VICE CHAIRS ON ITS WAY. AND WE
ARE TOLD THERE WERE TWO PULLED
BY THE AUTHOR FROM THE FILE
YESTERDAY WHICH WILL HERE ON
JUNE NINETEENTH AND THOSE ARE AB
THREE. BY SIMPLY MEMBER BONTA
AND AB THREE SEVEN TWO. BY
ASSEMBLY MEMBER STONE SO THOSE
ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA AND THEN
FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
YEAH WE HAVE A FEW.
WILL TAKE A MOTION ON IT YET.
BUT THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
ARE.
AB TWENTY EIGHTY SIR RUN TESTS.
AB TWENTY FIVE EIGHTY NINE
MISTER BIGELOW AB TWENTY SEVEN
SEVENTY FOUR MS LEMOND AB TWENTY
EIGHT OR ONE MR SOLACE. AB
THIRTY SEVENTY EIGHT EIGHTY
MISTER GALLAGHER. AB THREE ONE
ONE TWO MISTER GRAYSON EIGHTY
THREE TWO TWO NINE THIS PERK.
AND THAT'S IT SO WE'LL START NOW
WITH OUR.
FAMILY MEMBER WHO IS HERE
PATIENTLY WAITING ASSEMBLY
MEMBER LACKEY AND THAT IS. AB
EIGHT SEVENTY THREE.
YEAH. YEAH MY ALL THE TIME TEXAS
LEFT READ ON THE PURITAN'S.
THEY'LL GET IT.
FOR.
WITH MY.
SO I GUESS IT WAS.
WE HAVE SOME. OF THE THINGS.
YEAH.
AND IT'S A REMEMBER LACKEY
WHENEVER YOU'RE READY YOU YOU'RE
YOU MAY BEGIN. ALRIGHT WELL
THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS
THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO
PRESENT AV EIGHT SEVEN THREE.
FORD IS IN THE MIDST OF A LARGE
TRANSITION AS THE STATE WORKS TO
IMPLEMENT PROPOSITION SIXTY
FOUR.
DESPITE CANNABIS NOW BEING LEGAL
FOR DUAL USE. CALIFORNIA'S
ILLICIT MARKET SKILLS RIGHT.
BLACK MARKET. CONTINUES TO
THRIVE.
THIS MAKES ROBUST ENFORCEMENT
AGAINST ILLEGAL ACTORS CRITICAL
TO THE STATE'S SUCCESS.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD
AND AGRICULTURE HAS BEEN PLACED
IN CHARGE OF REGULATING
CULTIVATION LICENSES. PART OF
THEIR WORK IS CONDUCTING SITE
INSPECTIONS ON LICENSEES.
HOWEVER CDFA INVESTIGATORS DO
NOT HAVE NON PEACE OFFICER
STATUS UNDER CURRENT LAW. THIS
MEANS IF AN INVESTIGATOR
OBSERVES VIOLATIONS OF MERIT
PROBABLE CAUSE FOR A SEARCH
WARRANT. THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE
TO DEVELOP APPLIED FOR AND SIR
I'M SORRY AND SERVE A SEARCH
WARRANT RESULTING IN. THE HALLS
OF THE DEPARTMENT'S
INVESTIGATION.
MAYBE EIGHT SEVENTY THREE WOULD
GIVE CDFA INVESTIGATORS NON
PEACE OFFICER STATUS TO ADDRESS
THIS PROBLEM WITH CURRENT LAW.
THIS WILL HELP ENSURE THAT
INVESTIGATIONS CAN MOVE FORWARD
WITH LICENSEES THAT CAN BE
CONDUCTED.
ILLEGAL I'M SORRY THAT
IDENTIFIES ILLEGAL ACTIVITY
WHICH WILL HELP OUR FIGHT
AGAINST THE BLACK MARKET. HERE
TO ANSWER QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT
HAVE AS JOHN HELLO AGAIN WHO WAS
THE COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
BRANCH OF THE. CHIEF FOR CDFA.
YES HELLO CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE MY NAME'S
JOHN HOW ECONOMIC ENFORCEMENT
OCCUPIES. BRANCH CHIEF ACCOUNT
CANNABIS CULTIVATION LICENSING.
THANK YOU FOR HEARING THE BILL
TODAY.
WHERE IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT
WE SECURE WAR OF PENAL CODE
EIGHT THIRTY AUTHORITY FOR MY
INVESTIGATORS TO CONDUCT?
INVESTIGATIONS UNDER DIVISION
TEN OF THE BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONS CODE. SPECIAL
INVESTIGATORS WITHIN CDFA
ALREADY HAVE PENAL CODE
AUTHORITY BUT ONLY TO ENFORCE
OUR DIVISION FIVE OF THE
BUSINESS PROFESSIONS CODE OR
FOOD MEDICAL AGRICULTURAL CODE
SECTION SO THIS WOULD JUST. A
GUESS ON PAR. WITH OTHER SPECIAL
MASSACRES WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
ANY WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
WE UNFORTUNATELY BECAUSE WE HAVE
A. YES NO NO NO YOU DON'T HAVE
TO GET YOUR THE OTHER WITNESS
NEEDS TO LEAVE THE TABLE SO THAT
OKAY POLICIES THAT WE HAVE SUCH
A SMALL ROOM.
GOOD AFTERNOON.
MY NAME IS OSCAR BARBARA ON THE
CHIEF DEPUTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OF
SOLANO COUNTY AND VICE PRESIDENT
OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
DEFENDER ASSOCIATION.
WE ARE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO
THIS LEGISLATION.
THE PDA OPPOSES THE LEGISLATION
AND THAT WE BELIEVE IT WOULD
FUNCTION TO EXPAND THE POWERS OF
LAW ENFORCEMENT PERMIT
DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE
EMPLOYEES.
TO ARREST PERSONS. WHO UP IS
PROVIDED AS EMPLOYEES ARE NOT
POLICE OFFICERS ARE TRAINED LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS?
TO ENFORCE WHAT ARE PERCEIVED AS
CRIMINAL LAW VIOLATIONS RELATED
TO THE SALE OF MARIJUANA.
AS THE LAWS SURROUNDING THE SALE
AND USE OF MARIJUANA HAVE BEEN.
EFFECTIVELY CREEPY CRIMINALIZE
OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS IN
CALIFORNIA AND IN SEVERAL STATES
IN OUR NATION. IT WOULD BE
CONTRARY TO THE WILL OF THE
ELECTORATE INTO THE SPIRIT. OF
THE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA
THE MARIJUANA MOVEMENT TO EXPAND
THE POWERS OF SEARCH AND ARREST.
THOSE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS CARS
WITH THE REGULATION OF
COMMERCIAL MARIJUANA.
WE THINK THESE THINGS CAN BE
TREATED AS CIVIL VIOLATIONS AND
IF THERE IS A CRIMINAL LAW
VIOLATION. THERE ARE CERTAINLY
AVENUES TO PURSUE IN ORDER TO
ENFORCE THE VIOLATIONS OF
CRIMINAL LAW. SO WERE IN
OPPOSITION. THANK.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
ALL RIGHT.
SEEING NONE IS THERE ANY
DISCUSSION FROM THE DYESS YES AS
SENATOR ROD FOR THE GIVEN CHEER
US SOME WACKY AND I NEED
CLARIFICATION STORE YOU
REQUESTED THAT THESE INDIVIDUALS
HAVE. EIGHT THIRTY POINT ONE
POLICE STATUS. EIGHT THIRTY.
NOT A THIRTY FOUR WHEN THESE ARE
NON SWORN PEACE OFFICER STATUS
SO I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT
STATUS YOU'RE TRYING TO SECURE
FOR THEM THAT IS IT.
EASIER FOR HIM TO EXPLOIT THAT
HE SAID EIGHT THIRTY NO SE
THIRTY ELEVEN EIGHTY SEVEN I'M
SORRY EAT THIRTY OF ELEVEN NOT
ONE EIGHT THIRTY ELEVEN IS NOT
PEACE OFFICER STATUS.
SO.
SO YEAH WE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
CARRY FIREARMS OF ANY KIND IS
THIS EXTENDS THE AUTHORITY FOR
US TO. DEVELOP SEARCH WARRANTS
AND. PROVIDES US WITH THE POWERS
OF ARREST.
AND YOU WOULD BE ARRESTING THOSE
INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE.
ILLEGALLY CULTIVATING OUR.
UNLICENSED CULTIVATION IS
PRIMARY THE PURVIEW OF LOW OF
LAW ENFORCEMENT STATE AND LOCAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT. OUR GOAL IS TO
BE ABLE TO BE IN A POSITION TO
ASSIST THEM LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT STATE LAW
ENFORCEMENT TO GRACE THE EXTENT
POSSIBLE.
WE WE INTEND TO USE UP SOME OF
THIS AUTHORITY IF IT'S GRANTED.
TO PURSUE POTENTIAL WE.
LICENSED ENTITIES WHO MAY BE
CULTIVATING OFFSITE OR MAYBE
INVERTING ARE DIVERTING PRODUCT
FROM THE LICENSE MARKET.
THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO.
ACTUALLY DEVELOP PROBABLE CAUSE
AND SECURE SEARCH WARRANTS TO
ACCESS OTHER PROMISES THAT ART
LICENSED PREMISES WHICH WE HAVE
AUTHORITY TO ACCESS. AND THEN WE
WOULD WORK WITH CONJUNCTION WITH
LAW ENFORCEMENT TO ACTUALLY
SERVE SEARCH WARRANTS.
ANY OTHER. GUYS.
I'M I HAVE RECOMMENDED AND BY I
APPRECIATE THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS
AND CONCERNS. ESPECIALLY NOW
THAT THE VOTERS HAVE
CRIMINALIZED.
MARIJUANA BUT WE ALSO KNOW THAT.
IT IS STILL A REGULATED
SUBSTANCE AS IS ALCOHOL AND WE
ALREADY HAVE ENFORCEMENT.
AROUND ALCOHOL ISSUES AND AND
DIFFERENT ISSUES THAT ARE. THAT
CERTAIN REGULATORY ENTITIES HAVE
CERTAIN ENFORCEMENT POWERS THAT
ART EQUIVALENT TO PEACE OFFICER
POWERS AND IN THIS CASE.
WE ARE NOT MAKING STAFF OF. THE
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD NAG PEACE
OFFICERS WE ARE NOT GIVING THEM
FIRE ARMS WERE NOT ALLOWING THAT
WE ARE. WE ARE ALLOWING YES WAS
DESCRIBED.
SEARCH WARRANT POWERS
INVESTIGATE TOUR INVESTIGATIVE
POWERS AND A COUPLE OF OTHERS.
I'M SO THAT'S WHY I WAS
COMFORTABLE WITH. RECOMMEND DENY
ON THE BILL.
BUT HAPPY TO HAVE FURTHER
DISCUSSION GO AHEAD SENATOR
BRADLEY. IS THERE PARALLEL
AUTHORITY FOR A. B. C. WORKERS
WHO ARE NOT PEACE OFFICERS WHO
HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO. ISSUE
WEREN'T YES THERE ISN'T.
YES.
RIGHT SO PERHAPS BEFORE I TAKE A
MOTION LET ME ESTABLISH
COURTROOM. YOU COULD READ THE
ROLE.
SKINNER I'M HERE EITHER HERE
ANDERSON BRADFORD. I FOR HERE
JACKSON'S MITCHELL. SO HERE'S
DOWN. HERE AND HERE WE WERE
WINNER.
ALRIGHT SO IS THERE A.
SENATOR STAFFORD GO AHEAD
VETERAN MENTOR WOMAN AND
REMEMBERS A.
MAYBE JUST A QUICK COMMENT TODAY
I.
I APPRECIATE THE AUTHOR OF
BRINGING THIS FORWARD.
THERE'S A LOT OF.
GOOD ACTORS OUT THERE TRYING TO
FOLLOW THE RULES TRYING TO
FOLLOW THE LAWS AND.
THERE THOSE ALWAYS SAID THAT
ONE CIRCUMVENT A LOT BUT. HOW
YOU CIRCUMVENT THE LAW YOU?
YOU'RE NOT ONLY.
.
PUTTING YOUR YOUR COMPETITION IS
DISADVANTAGE BUT YOU'RE ALSO
HURTING CITY CALIFORNIA THAT IS
DRIVING REVENUE.
FROM THE SALES SO.
APPRECIATE THAT THE CHAIR.
REITERATED THAT THE THESE ARE
NOT GOING TO BE ARMED.
OFFICERS ARE GONNA BE HELPING
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TO.
.
AND COVER THE AND THE
UNDERGROUND ECONOMY THAT DOES.
IS GROWING AND IF WE'RE GOING TO
STOP THAT WE WE NEED TO TAKE
THIS ACTION TODAY. AND SO WITH
THAT I'M VERY HAPPY TO MOVE THE
BILL THANK YOU.
RIGHT EARNED HIM A RELAXING
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE.
JUST REAL QUICKLY RESPECTING
YOUR I. VOTE BECAUSE I I BELIEVE
THAT EVERYBODY. ON THE DIGEST
WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT.
THIS MARKET.
CONTINUES TO THRIVE THE
REGULATED MARKET AND WE USE THE
TERM REGULATED RULES REALLY
DON'T.
HAVE ANY APPLICATION UNLESS
THEY'RE FORCED. AND WERE HAVING
TROUBLE ENFORCING THAT'S WHY THE
NUMBERS ARE RIGHT NOW VERY
DISMAL. AND WELL BELOW THE
PROJECTED.
INCOME LEVELS AND IT'S QUITE
FRANKLY BECAUSE. THE.
THE ILLICIT MARKET IS DOING
QUITE WELL. AND WE NEED TO GIVE
THE TOOLS TO COMBAT THAT AND
THIS WILL DO THAT THIS THIS BILL
WILL HELP ACCOMPLISH THAT SO I I
WOULD ASK YOUR RIVAL.
RIGHT SAYING NO OTHER DEBATE OR
SCRATCH SENATOR FRED FIRST
ALRIGHT BUT I GUESS.
LOOKING AT WHAT WASHINGTON STATE
A GESTURE THAT THEY'RE LOOKING
AT.
MAYBE DEREGULATING ON CANNABIS
AS A SCHEDULE ONE WITH THE STILL
BE A NECESSARY TOOL THAT.
YOU NEED IT DOESN'T PREVENT
THOSE LEGAL OPERATORS AND I SEE
THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET
TO BUT I MEAN WITH THAT. CHANGE
THE NEED FOR THIS AT ALL.
I DON'T BELIEVE SO ONE NIGHT ON
AN I'M SORRY SADDAM SHOULD
CAROUSEL UNDER UNDER THE
CURRENT.
STATUTES AND REGULATIONS WHERE.
.
WHERE WHERE A MINISTRY AND
LICENSE ACTIVITY OUT? AND WE'RE
TRYING TO ENSURE THAT THE
LICENSEES ARE.
ENGAGED IN COMMERCIAL CANADA'S
ACTIVITY AND THEY'RE NOT
DIVERTING OUR AND PARTY PRODUCT
FROM THE LEGAL MARKET SO. YES I
BELIEVE THESE POWERS WOULD STILL
BE REQUIRED.
MORE SO.
ALL RIGHT.
THE.
I I.
WASN'T GONNA SPEAK AGAIN BUT I
WANTED TO JUST ADD THAT.
WE. HAVE.
THE ISSUE IS I'M SURE AS WE'VE
HEARD FROM FOR TRICKY FOR MANY
PEOPLE BECAUSE THE FEAR IS THAT.
WE THAT. IN ADDING MORE
ENFORCEMENT.
FROM THOSE ENTITIES IN THE STATE
WHO MAY NOT BE SUPPORTIVE OF THE
VOTERS ACTION MAY GO BEYOND THE
SCOPE OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITY
BUT ON THE OTHER HAND AS. THE
AUTHOR INDICATED BECAUSE WE HAVE
A SET OF REGULATIONS THAT WE
ENACTED AS PART OF THE
LEGALIZATION.
AND WE ARE.
PEOPLE WHO ARE POOR OF FOLLOWING
THE RULES ARE.
PAYING FOR LICENSES ARE THERE
THEY'RE GOING TO QUITE A LOT OF
REGULATORY HOOPS SO I THINK. IN
THE COMMENTS FROM THE DICE ABOUT
UNDERGROUND ECONOMY I TINK. WE
ARE TRYING TO LIFT THIS UP TO
THE ABOVE GROUND ECONOMY AND.
IT'S NOT EASY. AND IT SEEMS
COUNTER INTUITIVE THAT WE MIGHT
NEED MORE ENFORCEMENT IN ORDER
FOR SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN
ILLEGAL TO BE PROPERLY LEGAL.
IN NINETEEN CONSPIRED TO
APPRECIATE THE CONCERNS OF FOLKS
THAT WOULD BE BE USED IN A
FASHION THAT WOULD BE TOO BROAD.
SO WE WILL HAVE TO MONITOR THAT.
BUT THAT'S WHY I WAS COMFORTABLE
WITH MOVING FORWARD WITH THE
BILL. SELL. UNLESS THERE'S ANY
OTHER COMMON THE DICE WHICH I'M
HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN. WE WILL.
TAKE A ROLL CALL.
THE MOTION IS TO PASTOR
APPROPRIATIONS SCANNER. BY INNER
EYE ANDERSON BRADFORD.
AT FIRST I JACKSON MITCHELL.
MITCHELL I STONE. STONE I
WINNER.
WE'LL HOLD IT OPEN WE HAVE VERY
MUCH MEMBER STATE AND NUMBERS
THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT WE WILL NOW GO TO TO
FIND ANYBODY ELSE IN THE ROOM
ASSEMBLY MEMBER GREECE AND.
AB NINE NINETEEN TWENTY THAT'S
ITEM SIX.
YOU MAY PROCEED.
THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR AND AND
SENATORS. I AM PLEASED TO
PRESENT ASSEMBLY BILL NINETEEN
TWENTY RELATING TO SEARCH AND
RESCUE OPERATIONS AND THE STATE.
UNDER CURRENT REGULATIONS THERE
ARE NO PROVISIONS IN EXISTING
STATUTE GOVERNING OR REGULATING
INDIVIDUALS OR ORGANIZATIONS
THAT PRESENT THEMSELVES AS
SEARCH AND RESCUE ENTITIES. DUE
TO THIS EXCLUSION CALIFORNIA LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HAVE SEEN
AN INCREASE OF LAY PEOPLE
CREATING THEIR OWN GROUPS TO DO
SEARCH AND RESCUE WORK. THAT
AREN'T THEY'RE NOT EQUIPPED FOR
IT AND.
THE.
HAVE NOT BEEN TRAINED OR
PROFICIENT IN IT PERFORMING THE
NEEDED RESCUE SERVICES THAT ARE
VITAL AND IMPORTANT TO LIFE
SAVING. TECHNIQUE THESE GROUPS
OFTEN SEARCH FOR MISSING PERSONS
AND RESPOND TO MAJOR AND MINOR
DISASTERS AND OTHER STATE AND
LOCAL EMERGENCIES WITHOUT THE
PUBLIC EVER REALIZING THAT THEY
ARE NOT. VETTED TRAINED
CERTIFIED OR THAT THEY'RE
INSURED ALSO THESE UNAFFILIATED
SEARCH AND RESCUE GROUPS ARE
CAPITALIZING ON AMBIGUOUS
STATUTES. AND SOLICITING
DONATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
MULTIPLE UNAFFILIATED GROUPS
THROUGHOUT THE STATE HAVE
OBTAINED NONPROFIT STATUS AND
ACTIVELY SOLICIT MONEY AND
EQUIPMENT FROM THE UNSUSPECTING
PUBLIC BY PASSING THEMSELVES
OFF.
AS ORGANIZATIONS CONNECTED TO
PUBLIC AGENCIES. SO FOR THESE
REASONS I HAVE INTRODUCED A B.
NINETEEN THIRTY. TWO OR NINETEEN
TWENTY TO REGULATE INDIVIDUALS
OR GROUPS PRESENTING THEMSELVES
AS PROFESSIONALS SEARCH AND
RESCUE PERSONNEL AND
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR I VOTE. I
WILL NOW TURN IT OVER TO THE
SHOW MUCH LOWER. CSS A
LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVE FOR A
BRIEF STATEMENT.
THANK YOU GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM
CHAIR MEMBERS TO SHOW MUCH
LARABEE HAVE THE CALIFORNIA
STATE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
SPONSORS OF EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
TWENTY WE'D LIKE TO THANK
ASSEMBLYMEMBER GRACE AND FOR
SUPPORTING THIS LEGISLATION
THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
I'M NINETEEN TWENTY WOULD
PREVENT ROGUE AND SEARCH AND
RESCUE.
ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONAL
CAUSING PROBLEMS ESPECIALLY IN
TIMES OF DISASTER IN
EMERGENCIES.
WHEN THE CITIZENS RELY ON THESE
ORGANIZATIONS ARE LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO HELP
THEM AND OFTEN THESE
ORGANIZATIONS AND I WITHOUT ANY
KIND OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST. IN
OUR SEARCH AND RESCUE AND A
CAUSE PROBLEMS ON FOR THESE
REASONS WE RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT
YOU SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION
THANK YOU.
AND THE MORE WE. WORK ALL.
THANK YOU MADAM CHAIRMAN AND
MISTER CHAIRMAN MICHAEL GOT IN
HERE ON BEHALF OF THE PERSONAL
INSURANCE FEDERATION OF
CALIFORNIA. AND WE'RE HERE IN
SUPPORT OF THIS MEASURE OUR
MEMBERS BELIEVE IN ANYTHING THAT
ENHANCES PUBLIC SAFETY AND SO
FOR THAT REASON WE SUPPORT THE
BILL.
THANK YOU ANY ADDITIONAL
WITNESSES AND SUPPORT. LEVEL.
JOHN LEVEL ON BEHALF OF THE
ASSOCIATION OF DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION
OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
CALIFORNIA COLLEGE AND
UNIVERSITY POLICE CHIEFS
ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY PROFESSIONAL
PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ALL
IN SUPPORT ALL IN ALPHABETICAL
ORDER.
FOR THE OPPRESSED ANY ADDITIONAL
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
WITNESSES. AND OPPOSITION
COMPORT PLACE.
YOU CAN PROVIDE OKAY FROM STATE.
GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN.
FOSTER BARBER WITH THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC DEFENDER
ASSOCIATION.
THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC DEFENDERS
ASSOCIATION OPPOSES THIS BILL
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS.
AS OUR GOVERNOR HAS REPEATEDLY
STATED CRIMINAL PENALTIES ARE
NOT THE SOLUTION TO EVERY
PROBLEM.
THE PDA'S POSITION WOULD BE THAT
NOT EVERY INCIDENT OF IMPROPER
BEHAVIOR NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED
BY A NEW LEGAL PROHIBITION OR
MANDATORY PUNISHMENT. THERE
CURRENTLY EXISTS A VARIETY OF
CRIMINAL LAW SOME PENALTIES THAT
COULD ADDRESS THIS BEHAVIOR
INCLUDING. OBSTRUCTING A PEACE
OFFICER. IN VIOLATION OF PENAL
CODE ONE FORTY EIGHT A ONE.
INTERFERING WITH THE DISTORTED
OF DUTY OF A FIREMAN OR
EMERGENCY RESCUE PERSONNEL IN
VIOLATION OF PENAL CODE SECTION
ONE FORTY EIGHT POINT TWO. AND
FALSELY REPORTING AN EMERGENCY
IN VIOLATION OF PENAL CODE
SECTION ONE FORTY EIGHT POINT
THREE A ONE. ALL OF THOSE
STATUTES COVERED THIS BEHAVIOR
TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL
LAW VIOLATION FOR PEOPLE THAT
ARE. ENGAGED IN THE ATTEMPT TO
HELPAND RESCUE OTHER
INDIVIDUALS IN OUR STATE THEMES.
COUNTER INTUITIVE AND IN OUR
OPINION AND WE OPPOSE THIS
LEGISLATION.
THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
SHANE HERE NINE SENATOR
MITCHELL.
THANK YOU MR CHAIRMAN.
.
SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THE
OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE
FREQUENTLY USE A TERM THAT I
DON'T KNOW THAT I'VE EVER HAD
THE OPPORTUNITY TO USE IN THAT
TERM IS THIS LOOKS LIKE A. IS
THIS A SOLUTION LOOKING FOR A
PROBLEM.
AND SO IS THIS A SOLUTION
LOOKING FOR A PROBLEM WE JUST
HEARD TESTIMONY FROM THE
OPPOSITION THAT. THEIR CURRENT
LAWS ON THE BOOKS. TO PROSECUTE
THOSE WHO.
BEEN APPROPRIATELY MISREPRESENT
THEMSELVES SOLICITOUS.
A MASSIVE PROBLEM ACROSS THE
CITY CALIFORNIA GIVE ME A SENSE
OF.
WHY YOU THINK THIS IS A VALID
SOLUTION TO A REAL PROBLEM
MITCHELL THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
BRINGING THAT UP I APPRECIATE
THAT? AND.
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE
VOICE OF OPPOSITION AND
TESTIMONY THERE ARE SITUATIONS
THAT DO EXIST THAT THOSE THREE
PARTICULAR.
POWERS OR. BECAUSE HE BROUGHT
UP STATUTES DO WOULD NOT APPLY
GIVE ME THOSE AND SO WE DO HAVE
SOME. AS LISTED WE HAVE.
PROBABLY OVER TWENTY PARTICULAR
SITUATIONS THAT WERE LISTED.
FROM FRESNO ALL THE WAY TO PASS
A COUNTY OF FOLKS THAT WERE.
LISTING THEMSELVES SEARCH AND
RESCUE ORGANIZATIONS THAT WERE
ACTUALLY OPERATING OF
FRAUDULENTLY BUT THERE IS NO
SPECIFIC CODE THAT COULD STOP
THEM FROM DOING THAT COULD STOP
THEM FROM DOING AND SO THEIR
FUNDRAISING OR THEY ARE.
ACTUALLY DOING SEARCH RESCUES SO
THEY'RE ACTUALLY DOING SOME
SEARCH AND RESCUE BUT IN SOME
CASES WERE JUST FUNDRAISING AS
WELL.
THE KEY THINGS I THINK WE NEED
TO REMEMBER HERE ABOUT THE
SEARCH AND RESCUE PART OF IT IS
THE ACTUAL SAFETY. AND THE
CERTIFICATION HAS TO GO INTO.
BEING A.
SAFE SAFETY FOR A RESCUE.
INDIVIDUAL AS THE TRAINING SO
IT'S MORE OF A PUBLIC SAFETY
WHERE WE FIND OURSELVES
SOMETIMES TRYING TO RESCUE THE
RESCUER RIGHT BECAUSE THEY
WEREN'T PROPERLY TRAINED AND
THAT. ARE THERE. WHAT ABOUT THE
INSTANCES WHEN?
?
EITHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OR FAMILY
MEMBERS ASKED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO
COME OUT AND ENGAGE IN A SEARCH
MAY NOT BE A SEARCH AND RESCUE
CATEGORY BUT BY SEARCH FOR A
MISSING PERSON OR ONE FAMILY
MEMBERS FEEL THAT LAW
ENFORCEMENT.
PUTTING FORTH ALL THE RESOURCES
THE FAMILY MAY THINK IT IS
NECESSARY TO DO A CIRCUS OF
FAMILY LEAVE SEE THAT ALL THE
TIME FAMILIES ARE HANGING SIGNS
FAMILIES ARE. ARE OUT IN THE
COMMUNITIES DOING SEARCHES FOR
MISSING FAMILY MEMBERS WITH THE
SUPPLY THEM TO. KNOW IT WOULD
NOT AND THANK YOU FOR DRAWING
THAT DLINEATION LINE BETWEEN
THOSE THAT ACTUALLY REPRESENT
THEMSELVES AS OFFICIAL SEARCH
AND RESCUE. VERSUS THOSE THAT
ARE JUST.
OFFERING THEMSELVES AS
VOLUNTEERS. OPPOSITE TO AN
EXAMPLE IMPASSE OR COUNTY LAST
YEAR THE SHARE OF THE THE SHARE
OF SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAMS HELD
THEIR ANNUAL FUNDRAISING DRIVE
TO RAISE MONEY FOR MOBILE
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. THIS
HELPS TEAMS THAT SPENT THOUSANDS
OF HOURS EACH YEAR LOCATING LOST
HIKERS IN THE WLDERNESS BUT
BEFORE HOLDING THE FUND RAISER
THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE HAD TO
ISSUE A WARNING TO THE COUNTY
RESIDENTS TO BEWARE OF SCAMS.
SINCE DURING THE PAST
FUNDRAISERS A COMPANY CALLING
ITSELF SEARCH AND RESCUE
CHARITIES LED SOME DONORS TO
BELIEVE THAT THEY WERE ACTUALLY
DONATING TO PASS OUR COUNTY. AND
TO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT HAD
THEIR SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM
WHEN ACTUALLY THEY WEREN'T.
THANK YOU IN IN JUST A WITNESS
ME QUESTIONS FROM OUR PANEL
HERE.
A BILL HAS BEEN MOVED BY SENATOR
STONE I THINK THERE'S A DO PASS
RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROPRIATIONS.
MADAM SECRETARY YOU MAY CALL
THE ROLL WHAT WE LIKE TO CLOSE
US IMMIGRATION. THANK YOU VERY
MUCH FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO
TESTIFY ON THIS AND TO PRESENT
THIS BILL I SIMPLY AM
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR AN ITEM.
DOCTOR PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
ENTER ANDERSON BRADFORD.
JACKSON MITCHELL MITCHELL VICE
DOWN DOWN FIVE WINNER.
THE PEROT OPEN THANK YOU.
OUR NEXT UP WE HAVE ITEM NINE AB
TWENTY FIVE TWENTY SIX BY SIMPLY
WOMAN RUBIO. MISS RUBY IF YOU'RE
READY.
GOOD AFTERNOON SENATORS TODAY
I'M PRESENTING AB TWENTY FIVE
TWENTY SIX WHICH CLARIFIES THE
LAW. THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT
OFFICERS MAY MAKE AN ORAL
REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY
EMERGENCY GUN VIOLENCE
RESTRAINING ORDER. AS THE
DEFAULT PROCEDURE CURRENT LAW
MAKES BRITAIN PETITIONS THE
DEFAULT PROCEDURE HOWEVER IN
EMERGENCY SITUATIONS AN OFFICER
AN OFFICER RARELY HAS TIME TO GO
TO COURT AND FILE A WRITTEN
PETITION. IN PRACTICE AN OFFICER
WILL FOLLOW THE AURA PROCEDURE
PROVIDED AND REQUEST AN ORDER
FROM THE COURT OVER THE PHONE
BECAUSE THEY ARE DEALING WITH AN
IMMEDIATE THREAT OR VIOLENCE IN
THE FIELD. MY BILL ALIGNS THE
LAW WITH PRACTICES USED IN THE
FIELD. AND WITH OTHER
RESTRAINING ORDER STATUS
STATUTES LIKE BILLS FOR DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE. THE BILL DOES NOT GIVE
LAW ENFORCEMENT ANY NEW
AUTHORITY TO REMOVE THE FIREARM
AND DOES NOT CHANGE ANY FACTUAL
FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR THE ORDER
TO BE ISSUED. A WITH ME TODAY I
HAVE TERRAN EDWARDS WITH THE
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA
OUR BILL SPONSOR AND AMANDA
WILCOX WITH THE BRADY CAMPAIGN
TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE THANK
YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON TURN MEMBERS
TURNOVERS ON BEHALF OF THE
JUDICIAL COUNCIL.
WE WOULD LIKE TO FIRST THANK THE
ASSEMBLY MEMBER FOR CARRYING
THIS LEGISLATION ON OUR BEHALF.
AS THE ASSEMBLY MEMBER MENTIONED
AB TWENTY FIVE TWENTY SIX IS
MAINLY A CLARIFYING AND
STREAMLINING MEASURE.
IT JUST A PROCEDURE THAT IS
ALREADY PROVIDED UNDER EXISTING
LAW. SPECIFICALLY THE BILL WOULD
MAKE THE VERBAL PROCESS THAT IS
ALREADY USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT
TO OBTAIN THESE EMERGENCY GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS. THE
PRIMARY PROCEDURE.
AND IT WOULD ALSO SPECIFY THAT
WHEN A REQUEST IS MADE ORALLY
CERTAIN PROCEDURES WILL BE
FOLLOWED THAT ARE MORE ATTUNED
TO THE EMERGENCY SITUATION. SUCH
AS RECITING FACTS AND EVIDENCE
TO USUAL OFFICER. THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITHOUT AND
MEMORIALIZE THOSE STATEMENTS
THAT ARE MADE TO THE OFFICER ON
A DOCUMENT PROVED BY THE
REGIONAL COUNCIL.
UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY AND
THEN FILE THAT COPY OF THE
DOCUMENT WITH THE COURT AS SOON
AS POSSIBLE AFTER IT IS ISSUED.
THESE CHANGES RETAIN THE
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF THE
ORIGINAL STATUTE AND ALSO A LINE
AT THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE AS THE
MEMBER NOTED WITH WHAT PRACTICES
ARE BEING RELIED ON IN THE
FIELD.
TO ELIMINATE ANY CONFSION I'M
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ADDITIONAL WITNESSES AND
SUPPORT.
GOOD AFTERNOON AMANDA WILCOX ON
BEHALF OF THE TWENTY EIGHT
CALIFORNIA CHAPTERS OF THE BRADY
CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
I'M ALSO AUTHORIZED TO EXPRESS
THE SUPPORT. OF BAY AREA STUDENT
ACTIVISTS OTHER APPLICANT COULD
NOT BE HERE TODAY BECAUSE OF
THAT I'M RESCHEDULING OF THE
HEARING SIZE A VERY INVOLVED IN
THE INITIAL LAW AB TEN FOURTEEN
WHICH WAS SIGNED INTO LAW. IN
TWENTY FOURTEEN ARM AND I
REMEMBER VERY WELL THAT THE
INTENT OF THAT WALL WAS UP FOR
LAW ENFORCEMENT IN AN EMERGENCY
SITUATION WITH THE STANDARDS AS
NOTED WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO.
OF. CONTACTED JUDGE SAY A ONE
OR TWO AM AND.
GET THE WAR AND HAVE THE
ABILITY TO GO TO THE HOME AND
AND SEES THE GUN WHEN NECESSARY.
AND I JUST WANT TO EXPRESS WHAT
THE ALTERNATIVE IS IF. IF THAT
KID PROCEDURE CAN'T TAKE PLACE
WHICH IS EITHER THE PERSON WILL
MAY BE ARRESTED AND TAKEN TO
JAIL OR WHAT'S OFTEN THE CASE IN
THE SITUATIONS THEY BE TAKEN TO
THE HOSPITAL FOR FIFTY ONE FIFTY
EVALUATION. IF THAT PERSON WAS
FIFTY ONE FIFTY THEY WOULD LOSE
THEIR FIREARM RIGHTS FOR FIVE
YEARS WITHOUT ANY KIND OF
HEARING OUR PROCESS WHATSOEVER
SO I ACTUALLY WOULD. CONSIDER
THIS PROCESS FAR MORE BEN BUT
NINE AND ALSO JUST TO MAKE THE
POINT THAT THERE ARE MANY IN OUR
PEOPLE IN EMOTIONAL. CRISIS OR
WITH HEIGHTENED ANGER WHO WOULD
NOT QUALIFY FOR FIFTY ONE FIFTY
HOLE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE A
MENTAL HEALTH CONDITION BUT
CLEARLY THEY ARE DANGEROUS AND
THERE DOES NEED TO BE A WAY. TO
DISARM AND AT THE VERY WORST
THEY DO NOT HAVE THE GUN FOR
TWENTY ONE DAYS AND THEY WOULD
GET THE COME BACK. ON SO I THINK
THIS IS IMPORTANT LIFE SAVING
MEASURE AS I'VE SAID MANY TIMES
TO THIS COMMITTEE. THIS LAW I
BELIEVE COULD SAVE MY DAUGHTER'S
LIFE WAS KILLED BY SOMEONE WHO
IS CLEARLY DANGEROUS PEOPLE
AROUND HIM KNEW THAT BUT THERE'S
NO TOOL AT THAT TIME TO DISARM.
THIS IS TO MAKE THAT COME OUR
GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER
LAW WORK AS AND
TENDED AND MAY THINK
CLARIFICATION FOR THE COURTS OF
LAW ENFORCEMENT WHICH THEY ARE
SEEKING TO HALF. URGE YOUR
SUPPORT THANK YOU THANK YOU
ADDITIONAL WITNESSES AND
SUPPORT.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS STAND
PULLS OUT ON BEHALF THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. THIS WILL
JUST REMIND EXISTING LAW WE
THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA. THANK
YOU.
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS LEXI
HOWARD ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION
AND SUPPORT. THANK YOU NEXT
WITNESS.
REBECCA GONZALEZ NATIONALISTS
ACTUALLY HEAR SOMEHUNTER FOR
THE BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT
GUN VIOLENCE SACRAMENTO VALLEY
CHAPTER. IN Q..
GOOD AFTERNOON TO SHOWMUCH RB
HELP THE CALIFORNIA STATE
SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
IS THAT THE EXTENT OF OUR
WITNESSES AND SUPPORT WITNESSES
IN OPPOSITION.
HEARING NONE THE HEARING NONE.
CENTER STONE. THANK YOU ARE
MISTER CHAIR AND I JUST WANT TO.
PLOT AND.
SOME BEEN REVIEWED FOR BRINGING
THIS FORWARD AS A FORMER CITY
OFFICIAL AND COUNTY OFFICIAL THE
FIRST.
FINALITY IN THE CITY TO MACULAR
WAS A.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
RELATED CALL. AND.
WE ALL KNOW THAT THE THOSE
CALLS ARE SOME OF THE MOST
DANGEROUS THAT OUR PUBLIC SAFETY
OFFICERS HAVE TO RESPOND TO. AND
IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES
THINGS ESCALATE RATHER FAST. IN
THE SPECIAL CRIMES OF PASSION SO
YOU ARE GOING TO BASICALLY BE.
ABBREVIATING.
THE ACTION OF A JUDGE TO
HOPEFULLY.
DISARM SOMEONE THAT IS
POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS THAT THE
IN A MOMENT OF RAGE COULD CREATE
CREATE A LOT OF.
MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY AND SO.
THIS IS NOT A GUN RIGHTS ISSUE
THIS IS THE ARE THE RIGHT ISSUE
TO PROTECT A.
YOUNG WOMEN OLDER WOMEN YOUNG
MEN OLDER MEN.
FROM.
THE RAGE THAT SOMETIMES HAPPENS
AND AND RELATIONSHIPS AND SO.
I'M I'M DELIGHTED TO BOOK YOUR
BILL.
THERE. OKAY WE HAVE A MOTION BY
SENATOR STONE.
SOME WOMAN WOMAN RUBY WHICH
LIKE CLOSE I RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR YOUR IBOOK THANK YOU WE HAVE
A MOTION IT'S DO PASS TO
APPROPRIATIONS MADAM SECRETARY
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. ENTER
ANDERSON BRADFORD BAR BUT I
JACKSON MITCHELL. MITCHELL I
STONE STONE I WEINER.
THAT HAS TO GO TO LEAVE THE
WORLD OPEN AND VERY MUCH OKAY
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT NEXT UP WE
HAVE A SOME WOMEN REGGIE JONES
STORY ERROR AND WE HAVE A I ATE
ON THIRTEEN.
ALL YEAR ITEM TENANTS ARE TWENTY
FIVE THIRTY TWO.
THANK YOU.
MY ONLY RICH. I AM READY.
GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS AB TWENTY
FIVE THIRTY TWO WOULD ENSURE
THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAIN
INFRACTION FINDS. THE VALUE OF
ONE HOUR COMMUNITY SERVICE IS AT
LEAST DOUBLE. THE CALIFORNIA
MINIMUM WAGE FOR SMALL
BUSINESSES CALIFORNIA'S FINES
AND FEES ARE AMONG THE HIGHEST
IN THE NATION. AS AN EXAMPLE
DEBATES FINE FOR A RED LIGHT
VIOLATION IS ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
BUT AFTER PENALTIES AND
ASSESSMENT THE TOTAL COULD
AMOUNT TO OVER FOUR HUNDRED
NINETY DOLLARS. THESE LARGE FINE
AMOUNTS ARE BURDENSOME FOR LOW
INCOME INDIVIDUALS AND
DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECT PEOPLE
OF COLOR. AB TWENTY FIVE THIRTY
TWO WHAT REMEDY THIS BY
PROVIDING A UNIFORM RATE FOR
CONVERTING NFRACTION FIND EQUAL
TO NOLESS THAN DOUBLE THE
MINIMUM WAGE RATE FOR BUSINESSES
WITH FEWER THAN TWENTY FIVE
EMPLOYEES. BILL IS CONSISTENT
WITH A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA
IN HERE WITH ME TODAY TO TESTIFY
IS A REPRESENTATIVE. FROM THE
JUDICIAL COUNCIL SPONSORS OF THE
BILL MEMBERS I RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR YOUR IDOL.
MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS ANTI
LEVON BOMB REPRESENTING JUDICIAL
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA I THINK
ASSEMBLY MEMBER JOHN SAWYER SAID
IT ALL WE'RE LOOKING FOR
CONSISTENCY STATEWIDE WERE
LOOKING FOR A FAIR CALCULATION.
FOR THE VALUE OF AN HOUR OF
COMMUNITY SERVICE WE'D LIKE TO
SEE THAT. THAT ENACTED SO THAT
PEOPLE WHO ARE SERVING COMMUNITY
SERVICE IN LIEU OF PAYING A
FINE.
HAVE THE DIGNITY OF A REASONABLE
HOURLY CALCULATION.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER WITNESSES
IN SUPPORT.
REBECCA GONZALEZ NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
CALIFORNIA CHAPTER IS PART.
OSCAR BARBER WITH THE CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION IN
SUPPORT.
ANY OTHER. THIRTY WE HAVE ANY
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
ALL RIGHT.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE
DICE.
MOVE THE ARROW.
AT ITS CENTER SOON TO DO ONE IF
WE HAVE A MOTION BUT YOU MAY
STILL JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
HOW WILL THE COURT VERIFY THAT
THE COMMUNITY SERVICE IS IN FACT
A? DONE BECAUSE IT IS I MEAN
THIS COULD AFTER BE REPORTED
BACK TO THE COURT WHEN THE IS
UNDER CURRENT UNDER CURRENT
PRACTICE IN THE COURTS OF THE
ISSUE IS HELD OPEN UNTIL THE
VIOLATOR COMES BACK TO COURT
WITH A CERTIFICATE FROM USUALLY
THE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION WHERE
THE SERVICE HAS. BEEN DONE
SAYING THAT I HAVE COMPLETED MY
SERVICES ARE TIME CERTAIN THAT
THEY HAVE TO GET THE COMMUNITY
SERVICE IT WAS ON THE NUMBER OF
HOURS THAT THE JUDGE WILL LET
THE VIOLATOR KNOW HOW LONG SHE
OR HE HAS TO RETURN BEFORE A
JUDGMENT WOULD BE ENTERED
AGAINST HIM. OCCUR AND IT'S
USUALLY A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF
TIME YOU KNOW IF AS MR JONES
WERE POINTED OUT IF THE FINE IS.
FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND WE'RE
GOING TO DIVIDE THEM BY THEM
DOUBLE THE MINIMUM WAGE WHICH ON
THE FIRST OF JANUARY NEXT YEAR
WILL BE TWENTY TWO DOLLARS AN
HOUR.
IT'LL BE ELEVEN DOLLARS AN HOUR
ACCORDING TO THE BILL.
CALCULATION RIGHT.
THE CALCULATION WOULD BE AT
TWENTY TWO DOLLARS AN HOUR SO
WE'RE STILL LOOKING AT TWENTY
FIVE HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
A JUDICIAL OFFICER IS GOING TO
TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.
AND GIVE A VIOLATOR SEVERAL
MONTHS IF NOT MORE THEIR
OPPORTUNITIES TO EXTEND THAT IF
SOMEBODY HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO
COMPLETE IT SO NONE OF THAT IS
TOUCHED IN THE BILL REALLY THE
BILL IS JUST FOCUSING ON THE
CALCULATION. FOR AN HOUR OF
COMMUNITY SERVICE AT THIS MORE
DIGNIFIED AND THEN STATEWIDE
CONSISTENT RATE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE HAVE A MOTION I APPRECIATE
THE BILL AS A PERSON WHO. NEEDED
TO GET A JUDGE TO GIVE ME
COMMUNITY SERVICE AT ONE POINT
IN MY LIFE IN ORDER TO MAKE.
.
THE ABILITY TO PAY THOSE FINES
IT'S VERY NEEDED AND THE FACT
THAT THIS IS JUST CLARIFIES THE
LAW RATHER THAN STARTING A WHOLE
NEW.
JUST CLARIFIES THE IMPORTANT
ONE SO.
SENIOR WHETHER ADAM COMMENTS WE
WILL TAKE A ROLL CALL.
QUESTION IS DO YOU PASS TO
APPROPRIATION SCANNER. FIRED IN
ALLOW YOU TO CLOSE BUT I'M
SORRY.
SAID RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR
VOTE IN THANK YOU OKAY BYE INNER
EYE ANDERSON BRADFORD ARE
BRADFORD I JACKSON MITCHELL.
MITCHELL I STONE STONE I WINNER.
I WILL HOLD IT OPEN. IN THE.
YOU HAVE ANOTHER BILL YES I DO
OKAY GREAT GO AHEAD AB TWENTY
SIX SIXTY NINE TWO SIX SIX NINE.
GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS ON THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CHAIR. I
WILL BE TAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE
RIVER TO REMOVE THE PEACE
OFFICERS OF CORRECTIONAL SAFETY
SPECIAL SERVICES UNIT FROM BABY
TO SIX SIX NINE. AND ONLY AT THE
OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
WITHIN THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION. THE PENAL CODE
SIX THREE THREE. MUCH OF THE
EVIDENCE GATHERED BY THE OFFICE
OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS IT OBTAINED
WHILE UNDER COVER OR
HAPPENSTANCE BUT WHEN SUBMITTED
TO THE LOCAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY.
IS AFTER THE FACT AND NOT
PERMISSIBLE AS LEGAL EVIDENCE
BECAUSE THE SWORN PEACE OFFICERS
ARE NOT INCLUDED IN PENAL CODE
SIX THREE THREE. THE OFFICE OF
INTERNAL AFFAIRS ARE RESTRICTED
FROM USING THIS EVIDENCE BECAUSE
THEY NEED A LOCAL DISTRICT
ATTORNEY'S WARRANT PRIOR TO
GAINING. THE EVIDENCE WITH ME TO
TESTIFY TODAY IS FORD CANUTE AND
JOHN LEVEL OF THE CALIFORNIA
CORRECTIONAL SUPERVISORS
ORGANIZATION. MEMBERS I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR VOTE.
A GOOD AFTERNOON A GERMAN
SKINNER MY NAME IS FORD CANNOT
I'M WAS A CALIFORNIA
CORRECTIONAL SUPERVISORS
ORGANIZATION. WE REPRESENT.
MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS AND
DEPARTMENT STATE HOSPITALS AND
DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS.
.
HOW WE GOT HERE WE?
OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS.
USUALLY DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM
WITH THIS TYPE OF EVIDENCE
BEFORE A.
AB ONE OH NINE TOOK EFFECT AND
THEN NOSE PROP FIFTY SEVEN WHICH
KIND OF INCREASE THE WORKLOAD OF
ALL THE COUNTY PEACE OFFICERS
THAT THEY NORMALLY WOULD WORK
WITH. WHICH WOULD PUT HIM UNDER
THE UMBRELLA OF PENAL CODE SIX
THIRTY THREE BECAUSE THEY
WORKING IN TANDEM WITH. THE
LOCAL POLICE AGENCIES.
BECAUSE OF OF THE.
THE DEMAND ON THE LOCAL
PEACEOFFICERS.
THEY FIND THEMSELVES HAPPENED
TO.
STARTER CASES IN COMPLETE HIM
WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF THE
LOCAL OF PDAS OR POLICE OFFICERS
BECAUSE OF. OF.
THE TIME THAT.
A DEAD POLICE OFFICERS DON'T
HAVE THE.
LOCAL PEACE OFFICERS DON'T HAVE
THE TIME TO WORK WITH THEM AS
MUCH AS THEY USED TO.
HOW OUR ORGANIZATION IS LOOKING
FOR THIS TOOL TO MAKE OUR?
AGENCY BETTER AND AND HAVE MORE
COMPETENT OF INVESTIGATIONS AND
COMPLETE MORE OF CRIMINAL
PROSECUTIONS. THE OFFICE OF
INTERNAL AFFAIRS. IS OVERSEEING
OVER SIXTY THOUSAND STATE
EMPLOYEES. AND EVEN WAS ARE A
GREAT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS
ABILITIES. OF WE DO HAVE
CRIMINALS WHO WAS IN OUR OUR
AGENCY THAT EMBEZZLED DO ALL
TYPES OF THINGS. FILL UP. OUR
OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS ACT
REALLY NEEDS IS COOL TO BE A
BETTER PEACE OFFICER
ORGANIZATION FOR THE STATE.
HIRED RIVAL.
OTHER WITNESSES AND SUPPORT JOHN
LEVEL ASSOCIATION OF DEPUTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS CALIFORNIA
COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY POLICE
CHIEFS. CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION LOS ANGELES
COUNTY PROFESSIONAL PEACE
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ALL IN
SUPPORT.
THERE'S OTHER WITNESSES NOT.
TIFFANY MATTHEWS ON BEHALF OF
THE CALIFORNIA DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION AND
SUPPORT.
WELL I'M SURE DAN PHYLLIS AUTO
AND HAVE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
WE SHOW MUCH LARABEE HAVE THE
CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS
ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
RIGHT ANY WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
MILLIONS OF.
GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM CHAIR AND
MEMBERS KATHY SURE FOR THE ACLU
OF CALIFORNIA. IN THE FIFTY
YEARS SINCE PENAL CODE SECTION
SIX THIRTY THREE WAS ENACTED
THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL PREVIOUS
ATTEMPTS TO EXPAND ITS EXEMPTION
OF SPECIFIED PEACE OFFICERS TO
ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES OF
OFFICERS. THE ACLU HAS
CONSISTENTLY OPPOSED THESE
EFFORTS AS WORKING AGAINST THE
PRIVACY RIGHTS OF CALIFORNIANS
AND EACH TIME THE LEGISLATION
HAS EITHER FAILED PASSAGE OR
BEEN VETOED.
TODAY WE ARE BACK TO OPPOSE THIS
MOST RECENT EFFORT. FIFTY EIGHT
FOR FIFTY YEARS NOW THESE
OFFICERS AS WELL AS MANY OTHER
TYPES OF PEACE OFFICERS NOT
EXPRESSLY LISTED IN PENAL CODE
SECTION SIX THIRTY THREE. HAVE
BEEN OPERATING ON UNDER THE
RESTRICTIONS ON EAVESDROPPING
AND RECORDING OF CONVERSATIONS
THAT APPLY GENERALLY ACROSS THE
BOARD TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF
CALIFORNIANS. THEY'VE BEEN DOING
THEIR JOBS WITHOUT NEEDING TO
USE THE TYPES OF OVER HEARD A
RECORDED EVIDENCE THAT THEY NOW
SAY THEY MUST BE ABLE TO USE AND
I I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT OF
COURSE. THEY HAVE TOOLS AT THEIR
DISPOSAL THROUGH GETTING A
WARRANT ARM AND WORKING WITH
OTHER.
TYPES OF PEACE OFFICERS TO USE
THIS EVIDENCE THAT THEY WERE NOT
BLOCKED FROM USING IT THEY'RE
THEY'RE JUST. BLOCKED FROM
GETTING IT IN A PARTICULAR WAY
THAT THAT IS.
.
ARE COVERED.
WE THINK THE EVIDENCE OF FIFTY
YEARS OF PRACTICE SHOWS THAT THE
LEGISLATURE GOT IT RIGHT IN THE
FIRST PLACE IN TRIKING THE
BALANCE. TO REVISIT THAT BALANCE
NOW WILL SURELY LEAD TO EACH OF
THE KINDS OF PEACE OFFICERS NOW
NOT INCLUDED ASKING THAT THEY TO
BE ADDED.
AND IF THEY SUCCEED TO THE
PRIVACY RIGHTS OF CALIFORNIANS
WILL GRADUALLY BE ERODED. WE ASK
FOR YOUR NOVEL.
YOU'RE ON THE RIGHT.
OSCAR ROBBER WITH THE CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION WE
ARE ALSO IN OPPOSITION. OF WE
OPPOSE THIS LEGISLATION AND THAT
IT WOULD FUNCTION TO FURTHER
INVADE. THE PRIVACY OF THE
LIMITED PRIVACY OF INMATES IN.
THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND ANOTHER CORRECTIONAL
FACILITIES. A MORE SO THAN IT'S
ALREADY LIMITED. AND THAT WE
THINK IT'S BAD LEGISLATION.
VOICE OPPOSITION.
.
SO.
TROUBLE WITH THIS.
PARTICULAR BILL BECAUSE OF THE
ISSUES OF.
ARE THE LEGISLATURES HISTORY OF
NOT.
EXPANDING.
THIS PRACTICE TO OTHER.
PEACE OFFICERS.
AND THE.
BUT BECAUSE THE AUTHOR TOOK THE
AMENDMENT TO NARROW IT TO ONLY
THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICE
SERVERS AT CDC ARE.
.
I THOUGHT THE BILL WAS IMPROVED.
THERE'S ANY.
ANY MOTION.
YEAH.
RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION WOULD YOU
LIKE TO CLOSE. YES SOME.
YOU KNOW.
I WANT TO THANK THE CHAIR FOR
FOR NARROWING THE BILL I THINK
ANYTIME YOU HAVE FURTHER
SCRUTINY. OF THE FAR AS INTERNAL
AFFAIRS WITH WHAT'S GOING ON
WITH WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT IT
ONLY AIDS TO ENSURE. THAT
EVERYONE IS BEHAVING ABOVE THE
LAW AND SO I I. REALLY DO.
HE SHARED WITH TWO CHAIRS DONE
SO WE COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH
ENSURING THAT ARM. OF.
WHAT WE EXPECT FROM LAW
ENFORCEMENT I COME FROM LOS
ANGELES WHERE WE'VE HAD? SOME
UNFORTUNATE INCIDENTS WHERE LAW
ENFORCEMENT. OF WHAT'S NOT
BEHAVING PROPERLY AND I THINK
THIS IS A GOOD STEP BOB AND IN
DOING THAT AND USING TOOLS TO
ENSURE. THAT EVERYONE IS. ABOVE
BOARD.
RIGHT SO WE HAVE A MOTION.
LET'S TAKE ROLL CALL.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS AS AMENDED
TO THE FLOOR SCANNER.
BYE INNER EYE ANDERSON BRADFORD.
FOR I JACKSON MITCHELL.
THE TOWN.
WINNER.
ARE YOUR BILLS ON CALL DAY I'M
IN.
WILL I THINK THAT WAS YOUR
SECOND LAST SO. THANK YOU THANK
YOU OKAY. AND WILL NOW GO TO.
.
I BELIEVE THE NEXT AUTHOR THAT'S
HERE MR GLOW. MISS CONSOLES
LECTURE WAS IF WE GO IN AND FILE
ORDER. SO.
MS GONZALEZ FLETCHER WE WILL NOW
GO DO YOUR FIRST BILL AB FIFTEEN
EIGHTY FOUR.
LOW.
OKAY.
ALRIGHT.
THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR AND
MEMBERS.
CURRENT LAW UNDER PROPOSITION
SIXTY NINE SPECIFICALLY LIMITS
COLLECTION OF DNA SAMPLES FROM
MINORS TO ONLY WHEN THEY'VE BEEN
CONVICTED OF CERTAIN SPECIFIED
CRIMES SUCH AS A SEX OFFENSE OR
A FELONY. HOWEVER THE
PROPOSITION ALSO CREATED A LEGAL
LOOPHOLE WHERE SAMPLES WHICH ARE
ONLY SUBMITTED TO A LOCAL
DATABASE BUT NOT THE DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO
THE SAME STANDARDS. AND
PRACTICES IS ALLOWED LAW
ENFORCEMENT TO BROADEN THEIR
SCOPE OF THOSE ELIGIBLE FOR
COLLECTION OF DNA SAMPLES. FOR
INSTANCE IN SAN DIEGO THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT CURRENTLY COLLECT
SAMPLES FOR INVESTIGATIVE
PURPOSES SIMPLY BASED ON A
SIGNED CONSENT FORM. FROM THE
MINOR WHICH IS USED FOR BOTH
MINORS AND ADULTS.
POLICE DEPARTMENTS ARE
COLLECTING DNA FROM KIDS WITHOUT
ANY LEGAL PROCESS WITHOUT THEIR
PARENTS KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT.
NOT ONLY DOES THIS VIOLATE THE
INTENT OF PROPOSITION SIXTY NINE
IS ALSO IN REASONABLE TO ASSUME
THAT WHEN POLICE ARE DETAINING
KIDS WERE SCARED AND CONFUSED
THAT THESE KIDS ARE CAPABLE OF
GIVING INFORMED CONSENT.
MAYBE FIFTEEN EIGHTY FOUR WILL
HELP PROTECT MINERS AND
STRENGTHEN THE INTENT. A PROP
SIXTY NINES LIMITATIONS ON DNA
COLLECTION BY MANDATING THAT IN
ORDER TO COLLECT A SAMPLE FROM A
MINOR WHICH IS NOT ALREADY
MANDATED BY LAW LAW ENFORCEMENT
MIGHT MESS EITHER.
HAVE A COURT ORDER SEARCH
WARRANT OR THE CONSENT OF BOTH
THE MINOR THE MINOR'S PARENT OR
LEGAL GUARDIAN WITH ME TODAY TO
SPEAK IN SUPPORT.
IS.
PARTIES. ACUTELY WHAT THE ACLU.
THANK YOU GO AHEAD THANK YOU
GOOD MORNING CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF
THE COMMITTEE MY NAME IS PART OF
SECURELY I'M A SENIOR STAFF
ATTORNEY WITH THE ACLU OF SAN
DIEGO IMPERIAL COUNTIES. I'M
HERE WITH A SILLY CALIFORNIANS
SUPPORT OF A BEEF FIFTEEN EIGHTY
FOUR AN UNCONTROVERSIAL MEASURE
THAT ACCOMPLICES TO COMMON SENSE
GOALS. FIRST. PREVENTS CHILDREN
FROM MAKING THE LIFE ALTERING
DECISION OF GIVING POLICE
UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THEIR
GENETIC CODE. IN PERPETUITY
WITHOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF THEIR
PARENT.
STUDY AFTER STUDY HAS CONFIRMED
THE COMMON SENSE WHAT COMMON
SENSE ALREADY TELLS US. PARENTAL
INVOLVEMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO
ENSURING POSITIVE OUTCOMES FOR
CHILDREN. HERE WITHOUT A B.
FIFTEEN EIGHTY FOURTH
PERMISSIBLE FOR POLICE TO TRY TO
CONVINCE CHILDREN.
TO HAND OVER THEIR DNA FOREVER
WITHOUT ASKING THAT TELLS
PARENTS MUCH LESS A LAWYER OR A
JUDGE. IF IT'S OKAY WITHOUT A B.
FIFTEEN FORTS LAWFUL FOR
DEPARTMENTS LIKE THE S. CPD. TO
HAVE EXPLICIT POLICIES WRITTEN.
JUNIOR OFFICERS TO DO JUST THAT.
BILL DOES NOT MAKE IT HARD FOR
POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB. IF
THERE'S REALLY INVESTIGATED ME
FOR TAKING A CHILD'S DNA. POLICE
SHOULD BE ASKING A CHILD FOR
THEIR PERMISSION THEY SHOULD BE
ASKING A JUDGE IMPROVING IS
PROBABLE CAUSE TO TAKE IT.
DNA ISN'T GOING ANYWHERE THERE'S
NO RUSH.
IF THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TO GO
TO A JUDGE OR FOR SOME REASON
DON'T WANT TO AT THE VERY LEAST
THEY SHOULD BE INVOLVING A
PARENT IN THE DECISION. NOT
WORKING IN SECRET FROM THEM. AB
FIFTY FOUR REQUIRES POLICE
DEPARTMENT PARENTS AND IT PUTS
PARENTS WHERE THEY BELONG
PROTECTING THEIR CHILDREN.
SECOND BRIEFLY IT PUTS IMPORT
LIMIT ON THE GROWING USE OF ON
REGULATED LOCAL DNA DATABASES.
SIDESTEP IT CITES THE CAREFULLY
CRAFTED RULES FOR THE STATEWIDE
DNA DATABASE. BY LIMITING THE
STORAGE OF JUVENILE DNA DATA IN
THESE UNREGULATED DATABASES
MAYBE FIFTEEN FOR FIFTEEN EIGHTY
FOUR PROVIDES CRITICAL
PROTECTION TO YOUTH OF COLOR. BY
ELIMINATING INCENTIVES FOR THE
INCREASING PHENOMENON OF
STOPPING SPIT POLICE ENCOUNTERS.
WE HAVE NOT YET LEARNED THE
RACIAL MAKEUP OF SDP'S LOCAL DNA
DATABASES THAT AS A DATA POINT
THEY HAVE CARTED FIERCELY. BUT
GIVEN WHAT WE ARE LEARNING ABOUT
THE FREQUENCY OF POLICE STOPS OF
BLACK AND LATINO YOUTH.
IT WOULD NOT BE STALKING TOWARD
THE DISPROPORTION CLUED
SPECULATIVE YOUTH WHICH MEANS.
MORE FREQUENT DNA SEARCHES OF
BLACK AND LATINO YOUTH.
MORE SEARCHES EQUALS MORE HITS
INCLUDING FAMILIAL PARCEL HITS.
IN THECYCLE CONTINUES ON THINK
ASSEMBLY MEMBER GAUNT CONSULTS
FLETCHER FOR INTRODUCING THIS
BILL. ADDRESS A GROWING PROBLEM
FOR IT TAKES HOLD.
THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME TO
CONSIDERATION TO.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES AND SUPPORT
CAN SPEAK AT THAT MIGHT.
IF YOU'RE JUST GO AHEAD. THIS ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION WORDS OR.
GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME IS JAMIE
WILSON AND I CAME HERE FROM
SOUTHEASTERN THEIR OWN SUPPORT
OF AB ONE FIVE EIGHT FOUR.
BEFORE ANYTHING ON I THINK THE
ACLU FOR RELENTLESSLY TAKING ON
THIS BIZARRE AND INTENTIONAL
LOOPHOLE THAT WAS CREATED IN SAN
DIEGO AND ALSO THE RAIN IT
INVOLVES FLETCHER. FOR PERSON SO
HARD TO GET THIS BILL PASSED.
IT'S CRAZY TO THINK THAT A GROUP
OF KIDS WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD
CAN GO TO A PARK AFTER SCHOOL.
BASKETBALL AND BY THE TIME THEY
RETURNED HOME TO THEIR FAMILIES
IN THE EVENING THEIR DNA HAS
BEEN STORED IN A SECRET LOCAL
DATABASE. AND THEIR FAMILIES
HAVE NO IDEA THIS IS EXACTLY
WHAT HAPPENED TO ONE OF MY SONS
AND HIS FOUR FRIENDS ALL AGES
FOURTEEN FIFTEEN AND SIXTEEN AND
MARCH OF TWENTY SIXTEEN.
WITHOUT A PHONE CALL HOME. TO
ANY PARENT BEFORE DURING OR
AFTER WITHOUT EVEN READING THESE
CHILDREN THE CONSENT FORM THAT
WAS PUSHED IN FRONT OF THEM. STP
D. BULLIED AND COURSE FIVE HAND
CUFFS KIDS INTO SIGNING AWAY
THEIR DNA AND OPENING THEIR
MOUTHS TO BE SWAPPED AT A PARK
IN THE MIDDLE OF THE AFTERNOON.
DNA IS CONFUSING BEYOND
COMPREHENSION TO MOST ADULTS.
IT'S NOT REASONABLE TO THINK
THAT A CHILD BY THE AGE OF
FOURTEEN FIFTEEN. AND SIXTEEN
HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO UNDERSTAND
AND RETAINED ENOUGH INFORMATION
ABOUT DNA TO BE CONSIDERED
CAPABLE OF CONSENTING TO GIVING
THERE'S THAT TAKE PLACE. AND
SOME SECRET DATABASE UNTIL THE
END OF TIME.
MY SON THAT WAS FOGGED IN TWENTY
SIXTEEN IS NOT MY ONLY CHILD I
HAVE OTHER CHILDREN ALSO WITHOUT
ANY CRIMINAL RECORD. THAT SHARE
THE SAME DNA.
WHEN THE F. SAN DIEGO POLICE
DEPARTMENT ASK MY MINOR CHILD TO
FIND HIS DNA INTO DATABASE THEY
ALSO TOOK MY DNA. AND MY OTHER
CHILDREN DNA TO A CHILD IS NOT
CAPABLE OF MAKING THAT TYPE OF A
DECISION NOR SHOULD THEY BE
ALLOWED TO.
IT'S BEYOND ME.
BY A POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD GO
AROUND STATE POLICY TO VIOLATE
THE MOST VULNERABLE PEOPLE IN
SOCIETY. IT'S BEYOND ME WHY THIS
ISSUE WAS BROUGHT INTO THE LIGHT
OVER TWO YEARS AGO AND STILL
HAVEN'T BEEN SHUT DOWN. AS WE
SIT HERE TODAY THIS PRACTICE IS
STILL ACTIVE IN SAN DIEGO JUST
LAST WEEK A FRIEND CALLED TO
TELL ME IT'S HAPPENING TO
ANOTHER CHILD TO.
TODAY I'M ASKING YOU TO PASS
THIS BILL AND PUT INTO EFFECT IN
THE MOST URGENT FASHION
POSSIBLE.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR. TESTIMONY.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER WITNESSES
WHO WANT TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF
THE BILL.
THE BILL AS WE GOT A MOTION TO
WANT TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
SEEING NO WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION IS THERE ANY COMMENT
FROM THE DIET.
RIGHT NOW I'M. SIMPLY MEMBER
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE. I JUST
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR MY.
GREAT.
WE WILL TAKE A ROLL CALL.
MOTION IS TO PASS TO THE FLOOR
SKINNER HIGH INNER EYE ANDERSON.
BRADFORD. BRADFORD I JACKSON
MITCHELL MITCHELL ICE DOWN. DOWN
I WINNER.
ALRIGHT THAT BILL WE WILL.
KEEP IT ON CALL BECAUSE WE HAVE
A COUPLE MISSING MEMBERS BUT WE
ALLOW YOU TO. GET YOUR NEXT
BILL.
AB IN NINETEEN OH THREE.
THANK YOU AB NINETEEN OH THREE
IS A SIMPLE BILL.
THAT WOULD SAY IF WE'RE GOING
TO ALLOW FOR GUN BUY BACK
PROGRAMS WHICH CAN BE VERY
SUCCESSFUL.
THAT THE MONEY THAT THE GIFT
CARDS THAT ARE GIVEN OUT IN THIS
HAPPEN IN MY DISTRICT JUST
RECENTLY. ARE ARE NOT GIVEN TO
RETAILERS A POSSESSIVE FIREARMS
OR AMMUNITION DEALERS LICENSE IT
SEEMS CLEAR THAT WITH WHAT WE'RE
TRYING TO DO IS GET GUNS OFF THE
STREETS THAT WE SHOULDN'T BE
THAN ENCOURAGING PEOPLE WHO ARE
TURNING AN OLDER MAYBE. I'M
DYSFUNCTION IT GUNS TO TO GO OUT
AND BUY NEW ONES SO I RESPECT
LAST NIGHT ABOUT.
RIGHT NOW THE CALIFORNIA
FEDERATION OF TEACHERS WERE A
STRONG SUPPORT.
RIGHT. NOT.
WE'LL BE ABLE.
YEAH.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE CRACK DEALERS ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION FEDERAL FIREARMS
LICENSEES AS WELL AS FARMS
POLICY COALITION. WE HAVE KIND
OF A DOUBLE ISSUES WITH THIS
PARTICULAR MEASURE FIRST AND
FOREMOST IT'S A MEASURE THAT
DISCRIMINATE GATE DISCRIMINATES
AGAINST. LAW ABIDING BUSINESSES
THAT HAVE THAT HAVE DECIDED TO
STEP THROUGH ALL SORTS OF LEGAL
HOOPS IN ORDER TO. COMPLY WITH
CALIFORNIA'S VERY COMPLEX
FIREARMS LAW WHEN IT COMES TO
DEALING WITH FIREARMS AND NOW
AMMUNITION. EVEN THE AND BY THE
WAY THE THE RETAILER THAT.
THAT STAT WHOSE.
.
WHO'S OF GIFT CARDS WERE
ACTUALLY HANDED OUT AS A PART OF
THIS GUN BUY BACK PROGRAM NUMBER
ONE DO NOT SELL FIREARMS IN THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. IN NUMBER
TWO AS OF RECENTLY.
INMANY CASES DOES NOT EVEN
SELL AMMUNITION CURRENTLY IN THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT WOULD
BE WELL MARK.
BUT THESE ARE ONCE AGAIN THESE
ARE BUSINESSES WHO STEP WE'VE
GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY IN ORDER
TO. COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA'S
COMPLEX LAWS AND THEY'RE BEING
DISCRIMINATED AGAINST FOR. A
WHILE FOR FACILITATING IN THE IN
A CONSTANT PROCESS FOR.
FACILITATING THE EXERCISE OF A
CONSTITUTIONALLY
CONSTITUTIONALLY ENUMERATED
RIGHT. THE OTHER ISSUE THAT WE
HAVE HERE IS QUITE HONESTLY WITH
THE ISSUE OF GUN BUYBACKS
ENGENDER A JUDGE IN IN GENERAL
AND THAT IS THE FACT THAT IT IS
THE IT IS A A WAY IN WHICH.
CRIMINALS CAN DISPERSE OF.
FIREARMS THAT ARE USED IN THE
COMMISSION OF CRIMES AS THEY
WALK UP TO ANY CITY OR COUNTY OR
WHOEVER'S IN A DOING ONE OF
THESE GUN BUYBACKS AND NO
QUESTIONS NO QUESTIONS ASKED
THEY ARE ABLE TO. HAND OVER
POTENTIAL EVIDENCE OF CRIMES
THAT ARE COMMITTED IN OUR
COMMUNITIES. I THINK THAT
WE WOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE TAX
DOLLARS GO TO SUPPORT ANYTHING
LIKE THAT SO I WOULD LIKE TO
THINK THAT WE WOULD WANT TO
HAVE.
ANY TAX DOLLARS GOING TO ANY GUN
BUY BACK PROGRAM LET ALONE TO
GIVE CARDS IN THOSE FOR IN
THOSE.
IN THESE PROGRAMS IN ORDER TO
HELPPEOPLE FACILITATE. GETTING
RID OF EVIDENCE OF A CRIME IS
FOR THESE REASONS THAT WE OPPOSE
THIS MEASURE THANK YOU.
THE OTHER WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
RIGHT ANY COMMENTS FROM THE
DICE.
US A RETAILER SELLS AMMUNITION
OR
GUNS IN THIS STATE IF THEY SELL
ONLINE AND IF THE PERSON'S
LEGALLY ABLE TO BUY THEY CAN
CERTAINLY JUST USE A GIFT CARD
EVEN ONLINE SO. I I THINK THAT'S
A GOOD LEUPOLD CLOTHES. AND.
WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
GOLDSTAR YOU DID MOVE IT
APOLOGIES YES YOU DID. CENTER
RITUAL MY APOLOGIES WOULD YOU
LIKE TO CLOSE THEM REMEMBER
THINK I JUST WANNA. REMIND FOLKS
THAT THIS ISN'T WHETHER OR NOT
WE APPROVE OF SOMETHING THAT
GOES ON I MEAN CAN BUY BACK
PROGRAMS GO ON AND. AND WE WE
CAN HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS
ABOUT THAT BUT LIKE YOU SAID
IT'S A STRAIGHTFORWARD BILL THAT
SAYS BASICALLY.
AND RETAILERS EVERY YEAR SEEM
TO BE CHANGING WHETHER OR NOT.
TEY'RE SELLING GUNS OR
AMMUNITION IN THE STATE BECAUSE
OF PUBLIC PRESSURE THIS IS JUST
ANOTHER WAY TO ENSURE. THAT WE
CONTINUE TO KEEP GUNS AND
AMMUNITION OFF OF OUR STREETS
SO.
RESPECT LAST NIGHT ABOUT THREE
ROLL CALL.
MOTION IS TO PASS TWO
APPROPRIATION SCANNER RIGHT IN
OUR I ANDERSON BRADFORD.
BRADFORD I JACKSON MITCHELL
MITCHELL ICE DOWN. DOWN NO
WINNER.
DON'T CALL YOUR ONE REMAINING
BILL WHICH IS AB TWENTY EIGHT
SIXTY SEVEN.
THANK YOU AND THAT'S SAD IS IT'S
PRETTY SIMPLE IT'S CLOSING A
LOOPHOLE. EIGHT A BILL THAT I
DID PREVIOUSLY AB EIGHT THIRTEEN
WHICH WAS POST CONVICTION
RELIEF.
TO ALLOW FOR CALIFORNIANS WHO.
WERE EITHER FACTUALLY INNOCENT
OR HAD BEEN MISINFORMED OR THE
RIGHTS TO BE ABLE TO VACATE A
CONVICTION OUT WE WANT TO ENSURE
THAT IT'S BEING.
ADMINISTERED EQUALLY OF BY ALL
JUDGES AND I THINK WHAT IT IT'S
A PRETTY SIMPLE CLEAN UP BILL
AND I RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR MY
ABOUT.
WITNESS IN SUPPORT I ENGRAM A
SILLY OF CALIFORNIA CO SPONSOR
OF THIS BILL AND ITS PREDECESSOR
THIS BILL HAS BEEN A CRITICAL
LEGAL VEHICLE FOR CITIZENS AND
NON CITIZENS ALIKE TO CHALLENGE
OLD AND LEGALLY INVALID
CONVICTIONS. SENSES LAWS GOING
INTO EFFECT FOR EXAMPLE DURING
CRABTREE A US CITIZEN FROM BUTTE
COUNTY WAS ABLE TO RAISE AN OLD
CONVICTION.
BECAUSE HE WAS ABLE TO PROVE TO
THE JUDGE AND THE DA THAT HE WAS
FACTUALLY INNOCENT OF THE CRIME
THAT HE SERVED NINE YEARS IN
PRISON FAR. I'M IN ANOTHER
EXAMPLE JULIE I REMEMBER AS A
GREEN CALLED GREEN CARD HOLDER
AND MOTHER OF TWO WAS ABLE TO
VACATE HER CONSTITUTIONALLY
DEFICIENT CONVICTION. SIMPLY TO
A NEW OFFENSE THAT DID NOT
RENDER HER TO PORTABLE AND IT'S
ACTUALLY ALLOWED HER TO GO ON TO
OBTAIN US CITIZENSHIP. THESE ARE
JUST TWO OF THE HUNDREDS OF
SUCCESS STORIES WITH THE SPELL
BUT WHAT WE'VE SEEN IS THAT
THERE'S BEEN INCONSISTENT
IMPLEMENTATION THROUGHOUT THE
STATES OF THE SIMPLE CLEAN UP
EFFORT ONE SURE THAT THE
LEGISLATURE. LEGISLATIVE INTENT
OF THE REGIONAL BELLS FULLY
REALIZED THIS ONE SURE THAT
PEOPLE LIKE JOSE UNITE HERE
MEMBER AND A GREEN CARD HOLDER
OF THREE DECADES DOES NOT HAVE
TO ACTUALLY PUT HIMSELF INTO
DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS. IN
ORDER TO CLEAR AN OLD CONVICTION
AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR
EYES OUT.
THANK YOU OTHER WITNESSES AND
SUPPORT. YOU CAN GET TO THE
MIKE.
ENOUGH HERNANDEZ ON BEHALF THE
CALIFORNIA TRANSFER CRIMINAL
JUSTICE STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION
COME OFFENSE ATTORNEYS WE ARE CO
SPONSOR OF THE ORIGINAL BILL AND
THIS MEASURE ASK FOR SUPPORT.
HE NOTICED OVER WITH A
CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY
CENTER IN STRONG SUPPORT.
IN GERMANY AND WITH ASIAN
AMERICANS ARE GETTING JUSTICE A
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORT.
BECAUSE OUR SENSE OF THE CHURCH
OF THE COLORS IMMIGRANT RIGHTS
AND STRONG SUPPORT.
OSCAR BARBARA ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC DEFENDERS
ASSOCIATION WE WERE ALSO THE
INITIAL CO SPONSORS OF THE
ORIGINAL BILL.
WE BELIEVE THIS BILL WOULD ALLOW
PEOPLE WHO ARE NO LONGER IN
CUSTODY. FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES TO
CHALLENGE LEGALLY INVALID
CONVICTIONS SOUDER FAILURE TO
PROPERLY ADVISE OF IMMIGRATION
CONSEQUENCES.
MANY OF OUR FORMER CLIENTS ARE
FACING DEPORTATION. AND
DRACONIAN CONSEQUENCES THE TEAR
THEIR FAMILIES APART AND LEAVE
THEIR COMMUNITIES IN FEAR.
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REASONS
WHY CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS MAY NOT
HAVE UNDERSTOOD. OR BEEN ABLE TO
DEFEND AGAINST SIR EXCEPT THE
IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF A
PLEA.
THESE INDIVIDUALS SHOULD BE
ALLOWED TO VACATE THEIR
CONVICTIONS BECAUSE SHOULDN'T BE
ALLOWED. TO SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO
VACATE THEIR CONVICTION SORRY
BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T TOLD.
THAT THEY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT
THEY WERE DOING FOR EXAMPLE MANY
MISTER BEATER DEFENDANTS WHEN
THEY COME INTO COURT FOR THE
FIRST TIME. ARE ASKED TO PLEAD
GUILTY OUGHT TO MINOR DRUG
OFFENSES OR TO DIY CONVICTIONS
IN ORDER TO BE RELEASED FROM
CUSTODY WITHOUT AN EXPLANATION A
PROPER THOROUGH EXPLANATION. OF
CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR PLAY.
ADDITIONALLY DEFENDANTS HAVE
BEEN NOT PROVIDED WITH
INTERPRETERS BECAUSE
INTERPRETERS WEREN'T AVAILABLE
AND OFTEN. SAY YES TO A GUILTY
PLEA WITHOUT THE IMMIGRATION
CONSEQUENCES BEING MADE CLEAR.
THIS UP CLEANUP BILL REALLY DOES
NOT MAKE DRAMATIC CHANGES TO THE
EXISTING BUILDERS FIXES PROBLEMS
HAS BEEN STATED EARLIER. AND WE
ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE. PASSAGE
OF THIS LEGISLATION THANK YOU
THANK YOU.
REBECCA GONZALEZ NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
CALIFORNIA CHAPTER IN SPORT.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES IN SUPPORT
ANY WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE I DO
WANT TO SAY THAT I ACCEPT THE
COMMITTEE'S AMENDMENTS AND I
RESPECT LAST NIGHT AT.
ALRIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION AND
WOULD TAKE A ROLL CALL.
AND IS DO WE HAVE THIS AND IS
AMENDED YET AS TO THE FLOOR.
SKINNER RIGHT IN OUR I ANDERSON
BRADFORD MARK BRADFORD I JACKSON
MITCHELL. MITCHELL ICE DOWN
STONE NOW WINNER.
THANK YOU ASSEMBLYMEMBER.
LET'S. THANK YOU WE WILL.
YOUR BILLS OR A COUPLE OF MY
CALLS SO WOULD LET THE OTHER
MEMBERS AD. AND WE WILL DO THE
CONSENT CALENDAR.
TWO I HAVE A MOTION CONSENT.
SKINNER RIGHT IN OUR I ANDERSON
BRADFORD BRADFORD I JACKSON
MITCHELL. MITCHELL ICE DOWN DOWN
I WINNER.
NOW WE WILL GO TO SOME REMEMBER
OVER NINETY.
USUALLY THEY'RE REALLY WARM
GETS.
THE EARLY BIRD GETS THE WORM BUT
UNFORTUNATELY IN THIS CASE FOR
YOU GO AHEAD. THANK YOU MADAM
CHAIR TWENTY FIVE NINETY FIVE.
THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR AND
MEMBERS.
SECTION SEVEN THIRTY ONE OF THE
WELFARE INSTITUTIONS CODE
GOVERNS THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN.
THE CALIFORNIA COURT SYSTEM AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE
JUSTICE.
IN PARTICULAR THIS CODE SECTION
SETS MAXIMUM TERMS OF
CONFINEMENT FOR JUVENILES IN THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.
HOWEVER BECAUSE OF THE
COMPLEXITY OF THE LANGUAGE IN
THIS CODE SECTION SOME CONFUSION
HAS ARISEN. ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT HAS
PULLED OVER THE TERM OF
CONFINEMENT AND ALSO AND MORE
IMPORTANTLY OVER THE CONDITIONS
OF RELEASE IN THE SUPERVISION OF
THE JUVENILE AFTER RELEASE SO%
THIS BILL. MAYBE TWENTY FIVE
NINETY FIVE WOULD CLARIFY THAT
THE COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION
OVER THAT JUVENILE AND IN
PARTICULAR OVER THE SUPERVISION
OF THAT JUVENILE.
POST RELEASE ALSO THIS BILL
WILL CLEAN UP SOME SOME BAD
COULD REFERENCES WITHIN THAT
SECTION. MADAM CHAIR I'D LIKE TO
THANK YOU AND YOUR STAFF FOR
WORKING WITH ME ON THE BILL AND
IN PARTICULAR LIKE TO COMMIT TO
TAKING THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS
ALL READ THEM FOR THE RECORD. IN
SECTION SEE OF THE BILL WERE
CHANGING MAY TWO. SHALL SET A
MAXIMUM TERM. AND WE'RE CHANGING
NECESSARY TO. END HAS DEEMED
APPROPRIATE AND EVERYONE SHOULD
HAVE A MOCK UP OF THOSE ARE IN
CONTACT LENS PART OF YOU. WITH
ME TO TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE
BILL IS LARRY DOYLE FROM THE
COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA.
BAR ASSOCIATIONS.
THANK YOU MAY PROCEED. REPRIMAND
TURN MEMBERS LAREDO WITH AND
HAVE TO CONFISCATE.
ASSOCIATIONS SOME REMEMBER OVER
NOLTE IS.
.
PRETTY MUCH COVERED THE
WATERFRONT AS FAR AS THE.
PROVISIONS OF THE BILL OF THE
INTENT OF THREE B. TWENTY FIVE
NINETY FIVE.
TO CLARIFY THE POWER.
WITH THE COURT TO LIMIT THE
COMMITMENT TO JJJ IN ALL CASES.
FOUR NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE
REHABILITATION WHICH IS
SOMETHING ALREADY WITHIN THE
COURT'S JURISDICTIONAL POWERS.
BUT WHICH IS MADE ON CLEAR BY
THE. CURRENT LANGUAGE OF THIS
CODE SECTION AND BUYS. OF THE
PRESENCE OF SOME COURTS TO
ACCEPT THAT POWER. ALARM IN
PARTICULAR THE BILL. WE'RE
BUILDING FOR THE BILL AROSE TO
PREVENT UNJUST OUTCOMES
INTERNATIONAL COMMITMENTS WERE
DJJ IS THE ONLY DISPOSITIONAL
TOOL AVAILABLE. TO THE AGE OF
THE YOUTH ANOTHER THE OFFENSE OF
THE YOUTH. ARE APPROPRIATE FOR A
LENGTHY COMMITMENT. SO. THIS IS
A GOOD BILL WHICH WILL COME IN
TO HELP ACHIEVE JUSTICE AND WE
ASKED FOR AND I VOTE.
THANK YOU ANY OTHER WITNESSES
AND SUPPORT.
LEXIE HOWARD ON BEHALF OF THE
JUVENILE COURT JUDGES OF
CALIFORNIA SECTION OF THE
CALIFORNIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION
WITH LATE SUPPORT THANK YOU FOR.
ANY OTHERS.
MANY IN OPPOSITION.
SEEING NONE WE GOT A MOTION ON
THE BILL.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE.
COLLEAGUES THIS IS COMMON SENSE
LEGISLATION I RESPECTFULLY
REQUEST DRIVE OUT.
RIGHT WITHOUT.
COMMENT ON THE DIETS WE WILL
TAKE A LOCAL.
QUESTION IS DO PASS AS AMENDED
TO THE FLOOR SKINNER HIGH IN OUR
I ANDERSON BRADFORD. BRADFORD I
JACKSON MITCHELL DOWN. DOWN I
WINNER.
DON'T. AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AND WE WILL NOW GO TO ASSEMBLY
MEMBER GLORIA WHO JUST WALKED IN
THE ROOM.
AB TWENTY ONE OH THREE YES
WHAT'S THE SECRET OF COMEDY.
OFF TO.
HI SENATOR CORKY.
I APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE VERY
HAPPY. ALL YES YOU ARE ARE
THAT'S WHAT.
PLEASE PROCEED THANK YOU
SENATOR.
AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE I
BRING BEFORE YOU TODAY AB TWENTY
ONE OH THREE COMMONSENSE
LEGISLATION TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM
STANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUALS
WISHING TO CARRY. A LOADED
CONCEALED WEAPON IN CALIFORNIA
UNDER CURRENT LAW A PERSON WHO
HAS NEVER EVEN FIRED A GUN OR
SEE PROPER TRAINING ON HOW TO
HANDLE ONE SAFELY. CAN RECEIVE A
CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT FROM
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS AND CARRY A
LOADED FIREARM IN PUBLIC.
I BELIEVE THAT THIS PUTS THE
PUBLIC SAFETY IN JEOPARDY AS
THESE DEADLY WEAPONS COULD END
UP IN THE WRONG HANDS OR
UNTRAINED HANDS. TO ADDRESS THIS
ISSUE AB TWENTY ONE OH THREE
ESTABLISHES SOME COMMON SENSE
STANDARDS FOR CONCEALED CARRY
APPLICANTS. FIRST THIS BILL
WOULD REQUIRE ALL TRAINING
COURSES CURRENTLY REQUIRED
CONFER CONCEALED WEAPON FOR AT
LEAST LICENSES TO BE AT LEAST
EIGHT HOURS IN LENGTH. THEY ARE
CURRENTLY IN ESTABLISHES A
MAXIMUM OF SIXTEEN HOURS FOR
TRAINING COURSES BUT THERE IS
CURRENTLY NO MINIMUM IN
CALIFORNIA WE BELIEVE IT'S EIGHT
HOUR MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IS
CONSISTENT WITH WHAT MANY
LICENSING AUTHORITIES ACROSS
CALIFORNIA ALREADY REQUIRE. A
CONCEALED CARRY LICENSE FEES.
SECONDLY THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE
CONCEALED CARRY APPLICANTS TO
DEMONSTRATE. SAFE HANDLING
PROFICIENCY ON THE FIRING RANGE
AGAIN WITH THIS PROVISION WE ARE
CODIFIED BEST PRACTICES DRAWING
HEAVILY FROM WHAT LOCAL
LICENSING AUTHORITIES GENERALLY
REQUIRE OF TRAINING PROGRAMS.
HOWEVER IN THIS CASE WE ARE WELL
AWARE OF AT LEAST ONE LICENSING
AUTHORITY THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE
ANY LIVE FIRE TRAINING. IN MY
MIND THAT'S THE IDEA THAT A
PERSON CAN CARRY A CONCEALED
WEAPON LOADED WEAPON IN PUBLIC
WITHOUT DEMONSTRATING
PROFICIENCY IS A RECIPE FOR
TRAGEDY.
LASTLY THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITIES TO
DEVELOP SPECIFIC LIVE FIRE
PROFICIENCY STANDARDS TO MAKE
SURE THAT THOSE STANDARDS ARE
AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC WE
BELIEVE THIS PROVISION IS
IMPORTANT TO ENSURE RIGOROUS
UNIFORM STANDARDS. AMONG
TRAINING PROGRAMS MAINTAIN WHILE
MAINTAINING LOCAL CONTROL. TO
PUT THIS BILL IN PERSPECTIVE.
MADAM CHAIR CALIFORNIA REQUIRES
APPLICANTS FOR DRIVERS LICENSES
TO DEMONSTRATE BEHIND THE WHEEL
PROFICIENCY OF A VEHICLE BEFORE
THE DMV WILL ISSUE THEM A
DRIVER'S LICENSE. YES STATE LAW
FAILS TO PRESCRIBE SIMILAR
REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCEALED CARRY
WEAPONS LICENSES THAT'S WHAT AB
TWENTY ONE A THREE SEEKS TO
REMEDY. I'D LIKE TO THANK THE
CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS
ASSOCIATION FOR THE RECENT
LETTER OF SUPPORT. THE CHIEF NOW
JOIN CALIFORNIA SHOULD SHOULD
STATE SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION THE
BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN
VIOLENCE INEQUALITY CALIFORNIA
IN SUPPORT OF THIS BILL. WITH
THAT I ASK FOR YOUR I VOTE IN
WITH ME TODAY WE HAVE
REPRESENTATION FROM EVERY TOWN
FOR GUN SAFETY TO SPEAK IN
SUPPORT.
YOU MAY PERCEIVE. THAT
AFTERNOON.
MY NAME IS THAT ALVY AND I'M
COUNSEL WITH EVERY TIME FOR GUN
SAFETY THE NATION'S LARGEST GUN
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
ORGANIZATION.
THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO
SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF AB TWENTY
ONE OF THREE.
THIS BILL ADDRESSES A SURPRISING
GAP IN CURRENT CALIFORNIA STATE
LAW UNDER WHICH IT IS LEGAL FOR
AN INDIVIDUAL TO OBTAIN A PERMIT
TO CARRY A CONCEALED HANDGUN
WITHOUT EVER HAVING TO
DEMONSTRATE HOW TO PROPERLY AND
SAFELY SHOOT A GUN. TWENTY FIVE
OTHER STATES REQUIRE THAT A
PERSON RECEIVE LIVE FIRE
TRAINING BEFORE GETTING A
CONCEALED HANDGUN PERMIT.
CALIFORNIA WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN
A LEADER OF STRONG GUN SAFETY
POLICIES IS A CLEAR OUT LIAR IN
THE COUNTRY WHEN IT COMES TO
THIS PARTICULAR REQUIREMENT. AS
YOU MAY IMAGINE EVIDENCE SHOWS
THAT COMPREHENSIVE GUN SAFETY
TRAINING CAN MEANINGFULLY IMPACT
PUBLIC SAFETY. MOST IF NOT ALL
SHARES IN THE STATE HAVE ALREADY
ADDRESSED THIS GAP IN THE LAW BY
HAVING THEIR OWN POLICY THE
APPLICANTS FOR CONCEALED WEAPON
PERMITS RECEIVE LIVE FIRE
TRAINING. THIS LEGISLATION WOULD
MEMORIALIZE AND PRESERVE THIS
IMPORTANT TRAINING AND ENSURE
THAT AN APPLICANT DEMONSTRATE
SAFE HANDLING AND SHOOTING
PROFICIENCY AT A GUN RANGE IN
ADDITION TO MEETING CALIFORNIA'S
CURRENT MINIMUM CONCEALED
WEAPONS TRAINING STANDARDS.
PROPER EXPERIENCE AN ADEQUATE
SAFETY TRAINING IS VITAL TO GUN
SAFETY. THE ANSWER HERE IS
SIMPLE CALIFORNIA SHOULD PASS A
B. TWENTY ONE OF THREE CONTINUE
ITS POWERFUL FIGHT TO END GUN
VIOLENCE THANK YOU.
OTHER WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
BRIAN HOW WITH CALIFORNIA
FEDERATION OF TEACHERS WORDS
FROM SUPPORT THANK YOU.
AMANDA WILCOX ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA CHAPTERS OF THE BRADY
CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
IN SUPPORT I'M ALSO HERE. TODAY
ON BEHALF OF THE BAY AREA
STUDENT ACTIVISTS AND SUPPORT
AND I JUST LIKE TO MENTION THAT.
IN CALIFORNIA A SHERIFF
NORMALLY SHERIFF ISSUES A PERMIT
TO CARRY LOADED HITTING GONE
PUBLIC BUT THAT PERMIT IS VALID
THROUGHOUT THE STATES AT THE
VERY LEAST WE SHOULD HAVE A
MINIMUM STATEWIDE STANDARD IN
TERMS OF TRAINING. IN ORDER TO
OBTAIN A PERMIT THANK YOU.
CAROL ROGERS ASSEMBLY DISTRICT
NINE. A GROVE.
AND THE SENATE DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY RICHARD PAN I
RISE IN SUPPORT OF THE CV TWENTY
ONE OF THREE. THANK.
LUCIA MUCH ARMY OF THE
CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS
ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
MARION READ FROM FOLSOM
CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF AB
TWENTY ONE.
THE CALL SUE FROM DANVILLE
CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF AB
TWENTY ONE OH THREE.
LIVIA SZIFRON DEVIL CALIFORNIA
AND I SUPPORT AV TWENTY ONE A
THREE.
MY NAME IS DOCTOR KIDDED AROUND
AND I'M WITH EVERY TOWN SURVIVOR
NETWORK AS WELL AS MY MOMS
DEMAND ACTION HAVING LOST MY
SISTER TO GUN VIOLENCE. I DON'T
WANT ANYONE TO GO THROUGH WHAT
OUR FAMILY HAS GONE THROUGH AND
THIS IS A VERY COMMON SENSE. OF
PROPOSITION SO I'M IN SUPPORT OF
AB I TWENTY ONE OH THREE THANK
YOU.
IF THE CALENDAR FROM SANTA
CLARITA IS THE POOR AB TWENTY
ONE OF THREE.
BROWN LAFAYETTE CALIFORNIA IN
SUPPORT OF AB TWENTY ONE OH
THREE.
DAVID POLLOCK OF FROM SAN CARLOS
CALIFORNIA AND I'M IN SUPPORT OF
TWENTY ONE OH THREE. THANK YOU.
BRIDGE OVER CEMETERY
CALIFORNIANS SUPPORT OF AB
TWENTY ONE OH THREE.
THE LAST PARENTS SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF AB
TWENTY ONE OF THREE.
RESUME YOSHIKAWA FROM WOODEN
CALIFORNIANS SUPPORT OF AB
TWENTY ONE OH THREE.
CYNTHIA SHALLOT.
SACRAMENTO I SUPPORT AB TWENTY
ONE OH THREE THANK YOU.
KRISTEN* FROM ALAMO
CALIFORNIA NICE FOR.
JOINING COLLINS DANVILLE
CALIFORNIA AND I SUPPORT TWENTY
ONE OF THREE.
A LORRY PARKED IN THE CALIFORNIA
ALSO IN SUPPORT OF AB TWENTY ONE
OF THREE.
JULIE WILL FROM DANVILLE
CALIFORNIA AND SUPPORT.
LORI WOLF DANVILLE CALIFORNIA IN
SUPPORT.
LUIS LOPEZ FOLSOM CALIFORNIA IN
SUPPORT.
DAVID BRAME ROCKLIN CALIFORNIA
FATHER VETERAN AND GUN OWNER AND
I SUPPORT.
ANYWAY THIS IS AN OPPOSITION.
SO WE YOU'LL NEED TO LEAVE THE
TABLE SO THE WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION CONSPIRACY.
ONE AT THE TABLE AND THEN THE
OTHERS CAN BE AT THE MIKE.
GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM CHAIR FOR
THE RECORD AND RE WITH NATIONAL
RIFLE ASSOCIATION.
HERE IN OPPOSITION TO TWENTY ONE
OH THREE. CCW HOLDERS HAVE
PROVEN NOT ONLY IN CALIFORNIA
BUT ACROSS THE NATION TO BE
AMONG THE MOST LAW ABIDING
CITIZENS. RIGHT NOW IN
CALIFORNIA AS WAS POINTED OUT WE
ALREADY REQUIRE TRAINING FOR CCW
HOLDERS UP TO SIXTEEN HOURS
ALONG WITH FOUR HOURS UPON
RENEWAL EVERY TWO YEARS.
AND LET'S NOT FORGET RIGHT NOW
THE SHERIFFS HAVE THE AUTHORITY.
TO MAKE REQUIREMENTS OF TEIR
APPROVED INSTRUCTORS AND THERE
IS VARIOUS COUNTY AS WAS POINTED
OUT BY BY THE AUTHOR THAT. MOST
COUNTIES ARE YOU DO REQUIRE LIVE
TRAINING AND YOU HAVE MINIMUMS
OVER OUR RT SIMILAR TO THIS SO.
I'M SURE SIR OR GIVING UP SOME
AUTHORITY HERE THAT DAY THEY
HAVE IN PLACE TO REQUIRE THE SO
THIS BILL'S REALLY UNNECESSARY.
AND AT THE END OF THE DAY.
I'M NOT AWARE OF A PROBLEM WITH
CCW HOLDERS IN CALIFORNIA. ON
HAVING A LACK OF TRAINING.
OR CREATING ISSUES BECAUSE OF
LACK OF LIVE FIRE TESTING SO
AGAIN THIS IS A SOLUTION IN
SEARCH OF A PROBLEM WE STAND IN
OPPOSITION THANK YOU.
OTHER WITNESSES A MADAM CHAIR
MEMBERS TEMPERATE AS
REPRESENTING GUNS CALIFORNIA. ON
I HAPPEN TO BE A CCW INSTRUCTOR
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE AND BY
MY SHERIFF IN IN MY COUNTY.
ARMED WITH ALL DIFFERENCE TO TO
THE ASSEMBLYMAN.
WE KNOW A LOT ABOUT A TRAINING
AND AND WHAT WORKS AND
WHAT-DOESN'T WORK AND THAT IS
BORN
OUT. A GIVEN THE FACT THAT.
THERE HAVE BEEN NO INSTANCES OF
CCW HOLDERS IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA WHO HAVE EITHER.
INAPPROPRIATELY OR UNWISELY OR
WITHOUT TRAINING USED A FIREARM.
TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND AND
HAVE LOST THEIR SPECIES OF THE
PRIVILEGES FOR THAT FOR THAT
KIND OF A PURPOSE SO. ON THIS IS
A BILL IN SEARCH OF A PROBLEM
THAT DOESN'T EXIST. SECONDLY.
IN THE IN THE TRAINING PROCESS
WE GO THROUGH ALL OF THE LOS.
ALL OF THE LAW.
OF THAT ARE PASSED BY THIS
LEGISLATURE THAT HAVE TO DO
WITH.
WITH THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE.
GUN CONTROL ALT AND YOU KNOW
EVERYTHING WE GO THROUGH ALL OF
THESE THINGS ARE TO TRAIN. THESE
PEOPLE. END AND SECONDLY AS WAS
POINTED OUT BY MY COLLEAGUE FROM
THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION.
THERE ISN'T A SHARE OF THE DOES
NOT EXPECT THE PEOPLE THAT IT
CERTIFIES IS BEING INSTRUCTORS
KNOW EVERY INSTRUCTOR IS
CERTIFIED BY THE SHERIFF. AND
EVERY INSTRUCTOR HAS A SHOOTING
COMPONENT INTO THEIR. CURRICULUM
THAT THEY SUBMIT.
NOW. THERE ARE SOME CASES WHERE
AN INSTRUCTOR LIKE MYSELF HAS AN
OPPORTUNITY TO TO.
GIVE A TRAINING COURSE OR A CCW
COURSE TO SOMEBODY WHO IS A
RECENT.
DIP THE DEPARTING PERSON FROM
THE MILITARY.
SOMETIMES SPECIAL FORCES PEOPLE.
FOR US TO PUT THE REASON A
TRAINING REQUIREMENT THAT WE.
THE CONSTABULARY ALMOST ALMOST
SILLY TO REQUIRE THEM TO TO
SHOOT A TWO TO SHOW THAT THEY
CAN SHOOT THAT'S ALSO TRUE WITH
MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.
PEOPLE WHO'VE BEEN IN LAW
ENFORCEMENT BUT IT SEPARATED
FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT. UP BEFORE
THEIR THEIR THEIR OPPORTUNITY TO
RETIRE.
AND TO PUT THEM THROUGH A A UP
PROFICIENCY COURSE. ARM.
JUST DOESN'T MAKE A WHOLE LOT OF
SENSE.
THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THAT.
EVERY TIME AN INSTRUCTOR IN THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
TEACHES A CLASS AND THEY FIND
THAT PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE
SUFFICIENT TRAINING.
THEY OFFER THE SHOOTING TRAINING
THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS. THEY
ACTUALLY DO IT THAT'S WHY THERE
HAVE BEEN NO INCIDENCES THAT'S
WHY THERE ARE NO PROBLEMS THAT
HAVE OCCURRED.
THE TRAINING DOES THAT TAKE
PLACE AND THIS BILL IS A COOKIE
CUTTER BILL THAT WILL JAM STATE
LAW AND ALL COUNTIES ALL
JURISDICTIONS INTO A ONE SIZE
FITS ALL. SITUATION THAT NEVER
WORKS.
FOR THOSE REASONS GUNNERS
CALIFORNIA IS STRONGLY OPPOSED
TO THIS MISSION.
I IS THERE.
COMMENTS CENTER SEVENTY ONE GO
AHEAD YES PLEASE SIR THANK YOU.
MANAGER A SUN AND GLORIA.
.
I WAS ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS FOR THREE TERMS IN
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY
COUNCIL BEEN THERE FOR TWENTY
SIX YEARS.
I CAN TELL YOU THAT OUR SHARE OF
HIS.
VERY DILIGENT IN DOING
COMPREHENSIVE.
APPLICATION REVIEWS WHEN C. C.
W.'S ARE ISSUED I CAN'T
REMEMBER.
AT ANY TIME AND THE TIME THAT
I'VE SERVED. OR EVEN BEFORE I
SERVED ANY INCIDENT WHERE A
CONCEALED CARRY. PERSON.
INAPPROPRIATELY USED THEIR
THEIR WEAPON CAUSE INJURY OR
CAUSE DEATH. SO. I'D LIKE TO
KNOW COULD YOU POINT TO.
A FEW EXAMPLES IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA WHERE WE'VE SEEN
PEOPLE THAT HAVE GONE THROUGH
GOTTEN THERE SEE C. W.'S.
HAVE AN APPROPRIATELY USE OR
BRANDISHED A WEAPON.
BECAUSE PEOPLE IN FEAR.
INJURY OR DEATH CAN YOU POINT TO
SOME EXAMPLES.
THEY ACTUALLY VERY WELL
DOCUMENTED SAID I DON'T BUT I
DIDN'T BRING SPECIFIC EXAMPLE
STATEMENT HAPPY TO SUPPLY YOUR
OFFICE WITH THOSE. ON A CURSORY
GOOGLE SEARCH WILL SHOW YOU THAT
THIS IS AN ISSUE OKAY HAS THERE
BEEN INJURY AND DEATH.
BUT I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU THAT
WE HAVE OF SADLY DAILY EXAMPLES
OF DEATH WAS ABOUT THE GUN
VIOLENCE IN OUR COMMUNITIES.
I DON'T KNOW IF. MY WITNESS
HERE JOHN AS ANY DISINFORMATION
BUT YOU KNOW THE SENATE RIGHT IF
YOU'RE LOOKING FOR SPECIFIC
EXAMPLES I'M HAPPY TO TRACK DOWN
THOSE WEB PAGES FOR UN SUPPLIES
WE APPRECIATE THAT AND I
APPRECIATE YOUR. YOU WANT TO CUT
DOWN ON GUN VIOLENCE IN THE
COMMUNITY I THINK WE ALL WANT TO
CUT DOWN THE GUN VIOLENCE IN THE
COMMUNITY BUT I WOULD FIND THAT
THE GUN VIOLENCE IN THE
COMMUNITY IS NOT BEING.
PERPETRATED BY BY THOSE THAT
HAVE GONE TO THE CONCEALED
WEAPONS APPLICATION AND AND OF
AND I'VE GOTTEN THOSE.
I I WILL ALSO FIND THAT JUST
SEEMS SO THIS IS JUST A AGAIN
ANOTHER ASSAULT ON. LIFE BINDING
LAW ABIDING CITIZENS THAT. YOU
DON'T WANT TO HAVE THEIR SECOND
MEMBER WRITES A UPHELD. AND.
IN MANY CASES.
PEOPLE THAT HAVE CONCEALED
WEAPONS.
HAVE AIDED LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
ONGOING CRIMES THROUGHOUT THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND I'M VERY
GRATEFUL THAT MANY PEOPLE HAVE
CHOSEN TO PURSUE THESE LICENSES
AND TO. DO WHAT THEY CAN TO
ENHANCE PUBLIC SAFETY IN THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SO I I AGREE
WITH THE OPPONENTS AND I THINK
THIS IS A. AS MY COLLEAGUE FROM
LOS ANGELES MENTIONED BEFORE
THIS IS A PROBLEM IN SEARCH OF A
SOLUTION AND I REGRET TO CAMP
SUPPORTABLE TODAY.
.
SEEING NO OTHER COMMENT ON THE
DIET SIR SENATOR BRADFORD GO
AHEAD.
YEAH I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED HERE
BECAUSE. I THINK WHAT WE'RE
TRYING TO DO IS A COMMON SENSE
MEASURES SEEN A MINIMAL AMOUNT
OF TRAINING WERE. RIGHT NOW I
GUESS THE STATE LAW SAYS YOU
WILL. NEED TO TAKE NO MORE THAN
EIGHTEEN BUT IT DOESN'T SET A
FLOOR. MINIMAL. NO MORE THAN
SIXTEEN WOULD NOT BE SIXTEEN
YEARS SINCE OUR.
SO IT'S NO MINIMUM SO I CAN GO
IN JUST FOUR HOUR AND THEN WALK
OUT AND. GO INTO THIS THAT SOME
SAND SO. I I I I THINK IS COMMON
SENSE MEASURED THINK YOU DO THE
LEAST NEED TO SETTLE FOR IT
MINIMUM ON A TRAIN THAT ONE
MIGHT NEED TO. MOVE THE BILL.
I WOULD NOTE THAT THE SHERIFFS
ASSOCIATION IS IN SUPPORT.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE SENATOR
I MEAN ASSEMBLY MEMBER GLORIA.
BETTER I OVERLOOKED ONE OF MY
WITNESSES FROM ON DEMAND ACTION
MAY I GIVE HER MY CLOSING.
CERTAINLY. THANK YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON THANK YOU FOR
THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IN
SUPPORT OF BILL TWENTY TWENTY
ONE OH THREE WEEKS REQUIRING
LIVE FIRE TRAINING FOR CONCEALED
CARRY PERMITS IN OUR STATE. MY
NAME IS JOAN HOW IT'S RAINING IN
MY BACKGROUND IS IN EDUCATION
AND CHILDHOOD TRAUMA MAIN CO
LEADER OF CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
MOMS DEMAND ACTION FOR GUN SENSE
IN AMERICA. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY
I AM A MOM I GOT INVOLVED WITH
GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AFTER
THE ISLA VISTA SHOOTINGS IT
COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN MY
DAUGHTER AS SHE WAS THEY'RE
GOING TO SCHOOL. INSTEAD IT WAS
HER PEERS WHO WERE SHOT AND
KILLED THAT HORRIFIC EVENING ALL
BECAUSE OF A YOUNG MAN WHO
SHOULD HAVE NEVER HAD A GUN IN
THE FIRST PLACE. BECAUSE AT THE
TIME WE DO NOT HAVE A SAFETY LAW
IN PLACE LIKE OUR CURRENT. GUN
VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER THAT
WOULD HAVE GIVEN A MECHANISM TO
THE SHOOTER'S FAMILY AS WELL AS
LAW ENFORCEMENT. AT THE HEART OF
THIS BILL IS PASSING LEGISLATION
TO PREVENT A TRAGEDY BEFORE IT
STRIKES. I AM PROUD THAT
CALIFORNIA HAS BEEN A LEADER ON
GUN SAFETY LAWS BUT UNLIKE
TWENTY FIVE OTHER STATES WE DO
NOT HAVE A LAW REQUIRING LIVE
FIRE TRAINING. FOR PEOPLE
PERMITTED TO CARRY AHEAD IN
LOADED GUN IN PUBLIC. AMENDING
THE STATE LOTTERY QUITE WILL
LIVE FIRE TRAINING FOR CONCEALED
CARRY WOULD MEMORIALIZE AND
PRESERVE A POLICY THAT
CALIFORNIA SHERIFFS AND POLICE
CHIEFS HAVE ALREADY ADOPTED AND
WANT. THE CALIFORNIA STATE
SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION SUPPORTS
THIS BILL AND AGREES THAT
ENSURING PROPER QUALIFICATIONS
AND SAFETY TRAINING FOR
PERSPECTIVE. CCW HOLDERS IS A
PARAMOUNT. SAFETY ISSUE. ADDING
A LIVE FIRE TRAINING REQUIREMENT
IN STATE STATUTE. WOULD INSURE
THAT THIS COMMON SENSE
REQUIREMENT IS CONSISTENTLY
APPLIED ACROSS THE STATE THANK
YOU.
RIGHT SO WHAT DOES THE CLOTHES
WE HAVE A MOTION WOULD DO A ROLL
CALL.
QUESTION IS DO YOU PASS TO
APPROPRIATION SKINNER RIGHT
INNER EYE ANDERSON BRADFORD.
BRADFORD I JACKSON MITCHELL.
DOWN. DOWN NO WINNER.
WE HAVE SOME MISSING MEMBERS
WILL HOLD AN ON CALL.
AND THANKS SO MUCH IN OUR LAST
BILL IS SEVEN MEMBER O'DONNELL.
AB TWENTY SEVEN EIGHTY THREE.
IT IS. YEAH OKAY.
YEAH. SO I DO THAT. RECORD LABEL
IN A COUPLE OF.
GO AHEAD OF. US ARE GOOD
AFTERNOON MADAM CHAIR AND
COMMITTEE MEMBERS I AM PLEASED
TO PRESENT AB TWENTY SEVEN
EIGHTY THREE WHICH RESCHEDULED
HYDROCODONE COMBINATION PRODUCTS
FROM A SCHEDULE THREE DRUG. TO A
SCHEDULE TWO DRUG ON THE STATE
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. SCHEDULE.
HYDROCODONE COMBINATION PRODUCTS
KNOWN AS H. C. P.'S ARE DRUGS
THAT ARE THAT MAKES HYDROCODONE
WITH A NON NARCOTIC INGREDIENTS
SUCH AS IBUPROFEN. THESE DRUGS
ARE A CATEGORY OF OPIOIDS
PRESCRIBE MORE FREQUENTLY THAN
ALL OTHER MEDICINAL OVER YOURS
COMBINE. IN RECOGNITION OF THE
DRUG'S ABUSE POTENTIAL. EIICHI
PEAS WERE RE CLASSIFIED AT THE
FEDERAL LEVEL IN TWENTY FOURTEEN
FROM SCHEDULE THREE TO SCHEDULE
TO.
HOWEVER NO SUCH CHANGE WAS MADE
IN CALIFORNIA NH C. PEAS REMAIN
AS SCHEDULE THREE DRUGS ON THE
STATE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
SCHEDULE.
THIS IS CRAP Z. BETWEEN THE
STATE AND FEDERAL SCHEDULES CAN
BE PARTICULARLY CONFUSING FOR
PRESCRIBERS AND PHARMACISTS.
WHEN DETERMINING WHICH SCHEDULE
TO REFER TO OR WHAT
CORRESPONDING RESPONSIBILITIES
THEY ARE REQUIRED TO MEET BY
LAW.
AB TWENTY SEVEN EIGHTY THREE SIX
TWO ALLIED FEDERAL AND STATE
POLICY BY RESCHEDULING HC PIECE
FROM A SCHEDULE THREE TO A
SCHEDULE TWO DRUG ON THE STATE'S
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE SCHEDULE.
AS NOTED IN THE COMMITTEE
ANALYSIS THIS CHANGE WILL NOT
AFFECT CRIMINAL PENALTIES
PENALTIES FOR DRUG OFFENSES. THE
BILL SIMPLY CLICK CLARIFIES THE
LAW FOR PRESCRIBERS AND
DISPENSERS WHO RELY ON THESE
SCHEDULES FOR COMPLIANCE AND
HERE TO TESTIFY ME WITH ME TODAY
AND SUPPORT IS VIRGINIA HURLED
WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD
OF PHARMACY MADAM CHAIR.
THANK YOU AHEAD GOOD AFTERNOON
HOME I AM VIRGINIA HURLED WITH
THE BOARD OF PHARMACY.
HYDROCODONE IS NO ORDINARY
PRODUCT IT IT JUST MONOPOLIZE IS
THE SCHEDULES OF DRUGS THAT HAVE
BEEN ENTERED INTO CARES. FOR
EXAMPLE FOR PRESCRIPTIONS
WRITTEN IN TWO THOUSAND
SEVENTEEN OF THE FIFTY SIX POINT
FOUR MILLION PRESCRIPTIONS AND
SCHEDULE TWO THREE AND FOUR THAT
WERE ENTERED. FORTY PERCENT OF
THEM WERE SPECIFICALLY
HYDROCODONE COMBINATION PRODUCTS
WHICH IS A HUGE QUANTITY. WE
JUST WANT TO MAKE CERTAIN AS
DOES MR O'DONNELL THAT OUR GOAL
IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN PEOPLE
ARE WRITING PRESCRIPTIONS PER
SCHEDULE THREE DRUGS AROUND THIS
CASE SCHEDULE TWO DRUGS. THAT
THEY DON'T BECOME CONFUSED BY
LOOKING AT CALIFORNIA LAW THE
STILL CLASSIFIES IT AS A
SCHEDULE THREE DRUG WHICH ALLOWS
FIVE REFILLS OR A HUNDRED TWENTY
DAYS SUPPLY. WHERE THE REFILLS
WITHIN A SIX MONTH PERIOD THIS
WILL CONFORM? TO THE MORE
STRINGENT LAW THAT APPLIES
FEDERALLY ANYWAY TO MAKE SURE
THAT THERE'S LESS CONFUSION OUT
THERE UNLESS CHANCE FOR. PERHAPS
EVEN BY THE REGULATORS GOTCHA.
THANK YOU OTHER WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS STAND FILLS
OUT ON BEHALF OF THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE IN SUPPORT.
MADAM CHAIR JOHN LEVEL ON BEHALF
OF THE CALIFORNIA NARCOTICS
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT.
ANY OTHER WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
ANY WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION.
NO GREAT LIKE IT AND. I THINK
IT'S A GOOD BILL I THINK.
PROBABLY.
NOT INTENTIONAL THAT. WE WOULD
HAVE THE TWO DIFFERENT.
.
SCHEDULES. AND CERTAINLY I THINK
MOST OF US WERE WERE OPIOID
EPIDEMIC. AND UNFORTUNATELY MANY
PEOPLE. FALLING INTO IT AS A
RESULT OF IT I MEAN HIM HAVING
AN INJURY BEING IN PAIN. THAN
PRESCRIBED PAIN MEDICATION AND
IF YOU ARE ALONE THEN ABLE TO
GET INTO IF FIVE REFILLS AND
HAVE USED THAT MEDICATION FOR
SUCH PERIOD OF TIME YOU KNOW
WHAT. WITH WHAT WE NOW KNOW. IS
IT'S.
DEPENDENCY ITS ABILITY TO CREATE
DEPENDENCY. I THINK THIS IS A
VERY GOOD MOVE AND IT DOESN'T AS
YOU SAID CHANGE ARE ANY CRIMINAL
PENALTIES SO I HAVE RECOMMENDED
AND I. AND. I HAVEN'T I RECALL
IN THE BILL. IF THERE'S ANY
OTHER COMMENT HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN
IT.
OKAY WILL HAVE A ROLL CALL.
I DIDN'T LET YOU CLOSE.
ASSESSMENT OF.
THE MOTION IS TO PASS TWO
APPROPRIATION SKINNER BY INNER
EYE ANDERSON BRADFORD OXFORD I
JACKSON MITCHELL. STONE BY STONE
FIVE WINNER.
THANK YOU WE HAVE AN ON CALL
BECAUSE WE HAVE SOME PEOPLE TO
COME BACK BUT THANKS SO MUCH.
AND IN THE COMING DOWN.
YEAH WE SHOULD WE NEED TO RAISE
FOR HER.
THEY WERE.
OKAY.
A DOOR WITH THE RULES FIRST ONE
AS ONE OF US WHO HAVEN'T VOTED
ON IT.
YEAH GREAT SINCE THE GREAT.
MAYBE. PHOEBE NINETEEN.
ENTER. HERE FOR THIS.
IT'S A HIGH.
THIS IS. IS THERE ANOTHER ONE.
YEAH.
TWENTY SIX MEDIA.
TWENTY. SIX TO.
IT WAS ANNOUNCED ON.
OKAY GO AHEAD TWENTY FIVE TWENTY
SIX. FIVE. FIVE.
THERE WAS. THERE WAS THE.
RIGHT.
OKAY.
THERE'S SO.
THIS PRESENT.
IT ALMOST DONE.
.
ONLY LATER.
HE WAS.
YEAH.
YEAH IMAGE FOR
YOU READY.
BABY TWENTY ONE OH THREE GLORIA
MOTION IS TO PASS TO
APPROPRIATIONS CURRENT VOTE IS
TO. SIZE ONE NOW IT'S THE
TRAINING FOR A LICENSE TO CARRY
CONCEALED FIREARMS.
ALL RIGHT.
OKAY GREAT THANK YOU.
HELD. THE NUMBER EIGHT.
HI. MITCHELL.
MITCHELL I.
AT. EIGHTY TWENTY FIVE TWENTY
ONLY DID THAT ONCE OUR.
MAYBE TWENTY FIVE NINETY FIVE
OVER NOLTE. MOTION AS DO PASS AS
AMENDED TO THE FLOOR.
TWELVE.
MITCHELL I.
ITEM THIRTEEN EIGHTY TWO SIX
SIX NINE MOTION WAS DO PASS AS
AMENDED TO THE FLOOR.
I APOLOGIZE. K..
AND NEXT ONE WAS ITEM FIFTEEN.
AB TWO SEVEN EIGHT THREE
O'DONNELL MOTION WAS TO PASS TO
APPROPRIATIONS.
SO I.
AND I THINK THAT'S
SHE.
WE CAN.
ONE OF HER ONCE OR TWICE OR.
WINTER STORM. WHICH IS ABOUT TO
HAPPEN.
ARE YOU A STATUS.
YEAH.
IS HE.
OKAY. READING.
HE IS JUST.
RIGHT NOW LET'S ALL RIGHT. GONNA
START WITH I AM ONE.
AB EIGHT SEVEN THREE LAST TIME
APOLOGIZE THREE. EIGHTY EIGHT
SEVEN THREE LACKEY THE MOTION
WAS TO PASS TO APPROPRIATIONS
CURRENT VOTE IS FORTY ZERO.
ANDERSON ON BY ANDERSON I'D
JACKSON. JACKSON EYES.
ITEM. FOUR EIGHTY FIFTEEN EIGHTY
FOUR MOTIONS TO PASS TO THE
FLOOR CURRENT VOTE FORTY ZERO
ANDERSON. ANDERSON I'D JACKSON.
JACKSON HIGH.
ITEM FIVE. BABY NINETEEN OH
THREE DO PAST PROCREATION IS
CURRENT VOTE IS THREE TO ONE
ANDERSON. ANDERSON NOW JACKSON
JACKSON HIGH.
ITEM SIX EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
TWENTY DO PASS TO APPROPRIATIONS
CURRENT PHOTOS FORD IS ZERO
ANDERSON.
I AM SIX. SIX YES. NAME.
ANDERSON I YES. JACKSON OBJECTS
AND I.
ITEM SEVEN EIGHTY TWENTY EIGHTY
ALBUM STARTS THE CONSENT
CALENDAR. AT ANDERSON. ANDERSON
I'D JACKSON JACKSON.
ITEM EIGHT AB TWENTY ONE OF
THREE TO PASS TO APPROPRIATIONS
CURRENT VOTE THREE EYES ONE NOW
ANDERSON.
YES TWENTY. ANDERSON NOW JACKSON
JACKSON.
ITEM NINE EIGHTY TWO FIVE TO SIX
THE PAST TWO APPROPRIATIONS
CURRENT VOTE BORDER ZERO
ANDERSON.
ANDERSON I'D JACKSON. JACKSON.
ITEM TEN EIGHTY TWO FIVE THREE
TWO TO PASS TO APPROPRIATIONS
ANDERSON.
ALMOST CURRENT VOTERS FORTY HERE
I APOLOGIZE. ANDERSON I'D
JACKSON JACKSON.
ITEM TWELVE EIGHTY TWO FIVE NINE
FIVE. MOTIONS DO PASS AS AMENDED
TO THE FLOOR CURRENT VOTE FORTY
ZERO ANDERSON. ANDERSON I
JACKSON JACKSON HIGH.
ITEM THIRTEEN EIGHTY TWO SIX SIX
NINE MOTION AS DO PASS AS
AMENDED TO THE FLOOR CURRENT
VOTE TWO TO ZERO. ANDERSON.
MANY OF THE THINGS YOU WANNA.
JACKSON. UP. HERE.
THE SHERIFF SO THE VOCAL CORDS
SKINNER OFF BY. BRADFORD BY.
MITCHELL NOT VERY SOON ENOUGH
VOTING. THING.
YEAH THIS IS.
HE TOOK A MOMENT SO IT'S.
.
ONE TASK YEAH YOU NEVER GET TO
JUST THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS.
JACKSON.
JACKSON I.
ANDERSON I.
ITEM FIFTEEN EIGHTY TWO SEVEN
EIGHT THREE MOTIONS TO PASS TO
APPROPRIATIONS CURRENT VOTERS
FORTY ZERO ANDERSON.
NO I.
OTHER. YES SO.
ANDERSON I JACKSON. JACKSON I.
THE FIGHTING THERE ARE ALSO.
WITH. THE LAST ONE WE HAVE IS
ITEMS SEVENTEEN.
EIGHTY TWO EIGHT SIX SEVEN.
MOTION AS DO PASS AS AMENDED TO
THE FLOOR CURRENT FOCUS THREE TO
ONE ANDERSON.
NO ANDERSON NOW JACKSON. JACKSON
HIGH.
RIGHT.
THIS IS GOING TO GO FOR AWHILE.
CAN MAYBE TAKE A RECESS. YEAH.
RIGHT.
THE SAME WAY. ISN'T SO EASY SO
PRESENTING
ONE OF OUR MEMBER SENATOR
WIENERS PRESENTING A BILL IN THE
COMMITTEE AND HE WANTS TO BE
ABLE TO ADD ON TO HIS TO THE
BILLS. HE WANTS TO BE ABLE TO
VOTE SO WE WILL RECESS
TEMPORARILY UNTIL HE HAS
COMPLETED HIS PRESENTATION IN
THE HEALTH COMMITTEE UPON WHICH
HE WILL RETURN TO THIS COMMITTEE
AND VOTE.
SO WE'LL BE IN RECESS TO THAT
POINT WHICH WE HOPE WILL BE SOON
SESAME WILL OPEN THE ROLL CALL.
SO THAT SENATOR WINNER CAN ADD
ON SOON WE CAN PROCEED OF COURSE
GO AHEAD.
FIRST ONE IS EIGHTY EIGHT SEVEN
THREE LACKEY SIXTY ZERO LEANER.
MEANER I.
BILL IS OUT IN THE FIFTEEN
EIGHTY FOUR CURRENT VOTE IS
SIXTY ZERO WINNER.
WE ARE I MAYBE FIFTEEN EIGHTY
FOUR IS OUT. IN THE NINETEEN OH
THREE CURRENT VOTE IS FORTY TWO
WINNER.
IN HER EYES. BILLS ALL
THROUGHOUT THE NINETEEN TWENTY
CURRENT VOTE SIXTY ZERO WINNER.
WE ARE OUT OF THE NINETEEN
TWENTIES OUT.
TWENTY EIGHTY THOUGH THIS IS
CONCERNED I BOUGHT AT WEINER.
SAID CALENDAR YEAH WINNER. THEY
CAN SEND CALENDARS OUT.
AB TWENTY ONE OUT OF THREE
CURRENT VOTE FORTY TWO WINNER.
HERE I. WILL BE TWENTY ONE OR
THREE GOES TO APPROPRIATIONS.
TWENTY FIVE TWENTY SIX RUBIO
CURRENT VOTE SIXTY ZERO LEANER.
MEANER I WHISPERED TWENTY SIX
ALSO GETS TO MOVE ON.
AB TWENTY FIVE THIRTY TWO.
CURRENT VOTE SIXTY ZERO WINNER.
WINNER I WRITE AB TWENTY FIVE
THIRTY KIDS GETS MOVED OVER TO
APPROPRIATIONS. AB TWENTY FIVE
NINETY FIVE OVER NOLTE TO PASS
AS AMENDED TO THE FLOOR SIX ZERO
WEINER.
I.
THAT FILLS ALL THROUGHOUT.
AB TWO SIX SIX NINE SIX BACK TO
SIX SIX NINE JOHN SAWYER
DEPOSITED TO THE FLOOR CURRENT
VOTE FOUR TO ZERO.
LEROUX OTHERS SO I GUESS THERE'S
ONLY ONE NIGHT TO NOT VOTING.
TWO ABSTENTIONS.
YEAH WHEN I.
THAT BILL IS OUT.
THREE TWO SEVEN EIGHT THREE OH
DONALD TO PASS TO APPROPRIATIONS
CURRENT VOTE SIXTY ZERO WINNER.
WINNER I.
RIGHT USE SERVICES IN EIGHTY
THREE IS OUT.
EIGHTY TWO EIGHT SIX SEVEN
DOLLARS FLETCHER DO PASS AS
AMENDED TO THE FLOOR CURRENT
VOTE FORTY TWO MEANER. MEANER I
RAISE A B. TWO EIGHT SIX SEVEN
IS OUT. AND THAT. IS ALL THE
BILLS FOR NOW. PUBLIC SAFETY
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE IS
NOW ADJOURNED