVAILABLE BY APPROPRIATION
BY THE LEGISLATURE.
I MEAN THAT'S CERTAINLY AN
ALTERNATIVE ON THAT COULD BE
CONSIDERED BUT OUR CHAT WITH SIX
POINT ONE OUT.
IS REALLY HAVE TO DELIVER MONEY.
QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY AMBIENCE
QUICKLY AS WE POSSIBLY CAN. TO
START ADDRESSING THE BACKLOG
IMMEDIATELY AND.
BASED ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE
CONTROL SECTION WE BELIEVE THAT.
OF SIMILAR TO SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN
WE'D BE ABLE TO DELIVER THOSE
FUNDS IN. AUGUST OF THIS YEAR.
YES THE QUESTION I MEAN THE
ISSUE IT SEEMS TO ME AND I'LL
LET THE LA A COMMENT I DON'T
WANT TO STEP ON THE OHIO.
SINCE WE DEPEND ON THEM FOR
BRAND CAR HERE BUT. THE ISSUE
SEEMS TO BE THE PRIORITIZATION
OF PROJECTS NOT JUST PROJECTS
WITH THE ONES THAT. THE GENERAL
NATURE OF PROJECTS THAT ARE
IDENTIFIED ON OUR LIST HERE BUT
THOSE THAT PERHAPS AREN'T ON THE
LIST. AND PRIORITIZATION WITHIN
CATEGORIES WHETHER IT'S THE
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY OR
THE. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT AND THEN AND THEN THE
ROLE OF THE LEGISLATURE IN
PROVIDING INPUT. AS TO THAT.
PRIORITIZATION PROCESS AND WIND
YOU KNOW.
I USE YOU KNOW BECAUSE YOU'VE
BEEN HERE WITH ME AS THIS IS MY
SIX YEARS SITTING IN THIS BUDGET
SUBCOMMITTEE I LOVE IT. BUT OF.
BUT WE SPEND A GOOD DAL OF TIME.
IN WHAT BRAIN PER WE HAVE UP
HERE.
LOOKING AT AN APPROVING
INDIVIDUAL POSITIONS.
IN DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES AND
WE. MOVED FROM APPROVING
INDIVIDUAL POSITIONS IN THE
PERMANENT AGE AND PURPOSE AND
AGENCIES TO APPROVING. MAJOR
PROJECTS OPERATIONAL TYPE
PROJECTS THAT DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES. ENGAGING YET WHEN WE
ARE TALKING.
ABOUT FACILITY PROJECTS.
E APPARENTLY AS A LEGISLATURE
DON'T SEEM TO BE.
TO HAVE A ROLE.
OTHER THAN TO SIMPLY SAY YES
HERE'S A BILLION DOLLARS OR
HEARS TWO BILLION DOLLARS AND.
WE YOU TELL US WE NEEDED WE
BELIEVE YOU NEED IT BUT WE DON'T
HAVE ANY ROLE IN DECIDING. WHICH
ONES GET
DONE FIRST AND MAYBE WE DON'T
HAVE THAT MAYBE WE'RE NOT THE
DECIDER. ON THE ISSUE BUT I'M
JUST WONDERING WHY THE
LEGISLATURE DOESN'T HAVE MORE.
OF A ROLE IN THAT AND FOR
EXAMPLE WHAT WOULD BE THE HARM
IN.
IN SEGREGATING FUNDS THAT ARE
PROPOSED TO BE EXPENDED OUTSIDE
OF THE BUDGET YEAR.
AND THEN HAVE THE LEGISLATURE
COME BACK WITH THE
ADMINISTRATION AND SORT OF WORK
THROUGH A PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
ON AN EXPEDITED.
IN AN EXPEDITED WAY AND I'M NOT
THE BUDGET PROCESS EXPERT
DESPITE MY SIX YEARS. BUT THERE
PROBABLY ARE WAYS TO EXPEDITE.
THE BUDGET PROCESS WHEN WE NEED
TO EXPEDITE THE BUDGET PROCESS.
AND THEN TO ALLOW US THEN TO
HAVE SOME INPUT INTO WAY IN.
ON THE THE PRIORITIZATION OF THE
PROJECTS I MEAN FOR THE MOST
PART GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF MONEY
THAT.
WE'RE PROPOSING HERE AND THE
BACKLOG.
IN CRITICAL DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE OF.
ODJICK STATEWIDE.
WE'RE NOT CHANGING OUT LIGHT
SWITCHES AND PLUGS YEARS SO
THESE PROJECTS REQUIRE I'M SURE
DETAILED PLANNING. OF PERMITTING
ENTITLEMENTS TO THE EXTENT WE
HAVE TO GET THEM AND ALL OF THE
OTHER THINGS THAT GO INTO. THE
CONSTRUCTION RELATED PROJECT
THAT IN AND OF THEMSELVES ARE
GOING TO TAKE TIME. SO IT'S NOT
LIKE. WE SAY YES YOU THROW THE
LIGHT SWITCH AND YOU ROLL OUT A
BILLION DOLLARS SOON THAT'S
GOING TO TAKE TIME. SO.
I'LL SPLA TOOK OVER THE COMMENT
BUT MAYBE YOU COULD WE COULD
HAVE A LITTLE CONVERSATION I
HAVE NO HOPE THAT WE'RE GOING TO
WIN THIS CONVERSATION BECAUSE
THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME.
IN THIS BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE THAT
WE'VE DISCUSSED THESE VERY
ISSUES AND I DON'T THINK WE HAD
ANY IMPACT ON THE ON THE SUBJECT
LAST TIME. AND I SUSPECT WE'RE
NOT GONNA HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE
FINAL DECISION THIS TIME.
BUT WE NEED TO SAY IT LOL.
THANK YOU SO MUCH MISTER CHAIR
SO WE ARE CERTAINLY SUPPORTIVE
OF THE CONCEPT OF PROVIDING
ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE WE THINK DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE IS A REALLY
IMPORTANT. ISSUE FOR THE STATE
TO TACKLE TIMES WE APPRECIATE
THE ADMINISTRATION DOING THAT
HOWEVER WE HAVE RAISED SEVERAL
CONCERNS AS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED.
I'M ONE OF THEM IS THAT WE DON'T
THINK THAT THERE'S A CLEAR BASIS
FOR THE FUNDING LEVELS AND
THROUGH THE ALLOCATION ACROSS
DEPARTMENTS. I'M PART OF THAT IS
BECAUSE WE HAVE. VERY LITTLE
CONFIDENCE IN THE NEED FLIPS ON
WE DID RECEIVE. NEEDS LESS OVER
THE WEEKEND FROM.
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION THAT WE
WOULD NOTE THAT STIRRED THE
AMOUNT OF DOLLARS A SORT OF
IDENTIFIED NEED FOR EACH
DEPARTMENT. HAS JUMPED AROUND
DRAMATICALLY IN MANY CASES FROM
YEAR TO YEAR.
AND A LOT OF TIMES THERE'S NO
CLEAR REASON WHY THAT'S
OCCURRING AND WE'LL FIND MORE
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE AND THEN
MAGICALLY IT SEEMS LIKE IT COMES
UP AGAIN AND. IT'S NOT CLEAR
WHETHER IT'S BECAUSE IT WASN'T
IDENTIFIED. WHETHER YOU KNOW THE
PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING THE LAW
THAT NEEDS YOU KNOW. HAS BEEN
REFINED OVER TIME AND SO YOU
KNOW THEY'RE JUST SORT OF
FIGURING OUT MORE AND MORE
PROJECTS THAT THEY MISSED THE
FIRST TIME OR WHETHER THERE'S A
LACK OF ONGOING MAINTENANCE OR
SHOULD WHAT'S GOING ON BUT. IT'S
REALLY HARD TO ACTUALLY NAIL
DOWN WHAT THAT IS BUT THERE'S
DIFFERENT NAMES MAINTENANCE
NEEDS ARE. AND. WE ALSO KNOW
THAT THE LIST INCLUDE A VARIETY
OF THINGS THAT WE WOULDN'T
TRADITIONALLY CONSIDERED TO BE
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE OF THINGS
LIKE LOOK ELECTRIC VEHICLE
CHARGING STATIONS OR. ENERGY
UPGRADES ARE VARIOUS KINDS OF OF
SURVEYS OF YOU KNOW TRAILS AND
YOU KNOW A WHOLE HOST OF THINGS
MAYBE VERY WORTHY PROJECTS BUT
NOT. YES IN PARKS AND RECREATION
THEY HAVE THEY HAVE SOME SOME
INTERESTING ONES IN THERE SO
THERE'S JUST A. WHOLE HOST OF
THINGS.
WE ALSO THINK THAT A
SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGE IS THAT
THE PROPOSED PROJECTS GENERALLY
HAVEN'T BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THIS
WE CAN BILL MENTIONED WE'VE
RECEIVED TENTATIVE LISTS FROM.
FROM SOME DEPARTMENTS I JUST
RECENTLY ABOUT NOT FROM EVERYONE
AND WE HAVEN'T REALLY HAD TIME
TO FULLY EVALUATE THEM BUT I
WOULDN'T KNOW THAT. EVEN THOSE
LIST THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED.
THERE ARE AS I SAID SOME
PROJECTS THAT I THINK
MERIT FURTHER REVIEW THINGS LIKE
I SAID ENERGY EFFICIENCY TPES
OF PROJECTS BUT ALSO THERE'S.
FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS FOR
DREDGING A RESERVOIR FOR CDC ARE.
WHICH WAS KIND OF NOTABLE AND
AND IT WAS THAT WE HAVEN'T HAD
TIME TO GO TO TO GET TO THAT
BECAUSE WEWE JUST RECEIVE THE
WEST. BUT THAT'S THE KIND OF
PROJECT TO THAT YOU KNOW PERHAPS
THE LEGISLATURE WOULD WANT TO
HAVE FURTHER CONVERSATIONS ABOUT
WHETHER. IT WANTS TO FIND AND SO
ON WE JUST NOTE THAT WE ALSO.
WE WE DON'T FEEL LIKE THE SIX
POINT A PROCESS HAS WORKED WELL.
WE THINK THAT IT'S BEEN
PROBLEMATIC FOR A NUMBER REASONS.
WE THINK IT GENERALLY LIMITS
LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT BECAUSE
WE'RE DOING ALL THIS THROUGH
JAIL BE SEE NOTIFICATIONS I'M IN
SOME CASES JUST AFTER THE FACT
THAT THE PROJECT OF LESS THAN A
MILLION DOLLARS. I'M SO IT'S
REALLY DIFFICULT YOU KNOW
THERE'S A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME
TO REVIEW THE JAIL BC HAS TO
REVIEW THOSE PROJECTS. I DO KNOW
THAT YOU'LL BE SURPRISES IS NOT
AS PUBLIC AS A AS A TRADITIONAL
BUDGET PROCESS WE THINK THOSE
ARE VERY CHALLENGING.
WE'VE ALSO HAD CHALLENGES EVEN
JUST WITH THE ALLOCATION OF THE
PREVIOUS FUNDS.
NOT ONLY.
THERE'S BEEN A NUMBER OF
CHALLENGES THAT WILL GO THROUGH
THEM ALL AND IN THE INTEREST OF
TIME I RESET ONE WAS HIGHLIGHTED
BY. DEPARTMENT FISH AND WILDLIFE
THEY CHANGE THE SIGNIFICANT
MAJORITY OF THEIR PROPOSED
PROJECTS I THINK IT WAS MAYBE.
TWO THIRDS OR SO OF THEIR
PROJECTS WERE CHANGED FROM THE
INITIAL LIST.
AND THEN GO TO SUTURE DIDN'T
RECEIVE TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF
THOSE CHANGES. EVEN THE
QUARTERLY NOTIFICATION WASN'T
WASN'T TIMELY THAT WAS ONE
EXAMPLE IS PROBABLY THE MOST
EXTREME BUT.
WE WE KNOW THERE ARE NUMBER OF
PROJECTS THAT THEY HAVE NOT YET
BEEN COMPLETED EVEN FROM FIFTEEN
SIXTEEN. ON THEIR NUMBER OF
CHANGES AND IT'S JUST VERY
DIFFICULT I THINK AS A PROCESS
FOR THE LEGISLATURE TO REALLY.
KIND OF GET A HANDLE ON THIS
THIS IS A BILLION DOLLARS OF
GENERAL FUNDS IT'S A LOT OF
MONEY.
AND SO WE WANT MAKE SURE WE GET
THIS RIGHT. WHAT OVER ME JUST AS
GOOD I APOLOGIZE KILLING SOME OF
I KNOW MY COLLEAGUES HAVE
QUESTIONS?
OF.
THE PROBLEM WITH THE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE
NOTIFICATION AS I UNDERSTAND IT
IS.
THE JOINT COMMITTEE GETS A
NOTICE.
AND THEN SO WHAT.
I MEAN IS THERE ANYTHING THAT
THE BOOK BUDGET COMMITTEE CAN DO
WOULD WOULD THE ADMINISTRATION
BE WILLING TO BUILD INTO THIS.
A PROPOSAL.
THAT THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE
BUDGET COMMITTEE UPON NOTICE THE
THIRTY DAY NOTICE COULD COOK
COULD.
BECAUSE THE.
PROJECT THE MONEY DISBURSEMENT
TO HALT AND DIRECTED THE PROCESS
RETURNED TO THE. BUDGET
COMMITTEE ASSUMING WE'RE IN
SESSION AND IF NOT YOU'D HAVE TO
LENGTHEN THE NOTIFICATION.
TO COINCIDE WITH THE LEGISLATIVE
SESSION. TO THROW THE. FURTHER
PROCESS BACK IN FRONT OF A
BUDGET COMMITTEE THIS ONE OR
SOME OTHER COMMITTEE TO. HAVE A
LITTLE DISCUSSION ABOUT WHERE
THE MONEY'S GOING AND WHAT THE
PROJECTS ARE ALL ABOUT. WE MIGHT
KEEP MY CONCERN IS THIS IS A
CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION ONCE IF
IF AND WHEN WE APPROVE IT. AND
THEN THE MONEY JUST ROLLS AND
THE ONLY THING WE GET IS A
LETTER THAT SAYS OTHER PROJECTS
CHANGED AND. THIS IS WHAT'S
HAPPENING IS MY UNDERSTANDING
CORRECT. I TECHNICALLY THAT IS
TRUE I THINK IN PRACTICE THE
ADMINISTRATION HAS.
WHEN WE HAVE BEEN RAISED
CONCERNS ABOUT SPECIFIC PROJECTS
I THINK THEY TYPICALLY DO TAKE
THIS VERY SERIOUSLY THERE'S ONE
SPECIFIC INCIDENT INSTANCE THAT
COMES TO MIND ONE OF THE
PROJECTS THAT WAS INCLUDED ON
ONE OF THE LISTS. WITH ACTUALLY
PROJECT THE LEGISLATURE HAD.
PREVIOUSLY REJECTED.
AND SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT
WAS FLAGS TO THE GOP SEE REVIEW
PROCESS AND THE ADMINISTRATION
AGREED TO TAKE THAT PROJECT OFF.
I THINK STATE BLANKLY WOULD.
WOULD NOT MOVE FORWARD IF IF
THE LEGISLATURE DID RACE
SPECIFIC CONCERNS HOWEVER I
THINK THE CHALLENGE IS ALSO EVEN
BEYOND THAT ON THE CHALLENGES
THAT. THE GOP SEAT PROCESS IS A
VERY COMPRESSED AND IT'S NOT
VERY.
PUBLIC AND THESE ARE VERY LONG
LIST AS AS MISSILE CONTROL
MENTIONED I MEAN THESE ARE YOU
KNOW. KEPT A COUPLE OF THOUSAND
DIFFERENT PROJECTS I'M SO WHEN
WE GET THE ORIGINAL LIST SAY IN
JULY OF WHAT'S GOING TO BE
FUNDED FOR SURE. ON COURSE I CAN
CHANGE WITH THESE MEDICATIONS
BUT YOU KNOW WE HAVE. A PRETTY
SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME PREVIEW A
LARGE NUMBER OF PROJECTS.
AND WE'VE ALREADY PROVED THAT
FUNDING ALLOCATIONS AND SO EVEN
IF SOME OF THE PROJECTS LOOK
LIKE THEY DON'T REALLY MAKE
SENSE WE CAN'T MOVE THE MONEY TO
ANOTHER DEPARTMENT THAT HAS MORE
SICK SIGNIFICANT NEEDS. SO I
THINK THEY'RE JUST A LOT OF
PROCESS ISSUES HERE I'M ONE OF
THEM CERTAINLY IS THE ABILITY OF
THE LEGISLATURE TO SAY NO TO A
PROJECT BUT I THINK THEY GO
BEYOND THAT WELL THE OTHER
OBVIOUS. MAYBE IT'S NOT SO
OBVIOUS TO YOU ALL BUT I CAN
ASSURE YOU THAT.
AND I THINK I SPEAK FOR MY
COLLEAGUES WE HAVE NO VISIBILITY
OVER THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE
BUDGET LETTER PROCESS.
I DON'T BELIEVE THAT I SEE THEM.
AS A BUDGET SUB CHAIR. SO THEY
GO SOMEWHERE AND I'M SURE IT'S
ABOVE MY. PAY GRADE.
BUT.
WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DEALING
WITH THIS AND YET I DON'T SEE.
WHATEVER IT IS THAT'S SENT IN
LET ME AS MY COLLEAGUES IF THEY
HAVE QUESTIONS I WOULD BET
CENTER GLAZIER DOES. THAT ARE
WELL.
IRAN SIR I WILL THANK YOU MISTER
CHAIR AND. AT FIRST I I I WANT
TO SAY THAT.
I I REALLY. APPRECIATE THE
ADMINISTRATION COMING FORWARD
WITH THIS.
PROPOSAL BECAUSE SIDE THEY HAVE
RECOGNIZED I KNOW FOR A LONG
TIME AND AND.
THAT THIS IS A BIG PROBLEM. AND
OBVIOUSLY UNDER GREAT BUDGET
CONSTRAINTS AND.
AND GREAT BUDGET LEADERSHIP
OVER THE LAST NUMBER OF YEARS
WERE IN A POSITION NOW WHERE WE
CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT SO I
THINK THIS IS. GOOD TO HAVE THIS
BEFORE US IT STIMULATES AN
IMPORTANT CONVERSATION IT'S A
LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY BUT THE
NEED IS GREAT TOO. AND THAT'S
PART OF WHAT.
CREATES A LITTLE LEVEL OF
FRUSTRATION FOR ME IS THAT AND
AT FIRST THE MALE LINE MY
COMMENTS OF. MY VIEWS WITH THOSE
OF THE CHAIR AND THE OHIO AND.
BOTH IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY HAVE
SAID. BUT.
.
THE STRUGGLE THAT I HAVE IS THAT.
AND THIS IS IMPORTANT
LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT
LEGISLATIVE ROCKET IS TO
UNDERSTAND. THE.
AT THE PRIORITIES AND CONTEXT
FOR THESE CHOICES AND I CAN'T
GET IT FROM WHAT WE SEE BEFORE
US. DOES IT SURPRISE ME THAT
THERE'S A NEED OF A HUNDRED
MILLION DOLLARS AT THE CSU FOR
MAINTENANCE NOW. I'M FAMILIAR
WITH THEIR CAPITAL AND
MAINTENANCE NEEDS. BECAUSE I'VE
WORKED IN THOSE AREAS AND SO I
GET I I'D KNOW THE CONTEXT. FOR
UC AND CSU IT'S OVER SIXTEEN
BILLION. IN CAPITAL AND
MAINTENANCE BIG NUMBER. WHY HAVE
A BOND MEASURE OF FOUR BILLION
DOLLARS FOR BOTH SYSTEMS THAT I
HOPE CONTINUES TO MOVE TO THE
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS? BUT FOR
EVERYONE OF THESE OTHERS I
REALLY DON'T HAVE ANY SENSE. OF
PRIORITIES FOR THE BIG PICTURE
WHAT THE NEED IS IN THE
PRIORITIES THAT WE MIGHT COME
OUT OF THESE ALLOCATIONS.
AND I ALSO DON'T UNDERSTAND THE
CONTEXT BETWEEN THE TWO. WHAT'S
MORE IMPORTANT IN STATE
HOSPITALS VERSUS CSU VERSUS THE
FARES I HAVE NO WAY OF ASSESSING
THAT FROM THE MATERIALS THAT
HAVE BEEN PUT BEFORE ME.
AND I THINK IT IS SO IMPORTANT
FOR THE WORK THAT WE DO THAT IS
THAT WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION SO
WE CAN.
ADVISE AND POTENTIALLY CONSENT
TO THESE. THESE REQUESTS THAT
YOU'VE BEEN. KIND ENOUGH TO PUT
IN THE MAY REVISE I'M NOT
COMFORTABLE WITH THE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE
PROCESS. AT ALL.
FOR REASONS THAT SOME OF THEM
PUT ON THE RECORD MAYBE IF I WAS
CHAIR OF THE. JAIL BC I'D BE
HAPPIER WITH THE. THAT THAT
PROCESS BUT I I'M NOT AND I I
DON'T HAVE ANY CONFIDENCE THAT
THAT REALLY IS THE CORRECT ROLE
THAT WE SHOULD BE PLAYING HERE.
YES IT IS IN THIS CASE A BILLION
DOLLARS THE NEEDS ARE IN THE
TENS OF BILLIONS I'M SURE AND I
I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE
COMFORT WITH THE. THE CONTEXT
THE PRIORITIES THE CHOICES.
AND CERTAINLY THE OVERSIGHT THAT
THE IEP WHO WOULD PROVIDE TO US
AND THAT'S WHY MISTER CHAIRMAN.
FIGHT FOR THIS ITEM DEEPLY HELD
OVER NOT BECAUSE THE NEED IS IN
GREAT AND AND THESE ARE IMPORT
ALLOCATIONS WHICH I HOPE WE
EVENTUALLY WILL PROVIDE AT SOME
LEVEL.
BUT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THIS
IS BEING DONE THE WAY THAT MAKES
ME COMFORTABLE FOR THE REASONS
STATED.
WHAT WELL LET ME AND LET ME MAKE?
BY THE WAY I DO APPRECIATE WE DO
APPRECIATE THE INFRASTRUCTURE
NEEDS.
I SURE OF THE COMMENTS OF MY
COLLEAGUE SENATOR GLACIER.
I MEAN ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO
SEE IF IF IF THIS IS ULTIMATELY
THE FRAMEWORK THAT WE'RE GOING
TO.
WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH WHICH IS
WEAK WE APPROVE MINUTES
CONTINUOUSLY APPROPRIATED OVER
MULTIPLE BUDGET YEARS.
ANDIF THERE IS IN FACT A
PRACTICE IT'S BEING FOLLOWED
WITH THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE
BUDGET COMMITTEE LETTERS.
THAT I'VE ALREADY SAID I'M NOT
INVOLVED WITH BECAUSE I DON'T
SHARE THE. THE BUDGET COMMITTEE.
MAYBE WE SHOULD BUILD SOME
LANGUAGE INTO WHATEVER IT IS
WE'RE OING TO APPROVE THAT
SIMPLY SAYS THAT THE BUDGET
COMMITTEE JOINT LEGISLATIVE
BUDGET COMMITTEE IS NOTIFIED.
OVER WHATEVER PERIOD OF TIME THE
NOTIFICATION NEEDS TO BE NOW IF
WE'RE NOT IN SESSION IT DOESN'T
DO MUCH GOOD TO SEND A LETTER TO
THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE BUDGET
COMMITTEE BECAUSE THERE'S
NOTHING THAT THE LEGISLATURE CAN
DO ABOUT IT.
MUCH BETWEEN SEPTEMBER AND.
JANUARY OF ANY GIVEN YEAR.
BUT YOU PROVIDE A NOTIFICATION
SO THAT THE LEGISLATURE IS ABLE
TO CONSIDER THE LETTER WHEN IT'S
IN SESSION.
AND IF THE CHAIR OF THE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE AND
MEMBERS OF THAT COMMITTEE WISH
THEY CAN SIMPLY HALT THE PROCESS
AND BRING THE ISSUES. BACK TO A
BUDGET COMMITTEE FOR DEBATE
DISCUSSION AND VOTE ON A
PARTICULAR PROJECT OR
PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS. AND-IF UPON NOTIFICATION EVERYBODY
SEEMS TO BE HAPPY WITH THE WAY
IT WORKS AND.
MAYBE THAT'S OKAY BUT WE NEED TO
HAVE SOME.
ROLE IN THIS AS A AS A BUDGET
COMMITTEE.
AS THE ELECTED MEMBERS OF THE
BUDGET COMMITTEE.
DOES THAT MAKE I'M NOT ASKING
YOU TO AGREE AND ASKING IF THAT
MAKES SENSE.
ARE. JUST TO CLARIFY OUR USE
ARE YOU.
SUGGESTING THAT WHEN THERE'S A
CHANGE TOO PROJECT ON THE LARGER
LISTED THAT. THAT THE
LEGISLATURE WOULD GET A GROUP OF.
BE NOTIFIED IN ADVANCE OF THAT
CHANGE BEING MADE MORE WE
NOTIFIED OF THE PEROT NOTIFY THE
PROJECTS RIGHT. YEAH WE GET A
LOCATION BY LETTER. YES OKAY WE
SO WE GET NOTIFIED BY LETTER OF
THE PROJECTS WITHIN SOME WINDOW.
AND IF WE'RE NOT IN SESSION
THERE'S NOTHING REALLY WE CAN DO
ABOUT IT.
TWO WERE NOTIFIED WHEN THEIR
CHANGES IN PROJECTS EITHER
ADDING PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED
CAUSE GREATER THAN WHATEVER AND.
QUARTERLY OF ANY CHANGES TO THE
LIST AS I READ IT YES THAT'S
RIGHT WITH THE PROBLEM I SEE
HERE IS THAT DOESN'T. THAN SAY
WHAT HAPPENS SO YOU TELL US AND
WE DON'T AGREE.
FOR ONE I HAVE A CONVERSATION.
WHAT'S NEXT.
NOTHING.
WHATEVER IT IS IS NOT IN THE
PROPOSAL AS A MATTER OF PRACTICE
YOU MAY LISTEN TO WHATEVER WORD
YOU GET WORDS OF WISDOM YOU GET
FROM THE CHAIR OF THE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE. OR
STAFF.
BUT THERE'S NO REQUIREMENT IS
THERE.
NO NOT AT THIS TIME AND THAT'S
WHAT BOTHERS SOME OF US I THINK
SO.
.
I'LL SEE IF THEIR WORKERS ANY
COMMENT.
LET'S TAKE SOME PUBLIC COMMENT
ON THIS IF THERE IS ANY.
NOBODY WANTS TO VENTURE FORWARD.
A BRAVE SOUL PLEASE STEP
FORWARD MA'AM THANK YOU FOR
COMING HIGH OF SAY OVER TEN AND
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA WE
WANTED TO EXPRESS OUR. GRATITUDE
TO THE GOVERNOR FOR PUTTING THIS
PROPOSAL FORWARD AND REQUEST
YOUR APPROVAL OF IT.
OKAY MY MY ANY OTHER PUBLIC
COMMENT. MY COLLEAGUE SENATOR
GLASER'S REQUESTED THAT WE. HOLD
THIS OVER TILL TUESDAY AND I'M
INCLINED TO DO SO.
WILL OBVIOUSLY HAVE TO TACK
TAKE ACTION ON THIS I SUSPECT.
I PROBABLY KNOW WHAT THE ACTION
WILL BE BUT WHAT I'M ASKING IS
BETWEEN NOW AND TUESDAY. IF
SOMEONE CAN'T GET TOGETHER AND
BUILD SOME LANGUAGE INTO THIS
PROPOSAL.
THAT IF IT IS GOING TO BE A
CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION.
THAT WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY IF
IF IT'S LEGALLY POSSIBLE WITHIN
THE WAY THE BUDGETS WORK AND OUR
AUTHORITY.
TO CALL THE MATTER BACK IF
FOLLOWING ONE OF THESE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE
LETTERS THERE ARE SERIOUS ISSUES
THAT NEED TO BE.
ADDRESSED IN THE OPINION OF THE
LEGISLATURE.
WE'D BE HAPPY TO WORK WITH LECH
STUFF ON. PERFECT.
OKAY WE'LL HOLD THIS ITEM OPEN
UNTIL TUESDAY AS WELL BUT THANK
YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR
PRESENTATION AND. THANK YOU FOR
ATTEMPTING TO ADDRESS
ADMINISTRATION ATTEMPTING TO
ADDRESS ARE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
NEEDS WE LIVE IN THEM.
THANK YOU STEPH.
WHAT'S NEXT.
DID YOU SEE.
ITEM SEVEN SEVEN SIX ZERO
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
ISSUE ONE STATE PROJECT
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
.
GOOD AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIR
COMMITTEE MEMBERS MY NAME IS
JASON KENNEY I AM THE DEPUTY
DIRECTOR FOR REAL ESTATE
SERVICES FROM THE GS. I WAS
STRUCK BY SAYING WE ARE VERY
PLEASED THIS PROPOSAL SHOWS
INITIATIONS CONTINUED SUPPORT OF
OUR EFFORTS TO ADDRESS OUR STATE
OFFICE SPACE AND INFRASTRUCTURE
DEFICIENCIES. HOWEVER BECAUSE
THIS IS LARGELY A TECHNICAL
POLLS WILL I WOULD PREFER TO
FINANCE HERE.
THAT SAID IF THERE ARE ANY
QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ON THE
PROJECTS THEMSELVES IN THE LIST
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF THEM.
FINANCE.
SALLY WE CAN BUILD AGAIN.
JUST QUICKLY SWITCH SPOT.
WE MAY HAVE EXHAUSTED ALL OF OUR
QUESTIONS.-I I DOUBT IT.
YEAH.
OF OKAY SO THE GOVERNORS.
TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
MAY REVISION ON PROPOSES TO
DEPOSIT SIX HUNDRED THIRTY
MILLION GENERAL FUND. INTO THE
CONTINUOUSLY CONTINUOUSLY
APPROPRIATED STREET PROJECT
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND WHICH. AFTER
ALL CALL STUFF. MUCH EASIER TO
TAKE. ESTABLISHED BY THE
LEGISLATURE IN SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN
BUDGET.
THIS PROPOSAL IS ANTICIPATED TO
FULLY FUND FUTURE PHASES OF
PRIORITY OFFICE PROJECTS.
IN SACRAMENTO REGION
SPECIFICALLY THAT WOULD BE
DEBATES AND BUILDING RENOVATION
DESIGN BUILD PHASE. THE UNRUH
BUILDING RENOVATION DESIGN BUILD
FACE THE STATE PRINTING PLANT
DEMOLITION PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
PHASE AND THE. THE RESOURCES
BUILDING RENOVATION PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA AND DESIGN BUILD CASES.
WE BELIEVE THIS IS A PROPOSAL
IS FISCALLY PRUDENT.
IT WOULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT
COST AVOIDANCE OF AT LEAST FOUR
HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS IN
FINANCING COSTS OVER THE LIFE OF
SAY TWENTY FIVE YEAR BONDS.
WOULD ALSO RESULT IN A RISK
AVOIDANCE RELATED TO.
FUTURE BOND TAX COMPLIANCE AND
DISCLOSURE ISSUES AND OTHER
ISSUES RELATED TO THE COURT
REQUIREMENTS OF LEASE REVENUE
BOND FINANCING.
BE LA SO.
ANALYSIS ON THIS ISSUE IS NOTED
SPECIFIC CONCERNS SO I'D LIKE TO
ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE HERE. ARM.
OF THE ELLIOTTS PRESSES CONCERNS
THAT THE PROJECTS ANY PROJECTS
FUNDED THROUGH SPIFF LEFT LESS
OVERSIGHT THEN.
THOSE FUNDED THROUGH THE BUDGET
ACT.
AND I WOULD RESPECTFULLY
DISAGREE WITH THAT ASSESSMENT.
AND POINT OUT THAT THE SPEED
STATUTE WHICH IS GOVERNMENT CODE
ONE FOUR SIX NINE FOUR PROVIDES.
THE LEGISLATIVE NOTIFICATIONS
THAT ARE MUCH MORE ROBUST AND
COMPREHENSIVE THAN THOSE
REQUIRED THROUGH THE TYPICAL
TYPICAL CAPITAL OUTLAY PROCESS
ON THERE'S A TWENTY DAY. NOTICE
PRIOR TO EXPENDITURE OF ANY
FUNDS ON DESIGN ACTIVITIES
THERE'S A SIXTY DAY NOTICE ONTO
THE PRIOR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF SCOPE COST AND DELIVERY
METHOD FOR STREET PROJECT AND
AND USING THAT THE. TWO MOST
RECENT PROJECTS AS AN EXAMPLE OF
STREET STREET. OF. THE. DOCUMENT
THAT WAS DELIVERED IN THE IN IN
THAT NOTICE WAS A UP PROJECT
DEFINITION DOCUMENT WHICH IS
ACTUALLY MUCH MORE INFORMATIVE
THAN AT A COUPLE OUT LIKE THE
SIXTY.
.
THEN THERE'S ANOTHER
NOTIFICATION THIRTY DAYS PRIOR
TO THE PUBLIC WORKS BOARD
APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN PHASE AND
THIRTY DAYS PRIOR TO ENTERING
INTO A CONTRACT RELEASE
AGREEMENT. ON BY CONTRAST THE
TYPICAL CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT
ON THE LEGISLATURE APPROVES THE
THE PROJECT WITH BUDGET ACT
HOWEVER AFTER. ENACTMENT THERE
WOULD REALLY ONLY BE A COUPLE
TIMES THAT THE LEGISLATURE MAY.
WEIGH IN ON THAT PROJECT AGAIN
AND THAT WOULD BE IF THERE'S A
SCOPE CHANGE.
OR.
IF THERE'S AN AUGMENTATION
BETWEEN TEN AND TWENTY PERCENT
OR IF THERE ARE THERE'S A NEED
FOR SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION.
I'M THE ONLY ALSO EXPRESSES
CONCERN THAT THE FUNDS DEPOSITED
INTO SPIFF WOULD BE USED FOR
DIFFERENT PROJECTS OTHER THAN
THOSE IDENTIFIED. AND.
I WOULD JUST SAY THAT THAT'S
NOT SOMETHING THE ADMINISTRATION
WOULD SUPPORT AND THAT'S NOT
SOMETHING WE WOULD DO BUT IF
THAT WERE TO HAPPEN. ON THE
NOTIFICATION PROJECT ALREADY
ESTABLISHED IN STATUTE WOULD
ALERT THE. LEGISLATURE OF SUCH A
CHANGE AND IT CERTAINLY BE ABLE
TO EITHER.
PRUE FOR.
OBJECT THAT THE PROPOSAL.
HAS TO CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION.
ONLY OAKS PRESS IS CONCERNED AT
THAT SPEED STATUTE PROVIDES FOR
CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION.
AS WE STATED IN TWO THOUSAND
SIXTEEN ONCE BEFORE STABILISED
IN AS WE CONTINUE TO.
BELIEVE NOW A CONTINUOUS
APPROPRIATION IS REALLY
BENEFICIAL TO VERY LARGE
PROJECTS SUCH AS THESE. ON THAT
PROVIDES FLEXIBILITY IN THE
DELIVERY PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD
ALLOWS PROJECTS TO PROCEED AS
EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE.
WITHOUT BEING. DEPENDENT ON
FISCAL YEAR BUDGET CALENDAR OR
ON A BOND SALE CALENDAR.
AND IT'S VERY EXPENSIVE TO STOP.
THE PROJECTS OF.
AWAITING THOSE KIND OF
MILESTONES FOR EXAMPLE.
CONSTRUCTION ESCALATION BECAUSE.
IN CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATELY
FIVE PERCENT ANNUALLY SO YOU
KNOW IT'S HOT PROJECTS OF THIS
SIZE THAT REALLY ADDS UP QUICKLY
AND CAN RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT.
COSTS TO THE STATE OF THE ART
IF THERE IF THEY. NEED TO STOP.
ALSO THESE PART PROJECTS ARE
pPLANNED.
AND THAT SCHEDULES DESIGNED TO
MINIMIZE THE TIME BETWEEN
PROJECTS OF THE FACILITIES
AREN'T LEFT VACANT AS PLANNED
PROGRESSES. A CONTINUOUS
APPROPRIATION ALLOWS THE STATE
TO MAINTAIN PROJECT MOMENTUM.
AND TO ADDRESS A BUILDING
DEFICIENCIES THE MOST EFFICIENT
WAY POSSIBLE.
I NOTE THAT THERE ARE OTHER
LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
THAT DO HAVE CONTINUOUS
APPROPRIATIONS ON THAT WORK
QUITE WELL AND THAT'S.
AB NINE HUNDRED YEAR OLD
PROGRAM FOR EXAMPLE AND SEVERAL
THE VETERANS HOMES AND OF COURSE
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND
WHAT WE JUST GOT THROUGH TALKING
ABOUT. IS AT LEAST HERE WE'RE
DEALING WITH IDENTIFIABLE.
SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIABLE
PROJECTS.
THE BUILDING'S PARKING ABOUT AS
OPPOSED TO.
OF A LAUNDRY LIST OF LARGE
ENTITIES IN THE DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE AND OTHER
IMPROVEMENTS YES THERE CAN YOU
ADDRESS THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE SEEN THAT
I HAVE TO DO WITH THE FUNDING IN
THE. LOCATION OF THE.
I EAT THIS IS NEW INFORMATION
ON TWO OF THE ADMINISTRATION. AT
THIS POINT WE HAVEN'T WE HAVEN'T
LOOKED INTO IT AND SO WE
CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE
ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSAL.
HELLO.
I HAVE ONCE AGAIN HOW
INTERESTING FROM THE I AO.
ARE COMMENTS ON THIS ARE
SOMEWHAT SIMILAR COMMENTS ON THE
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE OUT
PROPOSAL. UP ONCE AGAIN WE DO
YOU THINK IT'S REASONABLE TO SET
ASIDE MONEY TO INVEST IN OUR
BUILDINGS TO RENOVATE THEM IF
THEY NEED TO BE RENOVATED ON. TO
TAKE CARE OF THEM AND WE DO HAVE
SOME SPECIFIC CONCERNS HOWEVER
WITH THE PROPOSAL.
THEIR FEW SORT OF A FEW THINGS
HE WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT.
IT'S ONE IS JUST A LACK OF
CLARITY ABOUT WHETHER THESE
THESE ENVISION PROJECTS ON OR
THE HIGHEST PRIORITIES THAT
CERTAINLY LEGISLATIVE YOU KNOW
AND SHE FOR LEGISLATIVE
CONSIDERATION WE TALK ABOUT THAT
A LITTLE BIT AND THEN. WE TALKED
ABOUT THE JANUARY PROPOSALS. AND
YOU HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THE
APPARENT HIGH COST OF SOME OF
THE PROJECTS WE ALSO KNOW THAT
ONE OF THESE PROJECTS HASN'T YET%
BEEN PROPOSED ON THE LEGISLATURE
HASN'T YET SEEN. OF IT IS IN THE
SEQUENCING PLANNED BUT WE
HAVEN'T SEEN A PCP FOR IT IT'S
THE RENOVATION OF THE. EXISTING
RESOURCES BUILDING THAT
PREDICTABLY MAKES SENSE TO DO
WE'RE GONNA VACATED REPUBLIC ONE
RENOVATED BUT WE JUST HAVEN'T
REALLY SEEN A LOT OF DETAILS ON
THAT.
AND THAT REALLY HIGHLIGHTS OF
THE LARGER CONCERN WHICH IS THE
STAFF PROCESS.
AND THIS AS WAS MENTIONED AS A
CONTINUOUSLY APPROPRIATED FUNDS
ON THESE THAT'S FINE. YOU KNOW
WE DON'T WE WE CERTAINLY
RECOGNIZE THE ADMINISTRATION
CURRENTLY ENVISIONED SPENDING%
THE MONEY ON THESE PROPOSED
PROJECTS BUT IT WOULDN'T BE
LIMITED TO DOING THAT WITH THESE
FUNDS.
THE WAY THAT THAT COUNT IS SET
UP ON THE CAN FIND STATE
PROJECTS AND THAT'S THAT'S
PRETTY BROAD.
AND THEN THERE'S A NOTIFICATION
THAT WE WOULD RECEIVE ONCE AGAIN
TO THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE BUDGET
COMMITTEE PROCESS THOUGH NOT
THROUGH THIS COMMITTEE.
THAT WOULD SAY HEY WE'RE GONNA
SKIP DEVILISH THE SCOPE THIS
COST THIS DELIVERY METHOD WE
ALSO GET NOTIFICATIONS AS WAS
REFERENCE.
AT CERTAIN POINTS IN THE
PROJECT LIFE CYCLE WE THINK
THOSE NOTIFICATIONS ARE
CERTAINLY VERY IMPORTANT BUT
THEY DON'T REALLY REPLACE THE
LEGISLATURE ACTUALLY GETTING TO
SAY YEA OR NAY.
THERE REALLY YOU KNOW. BUT WE
DON'T THINK A SUBSTITUTE PROCESS.
I'M SORRY CONDITION HERE IS TO
SET ASIDE FUNDING FOR PRIRITY
PROJECTS.
SO WE THINK THAT'S FINE I'M IN
IT COULD BE UP AND ABOUT HIGHER
OR LOWER THAN WHAT'S PROPOSED IT
IF YOU COULD BE OVER FOR SEVERAL
YEARS IT COULD BE YOU KNOW
CERTAINLY INVOLVE. OTHER FUNDING
IF THAT'S IF THAT'S THE WAY THE
LEGISLATURE.
AT ONCE TO PRIORITIZE THINGS
BUT WE DO THINK THAT IT'S VERY
IMPORTANT.
THAT THESE FUNDS NOT BE
CONTINUOUSLY APPROPRIATED SO WE
WOULD RECOMMEND. MODIFYING THE
THE STATUTE THAT GOVERNS THE
SPECS SO IT'S NO LONGER
CONTINUOUSLY APPROPRIATED.
I WILL NOTE CORRECT ME IF I'M
WRONG THOUGH WHEN WE DID DEBATE
THIS VERY SAME.
SOME OF THE SAME ISSUES HERE TO
GO.
WE WERE DEBATING IT IN THE
CONTEXT OF OF IDENTIFIABLE
BUILDINGS.
IN THE SACRAMENTO AREA THAT
NEEDED RENOVATION AS OPPOSED TO.
BROAD CATEGORIES OF AGENCIES AND
DEPARTMENTS STATEWIDE THAT HAVE
INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES SO.
THE THERE WAS A STATE OFFICE OF.
BUILDING PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED
HERE IN THE CONTEXT OF
ESTABLISHING THIS SPIFF
WE DID HAVE THE DEBATE ABOUT
CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION AND
WHETHER THAT WAS THE RIGHT WAY
TO DO IT BUT.
YOU KNOW I GUESS IN FAIRNESS TO
THE DISCUSSION INTO THE
ADMINISTRATION AT LEAST ON THAT
ONE. WE WE KNOW THE UNIVERSE OF
BUILDINGS THAT WE'RE TALKING
ABOUT GENERALLY.
AND TO SOME AS EXTENSIVE AS
SEPARATELY.
AS OPPOSED TO THE PREVIOUS TO
THE LANTERN PRESENTATION THAT WE
HAD WHERE WE ARE ALSO CONCERNED
ABOUT CONTINUE MISAPPROPRIATION.
I WOULD I WOULD AGREE THAT.
IN BOTH CASES BOTH THAT
PROPOSAL IN THIS PROPOSAL THERE
HAS BEEN. A. AN IDENTIFICATION
OF LIKELY PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED
AND EXPECTED PROJECTS TO BE
FUNDED.
I WOULD KNOW WITH WITH THAT ONE
THOUGH FOR EXAMPLE IT WAS
ENVISIONED THAT THE ANNEX WOULD
BE ONE OF THE PROJECTS THAT
WOULD BE FUNDED. ORIGINALLY ONE
POINT FIVE BILLION WAS PROPOSED
AND IT WOULD INCLUDE WOULD HAVE
INCLUDED FUNDING FOR CAPITAL
ANNEX.
ULTIMATELY THERE ARE A VARIETY
OF DIFFERENT ACTIONS THAT WERE
TAKEN ONE POINT THREE BILLION
WAS ORIGINALLY. WAS THEN
ACTUALLY PUT INTO THE BUDGET ACT
ONE BILLION AND I'M IN THE FIRST
YEAR AND THREE HUNDRED NINE THE
SECOND YEAR THAT I'M NOT DOING
THE THREE HUNDRED MILLION THAT
WE ENDED UP. REPLACING A LOT OF
THE ONE BILLION WITH THESE
REVENUE BONDS WE ENDED UP
ACTUALLY.
REPLACING ABOUT EIGHT HUNDRED
FIFTY ONE MILLION OF THAT.
WE ONLY ENDED UP SPENDING I
THINK YOU KNOW MAYBE AROUND
TWENTY MILLION OR SOMEONE
PLANNING ACTIVITIES FOR THE
ACTUAL ORIGINALLY PROPOSED
PROJECTS. THERE'S ABOUT A
HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE MILLION
THAT'S LEFT IN THE STATE PROJECT
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND NOW SOME
CLEAR HOW THAT'S GOING TO BE
SPENT I THINK AT THIS POINT. ON
BUT I GUESS. I I THINK THE
ADMINISTRATION IS CERTAINLY TRY
TO BE TRUE TO THEIR COMMITMENT
BUT I THINK.
BECAUSE THE NATURE OF THE WAY
THAT THE PROCESS WORKS YOU'RE
NOT WHEN YOU PROOF YOU PROVE
THAT YOU'RE NOT REALLY APPROVING%
THE SPECIFIC AMOUNTS FOR THE
SPECIFIC PROJECTS YOURS YOU'RE
RECRUITING. MONEY THAT'S GOING
INTO THIS FUND. AND IT'S
CURRENTLY ENVISIONED TO GO FOR
THOSE PROJECTS BUT.
THERE'S NO GUARANTEE IN THE
SPECIFIC WAY THE PROCESS WORKS
THAT IT NOT THAT IT WOULD
NECESSARILY GO IN THOSE DOLLAR
AMOUNTS TO THOSE PROJECTS.
WELL MY COMMENTS ABOUT THE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE.
LETTER PROCESS BUT I MADE
PREVIOUSLY APPLY TO THIS MEANS
WE DON'T HAVE ANY.
VISIBILITY ONCE IT LEAVES HERE
AS EVIDENCED BY THE FACT THAT I
JUST LEARNED THINGS.
TWO SEONDS AGO THAT I REALLY
HAD NO.
IDEA ABOUT.
SO I DON'T KNOW HOW WE DEAL WITH
THAT I MEAN I'M.
I'M MORE COMFORTABLE SINCE WE'VE
STARTED DOWN THIS ROAD AND LOST
THIS BATTLE BEFORE. I'M MORE
COMFORTABLE WITH THIS PROPOSAL
THAN STARTING ANOTHER ONE
WITHOUT SOME TIGHTENING UP OF
THE LANGUAGE SO. COLLEAGUE'S
QUESTION.
YEAH.
SIR GLAZER. MISTER CHAIRMAN THAT.
I.
YOU KNOW I'VE I'VE SPOKEN ON
THIS IN THE PAST AND I DON'T
WANT TO BE A BROKEN RECORD THAT
BUT I. LOOK AT. MAYBE TODAY WE
HAVE CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNOR
BROWN AND HIS STAFF THAT THEY
CAN.
YOU KNOW WE'LL DO THE
RESPONSIBLE THING AND AND MAYBE
AS THE MEMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE
AND THE LEGISLATURE WILL BE
CONFIDENT WHEN GOVERNOR TRAVIS
ALLEN IS HERE THAT HE AND HIS
STAFF.
WILL MAKE GOOD CHOICES TO.
BUT WE DO HAVE SOME
RESPONSIBILITY AS A AS THE
LEGISLATURE. TO.
EXERCISE OUR OVERSIGHT AND
WHATEVER WHOEVER THE GOVERNOR IS.
I'M I'M ALWAYS UNCOMFORTABLE AT
YOU KNOW GIVING THAT UP AND UP
YOU KNOW I COULD BE PERSUADED TO
GO ALONG WITH THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION BUT. FOR A LOT OF
THE REASONS THAT THE LA I WAS
RAISED IN THAT MISTER CHAIRMAN
THINGS THAT YOU HAVE SAID.
I YOU KNOW I'M JUST UNEASY ABOUT
THAT THIS THIS HOW THIS WHOLE
THING IS PROCEEDING.
.
IN SOME WAYS IT'S LIKE A GIANT
WERE GIVEN ANOTHER. ATTACK.
PIGGY BANK TO THROW FITS MONEY
AND AND WE'VE TALKED ABOUT HOW
THINGS HAVE EVOLVED OVER THE
LAST COUPLE YEARS WHERE. THE
BILLIONS GET PUT IN AND THEN
TAKEN OUT AND. AND GETS
CORRECTLY THAN I DO.
IT INDICATED THAT REVENUE BONDS
IS MORE TRADITIONAL SOURCE AND
THAT OBVIOUSLY WOULD SAVE A LOT
OF INTEREST IN THIS IN THIS A
GOOD TIME TO SAY THAT THAT'S
PRETTY COMPELLING. AS AN
ARGUMENT.
BUT AS I STILL STRUGGLE WITH THE
THE QUESTION OF PRIORITIES NOT
JUST WITHIN THE SACRAMENTO CORE
LEGISLATIVE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE
BROADER.
INFRASTRUCTURE THAT THE STATE
HAS TO PROVIDE FOR AT LOTS OF
LEVELS AND AS THOSE ARE JUST
COMMENTS THAT I THINK YOU'VE
HEARD FROM ME BEFORE IN.
.
I I DON'T.
ALL LOOK FOR THE CHAIRS
GUIDANCE AND I'M SURE OF THIS
ALL WORK OUT.
WITH GOVERNOR TRAVIS.
ALAN.
DURING A QUESTION TOO CLOSE TO.
THE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS.
IT'S A POPULAR ITEM IS.
.
WELL LET ME SAY THIS I DON'T
KNOW WHAT'S POSSIBLE WITH
RESPECT TO THE TIGHTENING UP OF
OF.
LANGUAGE INVOLVING THE JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE.
SINCE WE HELD THE OTHER ITEM
OPEN MAYBE WE SHOULD HOLD THIS
ITEM OPEN. AND TO THE EXTENT
THAT WE CAN COME UP WITH
LANGUAGE IF IT'S POSSIBLE.
TO GIVE THE LEGISLATURE A LITTLE
BIT MORE DETAIL THE.
OVERSIGHT AND THE ABILITY TO
CLOT ISSUE BACK FOR CONVERSATION.
I GUESS WHAT WAS WHAT.
MAY BE GOOD FOR THE LAST
PROPOSAL WOULD BE GOOD FOR THIS
ONE AS WELL AND.
WE SHOULD TRY TO DO THAT AND IF
WE CAN'T THEN I GUESS WE'LL TAKE
HIM UP ON TUESDAY I HATE TO ADD
TO THE. AGENDA FOR THE. BIG
BUDGET COMMITTEE IN MY. CHAIR
HOLLY CENTER HOLLY MITCHELL BUT
I THINK WE NEED TO TAKE A LOOK
AT THIS ONE. THIS PROPOSAL IN
THE SAME LIGHT THAT WE VIEW THE
LAST ONE SO. LET'S HOLD THIS
ITEM OPEN AND MAYBE I CAN GET
WITH FOLKS WHO ARE MUCH SMARTER
THAN I TO SEE IF THERE'S A WAY
TO.
TIGHTEN UP THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE
BUDGET COMMITTEE NOTIFICATION
PROCESS TO ALLOW.
ON THE BUDGET COMMITTEE TO AGAIN
BECOME INVOLVED IF IT LOOKS LIKE
FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE THE TRAINS
GOING OFF THE TRACK.
OKAY.
THANK YOU SIR
.
LET'S MOVE TO OF PART B. OF THE
AGENDA THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH
YOU WERE HERE BEFORE.
LET'S TAKE.
ITEM.
CONTROL SECTION TWELVE STATE
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT ISSUE
NUMBER ONE WE PULLED THAT FOR
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE VOTE
.
ONE OF HIS IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR
THE RECORD PLEASE EARLY MORNING
CHAIRMAN OF MONEY AND HARM WITH
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE. HAVE YOU SIR GREG BRUST
APARTMENT OF FINANCE SEE YOU
AGAIN SIR OKAY WHO WANTS TO.
HOLD OUR USER LMAO RYAN MILLER
FROM THE ONLY I DIDN'T MEAN TO
MISS YOU. FROM.
WE NEED TO.
OKAY WHO WANTS TO PRESENT ALL
RIGHT I WILL GO AHEAD AND EEP
THIS VERY HIGH LEVEL BECAUSE IT
IS EXTREMELY TECHNICAL.
BUT. FOR GENERAL PRESENTATION
PURPOSES SELF CONTROL SECTION
TWELVE ESTABLISHES THE LIMIT ON
STATE SPENDING THE LINDA
SPECIFICALLY CALCULATED BY USING
LAST YEAR'S LIMIT. AND WE JUST A
FOR GROWTH FACTORS AND SHIPS.
THE CURRENT LIMIT AT THE
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN MAY REVISION
IS CURRENTLY UNDER SEVEN POINT
EIGHT BILLION DOLLARS.
COLLEAGUES ANY QUESTIONS.
THERE WILL.
FOR SURE.
WELL WE'VE HAD THE SAME THEME
ALL DAY AND I WANT TO CONTINUE
THAT THEME IS THAT JUST THE
ADMINISTRATION'S MATH
METHODOLOGY AND I WAS HOPING
THAT THE LA OKAY COULD WEIGH IN.
YES ABSOLUTELY PLEASE SIR.
I'M SO AS MISTER HART MENTIONED.
ONE PART OF CALCULATING OUT OF
THE STATE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
IS TO CALCULATE THE LIMIT ITSELF
THAT IS THE AMOUNT BY WHICH WE
CAN. SPEND MORE.
FROM TAX REVENUES.
THERE THERE ARE OTHER
CALCULATIONS THEN THEY'RE DONE
TO ESTIMATE ESSENTIALLY WHERE
OUR SPENDING IS RELATIVE TO THAT
LIMIT.
AND WE DO NOT HAVE CONCERNS WITH
THE ITEM BEFORE YOU TODAY THAT
IS SPECIFICALLY CALCULATING THE
LIMIT ITSELF.
WE DO HAVE ISSUES THAT WE
RAISED IN AN APRIL REPORT
CONCERNING THE OTHER PARTS OF
THE CALCULATIONS.
THAT.
SOME OF WHICH WERE ADDRESSED BY
THE ADMINISTRATION AND THERE MAY
REVISION BUT OTHERS. REMAIN.
NAMELY WE IDENTIFIED A CONCERN
WITH THE METHODOLOGY THEY USED
TO TALLY.
.
COST TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL IN
COURT MANDATES WHICH ARE EXEMPT
FROM THE LIMIT IN OTHER WORDS.
THE MORE MANDATE COST THE STATE
HAS. THE MORE ROOM IT HAS OR
SPENDING CAPACITY UNDER ITS
LIMIT.
AND IN ADDITION WE CONTINUE TO.
HIGHLIGHT THE.
THE VEHICLE LICENSE FEE MONIES
WHICH THE STATE. COLLECTS AND
GETS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
THE ADMINISTRATION.
EXEMPTS THOSE AS SUBVENTIONS TO
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
STATE STATUE HOWEVER.
SPECIFIES THAT IN ORDER TO
QUALIFY AS A SUBVENTION.
THE USE OF THE MONEY MUST BE
UNRESTRICTED.
AND BECAUSE THE STATE.
PROVIDES THE VLF MONIES TO
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS A PART OF
NINETEEN NINETY ONE REALIGNMENT.
AND AND THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
HAVE TO USE THE MONEY TO
ADMINISTER CERTAIN HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS. WE
DON'T THINK THAT THE VLF.
THE VEHICLE LICENSE FEE
REVENUES SHOULD BE. EXCLUDED AS
SUBVENTIONS.
THE ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT
IT IS FAIRLY TECHNICAL ISSUE AS
MR MENTION.
OKAY.
RIGHT RIGHT YEAH.
SO. I APPRECIATE THE EXPLANATION
SO NOW GIVEN ALL THAT DO YOU
THINK THAT THE GOVERNORS.
ESTIMATION OF THE.
THE REVISED LIMIT UNDER THEIR
BUDGET PROPOSAL IS CORRECT.
AND IF SO HOW IS IT DIFFERENT.
IN YOUR ESTIMATION.
YEAH YEAH AGAIN WE DON'T HAVE
AN ISSUE WITH THE CALCULATION OF
THE LIMIT AT THIS TIME WHICH IS
THE ITEM THAT'S PROVIDED FOR FOR
DISPLAY PURPOSES IN THE BUDGET.
.
BUT THIS CONTROL SECTION IS
ESSENTIALLY THE OPPORTUNITY
WHERE THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
IS DISCUSSED IN THE BUDGET
PROCESS THERE ISN'T REALLY LIKE
ANOTHER NATURAL OPPORTUNITY. AND
SO THIS IS THE WE DO HAVE
CONCERNS THAT SORT OF DOWN.
APPLY SPECIFICALLY TO THE ITEM
BUT ARE CLOSELY RELATED.
THE ADMINISTRATION CURRENTLY
ESTIMATES THAT WE HAVE ABOUT
SEVEN POINT SIX BILLION DOLLARS
OF ROOM UNDER THE LIMIT.
IF THE LEGISLATURE MADE THE
ADJUSTMENT RELATING TO THE
VEHICLE LICENSE FEES THAT WOULD
REDUCE ROOM. BY ABOUT THREE
BILLION DOLLARS IN THE UPCOMING
FISCAL YEAR. ON THE OTHER HAND.
CHANGING THE MANDATES
METHODOLOGY WOULD BE A FAIRLY
LABOR INTENSIVE PROCESS AND IT
WILL REALLY BE A GROUND UP
REASSESSMENT OF. OF STATE
MANDATE COSTS.
AND AND THE RESULT OF THAT
WOULD BE UNCERTAIN THAT IS THAT
THAT WE MAY HAVE MORE OR LESS
MANDATE COSTS IF IF THE
ADMINISTRATION CHANGED AROUND
THAT OLOGY.
SO WHAT WHAT I HEARD YOU SAY IS
THAT IF YOU TOOK THE VLF OUT
BECAUSE OF FEAR JUDGMENT ABOUT
ITS OF.
APPLICABILITY THAT THERE'S
APPROXIMATELY. FOUR POINTS.
FOR FOUR BILLION.
IN A ROOM MINUS OR PLUS THESE
RECALCULATIONS BASED ON MANDATES
WHICH YOU HAVEN'T DONE. THAT'S
RIGHT.
RIGHT AND SO WELL YOU KNOW A
PRUDENT PERSONS TEST YOU FEEL
LIKE WE'RE. OPERATING IN IN THAT
SPACE GIVEN TO WHAT YOU NOW.
WELL I I THINK THAT'S ON CERTAIN.
IF IF IF WE WERE TO GO AHEAD
AND CHANGE THIS MANDATES
APPROACH.
THERE'S A FAIR CHANCE THAT
THERE. MIGHT BE SIGNIFICANTLY
LESS ROOM UNDER THE LIMIT.
BY THE I I YEAH I JUST DON'T
THINK THAT WE CAN GIVE YOU A
BETTER ASSESSMENT OF THAT RIGHT
AND THEN ONE FINAL QUESTION YOU
KNOW THIS CAME UP LAST YEAR AS
WELL BECAUSE THERE WERE SOME
QUESTIONS ABOUT WHETHER THEY
WERE DOING IT CORRECTLY.
WHAT WHY HAVEN'T WE IN DOWN
TIMES TAKEN THE TIME TO REALLY
JUST FIGURE THAT OUT? WHAT OUR
OBLIGATIONS AND AND ADJUSTED
YEARLY BUT AT LEAST HAVE DONE
THAT THE WORK KEEPS COMING UP
AND IS THAT BECAUSE YOU THINK
IT'S NOT A BIG DEAL THERE'S NO
LEGAL EXPOSURE?
YOU THINK THAT. HAVING MAYBE
KITTY AFTER THAT AS TO WHY WE
HAVEN'T JUST KINDA.
WHAT ABOUT THIS THAT PLANE TO
THE GROUND AND?
WELL THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT
THE ADMINISTRATION.
REVISES ONCE OR TWICE A YEAR
AND AND HAS FOR SINCE THE
MEASURE PASSED IN THE SEVENTIES.
BUT.
WE ARE FAIRLY CLOSE TO THE LIMIT
NOW BUT THAT WASN'T THE CASE FOR
PROBABLY TEN TO FIFTEEN YEARS
DURING THE TWO THOUSANDS WHEN
WHEN THE STATE HAD BUDGET
PROBLEMS AND THERE WERE A COUPLE
OF RECESSIONS. WHEN REVENUES
DROP LIKE THAT WE TEND TO HAVE
CONSIDERABLE ROOM UNDER THE
LIMIT.
.
AND AND I MEAN I I I I I DON'T
KNOW I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY
CONCERNING YOU KNOW THE THE THE
THE THE QUESTION OF.
YOU KNOW LIKE.
I GUESS WHY ISN'T THIS A
PERENNIAL DISCUSSION ITEM I
THINK THE ANSWER PROBABLY IS
THAT WE IN THE TWO THOUSANDS
WHEN WE HAVE A LOT OF ROOM. IT
JUST WASN'T SOMETHING THAT WAS
GIVEN A LOT OF FOCUS.
THE HEAD ROOM IS FOUR POINT SIX
BILLION.
IT WOULD NEED FOUR POINT SIX IF
IF THE LEGISLATURE ADOPTED THE
THE RECOMMENDATION WE HAVE ON
THE VEHICLE LICENSE FEE REVENUES.
IT'S IT'S SEVEN POINT SIX
BILLION UNDER THE
ADMINISTRATION'S ESTIMATES. THAT
ONE FINAL INSTRUCTIONS. AND DOES
THE SPENDING PROPOSALS THAT THE
LEGISLATURE IS CONSIDERING WITH
THAT CHANGE. THOSE NUMBERS IN
OTHER WORDS.
YOU KNOW WHAT WE'RE WE'RE
MAKING NEW ESTIMATES. REVENUE
PER YEAR OFFICES.
ASSESSMENT WE HAVE MANY MORE
SPENDING PROPOSALS.
THAT STILL HAVE TO GET RESOLVED
SO HOW DO WE MONITOR THAT TO
KNOW. HOW THEY'RE GOING TO
AFFECT WHETHER WE'RE IN
COMPLIANCE OR NOT WITH THE
CAMERA?
WELL YEAH AS YOU KNOW DOES ITS
LEGISLATURE ADOPTS OUR REVENUES.
WE PULL WE WOULD BE CLOSER TO
THE LIMIT BECAUSE.
UNDER OUR REVENUES WE HAVE MORE
TAX PROCEEDS TO SPEND. BUT THE
THE LEGISLATURES ARE THE
SENATE'S PACKAGED OBVIOUSLY
WOULD HAVE DIFFERENT.
SPENDING PRIORITY SOME OF WHICH
MIGHT BE EXEMPT AS CAPITAL
OUTLAY OR AS YOU KNOW MONEY FOR
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND SOME THAT
WOULD COUNT. I GUESS THE SHORT
ANSWER IS.
.
I I VERY ISN'T REALLY A APART IN
THAT PROCESS CURRENTLY THAT I'M
AWARE OF WHERE WHERE WERE.
ESTIMATING THAT BUT IT'S
CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT WE
COULD PROVIDE THE COMMITTEE SOME
ASSISTANCE MY FINAL COMMENT
MISTER CHAIRMAN IS THAT WE
OBVIOUSLY WANT TO COMPLY WITH
THE CAN LIMIT ITS.
YEAH AND THAT IN OUR STAFF I
KNOW WILL CONTINUE TO PAY CLOSE
ATTENTION TO IT AND TO. MAKE
SURE THAT IF WE ARE CONSIDERING
PROPOSALS THAT MIGHT. PUT US AT
RISK THAT THEY BRING IT TO OUR
ATTENTION SO THANK YOU.
SO AT THE END OF THIS BUDGET
PROCESS BEFORE THE GOVERNOR
SIGNS THE BUDGET NOBODY TAKES A
LOOK AT THE.
GALEN.
AND WE DEFINITELY CALCULATED ON
A.
.
TWICE A YEAR BASIS.
SO WE DO HAVE A AN ESTIMATION
CALCULATION THAT WE DO PROVIDE
SO WE DO PROVIDE THAT TO THE THE
LEGISLATURE.
I MEAN AS WE GET AS WE WE KNOW
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOMEBODY.
SENATE PROPOSAL TO SPEND A
BILLION DOLLARS ON WHATEVER
THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY IN THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET TO. SOMEBODY
ELSE AS A PROPOSAL TO SPEND TWO
BILLION DOLLARS IT.
MAY NOT BE IN THE GOVERNOR'S
BUDGET AND.
ASSUMING ALL THAT GETS WORKED
OUT AND IT'S AN ADD ON TO THE
MAY REVISION.
I MEAN SOMEBODY NEEDS TO BE
TAKING A LOOK AT THIS. WHETHER
IT'S SEVEN POINT SIX BILLION OR
FOUR POINT SIX BILLION RIGHT TO
SEE WHERE IT IS.
I MEAN I REALIZE IT'S A TWO YEAR.
TWO YEAR PROCESS. BUT.
I THINK WITH THAT I MEAN WE CAN
DEFINITELY CALCULATING REPORT.
IN REGARDS TO THE DECISIONS
MADE WE GIVE RECOMMENDATIONS BUT
WERE NOT NECESSARILY A THE
DECISION MAKERS ON THE THE
SPENDING PROPOSAL SPECIFICALLY
SO NOR NOR WE BY THE WAY.
I THINK WITH THAT AGAIN WE CAN
WE DO CALCULATED WE PROVIDE THAT
INFORMATION ON. ON ON A
CONTINUAL BASIS TO BE ABLE TO TO
PROVIDE WHAT THE LIMIT IS AND
WHAT THE SPENDINGS ARE SUBJECT
TO THE LIMIT. OUTSIDE OF THAT
YOU KNOW WE WE ARE OPEN TO BE
ABLE TO HAVE ANY CONTINUE
DISCUSSIONS. GOT.
THEY'RE WORKING FOR THE
QUESTIONS SERVERS OR ANY PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.
SAYING.
RIVETING.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THIS
IS TO APPROVE HIS BUDGET IS
THERE A MOTION.
I WAS SOME OF. IT HAS BEEN MOVED
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
ETCETERA I SENT A GLACIER CENTER
WILL.
OKAY.
YEAH.
LET'S MOVE TO.
THANK YOU RICHARD UNLESS YOU'RE
GOING TO STAY.
EACH PRESENTATION AND YOUR HARD
WORK.
TO LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR
DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE IS.
ISSUE ONE AND IT HAS TO DO WITH
THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS IT IS ON
PAGE.
THIRTEEN OF THE.
AGENDA.
AND.
.
SIR WILL CREATE A PROCESS FOR
SENATOR BATES.
YES.
AN EXCELLENT PROPOSAL.
I CUT THE REMARKS SHE GAVE ME. A
LOT YES I THINK I THINK YOU
WOULD BE HELPFUL TO IDENTIFY IT
FOR THE RECORD AND.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO
PROVE HIS REQUESTED AND I WILL
ENTHUSIASTS. ENTHUSIASTICALLY
ENTERTAIN A MOTION WHICH WERE
FINISHED. THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR.
CENTER SHOT WILL COME.
MAKING A REQUEST ON BEHALF OF
SENATOR.
SHE DATES DOLLAR ALLOCATE TWO
MILLION DOLLARS OF CRUCIAL FUNNY
TO THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA AND SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA. WITH ME TODAY AS A
SPECIAL GUEST. SPECIALTY GHASTLY.
MARK MARSHALL.
ELICITS A CANCERS WHO'S THE
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICERS FOR
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA. AND KATHY I DEMAND
SKI WHOSE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
OF SCHOOL OF THE SCHOOL
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM TO TESTIFY
SO I WILL TURN. IT OVER TO
MEMBER WANTS TO GO FIRST WE LOOK
FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU
PLEASE.
THE TIME.
THANK YOU.
SO I KNOW IT'S GOOD AFTERNOON.
MISTER CHAIRMAN SENATORS. AND
THANK YOU SENATOR WILL FOR
BRINGING THIS TO.
.
TO THE COMMITTEE.
WE'RE HERE REPRESENTING US
SPECIAL LYMPICS.
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND ALSO OUR
COLLEAGUES FOR SPECIAL EFFECTS
OF THE CALIFORNIA. AND.
THIS IT FUNDING IMPACTS MORE
THAN FORTY FOUR THOUSAND
ATHLETES. THESE ARE CHILDREN AND
ADULTS WITH INTELLECTUAL
DISABILITIES. AND.
ALL ALSO OVER TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND STUDENTS THROUGHOUT
SCHOOL CAMPUSES IN CALIFORNIA.
SO A HUGE AMOUNT OF IMPACT THAT
THIS FUNDING HELPS.
PART OUTCOME. IS FOR PEOPLE
PARTICIPATING IN SPECIAL
OLYMPICS IT'S REALLY ABOUT MORE
THAN SPORTS WE ALSO HAVE A
HEALTH SERVICES THAT WE DO. AS
WELL AS EDUCATION FOR THE
EDUCATION SECTOR. I WITH THE
MISSION OF SPECIAL EFFECTS LIKE
EVERYTHING ELSE WE DO THERE IS
NO COST TO OUR ATHLETES. TO
PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE
THINGS.
WE JUST WANTED TO QUICKLY
HIGHLIGHT THREE.
THREE POINTS. TO THE ONE IN
FIRST IS THAT WE.
WE CAN SUPPORT AN ATHLETE
THROUGHOUT THEIR.
LONGEVITY OF THEIR LIFE SO FROM
CHILDHOOD THROUGH ADULTHOOD AND
WE GIVE THEM A SENSE OF
COMMUNITY THE OPPORTUNITY TO
EXERCISE WE'RE GIVING THEM
ACCESS TO THESE FREE HEALTH
SCREENINGS. AND THEY ALSO LEARN
THESE LIFE LESSONS THROUGH
SPORTS SECOND WE ENSURE THAT OUR
FUNDING IS EXTREMELY EFFICIENT.
AS WELL AS WORKS EFFECTIVELY AS
POSSIBLE THAT MEANS THAT FOR ALL
THE FUNDING WE GET. NINETY ONE
CENTS OF EVERY DOLLAR IS GOING
BACK INTO OUR PROGRAMMING AND WE
ARE VERY PROUD OF THAT.
KATHY WOULD YOU LIKE TO POINT
OUT JUST A FEW WORDS ABOUT OUR
OUR SCHOOL FOR A PARTNERSHIP
PROGRAM SO AS SPECIAL EFFECTS
CELEBRATES FIFTY YEARS IN
EXISTENCE.
OUR FUTURE OF OUR MOVEMENT IS
REALLY ABOUT INCLUSION AND
INCLUSION IN SCHOOL SO ARE
WORKING CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS AND
IT WHAT WE CALL THE SPECIAL
EFFECTS UNIFIED TAPING SCHOOL
PROGRAM PUT STUDENTS. WITH AND
WITHOUT DISABILITIES ON THE SAME
TEAMS IN THE SAME CLUBS AND
PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME
ACTIVITIES ON CAMPUSES. IT'S
BASED ON A SIMPLE PRINCIPLE THAT.
PLAYING TOGETHER AND LEARNING
TOGETHER AS A QUICK PATHS OF
FRIENDSHIP AND UNDERSTANDING.
AND IT CAN REDUCE BULLYING WE
HAVE DATA TO SHOW THAT.
ADMINISTRATORS AS WELL AS
STUDENTS OF THE PARTICIPATING IN
THE PROGRAM SEE AN EIGHTY TWO
PERCENT DROP IN.
BULLYING ON CAMPUSES WHICH IS A
BIG PROBLEM IN EDUCATION RIGHT
NOW. SO YOU TRY TO BE A SCHOOL
PROGRAM IS CREATING A SCHOOL
CLIMATE OF ACCEPTANCE AND
RESPECT FOR ALL STUDENTS FEEL
SAFER MORE CONNECTED TO THEIR
SCHOOLS AND READY TO LEARN.
SO WE JUST WANT TO INTRODUCE
MARC.
AND HAVE HIM SAY A FEW WORDS.
BUT IS MARKING ON THE SPECIAL
PRECISELY FOR NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA BECAUSE HE SAID I HAD A
DISABILITY. AS A RESULT I WAS ON
A TEAM. TONE HE WILL PLAY ME
WHENEVER HE WANTS TO PLAY WITH
ME A MINUTE. FINAL TWO MINUTES
IN A BLOW OUT ON THE ROAD. WHO
NEVER FIND MY FRIENDS OR FAMILY
NEVER AT HOME?
WHICH REALLY HURT MY SELF ESTEEM.
BECAUSE AFTER I JOINED THE TEAM
BECAUSE I MADE IT CLEAR CUT
POSTERS FOR MY DISABILITY.
IN IN. A MINUTE IS ALSO COACH I
HAVE NOW.
ONE IS STAFFERS TOLD ME ABOUT
SPECIFICS JOINED IT HAS. SINCE
THEN HAVE BEEN DOING IT.
NOW I. AM DOING.
FOUR DIFFERENT SPORTS HERE
AROUND THE PHONE. TOUGH BOSS
CHUCKLE FILLED. PAST ONES FOR US
HE.
SPECIAL POSES HELPED ME OUT TOO.
LIFE KNOWLEDGE WHO WERE DRIVER.
HER I'M AN INTERN HERE AT THE
CAPITOL FOR A SALOON IN RETURN
FOR HIS OR.
GOOD FOR YOU THANK YOU. SEE YOU
DOING ALL THAT FIND WORK FOR THE
ASSEMBLY MEMBER OF YES GOOD.
THANK YOU. AN EXTRAORDINARY
PROGRAM. YOU WILL DO AND HAVE SO.
IT'S JUST EXTRAORDINARY.
PRESENTATION WE'VE HAD TODAY.
SO FOR FOR MY CLOTHES SAYS
SPEAKING JIM FRASIER.
THERE IS SOMEONE THAT HAS THE
SAME DOLLAR FIGURE THAT HE'S
PRESENTED IN.
AS SIMPLY BUDGET.
BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE TO SO WITH
THE HOPES OF THIS BEING. YOU
KNOW.
BECAUSE I HAVE TO GO TO
CONFERENCE AND WE BOTH HAVE THE
SAME DOLLAR FIGURE PERFECT SOON
AS I TAKE SOME PUBLIC COMMENT IF
THERE IS ANY.
WILL MAKE THAT HAPPEN FOR YOU
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
PARTICULAR ITEM.
SEE YOU ALLOWED THEM TO. BE
HAPPY WITH HIS STUFF. STUFF
RECOMMENDED. PERFECT IT'S BEEN
MOVED PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
ETCETERA HIGH CENTER LEISURE
CENTER WILL I.
I THINK YOU BETTER. SO WE'LL
MAKE SURE THIS HAPPENS FOR YOU.
WHAT YOU DO?
THE LAST.
THREE.
ITEM ZERO EIGHT FOUR ZERO STATE
COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE ISSUE
NUMBER ONE CALIFORNIA STATE
PAYROLL SYSTEM PROJECT AN ISSUE
TOO CAL EIGHTERS IF I PRONOUNCE
THAT CORRECTLY SYSTEM.
ALONE THOUGH.
THIS IS A PAGE.
FOURTEEN ON THE.
I COULD ASK YOU TO IDENTIFY
YOURSELVES. AT THE TABLE MY LEFT
YOU'RE RIGHT MA'AM. GOOD
AFTERNOON CHAIRING COMMITTEE
MEMBERS AND MY NAME IS JENNIFER
CHAVEZ I AM THE CHIEF OF THE
ADMINISTRATION AND ITS FOR CENTS
FOR THE STATE COMPTROLLER'S
OFFICE THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
AND I'M CHRIS MAY WHEN I'M THE
DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
PAYROLL SYSTEM PROJECT. MAN
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US AGAIN
BUT IT IS.
ANYONE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.
CAN AID IN OUR DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE. THANK YOU SIR. LUTAS
MORALES LA OPENS ROOMS. AND ONLY
FELLOW. GOOD TO SEE YOU TOO.
OKAY WHO WANTS TO PRESENT. I'LL
TAKE IT WERE IN THE BACK NINE.
SOUNDS GOOD THE FIRST ITEM IS
AND THE CALIFORNIA STATE PAYROLL
SYSTEM IN THE STATE
COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE REQUEST TO
CONTINUE IN NINETEEN EXISTING
RESOURCES IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN.
TO SUPPORT THE CALIFORNIA STATE
PAYROLL SYSTEM PROJECT IN STAGE
TWO OF THE.
WHO'S FIVE NEW TO YOUR LTE
RESOURCES TO SUPPORT A STATEWIDE
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMPLOYEE SELF
SERVICE PORTAL WEB APPLICATION
KNOWN AS THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEE
CAN ACT. AND ALSO I JUST LIKE TO
NOTE THAT WE RESPECT THE ALIAS
RECOMMENDATION. IN THE AGENDA ON
THIS PROPOSAL.
HOWEVER WE DO RESPECTFULLY
REQUEST THE COMMITTEE TO
RECONSIDER LIMITING THE ELEVEN
PERMANENT RESOURCES TO TWO YEAR
ALTI. AND WE KNOW THE CURRENT
REQUEST DOES NOT INCLUDE FUNDING
TO SUPPORT THE PROJECT EVEN
THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF STAGE
TWO. THEREFORE THAT I FEEL WILL
BE BACK IN FRONT OF THIS
COMMITTEE AS EARLY AS NEXT
SPRING. TO REPORT ON THE
PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT INTO
SECURE RESOURCES TO COMPLETE
STAGE TWO THEREFORE WE BELIEVE
IT'S. NOT NECESSARY TO LIMIT THE
PERMANENT RESOURCE PORTION OF
THE REQUESTING WHICH WILL
SUPPORT THE POOR PROJECT.
THROUGH THE DURATION OF THE
PROJECT AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE
THE COMMITTEE SUPPORT IN
CONSIDERING A REQUEST OF BUDGET
AND WE'RE GLAD TO TAKE ANY
QUESTIONS.
SO YOU ARE WILLING TO.
WE HAVEN'T HEARD FROM THE LA
OVER WE WILL IN A SECOND BUT
YOU'RE WILLING TO.
EXCEPT THE LA OWES
RECOMMENDATION EXCEPT THAT WITH
REGARD TO THE ELEVEN.
EXISTING LIMITED TERM POSITIONS
YOU ARE REQUESTING THAT THOSE BE
CONTINUED TO. PERMANENTLY TO
THIS TO THE EXTENT THAT THE WORD
WE USE I DON'T KNOW. OF FOR
PURPOSES OF SEEING THIS PROJECT
THROUGH. FLUTE ONE MAKE SURE I
UNDERSTOOD FINANCE.
IN OUR DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SO
WE SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL AND THAT
IS IN FRONT OF YOU HAS THE SCO
HAS PROVIDED JUSTIFICATION THAT
THE RESOURCES NEED. DO EXTEND
LONGER THAN JUST THE TWO YEAR
BASIS THAT THAT LEO HAS
RECOMMENDED. THAT WE ARE
SUPPORTIVE OF THEM CONTINUING
THE POWER PROCESS AS WELL AS THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SS PORTAL
AND SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL AS IT
IS.
LEO AND PERHAPS YOU COULD
ADDRESS THE ELEVEN POSITIONS AS
FISHY WAS WELL. I'M SURE YEAH SO.
ME JUST BACK UP AND GIVE A
LITTLE BIT MORE CONTEXT DON'T
TAKE TOO LONG.
SO OKAY.
I SEE IT WAS IN THE PLANNING
STAGES FOR THIS IT PROJECT IT
WOULD REPLACE THE PERSON ON
PAYROLL SYSTEMS. AT SCO IF.
IF THE STATE WENT THROUGH WITH
IT IT COULD BE A RELATIVELY
SIGNIFICANT AND COSTLY PROJECT
ON SO IT MAKES SENSE FOR THIS
PLANNING PROCESS TO TAKE SOME
TIME.
IN STAGE TWO THAT INVOLVES AN
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FOR
EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE AT
THE MOMENT ON EVERYTHING FROM
RELATIVELY COMPLEX CUSTOMIZED
OPTIONS THAT WOULD INVOLVE A YOU
KNOW A GREAT DEAL OF COST TOO
MUCH MORE SIMPLE ACTIONS.
SO WITH THIS REQUEST AS YOU
WOULD MOVE ON FROM STAGE TO WERE
ALL THOSE ALTERNATIVES ARE ON
THE TABLE TO STAGE THREE WHERE
THE PLANNING PROCESS BEGINS
BASED ON PROCUREMENT FOR A
SINGLE ALTERNATIVE. I'M SO OUR
RECOMMENDATION SO OBVIOUSLY
THAT'S A PRETTY CRITICAL
DECISION POINT IN OUR
RECOMMENDATION IS ATTEMPTING TO
ALIGN THE BUDGET PROCESS WITH
THIS PLANNING PROCESS. SO THAT
THE LEGISLATURE HAS AN
OPPORTUNITY TO MEANINGFULLY
WEIGH IN ON BAD ARRAY OF
ALTERNATIVES AT SOME POINT.
WHETHER THAT'S IN TWO YEARS OR
THREE YEARS.
YOU KNOW OBVIOUSLY THAT CAN BE
FLEXIBLE I'M SO WE ARE
RECOMMENDING THAT A PORTION OF
THESE RESOURCES ARE TO YOUR
LIMITED TERM BUT THAT ALSO THAT.
THE LEGISLATURE ADOPT TRAILER
BILL LANGUAGE TO REQUIRE THE SCO.
TO PRESENT IN JANUARY OF TWENTY
TWENTY OR ANOTHER JANUARY THE
NEXT JANUARY WOULD ALSO BE FINE
ARMS THAT THE LEGISLATURE HAS
THAT LINK THE YOU KNOW JANUARY
TO MAY PROCESS.
TO THINK THROUGH THESE
ALTERNATIVES.
WELL ONE OF THE THE N. ALICE'S
NOTES ARE. FIGHTING.
THE SEA OF. CORRECT ME IF I
DON'T GET THIS RIGHT BUT THAT
THE ELEVEN POSITIONS THAT WE
WERE GOING TO.
APPROVE ON A TWO YEAR BASIS.
OUR POSITIONS THAT ARE
ESSENTIALLY CORE PROJECT STAFF
AND.
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT POSITIONS
AND THAT THOSE POSITIONS WILL
CONTINUE THROUGH. I GUESS THE
LIFE CYCLE OF THE PROJECT AND
THEREFORE. IT DOESN'T MAKE A LOT
OF SENSE TO LIMIT THEM INVITE
INVITE MY UNDERSTANDING WHAT
YOU'RE SAYING THAT'S ABSOLUTELY
CORRECT KIND OF DESIGNED IN THIS
PROPOSAL WITH A MODEST APPROACH
TO.
ANYTHING IN ADDITION TO THE
CORE PROJECT STAFF AND SO WE
RECOGNIZE THAT AS WE PROGRESS
THROUGH THE PROJECT LIFE I WILL
CYCLE WILL HAVE A NEED FOR.
MAYBE DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATIONS
OF THE STAFF FOR DIFFERENT
LEVELS HERE AND THERE AND SO WE
PURPOSELY ONLY REQUESTED FOR THE
STAFF ON A LIMITED TERM BUT.
DECOR PROJECTS STAFF TO BE
ONGOING.
SO THE ONLY.
ANY ANY FURTHER COMMENT ON THAT
OR IS IT JUST SOMETHING WE NEED
TO NOODLE OUT HERE.
I MEAN SOMETIMES IT'S TOUGH TO
GET PEOPLE TO COME ON BOARD AND
FOR A LIMITED.
IS IT TIME.
SOME POSITIONS BLOOM SELLS WELL
TO THAT OTHERS DON'T.
IF YOU HAVE.
WORK IN JOB CLASSIFICATIONS IT
SEEMS TO ME THAT ARE GONNA
SPANNED SEVERAL SEVERAL YEARS
THEN. MAYBE IT DOES MAKE SOME
SENSE TO GO JUST GO AHEAD AND
APPROVE THOSE SO THEY CAN
RECRUIT. TO FILL. HIM YOU NEED
TO RECRUIT AT THIS POINT TO FILL
POSITIONS THAT ARE GONNA BE NO
WE'RE GOING TO EXIST FOR FIVE OR
TEN YEARS BECAUSE.
IT TAKES FOREVER TO DO AN IT
PROJECT IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA. NOT THAT DEFINITELY
MAKES SENSE.
AND I THINK THERE IS. IF I
REMEMBER CORRECTLY AND AS YOU'LL
CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG WITH
THEIR SORT OF MULTIPLE
COMPONENTS ABOUT ELEVEN RIGHT
THERE'S A SIX CORE AND THEN
THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL FIVE IS
THAT CORRECT.
CALL OUR.
YES OKAY I'M I GUESS ANOTHER
PERSPECTIVE TO OFFER WOULD BE
THAT UNDER THE CURRENT PLANS AS
YOU WOULD FINISH STAGE TWO I
BELIEVE IN MARCH OR APRIL OF
TWENTY TWENTY.
SO IF ANOTHER BUDGET PROPOSAL
DIDN'T COME FORWARD UNTIL THE
END OF STAGE TO THAT WOULD BE
ANOTHER MAY PROPOSE OVER THE
LEGISLATURE WOULD ONLY HAVE A
FEW DAYS TO CONSIDER IT.
SO THE INTENTION HERE IS TO
FORCE THERE TO BE SOME TIME I'M
IN THAT GENERATE PROCESS BUT WE
DEFINITELY KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR.
CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
ASSOCIATE WITH LIMITED TERM
POSITIONS.
AND IN THIS POINT WE DO EXPECT
TO BE BACK FRIEND THE COMMITTEE
NEXT YEAR THIS TIME SO EARLIER.
THAN TWENTY TWENTY OKAY.
OF.
SIR WILL GET A QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS.
THE COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE.
I'M.
.
BUT I'M PREPARED TO TAKE A
MOTION TO APPROVE THE LA US
RECOMMENDATION. WITH RESPECT TO
PROVIDING RESOURCES ON A TWO
YEAR BASIS EXCEPT AS TO THE
ELEVEN. CORE PROJECT STAFF AND
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT POSITIONS.
IF THERE'S ANY INTEREST IN
MAKING SUCH A LITTLE MOVED.
.
OKAY BEEN MOVED PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL ETCETERA I'VE SEEN IT LATER.
CENTER WILL.
HOPEFULLY THAT WON'T UPSET THE
APPLE CART TOO MUCH.
TALK ABOUT ISSUE NUMBER TWO.
THE CAL EIGHTERS DID I PRONOUNCE
THAT CORRECTLY.
OF THE NINETY. NINETY PROJECT
WITH WHICH I AM NOT FAMILIAR.
RIGHT KEY PROJECT YES.
AND FIFTY CONTROLLERS OFFICE
REQUESTS ONE POINT FIVE. FIVE
EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS IN
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN AND SEVEN
HUNDRED AND FOUR THOUSAND OF
THIS WOULD CONTINUE THROUGH
TWENTY TWENTY ONE WORKED WHICH
WILL SUPPORT FOUR AND A HALF
FOUR YEAR LIMITED TERM POSITIONS.
AND ALLOW THE SCO TO FINALIZE
THE CAL LEADER REPLACEMENT AFTER
PROJECT APPROVAL LIFECYCLE STAGE
THREE AND STAGE FOUR. AS WELL AS
THE RIP AND WORK WITH THE
REPLACEMENT VENDOR TO PREPARE
THE NEW SOLUTION FOR STATEWIDE
WERE ALL OUT. REPLIED TO ANSWER
ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
OKAY FINANCE.
WE SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL TO
ADDRESS THE WORKLOAD ASSOCIATED
WITH THE CALENDAR SYSTEM.
SO YOU YOU HAD A REBELLION YOU
HAD A RECOMMENDATION ON THIS
FRONT COULD YOU.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO
PROVE HIS BUDGETED BUT YOU KNOW
I ALWAYS LIKE TO.
HERE THE COUNTER TO THAT SHORE
I'M SO WE DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE
ANY CONCERNS OF THE RESOURCES
THAT ARE REQUESTED HERE. ON BUT
IN ADDITION TO THE RESOURCES THE
ADMINISTRATION IS PROPOSING
BUDGET BILL LANGUAGE.
THAT WOULD GIVE THE
ADMINISTRATION SIGNIFICANT
DISCRETION TO AUGMENT.
THIS. BUDGET ITEM ASIO IF SCO
OR OTHER STAKEHOLDERS DETERMINE
THAT THEY'RE DIFFERENT FEATURES
OF THE SYSTEM THAT THEY WOULD
LIKE AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO
THE CONTRACT WITH IBM. SO WE DO
THINK THAT YOU KNOW SOME
FLEXIBILITY IS REASONABLE IT
MAKES SENSE THAT YOU KNOW THERE
ARE SOME FEATURES THAT MIGHT NOT
BE ANTICIPATED AT THIS POINT.
BUT WE DO THINK THERE SHOULD BE
A CAP ON THAT DISCRETIONARY
AMOUNT ON WE'RE RECOMMENDING TWO
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS BUT
THAT'S NOT A MAGIC NUMBER.
ANOTHER I'M NOT WOULD BE
REASONABLE.
SO THE PROPOSAL ALLOWS FOR
AUGMENTATION WITHOUT A CAP.
AND YOU'RE PROPOSING A CAB I GET
IT OF SCO WE DON'T HAVE ANY
CONCERNS WITH THE LA US
RECOMMENDATION BUT WE WOULD
DEFER TO FINANCE.
TO THEIR CONCERNS.
WE DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC
POSITION ON THE ILLEGALS
RECOMMENDATION BUT WE WOULD SAY
IF IT IS ADOPTED THE TO BE ABLE
TO. CONFIRM THAT IF THE
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED TO BE ABLE
TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO THE
CURRENT SYSTEM TO EXCEED THE CAP
THAT THEY ARE AVAILABLE TO US.
UTILIZE THE NINETY FORTY PROCESS
FOR THOSE ADDITIONAL FUNDS.
OKAY SO THAT'S WHAT'S PROPOSED
TO PROPOSE BILLIONS PROPOSAL IS
TO LIMIT THE POTENTIAL COST
INCREASE.
WITH A CAP OF TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND ON THE INCREASE. OF
COSTS INCURRED OR LARGER THAN
THIS THE NINETY EIGHT FORTY
PROCESS WITH WHICH I AM NOT
PARTICULARLY FAMILIAR.
IS UTILIZED I GUESS TO THEN
DEAL WITH THE EXCESS COST ABOVE
THE CAP THAT YOUR UNDERSTANDING.
THAT WOULD BE THE NINETY EIGHT
FORTY PROCESS BEFORE THE
UNANTICIPATED COSTS FROM THE
RIGHT. TO THAT STELIOS PROPOSAL
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS.
COLLEAGUES ANY QUESTIONS.
I BELIEVE I WOULD ENTERTAIN I
LIKE CAPS I BELIEVE I WOULD
ENTERTAIN A MOTION THAT
ENCOMPASSES THE LA A
RECOMMENDATION WHICH IS TO CAP
THE.
POTENTIAL COST INCREASES AT
LEAST THE ABILITY TO TAP
ADDITIONAL MONEY AT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND AND OF COSTS INCURRED
OR LARGER TO USE THIS NINETY
EIGHT FORTY PROCESS WHATEVER
THAT IS SO MOVED. IT IS BEEN
MOVED PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
THERE ARE TIMES IN OUR LASER
CENTER WILL BUY.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
THE.
FINAL ITEM IS ITEM EIGHT EIGHT
EIGHT FIVE COMMISSIONER AND
STATE MANDATES ISSUE ONE IS
REPEALED MANDATE PAYMENT.
SET FORTH ON PAGE SEVENTEEN OF
THE AGENDA.
YES SIR.
THANKS FOR JOINING US GOOD
AFTERNOON YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE IS THE
FINAL EVENT YES SIR HE TOLD.
YEAH.
THE ADMINISTRATION PROPOSES THAT
THE COMMISSION STAKE MANDATES
BUDGET BE INCREASED BY THREE
HUNDRED THIRTEEN POINT TWO
MILLION TO PAY FOURTEEN EXPIRED
OR REPEALED MANDATES. WE KNOW
THAT.
NINETY PERCENT OF THE THREE
HUNDRED TWELVE POINT TWO MILLION.
APPROPRIATE IN THE MAY REVISION
IS.
TO AS A RESULT OF MANDATES
ASSOCIATED WITH MENTAL HEALTH
SERVICES.
THIS APPROPRIATION IS TO REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF OUTSTANDING DEBT
THAT IS OWED TO THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS.
PROVISIONALLY WHICH HAS BEEN
WRITTEN TO AUTHORIZE THE
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE TO AUGMENT
THIS AMOUNT AFTER PROVIDING JAIL
BC NOTIFICATION OF COURSE.
IF THE INITIAL APPROPRIATION IS
INSUFFICIENT TO PAY THE
PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON THE.
IDENTIFIED MANY CLAIMS AND AT
THIS TIME I'D BE HONORED TO
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS HELLO.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS. THEY
WILL KNOW THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION IS TO PROVE HIS
BUDGETED COLLEAGUES TOO MANY
QUESTIONS.
MOVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
PARTICULAR ITEM A. UP UNDER YES
MA'AM GOOD AFTERNOON MR TERM
MEMBERS DOROTHY JOHNSON OF THE
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTIES AND ALSO FOR MY
COLLEAGUES WHO CANNOT BE HERE
FROM. THE URBAN COUNTIES OF
CALIFORNIA AND THE CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION OF
ALL IN SUPPORT OF THE
PREPARATION DEPRECIATED FOR
PAYMENT. AND AGREE THAT IT IS
PRUDENT THESE GOOD TIMES TO
REPAY DEBT OWED TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS THANK YOU. THANK YOU
FOR JOINING US THIS CHAIR
MEMBERS JEAN HURST HERE TODAY ON
BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE INTERACT AND SANTA
CRUZ AND SUPPORT. THANK YOU.
A WE HAVE ANY OTHER PUBLIC
COMMENT SEEING NONE WE HAVE A
MOTION PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
ETCETERA I CAN IN LATER LIFE
CENTER WILL.
THANK YOU SIR.
IF THERE'S NO OTHER BUSINESS US
UP FOR IS ADJOURNED
.
YEAH