MADAM CHAIR AND COMMITTEE
MEMBERS TODAY IN PRESENTING SP.
FOUR NINE SEVEN WHICH PROHIBITS
ANY PERSON FROM MAKING
APPLICATION TO PURCHASE MORE
THAN ONE FIREARM WITHIN A THIRTY
DAY PERIOD --%
FIREARM FIREARMS OR NOT BE
DELIVERED WHATEVER THE DEALERS
NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
THAT WITHIN THE PIER PRECEDING
THIRTY DAY PERIOD THE PURCHASER
IS MADE ANOTHER APPLICATION TO
PURCHASE A FIREARM THIS IS A
BILL THAT HAS COME TO THIS
COMMITTEE A NUMBER OF TIMES AND
AND OTHER.
OF PIECES OF LEGISLATION
FUNDAMENTALLY IT'S MAKING
CALIFORNIA LAW CONSISTENT WITH
LONG GUNS.
AND HAND GUNS WHERE YOU HAVE ALL
ONE GUN A MONTH A LAW ON
HANDGUNS OR MAKING CALIFORNIA
CONSISTENT --
LONG GUN PURCHASES IN RECENT
YEARS HAVE OUT PACED HANDGUN
PURCHASES AND AS WE KNOW TO THE
MOST RECENT VIOLENT SHOOTINGS.
ON SCHOOL CAMPUSES WERE
PERPETRATED BY LONGER AND SO --
BY PROVIDING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
AGAIN A ROBUST DEBATE I'M SURE
WE'LL HAVE FOLKS WHO COME UP AND
TALK IN THE BRADY CAMPAIGN --
AMANDA WOULD BE HERE BUT SHE'S
OUT OF TOWN BUT YOU WANT ME TO
ADD HER SUPPORT I RESPECTFULLY
ASK FOR AN AYE VOTE.
FRICTION THE BILL IS AB ELEVEN
SEVENTY SEVEN RIGHT WHEN I SAY.
HEY HER SB IS S. ARM SEPARATE
CAMINO SP ELEVEN STORE YOU DID
THE RIGHT SB.
BUT YOU SAID FOUR SEVEN SEVEN
I'M SORRY ALL GOOD IT'S AN EARLY
ELEVEN SEVENTY SEVEN AND NOW WE
WILL HAVE WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
ALRIGHT WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION
[inaudible]
VOICE OTHER [inaudible]
YEAH [inaudible] ONE YOU COULD
GET ONE NOW. ONE OF THIS DIRE
EVERYONE.
I OR A FRIENDLY BUNCH.
I SPEAK FOR YOURSELF.
GO AHEAD HEARD THAT.
BUT SCHOOL EXPERIENCED IT
FIRSTHAND A LITTLE MOVE FURTHER
ENTERED PLEAS.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE FOR THE RECORD AND RE
WITH NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
HERE IN STRONG OPPOSITION.
AS YOU'RE ALL AWARE CALIFORNIA
HAS SOME OF THE MOST STRINGENT
GUN LAWS IN THE COUNTRY.
AND AGAIN WE HAVE A PROPOSAL
HERE THE GOES AFTER LAW ABIDING
CITIZENS WHAT THIS BILL IS DOING
IS IT'S MAKING IT.
A CRIME TO TRY AND LAWFULLY
PURCHASE TO FIREARMS WITHIN A
THIRTY DAY PERIOD FOR A LICENSED
DEALER THESE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT
ARE GOING THROUGH THE
APPROPRIATE STEPS. TO GO AND TO
HAVE THEIR BACKGROUND CHECK RUN
TO PRESENT THEIR FIREARM SAFETY
CERTIFICATE TO PAY THEIR FEES.
AND WE'RE GONNA SAY YOU CAN'T DO
THAT -- MRS
NOT GOING AFTER CRIMINALS WHO
ARE OPERATING OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM.
AND I KNOW THERE IS AN EXEMPTION
FOR HUNTING LICENCES BUT SECOND
AND IT'S NOT ABOUT.
HUNTING IT'S ABOUT SELF DEFENSE.
AND THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT THAT WERE PUTTING MORE
CONSTRAINTS ON AND THIS IS GONNA
PUT INCREASE BURDENS ON THOSE
LAW ABIDING PERSONS INCREASING
THE NUMBER OF TRIPS THEY NEED TO
MAKE TO A DEALER AS WELL AS A
DISH.
BECAUSE EVERY TIME YOU GO TO
PURCHASE A FIREARM YOU HAVE A
TWENTY FIVE DOLLAR FEE.
SO INSTEAD OF POSSIBLY LUMPING --
A PURCHASE TOGETHER WERE SOMEONE
TO PURCHASE TWO RIFLES AT ONE
TIME RATHER THAN --
A RIFLE IN JUNE AND ONE IN AN
AUGUST --
YOU'RE GONNA MAKE HIM MAKE. FOR
TRIPS INSTEAD OF TWO AGAIN --
WITH THIS THIS HUNTING LICENSING
SECTION ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S
KIND OF INTERESTING IS IT'S A
VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
AND SO YOU COULD GO IN AND AND
BUY A GUN IN IN JUNE BEFORE YOUR
HUNTING LICENSE EXPIRES YOU CAN
BY TWO FORMER THREE OF ON TIME
YOU COME BACK IN JULY AND YOU
HAVEN'T RENEWED YOUR HUNTING
LICENSE AND ALL OF SUDDEN THAT
EXEMPTION GOES OUT THE WINDOW
AND YOU.
COULD BE SUBJECT TO PENALTIES SO
ON THIS IS THIS IS REALLY AN
UNNECESSARY BILL IT'S REALLY
TARGETING A LAW ABIDING RATHER
THAN GOING AFTER THE CRIMINAL
MISUSE.
WITHOUT WHEN OPPOSITION THANK
YOU.%
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS SAMPRAS WITH
GUN OWNERS CALIFORNIA HAPPY TO
BE HERE --
TO TO TALK ABOUT THIS BILL --
PROMINENT CONCENTRATE ON ON THE
ACTUAL CONSTITUTIONALITY OF IT --
THE FACT THAT --
THIS BILL IS [inaudible]
TECHNICALLY.
RATIONING A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
SUPREME COURT SAID THAT THAT --
THE YOU GET YOU CAN'T BAN ANY
ANY CATEGORY OF GUN ANY TYPE OF
GUN THAT IS COMMONLY PURCHASED.
THROUGHOUT THE THE UNITED STATES
LONG GUNS ARE COMMONLY PURCHASE
THEIR EVERYBODY ACCEPTS THAT
THAT'S PART.
OF THE SECOND MAN AND PROTECTED
BY THAT NOW WHAT THIS BILL IS
DOING IT IS RATIONING.
THE EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT PEOPLE ARE YOU KNOW THEY
THEY SAY WELL YOU CAN.
YELL FIRE INOF IN THE THEATER
ABSOLUTELY YOU CAN.
DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU COULD
REALLY YELL FIRE IN A THEATRE IF
THERE'S A FIRE.
YOU HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT TO DO THAT.
YOU'RE NOT LIMITED BY THAT.
THIS BILL IS LIMITING.
THE EXERCISING OF A
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.
IT WILL BE CHALLENGED.
AND I DO BELIEVE THAT WE WILL
WIN.
IF WE WIN.
THE NET RESULT OF THIS WILL NOT
BE ONLY THAT.
YOU CANNOT --
REQUIRE THE PURCHASE OF OF ONLY
ONE GUN OF ANY KIND A MONTH BUT
I BELIEVE THAT IT WILL ALSO
OVERTURN.
THE PROHIBITION OF BUYING MORE
THAN ONE HANDGUN PER MONTH SO
FOR THOSE REASONS WE ARE
OPPOSITION AND WE KNOW THIS IS
GOING TO ONE FOR FOR QUITE SOME
TIME THANK YOU.
THINK ABOUT CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF
THE COMMITTEE CRAIG ELISABETH OF
THE FIREARMS POLICY COALITION IN
OPPOSITION.
MADAM CHAIRMAN MEMBERS ROY
GRIFFITH ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA RIFLE ASSOCIATION
OPPOSITION I JUST WANNA SAY HERE
WE GO AGAIN I ME TWENTY SIXTEEN
IT WAS AB SIXTEEN FORTY SEVEN
LAST YEAR WAS S. B. NINE FORTY
SEVEN WHICH IS CENTER OPENED
WITH.
AND WE ARE AGAIN WITH THAT SAME
BAD PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT
ONLY IMPACTS LAW BANNING
CITIZENS FOR THOSE REASONS WE
STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS BILL THANK
YOU.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
I'D GO SENATOR MITCHELL.
MATT CHAIR --
AS THE HOUSE TO ONE OF THE
OPPONENTS --
QUESTIONED THE CONSTITUTIONALITY
OF THE BILL I WAS LOOKING BACK
TO THE ANALYSIS. TO FIGURE OUT
THE YEAR IN WHICH CALIFORNIA
PASSED THE ONE HANDGUN A MONTH
LAW.
I AND I SEE THAT WAS A KNOCKS.
BILL AB TOOL TO OF NINETEEN
NINETY NINE AND SO MY QUESTION
IS HAS THAT BEEN CHALLENGED IN
THE COURT AND DO IT HAS IT.
BILL HANDGUN.
BUT IS HAVE BEEN KILLED.
I BELIEVE SAU AT THE TIME BUT IT
WAS IT WAS DEEMED CONSTITUTIONAL.
EXCELLENT ALMOST A BILL THANK
YOU.
SENATOR WIENER AYE YEAH SO I
SUPPORT THE BILL ON ONE OF THANK
YOU OUGHT TO BRING UP FOR IT I
SAW AND I THINK I MADE.
THIS COMMENT AND OTHER COMMITTEE
AS WELL AYE AYE.
THIS STILL ALLOWS PEOPLE TO
I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE
FRANKLY NEEDS TO PURCHASE TWELVE
LONG GUNS HERE --
BUT TO SAY THAT YOU'VE A
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A BY A
TWENTY THIRTY FIFTY A HUNDRED
LONG GUNS A YEAR WHAT THE ONLY.
PURPOSE OF PURCHASING DOT MANY
LONG GUNS --
IT I CAN'T I DON'T SEE ANY.
THAT WERE POSSIBLE.
JUSTIFICATION [inaudible]
FOR ANY --
GARDENS IT EVEN IF THE
CONSTITUTE AYE I STRONGLY
DISAGREE WITH THE SUPREME
COURT'S.
RADICAL AND COUNTER FACTUAL --
INTERPRETATION OF THE SECOND
AMENDMENT WHICH IS INCONSISTENT
WITH THE ACTUAL LANGUAGE OF THE
SECOND ELEMENT.
BUT WE ARE OF COURSE BOUND BY
SUPREME COURT RULINGS BUT EVEN
IF YOU ACCEPT WHAT THE SUPREME
COURT HAS SAID.
ABOUT.
THE IT WHAT GOD DOES NOT MEAN
YOU GOTTA CHANCE HAVE AN ARSENAL.
BY IN YOUR HOME WE KNOW THAT YOU
KNOW THAT SECOND I'M A DOZEN.
GIVE YOUR RIGHT TO HAVE MACHINE
GUNS ARE OTHER CIVIC OR A
BAZOOKA --
AND SO THIS IS A VERY REASONABLE
RESTRICTION AND I'LL BE
SUPPORTING.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE GUYS --
CENTER STONE.
MONEY MANAGER MEMBERS --
FIRST LET ME SAY THAT I
ASSOCIATE MY MY COMMENTS WITH
THEM IN.
EXCUSE ME DIDN'T THOSE OF THE
OPPOSITION --
I HAVE I HAVE A DEAR FRIEND IS --
HIS NAME IS MARK [inaudible]
AND MY FRIEND IS A AVID --
RIFLE COLLECTOR --
FOR HIS --
SIXTIETH BIRTHDAY I PURCHASED A
ALONG GUN AND IT WAS --
BEAUTIFULLY --
ATTACHED WITH THE BEAUTIFUL
QUAYLE ON ONE SIDE AND BACK ON
THE OTHER SIDE --
HIS A MODEST INCOME KIND OF A
GUY BUT YOU KNOW SOME OF US YOU
KNOW COLLECT CARS.
SOME OF US COLLECT --
COINS HE LOVES RIFLES AND HE'S
GOT A RIFLE COLLECTION YOU CAN
SEE THEM ON HIS.
ON HIS WALL HE DOES HUNT HAS HIS
WHILE.
AND YOU KNOW I WORRY --
THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE IMPEDE --
LAW ABIDING CITIZENS GOING AND
BUYING GUNS FILLING OUT THE
PAPERWORK --
WE KNOW THAT A MAJORITY OF GUNS
THAT ARE USED IN CRIMES ARE
HANDGUNS NOT LONG GUNS US NOT
SAY THERE HASN'T BEEN
SIGNIFICANT DEVASTATION BY THOSE
AT HER.
USING LONG GUNS AND SOME
HORRIBLE INCIDENTS ARE WERE ALL
CONCERNED ABOUT.
AND I KNW THAT THE THE AUTHOR
HAS GOOD INTENTIONS AND TRYING.
TO LIMIT --
THE THE RASH OF HORRIFIC EVENTS
THAT WE WITNESSED A THROUGHOUT
THE COUNTRY BUT YOU NOTE THAT
THOSE ARE THOSE ARE CRIMINALS
LOSER.
MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE WE WE'VE
TRIED TO STRENGTHEN LAWS TO
PREVENT MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE FROM.
ACQUIRING HA WEAPONS WHETHER
IT'S A HANDGUN OR WELL A LONG
RIFLE BUT BUT BUT I I WORRY THAT
THIS ONE SIZE FITS ALL KIND OF
HIM IMPEDIMENT ON THE SECOND
AMENDMENT IS GOING --
TO TAKE AWAY THE THE PLEASURES
OF THE JOYS OF TO MANY PEOPLE IN
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THOROUGHLY ENJOY.
AND YOU KNOW.
SENATOR I DON'T KNOW IF IF YOU
CAN RESPOND TO THAT WHAT WHAT
WOULD WE SAY TO THE LED TO SO
COLLECTORS THAT.
ARE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS OF
NEVER EVEN HAD A TRAFFIC TICKET
OR MISDEMEANOR --
YOU KNOW THERE'S SOME ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT --
ASPECTS OF THIS AS FAR AS HE
COULD HAVE GONE.
STORES THAT I KNOW THAT SOME
MOST PROBABLY DON'T LIKE I LIKE
THEM -- THAT.
PALEY'S SO PAY TAXES --
THIS REALLY LIMITS SOME TO
BUYING --
ELEVEN RIFLES HERE NOT. TWELVE
BECAUSE YOU HAVE A TEN A WAITING
PERIOD SO --
BICU IF YOU COULD JUST CALMLY
RESPOND TO THOSE COLLECTORS WILL
BE WHAT WE CALL THEM.
I THINK YOU HAVE TO SEPARATE IT
MAY IF I MAY BE ASSUMING YOU
HAVE TO SEPARATE YOU KNOW WE'RE
NOT TALKING ABOUT --
REPLICAS OR HISTORIC.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CASUAL
PURCHASER.
WHO?
IT'S NOT A HUNTER [inaudible]
WHO? ONE GUN A MONTH SEEMS AMPLE
FOR THAT PERSON.
AYE AS IT'S BEEN STATED AYE THE
ASSOCIATE MY COMMENTS WITH MY
COLLEAGUE FROM SAN FRANCISCO.
THE BULK PURCHASERS THERE'S NO
REASON FOR THE BULK PURCHASERS
TO BE PURCHASING THESE WEAPONS
IN MASS QUANTITIES FOR OTHER
REASONS THAN --
PROBLEMS SO YOU KNOW I THINK
YOUR QUESTION IS A GOOD ONE BUT
I DON'T REALLY THINK IT'S IT'S
GERMANE TO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO
GET HERE RESPECTFULLY.
MAYES I COULD IF I COULD --
DE ACTUAL BILL IF YOU LOOK AT
PAGE --
THREE OF SIX EPIC VIEW LOOKING
ANALYSIS [inaudible]
SECTION.
NINE HAS A EXCEPTION FOR THOSE
WHO ARE LICENSED AS COLLECTORS.
THE MAKING OF THE IN A TENDER
EXAM FOR THE BILL BRECK.
AND HOW DO YOU GET THE
DOCUMENTATION OTHER CURIOSITY.
AN ANALYSIS IT'S AN EXIT GUIDES
LAID OUT IN EXISTING LAW
[inaudible]
THANK YOU.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THE DICE.
VETERANS LIKE TO CLOSE
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR LIVE OF WE
HAVE A MOTION --
WITH SEVERAL CALL.
THE MOTION IS THE SEMIMINUTES
BEACON CURTAIN SKINNER LIKE IN
OUR AYE ANDERSON.
BRADFORD ON BRADFORD AYE JACKSON
MITCHELL AYE RITUAL AYE STONE.
STONE NO WIENER.
WIENER AYE --
PHYLLIS OUT I THINK WE CAN.
HOLD IT BECAUSE WE HAVE A COUPLE
MISSING MEMBERS IF THEY SHOW UP
TO HIM RECENTLY TIMES RIGHT TO
THE FLORA [inaudible]
THEY GOT --
GREAT SO NOW WE WILL HEAR
SENATOR WIENER SPELL
.
OKAY GO AHEAD SENATOR BOB THANK
YOU VERY MUCH --
MADAM CHAIR --
THANK YOU FOR HEARING THIS BILL
TODAY I S. B. --
SP -- TWO
TWENTY ONE IS A BILL BRING A
DISTRICT BILL --
THAT WILL FINALLY RESPECT THE
OVERWHELMING --
SENTIMENT OF UNTIL COUNTY DALY
CITY SO FORTH --
TO AND OF THE OF THE GUN SHOWS
AT THE COW PALACE --
CAO PALACE IS A AYE STATE
AGRICULTURAL FAIR GROUND --
PROPERTY RIGHT AT THE BORDER OF
DALY CITY.
AND SAN FRANCISCO.
BY V. TALK HELP PALACE TIMEHAS
BEEN HOLDING A GUN SHOWS ABOUT
HALF A DOZEN TIMES --
A YEAR THOUGHT FOR MANY YEARS
AND FOR MANY YEARS THE LOCAL
COMMUNITY HAS BEEN ASKING THE
CAL CALLOUS TO STOP HOLDING GUN
SHOWS.
THE CONCERNS ARE SMALL
PERCENTAGE OF THE CAL PALACES A
REVENUE THAT REVENUE COULD BE
EASILY REPLACED FRANKLY --
WE HAVE UNANIMOUS SUPPORT FROM
THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS SUPPORT
FROM THE CEMETERY COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS SUPPORT
IT FOR ON THE DALY CITY CITY
COUNCIL.
UNANIMOUS SUPPORT FROM THE SAN
FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT UNANIMOUS SUPPORT --
FROM THE JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT IN DALY CITY THERE IS
NO CONTROVERSY HERE IN THE LOCAL
COMMUNITY AND AT THE CAL PALACE.
HAS IGNORED THE LOCAL COMMUNITY --
AND IT'S CONTINUED CAUGHT TO
HOLD OF THESE GUN SHOWS BOTTOM
WE HAVE --
MY PREDECESSORS --
WE'RE WE WILL.
WE WILL GET RID OF THESE GUN
SHOWS --
EVENTUALLY AND I HOPE IT'LL
HAPPEN OF THIS YEAR --
AND WE DO IN THE BILL RESPECTS
EXISTING CONTRACT WHICH EXPIRES
AT THE END OF TWENTY NINETEEN
WERE NOT LOOKING THE CAUSE A
BREACH OF CONTRACT.
BUT AS OF THE END OF THAT
CONTRACT ARE NO MORE A GUN SHOWS
WILL BE PERMITTED A RESPECTFULLY
ASK YOUR AYE VOTE WITH ME TODAY
A REPRESENTATIVES.
ON BEHALF OF BOTH SAN FRANCISCO
COUNTY AND AND CEMETERY COUNTY.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS MADISON DRY
WITH POLITICAL SOLUTIONS ON
BEHALF OF SAN MATEO COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS IN SUPPORT OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPRECIATES
THE AIM OF THE BILL TO AFFORD
THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES THE
ABILITY TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT
THESE SHOWS BEING HELD IN THEIR
COMMUNITIES AND FOR THESE.
REASONS WE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
AND ABOUT.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS PAUL YOU'RE
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO SHE'D JUST HEARD
ON THE IN THE DEBATE ON THE
PREVIOUS BILL THERE'S STILL
PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES BY GUNS
IN CALIFORNIA OR DRIVE VOTE.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
EXCUSE ME WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION THANK.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE LOOK LOUIS BROWN ON
BEHALF THE WESTERN FAIRS
ASSOCIATION.
HOW WE REPRESENT ARE ALL FIFTY
FOR THE DISTRICT ASSOCIATIONS IN
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA --
FOR US THERE ARE GUN SHOWS HELD
AT MOST TO THE DISTRICT
ASSOCIATIONS AND THEY ARE HELD.
AT CAL PALACE HOME.
OUR CONCERN IS IS REALLY WITH
THE IDEA OF THIS LEGISLATION
COMING IN MANDATING WHAT A
DISTRICT AG ASSOCIATION CAN AND
CANNOT DO.
EACH OF THEM ARE GOVERNED BY
GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTEES --
AND THEY ARE GIVEN THE CHARGE TO
A MAKE THOSE STATE AGENCIES
FISCALLY SOUND.
DETRACT ASSOCIATIONS RECEIVED
VERY LITTLE SUPPORT FROM THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THERE'S
THREE MILLION DOLLARS THIS YEAR
IN THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET. FOR
ALL FAIRS IN THE STATE SEVENTY
TWO OF THEM WHICH INCLUDES THE
DISTRICT AG ASSOCIATIONS.
AND THE COUNTY FAIRS.
THE FARES ARE GENERALLY SELF
SUSTAINING AND ARE EXPECTED TO
DO THAT AND MEET THEIR BUDGET
MEET THEIR DIRT DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE AND THEIR OPERATING
EXPENSES.
EVERYTIME THE STATE COMES IN AND
SAYS YOU CAN OR CANNOT HAVE A
CERTAIN CONTRACT MAKES THAT MUCH
MORE DIFFICULT.
AND SO WHILE THIS CONTRACT IS
ROUGHLY A HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS A YEAR.
ARGUABLY A SMALL PART OF THEIR
BUDGET I IT IS NOT THAT EASY FOR
ANY ENTITY LIKE COW PALACE TO
COME BACK IN AND FEEL THAT.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE IS THAT AND JUST
LAST YEAR.
THE LEGISLATURE PASSED AND THE
GOVERNOR SIGNED AB FOURTEEN
NINETY NINE WHICH ALLOWS A SMALL
PERCENTAGE OF THE SALES TAX
GENERATED FROM SHOWS ON
FAIRGROUNDS ACTUALLY START TO GO
BACK. TO THOSE DISTRICT AG-ASSOCIATIONS SO NOW AGAIN A SHOW
LIKE A GUN SHOW THAT MAY
ACTUALLY CREATE SOME.
SALES TAX REVENUE.
COULD BE REPLACED WITH MAYBE A
TRADE SHOW OR ACCOMPANY CHAU
THEY GENERATES NO OR LITTLE
SALES TAX NOW HAVING AN IMPACT
ON THE ENTIRE NETWORK AFFAIRS.
SO I'VE SPOKE WITH THE AUTHOR OF
PRIOR TO THIS --
WE UNDERSTAND THE THE NEED AND
TO BE SYMPATHETIC INSINCERE TO
THE LOCALS BUT AT THE SAME TIME
THERE'S GOT TO BE SOME GIVE AND
TAKE HERE.
IF THE LEGISLATURE IS GOING TO
RESTRICT WHAT A DISTRICT AG
ASSOCIATION CAN OR CANNOT DO
THEN ON THE BACKSIDE THEY NEED
TO BE MORE FORTHCOMING TO
PROVIDE FOR OPERATING COSTS AND
OTHER ESSENTIALS.
BECAUSE WHEN IT COMES TO AN
EMERGENCY DISREGARD ASSOCIATIONS
ARE CALLED UPON WHEN IT COMES TO
COMMUNITY EVENTS DISTRICT AG
ASSOCIATIONS ARE CALLED UPON.
THERE'S NOTHING ON THE BACKSIDE
TO REALLY MAKE UP FOR THE HOLES
THAT ARE CREATED BY LEGISLATION
LIKE THIS SO.
FOR THESE REASONS WILL LAST FOR
NO VOTE TODAY [inaudible]
NEXT WITNESS.
I'M SURE MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE CRIED TO LOSE A BATTLE
COALITION.
IN ESSENCE IT I THINK SUPPORT
UNDERSTAND OF JUST A LITTLE BIT
A PART OF THE BACKDROP HERE IN
THE CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO THERE
IS NO THERE ARE NO GUN STORES
THERE IS NO PLACE WHERE.
AN INDIVIDUAL CAN GO TO HELP
FACILITATE THEIR RIGHTS TO KEEP
AND BEAR ARMS IN THE ENTIRE CITY
OF SAN FRANCISCO.
THE MAYOR OF DALY CITY IN THE
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE BASICALLY
NOTED THAT THEY ARE DOING
WHATEVER THEY CAN PASSING
WHATEVER POLICIES THEY CAN TO
MAKE SURE THAT THERE ARE NO GUN
STORES.
HE'D NO GUN STORES IN THE CITY
OF DALY CITY IN IN IN DALY CITY.
THE POINT HERE IS THAT --
WE HAVE --
GOVER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
WHO HAVE SAID WE ARE GOING TO
PUT OUT OF BUSINESS ENTITIES
THAT ARE SEEKING TO FACILITATE
THE EXERCISING OF A
CONSTITUTIONALLY ENUMERATED
RIGHT.
NOW NOT EVERYONE HERE MAY NOT
MEAN LIKE THAT RIGHT BUT THAT
DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT IS NOT THE
CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.
AND AND IS IT OUGHT TO BE
AFFORDED AT LEAST SOME DEGREE OF
OF RESPECT BUT THE WAS SAME WAY
IN WHICH WOULD FOR THAT RESPECT
OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WE
WOULD NEVER SAY WELL WE HAVE
WE'RE GOING TO MAKE IT A POINT
TO ALLOW.
NOPE CHURCHES IN THE ENTIRE CITY
OF SAN FRANCISCO WE WOULDN'T SAY
WORK ON ONE WHAT'S GOING TO
ALLOW ANY NEWSPAPERS IN THE CITY
OF SAN FRANCISCO SIMPLY BECAUSE
WELL WE DON'T YOU KNOW WE DON'T
LIKE WITH THE RITING.
WE WOULD NEVER ALLOW THESE
THINGS TO HAPPEN WE WOULD NEVER
ALLOW THESE CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS TO BE A INFRINGED UPON.
AND YET HERE WHAT WE'RE SAYING
WHEN ONCE AGAIN THIS IS NO
LONGER NOW JUST A MUNICIPALITY
SAYING IT THIS IS NOW THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA.
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAYING
THAT WE ARE NOW GOING TO MAKE IT
SO THAT A PARTICULAR COMMUNITY
WILL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT WITH THE
ABILITY TO EXERCISE THEIR
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO KEEP AND
BEAR ARMS.
IT'S NOT ENOUGH TO SAY YOU HAVE
A RIGHT TO OWN A GUN BUT YOU
KNOW WHAT WE'RE GONNA MAKE SURE
YOU CAN'T WE'RE GONNA MAKE SURE
THAT YOU CAN'T AFFORD THE
AMMUNITION.
WE'RE GONNA MAKE SURE THAT YOU
CAN'T AFFORD TO GO SOMEWHERE AND
PURCHASE THAT FIRE RUMORED TO BE
ABLE TO OWN A FIREARM.
I I I I REALLY JUST BELIEVE THAT
[inaudible]
WOULD ALLOW S. ANY OTHER CIVIL
RIGHT TO BE TREATED THIS WAY.
AND I THINK IT'S VITALLY
IMPORTANT THAT WE SEND UP WE SAY --
THAT THOSE WHO LIVE IN THE CITY
OF SAN FRANCISCO DESERVE THE
SAME EXACT RIGHT. TO KEEP AND
BEAR ARMS AS ANYONE ELSE IN THE
AND AS AS ANYONE ELSE IN
CALIFORNIA OR IN THESE UNITED
STATES THAT RIGHT OUGHT TO BE
RESPECTED THEIR FRIES THAT YOU
REJECT THIS VOTE.
THIS BILL THANK YOU TEXTS
WRITTEN.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE FOR THE RECORD AND WE
BUT NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
ALL.
TACKLE MY COLLEAGUE MR DELUDE
SET A MUCH TOUGHER DID GUN SHOWS
ARE SUBJECT TO ALL THE SAME AWE
STRUCK THE STATE WHEN YOU GO TO
A GUN SHOW IT'S NOT.
LIKE THE LAWS. TO EVAPORATE.
IT'S LICENSED DEALERS SELLING
FIREARMS THEY NEED --
TO TREAT EACH FIREARM PURCHASE
LIKE THEY WOULD AT A BRICK AND
MORTAR STORE.
THERE'S TEN DAY WAITING PERIODS
THERE'S BACKGROUND CHECKS YOU
NEED TO RIVER SUPPLY ALL THE
DOCUMENTATION.
SO ALL THE SAME LAWS APPLY AT A
GUN SHOW THAT THEY WOULD
ANYWHERE ELSE.
AND AS MR DELUDE SAID THAT THERE
ARE NO GUN STORES IN SAN
FRANCISCO AND THERE QUICKLY
EVAPORATING THE SURROUNDING AREA
SO PEOPLE THAT DO ONE EXERCISE
THOSE RIGHTS.
THIS ISN'T AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
THEM TO GO AND DO THAT AND WITH
THE NEW LAWS I'M.
IN WITH AMMUNITION THAT ARE
GOING ARE HAVE STARTED TO GO
INTO EFFECT IN WILL BE FULLY
IMPLEMENTED AND TWENTY NINETEEN
WHAT IT COMES TO PURCHASING
AMMUNITION IT HAS TO BE DONE
FACE TO FACE AND HOUSE HAVE A
BACKGROUND CHECK.
SO NOW IF YOU LIVE IN SAN
FRANCISCO OR DALY CITY AND YOU
WANT TO GO BUY AMMUNITION YOU
CAN'T GO ONLINE AND PURCHASE
THAT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO DRIVE.
MILES AND GETTING OUT OF SAN
FRANCISCO AS WE ALL KNOW IS A
CHALLENGE I THINK IT WAS JUST
TWO WEEKS AGO THE ENTIRE --
HIGHWAY EIGHTY CORRIDOR WAS SHUT
HOURS TO JUST GO OUT AND PER
SOME AMMUNITION FOR A
CONSTITUTIONALLY ENUMERATED
RIGHT SO.
LET'S NOT FORGET THESE ARE THESE
ARE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS GOING
TO LAWFULLY EXERCISES RIGHT
AGAIN WE TALKED EARLIER ABOUT
CRIMINALS ARE NOT GOING TO GUN
SHOWS THEY'RE GOING.
INTO SECURING FIREARMS THROUGH
ILLICIT MEAN SAME WITH
AMMUNITIONS SO WE'RE REALLY
PENALIZING LAW ABIDING CITIZENS.
AND I THINK THAT WE WOULD BE
PRETTY OUTRAGED IF THIS WAS
ANOTHER -- I
ANOTHER RIGHT IN ANOTHER PART OF
THE STATE ON STATE OWNED
PROPERTY WE SAID YOU CAN'T DO
THIS HERE WE DON'T LIKE IT.
YOU CAN'T DO THIS HERE SO AGAIN
WERE RETREATING ALL THESE
PROBLEMS FOR LAW ABIDING
CITIZENS IGNORING THE CRIMINAL
ELEMENT THERE.
AND WITHOUT WERE OPPOSITION
THANK YOU.
MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS THANK
YOU REUTER OF THE SPEAKING ON
BEHALF THE CALIFORNIA RIFLE
PISTOL ASSOCIATION OTHERS ECHO
MY COLLEAGUES COVERED ALL THE
POINTS WELL THE ONE THING I
WOULD ADD IS.
HAS A SENATOR POINTED OUT THIS
UNANIMOUS SUPPORT IN THOSE
COUNTIES TO A IN SUPPORT OF THIS
BILL AND IN IN THE SALE.
OUR MIND THE SCRIPTED THIRTY
EIGHT THOUSAND RESIDENTS OF THE
COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO VOTED
AGAINST PROPOSITION.
SIXTY THREE HAS AT LEAST THIRTY
EIGHT THOUSAND MEMBERS OF OF
YOUR COMMUNITY THAT WOULD LIKE
THIS OPPORTUNITY I'M SURE TO
PURCHASE FIREARMS IN THEIR
COMMUNITIES HOLE.
IT'S I DON'T THINK THERE IS
COLDLY UNANIMOUS SUPPORT IN
THOSE COUNTIES AGAINST THIS
THANK YOU WE POSE THE BILL.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS SEPARATE IS
REPRESENTING UNKNOWNS CALIFORNIA
AND THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A VERY
POLITICAL --
ISSUE -- YES
THE UP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS OF
SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO DALY CITY.
A UNANIMOUSLY OPPOSE.
GUN SHOWS GUNS AMMUNITION
EVERYTHING THERE AND IN STRONG
OPPOSITION THAT DOESN'T MEAN.
THAT THERE ARE NOT PEOPLE
RESIDENTS OF THOSE COMMUNITIES.
WHO ARE GUN OWNERS LEGAL LAW
ABIDING CITIZENS WHO OWN GUNS IN
USE GUNS FOR PROTECTION IN THEIR
OWN HOMES --
PROTECTION OF THEIR FAMILIES
SOME OF THEM EVEN HAVE CONCEALED
WEAPONS PERMITS [inaudible]
NOW [inaudible]
THOSE PEOPLE --
ARE NOT SERVED BY THOSE
COMMUNITIES BECAUSE THOSE
COMMUNITIES DO NOT ALLOW ANY GUN
STORES TO EXIST IN THEIR IN
THEIR IN THEIR JURISDICTIONS.
SO THE GUN SHOW IS THE ONLY
LEGAL PLACE THAT PEOPLE CAN GO.
TO ACQUIRE WHAT THEY NEED. TO
EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT IT'S THE
ONLY LEGAL PLACE.
NOW LET ME TELL YOU THAT THERE
ARE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF SAN
FRANCISCANS FELT SAN FRANCISCANS
IN DALY CITY RESIDENTS WHO COME
TO THESE GUN SHOWS WHY.
BECAUSE ACTUALLY PLACE THAT CAN
GO.
THEY'RE NOT GONNA GOETHE FREMONT
OR OR OR OR DUBLIN OR OR OR
VALLEJO OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT --
TO DID IT'S JUST NOT PRACTICAL
FOR MANY OF THEM.
THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE THAT
PEOPLE CAN LEGALLY GO IT IS
CONTROLLED [inaudible]
UNBELIEVABLY.
NO CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED AT
THIS GUN SHOW [inaudible]
INDICATES.
NO GUN COMING FROM A GUN SHOW
HERE HAS BEEN SHOWN TO COME FROM
THIS GUN SHOW.
AND BEEN USED ILLEGALLY IN THE
COMMUNITY NONE [inaudible] NINE
SO THAT MEANT FOR GETTING DOWN --
TO A POLITICAL QUESTION IN AND
IT WILL BECOME A CONSTITUTIONAL
ISSUE -- IT
WILL BE CHALLENGED IN COURT IF
IT DOES PASS --
AND AS THE SENATE POINTED OUT WE
WE DISAGREE WITH SOME OF THE
DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT
WE LIVE BY THE DECISIONS OF THE
SUPREME COURT.
I MEAN IF YOU WANT TO USE THE
ARGUMENT THAT DO NOT HIT HOME
WITH WAS A RADICAL THING. TO TO
YOU KNOW INTERPRET THE SECOND
AMENDMENT WITH THIS WELL THE
SUPREME COURT HAS IN THE PAST
INVENTED RIGHTS --
AND AND AND AND MADE THEM LAW
THAT WE ALL HAVE TO COME ABIDE
BY SOLD --
SO WE ARE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS
BILL AND WE THINK THAT --
IT'S BAD POLICY FOR THE
RESIDENTS [inaudible]
THANK YOU --
COMMENTS FROM THE DYESS.
ALRIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION --
SENATOR WAGNER WHICH ELECT. FIVE
DIDN'T THANK YOU VERY MUCH
WRITTEN.
SO ALTHOUGH IT IS TRUE THOSE
COMMENTED.
REPEATEDLY THAT THAT'S OF SOME A
POLITICAL ISSUE AND THESE.
ARE ELECTED OFFICIALS ARE ALL
VOTING IN FAVOR OF IT.
I ACTUALLY I KNOW MY DISTRICT
PRETTY WELL.
I'LL TELL YOU A FEW THINGS --
THE GENESIS OF THIS LEGISLATION
AND WERE NOT ELECTED OFFICIALS
COMING TO ME ARE EVEN TOUGH
THEY WERE VERY HAPPY WHEN WE
ANNOUNCE THE BILL.
OF GENESIS WAS A BUNCH OF MOMS
COMING TO ME AND SAYING.
AND BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE THIS
GUN SHOW.
RIGHT HERE AND NEEDS TO GO.
ODD GENESIS WAS HIGH SCHOOL
STUDENTS PROTESTING THIS YEAR.
THE GUN SHOWS AT THE COW PALACE
ISN'T ABOUT POLITICIANS IS ABOUT
REAL PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY.
WHO WANT THESE GUN SHOWS GONE?
BECAUSE WE ALSO --
TODAY HEARD I GUESS A NEW
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT --
THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE
A LAND USE A COMEDY --
GUN STORES ARE GUN SHOWS MAYBE
THEY'RE GONNA TAKE THE POSITION
AND MAYBE ACID SPRINT COURT TO
TELL US.
THAT YOU ARE TO OVERRIDE LOCAL
LAND USE CONTROLS OUR STATE LAND
USE CONTROLS --
BIT WHATEVER THE SECOND
AMENDMENT IS INTERPRETED --
TO BE IN TERMS OF AN BEAR ARMS --
IT IS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT --
TO FORCE CITIES --
TO ALLOW --
GUN SHOWS OR GUN STORES PEOPLE
CAN GO AND THEY CAN GET THEIR
THEIR GUNS THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO
IT -- AT THE
COW PALACE AND SO I ASKED FOR AN
AYE VOTE.
BUT WE HAVE MOTION.
NO MORE ROLL CALL.
MOTION IS ASSEMBLYMAN IT'S BIG
CONCORDANCE SKINNER AYE INTER
AYE ANDERSON.
ANDERSON NO BRADFORD.
BRADFORD AYE JACKSON AYE JACKSON
AYE MITCHELL.
MITCHELL AYE STONE.
STONE NO WIENER AYE WIENER AYE.
PHYLLIS OUT AND WE'RE GOING TO
RE OEN THE ROLE SEEKING OUT ON
THIS JACKSON THIS IS THE AND AND
SENATOR ANDERSON THIS IS --
SENATOR PORTANTINO'S BILL --
S. B..
ONE ONE SEVEN ANDERSON.
ANDERSON NO JACKSON HIGH JACKSON
AYE.
RIGHT AROUND THAT BILLS OUT.
FILTER OUT AND TO THINK
[inaudible]
INCLUDING THE