WE DO HAVE A QUORUM SO IF THE
SECRETARY WILL PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL. ALLEN HERE ALLEN HERE WILL
PRESENT WILK HERE GALGIANI LEYVA.
HERE LEYVA HERE PAN. BIDAK.
RIGHT AFTER. OKAY SO WE DO HAVE
A QUORUM.
WE HAVE FIVE BILLS ON CONSENT
FIRST OF ALL I ITEM. OF ONE
WHICH IS S. B. TWENTY NINE
THAT'S WIENER.
I ITEM FIVE AB TWO ZERO ZERO
NINE MAIENSCHEIN ITEM SIX AB
TWENTY TWO EIGHTY FIVE O'DONNELL
ITEM SEVEN AB TWENTY THREE
NINETEEN IS THERE AN ITEM EIGHT
AB TWENTY HUNDRED CHIU.
AND DO I HEAR MOST OFTEN VICE
CHAIR.
ALRIGHT. GO AHEAD CENTER LEYVA
HELP I LIKE THE MOVE THE CONSENT
CALENDAR OKAY SO IT'S I'VE BEEN
MOVED.
MAYBE A JOINT MOVING.
VOTE WILL CREDIT TO THE VICE
CHAIR.
.
TIGERS THE VICE CHAIR AGAINST
CERTAIN. SO. I SECURE PEACE
KALRA ALLEN.
I.
ALAN AYE WILK AYE WILK AYE
JOHNNY LEYVA. LEYVA AYE PAN
VINAYAK BIDAK AYE OKAY SO WILL
THAT THAT WILL HOLD THAT ROLE
OPEN FOR THE OTHER MEMBERS TO
ADD ON.
I NOTICED THAT.
SIMILAR WEBER IS HERE NAY IN
SHE'S HERE TO PRESENT HER AB
TWELVE THIRTY ONE.
AND YOU MAY COME FORWARD.
GOOD MORNING.
GOOD MORNING BANQUET MISTER
CHAIR AND AND SENATORS OF THIS
THIS MORNING I'M HERE TO PRESENT
TO YOU AB TWELVE THIRTY ONE. A
BILL RELATING TO THE STRUCTURE
SALARIES FOR C. ISSUE IMPLORE
HE'S.
I'VE ACCEPTED THE TECHNICAL
AMENDMENTS CLARIFYING THAT THE
IN WILL USE THAT TAKE PRECEDENT
OVER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS LAW
ARE COLLECTIVELY BARGAIN.
EVIDENCE STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT
SEE ISSUE IS THE ONLY CALIFORNIA
STATE AGENCY THAT DOES NOT
PROVIDE SOUR STEPS TO ATTEMPT
ITS EMPLOYEES WHO STAFF.
THIS IS COMMITTED AN INVERSION
OF SALARIES WHERE NEW HIRES ARE
EARNING MORE THAN MORE
EXPERIENCED EMPLOYEES.
FOLLOWING IN NINETEEN NINETY SIX
IMPASSE IN CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
THE CSU BOARD OF TRUSTEES
UNILATERALLY ELIMINATED EXISTING
EMPLOYEES TO A SAUDI STEPS.
US STEPS INC AND WHICH INCREASES
INCREASES TIED TO JOB
PERFORMANCE AND LONGEVITY.
THIS HAS RESULTED IN NEW HIRES
EARNING HIGHER SALARIES IN
EXISTING EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE
WORKED IN THE SAME
CLASSIFICATION BUT MANY YEARS.
THIS IN EQUITY HAS CREATED A.
EIGHT NINETY FIVE POINT FOUR
MILLION DOLLAR INVERSION GAP
BETWEEN THE SALARIES OF THE
NEWLY HIRED EMPLOYEES. I TEACH
YOU SUPPORT STAFF.
BUT TO USE THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN
UNWILLING TO REINSTATE SALARY
STEPS DESPITE THE FAILURE OF THE
EXISTING SALAS STRUCTURE. AND
THE INABILITY OF EMPLOYEES TO
EARN A FAIR AND EQUITABLE WAIT.
AB TWELVE THIRTY ONE WILL
REINSTATE FIVE PERCENT SALAS
DEBTS FOR CALIFORNIA STATE
UNIVERSITIES US SUPPORT STAFF.
BUT INCREASE WILL BE MADE
ANNUALLY WHEN EMPLOYEES MEET THE
STANDARDS WERE SATISFACTORY
PERFORMANCE EXIT PERMIT BY THE
EMPLOYEES ADMINISTRATORS.
HERE IT WOULD MEAN TO SPEAK IN
SUPPORT OF AB TWELVE THIRTY ONE
IS TERRY WILSON WHO WORKS AT
FRESNO STATE UNIVERSITY. AND
DAVID BELL HAWKINS FOR
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
EMPLOYEES UNION.
TERRY ALLEN SENATORS BY NAME IS
TERRY WILSON NUMBER TEN YEAR
EMPLOYEE AT FRESNO STATE
UNIVERSITY.
AB TWELVE THIRTY ONE REINSTATE
SALARY STEPS THAT WERE
UNILATERALLY TAKEN AWAY BY THE
CSU ADMINISTRATION SOME TWENTY
YEARS AGO.
SALAR STEPS WILL ALLOW EMPLOYEES
TO MOVE THROUGH THEIR SALARY
RANGE AND AE BASED ON MERIT AND
JOB PERFORMANCE.
OF THE STATE'S TWO HUNDRED AND
THIRTY THREE AGENCIES.
THE CSU IS THE ONLY STATE AGENCY.
THAT DOES NOT PROVIDE.
STEPS TO SUPPORT STAFF.
AFTER THE CSU ADMINISTRATION.
ELIMINATED SALARY STEPS IN
NINETEEN NINETY SIX.
WE TRY TO RE INSTATE STEP PAY AT
THE BARGAINING TABLE.
BUT FOR OVER TWENTY YEARS
THE CSU HAS REFUSED OUR REQUEST.
DESPITE THE FAILURE OF THE
EXISTING SALARY STRUCTURE AND
THE INABILITY OF EMPLOYEES. TO
EARN A FAIR AND EQUITABLE RAISED.
ALL WE ARE ASKING FOR IS PARITY
WITH OTHER STATE AGENCIES AND
PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES.
I WAS FIRST HIRED IN TWO
THOUSAND SEVEN AS AN
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ONE.
AND OVERSAW THE BUDGET OF THE
ENTIRE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
I WAS THEN GIVENWORK ASSISTING
THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR STUDENT
AFFAIRS. WHICH REQUIRED INCREASE
STAFF OVERSIGHT AND BUDGET
RESPONSIBILITIES.
I NOW RUN THE BULLDOG ID CARD TO
AN EMERGING DEPARTMENT WITH
THIRTEEN EMPLOYEES WORKING
DIRECTLY UNDER ME.
I PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DEPARTMENT. AND THE UNIVERSITY
CONTROLLER.
I HAVE UNDERGRADUATE DEGREES IN
EMPHASIS IN MATHEMATICS SCIENCE
AND BIOLOGY.
FIVE TWO MASTERS DEGREES.
A MASTERS IN BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION WITH EMPHASIS IN
FINANCE.
I HAVE A MASTERS IN
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT.
DESPITE MY EDUCATIONAL DEGREES.
CHANGES IN MY JOB
RESPONSIBILITIES WORKLOAD.
I CONSISTENTLY RECEIVING
OUTSTANDING EVALUATIONS.
MY BASE SALARY HAS NOT INCREASED
IN THE TEN YEARS SINCE I WORKED
AT FRESNO STATE.
ADDING FURTHER INSULT NEW
EMPLOYEES ARE BEING HIRED IN THE
SAME JOB CLASSIFICATION AS ME.
AND EARN A HIGHER WAGE.
THE CSU ADMINISTRATION ADMITS
THAT THIS DECISION TO ELIMINATE
SOUR STEPS.
HAS RESULTED IN THE BROKEN
STRUCTURE.
IT WOULD TAKE NEARLY NINETY FIVE
MILLION TO PROVIDE THE SAME
SALARIES TO LONG TERM EMPLOYEES.
THAT ALREADY BEGINNING TO NEW
HIRES.
NOT. MY EXPERIENCE THAT IS
SHARED BY THOUSANDS OF EMPLOYEES.
CSU MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS.
TO RECEIVE.
ANNUAL MERIT SALARY INCREASES.
DESPITE CRITICISM FROM THE STATE
AUDIT THAT WAS RELEASED LAST
YEAR.
YES THEY AUDIT FOUND THAT CSU
MANAGEMENT POSITIONS GREAT OVER
TWICE THE RATE OF SUPPORT STAFF.
WITH OVER HALF A BILLION DOLLARS
PER YEAR IN TOTAL COMPENSATION
THAT FAR OUT. THE SLARY FOR
INCREASING SUPPORT STAFF.
POSITIONS IN SALARIES AT THE
AUDIT CONCLUDED COULD NOT BE
JUSTIFIED.
BUT CSU ALSO PROFITS FROM THESE
ACTIONS.
WELL EMPLOYEE SALARIES REMAIN
STAGNANT.
AND THE CSU CLAIMS POVERTY.
THIS YEAR'S HERE HAS INCREASED
THE ACCOUNT BALANCES IT HOLDS AN
OUTSIDE OF THE STATE TREASURY BY
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
AND IT GENERATES HUNDRED MILLION
DOLLARS IN INTEREST.
THE CSU PROFITED FROM NOT PAYING
EQUITABLE SALARIES AND NOW IT'S
TIME TO HOLD THE CSU ACCOUNTABLE.
BY COMPLYING WITH THE SAME
PRACTICES OF ALL OTHER STATE
AGENCIES.
AGAIN WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR IS
PARITY WITH OTHER STATE
EMPLOYEES.
I SHOULDN'T BE FINANCIALLY
PENALIZED FOR WORKIN FOR THE
CSU.
NOR SHOULD KNOW EMPLOYEES BE
HIRED FROM MY SAME JOB
CLASSIFICATION THAT I'VE WORKED.
FOR YEARS AND BE GIVEN A HIGHER
SALARY.
I'M ASKING TO BE FAIRLY
COMPENSATED AND JUST TREATED
WITH RESPECT.
I URGE YOU TO SUPPORT AB TWELVE
THIRTY ONE. THANK YOU.
BUT YOU.
I FOLKS WHO WANT TO BEEN WANTS
TO ADD ON SUPPORT.
ONLY RESUME HER WITH SERVICE
EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
PROUD TO CO SPONSOR THIS BILL
IT'S LONG OVERDUE ONLY THINK
IT'S TIME THAT WE RECOGNIZE OUR
DEDICATED WORKERS OF THE CSU ARE
CLASSIFIED ARE. INTEGRAL TO THE
SUPPORT AND A SUCCESS OF OUR
STUDENTS AND THIS IS JUST A
SYMBOL PARITY BILL WE URGE AYE
VOTE THINK YOU. OFTEN WE HAVE TO
THE BECAUSE BEARDS IN THE HOUSE
COMING UP.
YOU. MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS MAP
RIGHT HERE ON BEHALF THE
TEAMSTERS AND SUPPORT WE HAVE
SKILLED TRADE WORKERS WHO ARE
PART OF THE CSU SYSTEM. WE THINK
OBVIOUSLY THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR
PARITY ADAM AND SO WE ARE JUST
SUPPORT THANK YOU YOU.
NEIL JACQUELINE PRESIDENT
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITIES
EMPLOYEE UNION TWENTY FIVE YEAR
EMPLOYEE AT CSU STANISLAUS IN
SUPPORT.
OKAY UP BUT.
SORRY PICKING MACLEOD DIMAS OVER
THIRTY YEAR EMPLOYEE AT THE CSU
I MET CSU FULLERTON. AND WE HAVE
SEVEN POINT FIVE MILLION AN
INVERSION IN REGARDS TO OUR
SUPPORT STAFF. I URGE YOU TO
SUPPORT THE BILL THINKING OF.
OKAY I KNOW WE'VE IN DRAMMEN
WANTS TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OR.
RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT THE BILL.
GOOD MORNING AND YOU MARTINEZ
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY A WE
MUST RESPECT WOULD BE OPPOSED TO
THE MEASURE.
BOB BECAUSE OF A NUMBER OF
REASONS
BUT ONE BECAUSE IT TAKES AWAY
FROM THE COURT REPORTING PROCESS
I APPRECIATE THE MEMBER THAT'S
PARTICULAR TO COMMANDMENT.
BUT IT DOES CHANGE THE DYNAMIC
SIGNIFICANTLY WE CODES THE
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TABLE.
WE NEED COAT THE REQUIREMENT OF
A FIVE PERCENT AUTOMATICALLY.
IT DOES SAY RECYCLED BARGAINING
BUT I IMAGINE THAT OUR UNIONS
WILL COME TO THE TABLE ASKED
THAT OUR ARE NEGOTIATED ARE TO.
OUR CONTRACT THE OPENED UP AGAIN.
AND THEN YOU GIVE SHAPE
IMMEDIATELY A FIVE PERCENT.
STEPPED SO IT DOESN'T.
OUR DDITIONALLY FRANKLY THIS
BILL IS GOING TO BE VERY
EXPENSIVE FOR US TO IMPLEMENT.
WE ANTICIPATE ACOSTA THE FIRST
YEAR OF SEVENTY MILLION DOLLARS.
AND EACH YEAR OBVIOUSLY AS
SELLERS INCREASE THAT FIGURE
GOES UP AND UP AND UP AGAIN.
UNTIL A POSSIBLY IN TEN YEARS IT
COULD BE A BILLION DOLLARS IN
COST TO THE SYSTEM.
I GUESS I WOULD STEP BACK A
LITTLE BIT BECAUSE I WAS NOT
EMPLOYEES OUT BACK IN THE
EIGHTIES WHEN.
I GOVERNOR DEUKMEJIAN THE LATE
GOVERNOR DEUKMEJIAN ON FASTER
STORY.
HE DECIDED THAT HE DID NOT WANT
TO FUND THE CSU STEPS SALARY AS
PART OF THE CS USE BUDGET.
YOU TOOK THAT AWAY.
AND THEN THERE WAS A SERIES
NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN MAN. AND I
TWO NINETY SIX ABOUT HOW TO
ADDRESS THAT ISSUE.
BOB FIRST THERE IS THIS INITIAL
ACTION WHERE THE THIS ISSUE
RECOGNIZE THAT BECAUSE VOTE
IMMIGRANTS SAID IF MONEY WAS
AVAILABLE.
THAT WE SHOULD DO THIS
THAT WILL OBVIOUSLY LEVINE WAS
NOT AVAILABLE TO.
REALIZE THAT WE DIDN'T AVE THE
MONEY FOR THAT. THAT CAME OUT OF
THE CAMPUS BUDGET CAPS IS
OBVIOUSLY ON A CHALLENGE.
PAYING THAT.
.
IT AND I TO ME SIX I IMAGINE
BECAUSE OF A BAD BUDGET WE HAVE
TO IMPOSE.
AND SINCE THAT TIME WE HAVE
OBVIOUSLY.
GUNS ARE INCREASES OF FOR
EXAMPLE SINCE TWO THOUSAND
FOURTEEN ALREADY THROUGH TWO
THOUSAND NINETEEN.
WE HAVE PROVIDED OR WILL
PROVIDE NINETEEN PERCENT. IN
SALARY INCREASES FOR CSU
EMPLOYEES.
ALTHOUGH.
WE WERE HAPPY THAT WE WERE ABLE
TIME TO NEGOTIATION ON THE UNION
CONTRACT LAST YEAR BACK OUT.
CERTIFIED BY THE BOARD AND BY
THE UNION. THAT AVOIDED A STRIKE.
BACK UNION AGREEMENT IT'S GONNA
COST ASSIST YOU ABOUT EIGHTY
FOUR MILLION DOLLARS TO
IMPLEMENT.
AND WE ARE COMMITTED TO PAYING
THAT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR
NOT THE FUNDING IS THERE FROM
THE STATE.
OUR FIRST GENERALS ARE FROM
STUDENT FEES WHILE. THAT IS
SOMETHING WE ARE GOING TO BE
COMMITTED TO PAYING FOR.
ARE ALSO GOING TO TALK A LITTLE
BIT ABOUT.
ASSEMBLY OF SKEPTICISM DURING
RECENTLY.
WHICH IS IN RANGE PROGRESSION.
IN RANK PROGRESSION IS
ALLOWS CAMPUSES.
TO PROVIDE A SALARY INCREASE TO
ADDRESS EQUITY ISSUES.
CSU HAS OBVIOUSLY BEEN SHORT
FUNDING FOR BLACKS FOR YEARS BUT
RECENTLY.
THE CAMPUSES HAVE MADE IT A
PRIORITY TO ADDRESS THESE EQUITY
ISSUES.
IN IN RANGE PROGRESSIONS HIS
THE SALARY ADJUSTMENT OF THREE
TO TEN PERCENT AND IT IS
INTENDED TO ADDRESS RETENTION
PERFORMANCE ADAM IT INCREASE
RESPONSIBILITIES.
SO FORTH SO DAMN FOR. THE THE
TYPICAL EQUITY GINGRICH
PROGRESSION IS FROM A THREE TO
TEN PERCENT SON CHRIS
WE HAVE REALLY SIGNIFICANT BUMP
THAT EFFORT IN THE LAST TWO TO
THREE YEARS AS FUNDING HAS BEEN
RISING.
AND I WOULD SAY THAT. IT'S
SINCE JULY FIRST THIS YEAR WE'VE
PROVIDED FOURTEEN HUNDRED FORTY
IN RANGE PROGRESSIONS BUS CAPS
OUT CAPS IS BUDGET.
OF THOSE FOURTEEN HUNDRED FORTY.
ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FORTY
SEVEN WHICH ISSUES YOU YOU
EMPLOYEES.
IN CONTEXT
THERE ARE FIFTY THOUSAND
EMPLOYEES OF CSU CSU E.
REPRESENTS FOURTEEN THOUSAND.
FOUR INCHES OF FOREIGN CHIU
FORTY THOUSAND APARTMENTS THREE
SEVEN.
SO THE MAJORITY. EIGHTY TO
NINETY PERCENT OF THE IN
RETROGRESSION THAT WE OFFER TO
EMPLOYEES AS HE SHE WENT CSU
EVEN PLACE WE'RE TRYING OUR BEST
TO ADDRESS. THIS SALARY LIKE.
BUT FRANKLY.
THE FUNDING NEEDS TO BE THERE.
AND BRAG BEING ASKED TO DO MORE
MC ISSUES BUDGET FOR EXAMPLE.
INFRASTRUCTURE.
USED TO BE A SEPARATE ITEM OUT
OF THE BUDGET OVER THE SEATS YOU
BUDGET. IS NOW BEEN FOLDED INTO
OUR BASE BUDGET.
SORT OF OUR BUILDINGS ARE
FACILITIES ARE ALL OUT OF WHAT
WE GET FUNDED FROM STATES AND IT
HAS TO BE OUR OBLIGATION TO PAY
FOR.
JUST BECOMES A BURDEN FOR THE
SYSTEM TO PAY FOR SOMETHING THAT
WE DON'T DEFINE IT FOR. AFTER
THAT WE MUST BE OPPOSED.
CRIME.
THANK YOU I OTHER FOLKS WANT TO
REGISTER CONCERNS ARE OPPOSITION
THE BILL.
OKAY THE ITEM IS BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE FOR QUESTIONS AND LOTS
OF THE PRESENTATION.
.
OKAY HOW COME OKAY.
I'M SO SORRY I THOUGHT I.
I REALLY APOLOGIZE I'M SO SORRY
I THAT'S OF WHY THAT WE DO THE.
DISCUSSES BEERS AT ANOTHER YOUR
PARENTS NOT QUITE AS INCLUDING
STEALTH IS WHAT I WAS TRYING TO
IT I I'M SORRY MIDDLE TO MOVE SO
I REALLY APOLOGIZE I.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU. PLEASE
PROCEED.
ACTUALLY THAT THE TIMING CAN BE
BETTER BECAUSE MANY OF THE
THINGS THAT OTHERS SEE ISSUES
REPRESENTING IS FALLACIOUS AND
UNTRUE.
BY DIE I PASSED ON SOME
DOCUMENTS TO YOU YOU TO EAT AT
THE SEA AS YOU YOU BELIEVE VERY
MUCH IN DOCUMENTATION. BUT ME
WALKING THROUGH WHAT HAS
OCCURRED ON THE INVERSION FIRST.
SO THE TOP DOCUMENT YOU'LL SEE.
DESPITE SEE ISSUES CLAIM THAT I
JUST HEARD THAT THE ARE RAMPING
UP BY TRYING TO A COMPENSATE
EMPLOYEES AND GIVE THEM MERIT
INCREASES YOU CAN SEE THAT IN A
ONE YEAR PERIOD. THE NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES THAT.
HAVE THEIR SALARIES UPSIDE DOWN
ACTUALLY INCREASED.
SO WE HAVEN'T SEEN ANY
CORRECTIONS IS PROBABLY SEE NO
NEED ONLY AT THE EXASPERATION OF
THE PROBLEM. AND YOU CAN SEE
THAT THE AVERAGE DIFFERENTIAL
BETWEEN A NEW EMPLOYEE HIRED FOR
THE SAME POSITION AT THE SAME
CAMPUS.
THEY'RE GETTING PAID SEVEN
HUNDRED TWELVE DOLLARS MORE.
THAN THE EMPLOYEE HE'S BEEN
THERE FOR TEN YEARS.
NOW LET'S SEE IF YOU CLAIM BUT
WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY.
TARA.
SECOND PAGE WHAT THEY DO HAVE
MONEY FOR IS TO GIVE MARIS
SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR
MANAGEMENT.
MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS FOR
YEARS HAVE RECEIVED ANNUAL MERIT
SALARY INCREASES THIS IS THERE A
NEW US POLICY IN EVEN THOUGH IN
THE POLICY ITSELF THE BLAME THE.
AUDITOR FOR HAVING TO DO THIS.
WHAT THE AUDITOR'S SAID WAS?
LAST YEAR. YOU CAN'T GIVE MERIT
SALARY INCREASES TO MANAGEMENT
THAT YOU'VE NEVER DONE ANY
VALUATION FOR.
THEY FOUND INSTANCES WERE
WORRIED MORE MANAGERS WERE
GETTING A SALARY.
INCREASES BASED ON MERIT AND
YET THERE IS NO EVALUATION ON
FILE SO THE SEE IF YOU NEEDED TO
DO.
BEEN UPDATED POLICY.
THE AUDIT ALSO COVERED.
IS IS TERRY TALKED ABOUT WE HAD
A GROWTH MANAGEMENT POSITIONS
DURING THE AUDITOR'S.
PERIODS THAT THEY LOOKED AT
MORE THAN DOUBLE THE GROWTH RATE
OF SEE IF YOU SUPPORT STAFF SO
NOT ONLY ARE OUR EMPLOYEES.
NOT BEING COMPENSATED.
THEIR WORK CLOSER INCREASES.
THE WORKLOADS ARE INCREASING.
TEACH YOU CAMPUS IS AND THIS IS
FROM FROM THE ARCTIC CANNOT
ADEQUATELY ADEQUATELY JUSTIFY
THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN
MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND THEIR
COMPENSATION THE AUDIT THAT WAS
THE AUDITOR'S CONCLUSION.
THE AUDITOR ALSO CONCLUDED THE
CAMPUSES DO NOT ADEQUATELY.
THERE BUDGET.
WHICH QUOTE REDUCE ASSURANCES
THAT STATE FUNDS ARE BEING SPENT
EFFICIENTLY AND APPROPRIATELY.
NOW INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH
EXECUTIVES ARE DOING FINE. THEIR
SALARIES ARE NOW INCREASE FROM
TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY FOUR THOUSAND
DOLLARS TO THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS PER YEAR BUT
THAT'S NOT ALL THEY RECEIVE.
THEY ALSO RECEIVE HOUSING
ALLOWANCES BETWEEN FORTY FIVE
THOUSAND AND SIXTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS A YEAR I'VE A LOT OF
EMPLOYEES WHO WOULD BE VERY
HAPPY TO HAVE THAT AS THE YEARLY
EARNINGS OPPOSED TO A HOUSING
ALLOWANCE.
THE CURRENT LANCE'S BETWEEN
ELEVEN THOUSAND TO TWELVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS A YEAR AND SOME
OF THEM GET STIPENDS FROM THE
FOUNDATIONS WHICH RANGE FROM
TWENTY FIVE TO THIRTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS A YEAR.
SO WE STARTED ASKING WHERE IS
THE MONEY. OTHER STATE AGENCIES
ARE GIVING STEPS OF THEIR
EMPLOYEES OTHER STATE. EMPLOYEES
ARE NOT INVERTED IN THEIR
SALARIES WHERE'S THE MONEY. SO
WE RAN ACROSS THIS AUDIT FROM
TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN LOOKING AT
ACCOUNT CENTER OUTSIDE OF THE
STATE TREASURY.
WE DO KNOW THAT THEIR WORKOUTS
OUTSIDE THE STATE TREASURY WE
DEFTLY DID KNOW THAT THE CSU
HELP THEM.
ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT.
BALANCE IN THE CSU OUTSIDE
ACCOUNT.
INCREASED BY SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY
TWO MILLION DOLLARS.
AND WHERE THAT MONEY COME FROM.
MOST OF THE INCREASE RESULTED
FROM HIGHER REVENUES GENERATED
BY TUITION INCREASES.
AND FROM LOWER SPENDING CUT BY
FURLOUGHS AND LAYOFFS.
IT WOULD SENATOR ALLEN'S
LEADERSHIP WE WERE CURIOUS WHAT
IS OUTSIDE KANSEN SO HE DID AN
INQUIRY LETTER TO THE CHANCELLOR
AND THAT'S.
THE FINAL PIECE IN YOUR PACKET.
IF YOU LOOK ON PAGE TWO OF THAT
LETTER YOU WILL SEE THE HISTORY.
OF THE SEA IS USE OUTSIDE
ACCOUNTS UNDERSTAND THE AUDITOR
HAS SAID BUT THESE OUTSIDE
ACCOUNTS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME
SORT OF STANDARDS IN OVERSIGHT
THAT OCCUR WITHIN THE STATE
TREASURY. AND THAT ABUSES CAN
OCCUR.
WE'RE NOT ACCUSING TO SEE IF YOU
WERE BURKE THAT OF ABUSES BUT
CLEARLY. AROUND THEIR ORG ARE
QUESTIONABLE.
AMOUNTS OF MONEY IN HERE.
SO YOU SEE FROM THE CHART AND AS
OF JUNE THIRTIETH TWO THOUSAND
EIGHT THIS IS FROM THE CSU BY
THE WAY.
TIMOTHY WHITE SIGNED THE LETTER
AT THE END.
JUNE THIRTIETH TWO THOUSAND
EIGHT THERE WAS A BALANCE OF ONE
POINT EIGHT BILLION DOLLARS.
WHAT HAPPENED THAT BALLOTS SINCE
JUNE THIRTIETH TWO THOUSAND
SEVENTEEN A BALLOON TO THREE
POINT SEVEN? BILLION DOLLARS.
I GO TO THE LAST PAGE OF THE
LETTER SENATORS REVIEW IF YOU
WOULD.
LOT OF THESE FOR OTHER USER FEES
SO WHEN YOU DO HEALTH SERVICES
WOULD YOU PARKING YOU PAY A FEE
THEY GO INTO THE
INVESTMENT CAN.
THAT LAST NUMBER AND TO SEE IF
YOU OPERATIONS AT HIS
DISCRETIONARY MONEY.
SO AS OF JUNE THIRTIETH OF LAST
YEAR THERE IS ONE POINT EIGHT
SEVEN SEVEN BILLION DOLLARS.
BEING HELD BY THE CSU AN OUTSIDE
ACCOUNT THAT'S DISCRETIONARY
MONEY.
WE NOW HAVE FOUND OUT THAT HAS
NOW INCREASED TO EVEN TWO
BILLION DOLLARS AS OF THE END OF
DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR.
NOW.
TO SEE IF YOU CAN TALK ABOUT
BEING POOR THE SEE IF YOU CAN
TALK ABOUT THEY'RE TAKING CARE
OF THEIR EMPLOYEES BUT.
BUT. FRANKLY WHEN WITH WE DON'T
BELIEVE THEM AND THE EVIDENCE
DOESN'T BELIEVE THE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES WAS EVEN AWARE OF THESE
ACCOUNTS OUTSIDE ACCOUNTS.
WE DID A PRESENTATION THE BOARD
OF TRUSTEES THE OUTLOOK TO THE
US IN DISBELIEF YOU CAN'T PICK
KEPT SHAKING HIS HEAD.
WE SYMBOL LET'S JUST MAIL THEM
THE DOCUMENT.
WE MIL THEN THE DOCUMENT FOUR
DAYS LATER IN THE SACRAMENTO BEE.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY HAS
ABANDONED ITS PLAN TO RAISE
TUITION NEXT YEAR.
AND I QUOTE GIVEN ITS MULTI
BILLION DOLLAR BUDGET SURPLUS.
WHITE SAID IN AN INTERVIEW
CALIFORNIA SHOULD USE THE
PUBLIC'S MONEY TO INVEST IN ITS
FUTURE.
IT'S UNFAIR AND INAPPROPRIATE TO
ASK OUR STUDENTS AND THEIR
FAMILIES TO
I'M MORE.
BUT WE WILL ALSO ARGUE IT'S
UNFAIR TO BE INEQUITABLE DOOR
EMPLOYEES AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF
THEIR SITUATION.
WHEN I'VE GOT WORKING POURED
INTO DOING FULL TIME TO BENEFIT
TEN YEARS IT'S JUST IT'S IT'S
UNCONSCIONABLE.
SEVEN CLOSING. UP THIS PARTY
GAVE US THE AUTHORITY TO DO
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
THIS BODY REMOVED ALL THE
ACCOUNTABILITY PROVISIONS FOR
THE CSU BUDGET DECIDED TO GIVE
THEM FLEXIBLE BUDGETING THEY CAN
DO IT BETTER BY THEMSELVES.
HIS BODY HAS AUTHORIZED OUTSIDE
THE KILLINGS.
FOR THE CSU TO HOLD MONEY.
OUTSIDE OF THE STATE TREASURY.
WE DON'T BELIEVE THAT ANY OF
THESE ACTIONS WERE INTENDED TO
DISENFRANCHISE A GROUP OF A
GROUP OF EMPLOYEES AND AS WHICH
OCCURRED.
WE ARE SEEKING PARITY WE'RE NOT
ASKING FOR ANY MORE OR ANY LESS
THAN TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY
THOUSAND OTHER STATE EMPLOYEES.
ASK YOUR AYE VOTE.
PRODUCER.
JUST BECAUSE WE GOT SO UNUSUALLY
I SORTS IT IF YOU WANT TO TAKE A
MINUTE OR TWO TO RESPOND YOU
WELCOME TO OTHERWISE YOU CAN GO
TO DISCUSSION.
OKAY IT'S ABOUT THAT.
I GUESS I'D LIKEADDRESSED THE
TWO ISSUES ARE BAD BEEN RAISED
ONE IS THE THE MERIT SALARY
VERSUS.
BUT EXECUTIVE MVPS RECEIVER
SAYS WHAT. THE REGULAR CSU EU
EMPLOYEE RECEIVE.
I THE DIFFERENCE WOULD BE.
CASEY IS YOUR VIEW HOLLYWOOD GET
A SALARY.
INCREASE AUTOMATICALLY ABOUT
EVALUATION ONE WAY ANOTHER THAT
WILL BE THERE THERE GET THAT YES
I INCREASED THE JOURNAL CELL
INCREASE.
AN APP EMPLOYEE WILL NOT RECEIVE
A SALARY INCREASE UNLESS THERE
IS AN EVALUATION ACCOMPANYING OR
THAT.
THERE WAS AN INSTANCE FOUND IN
THE AUDIT ARE WORTH THEIR ITS
TWO PERCENT GIVEN TO ALL
EMPLOYEES TO PRESENT FLAT ALL
ACROSS THE BOARD. AND ONE CAMPUS
IN PARTICULAR DECIDED THAT
BECAUSE OF SUCH A MINIMAL AMOUNT
OF MONEY THAT THEY DIDN'T PICK
AN EVALUATION WAS MERITED.
THAT WAS OBVIOUSLY ARE IN
CONFLICT WITH WHAT OUR POLICIES
WERE THAT WAS FOUND IN THE AUDIT
IN THAT WAS ADDRESSED.
SO NOW FROM GOING FORWARD AS
REFERENCE BITE EDIBLE HAWKINS.
EVERY EMPLOYEE EVERY APP
EMPLOYEE WILL REQUIRED AN
EVALUATION TO RECEIVE A SALARY
ADJUSTMENT Y. MERIT INCREASE.
WITH REGARDS TO THE ACCOUNTS
I DON'T. THINK I WOULD
CHARACTERIZE HIS ACCOUNTS AS
SECRET ACCOUNTS.
I WOULD SAY THAT THE LEGISLATURE
GRANTED THE AUTHORITY TO THE
SECTS IN CSU. TO OPERATE A CLICK
THESE FUNDS TO SUPPORT A NEW
VERSUS.
OURSELVES SUPPORT PROGRAMS LIKE
EXTENDED EDUCATION
HOUSING PARKING ALL THOSE DO NOT
RECEIVE STATE FUNDS WE ARE
ALLOWED TO CLICK IS FEES AND
HOLD THEM LOCALLY.
THOSE THAT.
THAT.
APPROACH WAS AUGMENTED AGAIN.
IN TWO THOUSAND.
I THINK IT WAS TWO THOUSAND
EVEN. WHEN THIS LEGISLATURE
GRANTED THE CSU THE ABILITY TO
HOLD FUNDS STUDENT TUITION FEES.
OUT THERE OFFICE.
LOCAL INSTEAD IS A TREASURES
ACCOUNT.
THOSE SPONSORED CREATED THE
SWIFT ACCOUNT.
THIS WOULD ACCOUNT ALLOWS THE
CSU TO HOLD THOSE FUNDS LOCALLY
AND INVEST THEM IN A MANNER THAT
THEY SEE FIT. ALL THOSE FUNDS
HAVE A SPECIFIC TIE AND THIS WAS
A RESTRICTION ON WHAT THAT
INTEREST YOU GO TO.
BOB.
IN REGARDS TO THE INTER THAT
WE'VE MADE WE MADE ABOUT TWENTY
FIVE MILLION DOLLARS A. YEAR IN
INTEREST ALL THOSE AGAIN HAVE TO
GO BACK THAT POTS.
AND THEN FRANKLY IN TWO THOUSAND
ABOUT FIFTEEN SENATOR BLOCK.
SAW THAT WE WERE NOT REALLY
GETTING ENOUGH BEING HONORED
VESTMENTS AS WHAT WOULD YOU SEE
WAS. SO LEGISLATION WAS ENACTED
TO LAOS TO INVEST A LITTLE MORE
AGGRESSIVELY SO EVERY KID.
MAKE A LITTLE MORE MONEY THAT
CAVIAR WITHOUT AUTHORITY WAS
THAT ANY INVESTMENT LOSS THAT WE
INCURRED WOULD COME OUT OF OUR
BUDGET.
TO THE EXTENT THE GENERAL FUND
WOULD NOT BACK FEEL ANY LOSS
REVENUE. THAT WAS THE RISK
YOU'RE WILLING TO TAKE.
SO.
THE.
THE REFERENCE TO THESE POTS OF
MONEY THEIR MYSTERIOUS AND AND
UNKNOWN THERE'S BEEN A SERIES OF
LETTERS THAT HAVE BEEN HAS SENT
OUT MANY MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE. FOR PARTS ON UP TO
THE FIRST LETTER WE RESPONDED
THAT LETTER. TO YOU ALL.
SECULAR WASN'T TOO AYE MR
SANTIAGO AND AND IN RESPONSE TO
A LETTER AS WELL.
.
WHEN IT COMES TO THE STUDENT
TUITION FEE DOLLARS THAT ARE
HELD BY THE SYSTEM.
THE GOAL IS TO GET TO A SIX
MONTH RESERVE.
THAT IS TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE
CASH ON HAND. TO OPERATE IN A
MANNER IN CASE OR SOME SORT OF
NET AKA CATASTROPHE WE HAVE THE
ABILITY TO OPERATE FOR SIX
MONTHS THAT'S THE NATIONAL
STANDARD. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF UNIVERSITIES COLLEGES
BUSINESS OFFICERS CURRENTLY WE
HAVE ABOUT THREE MONTHS OF CASH
ON HAND.
REALLY BELIEVE THAT'S THE SPOTS
THAT FUNDED MISTER HAWKINS WAS
REFERRING TO.
OKAY. ARM.
ALRIGHT I KNOW THAT CENTER LEYVA
HAS A QUESTION.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR GOOD
MORNING.
.
THE POTS OF MONEY BUT YOU
EXPLAINED WHAT IT'S FOR BUT IT
IS A LITTLE CONCERNING.
I DID NOT KNOW ALL THAT MONEY
WAS THERE THAT'S A LOT OF MONEY
TO BE THERE AND I'M GLAD THAT
THIS ISSUE SAW FIT NOT TO. RAISE
TUITION THIS YEAR MY BIGGER
CONCERN IS IT HOW DO YOU HAVE AN
EMPLOYEE WHO IS CLEARLY HIGHLY
EDUCATED HAS BEEN THEY'RE DOING
A GOOD JOB FOR YOU.
FOR MORE THAN TEN YEARS I'M
SORRY HOW LONG DID YOU SAY.
IT'LL BE TWO THOUSAND SEVEN THE
TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN OKAY SO
ELEVEN YEARS.
AND BRING SOMEONE IN WHO MAKES
THE SAME OR MORE THAN HIM. WHAT
IS THE POLICY THAT ALLOWS THAT
TO HAPPEN?
BOB.
WE HAVE OFFERED STEPS BEFORE THE
BARGAINING NEGOTIATION.
THE UNION HAS DECLINED
AND THAT'S MY QUESTION BUT WE DO
HOW DO AS I DESCRIBED EARLIER WE
DO HAVE BEEN RANGE PROGRESSION
THAT ALLOWS ADDRESSES EQUITY
ISSUE WE HAD OBVIOUSLY NOT BEEN
AS ROBUST ON THAT EFFORT AS WE
HAVE. THE MOST RECENT YEARS
THAT'S OUR INTENTION IS TO
ADDRESS THE ISSUE WITH THOSE
FUNDS.
BUT I'M SURE HE'S NOT THE ONLY
ONE.
BUT IT IS WORKING THOUGH NEVER
HAD SOMEONE NEW I JUST THINK
THAT THAT IS AT ITS JUST BLATANT
DISREGARD FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES AND
IT CREATES A MORALE ISSUE. I
MEAN IF I'M WORKING IN BEEN
DOING A GOOD JOB.
GOOD VALUE.
OR MORE THAN ME
WHAT IS MY INCENTIVE TO KEEP
WORKING.
I THINK WE HAVE TO LIVE WITHIN
THE THE FUNDS THAT WE RECEIVE
FROM OF THE LEGISLATURE AND IN
THE BUDGET PROCESS IS EAGER TO
HEAR THERE'S DISCRETIONARY AND
FRANKLY YOU THAT IS THE REALITY
THAT WE LIVE IN. NOW YOU COULD
BRING THAT PERSON IN A LOWER
RATE.
BY WOULD YOU BRING A BRAND NEW
PERSON AT THE SAME RATE AS
SOMEONE WHO'S EXPERIENCED I I
JUST THINK THAT'S A FAILURE ON
THE C. ISSUES PART SO TO ASK YOU
TO LOOK AT THAT. AND JUST THINK
ABOUT MORALE AND THINK ABOUT
SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN DOING A GOOD
JOB IN COMING IN EVERY SINGLE
DAY AND YOU BRING SOMEONE IN AND
NOW YOU WANT THEM TO DO THE SAME
GOOD JOB THEY'VE ALWAYS DONE.
AND THE PERSON RIGHT NIXON IS
MAKING THE SAME OR MORE THAN
THAT.
SO I'D LIKE YOU TO LOOK AT THAT
AND PLEASE ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN
ANYMORE.
THEN A PARENT.
THANK YOU.
.
I AND DEDUCTIBLES OF EVER
REACTION ABOUT.
THE STATEMENT THAT STEPS WERE
OFFERED IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
PERHAPS THE CSU REPRESENTATIVE
WHAT TO ADDRESS THAT IN THE
PERHAPS YOU SEE REPRESENT WANTS
TO ADDRESS.
THE WHOLE.
THE REACTION. YEAH YEAH THAT
THAT'S RIDICULOUS I MEAN WHY
WOULD WE NOT ACCEPTED IF IT WAS
AFTER WE TRIED FOR TWENTY TWO
YEARS TO GET STEPS REINSTATED
THERE UNILATERALLY TAKEN AWAY
BUT BY THIS YEAR'S YOU BACK IN
NINETEEN NINETY SIX.
IT IS SOMETHING THAT NO OTHER
STATE EMPLOYEE DOESN'T HAVE.
WHY WOULD WE NOT ACCEPT AN OFFER
FROM THE SEAT YOU TO REINSTATE
THAT?
SO KNOW THAT THAT HAS NOT
OCCURRED A BARGAINING.
IT IS MY ESTIMATE HAS BEEN
OFFERED OF THE PARTY TABLE WE
HAVE OFFEREDSIMILAR STEPS TO
CFA THAT FACULTY ASSOCIATION.
AND THEY DID ACCEPT THAT IN
YEARS PAST.
IT I MEAN IF IT.
WHAT COULD HAPPEN IS IT TIME FOR
MANY YEARS MAYBE THEY'RE WERE
TOLD YOU CAN HAVE THIS BUT
YOU'VE GOT TO GIVE UP THIS?
SO IT MAY NOT OF BEEN WORTH THE
TRADE OFF.
WELL.
WELL JUST TO CLARIFY ACTUALLY BY
A.
IS THAT SITUATION ARE OWES THAT
ARE.
OR WAS THAT ARE ISN'T EVER
OFFERED TO.
I SAW I CLARIFY.
I AM NOT AWARE SENATOR PAN OF
THIS YEAR'S YOU EVER PUTTING
STEPS ON THE TABLE AS PART OF
OUR BARGAINING PROCESS. NOW WHAT
SORT OF.
.
PACKAGES.
THAT THE CLAIM OR MERIT
INCREASES
BUT THEN THEY DON'T FUNDED
THAT'S WHAT THE SITUATION WE
HAVE RIGHT NOW SAYS. THE ONE TO
SEE IF YOU TOOK AWAY STEPS THEY
REPLACE WITH WHAT'S CALLED AN
OPEN RANGE PROGRESSION.
SEE IF YOU TOLD THE EMPLOYEES
YOU WILL PROGRESS THROUGH THE
RANGE UNDER THIS DON'T WORRY
ABOUT IT.
YOU CAN SEE FROM THE INVERSION
CHART THAT ARE PEOPLE ARE NOT
PROGRESSING THROUGH THE RANGE.
THANK YOU.
OKAY MMHM FOR THIS COMMISSION TO
FIND OUT WHAT WHAT THE TRUTH IS
ON THIS PATENT BY MISTER VICE
CHAIR.
THEY COMMITTEE CHAIR AND I THINK
THE AUTHOR FOR BRINGING THIS
FORWARD WHEN WE COME HERE WE
OUTCOME BASED UPON OUR OWN LIFE
EXPERIENCE. I SERVED SIX YEARS
ON THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT.
BEFORE AND DURING THE GREAT
RECESSION.
WITH THREE BARGAINING UNITS
AND ARE LAST SERIES OF CONTRACTS.
THEY GOT.
ZERO PAY INCREASES BUT THEY DID
HAVE STEPS IN COLUMNS RIGHT
AFTER WE NEGOTIATE ALL THREE
CONTRACTS. THE CHANCELLOR COMES
FORWARD.
WITH THE PROPOSAL EVEN THOUGH WE
ARE RUNNING A DEFICIT TO GIVE
ADMINISTRATORS A SIX PERCENT PAY
INCREASE.
I WAS THE ONLY TRUSTEE WHO VOTED
NO BECAUSE. THAT WAS NOT FAIR
BUT IT IT TORE IT TORE THE FRAPH
IT OUT. FABRIC OF OUR COMMUNITY
BECAUSE IT WAS SO INEQUITABLE AT
I SEE GREAT IN EQUITY HERE. THAT
THAT NEED THAT NEED THAT NEEDS
TO BE FIXED SO I'M GONNA BE
SUPPORT SUPPORTING THIS TODAY
AND I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR
BRINGING THIS FORWARD.
ALRIGHT I'M. LIMIT AB FIVE. YES.
SENATE MANY MORE QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU AND THE MANY MANY AS
YOU WANT ACCENT I'VE SOMETIMES I
WANT TO SAY IS WAY LESS OF A
QUESTION AND THE GREAT HAD AT
SOME.
YEAH. I AS I MAY I SHARE MY
COLLEAGUE SAYS CENTER LOS
CONCERNS ARE LABOR THAT.
.
WE'VE.
FOR YOUNG THE END RESULTS
WHATEVER HOWEVER WE GOT THERE.
CSU.
.
CERTAINLY THE END RESULT THE
OUTCOME IS ONE DEAD IT'S QUITE
TROUBLING AND I THINK.
WHAT WAS WORTH SEEING?
THE DATA ABOUT. EL BUT
CERTAINLY YOU KNOW.
LITTLE MICROMANAGE CSU BUT WHAT
WE'RE SEEING IS IS THAT WE SEE
DISPROPORTIONATELY COMPENSATION
GOING TO THE UPPER TIERS WITH
YOU KNOW.
BUT THE EXPANSION. AND ND AGAIN
DOWN THERE ARE THINGS THAT
MANAGERS NEED TO DO AND SO FORTH
SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WORK
LOAD IS UP THERE BUT ASSN KNOW
THERE'S A LOT OF WORK.
THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AT.
IT AT THE STAFF LEVEL.
ON THE GROUND TO AND I CAN
CERTAINLY AND MY.
NO.
TOURS OF.
OF CAMPUSES I COULD SEE THAT
THERE'D THERE CERTAINLY NEEDS
THERE TOO AND AND ANDERSON
VERSION. ISSUE CERTAINLY IS THE
ATI TIMMY'S RACING EVERYONE FROM
JUST THE MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE.
AYE I DON'T SEE HOW YOU USE THE
MORALE HOW DO YOU RETAIN PEOPLE
HOW DO YOU MAINTAIN MORALE WHEN
YOU BASICALLY SEE.
SAY THAT SOMEONE WHO'S INTO.
GETS PAID A LOT MORE THAN
SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN THERE.
THAT THAT IS THAT.
THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT.
NO FOSTER'S. LONG TERM LOYALTY
IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T RECOGNIZE
THE VALUE OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE
DEVOTED THEIR YOU KNOW LIFE AND
CAREER TO HELPING THE
INSTITUTION AND SO FORTH.
AND I THINK PERHAPS YOU KNOW A
ENTERS.
IT'S A LAZY IN THE GARDEN TABLE
AGAIN THE WEEDS BUT YOU STEP
BACK AND YOU HAVE TO SAY WELL
WHAT IS THE OVERALL IMPACT OF
OUR COMPENSATION POLICIES.
SO.
YEAH I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT
ABOUT THIS AND THE FACT THAT.
.
WE REALLY SHOULD BE THINKING
ABOUT AND I I MADE IDEALLY WOULD
BEEN THE CSU TRUSTEES AND THE
LEADERSHIP TO US SAID WELL YOU
WE NEED TO COME UP WITH POLICY
SINCE AND AND SYSTEMATIC.
APPROACHES TO TRY TO ADDRESS
THESE AND BRING THOSE FORD AT
THE BARGAINING TABLE ON THEIR
DISCUSSION WITH OUR EMPLOYEE
REPRESENTATIVES OF HOW WE CAN
ADDRESS THESE ISSUES.
SO I WON THE LAST NIGHT OF MY
LITTLE.
YEAH I. AND THE NOT TERRIBLY
ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT SAYING THE
LEGISLATURE NEEDS TO STEP IN AND
DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS BUT I
MEAN THE FACT. IN THE FACE OF
THE FACT THAT FOR SO LONG I MEAN
SOUNDS LIKE FOR OVER A DECADE
MORE.
YET TWENTY OUT TWO DECADES THAT
THAT THE STILL HASN'T BEEN
ADDRESSED IS VERY DISTURBING TO
ME. AND THAT PERHAPS WE DO NEED
TO YELL I I THINK WE ARE GOING
TO HAVE TO GIVE A NUDGE.
INTO IT. NOTED THAT THE TO TO
TRY TO DRESS THIS AND THAT BUT I
CERTAINLY WOULD URGE THE CSU
LEADERSHIP TO STEP BACK AND
THINK ABOUT WHAT WHAT ARE YOU.
WHAT HAS STRUCTURE WE SETTING UP
AND?
FOR OUR EMPLOYEES
AND WHAT KIND OF INCENTIVES THAT
GIVING TO OUR EMPLOYEES AND OUR
RECRUITING AND SO FORTH AND. AND
AND REALLY WORK MORE CLOSELY
WITH OUR.
THEIR BARGAINING UNITS OUT
WHAT'S THAT EMPLOYEE
REPRESENTATIVES THE THING ABOUT
A MORE EQUITABLE COMPENSATION
STRUCTURE FOR THE FOR THE SYSTEM
AND CERTAINLY.
YOU KNOW WILL.
THIS YEAR HAVING CONVERSATIONS
THE LEGISLATURE AND WE TALK
ABOUT FUNDING AND SO FORTH BUT.
EVEN WITHIN THOSE CONSTRAINTS I
THINK THAT.
JUST HAVING THIS THAT MEDICINE
VERSION IS IS EXTREMELY
PROBLEMATIC I WOULD SEE FOR I
WOULD SAY
FOR THE INSTITUTION MY OPINION.
YEAH I BY CHERYL OUT OF A OF
SENATE PANTS.
CONCERNS IN BOTH DIRECTIONS I'M
I DO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR
ACCEPTING THE TECH AMENDMENTS.
.
YOU KNOW I I I GUESS THERE'S
THERE'S THERE'S SEVERAL AND KEY
EQUITY ISSUES HERE AND THERE IS
THE LACK OF GROWTH IN NON
MANAGEMENT OSITIONS THERE'S
THIS WHOLE SALARIES VERSION.
ISSUE WHERE NEW HIRES IN SOME
CASES ARE MORE THAN THEIR IN A
MORE EXPERIENCED PEERS I KNOW
THAT THAT RAISES A LOT OF OF
MORALE ISSUES IN FAIRNESS ISSUES
AND.
I AND I'D DOES THAT NEEDS TO BE
ADDRESSED NON.
YOU KNOW I.
I AM ENTITIES PART OF WHY OTHER
AGENCIES HAVE ADOPTED.
THIS ARE MARRIED.
SYSTEM.
I ALSO KNOW THAT THIS BILL
RAISES SEND SERIOUS CONCERNS
ABOUT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING INTO
THE SCOPE OF THE SPIRIT OF
HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYER.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS ACT IT'S IT'S
SO I HAVE.
I I GUESS IS.
IN THIS WAY BUT THIS IS EVEN
HAVE THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
PROCESS.
BE PLAYING OUT IN FRONT OF THE
EDUCATION COMMITTEE THE SENATE
IS JUST A.
NOT A IDEAL IT'S NOT IDEAL EYES
IN TIME I UNDERSTAND WHY THINGS
LIKE THIS AND THAT HAPPENING
HIGH BUT NINE.
IT IT DOES SIMILAR DYSFUNCTIONAL.
SO.
YOU KNOW IN THE CLERK THE CAMINO
HOUSES DOES POINT OUT THAT THIS
CSU EMPLOYEES ARE EXEMPT FROM
CIVIL SERVICE AND EMPLOYMENT
PLANNING CONDITIONS SUCH AS
WAGES AND HOURS AND WORKING
CONDITIONS.
BUT THERE WITHIN THE MANAGER
SCOPE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
AND DONE.
YOU KNOW I IT SO SO THIS IS THIS
IS THE KIND OF CORE CONCERN HERE
I GUESS. ULTIMATELY THIS IS A
BIG MONEY QUESTION AND YOU KNOW
THEY'RE DIFFERENT.
ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED BY
THE.
THAT THE VARIOUS PARTIES AS TO
THE AMOUNTS.
MY KNOW THAT YOU I SAID THIS IS
MORE LIKE SIXTY SIXTY FIVE.
THEIR SINGS EVERY FIVE YOU
MENTIONED NINETY FIVE DURING
YOUR.
.
YOUR TESTIMONY ICE WAS OUST SOME
COMMENT WAS MADE BY A
ADMINISTRATOR.
IT'S IN VERSION YEAH THAT'S THE
INVERSION.
OKAY OKAY I GOTTA AYE ANDERSON.
SO YOU KNOW ULTIMATELY IT'S NEAR
THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
TAKES A LOOK AT THIS THIS IS ALL
LOOKED ON WITH IN THE CONTEXT OF
THE BUDGET BAD THIS YEAR.
I AND YOU KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF
OF COUNTRY SHE'S A PLATE WITH
REGARDS TO THAT.
.
YOU KNOW I SO I THIS DOES SEEM
TO STILL VERY MUCH BE A WORK IN
PROGRESS AND THESE CAN BE
SUBJECT TO A LOT OF FOLKS
WAITING IN PARTICULAR ON THE
BUDGETARY SIDE BUT. I JUST WANT
TO SAY I MEAN I'M I'M HAPPY TO
SUPPORT IT TODAY TO.
HELP KEEP THIS CONVERSATION
GOING BUT I I JUST DON'T THINK
THAT ULTIMATELY COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING DISAGREEMENTS.
SHOULD BE SOLVED BY THE
LEGISLATURE IN AND THAT'S MY
CONCORD CONCERNED WITH THIS BILL
I UNDERSTAND WHY. HE FELT THE
NEED TO BRING IT.
TODD. BUT IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT
THAT IT'S NOT THE.
BEST PRACTICES OF OUR
GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM ACT YOU KNOW
I UNDERSTAND IS TWO SIDES OF THE
STORY AND IT'S BEEN A DIFFICULT
NEGOTIATION AND.
AYE THERE'S A LOT HISTORY TO
THIS AND AND.
THAT'S WHY I'M I'M I'M IN
SUPPORT IT TODAY HOW BUT I I
JUST KIND OF.
SEND OUT INTO THE UNIVERSE.
THE MESSAGE THAT.
THIS IS NOT AN OPTIMAL WAY OF
ADDRESSING OUR COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING CHALLENGES.
THAT'S MY FEELING I CERTIFY THAT.
THE DO HAVE A QUESTION NOW. OKAY.
YEAH.
THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS BILL
FORWARD AND NOW I'M IN FULL
SUPPORT AND. LOVE TO MOVE IT
WOULD APPROPRIATE THANK YOU.
BECAUSE I DO HAVE A.
OKAY PARA SO THE THANK YOU THANK
YOU EVERYBODY AYE AND AND WE'RE
GONNA SPEND OUR TIME LOOKING AT
SOME OF THE THE CLAIM THAT IN
SOME OF THE CDVA ISSUES THAT
WERE RAISED.
BUT THE.
THE BILL WAS REMOVED AND WE ASK
YOU CLOSE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH
AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE
COMMENTS IN THE DISCUSSION THAT
HAS OCCURRED. BUT IN ADDITION TO
BASICALLY AUTHORING THIS BILL IN
AND WORKING WITH THE
ORGANIZATION.
I WAS A FORTY YEAR EMPLOYEE AT
SEA ISSUE.
AND.
AND I REMEMBER WHEN THE.
MOST OF THE MERIT STEP WHO ARE
TAKEN AWAY FROM FACULTY AS WELL.
AND I UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT
HAPPENS AND I WAS A VICTIM OF
WHAT HAPPENED IN THOSE
SITUATIONS THAT WOULD BE.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT IT'S IT'S
IT'S MOST UNFAIR AND UNJUST
SITUATION BECAUSE WHEN IT WAS
TAKEN AWAY DESPITE THE FACT THAT
THERE WAS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
IN PLACE IT WAS NOT DONE THROUGH
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. IT WAS A
UNILATERAL DECISION MADE BY THE
ADMINISTRATORS SO WHILE WE
BELIEVE IN THE COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING IF COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING WAS AT WORK THEN IT
WOULD BE.
HAVE HAPPENED.
AND OUT AND OFTENTIMES THINGS
ARE TAKEN AWAY AND BROUGHT BACK
WITH IT WAS DEALING WITH A
FURLOUGHS WHATEVER BECAUSE OF
ECONOMIC SITUATIONS WITH THIS
WAS NOT BROUGHT BACK T THEM.
VINCE WAS BROUGHT BACK TO
FACULTY AS A UNIVERSITY
PROFESSOR AND CHAIR OF THE
DEPARTMENT I HAD THE UNFORTUNATE
CIRCUMSTANCE OF OFTEN EVALUATING
MY STAFF AND NOT BEING ABLE TO
GIVE THEM ANY INCREASES AT ALL.
IN TERMS OF STEP INCREASES WHO
WOULD DOING WONDERFUL JOBS WHO
MEETING ALL THE GOALS AND
EXPECTATIONS THAT I HAD FOR THEM
IN MY OFFICE IF THERE WERE NO
STEP INCREASES FOR THEM. AND
THEY WERE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT
PEOPLE BING BROUGHT AGAIN AND
THE GUY WOULD NEGOTIATE A
DIFFERENT KIND OF SALARY SO THAT
WAS ALL THESE. BEINGS BEHIND THE
DOOR AND WHERE EVER THAT WERE
TAKING PLACE AND THERE WERE LOTS
OF FOLKS WHO WORK AT THE
UNIVERSITY INNOCENT VIRGIN
SITUATION WHERE PEOPLE CAME IN
LATER. MAY LOTS MORE THAN THEY
DID THE SAME WAS TRUE WITH
FACULTY WHO CAME IN AS BEGINNING
FACULTY OFTENTIMES SOME OF THOSE
MAY MORE THAN FACULTY WHO
ALREADY VEERED. INVERSION WAS
SOL PERVASIVE THEN WHEN I GOT MY
LAST STEP INCREASE I HAD TO
BASICALLY GET I DON'T KNOW
TWENTY PERCENT INCREASE BECAUSE
I HAVE FACULTY WORKING FOR ME
THAT MADE MORE MONEY THAN I MAY.
AS A FULL PROFESSOR AND CHAIR OF
THE DEPARTMENT
AND SO THE INVERSION WAS
INSIDIOUS AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WOULD LEAVE THEY WERE UPSET AND
ANGRY ABOUT THE STUFF THAT TOOK
PLACE. AND SO THIS IS NOT JUST
YOU KNOW ME TAKING A BILL THIS
IS TRYING TO CORRECT A SYSTEM
THAT I WAS A VICTIM OF AND THAT
SO MANY PEOPLE ARE THE FACULTY
VINCE WE GOT THERE STEP
INCREASES BACK.
BUT THOSE WHO MAKE THE LEAST
AMOUNT OF MONEY AT THE
INSTITUTION WHICH ARE STAFF
PEOPLE WHO WORK VERY HARD WOULD
TAKE CARE BYE INSTITUTION WHO
MAKE THE STUDENTS FEEL GOOD WHO
BASICALLY CLEAN THE PLACE. WORK
THE INSTRUMENTS DEAL WITH ALL
THE THINGS THAT REALLY GIVE THE
FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATORS THAT
OPPORTUNITY TO BE TO LIVE A
GREAT LIFE AT THE UNIVERSITY ARE
THE ONES WHO THE VICTIM OF THIS
SITUATION. THIS ISN'T AN EQUITY
THAT WE HAVE TO ADDRESS KNOW IT
SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE THROUGH
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BUT KEEP
IN MIND IT WAS TAKEN AWAY OUT OF
THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
PROCESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. SO
IT WAS CORRUPTED FROM THE
BEGINNING AND WE AS AS IT
LEGISLATORS NEED TO DO THE RIGHT
THING AND PUT IT BACK AND MAKE
SURE THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
DOES TAKE PLACE IN THIS VITAL TO
STAY FOR. I RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
YOUR SUPPORT THIS IS RECEIVED
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT.
IN THE ASSEMBLY OBVIOUSLY
BECAUSE MOST OF US UNDERSTAND
WHAT FAIRNESS IS WHAT WORKING IS
TO DO AND HOW WE SHOULD REPORT
HOW WE SHOULD SUPPORT AND
ENCOURAGE GOOD EMPLOYEES AT OUR
UNIVERSITY. I RESPECTFULLY ASK
WHAT AYE VOTES AB TWELVE THIRTY
ONE.
ALRIGHT PASSAGE OF HIS KALRA.
I AM TOO AB TWELVE THIRTY ONE
THE MOTION IS TO PASS AS AMENDED
TO APPROPRIATIONS ALLEN. ALLEN
AYE WILK AYE WILK AYE GALGIANI
GALGIANI I LEAVE THEN. LEAVE THE
AYE PAN PAN AYE VIED ACT BY ACT
I.
AREN'T THEY CAN USE THAT BECAUSE
THE. PREPARATIONS AND AND WE DO
APPRECIATE EVERYONE'S SAKE
PRESENTATION THANK YOU.
YEAH. ANNEXING.
YES I SEE TODD GLORIA IS I THINK
IT'S HERE AND SO I YOU'RE
TECHNICALLY FIRST IN LINE BUT.
A DIFFERENT LOOK AT THAT BUT A
GENTLEMAN. BY.
THANK YOU SO MUCH THAT I.
THIN.
OUR SO WE WELCOME YOU TO THE DIE
SO THIS IS A SORT OF A REYES
WHO'S HERE PRESENT.
TWO DOZEN ONE.
HOW TWO THOUSAND AND ONE?
I THINK I MISTER CHAIR. AND
SENATORS.
AB TWO THOUSAND ONE STANDARDIZES
A THE DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES OF FAMILY
CHILDCARE HOME EDUCATION NETWORK.
CONTRACTORS AND OTHERS.
THIS LEGISLATION WILL MABEL THE
STATE T PROVIDE CONSISTENCY.
ADDRESS REIMBURSEMENT RATES.
SUPPORT TO CAREER DEVELOPMENT
PATHWAYS FOR PROVIDERS AND USED
TO BE INAPPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT
TOOLS TO EVALUATE FAMILY
CHILDCARE HOMES WITHIN THESE
NETWORKS.
FAMILY CHILDCARE HOMES PROVIDING
WARM AND NURTURING CHILD CARE
SETTING AS WELL AS AN
OPPORTUNITY FOR LEARNING THAT
CAN BE FOUND IN NEAR THE CHILD'S
HOME OR SCHOOL.
THIS TYPE OF CARE SERVES ALL
AGES OF CHILDREN IN THE HOME
SETTING AND IS FREQUENTLY AN
OPTION FOR PARENTS SEEKING CHILD
CARE FOR SIBLINGS.
THIS MEETS THE NEEDS OF FAMILIES
WORKING NONTRADITIONAL HOURS
SUCH AS WEEKENDS EVENINGS AND
ROTATING SCHEDULES.
FAMILY CHILDCARE HOME EDUCATION
NETWORKS OFFER A PROMISING MODEL
FOR THE STATE TO IMPROVE THE
QUALITY OF FAMILY CHILDCARE
OPTIONS IN CALIFORNIA.
HOWEVER EXISTING LAW LACKS THE
CONSISTENT ADMINISTRATION AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE NETWORKS.
SO THE TOOLS USED TO MAKE
QUALITY ASSESSMENTS MAY NOT BE
APPROPRIATE TO FAMILY CHILD CARE
HOMES SETTINGS.
IN ADDITION EXISTING LAW DOES
NOT PROVIDE FOR UNIFORMITY IN
PROVIDER REEMBARKED
REIMBURSEMENT RATES OR ONGOING
EDUCATION FOR PROVIDERS.
SMALL FAMILY PROVIDERS ON THE
VULNERABLE CHILDREN. THEY SERVE
SUFFERS REIMBURSEMENT RATES FALL
BELOW WORKABLE LEVELS IT IS
CRITICAL THAT WE PROPERLY
PROVIDE FOR WORKING FAMILIES
BECAUSE LOSING A CARE GIVER
THREATENS THE ABILITY OF PARENTS
TO WORK. AND INTERRUPTS A
CHILD'S COGNITIVE AND SOCIAL
DEVELOPMENT.
HERE TO TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE
BILL ARE. SMEAR INJURED DIRECTOR
OF GOVERNMENT RELATIONS FOR THE
CHILD CARE RESOURCE.
CENTER AND ADAM NORTH
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
WITH CALIFORNIA CHILD
DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATORS
ASSOCIATION.
GOOD MORNING I'M DONNA SNARE
INJURE AND I'M SPEAKING TODAY ON
BEHALF OF THE CHILD CARE
RESOURCE CENTER AND ALSO THE
CHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS
ANGELES WHO IS ALSO A CO SPONSOR
OF THIS BILL. AND WE'VE BEEN
WORKING ON FAMILY CHILDCARE HOME
EDUCATION NETWORK SINCE THE
NINETEEN.
S. AND CAL
FOR NOW.
BECAUSE IT BUILDS A NETWORK OF
FAMILY CHILDCARE PROVIDERS WHO
ARE INTO.
TO CREATE A NETWORK OF SUPPORT
AND GIVE THEM TRAINING AND
RESOURCES TO DO THE BEST WORK
THAT THEY CAN DO. MY
ORGANIZATION THE CHILDCARE
RESOURCE CENTER HAS HAD
FAMILY CHILDCARE NETWORK SINCE
THE NINETEEN NINETIES AND OF THE
FORTY FAMILY CHILD CARE
PROVIDERS IN OUR NETWORK OVER
THIRTY FIVE OF THEM HAVE BEEN
WITH US.
SINCE NINETEEN NINETY SIX WHICH
SHOWS ITS STRENGTH IN PROVIDING
RETENTION AND SUPPORT. WE ALSO
REALLY BELIEVE THAT THIS IS A
WAY TO EXPAND HIGH QUALITY
OPTIONS FOR ALL FAMILIES
PARTICULARLY THOSE IN RURAL
COMMUNITIES WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE
THE CRITICAL MASS TO OPERATE AT.
ENTER
AND IF DURING NONTRADITIONAL
HOURS OF CARE AS THE ASSEMBLY
MEMBER MENTIONED. AND.
THE DESIRE OF THE FAMILY
CHILDCARE HOME EDUCATION NETWORK
OPERATORS AND THE PROVIDERS THAT
PARTICIPATE. IS REALLY TO WORK
THROUGH THIS BILL TO CODIFY
EXISTING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES
TO CREATE CONSISTENCY ACROSS THE
STATE.
WE WORKED AND CAN BE INTO TWO
YEAR STAKEHOLDER PROCESS TO COME
TO THE.
VISIONS THAT ARE CAN.
SPELL IT WAS AGREED UPON BETWEEN
THE PROVIDERS AND THE.
ADMINISTRATING AGENCIES AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
AND WE REALLY FEEL STRONGLY THAT
THIS IS A GOOD STEP FORWARD IN
WHAT WE BELIEVE IS THE BEST
PRACTICE AND WE WE THANK YOU FOR
YOUR SUPPORT.
Q..
GOOD MORNING I ADAM NORTH FOR
THE CALIFORNIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSOCIATION.
THE CDA IS PROUD TO BE CO
SPONSOR THIS BILL BECAUSE WE
RECOGNIZE THAT FACTIONS PROVIDE
A FLEXIBLE CHILDCARE. AFFORD
CHILDREN DURING NONTRADITIONAL
HOURS INCLUDING WEEKENDS.
THIS TYPE OF CARE SERVES
CHILDREN OF ALL AGES AND A HOME
SAID IT IS AN ESPECIALLY
VALUABLE OPTION FOR PARENTS.
SEEKING A CHILD CARE FOR THE
SIBLINGS AND ESPECIALLY IN FITS
AND TODDLERS.
AB TWO THOUSAND ONE ENSURES THAT
EACH CHILD CARED THROUGH
AFFECTION IS PROVIDED STAY WHY
CONSISTENCY TO SUPPORT AGING
DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE.
EDUCATION CURRICULUM.
A PORTFOLIO THAT MAINTAINS A
RECORD AND DEVELOPMENT
OBSERVATION OF THE CHILD.
WELL.
AND AND WORK THAT THEY DO DURING
THEIR TIME AND I CARE AND THE
ADDITIONALLY THIS BILL OFFERS
ANNUAL I STAY WAY PERIMETERS TO
ENSURE TRYING OUT STATEWIDE
TRAININGS.
THE PROVIDERS TO SUPPORT
APPROPRIATE CARE AND SUPERVISION
OF CHILDREN PROPER NUTRITION AND
MEAL PLANNING AND AND THOROUGH
APPARENT AND PROVIDER
COMMUNICATION.
I WOULD THIS BILL IS VERY MUCH
NEEDED AND WE'RE VERY EXCITED TO
URGE AND HAVE YOUR SUPPORT THANK
YOU.
OKAY EVERYONE IS TESTIFIED IN
SUPPORT NOW I I SOMEHOW MISSED
THIS LAST TIME. ALRIGHT OF FOLKS
WANNA OUT ON ME.
ANATOMY IS NOT SIMILAR CHILDREN
NOW IN STRONG SUPPORT.
AFTER YOU'RE GONE ON BEHALF THE
FIRST FIVE ELAINE FIRST HAVE
CALIFORNIANS SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING FUTURE MEMBERS OF
THE COMMITTEE RON RAFFLE BEHALF
OF THE CALIFORNIA FEDERATION OF
TEACHERS AND SUPPORT.
REYES MACHADO FOR COMMON SENSE
KIDS ACTION IN SUPPORT.
THEY'RE CUTER SOMEONE TO HAPPEN
NORTHERN DOCTORS GROUP AND COCOA
KIDS STRONG SUPPORT THANK YOU.
GO GET A WITH THE TELL CARE
ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES IN
STRONG SUPPORT. BEGIN PARTNER
BUT IT. UP ANYONE WANTS SERIOUS
CONCERNS ARE OR VOICE OPPOSITION
TO THE BILL.
OKAY SING AND THE ITEM IS NOW
BEFORE THE COMMITTEE FOR
QUESTIONS COMMENTS THOUGHTS.
TO MOVE ANY THOUGHTS CENTER PAN
ANY QUESTIONS.
OKAY.
.
ALRIGHT SO.
ASSEMBLY MAY CLOSE.
AB TWO THOUSAND ONE TAKES THE
FIRST STEP IN PROVIDING FOR
CONSISTENCY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF
THESE PROGRAMS STATEWIDE
VALUABLE TOOL AND WE MOVE AS WE
MOVE FORWARD IN PROVIDING THE
HIGHEST QUALITY. OF CHILDCARE
OPTIONS FOR FAMILIES ESPECIALLY
THOSE WITH INFANTS AND TODDLERS.
THERE HAS BEEN NO REGISTERED
OPPOSITION TO THE BILL AND I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR AYE
VOTE. THANK YOU THANK YOU SO
MUCH ALRIGHT SO THE BY BILLS
MOVE BY SENATE LEYVA. TACTIC IS
KALRA. ITEM FOR AB TWO ZERO ZERO
ONE THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO
APPROPRIATIONS ALLEN AYE ALLEN
AYE WILK AYE WILK AYE GALGIANI.
GALGIANI I LEAVE THAT LEAVE THE
AYE PAN PAN AYE BIDAK BIDAK AYE.
OKAY SO THAT BILL IS OUT
UNANIMOUSLY GRADUATION SO MEMBER
THANK YOU SO.
THE TWO OF YOU FOR COMING IN TO
TESTIFY.
AND WITHOUT FURTHER ADO WE
APPRECIATE SOME MEMBER GLORIA'S.
VERY.
ADMIRAL PATIENCE AND WE HOPE YOU
WOULD COME WITH A.
PUT SOME ADORNMENTS.
FOR THIS PRESENTATION PERFECT.
PLACE EVEN FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF
OKAY HIRING HIRING IDEA THAT'S
TRUE WE CAN.
CAN I CHECK IT BEFORE THEY HATCH
WELL WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING
HERE ASSEMBLY MEMBER TO PRESENT
YOUR BILL.
AND IT LOOKS VERY FAMILIAR.
IT'S AB TWELVE FORTY EIGHT AND
WE APPRECIATE YOUR. BEING HERE.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN AND
THANK YOU FOR LET ME PRESENT ON
AB TWELVE FORTY EIGHT OF THE
BILL THIS BILL AIMS TO ENHANCE
DIVERSITY CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS BY
PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF
STUDENTS TO OUR CULTURAL
ADORNMENTS. AT THEIR GRADUATION
CEREMONIES AS MANY OF YOU MAY
KNOW UNDER EXISTING LAW SCHOOL
DISTRICTS ARE PERMITTED TO
DEVELOP REASONABLE DRESS CODE
POLICIES THAT FOSTER POSITIVE
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND PROTECT
THE HEALTH AND SAFETY. OF THE
SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT UNFORTUNATELY
SOME SCHOOL DISTRICTS HAVE IN MY
VIEW UNJUSTLY ENFORCED THE DRESS
CODE POLICIES TO PROHIBIT
APPROPRIATE CULTURAL ADORNMENTS
AT THEIR GRADUATION.
AND THESE.
INSTANCES ARE HAPPENING ACROSS
CALIFORNIA AND I THINK ARE
WORTHY OF SOME ACTION AS THE
CHAIR HAD MENTIONED.
THIS BILL MAY SEEM FAMILIAR TO
YOU BECAUSE THIS COMMITTEE
PREVIOUSLY UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
A SIMILAR BILL AB TWO THIRTY
THREE LAST YEAR ENFORCING THAT
BILL WAS VETOED BY GOVERNOR
BROWN. CITING HIS BEEN IN HIS
VETO MESSAGE HE CITED HIS BELIEF
THIS ELECTED SCHOOL BOARDS ARE
BATS PRES POSITION TO MAKE
JUDGEMENTS ABOUT GRADUATION
ATTIRE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE
COMMENTS I IN THE BILL
COMMITTEES ANALYSIS ABOUT
WHETHER THIS BILL SHOULD PASS
AND GIVEN THAT IT'S
SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THE
BILL. GIVE IT BY THE PAST YEAR.
I WANTED SUBMIT ADMIT THAT I
EXPRESS OUT DIE HAVE A BIT OF
FRUSTRATION I THAT WE HAVE NOT
HAD PROGRESSED FURTHER AND THIS
DISCUSSION A PART OF THAT IS
BECAUSE OF THE OPPOSITION.
AND I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO
COMMUNICATE IN THE WAY THAT I
WOULD LIKE TO TRY AND GET PAST
THEIR OPPOSITION.
BY OFFICES TRY TO ENGAGE THE
OPPONENT SEVERAL TIMES AND
REGRETTABLY WE HAVEN'T REACHED
POTENTIAL OR SUBSTITUTE FEEDBACK.
I'M WHILE THE OPPOSITION MIGHT
APPRECIATE THE GOVERNOR'S VETO
MESSAGE FROM AB TWO THIRTY THREE
IT IS CLEAR THAT THE GOVERNOR
AYE AND SCHOOL BOARDS TO
DISAGREE ON THE CURRENT STATE OF
THE LAW. AS URINALYSIS NOTES THE
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS
ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THAT THEY
HAVE THE RIGHT TO TO PROHIBIT
IMPORT IMPORTANT CULTURAL ITEMS
UNDER EXISTING CASE LAW. HOWEVER
GOVERNOR BROWN AND HIS MESSAGE
EYES DECIDED THAT THESE ARE AYE
THIS RIGHT TO WEAR CULTURE
ADORNMENTS IS LONG ESTABLISHED
AND THEREFORE THE BILL IS NOT
NECESSARY. YOU CAN SEE THE
TENSION THAT WE'RE TRYING TO
ADDRESS WITH THIS BILL.
SO THAT'S THE OPPOSITION IS THE
GOVERNOR'S ANALYSIS CORRECT AND
CAN WE AGREE THAT THE CURRENT
STATE OF LAW.
IT ON THE CURRENT STATE OF LAW
AND ORDER CRAFT LEGISLATION TO
PRESERVE THE RIGHTS OF THE
STUDENTS.
TODAY I'M ASKING NOT ONLY FOR
YOUR SUPPORT BUT TO ASK YOU TO
ENCOURAGE THE OPPOSITION TO ROLL
UP YOUR SLEEVES AND TO WORK WITH
ME ON CRAFTING A FAIR POCKET
SENSIBLE POLICY FOR CALIFORNIA.
THIS BILL PASSED THE COMMITTEE
UNANIMOUSLY LAST YEAR BECAUSE I
THINK WE ALL AGREE THAT STUDENTS
HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY HOMAGE TO
THEIR CULTURAL TRADITIONS AND
THAT OUGHT TO BE PRESERVED. THIS
BILL REALLY SHOULDN'T BE THAT
COMPLICATED AND I BELIEVE THAT
THE IF THE OPPOSITION CAN WORK
SERIOUSLY WITH ME WE CAN CRAFT A
CONSENSUS BILL AND SETTLE THIS
ISSUE ONCE AND FOR ALL. AYE WITH
ME THIS MORNING I HAVE COLLEGE
TREAT TO TESTIFY IN SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIR OF A MISTER VICE
CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE
PUBLIC TREAT ON BEHALF OF THE
PECHANGA AND COLUSA TRIBES. I'M
ALL MAKE IT SHORT ALTHOUGH I
THINK HE'S INTO LIKE LONG
TESTIMONY.
UP JUST GETTING.
.
A ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE.
WHAT WITH THAT WE WENT THROUGH
IN THE LAST TWO YEARS OF GOING
THROUGH THIS WITH AND THANK YOU
ASSEMBLY MEMBER GLORIA?
IT'S THE FACT THAT IT IT FOR PER
CHILD AND COLUSA THERE ARE
CERTAIN RITES OF PASSAGE WITHIN
THE TROUBLE COMMUNITY.
OF.
EAGLE FEATHER THE CAN ONLY BE
OWNED OR OR OR HELD BY A TRIBAL
MEMBER OR IN THE CASE OF THE
JUNGLE WE HAVE A SASH.
THAT IS MADE WITH THE PECHANGA
COLORS ON IT TALKING ABOUT THE
FACT THAT YOU'RE ENTERING INTO
ADULTHOOD IT'S A PART OF THEIR
TRIBAL CULTURAL. A EXCHANGE THEY
HAVE WITH THE KIDS AS THEY GROW
INTO ADULTHOOD. WE HAVE HAD ON
ANY GIVEN YEAR IN OUR SCHOOL
DISTRICTS
ONE YEAR IT'S OKAY TO WEAR ONE
YEAR IT'S NOT OKAY TO WEAR IT SO
YOUR BROTHER GOT TO WEAR BUT NOW
THE SISTER DOESN'T GET TO WEAR
WHEN SHE GOES THROUGH. IT
THERE'S NO CONSISTENCY
WHATSOEVER IT'S NOT CLUB THAT WE
HAVE AT PACHANGA OR COLUSA IT IS
CULTURAL. HERITAGE THAT THEY'RE
VERY PROUD OF.
THE PROBLEM IS IS THAT WHAT YOU
DO HAVE A DIATRIBE LIKE COLUSA
OR PECHANGA WHO ACTUALLY CAN
AFFORD TOURNEY'S WHEN THIS IS
BROUGT UP. MENU GOING TO
LAWSUITS OR WITH OR OR SOME OF
THE TRIBES HAVE TO GO SEE I'LL
ASK WHICH IS THAT IT INDIAN
LEGAL SERVICES WE SHOULDN'T HAVE
TO DO THAT. NOT FOR SOMETHING
THAT'S PART OF OF YOUR BEING SO
I NOT ONLY COURAGE YOU TO
SUPPORT THIS I WOULD VERY MUCH
LIKE TO SEE AS MANY CO AUTHORS
ON THIS BILL AS POSSIBLE.
THANK YOU.
FOLKS WHO WANNA PUT THEIR
SUPPORT FOR THE BILL.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
JAMES JACK HERE ON BEHALF OF THE
SAFETY NETS BAND OF CHUMASH
INDIANS IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU.
CARE MEMBERS ON FLAT AGAIN ON
BEHALF OF SQUAD DRIVE IN SAN
DIEGO STRONG SUPPORT.
AT THE SHORE ON BEHALF OF THE
ACLU CALIFORNIA AND STRONG
SUPPORT.
MORNING SONICALLY OF US ON
BEHALF OF THE VIA. COMMUNITY
INDIA AND THE HOW ABOUT MENTAL
PROM OF UPPER LAKE IN THE CREEK
TRIBE YOU.
I TIFFANY PULLEYBLANK AT
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL
WORKERS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER IN
STRONG SUPPORT.
CHAIRMAN IN TWENTY REYES
MUSCULAR CHRIS LUNCHEON WITH THE
CALIFORNIA TRIBAL BUSINESS
ALLIANCE IN SUPPORT.
GOOD MORNING BLESSED GONZALEZ ON
BEHALF OF WILL TO INJURY AND
SUPPORT.
LIKE THE LINES ON BEHALF OF
TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA IN
SUPPORT ALRIGHT THANK YOU ARE SO THE
MATTER IS OF SORRY OPPOSITION
YES OPPOSITION I'M SO OUT OF IT
TODAY.
YEAH.
I'M NOT GONNA MAKE A JOKE ON THE
MICROPHONE. ALRIGHT.
YOU'RE VERY WELCOME TO THE DYESS.
MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS AND TO TRY
TO SUSPEND ALSO WITH THE
AFOREMENTIONED CALIFORNIA SCHOOL
BOARDS ASSOCIATION.
I AM A LITTLE SURPRISED TO HEAR
THE AUTHORS SAY THAT. THAT WE
HAVE NOT ENGAGED MEANINGFULLY ON
A SUBSTANTIAL MANNER.
WE'VE SPENT THE PAST YEAR
ASKING TO TO ENGAGE WITH THE
AUTHORS OFFICE AND ONLY RECENTLY.
RECEIVED A REQUEST TO DO THAT
AND I I THOUGHT WE WERE.
STILL DISCUSSING THE THING GOOD
FAITH.
WE HAVE PROVIDED IN MY OPINION
SUBSTANTIAL.
I FEEL HAS ENGAGED OUTSIDE
ATTORNEYS WHO ARE EXPERTS IN
THIS MATTER AND FROM THE VERY
BEGINNING.
HAVE TRIED TO FIND A WAY.
TO TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. TO FIND
A WAY THAT WOULD ALLOW ELEAZAR
TO SELECTIVELY ALLOW THE
EXPRESSION THAT THIS BILL WOULD
LIKE US TO PROVIDE.
UNFORTUNATELY WE CAN'T DO THAT
ALIAS CANNOT SELECTIVELY ALLOW
STUDENT EXPRESSION.
WE COULD NOT FIND A WAY TO
ALLOW EAGLE FEATHERS BUT NOT
ALLOW STUDENT WHO SAYS THAT.
WEARING A STILL WITH THE VIRGIN
MARY ON IT.
IS IT'S AN EXPRESSION OF THEIR
MEXICAN HERITAGE WE COULD NOT
FIND A WAY TO ALLOW EAGLE
FEATHERS AND NOT ALLOW A STUDENT
WHO SAYS THAT.
THE CONFEDERATE FLAG IS A IS A
SYMBOL OF THEIR SOUTHERN
HERITAGE.
WE WE HAVE CERTAINLY TRIED BUT
WE'VE WE HAVE BEEN TOLD BY OUR
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT THAT AMOUNTS
TO VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION IT
CREATES AN ISSUE AND I KNOW YOU
WANT TO STAY AWAY FROM THE NITTY
GRITTY. LEGAL ASPECTS AND SAY
THAT FOR JUDICIARY BUT IT
CREATES AN ISSUE WHERE.
THIS IS CALLED A CLOSED FORUM
WHICH MEANS ANY.
POLITICAL.
CULTURAL RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION
THAT WE ALLOW TO HAPPEN. IN A
FORM THAT WE CONTROL AS A PUBLIC
AGENCY IS ASSUMED TO BE AN
EXPRESSION OF THE PUBLIC AGENCY.
SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE
NOT ALLOWED TO DO AS AS A TAX
SUPPORTED PUBLIC AGENCY.
THAT IS ONE OF THE
RESPONSIBILITIES THAT OUR SCHOOL
SITE LEADERS AND OUR SCHOOL
BOARD MEMBERS HAVE. TO TO ENSURE
THAT WE ARE NOT.
THAT WE ARE NOT ALLOWING OUR
RESOURCES ARE EVENTS TO TO
CONVEY SOMETHING THAT THEY
SHOULD NOT.
THE. PERSON RAISES THE QUESTION
OF WHAT IS THE DISRUPTION. THE
DISRUPTION. EFFECTIVELY OCCURS
WHEN.
WHEN THIS COMMITTEE PUSH
SOMETHING DOWN TO THE LOCALS
THAT SAYS.
FIGURE IT OUT AND IN OUR QUEST
TO FIGURE IT OUT WE WILL HAVE
STUDENTS SHOWING UP THE DAY OF
GRADUATION AND ADMINISTRATORS
TRYING TO FIGURE IT OUT. THAT IS
WHERE THE DISRUPTION COMES.
BECAUSE WE CANNOT DISCRIMINATE
AGAINST VIEW POINTS.
THE ONLY LEGALLY DEFENSIBLE AND
FOR US IS TO ALLOW EVERYTHING.
AND IF WE ALLOW EVERYTHING THEN
WE ARE NOT.
ABIDING BY THE LAWS THAT SAY
THAT WE CAN'T.
REPRESENT CERTAIN OF VIEWPOINT
AS OUR OWN AND WE ARE NOT
PROTECTING SCHOOL CLIMB.
AND IT'S VERY EASY WHEN YOU'RE
SELECTIVE ANDONLY TALKING ABOUT
EAGLE FEATHERS AND KENTE CLOTH
THINKS THAT A LOT OF US MAY HAVE.
VERY POSITIVE FEELINGS ABOUT.
TO TRY TO TO MAKE THIS LOOK
LIKE THAT THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IN
WHICH WE'RE OPERATING WERE ALSO
YASSER.
BUSINESS ESSENTIALLY WHAT'S
HAPPENING NOW NEW BEFORE THE
SPILL SUITS HIM RIGHT NOW SCHOOL
BOARD SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS ARE
HAVING TO MAKE THOSE JUDGMENT
CALLS ON THE GROUND TODAY. PETER
Y. NEAR THERE ACCEPTING EAGLE
FEATHER ANOTHER YOU THEY'RE NOT.
ARGUABLY THEY'RE ACTUALLY IN
MORE JEOPARDY NOW BECAUSE THEY
DID THE RULE THE LAW HAS
SO LITTLE CLARITY.
AND IT PUTS.
THE MINISTERS AND A IN IT IN AS
YOU A IN IN MORE OF A TWILIGHT
ZONE.
YOU DON'T KNOW AYE I WOULD
CERTAINLY SAY THAT ANY ACTIVITY
DISTRICT THAT IS NOT CONSISTENT
YEAR OVER YEAR NEEDS TO REMEDY
THAT SO WITHIN AN ALLEY AND THAT
CERTAINLY DO NEED TO HAVE THEIR
OWN CONSISTENT POLICIES. BUT
FROM MALEATE TO LA A THAT THAT'S
WHERE OUR CONCERN WITH THE BILL
COME.
SO A THOUGH THE LOCALS ARE THE
ONES WHO WOULD KNOW FOR EXAMPLE
IF THEY HAVE A GANG PROBLEM IF
THEY HAVE A NEO* PROBLEM IF
THEY HAVE.
AN INFLUX OF MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS
WHERE IF SOMEONE WANTS TO DO A
CAMPAIGN OF WEARING A STOLE THAT
SAYS JESUS SAVES OUR JOHN THREE
SIXTEEN IT MEANS SOME.
THEN A SINCERE EXPRESSION.
THE LOCALS WOULD KNOW THAT AND
AND THIS SHOULD IT'S TABLETS A
CONSISTENT POLICY AND DEFINITELY
NOT CHANGED THAT YEAR OR THE
YEAR.
SO THINGS THAT WOULD BE.
PREVENTED BY THIS BILL SO.
AYE I WILL TRY TO CLOSE I KNOW
THIS COMMITTEE HAS HAS DISCUSSED
AND APPROVE THIS BILL BEFORE SO.
BE NO WE HAVE REALLY TRIEDTO
FIND A WAY TO MAKE THIS WORK
WE'VE WORKED CONSISTENTLY OVER
THE PAST TWO YEARS AND.
WE WE WOULD LIKE
FOR.
PEOPLE TO HAVE THE RIGHTS OF
THIS BILL WOULD WOULD CREATE BUT
ON BALANCE A A NICE TO HAVE.
IN A IN A PUBLIC FORUM IN AN
EDUCATIONAL CEREMONY.
JUST DOESN'T NO WAY FOR US THE
DISRUPTION IT WOULD CAUSE AND
THE THE VERY CLEAR LAWSUIT
THAT WOULD RESULT. OF FROM THIS
AND I SAY THAT AS SOMEONE WHO
HAILS FROM THE DISTRICT THAT WAS
SUED FOR ALLOWING UNDER GOD IN
THE PLEDGE.
SO SO WE READ THIS BILL AS
ACTUALLY CREATING MORE
LITIGATION AGAINST US THEN THE
STATUS QUO SO RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR HER NUMBER.
YEAH THIS IS ME THIS IS THAT IN
SOME RESPECTS.
I'M.
YOU KNOW I'M A RECEIPT
SUBMISSIVE GETS GETS LOOKED AT
IT OVER JUDICIARY BUT.
.
YOU KNOW IT'S IT IN SOME WAYS
WHETHER WE HAVE THE BILL ARE NOT
THE ISSUES REMAIN.
AND I'M NOT EVEN SURE THAT.
I KNOW THE BILL THE BILL KIND
SHIFTS THE.
THE THE PENDULUM TOWARD.
TOWARD ACCEPTING.
BUT IT EAT BUT STILL UNDER THE
BILL I THE LOCALS MAKE A
DECISION AS TO WHETHER.
SOMETHING WOULD ACCOUNT.
WHAT WOULD WOULD RESULT IN A
SUBSTANTIAL DISRUPTIONWHICH IS
ESSENTIALLY THAT JUDGMENT
BECAUSE ARE MAKING? TODAY RIGHT
YOU JUST TALKED ABOUT HOW THE
LOCALS.
WOULD KNOW IF THEY HAVE ANY ARE
NOT THE PROBLEM ON CAMPUS.
AND. BAKED UNDER THIS BILL-WHAT'S STOPPING THEM AS WRITTEN
WHAT'S STOPPING THEM FROM MAKING
A JUDGMENT CALL WE GOT AND
YOU'RE NOT SUPERMARKET PRESS.
SO THIS PARTICULAR TYPE OF
INSIGNIA WOULD CREATE A
SUBSTANTIAL DISRUPTION SO UNDER
THIS BILL THEY WOULD STILL BE
ABLE TO.
BUT I.
UNDER THIS BILL.
THE RIGHTS IT CREATES ARE NOT
WITHSTANDING ANY OTHER ANY OTHER.
CODES ACTUALLY FORGET WHAT THE
WHAT THE WORDING IS IN THE BILL
SO WE READ THIS AS CREATING A
RIGHT THAT.
WE WE CANNOT.
CURB.
WELL BUT IT.
BUT SEE HERE IT'D.
IT SAYS THAT TIME.
IT PROHIBITS THE UP THE PREVIOUS
ITS PROVISIONS FOR ME CONSTRUED
TO LIMIT A LOCAL EDUCATIONAL
AGENCIES AUTHORITY TO PROHIBIT
AN ITEM THAT IS LIKELY TO CAUSE
ESSENTIAL ASSUMPTIONS. OF OR
INTERFERENCE WITH THE CEREMONY
OR TO EXPAND OUR DIMINISH
CERTAIN PEOPLE RIGHTS.
SO.
ARE. YOU ALREADY GOT SO THERE
THERE'S SO I DID AS YOU SAID
THERE'S ALREADY ROOM FOR LOTS OF
LITIGATION YOU'VE EXPERIENCED IT
YOURSELF IN YOUR OWN SCHOOL
DISTRICT.
.
THE LAW THE LAW THE FIRST
AMENDMENT IS WHAT IT IS THERE A
LOT OF THERE'S A LOT OF A
JURISPRUDENCE ON ON QUESTIONS OF
STEW NEXT QUESTION SCHOOL.
I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER THIS
REALLY. AYE I DO SEE THIS BILL
IS KIND OF SHIFTING.
THE MOVIE THE BROADER JUDGMENT
CALL ON ACCEPTING CULTURAL
ADORNMENTS A LITTLE BIT MORE
TOWARD THE STUDENT EXPRESSION
SIDE. AS OPPOSED TO RESOLVING OR
CREATING.
OR DIMINISHING OR INCREASING.
LITIGATION IN THIS AREA BECAUSE
I THINK BILL EDUCATION IS GOING
TO BE THERE WHETHER WE HAVE THE
BILL ARE NOT AND.
SO THAT'S MY SENSE OF BUT I I
YOU KNOW YOU AS YOU SAY YOU HAVE
YOUR OWN LITIGATION YOU'RE
DEALING WITH RIGHT NOW IN YOUR
OWN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT IS.
WITHOUT THIS BILL HAVING THE
PAST.
UNRELATED TO GRADUATIONS RIGHT
BUT IT BUT IT'S RELATED TO
STUDENT EXPRESSION.
WHO BRIGHT?
AND ULTIMATELY THE SAME ISSUES.
COME INTO PLAY.
MY QUESTION TO YOU THAT MISTER
AUTHOR IS YOU KNOW IDON'T SO AS
A MATTER I SUPPORT THIS BILL
LAST YEAR CERTAINLY.
AS A MATTER OF COURSE I DON'T
LOVE JUST.
KICKING BACK THE EXACT SAME BILL
GOVERNOR THAT HE VETOED LAST
YEAR I UNDERSTAND IF THERE IS A
NEW GOVERNOR.
I'M RECONSIDERING THE BILL
WITHOUT IN MIND BUT WHY.
YOU KNOW ARE YOU.
YOU KNOW I MASSING UP PURPOSELY
PROVOCATIVE QUESTION BUT ANYWAYS
IN THE COMMITTEE'S TIME. BY
GIVING US THE EXACT SAME GARBAGE
THAT THE GOVERNOR VETOED LAST
YEAR.
.
NO AND LET MAKES LACY Y.
THINKABLE PART OF WHY WE'RE HERE
IS THE GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE
INDICATED UP ESSENTIALLY WHAT
YOU ARE THE SAME WHICH IS
STUDENTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO WEAR
THIS. BUT NATURALLY IN WERE
ALMOST A GRADUATION SEASON I
GUARANTEE YOU YOU'RE GOING TO
SEEK.
PROHIBITED FROM
SEE WEARING CULTURAL.
A RIGHT THAT THE GOVERNOR NOW
HAS EXPRESSLY PUBLICLY STATED
THEY HAVE UNDER THE LAW WE HAVE
SCHOOL BOARD TO SCHOOL DISTRICTS
THAT WILL PERMIT OUR CHILDREN TO
DO THAT. SO WHILE THE GOVERNOR'S
AYE I THINK PART OF WHY I'M HERE
IS THIS IS HAPPENING. THE
GOVERNOR SAYS THEY'RE ALLOWED TO
DO IT I THINK THE BILL IS WORTHY
BECAUSE IT CLARIFIES THIS AND
HOPEFULLY REDUCE SOME LEVEL OF
LITIGATION THAT OUR COMMUNITY
SOME LEVEL CONFLICT A GRADUATE.
GRADUATION SHOULD BE THAT
CELEBRATION NOT LITIGATION AND
YET THAT IS EXATLY WHAT IT IS
THIS BILL WILL CLARIFY AND WOULD
HOPEFULLY REDUCE HINATA
LITIGATION TO THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT DEAL WITH. SO IT'S YOUR
THOUGHT THAT ARE DEAD.
DIDN'T IT'S GRADUATION SEASON
MAY.
GEN UP SOME CASES YOU WILL SEE
THEM EVERY SINGLE YEAR THAT'S
PRECISELY WHY THE BILL IS
NECESSARY AS MYSTERY WAS
EXPLAINED JUST WITHIN HER. A TWO
TRIBES THAT SHE REPRESENTS
EXPERIENCES ON A YEAR TO YEAR.
BUT IN ADDITION THIS BILL LAST
YEAR I DID AS THE INVOLVED
MEMBER OF THE.
OF AND DAVE MAC AND.
YOU'RE RIGHT THIS IS PERSONAL TO
ME BUT I GOT LETTERS FROM
AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS WHO
FROM NOT FROM ITS WORK CAN TAKE
CLASS AND THE LIST GOES ON AND
ON. THIS IS NOT A UNIQUE OR
INFREQUENT OCCURRENCE THIS DOES
HAPPEN ACROSS THE STATE I
GUARANTEE YOU WILL START
HAPPENING NEXT MONTH AND WHEN
THEY DO MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE
OF THOSE CHILDREN THAT ARE CHAO
SCRIPT TO SPINNING THEIR
GRADUATION CEREMONIES. CARRIES A
COPY OF THE GOVERNOR'S VETO
MESSAGE WHICH WILL SHOW IT TO
THEIR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR AND
TELL THEM THAT THEY DO HAVE
IDENTICAL LA AND IT'S ON ALL OF
US TO CHANGE THIS LAW TO MAKE IT
MORE EXPRESSLY CLEAR. SO THOSE
KIDS DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT BUT
THEN ENJOY THEIR CEREMONY WHILE
WEARING A CANTICLE WHAT HARM
DOES IT DO AND I WANT TO SAY FOR
THE RECORD BECAUSE I THINK IT'S
PART OF THE WHERE THE SAME. A
KENTE CLOTH AN EAGLE FEATHERS
HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
CONFEDERATE FLAG OR ANY OTHER
SORT OF RACIST RELIGIOUS
STATEMENT THAT IS NOT MORE TALK
ABOUT COST TIENEN CULTURAL
ADORNMENTS.
I'M.
YEAH I MEAN THAT'S THE TYPE I.
TEN AGREES YOU BUT I CAN YOU
KNOW THE LAWYER IN ME SEES HOW
SOME FOLKS CAN MAKE A A MAKING
OPPOSITE ARGUMENT.
WE WE CAN CERTAINLY WORK TO
CLARIFY THAT IMMEDIATE THERE'S
LANGUAGE THAT LIVING JUDICIAL
PROBABLY WORK WITH US ON THIS
PARTICULAR MATTER. BUT YOU KNOW
TO CONFLATE THE ISSUES ON WHAT
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE WE'RE
TALKING ABOUT CULTURAL ARE.
ADORNMENTS NOT OTHER FOR HAVE
FORMS OF POLITICAL EXPRESSION
AND WE HAVE A CAR BUT WITHIN THE
BILL THIS IS IF IT'S BELIEVED TO
BE DISRUPTIVE THEY WON'T BE
ALLOWED PER RIGHT NOW WE'RE
HAVING SIX STUDENTS WRITING A
PERMITTED TO WEAR COTTON BUT
HARM IS THAT WAY. WHAT GUIDED MY
SCHOOL I WORE A BIG PASSED OUT
OF THE?
HAWAIIAN LEIS ON A HAWAIIAN AT
BELOW THAT EVERYTHING THAT ONE
NOT THAT BUT I WAS COMMITTED TO
WEAR THAT BUT WE KNOW THAT MANY
OF THE OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS
MAY NOT WILL THIS. INCONSISTENCY
IS WEIRD ANDIN DESERVES
CLARIFICATION I DECIDE WHICH IS
JUST.
SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT THE WHOLE
DEBATE OVER THE CONFEDERATE FLAG
AT RECENTLY HAS BEEN.
BOB VERY MUCH ALONG THE LINES OF
WHAT YOU DESCRIBE SOME PEOPLE.
LOOKING AT IT AS A YOU KNOW AS A.
YEAH I WAS VERY DIFFERENT.
AND OTHERS SAYING THAT IT IS
JUST A CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS
CULTURAL ADORNMENTS.
IT IS A FLAG IT'S A POLITICAL
STATEMENT OR TALKING TO HEAR A
CULTURAL. THAT IT WOULD OU
CULTURAL THING I MEAN I I EAGLE
FEATHER HAS CULTURAL
SIGNIFICANCE IT AND IT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THIS TIME
PASSAGE FROM A CHILD.
TO ADULTHOOD
THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT
OKAY I AM DO THIS IS A YOU KNOW
PIN.
THIS IS IT THIS IS A FAST AND TO
BE I THINK HERE IN CALIFORNIA
MAYBE WE HAVE. MORE MORE.
.
THE AGREEMENT ON ON ON THE
QUESTION THE CONFEDERATE FLAG.
BUT CERTAINLY CAUSING WATER
CONSERVATION THE PARTS COUNTRY
AYE MR AYE SIR.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR I AGREE
WITH YOUR INITIAL ARGUMENT THAT
THIS ERRS ON THE SIDE OF OF
STUDENT CHOICE AND STUDENT
FREEDOM WHICH IS WHAT I WE WE
SHOULD ALL BE SUPPORTING. I LOVE
IT COOPER YOUR BILL.
WHO I'VE I VOTED FOR IN THE
PAST AND IN LOOKING AT LOOKING
AT HOW YOU PROGRESS SO FAR
YOU'VE ONLY GOT ONE NO VOTE? AND
THAT PERSON IS A DEFAULT NO VOTE
ON EVERYTHING SO THAT YOU GOT
YOU GOT KIND OF SET THAT ASIDE
AND I KNOW YOU'RE GONNA WORK
WITH EVERYBODY. AND I TELL YOU
I'M NOW ON MY SIX YEAR HERE IN
THE LEGISLATURE AND ONE OF MY
BIGGEST FRUSTRATIONS IS THAT WE
ARE CO EQUAL BRANCH OF
GOVERNMENT.
AND BUT WERE NOT TREATED AS SUCH
AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEEIF WE
HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE GOVERNOR
THIS TIME AROUND THAT WE DO A
VETO OVERRIDE. NOT ONLY BECAUSE
THIS IS A JUST CAUSE BUT TO TO
SEND A MESSAGE TO THE NEXT
GOVERNOR THAT WE ARE CO EQUAL
BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT AND YOU
MUST DEAL WITH US SO THANK YOU
FOR DEBT. THAT WAS MY OTHER
QUESTION.
IF WE'RE GONNA BRING IT BACK WHY
DIDN'T WE TRY FOR A VIEW THAT
OVERRIDE LAST YEAR.
IT'S ABOVE MY PAY GRADE SENATOR.
OKAY BUT.
MAYBE WE OUGHT OF I MEAN LOOK I
MEAN WE GOTTA BE CONSIDERING
THAT IF THAT'S IT BEFORE MISTER
CHAIR THROW YOU INTO YOU TO THE
VICE CHAIR WEREN'T. ALLOWED A CO
GOVERNMENT TOO SO. NATIVE
AMERICANS ARE INDEPENDENT
GOVERNMENTS ALL BY THEMSELVES
ALSO AND WE STILL CAN'T DO IT ON
THAT FACE YEAH.
ARIZONA DOES YOUR. MOM I TOO
WOULD LIKE TO CALL AUTHORED THE
BILL BACK ON BECAUSE I WAS A
STAFF PERSON A LONG TIME AGO IN
THE NINETIES I WORKED FOR
SENATOR PATRICK JOHNSON I
REMEMBER. THE CONVERSATION ABOUT
A YOUNG PEOPLE BEING ABLE TO
WEAR THE CURB PANS TO SCHOOL IN
THIS WOULD BE YOUNG SIKH
AMERICANS. AND. I BELIEVE MY
FORMER BOSS SENATOR PATRICK
JOHNSON CARRIED THE LEGISLATION
TO ALLOW FOR THAT I'VE BEEN
TRYING TO FIND IT AND I CAN'T. I
CAN'T FIND IT BECAUSE IT WAS
OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO ON BUT I
DID FIND SOMETHING HERE WARY IT
RIP REFERENCES IN A CALIFORNIA
CASE.
LITIGATED IN THE EARLY NINETEEN
NINETIES UNDER STANDARD THAT
REQUIRED REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGION THE
COURT CONCLUDED THAT SUCH A
COMPROMISE WAS POSSIBLE. THE
COURT FOUND THAT THE RISK POSED
BY THE CURB HAN COULD BE
ELIMINATED IF THE STUDENT WAS
REQUIRED TO KEEP THE CAR PANTS
BLADE DAHLE. AND DEMONSTRATE
THAT THE CAR PAN WAS
STONE TIGHTLY INTO ITS SHEATH SO
COULD NOT BE DRAWN.
IN A SIMILAR LAWSUIT IN CANADA
THE CANADIAN SUPREME COURT IN
TWO THOUSAND SIX RECOMMENDED THE
SAME ACCOMMODATION.
FOR SIX STUDENTS AND THAT
COUNTRY'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
WHEN I AM SUGGESTING IS THAT
BOTTOMS THE STAFF WHO ARE
WORKING ON THIS BILL LOOK TO
THAT PRESIDENT. AND NOT
DISCUSSION ON FROM TWENTY YEARS
AGO AND INCLUDE THAT IN THE
INFORMATION IN THE ANALYSIS SO
THAT THE GOVERNOR HAS. ANOTHER
PERSPECTIVE TO LOOK AT THIS FROM
HE GETS.
YOU KNOW THAT THOUSAND OVER A
THOUSAND BILLS THAT HE LOOKS
THAT TOWARD THE END OF SESSION
AND UNLESS YOU HAVE REASON TO
REMEMBER THIS DISCUSSION MOST
PEOPLE WOULDN'T REMEMBER IT BUT
I THINK IT'S. EXTREMELY
INSTRUCTIVE MOVING FORWARD AND
AGAIN I WOULD LIKE TO COST OF
THE BILL. EXERT I SHOULD YOU
BRING UP THE POINT IS THE
COMMUNITY ACTUALLY HAS BEEN
TOUCH ABOUT THE LAST BILL I'M
BECAUSE THEY CONTINUED
EXPERIENCES CHALLENGE.
SO IT'S GOOD TO KNOW I WILL
FOLLOW UP WITH YOU.
THANK YOU SURVIVE ACT.
THANK YOU BRING IN THE BILL
FORWARD I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO BE
ADDED AS A CO AUTHOR AND I THINK.
IT IS THAT WILL IN INTENT OF
THIS LEGISLATURE TO PASS THIS
AND I THINK WE NEED TO GO TO ALL
MEANS TO MAKE SURE GETS PASSES
HERE.
IT'S NOT ABOUT YOUR PAY GRADE.
I DON'T THINK FAILURE SERPENT.
I THINK YOU CHAIR.
SO THAT IT.
THREE.
SO I ASKED THEM IN THE. WHEN
THINGS THAT IS LOW.
CERTAIN ABOUT THAT DATA. THE
TESTIMONY HERE TODAY IS THAT I
HEARD YOU SAY SUMNER GLORIA THAT
YOU'VE BEEN TRYING TO WORK WITH
THE OPPOSITION THE OPPOSITION'S
BASICALLY CALLING YOU OUT FOR.
CAN YOU CAN YOU BEAR PERHAPS
ELABORATE WILL THEN HOW YOU
WORKED WITH THE OPPOSITION I
MEAN NIGHT I FIND REMARKABLE THE
OPPOSITION WITH.
WOOD SOLDIER. NOT ALLOW ME TO
RETORT PLEASES HER PADDLERS. SO
THEY HAVE A LOT OF THE DAY RIGHT
SOME OF THE SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
CAME AND VISITED ME THEY HAVE
NICE CONVERSATIONS BIOLAGE
KITCHEN FINANCE THE SORT OF
GENERAL BREAD AND BUTTER ISSUES
FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS YOU CAN
DEVOTE ALL OF TO THIS.
KENNEDY TO ASK THE QUESTION.
CIVIC MATTER UNDERSTANDING THAT
I'VE AND TENACIOUS.
BUT I MEAN IT IS THIS BILL AND
ASK THEM CAN I HAVE A
CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS. MARCH
FIFTEENTH.
THEY SAID THAT THEY WOULD IN
FACT GET PEOPLE IN TOUCH WITH ME
NOTHING HAPPENED UNTIL APRIL
THIRD WHEN WE ASKED AGAIN FOR
MEETING.
FROM THE SCHOOL BOARDS
ASSOCIATION APRIL FIFTH WE GOT
THE MEETING TWO DAYS LATER. THAT
TIME WE ASK FOR FEEDBACK ON THAT
MATTER WAS CHAIR THAT THEY NEED
TO HAVE LEGAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED.
I TWO WEEKS PASSED NOTHING WAS
SAID AYE WE CHECKED IN ON APRIL
SEVENTEENTH GET NOTHING BACK.
ON THE FOURTH WE RECEIVED
INFORMATION THERE LOT LETTER OF
OPPOSITION SO.
WE DID HAVE ALL LAST YEAR.
THERE'S REFLEXIVE OPPOSITION
THEY DON'T WANT TO SUPPORT THIS
BECAUSE I THINK THEY SEE IT AS
AS I'M.
INFRINGE UPON THEIR ABILITIES
BUT AS THIS PICTURE MY THINK
RIGHTLY POINT OUT THEY'RE
ALREADY DEALING WITH THIS
PROBLEM AND WE CAN PROVIDE THE
LEGAL CLARITY THAT I THINK WOULD
ARM THEIR LOCAL SCHOOL.
ADMINISTRATORS THE ABILITY TO
HANDLE THIS THING A LITTLE MORE
ELEGANTLY THEY CURRENTLY DO.
BUT NO MY STAFF IS SUBSISTENCE
FOOD HAS MADE CONSISTENT
PERSISTENT EFFORTS
TO GET FEEDBACK ON THIS MATTER
WHAT WE HAVE IS IN OPPOSITION.
OKAY NO I I APPRECIATE YOUR
COUNTING THAT I MEAN IT'S
CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND WE ALL WERE.
WE'RE OUT HERE IN THE
LEGISLATURE WE UNDERSTAND THAT.
WE HAVE DISCUSSIONS THAT
SOMETIMES OUT WE CAN GET TO A
PLACE WHERE THE OPPOSITION COMES
OFF BY JUST FIND REMARKABLE THAT
ACCUSATIONS THROWN BACK THAT.
DIDN'T EVEN TRY REACHING OUT AND
I I THINK THAT'S A LITTLE
DISTURBING TO ME BECAUSE.
.
FIND WE CAN YELL THAT THAT'S A
VERY DIFFERENT FRAME THAN SAYING
OHL CAN COME TO AN AGREEMENT
SO.
I MEAN DAD WE CERTAINLY
UNDERSTAND THAT HAPPENS.
I GUESS THE OTHER POINT I'D.
I WANT TO ASK AND MAYBE IT'S
PRIME MORE.
MIGHT GET FLESHED OUT MORE
JUDICIARY BUT ON THAT AND
JUDICIARY SENT TO MY OPPORTUNITY
ASK IS THAT.
SO THINKING ABOUT WHAT WE
CURRENTLY REQUIRE STUDENTS TO
WEAR A GRADUATION.
I THINK MOST GRADUATIONS AND
KNOW THAT OF MY SEEDS THEY SCORE
MAYBE I'M MISSING SOME.
THERE WILL WEARING A COSTUME
THAT.
.
HAS CERTAIN CULTURAL
SIGNIFICANCE AND NOT ONE THAT
YOU SEE PEOPLE WALKING AROUND ON
THE STREETS EVERYDAY.
ACTUALLY HAS ITS ROOTS I THINK
AND WESTERN EUROPEAN CULTURE AT.
SOME SORT OF FUNNY HT WITH A
MORTARBOARD IT DOWN.
.
HOW DO YOU KNOW IT ISN'T ISN'T
THAT IN ITSELF THAT REQUIREMENT
TO WEAR THAT COSTUME ITSELF A?
CULTURAL REQUIREMENT.
I MEAN DEBTS.
AND IF YOU CAN REQUIRE SOMEONE
IS.
TO WEAR A PARTICULAR COSTUME.
AT.
AND EVENTS.
BUT SO THE TRAY VENT CERTAINLY
IT'S SLEEK CULTURALLY TO THAT
CELEBRATION.
I I JUST DON'T SEE WHY YOU
CAN'T CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF
IT.
TO ALLOW OTHER THINGS OF. OTHER
ITEMS OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE
AND STILL NOT BE ABLE TO CREATE
REASONABLE BOUNDARIES.
TO.
TO PREVENT YOU KNOW DISRUPTION
AND ARE ARE ARE ARE NOT SO DO
DISPLAY TORY EXPRESSIONS I MEAN
I I DID I JUST I JUST FIND IT.
CURIOUS IN MY MIND OF THAT.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT CULTURAL
EXPRESSION IN YET WHAT WOULD
HAVE ACTUALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING
IS WE HAVE SCHOOL DISTRICTS
REQUIRING.
STUDENTS TO ACTUALLY BE COSTUMED
IN THE GARB THAT REFLEXIVITY
COLOR CULTURE THAT ISN'T
ACTUALLY EVEN NECESSARILY.
.
AQUACULTURE.
I THINK THAT'S WHAT HE DOES NOT
HAVE HAY FEVER.
THANK YOU I KNOW THAT NEEDS A
GOOD JOINT VERY QUICK YOU WANT
TO RESPOND RECOVERING OAKLEY AND
AND OF COURSE I AGREE WITH.
THE CHRONOLOGY THAT THE AUTHORS.
SENATOR PAN RAISE THE ISSUE.
WE HAVE REACHED OUT THROUGH THE
LIFE OF THE PRECEDING BILL AB
TWO THIRTY THREE AND THEN THE
TIME AFTER THE VETO OF THAT
UNDERSTANDING FROM STAFF THAT
THERE WAS A DESIRE TO TO
CONTINUE WORKING ON THIS ISSUE.
I HAVE EMAILS AT LEAST THREE
DIFFERENT OCCASIONS REACHED OUT
TO THE AUTHORS OFFICE ASKING TO
MEET TO DISCUSS THESE ISSUES AND
WAS REFUSED EVERY SINGLE TIME.
SO JUST INSTEAD ISSUE WAS RAISED.
I REGRET THAT THERE MAY HAVE
BEEN A MISCOMMUNICATION
SOMEWHERE BUT WE HAVE BEEN
CONSISTENTLY REACHING OUT TRYING
TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE.
I HAVE TO SAY THAT'S NOT PART
THAT'S NOT CONSISTENT WITH MY
UNDERSTANDING FROM OUR STAFF SO.
EMAILS TO THE AUTHOR STAFF NOT
COMMITTEES.
MMHM OKAY.
.
I DON'T KNOW I'M NOT GONNA
BEHIND ON THAT BUT I'M ANYWAY
ARE LOOK I MEAN I THINK
ULTIMATELY.
I ICED I STAND BY MY COUNT
PREVIOUS ARAB COMMENTS THAT
THEY'D THEY'D THE THE ISSUE THIS
DOESN'T RESOLVE THESE THESE
THESE ISSUES IT A BIT BUT BUT
THIS BILL ULTIMATELY.
TEXAS AS A STEP IN THE DIRECTION
STUDENT FREEDOM I THINK
APPROPRIATELY SO.
I DO THINK THAT. YOU KNOW I'M.
THE VAST MAJORITY OF OF. OF.
I EGGMAN EVERYBODY IN OUR STATE
WOULD WOULD SEE.
THE CONFEDERATE FLAG ADORNMENT
DIFFERENTLY THAN.
THAT EAGLE FEATHER IT WITHIN
THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBSTANTIAL
DISRUPTION LANGUAGE IT'S IN YOUR
BILL. AND SO I I JUST THAT I
THINK IT'S A REASONABLE AND I
I'M AND SUPPORTED AGAIN
THIS YEAR.
AND.
.
YOU KNOWTHAT'S MY FEELING I I'D
DIE I HEAR YOU I HEAR YOU ON
THIS LITIGATION QUESTION BUT I I
DON'T THINK THAT.
BICU THOUGHT OF THE D.
RESOLVE THE LITIGATION QUESTION
NOW UNDER THE CURRENT. LAW.
SO I MISTER CHAIR BASED ON SOME
OF THE BILL BILL ALRIGHT SO
LET'S SAN LET'S.
GASTRIC CLOSING AYE AYE SOME
THEM SECURITY JUST CUT VIOLATIVE
TURN THAT SENATE PAN HE'S VERY.
GOOD GOOD ABOUT THAT SO.
LET'S.
LET'S TO SURGICALLY CULTURAL.
ITEM THREE AB TWELVE FORTY EIGHT
THE MOTION IS TO PASS TO
JUDICIARY ALLEN BY LYNN AND I
WILK AYE AYE WILK AYE GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE LEYVA.
PAN PAN AYE BIDAK AYE BIDAK AYE.
OKAY SO THAT BILL IS OUT WE WILL
HOLD THE ROLE OPEN SHIRT CENTER
LEYVA TAD ON.
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO'VE CASTLE
EVERYTHING HERE BUT I THINK UBER
PRECIPITATING AND AND I'M.
GOOD LUCK WITH WITH THIS TOTAL.
OVER AND YOU SAY OKAY SO LET'S
pSOME MEMBERS OUT ON I THINK
CENTER GALGIANI.
AND CENTER PAN ONE DOWN TO THE
CONSENT CALENDAR SECRETARY WITH
COLORFUL CONSENT CALENDAR
CONSENT CALENDAR WITH THE VICE
CHAIR VOTE WITH THE CHAIR VOTING
I VICE CHAIR VOTING I'VE FOUR
ZERO. GALGIANI GALGIANI AYE PAN.
PAN AYE OKAY THAT'S CONSENT
COUNTY THAT IS OUT UNANIMOUSLY.
OKAY SO SOMEWHERE CLOSE OKAY ANY
OTHER THINGS THAT NEEDED.
I MEAN.
OKAY.
THAT'S IT OKAY SO. FAR WE'RE
GONNA CLOSE THE RULE ACTUALLY.
BECAUSE IT IS A PRESS COMES IS
GOING TO BE HERE BUT AND.
SO ITEM THREE AB TWELVE FORTY
EIGHT THE MOTION IS DUE PASSED
YOU JUDICIARY THE CHAIR VOTING
I'VE VICE CHAIR VOTING I FIVE
ZERO LEAVE THAT.
OKAY.
SO WILL CLOSE THE ROLE ON THAT
THAT'S OUT.
AND WITH THAT WE WILL ADJOURN
THIS HEARING OF THE SENATE
EDUCATION COMMITTEE THANK
EVERYBODY.
EXCEPT FOR THE