CHALLENGES KENNER.
HERE.
SENATOR ANDERSON.
THAT ARE ABOUT.
YOU'RE.
NDER.
BUILDS.
WILL HOLD LITTLE HOPE OF TICKET.
ALRIGHT SO ON THE ELLIPSE YOU
LITTLE CHANGES ON THE AGENDA.
ITEM.
SEVEN THREE FIVE ZERO.
ISSUE SIX THE APPRENTICESHIP
PROGRAM FOR NON TRADITIONAL
INDUSTRIES
WE ARE GOING TO REMOVE IT FROM
VOTE ONLY BUT WE'RE GOING TO
HOLD IT OVER. TO A.
SUB ROAD FUTURE.
SUBCOMMITTEE BECAUSE THE.
.
PERSON FROM THE DEPARTMENTS NOT
ABLE TO JOIN US.
BY I WILL WE WILL HEAR IT.
LATER. AND THEN OTHERWISE WE
HAVE A NUMBER OF ITEMS. ON VOTE
ONLY BEFORE WE GET INTO THAT
DISCUSSION ITEMS SO. QUILTS
HAVE.
FIGHTING THEM VOTE ON THE VOTE
ONLY.
AND.
ALRIGHT SO WE'LL VOTE ON ALL OF
THE VOTE ONLY ITEMS RIGHT NOW
OTHER THAN SEVEN THREE FIVE ZERO
ISSUE SIX.
MADAM CHAIR.
I. SENATOR ANDERSON.
CENTER ABOUT.
GREAT GREAT. SO NOW WE WILL GO
TO. ITEM.
.
SOON WHEN THE FIRST ITEM
PROPOSED FOR DISCUSSION.
WHICH IS.
SSUE THIRTEEN THE CIVIL
SERVICE IMPROVEMENT TRAILER BILL
LANGUAGE AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE.
MIRABEL VOUCHER FROM THE
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AGENCY WHO
WILL BE PRESENTING.
YOU MAY PROCEED.
MORNING MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS.
YOU VERY IS AWAY ON HIM THANK
YOU VERY MUCH.
OUT JUST TAKE A FEW MINUTES IF
I MAY MADAM CHAIR TO UPDATE.
YOU IN THE COMMITTEE.
ON.
CIVIL SERVICE IMPROVEMENT.
AND.
TO DO SO.
TO PUT IT INTO CONTEXT WHERE
WE'VE BEEN WHERE WE ARE NOW. OF
FOR THE FOR THE TRAILER BILL
ADDITIONALLY. I WOULD LIKE TO
TAKE A FEW MINUTES AFTER I'VE
DONE THAT.
TO ADDRESS STAFF COMMENTS ON THE
TRAILER BILL I'LL TRY AND BE AS
QUICK AS POSSIBLE.
SO THE GOAL OF CIVIL SERVICE
IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE IS TO
PRODUCE A MODERN HUMAN RESOURCE
SYSTEM. THAT ALLOWS STATE
DEPARTMENTS TO FIND AND QUICKLY
HIRED THE BEST CANDIDATES THREE
FAIR AND MERIT BASED PROCESS
THE DEPARTMENTS WILL BE ABLE TO
SYSTEMATICALLY DETERMINE THEIR
WORKFORCE NEEDS. AND WILL BE
ABLE TO QUIT.
VOTE.
BE EQUIPPED SKEWS ME TO TRAIN
AND DEVELOP THEIR EMPLOYEES TO
MAXIMIZE THEIR INDIVIDUAL
POTENTIAL TO BETTER SERVE THEIR
DEPARTMENTS MISSION.
AND IMPROVE CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM
WILL PRODUCE A CAPABLE AND
ENGAGE STATE WORKFORCE THAT IS
ABLE TO ADAPT TO NEW CHALLENGES
IN SERVING THE PEOPLE OF
CALIFORNIA AND WILL REFLECT THE
DIVERSITY. OF THE PEOPLE OF
CALIFORNIA THIS IMPROVE CIVIL
SERVICE SYSTEM WILL MAKE
CALIFORNIA AN EMPLOYER OF CHOICE
NOT ONLY FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO
MAKE A CAREER OF PUBLIC SERVICE.
BUT ALSO FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO
MAKE PUBLIC SERVICE A CHAPTER OF
A BROADER CAREER.
ESSENTIAL TO CREATING THIS
ENVIRONMENT IS ESTABLISHING A
LEADERSHIP CULTURE COMMITTED TO
DEVELOPING AN INSPIRING
EMPLOYEES TO ACHIEVE GREAT
RESULTS.
ONCE HRE EMPLOYEES WILL
PROPERLY. ON MEAT ON BOARDED AND
TAUGHT CRITICAL INFORMATION
ABOUT THEIR DEPARTMENTS AND JOB
DUTIES SO THAT THEY ARE SET UP
FOR SUCCESS AND CAN IMMEDIATELY
START CONTRIBUTING. EMPLOYEES
HAVE MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN
NEW SKILLS AND ARE EARNING
RECOGNITION FOR DOING GOOD WORK.
AS OPPORTUNITIES AND NEW
TECHNOLOGIES EMERGE EMPLOYEES
WILL HAVE CLEAR PASS.
OF FOR UPWARD MOBILITY AND
CONTINUED PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
ENSURING THAT EMPLOYEES BRING
VALUE TO THEIR WORK AND THAT
THEIR WORK ADDS VALUE TO THE
LIVES OF CALIFORNIANS SUPPORT
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT.
AND ATTRACTS MOTIVATED
CANDIDATES.
THE TEST OF THE SYSTEM SUCCESS
WILL BE IN ITS ABILITY TO GET
THE RIGHT PEOPLE IN THE RIGHT
JOHNS AT THE RIGHT TIME
ENSURING.
THAT THEY HAVE THE TOOL AND
WORK PROCESSES TO COMPLETE HIGH
QUALITY WORK.
NEARLY TWO HUNDRED STATE
EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYEES
REPRESENTATIVES HAVE WORKED ON
FORTY DIFFERENT WORK GROUPS AT
DIFFERENT TIMES.
THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN
LARGELY APPROVED AND IMPLEMENT
IT.
SO WHERE HAVE WHAT WE HAVE WE
ACHIEVED AT SCEA DOING CSI SO
VERY QUICKLY. CLASS
CONSOLIDATION IS THE MOST
IMPORTANT CLASSROOMS ALLEGATION
IS THE FIRST AND MOST
FUNDAMENTAL STEP IN MODERNIZING
THE STATE'S CIVIL SERVICE
SYSTEM.
CS I STARTED OFF IN TWENTY
FOURTEEN WITH THE STATE
PERSONNEL BOARDS CLASS
CONSOLIDATION ANALYSIS I'M
NEARLY FOUR THOUSAND JOB
CLASSIFICATIONS ASSESSING HOW
THE STATE COULD ELIMINATE SOME
CLASSES AND CONSOLIDATE OTHERS
INTO BROADER STATEWIDE CLASSES.
ELIMINATING DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC
CLASSIFICATIONS MAKES IT EASIER
FOR MANAGERS TO CREATE LARGER
POOLS FOR QUALIFIED CANDIDATES
AND ALLOWS EMPLOYEES TO BROADEN
THEIR SEARCH WHEN LOOKING
LOOKING FOR PROMOTION. IT ALSO
AVOIDS THE ENORMOUS WORKLOAD AND
EXPENSE OF DEVELOPING OFFERING
AND SCORING DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC
EXAMINATIONS FOR CLASSIFICATIONS
THAT DIFFER ONLY IN TITLE.
BY CONSOLIDATING CLASSES EACH
DEPARTMENT NO LONGER HAS TO
SPEND HOURS DEVELOPING AND
VALIDATING EXAMINING.
BROADENING CLASSES REDUCES THE
OVERALL NUMBER OF EXAMINATIONS
NEEDED. AND FOR EMPLOYEES
CLARIFIES POTENTIAL CAREER
PATHS.
THE HIRING PROCESS IS MORE
NIMBLE AS EMPLOYEES ARE ABLE TO
APPLY FOR CONTINUOUS
EXAMINATIONS FOR STATEWIDE
CLASSIFICATIONS.
SHORTER RECRUITMENT AND HIRING
TIMES ALLOWS THE STATE TO HIRE
CANDIDATES IN A MORE TIMELY
MANNER AS A MANAGER NO LONGER
HAS TO BUILD IN ADDITIONAL TIME.
FOR THE EXAMINATION PROCESS
THESE IMPROVEMENTS ALLOW THE
STATE TO FOCUS ON MUCH NEEDED
RECRUITING HIRING AND ON
BOARDING EFFORTS.
CLASS CONSOLIDATION AND THE
BENEFITS IT GENERATES PROVIDES A
CRITICAL FOUNDATION FOR IMPROVE
CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM SINCE JUNE
ONE OF TWENTY FOURTEEN CALAIS
JAR AND THE STATE PERSONNEL
BOARD HAVE ABOLISHED ONE
THOUSAND. TWENTY SIX CLASSES
CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM NOW HAS
FEWER THAN TWO THOUSAND EIGHT
HUNDRED CLASSIFICATIONS.
VERY QUICKLY SOME OF THE OTHER
ACHIEVEMENTS ARE WE'VE ABOLISHED
CLASSES VACATED FOR OVER TWO
YEARS WE'VE INCREASED MULTI
MULTI DEPARTMENTAL EXAMINATIONS
WE'VE ELIMINATED OUTDATED
EXAMINATION RULES. WE'VE
SIMPLIFIED THE LIMITED
EXAMINATION AN APPOINTMENT
PROGRAM.
WE HAVE CHANGED CAREER EXECUTIVE
ASSIGNMENT RULES WE'VE IMPROVE
STATEWIDE RECRUITMENT.
EXPANDED RECRUITMENT FOR
VETERANS
CREATED A PRISON TO EMPLOYMENT
PROGRAM LAUNCHED A RECRUITING
PILOT WITH LINKED IN.
WE'VE ALSO EXPANDED LEADERSHIP
TRAINING WILL DEVELOP
APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING PROGRAMS
WORKING WITH THE LABOR AGENCY
AND SEIU LOCAL ONE THOUSAND.
WE HAVE CREATED LEAN TRAINING.
AND SPECIFICALLY A LEAN APPROACH
PROVIDES TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO
REDUCE WASTE AND INCREASE
EFFECTIVENESS
AND HOW THE STATE DELIVER
SERVICES TO PEOPLE OF
CALIFORNIA.
THIS EFFORT BEGAN IN TWENTY
FOURTEEN WE HAVE NOW TRAIN MORE
THAN SIX THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED
EMPLOYEES IN THIS PROCESS
IMPROVEMENT METHODOLOGY.
WE HAVE LAUNCHED THE FIRST
STATEWIDE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
SURVEY
WE GIVE REVISED THE STATE.
WORKFORCE PLANNING MODEL WE
REVISED UPWARD MOBILITY GUIDE.
WE CREATED NEW EMPLOYEE
ONBOARDING IN ORIENTATION
INFORMATION WE'VE CREATED HUMAN
RESOURCE CREDENTIALING PROGRAM.
IN CONCLUSION CSI PROCESS TO
DATE HAS INVOLVED NEARLY TWO
HUNDRED TATE EMPLOYEES AND
EMPLOYEES REPRESENTATIVES MOST
OF THEM SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS.
WHO'VE CONTRIBUTED THROUGH FORTY
DIFFERENT WORK GROUPS AT
DIFFERENT TIMES.
THE CSI TRAILER BILL WE ARE
PROPOSED IN IN THIS YES I
TRAILER. BILL WE ARE PROPOSING
VARIOUS TECHNICAL CHANGES THAT
WILL CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE
CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM.
BEFORE I WE REVIEW THE DETAILS
OF THE PROPOSED LANGUAGE OF THE
BILL.
I WOULD LIKE TO A.
GO OVER WITH YOU MADAM CHAIR AND
MEMBERS
TO.
REVIEW SOME OF THE STAFF
COMMENTS THAT WE RECEIVED
YESTERDAY OUGHT TO CLARIFY UP A
FEW POINTS IF I MAY.
ON POINT ONE TWO QUOTES THIS
STAFF COMMENTS STATE PERSONNEL
BOARD AUTHORIZES SPV TO
PRESCRIBE RULES TO GOVERN
APPOINTMENTS.
CURRENTLY. EXCUSE ME AS PHOEBE
DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY UNDER
STATUTE HOWEVER SBB HAS PASSED
REGULATIONS.
TO GIVE ITS SELF THIS AUTHORITY.
AND I JUST WANNA BE CLEAR THAT
ACTUALLY SPV HAS THE AUTHORITY
WITHIN THE SIX THE US STATE
CONSTITUTION TITLE SEVEN SECTION
ONE SUBSECTION BE OF THE STATE'S
CONSTITUTION.
GIVES THE SP BE THIS AUTHORITY
QUOTE IN THE CIVIL SERVICE
PERMANENT APPOINTMENT AND
PROMOTION SHALL BE MADE UNDER A
GENERAL SYSTEM BASED ON MERIT.
ASCERTAINED BY COMPETITIVE
EXAMINATION
AGAIN ANOTHER POINT MADE BY.
THE STAFF
QUOTE EXAMINATION AUTHORIZES
CALAIS CHAR OR DEPARTMENTS TO
OFFER ALL EXAMINATIONS ON A
CONTINUOUS BASIS.
CURRENTLY CAL HR OR DEPARTMENTS
CAN ONLY OFFER JOB EXAMINATIONS
ON A CONTINUAL BASIS.
IF IT HAS DIFFICULTY MAINTAINING
QUALIFIED ELIGIBILITY LISTS END
OF QUOTE.
THE PURPOSE POSE.
TRAILER LANGUAGE
DOES DOESN'T STATE THAT KELLY
JAR IS REQUIRING ALL
EXAMINATIONS TO BE CONTINUOUS
THE MAJORITY OF OUR ONLINE EXAMS
ARE CONTINUOUS.
THIS STATUTE WAS WRITTEN IN
NINETEEN FORTY FIVE BEFORE
COMPUTERS. OR THE INTERNET OR
MOST OF US.
WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE DEPARTMENTS
TO USE MORE CONTINUOUS TO
HOES
TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR JOBSEEKERS
AND CREATE LARGER QUALIFIED
CANDIDATE POOL'S.
WITH CONTINUOUS EXAMS ONLINE
CANDIDATES CAN TAKE AN EXAM FROM
HOME ON THEIR OWN TIME MAKING IT
MORE MODERN AN EASIER FOR THOSE
SEEKING JOBS.
STAFF ALSO COMMENTED QUOTE
PROMOTIONAL EXAMS REMOVES THE
REQUIREMENT THAT AN INDIVIDUAL
CAN ONLY APPLY FOR PROMOTION IF
THEY ARE ON EXAMINATION LIST.
FOR THE SAME JOB CLASSIFICATION
AND PROVIDES S. B. B. THE
AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE
CONDITIONS FOR PROMOTION
EXAMINATIONS AND TRANSFERRED.
AND OF QUOTE.
THIS IS A CAREER CORRECT AS
WRITTEN HOWEVER THIS PROVIDES
EMPLOYEES WITH MORE FLEXIBILITY
BY ALLOWING THEM TO TRANSFER
THEIR ELIGIBILITY FROM ONE
PROMOTIONAL LIST TO ANOTHER
SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT
PROMOTIONAL LAST. IN ORDER TO
ADVANCE THEIR CAREER. AGAIN
BRINGING GREATER EASE TO THE JOB
SEEKER AND MODERNIZING OUR
SYSTEM.
AGAIN I THE STAFF COMMENTED
QUOTE EMPLOYEE LISTS ELIMINATES
THE CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
CONDITIONS THAT MUST BE MET.
WHICH CURRENTLY ALLOWS THE
DEPARTMENT TO OBTAIN ANOTHER
EMPLOYMENT LIST AT THE SAME OR
HIGHER LEVEL CLASS.
IF AN EMPLOYMENT LISTS IS
UNAVAILABLE FOR THE CLASS IN
WHICH IT BELONGS INSTEAD THE
PROPOSAL WOULD ALLOW THE
DEPARTMENT TO OBTAIN ANOTHER
LIST. UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE AS
PRESCRIBED BY S. B. B. AND OF
QUOTE.
THIS IS CORRECT IS WRITTEN I
NEED TO POINT OUT HOWEVER THERE
ARE CREATED IT HOWEVER THERE ARE
CRITICAL.
EXCUSE ME CRITERIA. THERE ARE
CRITERIA THAT THE DEPARTMENTS
FOLLOW FROM CALAIS CHART THAT
DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE LIST.
ADD THAT MUST BE USED
DEPARTMENTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO
USE WHATEVER LIST THEY WANT.
WE'RE GOING TO CLARIFY THAT OF
COURSE.
STAFF ALSO NOTED QUOTE
EXAMINATION PROCESS ELIMINATES
REQUIREMENT FOR CAL HR TO
APPROVE A QUALIFIED CANDIDATE.
AND ALLOW THE DEPARTMENT TO HIRE
CANDIDATES DIRECTLY.
ADD THIS IMPLIES THAT KELLY
TERMINAL LONGER APPROVED
QUALIFIED CANDIDATE LIST AND
THIS I MUST SAY IS INCORRECT.
THE LANGUAGE IN THE TRAILER
BILL.
REALLY RELATES TO THE STATUTE TO
LEAP CANDIDATES ONLY NOT GENERAL
CANDIDATES AND IS CONNECTED TO
STATUTE ONE NINE TWO FOUR THREE.
SINCE A LEAP CANDIDATE BECOMES A
PERMANENT EMPLOYEE ONCE THEY
HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED
THEIR JOB EVALUATION PERIOD.
IT'S UNNECESSARY FOR KELLY CHAR
TO ALSO PROVED THAT STATUS.
ALSO IN THE STAFF COMMENTS WAS
PERMANENT PLEASE STATUS FOR
CAREER EXECUTIVE ASSIGNMENTS C.
E. AIDS.
THIS SPECIFIES THAT A PERMANENT
EMPLOYEE WOULD.
INCLUDE A PERSON WHO WAS
APPOINTED TO S. C. E. A POSITION
AND WHO NEVER COMPETED IN CIVIL
SERVICE EXAMS TOOK PAINS. OBTAIN
PERMANENT CIVIL SERVICE STATUS
UNDER CURRENT WALLONIA SIMON IS
OVER.
THE STAFF FURTHER SAYS THE
PERSON HAS NO PERMANENT RIGHT TO
A POSITION STATE GOVERNMENT
UNLESS THE PERSON HAS READING
AND STATEMENT RIGHTS ARISING OUT
OF PREVIOUS SEVERAL SERVICE.
I MUST CLARIFY MANAGER THERE IS
NOTHING IN THE TRAILER BILL AT
ALL ABOUT CA SO I AM NOT SURE AT
ALL AT THIS COMMENT PERTAIN TO
BECAUSE WE HAVE NO LANGUAGE IN
THE BAY TRAILER BILL.
THAT RELATES TO SEE EA'S.
FURTHER STAFF NOTED QUOTE
DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION
REQUIRES SBB AND CALLIE CHARTER
COOPERATE WITH EACH OTHER AND
WHAT DO F. AND THE STATE CONTROL
AND OTHER AGENCIES. TO PROMOTE
EFFICIENT AND ECONOMIC
ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE'S
BUSINESS.
THIS IS REALLY A CLEAN UP UP
PART OF THE TRAILER BILL UNDER
THE CURRENT STATUTE IT IS S. B.
B. THAT IS REQUIRED TO COOPERATE
WITH OTHER CONTROL AGENCIES AND
THERE'S NO RECIPROCITY. THAT THE
CONTROL AGENTS MUST COOPERATE
WITH S. PP.
HOWEVER I BELIEVE THIS LOT TRULY
IS ARCHAIC AND AND PATERNALISTIC
AND REALLY SHOULD JUST BE
REMOVED OUR TRAILER BILL IS
TRYING TO. CLARIFY AND CORRECTED
BUT FRANKLY IT'S ANOTHER THING
THAT HARKENS BACK TO ABOUT
NINETEEN FORTY.
IN THE STAFF'S NARRATIVE I WAS
QUITE CONCERNED ABOUT A COUPLE
OF THINGS STAFF ALSO QUESTIONS
THE IMPACT ON THE PROPOSED
CHANGES OF RANKINGS AN
ELIGIBILITY LIST SPECIFICALLY.
UNDER THE PROPOSAL DEPARTMENTS
CONTINUE CONTINUALLY RE ISSUE AN
EXAMINATION WHICH. MAY LEAD TO.
QUOTE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.
OF IGNORING CANDIDATES TO RANK
ON PREVIOUS EXAMS AND MY AND
MAKE THE EXAMINATION PROCESS
LESS COMPETITIVE ADDITIONALLY
THE PROPOSAL NATE'S THE
DEPARTMENT'S ABILITY TO RECRUIT
DEEPER WITHIN AN EXISTING LESS.
WHICH COULD ALLOW DEPARTMENT TO
CONTINUOUSLY OFF EXAMS AND
REFRESH LESS.
MADAM CHAIR THIS IS THE VERY
ESSENCE
OF THE MATTER MERIT PRINCIPLE.
ON OUR CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM IS
BASED ON MERIT WE WANT TO
ENCOURAGE DEPARTMENTS TO USE
MORE CONTINUOUS EXAMS TO MAKE IT
EASIER FOR JOBSEEKERS.
TO CREATE LARGER QUALIFIED
CANDIDATE POOLS AND REDUCE
DEPARTMENTAL EXAM COSTS.
I AM SURE IT'S NOT INTENDED.
BY ANYONE THAT WE WOULD HIRE
UNQUALIFIED PEOPLE.
OR USE OUTDATED LISTS
CONTINUOUS EXAMINATIONS HELP
EVERYONE THOSE SEEKING A STATE
JOB FOR THE FIRST TIME AS WELL
AS THOSE STATE EMPLOYEES WHO
PERHAPS HAVE RANKED LOWER. IN
THE RANKINGS AND CANNOT BE REACH
THEY CAN WAIT AND BE REEXAMINED
AND AND IN SO DOING.
PUT THEMSELVES IN A BETTER
HIRING POSITION
WITH AN EXAM THAT CONTINUOUS
EXAM IT IS NOT CONTINUOUS THAT
THAT JOB PERSON WHO IS A STATE
EMPLOYEE WHO IS NOT. RANK HIGH
ENOUGH TO REACH
COULD HAVE TO WAIT A YEAR
POSSIBLY TO TO BE REEXAMINED.
SO THAT'S OF OF CONCERN AGAIN
FROM STAFF NARRATIVE I QUOTE
THE.
THE ADMINISTRATION NOTES THE
INTENT OF MERGING THE LEAP LISTS
AND OTHER LESS TOGETHER IS TO
MAKE A DEPARTMENT UNAWARE. THAT
A CANDIDATE HAS ELIGIBILITY FROM
A LEAP LIST AND THEREFORE. MAKE
IT EASIER FOR A LEAP CANDIDATE
TO BE HIGHER WELL THE INTENT OF
THE PROPOSAL IS LAUDABLE.
STAFF SAYS. UP STAFF WONDERS IF
THERE IS AN UNINTENDED
CONSEQUENCE AGAIN AN UNINTENDED
CONSEQUENCE.
FOR MAKING IT ACTUALLY.
HARDER FOR A LEAP CANDIDATE TO
BE CHOSEN OVER A HIGHER RANK
CANDIDATES AND OF QUOTE. UNDER
CURRENT STATUTE MONTH WHEN
DEPARTMENTS PULL A LIST THE LIST
WILL NOT HAVE ANY LEAD
CANDIDATES INCLUDED. EVEN IF
THERE IS AN ASSOCIATED LEE PRESS
WITH CURRENT LAW.
THE ONLY WAY DEPARTMENTS CAN
HIRE LEAP CANDIDATES AS IF THEIR
REQUEST IF THEY REQUEST A LEAP
LIST UNDERCURRENT SP BE RULES
AND REGULATIONS AND WITH THE
PROPOSED. CSI TRAILER BILL
LANGUAGE WHEN DEPARTMENTS
REQUEST A LIST WITH AN
ASSOCIATED LEAP LIST. THEN THE
LEAP LIST WILL BE MERGED WITH
THE REQUESTED LIST.
STAFF ALSO HAD THREE QUESTIONS
ONE WAS ARE THERE ANY COURT
CASES THAT PROPOSED STATUTORY
CHANGES WOULD OR COULD OVERTURN
OR IMPACT.
THE ANSWER IS NO CASE LAW
ACTUALLY SUPPORTS COMPETITION
WHICH IS WHAT THE MERIT RULE AND
MERIT SYSTEM IS BASED ON.
STAFF ALSO ASKED
HOW CSI WOULD IMPACT SENIORITY
RIGHTS AMONG STATE EMPLOYEES IN
THE EVENT THERE WAS A LET ME BE
SPECIFIC ON THAT QUESTION HUNT.
THAT IS HOW THIS LANGUAGE IN THE
TRAILER BILL FOR THE CSI WOULD
AFFECT SENIORITY RIGHTS AMONG
STATE EMPLOYEES IN THE EVENT
THERE WAS A RECESSION.
WHERE THE ADMINISTRATION
IMPLEMENTED A WORK FORCE
REDUCTION?
CORRECT. AGREEMENT MADAM CHAIR
RIGHT THAT AND THIS TRAILER BILL
IS NOT IMPACTING LIST PREFERENCE
AT ALL. EMPLOYEES THAT THAT
WOULD GET THAT MAYBE LAID OFF IN
THE EVENT OF A RECESSION.
WOULD STILL HAVE PRIORITY VIA
THE RE EMPLOYMENT THE SRO A
LISTS.
THAT THIS WOULD NOT CHANGE AT
ALL IN FACT WE DO NOT. WE DO NOT
HAVE ANY LANGUAGE IN THE CURRENT
BILL ON ORDERING OF THE LISTS
IT IS NOT IN THE IN THE TRAILER
BILL.
SO THAT THIS.
THAT WE WOULD HAVE THE PRIORITY
THE EMPLOYEE WOULD HAVE THE
PRIORITY.
OF THE RE EMPLOYMENT OF SORRY
LESS.
THAT WOULD NOT CHANGE.
WITH THIS TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE.
AND THE THIRD QUESTION WAS WHAT
HAPPENS WHEN EMPLOYEES LET GO
BUT HAS THE RIGHTS TO A POSITION
THAT HAS BEEN ELIMINATED BECAUSE
OF THE CLASS CONSOLIDATION
THAT'S A CONCERN AS WELL. THIS
TRAILER BILL IS NOT IMPACTING
RETURN RIGHTS AND IS NOT
DIRECTLY RELATED TO CLASS
CONSOLIDATION HOWEVER. IN THIS
SITUATION IS DESCRIBED BY STAFF.
ON IT IS A CASE BY CASE
DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF
INCUMBENTS.
IN THE ABOLISHED CLASSIFICATION.
ON WITH THAT SAID THOUGH S. B.
B. AND CALLIE CHART REQUIRED BY
LAW.
PLACE AN EMPLOYEE WITH RETURN
LIGHTS IN A SIMILAR
CLASSIFICATION IF INDEED THAT
CLASSIFICATION IS DOMINATED.
SO UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE WILL
THEN PLOIDY AND BE WITHOUT A
JOB.
SO AND MADAM CHAIR WITH FAT ON I
WOULD LIKE TO.
IF.
I NAY AND HAVE.
MY STAFF DEPUTY SECRETARY MISTER
DAVE REX OVER THE SPECIFIC
LANGUAGE.
IN OF.
QUICK FASHION THAT IS INDEED IN
THE TRAILER BILL.
MISTER BELLER NEWSLETTER OKAY.
RIGHT WE.
WILL BE BRIEF ON THAT BECAUSE I
WILL BE VERY CLEAR THAT.
THIS LANGUAGE WAS ONLY RELEASED
ON APRIL EIGHTEENTH.
AND SO THE OF BOTH THE
CONSULTANTS FOR OUR LABOR
COMMITTEE AND OUR BUDGET
CONSULTANTS
HAVE A AND NUMBER OF CONCERNS
AND ISSUES. WERE NOT GOING TO BE
ABLE TO RESOLVE THOSE HERE TODAY
NOW SO CERTAINLY CAMBI DESCRIBED
BUT YEAH.
AND YOU CAN PROCEED ON MATCH I
APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH AND
LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
BOTH. THE STAFF ONLINE ON THE.
DON'T MAKE SURE WE HAVE HAVE A
GREAT UNDERSTANDING THINKERS.
MEN CHAIR.
NUMBER THANK YOU THE REX
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AGENCY.
THIS TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE
MAKES TEKKEN TECHNICAL CHANGES
IN THREE AREAS
AND REMOVES BARRIERS FOR PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES.
IT CLARIFIES THE RULES BETWEEN
THE STATE PERSONAL BOARD AND
CULTURE ARE.
AND IT REMOVES OUTDATED
PRACTICES.
TO HELP RECRUIT MORE PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES INTO STATE
GOVERNMENT WE WANT TO MODIFY THE
LIMITED EXAMINATION AN
APPOINTMENT PROCESS OR LEAD.
SLEEP IS AN ALTERNATIVE FORM OF
TESTING AVAILABLE TO PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES.
IN TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN WE
REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT LEAD
CANDIDATES HAD TO SERVE A
PROBATIONARY PERIOD.
PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE IN THE
CANDIDATE DIDN'T ESSENCE SERVES
TWO PROBATIONARY PERIODS.
BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY VALUE
TO REACH A VALUATION.
BUT THIS TRAILER BILL CLARIFIES
IT ONCE A LEAD CANDIDATE PASSES
HIS OR HER JOB EVALUATION THEN
THEY BECOME PERMANENT EMPLOYEES.
IT ALSO GIVES YOU BILLY FOR
CULTURE EMERGED LEAP REFERRAL
LISTS AND NON LEAD HIRING THIS
TO MITIGATE ANY. UNCONSCIOUS BY
BY SENATOR PROCESS
IT'S ALREADY STATED IN.
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS.
A SECOND AREA IS TO CLARIFY
RULES BETWEEN STB KELLY CHARM IN
THIS IS LEFT OVER FROM OUR TWO
THOUSAND ELEVEN REORGANIZATION.
THE GOVERNOR'S REORGANIZATION
PLAN RECOGNIZES SPV IN CULTURE
BY INVESTING IN COLLEGE ARE THE
POWERS DUTIES AND AUTHORITIES
NECESSARY TO OPERATE THE CIVIL
SERVICE SYSTEM.
IT SEEMED TO CIVIL SERVICE LAWS
AND BOARD RULE.
A GIVEN THE NEW RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN S. B. BEING CULTURE ARE
A FEW STATUTES REQUIRE TECHNICAL
CLEAN UP TO REFLECT THE NINTH
ASSESS CITY OF COLLABORATION
BETWEEN THE TWO TO.
LAST YEAR IT IS WHAT WE WANT TO
REMOVE SOME OUTDATED PROP.
WE BELIEVE OUR CHANGES.
TO IMPROVE THE EXAM PROCESS BY
ALLOWING FOR THE USE OF MORE
CONTINUES EXAMS AS THE SECRETARY
MENTIONED EARLIER.
WANT TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR
JOBSEEKERS TO TAKE EXAMS.
BUT TO CREATE LARGER QUALITY
CANADA POOLS AND WE WANT TO
REDUCE DEPARTMENTAL EXAM
BECAUSE.
WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE IT EASIER
FOR POLICE TO TRANSFERRED TO
DIFFERENT POSITIONS WITHIN THE
STATE.
THAT GIVES STAFF DE BILLY TO
GAIN A BROADER SET OF SKILLS AND
POTENTIALLY FIND A BETTER JOB
PERSON.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND BE
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION.
THEY'RE BUILT TO HAVE BEEN.
THOUGH.
THE FUTURE TIMELINE ONE A IN.
SOME NUMBERS ABOUT.
THE.
YOU KNOW YOU'RE CHANGING THE.
LEAVE PROGRAM.
SO.
GETTING SOME NUMBERS ABOUT.
.
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ARE IN THAT
PROGRAM AND THE OTHERS THAT.
HAVE DISABILITIES WHAT KIND OF
DISABILITIES AND SO FORTH.
HOME.
AND.
.
IN YOUR OPINION DOES THAT.
PERSONNEL CROSSES CONFORM TO THE
AMERICANS FOR DISABILITIES ACT.
YES.
IT WILL CONFORM TO THAT YES.
SO HAD I LIKE TO HAVE SOME
NUMBERS ON THAT AND WHAT OF.
YEAH LOOK TO SEE WHAT THE
RESULTS ARE WHAT IT WAS THE
FACTS.
WE CAN GET THOSE NUMBERS WHAT
KIND OF CLASSIFICATIONS.
ABSOLUTELY OR.
YOU KNOW THOSE KINDS OF
INFORMATION.
THANK YOU MA'AM SHARP.
CERTAINLY.
SOME OF MY QUESTION.
AND I KNOW THERE'S SOME.
CAN BE SOME PUBLIC COMMENT
TODAY BUT.
ON THE CONDITIONS PRECEDENT BY
ELIMINATING IT.
IT WOULD ONE OF THE ARGUMENTS
THAT.
WHO'S BEEN PRESENTED IS THAT IT
WOULD GIVE GREATER AUTHORITY TO.
.
TO HAVE WIDER ENDS FLEXIBILITY
AROUND.
.
AND.
BASICALLY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE. OF THESE PROVISIONS.
AND.
I THINK THAT.
THE IN SOME OF THE CASES.
REGARDING CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
THE LEGISLATURE INTENDED
FLEXIBILITY FOR NARROW
EXCEPTIONS SO CAN YOU COMMENT
ON.
THAT POTENTIAL AND.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT.
WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS TO REMOVE.
CONDITION PRESIDENT'S FROM THE
STATUES THAT WERE WRITTEN IN
NINETEEN FORTY FIVE AS A
SECRETARY SAID TIM ALLOW.
A LITTLE MORE
ABILITY IN
TO ALLOW THE EMPLOYEES.
BILLY
TO.
GET ON A HIRING LIST A TO APPLY
FOR EXAMS TO TO TRANSFER TO
OTHER DEPARTMENTS. MUCH EASIER
THAN THEY CAN TODAY.
WE BELIEVE TRAILER BILL LANGUAGE
NOW.
LIST THE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
PRESENTS IT REMOVES OR IS IT A
BLANKET REMOVAL IT LISTS FOR
THIS.
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT THAT WE'D
LIKE TO REMOVE
AND WE CAN GO OVER WITH STAFF
THOSE EXACT.
CONDITION PRESIDENT AND WE THANK
YOU FOR HOLDING THIS OPENED
BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT.
THERE IS SOME.
MORE DISCUSSION NECESSARY.
AFTER STAKEHOLDERS.
.
SO. WILL.
HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
SITE.
GOOD MORNING MADAM CHAIR SENATOR
BELL ATTEND TOP IN FOR THE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS IN
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT.
FIRST OF ALL I WANT TO THANK
THE ADMINISTRATION PARTICULAR
SECTOR BACHELOR.
DIRECTOR GIL HAND FOR REACHING
OUT EXTENSIVELY ON THIS
LANGUAGE.
IT REALLY HAS.
BEEN A TEAM EFFORT FOR THAT FOR
THEM AND THEIR STAFF TO TALK TO.
TO STATE EMPLOYEE GROUPS
INCLUDING BAG.
THE SECRETARY HAS.
CALLED ME ABOUT THIS LANGUAGE
PERSONALLY WHICH IS PROBABLY
MORE ATTENTION THAN I WANT.
BUT.
I.
WE SHARE THE SAME GOALS.
THEY WANT MODERN.
HIRING.
SYSTEM MODERN MONO WORKFORCE
SURGES PAGAN I THINK OTHER STATE
PLAYGROUPS.
BUT WE ALSO WANT IT TO BE
RESPECTFUL OF THE MERIT BASED
CIVIL SERVICES TO.
AND I THINK THE OUTREACH THAT
THEY HAVE DONE HAS MADE THIS
PRODUCT MUCH BETTER THAN YOU
SAW.
LAST YEAR.
I MEAN THIS IT HAS BEEN RELEASED
FOR A SHORT TIME BUT THIS IS.
VERY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THEY
SAY.
THOUGHT LAST BUDGET CYCLE.
AND WITH THAT I I THINK THERE IS
UP PATH THAT WE FORWARD THAT WE
CAN GET TO THE DATA.
GET LANGUAGE THAT WORKS FOR. A
MODERN HIRING SYSTEM.
THAT HIS BASED ON THE MERIT
BASED CIVIL SYSTEM SERVICE
SYSTEM I SENT THEM. A COUPLE OF
COMMENTS LAST NIGHT BUT AND ONE
OF THEM. WAS CLEARED UP AND I
THINK WE'RE VERY CLOSE I THINK
IF YOU HOLD IT OPEN. IS THE
RIGHT CALL AND WE CAN TALK SOME
MORE AND GET SOMETHING THAT YOU
CAN.
PROVE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.
THANKS.
NO GOOD MORNING MY NAME'S.
DAN CLARK COME MA THE PRESIDENT
OF ACCESS TO WHICH THE
SOLICITATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES
WITH DISABILITIES.
WE HAVE BEEN IN TALKS WITH GOV
OPS ON THIS ISSUE AND CAN AND.
REALLY HAPPY ABOUT THE DIRECTION
WHERE THINGS ARE GOING I THINK
IT'S GOING TO HELP IN THE HIRING
AND.
RETENTION PROMOTION PEOPLE WITH
DISABILITIES.
THESE LITTLE TWEAKS AND GO ON WE
LOOK FORWARD TO FURTHER
DISCUSSIONS ABOUT.
CLARIFYING AND DEVELOPING THE
LANGUAGE AROUND THIS LEGISLATION
TO HELP MAKE SURE IT'S FAIR AND
HONEST AND EQUITABLE TO BOTH
SIDES BUT ALSO FOR THE. HELPS
WITH A INDIVIDUALS GIVING THE
STATES SERVICE SO.
WE APPRECIATE.
GOV OPS CONTACTED US AND NOW
LOOK OUR FURTHER DISCUSSIONS
WITH THEM.
GREAT.
ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
ITEM.
RIGHT SO.
ENCOURAGING TO KNOW THAT.
DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS ARE
ENGAGED.
IN.
.
CROSSING THE T.'S AND DOTTING
YARDS ON THE LANGUAGE SO THAT.
WILL HOLD IT OPEN NOW. AND.
.
HAVE HOPEFULLY HAVE. COME TO A
GOOD CONCLUSION.
RIGHT SO WE WILL GO TO OUR NEXT
ITEM. WHICH IS ISSUE SEVEN ONE
TWO ZERO PER ITEM SEVERAL
WHATEVER ISSUE FOURTEEN.
THE CALIFORNIA WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD.
AND.
SPECIFICALLY IT'S THE PERSON TO
EMPLOYMENT INITIATIVE OF THE
CALIFORNIA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
BOARD.
WE HAVE CURTIS NOTES IN A AND.
.
POLICY STANDING YES FROM.
OF.
YOU CAN.
I'VE BEGIN.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR.
SENATOR BILL KURTIS LOTS AND I
WITH THE CALIFORNIA WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD.
HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF ARE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TIM RAINY.
SO CALIFORNIA RELEASES
APPROXIMATELY THIRTY SIX
THOUSAND PEOPLE. FROM THE STATE
PRISON EACH YEAR.
A PORTION OF WHO HAVE RECEIVED
IN PRISON JOB TRAINING
REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.
SUCH AS CAREER TECHNICAL
EDUCATION OR HAVE PARTICIPATED
IN PROGRAMS OPERATED BY THE
CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY
AUTHORITY.
CONCURRENTLY CALIFORNIA MANAGES
FEDERAL WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND
OPPORTUNITY ACT FUNDS THE STATE
WORKFORCE PLAN.
DEVELOP BY THE STATE WORKFORCE
BOARD. AND IMPLEMENTED BY OUR
FORTY FIVE LOCAL WORKFORCE.
A DEVELOPMENT BOARDS ACROSS
FOURTEEN LABOR REGIONS IN
CALIFORNIA.
WELL THERE IS SOME. OFTEN
INFORMAL CHO HAU COORDINATION.
BETWEEN THOSE TWO SYSTEMS THERE
IS NO FORMAL SUSTAINED AND
SYSTEMIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
THEM.
SOME REENTRY AND WORK FORCE.
PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN CREATED TO
TARGET CERTAIN SUBPOPULATIONS OF
THE STATE SUPERVISE POPULATION
AND WHILE THESE PROGRAMS.
HAVE PROVIDED GOOD DATA AND
LESSONS LEARNED AND ONGOING
MARRIAGE OF THE TWO SYSTEMS IS
NEEDED TO BETTER INTEGRATE
SERVICES.
OPERATING IN ISOLATION AND THE
FILL GAPS IN PROVIDE HOLISTIC
AND LONG TERM OUTCOMES.
PART OF THE GOVERNOR'S OUR
CONTINUED EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE
STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
THE STATE BOARD CDC R. KELPIE I
A THE CALIFORNIA WORKFORCE SOCIO
XIN OF FINALIZE A PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT.
WHICH IS INCLUDED IN AMENDMENTS
TO THE STATE WORKFORCE PLAN.
THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WILL
BETTER LINK.
EDUCATION JOB TRAINING.
WORK EXPERIENCE INSIDE PRISONS
TO POST RELEASE JOBS BY
FOSTERING A SYSTEM OF
COORDINATED SERVICE DELIVERY. A
TO A POPULATION THAT FACES A
VARIETY OF BARRIERS.
IT SERVES AS A BLUEPRINT FOR A
BUILDING LOCAL AND REGIONAL
PARTNERSHIPS TO IMPROVE LABOR
MARKET OUTCOMES.
AND EVENTUALLY REDUCE
RECIDIVISM.
THIS BUDGET PROPOSAL CONTAINS
THIRTY SEVEN MILLION IN FUNDING
TO FACILITATE THE SYSTEMIC
ALIGNMENT AND COORDINATION. OF
PRE RELEASE REHABILITATED OF RE
INJURY. TRAINING AND EDUCATION
PROGRAMS OPERATED BY CDC ARE IN
CALPE AYE A. WITH POST RELEASE
REENTRY AND WORK FOR SERVICES
OFFERED IN THE STATE'S FOURTEEN.
LABOR REGION'S.
THE FUNDING IS FOR STAKEHOLDERS
INCLUDING COMMUNITY BASED
ORGANIZATIONS. LOCAL WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD'S PAROLE
PROBATION AND REENTRY SERVICE
PROVIDERS TO DEVELOP
COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL PLANS.
TO ALIGN RELEVANT PRE RELEASE
REBUILT HEAD OF PROGRAMMING WITH
POST RELEASE WORKFORCE EDUCATION
AND RE ENTRY SERVICES.
WE BELIEVE IT IS CRITICAL THAT
ALL RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS BE
CONVENED TO DEVELOP THESE
REGIONAL PLANS SO THAT THE
APPROPRIATE REFERRALS CAN BE
MADE.
TO ENSURE THAT INDIVIDUALS CAN
BOTH ACCESS RELEVANT SERVICES
AND NAVIGATE BETWEEN PROGRAMS AS
THEY REENTER SOCIETY AND INTO
THE JOB MARKET.
THE FUNDING FOR THE PRISON TO
EMPLOYMENT INITIATIVE IS FOR
PLANNING ACTIVITIES
IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL PLANS
DIRECT SERVICES.
SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AN ARM AND
LEARN ACTIVITIES.
THERE THREE POTS OF MONEY THE
FIRST THE SMALLEST OF ONE POINT
SEVEN FIVE MILLION. OF FOR
CONVENING OF STAKEHOLDERS AND
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL PLANS.
ARE TO LIGHTEN COORDINATE.
SERVICE DELIVERY.
SECOND US FOR IMPLEMENTATION. OF
REGIONAL WORKFORCE PLANS.
FROM DIRECT SERVICES AND
EDUCATION SERVICES.
ARM THAT'S FOURTEEN MILLION IN
THE THIRD PART IS TWENTY MILLION
NOT A LARGE PORTION IS SET ASIDE
FOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES.
AND EARNED IN THEIR ACTIVITIES
ALL THREE POTS OF MONEY ARE
DESIGNED TO WORK IN CONCERT.
ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE
INTEGRATED POST RELEASE SYSTEM.
OF SUPPORTS TO HELP TRANSITION
FORMALLY INCARCERATED BACK INTO
OUR COMMUNITIES WHILE ALSO
HELPING THEM SECURE EMPLOYMENT.
I'M HAPPY TO TAKE QUESTIONS ON
MADAM CHAIRMAN THANK YOU FOR THE
OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT.
HURRY TERMS.
I HAVE.
SOME QUESTIONS BUT IF YOU HAVE
SOME SENATOR BILL YOU CAN ESTO.
OBVIOUSLY THIS IS SO IN RELATED
WITH MY LEGISLATION. AND I
EXPECT OVER THE NEXT TO GO.
MONTH THAT WOULD HAVE
DISCUSSIONS ABOUT.
BLAND THIS PROPOSAL. WITH.
S. B..
A TWENTY FIVE AND.
.
I RESPECTED WOULD ALSO HAVE TO
BLEND IT WITH. S. B. JUAN WHICH
SHOW.
WORKS WITH THE DEPARTMENT TO
PROVIDE.
HERE FORMALLY INCARCERATED
INDIVIDUALS.
WITH CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT.
THAT'S FUNDED BY THE SP ONE
WHICH IS UNDER WAY NOW SO WE'RE
BUILDING A LOT OF.
ROSE WERE MILLING.
WELL WE'RE BUILDING FIVE BILLION
DOLLARS WORTH OF CONSTRUCTION A
YEAR NOW BECAUSE SP ONE.
SO PART OF THAT WAS TO.
.
PART OF THE LAW THAT WE PASSED.
WAS TO.
.
HAVE YOU GO WORK WITH US.
AND AND WE ACTUALLY HAVE
ACTUALLY PUT MONEY INTO THE BANK
FOR THAT TOO BY THE WAY WE
ADDITIONAL.
WE SHOULD.
.
SO YOU GOT SOME MONEY FOR THAT
SO I HAD A LEAD TO SEE HOW THAT.
FITS IN WITH THE US LE
INITIATIVE.
THE SP ONE INITIATIVE FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
WHEN WE PUT THAT IN THERE AND.
ESPY.
A TWENTY FIVE.
WITCHES STUDY MC THREE.
CURRICULUM.
BILL.
SO DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON
THE. OTHER CAN WORK OVER THE
NEXT MONTH ON THIS BUT. THAT'S
ESSENTIALLY.
I THINK THAT THAT'S AREA THAT WE
HAVE TO WORK ON PHYSICALLY. OR
SENATOR BELT WE'RE HAPPY TO
CONTINUE THAT CONVERSATION
CONTINUE WORKING WITH YOUR
OFFICE.
.
MC THREE IS THE OFFICIAL POLICY
OF THE STATE BOARD RAYON MEN SO.
SA I CAN SLIP DISSOLUTION.
THERE ARE TENS BILL.
AND SEWER. I'LL WE THINK THAT
THIS IS ALL CONSISTENT AND ARE
HAPPY TO CONTINUE THAT
CONVERSATION.
THANK YOU.
SO I THINK FIRST OFF I WANTED TO
SAY THAT TIME AND I THINK I
SPEAK FOR MY COLLEAGUE THAT THE.
.
THE ADMINISTRATION IN THE
LEGISLATURE SHARE. I'D A
COMMITMENT TO.
DOING OUR BEST TO CONNECT THOSE
DOTS AND MAKE SURE THAT. PROVIDE
THE TYPE OF PROGRAM SERVICES JOB
TRAINING AND SUCH THAT WE'RE
PROVIDING FOR EX OFFENDERS.
IS.
IS TAILORED.
TO.
REAL JOB OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEN
CAN.
.
GET THEM EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE OUR
INTEREST IN.
DIRECTING FUNDS AND OTHER
STATUTE CHANGES THAT WE'VE MADE.
IS TO REDUCE THE RECIDIVISM RATE
NOW CLEARLY.
.
A A JOB. WITH HIS KNIFE AND
GUARANTEED THAT SOMEONE DOESN'T
RETURN TO PRISON. FENCE ON THE
INDIVIDUAL BUT CERTAINLY THE.
LIKELIHOOD GOES DOWN. IF OUR
FORMER OFFENDER IS EMPLOYED.
SO.
THE ARMED. ONE OF THE BILLS
THAT.
PROVIDE THAT SET UP GRANTS
WAS.
.
A. B. TWENTY SIXTEEN THE MANY
PRESSES BILL.
FROM I TWENTY FOURTEEN. AND.
THE DATA THAT WE HAVE WOULD
INDICATE THAT THERE IS A FORTY
FOUR PERCENT JOB PLACEMENT RATE.
NOW I DON'T KNOW I DON'T HAVE
DATA FOR OTHER JOB TRAINING
PROGRAMS AND WHETHER THAT'S PAR
FOR THE COURSE OR NOT BUT I
THINK THAT WE WOULD PROBABLY
WANT TO DO BETTER.
SO CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT
ABOUT EITHER CHANGES OR THINGS
THAT ARE BEING DONE TO INCREASE
THAT RATE.
ABSOLUTELY SENATOR
THANKS SO WE WE RECENTLY
SUBMITTED OF THE REPORT ON AB
TWENTY SIXTY TO THE LEGISLATURE
WITH PRELIMINARY.
DATA AND WILL CONTINUE. TO
UPDATE THE DATA AS IT COMES BACK
FROM. OUR OUR GRANTEES
ODD TWENTY SIXTY IS A GREAT.
A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT THAT WAS
EFFECTIVE IN AND PLACING SOME OF
THE MOST.
.
DIFFICULT TO SERVE INDIVIDUALS
INTO EMPLOYMENT AND EVEN AMONG
BARRIER POPULATIONS RIGHT EX
OFFENDERS.
MORE ARE ARE.
HAVE A LOT OF BARRIERS AND SO
LIKE MOST UP PILOTED PROGRAMS
AND BECAUSE OF. A VARIETY OF OF.
FACTORS JUST VARIATIONS IN LABOR
MARKETS THERE WAS NO REAL
UNIFORM APPROACH TO AB TWENTY
SIXTY. OUR PROGRAMS
A SUDDEN GRANTEES ARE ABLE TO GO
ACCORDING TO PLAN. AND PRODUCING
STRONG RESULTS BY WORKING THE
PROBATION AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
A SOME GRANTEES.
DIDN'T HAVE THEIR PROGRAMS
GO AS PLANNED BUT YOU KNOW ONE
OF THE.
.
WHAT WE DID DO IN TWENTY SIX INS
IS CONDUCT COMMUNITIES OF
PRACTICE WHERE?
I WENT GRANTEES GET TOGETHER.
THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THEIR
GRANTS DISCUSS ABOUT WHAT
APPROACH TO SERVICE DELIVERY
THERE ARE TAKING.
WHAT WAS WORKING AND WHAT WASN'T
I THIS WAS A NEW PROGRAM AND?
WE WERE PLEASED TO SEE THAT
SOME OF THE PROGRAMS. DID ADJUST
THEIR PLANS AND SO. ARE IN SOME
CASES.
.
EVEN HAD TO CHANGE THEIR
PARTNERS BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T
GETTING THE OUTCOMES THAT THEY
HAD PLANNED FOR. AND SO EVEN
SOME PROGRAMS A MAY HAVE.
YOU KNOW UNDER PERFORMED WERE
NOT IN A PRODUCED US SOME OF THE
NUMBERS THAT THEY HAD PLANNED
FOR.
WERE SUCCESSFUL.
A IN THE IDEA OF PILOTING A NEW
IDEAS A MAKING THOSE ADJUSTMENTS
AND WE WERE. A PLEASED TO SEE
THAT AND LOOK AT THAT
INFORMATION AND INCORPORATED IT.
INTO THIS PLAN SPECIFICALLY THE
NEED FOR A SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
CAME UP OVER AND OVER AS A
BARRIER. TO THIS POPULATION
THAT'S WHAT'S THE LARGEST.
PART OF FUNDING AYE THAT'S
BEING PROPOSED IN THIS
INITIATIVE. ARM EXISTING
SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FUNDS.
AND SOME OF THEM REQUIREMENTS
ATTACHED THOSE FUNDS WERE A
LITTLE BIT TOO RESTRICTIVE.
WE ALSO LEARNED THAT THE
INCLUSION OF PRE APPRENTICESHIP
AN APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS A
BOLSTERED SUCCESS AND PROVIDE
PARTICIPANTS WITH MARKETABLE
SKILLS AND UPWARD. MOBILITY ALSO
SOME PROGRAMS RATHER THAN JUST
PLACING THEM IN THE MOST
CONVENIENT JOB NO REALLY FOCUSED
ON MARKETABLE SKILLS THAT COULD
BE A TRANSFER IN AND CARRIED
WITH THEM.
THROUGHOUT THEIR CAREERS.
pFOR A REAL COORDINATION IN THIS
THIRD ROUND ACTION REQUIRED AND
WILL USE BETWEEN THE PARTNERS.
BETWEEN YOU KNOW A WEATHER WAS
COUNTY PROBATION THE SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT AND CBO'S AND SERVICE
PROVIDERS WHO PROVIDING THE
SERVICE
SO.
.
THE OTHER THING IS TWENTY SIXTY.
INITIALLY WAS A BIT OF A
DIFFERENT POPULATION KNOWS FOR
THE COUNTY.
SUPERVISE POPULATION.
AND SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF
DIFFERENCE THEY ARE BOTH
SUPERVISED THERE'S A LITTLE BIT
OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN. COUNTY
SUPERVISOR AND AND STATE.
RELEASED FOLKS AND IN THE
APPROACH AND SO. ON A AGAIN IT
WAS IT WAS A GREAT PROGRAM TO A
PILOT. DEVELOP SOME OF THE
LESSONS LEARNED AND SEE WHAT WAS
WORKING THE FILL THEM WAS NOT
WORKING IN. A REALLY HELPED US
HELPED INFORM OUR LOCAL REGIONAL
PLANNING GUIDANCE AND AND
EVENTUALLY THE GRANTS.
DOT WILL GO OUT AND OF THIS
INITIATIVE.
AND.
I'M.
SO I NOTE FROM THAT DATA IN
THERE IN THE MATERIALS THAT WE
HAVE. THAT THE PROGRAMS OFFERED
SERVED ABOUT EIGHT HUNDRED X.
VENDORS AND THAT HE WOULD APPEAR
SO FAR THAT ABOUT THREE HUNDRED
AND FIFTY SIX.
WERE ABLE TO SECURE EMPLOYMENT.
AND THE ADMINISTRATION'S
PROPOSAL HAS.
SOME FINDINGS THAT THEY'RE
PROPOSING TO CONTINUE THESE
PROGRAMS IT'S NOT REALLY AND
BEGIN CREASE.
BUT WHAT I NOTE IS THAT WE HAVE
THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE
APPROXIMATELY A MONTH TO WEAR
REALLY RELEASING FROM OUR STATE.
FACILITIES.
AND.
WE WHILE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY
THAT'S BEING.
PROPOSED IS NOT HUGE
IF WE IF WHERE ONLY SERVING. AND
THIS ISN'T SO MUCH IT'S MORE A.
S.. LET'S SWITCH CRITICIZING AS
MUCH AS.
I WANT TO DO BETTER.
SO I WANT TO SERVE MORE THAN
EIGHT HUNDRED PEOPLE IT SEEMS
LIKE A PRETTY.
.
SERVE ONLY EIGHT HUNDRED TWIN
WERE SENDING HOME THREE THOUSAND
A MONTH. AND TO ONLY THEN HAVE
THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY SIX THAT
WE HAVE THE DATE ON THE GETS A
JOB.
IS IT NOT MAKE ME EXCITED.
SO.
.
THE SO I'D LIKE TO SERVE MORE
AND I WOULD LIKE THE. OF BOARD'S
RECOMMENDATIONS WERE HOLDING
THIS ITEM OPEN. AS TO WHAT
THINGS WE CAN DO. TO BE ABLE TO
EFFECIVELY I DON'T WANT TO JUST
THROW MONEY AT THINGS BUT HOW
CAN WE EFFECTIVELY EXPANDS.
AND WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS ARE
THERE. WE NOW HAVE THERE'S.
EFFORT TO TRY TO LOOK AT.
OF THE VARIOUS.
LICENSING AND OCCUPATIONAL WHEN
I SAY THAT. IF THERE'S PUBLIC
LISTENING.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIRES A
LICENSE FOR ALMOST ANYTHING
ANYBODY WANTS TO DO GREEN LIKE
ANYTHING.
AND SO NOR JOBS THAT PEOPLE
PROBABLY DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT
THAT ARE.
RELATIVELY I WANT COLIN NON
SKILLED JOBS BUT LOW SKILLED
JOBS.
THOUGH HERE REQUIRE LICENSE IN
IN MANY MANY CASES THERE IS A.
OBSTACLE IN IF THE PERSON IS A
NEXT OF EX OFFENDER SO THAT OF
COURSE VERY SINCERELY NARROWS
THE CATEGORY OF JOB
OPPORTUNITIES FOR EX OFFENDERS.
SO I WOULD LIKE THE WORKFORCE
INVESTMENT BOARDS.
.
I SAID THAT RIGHT.
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD
START WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
BOARD'S ASSISTANCE IN TRYING TO
HELP BUT.
IDENTIFY.
WHAT LICENSING OR OTHER BARRIERS
LIKE THAT DO WE NEED TO ADDRESS?
TO ENABLE US TO BROADEN THE
TRAINING AND BROUGHT. THE.
JOB.
.
THE SECURING OF THE EMPLOYMENT.
AND THEN WHAT OTHER AFFECTED
THINGS CAN WE DO. TO EXPAND THIS
BECAUSE THE NEED IS FAR GREATER.
THAN WHAT WE'RE SERVING.
AND THOSE ARE SOME OF MY
REASONS FOR HOLDING IT OPEN FOR
US TO BE ABLE TO.
.
TO BROADEN AND I'M GONNA CALL ON
THE A LEóN A MINUTE THE DEALIO
HAS SOME OTHER THINGS IT ASKS TO
DO BUT I'M NOT ABOUT TO AT I'M
NOT OPPOSED TO ASKING THOSE
THINGS BE DONE BUT I'M NOT ABOUT
TO GO AND ASK ALL THAT. TO SERVE
JUST EIGHT HUNDRED PEOPLE.
SO I WANT TO SERVE MORE PEOPLE.
AND I WANTED TO PUT IN THE
TRAILER BILL THINGS THAT I KNOW
WILL ASSIST US IN ACTUALLY
GETTING THOSE FOLKS THAT WERE
TRAINING.
EMPLOYMENT.
SO IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT BEFORE
I CALL ON THE LA JOH.
ARE WE WE AGREE AND HAPPY TO.
HAVE THAT CONVERSATION CONTINUE
WORKING WITH THE SUBCOMMITTEE.
S. OF THE CARMEN ON WOULD YES GO
AHEAD SO I TOTALLY AGREE WITH TO
CHAIR ON THOSE.
I THINK DID TO HIM.
WHEN YOU REVIEW THESE
APPLICATIONS FOR THIS POPULATION
OR TALK ABOUT.
YOU REALLY NEED TO FOCUS ON.
LOOKING AT WHETHER OR NOT THE
PROGRAMS REDUCE RECIDIVISM.
YOU KNOW OUR SUCCESSFUL WITH
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES.
.
AND I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU
SHOW OF THE SHOW UP FROM ONE.
YOU'RE. LOOKING AT PROGRAMS HOW
THE LINK WITH.
HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS THE COUNTY
HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS A.
THOUGH YOU KNOW THE META CAO. DO
THEY HAVE DO THEY HAVE.
ASSURANCES TO HAVE MDI CAL.
AND THEY HAVE.
MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE
ABUSE SERVICES
DO THEY HAVE A WRAPAROUND
PROGRAM IN THAT COUNTY.
YOU KNOW FOR WRAPAROUND
SERVICES.
.
DO DO THEY HAVE A HOUSING.
IS.
A HOUSING OUR PROGRAM.
SO YOU KNOW LIKE.
I THINK.
WHEN PEOPLE LOOK AT RECIDIVISM
THEY SAY. OKAY IF YOU HAVE
STATES THAT HAVE PROGRAMS THAT.
THAT BLANDER HOUSING.
THE HEALTH CARE. AND EMPLOYMENT
THAT SITS.
THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD.
TRY FLECKED.
.
TO SUCCESS AND YOU START HAVING
REDUCE RECIDIVISM HAVE THOSE
THREE OKAY. SO YOU'RE DO ON THE
ONE OF THE THREE. SO BUT I THINK
IN IN TERMS OF.
YOU KNOW WHEN YOU LOOK AT
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAMS YOU
HAVE TO KIND OF LIKE.
CHECK OUT THE OTHER.
TO WHEN YOU'RE.
DOING YOUR.
YOURGRANTS TO THESE PROGRAMS.
AND AND I THINK ALSO.
.
AS A PROGRAMS BECOME MORE
SUCCESSFUL WE SEE SUCCESS
THAT'S.
TYPE OF INVESTMENT THAT WE NEED
TO MAKE.
IN THE LIGHT OF THE FACT IT COST
WAY MORE TO PUT SOMEBODY IN THE
STATE PRISON.
NINETY THOUSAND DOLLARS I THINK
THEY'RE SITTING NEXT YEAR SO I
THINK I THINK AGO.
IT WOULD YOU KNOW WE WANT WE
WANT TO LOOK AT MEASURES SUCCESS
SO. SO I THINK THE WORKFORCE
INVESTMENT WORD HAS.
THE ONE PART OF THOSE THREE.
BASICS THAT WE NEED YOU KNOW.
BENITO HEALTH CARE AND THAT
INCLUDES FOOD YOU KNOW FOOD YOU
KNOW SNAP CAR YOU KNOW THEY GET
SNAPPED.
THEY GET INTO MEDI CAL THEY HAVE
THE WRAPAROUND SERVICES
AVAILABLE.
COUNSELING.
ALL THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.
TO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
OF THERE'S A NEED FOR.
SOME OF IT HAS A.
DISABILITY THEY SHOULD BE
INVOLVED ALSO.
SO SO.
.
YOU KNOW KIND OF.
YOU KNOW YOU YOU CAN HELP WITH
YOUR. PROCESS WHEN YOU SET IT UP
GLUING THIS ALL TOGETHER BECAUSE
THAT'S HOW YOU KNOW IS YOU KNOW
I THINK MOST.
I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYBODY ELSE
DISAGREE WITH THAT'S A GOOD.
MAX THAT WOULD HELP REDUCE
RECIDIVISM THAT'S WHAT THE GOAL
OF THE STATE.
HOPEFULLY AGO GOVERNOR BROWN
ALSO.
AND FOLLOWING UP ON THAT.
IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF THE.
.
FORD HAS INSIGHT INTO WHETHER
FOR EXAMPLE.
.
WAS THE.
LOWER RATE OF A SECURING
EMPLOYMENT WAS IT TO DO WITH.
.
THE LACK OF DID ACTUAL JOBS
BEING AVAILABLE WERE AGAIN ONE
OF THESE LICENSING THINGS OR THE
FACT THAT THE EX OFFENDER DID
NOT HAVE HOUSING.
SO IF THOSE ARE THEY THAT'S THE
KIND OF INFORMATION THAT WOULD
BE HELPFUL TO US BECAUSE
CLEARLY.
MOM.
THERE ARE. THERE ARE WAYS TO
STRUCTURE PROGRAMS.
WHERE POTENTIALLY SOME HOUSING
ASSISTANCE COULD BE OFFERED?
AS WELL AS THE TRAINING
ASSISTANCE.
AT FAR LESS COST OF NINETY
THOUSAND A YEAR FOR THEM TO
RETURN TO THE STATE PRISON.
I AND THEN WE KNOW.
DIED IN THE LATEST ON. THE VERY
HUGE INCREASES WERE HAVING AN
HOMELESSNESS IN THE LAST COUPLE
OF YEARS IN GENERAL SINCE TWENTY
TEN IN CALIFORNIA HOMELESSNESS
HAS INCREASED
BUT IN THE LAST TWO YEARS IT'S
JUMPED. SEVERELY. AND WHEN DID
THOSE COUNTIES THAT HAVE DONE.
VERY VERY.
.
CAREFUL TYPE ACCOUNTS WITH WITH
GETTING BACKGROUND ON THE
INDIVIDUALS WE FIND THAT.
A NUMBER OF FOLKS.
WHO ARE SOME OF THE INCREASE IS
FOLKS WHO WERE FORMER AND
FORMERLY INCARCERATED TO HAVING
NOT BEEN ABLE TO SECURE?
HOUSING.
AND A SO ARE JOB TRAINING CAMP
UNIBETON OF THAT AND THEN THE
OTHER FACTOR THAT I WANT.
SOME INSIGHT ON IS WHETHER WE
IT.
HOW MANY OF THESE PROGRAMS ARE
PROVIDING SOME TYPE OF STIPEND
FOR THE INDIVIDUAL? IN IS THE
LACK OF A STIPEND ALSO. ON
AFFECTING EITHER THE
PARTICIPATION RATE OR THE AND
SUCCESS RATE.
IF YOU UP MADAM CHAIR OF.
AND SENATOR BILL COMPLETELY
AGREE WITH YOUR YOUR COMMENTS I
THINK THATS WHY IN OF THE LOCAL
AND AND REGIONAL PLANNING
GUIDANCE OF THE STATE BOARD IS
PUTTING OUT INTO THE FIELD. OF
WE HAVE OUR DRAFT.
READY WORKING AT THE ET DE. AND
WILL BE OUT IN THE FIELD FOR
PUBLIC COMMENT.
THIRTY DAYS PUBLIC COMMENT HERE
SHORTLY.
AND WE PLAN TO RELEASE THAT
FINAL GUIDANCE IN. A JULY BUT
THAT GUIDANCE NO REALLY. ABOUT
REQUIRES OUR FOURTEEN REGIONAL
PLANNING UNITS TO DEVELOP PLANS
WITH ALL STAKEHOLDERS AT THE
TABLE RIGHT BREAKING DOWN THOSE
SILOS.
A SENATOR BILL ALRIGHT WHERE
IT'S JUST YOU KNOW WE JUST DON'T
WERE JUST IN JUST ONE NIGHT IN
THE STORE THAT'S NOT WHAT WE
WANT. TO DO HERE RIGHT WE WANT
ALL THOSE STAKEHOLDERS.
AT THE TABLE IN FIGURING OUT
HOW TO COORDINATE SERVICE
DELIVERY HOW TO BRAID RESOURCES
RIGHT AND HOW. THEY'RE GOING TO
OPERATIONALIZE THAT THE ON THE
GROUND RESPONDING TO THEIR
LOCAL.
A MARKET CONDITIONS THEIR LOCAL
LABOR MARKETS THERE LOCAL
SERVICE PROVIDERS AND KNOW WHAT
COUNTIES ON WHAT SIR WHAT ARE.
WHAT SERVICES ARE PROVIDED IN
THE COUNTIES THAT THEY'RE AT SO?
WE FULLY EXPECT OUR LOCAL
BOARDS TO A CONVENE THOSE AND
THAT'S REALLY WHAT THE.
THE ONE POINT SEVEN FIVE
MILLION OF PLANNING GRANT MONEY
IN THIS INITIATIVE.
IS IS INTENDED FOR BECAUSE IF
WE JUST YOU KNOW ADDRESS THE
WORK FORCE.
INSIDE OF THIS AND I THINK IT'S
ALSO WHAT DIFFERENTIATES THIS
I'M GREATLY FROM AB TWENTY SIXTY
IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE THOSE
COORDINATED PLANS ON THE GROUND
THAT THEN BECOME THAT POLICY ON
HOW TO.
YOU KNOW HOW TO DELIVER THOSE
SERVICES ON THE GROUND.
BETWEEN A VARIETY OF PARTNERS
AND WHO'S HANDING OFF TO WHO.
AND SOMETHING THAT WE SAW ON
TWENTY SIXTEEN MADAM CHAIR TO
YOU KNOW JUST SOME OF. YOUR
QUESTIONS IS THAT IT WAS A
VARIETY OF FACTORS SOMETIMES IT
WAS LACK OF SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
SOMETIMES LACK OF HOUSING.
SOMETIMES.
WHAT WE SAW TWO IS IS MAYBE THE
REFERRAL PROCESS THAT THEY HAD
IN VISION
WASN'T A GOOD ONE RIGHT MAYBE
THEY SHOULD BE ACCESSING OTHER
SERVICES BEFORE THEY'RE READY
FOR EMPLOYMENT INSTEAD OF JUST
BEING?
REFER DIRECTLY FROM THE
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OR FROM
PROBATION AND SO. BEING ABLE TO
GO TO WORK SOME OF THOSE ISSUES
OUT AND FOR US TO.
HAVE THOSE LESSONS LEARNED FROM
AB TWENTY SIXTY CHEN REALLY
INFORMED.
AND HOW WOULD YOU AFTER LOCAL
REGIONAL PLANNING GUIDANCE IN
AGAIN THAT WILL. GO OUT IN THE
FIELD IN AND WILL YOU REALLY.
.
GUIDE.
HOW THE SERVICES ARE DELIVERED
HOW THOSE FUNDS ARE SPENT?
WITHIN OUR OUR LOCAL REGIONS TO
RESPOND THE CONDITIONS ON THE
GROUND.
SO M. LA OH I KNOW YOU HAD SOME
COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM.
THANK YOU CHAD ALLEN THOUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S OFFICE ON
IN AN EARLIER ANALYSIS WE
POINTED OUT SOME. OF NEW ONCE
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AB TWENTY
SIXTIES JUST IN PROGRAM AND THE
GOVERNOR'S DOES IT. AYE
INITIATIVE THOSE DIFFERENCES
WERE LARGELY RELATED TO THE THE
STRUCTURE ARE OR DESIGN OF THE
GRANT PROGRAM COMPETITIVE GRANTS
VERSUS STATEWIDE.
STATEWIDE ON INITIATIVE.
I THINK THE IMPORTANT POINT WE
WOULD WANT TO MAKE AT THIS POINT
IS TO ECHO SOME OF THE THINGS
YOU'VE SAID HERE ABOUT. TRACKING
THE PROGRAMS GOING FORWARD WITH
WHATEVER AVENUE. THE LEGISLATURE
CHOOSES TO GO IN TERMS OF
PROGRAM DESIGN.
WE WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO
CONSIDER DIRECTING THE BOARD TO
WORK WITH CDC ARE AND AND LOCAL
PROBATION AGENCIES.
COLLECT REAL TIME INFORMATION ON
RECIDIVISM.
BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THE
INITIATIVE.
IT DOES HAVE AN EVALUATION AT
THE END OF THE THE TWO YEAR
CYCLE BUT IT WOULD BE A LOOK
BACK.
AND IF WE DON'T COLLECT THE
INFORMATION ON RECIDIVISM NOW
IT'LL BE DIFFICULT TO ASSESS.
WHICH COMPONENTS REALLY WHICH
LEVERS SO TO SPEAK REALLY
INFLUENCE THE OUTCOMES FOR THESE
INDIVIDUALS AND IT SOUNDS AS
THOUGH. GIVEN EXPERIENCE WITH AB
TWENTY SIX EITHER COULD BE QUITE
A BIT OF.
VARIATION SO TO SPEAK IN THESE
PROGRAMS OUT IN THE STATE SOME
COULD BE OPERATED IN ONE WAY
OTHER PROGRAMS WE OPERATED THIS
WAY IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY
FOR ALL OF US.
AND ESPECIALLY FOR THE
LEGISLATURE TO LEARN WHAT
SPECIFICS WHAT POLICY COMPONENTS
AS A HOUSING COMPONENT IN THIS
PROGRAM TO MAKE IT REALLY
SUCCESSFUL.
I'M WILL LEARN MORE IF WE HAD
THAT RECIDIVISM DATA THAT WE CAN
USE GOING FORWARD TO MAKE
DECISIONS ABOUT AUGMENTING THE
PROGRAM CHANGING ES UM DOING IN
ANOTHER FASHION TO ULTIMATELY
MAKE IT MORE EFFECTIVE. AND TO
REACH A BROADER A BROADER GROUP
OF OF OF THIS POPULATION NO.
HOME SERVO. WELL YEAH I AGREE
WITH YOU THAT DEAD.
YOU KNOW WHEN IT WHEN I SEE.
ON TO SAY THE US.
I OF.
LONG TERM FELONS THAT COME OUT
OF THE PRISON.
THAT HAD A HEROIN ADDICTION.
AS MUCH AS RECIDIVISM FOR.
SOME OF IT WAS IN THE TWENTY
SIXTY TYPE OF CATEGORY.
YOUR ARMS I.
I MEAN I I I THINK IT MIGHT BE A
LITTLE HARDER. I DON'T KNOW.
IT THERE ARE SOME PROGRAMSARE
VERY EFFECTIVE.
FOR THIS GROUP OF PEOPLE.
AND THERE ARE SOME PROGRAMS
OTHER.
EFFECTIVE FOR THIS OTHER GROUP
OF PEOPLE.
I BELIEVE IS SYSTEM TO SERVE MY
FEELING.
IS IF WE JUST CHASE. STATISTICS
WE GO TO THE ONES THAT ARE
EASILY RESET OF IT REDUCED
RECIDIVISM WE GET SERVE GET
NUMBERS. BUT WE'RE NOT DEALING
WITH.
.
THE MORE SERIOUS SO.
CLASS OF.
PAROLEES THAT WE HAVE IN
CALIFORNIA.
BUT I I THINK WE'LL TO HAVE HAVE
THOSE.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT PROGRAMS YOU
HAVE TO LOOK AT.
LOOK AT IT WAY AND I DON'T THINK
YEARS.
I DON'T THINK THE TYPE OF
PROGRAM YOU WANT FOR ONE IN MAY
NECESSARILY BE A GOOD PROGRAM
FOR THE OTHER.
SO WE HAVE TO BE FAIR ABOUT.
ACROSS THE BOARD.
OF CONTINUUM OF CATEGORIES OF
INMATES.
YOU KNOW PEOPLE LIVING IN THE
PRISON FOR TWENTY YEARS WHEN
THEY GET OUT.
WHAT KIND OF PROGRAM WORKS FOR
THEM?
YOUNGER PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THERE
FOR FIVE YEARS.
WERE KIND OF PROGRAM WORKS FOR
THEM YOU KNOW.
I THINK WE HAVE TO LOOK AT HIM.
CAREFULLY.
AND I OF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS
ANNOUNCED ON. DELEO MAYBE HAS A
COMMENT ABOUT.
SO WE LOVE DATA AT THE WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD INCOME WE LIKE
DOING EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS AND
WE LIKE IT WHEN THE LEGISLATURE
DIRECTOR OF THAT SORT OF WORK.
AND WE'RE MANDATED UNDER STATE
LAW TO DO DATA DRIVEN AN
EVIDENCE BASED POLICIES SO ON WE
LOVE DOING IT. ON BEING ABLE TO
DO THE KIND AND NUANCED ANALYSIS
THAT'S BEING DISCUSSED HERE
REQUIRES TWO THINGS THAT YOU
HAVE THE RIGHT DATA AVAILABLE.
AND SOMETIMES THERE'S OBSTACLES
IN TERMS OF GETTING THE RIGHT
DATA THERE COULD BE STATUTORY OR
REGULATORY OBSTACLES THERE COULD
BE. ON CONFIDENTIALITY CONCERNS
ABOUT PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE
INFORMATION.
SO YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE RIGHT
DATA YOU ALSO HAVE TO HAVE THE
RIGHT PEOPLE DOING THE DATA
ANALYSIS.
AND THAT DEPENDS ON THOSE
PEOPLE HAVING ACCESS TO THE
RIGHT DATA AS WELL SO WE'RE
HAPPY TO WORK WITH YOU IN TERMS
OF EVALUATION WE LIKE ROBUST
EVALUATION.
AND IF WE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN
WE'RE HAPPY TO DO IT.
YEAH IN A AYE OF ALSO NONE.
IF WE IN THE KNOW EVEN THOUGH WE
MAY NOT HAVE DONE THE RIGOROUS
EVALUATION BUT IF WE ALREADY
HAVE.
INFORMATION THAT HAS INFORMED US
OF SOME OF THE OBSTACLES THAT
MAY HAVE INHIBITED THE SECURING
OF EMPLOYMENT.
OR THE PERSON STAYING IN THE
PROGRAM WHICH EVERITT IS.
TO HELP US INFORMING IT NOW
VERSES LEARNING LATER IF WE ONLY
FIND SAY A RIGOROUS EVALUATION
AND LEARN LATER THAT.
YOU KNOW YOU WHATEVER IF WE CAN
IN THE STRUCTURING OF ANY
FUNDING WE GIVE.
IN THIS BUDGET.
ACTION.
ADDRESS SOME THINGS THAT WE
KNOW.
THEN THAT WOULD BE VERY
IMPORTANT.
AND.
IT IN GIVEN THAT THE POPULATION
AND THAT IN FACT.
WE.
LIKE I MENTIONED RELEASING ITS
HOME MUCH LARGER THAN THE
POPULATION WERE SERVING.
I'D LIKE TO GET EVALUATION ON A
LARGER POPULATION.
THEN THE EIGHT HUNDRED THAT. ARE
IN THE DATA RIGHT NOW.
OKAY.
ANY OTHER COMMENT FAMILIAR.
OKAY
SO OF PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
ITEM.
GOOD MORNING MADAM CHAIR.
SENATOR BELL.
MARKET PREY ON HERE ON BEHALF
OF THE CALIFORNIA WORKFORCE.
ASSOCIATION WE REPRESENT THE
FORTY FIVE LOCAL WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARDS AND WE'RE
PLEASED TO BE HERE IN SUPPORT OF
THIS BUDGET ITEM BEFORE YOU AND
WE'RE HAPPY TO WORK. WITH THE
DEPARTMENT.
WITH WORK FOR SAY WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD WE HAVE BEEN
A.
PART OF THE WORKING GROUP FOR
THE PRISON TO EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT AND
WE URGE YOUR.
SUPPORT THANK YOU.
MADAM CHAIR SENATOR BALCH A
SALINAS ON BEHALF OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY ALSO IN SUPPORT OF THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE
COMMITTEE'S WORK ON THIS
PARTICULAR BUDGET PROPOSAL THANK
YOU.
THEN I. AU. DIDN'T CALL AND
BERMAN FINANCES WERE LEAVING IT
OPEN BUT IF YOU DID HAVE ANY
COMMENT YOU'RE WELCOME TO MAKE
IT.
OKAY.
ALRIGHT ANY OTHER PUBLIC
COMMENT RIGHT SO WE WILL THANK
YOU HOLD THIS OPEN YOU'LL HEAR
FROM STAFF YOU'LL GET TO WORK ON
THIS SOME MORE.
AND WE'RE NOW GOING TO.
STEVE KERR MY PAGE.
.
WORKLOAD OVERSIGHT ITEM. ON THE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS
BOARD.
ISSUE FIFTEEN.
THROUGHOUT.
IN THE SAME.
GOOD GOVERNMENT.
YES THOSE OF THE.
GOOD MORNING.
MY NAME IS MARK GREGERSON I'M
EIGHT CHAIR OF PER.
I'M JOINED THIS MORNING WITH
OUR GENERAL COUNSEL FELIX
DILATORY AND OUR CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER. MARIANNA
GUAJEO.
I NOTICED IN YOUR GENDER THERE
WERE. FOUR QUESTIONS AND WITH
YOUR PERMISSION I'D LIKE TO
OFFER A. BRIEF RESPONSE TO EACH
OF THOSE QUESTIONS AND THEN BE
AVAILABLE TO RESPOND TO ANY
OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT
HAVE.
THAT IS CORRECT.
BUT MAYBE WE BEFORE YOU ANSWER
THE QUESTIONS THIS IS A
OVERSIGHT ITEM. MEANING IT'S
INFORMATIONAL THERE'S NOT AN
ACTION.
BUT I THINK THE.
.
REASON THAT THERE WAS
INTERESTING HEARING IT IS THERE
ARE VACANT FOR EXCEEDS.
THERE WAS A ACTION LAST YEAR.
IN THOSE SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN
BUDGET TO PROVIDE SOME NEW
POSITIONS.
.
I THINK TO INCREASE THE
INVESTIGATION SINCE ACT.
AND SO I THINK WHAT WE'RE GIVEN
DOUBT WE DID MAKE AN ALLOCATION.
FOR SO AND AND IN.
PARTICULAR ACTIVITIES HER DEATH
TO WERE INTERESTED IN HEARING
ABOUT.
SURE SO LET ME THEN KIND OF
TAYLOR MY RESPONSE TO.
THAT MORE REFINED.
REFINED AGENDA.
SO LET LET LET ME START WITH
VACANCIES FIRST WALL THERE ARE
NO VACANCIES ON THE BOARD OF THE
GOVERNOR RECENTLY.
APPOINTED OF FULL BOARD IN THIS
THE FIRST TIME IN IN A LONG TIME
THAT WE'VE HAD A FULL BOARD AND.
WE HAVE BEEN A FULL BOARD SINCE
APRIL NINTH THAT'S A CLASSIC
GOOD NEWS BAD NEWS SITUATION.
IT'S A GOOD NEWS SITUATION
BECAUSE WE NOW HAVE FIVE BOARD
MEMBERS THAT ARE GOING TO BE
ABLE TO ADDRESS THE BACKLOG OF
CASES.
THAT ARE AT THE BOARD LEVEL.
IT'S A BAD NEWS SITUATION
BECAUSE SANTA LEMONADE SALARY
SAVINGS THAT WE WERE USING IN
ORDER TO.
KIND OF ADDRESSED SOME
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ARE AS WELL
AS. TO.
AT YOUR MARK THOSE FUNDS IN
ORDER TO ADDRESS BACKLOGS IN
OTHER AREAS OF PER.
IN TERMS OF THE PROCESSING TIME
OF CHARGES FOR SO I THINK IT'S
IMPORTANT TO REALIZE THAT PER.
REALLY HAS THREE DISTINCT
PHASES IN ITS OPERATION THERE'S
THE GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE.
THAT LOOKS AT CHARGES THAT ARE
MADE.
UNFAIR PRACTICE CHARGES THAT
ARE MADE.
IN THE MOST RECENT QUARTER
ENDING.
MARCH THIRTY FIRST OF TWENTY
EIGHTEEN WAS TAKING US ABOUT A
HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DAYS.
IN ORDER TO PROCESS.
CHARGES AT THE GENERAL
COUNSEL'S LEVEL AND ON THE
AVERAGE LOOKING AT MOST THEIR
MOST RECENT QUARTERS IT PROBABLY
AVERAGED ABOUT A HUNDRED AND
FIFTY DAYS. ONE OF YOUR
QUESTIONS OR ONE OF THE
QUESTIONS WAS ON THE AGENDA WAS.
.
WHAT?
HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE IN ORDER
TO REDUCE THE PROCESSING OF
THOSE CHARGES DOWN TO SIXTY
DAYS?
WELL IT'S ON.
WE'VE WHICH I THINK MIGHT HAVE
BEEN IN THE TRAILER BILL WHEN
THE.
FINDING THE.
ADDITIONAL FUNDING THAT WAS
ALLOCATE PERV WHICH IN THAT LAST
YEAR'S TRAILER BILL WAS
ALLOCATED NOT ONLY FOR THE AND.
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN YEAR BUT FOR
SUBSEQUENT YEARS SO I THINK IT
HAD IT HAD INCREASES FOR
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN INCREASES FOR
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN AND FOR
NINETEEN TWENTY AND TWENTY
TWENTY ONE. FOR IT AND AND.
THOSE ALL OF THAT THOSE FUNDS
HAVE SUPPORTED ADDITIONAL
POSITIONS AND WE WERE GIVEN THE
FUNDING SO THAT WE CAN FIND ALL
OF THE AUTHORIZED PACKAGE LOG IN
YEAH RIGHT. AND WE HAVE BEEN
FOCUSING IN ON RAMPING UP IN
ORDER TO FILL THOSE POSITIONS.
AND AT THE GENERAL COUNSEL
LEVEL.
UP TO RECENTLY WE HAVE BEEN ITS
FULL STAFFING.
AND.
BASED ON FULL STAFFING WORK
BURKE KIND OF.
REACHED THE. THE THE BASELINE
OF AND THE BASELINE OF
PROCESSING CHARGES IS GOING TO
BE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF ABOUT
A HUNDRED AND FIFTY DAYS.
SO I THINK BASED ON CURRENT
LEVEL OF RESOURCES THAT ARE
AVAILABLE TO GENERAL COUNSEL'S
OFFICE.
THE ATTAINMENT OF THE SIXTY DAY.
PROCESSING TIME IS REALLY
UNREALISTIC.
WITHOUT.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES.
SO.
.
THE OTHER QUESTIONS IN TERMS OF
YOU KNOW SPECIFICALLY WHAT HAVE
WE DONE WITH THE BUDGET
AUGMENTATIONS THAT EVER OCCURRED
IN.
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN AND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN.
WE'VE AS I HAD MENTIONED BEFORE
WE'RE RAMPING UP OUR STAFF SEEN.
WITH OUR EXCEPT.
IT IN ALL AREAS THAT WE CAN
DIRECTLY CONTROL WERE USING
THOSE MONIES TO UPDATE OUR
TECHNOLOGY OUR EQUIPMENT.
A ONE OF THE BIG THINGS THAT
WE'RE DOING WITH US SOME OF THE
SALARY SAVINGS THAT ARE BEING
GENERATED IS TO REPLACE OUR CASE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WHICH WAS.
VANTAGE.
NOT OF LATE SEVENTIES.
OH WE'RE USING IT TO INVEST IN
STAFF TRAINING AS WELL AS
FUNDING TE.
LA A REGIONAL OFFICE.
RELOCATION TO AN ADA COMPLIANT
FACILITY.
IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN FOR USE IN
THOSE RESOURCES TO. CONTINUE TO
SUPPORT OUR FULL STAFFING.
WERE FOCUSING ON PROCESS
IMPROVEMENT THERE'S AN
INITIATIVE.
AT THE.
A PER PROBE LEVEL TO LOOK AT
OUR PROCESS SEASON COME UP WITH
SOME PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS.
AND WE'RE FOCUSING ON RETENTION
WERE HAVING SOME RETENTION
ISSUES PARTICULARLY AMONG OUR
ATTORNEYS IN ORDER TO.
CONTINUE TO RETAIN OUR
EXPERIENCED.
ATTORNEYS.
I'D TOUCHED ON THE THE.
THE VACANT BOARD LEVEL
POSITIONS AND AS I HAD MENTIONED
WERE ALL FILLED WITH OUR BOARD
LEVEL.
OF POSITIONS.
AND.
.
THE FINAL QUESTION.
.
WAS THAT.
THAT ALL ADDRESSES WHY DID PER
HOLD POSITIONS VACANT.
TO FUND THE OFFICE RELOCATION.
SINCE THE TWENTY SIXTEEN
SEVENTEEN BUDGET PROVIDED ABOUT
TWO HUNDRED SEVENTEEN THOUSAND
DOLLARS.
FOR THAT PURPOSE.
IN FIFTEEN SIXTEEN WE WERE RICH
HOLDING POSITIONS VACANT OF
ABOUT SEVEN POINT FIVE POSITIONS
IN ORDER TO
OUR BUDGET ALLOCATION.
WITH A BUDGET AUGMENTATIONS THAT
WE'VE RECEIVED AS I'D MENTION WE
NO LONGER HAVE TO. MAINTAIN
THOSE POSITIONS VACANT SO WE'RE
IN THE PROCESS OF NOT ONLY FILL
LANE. BUT ALSO.
.
THAT NOT ONLY FILL IN THOSE
POSITIONS BUT ARE ALSO FOCUSING
ON.
RETENTION
SO THEY'RE REALLY KIND OF
GENERALLY ADDRESSES I THINK YOUR
QUESTIONS AND I'D BE HAPPY TO
ANSWER ANYTHING SPECIFIC WELL ON
THAT ONE. YOU JUST MENTIONED
IT'S YOU REFERENCE THAT IN
FIFTEEN SIXTEEN YEAR HELD
POSITIONS VACANT.
BUT THAT.
.
NOT SUBSEQUENTLY BUT IN BETWEEN
THERE WAS SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN NO WHERE IN.
.
WELL SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN I GUESS.
.
AND YET THERE WERE POSITION
STILL HELD VACANT.
.
WE WELL. THEM TO THE LARGEST
NUMBER OF POSITIONS WERE VACANT
WERE AT THE BOARD LEVEL.
AND WE WERE RUNNING AT THREE
THREE BOARD MEMBERS AND EACH
BOARD MEMBER HAS A LEGAL
ADVISER.
AND WE DON'T CONTROL THE
STAFFING OF THOSE POSITIONS
THOSE ARE.
GOVERNOR UP APPOINTEES
UNIMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T.
THEY WERE IT FELT VIA AND THEY
WEREN'T FILLED IN AS OF APRIL
NINTH THE THE THE FIFTH BOARD
MEMBER POSITION IS THEN FILLED
WE STILL HAVE.
THREE.
LEGAL ADVISER BECAUSE EACH
BOARD MEMBER IS AUTHORIZED ONE
LEGAL ADVISER THERE ARE STILL
THREE LEGAL ADVISERS THAT ARE
VACANT.
WERE.
YOU KNOW I HAVE MADE A REQUEST
OF.
THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE IN ORDER
TO CONFIRM THOSE APPOINTMENTS
SO WE STILL HAVE VACANCIES PART
OF THE VACANCIES.
THAT WE HAD REFERRED TO BEFORE
THE SEVEN POINT FIVE THAT RETAIN
IT WERE VACANT WERE IN ADDITION
TO THOSE APPOINTED POSITIONS
BECAUSE WE NEVER KNEW AT ANY
PARTICULAR POINT IN TIME.
WHEN THOSE GUBERNATORIAL
APPOINTMENT OF POSITIONS COULD
BE FILLED.
BUT. THE THE NOT APPOINTED
POSITIONS WERE FOCUSING ON
KEEPING THOSE FILLED TO THE
EXTENT THAT WE CAN AND ONE
VACANCIES OCCUR WE FILL THEM AS
QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
BECAUSE THEY DO IMPACT OUR
PROCESSING OF CHARGES.
THROUGH THE OF
THREE PHASES OF OUR OF
OPERATION.
I'M.
SO I CAN APPRECIATE Y..
IF YOU HAD BEACON BOARD
POSITIONS WHICH ALSO MEANT
VACANT LEGAL POSITIONS AND SUCH
LIKE THAT WERE PERHAPS THERE
WOULD BE A BACKLOG.
HOWEVER.
I IS YOU MAY NOW NOTED THOSE
POSITIONS THE GOVERNOR'S MADE
THE APPOINTMENTS.
THOSE SAY INDIVIDUALS WHO'LL
THEN AS I SOON MAKE. THEN THE
HIRING IN TERMS OF THE LEGAL
POSITIONS.
AND IT WAS THE BOTH HERB AND
THE LEGISLATURE'S INTENT.
WITH THE BUDGET AUGMENTATIONS
THAT WERE APPROVED TO ADDRESS
THE EXISTING BACKLOG AND TO.
HELP RESOLVE LABOR DISPUTES IN A
TIMELY MANNER.
IN THE ALLOCATION WAS BASED ON.
CURBS OWNED.
STATED GOAL OF A SIXTY DAY A
RESOLUTION. AND IN THE JANUARY
TWENTY SEVENTEEN REPORT BIRD
INDICATED THAT SIXTY DAYS IS A
REASONABLY EFFECTIVE PERIODS.
FOR THE OFFICE OF GENERAL
COUNSEL TO COMPLETE
INVESTIGATIONS.
ON.
AND YET AS YOU JUST INDICATED. A
YOU YOU DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S
POSSIBLE ALONE IF THAT'S
CONTRADICTORY BEFORE IT UNLESS
YOU HAVE MORE RESOURCES AND.
THE.
RESOURCES THAT WERE ALLOCATED.
WERE BASED ON ACHIEVING THAT
GOAL SO. WELL AYE AYE I'D I'D
AYE I UNDERSTAND THE SIXTY DAYS
OF PROCESS TO IT WASN'T THE
LEGISLATURE WHO CAME UP WITH
THOSE IN THAT DATE OR THOSE
DAYS.
IT WAS A PER REPORT. I AND I I'M
I'M I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE
GENESIS OF THE SIXTY DAYS I
CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THAT THAT'S
A STANDARD AND I AGREE WITH YOU
IT CLEARLY IS. A REASONABLE TIME
IN ORDER FOR THE PARTIES TO
RELATE A TOO WAIT FOR.
CHARGE IN ORDER TO BE PROCESS.
BUT WHAT I'M REPORTING IS THAT
NOW WITH.
A FULLY STAFFED.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE OF AND
HAVE LOOKED AT THE PROCESSING
TIME THAT IT TAKES
IS WHAT WHAT WHAT I'M SAYING IS
IT TAKES ABOUT A HUNDRED FIFTY
DAYS FOR US TO PROCESS. THOSE
CHARGES BASED ON THE CURRENT
LEVEL OF RESOURCES.
AND SO THE SIXTY DAYS ALTHOUGH
IT'S A REASONABLE.
GOAL.
IT'S UNREALISTIC THAT THINK
THAT IT CAN BE ACHIEVED BASED ON
THE CURRENT LEVEL OF RESOURCES
THAT ALLOCATED TO.
THE GENERAL COUNSEL SAW.
AND UNDERSTAND THAT THAT'S ONLY
ONE OF THREE PHASES.
OF PURBA CHARGE WOULD GO
THROUGH IT WOULD START AT THE
OUR GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE.
AND IF A COMPLAINT WAS ISSUED IT
WOULD BE THEN SCHEDULED FOR A
HEARING.
AT THE.
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
DECISION PROPOSED DECISION WOULD
BE ISSUED
AND THAT PROPOSED DECISION IS
SUBJECT TO APPEAL TO THE BOARD.
AND THEN THE BOARD WOULD ISSUE A
DECISION AND THAT APPEAL IS
SUBJECT TO COURT REVIEW.
SO I THINK I CAN'T SPEAK FOR ALL
MY COLLEAGUES IN THE LEGISLATURE
BUT I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY.
LESS WNBA.
WITNESS TOWARDS EIGHTY THE SIXTY
DAYS.
BUT MORE CONFUSION BECAUSE IT
WAS PERVS OWN REPORT.
THAT IT THAT TO US CITED THE
SIXTY DAYS SO TO HEAR NOW.
THAT IT'S.
THAT A HUNDRED AND FIFTY DAYS.
HARM.
IS WHAT YOU FEEL IS THE TIME
RAIN GIVING YOUR RESOURCES I
THINK THERE'S A HUGE DISCONNECT
THERE. SO I MEAN THERE NEEDS TO
BE.
I WOULD EXPECT HER TO IN
ISSUING WHATEVER NEXT REPORT TO
DO A BETTER ASSESSMENT.
AN I THINK THAT. THERE AND.
IT'S.
IT WOULD BE HARD FOR ME TO GO TO
MY COLLEAGUES IN ARGUE FOR.
AN INJECTION OF RESOURCES.
TO DEAL WITH THE BACKLOG WHEN
THE LAST INJECTION OF RESOURCES
WAS FOR THAT PURPOSE AND BASED
ON CURBS OWN ANALYSIS KNOW AGAIN
I'M NOT. TRYING TO SAY WE HAVE
TO HOLD TO SEE
STEVE DAYS BUT IT'S SEE THERE'S
A BIG DISCONNECT
BETWEEN.
THE ARM. ALLOCATIONS THAT WERE
APPROVED BASED ON INPUT FROM
CURB AND NOW TO HEAR THAT WELL
THIS DOESN'T REALLY WORK AND IT
TAKES A HUNDRED AND FIFTY TAX.
MEANT MADAM CHAIR IF YES SPEAK.
A GREAT COULD TOLD THE
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.
AS YOU'VE INDICATED WE HAVE
GIVEN HERB SOME BUDGETARY
AUGMENTATIONS OF THE LAST TWO
BUDGET AXE RIGHT WHICH RESULTED
IN A NET GOING TO THE FUTURE.
THEY'RE NOT JUST FOR THEY WORK
JUST A ONE TIME ONLY.
ABSOLUTELY OTHER IT WAS ONGOING
FUNDING TO ADDRESS AS YOU
INDICATED A BACKLOG.
THE BUDGETARY PRESSURES THAT
THEY HAD AS A RESULT OF FULLY
IMPLEMENTING THEIR BOARD AND
THAT THE STORY COMPLEMENT THE
ALSO SUPPORTING RESOURCES.
TO ADDRESS THE BACKLOG.
THOSE AUGMENTATIONS WERE
APPROXIMATELY A FOURTEEN OR
THEIR OVERALL BUDGET SO WAS IT A
PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL SIZE INCREASE
OR THE LAST TWO YEARS.
POWER DESPITE THOSE RESOURCES
ON THE NUMBER OF CASES BEING
PROCESSED HAS KIND OF REMAINED
STAGNANT WHILE THE BACKLOG IT'S
INCREASING SO.
KIND OF GIVEN THESE LONGSTANDING
CONCERNS AND.
CONTINUED INTEREST BY EXTERNAL
STAKE STAKEHOLDERS IN ADVOCATES.
THE SEE HOSE THINGS IMPROVED.
WE ARE GOING TO BE EMBARKING ON
A MISSION BASS REVIEW WITH HERB.
.
AND THAT TOGETHER A BETTER
UNDERSTANDING OF THE
DEPARTMENT'S CORE MISSIONS
HISTORICAL ALLOCATION OF
RESOURCES AND METHODS ASSOCIATE
WITH PROGRAM DELIVERY. I WANT TO
BE CLEAR THIS IS NOT AN AUDIT.
THIS IS A COLLABORATIVE PROCESS
OR WE SIT DOWN WITH THE
DEPARTMENT AND TAKE A REALLY
HOLISTIC VIEW. OF WHAT THE
MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT IS AND
GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE CHAIN
OF A CASE THROUGH THEIR
DEPARTMENT AND FIGURE OUT. ON
WHERE WE CAN GAIN EFFICIENCIES
IF THERE'S ANY I STOP GAPS THAT
WE CAN IMPLEMENT.
IF THE LEVEL OF RESOURCES IS
APPROPRIATE BASED ON THAT THE
AMOUNT OF WORK AT THE RECEIVING.
SO WHAT WE'RE GONNA BE EMBARKING
ON THIS PROCESS OVER THE NEXT
SEVERAL MONTHS. AND TO GAIN A A
REALLY GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF
THEIR OPERATIONS BECAUSE WE HAVE
THE SAME CONCERNS AS YOU'RE KIND
OF INDICATING SO I CAN
APPRECIATE WHY THERE WOULD STILL
BE. BACKLOG GIVEN THAT THERE
WERE POSITIONS THAT WEREN'T
FILLED BEHIND ONLY BOARD
POSITIONS BUT OTHERS. AND I'M
NOT OPPOSED TO I DON'T WANT TO
BE I ON THE RECORD I DON'T WANT
IT TO BE INTERPRETED THAT I'M.
CLOSE MINDED TO PROVIDING AN
APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF RESOURCES
TO PER BY VERY OPEN MINDED THAT
IT'S JUST THAT.
WHEN WE RECEIVE.
REPORTS FROM PER THAT.
GIVEN CERTAIN ASSESSMENT WERE I
MEAN AT.
WE OBVIOUSLY ARE RESPONDING TO
THE BOARD'S OWN THE INFORMATION
YOU PROVIDE US SO.
A ASSISTING US WITH.
.
WHATEVER YOU KNOW EITHER BETTER
MORE ACCURATE OR BETTER
ASSESSMENTS WOULD BE HELPFUL
WHERE IN FACT IF IT IF I COULD
OPEN I WAS JUST REMINDED.
BY GENERAL COUNSEL OF.
THAT THAT THAT THIS THE SIXTY
DAYS WAS LOOKED AT KIND OF IS AN
INDEPENDENT REASONABLE STANDARD
AND I'D 'D AND THE BUT I WAS
REMINDED OF IS I DON'T BELIEVE
THAT WE HAVE MADE THE
REPRESENTATION.
THAT IF WE WERE OF A FUNDED AT
EXISTING STAFFING LEVELS THAT WE
COULD.
ACHIEVE THAT IS TO SAY THAT
COULD ACHIEVE THAT.
SIXTY DAYS STANDARD IS REALLY
KIND OF AN INDEPENDENT STANDARD.
BUT THE OF THE THE FISCAL.
FACED YOU KNOW REVIEW IS GOING
TO ADDRESS THAT BECAUSE THAT'S
THE VARIABLE I MEAN THE WORK
COMING IN THE THE THE FRONT DOOR
IS. USUALLY PRETTY PREDICTABLE
IT'S A QUESTION OF HOW FAST
WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO
PROCESS THAT.
INCENSE WERE LABOR AND AN
INTENSIVE OF FUNCTION F. YOU
KNOW THE MORE HANDS THAT WE HAVE
IN ORDER TO WORK ON CASES THE
THE SHORTER THE TIME THAT
THEY'RE GOING TO BE A.
BUT THE FISCAL A BASE REVIEW I
BELIEVE IT'S GOING TO LOOK AT
RESOURCES BASED ON OUTPUT.
AND.
.
AND THE I HOPEFULLY THE
CALCULATION WILL BE WHAT NUMBER
OF RESOURCES DO WE KNEW DO IN
ORDER TO NEED IN ORDER TO
PRODUCE THIS.
TODAY TURN AROUND TIME
AT THE GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE
LEVEL.
EMILIO DID YOU WANT TO COMMENT
ON THIS ITEM.
ANNETTE SCHROEDER WITH THE LA WE
HAVEN'T EVALUATED THE SINCE LAST
YEAR.
KAHAN BUT IT DOES SEEM LIKE THE
BACKLOG THAT EXISTED.
A LAST YEAR'S NOT REALLY
IMPROVED.
AND AND AS A THE CHAIR PER BUT
INDICATED THERE WAS I DON'T
THINK REALLY UNDERSTAND IT
UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY
NECESSARILY WOULD GET.
THE DAYS OF HERBASED ON ON THE
RESORT.
SENATE BILL DEVON COMMONER
CLASS.
OKAY.
OBSERVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
ITEM.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE KRISTI PALMA BEHALF
FOR THE CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL
FIREFIGHTERS.
I'LL TRY NOT TO BE AGITATED
WITNESS NUMBER ONE.
.
ITS FIRST IT'S IT'S ENCOURAGING
AND THEN FRUSTRATING TO HEAR
ABOUT THE MISSION STUDY. THAT WE
JUST WAITED A YEAR ON AN
INTERNAL PROBE EFFICIENCY STUDY
THAT WAS ANOTHER REASON TO DELAY
ALLOCATING ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
OF THAT PROBE COULD MEET ITS.
BUT GOALS AND MISSION.
.
SO THAT SOUNDS LIKE ANOTHER
DELAY WILL APPRECIATE THAT THAT
IS OF GOOD LOOK YOU CAN JUST
SIMPLY LOOK AT THE NUMBERS ABOUT
THE JURISDICTION A PERVERT HOW
DOES GROWN IN THE LAST FIFTEEN
YEARS. FROM OVERSEEING A
COUPLE'S THREE FOUR BUT
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STATUTES
TO OVERSEEING OVER EIGHT
DIFFERENT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
STATUTES I THINK THERE'S THREE
OR FOUR BILLS PENDING IN THE
LEGISLATURE THAT WANT TO ADD
MORE. SO A FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE
THAT MORE PEOPLE MEANS MORE
CASES.
THAT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE IT TAKES
TWO YEARS TO FIGURE THAT OUT.
AND THEN THE OTHER THING ON
THIS DISCUSSION ABOUT SIXTY DAYS
I CAN APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE
SAYING BECAUSE. THERE IS NO
STATUTORY MANDATE THAT IS A
REASONABLE STANDARD WAITING FIVE
YEARS FOR A CASE IS NO SOLUTION
AND NO JUSTICE AT ALL AND SO IF
THEY'RE DOESN'T EXIST A
STATUTORY MANDATE. THEN THE
PARTIES HERE CAN CONTINUE TO SAY
WELL WE'RE NOT MEETING WHAT'S
REASONABLE BUT WE'RE NOT
BREAKING THE LAW.
SO WE WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO DIG
AND CONTINUE DIGGING AND
ALLOCATE RESOURCES NOW.
THANK YOU.
OFFICIAL CAST OF THE SERVICE
EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION I
WILL ALSO TRY NOT TO BE.
IRRITATED WITNESS NUMBER TWO.
OPEN ADVOCATE PRESS CA FOR
ALMOST TWENTY FIVE YEARS AND FOR
ALL THAT TIME I'VE WORKED ON
MATTERS DEALING WITH PER.
AND.
THROUGH THAT ENTIRE TIME
PURPOSE BEEN UNDERFUNDED. UP MY
UNION IN TWO THOUSAND.
PASSED S. B. SEVEN THREE NINE
BUT THE MYERS MILIUS BROWN ACT
UNDER THE PER. THAT ADDED
APPROXIMATELY ONE POINT FIVE
MILLION EMPLOYEES AND SEVERAL
THOUSAND EMPLOYERS. AT THAT TIME
WE ASK THE LEGISLATURE TO
INCREASE THE FUNDING. BY TWO
MILLION DOLLARS JUST TO ADDRESS
ADDING THAT ONE ACT TO IT.
INSTEAD ONLY TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS WAS ADDED TO
ADDRESS THAT THE CASELOAD.
FROM ADDING JUST THE MYERS MICE
BROWN OUT THE PURPOSE.
CASES IN JURISDICTION ALMOST
DOUBLED AND SINCE THEN AS A SPAM
IMAGINE THERE BEEN OTHER OUT
ADDED TO IT SO THIS AGENCY HAS
ALWAYS BEEN UNDERFUNDED. AND IT
CONTINUES TO BE UNDER FUNDED
AREN'T SO WOULD WE THINK THAT AT
LEAST FIVE MILLION DOLLARS NEEDS
TO BE INFUSED INTO BUDGETED AT
LEAST GET THEM. CLOSER TO THAT
SIXTY DAY PROCESSING TIME ON
IT'S WEEDS ON REALLY REQUEST A
CLOSE LOOK AT PROVIDING
ADDITIONAL FUNDING THANK YOU.
BEN CHAIR MEMBERS MICHAEL YOUNG
WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION
OWN ECHO THE COMMENTS OF MY
COLLEAGUE THE JUST HEARD I THINK
THE. ISSUE IS NECESSARILY.
A BIT WE GIVE HER A LITTLE
EXTRA MONEY OVER THE LAST FEW
YEARS WITH THE KILLING OF MORE I
THINK THE QUESTION IS HAVE WE
ADEQUATELY FUNDED HIS
ORGANIZATION ORDER TO MEET ITS
MANDATE OR TO MEET THE GOALS
THAT. WE NEED TO DO I THINK WILL
BE ADDED SOME FUNDS WE GET SOME
NEW PEOPLE ON THE TIMELINES FOR
AMPERES WENT FROM ALMOST A
HUNDRED NINETY NINE DAYS POTS
WINTER DAYS TO AS A CHAIR JUST
DID. HUNDRED FIFTY IN THE GOAL
IS TO GET IT YOU KNOW CLOSER TO
SIXTY SO YOU SING SOME MOVEMENT
BUT THE QUESTION IS ADEQUACY.
ARE WE GIVING THEM ENOUGH MONEY
TO MEET THIS GOAL ON THIS
REASONABLE GOLDEN AS I A CHRISSY
SAY WHICH ISN'T A STEP THREE
MANDATE BUT IT SHOULD BE.
SO I THINK.
ESPECIALLY WITH PRESSURES FROM
THE FEDERAL LEVEL ON THE CHANGES
IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR AS WE'RE
GOING TO SEE MORE SERVE
DISCOURSE AND MORE.
.
A.
JUST MORE AGITATION BETWEEN THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUBLIC
SECTOR EMPLOYEES AND PUBLIC
SECTOR EMPLOYERS I THINK NOW IS
A CRITICAL TIME WE TAKE THE STEP
TO MAKE SURE THAT WERE PUT THAT
WERE ADEQUATELY FUNDING THIS
RGANIZATION. THE MEET THE
LEGISLATIVE BILLS WE PASS
SEVERAL AFTER YEARS INCLUDING A
NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION
INCLUDING MAKING SURE THAT.
AT A PUBLIC SECTORS ARE PUBLIC
SECTOR EMPLOYERS ARE ENGAGED IN
UNION BUSTING TO HIM SURE THAT
OUR CONTRACTS ARE ADEQUATE LEAD
A AND FORCE WE NEED TO MAKE SURE
THEY HAVE THAT
IF PLANS WE THINK IT'S REAL.
FIVE MILLION DOLLARS IN AN
ONGOING PLANS TO MEET THAT GOAL.
I'M.
I DON'T OWN RECALL EXACT YEARS
THOSE S. SOME OF THOSE STATUTES
WERE PASSED THAT PUT IT ON. NEW.
UNITS UNDER.
PER BUT I'M WONDER FROM EITHER
PROVE ITSELF FOR DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE USUALLY LIKE WE.
IN SOME OF OUR VOTE ONLY
ACTIONS TODAY FOR EXAMPLE WE.
IT TOOK ACTION ON.
FINDING. CONDOMS NEW STATUTORY
REQUIREMENTS
SO I WONDER IF THOSE STATUTORY
REQUIREMENTS
WHAT IF THE ADMINISTRATION DID.
PUT BECAUSE THE THE.
LANGUAGE I SEE. IN THE THIS ITEM
IS REFERENCING THE AND FINDING
INCREASES THAT WERE APPROVED DID
NOT SEEM TO BE CONNECTED. TO
THOSE NEW STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
SO I SUPPOSE I'M ECHOING THE.
SENTIMENTS EXPRESSED AT THE MIKE
THAT OF AND THE COMMENT THAT.
IF
WHY WOULD WE NEED TO DO A YEAR
LONG REVIEW IF WE KNOW THAT WE
GAVE AN AGENCY. MORE.
ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES WHY
WAS THERE NO I A AND ACTION TO
LOOK AT.
HOW TO FIND THEM APPROPRIATELY
FOR NEW RESPONSIBILITIES?
THANK YOU MADAM CHIR.
A LOT OF THOSE STATUTES HAVE
BEEN UNDER PURPOSE JURISDICTION
FOR MORE THAN A DECADE THE ONLY
NEW STATUTE THAT ADDED
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYER GROUPS TO
HERB RECENTLY WAS THAT.
JUDICIAL COUNCIL BILL THAT
ADDED THE AT JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES.
TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND
PUT THEM UNDER.
.
PURPOSE JURISDICTION THERE WAS
ALSO THE AYE JUSTICE ERA ON BUT
THAT HAS SINCE BEEN REPEALED SO
THAT.
GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS IS NO
LONGER NECESSARILY FALLING UNDER
HER.
WENT WHENEVER A BILL IS
SUBMITTED HOWEVER WE DO WORK
WITH THE DEPARTMENT TO IDENTIFY
POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO THEIR
OPERATIONS AND AND MAKE SURE
THAT IF THERE ARE GOING TO BE.
THAT WE ANALYZE THOSE.
AND DETERMINE IF ANY
SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING IS
NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THOUGH
IT RATCHETS BUT BECAUSE THOSE
ARE SO OLD. I REFERENCE THE
JUDICIAL COUNCIL BILL THOUGH WAS
THERE.
FINDING
PUT TO.
.
TO.
REFLECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
THAT STATUTE.
FOR PER I DON'T RECALL I'M IF
THERE WERE SPECIFIC
AUGMENTATIONS TO THEIR BUDGET I
KNOW THAT THERE WAS SOME
INCLUDED FOR THE JUDICIAL
COUNCIL TO STAND UP THEIR
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.
UNIT AND TED TO BEGIN
ADDRESSING ADDITIONAL WORKLOAD
BUT I DON'T RECALL.
SPECIFICALLY FROM THERE AM I
USUALLY WOULDN'T CALL FOR A BACK
AND FORTH BUT SINCE I'M NOT
FAMILIAR WITH ALL THE STATUTES
AND THERE SEEMS TO BE A
DISAGREEMENT.
AMONGST THOSE WHO MADE PUBLIC
COMMENT FROM THE REFERENCE THAT
YOU MADE.
.
IF ONE OF YOU KNOW I YOU COULD
COME TO THE MIKE AGAIN.
INITIAL CAST OF THE SERVICE
EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
YES AT ONE TIME THERE WAS A
SPECIFIC COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
OUT FOR HOME CARE WORKERS BUT
PART OF THAT THEY WERE UNDER THE
MYERS MILIUS BROWN ACT SO WE GOT
RID OF THE I. H. ASSESSED ACT.
THEY JUST WENT BACK UNDER THE
MYERS MILIUS BRADDOCK SO THEY
ALWAYS REMAINED. UNDER THE PROBE
JURISDICTION SO YES SOME OF
THOSE STATUTES ARE OLD.
AND THEY WERE DONE MORE THAN A
DECADE AGO BUT MORE THAN A
DECADE AGO THEY WERE NOT
PROVIDED ADEQUATE FUNDING TO DO
THAT. IS ALSO CORRECT THAT
FUNDING WAS PROVIDED WHEN.
THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL PLOYS WERE
AUTHORIZED.
TO UNIONIZE MONEY WAS GIVEN TO
THE EMPLOYER.
TO MEET ITS OBLIGATIONS BUT NONE
WERE GIVEN TO THE BODY THAT
ENFORCES AND ADMINISTERS A
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STATUTES
THE KIND OF ON BALANCE THERE
OKAY. RIGHT AND CHAIR COULD
CERTAINLY MISTER CHAIR. OF THANK
YOU.
FIRST OF ALL THAT THAT'S
CORRECT I MEAN THERE WERE HERB
DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY ADDITIONAL
BUDGETARY FUNDS.
WHEN JUDICIAL COUNCIL CAME
UNDER PURPOSE JURISDICTION.
THE.
.
AND DEPARTMENT FINANCES
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT IS THAT ALL
BILLS THAT ARE.
CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH PART OF
OUR ANALYSIS INTERNALLY IS TO
LOOK AT WHAT THE IMPACT IS.
ON OUR OPERATIONS AND I THINK
WHAT'S IMPORTANT. TO AND MORE
BECOMING MORE SOPHISTICATED IN
TERMS OF THE WAY THAT WE'RE
LOOKING.
AT THOSE AND COST THE IN THE.
A LABOR IMPACTS AT LEAST LABOR
IMPACTS TO TO PER.
AND FOR EVERY SIXTY CHARGES.
THAT WE LOOK AT AS LEGISLATION
INCREASES WHAT OUR STAFFING
NEEDS ARE IS THAT WE NEED.
ONE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY IN THE
GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE TO
PROCESS THOSE ADDITIONAL SIXTY
CHARGES AND FOR EACH ATTORNEY.
THAT'S IN THEGENERAL COUNSEL'S
OFFICE.
OF WE NEED AN ADDITIONAL ONE
POINT SEVEN POSITIONS THROUGHOUT
THE REST OF THE ORGANIZATION IN
ORDER TO PROCESS THOSE THE
IMPACT OF THOSE.
XTR* SO IT'S NOT JUST.
AT THE GENERAL COUNSEL'S LEVEL
BUT IT BECAUSE OF THE ARE THE
SYSTEM THAT WE HAD AS I
ARTICULATED BEFORE. GENERAL
COUNSEL HANDLES THE CHARGES.
IF IF A COMPLAINT IS ISSUED IT
THEN GOES TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
SO THERE'S AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
JUDGE THAT WOULD HOLD AN
EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
ISSUE DECISION.
AND THEN THOSE ARE APPEALED
POTENTIALLY TO THE BOARD SO ALL
OF THOSE IMPACTS FOR SIXTY
CHARGES. COMING IN THE DOOR AND
OF ADDITIONAL WORK COMING IN THE
BOARD DOOR CREATED BECAUSE OF
LEGISLATION.
PROBE NEEDS A ABOUT A TWO POINT
SEVEN POSITIONS TO HANDLE THE
IMPACT OF THAT INCREASE IN SIX
OF SIXTY TWO.
ALRIGHT SO M..
THIS WAS INFORMATIONAL WE DON'T
OBVIOUSLY HAVE A AND BUDGET
ACTION ON IT TOO CLEARLY THERE'S
BEEN.
ADDRESSED THE.
NEED TO OR THERE'S BEEN RAISE
THE NEED TO ADDRESS THIS
BACKLOG.
SO I'M SURE WE'LL BE TALKING
WITH STAFF.
AS TO. WHAT THE COMMITTEE MAY DO
GOING FORWARD?
THANK YOU OKAY APPRECIATE
.
FIVE ZERO DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ISSUE
SIXTEEN.
THE WAGE THEFT RESTITUTION
PHONES.
GOOD AFTERNOON MA'AM SHARE
SENATOR BILL.
MY NAME IS GREG EDWARDS I AM OF
THE.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS.
THE PROPOSAL YOU HAVE BEFORE
YOU.
.
IT IS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS A.
THE CIVIC A VERY SPECIFIC IN
PARTICULAR IF.
OF THE GARMENT RESTITUTION FUND
IS. A FUELED BY OR SUPPORTED BY
OUR KARMIC REGISTRATION FEES.
WHICH SELF WHICH STATUTORILY
SEVENTY FIVE DOLLARS FROM EACH
REGISTRATION GOES INTO THE REGS
RESTITUTION FUND.
ARE WE HAVE I'M SEEN A GROWTH IN
ACCUMULATION OF OF CLAIMS THAT
OF HAVE EXCEEDED THE FUNDS
ABILITY TO PAY.
AND SO THIS PROPOSAL.
REQUEST FOR FORTY.
TO REDIRECT MONIES THAT HAVE
BEEN DEPOSITED INTO THE UNPAID
WAIT FOR.
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAIN.
WHAT AT THE TIME OF THIS
PROPOSAL'S WRITING WAS
APPROXIMATELY FOUR POINT FOUR
MILLION DOLLARS AND?
A GARMENT CLAIMS WHICH WE WHICH
THE FUND A DOES NOT HAVE THE THE
WHERE WITH ALL TO PAY.
A BEFORE THE REMAINING MONIES
ARE SWEPT.
TO THE GENERAL FUND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH BUDGET BILLING.
OKAY.
ALRIGHT ANY ERA COMMENTS ON THIS
ONE TUNIC COMMENTS AND EITHER
FINANCER OLEO.
OKAY.
.
THEN IF WE.
WILL MOVE A REVERSAL WORKABLE
ENTERTAIN A MOTION OR WE HAVE A
MOVES AND MOTION TO APPROVE THE
ITEM AS PROPOSED.
WE'LL TAKE A ROLL CALL.
MADAM CHAIR.
BY SENATOR AND.
ANNABELLE.
RIGHT.
THANK YOU.
I THINK THAT.
CONCLUDES US FOR.
TODAY.
AND A REALLY GOOD TO SEE YOU
AGAIN SOON YES WE DID GREAT OKAY
DID COME.
SUBCOMMITTEE NUMBER FIVE ON
BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW NOW
CONCLUDE