COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS
PROFESSIONS AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND THIS IS OUR
FIRST HEARING FOR TWENTY FOR THE
YEAR TWENTY EIGHTEEN WE HAVE
THREE BILLS ON OUR FILE TODAY.
NONE OF THEM ARE A PROPOSED FOR
CONSENT A I'D ALSO LIKE TO
WELCOME OUR COMMITTEES.
THE NEWEST MEMBER WE HAVE FOR
THE SENATE FELLOW.
AND HE SAID THE DATA ILLICIT
WELCOME THANK.
LISA. IN DESERVE FIRST HEARING
AND SHE WE LOOK FORWARD TO
WORKING WITH YOU DURING THIS
YEAR AND A.
IT'S ALWAYS A LOT OF FUN.
YOU ENJOY SO WELCOME.
BUT SENATOR BATES GOOD AFTERNOON
PLEASE. COME FORWARD MOVE TAKE
ITEM NUMBER ONE SP SEVENTY.
AND WE.
WE WE WILL BEGIN AS A.
SUBCOMMITTEE UNTIL WE HAVE A
ESTABLISHED.
SENATOR RATE.
PLEASE THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS I.
WANNA THANK YOU AYE AND STAFF IN
PARTICULAR FOR THE EXTENSIVE
WORKING CONSIDERATION NOW THAT
YOU'VE GIVEN THIS PARTICULAR. A
PIECE OF LEGISLATION AS AMENDED
S. B. SEVENTY WITH KERMIT
RESTRICTED APPRAISAL REPORTS TO
BE SHARED WITH USERS BEYOND THE
CLIENT WHO REQUESTED IT IF THE
CLIENT APPROVES.
THIS BILL IF A LIMITED EXCEPTION
EXEMPTION THAT SIMPLY ALLOWS FOR
A CLIENT TO HEAR THESE LIMITED
AND RESTRICTED REPORTS WITH
SPECIFIC INTENDED RECIPIENTS THE
REPORTS WOULD STILL HAVE TO BE
COMPLETED. BY LICENSED OR
CERTIFIED APPRAISERSWHO HAVE TO
COMPLY WITH THE REST OF
PROVISIONS OF USE APPLE OR THE
UNIVERSE UNIFORM STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE
ADDITIONALLY. THE EXEMPTION
WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED FOR A
FEDERALLY RELATED TRANSACTION A
LONER REFINANCE ON RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY WERE ALONE OF INVESTOR
FUNDS ARRANGED BY A MORTGAGE
BROKER. I'M COMMITTED TO
CONTINUING TO WORK WITH
INTERESTED STAKE HOLDERS ON THE
LEGISLATION THROUGHOUT THE REST
OF THE YEAR.
ALL I HAVE WITH ME TODAY MIKE
THE LOS WITH THE APPRAISAL
INSTITUTE TO TESTIFY IN SUPPORT.
AND SPEAK TO THE TECHNICAL
DETAILS OF THE BILL.
AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH SENATOR
BATES IN THAT MR BELOW IF YOU
WOULD HOLD FOR ONE SECOND SO WE
COULD ESTABLISH A QUORUM PLEASE
CALL THE ROLL. HEALTH HERE BILL
HERE FULLER.
FULLER HERE THOUGHT.
GALGIANI GALGIANI HERE GLAZER.
HERNANDEZ NEWMAN HERE NEWMAN
HERE PAN.
WILK PRESENT HERE VERY GOOD WE
HAVE ESTABLISHED A QUORUM SO MR
BELOW PLEASE PROCEED THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS MIKE
BILLOWED ON BEHALF THE APPRAISAL
INSTITUTE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
COMMITTEE.
A THIS IS A VERY NARROW BILL.
ACTUALLY THE COMMITTEE PASSED A
MUCH BROADER BILL TWO YEARS AGO
WHICH DIED IN APPROPRIATIONS ON
FISCAL GROUNDS THIS IS A VERY
NARROW. OF VERSION OF THAT MUCH
NARROWER THAN TWO YEARS AGO AND
UNDERSTAND THE REASON FOR IT IF
I COULD DO JUST A MINUTE ON THE
VERY UNUSUAL NATURE OF
CALIFORNIANS APPRAISAL LAW. IS I
THINK IT DEMONSTRATES THE REASON
FOR THE BILL.
IN NINETEEN NINETY CALIFORNIA
CREATED AN APPRAISAL LICENSING
LAW AS GOOD EVERY OTHER STATE IN
RESPONSE TO A FEDERAL MANDATE
COMING OUT OF THE SNL CRISIS.
AND THE FED SAID YOU BUST
LICENSE OR CERTIFY APPRAISERS
TO DO WHAT ARE KNOWN AS
FEDERALLY RELATED TRANSACTIONS
THAT'S A VERY A NARROW TERM OF
ART. THAT BASICALLY MEANS
FEDERALLY INSURED.
TRANSACTIONS BUT
A ALL OTHER OF PRE SELECTIVITY
REQUIRES NO LICENSE OF ANY SORT
SO I COULD DO IT. A SENATOR
BATES COULD DO IT I DON'T KNOW
ABOUT SENATOR BATES BUT I WOULD
BE UNQUALIFIED. AND IF I AM
DOING THIS.
I CAN DO IT SUBJECT AND NO
STANDARDS AT ALL.
SO A FEDERALLY RELATED
TRANSACTION MUST BE PERFORMED
PURSUANT UNIFORM STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE.
BUT CALIFORNIA GO LAW GOES ONE
STEP FURTHER AND THEY SAY.
ANYTHING A LICENSED OR CERTIFIED
APPRAISER DOES.
MUST COMPLY WITH THESE UNIFORM
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL
APPRAISAL PRACTICE.
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM THEN?
THE PROBLEM IS A NARROW ONE.
USE PATH AS WE CALL IT ALLOWS
TWO TYPES OF REPORTS
A FULL APPRAISAL REPORT.
OR A RESTRICTED APPRAISAL
REPORT.
THINK ABOUT IT A LITTLE LIKE IN
THE ACCOUNTING CONTEXT WHERE YOU
COULD BUY IN AUDIT AURA LESSER
PRODUCT KNOWN AS A REVIEW.
IF SOMEBODY COMES TO A LICENSED
OR CERTIFIED APPRAISER AND SAYS
I WANTED TO.
LESS THAN A FULL USE PAP
APPRAISAL I WANT A RESTRICTED
REPORT.
THE APPRAISER CANNOT DO IT IF IT
IS INTENDED FOR MORE THAN ONE
USER.
THEY CAN ONLY DO THE SERVICE.
IF ONLY THE CLIENT IS GONNA GET
THE REPORT.
SO FOR EXAMPLE IF IT IS CLIENT
AND LAWYER.
OR CLIENT AND FINANCIAL PLANNER
FOR CLIENT AND
A REAL ESTATE BROKER OR CLIENT
AND I. ARRESTS.
THEY CANNOT PURCHASE THE
RESTRICTED REPORT BECAUSE THERE
IS MORE THAN ONE INTENDED USER
AND THAT IS THE ENTIRETY OF THE
BILL ALL WE'RE SAYING IS.
WITH THE CLIENTS CONSENT.
YOU CAN DO A RESTRICTED
APPRAISAL REPORT AND GIVE IT TO
MORE THAN ONE PERSON.
WITHOUT VIOLATING THE LICENSING
LAW HERE'S WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU
DON'T ENACT THE BILL IN THIS IS
WHAT'S HAPPENING TODAY.
THAT WORK
IS GOING TO UNLICENSED PEOPLE
THAT WE HAVE NO IDEA WHO THEY
ARE. AGAIN IT COULD BE ME.
AND WE WILL AND WE KNOW THAT
THERE ARE NO STANDARDS WHICH
WHICH MUST BE A PERFORMED BY THE
UNLICENSED PERSON.
SO.
IT IS ODD PUBLIC POLICY
RESPECTFULLY I WOULD SUGGEST TO
ENCOURAGE THE USE OF UNLICENSED
PEOPLE OVER WHOM WE HAVE NO
OVERSIGHT.
WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE WE
CANNOT TAKE THEIR LICENSE AWAY
BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ONE.
AND THEY'D NEED NOT PERFORM THE
APPRAISAL ACCORDING TO ANY
STANDARDS OF ANY SORT.
FAR FROM BEING A REPUDIATION OF
USE CPAP.
THIS BILL IS ACTUALLY AN
AFFIRMATION OF YOU SPENT
BECAUSE.
THE LICENSED AND CERTIFIED
APPRAISER IS GOING TO HAVE TO
COMPLY PRECISELY WITH USE CPAP.
WITH THE ONLY EXCEPTION BEING.
THAT MORE THAN ONE INTENDED USER
COULD GET THE REPORT.
NOW IN THE PAST PEOPLE HAVE
SUGGESTED A POTENTIAL. CONSUMER
PROBLEM A. IT IS BEEN DESCRIBED
TO ME AS THE MA AND PA KETTLE
PROBLEM
WHAT HAPPENS IF MA AND PA KETTLE
ARE BUYING A HOUSE OR
REFINANCING THEIR HOUSE.
SHOULDN'T THEY GET A FULL USE
CPAP REPORT.
WELL WE'VE
PROVIDED IN THE BILL AN
EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION IF
YOU WILL SO THE BILL WOULD NOT
APPLY TO THAT MONPA CATTLE
BUYING OR REFINANCING THEIR
HOUSE. WOULD STILL GET A FULL
USE CPAP REPORT.
BUT IF MONPA CATTLE ARE
INVESTING IN A REAL ESTATE LOAN.
TAKEN THAT OUT AS WELL WE ARE
TALKING ABOUT SOPHISTICATED
PARTIES AND PEOPLE HAVE ASKED ME
HOW MIGHT THIS COME UP IN REAL
LIFE.
SO LET'S SAY YOU'RE THINKING OF
CHALLENGING YOUR PROPERTY TAX
ASSESSMENT.
YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE GONNA
GO TO THE TIME AND EXPENSE OF
THE PROPERTY TAX PEEL. BUT
YOU'RE TALKING TO YOUR PERSON
WHO MIGHT HANDLE THE APPEAL WITH
YOU AND YOU SAY. THE THE PERSON
SAYS LET'S GET A AND A SHORT
FORM APPRAISAL REPORT AND SEE IF
IT'S WORTH DOING.
THE CLIENT COULD ORDER SUCH A
PRODUCT BUT NOT IF THEY'RE
SHARING IT WITH THEIR LAWYER OR
THEIR.
APPEAL PERSON IT YOU CAN ONLY
HAVE ONE INTENDED USER AND
THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT'S
CHANGED IN THIS BILL.
SO WE THINK THAT WE HAVE A FIRM
TO USE PAP WE'VE CREATED THE
NARROWEST POSSIBLE EXCEPTION.
WE ARE ENCOURAGING THE USE OF
LICENSE PEOPLE RATHER THAN
UNLICENSED PEOPLE.
AND WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
YOUR IDOL.
THANK YOU MR BELOW THAT WAS A
LONG MINUTE BUT I AM VERY SORRY
SORRY. A OTHER OTHERS IN SUPPORT
OF.
SENATOR MITCHELL.
THOSE IN OPPOSITION.
AND FORGET PLEASE.
THE FORT UNTIL I CAN AFFORD IT
COURSE HITLER GOT.
I I I I GOT YOUR.
.
YEAH THE DIFFERENCES YOU'LL BEAT
BEAT BETWEEN THE TWO I THINK IT
IT IT DOES MAKE SENSE TO ME FROM
THE STANDPOINT IF YOU'RE.
S. TRYING TO FIND OUT WHAT THE
VALUATION OF SUB THE YEARS.
BEFORE YOU LOG SHE AND.
TO.
TO PEEL THE PROPERTY TAX
ASSESSMENT AS YOU DESCRIBED.
.
I'VE GOT A COUPLE QUESTIONS
WERE.
SO THAT ONE PERSON FOR THAT ONE.
.
THE DEED THE D. I APPRAISALS
ATTENDED FOR.
WHAT STOPS THAT ONE PERSON WHO
GETS THIS APPRAISAL FROM GOING
OUT?
IN USING THAT APPRAISAL.
TWO WHY TRY.
TO.
NEGOTIATE.
ITS SAY HERE'S MY APPRAISAL FOR
MY PROPERTY MY COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY MY.
RESIDENTS ARE WHAT STOPS THAT
PERSON FROM DOING THAT FOR
SIBLINGS AND EVERYTHING ON IN
THE.
AND THE STATE
YOU KNOW WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO.
YOU KNOW DISTRIBUTE MONEY TO TWO
ERRORS.
SO THELAW. ONLY REGULATES THE
LICENSEE WE CANNOT SAY WHAT YOU
AS THAT CLIENT CAN DO WITH THE
YOU WHAT WHAT THE LAW SAYS IS
THE APPRAISER CAN'T DO THE
PRODUCT. IF THERE IS MORE THAN
ONE INTENDED USER SO IF THE
APPRAISER IS AWARE THAT ANYBODY
ELSE BESIDES THE CLIENT. CAN BE
A USER OF THE REPORT THEY CAN'T
DO THE SERVICE WHAT YOU CAN DO
IS YOU CAN GO TO THE UNLICENSED
PERSON WHO HAS NO SUCH
RESTRICTION AND THAT'S WHAT'S
HAPPENING.
OKAY BUT WE HAVE A STANDARD AND
YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THIS
COMMITTEE.
YOUR WORKS ALL THE TIME WITH
LICENSE CONTRACTORS AND.
I I I GUESS WHAT MY CONCERN
WOULD BE IS ARE WE.
YOU KNOW BY DOING SOMETHING
LIKE THIS SO WE JUST SAY NO WELL
YOU KNOW THERE'S ON LICENSE
PEOPLE THAT ARE. WORKING AND
ETHICALLY OUT THERE SO WE SHOULD
LOWER THE BAR. LOWERED THE
STANDARD FOR EVERYBODY ELSE
WHERE. TIM IN MY MIND.
THE USE PAP EVERY STANDARD OF
USE CPAP WILL STILL. BE REQUIRED
SO COMPETENCY ETHICS RECORD
KEEPING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
ALL OF THAT WILL STILL BE
REQUIRED IT'S ONLY YOU CAN GIVE
IT TO MORE THAN ONE PERSON.
SO NOW YOU DON'T.
FINAL DON'T KNOW YOUR HONOR BUT
BUT NOW YOU DO. NOW YOU'RE AT US
DATASTAGE.
WHERE YOU HAVE LICENSE
CONTRACTOR LIFE AND LICENSE
APPRAISERS?
OTHER WILL BE THAT THAT ARE OUT
THERE RIGHT NOW MOST ASSUREDLY
DOING THESE TYPE THINGS BUT NOW
WE'RE SETTING UP A SITUATION
WHERE. BE CUT IF WE ALLOW THIS
TO HAPPEN POTENTIALLY.
THAT WE'VE GOT.
LICENSE PEOPLE DOING. ONE OFF
APPRAISALS LIKELY US.
TO SERVE THIS NEED THAT YOU
ASSERT IT IT IS NEEDED. THAT NOW
WE WOULD THAT NOW OR ADDING TO
THE NUMBER OF. OF SITUATIONS
WHERE PEOPLE COULD USE.
APPRAISALS IN A IN A MANNER THAT
THE APPRAISALS ARE NOT SET UP TO
BE USED FOR.
IT IT IT AND CALL THEIR SET UP
TO BE USED THAT WAY FOR THE
CLIENT.
SO WHY SHOULD THE CLIENT NOT BE
ABLE TO HAVE A LAWYER LOOK AT IT
OR THEIR FINANCIAL PLANNER LOOK
AT IT I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM
WITH THAT BUT WHAT I'M WORRIED
ABOUT HERE IS.
THE CLIENT.
THE GETS THIS APPRAISAL INTAKE
THIS ANYWHERE HE WANTS.
AND USE IT HE'S NOW GOT A
LICENSED.
APPRAISAL.
SAYING THAT MY PROPERTY IS WORTH
THIS MAN BUT I THINK WE SHOULD
LISTEN TO THE OTHER SIDE.
INTO WHAT THEY SAY BUT AND
THAT'S THAT THAT'S MY ONLY
CONCERN WITH THIS.
IS WATER JEFFREY TO QESTIONS IN
JUST A REITERATE EVERY ETHICS
AND COMPETENCY RULE WE'RE
TALKING ABOUT BASICALLY SHORTER
DOCUMENTATION.
BUT LOOK AT THE LAST TIME AN
APPRAISER SPENDS ON THIS
ASSIGNMENT THE LESS THEY NEED TO
CHARGE FOR IT SO IT ALLOWS US TO
EAT CHART TO HAVE A LESS
EXPENSIVE ALTERNATIVE. FOR THE
CLIENT WHO WANTS.
IS THERE A RAINY.
JUMP AHEAD OF IT YET I YOU
FOLLOW UP WITH YOU WHAT IT IS IS
THERE A RANGE OF WHAT THE SAVE
ME INTO AND I KNOW IT'S LIKE.
YOU KNOW WHAT OF THE
SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISAL
BUT LET'S JUST SAY. THAT
APPRAISAL OF A TWO THOUSAND
SQUARE FOOT HOME.
IN ANY CITY.
WITH.
.
YOU KNOW WITH IT WITH THE
CERTIFIED ONE AND. THE ONE OFF.
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN THE
COST THE PRAYER. THAT I CAN'T
TELL YOU UNFORTUNATELY I'M SORRY
SENATOR I KNOW THAT THE LESS
DOCUMENTATION THE APPRAISER IS
WRITTEN LITTLE LIKE IN SCHOOL IT
WAS. A IN MATH WE WERE SAID SHOW
YOUR WORK.
A THIS GIVES YOU THE VALUE
CONCLUSION.
WITHOUT ALL THE DOCUMENTATION
UNDERNEATH.
AND IS WHAT THE CLIENT.
PEOPLE ARE COMING TO OUR.
MEMBERS
LICENSEES AND SAYING WE LIKE
THIS PRODUCT BUT WE DON'T NEED A
FULL USE CPAP APPRAISAL AND WE
HAVE TO SAY I'M SORRY I CAN'T DO
IT FOR AND I DO AGREE WITH YOU
IS LIKE IF YOU GET. GAP.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THAT ARE
ALL CERTIFIED.
AS OPPOSED TO.
.
YOU ARE NOT CERTIFIED STATEMENTS
THERE IS A NEED FOR THOSE IN IN
BUSINESS EVERY SINGLE DAY AND
THE LIMITATION ON SHARING.
SO IS ESSENTIALLY WHICH ARE
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
ARE THE ONES WOULD BE.
IT'S ONLY GONNA BE THE
UNSOPHISTICATED.
YOU NO PERSON THAT'S COULD
POSSIBLY.
.
GET HIT BY THIS BUT THEY'RE
PROBABLY GET HIT AS YOU SAY. IF
I COULD FOLLOW UP ONE ON THE
MISTER BLOOD ON ON SENATOR DUTCH
QUESTION IS THERE AN EXPECTATION
OR REALITY THAT IF YOU HAVE A
FULL.
FULLY DOCUMENTED LICENSED
APPRAISAL THAT THE END.
VALUE WOULD BE DIFFERENT THAN IT
HAD SPENT ONE THAT IS A
SHORTENED.
SHORTENED US SAME PRESIDENT
DETAIL AND ADDED IT'S PRESENTED
SAME SHOULD BE THE SAME EXACT SO
THERE'S NOW YOU CONCLUSION. NO
DIFFERENCE THERE IN THATSO THAT
THAT WAS I THOUGHT WHERE YOU
GOING ON. WELL IT ISSUE THAT
COULD BE A PROBLEM THEM MORE
THAN WISER BIG COST DISPARITY.
THE NEED TO SHOW AND PROVIDE ALL
THAT DOCUMENTATION.
BEHIND THE VALUE CONCLUSION.
WE CAN PRESENTE FOR.
THE MATERIAL CENTER GALGIANI
HERE
WHICH IS.
MINE ISN'T NECESSARILY A
QUESTION SPECIFIC ABOUT THIS
BILL BUT I'M GONNA BRING UP
SOMETHING THAT OCCURRED DURING
THE HOUSING CRISIS.
AND SO I WANNA KNOW IF WHAT
HAPPENED THAT I'M GONNA BRING UP
IS APPLES AND ORANGES TO THIS.
IF THIS COULD HAPPEN AGAIN UNDER
YOUR BILL AND WHAT IT WAS
HISTORY HOUSING CRISIS.
REALTORS WERE ALLOWED TO GIVE
BE-PO'S BEST PRICE OFFERS AT A
GOOD
FRIEND WHO EVERY MORNING WE WAKE
UP A GOOD OR A COMPUTER. AND
BECAUSE THEY WERE.
REAL STATE AGENTS WERE DOING A
LOT OF SALES AT THAT THAT TIME
AS ALL THE NAME OF THE GAME A
SHORT SALES AND FORECLOSURES.
SO. REALISTIC AGENTS WOULD DO
THESE BP OWES WHERE THEY COME UP
WITH THE BEST PRICE OFFER.
ESSENTIALLY KIND OF LIKE AN
APPRAISAL OF WHAT OUR HOME WAS
WORTH. THERE IS NO PERSON TO
TALK TO YOU IT WAS STRICTLY
COMPUTER GENERATED FROM THE
BANKS THAT WERE.
STARTING THE FORECLOSURE
PROCEEDINGS ON ON HOMES AND WE
ALL WATCHED THE VALUES JUST
TUMBLE AND FALL.
AND THEN YOU HAVE.
THESE APPRAISALS IF YOU WILL.
BETTER JUST COULD OCCURRING SO
RAPIDLY AND A MARKET IS THIS
BILL APPLY TO THAT SCENARIO OF
COULD THAT.
WHY WHY WAS THAT A LOUD HAS THE
LAW CHANGED BECAUSE WHAT THAT
WAS WAS NOT A FEDERALLY RELATED
TRANSACTION SO ANYONE COULD DO
THE WORK?
THAT SO THIS BILL HELPS ADDRESS
THAT PROBLEM BECAUSE IT BRINGS
THE WORK INTO THE LICENSED AND
CERTIFIED PERSON WHO HAS TO
COMPLY WITH ALL NINETY NINE
POINT NINE NINE PERCENT OF YOU
SPELL OUT.
BUT BECAUSE THAT WAS A NON
FEDERALLY RELATED TRANSACTION.
ANYONE COULD DO IT.
BROKER OR.
PERSON OFF THE STREET WITH NO
STANDARDS OF ANY SORT.
SO THEY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE
DECLINE.
OPINION.
BUT.
THIS BILL.
DURING.
ACTUALLY RELATES TO THAT
PROBLEM.
VERY GOOD THANK OTHER QUESTIONS
POINT VERY WELL WE WILL HAVE THE
OPPOSITION COME FORWARD IF YOU
LIKE AND THE.
BECAUSE I HAVE A SEAT LIKE.
THANK YOU CHAIRMAN HILL
COMMITTEE MEMBERS IT'S ARE ON AN
HONOR TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE
SISTINE BODY. R. MY NAME IS JOHN
BRENNAN I AM THE DIRECTOR OF
APPRAISAL ISSUES WITH THE
APPRAISAL FOUNDATION.
THE APPRAISAL FOUNDATION IS
AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS TO
ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM APPRAISER
QUALIFICATIONS.
IN ORDER DID GET A LICENSE AND
THE MINIMUM APPRAISAL STANDARDS
BY WHICH TO PERFORM APPRAISALS.
THE STANDARD THAT WE'RE TALKING
ABOUT ARE WHAT YOU'VE HEARD.
THE UNIFORM STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE
IT'S ONE OF ARE INDEPENDENT
BOARDS THAT SETS THOSE
STANDARDS.
ARE A LITTLE BIT BACKGROUND ON
MYSELF PRIOR TO JOINING THE
APPRAISAL FOUNDATION IN TWO
THOUSAND THREE. I SPENT EIGHT
AND A HALF YEARS AS THE CHIEF OF
LICENSING ENFORCEMENT FOR THE
CALIFORNIA OFFICE REALISTIC
REFEREES.
AS A STATE EMPLOYEE I AM ALSO A
NATIVE CALIFORNIAN BORN AND BRED
AND SPEND MY ENTIRE LIFE AND IN
OUR GOLDEN STATE.
FIRST OF ALL I WOULD LIKE TO
SAY WE ARE EXTREMELY PLEASED TO
HEAR MR BLOWOUS AND AND MISS
BATES ENCOURAGEMENT AND
ENDORSEMENT OF UNIFORM STAFF
PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE
WE THINK THAT IS. THOSE ARE THE
MINIMUM LEVELS OF ETHICS AND
COMPETENCY. IN PERFORMING
APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENTS.
QUITE FRANKLY THIS ISSUE WE
BELIEVE IS A SOLUTION IN SEARCH
FOR PROP.
THE RESTRICTED APPRAISAL REPORT
THAT IS AT ISSUE HERE. IS A
SPECIAL REPORT. IT IS DESIGNED
FOR CLIENTS THAT HAVE A VERY
THOROUGH KNOWLEDGE
OF THE PROPERTY.
AND THE MARKET CONDITIONS IN
THIS PARTICULAR ASSIGNMENT.
IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR PEOPLE
WHO HAVE LESSER KNOWLEDGE TO WIT
IF YOU APPLY FOR A MORTGAGE FROM
A FEDERALLY REGULATED FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION THEY WILL NOT ALLOW
RESTRICTED APPRAISAL REPORT.
BECAUSE THAT BORROWER DOES NOT
HAVE THAT KIND OF KNOWLEDGE
A IN MANY CASES THAT WOULD
REQUIRE A PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS.
ONE OF THE MOST.
IMPORTANT
THINGS TO CONSIDER HERE. IS
THERE CAN BE ADDITIONAL PARTIES.
TO A RESTRICTED APPRAISAL
REPORT.
AND THAT IS THAT MULTIPLE
PARTIES CAN ENGAGE AN APPRAISER
IN AN ASYLUM.
SO IF A CLIENT AND POSSIBLY THE
CLIENT'S ATTORNEY OR ANOTHER
PARTNER IF THEY ALL WANT TO BE
INTENDED USERS ON THE APPRAISAL
REPORT THEY CAN CALL ENGAGE THE
APPRAISER. THEY CAN ALL BE THE
APPRAISERS CLIENT AND THEN THERE
IS NO RESTRICTION ON THEM
RECEIVING THE APPRAISAL REPORT.
THE KEY INTENDED USE
HER DOG MADE A COMMENT ABOUT
PEOPLE THAT GET IT THAT GIVEN A
PRISON GOING USE IT FOR
SOMETHING ELSE ONE OF THE
REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE UNIFORM
STANDARDS.
IS FOR THE APPRAISER TO IDENTIFY
THE INTENDED USE AND INTENDED
USER AND YOU PRESERVE
RESPONSIBLE. FOR DEVELOPING AN
APPRAISAL AND COMMUNICATING THE
RESULTS OF THAT APPRAISAL IN A
WAY THAT THOSE INTENDED USERS
CAN UNDERSTAND AND IT IS
APPROPRIATE FOR THE INTENDED
USE.
SO WHAT YOU'RE GETTING HERE IS A
LITTLE BIT OF A MISHMASH WHEN
YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. TAKING OUT
THE RESTRICTION ON ADDITIONAL
INTENDED USERS YOU SIMPLY DON'T
KNOW THEIR KNOWLEDGE LOW OR
UNDERSTANDING WHICH IS WHY
THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED IN MORTGAGE
EVEN IF THIS COMMITTEE BELIEVES
THAT THE BILL IS WARRANTED AND
THIS CONCEPT IS GOOD. I WOULD
ALSO CAUTION THAT IN A WAY WERE
SHORT CUTTING THE WORK OF THE
APPRAISAL STANDARDS BOARD. WHICH
IS THE ORGANIZATION AUTHORIZED
BY CONGRESS TO SET THE PRESENT
STANDARDS.
IN FACT YOU BRISTLE STANDARDS
BOARD IS CONSIDERING THIS VERY
TOPIC.
IS CONSIDERING WHETHER OR NOT
THERE MAY BE ROOM WITHIN THE
STANDARDS TO ALLOW FOR
ADDITIONAL INTENDED USERS BEYOND
THE QUIET. IN RESTRICTED
OPERATIVES REPORTS THE KEY WOULD
BE THAT THOSE USERS MUST HAVE
THE SAME OR SIMILAR
UNDERSTANDING TO AVOID THAT TYPE
OF CONFUSION OR MISLEADING
REPORT.
BUT THE BOARD HAS HAS ISSUED A
SURVEY FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES.
TO THE TWENTY TWENTY ADDITION OF
USE BUT IT'S A TWO YEAR
DOCUMENT.
ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT SURVEY
WAS IS THERE ROOM FOR ADDITIONAL
INTENDED USERS BEYOND THE CLIENT
AND RESTRICTED PRAISE REPORT.
THE BOARD IS FULLY COMMITTED
THEIR WORK ON A PROCESS NOW TO
START A DISCUSSION DRAFT WHICH
WILL BE ISSUED IN THE NEXT.
TWO TO FOUR WEEKS
WHICH WILL DISCUSS THIS ISSUE AT
LENGTH.
TALK ABOUT THE RATIONALE FOR WHY
IT'S CONSIDERED.
THEN BE ABLE OFFER PROS AND
CONS.
AND THEN THE PROCESS FROM THERE
IS.
EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS WITH
UNIFORMS DOES PROFESSIONAL
APPRAISAL PRACTICE.
IS
PUT INTO PUBLIC IT'S ALL
PUBLISHED
WRITTEN AND VERBAL COMMENTS ARE
ACCEPTED THEY'RE ALL ON RECORD
IN THE A. S. B. OF STANDARDS
BOARD WILL THEN LOOK AT THOSE
AND DECIDE. MAYBE IT NEEDS
TWEAKING AND RE EXPOSED MAYBE
THEIR ISSUES WE DIDN'T ADDRESS.
SO THIS IS THE FULL VETTING
PROCESS.
BY WHICH APPRAISAL STANDARDS ARE
DEVELOPED
IN THIS COUNTRY.
IF THE STANDARDS BOARD DOES
EXPOSE THIS AND RECEIVE THE KIND
OF COMMENTARY THAT KIND OF A
FAVOR THAT IS LOOKING FOR IN
TERMS OF MOVING FORWARD WITH
THIS CONCEPT.
IT WILL BE RE EXPOSED IT WILL BE
PUT OUT AND THEN IT WOULD BE
ADOPTED. ALL IN PUBLIC SETTINGS
ONE HUNDRED PERCENT PUBLIC
SETTINGS.
FOR USE BY APPRAISERS WITH THE
TWENTY TWENTY ADDITION A FEW
CPAP.
MAKERS WHEN QUESTIONS OF.
I HAD A COUPLE FOLLOWS OF BEFORE
WE GET TO THE REST OF THEM
OPPOSITION TO TO YOU KNOW I'M
LOOKING AT SOME OF THE LETTERS
OF OPPOSITION THAT CAME IN TODAY
AND AND.
NO I ASK THE QUESTION MR
BILLOWED ABOUT THE VALUE AND.
YEAH WE.
THERE'S A IT IMPLICATION IN ONE
OF THE LETTERS OF OPPOSITION
THAT THE THE LACK OF CONTEXT MAY
ALLOW CLIENTS WHO SUMA ROSIER
PICTURE. OF THE FACTS A IT WOULD
ARE YO DO YOU AGREE WITH MR
BALOCH COMMENTED THE VALUES
VALUE. REGARDLESS OF THE.
WHETHER IT'S THE SHORT
RESTRICTED APPRAISAL REPORTER
NOT.
THE APPRAISER IS REQUIRED TO
PRODUCE CREDIBLE ASSIGNMENT
RESULTS THAT'S THE DEVELOPMENT
SIDE OF THE OPPRESSED.
IN REPORTING THOSE RESULTS THERE
ARE TWO OPTIONS CURRENTLY THE
APPRAISAL REPORT AND THE
RESTRICTED.
THEORETICALLY
THE THE CONCLUSIONS THE
APPRAISERS ASSIGNMENT RESULTS
SHOULD NOT DIFFER BETWEEN THE
TWO. BECAUSE THE APPRAISER IS
REQUIRED TO BE CREDIBLE.
IT'S THE COMMUNICATION OF WHAT
THE APPRAISER DID OR DIDN'T DO
AND HOW THAT HOW THAT OPINION
THE VALUE WAS DEVELOPED THAT MAY
NOT BE UNDERSTOOD BY SOMEBODY
WHO DOES NOT HAVE THE KIND FROM
THAT FAMILIARITY NEEDED. TO NOT
SEE ALL THE INFORMATION ON THE
PURCELL REPORT.
OKAY I GUESS I'M USUALLY GET
FROM PAST EXPERIENCE ALL LOOK AT
AN APPRAISAL. AND A LOT OF THE
THE VALUE IN THE METHODS OF.
DETERMINING VALUE OR.
VERY.
PROFESSIONALLY.
AND.
THAT THEY.
IT DO IT GET YET DONE IT TO JUST
NO THE PROFESSION UNDERSTAND HOW
THEY GET TO THAT CONCLUSION AND.
AND SOMETIMES ANOTHER IT WOULD
WHICH ONE FINAL QUESTION THAT
IT'S.
YOU KNOW IT'S IS IMPLICATION
HERE THAT. COULD ENCOURAGE
UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR HARM HARM
CONSUMERS WHERE'S THE CONSUMER
HARM THAT YOU CAN SEE IN THIS.
WELL THERE ARE A COUPLE OF THE
DIFFERENT WAYS AND MEAN FIRST OF
ALL ON IF AN APPRAISER IS NOT
REQUIRE A.
APPRAISERS WHO MAY NOT BE THE
MOST ETHICAL.
ARM.
IF THEY IF THERE ARE THINGS THAT
THEY WOULD NORMALLY BE REQUIRED
TO DISCLOSE IN AN APPRAISAL
REPORT.
AND ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED TO
DISCLOSE IN RESTRICTED APPRAISAL
REPORT POTENTIALLY BAD ACTORS
COULD USE THAT TO THEIR
ADVANTAGE IN A COMPLETE CONSUMER
HARM.
ONE OTHER ASPECT OF THIS VISIT
ARM IT IS TOUCHED ON IN OUR
LETTER AS WELL SOME OF THE
OTHERS THAT I'VE SEEN. IS THAT
THIS COULD LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT
INCREASED ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY
BY THE CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF REAL
ESTATE APPRAISERS.
BECAUSE OF THE CONFUSION THAT
SOME OF THESE OTHER INTENDED
USERS MAY RECEIVE.
AND THOSE COSTS AND THAT WOULD
CLEARLY TRANSLATE TO PUBLIC HARM
AS WELL.
OKAY THANK YOU.
.
QUESTION YET QUESTIONS.
EARLIER IN YOUR DEPRIVE OKAY
VERY GOOD THANK YOU ADVENT.
NOTHING THANK YOU THANKS VERY
MUCH.
.
FIRST OF ALL JUST EQUIFAX OWN
ANALYSIS.
AND TRY TO KEEP ALL THESE
DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS ST GIVE
THE PRES ALL INSTITUTE WHO'S
HERE WITH US AT THE AMERICAN
SIDE OF GREATNESS WHICH IS THE
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR
PRAZERES AND.
AND.
CALIFORNIA.
BOTH.
THERE WERE A NUMBER OF
PROFESSIONAL COURAGEOUS
ASSOCIATIONS.
OKAY SO THAT I GUESS ONE CONCERN
I HAVE IS THAT I SEE A LOT OF
PRISONERS ORGANIZATIONS AMERICAN
SIDE APPRAISERS OF THAT.
DEREK WHO ARE POST
AND I HADN'T DONE OF BUSH I
DIDN'T HAVE THE BENEFIT OF
SEEING THEM LETTERS OF
OPPOSITION.
BUT.
.
THAT ALWAYS IS CONCERNING
BECAUSE IT MEANS PROFESSION AT
LEAST THE FIRST IS DIVIDED
ACTUALLY SEEMS LIKE A LOT MORE
OPPOSITION.
.
I.
THE OTHER PART THAT I AS A SAM.
CAST SENSITIVE TO IS THAT.
.
AT FROM I UNDERSTAND THE
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A RESTRICTED
REPORT.
AND NOT THAT I LIKE WITH A FULL
REPORT I GUESS.
IS THAT RESTRICT REPORT DOES NOT
PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTATION
OF HOW YOU CAME UP BUT THE
NUMBERS NOW I UNDERSTAND THE
ETHICAL RULES OF SUPPORT SAY YOU
SHOULD STILL COME OUT WITH THE
SAME PRODUCT.
BUT I THINK THAT SPEAKS TO THE
NATURE OF BEING VERY SPECIFIC
ABOUT WHO GETS THAT REPORT.
BECAUSE YOU SEE SOMEONE SAYS
CERTIFIED APPRAISER LICENSE
BUBBLE WHATEVER.
AND YOU GET A REPORT. AND.
THE EVIDENCE BEHIND THE NUMBERS
AREN'T THERE.
I THINK THERE IS AYE
UNFORTUNATELY AN OPPORTUNITY
ESPECIALLY IF SOMEONE PLAYS A
LITTLE FAST AND LOOSE.
TO.
TO HER FOR FOR A REPORT TO BE
MISUSED.
BY THE KLA EL WHO WILL THAT BY
THE CLIENTS OR IN THE WAY THE
PRAISES NINE.
STINE SO I'LL WITHOUT THE
DOCUMENTATION TERMS I THINK I
HEAR ONE ST THE COMMUNICATIONS
PART. RIGHT HOW DO YOU
COMMUNICATE RESULTS ALRIGHT AND.
.
YOU KNOW.
I'LL TELL YOU I I LOOK AT
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IS
A PHYSICIAN AND I ALWAYS LOOK AT
THE REFERENCES.
NOW SOMETIMES IT'S VERY
TECHNICAL MOST PEOPLE WHY JUST
LOOK AT THE RECOMMENDATIONS THE
CONCLUSION.
BUT I WONDER WHERE THE DATA CAME
FROM BECAUSE I DON'T WHY WONDER
HOW SOLID THAT RECOMMENDATION IS
AND THAT'S A WAY TO DO IT BUT
IT'S NOT THERE ALL I CAN DO IS
TAKE ON FAITH WHAT THAT
DOCUMENT.
I SAID AND I LOOKED AT IT BUT
I'M NOT SHOWING YOU WHERE IT
CAME FROM.
AND I THINK THAT'S A BIT
PROBLEMATIC ESPECIALLY IF IT
GETS
TO PLACE WHERE.
THIS REPORT AGAIN YOU KNOW.
IS IS NOT RISK.
ST IT NOT US WE VERY CAREFULLY
THE FINE TO WHOM.
REPORT.
YOU GOING TO.
SO.
.
SO AND THE FACT THAT I DON'T SEE
THIS DIVISION WITHIN THE
PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY ABOUT
THAT IS ALSO CONCERNING BECAUSE.
AGAIN I Y. TRIED.
NOW I THINK THAT IF THERE IS
UNITY AND SAID NO WE WERE IN THE
FIELD WE THINK EVERYTHING'S OKAY
THAT'S ONE THING BUT I THINK
THIS DIVISION.
SEEMS TO ME THE IMPLIES THAT
THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT TURNS OF
THAT PROFESSION ABOUT DOING THIS
HAVING US LEGISLATE THIS.
IT'S THAT HAVING THIS BEING
DECIDED WITHIN THE PROFESSIONAL.
BUT PERHAPS NOT THE PROPONENTS
WANT TO COMMENT ON THAT WILL I
WOULD TWO THINGS A DOCTOR PAN
FIRST.
THE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS WOULD
STILL REQUIRE THAT EACH OF THE
INTENDED USERS BE IDENTIFIED.
SO THE REPORT IS GOING TO HAVE
TO SAY I INTEND THIS FOR. MISTER
HILL THE PROPERTY OWNER AND
MISTER HILL'S LAWYER AND MISTER
HILLS FINANCIAL PLANNER.
SO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND I
THINK DíAS BOTHA BELIEVE MISTER
BRENNAN WILL.
A. AGREE.
WERE NOT DISPENSING WITH THE
REQUIREMENT THAT THE INTENDED
USERS BE IDENTIFIED SO THAT'S
GOING TO BE A REMAIN. BUT
SECONDLY REMEMBER THAT THE
ENTIRE BODY OF UNLICENSED
PRACTICE IS WHERE THE PROBLEM IS
HERE THE PROBLEM THE RISK OF
MISLEADING PEOPLE IS MUCH
BIGGER.
BECAUSE WE HAVE NO IDEA WHO'S
DOING THIS WORK SO IF WE BRING
THE PEOPLE IN THAT ARE LICENSED
YOU GET MORE CONSUMER
PROTECTION.
OKAY SO MY.
SO I GO TO MUCH OF THAT BUT I
THINK IT'S OUR FAULT THAT'S WHAT
CENTER DOT THAT.
IF SOMEONE WHO DOES THIS
UNLICENSED I CAN'T YOU KNOW WE
CAN.
PROSECUTES OVERVIEW DOINGS OF
LICENSE WORK AT CENTER OF BUT
ARE OWES US SO IT DOESN'T
LICENSES YOUR BILL SAY THEY'RE
LICENSED
APPRAISER.
WHEN I SEE REPORT.
AS A NON PROFESSIONAL SAYS IT'S
DONE BY LICENSE APPRAISER THE
ASSUMPTION IS.
EVERYTHING'S ON THE UP AND UP.
RIGHT THAT'S A THANK YOU SEE YOU
SEE THAT CERTIFICATION JUST LIKE
IF SOMEONE SAID THAT YOU KNOW
THERE THEY TOOK CARE OF YOU AND
THEIR LICENSE POSITION.
YOU HOPE THAT THEY GOT RIGHT
VERSES CHURCH SO WE CAN GO AND.
GOT ANYONE OFF GET MEDICAL
ADVICE MANY BUDDY.
BUT.
THEY MAY LOOK AT A LITTLE
DIFFERENTLY I MEAN I THINK THAT
THAT I THINK THAT'S THE KIDS
THAT THAT'S GOOD THAT'S ACTUALLY
THE CONCERN IS IS THAT. YOU HAVE
A LICENSED PERSON DOING
SOMETHING.
THAT THEREFORE AUTOMATICALLY
GIVES IT A CERTAIN LEVEL OF
CREDIBILITY.
AND PEOPLE ASSUME.
NOW I'VE JUST LAY PEOPLE BUT
EVEN SOME PEOPLE OR MORE
INVOLVED.
ARE YOU ASSUME THERE'S A
CERTAIN STANDARD THERE NOW THERE
IS TO A CERTAIN DEGREE BUT THAT
IT BUT I THINK
THAT'S I THINK THE OPPORTUNITY
FOR.
FUCHSIA AND AND AGAIN GOING BACK
TO THE FACT THAT THERE SEEMS TO
BE SIGNIFICANT DIVISION WITHIN
THE.
PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY ABOUT
HOWWISE OF INACTION THIS IS SO I
I
MEAN I APPRECIATE WHERE YOU TALK
ABOUT THE
PROBLEM YOU'RE SPEAKING TO BUT.
I ALSO WANNA BE SURE THAT WE'RE
NOT UNDERMINING PUBLIC
CONFIDENCE.
IN THE PRAISING.
PROFESSIONS AS WELL AS THE
STANDARDS.
YES JUST RETURN QUICKLY LACKEY
REAL QUICKLY ARMED YES DOCTOR
PAN AM YOUR COMMENTS ARE ARE
RIGHT ON TRACK AND I THINK THAT
THE BOTTOM LINE YOU SAID AT THE
CLOSE OF YOUR PRIOR TATEMENTS.
IF THIS IS A GOOD IDEA LET'S LET
THESE APPRAISAL STANDARDS BOARD
EXAMINER LET'S LET IT PUT IT OUT
THERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FROM
THE APPRAISAL INSTITUTE AS WELL
AS ALL OF THE OTHER PROFESSIONAL
PRAISE ORGANIZATIONS. FROM
PUBLIC SAFETY PEOPLE FROM
REGULATORS LET'S EXAMINE ALL
SIDES OF THE ISSUE AND IF IT IS
VALID THE PRISONERS BOARD COULD
MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT.
INTERVIEW NEWMAN.
THAT HEY MISTER SO ACT ACTUALLY
MY QUESTION WAS TO THAT POINT
TIGHTLY.
IT'S MISTER BROWN YOU YOU
MENTIONED THAT YOU ARE WITH THE
PRECIPITATION THERE'S THERE'S
FIVE ORGANIZATIONS HERE IN
OPPOSITION. THAT AMERICAN
SOCIETY APPRAISERS AMERICAN
SOCIETY FOR MANAGERS AND RURAL
APPRAISERS.
CALIFORNIA COALITION FOR PRAISE
A PROFESSIONALS NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT FEE
APPRAISERS. AND I'M IMPRESSED
FOR SUCH AN ESOTERIC FEEL THAT
YOU HAVE SOMEBODY SOLID
ORGANIZATIONS THAT INCLUDE
MEMBERS SO I I GUESS I HAVE TWO
QUESTIONS WHAT'S THE OVERLAP IF
ANY BUT LIKE AMONG MEMBERSHIPS
IF YOU WERE A MEMBER OF ONE
WHICH OF A MEMBERS ONLY THAT
WONDER OR OTHERS.
THERE ARE NUMEROUS MANY
APPRAISERS HAVE DESIGNATIONS AND
BELONG TO MULTIPLE ORGANIZATIONS
SOME JUST WITH ONE OTHERS WITH
JUST ONE BUT THERE ARE SOME THAT
BELONG TO MULTIPLE.
AND AND THEN YOU KNOW THIS IS A
RECURRING RECURRING THEME IN THE
OPPOSITION AS AS PRESENTED TO US
IN THE DIGEST. AMONG SOME OF THE
OF THE OPPOSITION THAT THAT WE
SHOULD GIVE.
THE PROCESS TIME TO WORK THAT
BIENNIAL REVIEW PROCESS BY THAT
THE APPRAISAL STANDARDS WHICH MY
QUESTION FOR MR BELOW IS. WHAT'S
THE PROBLEM WE'RE SOLVING BIDE
BY NOT WAITING WHAT'S WHAT IS
THE IMPETUS
TO NOT WAIT FOR THAT BY A NEW
FOR YOU TO TAKE PLACE. TO
CONSIDER THIS QUESTION OF
NARROWING A YOU KNOW THE THE
SCOPE FOR THESE CUTS RESEARCH
PROBLEM IS THAT WE HAVE A
STRUCTURAL. ODDITY IN OUR
LICENSING LAW
AND WE ARE ACTUALLY ENCOURAGING
THE USE OF UNLICENSED PEOPLE.
WHO ARE PERFORMING ACCORDING TO
NO STANDARDS WHATEVER?
SO WE TAKE THE POLICY POSITION
RATHER THAN WAIT.
TWO OR THREE OR FOUR YEARS TO
CONSIDER THIS CHANGE WHICH WE
THINK IS LIKELY TO COME ANYWAY.
LET'S BRING LET'S INTO INSTEAD
OF DISCOURAGING THE USE OF
LICENSE PEOPLE.
IN FAVOR OF UNLICENSED PEOPLE
PERFORMING WITH NO STANDARDS
LET'S GIVE THE TINIEST BIT OF
REGULATORY RELIEF.
TO THE EXISTING LICENSEES WHO
STILL HAVE TO IDENTIFY WHO THESE
INTENDED USERS ARE AND LET'S DO
IT NOW BECAUSE AS THE LARGEST
ORGANIZATION OF LICENSED AND
CERTIFIED APPRAISERS IN
CALIFORNIA. WE ARE TRYING TO
RESPOND TO CONSUMER DEMAND
PEOPLE ARE ASKING US TO DO THESE
ASSIGNMENTS AND WE CAN'T DO IT.
SO THAT'S WHY WE THINK IT'S
IMPORTANT TO ACT NOW EARLIER
RATHER THAN LATER. AND PUT THIS
OFF OF THE TABLE.
SO MY MY LAST QUESTION IS I
GUESS FOR MISTER BROWN TO
RESPOND IS IS THAT.
YOUR UNDERSTANDING YOUR
IMPRESSION THAT THAT THE STATUS
QUO IS CREATING AND INCENTIVE
TO USED UNLICENSED APPRAISERS
THAT THAT IS NOT OUR OBSERVATION
NOR ARE WE AWARE OF A. OF A
CALLING A DEMAND FOR THIS TYPE
OF RELIEF IMMEDIATELY
OUR PRISONS STANDARDS BOARD IS
LOOKING AT IT BECAUSE THEY ARE
LOOKING AT WHAT.
PUBLIC TRUST DEMANDS IN THE
STANDARDS OF THAT WOULD BE THEIR
EXAMINATION OF THIS WE HAVE NOT
HEARD ANY KIND OF PUBLIC OUTCRY
THAT APPRAISERS ARE BEING. ARE
NOT RECEIVING ASSIGNMENTSNOT
GETTING WORK BECAUSE OF THIS
PARTICULAR ITEM.
AND THANK YOU THANK YOU MISTER
CLINTON HEARD ON IT.
YEP I'M SCHOOL WOULD DISCLOSURES
UNDER THIS BILL WOULD
DISCLOSURES BE REQUIRED THAT
THIS.
LEADING.
.
THE CLIENT KNOW AND UNDERSTAND
THAT THEY CAN'T BE USING THIS
FOR OTHER OTHER USES.
WELL I THINK WE WOULD YES.
THAT THE REPORT IS GONNA SHOW
WHO THE INTENDED USERS OUR
WHETHER ONE OR TWO OR THREE OR
FOUR.
A.
SO YES ALL THE DISCLOSURE ABOUT
INTENDED USERS ARE PART OF THE
STANDARDS NOW AND THEY WILL HAVE
THAT.
IF YOU IF THE COMMITTEE'S VIEW
IS WE SHOULD HAVE AN ADDITIONAL
THING SAYING BY THE WAY THIS IS
BEING DONE PURSUANT TO THIS
BILL.
AND ALL OTHER STANDARDS IN USE
PAT MUST BE A CONFORMED.
WE'RE FINE WITH THAT.
SO YES.
IT ISN'T THE RECIPIENTS.
OF THE REPORT.
DETERMINATION AS TO WHO ELSE
WILL GET THE REPORT.
WORST YES BECAUSE THE BILL
REQUIRES THE CLIENT CONSENT.
AS PART OF IT.
SO I THINK YOU ARE.
THIS WEEK
CLARIFIED THE RESTRICTED REPORT
DOESN'T HAVE THE DOCUMENTATION.
FOR ARE THE NUMBERS SO THAT BUT
THERE'S THE PRAISE ARE ACTUALLY
STILL HAVE TO SEEK OUT THE
DOCUMENTATION THEY JUST DON'T
INCLUDE THE REPORT CELLS SO THE
DOCUMENTATION ACTUALLY
POTENTIALLY.
IN THE POSSESSION OF THE
APPRAISAL.
OKAY SO EXCITING IS IN IN IN USE
PEPPER AS IT'S CURRENTLY WRITTEN
YOU WERE THE RESTRICTED
APPRAISAL WORK RECORD REQUIRES
REPORT REQUIRES A WEEK A
PROMINENT. DISCLOSURE THAT THERE
IS INFORMATION WITHIN THE
APPRAISERS WORK FILE THAT THE
CLIENT BERMAN AND INTENDED USER.
COULD NOT PROPERLY UNDERSTAND
WITHOUT HAVING THAT INFORMATION.
THAT IS A REQUIREMENT BECAUSE OF
THIS VERY SPECIAL NATURE OF A
RESTRICTED APPRAISAL REPORT IT'S
NOT FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC IT'S
NOT FOR A CLASS OF PEOPLE IT'S
FOR. A PARTICULAR CLIENT THAT
UNDERSTANDS THE PROPERTY
UNDERSTANDS THE MARKET MAYBE HAS
HAD THE PROPERTY APPRAISED FIVE
TIMES IN THE PAST EIGHT YEARS.
DOESN'T NEED ALL THAT
INFORMATION BUT IT REQUIRES THAT
TYPE OF DISCLOSURE TO UNDERSTAND
YOU MAY NOT GET THIS IF YOU'RE
NOT IF YOU'RE NOT QUALIFIED TO
DO.
WE THINK YOU GO TO PAN OF IS
THERE ANYONE ELSE IN OPPOSITION
YES PLEASE COME FORWARD.
WHICH WE HAVE.
APPRAISERS.
I'M A LICENSED APPRAISER OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
AND TO SOMEBODY'S POINT AS FAR
AS A. RESTRICTED REPORT THAT
REQUIRES US.
DO
EXACTLY WHAT HAS BEEN PRESCRIBED
IT'S GOING TO COST THE SAME.
AND WE'VE HAD TO DO THAT IN THE
PAST.
IT COULD HAVE TO DO THE SAME
WORK.
BE CREDIBLE.
OKAY.
SO SO THAT THAT DOESN'T THINK
TED.
HOLD WATER WE'RE OPPOSED TO THIS
BILL FOR THE REASONS THAT MISTER
BRANDS RT THAT. A CERTAIN.
I RECENTLY GOT A.
OF.
AN EMAIL FROM THE BUREAU OF
OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE
APPRAISERS.
THAT TELLS ME THAT MY.
LICENSING FEES ARE GOING UP THEY
HAVE TO GO UP.
IF THIS GOES FORWARD.
THE BUREAU'S GOING TO HAVE TO.
GET A WHOLE BUNCH MORE CLASSES
FOR ALL OF THEIR PEOPLE TO
UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN THESE TWO THINGS NOT
ONLY PUTTING CONFUSION IN THE
MARKETPLACE.
BUT ALSO.
ACOSTA THAT CLASSES GOING TO
HAVE TO BE PASSED ON TO THE
LICENSE APPRAISERS.
I MEAN IT'S JUST SIMPLE TWO PLUS
TWO EQUALS FOUR.
THE OTHER ASPECT OF THIS IS.
WENT NGUYEN.
YOU LOOK AT THOSE I'VE SEEN
RESTRICTED REPORTS THAT HAVE
BEEN PASSED AROUND SENT TO ME.
AND SAID YOU KNOW WE'VE. WE
THINK THIS VALUES RIGHT WHAT DO
YOU THINK.
IT'S A RESTRICTED REPORT I
SHOULDN'T HAVE THAT THAT THE
LAYMAN GENERALLY DOESN'T
UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S AN
APPRAISAL IT'S DONE BY A
LICENSED APPRAISER.
IT'S A VALUE IT IS.
AND SO MOSTLY THEY DON'T
UNDERSTAND THE NUANCES THAT
JOHN'S TALKING ABOUT.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
THANK YOU OTHERS IN OPPOSITION.
IT'S YOUR PLEASE COME FORWARD IT
IS ANYWHERE ELSE IN OPPOSITION
YOUR ARE PLEASE.
GO UP NOW.
MISTER CHAIR THE COULD
DISTINGUISH MEANT MEMBERS OF
THIS COMMITTEE MY NAME IS JOHN
DOING THEN I AM NOT THE
PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF APPRAISER SO WE
WON'T MENTION THERE. BUT I'M
ALSO HERE REPRESENTING THE REAL
ESTATE APPRAISERS ASSOCIATION OF
CALIFORNIA.
WE WROTE A LETTER I IN
OPPOSITION TO U. S. B. SEVENTY.
AND WE'RE IN SUPPORT OF THAT
OPPOSITION IN AND FOR MANY OF
THE REASONS THAT JOHN JUST
DISCUSSED AS WELL AS MY.
.
ONE OF THE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS
THAT I WOULD HAVE AS AN
APPRAISER AYE AND I AM A
CERTIFIED RESIDENTIAL PRES R.
INSTEAD CALIFORNIA. AND IN OTHER
STATES
ARE THE STANDARDS ALLOW ME TO
FOLLOW SOME SORT OF GUIDANCE.
.
IN THEY DEFINE WHO BY INTENDED
USE OR MY CLIENT IS AS JOHN
MENTIONED. AYE. I CAN HAVE
MULTIPLE PARTIES ENGAGE ME IN
THE ASSIGNMENT. AND THEREFORE I
CAN COMMUNICATE WITH YOU
EFFECTIVELY ON WHAT IT IS THAT
I'M DOING OR TRYING TO
ACCOMPLISH.
RIGHT.
IF FOR SOME REASON SO RESTRICTED
REPORT. ANY VAST ME TO COMPLETE
THE ASSIGNMENT BET BY THE WAY
THIS WOULD BE A SCOPE OF WORK
ISSUE.
BASED ON A CERTAIN SCOPE OF
WORK.
AND THE OTHER PARTIES THAT YOU
DISTRIBUTE THE REPORT TO ARE NOT
AWARE OF THAT SCOPE OF WORK.
HOW DO WAY THEN SHARE THAT WITH
YOU YOU'RE NOT MY CLIENT?
ARE YOU NOW ASKING ME TO BE ABLE
TO DISCLOSE WHAT'S IN MY WORK
FILE.
THE SHARE WITH EVERYBODY.
IT DOESN'T MAKE VERY MUCH SENSE
WE HAVE THE STANDARDS FOR REASON
WE FOUGHT VERY HARD FOR THOSE.
ON AND WE BELIEVE THAT THúNH
THEY WERE DEVELOPED FOR A REASON
AND THAT WAS TO AGAIN PROMOTE
AND MAINTAIN A HIGH LEVEL PUBLIC
TRUST.
I GET YOU.
NO ONE ELSE IN OPPOSITION BRING
IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE AT
THEIR QUESTIONS HERE.
COMMENTS OR CONTRIBUTE SENATOR
GOT YOU I'M JUST TRYING TO
BETTER UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS
REPORT WOULD ACTUALLY BE USED
FOR OTHER THAN GOING TO A
PROPERTY.
TO CHALLENGE OF PROPERTY TAXES
BECAUSE IF I CAN I SEE ANALYSIS
WHERE SAYS IT CAN'T BE RELATED
TO A FEDERALLY RELATED
TRANSACTION. RESIDENTIAL LOAN OR
REFINANCE YOUR MORTGAGE BROKER
TRANSACTION.
SO WHAT WHAT ARE THE INSTANCES
IN WHICH SOMEBODY WOULD USE.
BUT SOMETIME A I CAN'T MAKE UP
MY MIND ON THIS I'M TRYING TO
UNDERSTAND IT FROM. PRACTICAL
USER IF I'M THE CONSUMER.
WHAT I MIGHT WHY AM I GONNA GET
WANT ONE OF THESE AND WHAT WHAT
I USE IT FOR THE WHOLE BUNCHES
OF THANK YOU CENTER ABOUT WHAT
THE?
MATT MAHOOD.
PERMISSION OF THE CHAIR LOTS OF
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES WHERE YOU MAY
WANT TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE
INTENDED USER.
YOU HAVE A MARITAL DISSOLUTION
GOING ALONG.
THE QUESTION IS SHOULD WE
CHALLENGE WHAT ONE SPOUSE SAYS
ABOUT THE VALUE OF THE FAMILY
HOME.
THE OTHER SPELLS SAYS TO HIS OR
HER LAWYER. I SAY THAT I SAY
THAT THE SPOUSES VALUATION IS
WRONG THE LAWYER SAYS.
A WELL LET'S GET OF APPRAISAL
REPORT LET'S
NOT SPEND MUCH MONEY BUT LET'S.
IT LET'S TRY TO HAVE THE LOWEST
COST OPTION TO DECIDE WHETHER WE
MAKE AN ISSUE OUT OF THE VALUE
OF THE FAMILY HOME.
RIGHT NOW CLIENT CAN'T SHARE
WITH LAWYER BECAUSE THAT'S AN
ADDITIONAL INTENDED USER.
SO THEY COULDN'T GET A
RESTRICTED REPORT WE ARE
LITERALLY TRYING TO OFFER
CONSUMERS A LOWER PRICED
PRODUCT.
THE LESS TIMEYOU SPEND
ASSEMBLING THAT DOCUMENTATION
AND VALUE CONCLUSION THE LOWER
PRICE YOU CAN CHARGE.
WHAT THE?
CURRENT SYSTEM SUGGEST IS THAT
YOU HAVE TO GO WITH THE HIGHER
PRICE SPREAD IF YOU WILL.
AND THAT RESTRICTED REPORT WILL
STILL HAVE TO IDENTIFY THE
CLIENT.
AND THE LAWYER OF THE CLIENT AS
THE INTENDED USERS AND RIGHT NOW
THAT WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED.
IF IT RAIN JUST VERY BRIEFLY
THAT'S THAT SITUATION CAN BE
RESOLVED VERY SIMPLY BY THE
CLIENT AND THE ATTORNEY CO
ENGAGING THE APPRAISER IN THE
US.
WHO COULD THEN PERFORMER STRICT
THAT APPRAISAL REPORT AND
DELIVER IT TO BOTH THOSE
PARTIES?
THANK YOU.
THERE ARE GOT.
THEY'RE GALGIANI HAVE ANY OTHER
COMMENT.
WE.
THEY SEE NONE OF.
FRANKLY AS I LOOK AT THIS IN IS
WE'VE RIVER REVIEWING IT OVER
THE WEEKEND AND IN OUR
CONFERENCE IN DISCUSSION.
I'M I'M TRYIN. THE LIFE OF ME TO
SEE WHAT CONSUMER HARM WOULD BE
PROVIDED ARE PRODUCED BY THIS
WHAT WHAT WHAT IS THE PROBLEM. I
CAN SEE A PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED
BY THE LEGISLATION.
TWO ONE GRANT GREATER CONSUMER.
AND.
.
IN RIGHT NOW I DO BELIEVE THAT
THERE ARE THOSE WHO ARE
UNLICENSED I DON'T IS THERE AND
PERHAPS ONE GENTLEMAN WOULD NOTE
ARE UNLICENSED APPRAISERS. IS
THERE AN ASSOCIATION OF.
A GROUP OF YEAH BUT THEY HAVE
THEIR OWN ASSOCIATE WELL THEY
MAY BE IT AND IT'S A VERY
INTERESTING SITUATION THEY MAY
BE A REAL ESTATE BROKERS WHO ARE
MEMBERS OF CA ARE THEY MAYBE
CPA'S THEY MAY BE IN BUSINESS
CONSULTING FIRMS THERE'S. THERE
IN ALL OVER THERE ALL OVER THE
PLACE OR THEY MAY BE IN THAT.
SO THAT THAT'S THE POINT TO MAKE
WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE AND
WE DO KNOW THAT NO STANDARDS
APPLY TO THEM AND THAT'S THE
CONCERN BECAUSE YOU COULD HAVE.
YOU KNOW A REAL ESTATE AGENT
GIVING THEIR BEST GUESS OF OF OF
OF VALUE OF A PROPERTY IN A
DIVORCE SITUATION OF SOMETHING
ELSE SO.
I I THINK THIS IS REASONABLE I
THINK IT'S NOT MAKING MAJOR
CHANGE AND AND I THINK ITS
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF CALIFORNIA
BEING ON THE EDGE OF.
TRYING TO MAKE IT WORK BETTER
FOR FOR THE CONSUMER SIDE AYE
MOVIES.
I AM SORRY IT WOULD YOU LIKE TO
CLOSE SENATE DEBATE I JUST THANK
YOU FOUR OF A VERY ROBUST AND I
THINK IN LIGHTNING.
DISCUSSION I I HAPPEN TO HAVE
AN EXAMPLE IN MY PERSONAL LIFE
WHERE THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY
HELPFUL.
BUT I WOULD TAKE UP THE
COMMITTEE'S TIME I JUST WANT TO
SAY I THINK THAT THIS IS
PROVIDING GREAT CONSUMER
PROTECTIONS SO THAT THE PUBLIC
DOESN'T ASSUME THAT COPS.
REGARDING REAL ESTATE
TRANSACTIONS ARE THE SAME AS
VALUE APPRAISAL. AND THAT IS
WHERE I THINK WE'VE HAD A LOT OF
ISSUES DEVELOP CERTAINLY DURING
THE RECESSION YEARS THAN THE
PEOPLE KIND OF EXPANDING THEIR
REACH BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN DOING
THOSE KIND APPRAISALS CAME UP.
WITH A SOBER LIVING HOME ISSUE
AND HOW IT WAS AFFECTING
NEIGHBORHOODS SO I JUST THROW
THAT IN FOR PART OF THE
DISCUSSION IN TERMS OF. HOW IT'S
GONE AWRY HERE?
GOOD THANK YOU AND I THINK
SENATOR DIED IT WAS JUST INNER
THOUGHT PERHAPS AN AMENDMENT TO
DEMO THIS THIS THIS IS ONE THAT.
THANK YOU.
THIS IS ONE CLEARLY.
.
THAT I WAS A NOT SUPPORT OF WHEN
I CAME IN HERE READ THIS
YESTERDAY. REALLY SPENT A LOT OF
TIME WITH A TALK TO MY STAFF
THIS MORNING AND.
.
THIS IS WHERE THESE COMMITTEE
MEETINGS REALLY HELP OUR YOU
KNOW BRING THE INFORMATION.
IS RUNNING WITH WITH ALL DUE
RESPECT I MEAN I DON'T THINK.
WELL YOU MADE SOME GOOD POINTS.
I'M I'M NOT SURE YOU MADE GOOD
ENOUGH I MEAN.
POINTS TO.
I KEEP ME OFF THAT BANDWAGON
BECAUSE I AT THAT AGAIN.
IF THE ASSOCIATION.
OR THE FOUNDATION OR WHOEVER
DOES THE STANDARDS WERE READ
REVIEW ULTIMATELY.
.
YOU EVEN SAID THEY'RE PROBABLY
OR COULD VERY WELL CHANGE THIS.
YOU KNOW TO DO THIS ANYWAY THING
CALIFORNIA.
YOU KNOW WE TEND. TO AYE YOU
OBVIOUSLY GET OUT FRONT OF SOME
OF THESE ISSUES THAT ARE
IMPORTANT TO OUR CONSUMERS THAT
MAKE. THE GIVE OUR CONSUMERS
OPTIONS.
AND SO. I GUESS IF THERE WAS
SOME SPECIAL NOTICE PROVISION I
THINK THAT'S THE ONLY THING FOR
ME.
IF WE YET SOME SORT OF AMENDMENT
TO HAVE SOME SORT SORT OF
SPECIAL NOTICE PROVISION IN THIS
THING I COULD SEE MYSELF. YOU
KNOW SUPPORTING THIS.
.
YOU KNOW THIS BILL.
GOOD WITH THAT.
THE AUTHOR DOES TAKE THAT ARE SO
WITH PREDICT WITH CONVERSATIONS
TO BRENT THANK YOU VERY MUCH
SENATOR WILK YOU HAD A I MEAN.
NATION WITH THE.
.
THE CONSIDERATION THAT THE
SENATOR DIED I'M FINE WITH THAT
GOOD THANK YOU YOU HAVE A
MOTION.
A PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
RUSSIA'S DE PASSED THE SENATE
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE HEALTH
AYE HILL AYE FULLER.
FULLER AYE DODD AYE DODD AYE
GALGIANI. GALGIANI AYE GLAZER.
HERNANDEZ FERNANDEZ AYE NEWMAN.
AND KNOW AND NO WILL. BY LOCI.
NEWMAN NO.
NEWMAN NEWMAN. NAY MENINO.
SIX TO TWO IT IS QUITE LOW THAT
THE BILL PASSES WHO HOLD A ROLE
OPEN FOR.
FOR THE AFTER MEMBERS THANK YOU
VERY MUCH THANK YOU.
MOVE NO WITH TEN MINUTES FOR. I
THINK A DOCTOR PH#N WE'RE
GOING TO PRESENT FOR.
SENATOR HUESO ON S. B. SIX
THIRTY FIVE ITEM NUMBER TWO ON
OUR. AGENDA TODAY.
THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT SENATOR
BúN. THANK YOU.
IF WE ARE THINKING IS FAIR.
MEMBERS SAID TODAY AM PROUD TO
PRESENT SP FIVE BY SIX THIRTY
FIVE BY SENATOR HUESO WHICH
WOULD CREATE THE OFFICE OF
PRODUCE OWN CORD COORDINATOR
WITHIN THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF
BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AGO THIS.
NO AT A PERSON'S R. CHILD ZIP
CODE YOU NEVER DETERMINE THAT
INDIVIDUAL STASTNY HOWEVER TODAY
THE COMMUTE THAT A CHILD GROWS
UP IN IMPACTS THEIR ODDS OF
GRADUATE HIGH SCHOOL TO HEALTH
OUTCOMES AND LIFETIME ECONOMIC
OPPORTUNITIES.
BRADFORD CHILDREN WHO DON'T GET
EAGLE START IN LIFE.
FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA CREATE THE
PROMISE ZONE INITIATIVE IN
TWENTY FOURTEEN AND IS CURRENTLY
WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING
ADMINISTERED BY THE US
DEPARTMENT HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT.
PROPOSITIONS ARE DEFINED BY HIGH
PARTY COMMUNITIES AND SELECT
URBAN RURAL AND TRIBAL
COMMUNITIES WORD FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT PARTNERS
STRATEGICALLY WITH LOCAL
LEADERS.
TO INCREASE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
AND GOOD OB GROWTH IMPROVE
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
ENHANCE PUBLIC HEALTH AND
LEVERAGE PRIVATE INVESTMENT TO
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN
THESE VOEPEL AREAS.
THAT'S A PROMISE ZONE INITIATIVE
DECEPTION TWENTY FOURTEEN FOR
CALIFORNIA GEOGRAPHIC REASONS
REGIONS HAVE BEEN SELECTED
OFFICIALLY SELECTED BY HUD IS
PROM SOUNDS.
THESE REGIONS INCLUDE
COMMUNITIES IN SOUTH LOS ANGELES
SAN DIEGO SACRAMENTO SELECT
COMMITTEES IN GREATER LOS
ANGELES.
THE EXAMPLE HERE IN SACRAMENTO
THE SECOND A PROMISE ENCOMPASSES
TWENTY TWO SQUARE MILES OF
ECONOMICALLY HARDEST HIT
NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE CITY.
RESIDENTS IN THE PROMISE OUT
HAVE YET TO ACHIEVE A HIGH
SCHOOL DIPLOMA OR GED. VISUALLY
THE PROMISE ZONE HAS ALARMINGLY
HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT AND MORTALITY
RATES.
AGAIN THIS BILL WOULD ESTABLISH
THE OFFICE OF THE PROMISE ZONE
COORDINATOR WITHIN GOBIZ TO
PROVIDE STATE LIAISON SERVICES
IN COORDINATION TO CALIFORNIA
PROMISE AND LEAD AGENCIES.
ARE IN THEIR EFFORTS TO RECEIVE
CRITICAL A FEDERAL
REVITALIZATION RESOURCES.
SO THIS WILL ALLOW THE STATE BE
A MORE EFFECTIVE PARTNER WITH
LOCALITIES AND THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT AND AND ADDRESSING
THOSE ISSUES. AB PLEASE TO HAVE
US SEVERAL IN THIS IS YOUR
SUPPORT OF THE BILL RELATED LINK
YOU. FIRST WITNESS IN SUPPORT
GOOD THANK YOU THANK YOU MISTER
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS WHERE TOP
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SAN
DIEGO WE ARE THE SPONSORS OF THE
MEASURE. EVEN AS A PINCH HITTING
AUTHOR IKE I DON'T THINK I HAVE
OUGHT TO MUCH TO. A TO EXPAND
UPON WE THINK THIS IS AN
IMPORTANT.
AS A DOCTOR PAN MENTIONED.
COLLABORATION THAT RIGHT NOW WE
HAVE A PROGRAM THAT IS STATE OR
THIS MINUTES FEDERAL AND LOCALLY
ON BASE THIS ADDS IN THE STATE
COMPONENT FOR COMMUNITIES
THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA.
AND WE VERY MUCH APPRECIATE
ALSO THE WORK OF YOUR COMMITTEE
AND STAFF OVER THE LAST FEW
MONTHS TO REALLY A FLESH THIS
BILL OUT AND I KIND OF.
PUT FINER FINER POINTS OUT WE
CAN MUCH APPRECIATE THAT OUT
WITH ME IS A REPRESENTATIVE FROM
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO THAT CAN
PROVIDE A FEW COMMENTS WE'RE
GOOD THANK YOU.
KAREN CALDWELL ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FOR THE
CITY OF SAN DIEGO WE ADMINISTER
SAN DIEGO'S PROMISED SOUND WITH
SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND
RESIDENTS.
AYE I THINK SENATOR PAN FOUR
WONDERFUL OVERVIEW THE BILL
WE'RE VERY EXCITED ABOUT THE
ADDITIONAL COLLABORATION THAT
COMES THROUGH OUR NONPROFIT AND
GOVERNMENT PARTNERS AND ACADEMIC
PARTNERS. ALL WORKING IN THE
PROMISE AND WE BELIEVE THAT THIS
LEGISLATION IF PASSED
WORD HAD OPPORTUNITIES TO BRING
STATE ORGANIZATIONS AND ENTITIES
INTO THAT CONVERSATION AS WELL
WITHOUT.
.
CREATING A NEW GOVERNMENT
PROGRAM WHICH
HELP US LEVERAGE EXISTING STATE
RESOURCES TO BEST SERVE THOSE
CAN.
THINK YOU BE GOOD THANK YOU
OTHERS IN SUPPORT. OF MR AND
MEMBERS DAVID JONES OF HALF THE
CITY SACRAMENTO WONDERFUL BILL
AS PRIVATE IF YOU MISTER JONES.
VERY GOOD THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
IN WILSON OPPOSITE IN IN
SUPPORT IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN
OPPOSITION.
YOU KNOW WHAT I KNOW OF PERHAPS
YOU TO AND I DUCKED AND I DON'T
EXPECT YOU TO STOP PERHAPS YOU
COULD ADDRESS SOME OF THE
CONCERNS THAT WERE REALLY
WRITTEN. RATE IN THE ANALYSIS.
ESPECIALLY THIS TIME PLEASE
THE BEST PLACE.
FOR THIS THE ISSUE AND A.
AT THE SUNSET DATE QUESTION AS
WELL CHARM.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR.
.
WE ARE THAT GO BACK AS WAS
IDENTIFIED YOU KNOW IT OF COURSE
GO BIZ WAS CREATED.
TO BE THAT ONE STOP SHOP IN
CALIFORNIA TO REALLY HARNESS THE
STATE'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITIES. I'M AT THE HEART OF
REVITALIZATION FOR FOR
COMMUNITIES.
LIKE PROMISED ON COMMUNITIES
IT'S ABOUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
IT'S ABOUT JOBS IT'S ABOUT
CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
PEOPLE AND SO WE DO THINK THAT
GOBIZ REALLY IS THE RIGHT PLACE
TO CHYNA. HARNESS THAT GOES ON
WITH A LOT MORE THAN IT DOES IT
DOES IT IT DOES.
BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY
ONE ENTITY THAT HAS KIND OF
EVERYTHING WE THOUGHT GO
BUSINESS NAME IT'S PROBABLY THE
MOST NIMBLE AGENCY AND STATE
GOVERNMENT THAT COULD REALLY
ADDRESS THAT. AND THE IDEA WAS
IT TO CREATE ISN'T TO CREATE.
A FULL BUREAUCRACY BUT TO HAVE
ONE COORDINATOR THAT CAN REALLY
HELP. OUT DIED THESE VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES TO TALK
ABOUT WHAT OUR BEST PRACTICES
WATER OTHER DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES DOING IN ORDER TO PARK
CREATE THE PARTNERSHIP FOR
PROMISED ON SO WE THINK THATTHEY
ARE THE. THE BEST FIT FOR
THIS BUT AGAIN WE'VE HAD A GOOD
DIALOGUE WITH WITH YOUR STAFF
AND I THINK THAT WE COULD
CONTINUE TO FINE TUNE THAT OVER
TIME VERY GOOD THANK YOU OTHER
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
IF I CAN JUST FOLLOW AT RAP
BRIEFLY ON AND THAT AS WELL.
SO FIRST OF ALL I THINK YOU
KNOW WHERE WHERE TO SIT CSUS
THAT IF THERE ARE OTHER
SUGGESTIONS CERTAINLY I THINK
THERE'S THAT OPEN TO.
CONVERSATION ANY WHETHER THINGS
I THINK ABOUT GO BITS AS WELL AS
IS THAT.
ON THE LOCAL LEVEL OF OUR STATE
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WE
OPERATE THROUGH THAT COUNTY
GOVERNMENTS RIGHT AND OFTEN THE
COUNTIES ARE PARTNERS READY AND
THE PROMISE ZONE INITIATIVE SO
THERE'S ALREADY KIND OF ENTITY
THAT HELPS WITH THAT BUT ON THE
PRIVATE SECTOR SIDE.
THAT THE GOBIZ IS THE AGENCY
THAT BEST AT THE STATE LEVEL
THAT BEST INTERFACES AWAY WHAT
FOR HOW WE LEVERAGE OUR STATE
INITIATIVES IN OUR STATE
PROGRAMS. ESPECIALLY ON THAT
SIDE OF THINGS GO BUSINESS
PROBLEM IT IS THE AND I THINK
IT'S THE ONLY FITNESS BUT IT
PROFIT MAYBE BECAUSE.
BUT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE
NATURE OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND.
AND PRIVATE SECTOR AND. THE
STATE.
THANK YOU DOCTOR HIS SENATOR
WILL.
THINK MISTER CHAIR I'D TWO
THINGS ONE.
ID WAY MORE COMFORTABLE IF IT
HAD A A SUNSET CLAUSE ON IT JUST
SIMPLY WHEN IT COMES TO
GOVERNMENT WE ALSO GET INPUTS
BUT WE NEVER LOOK AT OUTPUTS.
AND SO I WOULD RECOMMEND TO THE
AUTHORS MOVING FOR THAT THAT
HAPPENED MY OTHER QUESTION IS
IN.
WHOEVER CAN ANSWER IT'S FINE IT
DOESN'T HAVE TO HE THOUGHT A BAD
BUT YOU MENTIONED IN YOUR
OVERVIEW THAT ON THE ON THE HIGH
PROGRAM. THAT THIS APPLIES TO
RURAL COMMUNITIES AS WELL IN A
NOSE LOOKING AT IT IT'S IT'S ALL
URBAN. O THE THE QUESTION IS
YOU KNOW WHY IS THAT.
TO MAYBE IS IS SOMETHING THAT'S.
CUT TO BE LIKE A PILOT IS
LOOKING TO EXPAND IT LATER TO
SERVE CENTER GALGIANI SISTER MY
DISTRICT.
OR.
.
CENTER FULLER JEEZ
SENIOR MOMENT SO I JUST I JUST
CURIOUS WHY YOU WHY YOU CAME UP
WITH THAT PARTICULAR FORMULA.
SO OUR FIRST OF ALL.
THEY HAD MENTIONED BEGINNING AT
THE PROMISE ON PROGRAM.
IS A FEDERAL PROGRAM AND SO
THOSE WITH THE FOR ENTITIES
STAFF GOT APPROVAL SO FAR I
CERTAINLY. I'M HOPING THAT THE A
KERN YOU THAT FACT PERHAPS ONE
OF
THE THINGS WE SHOULD HAVE.
THROUGH THIS BILL WITH THAT FEE
CORONATION THAT THEY'RE
HOPEFULLY CAN BE MORE STATE
ASSISTANCE AND HELPING
COMMUNITIES LIKE. THE ONES YOU
REPRESENT OUR CENTER GALGIANI
OTHERS TO BE OF THE BORG THIS
OUT TO BE SUCCESSFUL APPLYING
FOR PROMISED ON. EFFORTS TO
BECAUSE I AIDS ONLY FAMILIAR
WITH. THAT BUT HAVEN'T
SACRAMENTO TERMS OF APPEAL TO
PULL ALL THE DIFFERENT PEOPLE
TOGETHER TO PUT IN A STRONG
APPLICATION THE PAPS I CAN ALSO
SEE.
SOME THE WITNESSES WANT TO.
I DON'T I I DON'T GOTTA HAVE
ANYTHING BUT A WHOLE LOT MORE TO
ADD OTHER THAN THE FACT BECAUSE
IT'S A FEDERAL PROGRAM THERE
ACTUALLY ARE AT THE FEDERAL
LEVEL.
THERE WERE SPECIFIC ABOUT WORLD
DESIGNATION TO PROMISED FUNDS
THEY DIDN'T HAPPEN TO MAKE IT
INTO THIS BUT BUT THOUGH THE
LAST COUPLE OF CALIFORNIA ROUNDS
BUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS
ABSOLUTELY FOCUSED ON WORLD
PROMISED ON SO WE WOULD.
ABSOLUTELY BE ABLE TO A PATH
FOR THE SO HOW OFTEN ARE YOU SIT
AROUND SO HOW OFTEN ARE THEY
DOING THE ROUNDS.
BROWN'S HAVE OCCURRED
HISTORICALLY EVERY YEAR ABOUT
EVERY YEAR EVERY EIGHTEEN MONTHS
SEEN DIEGO TRIED THREE TIMES
WHAT THROUGH THREE DIFFERENT
ROUNDS TO GET AND. I DO BELIEVE
THAT. THERE IS AT LEAST ONE RULE
PROMISED STONE OPERATING IN
SOUTH DAKOTA.
THEY TO PASS ON THAT AUTHORED WE
COULD HAVE LANGUAGE IN THE BILL.
TO TALK ABOUT.
HELPING.
COMMUNITIES
COMPETE FOR FOR THAT DESIGNATION
BE GREAT AS WELL THANK YOU
DOCTOR CAN THANK YOU. YES BUT
THERE ARE NEWMAN ARAB THANK YOU
MISTER SO ODD IN THE LETTER FROM
THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO IN
SUPPORT. I'D REFERENCES AMONG.
THE YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENT AREAS
TOUCH SOMEBODY ELSE'S ANY
PROGRAM ESTABLISHED HER FUNDED
BY THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT.
AND AND SO I DON'T MISS TOP IF
YOU COULD TALK TO THAT SO HOW
HOW WHAT WOULD THE. INTERSECTION
BETWEEN GOD GOBIZ OFFICE FOR
PROMISE ZONE THAT AND.
WE ARE YOU KNOW ASSISTANCE WITH.
SP ONE PROGRAMS. THAT THE BILL
ACTUALLY.
AUTHORIZES EACH OF THE
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY SO IN THE
CASE OF.
REMORA IT WOULD BE CALTRANS OR
CTC THAT THEY STILL HAVE
COMPLETE AUTHORITY AND CONTROL
WITHIN THEIR PROGRAMS THE
PURPOSE OF THE GO BIDS LIAISON
REALLY IS TO SAY.
PERHAPS
A HERE'S A WAY TO IMPLEMENT.
SOME ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE TO A
PROGRAM APPLICANTS WITHIN OR
FROM THE PROMISE ZONE SO IT DOES
NOT IT DOES NOT CHANGE ANY OF
THE CURRENT AUTHORITIES IN IN
THE TRANSPORTATION ACT AS WELL
AS ANY OTHER OF THE PROGRAMS
THAT ARE IDENTIFIED.
SURE TO BE CLEAR IT WOULD BE
GIVING A PREFERENCE TO BE GIVING
ASSISTANCE IN THE APPLICATION
FOR ANY ANY GRANT. APPLICATION
IT PROVIDES IT THE BILL PROVIDES
OF THE AUTHORITY FOR THE EACH
INDIVIDUAL AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT
TO COME UP WITH WHATEVER MAKES
SENSE WITHIN THEIR OWN
DEPARTMENT PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY
SO THAT ASSISTANCE OR PREFERENCE
COULD BE AUTHORIZED.
BUT ADMINISTRATION WE WHAT WAS
THERE CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO
HAVING A SUNSET. THAT WHY IS
THERE NO SUNSET FOR THIS.
I SENATOR ASKING FROM SENATOR
WESSELS OFFICE I WILL DEFINITELY
NEED TO WORK WITH THE COMMITTEE
STAFF TO THEM AND POSSIBLY
INCLUDE THEM BEFORE THE SENATE
THE SENATE FLOOR. A GUY I DO AND
I DO AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUES
CENTER WELL THAT THAT IS.
AB WORTHY AND NECESSARY THIS
GUY.
IT WE BE SILENT ON. SENATOR
LOTT.
YEAH THAT THAT'S JUST.
YOU BROUGHT SOME OF MY WHAT
YOU'RE WHAT YOU'RE JUST SAYING
THERE'S.
WHY WOULD ONE PERSON OUR YOU
KNOW IF IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA?
A SIGNIFICANTLY VALUE TO A
SOPHISTICATED ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT.
ORGANIZATION LIKE THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO THAT'S GOT PLENTY OF.
ALREADY BUDGET DOING DOING THAT
I'M JUST FRIGHTENED ALSO NAY I
HIT ON THAT WILL. WHAT WHAT WHAT
IS THE VALUE WHY SHOULD THE
STATE?
YOU'LL BE INVOLVED THAT WHEN
YOU'VE ALREADY GOT PEOPLE ON
STAFF TO TO DO THE JOB SO SO THE
ISSUE IS FOR YOU IN FACT IN
ORDER SIXTEEN APPLICATION YOU
HAVE TO HAVE A GOOD TEAM OF
PEOPLE READY PUT TOGETHER TO
CHALLENGES IS THAT.
NOW WE'VE ALL HAD OUR
EXPERIENCE.
AND I WAS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BUT IS THAT NOT PROP PERSON
CERTAINLY MADE YOU LOCAL GRAVEL
YOU HAVE TO INTERFACE WITH THE
STATE RIGHT.
IT'S GOOD IF THERE'S A POINT
PERSON WHO CAN HELP YOU.
I HELP MOVE THE DIFFERENT
AGENCIES AROUND BECAUSE THEY'RE
NOT ALWAYS THINKING ABOUT WHAT'S
GOING ON THE PROMISE AND IS
BEING THEIR FIRST PRIORITY AND I
THINK THAT'S. WHAT THIS IS ABOUT
IT'S ABOUT TRYING IT'S?
WE HAD THE EXPERTISE TO
CERTAINLY THERE AND IN TERMS OF
DOING THE WORK THE PROMISE ZONE
OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE BEEN
SUCCESFUL IN ACHIEVING THE
APPLICATION BY THINK THAT WE
WANT A MAXILLARY GE.
THE.
US. THIS STATE PROGRAMS AND
RESOURCES AS WELL AND.
AND TO HAVE A POINT PERSON AND
HIS THE COORDINATOR AT THE STATE
TO HELP YOU DO THAT.
INSTEAD OF PEOPLE HAVING TO GO
SEARCH AROUND ON THEIR OWN I
THINK IT IS GOING TO BE SOME
ADVANTAGE ALSO I THINK THAT ALSO
CREATES A PERSON WITHIN THE
STATE AS WHERE HOPEFULLY GET
FUTURE PROMISE SOUNDS THAT
ACTUALLY HAS SOME EXPERTISE A
FAMILIARITY STATE LEVEL WITH
PROMISE SOUNDS.
SO.
THAT.
SO THAT IS WE'RE TRYING TO MOVE
FORWARD AND BE MORE EFFECTIVE IN
TRYING TO LEVERAGE THE FEDERAL
RESOURCES WE GET TO THE PROMISE
OUT ARE THE DAMAGES. THAT YOU
HAVE SOMEONE AT STATE TO
ACTUALLY HAS A FAMILIAR TO
WHAT'S ALREADY HAPPENING IN THE
STATE BECAUSE ARE WORKING WITH
PEOPLE. AND ALSO WHAT.
HOW PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF VARIOUS STATE
PROGRAMS AS WELL?
I'M.
I THINK AS LONG AS IT'S GOT THE.
.
SUNSET AND ALSO ALL SUPPORT THAT
I JUST.
I'M NOT SURE WE ARE CREATING
ANOTHER BUREAUCRACY HERE BUT I'M
WILLING TO GIVE A SHOT.
WE THANK YOU SENATOR DODD
SENATOR FULLER.
I AGREE ON THE SUNSET THINK
THAT'S NUMBER ONE.
NUMBER TWO IS HOW MANY YEARS
HAS THE PROMISE ZONES PROGRAM
BEEN RUNNING ALREADY.
OF THE A PROGRAM ESTABLISHED
TWENTY FOURTEEN SO AND.
SO IT'S BEEN.
THREE YEARS.
AND SO HAVE THERE BEEN AROUND
EVERY YEAR OF FOR THOSE THREE
YEARS.
AND NO RULE AREAS FROM
CALIFORNIA HAVE BEEN SELECTED
DURING THAT TIME EVEN THOUGH MY
AREA FOR EXAMPLE IS DOUBLE THE
EMPLOYMENT OF THE STATE. NOT AS
OF YET.
AND IS IT.
IS IT A PROBLEM FOR GOBIZ SINCE
MANY OF THE PROGRAMS IN THE
PROMISE ZONES ARE OUTSIDE OF THE
MISSION OF GOLD IS.
AND HOW WILL THEY.
I'M I'M ASSUMING THAT WE HAVE WE
HAVE.
PEOPLE WORKING ON THOSE PROGRAMS
ALREADY TRYING TO THE PEOPLE THE
THE COULD HANDLE THE STATE
GRANTS.
TO THE TERRITORIES THAT? FOR THE
LAST THREE YEARS HAVE ALREADY
BEEN.
OF WORK DONE BY SOMEONE ELSE.
I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE MISSION OF
GOBIZ ELECTORAL DISTRICTS SPEAK
FOR THEMSELVES BUT AS AN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR I
DEFINITIVELY SEE THIS AS.
RUNNING IN THE SAME RUNNING LANE
AS OUR MISSION AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT WE WORK
COLLABORATIVELY WITH OTHER
GOVERNMENT A ENTITIES. INSIDE
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO AS WELL AS
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. AND
ESSENTIALLY OUR ROLE IS A
FACILITATORWE'RE TRYING TO GET
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
IN NON GOVERNMENT ACTORS TO WORK
COLLABORATIVELY WITH IN THE
PROMISE THEM. TO NOT BE
DUPLICATIVE TO NOT ALL PURSUE
THE SAME OPPORTUNITIES TO
PROGRESS WHO'S PASSED
SERVED TO PROCEED. FORWARD WITH
A PARTICULAR GRANT OPPORTUNITY
AND THE CARROT THAT WE HAVE TO
GET EVERYONE TO COME SIT AT THAT
TABLE. IS THE PROMISE ZONE IN
THE PROVINCE POINTS AND OTHER
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE THAT IT
PROVIDES TO BRING THE STATE INTO
THAT I THINK WOULD MAKE.
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND.
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO AS WELL AS
OTHER REGIONS AROUND THE STATE.
EVEN MORE FACTORS AS WE HAVE
THAT SHORT TENURE DESIGNATION
WERE PROMISE ON TO REALLY GET
OUR HOUSE IN ORDER. IN IN SOME
OF THOSE COMMUNITIES.
SO BASICALLY.
YOU KNOW FOR ME WE WOULD BE
CREATING A NEW.
.
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES.
ARE AND I'M NOT SURE THAT THERE
ISN'T.
OF. DUPLICITY.
DUPLICATION OF EFFORT.
BETWEEN WE'VE GOT GOING ON NOW
FOR PROGRAM.
THAT COULD RUN OUT IN THE VERY
NEAR FUTURE.
WHICH OFFERS NO PROMISE
TWO THE RULE AREAS OF CALIFORNIA
AS A WHOLE.
AND SO I'M NOT SURE THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
WOULD WANT TO CHOOSE.
AMONG THE CHILDREN THEY'RE GONNA
HELP OTHERS IF PUBLIC.
AND THERE'S NO SENSE AT THE.
SO AT THIS TIME ALTHOUGH I THINK
THE EFFORT HAS SOME MERIT.
I'M NOT SURE THAT I WOULD LIKE
TO SUPPORT IT.
BECAUSE I DON'T FEEL IT
ADDRESSES THE.
THE NEED OR THE COM OPPORTUNITY
APPROPRIATELY AT THIS TIME.
HOWEVER.
SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO
BE DOING SOME WORK ANYWAY.
SO.
I WON'T BE SUPPORTING IT TODAY.
IF.
THOSE OBSTACLES CAN BE OVERCOME.
I CERTAINLY THINK THE.
ANYTHING WE CAN DO TO ATTRACT.
MORE FEDERAL PROGRAMS.
EDUCATION AND EXPERTISE FOR OUR
RURAL AREAS ESPECIALLY IF
THEY'RE REALLY RULE.
A WOULD BE HELPFUL THANK YOU.
THANK YOU A CENTER FOR SENATOR
NEWMAN.
PROMISE IT'LL BE QUICK SO YEAH
YEAH I APOLOGIZE IF I MISS THIS
THE ANALYSIS BUT IN WITH RESPECT
TO THE ACTUAL POSITION BE
GREATER POSITIONS WHAT IT WHAT'S
THE NUMBER OF OF HEADS AND OR
THE. THE THE
GREAT COST.
OF ADDITIONAL LABOR AND KOBE.
AND I.
THE BILL DOESN'T SPECIFIED THE
AYE THE IDEA WOULD BE TO CREATE
A LIAISON SO I THINK THAT WOULD
BE A. A PERSON OR EVEN PROBABLY
IF I DOUBT IT'S EVEN A FULL TIME
PERSON BUT I'M NOT. SMELLY
INCUMBENT ON ON ME TO STYLE
GOBIZ WHAT EXACTLY IT WOULD TAKE
FOR THEM TO RUN AND THAT'S
PROBABLY A QUESTION THAT WE HOPE
TO ADDRESS. A MORE FULLY IN THE
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE AND
WHAT'S COMING QUICK SO I THINK
WE'LL HAVE THAT CONVERSATION
VERY SOON.
GOOD THANK YOU THAT SENATOR
PAINE WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE.
OUR SPECIAL GUEST WRITER GOOD
THANK YOU VERY MUCH IS THERE A
MOTION AND AND I RIVER THAT THIS
SINCE THAT DATE IS CRITICAL I
THINK SO. ACTUALLY.
BUT WHO WITH A FEW VERY GOOD
THANK YOU FOR THE MOTION WHICH
SENATOR GALGIANI PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL MOTION IS TO PASS THE
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
HELP. AYE HILL AYE FULLER.
FULLER NO DODD. DODD AYE
GALGIANI GALGIANI AYE GLAZER.
GLAZER AYE HERNANDEZ BANANAS AYE
NEWMAN. NEWMAN AYE PAN PART AND
AYE WILK AYE WILK AYE.
A TWO ONE THE BILL IS OUT THANK
YOU VERY MUCH. AND NOW WE WILL
MOVE TO THE FINAL ITEM I KNOW
THIS IS A SHOULD BE A FAIRLY
EXPEDITIOUS HEARING ON SB SEVEN
NINETY FIVE SENATOR GALGIANI
ITEM NUMBER THREE ON OUR AGENDA
TODAY PLEASE PROCEED.
S. B. SEVEN NINETY FIVE RELATES
TO THE MOBILITY PROVISIONS OF
THE CALIFORNIA ACCOUNTANCY ACT I
WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN BY ACCEPTING
THE AUTHORS AMENDMENTS
RESTRAINED COMMENTS FIVE AND SIX
OF THE COMMITTEE AND ALICE'S.
THESE AMENDMENTS WILL GIVE
STAKEHOLDERS IN THE LEGISLATURE
MORE TIME TO REVIEW THE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY REPORT. AS WELL AS
ADDRESS TECHNICAL ISSUES RAISED
BY THE BOARD. IN TWO THOUSAND
TWELVE THE LEGISLATURE CONFORM
CALIFORNIA CPA PRACTICE
PRIVILEGE PROVISIONS TO THOSE OF
THE REST OF THE NATION AND EASE
THE BURDENS OF INTERSTATE
PRACTICE FOR CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS.
THE MOBILITY PROGRAMS
ESTABLISHED IN TWO THOUSAND
TWELVE CONTAINED MANY OF THE
SAME CONSUMER PROTECTION
PROVISIONS AND REQUIRED THE
BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY TO REPORT
BACK TO THE LEGISLATURE. ON HOW
WELL THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAW
TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC S. B.
SEVEN NINETY FIVE AS AMENDED
WILL REMOVE THE JANUARY ONE TWO
THOUSAND NINETEEN SUNSET ON
THESE MOBILITY PROVISIONS. AND
PUSH THE DATE BACK ONE YEAR THIS
WILL ALLOW STAKEHOLDERS MORE
TIME TO ANALYZE THE BOARD'S
REPORT. MY PLAN ASSUMING YOUR
STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE
FINDINGS OF THE REPORT WOULD BE
TO REMOVE THE SUNSET PROVISION
ENTIRELY AS THE BILL ADVANCES
LATER THIS SESSION. THE BILL HAS
NO KNOWN OPPOSITION AND WITH ME
TODAY I HAVE JONATHAN ROSS ON
BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL
ACCOUNTING FIRMS AND JAMES GOES
ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
SOCIETY OF CPAS. THANK YOU
MISTER THANK YOU.
I GOOD AFTERNOON JOHN ROSS ON
BEHALF OF PWC ELI KPMG DELAYED
AND GRANT THORTON. AYE IN THE
INTEREST OF TIME I WAS GONNA
READ THIS EXCELLENT REPORT I
WON'T.
BUT IT'S BUT IT'S REALLY GOOD.
THE I THINK THE IDEA OF YOUR
STAFF CAME UP WITH TO JUST
EXTEND THE SUNSET AT THIS POINT
TIME TO ALLOW.
NON RUSHED REVIEW OF THIS
REPORT IS A GOOD IDEA WE LOOK
FOR TO WORK LOOKING WORKING WITH
EVERYBODY AS THEY GO THROUGH
THIS I THINK IT'LL WE JUST TO
THE RIGHT CONCLUSION THIS IS
CENTER SET WILL THEN. BE ABLE TO
GET RID OF THE SUN SUCH AS THIS
BILL GOES THROUGH THE PROCESS
THAT YOU COULD SOLUTION THANK
YOU MIGHT ADDRESS MR GROWTH IN
GROSS ON BEHALF THE CALIFORNIA'S
CITED CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS IN STRONG SUPPORT.
GOOD THANK YOU OTHERS IN
SUPPORT.
YOU KNOW ONE AND IS THERE ANYONE
HERE IN OPPOSITION.
SO OPPOSITION.
WE HAVE OF THREE MOTIONS THIS
ISSUE.
SENATOR BLASIER MOVES THE BILL.
WOULD LIKE TO CLOSE SENATOR
GALGIANI I RESPECT CLASS VIII
THE.
THE BILL AS AMENDED.
WITH THE.
.
THE ONE YEAR SUNSET
CONSIDERATIONS UP PLEASE CALL
THE ROLL.
MISSION IS TO PASS AS A MINUTE
TO SENATE APPROPRIATIONS
COMMITTEE HEALTH AYE HILL AYE
FULLER.
FULLER AYE DODD AYE DODD AYE
GALGIANI
GALGIANI AYE GLAZER. GLAZER AYE
HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ AYE NEWMAN
AYE NEWMAN AYE PAN AYE PAN AYE
WILK AYE WILK AYE.
THE BILL HAS NINE VOTES IT IS
OUT THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND WE
WILL GO BACK TO ITEM NUMBER ONE
S. B. SEVEN S. B. SEVENTY S.
SENATOR BATES PLEASE CALL THE
OPTION MEMBER.
RUSSIA'S DAY PASSED THE SENATE
APPROPRIATIONS CURRENT VOTE SIX.
TO.
SHARE VOTING AYE.
ADVICE FOR BUDDING AYE AND
LATER.
GLAZER I.
THE BILL HAS SEVEN VOTES IT IS
OUT THAT INCLUDES A BUSINESS OF
OUR HEARING TODAY THAT MEETING
IS ADJOURNED