MEMBERS.
TO GET THEM TO COME BUT WELCOME
CENTER STONE.
REGARDING MISTER CHAIR
[inaudible]
HUNTER.
THE HUNDRED TO BE WITH YOU --
JEWISH CENTER TIME NINE NINE
O'CLOCK AT RANDOM TIMES THANKS
TO SEE YOU --
OUR GOAL CHAIR I'M PRESENTING SP.
FOURTEEN FORTY THREE AS WE GO
AROUND OUR DISTRICTS THAN LISTEN
TO OUR CONSTITUENTS CERTAINLY
DURING THE BREAK INTO VARIOUS
OFFENSIVE ONE THING THAT I'VE
NOTICED RECENTLY IS.
THIRTY THE RISE IN THE CONCERNED
ABOUT SCHOOL VIOLENCE THAT WE
WITNESSED THROUGHOUT THE UNITED
STATES.
IN THIS WORLD OF UNCERTAINTY ONE
THING WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN IS
THAT IS.
NOT A QUESTION OF IF IT'S JUST A
MATTER OF WHEN.
THE NEXT TRAGIC EPISODE OF
SCHOOL VIOLENCE WILL OCCUR.
I KNOW LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS
HAVETHE ABILITY TO RAISE FUNDS
AND CAN ALLOCATE STATE FUNDS
WITH VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF
FLEXIBILITY. FOR CURRENTLY THERE
IS NO SPECIFIC FUND WITHIN THE
STATE FOR PURCHASING SAFETY --
EQUIPMENT AND TEN MEASURES SUCH
AS METAL DETECTORS FOR SCHOOLS.
SO S. B. FOURTEEN FORTY THREE
WOULD ESTABLISH A PILOT PROGRAM
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY THIS BILL IS.
ENTIRELY PERMISSIVE AND IS NOT A
MANDATE.
IF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE
OF EDUCATION CHOSE TO
PARTICIPATE PRIVATE FUNDS IN
ORDER TO BUY METAL DETECTORS FOR
SCHOOLS WITHIN ITS JURISDICTIONS.
AT THE OFFICE WERE ABLE TO RAISE
THE THRESHOLD OF NINE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS A STATE WOULD
ASSIST WITH ITS OWN FUNDS OF A
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OR 10%.
THERE WOULD BE A REVIEW OF THE
PROGRAM WITHIN TEN YEARS TO
JUDGE THE EFFICACY OF THE
PROGRAM.
AND WHAT SUNSET IN SIX YEARS.
WE ARE ALL LOOKING FOR WAYS TO
MAKE OUR SCHOOL SAFER AND THIS
IS JUST ONE SMALL WAY TO
ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL.
HOWEVER THE REASON SO I
RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR AYE VOTE.
THINK YOU THINK YOU CENTER.
ANYWAY THIS IS SUPPORT FOR FOLKS
WHO WANT TO VOICE THEIR SUPPORT
FOR THE BILL.
I SEE NO AND OUR FOLKS WANT TO
VOICE OPPOSITION TO RAISE
CONCERNS ABOUT THE BILL.
IF YOU COMPARE.
THE MORNING CENTER LET'S --
FIRST CALL QUORUM.
SELECT BECAUSE I YEAH WE'RE NOT
A FIVE MEMBER COMMITTEE.
WE ALMOST WHERE [inaudible]
PERFORM UNDER [inaudible]
CURRENT CONSIDER.
WE'RE HERE --
BOND ITEM WON THIS IS SP
FOURTEEN FORTY THREE
THUNDERSTONE.
IT'S MEN OF GOOD MORNING CATHY
SURE FOR THE ACLU OF CALIFORNIA
OUT WE RESPECTFULLY OPPOSE S. B.
FOURTEEN FORTY THREE AND I
APOLOGIZE FOR US NOT BEING ABLE
TO GET A LETTER.
IN ON TIME ON WE ALL AGREE THAT
SCHOOL SAFETY IS ESSENTIAL --
AND THAT THE MISSION OF
EDUCATING OUR CHILDREN HOUSE TO
START BY PROVIDING A SAFE PLACE
TO LEARN.
A WE BELIEVE THAT PUTTING MORE
MINUTES METAL DETECTORS IN
SCHOOLS IS THE WRONG WAY TO
ACHIEVE THIS AND METAL DETECTORS
DON'T.
DID AND UNSAFE THEY REDUCE THE
TRUST BETWEEN STUDENTS AND THE
ADULTS AT SCHOOL.
AND THIS MEANS THAT STUDENTS ARE
LESS LIKELY TO REPORT ACTUAL
THREATS AND SCHOOL SCHOOL
PERSONNEL.
LESS ABLE TO ADDRESS THOSE
THREATS.
I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT
ABOUT THE LOS ANGELES UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT WHICH HAS A
LARGE AND LONG STANDING PROGRAM
FOR USE OF METAL DETECTORS.
LA UNIFIED THAT BEEN CONDUCTING
METAL DETECTORS SEARCHES OF
INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS SINCE --
NINETEEN NINETY THREE THE
EXISTING POLICY THAT WHICH
MANDATES THAT EVERY MIDDLE AND
HIGH SCHOOL CONDUCT THE SEARCHES
WAS ADOPTED IN TWO THOUSAND AND
ELEVEN STUDENTS ARE TAKEN OUT OF
CLASSES FOR SUPPOSEDLY RANDOM
SEARCHES --
THEY MISS CLASS TIME TO BE
SEARCHED.
BASED HAVE TO SPREAD THEIR ARMS
AND LEGS TO BE WANTED AND THEIR
BELONGINGS ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO
SEARCH.
PREDICTABLY STUDENTS REPORT THAT
THEY FEEL ANXIOUS AND VIOLATED
WHEN THEY ARE SUBJECT TO SEARCH.
AND THE SEARCHES THAT MAKE THEM
LESS ABLE TO TRUST THE ADULTS AT
THEIR SCHOOLS --
YET THERE'S LITTLE APPARENT
BENEFIT THE ACLU'S REVIEW OF
SEARCH LOGS FROM THE TWO
THOUSAND THIRTEEN FOURTEEN AND
FIFTEEN SIXTEEN SCHOOL YEARS
SHOWED THAT IN THE OVER ONE
HUNDRED THOUSAND SEARCHES.
CONDUCTED NOT A SINGLE GUN WAS
FOUND.
WEAPONS ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO
BE FOUND IN CONFISCATED WHEN
STUDENTS COME FORWARD TO REPORT
INFORMATION TO ADULTS ON CAMPUS.
REPORTS THAT HAPPEN LESS
FREQUENTLY WHEN TRUST BETWEEN
STUDENTS AND ADULTS HAS ERODED.
I KNOW THAT THE FUNDING FROM
THIS BILL COULD BE USED TO TO
FUND HAND HELD METAL DETECTORS
AS I I READ IT --
INDIFFERENCE --
TO STATIONARY ONES AT SCHOOL AND
JUST YESTERDAY --
THE LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY
[inaudible]
NO ON SCHOOL SAFETY I ISSUED ITS
COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON SCHOOL
SAFETY WHICH I RECOMMEND TO YOU
IT'S IT'S AN INTERESTING REPORT
ON A NUMBER OF TOPICS --
BUT AMONG ITS OTHER
RECOMMENDATIONS IT RECOMMENDED.
THAT LA UNIFIED SUSPEND ITS
METAL DETECTOR SEARCH POLICY.
THE REPORT STRESSED THE NEED FOR
INTENSE MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCES
FOR STUDENTS AND THE NEED FOR
STUDENTS TO FEEL CONNECTED TO
ADULTS AT SCHOOLS AS WAYS TO
REDUCE VIOLENCE.
METAL DETECTORS STATIONED AT
SCHOOL ENTRANCES CAN ALSO BE
PROBLEMATIC IN NEW YORK CITY --
IN MANY SCHOOLS STUDENTS PASS
THROUGH METAL DETECTORS TO ENTER
SCHOOL AND AND THEN ARE OFTEN
SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL BAG
SEARCHES AND PAT DOWNS IN THE
PROCESS.
THEY ARRIVE AT SCHOOL FEELING
LIKE THEY'RE AUTOMATICALLY UNDER
SUSPICION THEY OFTEN USE CLASS
TIME DUE TO THE LINES OF THE
METAL DETECTORS.
THESE BURDENS FALL
DISPROPORTIONATELY ON STUDENTS
OF COLOR WHO ARE MORE LIKELY TO
ATTEND THE SCHOOLS WITH
PERMANENT METAL DETECTORS.
THIS IS NOT A MODEL THAT WE
SHOULD BE SEEKING TO REPLICATE
IN CALIFORNIA. TOO OFTEN OUR
RESPONSE TO ISSUES OF SCHOOL
SAFETY FOCUSES ON WAYS TO IMPOSE
TIGHTER CONTROLS.
THE RESULTS ARE SCHOOL FEEL MORE
LIKE PRISONS WHERE EVERY DAY
YOUNG PEOPLE WALK THROUGH THE
DOORS AD YOU'RE LOUD AND CLEAR
THE MESSAGE THAT THEY ARE SEEN
AS SUSPECTS NOT AS LEARNERS.
AND THAT THEY ARE ENTERING A
PLACE THAT IS NOT SAFE FOR THEM.
THE RESULTS AS THE RESEARCH
SHOWS IS TO MAKE THE STUDENTS
FEEL LESS SAFE AND MAKE THEM
LESS ABLE TO LEARN.
IF WE WANT SAFE SCHOOLS WE NEED
TO MAKE OUR SCHOOLS INTO
WELCOMING AN INCLUSIVE PLACES
THAT SUPPORT THE SOCIAL AND
EMOTIONAL HEALTH OF THE STUDENTS.
LET'S FOCUS ON PROVIDING STE
SCHOOLS WITH THE RESOURCES THEY
NEED TO DO THAT RATHER THAN
INVESTING IN EXPENSIVE MEASURES
THAT WILL MAKE THINGS WORSE.
WE ASK FOR YOUR NOVEL
[inaudible]
AND YOU.
THANK YOU MANY ANY OTHER FOLKS
WHO WANT TO RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT
THE BILL.
HI I NOTE THE PRESENCE OF A
QUORUM IF YOU PLEASE CALL CORPS.
ALLEN HERE ALLEN HERE WILK
PRESENT WELL CARE GALGIANI LEYVA
MCGUIRE PAN.
HERE PAN HERE* LEVINE
ACCURATE.
CURRENT PRIME OF A QUORUM IS
PRESENT OKAY SO WHERE NOW AT THE
STAGE WHERE PEOPLE CAN ASK
QUESTIONS ON THE BILL.
I QUESTIONS FROM THE FROM THE
COMMITTEE THOUGHTS YES OF ITS
ROSTER.
THANK YOU SO I GOT A COUPLE
QUESTIONS SENATOR FOOTBALL.
THIS IS A PILOT PROGRAM CRACKED
HER.
ONLY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOWARD
ASSUMING YOU'VE TALKED TO YOUR
LOCAL PEOPLE IN THEIR SUPPORT OF
THE CONCEPT.
THAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION IS --
HOW IT'S A SOME WHAT --
YOU KNOW.
WE ARE FORTUNATE TO HAVE HAD THE
INCIDENTS IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AND I DON'T WISH WE HAVE ANY
INCIDENTS ANYWHERE IN THE
COUNTRY.
AND I KNOW WHILE I RESPECT THE
ACLU LE --
INDICATING THAT THEY DO WANT THE
KIDS TO COLLECT THEIR GOING INTO
PRISON BY GOING INTO A SCHOOL
YOU KNOW OUR REMIND --
THIS COMMITTEE THAT --
WERE THE SECOND MOST VISITED
INSTITUTION IN THE STATE A
CALIFORNIA LIVE ARE FOR MILLION
VISITORS COME HERE THEY GO
THROUGH [inaudible]
METAL DETECTORS --
GET OLD --
WE LIVE IN A NEW NORMAL WE LIVE
IN A NORMAL WE'RE TOLD ALL THE
TIME AND MANY OF OUR COMMITTEES
SET UP WEHAVE CLIMATE CHANGE
WITH A FIRE SO WE HAVE TO ADJUST
TO NORMAL --
WE HAVE A NEW NORMAL IN THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WORK
KIDS CANNOT GO TO SCHOOL AND BE
GUARANTEED THAT THERE'S NOT A
CHILD THAT IS GOING INTO THAT
SCHOOL WITH A GUN THAT THEY
STOLE FROM THEIR PARENTS --
SAY FOR WHERE THEY KEEP THEIR
THEIR KIND SAFE FLEA.
AND PARENTS AND MY DISTRICT WANT.
TO ENSURE THAT WHEN THE KIDS GO
TO SCHOOL THAT THEY ARE GOING
INTO A ENVIRONMENT WHERE THERE
IS NO WEAPONS --
I'M GOING TO BE WORKING WITH THE
THE BOARD OF EDUCATION PENDING
THE THEY THINK THE PASSAGE OF
THIS.
BILL TODAY IF IF IT IS TO PASS.
NOT TO STRESS THE IMPORTANCE OF
IT TONIGHT.
PLAN AND ACTIVELY BEING ENGAGED
IN THE FUNDRAISING SO WE DON'TUSE --
SCARCE DOLLARS AT THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT THAT CAN BE USED FOR
BOOKS AND OTHER THINGS TOO TO
PAY FOR THESE METAL DETECTORS
ARE.
AYE I GUESS.
AND IN MY VIEW --
YOU KNOW.
WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A CHILD'S
LIFE CAMINO I THINK IT'S WORTH
THE INVESTMENT IN A PILOT
PROGRAM?
IF IT SAVES ONE WHITE WHAT ONE
LIFE I THINK IT'S ACCOMPLISHED
ITS GOAL --
AS A PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE REST
OF THE STATE AND FRANKLY FOR THE
REST OF THE COUNTRY --
TO TO EMBRACE SO --
I GO TO I GO TO BED AT NIGHT
LIKE MANY OF YOU --
CONCERNED ABOUT ISSUES OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IN WAYS
WHICH WE CAN MAKE LIFE BETTER
AND SAFER.
FOR OUR KIDS AND OUR ADULTS AND
THIS IS A HEY ISSUE THAT HAS
BEEN PRESSING ON ME PAN AND MY
KIDS WHO AS WE DISCUSS THESE
ISSUES AS WHAT COULD WE DO --
TO HELP MAKE THE THE SCHOOLS
SAFER FOR KIDS SO THAT WE DON'T
HAVE TO LIVE THE NIGHTMARE THAT
MANY OTHER COMMUNITIES --
ARE ARE LIVING AND SO I THINK I
BELIEVE WITH.
IF THIS IF IT WERE TO GO FORWARD
THAT -- I
COULD VERY EASILY --
PERSUADE THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
THAT THIS IS A I AM VERY
IMPORTANT PROGRAM CONCERNING
GETTING PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT AND
INSURING THAT.
THEY SHOW THEIR SUPPORT FOR HIM
AND SO JUST --
REITERATE SO THIS ALSO IT'S
PERMISSIVE AND AS WELL AS THEIR
SUNSET ON IT THAT'S CORRECT
RIGHT -- I
PERSONALLY AGREE WITH A LOT OF
WHAT THE OPPOSITION SAID IN
TERMS OF THINGS WE NEED TO DO.
BUT THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS IF
YOU READ OUR CONSTITUTION.
SCHOOLS ARE GUARANTEED TO BE
SAFE.
AND LISTENING HONEST THEY'RE NOT
SAFE -- I
LIKE I THINK MANY SENATORS I
DON'T SPEAK TO FOURTH GRADERS
EIGHTH GRADERS AND TWELFTH
GRADERS. ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I
ASK IS IF.
IF YOU COULD INTRODUCE A LAW
WHAT WOULD IT BE AND I WOULD
LAST YEAR'S AYE ALLEN HYSTERIA.
RURAL AREA RIGHT YOU THINK SAFE
AND I HAD A FOURTH GRADER.
RAISE YOUR HAND A VERY
ENTHUSIASTIC SAID.
METAL DETECTORS AT OUR SCHOOL.
THAT I NEVER.
I NEVER EVER CROSSED MY MIND
WHEN I WAS A FOURTH GRADER.
AND IF YOU KNOW WE IN YOU YOU'RE
RIGHT WE HAVE THE NEW NORMAL NOW
AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE AND IN
TERMS OF PROTECTING OUR KIDS I
THINK WE HAVE TO HAVE THE ALL OF
THE ABOVE APPROACH SO WE YEAH WE
NEED TO HAVE THE INVESTMENTS IN
MENTAL HEALTH.
AND AND BUILD BETTER FAMILIES
AND I AND I AGREE WITH ALL THAT
BUT THIS IS JUST ANOTHER LAYER
PROTECTION TO KEEP OUR KIDS SAFE
AND I AGREE WITH YOU.
THAT EVEN HAS ONE CHILD IT'S
WORTH IT WHEN IT'S APPROPRIATE
I'D LIKE TO MOVE THE BILL.
THINK VERY MUCH.
AND SENATE PAN.
THANK YOU AND THERE CYPRESS
SHAKES --
EACH YEAR INTEREST IN THEM
STUDENTS SAFETY AND NOT
SOMETHING THAT --
HEALTH IS IT SOMETHING THAT YOU
CARE.
I GUESS.
WHAT I GUESS THE FIRST QUESTION
I HAVE?
IS IS THAT JUST REALLY ANALYSIS
AND KNOWING THAT THERE'S OTHER
SCHOOL DISTRICTS LIKE LA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT WHICH IS A
PRETTY BIG SCHOOL DISTRICT --
AT THIRTY HAVE METAL DETECTORS
WHY DO WE NEED A BILL TO DO THIS
COULD END THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
THIRD THAT COUNTY OFFICE
EDUCATION ALREADY DO THIS.
IF THEY WISH TO YOU KNOW I THINK
IT'S SENDING A MESSAGE THAT THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOGNIZES
THAT THE A PROBLEM THAT WE'RE
NOT GOING TO STAND BACK AYE
ITALY AND ALLOW A SO INCIDENT
HAPPENED WE SEEM TO BE.
VERY REACTIVE IN CALIFORNIA AND
IN THE UNITED STATES AND WE WAIT
FOR THE INCIDENT TO HAVE AS A SO
WE JUST ITS CLARIFY WITHOUT.
I'M JUST WITH.
IF THERE WASN'T A BILL ARE LAWS
COULD BE STILL PUT METAL
DETECTORS IN SCHOOL IF THEY
COULDN'TGARNER THE RESOURCES TO
DO IT BUT THIS IS ALSO PROVIDING
A STATE INCENTIVE TO PARTNER
WITH THEM.
AND BASICALLY COVER 10% OF THE
COST OF THOSE METAL DETECTORS AS
AN INCENTIVE FOR THEM TO RAISE
ACCESS.
AND THEN THE OTHER QUESTION IS I
MEAN I HEARD THIS I HEARD ABOUT
THIS IS A PILOT AND SO FORTH
EXCEPT WE HAVE SCHOOLS THAT ARE
RATE DO IT MEAN THAT HEARD THAT
THE RESULTS WEREN'T REALLY ALL
THAT GREAT SO.
AND IT IS WHY DON'T YOU KNOW HOW
MANY HOW MANY KIDS WERE KILLED
IN THE LA COUNTY SCHOOLS.
AS A RESULT OF HAVING METAL
DETECTORS I THINK THE ANSWER IS.
ZERO SO I WOULD SAY
RETROSPECTIVELY THAT THAT HAS
BEEN SUCCESSFUL YES I MIGHT BE A
LITTLE BIT INVASIVE IF YOU HAVE
TO ONE SOMEBODY IF THEY COME
THROUGH A METAL DETECTOR AND IT
SOUNDS AN ALARM --
BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS HOW MANY
KIDS HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THIS
AREA WELL ACTUALLY WE WANTED.
DELIVERY COMPARISON TO SCHOOL
DISTRICT IN HAVE ONE TO SCHOOL
DISTRICT THAT BED SO --
SO I ADMIT I GUESS THE OTHER
QUESTION I HAVE IS THAT --
YOU INSTALL AND METAL DETECTOR.
YOU DON'T JUST DOESN'T JUST
STAND ALONE YET STAFF IT.
SO -- AND I
DON'T IS SO --
SO TAKES ONGOING STAFF RESOURCES
WELL CARRENTALS I DON'T IS THIS
IS THIS HELPING FUND AS WELL AS
A JUST EQUIPMENT MOST OF MOST
SCHOOL DISTRICTS CERTAINLY IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HAVE --
SWORN OFFICERS ARE ON SO I WOULD
ASSUME IS A PART OF THEIR
RESPONSIBILITIES PARTY SCHOOL
OPENING IN --
PEOPLE COMING OFF THE CAMPUS
THAT THEY WOULD BE MANNED THEM
OR THEIR SOCIAL.
OKAY BUT AND BUT I ALSO HEARD IN
YOUR PREVIOUS ANSWER THAT AT
LEAST AT THIS POINT TIME.
YOUR LOCAL COUNTY US EDUCATION.
HEARD WAS LUKEWARM I THINK
THAT'S THE WORD YOU USED ABOUT
THIS PROPOSAL.
WOULD BE THEY ARE --
GUY BUT BUT AGAIN --
I HAVEN'T HAD THE CHANCE BECAUSE
WE'VE BEEN KIND OF BUSY HERE
EXCEPT THAT LAST MONTH TO BE
ABLE TO SIT DOWN WITH EACH OF
THE BOARD MEMBERS.
I AM EXPLAINED THE IMPORTANCE OF
WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH
HERE TODAY --
AGAIN -- MY
ARGUMENT IS GOING TO BE WE DON'T
WAIT FOR THE INCIDENT THAT
HAPPENED WE WANT TO BE PREVENT
OF THIS IS.
EXTREMELY NON INVASIVE IT IS
VOLUNTARY.
SCHOOL DISTRICT DOESN'T WANT TO
PUT UP THE MONEY.
TO GET THE STATE MATCHING FUNDS
IF THEY DON'T WANNA. TO REDIRECT
THEIR PUBLIC SAFETY APPARATUS TO
OPERATE THE SAME OR NOT TO
PARTICIPATE --
BUT AT LEAST WE CAN SAY THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFERED THE
RESOURCES AND THE LEADERSHIP TO
TRY TO MAKE SCHOOLS SAFER IN THE
EVENT THAT AN INCIDENT US IN
FACT [inaudible]
AND I WELL I AND YET THAT PRISSY
WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO I JUST
DON'T NORMALLY I WOULD.
DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS NOW AS A
PILOT IT'S IN YOUR OWN DISTRICT
IT'S A BUT USUALLY WHEN SOMEONE
BRINGS DISTRICT BILLS THEY'VE
ALREADY GOTTEN SUPPORT FROM THE
LOCALS WHO SAID WE ALSO ONE AND
I'M PARTNERING WITH THEM TO MAKE
THIS HAPPEN [inaudible]
LOW UNCOMFORTABLE ABOUT THE IDEA
THAT FIRST OF ALL.
THEY COULD IF THEY WANTED.
TO STILL START EVEN WITHOUT THIS
LAW -- BY
THIS BILL --
AND THEN.
I MEAN I APPRECIATE YOU GONNA GO
TALK TO THEM THAT AYE SIR FEEL
LIKE THAT SHOULD HAPPEN FIRST.
AND IF THEY'RE ON BOARD THEY
COME.
STONE AND WE NEED THIS TO MAKE
THIS THING HAPPEN THAT WE ARE
COMEDIAS ALL CHOLESTEROL AND AND
SO FORTH AND DEFINITE THAT.
THAT WOULD MAKE ME MUCH MORE
COMFORTABLE ABOUT ESPECIALLY
SINCE WE'RE ALSO COMMITTING THE
STATE TO PUT.
SOME FUNDING AND AND AND INTO
THIS AS WELL SO --
SO AS WE KNOW THIS.
WE OFTEN IS ELECTED OFFICIALS
HAVE WILL BE CALLED KNEE JERK
REACTIONS AND TO MANY AUNTS --
BILLS THAT COME TO FRUITION --
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE WORDS THE
IDEA CAME TO MIND AFTER RECENT.
SHOOTINGS SO HAVE A THERE HASN'T
BEEN THE TIME TO TOOK TO REACH
OUT A FOR SURE WE COULD HAVE A
MONTH'S BREAK BUT DURING A MONTH
BREAK OF WHAT GOES ON VACATION
SO AFTER.
AFTER WE'RE THROUGH YOUR AUGUST
THIRTY FOR US ALL BE ABLE TO
MAKE MY ROUNDS BUT IT I'VE BEEN
REMISS IF I AYE IF I DIDN'T
BELIEVE SPRING THE BILL FORWARD
ACTUALLY WHAT I CAN TO HELP.
SHE BETTER STUDENT SAFETY TO
HAVE PREACHING THAT THANK YOU
[inaudible]
ANALYSTS.
SIGNATURE GOOD MORNING.
SENATOR STONE A VERY MUCH
APPRECIATE --
YOU BRING SOMETHING FORWARD THAT
WILL HOPEFULLY HELP ENSURE THE
SAFETY OF OUR CHILDREN I MEAN TO
SUPPORT THE BILL TODAY I DO HAVE
SOME CONCERNS --
FIRST JUST EDITORIALIZING I
WANNA SAY WAS SAD STATE OF
AFFAIRS THAT WE ARE IN THAT WE
HAVE TO THINK ABOUT HAVING METAL
DETECTORS AT OUR SCHOOLS.
AYE I THINK THERE'S THINGS WE
CAN DO ON THE OUT [inaudible]
HI -- MY
CONCERN IS IS THAT WE WON'T
CATCH EVERYTHING.
YOU KNOW NOW THAT WE HAVE.
YEAH THREE D. GUNS THAT ARE YOU
KNOW WE JUST ALL SEEN THAT ON
THE NEWS AND I DON'T KNOW PAPA.
CAN WOULD BE IF YOU GET CAUGHT --
GOING THROUGH THERE ON OF THAT
WOULD WORK WE HAVE DRONES --
SOMEONE COULD BRING THOSE AND SO
I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER
THINGS THAT WE NEED TO LOOK AT
TOM AND I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE.
IF THIS BILL PASSES AND SIGNED
INTO LAW THAT IT WILL BE APPLIED
FAIRLY IT WILL BE ALL OF YOUR
SCHOOLS IN YOUR IN YOUR SENATE
DISTRICT.
THIS WOULD BE JUST IN THE AREA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY.
DISTRICTS REPRESENT CANADA SIR
OKAY BY THE PROGRAM OKAY AND I
WILL MAKE SURE I THINK SOMETIMES
THAT WE DO THESE THINGS AND WE
AUTOMATICALLY LOOK TO THE
SCHOOLS THAT ARE LOW INCOME AND
WE THINK THAT OUR LOW INCOME
KIDS OUR PROBLEM --
BIT HIGH INCOME KIDS ARE THAT
CAN BE A PROBLEM TOO SO I JUST
WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S
APPLIED FAIRLY AND EVENLY.
OKAY SORRY US SO I WILL SUPPORT
THE BILL TODAY I DO HAVE A FEW
CONCERNS --
BUT I DO SHARE WITH YOU THE IDEA
THAT WE NEED TO KEEP OUR KIDS
SAFE FROM WE NEED TO TRY AND DO
EVERYTHING WE CAN.
I THINK.
I'D LIKE TO JUST ASK A COUPLE
QUESTIONS OF OUR PRIME WITNESS
IN OPPOSITION.
I'M HE IS YOUR SOUL.
LET'S PLAY WILL DEVIL'S ADVOCATE
WHAT DID.
THESE PROGRAMS ARE ALLOWED UNDER
CURRENT LAW LAUSD PROGRAM.
I SAW WHAT IS WHAT'S.
YOU KNOW WHAT I WOULD TELL INNER
STAND IF YOU ARE --
HERE TESTIFYING --
IN SUPPORT OF A BILL THAT WOULD
BAN METAL DETECTORS STATEWIDE OR
SOMETHING LIKE THAT THE WHAT'S
WRONG WITH THIS.
YOU YOU JUST YOU JUST YOU JUST
GENERALLY OPPOSE SMELL TECH TO
PROGRAMS IN SCHOOLS AND AND
DON'T DO ANYTHING THAT WOULD
HELP TO EXPAND [inaudible]
THEIR USE.
YEAH I MEAN I I THINK THAT THAT.
THERE ARE OTHER THINGS THAT WE
NEED TO DO TO TO INCREASE SCHOOL
SAFETY --
AND THAT SPENDING THE STATE'S
MONEY ON METAL DETECTORS IS THE
OF THE WRONG WAY TO GO --
THAT YET WITH IT ANY MONEY
THAT'S SPENT ON SCHOOL SAFETY WE
BELIEVE IT WOULD BE BETTER SPENT
ELSEWHERE.
ON BOTH IN TERMS OF OF ACTUAL
INCREASE SAFETY AND IN TERMS OF
RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF
STUDENTS AND CREATING THE RIGHT
KIND OF SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT FOR
LEARNING.
OKAY I GOTCHA.
OKAY SO YOU'RE IN YOU'RE NOT A
PROPOSING ANY AMENDMENTS.
AS JUST DID.
NOT WEAR OUT RICHEST YEAH OKAY.
YEAH WELL I'M I'M A LITTLE TORN
ABOUT THIS AYE AYE IDEA AND I DO.
AGREE WITH MUCH OF WHAT'S BEEN
SAID I THINK IF IF FOR ME I I'VE
IT WOULD SEEM MORE COMPELLING IF
WE WERE HEARING FROM --
FROM YOUR COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION THAT --
AND THAT THEY WERE VERY
INTERESTED IN PURSUING SOMETHING
LIKE THIS [inaudible]
I'M.
THANK I I YOU KNOW I I I
UNDERSTAND THAT THOUGH THE
EVIDENCE IS A LITTLE NEXT ABOUT.
THE IMPACT ON BUT THERE'S
CERTAINLY SOME REPORTS THAT
SUGGESTED IT COULD ACTUALLY HAVE
A DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON ON NINE
CONSTANCE PERCEPTIONS OF SAFETY.
BOB BUT IT SEEMS AS THOUGH
THERE'S A BIT OF A MIX IN THE
LITERATURE.
HI WHICH MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO
EVALUATE NOW.
INNOCENT VISITORS IT HAS ONLY A
PILOT PROGRAM YEAH I UNDERSTAND
THAT BRACELET IT PROVES TO BE
SUCCESSFUL.
MAYBE COULD HELP THE STATE TO
PREVENT LOSS OF LIFE OR CHILD SO
YEAH.
S. MOTIVATION IN THE BILL
[inaudible]
OKAY.
MY PERSONAL PLAN IS IS THE LEFT
THE FIRST ROUND I HAVE VOTE I'M
AND DOES A CONVERSATION I WANNA
HAVE WITH STAFF ABOUT A COUPLE
ASPECTS OF THIS BILL AND AND SO
I HAD SAID AND THEN ON BUT SOME
OF CONVERSATION A DECISION AS TO
WHAT I'M GONNA LATER.
BUT I BUT WE WE MADE A
RECOMMENDATION YOUR CALL.
I TELL YOU GREEDY I THINK
ULTIMATELY IT'S IS A PILOT TIME
IT'S ONLY GOING TO HAPPEN.
IF I THE MONIES RAISED WHAT WHAT
IS YOUR PLAN FOR THE FUNDRAISING
WHAT THE HOUSE AT WORK IS A IN
THE IDEAS YOU'RE GONNA PUT FOUR
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM
THE CITY GENERAL.
APPROPRIATION AND SOMEHOW WE'RE
GONNA CLUB NINE THOUSAND THAT'S
ONLY GOING TO BE --
ALLOCATED IN THE EVENT THAT THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT RAISES NINE
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS GROW.
WE WILL I WILL BE OUT IN THE
COMMUNITY WITH THE SKY
[inaudible]
PURITY AND WE ARE WE ARE RAISING
MONEY PRIVATELY WE'RE NOT
LOOKING TO USE TAXPAYER FUNDS
FOR THE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS I
HAVE SOME.
DONORS THAT I THINK WOULD BE
HAPPY TO STEP I PLAYED THE BEST
INTERESTS OF OF OF SCHOOL SAFETY.
OKAY ARE AT HER QUESTIONS
THOUGHTS FROM THE COMMITTEE.
WHAT'S BEEN MOVED BY CENTER WELL
IF YOU'D LIKE TO CLOSE AND TOM
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION --
AGAIN OF WHAT IS THE VALUE OF
ONE CHILD'S LIFE NOW.
WE SAVE ONE LIFE BY HAVING THESE
THESE BALLOT DECKER'S HIM SINCE
THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS A BRACE THE
CONCEPT AND AND PUT THE MEN I
THINK THAT WE HAVE --
THAN WHAT WE CAN --
TO PRESERVE THOSE LIES AND
REQUEST RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
YOUR AYE VOTE.
AND MOST AND SIGNIFICADO ITEM
ONE SP FOURTEEN FORTY THREE THE
MOTION IS TO PASS TO
APPROPRIATIONS ALLEN.
WILK AYE WILK AYE GALGIANI.
AYE GALGIANI AYE LEYVA LEAVE AYE
MCGUIRE PAN.
FIGHT BACK BIDAK I OKAY SERENA
PUT ON CALL AND DONE THANK YOU
TO BOTH OF YOU VERY
CONSIDERATION I THINK YOU FROM
CENTER.
OKAY WE SEE SENATOR WE UP HERE
IS GOING TO PRESENT ITEM TO IN
YOUR GENOCIDE SASSY A TWENTY
THREE MEMBERS.
DRESCHER COCO WATER NMRA WHO I
BELIEVE THIS IS FOR SOME EVER
PRESENTED FOR YOU.
THEY GO.
THIS IS A WE'RE GONNA MAKE IT
VERY DIFFICULT VISIT VERY START
I LOVE THE ACTUAL LITTLE HEARING
THEY THRIVE ON TOBY.
THE MORE DIFFICULT THE MORE
COMPLEX THE MORE CONTROVERSIAL
THE BETTER ALWAYS BELIEVED HIM
AFTER.
SO WITH THAT --
MISTER AND MISTER CHAIR OF
MISTER VICE CHAIR AS WELL AS
MEMBERS OF THE SENATE EDUCATION
COMMITTEE ONE THANK YOU VERY
MUCH -- FOR
THE OPPORTUNE TO PROCESS PRESENT
SENATE CONSTITUTIONAL MOMENTS OF
THE TWENTY THREE WANTED TO I
WOULD WANT TO BEGIN --
BUT WE TO TAKE THE AMENDMENTS
ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE
TO INCLUDE THE BASELINE SCHOOLS
AND COLLEGE SUB COUNT AS WILL
THE CALCULATION OF THE YEAR.
OVER YEAR GROWTH IN THE GENERAL
FUND REVENUES AS YOU KNOW LAST
YEAR --
CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS A RUSHED --
TO PASS IT A GROSSLY
IRRESPONSIBLE A TAX PLAN THAT
GIVES THE WEALTHIEST AMERICANS.
AND CORPORATIONS AB ONE TRILLION
DOLLAR TAX BREAK AT AT OUR
EXPENSE COMPOUND AND AND NOT TO
BE.
OVERLY PARTISAN THAT RESPECTFUL.
TO OUR REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES
HERE TODAY BUT THIS REPUBLICAN
TAX SKIM.
DELIBERATELY DOT TARGETS
AMERICANS.
IN BLUE STATES THAT DIDN'T VOTE
FOR DONALD TRUMP.
AND COULD CAUSE CALIFORNIANS
ESPECIALLY.
THE CALIFORNIANS BILLIONS OF
DOLLARS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS
EFFECT THE AVERAGE CALIFORNIA
TAXPAYER DEDUCTED OVER EIGHTEEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS OLD RECALL SALT.
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES LAST YEAR
ON THEIR FEDERAL RETURNS.
NOW THAT DEDUCTION HAS BEEN
CAPPED AT TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS
WHICH WAS LA NO CAP IS NOW THERE
IS A CAP WHICH IS TEN THOUSAND
DOLLARS.
MEANING SPECIFICALLY THREE
MILLION.
CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS WILL LOSE
OUT ON THOUSANDS OF VALUABLE
DEDUCTIONS EACH YEAR.
ON THEIR FEDERAL TAXES BUT MY
SENATE MEASURE SENATE BILL TWO
TWO SEVEN IS DESIGNED TO ENSURE.
CALIFORNIA DON'T HAVE TO FOOT
THE BILL FOR THIS RIDICULOUS
[inaudible]
TERRIBLE OUTLET THAT WILL HELP
THEM WHILE HELPING OUR PUBLIC
SCHOOLS.
BUT THE SENATE BILL TWO TWO
SEVEN WHICH IS THE NOT
DISPLEASURE BUT WOULD CREATE A
FUND THAT TAXPAYERS CAN COULD
CONTRIBUTE UP.
TO WHICH WOULD GIVE THEM AN 85%
TAX CREDIT AND EVERY DOLLAR THEY
CONTRIBUTED 100% SENATE
CONSTITUTIONAL MOMENT NUMBER
TWENTY THREE WHICH PROTECTS ALL
OF OUR EDUCATION FUNDING
FORMULAS.
MAKING SURE WE NEED ALL THE
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS BEFORE
ADMINISTERING.
THIS CREDIT HOLDS ME WOULD
BENEFIT THE STATE AND ITS
TAXPAYERS IF WE OFFERED A MENU.
OF CHARRED WILL OPTIONS SO THEY
CAN CHOOSE HOW THEY WANT TO PUT
THEIR TROUBLE GIVING TO WORK --
TAKEN TOGETHER THIS AMENDMENT IS
PAIRED WITH SENATE BILL.
TWO TWO SEVEN ANOTHER MAJOR MINE
WHICH IS ABOUT FIVE THIRTY NINE
WILL OFFER CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS
THAT MENU OF OPTIONS HELPING
THEM GIVE TO THE CAUSE OF THEIR
CHOICE.
NO I DO SO WE LOVE THE TAXPAYERS
OF CALIFORNIA TO CONTRIBUTE TO
THE BETTERMENT OF OUR STATE HELP
IN CALIFORNIA WAR THEY HELP
THEMSELVES.
THIS MEASURE WOULD ONLY
PROTECTED THREE MILLION
CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS --
WHO BENEFIT FROM THE SALT AND
STATE AND LOCAL TAX EXEMPTION
INCOME AGAIN ONLY BENEFIT OUR
PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE FOR THE
OBJECTIVE?
OF THE SENATE --
CA TWENTY THREE THESE TO PROTECT
PROP NINETY EIGHT THEREFORE I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR A VOTE.
THIRTY SENATOR I JUST TO CLARIFY.
BUT THAT DID THIS BILL AS IT IS
THE RECOMMENDATIONS DO PAST
ELECTIONS COMMITTEE BECAUSE HE
SHOULD ANSWER O BE MEETING
TOMORROW.
SO THERE'S A NUMBER TO COMMENTS
THAT YOU DON'T THINK YOU CAN
TAKE A PICTURE YOU'RE GONNA TAKE
IT PRECISELY THE FOR SO.
THANK YOU THANKS FOR THAT --
QUESTION ANY BOOKS ONE OF VOICE
SUPPORT FOR THE BILL IT'S OUR
OPPOSITION [inaudible]
THERE [inaudible]
MMHM.
MY FORMER EMPLOYER AND IF YOU.
MICHAEL ROBUST WE'RE STILL
FRIENDS.
OKAY TO USE ROOM IN AN
ARRANGEMENT WITH BERMAN AND THIS.
NO THEY OUT WE CHAU MORNING
JENNIFER BAKER WITH THE
CALIFORNIA TEACH ASSOCIATION IN
ITS UNFORTUNATE THAT --
THAT WE ARE IN OPPOSITE TO THE
MEASURE BUT LET ME SAY THAT WE
APPRECIATE AND AGREE WITH THE
DESCRIPTION OF WHY WITH THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
ALONE IS DOING STATE AND AND
THAT THEIR INTENTIONS ARE IN THE
BEST FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF OUR
STATE WE ABSOLUTELY AGREE WE
UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS A VERY
COMPLEX ISSUE AND WE WANT TO
ENSURE THAT THERE ARE GOING TO
BE NO PUN INTENDED CON.
QUINCY SOON AND THAT'S REALLY
WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO AS FAR
AS OUR DUE DILIGENCE SO WE DO
APPRECIATE THE TECHNICAL A
MOMENT --
THAT WAS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF
THAT ACTUALLY WAS ONE OF THE
ISSUES THAT WE HAD PRODUCTS WE
WE APPRECIATE THAT I'M
UNFORTUNATELY THERE --
THERE ARE SOME ISSUES WITH S. B.
TWO TWENTY SEVEN THAT WE HAVE.
FOUND ONE ASPECT UMF ON THE
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS THE
FACT THAT IT'S NOT --
IT'S NOT CONJOINED WITH SP TWO
TWENTY SEVEN SO THERE ARE A FEW
TECHNICAL.
ISSUES THAT COULD HAVE
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
LONG TERM VIABILITY OF PROP
NINETY EIGHT WHICH IS WHAT WE
WANT TO PRESERVE SO
UNFORTUNATELY WE DO OPPOSE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WE DO
UNDERSTAND.
THE ULTIMATE GOAL THAT YOU'RE
TRYING TO ACHIEVE OUT WE DO
BELIEVE THAT IT MAY HAVE SOME
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND WANT
TO WORK TO MAKE SURE THAT ON
THOSE ISSUES HER TRUST SO
UNFORTUNATELY WE DO OPPOSE THE
THANK YOU FOR YOU VERY MUCH.
THEM FOR BANKS FOR WORKING WITH
US I THINK I'M.
BUT AS YOU MENTION SOME OF THE
SUGGESTIONS YOU BROUGHT PEOPLE
AND WE WERE ABLE TO CORPORATION
TO WELCOME THE BILL AND I THINK
IT'S GOING TO HELP TO ADDRESS.
SOME OF YOUR CORE CONCERNS AT
LEAST WITH REGARD.
TO THE IMPACT ON FUNNY FORMA.
OKAY OTHER PEOPLE ONE RACE
CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
BILL ADDS THAT MATTERS NOW FOR
THE COMMITTEE FOR THOUGHTS.
IDEAS YES CENTER. TWENTY SENATOR
DALY ON SOME A LITTLE CONFUSED
BY THE BILL.
ARE WE SAYING THAT WHAT IT WILL
DO THE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW.
PEOPLE WHO QUALIFY FOR SALT. TO
CONTRIBUTE TO PROP NINETY EIGHT
AND USE THAT AS A TAX WRITE OFF
METHOD WITH THE SENATE --
COULD THAT NO I KNOW THE TIMERS
IT BECAUSE IT I WAS TRYING TO
FIGURE OUT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING
IT'S WITH SENATE BILL TWO TWO
SEVEN DOESN'T OKAY SO YOU'RE.
PUTTING THE TWO TOGETHER SO WHAT
DOES THIS BILL THIS BILL DOESN'T
ACTUALLY COMES ACTUALLY BE BORN
FROM -- MANY --
AS WITH A EDUCATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS AND AND FROM FROM
MISS MAKERS WALTER WITH THIS THE
IS HERE AND WE HAVE BEEN JOINED
THEM.
OF THEIR FOR THEY'VE TWO TWO
SEVEN PASSES --
WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION I'M
TWENTY THREE HAS TO PASS AS WELL
TWO THIRDS OF BOTH ENJOYING --
TO SO WE WANT TO MAKE THAT --
CLARIFICATION ON WHAT TWENTY
THREE DOES IT ADDS A
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ADDS
TO GUARANTEE.
THAT IF TWENTY NINETY EIGHT IS
HARMED IN ANY FORM WHERE SHAPE
YOU TWO SEVEN SUBTLE THEM FOR WE
STOP THAT RIGHT THERE WE WANNA
ADD EXTRA.
LAYER IF INSURANCE IF YOU WILL
ABOUT STOP IF YOU WILL TO GIVE
THAT CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE AS
OPPOSED.
TO THIS IS THE RIGHT POLICY TO
OPEN A PRAYER.
IRONCLAD GUARANTEES THAT THE
PROP NINETY WILL NOT BE HARMED
IN THE FORM WORSHIP OBVIOUSLY
THAT IS OUR GOAL I'M A LOT OF
ATTENTION.
OUR GOAL INTENTION IS IS TO DO
OUR THING WITH ENOUGH POWER TO
MAKE SURE THE TAXPAYERS A
CALIFORNIA --
ARE NOT TO OF FLEECE IN THIS
CASE BECAUSE OF THE THE
DECISIONS MADE BY THE PRESIDENT
AS WELL TO CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS.
AND THIS IS SORT KERN THEM IF
YOU WILL --
GOES POSTAL PARCEL ó WITH IT
IF I CAN GIVE AN EXAMPLE CIVIC
SAMPLE --
WITH THE ATTEMPTED --
IF THE SITUATION OF OUR CLEAN
AIR CLEAN WATER LOTS BY THE EPA.
IN THIS CASE JUST RECENTLY --
THE FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS OF
BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY.
THE THE DEPARTMENT JUSTICE
LAWSUIT AGAINST THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA IN THIS CASE AGAINST
A MEASURE THAT MANY OF US OF
VOTED FOR SENATE BILL FIFTY
FOURTH BUT HEALTH ABOUT EXACTLY
ALSO KNOWN AS A SECULAR STATE
BUT IN THIS CASE THIS IS A
REACTION TO THE GOP TAX PLAN.
OF TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN THAT
WAS VOTED ON DECEMBER WHICH
PURPOSEFULLY TARGETED --
BLUE STATES LIKE NEW YORK NEW
JERSEY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WE WILL RULES LOSE REVENUE --
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS [inaudible]
THAT RELIEF.
THIS IS MODEL BASED ON THAT
DON'T KNOW THAT THE THE MEASURE
OF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
OF THE MEASURE THAT I PASSED --
FEW YEARS BACK THAT IS LAW
CALIFORNIA THAT ALLOWS
CONTRIBUTORS TO TAKE A TAX
CREDIT WHICH IS 50% TAX CREDIT.
SO FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO CAL
GRANT THIS IS ON THE SAME MODEL
BUT WITH THIS BECAUSE HERE AS CA.
TWENTY THREE IT PROVIDES THAT
IRONCLAD GUARANTEE THAT NINETY
EIGHT IT'S NOT HARD TO KNOW FOR
SURE BUT CTA DOESN'T THINK THAT
ITS IRONCLAD THAT'S WHY YOU GUYS
ARE --
OPPOSED PUT SO SO IF IF YOU
THINK IF THIS IS FLOWS THROUGH
THE IRON CLAD GUARANTEE WHAT IS
IT THAT YOU FEEL.
IS THAT ISN'T THERE THAT YOU
WOULD NEED TO TO SUPPORT THIS.
IT IN IT IT'S A LITTLE
COMPLICATED EXCEPT DISCUSSING
EACH WHETHER MEASURE SEPARATELY
SO WHAT WE'VE TRIED TO DO IS IN
DISCUSS SOME OF THE ISSUES WITH --
WITH SP TWO TWENTY SEVEN AS WELL
AS WITH EXCEED TWENTY THREE
SINCE THEY'RE BOTH IMPACTED ON
THE FIRST IT SEEMS LIKE I CAN
SEE YOU'RE POSING THE OTHER ONE
BUT THIS ONE ACTUALLY.
MOVES THAT OTHER BILL
SIGNIFICANTLY IN YOUR DIRECTION
TOWARD PROTECTING.
THE NINETY COMMITTEE.
I THINK.
WHAT SENATE WHAT'S IMPORTANT TO
RECOGNIZE IS WHATEVER SOME
FUNDAMENTAL?
ISSUES THAT WE STILL HAVE WITH
S. B. TWO TWENTY SEVEN FIRSTHAND
THAT OUR NUMBER ONE ISSUE IS
FAILING TO RECONCILE THE TAX
YEAR BASIS WITH PROP NINETY
EIGHT FISCAL YEAR BASIS --
IN CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED
SCHOOLS RATE TO SUPPLEMENTAL
SOME ACCOUNT FUNDS SO IT DOES
GET SO MUCH TECHNICAL WE DO
APPRECIATE AND UNDERSTAND THAT.
I CENTER DELEON IS HIS WORKING
TO TRY TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES AS
MUCH AS WE CAN UNFORTUNATELY
WHAT DISTINGUISHES CALIFORNIA
FROM OTHER STATES.
ON IS ALSO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE
PROP NINETY EIGHT WHICH NEW YORK
DOESN'T HAVE BEEN SO THAT DOES
MAKE THIS I THINK A LITTLE MORE
CHALLENGING.
AND TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S
THE BEST WAY TO DO THIS TO NOT
ONLY PROTECT THE TAXPAYERS OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
BUT TO ALSO PROTECT FUTURE TAX
CALIFORNIA WHILE THEY'RE
ACHIEVING THEIR EDUCATION SO
THAT WE DO APPRECIATE THE
SENATOR HAS ON CONTINUING.
I REACHED OUT AND WE'VE BEEN
TRYING TO WORK TOGETHER IN ON
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ISSUES
WHERE WE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO
ULTIMATELY AGREE ON THE RIGHT
PATH FORWARD.
US BUT NEVERTHELESS WANT TO
CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION AND WE
APPRECIATE THAT.
WELL I'LL SEE YOU TOMORROW IN
ELECTIONS SO SO SO I'M GONNA I'M
GONNA LAY OFF TODAY BECAUSE I
WANT TO READ THE TECHNICAL
AMENDMENTS WITH WHICH I HAVE NOT.
AND HOPEFUL BILLS SORTS FOR
TOMORROW.
WITHOUT A COMPASS.
IT IS COMPLEX ARCANE BUT IT'S
NOT COMPLEX AND TERMS OF THE
POLICY.
OKAY OTHER GOD THOUGHTS
QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS TO SEND
HIM.
SO I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY IN
TERMS OF THAT'S I HEARD THERE
NOW HE SAID THESE ARE GOING TO
BE AT A CONJOINED ARE THEY GOING
TO BE CONJOINED WHAT'S THE
STATUS ON YOUR CONDUCTOR OKAY I
DON'T GO BECAUSE RIGHT NOW I
THINK YOU FOR CLEAR FUND.
COULD WE AND WE HAD WE HAD FIVE
ISSUES SO TO TWO OF THE BOXES
HAVE BEEN CHECKED OUT WE STILL
HAVE ON THREE BOXES THAT
HAPPENED THAT CATHOLIC SOME OF
THEM ARE STILL IN REGARD
SPECIFICALLY TO SB.
TWO TWENTY SEVEN ALRIGHT.
WELL --
GIVEN YOUR TESTIMONY --
SPEAKER -- I
THINK THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT
THERE'S CONTINUE CONVERSATIONS
AND I THINK IT SOUNDS LIKE
EVERYONE'S AT LEAST AGREED INTO
IN TERMS OF A TENT THERE SOME
TECHNICAL STUFF.
STILL TO BE WORKED OUT SET
LIMITS THAT YOU CONNECT
REFLECTION.
WHETHER OR NOT IT CAN BE WORKED
OUT WERE NOT ABSOLUTELY SURE BUT
WE DO APPRECIATE THAT THE
SENATOR IS RIGHT COUNTY TO WORK
IT OUT VAULT AND VIA SAYS I'M
I'M.
A SUPPORT THE BILL AND ACTUALLY
MOVE AT THE PROPIAS HIME --
I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING WHAT
THE RESULT OF HIS CONVERSATIONS
ARE BUT I WOULD HOPE THAT TYPE
KAMALA BE SURE THAT.
OTHERWISE IT'LL STOP HERE.
THAT AND THAT CONVERSATION SO I
DIRE AS SO I AM BUT I APPRECIATE
THAT THERE ARE SOME ISSUES THAT
STUFF TO BE WORKED OUT IN THE
HOPE THAT THEY CAN GET WORKED
OUT.
AND THEN THE FOR THE FOURTH WE
EXPECT THIS THING BEFORE THE
VOTERS.
MAKES SENSE.
THINK I DON'T THINK YOU.
I WANNA THANK THE AUTHOR FOR
THIS AND WE SERVED IN THE
ASSEMBLY TOGETHER WHEN WE HAVE
THE BUDGET CRISIS.
AND IT WAS NECESSARY TO
NEGOTIATE WITH CTA ON SOME
CHANGES TO PROP NINETY EIGHT SO
WE COULD BORROW FROM AND SO
FORTH.
WITH THIS BILL HAVE ANY FEATURE
IMPACT IF WE WERE TO FIND
OURSELVES IN THAT POSITION AGAIN.
WOULD WOULD IF THAT THAT THAT
THIS ADVOCATE QUESTION SO I'M
GLAD THAT YOU ASKED A QUESTION
THAT ENHANCE THE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMIT TWENTY
THREE WHICH AGAIN AS AS I
ARTICULATE TO CENTER LEYVA --
CREATES THE THE BR CLAD --
GUARANTEED TO PROP NINETY EIGHT
GUARANTEE --
THAT -- WE
WOULDN'T BE USING ANY DEDUCTIONS --
SO IT WOULD IT WOULD CEASE AT
THAT MOMENT THAT'S WHY THAT'S
IMPORTANT THAT TO MOVE FORWARD
TO STE OF MEASURE. TO COMPANION --
TO TWO TWO SEVEN BY I THINK
THERE'S AGREEMENT THAT. TWO TWO
SEVEN WITH THE CONCERNS THAT
THAT CITY HAS BUT THIS IS A LOT
BETTER --
TWENTY THREE MAY NOT BE EXACTLY
EXACTLY WHERE THEY WOULD LIKE TO
BE PUTS A LOT BETTER TO PROVIDE
THAT THAT GUARANTEE.
SO WE WOULD BE WE WOULD BE ABLE
TO STAY ON THE GO SHAPED GLORIA
IF IT WOULD YEAH DOES HAVE SOME
TO BET THAT THE BUDGET CRISIS
THINK LET ME CIVIC CONTENT BUT
IT'S CONTINUE INTO WHAT THAT THE
ECONOMIC CLIMATE DISLIKE
OBVIOUSLY THAT'S CONTINGENT THAT
WAS A POLITICAL DECISION.
THAT WAS MADE DURING THAT THE
LEGISLATIVE LEADERS AND THE
GOVERNOR --
AND VERY HARD FOUGHT TO
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CTA THAT.
YOU KNOW YES ALWAYS ON THAT THE
GUARANTEE THAT.
PROP NINETY IT WOULD BE PAID
BACK --
THOSE VERY DIFFICULT PEERED --
DURING THE BUDGET WHEN WE HAD
DONE.
I DON'T THINK ANYONE HERE --
HAS INDOOR THAT --
THAT WAS UNLIKE ANYTHING WE'VE
EVER INTO IT BEFORE.
HEALTH HOPING TO GROW
THEORETICALLY ELLIS WHO WOULD
NEVER GO THROUGH THAT AGAIN
[inaudible]
SEMESTER.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR. ONE
THING THAT WE PROBABLY DON'T
AGREE ON IS I THINK CALIFORNIA
TAXES ARE TOO HIGH.
HE MAY NOT AGREE WITH THAT BUT
WHAT I THINK WE DO AGREE UPON I
THINK THERE'S ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
SUGGEST.
THAT DONALD TRUMP HAD AN AGENDA
WITH HIS WITH HIS TAX PLAN NH
YOU MAYOR BECAUSE ONE OF TWO
REPUBLICANS WHO ACTUALLY
SUPPORTED.
TELL YOU PRIOR BILL.
AND I DO PLAN TO SUPPORT THIS
TODAY BABY INCHING SEE HOW WE
WORK IT OUT.
MIGHT BE FRUSTRATION IT IS I
DON'T THINK PUBLIC EDUCATION
INTO OFTEN WE TREAT PROP NINETY
EIGHT AS A CEILING.
WE SHOULD LOOK AT INSTEAD OF A
FLOOR SO.
I KNOW I LIKE HIM TO MOVE IN
THAT DIRECTION BOBBY SUPPORTING.
SUPPORTING IT TODAY WE'LL SEE
HOW IT.
IT IT PLAYS OUT.
BUT I THINK ONE OF THE OTHER.
STRATEGIES IS TRYING TO DRIVE
HIGH BOTH INDIVIDUALS OUT OF
STATES LIKE CALIFORNIA. TO GO
ELSEWHERE BECAUSE I'VE HAD
PEOPLE COME TO ME AFTER THAT
PLAN SAYING SHOWING ME THAT THE
TAX BURDEN IF THEY'RE NOT GONNA
DO.
AND SO I THINK THERE IS IS SOME
MOTIVATION BEHIND THAT SO
WHATEVER WE CAN DO TO ENCOURAGE
THESE PEOPLE TO STAY HERE AND
INVEST IN CALIFORNIA THINKS A
GOOD THING.
DINNER SEGMENTS Y. SURE --
I AGREE WITH YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY
R. B. SIX WE KNOW THE THE THE
INABILITY TO TAKE FOR EXAMPLE --
OPPORTUNITY OF OF THE SALT THE
IMPACTS OF THE DEMOCRATS AS WELL
AS REPUBLICAN SCOTT A LOT CAN
CALIFORNIA --
AGAIN IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT WHAT
WAS SO UNLIMITED EXEMPTION HOUSE
RECAP TO TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS
[inaudible]
SEE.
AS YOU MENTIONED --
TARGETING AS FOR STATES A STATE
LIKE CALVET WHICH WE HAVE THE
LARGEST NUMBER.
OF TAXPAYERS WHO FILE THAT
EXEMPTION AND AGAIN THAT IMPACTS --
EVERYONE ACROSS THE POLITICAL
SPECTRUM SO IN THIS CASE OF THE
MEASURE ITSELF IS IS IS A
BIPARTISAN MEASURE I KNOW ME
PERHAPS.
PUT UP ON SOME REPUBLICANS VERY
INOPPORTUNE AND GIVEN THAT IT
WAS -- GP
TAX PLAN YOU KNOW --
DRIVEN BY BY THE PRESIDENT BUT I
THINK SOME OF THE MORE
POLITICALLY ASTUTE OBVIOUSLY --
LOOK AT IF.
ABOUT THE SENATE AS WELL AS THE
ASSEMBLY REPUBLICAN.
OBVIOUSLY I THAT VOTED FOR IT OR
YOU KNOW SOMEONE TO CAPACITY IN
VOTE AGAINST YOU KNOW THEY JUST
IT OFF IT ALL TOGETHER.
BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT A LOT OF
THE CONSTITUENTS THEMSELVES ON
BENEFIT [inaudible]
THE SALT WITHOUT THE CAP.
YEAH I MEAN IT'S MY I'M VERY
SUPPORTIVE THESE EFFORTS I THINK
IT'S MY IT'S MY STRONG SENSE
THAT.
THIS IS A WIN WIN FOR THIS
LEGISLATURE MIDDLE FOR ME THAT
IS DAVE THIS IS.
ARE GOING TO GIVE.
FOLKS AN OPTION.
I WOULD IT'S TRUE THAT WE DON'T
KNOW WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN --
FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND
THE IRS WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY
OPPOSE THIS VIGOROUSLY BUT I
ALSO KNOW.
THAT --
WE'VE WORKED REALLY CLOSELY WITH
A NUMBER OF LAW PROFESSORS TO
CLOSELY MIMIC SEVERAL VERY
POPULAR.
RED STATE TAX DEDUCTIONS AND
CREDITS FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE
COUNTRY.
THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE UNWOUND IF
THE IRS CAN SUCCESSFULLY ATTACK
OUR INTENT HERE.
SO FROM MY PERSPECTIVE THIS IS A
WAY OF OF TRYING TO MITIGATE THE
IMPACT OF THIS TAX BILL ON A
NUMBER OF OUR TAXPAYERS GIVES
THEM AN OPTION --
ALLOWS US TO TO CHALLENGE IN
FACT THIS IN COURT --
AND AND IN THE END OF THE DAY
WILL ACTUALLY INCREASE FUNDS
I'VE FOR THE STATE.
BECAUSE IT'S NOT A 100%.
CREDIT SO PEOPLE WILL BE
DONATING TO THIS FIND.
AND ALSO I THOUGHT AT THE SAME
TIME I'D STILL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR IT ADDITIONAL.
AMOUNT OF MONEY THEIR TAXES.
SO I'VE FROM MY PERSPECTIVE
GIVEN.
THE FACT OF THE TAX.
BUILT THE FEDERAL LEVEL WAS A
LOSE LOSE FOR THE STATE THIS
RESPONSES A WIN WIN.
SO I'M.
VERY SUPPORTIVE OF IT I I
ACTUALLY THINK DID --
THE CORE CONCERNS ON PROP NINETY
EIGHT ARE MUCH MORE INHERENT.
TO S. B. TWO TWO SEVEN BALLOT IN
SCA.
TWENTY THREE IOS YOU TWENTY
THREE FROM MY PERSPECTIVE.
REALLY DOES ESPECIALLY WITH SOME
OF THE METHODS THAT HAVE BEEN
TAKEN REALLY DOES FIRM UP --
LIVING HERE BUT ALSO THROUGH
THROUGH THE CHAIR AND THEIR ONE
VOTED FOR TWO TWO SEVEN AS WELL
YEAH AND I I DON'T STRONG
SUPPORT OF THAT AS WELL.
BUT I I WRITE SO EXACTLY SO IF
YOU SUPPORT TO DO SEVEN THEN THE
DEATHLY OTHER SUPPORT AS CA
TWENTY THIRTY BECAUSE I'M.
BUT WHAT IT ACTUALLY HELPS TO
OUR PROTECT --
VETOED THAT THE CORE ISSUES THAT
HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE
EDUCATION COMMITTEE WITH REGARDS
TO PROP NINETY EIGHT SO I'D LOVE
TO BE AT IS COAUTHOR WHEN
APPROPRIATE.
TIME.
AND OMINOUS MULBERRY SUPPORT OF
THIS BILL I I THINK THAT IT'S AN
IMPORTANT THING FOR US TO DO
GIVEN.
WHAT HAPPENED FEDERAL LEVEL AND
IN HIS CHURCH AND YOU USE THAT
SOMETHING THAT WAS A VERY
POIGNANT WITH REGARDS TO OTHER
US STATES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY
IN PARTICULAR RED STATES SET OF
THAT HABIT?
THE SAME TAX DEDUCTION
UNFORTUNATE USE OF FOR THE
REASONS THAT I DON'T THINK MANY
OF US WOULD AND TERMS OF A TAX
DEDUCTION FOR A A PRIVATE
SCHOOLS.
VOUCHERS A SECTARIAN OR SECULAR
SCHOOLS.
IF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
AT THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY --
WHERE -- TO
OPINE WHO THAT THIS IS ILLEGAL --
WE WOULD YOU KNOW THAT CAPPING
THE SALT --
THAT HAVE AN IMPACT ON BLUE
STATES SPECIFICALLY WAS VERY
POLITICAL.
IF THEY ARE IS WHO ACTUALLY GO
OUT OF ITS WAY TO PINE THAT THIS --
IS A INAPPROPRIATE IN CANNOT BE
DONE THROUGH THE RED PROCESS.
THAT WOULD BE THE ABSOLUTE
VALIDATION THAT THEY POLITICIZE
THE SITUATION EVEN MORE SO
BECAUSE THE CURRENT STATUS QUO.
ALLOW WAS THAT THROUGHOUT THE
COUNTRY LITTLE ELSE IN HERE
CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE MEASURE
THEY MOVE FORWARD THE DEDUCTION
AT 50% FOR CAL GRANTS.
ARIZONA ALABAMA FLORIDA USES
THIS RANKS CREATED FOR VOUCHERS --
THE IRIS HAS NOT OPINED --
IN THE OPPOSITION OF THE IRIS
WOULD TO DO THIS AGAIN IT IS
LIKE -- ID
BE UNFORTUNATE BUT THAT MEANS
THAT SIX SIGMA NU CHIN --
AND THE WHITE HOUSE SPECIFICALLY
ARE GOING ALL THE WAY TO
POLITICIZE HARRIS AND HEAVILY.
A INFLUENCE AGAIN.
ON THE GROUND WHETHER YOU'RE
DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN AND YOUR
TAX FILING AND YOU TAKE
ADVANTAGE OF THE SALT --
ISSUE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHICH
POLITICAL PARTY FROM.
THAT'S OF THE LOSSES OF THE
RULES YOU KNOW AND YOU TAKE
ADVANTAGE O THOSE EXEMPTIONS
BECAUSE THE CALIFORNIA HAS MANY.
HIGH WAGE EARNERS IN THIS CASE
OF US MADE THREE MILLION WHO WHO
TAKE A BATCH OF OF OF OF SALT --
WHICH IS THE AVERAGE TAX
DEDUCTIONS BETWEEN EIGHTEEN AND
TWENTY TWO THOUSAND NOW WE HAVE.
TEN THOUSAND CAPTURING THAT
WE'RE GONNA LOSE ALL THIS
REVENUE RIGHT HERE SO WE'RE
GOING TO CONTINUE WORK --
WITH WITH THE IN THE THE SEE TO
IT THAT DO THINK MISS BAKER ON
FOR OPENNESS AND BE SEEN WORKING
IN IN IN AND I UNDERSTAND THAT
ANYTHING THAT.
THAT COMES IN DIRE AYE AYE COME
FROM CTA ANYTHING THAT COMES
NEAR THE HORIZON OF MAYBE AIDS
IN THAT SOUTHERN ACCENT
CORINTHIAN OF THAT CROWD.
EMAIL FROM HER HEAD OF THE BLOW
A LITTLE BIT IN THAT AND IT'S
REALLY SOMETHING.
SO SO LOOK I I THINK THAT THE
REASON WHY YOU'RE GETTING
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IS THAT IT IS
A WIN WIN FOR CALIFORNIA
TAXPAYERS AND I THINK THAT AS
YOU CLOSE IT IS MICHAEL FAT AND
DONE.
TICKET PLEASE COLOR.
THE HOMES ARE MOTIONS NOTES
CENTER PAN.
IT INTO A CA TWENTY THREE THE
MOTION IS TO PASS TO ELECTIONS
AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ALLEN.
ALLEN AYE WELL.
WILK AYE GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE LEYVA [inaudible]
REQUIRED BY.
OKAY.
THAT IS OUT WE WILL CLOSE THE
ROLE ON THAT BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T
HERE SO LET'S ENTERTAIN A MOTION
FILED FOR THE THE CONSENT
CALENDAR AND WE HAVE ITEM NUMBER
THREE THAT'S S. YET WHEN.
BY SENATE PAN. FIVE FOR THE
CONSECUTIVE SUCH OF ITS CULTURAL.
ALLEN BY ALLEN AYE WILK AYE WILK
AYE GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE LEYVA AYE LEYVA AYE
MCGUIRE.
MCGUIRE I CAN I CAN I BY NOW.
MIGHT ACT.
OKAY BUT THAT'S THAT OUT OF THE
UNANIMOUS LET'S NO REOPEN THE
RULES ON ITEM ONE THIS IS A
CENTER STONE'S BILL.
CHRISTY.
FORTY FORTY THREE AND ITEM ONE
SP FOURTEEN FORTY THREE THE
MOTION AS DO PASSED YOU
APPROPRIATIONS WITH THE CHAIR
NOT VOTING.
VICE CHAIR VOTING I FOUR ZERO
ALLEN BY ALLEN I REQUIRE.
MCGUIRE I CAN.
OKAY THAT'S OUT.
AND I THINK WITH THAT WE'VE
COULDN'T BELIEVE.
FINISH OUR VOTES.
OUR HEARTS GO OUT TO SENATOR
MCGUIRE FOR ALL THE CHALLENGES
IN THIS DISTRICT RIGHT NOW WITH
THE FIRES. FOR BEING HERE AND
WITH THAT WE ARE GOING TO
ADJOURN THINK YOU'RE ON