WHO SHISH PEOPLE THOUGH IS THAT
WHILE.
THAT WAS.
THAT WAS YOUR. BIG VOICE.
I GUESS OUR FIRST PANEL COULD
COME UP AND JUST GET COMFY.
AND THEN WILL GIVE.
MY COLLEAGUES A SECOND TO BE
HERE. I APOLOGIZE FOR RUNNING
LATE.
.
SO GIVE THEM A MAN AND THEN
WE'LL GET STARTED.
ALSO.
YEAH
.
PUBLIC
.
ROBERT ALL I JUST HANDED HIM
GRAB ONE FOR.
SORRY.
WE WILL GO AHEAD AND GET IS MR
MALEK ON A SWING.
ALRIGHT WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD.
THANK YOU WELCOME TO THE TWO
THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ADDITION OF
THE LAST.
A COUPLE WEEKS HAVE THE BUDGET
WILL TAKE AWAY.
WHOSE AFTERNOON I AM BACKING HOW
ARE YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON LISA PRESENTS YOU
WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
SO YOU'LL BE RECEIVING A ONE
PAGE HANDOUT I THINK BRIEFLY IF
YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY RECEIVED IT
IT WILL. ADMIT IT SHOWS WHAT'S
HAPPENED IN THE MAY REVISIONS
SINCE CHANGES SINCE THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET.
AND SO I WILL GO OVER THOSE
CHANGES WITH YOU. I'M IN THE
GOVERNOR OF IN THE FIRST FIGURE
FIGURE ONE IT SHOWS YOU THE
THREE YEARS A PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT MINIMUM GUARANTEED THE
UPDATED. REVISED LEVELS.
AS SHOWN IN FIGURE ONE RELATIVE
THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET REVENUES
HAVE INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY
OVER THIS POINT IN TIME. THEY'VE
INCREASED ONE POINT THREE
BILLION IN SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN
THREE POINT FIVE BILLION AND
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN. AND AN
ADDITIONAL EIGHTEEN POINT NINE
BILLION ARE SORRY AND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN THREE POINT ONE BILLION
DOLLARS A TOTAL OF SEVEN POINT
NINE BILLION DOLLAR REVENUE
INCREASE SINCE OUR GOVERNOR'S
BUDGET ESTIMATES.
AS WE'VE DISCUSSED IN PREVIOUS
HEARING THOUGH THIS THIS
INCREASE IN REVENUES DID NOT
TRANSLATE TO ONLY ONLY
TRANSLATED TO A MODEST MODEST
GROWTH IN PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT.
AND THE REASON THIS IS THEIR
SEVERAL DIFFERENT REASONS BUT
THE REALLY THAT OF OVER ARCHING
REASON IS THE PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT IS A TEST TO YEAR AND
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN. AND AN
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN IT SWITCHES
FROM A TEST THREE YEAR TO A
TESTY TWO YEAR SO UNTESTED YEARS
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT GROWS
BY A PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME
THAT'S THE GROWTH FACTOR. AND
IT.
DOT FACTOR IS NOT CHANGED WHEN
REVENUES GENERAL FUND REVENUES
CHANGE
SO THE ONLY GROWTH YOU WOULD GET
IN A PROP TO YOU UP PROPER.
TESTS TO YEAR WOULD BE YEAR
MAINTENANCE FACTOR GROWTH
REVENUES DO DRIVE BURKE
MAINTENANCE FACTOR PAYMENTS. BUT
AND IN THIS BUDGET FORECASTER
WINDOW MEANNESS FACTOR WILL BE
FULLY PAID AND TWO THOUSAND
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN SO INCREASES
IN REVENUES WILL NOT BE DRIVING
ANY INCUR. ANY ADDITIONAL
INCREASES IN PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT.
WITH THAT SAID I PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT IS INCREASING SEVEN
HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN MILLION
DOLLARS OVER THIS THREE YEAR
PERIOD. TWO HUNDRED FIFTY TWO
MILLION AND SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN
FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVEN MILLION
AND SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN.
AND SIXTY EIGHT MILLION
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN WHICH PUTS THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE AND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN AT SEVENTY EIGHT POINT
FOUR BILLION DOLLARS.
THE.
STILL ALSO A AT TO NOTE THAT A
PART OF THESE INCREASES IN
ADDITION TO THOSE THOSESLIGHT
CHANGES IN THE FACTORS. IS THE A
REVENGE CHAINSAWS PART OF THIS
ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSAL FOR
THE CERTIFICATION PROPOSAL AT
ALL BE DISCUSSING WITH YOU
LATER.
ARE WE FREE BENCH THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE TO INCLUDE A HUNDRED
FIFTY ONE POINT FIVE MILLION IN
CHILD CARE.
WRAPAROUND SERVICES THAT WERE
ADDED TO PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT FROM IN FIFTEEN SIXTEEN SO
THAT'S BEEN INCLUDED IN THAT IS
A PART OF THE REASON WHY THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE IS ACTUALLY
GROWING OVER THIS PERIOD. AYE IT
IT'S ADDS ABOUT A HUDRED
SEVENTY TWO MILLION TO THE
GUARANTEE AND SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN
AND HUNDRED SEVENTY EIGHT
MILLION. IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN.
SO AGAIN EVEN THOUGH THE
FORECAST IS MODEST COMPARED TO
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE IN TOTAL IS GROWING
QUITE SIGNIFICANTLY YEAR OVER
YEAR IT'S GROWING A TO POINT.
FIVE BILLION DOLLARS IN SIXTEEN
SEVENTEEN AN ADDITIONAL FOUR
BILLION IN SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN.
AND TWO POINT EIGHT BILLION AND
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN SO OVER THE
THREE YEAR PERIOD THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE IS GOING NINE POINT
THREE BILLION DOLLARS.
SO THE SAME AYE A HOLDS TRUE
WITH PROPERTY TAXES IF YOU SEE
IN FIGURE ONE YOU'LL NOTICE THAT
WE DID BRING PROPERTY COUNTY TAX
ESTIMATES DOWN SLIGHTLY. BUT THE
YEAR OVER YEAR THEY STILL ARE
GROWING WE.
THEIR GROWING BECAUSE OF
ASSESSED INCREASES AN ASSESSED
PROPERTY TAX VALUE COVER WE
BROUGHT OUR ESTIMATE DOWN TO
REFLECT SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN
NUMBERS THAT CAME IN SLIGHTLY
LOWER THAN WHAT WE HAD
ORIGINALLY EXPECTED.
SO FIGURE TO ON THE ONE PAGE
CHART REALLY JUST SUMS UP YOUR
AVAILABLE RESOURCES IN
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT IT
SHOWS YOU THE CHANGES IN THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE ALL OF THE ONE
TIME ADJUSTMENTS THAT OCCURRED
TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS. AND THAT
ANY ONE TIME ADDITIONAL SAVINGS
THAT'S AVAILABLE.
SO AT ME REVISION WE HAVE AN
ADDITIONAL SEVEN HUNDRED EIGHTY
THREE MILLION AVAILABLE
RESOURCES. PHAM FOR TOTAL FOR
THIS BUDGET PERIOD THIS THERE'S
A TOTAL RESOURCES OF SEVEN POINT
TWO BILLION DOLLARS.
SO BEFORE.
I MOVE ON TO THE SPENDING
CHANGES THAT WE'VE WHERE.
PROPOSING AND THAT MAY REVISION
I'D LIKE TO JUST QUICKLY WALK
YOU THROUGH UNDIES CERTIFICATION
PROPOSAL THAT'S INCLUDED.
AND IN IN THE MAYOR OF VISION.
SO AS OUTLINED IN FIGURE THREE
THE ADMINISTRATION IS PROPOSING
TO ESTABLISH A NEW CERTIFICATION
PROCESS. THIS PROCESS WE FEEL
ENSURES THAT CERTIFICATIONS ARE
FIRST OF ALL DONE ANNUALLY WHICH
HAS NOT BEEN DONE. THEY PROVIDE
TO CERTAINTY AROUND THE FACT
THAT PAYMENT OF FUTURE SUBTLE UP
PAYMENTS.
ADDITIONALLY WE BELIEVE JUST
PROVIDES MORE TRANSPARENCY TO
THE PROCESS.
AND IT ALSO HELPS RESERVE
RESOLVE DIFFERENCES IN
INTERPRETATIONS IMMEDIATELY
INSTEAD OF WAITING YEARS TO TRY
TO SELL THEM.
THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS WILL
BEGIN IN TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN
SEVENTEEN IT WILL BE A LITTLE
BIT MODIFIED SCHEDULE. ARE THEN
WILL EVENTUALLY BE BECAUSE OF
THE TIME WISE A PASSING THE
TRAILER BILL.
BUT IT WILL INCLUDE CERTIFYING
ALL THE WAY FROM TWO THOUSAND
NINE TEN.
TWO THOUSAND FIFTEEN SIXTEEN
SIXTEEN AND SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN.
UNDER CURRENT LAW THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE SHOULD BE CERTIFIED
EVERY NINE MONTHS HOWEVER THERE
ARE SOME ISSUES WITH THIS TIME
FRAME WITH REGARDS TO FACTORS
BEING AVAILABLE SO. THAT'S ONE
OF THE PROBLEMS WITH THAT
THERE'S ALSO BEEN VARIOUS.
IT DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS OF
THE LAW THAT OF COST ISSUES WITH
CERTIFYING.
SO WE'RE HOPING THAT THIS
PROCESS WILL. WILL SETTLE THIS
AND AND.
THE LEAD TO FUTURE
CERTIFICATIONS ON TIME.
SO THIS THIS PROPOSED CONSISTENT
WITH THE ADMINISTRATION'S FOCUS
ON RETIRING DEBTS AND
LIABILITIES.
BUT IT REALLY JUST SIX TO
ADDRESS THESE OUTSTANDING
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT IT
OBLIGATIONS AND THEN PROVIDE A
LEVEL OF CERTAINTY IS FOR
SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE AS
WE APPROACH GO INTO THIS NEW
ADMINISTRATION.
SO UNDER THIS NEW PROCESS IF IT
WERE IN PLACE RIGHT NOW AT THIS
MAY REVISION WE WOULD BE LOOKING
AT CERTIFYING THESE SIXTEEN
SEVENTEEN FISCAL YEAR. THAT'S
YOUR PRIOR FISCAL YEAR AT THIS
POINT.
DURING THIS PERIOD WE WOULD BE
COLLECTING DATA FROM THE
SUPERINTENDENT AND I. AND THE I
CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE ON FULL TIME
EQUIVALENT STUDENTS AVERAGE
DAILY ATTENDANCE PROPERTY TAXES
AND THEN THE ALLOCATIONS AND
APPROPRIATIONS THAT ARECOUNTING
TOWARDS MEETING THE MEN AND
GUARANTEE. AND THE MAYOR OF
VISION THE. ADMINISTRATION THEN
WOULD USE ALL OF THE AIR UPDATED
FACTORS THAT THEY WERE ITS
RECEIVE P. CPI NEW REVENUES.
POSSIBLY POPULATION ALL THE
OTHER OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS AND
WE WOULD RECALCULATE THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE AND PUBLISH THAT ARE
POSTED. AT THE MAY REVISION
THERE WOULD THEN BE A PERIOD
WHERE.
STAKEHOLDERS COULD COMMENT AND
MAKE RESPONSES OR.
AND ASK QUESTIONS OF FINANCE
FINANCE THEN WOULD A RESPOND TO
THOSE QUESTIONS ANSWERED THEM
AND.
AND WOULD HAVE UNTIL JUNE.
THIRTIETH WHEN FINANCE WOULD.
BE REQUIRED TO POST THE FINAL
CERTIFICATION MOUNT WITH ALL OF
THE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS AND
RESPONSES THAT HAVE BEEN
RECEIVED IN THIS PROCESS.
SO WE FEEL THIS ADDS MORE
TRANSPARENCY ITEM TO THE WHOLE
PROCESS.
THEN WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER
THAT FINAL POST DEAN OF THE
CERTIFICATION.
IF THERE'S NO LEGAL CHALLENGES
FILED THEN THE PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GUARANTEE WOULD BE
CONSIDERED CERTIFIED AND FILE.
AT THAT POINT THE CONTROLLER
THEN WOULD PAY ANY SUBTLE AFTER
OUTSTANDING BALANCES THAT ARROW
AND THEN ALSO THERE WOULD BE
SOME MOVEMENT OR CHANGES IN TO.
WHAT WE'RE CALLING THE
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT COST
ALLOCATION SCHEDULE SO THIS
SCHEDULE IS ALSO BEING CREATED
IN THIS PROPOSAL? IT'S A
MECHANISM THAT WILL ALLOW FOR
ADDITIONAL BUDGET FLEXIBILITY
FOR THE STATE AND ALLOW US UP
THE STATE TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO
APPROPRIATIONS THE COUNT TOWARDS
THE MEDIAN MEAN. MEETING THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE.
WITHOUT IMPACTING EXISTING
ALLOCATIONS TO SCHOOLS AND
COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
SO FOR EXAMPLE WHEN WE'RE
FINALIZING OF THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE IF APPROPRIATIONS THAT
HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED TO SCHOOLS
AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES. EXCEED
THE AMOUNT THAT ARE REQUIRED BY
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT.
WHEN INSTEAD OF REDUCING
APPROPRIATIONS OR PUSHING OR
SHIFTING HIS APPROPRIATIONS INTO
DIFFERENT FISCAL YEARS THAT'S
CREDIT WOULD BE A. BIT THE
AMOUNT OVER THE MINIMUM TO BE
CREDITED TO THIS COST ALLOCATION
SCHEDULE.
CREDIT IN THE SCHEDULE THEN CAN
BE USED WHEN THE STATE IS
REQUIRED TO PAY FUTURE SETTLE UP
PAYMENTS OUR OBLIGATIONS TO
SCHOOLS.
THEREFORE SCHOOLS ONGOING
APPROPRIATIONS ARE NOT IMPACTED.
ON THE STATE AND THIS GIVES THE
STATE THIS ADDITIONAL
FLEXIBILITY TO BRING THE
GUARANTEE DOWN BUT WITHOUT
IMPACTING SCHOOLS.
SO IF UPON CERTIFY IN THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE
APPROPRIATIONS.
ON DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED IN
OTHER WORDS WE HAVE SETTLED UP
THAT WE OWE.
THAT FOR THE FIRST THE
CONTROLLER WOULD FIRST APPLY ANY
CREDIT IN THIS ALLOCATION
SCHEDULED TO REDUCE THAT PAYMENT
OF SUBTLE UP.
AND THEN THEY WOULD APPROPRIATE
THE OUTSTANDING SELLABLE SELLER
UP BALANCE THAT YEAR UNLESS
STATE COULD NOT AFFORD IT THEN
THE STATE WOULD NEED TO HAVE A
MULTI. A YEAR SCHEDULE. AS PART
OF THE BUDGET PROCESS THEN THE
CONTROLLER WOULD ALLOCATE BASED
ON THAT SCHEDULE.
SO THERE IS THE ONE PERCENT CAP
THAT'S IN LANGUAGE FOR THIS COST
ALLOCATION SCHEDULE. UPBEAT THAT
CAP IS REALLY MEANT TO. ALLOW
THAT ADDITIONAL FLEXIBILITY
WITHOUT THE LAO IN THE CREDIT TO
BUILD UP AND BECOME TOO LARGE SO
FOR INSTANCE IN.
SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN THAT CAP THAT
GUARANTEES AROUND SEVENTY TWO
BILLION DOLLARS THE CAP WOULD BE
SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY MILLION
DOLLARS AND COST ALLOCATION
SCHEDULE.
SO I'M ALSO ADDITIONALLY AS PART
OF THIS ADMINISTRATION'S
PROPOSAL FOR CERTIFICATION WHERE
THE HEM OF PROPOSING TO AMEND
LANGUAGE TO FULLY APPROPRIATE
THE LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING
FORMULA. THE WAY CURRENT LAW
READS NOW THE LOCAL CONTROL
FUNDING FORMULA BASIS CURRENTLY
A. CONCH CONTINUOUSLY
APPROPRIATED HOWEVER THE COST OF
LIVING ADJUSTMENT IS
DISCRETIONARY. SO THIS WOULD
AMEND LAW IN ORDER TO KIND OF
REPLICATE THE OLD REVENUE LET'S
LET. IT HAPPEN IN LIMIT SYSTEM.
CAN PROVIDE SCHOOLS WITH
ADDITIONAL CERTAINTY AND THEIR
BUDGET DURING THE BUDGET
PROCESS.
IT IS FINALLY AS I HAD MENTIONED
EARLIER ANOTHER PIECE OF THIS
IS.
THE RE. DATA RETENTION OF CHILD
CARE AND PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT WAS PART OF IT.
SO WITH THAT.
ALL GO TO THE THE SECOND SIDE
pFOR WHAT SHOWS YOU ALL OF THE
DETAILS SPENDING CHANGES. AGAIN
CONSISTENT WITH PAST PROPOSALS
HIS MERE VISION CONTINUES TO
FOCUS THE MAJORITY OF THE
INCREASES ON ONE TIME
DISCRETIONARY PAYMENTS TO
SCHOOLS AND ALSO ON THE LOCAL
CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA. THE
ADMINISTRATION CONTINUES TO
PRIORITIZE THESE PAYMENTS
BECAUSE THEY PROVIDE SCHOOLS
WITH THE GREATEST AMOUNT OF
FLEXIBILITY IN MEETING THEIR
UNIQUE COST PRESSURES AT THE
LOCAL LEVEL.
SO FOR THE ONE TIME
DISCRETIONARY PAYMENTS THERE'S A
TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX MIN
MILLION DOLLAR INCREASE WHICH
BRINGS THE TOTAL OF
DISCRETIONARY PARA PAYMENTS TO.
TWO BILLION DOLLARS AND THAT'S
THAT'S INCLUDED IN THIS BUDGET.
OVERALL IF YOU LOOK AT THE FIVE
YEARS DISCRETIONARY PAYMENTS
WENT INCLUDING THESE TWO BILLION
DOLLARS SCHOOLS WILL HAVE
RECEIVED. SEVEN POINT EIGHT
BILLION IN A DISCRETIONARY
PAYMENTS.
SOME OTHER NOTABLE CHANGES IN
ONE TIME SPENDING WE'VE INCLUDED
FORTY TWO MILLION IN GENERAL
FUND FOR THE INCLUSIVE EARLY
EDUCATION EXPANSION GRANT. AT
THIS FORTY TWO MILLION DOLLARS
OVER IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
WAS TO BE PROVIDED BY TANITH
FUNDING BUT THAT FUNDING IS NO
LONGER AVAILABLE.
BUT THERE'S ALSO TWENTY SEVEN
MILLION DOLLARS ON PROPOSED IN
ONE TIME SPENDING TOCOMFORT THE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY
ASSESSMENT TO A COMPUTER BASED
MODEL. ON AND ALSO TO DEVELOP AN
ALTERNATIVE TEST FOR STUDENTS
WITH EXCEPTIONAL ME.
THE GRANT PROGRAM THIS WILL
BRING CURRENT YEAR TWO THOUSAND
SEVENTEEN UP TO OF THE
PARTICIPATION LEVELS AS YOU
RECALL THERE IS THE ONGOING
PROPOSAL TO DO THE SAME THING.
UNDER THE ON GOING SPENDING
PROPOSAL FOR THE OUT YEARS.
TWO OTHER A ONE TIME.
THE PROPOSALS TO A ADDRESS OUR
THERE'S THIRTEEN.
THE STATE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT
BECAUSE THIS COMMUNITIES AND
SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO AND GAUGE
WITH EACH OTHER MORE
EFFECTIVELY.
THIS WILL BE LED BY THE
CALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR
EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE UNFIT AN
ADDITIONAL EIGHT COUNTY LEAD
WILL BE PART OF THIS INITIATIVE.
AND THEN FINALLY FOR ONE TIME
THE MAY REVISION INCLUDES
FIFTEEN MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION AND BUTTE COUNTY
OFFICE TO PARTNER WITH A.
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF HIGHER
LEARNING IN ORDER TO EXPAND AND
STUDY THE CURRENT MULTI TIERED
SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT.
BOB THE FRAMEWORK THAT'S BEEN
GOING ON THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA
AND TO EXPAND THAT TO INCLUDE.
FOSTERING A POSITIVE SCHOOL
CLIMATE.
UNDER THE ONGOING SECTION FOR K.
TWELVE AGAIN THE LARGEST.
INVESTMENT IS IN THE LOCAL
CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA. THIS
PROPOSAL MAINTAINS FULL
IMPLANTATION AS WITH THAT WAS
PROPOSED AT THE GOVERNOR'S
BUDGET BUT ADDS TWO HUNDRED
SEVENTY SIX MILLION DOLLARS IN
ORDER TO ADDRESS THAT INCREASE
IN THE COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT
FROM TWO POINT FIVE ONE PERCENT.
TO TWO POINT SEVEN ONE PERCENT.
AND ADDITIONALLY THERE'S AN
ADDITIONAL.
HUNDRED SIXTY SIX MILLION
DOLLARS FOR A BASE SUPPLEMENTAL
AND CONCENTRATE CREATION RENT
INCREASE ABOVE WHICH. MEANS UP
KINDA MAKES THE CALL EFFECTIVELY
THREE PERCENT.
SO TOTAL FUNDING OF FOR. HEALTHY
IF AFTER THIS PROPOSAL IS THREE
POINT ONE BILLION AND IT BRINGS
THE TOTAL OF FOUR LOCAL CONTROL
FUNDING FORMULA TO OVER TWENTY
POINT TWO BILLION DOLLARS OVER
THE SINCE THIRTEEN TWO THOUSAND
THIRTEEN FOURTEEN.
ALL OF THESE STATUTORY PROGRAMS
IN THIS PROPOSAL WILL RECEIVE
THE INCREASE TO THE TWO POINT
SEVEN ONE PERCENT.
A THERE'S ALSO TWO MILLION AND
ONGOING INCREASE THAT IS SAD.
BEEN PROVIDED TOWARDS THE K.
TWELVE COMPONENT OF THE STRONG
WORKFORCE PROGRAM THAT WAS
PROPOSED AT THE GOVERNOR'S
BUDGET THIS WILL SUPPORT THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF THE
REGIONAL CONSORTIA AS.
AND FINALLY THIS PROPOSAL IN.
INCLUDES AN INCREASE FOR AFFECT
MATT OF NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS THIS IS TO
EXPAND FITNESS SUPPORT TO COUNTY
OFFICES OF EDUCATION AND ALSO
ALLOWS KICK BACK TO OFFER MORE
PROACTIVE AND. PREVENTIVE
SCHOOLS SERVICES TO SCHOOL
DISTRICTS WITH QUALIFIED
INTERIM.
BUDGET STATUS IN OTHER WORDS
DISTRICTS THAT ARE BEGINNING TO
SHOWN SIGNS OF DISTRESS WITH
THAT OF THAT CONCLUDES THE K.
TWELVE SPINNING PORTION AND I'M
ALTERNATE OVER TO. SAY A FEW
CRATES OF MY COLLEAGUE.
A GOOD AFTERNOON RIGHT SEWED
DECIDE WHAT COLLEGES AS SPENDING
PROPOSALS
ALL BEGIN BY HIGHLIGHTING SOME
pOF THE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE
COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENT
CENTERED FUNDING FORMULA
PROPOSED IN THE GOVERNOR'S
BUDGET. SINCE THE RELEASE OF THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET THE
CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE HAS ENGAGED
COLLEGE LEADERS AND STAKEHOLDERS
ON THE PROPOSED FORMULA. THE
MERE VISION INCLUDES AS SEVERAL
ADJUSTMENTS IN RESPONSE TO
FEEDBACK AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY
THE CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE.
I'M IN A HIGHLIGHTED A FEW OF
THOSE A FIRST THE REVISED
FUNDING FORMULA REFLECTS AN
OVERALL DISTRIBUTION OF SIXTY
PERCENT AS A BASE ALLOCATION
TWENTY PERCENT AS A SUPPLEMENTAL
ALLOCATION. AND TWENTY PERCENT
AS A STUDENT SUCCESS INCENTIVE
ALLOCATION.
THE MAYOR VISION REVISES A
SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOCATION TO
INCLUDE THE NUMBER F LOW INCOME
STUDENTS OVER THE AGE OF TWENTY
FIVE RECEIVING THE COLLEGE
PROMISE SCRAP THE WAIVER. AB
FIVE FORTY STUDENTS AND THE
TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS
RECEIVING A PROGRAM.
THE MAYOR OF VISION ALSO REVISES
THE STUDENT SUCCESS ALLOCATION
METRICS TO BETTER REFLECT
CERTAIN SUCCESS PROGRESS METRICS
NO LINE WITH THE GOALS OF VISION
FOR SUCCESS. THE REVISED METRICS
INCLUDE INCLUDE COMPLETION OF
ASSOCIATES DEGREES AND
CERTIFICATES OVER EIGHTEEN UNITS
ASSOCIATE DEGREES FOR TRANSFER
SUCCESSFUL TRANSFER. TO FOUR
YEAR INSTITUTIONS COMPLETION A
TRANSFER LEVEL MATH AND ENGLISH
AND THE FIRST YEAR OBTAINING A
REGIONAL LIVING WAGE WITHIN A
YEAR OF COMPLETING A DEGREE OR
CERTIFICATE. CERTIFICATE PROGRAM
AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETING NINE
UNITS OF CAREER TECHNICAL
EDUCATION COURSES.
IN RESPONSE IF YOU BACK ABOUT
THE TRANSITION TO THE NEW
FORMULA THE MAYOR OF VISION ALSO
PROPOSES A TWO YEAR ABSOLUTE
HOLD HARMLESS AS OPPOSED TO THE
ONE YEAR. I'M ABSOLUTE
HOLD-HARMLESS I WAS INCLUDED IN
THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET. THIS WOULD
ENSURE THAT NO DISTRICT WILL
RECEIVE LESS IN BOTH EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN AND NINETEEN TWENTY
THAT IT RECEIVED AND SEVENTEEN
EIGHTEEN.
ADDITIONALLY THE MAYOR VISION
PROPOSES A HUNDRED AND FOUR
MILLION ONE TIME PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GENERAL FUND TO
PROVIDE ONE TIME DISCRETIONARY
RESOURCES TO DISTRICTS TO ENSURE
THAT EVERY DISTRICTS THE YEAR
OVER YEAR. A FUNDING FROM
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN TO EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN REFLECTS REFLECTS A
GROWTH OF AT LEAST TWO POINT
SEVEN ONE PERCENT.
IN REGARDS TO CATEGORICAL
CONSOLIDATION AT THE GOVERNOR'S
BUDGET DIRECTOR THE CHANCELLOR'S
OFFICE TO DEVELOP A PROPOSAL FOR
THE MAYOR VISION THAT WOULD
CONSOLIDATE CATEGORICAL
PROGRAMS.
BASED ON THE CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT MAY
REVISION PROPOSES TO AND
INTEGRATE THE STUDENT SUCCESS
AND SUPPORT PROGRAM THE STUDENT
EQUITY PROGRAM AND THE STUDENT
SUCCESS. A FOR BASIC SKILLS
PROGRAM THESE PROGRAMS ALL SEEK
TO SERVE THE SAME STUDENT
POPULATIONS AND CONSOLIDATING
THEM WOULD GIVE DISTRICTS
ENHANCE FLEXIBILITY.
WE WOULD NOTE THAT THIS PROPOSAL
DOES NOT IMPACT E. OPS FUNDING
FOR VETERANS RESOURCE CENTERS
FOSTER YOUTH PROGRAM OR THE
DISABLED US STUDENTS PROGRAM
DOES WILL REMAIN AS SEPARATE
CATEGORICAL.
IN REGARD TO THE ONLINE COLLEGE
PROPOSAL THE MAYOR VISION
INCLUDES AT VARIOUS AT
CLARIFICATIONS AND TRAILER BILL
ALL HIGHLIGHTED I'M JUST A
COUPLE.
THE TRAILER BILL INSURERS THAT
FACULTY AND CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES
OF THE COLLEGE WOULD BE
REPRESENTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. TO
ACCOMPLISH THIS ONLINE COLLEGE
FOR PARTNER WITH AN EXISTING
DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSES OF
ESTABLISHING A COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENT.
AT THE PRESENT OF THE COLLEGE
WOULD ALSO ESTABLISH ADVISORY
COUNCIL WHICH WOULD INCLUDE
REPRESENTATIVES FROM LOCAL
TRUSTEES AND EMPLOYEES OF THE
COLLEGE. TO ADVISE HIM OR HER ON
ISSUES RELATED TO THE COLLEGE.
AT THE TRAILER BILL ALSO
INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
RELATED TO STUDENT OUTCOMES AND
STUDENT PROTECTIONS AT THIS
INCLUDES REQUIRING THE COLLEGE
TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE
REPORT ON STUDENT OUTCOMES AND
THE COLLEGES PROGRESS ON
REACHING WORKING ADULTS IN ITS
THIRD YEAR OF OPERATION.
AND FINALLY I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT
A FEW NEW INVESTMENTS PROPOSED
ARE FOR THE COMMUNITY COLLEGES
IN THE MAINE REVISION. IN THE
AREA OF FINANCIAL AID THE MAYOR
VISION PROPOSES SEVEN POINT
EIGHT MILLION PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT GENERAL FUND FOR THE
PROPOSED STUDENT SUCCESS
COMPLETION GRANT. TO REFLECT
INCREASE ESTIMATES OF ELIGIBLE
STUDENTS.
AS WELL AS THIRTY POINT FIVE
MILLION ONE TIME AND FIVE
MILLION ON GOING PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GENERAL FUND TO
ALLOW COLLEGES TO UPGRADE THEIR
FINANCIAL AID MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS.
FOR MORE EFFICIENT PROCESSING OF
FINANCIAL AID TO STUDENTS.
THE MAYOR VISION ALSO INCLUDES
AN INCREASE OF FIVE MILLION
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT GENERAL
FUND TO EXPAND THE NEXT UP
PROGRAM WHICH SUPPORTS CURRENT
AND FORMER FOSTER YOUTH AND THIS
WOULD ALLOW THE PROGRAM TO
EXPAND TO TWENTY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICTS. ON SOME
ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE
COMMUNICATIVE AS ARE LISTED IN
THE PROPOSITION EIGHTY HAND OUT
AND THE MCCAULEY DISTRIBUTED AND
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU.
JUMP IN.
EVEN FASHION I WAS LATE.
I'M.
COULD YOU JUST EXPLAIN THE THIS.
.
INCREASE IN FUNDING. FOR TWENTY
SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN OF TWO HUNDRED
FIFTY TWO MILLION AND THEN.
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN FOUR HUNDRED
SEVEN. IS IS IS THIS
SORT OF A A LOOK BACK WHERE
YOU'D. I AM I JUST RESERVE
SIMPLE WAY TO EXPLAIN WHERE
THOSE NUMBERS ARE COMING FROM.
YET SO THE TWO HUNDRED FIFTY TWO
MILLION DOLLAR INCREASE IN
SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN CAME AS A
RESULT OF THE INCREASE IN
REVENUES.
FOUR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR THE
CURRENT FISCAL YEAR YES THAT'S
ONE REASON WHY WE REALLY CAN'T
CERTIFY THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR
TWO WE RECEIVED THESE REVENUES
BECAUSE THEY CAN CHANGE THE.
BE.
GUARANTEE SO BECAUSE SIXTEEN
SEVENTEEN IS IN A TOUGH THREE
YEAR IT IS ONE YEAR THAT IS
RESPONSIVE TO CHANGES IN
REVENUES.
BECAUSE IT IS A WHAT YOUR TEST
THREE YEAR AND IN THE FACTOR
THAT DRIVES THE TEST THREE YEAR
AS PRATAPADITYA EMERALD FUND
GROWTH THREE TESTS THREE AGAIN
THAT'S THE WORD I'M. SORRY HAS
THREE YEAR ASKING.
AND BECAUSE IT WASN'T CERTIFIED.
YOU LOOK BACK THREE YEARS.
YES AND THAT BECOMES A REVENUE
SOURCE FOR THE CURRNT PROP
NINETY EIGHT CALCULATION.
SO YES SO THAT HIGHER AMOUNT
DOES CARRY FORWARD TO THE NEXT
YEAR'S CALCULATION THAT'S
CORRECT AND WE'RE GONNA
CERTIFIED THIS YEAR.
AND WE HAVEN'T DONE IT FOR
ALMOST TEN YEARS THAT WE WOULD
BE CERTIFYING CAN YEARS YES WHAT
DOES THE PART OF THE PROPOSAL IS
WE'D BE CERTIFYING WE WOULD
START SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN WITH
THIS NEW PROCESS A LITTLE IN A
LONG GATED PROCESS BECAUSE THE
TRAILER BILL WOULDN'T ACTUALLY
PASS. IN TIME TO FOLLOW THE
CURRENT PROPOSAL BUT WE WOULD BE
CERTIFIED SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN AND
THEN ALL THE YEARS FOR IT TO TWO
THOUSAND NINE TEN YES.
AND SO THEN YOU WON'T HAVE THE
THREE YEAR LOOK BACK WE WILL
ALWAYS HAVE THE THREE YEAR LOOK
THAT SO WHENEVER WE IN THE BUT
WHERE IN THE BUDGET YEAR WE
WOULD ALWAYS BE CERTIFYING. THAT
WE WOULD NEED CHANGING THE PRIOR
YEAR. IS A THREE YEAR LOOK BACK.
PROVIDE FOR.
NEGATIVE NUMBERS SAY NEXT YEAR
WE HAVE A DECREASE IN REVENUES
WHICH WOULD THEN BE ABLE TO TAKE
THOSE FUNDS BACK SO THAT'S PART
OF WHAT THE PROPOSAL IS ON THE
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT COST
ALLOCATION ACCOUNT. SO WE ARE
CERTIFYING THE PRIOR YEAR THE
GUARANTEE DOES DROP AND WE'VE
STATE AND ALLOCATIONS TO SCHOOLS
AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE. WE WOULD
WE WOULD BRING THE GUARANTEE
DOWN AND CREDIT THAT AMOUNT
THAT'S OVER WE WOULDN'T TAKE IT
BACK FROM THE SCHOOLS THEY WOULD
THEY WOULD KEEP THE FUNNY BUT WE
WOULD CREDIT IT TO THE SECOND
ALLOCATION SCHEDULE.
TO A POINT IN TIME WHERE WE THEN
OWE THEM MORE MONEY WAS SUBTLE
UP AND THEN. APPLY THAT CREDIT
FIRST.
GREAT. THANK THANK YOU MISTER
CHAIR.
IRWIN WAY IF IF WE'VE HEARD YOU
MENTION A COMMUNICABLE JUST ASK
A QUICK QUESTION.
I'M.
ON THE ONLINE COLLEGE.
.
THINGS THAT CAN BE A STATEWIDE
PROGRAM IS IS WORSE THE FUNDING
GONNA COME FROM JUST A PROP
NINETY EIGHT IN GENERAL.
BECAUSE IT WOULD WOULD SUMMIT
WITH WITH THE CURRENT COMMITTEE
COLLEGES BEAT PART OF THEIR
FUNDING BECOMING FROM LOCAL
PROPERTY.
TAXES.
BUT THE SO THIS COLLEGE WOULD
AND THERE'S THAT PROP NINETY
EIGHT APPROPRIATION A HUNDRED
MILLION ALL AT ONETIME TWENTY
MILLION ON GOING TO COLLEGE
WOULD ALSO BE AND.
ELIGIBLE FOR APPORTIONMENT
FUNDING OUT ONCE A COLLEGE
STARTED ON PARYLENE.
STUDENTS. THEN. IT IS IS EVERY
PART OF THE STATE COVERED BY A
COMMUNITY HALL IT'S DISTRICT.
YES. THAT YES AND THIS WOULD BE
UP AT THE COLLEGE WOULD BE
DEFINED AS ITS OWN I'D DISTRICT.
BUT I'M HAVING TROUBLE WITH SOME
OF.
CHRISTIANS DATA WHERE HE'S.
SHOWING ME A POPULATION OF STE.
AB IMPACTED AREAS IN THE STATE
OF ABOUT TWENTY FIVE MILLION.
AND I GOT ABOUT FORTY MILLION IN
THE STATE'S I'M TRYING TO.
TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IF I HAD A
NEW DELTA TO PLAY WITH. TO HELP
WITH THE PARCHMENT FUNDING SO
THAT YOUR QUESTION AND I NEED TO
GET BACK HERE STEP BE.
BUT DATA WE SHARED WITH YOU
ONLY COVERS A CERTAIN AGE RANGE
SO IT DOESN'T COVER ALL.
AUTUMN BUT AGE RANGE SO WE
WEREN'T WE YES WE DIDN'T GIVE.
I THINK WE COVERED EIGHTEEN TO.
AND I CAN GET THAT OPERAND BUT
WE DIDN'T COVER THE TOTAL
POPULATION SO THAT'S WHY DOES A
MATCH THAT THIRTY NINE MILLION
YOU MIGHT EXPECT THERE OKAY.
SO THAT WAS THAT HAVE A LITTLE
CONFUSED OF COURSE. AND CHEERED
BUT YOUR QUESTION I THINK THE
ANSWER IS IT WOULD ALL BE STATE
FUNDS THERE WOULDN'T BE LOCAL
PROPERTY TAXES APPLIED TO THE TO
THE ONLINE COLLEGE IN THE SAME
WAY THAT A. LOCAL COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT RECEIVES
FUNDING. AND WITH THE. CIVIC
CAPPER WOULD IT WERE WRITTEN
WITH THE ONLINE COLLEGE HAVE ITS
OWN COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT.
OR WOULD BE PART OF IT.
I THINK THOSE ARE DETAILS THAT
WILL NEED TO TO WORK OUT AS WE
KNOW TO THE EXTENT WE IMPLEMENT.
OKAY SO THAN A YEAR RE GONNA
HAVE LIKE A SEPARATE DIVISION.
ARE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE
DETAILS ARE AT ALL ON HOW YOU'RE
GOING TO MANAGE THE MONEY WILL
UNDER THEY UNDER THE GOVERNOR'S
MAYOR VISION PROPOSAL.
WE WOULD BE ESTABLISHING A A
COLLEGE UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS THE
COLLEGE WOULD BE DESIGNATED AS A
AS A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
FOR PURPOSES OF EXISTING LAW.
AND SO WOULD BE A SEPARATE
ENTITY TOUGH FOR OUR PURPOSES.
OKAY WITH THAT SEPARATE KAFFIR.
I HESITATE ON ACCOUNT FOR ONLY
GUY I CAN FALL OF QUICKLY JUST
TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU KNOW I
DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M COMMITTING
TO BUY.
COMMITTING TO PRODUCING A
KAFFIR BUT WE WILL FALL OF.
THANK YOU THANK YOU MUCH FOR
FIVE.
I CONFESS I AM STILL TRYING TO
UNDERSTAND A GOOD PORTION OF
THIS BUT SO IF I MAY JUST ASK A.
A FEW QUESTIONS HERE TO THE.
NO APOLOGIZE HAVE THEIR OBVIOUS
TO OTHERS BUT THIS.
BUDGET SOMETIMES FEELS LIKE
HIEROGLYPHICS TO ME.
.
SO THE.
.
THE YOU YOU'VE GOTTA UNDERS.
SOME OF THE DISCRETION WELL LET
ME GO BACK.
SO WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE NOW
BETWEEN THE MANDATORY IF.
PROP NINETY EIGHT.
AMOUNT VERSES THE JANUARY
NUMBERS USING. THE FORMULA WHICH
ESTIMATED FAR LESS IN TERMS OF
STATE INCOME THAT WE ACTUALLY
RECEIVED IN OTHER WORDS THE
GENERAL. WE REQUIRE FORTY
PERCENT AS A FLOOR.
THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET IN
JANUARY WAS.
A AT WHAT PERCENT OF THEIR FLOOR
AND HOW HAS THAT BEEN INCREASED
TO REFLECT.
THE ADDITIONAL MONEY THAT THE
STATE HAS RECEIVED A AND WILL BE
RECEIVING.
THIS COMING YEAR OR PROJECTED.
INCOMES FOR THE STATE THROUGH
THROUGH THE F. INTO THE FISCAL
YEAR.
SO I I THINK THAT WHEN YOU TALK
ABOUT THE FORTY PERCENT YOUR UP
REFERENCING THAT THE TEST ONE
YEAR. AND SO IT'S NOT GOING TO
BE A TOTAL OF FORTY PERCENT OF
THOSE REVENUES UNLESS TEST ONE
IT'S HIGHER THAN YOUR TESTS TO
YOUR DOOR YOUR TEST THREE
DEPENDING ON WHICH ONES
OPERATIVE.
SO WHAT IS STATE TEST ONCE ONE
IS BECAUSE IT'S PROBABLY THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEED YOU'RE GOING
YOU'RE GUARANTEED AT LEAST.
WANT FORTY PERCENT OF TOTAL
GENERAL FUND REVENUES PUT YOUR
LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES THAT WOULD
BE YOUR TEST ONE AND THE ONLY
TIME TEST ONE WOULD BE OPERATIVE
IF IT'S HIGHER. THAN YOUR OTHER
TWO TESTS
SO RIGHT NOW THE WAY IT WHAT THE
ITS FUNDING IT'S ACTUALLY THE
SCHOOLS ARE GETTING MORE REVENUE
THAN FUNDING AT THAT FORTY
PERCENT RIGHT IN SO I AND I
UNDERSTAND THAT. SO MY QUESTION
WAS WITH THE ADDITIONAL SUMS.
DOES THE BUDGET REFLECT AN
INCREASE SO THAT THE PERCENTAGE
IS A STAYS THE SAME AS IT WAS IN
JANUARY MEANING WAS ABOVE FORTY.
OR ARE WE NOW GIVEN THE NUMBERS
SO WE AT THE FORTY PERCENT IT IT
SHOULD BE ABOVE IT'S LIKE THE
END AND THAT FORTY PERCENT AND
NOW IT'S LIKE THIRTY EIGHT POINT
SOMETHING BUT. I'M IT IS ABOVE
BECAUSE WHERE IN THOSE.
WARRANTED.
A TEST THAT'S HIGHER THAN TEST
ONES WERE FUNDING ABOVE THAT.
IT BUT WE FUNDING AT A LOWER
PERCENTAGE GIVEN THE INCREASED
REVENUES YES LOCAL I. SO YOU
LOWER PERCENT ALRIGHT THAT'S
THAT I DON'T HAVE THAT AND I
COULD CERTAINLY GET THEM WE. TO
IF ANY I. THINK YOU DO HAVE ANY
IDEA WHY THAT WOULD BE. AGAIN IT
HAS TO DO WITH.
THE WAY THAT GENERAL FUND
REFERENCE CAME AND AND THE TESTS
THAT WE ARE AND SO THIS IS TO ED
ANY INSTANCE WHERE WE HAD A YOU
KNOW A FEW YEARS AGO WE HAD
ELEVEN BILLION DOLLARS IN
OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE FACTOR
THAT WE HAVE TO CATCH UP.
SCHOOLS TO GET THEM CAUGHT UP TO
WHAT WAS I MEAN OBLIGATED
THROUGH THE PROPOSITION NINETY
FORMULAS THAT MEAN INSPECTOR
BALANCES NOW ZERO.
SO AS WE WE GO INTO THESE YEARS
WHEN WE HAVE A TEST TO YOU'RE
STILL GOING TO GET GROWTH YOU'RE
GONNA GET YOUR THREE PERCENT
FOUR PERCENT. COST OF LIVING
ADJUSTMENT BASED ON PER CAPITA
PERSONAL INCOME OF THE GROWTH IN
REVENUES BUT YOU MAY NOT BE SEEN
THOSE HUGE SPIKES THAT YOU USE
TO SEE BECAUSE THERE'S NO
MAINTENANCE FACTOR LEFT TO PAY.
OKAY SO THAT BRINGS ME TO THIS
SITE ON.
PAGE THREE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS
MANDATE BACKLOG REDUCTIONS.
.
YOU ARE STILL AS I UNDERSTAND
IT.
EXTENDING I GUESS. A TWO
BILLION DOLLARS WHICH IS AN
INCREASE OF TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY
SIX MILLION OVER.
THE EARLIER BUDGET IN JANUARY
PROPOSED BUDGET.
FOR CONTINUED INVESTMENTS IN
IMPLEMENTING STATE ADOPTED
ACADEMIC CONTENT STANDARDS
UPGRADING TECHNOLOGY ETCETERA.
BUT THOSE ARE BEING.
TAKEN OUT OF PROP NINETY EIGHT
BASE FUNDING LEVELS CORRECT.
SO THIS.
THIS SO THE DISCRETIONARY
FUNDING IT'S. PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT YES IT'S COUNTING TOWARDS
MEETING THAT MINIMUM PARTS SO
BASICALLY WHAT WHAT YOU'RE DOING
HERE'S DIRECTING SOME OF THAT
PROP NINETY EIGHT MONEY OVER AND
ABOVE THE. FORMULA FOR GOING TO
LOCAL SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL
DISTRICT NO THIS IS INCLUDED IN
THE FORMULA THIS IS A PAYMENT
THAT'S
PART OF PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT
SO IT'S NOT OVER AND ABOVE OKAY.
THEN.
I HAVE A PARTICULAR INTEREST IN
THE FIRE RELATED PROPERTY TAX
BACKFILL BECAUSE MY DISTRICT IS
SEEN A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN
PROPERTY TAXES AND. WE FEAR IN
PART OF THE DISTRICT THAT WE
HAVE A BASIC CADE.
SITUATION THE THE. THE NUMBER OF
THESE HOMES WHICH PROVIDE THAT
MONEY WILL.
NOT BE REBUILT AND CERTAINLY
NOT IF THEY ARE THE THE AND NOT
FOR QUITE SOMETIME. HOW IS THAT
REFERENCED A IN THE BUDGET AND A
WHAT CONSIDERATIONS BEING MADE
LOVE FOR THE OUT YEARS?
SO WHAT'S INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET
AS A BACK FILL.
FOR BASICALLY DISTRICTS THAT'S
WILL HAVE LOST REVENUES AND ALSO
A YEAR FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION AND
COMMUNITY COLLEGES BECAUSE THEY
DON'T HAVE AN AUTOMATIC
ADJUSTMENT ON THEIR GENERAL
FUND.
OF FOR SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN SO AS
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN AND.
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN BOTH CONCLUDE
THAT PAYMENT FOR BASICALLY
DISTRICTS WERE.
SETTING ASIDE PROPOSITION NINETY
EIGHT PAYMENT IN ORDER TO A
FACTUAL THEIR LOSS AND THOSE
AMOUNTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY
THE COUNTY AUDITOR CONTROLLERS
ARE ARE SUBMITTING JUST AN
ESTIMATE OF WHAT THEY'VE LOST
TO.
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND
THAT'LL BE REVIEWED AND THEN WE
WILL BE RELEASING THOSE PAYMENTS
WITH THE LETTER TO THE
CONTROLLER AND ARE THERE ANY
CREATURE MY LAST QUESTION OTHER
ANY CRITERIA.
THAT.
HAVE YET TO BE ESTABLISHED IN
ORDER TO GET THAT BACK FILLED.
CLUB AREN'T THE MAJORITY OF
DISTRICTS WILL AUTOMATICALLY
FUNDED BY US TO GENERAL FUND AND
PROPERTY TAXES OF THE PROPERTY
TAXES DROPPED THEY'RE GOING TO
HAVE AN AUTOMATIC. FOR THE UP
BASICALLY DISTRICTS AND OF THE
SPECIAL EDUCATION IT WILL BE
DONE I BELIEVE WE HAVE IT IN A
LETTER THAT WOULD GO OUT.
FOR SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN WOULD BE
PROBABLY IN LIKE THIS MAY OR
JUNE AND THEN FOR EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN WOULD BE THE FOLLOWING
YEAR AROUND THE SAME TIME THANK
YOU.
IF I COULD ON THE COMMUNITY
COLLEGE OR WE CAN WE CAN DO THAT
LATER.
VERY GOOD THANK YOU SO WE'RE
GONNA WRITE.
ALEJO AND KEEP MOVING.
WE WANT TO TRY TO GET DONE BY
TWO.
THANK YOU AND GOOD AFTERNOON
MISTER CHAIRMAN NUMBER S.
KENNETH POND WITH THE
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S OFFICE.
I'LL BE COVERING.
OUR ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT GUARANTEE AS WELL
AS THE KICKOFF SPENDING
PROPOSALS AND LET MY COLLEAGUE
COVER EARLY EDUCATION IN THE
COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
I WILL BE SPEAKING FROM A PART
TIME OFFICE JUST RELEASED.
IRATE AROUND NOON TODAY SHOULD
HAVE PHYSICAL COPIES AND THAT
WILL ALSO BE.
ONLINE MOMENTARILY.
I THINK THAT TIME.
SOME TOMORROW I CAN SENATOR
JACKSON'S OPENING QUESTIONS
REALLY GOT RIGHT TO THE HEART OF
THIS BUDGET AND WHY WE SEEING
THESE INCREASES IN THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE.
SO IF YOU LOOK ON FIGURE ONE IN
PAGE THREE OF OUR AYE REPORT TO
SEE THE INCREASES IN THE
GUARANTEE EACH YEAR RELATIVES
THE JANUARY ESTIMATES.
I THINK THE WAY TO THINK ABOUT
THAT IS THE INCREASE IS REALLY A
PRODUCT OF THREE FACTORS.
ABOUT HALF OF THAT SEVEN HUNDRED
AND TWENTY SEVEN MILLION
INCREASE OVER THE PERIOD. IS THE
RESULT OF HIGHER GENERAL FUND
REVENUES STATE REVENUE I
COMPARED TO JANUARY IS UP NEARLY
EIGHT BILLION OVER THE THREE
YEARS.
AND THE REVENUE INCREASE THAT
LARGE I NORMALLY WOULD ACQUIRE
THE STATE TO MAKE A VERY LARGE
MAINTENANCE FACTOR PAYMENT TO A
TRUE STORY SCHOOL FUNDING FOR
PAST PERIODS OF SLOWDOWNS ARE
DROPS.
BUT THE STATE ALREADY MADE MOST
OF THOSE ILLUSTRATIONS IN
JANUARY. AND SO THIS LARGE
REVENUE SURGE ONLY INCREASES THE
GUARANTEE OF THREE HUNDRED
MILLION DOLLARS.
AS YOU KNOW HOW TO THE EARLIER
QUESTION HAD THE STATE
CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES SCHOOLS
A MINIMUM SHARE OF THE STATE
BUDGET. BUT WE WERE ALREADY
ABOVE THAT SHARE IN JANUARY AND
SO THAT'S WHAT ANOTHER REASON
YOU DON'T SEE LARGER AFFECT.
HOW THE SECOND FACTOR IS REALLY
A POLICY PROPOSAL AS YOU KNOW
THE STATE SOMETIME SHIFTS
PROGRAMS BETWEEN THE PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT TO NON PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT SIDE OF THE BUDGET?
SOMETIMES WE ADJUST THE
GUARANTEE FOR THOSE SHIFTS
SOMETIMES WE DON'T.
I MOST RECENTLY WE SHIFTED.
SOME COSTS FOR THE STATE
PRESCHOOL PROGRAM INTO
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT.
I THAT HAPPENED IN TWENTY
FIFTEEN SIXTEEN THE STATE DIDN'T
MAKE ANY ADJUSTMENT AT THAT
TIME.
ABOUT THE GOVERNOR NOW PROPOSES
TO GO BACK AND ADJUST TO
GUARANTEE UPWARD FOR THAT SHIFT.
AND THE THIRD FACTOR REALLY IS A
NON CHANGE
HOW THE ADMINISTRATION CONTINUES
TO ASSUME THAT ATTEND STUDENT
ATTENDANCE INCREASES SLIGHTLY
AND TWENTY SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN.
THAT TRIGGERS A SPECIAL HOLD
HARMLESS PROVISION THAT OUR
STATE CONSTITUTION. AND IT
NEGATES THE DECLINE OF THAT
WOULD OTHERWISE OCCUR IN TWENTY
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN AND TWENTY
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN.
I THINK THE ADMINISTRATION I
GIVE YOU A GOOD REVIEW OF SOME
OF THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF
THEIR PROPOSAL FOR THE NEW
CERTIFICATION PROCESS.
BY THE STATE ORIGINALLY CREATED
THIS PROCESS BACK IN NINETEEN
EIGHTY NINE AS A WAY TO FINALIZE
THE CALCULATION OF THE MINIMUM
GUARANTEE.
AND IT CALLED FOR THE DIRECTOR
OF FINANCE STATE SUPERINTENDENT
AND THE CHANCELLOR OF THE
COMMUNITY COLLEGES AYE TO ALL
AGREE UPON A FINAL CALCULATION
OF THE GUARANTEE NINE MONTHS
AFTER THE END OF THE FISCAL
YEAR.
AND AS SIMPLE AS THAT SOUNDS ON
PAPER AT THAT PROCESS AND THIRTY
YEARS HAS REALLY NEVER WORKED
THAT WAY THAT'S RIGHT NOW IN
STATUTE.
THE ENTITY IS RESPONSIBLE RARELY
AGREE HOW THE CALCULATION OF THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE. AND WE HAVE A
STATE IS NOT CERTIFIED ANY YEAR
IS.
SINCE TWO THOUSAND EIGHT NINE.
SO THE MAYOR VISION AND I THINK
PRESENTED TO YOU AS A PACKAGE
FOR REALLY CONSISTS OF THREE
SORT OF SEPARATE.
PARTS OF THAT PROPOSAL. LAW THE
FIRST IS THAT THE DIRECTOR OF
FINANCE WOULD ADMINISTER A NEW
PUBLIC PROCESS FOR CERTIFYING
THE GUARANTEE. THAT AS YOU FOR
THE ADMINISTRATION SAY THAT
WOULD CONSIST
OF AN INITIAL RECALCULATION OF
THE GUARANTEE FOR THE PRIOR YEAR
IN THE MAY REVISION. WOULD BE A
THREE OR FOUR WEEK PUBLIC
COMMENT PERIOD AND THEN A NINETY
DAY PERIOD FOR LEGAL CHALLENGES
AND ASSUMING A LEGAL CHALLENGES
GUARANTEE WOULD BE FINAL AFTER
THAT POINT.
THE SECOND COMPONENT PROBABLY
THE MOST COMPLICATED QUESTION IS
A PLAN TO AUTOMATICALLY ADJUST
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT
SPENDING TO REFLECT ANY
INCREASES OR DECREASES IN THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEED THAT OCCURRED
DURING THAT CERTIFICATION
PROCESS.
THE MINIMUM GUARANTEE WERE TO
DROP
STATE WOULD JUST ON PAPER I
REDUCE THE SPENDING THAT COUNTS
TOWARDS THE GUARANTEE THAT YEAR
AND CREDIT THE DIFFERENCE TRIED
THIS NEW TRIP ACCOUNT.
AND THAT'S CALLED THE
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT COST
ALLOCATION SCHEDULE.
TO GUARANTEE WHERE TO INCREASE
DURING CERTIFICATION AND THE
STATE WOULD USE ANY. CREDIT SOME
THAT ACCOUNT TO HELP MEET THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEE.
A DISCOUNT ISN'T SOMETHING THAT
HOLDS REAL DOLLARS IT'S REALLY
JUST AN ACCOUNTING MECHANISM.
FOR THAT THE STATE ON PAPER
CONCERT SCHOOL A SCHOOL SPENDING
AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE
MINIMUM GUARANTEED DURING THE
BUDGET CLOSE UP PROCESS.
I ONE OF THE WRINKLES STEP THE
GOVERNOR PROPOSES TO CAP THE
AMOUNT OF SPENDING THAT COULD BE
RECLASSIFIED TO THAT MECHANISM.
AND SO IN SOME AREAS THAT MIGHT
NOT NOT ACTUALLY RESULT IN
SPENDING BEING EQUAL TO THE
GUARANTEE CURRENT CERTIFICATION.
AND IN THE THIRD COMPONENT IS
JUST THE PROPOSAL TO CERTIFY THE
GUARANTEE THOUGHT BACK TO TWO
THOUSAND NINE TEN.
A SOURCE FAR AS OUR ASSESSMENT.
AS FAR AND AS FAR AS GROWTH A
MINIMUM GUARANTEE THIS MAYOR
VISION IS REALLY ABOUT AS GOOD
AS IT GETS COM ARE REVENUE
ESTIMATES ARE A FEW BILLION
HIGHER THAN THE ADMINISTRATION
OVER THE PERIOD.
LARGELY REFLECTING HIGHER
GROWTH IN PERSONAL INCOME TAXES.
NOW BUT EVEN ASSUMING THOSE
INCREASES THE MINIMUM GUARANTEE
WOULDN'T END UP ANY HIGHER THAN
WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS
PROPOSED RIGHT NOW.
IN FACT WE THINK THE A SEVENTEEN
EIGHTEEN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
GUARANTEES COULD END UP AYE
SOMEWHAT LOWER THAN THE
ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS.
AND WE THINK IT'S LIKELY THAT
THAT ATTENDANCE RELATED HOME
HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION WON'T
END UP BEING OPERATIVES.
AND SO THEY EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
GUARANTEE KIND OF THE TWO
HUNDRED MILLION ARE BELOW WHAT
THE ADMINISTRATION HAS CONCLUDED
INVESTMENT REVISION.
BY TURNING TO PROPERTY TAX
REVENUE WE THINK THE
ADMINISTRATION ESTIMATES ARE A
LITTLE LOW THEIR. A GROWTH ON
HOUSING CRISIS HAS BEEN VERY
STRONG LATELY THE NUMBER OF NEW
BUILDING PERMITS HAS BEEN
INCREASING.
AND WE THINK PROPERTY TAX IS
ACROSS THE THREE YEARS HAVE
LIKELY TO COME IN.
SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION
OR SO ABOVE THE MAYOR VISION
ESTIMATES.
THAT'S REALLY SIGNIFICANT NOT SO
MUCH FOR ITS AFFECT ON SCHOOL
FUNDING BUT FOR THE WAY THAT
HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES WOULD FREE
UP. A FUNDING FOR THE PRIORITIES
I AND THE REST OF YOUR BUDGET.
THOUGHT TAKING A LOOK AT THE
CERTIFICATION PROPOSAL WE THINK
THIS OFFER SOME CLEAR ADVANTAGES
OVER THE STATE'S CURRENT
APPROACH.
THINGS MORE TRANSPARENT TO
PUBLISH ALL OF THE FACTORS AND
CALCULATIONS SO THAT ANYONE CAN
LOOK AT THEM.
IT SEEMS LIKE A PROMOTE FASTER
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES RIGHT NOW
CONTROVERSIES OVER PROPOSITION
NINETY EIGHT TEND TO LINGER FOR
YEARS AND YEARS MAKING IT HARDER
TO PUT TOGETHER THE STATE
BUDGET.
BUT ANOTHER ADVANTAGE IS IT
SIMPLY LESS RISKY FOR THE STATE
YOU MIGHT THINK WELL HOW MUCH
CAN THE GUARANTEE REALLY CHANGE
AFTER THE END OF THE YEAR. BUT
TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE AS PART
OF THE TWO THOUSAND ONE MAY
REVISION. HOW THE ADMINISTRATION
WENT BACK AND UPDATED STATE
POPULATION ESTIMATES AS FAR BACK
AS NINETEEN NINETY FIVE NINETY
SIX?
AND THAT RESULTED IN A SIX
HUNDRED MILLION INCREASE ACROSS
THE NINETY FIVE NINETY SIX
NINETY SEVEN NINETY EIGHT.
FISCAL YEAR IS OBVIOUSLY LONG
AFTER THOSE YEARS WERE CLOSE
STERN.
STATE AND SCHOOL DESKS
DISTRICTS I MIGHT HAVE WANTED TO
LOCK DOWN HOW THEY BUDGETS FOR
THOSE YEARS.
AND FINALLY I THINK IT JUST
CREATE WE THINK IT CREATES CLEAR
LINES OF ACCOUNTABILITY HAD LETS
YOU CALLED ONE INDIVIDUAL THE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TIMELY
CERTIFICATION OF THE GUARANTEE.
I THE NEW TRIP PROCESS FOR
SPENDING ALSO SEEMS TO HAVE
MERIT.
I SPENDING ECLIPSED BY SETTING
SPENDING EQUAL TO THE GUARANTEE
AND HELPS PERFECT PRESERVE YOUR
BUDGET FLEXIBILITY MOVING
FORWARD. YOU CAN ALWAYS DECIDE
TO APPROPRIATE MORE THAN THE
PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT MINIMUM
GUARANTEE. BUT THIS MECHANISM
WOULD PREVENT THAT FROM
HAPPENING IN YEARS WHEN YOU
DON'T INTEND IT.
HOW THE NEW CAP ON THE TRIP
MECHANISM IS SOMETHING THAT WE
THINK WOULD ADD NEW COMPLEXITY
OF THIS PROCESS?
AND ALSO WERE COUNTER TO ITS
INTENT.
SO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO
APPROVE THE GOVERNOR'S
CERTIFICATION A PROPOSAL BUT
WITHOUT THAT I CAPS THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION DESCRIBED.
BY TRYING TO SPECIFIC K. TWELVE
A SPENDING PROPOSALS NAY
REVISION HAS APPROXIMATELY SEVEN
HUNDRED MILLION. AND USE OUR
PROPOSALS VICKY TWELVE SCHOOLS
AND WE HAVE A SUMMARY OF OUR
ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATION THAT'S
ON THE FIGURE FOUR PAGE ELEVEN
OF OUR REPORT.
THERE ARE ESSENTIALLY THREE
MAJOR PROPOSALS ON THIS MAY
REVISION.
ARE THE FIRST IS AN ADDITIONAL
TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY SIX
MILLION FOR ONE TIME
DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
I BRING THE TOTAL ALLOCATED NEXT
YEAR TO TWO BILLION.
OTHER THAN THE INCREASE IN
FUNDING THAT PROPOSAL WAS IS
ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS JANUARY.
DISTRICTS COULD USE THAT THAT
ALLOCATION THAT GRANT FOR ANY OF
THEIR PRIORITIES AND THE FUNDS
THEY RECEIVE WOULD BE SCORED
AGAINST THE K. TWELVE MANDATES
BACKLOG.
I THE SECONDS A PROPOSAL IS AN
ONGOING AUGMENTATION OF TWO
HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SEVEN
MILLION FOR THE LOCAL CONTROL
FUNDING FORMULA.
THAT BRINGS THE TOTAL INCREASE
NEXT YEAR TO THREE POINT TWO
BILLION. I THAT REFLECTS BOTH
THE HIGHER A STATUTORY COST OF
LIVING ADJUSTMENT AS WELL AS AN
EXTRA FEW TENTHS OF A PERCENT
INCREASE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE
STATUTORY COLA.
AND THAT IS THE ADMINISTRATION
MENTION THE THIRD PROPOSAL IS TO
PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC COST OF
LIVING ADJUSTMENT FOR THE
FORMULA MOVING FORWARD.
I WE THINK M.. AT TURNING TO OUR
ASSESSMENTS THAT THE TIME LCF
AUGMENTATION IS A REASONABLE
PROPOSAL BUT CERTAINLY NOT THE
ONLY INCREASE THAT YOU COULD
CONSIDER. WE WILL CONTRIBUTE
WHERE YOU HAVE MANY OPTIONS FOR
ADJUSTING THE FORMULA. BUT
DISTRICTS TO FACE NUMBER OF COST
PRESSURES PENSIONS OTHER
PRESSURES AND THIS INCREASE
MIGHT BE ONE OF WAY TO HELP THEM
ADDRESS THOSE PRESSURES.
THAT WE RECOMMEND YOU REJECT THE
AUTOMATIC COST OF LIVING
INCREASE
I'D THE LC FF AMOUNTS TO MORE
THAN NINETY PERCENT OF ALL OF
THE PROPOSITION NINETY EIGHT
FUNDING YOU ALLOCATE TO SCHOOLS.
AND.
TO PUT THAT AMOUNT OF FUNDING
ON AN ANNUAL UP AUTOPILOT IS
JUST SEEMED LIKE IT RESTRICTS
YOUR FLEXIBILITY AYE TOO MUCH IN
THE ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS.
AND THEN FINALLY REGARDING THE
DISCRETIONARY GRANT.
WE I. THINK THE IDEA OF
ALLOCATING FUNDING ON A PER
PUPIL BASIS MAKES SENSE
BUT LESS THAN TWENTY PERCENT OF
THAT TOTAL TWO BILLION
ALLOCATION WOULD ACTUALLY REDUCE
THE KICKOFF MANDATES BACKLOG. WE
RECOMMEND YOU TIE THIS MONEY
MIGHT FUNDING TO A MORE
STRATEGIC WAY OF PAYING DOWN THE
BACKLOG. AYE AT UPS PERHAPS
SOMETHING WHERE DISTRICTS WOULD
BE REQUIRED TO WRITE OFF ALL OF
THE REMAINING MANDY CLAIMS AS A
CONDITION OF RECEIVING THOSE
GRANTS.
HOW BEYOND THOSE SQUARE
PROPOSALS THE GOVERNOR HAS THREE
TOP PROPOSALS THAT ARE
COMPLETELY NEW IN THE MAIN THE
VISION?
I THOSE INCLUDE TWENTY TWO
MILLION TRIP PLACE EXISTING
PAPER BASED ASSESSMENTS AT
ENGLISH PROFESSOR PROFICIENCY
WITH COMPUTER BASED VERSIONS OF
THAT TEST.
I ALSO INCLUDES FIFTEEN MILLION
FOR THE ORANGE AND BUTTE COUNTY
OFFICES OF EDUCATION TO
ADMINISTER A NEW PILOT PROGRAM.
THAT IS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE
SCHOOL CLIMATES
AND THIRTEEN MILLION FOR THE
CALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE ART
WITNESSED A PROFESSIONAL
LEARNING NETWORKS FOCUSED ON
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.
I'LL IN ALLAH IN THE CASE OF ALL
THESE PROPOSALS WE THINK THE
COSTSEEM FAIRLY HIGH AND I AND
MANY CASES DUPLICATIVE OF THE
STATE'S OTHER EFFORTS IN THOSE
AREAS AND SO WE GOT COMMAND YOU
REJECT.
THOSE THREE NEW PROPOSALS IN
THIS MAYOR VISION.
THE ADMINISTRATION ALSO AS THEY
INDICATED EARLIER HAS SOME
SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS TO
PROPOSALS FROM JANUARY.
AND AND ON THE FIGURE WE HAVE
SOME SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
I FOR EACH OF THOSE SMALLER
PROPOSALS AND SOME CASES
RECOMMENDING AYE YOU REJECT THE
ADDITIONAL CHANGES. IN SOME
CASES RECOMMENDING FOR THE
MODIFICATIONS.
I AND I WILL I CAN THINGS OVER
TO MY COLLEAGUE TO COVER AT THE
COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
GOOD AFTERNOON A GROUP BOTH THE
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S OFFICE
I'LL BE COVERING UP. SINCE BEEN
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING OUR
AYE CHALKER IN PRESCHOOL A GOOD
TALKER PRESCHOOL PROPOSALS AND
THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE PROPOSALS.
AND.
PAGE SIXTEEN OF OUR ARE
REPORTED FIGURE SEVEN HAVE THE
CHILDCARE PRESCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE HAVE.
I'M THRILLED THAT THERE'S REALLY
ONE THE REALLY BIG ISSUE I'M IN
TUCKER IN PRESCHOOL THIS GUY IN
IN THE MIDDLE VISION AND THAT'S
REGARDING CASELOAD.
FOR OTHER CAL WORK SPEECH TO
SPEECH THREE PROGRAMS.
BUT THE MAN. WHO THEN ADDITIONAL
HUNDRED AND FOUR MILLION?
FOR ACTING CREEK ESTIMATES OF
THE HIGHER CASELOAD AT THEM WITH
THIS IN THE IN THE JANUARY
BUDGET.
I'M THESE INCREASES ARE DUE TO
RECENT POLICY CHANGES THAT WERE
ADOPTED IN LAST YEAR'S BUDGET
AROUND REGARDING.
INCOME ELIGIBILITY AND THE
INCOME EXIT THRESHOLD FOR.
BEFORE OF THESE PROGRAMS AND
ALSO.
DAY ADOPTION OF WHAT'S CALLED
WHAT'S GOING TO TWELVE MONTH
ELIGIBILITY WHICH HAS SINCE THE
ONLY RECORDING FAMILIES TO
PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT ONCE
EVERY TWELVE MONTHS TO VERIFY
THAT THERE ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THE
PROGRAM.
THESE CHANGES ARE BY IT
SIGNIFICANT INCREASING WITH THAT
INCOME EXIT THRESHOLD IS AND
AND.
PRODUCING OF.
DUH DUH SERVED ALLOWING FOLKS
TO STAY ON FOR A FULL YEAR
THAT'S HAD A SIGNIFICANT
REDUCTION IN ATTRITION IN THE
NUMBER OF STE.
PEOPLE LEAVING.
THESE PROGRAMS AND IT'S
INCREASED.
THE COST OF THE PROGRAMS I'M IN
IN SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN AND THE
ADMINISTRATION.
HAS AN ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO
REFLECT THAT WE ACTUALLY THINK
BASED ON THE TRENDS IN THIS
CURRENT YEAR AND IT'S HARD TO
REALLY PROJECT WHAT'S GOING ON
BECAUSE WE ONLY HAVE LIKE. NINE
MONTHS WORTH OF DATA WITH THIS
NEW POLICY BUT WE THINK THAT.
THE COST COULD BE EVEN FIFTY
MILLION DOLLARS ABOVE THE THE IS
THE ADMINISTRATION'S MERE
PRESENCE WE RECOMMEND ADDING. AT
LEAST A HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOUR
MILLION INSTEAD OF THE ONE
HUNDRED FOUR MILLION. I'M REALLY
JUST TO INSURE THAT.
SHORTFALL WHERE YOU HAVE TO.
MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT WHETHER
YOU WANT TO.
YOU KNOW.
TICK PEOPLE OFF A THE PROGRAM
OR OR DO MATURE AUGMENTATION.
AND THE OTHER TWO TALKER
PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS THERE ARE
POLLS ARE SMALLER AND WE
CONTINUE DIRECT RECOMMEND
REJECTION OF THE INCLUDES OF
EARLY EDUCATION EXPENSIVE. OP
PROGRAM.
WE THINK IF YOU'RE INTERESTED.
THERE COULD BE SOME ONGOING
INCREASES TO PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT.
TO HELP WITH.
HELP TEACHERS BETTER SERVE.
OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS
IF.
AND THERE ALSO IS AN EXISTING
REVOLVING LOAN FUND PROGRAM THAT
COULD BE ARE BUT A CERTIFICATE
IMPROVE TO MAKE IT MORE
PALATABLE FOR PROVIDERS.
AND THERE'S ALSO A A.
SIXTEEN AND FORTY FOUR THOUSAND.
CITIES THE OPERATIONS INCREASED
REFLECT RELATED TO CHILD CARE
PILOTS THAT WERE ADOPTED LAST
YEAR WE WOULD RECOMMEND
REJECTING THIS PROPOSAL AND
REVISITING IT. NEXT YEAR ARE IN
PART TO SO THAT WE HAVE MORE
TIME TO PROVIDE TO GET MORE
DOCUMENTATION ON THE NEED FOR
THE PROPOSAL. ON PART OF OUR
CONCERN IS THAT WE JUST ADOPTED
IN MARCH NEW LEGISLATION THAT IS
INTENDED TO STREAMLINE. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE WORKLOAD OF THE
DEPARTMENT IN MANAGING THESE
PILOTS AND WE WANT TO GET A
BETTER SENSE OF HOW THAT WOULD
CHANGE THEIR OVERALL WORKLOAD.
I'M SO THAT'S ALL THE CHAPTER IN
PRESCHOOL.
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE HAVE
FOUND THAT ON PAGE TWENTY TO
FIGURE ELEVEN WE HAVE A A BIG
TABLE THE SHOWS ALL OUR TIME
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RECOMMENDATIONS.
ALL THIS FOCUS ON THOSE THAT ARE
A MAJOR PROPOSALS OR THAT ARE
NEW.
AND THAT WORKED IN
JANUARY BUDGET.
SO IN TERMS OF THE.
APPORTIONMENT FUNDING FORMULA.
THE MAIN REVISION ADDRESSES MANY
OF THE SPECIFIC CONCERNS THAT WE
ADDRESS WITH A FUNDING FORMULA
IN IT.
IN FEBRUARY UNSERVED SO THE TWO
KEY CHANGES ONE IS THAT BY
PROVIDING OUTCOMES BASED FUNDING
I'M SPECIFICALLY FOR STUDENTS
RECEIVING A PELL GRANT AND THE.
THE FORMULA IS PROVIDING
ADDITIONAL OUTCOMES BASED
FUNDING.
RELATED TO LOW INCOME STUDENTS
AND HELPING CREATE INCENTIVES
FOR COLLEGES TO SERVE OF
STUDENTS WE THINK THAT'S A
THAT'S A GOOD IMPROVEMENT. BUT
ON THE OTHER THING IS ONE OF THE
NEW ALCHEMIST YEARS IS AN
INCREASE OUR FOR ADDITIONAL
FUNDING THAT COLLEGES COULD
RECEIVE.
BASED ON MEASURES OF.
WHETHER STUDENTS ARE ATTENDING
A REGIONAL WITH A LIVING WAGE
WHEN YOU'RE AFTER AFTER OF BEING
ENROLLED IN COMMITTEE BECAUSE
AS.
WE THINK THIS IS THE WAY TO HELP
OUR ENSURE THAT THAT COLLEGES
ARE BEING REWARDED FOR
PRIORITIZING SOME PROGRAMS MIGHT
BE EXPENSIVE. PROTECT EDUCATION
PROGRAMS BUT THAT TO PROVIDE
LABOR MARKET VALUE.
THAT BEING SAID WE RECOGNIZE
THAT THIS THERE'S A LOT OF
CHANGED WITH PROPOSAL AND WE
THERE IF THERE IS A LOT OF TIME
RIGHT NOW TO.
REALLY LIKE LOOK THROUGH THE
DETAILS I THINK THERE ARE SOME
JUST TECHNICAL QUESTIONS THAT WE
WOULD WANT TO MAKE SURE WE
UNDERSTAND HOW OTHER CHANGES
WOULD BE AFFECTING SCHOOL
DISTRICT ALLOCATION THEM. AND
HOW FUNDING WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
ACROSS THE STATE SO WE WOULD
RECOMMEND THIS TO A CO. ADOPT
DUBBED THE FREE MARKET IN THE
BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE FUNDING
FOR THE HOLD HARMLESS IN THERE
THE COMPONENTS OF THE
ADMINISTRATION. BOB HAS
PROPOSED.
BUT THE LABEL MADE IN
IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL NINETEEN
TWENTY AND THEN IN IN THE SUMMER
ADOPT LEGISLATION THAT WORKS OF
THE DETAILS THAT YOU HAVE MORE
TIME TO REALLY LOOK THROUGH. ALL
THE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS TO MAKE
SURE YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH
THOSE PIECES.
AND IF YOU DID DO THAT THAT
MEANS THAT SOME OF THE.
THAT THAT THAT YOU COULD IF YOU
IF YOU DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE THAT
THE.
SIMILAR COMPONENTS THAT ARE
HOLD HARMLESS PROVISIONS RELATED
TO THE. THE FORMULA YOU COULD I
USE THOSE FOR OTHER ONE TIME
PURPOSES BECAUSE YOU WOULDN'T BE
SHIFTING TO A NEW FORMULA UNTIL
NINETEEN TWENTY.
I'M IN TERMS OF THAT CATEGORICAL
CONSOLIDATION WE THINK THAT ARE%
YOU KNOW WE'VE RECOMMENDED FOR
MANY YEARS CONSOLIDATION OF
CATEGORICAL PROGRAMS WE
RECOMMEND TO GET OUT OF THEM.
TAKING THE GOVERNOR'S PPROACH
WE WOULD ACTUALLY RECOMMEND
CONSIDERING. ADDING ADDITIONAL
PROGRAMS INTO THAT BLOCK GRANT
NUMBER WOULD ALSO.
RECOMMEND REVISITING THE
ALLOCATION METHOD AND THINKING
ABOUT A DISTRIBUTION FOR THAT.
BLOCK GRANT THAT COMPLEMENTS
WHAT YOU DO WITH YOUR ONLINE
ABOUT THE WITH YOUR.
FORTUNATE FORMULA SO FOR
EXAMPLE IF YOU REJECT THE THE.
A REVISED FUNDING FORMULA YOU
MIGHT WANT THIS NEW FUNNY FOR
THAT TO PROVIDE MORE FUNDING
BASED ON THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS
WHO ARE LOW INCOME SO THAT YEAH
AS A SYSTEM AS A WHOLE YOU ARE
PROVIDING SOME COLLEGES WITH
ADDITIONAL FUNDING IF THEY HAVE
STUDENTS WHO HAVE. GREATER NEED.
I'M ON THE ELLEN COMMUNITY
COLLEGE NONE OF THE CHANGES
REALLY ARE ADDRESSED THE
CONCERNS THAT WE HAD INITIALLY
WHICH IS THAT WE DON'T. SEE A
CLEAR A A IDENTIFICATION OF THE
PROBLEMS IN THE EXISTING SYSTEM
BETTER PATTER OF BARRIERS TO
ACCESS FOR WORKING ADULTS AND
WOOD OFF CLEAR SENSE OF WHY THE
ONLINE COLLEGE IS GOING TO FIX
ANY OF THE PROBLEMS THAT EXIST
SO WE WOULD RECOMMEND REJECTING
THE PROPOSAL AT THIS. TIME AND
THAT YOU EXPLORE OTHER SYSTEM
MIGHT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SYSTEM
FOR UP PROGRAMS RELATED TO
WORKING ADULTS.
I'M.
WE ARE JUST ANOTHER A FEW
PROPOSALS VERY QUICKLY THAT I
WOULD HIGHLIGHT AND WE THINK
THAT IN IN SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN WE
DON'T THINK THAT I COLLEGES WILL
SPEND ALL OF THE FUNDING THAT
HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE FOR
ENROLLMENT GROWTH. WE CAN THAT
YOU COULD.
REDUCE FUNDING IN SEVENTEEN
EIGHTEEN BY TWENTY FIVE MILLION
AND AND I USE THAT FOR OTHER ONE
TIME PURPOSES.
THERE'S A PROPOSAL.
THAT'S NEW IN THE METER VISION
THAT'S THIRTEEN AND A HALF A
MILLION ONE TIME AND FIVE
MILLION ON GOING.
FOR CAMPUSES TO UPGRADE THEIR
FINANCIAL AID PROCESSING AND
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WE WOULD
RECOMMEND REJECTING THAT
PROPOSAL.
WE THINK THIS IS THE KIND OF
THESE ARE KIND OF BASE
OPERATING.
THE BETTER FOR BETTER TYPICALLY
FUNDED WITH APPORTIONMENT
FUNDING WE SEE NO NEED TO CREATE
A SEPARATE PROGRAM FOR THIS
PURPOSE.
AND THERE IS SIX MILLION
DOLLARS.
PROPOSED ONE TIME FOR OPEN
EDUCATION RESOURCES ARM WE WOULD
RECOMMEND APPROVING THE FUNDING
JUST I'M REQUIRED THAT THE
CHANCES OFFICE PROVIDE OF ANNUAL
REPORTS FOR THE NEXT THREE
FISCAL YEAR SO WE CAN GET A
SENSE OF. HOW THESE ARE
RESOURCES ARE BEING USED ACROSS
THE STATE TO GET A BETTER SENSE
OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS?
I'M. WERE YOU ARE RECOMMEND.
ADOPTING THAT ADDITIONAL FIVE
MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE NEXT UP
PROGRAM.
BUT WE DO THINK THAT THIS IS A
ALSO ANOTHER PROGRAM THAT COULD
BE CONSIDERED IN IN.
IN CONTEXT OF THE BLOCK GRANT
WHETHER OR NOT THAT SHOULD BE
ALSO A CONSOLIDATED IF YOU'RE
CONCERNED ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT
FOSTER YOU THIRD RISK. THAT
BEING SERVED YOU COULD
PRIORITIZE WITHIN THE BLOCK
GRANT THAT THAT THAT FIRST CALL
ON THE FUNDS ARE FOR OUR FOR
FOSTER YOUTH.
AND FINALLY I'M WE RECOMMEND
REJECTING A SIX MANY FIVE
THOUSAND THAT'S RELATED TO A
COURSE IDENTIFICATION NUMBERING
SYSTEM. UPON THIS.
THE UP THE PURPLE APPEARS TO
HAVE MARRIED BUT IT'S THE
PROPOSAL REALLY FOR AN ONGOING
SOURCE OF FUNDING. THEIR
ADMINISTRATIONS ONLY PROVIDING
ONE TIME.
FUND REVENUES HERE SO WE WOULD
RECOMMEND REJECTING IT HAVING
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE QUEBEC
WITH A FUNDING PLAN THAT
ACTUALLY FUNDS FROM ONGOING
BASIS.
TOSSED UP THERE BUT I'M HAPPY TO
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY
HAVE.
ACTUALLY IT'S A QUESTION FOR THE
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE I WAS.
CURIOUS.
AS TO WHY YOU BELIEVE.
STATED ON PAGE FOURTEEN I THINK
THIS IS.
A NO IT'S ALEJO'S ANALYSIS BUT
IT MAY RELATE TO YOUR VIEW OF
THIS.
THE MAY REBA REVISIONS BASED ON
UPDATED DATA REGARDING CAL WORKS
CHILD CARE CASELOAD AND COST OF
CARE.
UNDER THE ADMINISTRATION'S
ESTIMATES CASELOAD IS UP BUT
COST OF CARE IS DOWN.
SINCE JANUARY I FIND THAT.
CURIOUS GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE
MINIMUM WAGE IS INCREASING THAT
MOST TO OUR CHILDCARE WORKERS
DON'T EVEN. ARGUABLY MAKE
MINIMUM WAGE HOW IS IT THAT THE
COST OF CARE IS BEING REDUCED TO
FROM THE GOVERNOR'S PERSPECTIVE.
JESSICA HOLMES DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE I'M OUR PROJECTIONS ARE
IN COMPARISON TO THE PROTECTIONS
WE HAD A GOVERNOR'S BUDGET SO
OVERALL THE COST OF CARE IS
INCREASING ITS JUST IN
COMPARISON TO GOVERNOR'S BUDGET
IS A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN WE
HAD PROJECTED. AT THAT TIME.
AND DOES THE LA OWES OFFICE
AGREE WITH THAT I MEAN. YOU WE
DON'T HAVE ANY WE DON'T HAVE ANY
CONCERNS WITH THE
ADMINISTRATION'S COST OF CARE
ESTIMATES I WOULD TAKE A LOT OF
THAT THAT DIFFERENCES ON THAT ON
THE COST OF CARE. IF THERE'S THE
BIGGEST VARIATION IS REALLY OF
FAMILY PARENTAL CHOICE ON WHAT
KIND OF PROGRAM THEY WANT TO FOR
EXAMPLE. IF IF FAMILIES CHOOSE
MORE ARMED LICENSE EXEMPT CARE
PURSES FENDER CARE THAT CAN
SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE COST OF
CARE SO IT'S.
IT'S NOT ENOUGH THERE ARE A LOT
OF MOVING PIECES THAT WOULD THAT
THAT CAN AFFECT THAT NOT JUST
FOR EXAMPLE TRANSIT MINIMUM WAGE
ARE OVERALL COST. ALSO FAMILY
CHOICE SO IT CAN BE VERY COMPLEX
BUT WE RAN OUR OWN ESTIMATE AND
WE HAD A VERY SIMILAR.
ESTIMATES TO ADMINISTRATION BUT
NEITHER OF YOU TOOK INTO ACCOUNT
THAT WE GOT AT LEAST TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND CHILDREN WHO DON'T HAVE
ACCESS TO EARLY CARE. AT THIS
POINT TIME I ASSUME THE WITHIN
THE BUDGET BUT THE SPECIFIC.
ISSUE THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING IS
BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF.
SLOTS THAT WE THINK THAT THAT
BASED ON THE CASE ESTIMATED
CASELOAD WHAT WE THINK WOULD BE
THE AMOUNT THAT THESE VOUCHERS
WOULD BE WOULD BE COSTING THE
STATE SO THE VOUCHERS. ARE
INTENDED TO PROVIDE.
FAMILIES WITH THE AMOUNT OF
FUNDING BASED ON THAT THE TWENTY
SIXTEEN BY REGIONAL MARKET
SURVEY.
AND BASED ON WHATEVER OUR
SETTING THAT FAMILIES CHOOSE
BOTTOM WE THINK THAT BASED ON
THAT WE. YOU KNOW OUR ESTIMATE
TRY TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE
LATEST.
THAT WERE ADOPTED LAST YEAR AND
WE THINK BASED ON THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION'S FULLER FIGHTS
NOT A THAT'S NOT.
THIS IS NOT SAYING THAT
PROVIDERS IS DAY TO DAY COSTS
ARE NOT GOOD GROWING IT'S REALLY
MORE ABOUT WHAT'S THE VALUE OF
THE VOUCHERS THAT WE'RE
PROVIDING FAMILIES.
I I UNDERSTAND BUT THE FACT IS
THAT AND I'M TRYING TO FIGURE
OUT WHY YOU GIVE IT THIS NUMBER
WE KNOW THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF
THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN IN THIS
STATE WHO LACK. ADEQUATE EARLY
CARE.
SO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNOR'S
NUMBERS REFLECT.
RATES SINCE LOTS OF EXISTING.
IT PROVIDERS.
GOV EXISTING PROGRAMS WHERE WE
KNOW THESE PROGRAMS DO NOT
ANYWAY REFLECT THE NEED OF JUST
CURIOUS AS TO WHY. OTHERS KNOW.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THE NEED
IS SO MUCH GREATER THAN JUST
LOOKING AT SLOTS IN NUMBERS FOR
EXISTING PROGRAMS ABSOLUTE DEATH
PERFECT ISSUE IS REALLY RELATE
TO THE COST OF THE STATE'S TWO
INSTINCTS THREE CAL ARTS
PROGRAMS WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY
ENTITLEMENTS FOR FAMILIES THE
FAMILIES ARE IN THE PROGRAMS
THAT. RECEIVE THAT CARE SO IT'S
IT'S REFLECTED THE COST OF
SERVING THOSE FAMILIES THIS IS
NOT AN ESTIMATE I THINK WHAT
YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IT'S ENOUGH
TO KNOW WHAT WOULD IT COST TO
SERVE OTHER ELIGIBLE FAMILIES.
THAT OBVIOUS EVEN IF THAT'S
ANOTHER ISSUE THAT WE COULD
PROVIDE YOU WITH MARKETS ARE
BOTH ACTUALLY SO ARE YOU
SUGGESTING THAT WHEN THE THE
NUMBER OF FAMILIES IN CAL WORKS
TO IN A ONE AND TWO WERE TWO AND
THREE WHATEVER IT IS. ARE
ACTUALLY BEING SERVED.
YES WHAT WE IF GOT TO PUT THAT
SO WHAT WE WE HAVE TO BE SEVERE
ONE. WE THINK THAT THAT CAL WORK
STAGE TO STAGE THREE KEY CODE
WILL BE EVEN HIGHER THAN THE
ADMINISTRATION PROJECTED WHICH
IS WHY WE RECOMMEND ADDING. UP
THE AT LEAST FIFTY MILLION
DOLLARS TO THOSE PROGRAMS.
IN TERMS OF THE THE COST THE
AVERAGE COST TO SERVE EACH OF
THOSE FAMILIES WE THINK THAT
THE.
THE ADMINISTRATION'S ESTIMATE
THAT MAY ARE REASONABLE WHICH
ARE STILL GROWING FROM LAST YEAR
BUT OUR LITTLE BIT LESS THAN
THEY WERE IN JANUARY SO TO THE
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE ARE ARE YOU
INCLUDING. THE DO YOU BELIEVE
THAT ALL OF THOSE ELIGIBLE UNDER
CAL WORKS TWO AND THREE ARE.
ABLE TO ACCESS EARLY CARE.
UNDER THE EXISTING CAL WORKS
PROGRAM.
WE BELIEVE THAT AND TO THE
EXTENT THAT OF FOLKS COME TO
THEIR ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT AGENCY
AND REQUEST A VOUCHER. THAT WE
PROVIDE FUNDING WHERE FUNDING
THEM ON BASED ON WHOEVER COMES
UP AND HAS NEED.
IN TERMS OF I THINK YOUR
QUESTION IS A LITTLE MORE
NUANCED I THINK WHAT YOU'RE
ASKING IS. TO THE EXTENT THAT
SOMEONE LIVES IN AN AREA LET'S
SAY WHERE THERE IS AND ACCESS TO
CHILDCARE WE ENSURING BOMB THAT
THEY GET SOME SORT OF ACCESS TO
CARE AND I WOULD STAY WITHIN THE
CONFINES OF OUR CURRENT SYSTEM.
I'M MORE ENSURING THAT OUR
CALVET STEMS ARE GETTING ACCESS
TO CARE BUT WHETHER OR NOT
THAT'S.
AT LICENSE CARE THEY WANT
LICENSE CARE WE CAN ALWAYS YOU
KNOW. ENSURE THAT THAT'S
HAPPENING.
THE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD I
WOULD KNOW I I THINK WHAT YOU'RE
ASKING IS I'M FOR THE FOR THE
FAMILIES WHO ARE NOT CAL WORKS
ELIGIBLE ARE WE ENSURING THAT
THEY GET ACCESS TO CARE. AND
CURRENTLY ALTERNATIVE PM PROGRAM
SERVICE AROUND THIRTY THOUSAND
KIDS BUT IT'S NOT LARGE ENOUGH
TO.
SERVE ALL OF THE CHILDREN IN
THE STATE ON WHO ARE NOT COWARDS
ELIGIBLE AND SO YOU'RE NOT EVEN
BOTHERING TO TRY TO ESTIMATE
THAT IN YOUR NUMBER SHE SAID A
FRAMEWORK AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE
WORKING OFF OF RATHER THAN. THE
REALITY OF
THE ADDITIONAL DEMAND THAT IT
CAN'T BE MATTER ISN'T BEING MET
WE ARE FUNDING THE FULL AMOUNT
THAT'S REQUIRED TO SERVE ALL OF
THE COWARDS FAMILIES JUST BUT
NOT BEYOND THE CAL WORKS
FAMILIES THANK YOU.
EIGHTY THREE YOU HAVE FIGURE ONE
WHICH IS START OFF WITH.
CAN YOU HAVE AN EXPLANATION ON
PAGE FOUR ON IT.
PROPERTY TAXES DOWN FROM JANUARY
BUDGET. BUT IT JST IS
COUNTERINTUITIVE WHAT WHAT IS
REALLY GOING ON WHY.
IT IS THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
JUST.
ANTICIPATING A HIGHER PROPERTY
TAX IN REALITY OR.
I THINK THE YOU KNOW THE MAIN
THING THAT WAS AFFECTING BOTH
OUR FORECAST ADMINISTRATION'S
PROJECTIONS WAS THAT WE HAVE NOW
FOR SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN ACTUAL.
PRELIMINARY REPORTS FROM THE
COUNTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER IS AND
HOW MUCH.
.
REVENUE SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES ARE
RECEIVING. A MUCH OF THAT
INCREASE IN REVENUE IS A LITTLE
BIT LESS THAN WHAT WE WOULD HAVE
THOUGHT JUST BASED PURELY ON
LOOKING AT GROWTH IN ASSESSED
PROPERTY VALUES.
AND EXACTLY SURE WHY THERE'S
ALWAYS A LITTLE BIT OF A SOME
SLIPPAGE SOMETIMES LOOK AT
HIGHER SOMETIMES A LITTLE BIT
LOWER.
BUT THE BIGGEST FACTOR IS JUST
INCORPORATING THAT SLIGHTLY
LOWER. REVENUE AND SEVENTEEN
EIGHTEEN FROM THE PRELIMINARY
DATA AND CARRYING THAT FORWARD
INTO EIGHTEEN NINETEEN.
SO YOU'RE MAKING ADJUSTMENTS ON
YOUR.
REAL ESTATE.
TAX.
LOCAL PROPERTY JACKSON AYE.
IF YOU HAVE AN ANSWER. AS TO
WHY.
YOU HAVE A HIGHER NUMBER AT
FIRST AND THEN WITH YOUR REVISE
YOU ADJUSTED DOWN. BULLET AT
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET WERE KIND OF
USING A MODEL HOME TO KINDA
PROJECTOR FORECAST WHAT WE THINK
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN IS GOING TO
BE IN A YOU PUTTING YOUR INPUTS
AND IT COMES OUT WITH THE
PERCENT GROWTH. BUT WHEN WE
ACTUALLY RECEIVE THE DATA FROM
THE COUNTIES AND CITIES IN ON
THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
THAT DATA IS MORE RELIABLE
GENERALLY THEN THAT ARE MODELS
AND THE PERCENTAGES AND IT
REFLECTS ALL DIFFERENT THINGS
THAT MAY HAVE CHANGED. DURING
THE RIDGE BEFORE THE ORIGINAL
FORECAST SO WE'VE JUST SOLVE ONE
SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN CAME AND IT
CAME IN CONSIDERABLY LESS THAN
WHAT WE. THOUGHT WAS GOING TO
COME IN ITS STILL HIGHER THAN IT
WAS THE YEAR BEFORE AS WE STILL
SEE PROPERTY TAX GROWING
ASSESSED VALUES ARE GROWING.
APART WE JUST BROUGHT ESTIMATE
DOWN TO REFLECTS AN ACTUAL DATA
THAT WAS RECORDED. YOU DRILL
DOWN INTO IT IS YOU EXPECT TWO
PERCENT GROWTH AUTOMATICALLY
RIGHT.
OR IS INFLATION FACTORS LOWER
THAN TWO PERCENT.
IT'S MORE COMPLICATED THAN THAT
BECAUSE IT'S THE COMBINATION OF
TWO PERCENT GROWTH FINE SORT OF
YOUR EXISTING PROPERTY IS ITS
NEW PROPERTIES ADDED TO THE
WORLD'S THAT'S REALLY WHAT
DRIVES A LOT OF THE ICREASE. WE
ALWAYS TURN OVER THE TOP AND
THEN RIGHT THEN YOU IF WE HAVE
AN ESTIMATE OF HOW MUCH CRAPPIE
TRENDS OVER THERE HAVE BEEN SOME
SORT OF. SOME CHANGES AND THAT
THE HOW MUCH TURNOVER WE HAVE
COMPARED TO PREVIOUS YEARS FOR
ALL OF THOSE THINGS. GO INTO THE
S..
AFFECT THE SORT OF GROWTH AND
OVERALL ASSESSED VALUES IN THE
TAX BASE.
AND BASED ON A DIFFERENT MOVING
COMPONENTS IT DOESN'T ALWAYS
COME OUT. EXACTLY THE WAY WE
THINK WELL. OBVIOUSLY I JUST DID
SEEMS LIKE IT BACKWARDS FROM
WHAT YOU WOULD ANTICIPATE.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU MISTER. RIGHT
WE HAVE
COUPLE MORE WHO ARE GONNA.
TRY TO BE. RIGHT.
YES STEP AROUND ON BEHALF OF ST
TO PRINT AND IN THE PUBLIC
INSTRUCTION TOM TILLOTSON AND I
WILL TRY TO BE THAT CONCISE AND
JUSTMAKE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS
ON SOME ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS AND
THAT. AND GOVERNOR'S MAY
REVISIONS OF THE FIRST IS JUST
TO NOTICE OUR CONTINUED SUPPORT
FOR ELSE IF THAT IMPLEMENT IT
IMPLEMENTATION. INCLUDING THE
INCREASE IN AND FUNDING ABOVE
AND BEYOND THE CALL OF THAT THE
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSING I'M WE ALSO
STRONGLY SUPPORT THE LANGUAGE
ENSURING THAT ALL CFF IS
CONTINUOUSLY APPROPRIATED. AND
RECEIVES THE AUTOMATIC COLA
EVERY YEAR WE THINK THIS IS
REALLY IMPORTANT FOR THE
CONTINUED STABILITY OF SCHOOL
FUNDING. ON THE PROPOSAL AROUND
PROP NINETY EIGHT CERTIFICATION
WE ALSO STRONGLY SUPPORT STREAM
LANGUAGE THAT WOULD STREAMLINE
THAT CERTIFICATION PROCESS THINK
WE OUTLINED WHAT WAS OUTLINED
EARLIER WAS A COMPLICATED
PROCESS. AND REALLY I'M THIS AT
REVISED PROCESS WOULD INSURE
THAT UNDER APPROPRIATIONS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
AFTER YEAR AND. AND THE AMOUNTS
ODOR DISTRIBUTED TO SCHOOLS
EXPEDITIOUSLY WELL SO WOULD
SUPPORT THE.
WE ALSO SUPPORT THREE BENCHING
OF PROP NINETY EIGHT FOR THE
FULL DAY PRESCHOOL AUGMENTED
PATIENT. AND THEN ALSO SUPPORT
SEE A LANGUAGE CREATING THE PROP
NINETY EIGHT COST ALLOCATION
SCHEDULE WE THINK WE TAKE ALL OF
THESE. AND COMPONENTS TOGETHER
THAT THIS IS.
A POSITIVE STEP FORWARD.
ON OTHER ELEMENTS OF IT ON THE
CTE PROPOSAL AND KNOW THAT WE
APPRECIATE THE ADMINISTRATION'S
TAKING SOME OF OUR FEEDBACK ON
SOME OF THAT.
WE'RE STILL LOOKING AT IT AND
STILL HAVE SOME QUESTIONS NAMELY
AROUND THAT THEY QUE TWELVE
INFLUENCE ON THE SYSTEM ACTUALLY
AT THE CONSORTIUM LEVEL AND SO
LOOK FOR LOOKING FOR TO.
CONTINUE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE O THAT.
I'M WILL ALSO SEE SUPPORT THE
FUNDING THAT THE GOVERNOR'S
PROVIDING FOR THE.
ALPACA ASSESSMENT AND WE DON'T
THINK THAT WE SHOULD WAIT ANY
LONGER THIS.
IS A MULTI YEAR EFFORT TO
DEVELOP THE ASSESSMENT AND THINK
THAT WE SHOULD BE DEVELOPING IT
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO WE
SUPPORT THE.
PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE THE FUNDING
FOR THAT.
AND THEN I'LL DEFER TO. OTHER
AREAS BUT DID WANT TO MAKE A
COUPLE OF COMMENTS ON THE CHILD
CARE PROPOSAL WHICH IS TO NOTE
THAT WE ALSO SUPPORT THE.
OF FUNDING FOR THE INCLUSIVE
EARLY EDUCATION SPACE WE THINK
THAT AS WE LOOK AT OUR AYE AT
OUR CHILDREN AND HOW BEST SERVE
THEM MOVING
TOWARDS AN INCLUSIVE. SPACE
WHERE THEY'RE NOT SEPARATED FROM
THEIR PEERS BUT WORKING.
IN THE SAME CLASS WITH THEIR
PEERS WHILE THEIR NEEDS ARE
STILL BEING MATT IS A POSITIVE
STEP FORWARD UNTIL WE SUPPORT WE
SUPPORT THAT PROPOSAL. AND THEN
THE FUNDING THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION IS PROPOSING TO
PROVIDE ON THE SUBSIDIZED AT
CHILD CARE PILOTS SO WE ALSO
SUPPORT THAT FUNDING I WOULD
NOTE THAT THAT.
FUNDING PROVIDED DOES REFLECT
REVISED.
ESTIMATES THAT WE PROVIDED TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AT DO
REFLECT THE STREAMLINING THAT
WAS DONE IN MARCH AND SO WE
THINK THAT WORK ASSOCIATED WITH
THAT IS A LINES THEM TO THAT TO
THE NEW STREAMLINED PROPOSAL.
AND THAT TO KNOW THAT WE ARE AND
YOU KNOW AS AS THAT THE LOOK
THAT STATUTE HAS CHANGED ON
THAT.
WE ARE AND BEGINNING TO WORK
WITH THE COUNTY OFFICE THE WITH
THE COUNTIES THAT ARE LOOKING TO
DO THIS AND TO I'M.
PROVIDE THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
AND SUPPORT AND SO WAITING
ANOTHER YEAR I AM. PUTS MORE
PRESSURE ON OUR STAFF AND SO WE
SUPPORT THAT PROPOSAL AND HOPE
THAT THE LEGISLATURE WILL AS
WELL. AND WITH THAT I'M
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
CHRISTMAS WHEN IT FOR THE
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE COLLEGES
CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE I WILL JUST
EXPLAIN THE DOCUMENTS THAT WE I
HINTED TO. SODAS FIRST A PACKET
OF INFORMATION THAT SAYS
MEMORANDUM AT THE TOP IS JUST
THE MESSAGE THAT WE SENT TO OUR
SYSTEM AROUND THE MAYOR VICIOUS
AND.
WERE SUPPORTIVE OF THE MAYOR
VISION WE THINK IT REFLECTS
COULD PROGRESS.
MODEST GROWTH BUILDING ON
SUBSTANTIAL INCREASES IN THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET. ALL TALK
QUICKLY ABOUT THE TWO ISSUES
THAT HAVE CONSUMED MUCH OF OUR
TIME THIS YEAR.
WELL THE FIRST ON THE FUNDING
FORMULA WE THINK WE APPRECIATE
THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL.
AS YOU ARE AWARE WE'VE SPENT
FOUR MONTHS TALKING WITH OUR
STAKEHOLDERS ABOUT.
HOW TO IMPROVE THE FRAMEWORK
INCLUDED IN THE JANUARY BUDGET?
THIS DOCUMENT HERE TITLE CHANCES
RECOMMENDATIONS ON FUNDING WHERE
THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE
SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE.
EARLY LAST WEEK.
REQUESTING CHANGES TO THE
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL WE
APPRECIATE THAT THE DEPARTMENT
FINANCES INCLUDED MOST OF THOSE
IN THE MAY REVISION. WE THINK IF
ENACTED THE A FUNDING FORMULA
WOULD MAKE PROGRESS ON THE
VISION FOR SUCCESS THAT WE'VE
TALKED ABOUT. I THINK THE KEY
POINT HERE. IS THAT UNDER THE.
THE ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSAL.
ALL DISTRICTS WOULD RECEIVE AT
LEAST AS MUCH AS THEY RECEIVED
IN SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN AND
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN AND NINETEEN
TWENTY SO WE THINK. ABOUT THIS
PROVIDES A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF
TIME FOR A SYSTEM TO TRANSITION
TO A NEW FORMULA.
AMONG THE ONLINE COLLEGE I WOULD
JUST SAY GOD I THINK THAT THE.
THEM A REVISION REFLECTS
FEEDBACK ON TWO KEY ISSUES ON
GOVERNANCE SOME COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING THAT STRENGTHEN THE
PROPOSAL IN RESPOND OF A
FEEDBACK THAT WE THINK WE HEARD
FROM OUR STAKEHOLDERS OF THE
PAST FEW MONTHS.
HAPPY ANSWER QUESTIONS.
GUYS COVERED ALL MY QUESTIONS
WE'RE GOING TO GO RIGHT INTO OUR
NEXT A PANEL.
ISSUED TO.
IT ALL COME UP HERE. THAT WHERE
WE ARE COMFY
.
WE'RE HERE TO.
BUT IS GOING TO GO THROUGH ALL
THE PRESENTATIONS AND HOLD OUR
QUESTIONS SO LET'S GO. ALL RIGHT
CHUCKLED BERMAN FINANCE AYE
BEFORE GOING TO THE MAYOR VISION
PROPOSALS I'D LIKE TO REITERATE
THAT.
.
THIS PROPOSAL CONTINUES THE
NINETY ONE POINT HERE I'M
MILLION DOLLAR THREE PERCENT
INVESTMENT BOTH UC AND CSU THIS
REPRESENTS A SUSTAINABLE
COMMITMENT.
TO INVESTMENT IN HIGHER
EDUCATION.
.
MOVING INTO THE MAY REPRISALS BY
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE FIFTY
MILLION DOLLARS WITH HELD THEM
BUDGET ACT OF TWENTY SEVENTEEN.
IS.
REFLECTED IS BEING RELEASED.
AS YOU MAY REMEMBER THE FLOW
THAT THE SEA HAD TO PROVIDE A
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT HAVE
MET FIVE CONDITIONS NAMELY. THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE
AUDITOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS THE
COMPLETION OF ACTIVITY BASED
COSTING PILOTS. THE ATTAINMENT
OF A.
TRUE OF RATIO OF TWO FRESHMAN
STUDENTS FOR EVERYONE TRANSFER
STUDENT ALL CAMPUSES.
THE ELIMINATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL.
RETIREMENT PAYMENTS TO SENIOR
MANAGER GROUP EMPLOYEES AND THE
RELEASE OF DID ADDITIONAL
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
THE UC IS SUBMITTED EVIDENCE TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND
AFTER REVIEW. WE DETERMINED THAT
THEIR ACTIONS REPRESENTED A GOOD
FAITH EFFORT THAT WOULD
MERRILEES HOWEVER. THERE ARE
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS PENDING.
AT THE MAY REGION'S WEAVING
LATER THIS MONTH THAT WILL BE
TAKING A LOOK INTO BEFORE.
FUNDING IS IS ACTUALLY RELEASED.
I'M MOVING ON OF THE THE VISION
CONTINUES TO REFLECT THE ACTION
TAKEN IN LAST YEAR'S BUDGET TO
DIRECTLY APPROPRIATE FOR. THE UC
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND THE
EASY PATH PROJECT. HOWEVER
GIVEN.
ADDITIONAL FUNDING NEEDS FOR
THE SEE PATH PROJECT DUE TO
INCREASED DEPLOYMENTS AT MORE
CAMPUSES.
.
THE MAYOR VISION ALLOWS THE CITY
TO RETURN TO A FEE FOR SERVICE
THAT INCREMENTAL FIFTEEN POINT
THREE MILLION REQUIRED TO.
CAN DOT SAID TO MEET ITS
REQUIREMENTS AND AND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN YEAR.
IF YOU SEE.
NEEDS ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO.
COMPLETE WORK AND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN THEY CAN ASSESS
ADDITIONAL FUNDS ONLY IF THEY
RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND THE
JOINT LEGISLATION JOINT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMITTEE.
THE BAY REVISION ALSO CONTAINS
FIFTY FIVE MILLION FOR
PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY SLOTS AT
YOU SEE AMNESTY Y. GRANT PROGRAM
OF THAT MONEY FORTY MILLION IS
AVAILABLE FOR THE YOU SEE. TO
EXPAND RESIDENCY SLOTS FOR
PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTS SERVING
RURAL UNDERSERVED AREAS AN
ADDITIONAL FIFTEEN MILLION IS
AVAILABLE.
TO BE OPERATED BY YOU SEE AS A
STATEWIDE GRANT PROGRAM FOR
PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTS IN THOSE
AREAS.
ALL ELIGIBLE ALL RESIDENCY
PROGRAMS THAT ARE ACCREDITED IN
CALIFORNIA ARE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY
FOR THESE FUNDS.
THE UC BUDGET ALSO CONTAINS ONE
POINT TWO MILLION FOR ANTI BIAS
TRAINING AT BOTH THE UC AND CSU
CAMPUSES TO COMBAT THE RISING
NUMBER OF HATE INCIDENTS ON
UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES. AND ONE
MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE
INSTITUTE ON GLOBAL COOPERATION
IN HOLLAND GLOBAL CONFLICT AND
COOPERATION.
.
MOVING TO THE CSU AND YOU SEE.
TWO ISSUES THAT THEY BOTH HAVE.
ONE IS A TUITION OFFSET.
IF THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF
EITHER INSTITUTION WERE TO RAISE
TUITION AND TWENTY EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN.
THIS LANGUAGE WOULD ALLOW THE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO. REMOVE A
PORTION OF EACH.
EACH EACH SEGMENTS MAIN
APPROPRIATION TO COVER INCREASED
CAL GRANT COSTS ASSOCIATED. WITH
THAT TUITION INCREASE AND AS
WELL AS INCREASED MIDDLE CLASS
SCHOLARSHIP COSTS.
EACH BUDGET ALSO CONTAINS ONE
HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS FOR
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE THAT'S ONE
HUNDRED FOR YOU SEE IN ONE
HUNDRED FOR CSU. ARE BEFORE I
MOVED TO TO IDENTIFY TO MY
COLLEAGUE FOR FINANCIALLY
ADEQUATELY COVER UC HASTINGS AS
WELL.
UC HASTINGS RECEIVES HAS
RECEIVED ONE POINT FIVE MILLION
GENERAL FUND ONE TIME.
FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH VIA
IMPLEMENTING THE C. PATH PROJECT
AT THE CAMPUS LEVEL AND AN
ADDITIONAL ONE MILLION ONE TIME
GENERAL FUND FOR DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE SO WITHOUT ALTER MY
COLLEAGUE THE SHAMIR AS YOUR
AGENDA AND NOTES. THE
MAYOR VISION MAKES A NUMBER OF
ADJUSTMENTS FOR FINANCIAL AID.
IN THE BUDGET YEAR THAT
ADJUSTMENT AS FIFTY EIGHT
MILLION TO THE CAL GRANT PROGRAM
AND THAT'S MADE UP OF TWENTY
NINE MILLION IN NATURAL PROGRAM
GROWTH. AND ALSO BECAUSE OF A
DECREASE IN THE AVAILABLE.
TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY
FAMILIES FUNDS THAT OFFSET CAL
GRANT COSTS BECAUSE WE ARE
DECREASING THAT AMOUNT BY TWENTY
NINE MILLION IT INCREASES THE
GENERAL FUND COSTS OF THE
PROGRAM. BY A LIKE AMOUNT THE
MAYOR OF VISION ALSO INCLUDES
CHANGES TO THE ASSOCIATE DEGREE
FOR TRANSFER PROPOSAL THAT WAS.
IT TRANSMITTED ALONG WITH THE
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET. AND THE
PROPOSAL REDUCES THE REQUIREMENT
FOR ASSOCIATE DEGREES FOR
TRANSFER THAT HAVE TO BE
ACCEPTED IN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
FROM TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED. TO TWO
THOUSAND IT ALSO REQUIRES THAT
IN TWENTY TWENTY ONE THAT SECTOR
EXCEPT THIRTY FIVE HUNDRED.
ASSOCIATE DEGREES FOR TRANSFER
WHICH WILL NOW SERVE AS THE NEW
BASELINE MOVING FORWARD IN THE
OUT YEARS AND WILL INCREASE WITH
THE PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN
TRANSFERS TO THE SECTOR AS A
WHOLE. AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
DECENT CONSTANT TORRICELLA YOU
KNOW. YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF
PROPOSALS BEFORE YOU ESPECIALLY
IN THE UC ITEM FOR THE SAKE OF
TIME I'M GOING TO JUST TOUCH ON
A FEW OF THE HIGHLIGHTS AND
PROVIDE OUR SUSSMAN ON THOSE
PROPOSALS. WILL BE WORKING FROM
THIS REPORT THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED
TO EARLIER THERE'S A HIGHER
EDUCATION PORTION OF THE REPORT.
OFFER STRUCTURE BUT ATTENTION TO
PAGE TWENTY SIX.
FIGURE THIRTEEN THAT PROVIDES
OUR SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSALS ANY
REVISION PROPOSALS FOR CSU.
I'M GONNA TOUCH ON THE FIRST TWO
ISSUES BOTH OF THOSE ISSUES ALSO
ARE PROPOSALS FOR OU SEE AS
WELL SO ALL TOUCH ON BOTH CSU
AND YOU SEE.
ON THE FIRST ISSUE THE TUITION
OFFSET OF THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCED.
IN OUR VIEW IT MAKES SENSE TO
TIE YOUR GENERAL FUND IN TUITION
DECISIONS TOGETHER SO THE
OVERALL CONCEPT. OF MAKE SENSE
TO US TO THE EXTENT THAT THE OF
THE LEGISLATURE DOES NOT WANT TO
INCREASE TUITION THIS YEAR DOES
NOT DESIRE TUITION INCREASE. WE
THINK SUCH LANGUAGE COULD BE
WARRANTED ON WE THINK YOU COULD
EVEN GO.
STRONGER THAN WHAT THE
ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSING SO
RATHER THAN JUST LINK ANY
REDUCTIONS IN GENERAL FUND TO
JUST THE A CAL GRANT MIDDLE
CLASS SCHOLARSHIP COSTS. WE
RECOMMEND THAT YOU CONSIDER A
DOLLAR TO DOLLAR A REDUCTION IN
OVERALL I TUITION REVENUE
ASSOCIATED WITH THE INCREASE.
THAT WOULD PROVIDE A STRONGER
INCENTIVE TO NOT INCREASE
TUITION AND ALSO ENSURE THAT.
ANY INCREASES IN TUITION STILL
COVERS THE COSTS THAT YOU
ADOPTED A NEW ANTICIPATED
WRITTEN FOR YOU SINCE YOU SEE
WHEN YOU SEE IN THAT YEAR.
ONE THING JUST A NOTE OF
EXISTING LAW ALREADY PUTS
CONSTRAINTS ON CS USE ABILITY TO
RAISE TUITION AND EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN SO THE LANGUAGE MAY BE
LESS RELEVANT FOR CSU THAN YOU
SEE.
WE ALSO NOTE THAT TO THE EXTENT
THAT TUITION IS OFF THE TABLE
ANY ADDITIONAL FUNDING YOU'D
LIKE TO PROVIDE ABOVE THE
GOVERNOR'S BALL BUDGET WOULD
HAVE TO CONSEQUENTLY COME FROM
THE STATE FUNDING.
ONE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE OF FOR
BOTH SEGMENTS ADMINISTRATION'S
PROPOSING A HUNDRED MILLION
DOLLARS ONE TIME WE RECOMMEND
YOU ADOPT THE FUNDING LEVELS
BOTH SEGMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE.
CALL BACKLOGS OF OVER A HUNDRED
MILLION DOLLARS IN BOTH CASES
THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO WE
THINK THAT THE OVERALL LEVEL BUT
ADDRESS SOME NEED THEIR.
BUT ONE MODIFICATION WE WOULD
RECOMMEND THOSE THAT IN ADDITION
TO APPROVING THE FUNDING YOU
ADOPT SOME REPORTING WERE
EXPECTATIONS ON THE SEGMENTS
ADOPTING. A LONG TERM PLANS TO.
ELIMINATE THEIR BACKLOGS AND
ANAHIT IMPROVE MAINTENANCE
PRACTICES SO THAT BACKLOG DON'T
ACCUMULATE IN THE FUTURE EFFORT
IS MADE THIS MAKE THIS
RECOMMENDATION BEFORE SO THAT'S
JUST A REPEAT OF THAT. OF CSU IS
A LITTLE FARTHER ALONG THAN YOU
SEE ON UNDERSTANDING ITS
MAINTENANCE NEEDS SUCH THAT THE
TIMING OF THE REPORTING MIGHT BE
DIFFERENT FOR THE TWO SECONDS WE
WHAT TALK ABOUT IN OUR ANALYSIS.
I'M MOVING ALONG TO PAGE.
THE TWENTIES TWENTY NINE FIGURE
FIFTEEN TH WE WALK THROUGH THE
UC RECOMMENDATIONS AGAIN YOU
HAVE A LOT HERE SO I WON'T TOUCH
ON THE MALL. ON MY READY
DISCUSSED THE TUITION OFFSETS
AND THE DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
ISSUE SO I'LL JUST HIGHLIGHT TO
OTHER NOTABLE PROPOSALS. THE
FIRST IS THE ADMINISTRATION'S
PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ONE TIME
FUNDING FOR PSYCHIATRIC
RESIDENCY PROGRAMS.
OTHERS PROPOSAL WE THINK RAISES
A LOT OF COMPLEX QUESTIONS FOR
THE LEGISLATURE FIRST WHETHER OR
NOT A PSYCHIATRIC.
A RESIDENCY SLOTS ARE YOUR
HIGHEST PRIORITY GIVEN THIS YEAR
GIVEN. OTHER OF A SPECIALTY
AREAS THAT HAVE CONCERNS THAT
THERE MIGHT BE IS SHORTAGES SUCH
AS SOME PRIMARY CARE FOR
EXAMPLE.
IN ADDITION TO BE SOMETHING YOU
WOULD LIKE TO FOCUS YOUR EFFORTS
ON PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY SLOTS
ARE RAISES QUESTIONS A WHAT IS
THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM HERE WHAT
WHAT IS CAUSING THESE.
SHORTAGES AND WHAT ARE THE BEST
POLICY LEVERS
RIGHT NOW THE ADMINISTRATION IS
PROPOSING TO PROVIDE THE FUNDING
FOR RESIDENCY SLOTS BUT THE
STATE IN PAST YEARS HAS ALSO
CONSIDERED OTHER APPROACHES LIKE
LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAMS. A
RETREAT RETENTION AND
RECRUITMENT PROGRAMS FOR EXAMPLE
SO RAISES A BROADER QUESTIONS
ABOUT WHAT WOULD BE THE MOST
EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO GETTING
THERE.
WE THINK THESE QUESTIONS ARE ARE
SOMEWHAT COMPLEX SUCH THAT WE
QUESTION MOTHER NOT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS ADEQUATE TIME TO
REALLY THINK THROUGH THESE
ISSUES. UP BUT TO THE EXTENT
THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE.
OF FUNDING ONE TIME FUNDING THIS
YEAR FOR THIS PURPOSE WE DO HAVE
SOME SUGGESTIONS ON IMPROVING
THAT ABOUT GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL.
FOR EXAMPLE THE GOV THE PROPOSAL
I WOULD ALLOCATE A CERTAIN
AMOUNT OF FUNDING TO YOU SEE AND
A CERTAIN AMOUNT FOR A
COMPETITIVE GRANT PROCESS TO NON
YOU SEE INSTITUTIONS.
WE RECOMMEND MAKING THE WHOLE
FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR
COMPETITIVE GRANTS THAT WOULD
ENSURE THAT A FUNDING HAS BEEN
TARGETED TOWARDS INSTITUTIONS
THAT.
.
HAVE THAT PERHAPS HIGHEST. MEET
MEET THE GOALS OF THE PROGRAM
THE MOST.
WE ALSO RECOMMEND THAT YOU
CONSIDER USING AN INDEPENDENT
BODY RATHER THAN YOU SEE TO
MINISTER THE PROGRAMS SENT TO
ENSURE THAT PREFERENCES AND
GIVEN TO YOU SEE PROGRAM
SPECIFICALLY. FOR EXAMPLE THE
STATEWIDE HEALTH PLANNING.
.
STATEWIDE HELP THE STATEWIDE.
HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OSP HAD.
ADMINISTERS A SIMILAR PROGRAM
OF FOR PRIMARY CARE RESIDENCY
POSITIONS OF THAT THAT WOULD BE
A ONE LOGICAL PLACE TO DIRECT
THE FUNDING TO.
WE ALSO THINK THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSED.
ADMINISTRATIVE CAP OF TEN
PERCENT IS A BIT HIGH.
WE THINK SOMETHING LIKE FIVE
PERCENT WOULD BE MORE
REASONABLE.
AND WE ALSO NOTE THAT YOU CAN
HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS TO REVIEW THE
PROGRAM TO ENSURE THE FUNDS ARE
SPENT ON THE WAY YOU INTENDED.
THE OTHER THING I WOULD A NEW
BRING YOUR ATTENTION TO IS
SOMETHING THE ADMINISTRATION
PROPOSED A INTRODUCED THAT SAW
ON THE TABLE THERE TO SEE PATH
OPERATIONS. EASY PATH CENTER IS
A IS A LONG STANDING IT PROJECT
OF THE UNIVERSITY TO.
DEVELOPING NEW PAYROLL SYSTEM
AND A AND A SINGLE PAYROLL
SYSTEM FOR THE UNIVERSITY.
I'M TIRED SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN THE
UNIVERSITY FUNDED THIS PROGRAM
THROUGH CHARGES TO THE CAMPUSES.
AND IS PART OF THE
LEGISLATURE'S DECISION TO LINE
ITEM BUDGET YOU CO P. AND THIS
AND TWENTY SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN
THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT.
THAT INCLUDED YOU SEE PASSED IN
THAT LINE ITEMS AND ELIMINATED
THE CAMPUS CHARGES.
THE ADMINISTRATION IS PROPOSING
TO SUPPORT AN AUGMENTATION TO
YOU SEE PATH BUDGET. BUT IT'S
IT'S CHOOSING TO DO THAT BY
RETAINING THE LINE ITEM BUT ALSO
ALLOWING YOU SEE TO CHARGE
CAMPUSES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL
COSTS ABOVE THAT UP TO FIFTEEN
MILLION DOLLARS.
WE THINK THIS APPROACH IS
SOMEWHAT IS OVERLY COMPLEX WE
THINK A BETTER APPROACH IS TO
JUST PICK ONE OR THE OTHER A
LINE ITEM OR CAMPUS CHARGES. WE
SEE SOME RATIONALE TO DOING
CAMPUS CHARGES.
THAT USER FEE MODEL WAIT MIGHT
ALLOW FOR THE CAMPUS TO CAMPUS
IS TO ENGAGE EASY PATH IN A WAY
THAT MIGHT INCREASE IN SAVINGS
BECAUSE THEY'LL BE OUT
RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING THIS
COST INCREASES. WE DO THINK
THERE'S A RATIONALE THERE.
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU
CHOOSE TO KEEP THE LINE ITEM OR
TO DO IT HAS TO DO CAMPUS
CHARGES. BUT WE ALSO THINK THAT
pTHERE'S A RATIONALE TO BETTER
SHARE THE COST OF THE PROGRAM
BETWEEN THE STATE AND NON STATE
FUNCTIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY. YOU
SEE PATH SERVES THE ENTIRE
UNIVERSITY INCLUDING ITS GENERAL
CAMPUS FUNCTIONS.
.
ARE YOU THE HOSPITALS AND OTHER
FUNCTIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY WE
THINK IT MAKES SENSE THAT THE
STATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING
JUST THE STATE PORTION OF THAT.
CRUMBLES WHEN THE CAMPUSES WERE
CHARGED BY THE UNIVERSITY AND
PRIOR TO TWENTY SEVENTEEN
EIGHTEEN OF THE UNIVERSITY HAD A
RATIONALE THAT THAT SEEMS MAKE
THAT MAKE SENSE TO US TO SPUR.
BUT THOSE COSTS RECOMMEND USING
THAT AS THE RATIONALE DETERMINE
THE STATE'S SPLIT.
I'LL LEAVE THE REST OF THE
PROPOSALS IN THIS FIGURE
AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU
HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR US ON
THOSE.
FOR C. FAQ ON PAGE THIRTY THREE
THAT WE WALKED THROUGH THE*
PROPOSALS ON OUR
RECOMMENDATIONS.
A MOST OF THE FUNDING INCREASES
ARE.
OR IN EFFECT I SHOULD SAY ALL
THE FUNDING INCREASES THAT
REFLECT PARTICIPATION INCREASES
IN ESTIMATES OF CASELOAD AND OF
REFLECTIVE THE REDUCTION INTENT
OF SO WE DON'T HAVE CONCERNS
THAT THEY SEEM REASONABLE BASED
ON OUR. INITIAL REVIEW. THE
OTHER TWO PROPOSALS.
OF THE GOVERNOR'S CONTINUING TO
PROPOSE TELLING THE NONPROFIT
AWARD. TO.
OF THE SECTOR ENROLLING CERTAIN
NUMBERS OF STUDENTS OF AN
ASSOCIATE OR ADMITTING I SHOULD
SAY SCENES OF THE SERVICE.
ASSOCIATE DEGREE FOR TRANSFER.
BOB AND WHAT THEY'RE WHAT HE
WHAT HE PROPOSES TO DO AND A
REVISIONIST TO CHANGE THE
EXPECTATION. A YOU CAN SEE THAT
REVISED EXPECTATION ON FIGURE
SEVENTEEN OF THE SAME PAGE OF
YOUR REPORT.
I'M THIS IS AYE AYE NOW REVIEW
S. SOMEWHAT MINOR CHANGE DOESN'T
REFLECT THE UNDERLYING CONCERNS
WE HAD OF THIS PROPOSAL THAT WE
RAISED IN JANUARY DISCUSSED AT
THIS HEARING. WE CONTINUE TO
RECOMMEND REJECTING THIS
PROPOSAL UNFAIRLY THERE'S AN
ADDITIONAL PROPOSAL.
TO ALLOW.
OF THE STATE TO PROVIDE SHORT
TERM LOANS TO THE STUDENT AID
COMMISSION TO COVER OUR CASH
FLOW ISSUES.
IN THIS CASE WE WE THOUGHT THERE
COULD BE A RATIONAL WE JUST
HADN'T SEEN A CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
YET DEMONSTRATIONS COMMITTED TO
PROVIDE A SOMETHING SO WEIRD
THAT THAT OUR ASSESSMENT ON THAT
IS STILL PENDING.
THANK YOU.
CITY EVER ATTENDED UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA I PROVIDED A HANDOUT
FOR YOU IN CASE YOU WANT TO
FOLLOW ALONG ON SOME OF THESE
ITEMS. UP REGARDING THE BASE
BUDGET WE'RE VERY GRATEFUL TO
THE GOVERNOR FOR PLACING THE
FIFTY MILLION IN THE EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN BUDGET. AND WE HOPE
THAT ONCE THE REGENTS VOTE ON DO
YOU CO PIECE EIGHTEEN NINETEEN
BUDGET IN JUST.
BEFORE THE END OF MAY AND JUST A
LITTLE BIT.
THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
WILL RELEASE THE CURRENT YEAR
FUNDS TO US UP SO ON SLIGHT TO
OF THE DECK YOU SEE THE FIVE
ITEMS THAT WE HAD TO MEET IN
ORDER TO. OUR RECEIVED THOSE
FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS TO FOUR
SEQUESTERED IN THE CURRENT EAR
BUDGET AND WE BELIEVE AT THIS
POINT THAT WE HAVE MET EACH OF
THESE ITEMS.
REGARDING THE TUITION AND THE
BUDGET BILL LANGUAGE PROPOSED BY
THE GOVERNOR OF OUR REQUEST OF
THE LEGISLATURE CONTINUES TO BE.
A SEVENTY MILLION DOLLAR.
BY OUT OF THE TUITION INCREASE
BURKE AND STUDENT SERVICES BE
INCREASE THAT IS PROPOSED FOR
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN. AND IF THE
LEGISLATURE TO SYSTEM FUND THAT
FOR US.
WE WOULD NOT BUILT THE LANGUAGE
PROPOSED BY THE GOVERNOR WOULD
BECOME A MOOT POINT. I'M I WILL
NOTE THAT ALL OF THE TUITION
FUNDS BUYOUT THAT FUNDS OF WE
ARE REQUESTING WILL GO TO THE
CAMPUSES.
AND THUS WILL HELP THE STUDENTS
BY FUNDING INSTRUCTORS AND
SUPPORT SERVICES BOARD TO
STUDENTS ON THE CAMPUSES.
SLIGHT THREE IN THE DECK THAT I
HANDED OUT SHOWS HOW THE
UNIVERSITY HAS BECOME
INCREASINGLY RELIANT ON TUITION
FEE REVENUES. OVER THE LAST FEW
DECADES AS A FUNDING SOURCE FOR
OUR FOR OUR.
OPERATIONS.
REGARDING DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
WE'RE VERY GRATEFUL THE GOVERNOR
THAT HE RECOGNIZE. THAT UC'S
STRUGGLING WITH MAINTAINING OUR
AGING FACILITIES THESE PROPOSED
FUNDS WILL ALLOW CAMPUSES TO
ADDRESS THE MOST CRITICAL OF THE
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ISSUES
INCLUDING FAILING PLUMBING
LEAKING ROOFS. AND OTHER MAJOR
SYSTEMS.
WE HAVE NOT YET DETERMINED THE
EXACT ALLOCATION TO EACH CAMPUS
BUS BASED ON PREVIOUS DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE ALLOCATIONS OF WE
EXPECT OUR CAMPUS ALLOCATION
WILL BE BASED ON A COMBINATION
OF FACTORS INCLUDING. THE
CAMPUSES SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STATE
ELIGIBLE SPACE AND THE AGE OF
THE SQUARE FOOTAGE SPACE ON EACH
CAMPUS.
BOB AND WE WILL ASK YOU TO
CAMPUS TO SUBMIT A LIST OF THEIR
HIGHEST PRIORITY PROJECTS TO UC
OP.
THEN REGARDING DE GRADUATE
MEDICAL EDUCATION.
THE.
PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTS PROPOSALS
FROM THE GOVERNOR.
UC'S REQUEST CONTINUES TO BE S.
WE'VE DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY IN
THIS COMMITTEE. TO HAVE DE PROP
FIFTY SIX MOP UNDONE WE'RE
REQUESTING FORTY MILLION DOLLARS
ON GOING SO THAT WE CAN TAKE THE
PROP FIFTY SIX FUNDS. FOR
EMERGENCY ROOM. PHYSICIANS AND
PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS AND
DISTRIBUTE THEM. THROUGHOUT THE
STATE TO UNDERSERVED AREAS FOR.
OF PRESENT MEDICAL RESIDENCIES.
HOWEVER WE'RE ALSO REQUESTING.
WE WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL AND SHOULD
THE LEGISLATURE CHOOSE TO GIVE
THIS FIFTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS
THAT THE UC. WE WILL DISTRIBUTE
THE FIFTEEN MILLION OR. HOWEVER
MUCH THE LEGISLATURE WISHES.
THROUGHOUT THE STATE FOR
PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY SLOTS.
SO WHEN WE TALK A LITTLE BIT
ABOUT WHAT WHAT THE RESIDENCY
SLOTS MEAN.
FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY IS
ABOUT FOUR YEARS LONG. I COSTS
ABOUT FIFTY ONE HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND ANNUALLY.
OUR CONCERN IS THAT THE FUNDS
PROPOSED BY THE GOVERNOR AE ONE
TIME VERSUS THE PROP FIFTY SIX
FUNDS. UP WOULD BE ONGOING AND
THAT OBLIGATION TO UNIVERSITIES
AND ONGOING OBLIGATION.
.
ARE WE BELIEVE THAT OUR USUAL
GRANT MANAGEMENT COST IS ABOUT
FIVE PERCENT.
SO WE THINK WE CAN HANDLE IT
OUT ABOUT ROUGHLY THAT AMOUNT
MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE IF THE
GOVERNOR.
CHOOSE TO PROVIDE THAT TO US.
IT TAKES ABOUT A YEAR THE
GROWTH THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO
START A NEW RESIDENCY PROGRAM SO
IF THERE ARE NO CURRENT
RESIDENCY PROGRAMS IN AND
UNDERSERVED AREA WOULD TAKE
ABOUT AYEAR TO GET ONE STARTED.
THERE'S AN APPLICATION PROCESS
TO IT THE ACCREDITING
COMMISSION.
AND THAT APPROVAL PROCESS
APPLICATION APPROVAL TAKES ABOUT
A YEAR SO YOU CAN'T JUST SAY ó
WE'RE GOING TO PUT RESIDENTS
HERE. YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A
PROCESS THAT NEEDS TO GOV
FOLLOWED ALSO THERE'S A LIMIT ON
THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS EACH.
DOCTOR CAN SUPERVISE SERVE
THEIR ALREADY SUPERVISING THE
MAXIMUM NUMBER. YOU MAY NEED TO.
PUT IN AN APPLICATION FOR
ADDITIONAL SLOTS SO THAT COULD
DELAY THE START UP OF SOME OF
THOSE FUNDS.
I'M MOVING ON TO UC PASSED SO
THE NEXT SLIDE IN YOUR DECK
SHOWS STEVE. OF UC PASS I SHOULD
MENTION IS THE UC'S.
.
IT'S A BUSINESS SYSTEM. FOR OUR
TRACKING PAYROLL TIMEKEEPING AND
HUMAN RESOURCES AND IS A WAY FOR
US TO STANDARDIZE THE SYSTEMS
ACROSS OUR TEN CAMPUSES IN ORDER
TO CREATE UNIFORMITY.
AND HAVE.
OF GET RID OF OUR AGING AND
FAILING.
ANTIQUATED TIMEKEEPING SYSTEMS
ON THE CAMPUSES.
AND ALSO HAVE HAVE COMPARISON
DATA EASILY ACROSS ALL CAMPUSES.
FAR MORE EASY.
ON SITE FOR YOU CAN SEE THAT
THE.
TIMELINE FOR BRINGING ON THE
VARIOUS CAMPUSES TO DO YOU SEE
PASSED SYSTEM.
.
WE ARE VERY GRATEFUL THE
GOVERNOR FOR THE INCREASE ON YOU
SEE PASS.
.
PROJECT COST WE THINK THAT THE.
SIXTY SEVEN POINT SEVEN MILLION
THAT GUY IS PROPOSED IN THE MAY
REVISE WILL COVER OUR EIGHTEEN
NINETEEN OPERATIONAL COSTS FOR
YOU SEE PASS. AND ALLOW THIS
PROJECT TO CONTINUE AND BRING ON
NEW CAMPUSES AS.
SCHEDULED.
ON PAGE FIVE I PROVIDED YOU
WITH THE OPERATING COSTS COULD
COST FORECAST SO YOU CAN SEE HOW
THAT SIXTY SEVEN. UP WHEN SEVEN
MILLION WOULD BE SPENT THE
VARIOUS CATEGORIES WHERE WE'RE
INTENDING TO PUT THOSE FUNDS. IN
CASE THAT'S OF INTEREST TO YOU.
AND THEN. WE DO BELIEVE THAT IF
WE DON'T GET THE UC PASS FUNDING
THERE IS SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL
RISK.
TWO HAVING TO CARRY THE COSTS
FOR MULTIPLE SYSTEMS CAMPUS
SYSTEMS AND DO YOU SEE BASS
SYSTEM AT THE SAME TIME.
AND HAVING HAVING THE ENTIRE
PROCESS DELAYED AND SLOW DOWN SO
WE'RE HOPING THAT. ON THE
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL WILL BE
APPROVED.
I REGARDING THE OTHER PROPOSALS.
I'M NOT SURE IF YOU WANT ME TO
TAKE THE TIME WHERE.
WHAT KIND OF SHORT ON TIME BUT?
WE SUPPORT THEM.
ALRIGHT WE THANK.
RIGHT
THE ISSUE REAL BRIEFLY I'D LIKE
TO TALK ABOUT.
AND THE.
THE REVISION OF PERSONAL
GRATEFUL TO THE GOVERNOR.
STRUCTURE.
WE HAVE WELL OVER TWO BILLION
DOLLARS.
DEFINITELY.
BLOCKING OUT SO THAT FOR ME.
OTHER RECURRING SPIKE. MISTER
CHICAGO POSING INCREASE.
LARA OFFERING BUDGET REQUEST.
WE WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR THAT
REQUEST FROM DEALING SENATE.
AND WE ARE STILL.
WE WOULD ONLY BE INCREASING OUR.
ROBERT MUCH BY ABOUT. FOUR
PERCENT OF THE.
HUNDRED SEVENTY ONE MILLION
DOLLAR SHORTFALL.
AND THE CHALLENGE WITH THAT IS
THAT WE
STILL SIXTY ONE MILLION SHORT
OF.
COVER THE TORY CAUCUS.
AND IN HEALTH CARE COST
INCREASE.
AS WELL AS NOW WORSHIP MARK.
HANS
THAT A MAN.
FAIRLY GO SHOOTING.
AND THE COM AND GENERALLY
SPEAKING WITH WITH NO CHANGE.
GIVEN WHAT WE THAT.
THE ONE DOLLAR
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT. AS YOU KNOW
CHANCELLOR CON.
TWENTIETH TOOK.
THE OPTION A COMMISSION ON TAPE
AS WAS MENTIONED EARLIER BY.
STRANGE BY THE LA OVER.
THERE REALLY IS NO MECHANISM AT
THIS POINT.
BECAUSE OF STATE LOTS OF REALLY.
SORT.
THE LABOR SEVEN PROPOSED MEMBERS
BUILDINGS.
HELLO. PULLING LOTS OF OUR ONLY
CHANCE OF RAISING TO
WOULD HAVE BEEN MADE. WORKING.
CHANCE ARE BASED ON
CONVERSATIONS.
LARGER COMMUNITY.
LOOK AT HOW MUCH REVENUE IS.
STATE DON'T THINK IT MAKES
SENSE.
SPECIALIST IN SEVENTY FIVE
PERCENT
LAST YEAR.
STATE POLICE.
LAST THING I WOULD POINT OUT IS
THAT I HAD UP TO YOU. VERY
BRIGHT RED HAIR YOU'RE TAKING
COVER PAGE THEY'RE APPALLED
LEGISLATORS.
WORK.
LEADERS BUSINESSES.
SEVERAL SEE ISSUE
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
GOOD AFTERNOON DAVID O'BRIEN OF
THE CALIFORNIA STUDENT A
COMMISSION I WILL BE BRIEF I'M
AS WE HAVE NO CONCERNS
OBJECTIONS ANYTHING IN THE. MAY
REVISE HAS ONE EXPRESS OUR
APPRECIATION TO THE
ADMINISTRATION FOR FULLY FUNDING
THE CAL GRANT PROGRAM AS WELL
AS.
THE OTHER PROGRAMS THAT
DIRECTLY BENEFIT OUR STUDENTS
SUCH AS THE GRANT A LIVER SYSTEM
MODERNIZATION PROJECT. THE.
CAL GRANT AWARDS A PRIVATE
NONPROFIT INSTITUTIONS AND OUR
KELSO PROGRAM IS ONE OF THE.
EXCUSE ME.
AS WE DISCUSSED IN THIS
SUBCOMMITTEE BEFORE OUR
COMMISSION HAS ADOPTED SEVERAL
BUDGET PROPOSALS THAT AROSE FROM
THE RECENT CENTURY FOUNDATION
REPORT. ON FINANCIAL AID REFORM
SO WE DO LOOK FOR TO WORKING
WITH THE SUBCOMMITTEE AND HER
STAFF IN THE NEAR FUTURE ON THIS
MULTI REFORM PROJECT AND THEM.
HAPPY ANSWER THE QUESTIONS YOU
HAVE THANK YOU.
RIGHT.
ALRIGHT DO YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS SIR.
THE QUICK ANSWER. FOUND THE MAY
REVISE OUR REGION PROPOSES.
BUDGET BILL LANGUAGE AUTHORIZING
THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO
REDUCE UC'S.
APPROPRIATION BY THE AMOUNT OF
ESTIMATED CAL GRANT UNTIL CLASS
SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM. BECAUSE
SHOULD A TUITION INCREASE BE
IMPLEMENTED SO YOU CAN'T.
IN A SENSE RAISE TUITION IS THAT
CORRECT. THAT IF IF WE RAISE
TUITION A SIGNIFICANT COMPONENT
OF IT WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY
DEDUCTED FROM ELSEWHERE IN OUR
BUDGET SO SO THE. INCREASE
ITSELF WOULD BE UP FAR LESS THAN
THE THAN THE SEVENTY MILLION
THAT WE WOULD OTHERWISE GET IT
WOULD BE LESS THAN FIFTY ADAM IS
THAT LIKE THROWING DOWN THE
GAUNTLET.
THE GOVERNOR. SEEMS TO FEEL VERY
STRONGLY THAT WE SHOULD NOT
RAISE TUITION SO YOU JUST HOW
MUCH IT CHAIR. SO YOU JUST HAD
TO STRIKE A THREE DAY STRIKE SO
WHERE YOU GET THE MONEY TO.
PROVIDE FOR PAY INCREASES THAT'S
WHY WHERE WE'RE REQUESTING THE
LEGISLATURE FOR AN ADDITIONAL
HUNDRED AND FIVE MILLION DOLLARS
ON GOING SO WE CAN PROVIDE. A.
IS MANDATORY SALARY INCREASES
AND ALSO OF SOME OF.
SOME OPTIONAL SO THAT THAT THAT
STANDARD THREE PERCENT INCREASED
OUR STAFF.
YOU HAVE A CHART THAT SHOWS
INSIDE THREE THAT YOU. ARE
RECEIVING LESS EACH YEAR FROM
THE STATE.
YES THAT'S CORRECT I HAD ARGUED
AYE ARE PRETTY. COOL THT'S A
TREND THAT IS AN IMPROVING. OUR
OUT OF THE RECESSION. OF.
SUPPOSEDLY SO SO WHY HAS THIS
GOVERNOR NOT TRIED TO.
BRING BACK BUT FUNDING TO BOTH.
UC AND CSU SO IT'S A.
TENURE LEVELS A YEAR AGO LEVELS
WHAT. WHAT'S THE STORY MAYBE I
SHOULD BE ASKING.
MISTER OSWALD WHAT WHAT'S GOING
ON WHITE Y. OF WIRE WE NOT.
MOVING UP IN.
ARE PROPORTIONATE SHARE.
THE ADMINISTRATION HAS INCREASED
FUNDING FOR YOU SEE
APPROXIMATELY ONE POINT TWO
BILLION DOLLARS SENSE.
I BELIEVE TWENTY TWELVE THERE'S
BEEN SUBSTANTIAL AND CONSISTENT
REINVESTMENT IN BOTH UC AND CSU.
IN THE CITY GOVERNOR'S TERM SO I
DON'T KNOW THAT WE NECESSARILY
CHARACTERIZE IT THAT WAY.
WITH MAYBE YOU OUGHT TO PROVIDE
ME OR THE CHAIR WITH DIFFERENT
SLIDES
HIS ONE POINT TWO BILLION. IS
ALL YOU'VE RAISED.
THAT WE SAID YES ONE POINT TO
THAT'S IT ONE POINT TWO BILLION.
THAT'S A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE
OVER THE.
YOU SEE WHERE IT WAS BEFORE.
I BELIEVE THE UC'S TOTAL
GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS
THREE POINT FIVE BILLION WE'RE
SITTING AT ABOUT ONE POINT TWO
BILLION ABOVE.
TWENTY EIGHTH TWELVE LEVELS IF
YOU LOOK AT THIS YEAR'S
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT FOR YOU SEE.
I'VE TAKEN A LOOK.
MY OUT HOW DEEP IS OUR
UNRESTRICTED NET POSITION.
I DON'T KNOW THAT OFF HAND
MISTER LOCKE IT'S IT'S OVER
EIGHTEEN BILLION DOLLARS AND
THEY HAVE AN INCLUDED THE
RETIREE MEDICAL SITE. I'M KINDA
CURIOUS ON HOW THIS ALL UNFOLDS
OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS.
ESPECIALLY FOR GONNA LIMIT THEM
FROM DOING TUITION INCREASES
ITS.
AND WE WERE TALKING ABOUT A
TRAIN WRECK IN SLOW MOTION SO
I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE IT ALL
OUT YOU WANT TO JUMP.
CHRIS FERGUSON FINANCE WOULD
ALSO AND THAT THERE IS. ROUGHLY
ONE BILLION DOLLARS COMING OUT
OF THE CAL GRANT PROGRAM THAT
GOES TO THE YOU SEE THAT'S NOT
REFLECTED IN THAT SLOT.
KILL MAYBE YOU CAN HELP EDUCATE
ME WITH SOME SOME SLIDES THAT
COUNTERACT.
THOSE THAT ARE PROVIDED BY THE
UC SYSTEM BECAUSE. I'M WORRIED
ABOUT FIVE YEARS OUT TEN YEARS
OUT RIGHT.
MR STORM RIGHT.
AND THEN.
WHO FOR? MISTER O'BRIEN.
YOU'VE REDUCED FROM TWENTY FIVE
HUNDRED TO TWO THOUSAND THE ADT
STUDENTS.
BUT BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS.
IF THAT'S CUMULATIVELY ALL THEIR
PRIVATE SCHOOLS SO WHAT OF ONE
SCHOOL DOES THEIR FAIR SHARE.
AND YOU MISSED THE TARGET DOES
AT SCHOOL GET PENALIZED. IS IT.
SEVERAL QUESTION FOR THE
DEPARTMENT A FINITE SET OF THE
PROPOSAL IS FROM THE
ADMINISTRATION NOT FROM THE SOON
EIGHT COMMISSION SO. A WHAT THE
PROPOSAL SAYS IS THAT AS A
SECTOR AS A WHOLE ALL PRIVATE
INSTITUTIONS HAVE TO ACCEPT
UNDER THE MAY REVISION PROPOSAL
TWO THOUSAND ASSOCIATE DEGREE
FOR TRANSFER STUDENTS. IN
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN SO THAT FOR
THE NINETEEN TWENTY AWARD YEAR
THE AMOUNT OF THE MAXIMUM
TUITION AWARD FOR CAL GRANT
STUDENTS AT THOSE INSTITUTIONS
STAYS AT THE NINE THOUSAND
EIGHTY FOUR AMOUNT.
RIGHT SO THEN IF YOU FALL SHORT
BUT ONE OR TWO OR THREE CAMPUSES
REALLY DID A GOOD JOB. THEY GET
HIT THE SAME AS EVERYONE ELSE.
SO IT'S A YES THEY SECTOR
EXPECTATION IF AS A SECTOR THEY
FEEL THEY FAIL TO MEET THAT
EXPECTATION. THEN THE AWARD WILL
BE REDUCED FOR ALL NEW INCOMING
STUDENTS TO THE SECTOR. OKAY.
I WOULD JUST NOTE ON THAT.
THAT WE DIDN'T WORK WITH THE
ASSOCIATION FOR INDEPENDENT
CALIFORNIA COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES NOT THIS TIME
THEY'RE CONFIDENT THAT THEY CAN
MAKE THE TWO THOUSAND.
I WOULD ALSO NOTE THOUGH THAT.
THE ADMINISTRATION STILL DOES
NOT HAVE AN ESTIMATE OF THE
CURRENT NUMBER OF.
STUDENTS AN ASSOCIATE REFER
TRANSFERRED WHO ARE ADMITTED
ACROSS HE SECTOR SO WE DON'T
HAVE A WAY TO REALLY GAUGE THE
BASELINE THEY'D BE ABLE.
WE WILL.
TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT SO.
DEPENDING ON HOW MANY OF YOU
LINE UP ALL DEPEND ON HOW MUCH
TIME I GIVE YOU.
THANK YOU EVERYBODY WE WILL BE
BACK TOMORROW AT NINE THIRTY.
BE THERE OR BE SQUARE.
LET'S SEE HOW MANY YOU ARE
THERE.
NOT TOO MANY I WILL GO FOR A
MINUTE.
GOOD AFTERNOON JENNIFER BAKER
THE CALIFORNIA TEACHERS
ASSOCIATION THANK YOU FOR
KEEPING UP US ON OUR TOES UP FOR
A FAST START.
I DID WANT TO SAY THAT WE'RE
VERY APPRECIATIVE OF.
OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET FOR K.
TWELVE AND APPRECIATE THE
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FATHER
CERTIFICATION IN THE CONTINUOUS
APPROPRIATION THAT ARE INCLUDED
IN THERE WOULD STILL CHEWING
OVER SOME OF THE OTHER ASPECTS
WILL BE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL
COMMENTING COMMUNICATION AFTER
WE'RE ABLE TO DO THAT. WE DO
APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT ON THE
COMMUNICABLE ITS SIDE REGARDING
FUNNY IN AN ONLINE WE HAVE SEEN
A NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
WERE STILL CHEWING THROUGH THOSE
CHANGES TO TRY TO ASSESS. OF
WHERE WE ARE GOING TO BE OVERALL
BUT WE DO APPRECIATE DOWN THAT
THERE HAS BEEN A SIGNIFICANT
LEVEL OF A RESPONSE FROM THE
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE THANK YOU.
YOU.
CATHERINE GONE ON BEHALF OF THE
EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION
COALITION WE SUPPORT THE WOMEN'S
CAUCUS BUDGET REQUEST OF A
BILLION DOLLARS FOR INFANT AND
TODDLER CARE. CALIFORNIA IS THE
FIFTH LARGEST ECONOMY IN THE
WORLD GET LESS THAN FOURTEEN
PERCENT OF ELIGIBLE FAMILIES
HAVE ACCESS TO INFANTILE THEIR
CARE. THIS IS A CRISIS FOR
WORKING PARENTS THEIR FAMILIES
BUSINESSES IN OUR STATE'S
FUTURE.
WE ALSO ASKED FOR ONE TIME FUNDS
FOR PAID PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT CHILDCARE FACILITIES
IN START OF FINES SO THAT
PROVIDERS CAN KEEP THEIR DOORS
OPEN TO ALL OF FOR INFANTS AND
TODDLERS IN NEED.
CONGRESS PROVIDED ADDITIONAL TWO
HUNDRED THIRTY ONE MILLION FOR
CHILD CARE THIS YEAR AND IN
ADDITION WE HAVE AN EIGHT POINT
EIGHT BILLION STATE REVENUE
SURPLUS THE LARGEST IN EIGHTEEN
YEARS. WE BELIEVE INVESTING IN
CHILDCARE IS A WISE INVESTMENT
AND URGE YOU TO ADOPT THIS IN
YOUR BIKE BUT THE PACKAGE THINK
YOU.
MR COMMITTEE MEMBERS BRIAN HOW
WITH THE CALIFORNIA FEDERATION
OF TEACHERS AND WE'RE RUNNING
SHORT ON TIME SO WE DO HAVE A
LETTER THAT'S ABOUT TO GO OUT
TO.
I TO ADDRESS THE MAY REVISE.
WE DEEPLY APPRECIATED YOUR
APRIL TWELFTH IN APRIL
NINETEENTH HEARING.
.
ON THE FUNDING FORMULA THAT HAS
BEEN SIGNIFICANT PUSH TAX FROM
THE COMMITTEE COLLEGE EDUCATORS
THROUGHOUT THE STATE.
ARMS AND IN IN REGARDS TO THE
TOP PROBLEMATIC.
PERFORMANCE SPACE MECHANISM.
ON THE ONLINE COLLEGE THE
GOVERNOR'S FAVORITE MAYOR VISION
CONTINUES TO COMMIT HUNDRED
TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS DESPITE
THE PROPOSAL COMING UNDER FIRE
FOR BEING EXPENSIVE UNNECESSARY
DUPLICATIVE AND
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE. WE ARE
DISAPPOINTED BY THE LACK OF
UNDERSTANDING ACCEPTANCE BY THE.
ACCEPTANCE OF THESE ISSUES BY
THE ADMINISTRATION WE URGE YOU
TO REJECT BOTH PROPOSALS THANK
YOU.
HI GOOD AFTERNOON KATE MILLER
WITH CHILDREN NOW AND AS PART OF
THE C. COALITION I ECHO MY
COLLEAGUE'S COMMENTS.
ABOUT BILLION COACHING YOUR
LEADERSHIP ON A STRONG EARLY
CARE AND EDUCATION ASK THE MAY
REVISED DOES NOT ADDRESS THE
UNMET NEED THAT WE HAVE FOR
CHILDCARE IN THE STATE
PARTICULARLY FOR INFANTS AND
TODDLERS. AND WE ALSO KNOW WE
NEED THOSE ONE TIME INVESTMENTS
REALLY BUILD OUT CAPACITY.
SO THAT PROVIDERS CAN REALLY
START TO OPEN THEIR DOORS.
TWO MORE CHILDREN PARTICULARLY
THE THE BABIES IN THE TODDLERS
THANK YOU.
HI DINEEN MICHELETTI CULVER
REPRESENTING THE CALIFORNIA
ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT PROGRAM
ASSOCIATION.
ALSO A MEMBER OF THE EAST E.
COALITION AND SUPPORT THE
BILLION DOLLARS FOR BABIES AND
THE WOMEN'S CAUCUS M. REQUEST.
COUPLE THINGS THAT I'D LIKE TO
SAY IN REGARDS TO THE MAY REVISE
THEM THAT WE HAVE SOME CONCERNS
WITH THIS THAT. THERE'S FAILURE
TO.
FUN SLOTS
AND SO A COUPLE NUMBERS WERE
PUMP.
ON THE TABLE THE DAY I'D LIKE
TO CLARIFY.
SO THERE'S ONE POINT FOUR
MILLION INCOME ELIGIBLE KIDS
THAT.
QUALIFY FOR SUBSIDIZED
CHILDCARE.
AND THE BETH JACKSON NOTED THAT
THERE WERE ABOUT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND THAT'S WHEN AND.
ELIGIBILITY LIST WENT AWAY
ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO THAT
NUMBERS WELL INTO THE THREE
HUNDRED THOUSAND. THAT MAY
REVISE FAILS TO ADD ANY MORE
SLOTS
SO OF. THIS NUMBER AT THE NEED
FEWER THAN ABOUT THIRTY FOUR
THOUSAND ARE BEING FUNDED UNDER
THE SPELL. THE LOWER COST OF
CARE THAT WAS REFERENCED THE
REASON THAT IT'S A LOWER COST OF
CARE IS WE ARE LICENSED CAPACITY
PROVIDERS ARE GOING OUT OF
BUSINESS.
SO IN MANY PARTS OF THE STATE
THE ONLY PROVIDERS THAT FAMILIES
ARE ABLE TO UTILIZE WHILE
THEY'RE WORKING IS EXEMPT CARE
AND THE COST IS LOWER ON THE
EXEMPT CARE SO IT'S DRIVING THE
WHOLE MARKET DOWN. AND IT'S
SOMETHING TO BE AWARE WE HAVE
REAL CONCERNS THAT THERE STILL
IS A PREMIUM ON FUNDING PROGRAMS
PRIVATE PAY MARKET. SO THAT MAY
REVISE CONTINUES TO FUND TWO
THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY
NINE FULL DAY CHILDCARE SLOTS
AND TALKS ABOUT A RE BENCHING OF
WRAPAROUND SERVICES TO ELEAZAR.
HISTORY HAS SHOWN US THAT THE LA
A STONE FILL THE SLOTS FOR
CHILDCARE SO THEY'RE ABLE TO USE
FUNDING FOR CHILDCARE TO GO
ELSEWHERE. OR ASKING THAT IT BE
CONSIDERED TO REALLY HAVE A TRUE
PARTNERSHIP AND BLEND THE PUBLIC
AND PRIVATE.
PRIORITIES THINK.
GOOD AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS SPECIAL BLOCK WITH
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
WE'RE VERY PLEASEDTO SEE THAT
THERE WAS AN INVESTMENT IN
GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION IN A
FIFTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS IN
THE MAYOR VISION.
HOWEVER WE URGE THE COMMITTEE
TO CONSIDER MODIFYING THE
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL TO ENSURE
THAT THIS FUNDING IS AVAILABLE
ON AN ONGOING BASIS RATHER THAN
ONE TIME. IN ORDER TO MAKE USE
HIS BASE BUDGET HOLE AND ENSURE
THAT PROP FIFTY SIX FUNDS THAT
HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED TO UC'S FOR
STATEWIDE GME PROGRAMS. ARE
AVAILABLE AS A SUSTAINABLE LONG
TERM FUNDING SOURCE TO ADDRESS A
POSITION WORK FOR SHORTAGE AND
IN TURN ACCESS TO KAREN STATE
THANK YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIRMAN
SENATOR MORE LOCKED DOORS
DAVIDSON VICE PRESIDENT ELECT
FOR THE ACADEMIC SENATE FOR
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
OF FIRST OR WOULD LIKE TO
EXPRESS OUR APPRECIATION FOR
THE.
MONIES FOR THE C. ID PROGRAM WE
WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT THE
COMMITTEE CONSIDER THAT THOSE
BECOME ONGOING FUNDS AS THAT
PROJECT IS IN NO WAY FINISHED
AND WILL CONTINUE. TO BE ONGOING
FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER DECADE. BUT
WE ALSO ARE APPRECIATIVE OF THE
OPEN EDUCATION RESOURCES FUNDING
ALTHOUGH THAT IS AN AREA OF
CURRICULUM SHOULD BE UNDER THE
PURVIEW OF THE ACADEMIC SENATE
RATHER THAN THE CHANCELLOR'S
OFFICE WE DO ASK THE COMMITTEE
TO CONSIDER. A CHANGE IN THE
LANGUAGE REGARDING THAT THE
ACADEMIC SENATE CONTINUES TO
OPPOSE THE FULLY ONLINE
COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
INSTEAD WE SEEK TO HAVE THAT.
IMPLEMENTED THROUGH THE OPEN
EDUCATION EXCUSE ME THE ONLINE I
DID EXACTLY WHAT I SUPPOSED TO
DO THE ONLINE EDUCATION
INITIATIVE. AND WE CONTINUE TO
OPPOSE THE PERFORMANCE SPACE
FUNDING OF THE TWO POINT FIVE
MILLION WORKERS THAT THE
GOVERNOR IS REFERENCING.
WILL SEE AN AND EVEN LARGER
NUMBER OF INCREASE STRANDED
WORKERS IF WE DO PERFORMANCE
SPACE FUNDING THANK YOU VERY
MUCH.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
SENATOR MORE LOCKED ON A FLIGHT
IN A BEHALF OF THE FACULTY
ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY
COLLEGES HAVE ON A THANK YOU FOR
YOUR LEADERSHIP AND ALSO WANT TO
THANK YOUR RESPECTIVE STAFF
MEMBERS.
AND THE FACT REMAINS OPPOSED
IT'S THE ONLINE COLLEGE I'M AN
INSTITUTION HIS GOVERNING BODY
IS ALSO ITS REGULATORY BOARD
WILL NOT BE COMPETING ON A LEVEL
PLAYING FIELD.
RESOURCES SHOULD BE REDIRECTED
TO THE ONLINE EDUCATION
INITIATIVE AND WE WANT TO EXPAND
COURSES ALSO TO THE STRONG WORK
FORCE. WERE STILL OPPOSED TO THE
OUTCOMES BASED FORMULA AND NOTE
THE ABSENCE OF A FACULTY
COMPONENT.
NOT IS A SEPARATE CATEGORICAL
BUT AS PART OF THE FORMULA.
IF YOU CHOOSE TO DEFER FOR A
YEAR WE WOULD ENCOURAGE A MORE
INCLUSIVE PROCESS THAT INCLUDES
THE FACULTY VOICE. WE WE NEED
YOU TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL THE
DISTRICTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY
GOING TO BE RE BENCH UNDER THE
CURRENT FORMULA. ARE PROTECTED
WE WANT TO THANK YOU AND THANK
THE ADMINISTRATION FOR THE FIVE
MILLION DOLLAR AUGMENTATION TO
THE NEXT STEP PROGRAM. FOR
FOSTER YOUTH AND WE ALIGN WITH
THE ACADEMIC SENATE ON THE
COURSE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND
THE ONLINE EDUCATION.
THANK YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON SENATORS AND
STAFF NANA AND DAVID MANTLE WITH
JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE.
KRUEGER AND A LITTLE CONFUSED
AS WE WERE ALERTED LAST WEEK WE
SAW. THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE
SOME LOBBYING. FOR THE ONE POINT
TWO MILLION DOLLARS THAT WE THEN
DISCOVERED IN THE IN THE REVISED
ON FRIDAY ON FOR COMMENTED BIAS
TRAINING.
A PILOT PROGRAM IDENTIFIES
TRAINING AT UC AND CSU.
THAT'S PROBABLY WAY TOO LITTLE
THERE'S WEAKENED CONSIDERING
WHAT IND OF. A INCIDENTS OF
RACISM SEXISM ISLAMOPHOBIA HAVE
BEEN OCCURRING ON CAMPUSES.
BUT THE LOBBYING PROPOSAL THAT
THE BEES.
SO ALTHOUGH I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S
COMING.
TOMORROW WAS FOR THAT FUNDING TO
GO DB EARMARKED FOR THE ANTI
DEFAMATION LEAGUE.
AND HAN AS YOU MAY HAVE HEARD
THERE WAS AN INCIDENT SEVERAL
WEEKS AGO IN STARBUCKS IN
PHILADELPHIA. OF OF OF FLEET
RACISM AND THE ANTI DEFAMATION
LEAGUE WAS PROPOSED TO BE TO
COME IN AND TRAIN THEIR
EMPLOYEES ON HOW TO FIGHT TO TO.
TO NOT BE BIASED AND THERE'S A
BIG HUE AND CRY ABOUT THAT
BECAUSE THE ANTI DEFAMATION
LEAGUE. ARE UNFORTUNATELY HAS
STRAYED FROM ITS ORIGINAL
MISSION AS THIS IS A CIVIL
RIGHTS ORGANIZATION. AND HAS
MADE AS A AS A PRIORITY.
IT IT HAS AB INFECT PROMOTED.
ISLAMOPHOBIA IT WAS AND IT WAS.
THERE WAS A HUMAN CRY AND IT
WAS DEMOTED FROM THAT I HAVE AYE
INSTANT TIME SHORT I HAVE HERE A
ON A PAPER THAT WE'VE WRITTEN UP
THAT I WILL LEAVE WITH YOUR
STAFF. AND I WILL ALSO SEND IT
BY EMAIL SO THAT YOU CAN LINK TO
THE.
.
IS TO TO THE FOOTNOTES LET ME
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION I WOULD
JUST ASK.
FLORIDA OKAY BUT I WOULD JUST
ASK THAT THIS ITEM BEATNIK BE
VERY CLEAR THAT IT.
THANK YOU.
BE BACK TOMORROW AT NINE THIRTY.