COMMITTEE WE WELCOME YOU THINK
YOU SO MUCH FOR TAKING TIME OUT
OF YOUR BUSY MORNING THERE TO BE
WITH.
BE WITH US TODAY THAT WE HAVE.
EIGHT BILLS ON THE CALENDAR FOR
THAT TO BE TO TAKE CARE OF SOME
HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS IT'S AS WE
TRADITIONALLY DUE TO THE START
OF THE MEETING. ITEM NUMBER FIVE
THE SP TWELVE THIRTY SEVEN
CENTER BATES WILL BE OFF THE
AGENDA TODAY THAT IT WILL BE
WORKING WITH THE AUTHOR. ON A
WIN IN IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE
OF TO RESCHEDULE WE ALWAYS
WELCOME THEM BACK.
THAT WE HAVE TWO ITEMS ON
TODAY'S CONSENT WHICH IS ITEM
NUMBER SEVEN IN EIGHT S. B.
FIFTEEN OR SEVEN SP FIFTEEN TEN.
WITH THAT WE'LL TAKE A QUICK
LOOK INTO THE FUTURE UP WE ARE
GOING TO BE HAVING A PRETTY
MEETING MEETING.
NEXT WEEK AND WE HAVE ARE
PROBABLY THREE THREE AND A HALF
HOUR HEARING WE'RE GOING TO HAVE
A A ONE LAST HEARING PRIOR TO
SIMPLY BILLS. ON THE WEEK OF THE
SPACE WEAKENED OF.
MAY FOURTEENTH WILL HAVE A
HEARING ON MAY SIXTEENTH
pSIXTY EIGHT BILLS OFF OF.
IT'S COMING WEEK UNDER THE
SIXTEENTH AND WE WILL ALSO BE
DOING A SPECIAL ORDER HEARING ON
S. B. NINE NINE THREE. WHICH IS
A SINNER HERTZBERG TAX SALES TAX
ON SERVICES THAT WILL BE
STARTING STRAIGHT UP AT ELEVEN
AM. AND CENTER MORE LOCKERS RT
SALIVATING
SO.
.
BUT THAT WILL BE SPECIAL ORDER
S. B. NINE NINE THREE TAX ON
SERVICES AT ELEVEN A. M..
STEVE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR
ALLOWING US TO THE HOUSEKEEPING
WE'RE GONNA BE STARTING AS A
SUBCOMMITTEEHERE TODAY AND WE
OF COURSE WELCOME THAT THE GOOD
SENATOR FROM SANTA MONICA. TO BE
OUT OF PRISON S. B. TEN EIGHTEEN
SENATOR ALLEN BUT FOCUS ON
ELECTION CENTER AND WE WELCOME
YOU COMMITTEE SIR.
FOR SOURCE THANK YOU MEMBERS I
THINK YOU MISTER CHAIR.
SO SP TEN EIGHTEEN ALLOW SCHOOL
BOARDS COMMUTER CULTS BOARDS AND
SPECIAL DISTRICT BOARDS TO
ESTABLISH INDEPENDENT.
HYBRID FOR ADVISORY
REDISTRICTING EMISSIONS AND IT
MAKES VARIOUS CHANGES TO
STREAMLINING CLARIFY THE LAW.
THE LAND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO
CREATE REDISTRICTING COMMISSIONS.
TO BEGIN WITH THE APPROVAL OF
PROPOSITION ELEVEN IN TWO
THOUSAND EIGHT WHICH CREATED THE
CITIZENS REDUCING COMMISSION.
FOR THE STATE INDEPENDENT
ASSURING COMMISSIONS HAVE BEEN
TRYING TO SERVE CLIENTS
THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA TODAY ARE
STILL ASSEMBLY ARE SENATE O
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. PARK
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS ARE ALL
DRAWN THOSE LINES ARE ALL DRAWN
BY.
INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING
MISSIONS.
DRIVEN BY LOCAL INTEREST IN NON
PARTISAN REDISTRICTING BY
AUTHORIZED S. B. ELEVEN AWAY IN
TWENTY SIXTEEN WHICH AUTHORIZED
ALL COUNTIES AND CITIES TO
ESTABLISH AN INDEPENDENT OR
ADVISORY. REGISTERED COMMISSION
THEMSELVES
AND THIRTEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
INCLUDING THE CITIES OF SAN
DIEGO MODESTO OAKLAND SACRAMENTO
OF ALL STEPPED OUT AND
ESTABLISHED INDEPENDENT
COMMISSIONS.
SO S. B. TENNEY TEAM THIS YEAR
BUILDS UPON THAT PASSED
LEGISLATION.
BY GIVING NOW SCHOOL DISTRICTS
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTS AND
SPECIAL DISTRICTS. WITH SAME
AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH
INDEPENDENT HYBRID OR ADVISORY
COMMISSIONS.
THIS WILL BRING MORE TRANSPARENT
NONPARTISAN REDISTRICTING TO
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS THROUGHOUT
THE STATE. BUT IMPORTANTLY THE
BILL ALSO PROVIDES LOCAL
JURISDICTIONS WITH THE CHOICE.
UTILIZE INDEPENDENT HYBRID OR
ADVISORY REGISTERED COMMISSIONS
DOESN'T MANDATE THAT THEY DO SO.
TRADITIONALLY THE BILL CLARIFIES
AND STREAMLINES CURRENT LAW TO
ENSURE A SMOOTH PROCESS VERY
DISTURBING AFTER THE TWENTY
TWENTY CENSUS
SPECIFICALLY SOME OF THESE
CHANGES INCLUDE ALLOWING LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS TO CONTRACT.
WITH THE COUNTIES INDEPENDENT
DISTRICT COMMISSION PROHIBITING
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES A
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST A POLITICAL
PARTY PROHIBITING WHAT IS IT
ABOUT BODIES FROM REPEALING
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND DRAWN BY
INDEPENDENT OR. HAVE THE
COMMISSION.
PRODUCING SOME QUALIFICATIONS
OPPOSE SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO
ALLOW MORE CITIZENS BRISBANE THE
PROCESS.
AND WITH ME HERE TO TESTIFY IN
SUPPORT OF THE BILL WHO HAVE
BEEN WORKING VERY CLOSELY WITH
THE DEVELOPMENT THE SPELL
NICOLAS HER HEIGHT ON FROM
COMMON CAUSE. AND WHOSE MORALE
MIND FROM THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN
VOTERS AND.
I LOOK FOR TO HEAR THEIR
TESTIMONY.
WE WELCOME YOU THINK IT'S SO
MUCH YOU CAN NINETY SENATORS
YOURSELF WHEN YOU HAVE TWO
MINUTES SIR AND THANK YOU FOR
ATTENDING THIS MORNING.
SO YOU MISTER NICHOLS HAD ON
WITH CALIFORNIA COMMON CAUSE IN
STRONG SUPPORT OF THE BILL.
COMMON CAUSE FIRMLY SUPPORTS
INDEPENDENT REDUCING COMMISSIONS
AS A BEST PRACTICE IN
REDISTRICTING.
STUDIES OF INDEPENDENT
COMMISSIONS LIKE CALIFORNIA'S
INDEPENDENT COMMISSION FIND IT
TYPICALLY DO A BETTER JOB THAN
LEGISLATIVE BODIES DURING
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ALONG A
NUMBER OF METRICS INCLUDING
KEEPING CITIES COMMUNITIES
NEIGHBORHOODS HOLE. PROMOTING
PARTISAN FAIRNESS SOULS
INCREASING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
MINORITY REPRESENTATION.
NOW CALIFORNIA SINCE THE
CREATION THE STATE COMMISSIONS
CENTER MENTION WE SEE A SURGE OF
INTEREST IN INDEPENDENT
COMMISSIONS AT THE LOCAL LEVEL.
OVER A DOZEN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MOST ATTORNEY CITIES OF STATUS
INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONS. BUT
CENTERS LEGISLATION TWENTY
SIXTEEN S. B. ELEVEN AWAIT
AUTHORIZED CITIES AND COUNTIES
TO SALAS COMMISSIONS AS WELL IF
THEY WANT TO. THIS BILL DOES
NUMBER THINGS MOST SIGNIFICANTLY
BUILDS ON THAT BIKE STAND
EXPANDING AVAILABILITY OF
INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONS TO OTHER
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WELL NAMELY
SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND SPECIAL
DISTRICTS.
COMING BECAUSE BEING ON THE
GROUND WE HAVE HEARD FROM A
NUMBER OF SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
FOR EXAMPLE EXPRESSING INTEREST
IN HAVING THIS OPPORTUNITY AND
WE SEE NO REASON. SING THE
COMMISSIONS ARE BEST PRACTICE MY
SCHOOL SHOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE
THE SAME OPPORTUNITY ON THE SAME
BASIS OF CITIES AND COUNTIES.
THE BILL ALSO DOES SOME FINE
TUNING WHICH THE SENATOR
MENTIONED.
ON THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE
INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONS FOR
EXAMPLE PROHIBITS ENGAGING IN
PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING WHICH IS
AN ISSUETHAT IS SEES A LOT OF
ATTENTION THE NATIONAL NEWS.
IT'S ALSO RELAXES SOME THE
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SOME
THE COMMISSIONS AND THIS IS
REALLY IN RESPONSE TO THE FACT
THAT.
SMALLER COMMUNITIES HAVE A
SMALLER POOL OF PEOPLE TO APPLY
TO SERVE ON THESE COMMISSIONS
WHAT WE'VE BEEN HEARING ON THE
GROUND IS THAT. IN SOME CASES
REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTING AS A
BARRIER FOR THE RISE WELL
QUALIFIED PEOPLE WANTING TO
PARTICIPATE. TO SUPPORT THIS
RELAXATION IS WAY TO HELP SPREAD
INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONS. FINALLY
THE BUILD INCLUDE SOME
BENEFICIAL JUST CLARIFICATIONS
OF EXISTING LAW SIMPLY TO MAKE
IT CLEAR. FOR EXAMPLE THE
LANGUAGE S. B. LEVIN WE TALKED
Y. REDUCING COMMISSIONS AND THIS
BILL JUST MAKES CLEAR THAT THAT
ALSO ENCOMPASSES DISTRICTING
COMMISSIONS WHICH SWINGERS FOR
THINGS DONE FOR THE FIRST TIME.
TO CONCLUDE CALIFORNIA'S BEEN
JUST A A NATIONAL LEADER ON
STATE AND FEDERAL REDISTRICTING
AND WE THINK THIS BILL CONTINUES
OUR LEADERSHIP BY PRODUCING ON
THE LOCAL LEVEL AS WELL WHERE WE
THINK THE CENTER FOR BRING THIS
FORWARD AND HER TONIGHT. THINK
IT'S SO MUCH THAT YOU FOR BEING
HERE FOR ALL YOUR WORK MA'AM WE
WELCOME YOU THINK YOU SO MUCH
YOU KNOW MY NAME DO YOU SEE
YOURSELF.
WHO'S BEHIND ON BEHALF OF THE
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF
CALIFORNIA.
THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS IS OF
CALIFORNIA'S PLEASED TO SUPPORT
SB TEN EIGHTEEN. SB TEN EIGHTEEN
CLARIFIES THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF
S. B. ELEVEN AWAIT BY MAKING IT
MORE CLEAR THAT COMMISSIONS MAY
BE USED FOR AN INITIAL
DISTRICTING AND NOT SIMPLY A
REDISTRICTING. AND BY CLARIFYING
THAT HYBRID COMMISSIONS WERE
BOTH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND
COMMISSIONS SHARE AUTHORITY IN
ADOPTING FINAL MAPS MUST MEET
THE SAME STANDARDS OF
INDEPENDENCE AND TRANSPARENCY.
REQUIRED OF INDEPENDENT
COMMISSIONS.
THE LEAGUE BELIEVES THAT
RESPONSIBILITY FOR REDISTRICTING
SHOULD BE VESTED IN AN
INDEPENDENT SPECIAL COMMISSION
WITH MEMBERSHIP THAT REFLECTS
THE DIVERSITY OF THE UNIT OF
GOVERNMENT INCLUDING CITIZENS AT
LARGE REPRESENTATIVES OF PUBLIC
INTEREST GROUPS. AND MEMBERS OF
MINORITY GROUPS.
WE EXPLICITLY REJECTED THE
PROTECTION OF INCUMBENTS AND
PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR
POLITICAL PARTY.
WE SUPPORT PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
AND ENGAGEMENT WITH CITIZENS
REDISTRICTING COMMISSIONS.
BUT LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF
CALIFORNIA SUPPORTS SP TEN
EIGHTEEN WHICH MAKE IT EASIER
FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO ADOPT
TRANSPARENT NONPARTISAN
COMMISSIONS TO DRAW DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES. AND TO ELIMINATE THE
INHERENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST
AND HAVING LOCAL ELECTED.
ELECTED OFFICIALS DRAW THEIR OWN
DISTRICT.
ELECTIONS THEREFORE WE ARE
DENIED VOTE THANK YOU.
HE'S TOO MUCH TO GIVE YOUR
TESTIMONY FOR BEING HERE TODAY
WE NOW WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME
ANYONE WHO'S IN SUPPORT OF YOU
TO PLEASE TAKE YOUR FIRST AND
LAST YEAR ORGANIZATION WHAT. I
ENGRAM ACLU OF CALIFORNIANS
SUPPORT PICKING HIM.
FOR THAT TO TO SEE IF ANYONE
ELSE IS IN SUPPORT.
LAST CALL FOR THOSE WHO ARE IN
SUPPORT.
WITHOUT LIKE TO WELCOME ANYONE
WHO'S SUPPOSED TO BE TO PROVIDE
TESTIMONY IF YOU CAN PLEASE COME
FORWARD.
ANYONE WHO'S OPPOSED.
THE BILL. WE THE MOTION ON THE
FLOOR. BY ANY DISCUSSION OR
DEBATE BY THE COMMITTEE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH ON.
YES PLEASE A PARTICULAR.
THANK YOU WANNA AGAIN TO THINK
SENATOR ALLEN FOR FOR THE SPILL.
THAT'S VERSION WEEKEND MANDATE
THEM TO JUST CREATE A
REDISTRICTING COMMISSION THAT WE
DID A COUPLE YEARS AGO.
AND.
YOU KNOW I THINK IT'S IT'S VITAL
FOR FOR PARTICIPATION IT'S VITAL
FOR.
FAIRNESS.
ESPECIALLY AS
CAN COMMITTEES CONTINUE TO GROW
AND CHANGE AND SHIFT.
IT JUST A QUICK NOTE THAT WE
ARE
SUPERIOR COURT ACTUALLY JUDGE
RULED IN OUR FAVOR. A AGAINST.
THE LA COUNTY WHO IS CONTINUING
TO SUE US ON THE BILL THAT IDEA
TO FORCE THEM TO CREATE
LEADERSHIP BEING. OUT TO READ
PREDICT INDEPENDENT
REDISTRICTING COMMISSION SO
ABOUT. THE LAWS ON OUR SIDE AND
I THINK.
UNDERSTAND REALLY THE
IMPORTANCE OF CREATING
THESE INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONS TO
DRUG DISTRICTS SO A PART OF
SUPPORT TO SPELL. PICTURE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH IN.
CONGRATS ON THAT BY THE WAY
SIMILAR THAT IS A BIG ONE.
LIKE RECEIVING THE DISCS
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION OR DEBATE.
SCENE NINE WHAT WE'D LIKE TO BE
TO DO IS HAVE SOME AROUND HERE
TO PROVIDE A CLOSING STATEMENT
WE'D LIKE TO BE TO CREATE A
QUORUM SIT AROUND PLEASE.
VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THAT THE
YOUR THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION I
ASKED FOR A VOTE THANK YOU SO
MUCH IN AROUND THE STATUS REVIEW
PLEASE THAT WAS A QUORUM CALL
PLEASE WIRE HERE REQUIRE PRESENT
NGUYEN. BELL YOUR BILL PRESTON
HERNANDEZ HERTZBERG LARA HERE
ARE PRESENT MORLOCK. ELECTRICITY
THANK YOU SO MUCH WE DO HAVE A
QUORUM IT'S BEEN ESTABLISHED WE
HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY.
THANK YOU SO MUCH
THIS IS A DO PASSED TO THE FLOOR
MOTION BY SENATOR BELL MISLEAD
CHESSER WELCOME PLACE AYE. WIRE
AYE.
NOW. BILL I HERNANDEZ HERTZBERG.
LARA PRODUCT LARA I'M MORE LONG.
YEAH.
LOOK AT.
BIPARTISAN GROUP HUG GREAT THERE
ALRIGHT SO WE GOT A FOUR ZERO
FOUR ZERO.
WERE TO KEEP THE ROLE OPENS IN
AROUND THANK YOU SO MUCH
A DELYLAH MEMBERS TO BE ABLE TO
AYE ADD ON.
MEMBERS WOULD ACT IT TAKE UP THE
CONSENT CALENDAR AT THIS TIME.
THAT WE OF THE MOTION ON THE
FLOOR BY.
I DO PASSES WERE RECOMMENDED BY
MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY SENATOR
BELL.
THE SLAIN CHESSER BROKE VOTE
PLEASE ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
MCGUIRE TIE WIRE DRIVE WITHIN.
BILL. YOU KNOW I'VE HEARD THE.
BUT SPUR.
LARA.
PINE FLOOR I AM MORE LONG. LONG
LONG TIME FOR.
THAT IS CURRENTLY A FOUR ZERO
VOTE WE'RE GOING TO KEEP THE
ROLE OPEN. AND ALLOW MEMBERS TO
BE ABLE TO ADD ON.
WE HAVE THE GOOD SENATOR.
CENTER PORTANTINO. COM
PRESENTING SENATE BILL TWELVE
FOURTEEN WITCHES ON PERSONAL
INCOME TAXES AND IT'S A SPECIFIC
TAX LEVY. RECREATE.
SENATE PORTANTINO FOR BEING HERE
AND FOR ALL THIS HARD WORK.
THEN PORTANTINO THE FLOOR IS
YOURS SIR AND THANK YOU FOR
COMING COMMITTEE.
THANK YOU I'M MISTER CHAIR AND.
SENATORS SO I'D LIKE TO BEGIN
BY ACCEPTING THE TECHNICAL
AMENDMENTS OUTLINED IN THE
COMMITTEE ANALYSIS SO THANK YOU
FOR THOSE. SP TWELVE FOURTEEN.
FREAKS TAXABLE YEAR BEGINNING
ON OR AFTER JANUARY TWO THOUSAND
NINETEEN THEM BEFORE JANUARY TWO
THOUSAND TWENTY FOUR. WOULD
ALLOW TEACHERS WITH PRELIMINARY
CREDENTIALS TO CLAIM A TWENTY
FIVE HUNDRED DOLLAR ABOVE THE
LINE TAX DEDUCTION ON THEIR
PERSONAL STATE INCOME TAXES.
FOR FEES INCURRED TOWARDS THE
COMPLETION OF AN IDUCTION
PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE
COMMISSION ON TEACHER
CREDENTIALING.
THE BILL WOULD ALSO REQUIRE THE
LEGISLATURE REVIEW THE DEDUCTION
BEFORE JANUARY TWO THOUSAND
TWENTY FOUR. IN TWO THOUSAND I
SINCE TWO THOUSAND FOR
CALIFORNIA LAW HAS REQUIRED NEW
TEACHERS WHO HAVE COMPLETED A
TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAM AND
ARE ISSUED A PRELIMINARY
CREDENTIAL. TO ENROLL TO ENROLL
IN THE C. T. C. APPROVED
INDUCTION PROGRAM WITHIN THEIR
FIRST FIVE YEARS OF TEACHING IN
ORDER TO OBTAIN THEIR CLEAR
CREDENTIAL TO CONTINUE TO TEACH.
HOWEVER ALTHOUGH CALIFORNIA
REQUIRES TEACHERS TO ENROLL IN
SUCH A PROGRAM IT DOES NOT
REQUIRE DISTRICTS OUR SCHOOLS TO
ACTUALLY PROVIDED OR PAY FOR IT.
THIS IS AN OUT OF POCKET COSTS
FOR TEACHERS WHICH CAN AVRAGE
ABOUT TWO THOUSAND. FOR THE
TWELVE PERCENT NUMBER OUT TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR THE TWELVE
PERCENT OF THAT T. BELLY A BASE
PROGRAMS THAT CHARGE FEES. AND
AS MUCH AS FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
AT A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY. THE
REQUESTED TAX DEDUCTION WOULD
ASSIST ALL NEW CREDENTIALED
TEACHERS WITH AN INDIVIDUAL TAX
DEDUCTION. FOR THEIR TEACHER
INDUCTION PROGRAM EXPANDS TO
FILL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
OBTAINING A CLEAR CREDENTIAL.
WHICH EMPOWERS THEM TO REMAIN IN
ADVANCE IN THE PROFESSION HAS
GREAT EDUCATORS.
BY SUPPORTING THESE BEGINNING
TEACHERS WHO ARE NOW ACTIVELY
EDUCATING CALIFORNIA STUDENTS AS
WELL AS THOSE WHO MAY NOT BE
TEACHING RIGHT NOW BUT WILL JOIN
TO RETURN THE CLASSROOMS SUCH
TAX RELIEF WOULD BE A MEANINGFUL
INCREASE.
FOR CALIFORNIA'S SUPPLY OF
QUALITY IN FULLY PREPARED
TEACHERS I HAVE WITH ME RAVER
NOW FROM THE CALIFORNIA CATHOLIC
CONTEST CONFERENCE. AND RICO
TAMAYO CHAIR OF THE EARLY
EDUCATION.
T. K. TWELVE DIVISION COUNSEL
FOR THE CALIFORNIA FEDERATED OF
TEACHERS FRANKLY A LOT OF SCHOOL
DISTRICTS WILL PAY FOR THIS.
THOSE WHO DON'T THOSE TEACHERS
GET SADDLED WITH THAT COSTS AND
THIS IS A WAY TO HELP THOSE
TEACHERS WHEN WE DESPERATELY
NEED TEACHER SO TAKE IT. THE SO
MUCH AS PORTANTINO AND THAT THIS
IS.
AN IMPORTANT BILL I DO WELL YOU
KNOW YOU HAVE BIPARTISAN
SUPPORT ON THE BILL SO WE'RE
GOING TO ASK OUR WITNESSES TO
APPEAR TO BE BEACON OF COMMENTS
BUT YOU KNOW THAT YOU HAVE
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT WE WELCOME
SIR WOULD YOU LIKE TO KICK US
OFF.
HONORABLE CHAIR MCGUIRE THANK
YOU FOR YOUR CONCERN. UP TENSION
AND OTHER COMMITTEE MEMBERS MY
NAME IS.
RICO TAMAYO I AM PRESIDENT
EARLY CHILDHOOD QUE TWELFTH
COUNSEL FOR THE. CALIFORNIA
PATTERSON TEACHER'S. I TAUGHT IN
THE CLASSROOM FOR TWENTY YEARS I
STARTED BY IT AS A KINDERGARTEN
TEACHER IN COMPTON CALIFORNIA.
I THEN MOVED TO PICO RIVERA
THIS IS IN THE LOS ANGELES AREA.
BECAUSE I HAVE A BIG MOUTH AND I
LIKE TO HELP PEOPLE. OUT OF MY
BECAME LOCAL UNION PRESIDENT AND.
PECO AND THE STORY WANT TO SHARE
WITH YOU. IS ONE DAY A WOMAN
CAME TO MY OFFICE CRYING.
HER NAME WITH SYLVIA. MARTINEZ.
AND AFTER I CALMED HER DOWN AND
GOT HER SOME WATER. SHE WAS
UPSET BECAUSE SHE DID NOT HAVE
THE MONEY TO PAY FOR HER
INDUCTION PROGRAM.
THE BEST I COULD DO FOR HER WAS
PAYMENTS.
NOW SHE HAD FOUR KIDS
SINGLE MOM. LIVES WITH HER OWN
MOTHER.
AND I STARTED THINKING ABOUT
THOSE PAYMENTS.
IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT. THEY
WANTED TO COVER IN ONE YEAR.
AND THAT'S A CAR PAYMENT THAT'S
GROCERIES FOR HER KIDS THAT'S
COPAYMENTS WHEN SHE TAKES HIM TO
THE DOCTOR. IT'S A REAL THING
NOW THIS IS NOT ASKING THEM TO
PAY FOR THE INDUCTION IT SIMPLY
SAYING CONCERT LEASE RIGHT THE
SOFTENER TAXES. WE HAVE A HUGE
TEACHER SHORTAGE WE HAVE EVEN
BIGGER ONE AND SPECIAL EDUCATION.
AND THIS IS A VERY SMALL BABY
STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO
SUPPORTER TEACHERS. I THINK IT'S
THE RIGHT THING TO DO AND I
REALLY HOPE THAT ALL OF YOU.
VOTE BY ON THIS S. B. TWELVE
FOURTEEN.
TOM THANK YOU VERY MUCH HE
SWITCHES TO AND THINK YOU DID
CAN YOU LIFE TEACHING AS WELL
IT'S AND POOR PROFESSION THANK
YOU SO MUCH SIR. WHO ARE
CONCERNED AND YOU HAVE
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT THANK YOU
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE THAT
THAT MY NAME IS ROBERT ALLEN THE
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION FOR THE?
CATHOLIC CHURCH IN CALIFORNIA
AND MAKING SURE THAT EVERY
STUDENT HAS A GREAT TEACHER IS
THE SINGLE. BEST STRATEGY WE CAN
USE TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE EQUITY
AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION.
SENATE BILL TWELVE FOURTEEN IS A
WISE USE OF TAX POLICY THAT IS
FOCUSED THAT IS AFFORDABLE THAT
IS MEANINGFUL
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS GOING TO
EMPOWER OUR NEW TEACHERS TO.
REMAIN SUCCEED AND ACCELERATE
AND THEIR PROFESSIONS AND
THEREFORE WE RESPECTFULLY ASK
YOUR AYE VOTE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH IT'S
PRONOUNCED COULD YOU SEE SIR
WE'D LIKE TO WELCOME ANYONE
WHO'S IN SUPPORT OF YOU KNOW MY
INCOME AFFORD IF YOU PLEASE
STATE YOUR FIRST AND LAST ALONG
WITH ORGANIZATION GOOD MORNING
MA'AM.
MORNING ERICA ROMERO BEHALF OF
THE ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT
CALIFORNIA COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES AND SUPPORT THE
CONSUMER CORN SIR GOOD MORNING
RON REYNOLDS. CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF PRIVATE SCHOOL
ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT MAKING
HIS ROUNDS.
GOOD MORNING SIR.
MORNING MR SHARE MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE RON RAPIDLY AFTER THE
CALIFORNIA FEDERATION OF
TEACHERS.
WE'RE PROUD CO SPONSORS OF THIS
LEGISLATION THANK YOU WE
RESPECTFULLY REQUEST AND I THINK
HE WAS TRYING.
LAST CALL FOR THOSE WHO MAY BE
IN SUPPORT IF YOU TO PLEASE COME
FORWARD THIS TIME LAST CALL.
WHEN I WOULD LIKE TO BE TO SEE
IF WE HAVE ANYONE WHO'S OPPOSED
IF YOU COULD PLEASE ADVANCE FOR
STATEMENT. ANYONE IS SUPPOSED.
LAST CALL FOR OPPOSED TO THE
BILL ALRIGHT WE DO HAVE A MOTION
ON THE FLOOR WOULD LIKE ME TO
SEE IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS CENTER MOLOCH PLEASE.
VERIFICATION MISTER CHAIR HAVE.
MY MY. BRIEFING SAYS TO CLAIM A
TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED DOLLAR ABOVE
THE LINE TAX DEDUCTION FOR UP TO
THREE YEARS.
AND I JUST COULDN'T FIND IN IN
THAT MATERIALS WHAT THAT MEANS
IS THAT MEAN.
BUT IF YOU SPEND TWENTY FIVE
HUNDRED. THREE YEARS IN A ROW
YOU GET THE FULL TWENTY FIVE
HUNDRED OR VISIT MEAN YOU CAN.
SPREAD OUT OVER THREE YEARS HER
TWENTY FIVE PER THREE.
FOR YOUR FOR YOUR YEAR. SO IF
YOU SPEND FIVE THOUSAND FIRST
YEAR YOU GET TO DEDUCT TWENTY
FIVE HUNDRED BUT NOTHING THE
SECOND OR THIRD YEAR.
CORRECT THANK YOU THANK YOU
MISTER THANK YOU SO MUCH SIMILAR
PLEASE THIS ALSO INCLUDE
TEACHERS AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS.
YES YES THIS IS FOR ALL NEW
TEACHERS WITH THE MUST HAVE
PRELIMINARY CREDENTIALS AND BE
ENROLLED IN A CDC IMPROVED
INDUCTION PROGRAM WHERE THEY ARE
CURRENTLY TEACHING IN THE
CLASSROOM. OR YOU'RE GOING TO
RETURN OR JOIN THE WORKFORCE
LATER.
A CREDENTIALED TEACHERS SO
EIGHTY EIGHT PERCENT OF THE
SCHOOLS WILL PAY FOR.
I I KNOW I KNOW UNDER THIS ISN'T
WAS CURIOUS TO SEE IF IT HASN'T
BEEN IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS OKAY
THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH
ACUTE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
BY WE DO HAVE A MOTION ON THE
FLOOR BY CENTER BALLOTS IS A DO
PASSED TO APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATE WOULD LIKE TO BE TO OFFER
CLOSING COMMENTS
WE ASK FOR AN AYE VOTE THANK YOU
SO MUCH TO DO PASS
APPROPRIATIONS RECALL PLEASE
MISS LANCASTER.
REQUIRED BY THE FLYER I WIN BILL.
BILL I'M HERNANDEZ HERTZBERG
LARA. LARA I'M MORE LOTS. MELAKA.
THERE IS CURRENTLY A FOUR ZERO
WOULD KEEP THE ROLE OPEN SIR.
AND WILL ALLOW FOLKS BEEN AND I
THINK YOU SO MUCH IN GERMAN
THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.
SENATORS WERE NOT IN THE MOVIE
NINE TO SENATE BILL THIRTEEN OH
TO. FOCUS ON I CAN WHISTLE EVERY
SERVICES WE WELCOME THAT CENTER
LARA TO.
DICE IN FRONT OF US.
FUN AS ZERO LARS MAKING HIS WAY
WE'D LIKE TO BE A WELCOME A
COUPLE GUESTS WHO ARE HERE TODAY.
BUT CHECK IT OUT FOR THE FIRST
TIME GOVERNMENTS IN FINANCE WE
THE CHIEF DEPUTY DIRECTOR.
OF THE OFFICE OF TAX APPEALS
MISS GRADY'S HERE THANK YOU SO
MUCH FOR ITS GRADY. AND WE HAVE
A LEGEND HERE IN.
.
THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT IS OF
COURSE MIRIAM.
MIRIAM HAS LEFT.
SENATE IN GONE TO.
THE
YEAH.
FEELS THAT WE WANT HER BACK UP
SHE'S NOW THE DIRECTOR OF
LEGISLATION SO WE HOPE IT'S
GONNA BE SHORT STINT
SO I PLEASE COME BACK VERY WE
MISS YOU A LOT AND WELCOME. HOT
BOTH YOU IS WELL SO WITHOUT
FURTHER ADO WE'D LIKE TO BE
ADDED TURN IT OVER TO SENATOR
LARA. AND BITCHY WORK ON THIS
BILL SO THE FLOOR IS YOURS.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR AND
MEMBERS OF WANNA TAKE A MOMENT
AGAIN TECHNOLOGY AND ADDRESS A
FEW OF THE POINTS AND QUESTIONS
RAISED IN THE COMMITTEE ANALYSIS
AND TO APPRECIATE. GUY THAT THE
REAL WORK OF YOUR COMMITTEE
STAFF FIRST.
FIRST QUESTION WHAT DOES THIS
BILL MEASURE ADVANCE THE INTENT
OF THE VOTERS.
I BELIEVE IT DOES AND THE
PREMISE OF THIS MEASURE IS TO
ENSURE THAT THE WILL OF THE
VOTERS TO CREATE A FAITH ACCESS
TO MEDICINAL AND RECREATIONAL
CANNABIS. IS PRESERVED AND IN
SOME CASES.
RETURNED AT THE MEASURE
REQUIRES A TWO THIRDS MAJORITY
VOTE BUT DOES NOT REQUIRE A
CHANGE TO GO BACK TO THE VOTERS
FOR APPROVAL. AND IS MEASURE IS
NOT INTENDED TO INTERFERE WITH A
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DECISION TO
ABSTAIN FROM OR BAND LICENSING
TAXING OR REGULATING CANNABIS.
THIS BILL SIMPLY BROKE PROHIBITS
THE LOOK YOU KNOW LOCAL
JURISDICTION FROM INTERFERING IN
THE DELIVERY OF A NOW LEGAL
PRODUCT BY A LEGAL LICENSE.
DELIVERY COMPANY SO PRIVATE
RESIDENTS OF A PATIENT FOR AN
ADULT CONSUMER.
HOWEVER DUE TO THE PATCHWORK OF
LOCAL ORDINANCES FROM TOTAL
BANDS TO MEDICAL ONLY
OPTIMIZATIONS TO TOTAL
OPTIMIZATIONS SOME LEGITIMATE
QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN RAISED
REGARDING HOW THIS BILL. WILL
INTERACT WITH JURISDICTIONS THAT
CURLY LICENSE AND REGULATE
DELIVERIES IN THEIR
JURISDICTIONS. HAVE MET WHEN
NUMEROUS STAKEHOLDERS FROM THE
OPPOSITION INCLUDING MORE
RECENTLY WITH THE UNITED
CANNABIS BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
UFCW AND MY OUR VERY OWN LONG
BEACH COLLECTIVE THIS
ASSOCIATION ARE BACK HOME IN MY
DISTRICT. WHAT WE STILL HAVE
MUCH WORK TO DO BEFORE WE COME
TO ANY RESOLUTION ON THE MATTER?
A PLANET CONTINUE TO TACKLE THE
CONCERNS RAISED AND I ALSO WANT
TO CLARIFY THAT A DELIVERY
LICENSEE MUST ADHERE TO LOCAL
LABOR PEACE AGREEMENTS AND ONLY
DELIVERIES. TO A CUSTOMER'S
PRIVATE RESIDENTS WILL BE
AUTHORIZED HIM ALSO COMMITTED TO
EXPLORE THE SALES TAX ISSUE AND
THE POSSIBILITY OF AUTHORIZING A
DELIVERY REGISTRY. AND BAND
DELIVERY OF JURISDICTIONS TO
ENSURE LOCALS KNOW WHAT LICENSE
DELIVERY COMPANY IS DOING
BUSINESS IN THEIR COMMUNITY.
TODAY ANY JUST A PORTRAIT BASS
THE MEASURE BECAUSE DESPITE THE
PASSAGE OF PROP TWO FIFTEEN AND
PROP SIXTY FOUR MANY LOCALITIES
THROUGHOUT THE STATE DO NOT
LICENSE CANNABIS DISPENSARY OR
DELIVERY COMPANIES. AYE A RECENT
REPORT BY THAT CAN A RED SOX FAN
NOTE THAT THREE HUNDRED AND
THIRTY TWO CITIES AND COUNTIES
IN CALIFORNIA BAND THAT DELIVERY
OF BOTH MEN. MEDICAL AND
RECREATIONAL CANNABIS AND
ADDITIONAL SEVENTY TWO BAND ONE
OR THE OTHER TOTALING SEVENTY
FIVE PERCENT OF MUNICIPALITIES
IN CALIFORNIA. CURRENTLY THERE
ARE ONLY TWENTY TWO HUNDRED
EIGHTY FOUR LEGAL DISPENSARIES
IN CALIFORNIA AND SEVENTY FIVE
PERCENT OF THE STATE HAS NO
ACCESS TO LEGAL CANNABIS.
ADDITIONALLY ACCORDING TO THE
SACRAMENTO BEE ANALYSIS OF STATE
LICENSING DATA RESIDENTS IN
ABOUT FORTY PERCENT OF THE STATE.
HAVE TO DRIVE SIXTY MILES OR
MORE TO FIND THE LICENSE
DISPENSARY TO BUY ILLEGAL
CANNABIS PRODUCTS THE PREMISE OF
S. B. DON'T YOU KNOW TO IS TO
ALLOW LICENSE CANNABIS DELIVERY
COMPANIES. TO TRAVEL ON PUBLIC
ROADS TO ENSURE THAT PATIENTS
AND CONSUMERS OF OF OF. ARE ABLE
TO HAVE CANNABIS PRODUCTS SAFELY
DELIVERED TO THEIR PLACE OF
RESIDENCE. WHILE LOCAL CONTROL
IS A KEY TENET OF PROP SIXTY
FOUR LOCAL BANDS ON DELIVERY
FRUSTRATE. AT THE WILL OF THE
VOTERS AND AND HINDERING ITS
ABILITY OF INDIVIDUALS TO ACCESS
LEGAL CANNABIS PRODUCTS AND
ENCOURAGE BLACK MARKET ACTIVITY.
LOCAL BANDS ON DELIVERY ALSO
HEART PATIENTS DURIN THE
FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF THE
CALIFORNIA'S COMMERCIAL MARKET.
CANNABIS DELIVERY SERVICES
PROVIDE ACCESS TO CONSUMERS ALL
WHO ARE IMMOBILE SUFFERING FROM
SERIOUS ILLNESS OR DISABILITIES
OR SIMPLY LIVE IN JURISDICTIONS
WHERE THE SELF CANNABIS IS
SIMPLY NOT PERMITTED. MOREOVER
MANY CONSUMERS PREFER THE
PRIVACY OF CONVENIENCE OF
DELIVERY SERVICES IN SOME
JURISDICTIONS LICENSE DELIVERY
DRIVERS HAVE HAD BEEN ARRESTED
OR JAY AND JAILED FOR PERFORMING
LEGITIMATE. A JOB IN THEIR
DUTIES WITH ME THAT CLARIFY IN
SUPPORT OF THE BILL OUR SPONSORS.
KEIGHTLEY MAPLE REPRESENTING WE
DROP VERY BROAD WHO I DON'T SEE.
HOW YOU ARE VERY BROAD OF THE
TEAMSTERS
AND DODD THAT CAN REPRESENTING
AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS THANK
YOU?
POLITICIAN.
THANK YOU SO MUCH SO JUST REAL
QUICK SO WE TYPICALLY HAVE TWO
PRIMARY WITNESSES SO WE
DISSECTED IT TO SEE WHO CAN BE
OUR PRIMARY WITNESSES HERE TODAY.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT OKAY IN
TECHNICAL THAT'S GREAT WONDERFUL
WE WELCOME YOU MA'AM THANK YOU
SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE GOOD
MORNING CHAIR MEMBERS MY NAME IS
KATIE MADE FUN I'M HERE ON
BEHALF OF THE JOB.
STATE LICENSE CANNABIS DELIVERY
BUSINESS AND SPONSORED S. B.
THIRTY NO TO YOU.
IN NOVEMBER OF TWENTY SIXTEEN
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OVERWHELMINGLY PASSED
PROPOSITION SIXTY FOUR. WHICH
ALLOWED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION
AND SALE OF MEDICAL AND
RECREATIONAL CANNABIS AND CREATE
A PASSWORD FOR WHAT WOULD BECOME
REGULATED MARKET.
THE INTENT OF THAT PROPOSITION
AND THE EXPECTATION OF THOSE WHO
VOTED FOR IT WAS FOR RESPONSIBLE
USERS TO HAVE STAYS SAFE LEGAL
ACCESS TO CANNABIS. BUT IT'S
CLEAR THAT THE EXPECTATION IS
NOT CURRENTLY THE REALITY IN
CALIFORNIA. THAT REALITY IS THAT
MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE ACCESS
IN THE STATE. ACCORDING TO
CANTER EXEMPLIFYING THAT TRACKS
LOCAL CANDIDATES REGULATIONS
FOUR HUNDRED AND FIVE OUT OF
FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY CITIES
AND COUNTIES IN CALIFORNIA WHERE
ABOUT SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT BAND
SOME FORM OF DELIVERY. THIS
CREATES A NEAR IMPOSSIBLE
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR
LICENSE DELIVERY BUSINESS TO
OPERATE. IMAGINE IF WEREQUIRED
OTHER BUSINESSES THAT OPERATE
SELF STATEWIDE AND SELL LEGAL
PRODUCTS TO COMPLY WITH FIVE
HUNDRED FORTY DIFFERENT SETS OF
REGULATIONS.
MANY COMPANIES WIENER AS WE KNOW
THEM NOW CANNOT EXIST UNDER THAT
MODEL.
IN ADDITION TO THE NUMBER OF
LOCAL REGULATIONS ONE MUST KNOW
AND COMPLY WITH THEY MUST ALSO
KNOW THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN
THEM. FOR EXAMPLE IN THE CITY OF
SACRAMENTO A BUSINESS CAN
DELIVER IF THEIR LICENSE ANOTHER
JURISDICTION BUT IN THE COUNTY
SACRAMENTO THERE IS A COMPLETE
BAN ON ALL COMMERCIAL CANNABIS
ACTIVITY. IN THE COUNTY OF MARIN
BUSINESSES ARE ALLOWED TO
DELIVER INTO THE JURISDICTION
BUT THEY CAN OPEN UP SHOP THERE.
AND IN THE CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO
YOU CAN OPEN UP SHOP AND DELIVER
WITHIN THE CITY YOU CANNOT
DELIVER OUTSIDE OF IT. IN SOME
JURISDICTIONS ONLY STOREFRONT
DISPENSARIES CAN DELIVER DESPITE
THERE BEING A STATEWIDE LICENSE
TYPE FOR DELIVERY ONLY. IN THESE
ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES.
I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT
FOR THE AVERAGE CALIFORNIAN TO
BELIEVE THAT THIS IS THE
REGULATORY SYSTEM THAT WAS
INTENDED BY THEIR VOTE ON
PROPOSITION SIXTY FOUR. WE
IMPLORE YOU TO CONSIDER WAYS TO
ADDRESS THE VAST COMPLEXITY OF
LOCAL LAWS REGARDING DELIVERY
AND ASK YOUR AYE VOTE ON SB
THIRTEEN AT YOU HAVE YOUR ANSWER
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS THANK YOU
THANK YOU SO MUCH WE'RE GRATEFUL
SIR WE WELCOME TO COMMITTEE IF
YOU GET.
PERSON LAST NEAR ORGANIZATION.
THANK YOU GOT A GOOD MORNING. MY
NAME IS DON DUNCAN WITH
AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS THE
NATION'S LEADING MEDICAL
CANNABIS PATIENT ADVOCACY
ORGANIZATION I'M ALSO A TWENTY
YEAR VETERAN OF CALIFORNIA'S
MEDICAL CANNABIS INDUSTRY. I'M
HERE JUST BRIEFLY TO A TO POINT
OUT FOR THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
I'D THAT THAT MEDICAL CANNABIS
PATIENTS IN CALIFORNIA BOTH NEED
AND WANT DELIVERY SERVICES IN
ANY CHANGE IN POLICY AND LAW
THAT WE CAN. AFFECT THAT WILL
MAKE IT EASIER FOR PATIENTS TO
OBTAIN MEDICINE THROUGH DELIVERY
WILL BE BENEFICIAL. WITH THE
ADVENT OF STATE LICENSING A WE
CAN NOW BE MORE CONFIDENT THAN
EVER THAT DELIVERY SERVICES ARE
LEGAL WELL REGULATED SAFE FOR
THE CONSUMER AND SAFE FOR THE
COMMUNITIES. AND SO OUT WE DON'T
SEEK TO IMPOSE ON ANY CITY.
THE REQUIREMENT TO LICENSE.
OR TO PERMIT HE'S DEFICIT IS
DELIVERY SERVICES WITHIN THEIR
JURISDICTION ONLY TO ALLOW LEGAL
MEDICAL CANNABIS PATIENTS AND
INDEED RESPONSIBLE ADULT USE
CONSUMERS TO HAVE ACCESS TO
THOSE LEGAL SERVICE INSIDE THEIR
JURISDICTION. I MIGHT ALSO
REMIND THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
THAT MANY JURISDICTIONS HAVE SET
ABOUT TO OUR REQUIRE DELIVERY
SERVICES TO REGISTER OR TO
OBTAIN A LICENSE IT TO DELIVER
TO OUR JURISDICTION GIVING THE
CITIES AND COUNTIES SOME
ADDITIONAL CONTROL NOW. OVER THE.
DELIVERIES THAT ARE OCCURRING
INSIDE THEIR JURISDICTIONS FROM
OUTSIDE AND SO THERE IS A WAY TO
MOVE FORWARD AND TAKE CARE OF
THE NEEDS OF PATIENTS AND THEY
DON'T USE CONSUMERS THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SO MUCH OF MISTER
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS VERY BROAD
WITH THE TEACHERS LET ME JUST IF
IF IF IF I MAY MANY JUST ADDRESS
THIS QUESTION THE COMMITTEE HAS
RAISED IN THE OPPONENTS TO
PRAISE. ABOUT THE APPROPRIATE
BALANCE.
BUT IN THE WITH THE PROPOSITION.
I THINK AND WE HAVE BEEN VERY
STRONG SUPPORTERS OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT CONTROL IN THIS.
THE AREA AND WE STILL ARE STRONG
SUPPORTERS OF IT.
HOWEVER.
THE APPROPRIATE BALANCE NEEDS TO
BE LOGICAL AND CONSISTENT AND I
THINK WHAT PROP SIXTY FOUR GUYS
IS IT GIVES LOCAL JURISDICTIONS.
PLENARY CONTROL OVER LAND USE
THAT THE WORDS THEY DON'T HAVE
TO HAVE ANY MARIJUANA BUSINESS.
LOCATED IN THEIR JURISDICTION.
HOWEVER IF YOU ALSO BANNED
DELIVERY YOU YOU CREATE A HUGE
ACCESS ISSUE.
BUT. SOMEONE COULD IF THEY HAVE
A CAR THEY COULD JUST DRIVE TO
THE NEIGHBORING JURISDICTION AND
DRIVE IT BACK.
SO THE SAME ACTIVITY OCCURS
WHERE THERE'S DELIVERY OR
SOMEBODY GOES AND DRIVES IT BACK
WHAT THE IMPACT IS EXACTLY THE
SAME.
THE PERSON CAN GET IT NOW IF
THEY'RE MY EIGHTY FOUR YEAR OLD
MOTHER WHO I GOT HER TO TRY THIS
STUFF FOR PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
ON THE BOTTOM OF HER FEET.
SHE DOESN'T DRIVE A CAR ANY
LONGER.
SHE HAS TROUBLE EVEN USING
PUBLIC TRANSIT.
SHE REALLY WOULD BE DENIED
ACCESS TO THIS IF I DON'T BUY IT
FOR HER.
RIGHT I MEAN ANOTHER WERE SO
THERE AND THERE ARE LOTS OF
PEOPLE LIKE THAT. WHO USE IT IN
AND SO THAT TO ME IS THE
APPROPRIATE BALANCE
TO SAY YOU DON'T HAVE TO LICENSE
ANYBODY IN YOUR JURISDICTION BUT
ALLOW THEM TO RECEIVE THE
DELIVERY THANK YOU NO THANK YOU
SO MUCH? WE'RE NOW GONNA
APPRECIATE WITNESSES WERE NOT
GOING TO OPEN UP FOR THOSE WHO
LIKE TO GO SPEAKING
SUPPORT THE BILL. AND WE
TYPICALLY IF TO PRIMARY WITNESS
IS WHAT WE'RE GOING TO ASK ACH
OF YOU IN AGAIN THANK YOU OFFER
BEING HERE TODAY IF YOU PLEASE
STATE YOUR FIRST AND LAST YEAR
ORGANIZATION.
AND OTHER YOU ARE IN SUPPORT OF
THE BILL WELCOME GOOD TO SEE SIR
I DEAL DURING THEIR FOR A
CALIFORNIA NORMAL. HOPS IN
SUPPORT OF THE BILL THINK STILL.
GOOD MORNING SECURE MEMBERS RAN
TOMORROW NOW BEHALF OF CMG
KHALIFA AND BLACKBIRD LOGISTICS
IN STRONG SUPPORT OF THE BILL I
THINK IT COULD BE SEEN.
GOOD MORNING MA'AM. THANK
GOODNESS KNOWS ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA CANNABIS INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION AND WE SUPPORT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
GOOD MORNING SIR.
THERE'S A BUNCH OF VETERANS ON
SHOCKER IN THE WE FORCES BUDGET
BATCHES OF THAT THEY GET TO
SPEAK FOR THIRTY SECONDS ARE WE
JUST LIMITED TO WE SUPPORT THE
BILL SIR. OKAY AND WE SUPPORT
THE BILL BECAUSE WE HAVE
VETERANS DYING AND SEVENTY FIVE
PERCENT IS KIND STATE IS NOW DRY.
AND WERE DYING HAVE AN OVERDOSE
A SUICIDE EPIDEMIC THIS IS BILL
ABOUT PROTECTING OUR VETERANS
AND WE NEED.
YOU FOR BEING HERE SIR.
THE MORNING SIR.
MONNING JUST ISN'T SO COFOUNDER
OF HOME BREWED AND DELIVERY
SERVICE IN SACRAMENTO AND I'M A
ADVOCATE FOR SAFE ACCESS BOARD
THIRTEEN OR TO. THINK JUSTIN.
GOOD MORNING THE GIVER BEING
HERE.
THE MORNING MY NAME IS CRYSTAL
DIRECTOR AT HOME BREWED AND I
SUPPORT THE BILL THIRTEEN DON'T
YOU THINK YOU CHRIS.
GOOD MORNING SIR WE CAN THEM
LINE MOVE FORWARD TOWARDS MY CO.
GOOD MORNING MY NAME'S SEVERE
HERNANDEZ PART OF THE PRESIDENT
OF THE CALIFORNIA CANNABIS GROW
DISASSOCIATION WE SUPPORT THIS
BILL THANK YOU HAVE HERE.
GOOD MORNING MA'AM.
WE DON'T. MY NAME IS TERRY APPLE
I'M ALSO A VETERAN. AND OWNER OF
STC ALTERNATIVE HEALING I AM IN
SUPPORT. YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
CORN SIR.
GOOD MORNING THAT MAKYBE
LANDSCAPE PART OF THAT
CALIFORNIA CANNABIS CURRIER
ASSOCIATION AND IN SUPPORT OF
SAFE ACCESS I'M IN SUPPORT OF
THIS BILL THANK YOU SO MUCH.
MOURNING. MOURNING MOUNTING
GREIVIS ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA GENEROUS
MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION ALSO
IN SUPPORT IT TONY.
GOOD MORNING.
MEXICO WAS ON BEHALF THE COVER
HIM AS DELIVERY ALLIANCE TO FLOW
CON AND SUPPORT THINK YOU SO
MUCH. MORNING SIR. OR. MA'AM
SHOT FOR READ MEYER WHO VETERAN
AND A PROUD MEMBER WE FOR YOUR
PROJECT AND WE NEED SUPPORT
THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR.
GOOD MORNING TO BE SEEN.
RICH MILLER A PATIENT TO A
PERSONALLY AFFECTED BY THIS IN
THE CITY OF AUBURN WE ASK FOR
YOUR SUPPORT THANK YOU THANK YOU.
MONITOR.
I DON'T.
FOR THE SUB TO MAN SIZED.
MY NAME'S LE KEVIN RICHARDSON
ARM OF FORMER MARINE I'M A
SUICIDE SURVIVOR AND THE FOUNDER
WE FOR BUT WE FORCE PROJECT AND
I JST WANTED TO SHOW MY SUPPORT
FOR.
AS PETER THIEL TO THINK YOU
PRETENDING.
GOOD MORNING.
HELLO MY NAME IS MARSHA BLAU AS
I'M THE PRESIDENT OF THE BROWNIE
MARY DEMOCRATS OF SACRAMENTO
KENNY AND I'M A MEDICAL PATIENT
AND I'M ASKING FOR YOUR SUPPORT
OF THIS BILL. THANK YOU.
GOOD MORNING SIR.
I'M MY NAME'S WILLIAM CRANE HER
LIVER RANCHO CORDOVA I'M A
DISABLED VETERAN EX NAVY.
VIETNAM ERA AND I NEED TO
CANNABIS BUT SO PLEASE SUPPORT
THE BILL THANK YOU FOR BEING
HERE GOOD MORNING.
GOOD MORNING I'M ROBERT KERSHAWN
AND I JUST.
I'M A VETERAN AND I'M IN
SUPPORT OF SB THIRTEEN NO TO.
THANK YOU THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR
THANKS FOR BEING HERE CORN SIR.
I DON'T.
NAMES ARE JOHNSON ADVOCATE FOR
PATIENTS FOR SELF ACCESS FOUNDER
OF THE LOCAL DELIVERY SERVICE
TREES OF KNOWLEDGE AND I SUPPORT
THIS BILL THANK YOU SIR THANK
YOU FOR COMING.
AMMONIUM.
GOOD MORNING SAID THE GONZALEZ
WHO THE LEAKER CALIFORNIA WE WON
THE FIRST DELIVERY SERVICES TO
RECEIVE OUR MEDICAL TEMPORARY
LICENSING THE WERE A GRAND DAY.
WE HEAR IN SUPPORTING THOSE THAT
ARE DEAF DESPERATELY IN NEED
SINCE SAID TO GROUP DOES.
REPORTING JUST THIS LAST WEEK.
YOU CAN'T IMAGINE HOW MANY CALLS
WE RECEIVE FROM THE SIXTY FIVE
PLUS MARKET OUT THERE THAT ARE
BACKING FOR SOME KIND OF RELIEF
FROM OPIATE CRISIS THERE'D
DEFINITELY AFRAID. AND THE
RECOGNIZE THE TRUE VALUE OF THIS
THIS. BEAUTIFUL SACRED PLAN IS A
MEDICINE SO WE URGE YOU TO
SUPPORT SB THIRTEEN NO TWO THANK
YOU VERY MUCH THANK YOU SO MUCH.
GOOD MORNING SIR.
ONE.
MORE MONEY IS LOOSE WATCHING
THIS ON THE VICE PRESIDENT OF
THE.
TALKED AND WOOD FLOORS CHAPTER
BONE. DOES SUPPORT THIS BILL
BECAUSE WE NEED TO HAVE ACCESS
TO MARIJUANA TO THE GIVE US FREE
OPIUM PILLS WHICH IS BASICALLY
HEROIN. WHY CAN'T WE HAVE JUST
ACCESS THE FREE TRIP TO
MARIJUANA IN GENERAL? AS AN
ALTERNATIVE FORM STRONG SUPPORT
OF THIS BILL THANK YOU FOR
COMING SIR.
GOOD MORNING.
FAMILY BARN WITH THE CALIFORNIA
SPANK CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND
THE CALIFORNIA BLACK CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL
FIGURING IN.
GOOD MORNING SIR.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS GEORGE
MILLER ON BEHALF OF WE'D MAPS IN
SUPPORT OF THE BILL THINK IS
THERE.
THEY DREADED DO LAST CALL FOR
THOSE WHO ARE IN SUPPORT LAST
CALL FOR THOSE RENNSPORT IF YOU
CAN PLEASE ADVANCE THE
MICROPHONE THIS TIME.
ALRIGHT WE NOW WOULD LIKE TO BE
TO SEE WHO ARE OPPOSED BERMAN
ASKED ME TO MAKE ROOM FOR.
BUT THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED TO IN
THE FRONT.
SERVER GONNA HAVE THE I I JUST.
A GROUP.
SO TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE.
.
EQUAL TIME WE'RE GOING TO HAVE.
ONE PRIMARY TO IN SUPPORT. OF
AND SO THE PRIMARY.
WHO IS GOING TO BE OUR PRIMARY
WITNESS SUPPOSED?
THANK YOU SO MUCH AND THE WILL
HAVE TO INDIVIDUALS WHO SPEAK IN
PROPOSAL WILL HAVE TWO MINUTES
MA'AM WELCOME YOU HAVE.
UNLIMITED TIME THINK
GREAT THANK YOU SO MUCH.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIR
MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE MY NAME
IS CARE MARTINSON I'M HERE.
FOUR TRILLION OPPOSITION TODAY
ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
SEE SACK. AUSSIE SACK AND OUR
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERS WERE
VERY ENGAGED.
WITH YOU AND THE OTHER AND
SIERRA SAY AUTHORS IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF OUR MEDICAL LAWS
AND PROVIDING INPUT. INTO A
PROPOSITION SIXTY FOUR AND WE
WERE ABLE TO INCLUDE STRONG
LOCAL CONTROL PROVISIONS.
INTO THESE LAWS WHICH IN IN IN
ESSENCE CREATED A DUAL LICENSING
SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA WHERE BY
YOU NEED.
NOT ONLY A STATE LICENSE TO
OPERATE ANY TYPE OF COMMERCIAL
CANNABIS BUSINESS BUT ALSO.
LOCAL PERMIT OR.
AUTHORIZATION SO REALLY A
FUNDAMENTAL A COMPONENT OF OUR
OVERALL LIES COMBINED THROUGH
MAO CURSE AYE AYE IS THIS LOCAL
CONTROL PROVISIONS AND AND THIS
WAS REALLY WE BELIEVE A CENTRAL
PROVISION UP THE PASSAGE OF.
PROPOSITION SIXTY FOUR AND IN
CALIFORNIA AND WHAT THIS REALLY
MEANS IS THAT A CITY AND COUNTY
CAN DECIDE WHAT TYPE OF
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY THAT WOULD
LIKE TO REGULATE WITHIN THEIR
COMMUNITY OR BAND THAT TYPE OF.
ACTIVITY ALTOGETHER HOWEVER I
WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE POINT.
THAT A LOCAL JURISDICTION
CANNOT BAN THE PERSONAL GROW OF
UP TO SIX PLANTS OR ANNOUNCE
WHICH.
DEPENDING COULDN'T EQUAL ABOUT
SIX THIRTY TO SIXTY PRE ROLLED
CIGARETTE SO.
WE DO BELIEVE THAT THAT
PROVIDES ACCESS TO INDIVIDUALS
THAT DO NEED.
THEIR THEIR MEDICINE AND THAT'S
PROVIDED IN PROP SIXTY FOUR AND
AGAIN A LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
CANNOT.
TO REGULATE THE ACTIVITIES BUT
I DID WANT TO TALK FOR A MINUTE
ABOUT ON THE NUMBERS AND REALLY
WHAT'S HAPPENING AT THE LOCAL
LEVEL AND WHY THERE ARE SO MANY
BANDS ARE CURRENTLY. SO PROP
SIXTY FOUR.
INCLUDED A STATUTORY
REQUIREMENT FOR THE STATE TO
BEGIN LICENSE IN JANUARY ONE TWO
THOUSAND EIGHTEEN SO ABOUT FOUR
FIVE MONTHS. INTO THAT PROCESS
BUT THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT FOR
CITIES AND COUNTIES.
TO.
STAR OR BEGIN THEIR LICENSING
PROCESS IN JANUARY AND AND THIS
WAS REALLY INTENTIONAL WE
BELIEVE.
BUT WE'VE SEEN A BIT OF A
DISCONNECT OF.
VOTERS THAT SUPPORTER.
AND THE COMMUNITIES THAT
SUPPORT OR.
CANDACE LEGALIZATION AND WHAT
THEY WOULD ACTUALLY LIKE TO SEE
OCCURRING WITHIN THEIR COMMUNITY
MEANINGFUL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
WHICH A NUMBER OF JURISDICTIONS
ARE ENGAGING AND TO REALLY TEST
THE WATERS TO SEE WHAT TYPE OF.
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY THEY'D LIKE
IN THEIR JURISDICTION TAKES TIME.
THERE ARE CURRENTLY EIGHTEEN
COUNTIES THAT HAVE SOME TYPE OF
COMMERCIAL ORDINANCE ON THE
BOOKS BUT THIS NUMBER IS
CHANGING AND I THINK A GOOD
EXAMPLE OF THIS IS.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY.
THEY'VE SPENT THE LAST YEAR
YEAR AND A HALF.
ENGAGING AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH
PUBLIC EDUCATION THEY'VE HELD
OVER THIRTY.
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS ON THIS TOPIC
REALLY TO SOLICIT THE EMPIRE.
OF THEIR COMMUNITY AND IN WHICH
PROP SIXTY FOUR PASSED BY FIFTY
NINE PERCENT SO OBVIOUSLY THERE
WERE STRONG SUPPORTER.
FOR CAMPUS LEGALIZATION BUT
REALLY WHAT TYPE OF ACTIVITY
WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTION.
TOOK IS TAKING A LITTLE BIT
MORE TIME TO DETERMINE AND THIS
IS BECAUSE THEY'VE DEALT WITH A
LOT OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITY OVER THE
YEARS I THINK AT ONE POINT THERE
WERE EIGHTEEN HUNDRED A LEGAL
DISPENSARIES WITH IN THE COUNTY.
OF WHICH ABOUT OR AT WITHIN THE
OVERALL COUNTY YOU WHICH I ABOUT
HUNDRED OF THOSE WERE IN THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA SO. THE
COMMUNITY IS TO USE TO.
THIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY BUT THEY
DON'T WANT TO SEE UNFETTERED.
ABILITY FOR BUSINESSES TO
PROLIFERATE THEY WANT A LOCAL
CONTROL THEY WANT REGULATION AND
IT TAKES TIME TO FIGURE OUT
REALLY WHAT THE RIGHT BALANCE OF
THAT IS WITHIN YOUR JURISDICTION.
.
WE REALLY SEE THIS A BILL
UNFORTUNATELY.
AS A SOUL ON NOT A FUNDAMENTAL
COMPONENT OF PROP SIXTY FOUR
WHICH ALLOWS COMMUNITIES.
TO DETERMINE WHAT REALLY THE
BEST TYPE OF ACTIVITY IS WITHIN
THEIR JURISDICTION AND
UNFORTUNATELY WAS WORTH REMAIN
OPPOSED THINKING.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE
SIR GOOD MORNING IF YOU TO MY NE
MENTION YOUR FIRST CLASS
ORGANIZATION OF TWO MINUTES TURN
THANK YOU VERY BROAD. MISTER
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS MARIN
PANETTA THAT WITH CAPITA
STRATEGIES GROUP WE HAVE THE
UNITED CANADA'S BUSINESS
ALLIANCE.
OUR MEMBERS CONSIST OF
DISPENSARIES DISTRIBUTORS AND
CULTIVATORS I'M. WE HAVE
CONCERNS WITH THIS LEGISLATION
HAS IT ON THEIR MINDS ARE
MEMBERS
BUSINESS BY FOR EXAMPLE SOME OF
OUR MEMBERS ARE IN JURISDICTIONS
THAT ONLY ALLOW. FOR MEDICAL
OPERATIONS UNDER DAYS BILL
DELIVERIES FOR ADULT USE INTO
THAT JURISDICTION BE ALLOWED.
AND IN THE CITY OF IT FLA WE'VE
HAVE SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
WORKING WITH THE LOCAL
JURISDICTION. AND WHAT LAW
ENFORCEMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT.
WE ARE. RESPECTING THE COMMUNITY
THAT WE ARE AYE NINE YOUR
SCHOOLS SIDE DAY CARE CENTERS ON
AND.
THIS BILL ALLOWS FOR DELIVERY TO
COME TO THE CITY OF LA.
AND ONE DO ALL THAT I. WE HAVE
Y. WILL WORK WITH LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS FOR ALL THIS.
POWER AND.
I DO AGREE THAT THERE IS A NEED
FOR PATIENT ACCENTS I AGREE WITH
THE PROPONENTS OF THIS BILL.
HOWEVER AND IS BILL DOES MORE
THAN THAT AND.
TO MENTION THE COUNTY OF LA
WHERE IN THE CITY OF LA WE HAVE
PARTICIPATE IN THE STAKEHOLDER
PROCESS IN THE COUNTY OF LA. AND
THIS BILL DOES GO FORWARD IT
DOES GIVE WAS I HAD THE ABILITY
TO DELIVER INTO LA COUNTY BUT
NOW. WOULD DISRESPECTING THEIR
PROCESSES AND. THE STAKEHOLDERS
IN THAT AREA.
FIVE.
OTHER ISSUES WITH THE BILL IT'S
IT'S VERY BROAD. TIE AND IT'S
NOT VERY BROAD FROM THE
TEAMSTERS SAT. RIGHT I.
THE BILL HAS BEEN A BRIDE YEAH
YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
YEAH FULLERENE.
ONLINE
WHO RECEIVES A PRODUCT.
HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT THE
PRODUCT IS BEING RECEIVED BY AN
ADULT?
AND NOT BY A CHILD.
HOUSE THAT PRODUCT EIGHT HOW.
WIDE ON.
ONE LOOKS WHAT WHERE DO IS GONNA
BE ALLOWED.
YOU KNOW JUST JUST DUMB DOWN MY
HOUSE THERE'S A CHILDCARE CENTER
THAT IT'S ALSO A HOUSE.
SO THERE'S A LOT A AT QUESTIONS.
I HAD. THE STATE IS BEHIND BY
TEMPORARY LICENSES ARE.
BEING EXTENDED CHECKING CHANGE
IS NOT UP AND RUNNING TESTINGS
QUESTIONABLE. WE ARE PRETTY
EARLY ON.
WE HAD BEEN COMMUNICATING WITH
DOCTOR AND WE HAVE CONCERNS AND
FOR THOSE REASONS WE OPPOSE THE
BILL.
THANK YOU SO MUCH WE HAVE. A
ROOM FOR ONE ADDITIONAL PRIMARY.
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS SAID HE
AND CARRIED ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA CITIES.
IN THE INTEREST OF TIME
CERTAINLY CONCURRING WITH THE
THE GREAT REMARKS FROM C. SOCK
IN THE. IN THE OTHER WITNESS ARM.
I THINK ONE THING TO KEEP IN
PERSPECTIVE WITH THIS
LEGISLATION IS A WE WE JUST HAVE
WE'VE WHO ARE ANOTHER MAJOR
EXPERIMENT GOING ON IN
CALIFORNIA WITH WITH WITH A
VIDEO. AUTHORIZATION OF.
OF OF RECREATIONAL.
ACCESS TO RECREATIONAL Y.
CANNABIS ON COMMITTEE
JURISDICTIONS AS WAS WAS THAT IT
WAS RELATED BY C. SOCK OR OR A
SORT OF OF THE THEY'RE WAITING
TO SEE HOW THIS THING A IMP IS
GETS IMPLEMENTED YOU KNOW THERE
CERTAINLY ARE JURISDICTIONS THAT
HAVE THEY'RE OUT THERE THEY'RE
EMBRACING AT. THEIR ALLOWING IT.
OTHER JURISDICTIONS OR ARE
WAITING TO SEE HOW IT UNFOLDS A
LITTLE BIT THE BEST THING THAT
CAN HAPPEN IS TO THE EXTENT WE
HAVE A SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION
ONLY BY THE STATE BUT IN THOSE
LOCAL AGENCIES THAT ALLOW IT. I
THINK YOU KNOW DOWN THE ROAD
YOU'RE GOING TO SEE MORE
JURISDICTIONS OF ARCH IT CHANGE
THEIR POLICIES AND AND BEGIN TO
PERMIT MORE OUT WERE WORKED
THROUGH FOR FIVE MONTHS INTO A
AT NEW LAW NEW REGULATORY
STRUCTURE. I THINK WE DO TO GIVE
IT SOME TIME TO ACTUALLY.
TO WORK AND THEN I THINK.
IN TIME A MORE JURISDICTIONS
WILL JUST ORDINANCES ACCORDINGLY
THANK YOU EX MUCH SCARED. BUT I
DO KNOW THAT WE ALLOWED FOR SOME
TIME FOR THE I. TEAMSTERS APPEAR
TO SAY.
THE WORDS TO WE'RE GONNA ALLOW
SOME TIME.
IN SPREAD TOOK.
LITTLE FOR A MINUTE IN WE'RE
GONNA TURN IT OVER TO YOU SEE TO
BE TO BE AS SAFE YOU WORDS AS
WELL.
YES I'D JUST THE RAIL WITH UFCW
WESTERN STATES COUNSEL I'M SO WE
HAVE SOME CONCERNS WITH THE BILL
AS IT RELATES TO PROTECTING
LOCAL CONTROL ON THE LOCAL
PERMITTING PROCESS.
WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS BILL
APPLY TO AND TO ALLOW DELIVERIES
IN AREAS I HAVE BANDS IN THEIR
JURISDICTIONS ONLY. I'M AND WE
ALSO HAVE CONCERNS I AM. AROUND
I.
SORRY WE ARE WE HAVE CONCERNS
RELATED TO.
WE AGREE WITH THE MEDICAL
ACCESS QUESTION BUT IT WE ARE
FULLY THERE WHEN IT COMES TO THE
RECREATIONAL WHEN IT COMES TO
DELIVERING TO RECREATIONAL
PATIENTS. A WE HAVE COMMITTED
WITH THE AUTHORS OFFICE TO WORK
THROUGH SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS
AND WEAVING GAUGING
CONVERSATIONS.
.
YOU THIS WEEK WITH A
STAKEHOLDERS AND THE SPONSORS
AND THE AUTHORS OFFICE IN SO WE
WILL BE ABLE WE ARE HOPING TO
COME TO A POINT I AM WHEN IT
COMES TO THE RECREATIONAL SIDE
BUT WE AREN'T FULLY THERE YET.
I'M WE HAVE COMMITTED WAS
AUTHORS OFFICE I WOULD LIKE TO
SEE SOME AMENDMENTS I'M RELATED
TO THAT AREA.
THANK YOU SO MUCH SO LAZY GERMAN
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE
ARE KEEPING SCORE WE HAD ONE
PRIMARY WITNESS ON EACH SIDE TO
SUPPORTING WITNESSES ON EACH
SIDE THAT WE ALSO HEARD FROM THE
TEAMSTERS AND WE ALSO HEARD FROM
U. S. C. W.. WE NOW WOULD LIKE
TO BE AN OPEN UP TO THOSE FOR
OPPOSED TO KEEP PLEASED TO HEAR
OF PERSON LAST AN ORGANIZATION
IN YOUR POSITION ONLY PLEASE
REMEMBER BEING HERE MISTER
CHAIRMAN MEMBERS PULSE WITH WITH
THE RURAL COUNTIES ASSOCIATION
ALSO IN STRONG OPPOSITION THE
BILL.
DID PEOPLE THINK YOU.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE POCKETS
ALL THIS HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY AT THOUSAND OAKS IN
OPPOSITION THANK YOU SO MUCH
WARNING HIM.
AND I'LL FRAUD ON BEHALF OF
SACRAMENTO COUNTY IN OPPOSITION
TO GIVING YOU THE MORNING.
SO CHAIR MEMBERS JOIN OF OR SOME
BEHALF THE URBAN COUNTIES OF
CALIFORNIAN OPPOSITION FIGURES
TO MUCH.
GORDON SIR.
MORNING JERRY MEMBERS JONATHAN
WINDOWS WITH CALIFORNIA POLICE
ASSOCIATION LIKE STATED ALREADY.
WE OPPOSE THE BILL.
PREEMPTIVELY PREEMPTIVELY
CONTROL THANK YOU SO MUCH OF THE.
LAST CALL FOR THOSE WHO ARE
OPPOSED LAST CALL FOR POSTS IF
YOU PLEASE COME FORWARD TO THE
MICROPHONE.
ALL RIGHT PLACING GENERALLY LIKE
TO BETTER BRING IT BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE UP WE'RE GONNA INVITE
ONE ADDITIONAL.
SUPPORTER UP IN THE WILL HAVE
THIS MARTIN SET UP AS WELL. POT
SO WHOEVER.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. THAT WOULD
THAT WOULD A TURNED OVER TO THE
COMMITTEE HERE TO BE ABLE TO
HAVE A QUESTIONS CONVERSATION AS
WELL CENTER HERNANDEZ PLEASE.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR AND
MEMBERS.
.
CUT COUPLE QUESTIONS.
WITH OBVIOUSLY THERE'S SOME
CONCERN OF WITH REGARD TO LOCAL
CONTROL AND MUNICIPALITIES HAVE
THE ABILITY TO EITHER. NOT HAVE
WHETHER IT'S MEDICAL AND OR.
PALM RECREATIONAL BUT.
FIRST ASKS.
ANSWER HOW IT AFFECTS THE
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROP SIXTY
FOUR IF THIS BILL WERE TO BE PUT
INTO LAW IN ITS CURRENT FORM.
DOES IT OVERSEE.
LOCAL CONTROL AND IT WOULD THAT
GO AGAINST THE INITIATIVE NOW
HAVE ANOTHER QUICK COMMENT I
LOVE. IF YOU CAN ADDRESS THAT.
I DON'T BELIEVE IT DOES KNOW THE.
BICU NINETY THREE INTRODUCE
YOURSELF BELOW DON DUNCAN
AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS.
THE GOODS AND THE CITIES AND
COUNTIES RETAIN THE RIGHT TO BAN
AT DELIVERY SERVICES OPERATING
IN THEIR JURISDICTION AND SO
WE'RE NOT STEPPING ON THAT ARE
TAKING THAT AWAY AT ALL. THIS IS
ONLY OUR A ROUTE RELATIVE TO
ACTIVITY WITH A FROM ANOTHER
LICENSED LEGAL BUSINESS
DELIVERING INTO THAT
JURISDICTION.
BUT I MEAN WHEN THAT GO COUNTER
TO WHAT THE.
.
THE INTENT I'M JUST LOOKING AT
THE CONSTITUTIONALLY ASPECT OF
IT YOU KNOW BECAUSE YOU'VE LET'S
HEAR THE.
AS CITY BANDS IT BUT YET THERE
IS A DELIVERY FROM OUTSIDE AND
POSSIBLE IF THAT'S NOT THE
INTENT OF THE INITIATIVE I'M
JUST I'M JUST TRYING TO.
BUT IF THAT'S A PROBLEM IS THAT
OUR CITIES AND COUNTIES DO NOT
HAVE TO HAVE CANNABIS BUSINESSES
IF THEY'D DO NOT IF THEY CHOOSE
NOT TO HAVE THEM.
THAT THAT WAS PART OF THE SET
UP FROM THE VERY BEGINNING BUT.
THERE'S IT'S IT'S A BIT OVER
REACHING TO SAY SITTING COUNTY
CAN REACH OUT TO ANOTHER
JURISDICTION AND AND SOMEHOW
IMPOSE ON OR INFRINGE ON WHAT
ANOTHER LEGAL BUSINESS CAN DO.
THAT WE'RE NOT REALLY ASKING
CITIES AND COUNTIES TO LEGALIZE
ANYTHING.
WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTION
SIMPLY TO ALLOW OTHER LEGAL
LICENSE BUSINESSES OPERATE OR
MAYBE THE BIGGEST OPPOSITION
MADE HER I THINK YOU ACTUALLY
JUST MADE MY POINT FOR ME.
WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING IS THAT?
LICENSE BUSINESS IN THE COUNTY
OF LA CAN THEN OPERATE WITHIN
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND
REALLY DOT SLIDES AGAINST THE
FUNDAMENTAL LOCAL CONTROL AND
RESPECT FOR THE POLICE POWERS
PROVISIONS.
IN PROP SIXTY FOUR SO.
WE SEE THIS BILL IS REALLY.
TAG GOING AGAINST THE ORIGINAL
INTENT PROP HIM FOR ONE NIGHT
WHEN I LOOK AT JUST INITIATIVE
THE CONSTITUTIONALITY AND THEN
THE LOCAL CONTROL ISSUE THAT'S
IS KIND OF THE CONCERNED I DON'T
HAVE. A BUT I'M NOT CONVINCED
YET.
LAW CENTER LARA CAN YOU.
TALKED ABOUT THE. LOCAL CONTROL
ISSUE AND ARE YOU ARE YOU. ARE
YOU WILLING TO ADDRESS THE
CONCERNS AND AMEND THE BILL IN
THE FUTURE YES I'M ACTUALLY WAS
GONNA ANNOUNCE THAT.
EVEN THOUGH THIS BILL IS NOT
FISCAL MEXICAN.
CALL IT INTO MY COMMITTEE TO
CONTINUE TO WORK. I PUT INTO MY
COMMUTER CONTINUE WORK ON
FINDING THE BALANCE BETWEEN
LOCAL CONTROL AND ACCESS WHICH
IS WHAT WE WE WE WANT TO ACHIEVE
HERE.
AND AGAIN WHO ALL THE OTHER
DISCUSSIONS FOR FROM WHAT AT THE
POINT THAT THE.
PROPOSITIONS MAKING IF IT'S
STUFF THAT WE ARE CONSIDERING.
TOUGH TIME MENDING.
AS THE BILL MOVES FORWARD
SHOULD MOVE FORWARD TO THE END
AND I AYE DRAPERIES SHEET THAT
COMMON THAT CONCERNED.
THAT YOU'RE HEARING IN MY
OVERALL CONCERN IS THE
CONSTITUTIONALITY IN THE LOCAL
CONTROL ISSUE.
BECAUSE IT'S NOT WRITTEN ANY AT
WHAT I'D BE WILLING AND SO MEAN
UNLESS.
IT'S SHORT VOTES BUT I'D BE
WILLING TO GIVE YOU A COURTESY
VOTE AS LONG AS YOU KNOW YOU'RE
WILLING TO HAVE THAT
CONVERSATION. AND OBVIOUSLY WITH
THE ABILITY TO LOOK AT IT SHOULD
GET TO THE FLOOR AND IT DOESN'T
ADDRESS THE CONCERNS THAT I HAVE
THANK YOU AND. AS YOU ARE NO
MEMBERS THIS IS A TWO THIRDS
VOEPEL.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO REALLY.
ROLL UP OUR SLEEVES AND GET
TOGETHER AND HAVE A CONVERSATION
IF WE HAVE ANY SHOT TO GET OUT
OF THIS SENATE SO.
AGAIN THIS IS WHY WE WERE GOING
TO PUT IT INTO MY COMMITMENT
GIVE US SOME MORE TIME TO WORK
OUT. SOME OF THE DETAILS THAT
ARE QUITE FRANKLY.
ARE YOU KNOW MAKES SENSE IN MY
OPINION OF FROM THE OPPOSITION
AND SO WE'RE GONNA WE'RE GONNA
HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD AND WORKING
SO I'LL DEFTLY SEE HOW THE VOCAL
LOOKS AND THAT THESE ARE SOME OF
THE ISSUES THAT I. LIKED AT
LEAST HAVE REYES AND CONCERNED
ABOUT.
APPRECIATE THE OF THE AUTHORS
COMMITMENT TO ADDRESSING THAT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH SOONER.
WE HAVE OTHER QUESTION PLEASE
SIMILAR.
SURE I'M I'M WONDERING.
I WONDER IF I COULD JUST GO TO
THE BASICS OF OF THIS ISSUE. SO
SENATOR LARA.
IF SOMEONE MALES.
CANNABIS TO ME HOW WOULD THE
POST OFFICE KNOWING HOW.
OBJECTION TO THE BASIC SO IF
SOMEONE'S WATCHING THEY CAN SEE
WHAT THE INTRICACIES ARE HERE
PAT HI KATIE MAPLE AND AFTER WE
DROPPED BY UNDER THE STATE LAW
AND REGULATIONS MAILING CANNABIS
THROUGH THIRD PARTIES COMPLETELY
ILLEGAL. SO THERE ARE NO THERE
ARE NO DELIVERY COMPANIES NO
LEGAL LICENSED DELIVERY
COMPANIES IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA THAT ARE USING A MAIL
TO TO SEND CANNABIS. SO THIS IS
PROP SIXTY POOR THAT SAYS NO
MAIL.
THESE ARE THE STATE REGULATIONS
SAID UNDER THE BUREAU OF
CANNABIS CONTROL THEY HAVE IT'S
A SCHEDULE ONE.
THEREFORE YOU WOULD BE VIOLATING
BUT YOU S. P. S..
POSTAL SERVICE LAWS IF YOU WERE.
FOUND OUT TO BE DELIVERING IT
THROUGH THE MAIL SO THAT THAT'S
ILLEGAL THEN ABSOLUTELY YES THAT
IF YOU USE UPS OR FEDEX.
EVEN THOUGH THEY WOULDN'T KNOW
WHAT'S IN THE BOX TO LOOK LIKE
IN THE OTHER BOX.
BETTER NOT PERMITTED TO USE THAT
SERVICE THAT'S ALSO A CROWN
CRACKED ALSO ILLEGAL.
BUT ACTUALLY A CLEAR SO THAT SO
BEEN.
WE HAVE ALL THESE.
.
DELIVERY ALLIANCES
SO COULD YOU EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT
A DELIVER EARLY DELIVERY
ALLIANCE IS THAT FROM WHAT I
UNDERSTAND THE DELIVERY
ALLIANCES THAT EXIST THROUGHOUT
THE STATE THERE ARE ONES LA
MORAN BAY AREA I'M SACRAMENTO.
AT THEIR TRADE ASSOCIATIONS OF
DELIVERY COMPANIES THAT ADVOCATE
FOR DELIVERY.
AND IF THEY ARE ALLOWED TO
DELIVER.
CANNABIS LEGALLY I WOULD ASSUME
MOST OF THEM HAVE MEMBERS THAT
ARE STATE LICENSED BUSINESSES
YES BUT I DON'T REPRESENT THOSE
SO THEY CAN DELIVER BUT. NO ONE
NO OTHER COMMERCIAL YOU HAVE TO
BE.
DESIGNATED AS A CANNABIS
DELIVERY SERVICE BUSINESS
LICENSE AT SUCH.
CAN I ANSWER THAT QUITE WORKING
GROUP QUICK EIGHTEEN ON A DIRT
BECAUSE I WANT TO MAKE SHE
INTRODUCED HERSELF PLEASE HAS
VERY BROAD WITH THE TEAMSTERS
THE WAY THE STATE LAW WORKS IS
THAT. DELIVERY HAS TO BE TIED TO
A LAWFUL DISPENSARY. SO THAT SO
REALLY WHAT THESE ENTITIES ARE
EASY DISPENSARY THAT DELIVERS
AND ANY DISPENSARY CAN DELIVER
SOME OF THEM HOWEVER ARE NON
STOREFRONT DISPENSARIES THAT IS
TO SAY. YOU CAN'T WALK IN AND BY
THE CANNABIS
THEY JUST
DELIVER IT.
BUT THERE'S NO INDEPENDENT
LAWFUL DELIVERY COMPANY THAT
JUST.
PICKS IT UP. AT SOME UNRELATED
BUSINESS AND DELIVERS IT TO A
CUSTOMER.
ALTHOUGH DELIVERY SERVICE IS
ATTACHED TO THE STORE LIKE RIGHT
YES SIR AND I KNOW THAT AGAIN
I'M JUST WHAT MAKES.
IF IT'S IF IT'S HELPFUL I CAN
WALK THE COMMITTEE THROUGH KIND
OF HOW THAT THE SPECIFIC NON
STOREFRONT DELIVERY LICENSE TYPE
WORK SO THIS IS A LIFE LONG
LEARNING THINKING IT WAS AYE I
BUY BOOKS.
IT'S IT'S A MY BOOKSTORES I CAN
WALK INTO AND SOME OF THEM I
HAVE TO GO ONLINE AND BUY IN THE
DELIVER
ACCORDING THAT STATE LAWS AND
REGULATIONS IN ORDER TO BE A NON
STOREFRONT DELIVERY DISPENSARY
YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PHYSICAL
LOCATION. THAT'S A LICENSE BY
THE LOCALITY AND WHAT YOU'RE AND
AS WELL AS THE STATE AND THEN
FROM THAT PHYSICAL LOCATION IT'S
KIND OF LIKE THE PIZZA DELIVERY
MODEL. YOU'RE DELIVERING FROM AT
THE LOCATION TO PEOPLE'S HOMES
AND THIS IS WHY I CUT I WANTED
JUST A COUPLE OF OTHER CONCERNS
HE'D HEARD WHERE. I AM THEIR
CONCERNS ABOUT DELIVERY
COMPANIES BEING ABLE TO DELIVER
A VAST DISTANCES HAT WOULD NOT
EXIST UNDER THE CURRENT
REGULATIONS YOU HAVE TO BE BACK
AT YOUR PHYSICAL LOCATION BY TEN
O'CLOCK AT NIGHT. AND YOU CAN
ONLY CARRY A MAXIMUM OF THREE
THOUSAND DOLLARS RETAIL AT ANY
POINT TIME IN YOUR CAR IF YOU
KNOW WHAT ABOUT CANNABIS THAT'S
ACTUALLY NOT A WHOLE LOT OF
PRODUCTS. AND SO IN REALITY
THEY'RE ONLY GOING A SHORT
DISTANCE AROUND WHERE THE ACTUAL
PHYSICAL LOCATION AS.
PER SEMESTER WHEN I'M JUST
TRYING TO ADJUST IT DIDN'T KEEP
A REAL BREAK FIX UP SOMEONE WERE
WATCHING THEY KNOW WHAT WE'RE
DEBATING.
I THAT I JUST DIDN'T FEEL LIKE
IT WAS.
BLEED OUT ITS CLEARLY SO IF YOU
DON'T MIND IF I COULD JUST.
BUT NO THAT'S GREAT A TRYING TO
BE ARGUMENTATIVE BUT NO NINE THE
POLICE TO TO LAY IT OUT SO.
SO NOW IT'S I LIKE THE PIZZA
DELIVERY MODEL.
THAT THAT EXPLAINS
AND AND I LIKE THE FACT THAT
SOMEONE MENTIONED THAT YOU HAVE
TO HAND IT OFF TO SOMEONE WHO'S.
TWENTY ONE OR OLDER.
AND AND IT'S IT'S A IT'S A
PHYSICAL EXCHANGE DON'T DROP OFF
OF THE PORCH YOU KNOW THAT THE
PERSON ISN'T THERE THEN SHAME ON
THEM FOR HAVING. ASKED FOR TO BE
DELIVERED.
SOLD NOW WE'RE SAYING THAT PROP
SIXTY FOUR.
GIVES LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES
JURISDICTION TO DO WHATEVER THEY
WANT AND I'M JUST WANTING CENTER
LARA.
SHOULD WE BE AMENDING CROP SIXTY
FOUR.
SHOULD WE DO ANOTHER BALLOT
MEASURE TO. CLARIFY.
WELL UNDER ARE A TRADITION WITH
IT'S NOT NEEDED BECAUSE.
AND AND LET'S COUNCIL ACTUALLY
AGREED WITH US THAT WE'RE JUST
ENHANCING.
THE GOALS OF PROP SIXTY FOUR
WHICH IS TO ENSURE THAT PEOPLE
ACTUALLY HAVE SAFE ACCESS TO BUY
THIS PRODUCT.
IF YOU GET TWO THIRDS VOTE
ABSOLUTELY.
THEN.
.
AND THEN YOU'RE SAYING THAT THIS
WILL GO TO APPROPRIATIONS.
YEAH I'M AT THAT SIDE OF FISCAL
A BILL BUT I'M GIVEN THE FACT
THAT THERE'S LEGITIMATE THOUGHT
CONCERNS THAT I THINK ARE
APPROPRIATE FROM THE OPPOSITION
AND. I WANT TO PUT IT INTO MY
COMMITTEE ALLOW ME TO A. GUY
HAVE MORE TIME BEFORE WE BRING
IT TO THE FLOOR SO IT'S EASIER
TO AMEND IN MY COMMITTEE AS
OPPOSED TO TRYING TO MEND IT ON
THE FLOOR. THE REASON I ASK THAT
QUESTION IS YOU KEEP CALLING IT
MY COMMITTEE THAT ARE IN IN THIS
IS TELEVISED SO. SO I'M JUST
GOING TO SAY THAT YOUR COMMITTEE
YOU ARE THE CHAIR OF APPROPRIATE
RIGHTS THE CHAIR APPROPRIATIONS HONOR
TO. CALL THIS BILL THIS BILL.
SP THIRTEEN ALL TO INTO MY
COMMITTEE THE FOR THEIR WORK ON
EVERYTHING THANK YOU MISTER
CHAIR OF THINKING BILL THINKS
TOO MUCH MUCH SOONER.
PUT IT TO GOOD CENTER BILL
PLEASE.
I'M ON THE APPROPRIATIONS
COMMITTEE WE ALL HAVE EQUAL
VOTES.
.
PROP SIXTY FOUR. WASN'T IN
PERFECT.
LAW THAT WAS PASSED.
BY THE VOTERS BUT HAD A GENERAL
IT LIES INTENT ALLOWING THIS THE
SALES.
OF CANNABIS USE IMPERFECT LAW IT
IT RICK I THINK IT RECOGNIZES BY
ALLOWING.
US.
FOR BETTER LACK OF BETTER WORD
TO CLEAN UP THE PROPOSITIONS.
WITH TWO THIRDS VOTE.
SO IT'S OUR. JOB IF YOU WANNA
PUT THAT WAY.
WHEN WE FIND THESE.
.
INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE GENERAL
PURPOSE OF PROP SIXTY FOUR.
TO GO AND AND TRIED.
.
MAKE THESE CLEANUPS.
BUT THE THE OTHER HAND WE HAVE
TO.
.
RESPECT THE OVERALL IN TEN OF
THE PROPOSITION THAT'S.
I'M GIVING MY GENERAL VIEW OF
THE OF THE. PHILOSOPHY OF THIS
ISSUE.
THE BILL TRIES TO DO EXACTLY
WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
STRIDES AN IMPERFECT LAW.
CUT A CLEAN UP. BUT THE OTHER
HAND THERE WERE PROMISES MADE TO
THE VOTERS ABOUT LOCAL.
LOCAL.
CONTROL IMPLODE.
AND THAT'S PART OF THE OVERALL
PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSITION SO.
SO WE GET TO APPROPRIATIONS
THERE'S GOT TO BE SERVICE
BALANCE
BETWEEN MAKING A.
SYSTEM WORK IN A CORRECT MANNER.
AND MAKING IT OFFICIAL A MAKING
IT SO EVERYBODY CAN UNDERSTAND
IT WITHOUT EVERYBODY FINING
LAWSUITS AGAINST EACH OTHER.
ON ONE HAND AND YOU KNOW MAYBE
WE WON'T BE ABLE TO STOP THAT
ANYWAY YOU KNOW. BUT.
.
I THINK OUR JOB IS TO CONDUCT.
DO SERVE THE CLEAN UP KIND
THINGS TO DO THAT WE HAVE TO
HAVE THE PARTNERS OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT THE BUSINESSES
EVERYBODY.
TO CUT TO COME TOGETHER. AND.
.
WORK ON IT WE'RE NOT THERE YET
WITH THIS BILL WE NEED TO KEEP
WORKING.
SO I'M GLAD HE'S BRING ITS
APPROPRIATIONS HE'S GOING TO
HAVE TO GO THROUGH.
IN THIS BILL OF.
APPROPRIATIONS THE FLOOR I THINK
WE NEED TO THIRDS VOTE THAT WAS
THAT'S A HIGH HURDLE FOR THE
PROPOSITION.
APPROPRIATELY SO.
BECAUSE THE VOTERS APPROVED THIS
YOU KNOW FOR CHANGE.
WHAT THEY'RE DOING THERE AND?
?
I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY
CAREFUL ABOUT.
THE OVER ON TENER THE VOTERS SO.
SO.
.
I AM LOOKING AT THE BALANCE
BETWEEN.
THE PROMISE MADE A PROP SIXTY
FOUR TO LOCAL.
HAVING LOCAL.
INPUT CONTROL VERSES.
JUST SERVE MAKING A LAW WORK.
FOR BUSINESSES NOT HAVING.
.
DESPAIR AT.
OF LEVELS OF.
LAWS THROUGHOUT.
THROUGHOUT THE STATE CALIFORNIA
ON WHICH YOU CAN AND CAN'T DO
THAT'S NOT A GOOD THING IT'S
ALWAYS BAD.
SO I THINK WE HAVE TO CUT HAVE A
BALANCE.
AND I I DON'T WANT EVERYBODY ON
ON ALL SIDES TO WORK.
IN.
IN THE IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THAT.
WOULD YOU AUTHOR AND EVERYBODY
ELSE SO.
TO ACCOMPLISH THAT. I THINK IT
CAN BE DONE.
I RESPECT TO LOCAL CONTROL
ISSUE. HAVE MET A LOCAL.
.
GOVERNMENT.
p LEADER FOR TWENTY SIX YEARS.
BUT.
.
THERE HAS TO BE LIKE.
.
A CLEAN CUT.
STATEWIDE LAW ON THERE'S.
YOU KNOW SO WE HAVE TO HAVE A
THE STATEWIDE RULER VACANT OR
STAND. AND HALF AND ALSO. TO
MISTER CHAIRMAN I I WILL VOTE.
SIMILAR TO THE CENTER HERNANDEZ
MY OWN PARTICULAR VIEW IS.
WE NEED WORK WE NEED TO WORK ON
THE HOUSE I WILL VOTE FOR THIS
TODAY.
MISTER CHAIRMAN LIKE I HOPE
THAT EVERYBODY IN THE.
IT INTEREST OF THIS BILL
CONTINUES THAT DISCUSSION.
SELECT YOUR. GUITAR CENTER BILL.
BUT EXPERTS I THINK YOU WANTED
TO BE OF YEAH I JUST WANTED TO
MAKE IT CLEAR.
REALLY I THINK THE OBJECTIVE
AND AS OUTLINED IN THE ANALYSIS
OF THE BILL IS TO ALLOW.
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY INTO
JURISDICTIONS THAT HAVE BANNED
THE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY AND THAT
IS REALLY OUR FUNDAMENTAL.
OPPOSITION TO THE BILL WHICH IS
THE OBJECTIVE I THINK.
YOU KNOW I DON'T THINK THAT
I'VE.
IT WAS ENVISIONED THAT.
EVERY SINGLE JURISDICTION FOR
NAY TO CITIES AND FIFTY COUNTIES
IN CALIFORNIA WOULD PERMIT.
ANY TYPE OF CANNABIS ACTIVITY.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE MAP OF
WHERE POP SIXTY FOUR PASSED IN
CALIFORNIA BY ABOUT FIFTY SIX
PERCENT OF THE VOTE IT'S VERY
REFLECTIVE I THINK OF THE
POLITICAL CONDITIONS IN THE
COMMUNITY WELL. YOU SEE THROUGH
THE VALLEY AND THE NORTHERN
PARTS OF IT OF CALIFORNIA AND
THE OVERWHELMINGLY VOTED AGAINST
PROP SIXTY FOUR BUT IT PASSED
WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT IN THOSE
JURISDICTIONS THEY COULD IMPOSE
BANS ON COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY AND
THIS BILL WOULD ESSENTIALLY. FLY
AGAINST THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE OF
PROP SIXTY FOUR.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
I HAVE A. COUPLE ITEMS THAT I
WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO SHARE
BUT I WANT TO BE OF ANY
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION DEBATE BY
THE COMMITTEE THIS TIME.
UP FOR SO I JUST WANNA SAY THANK
YOU TO CENTER LARA.
WHAT I'M ALWAYS GRATEFUL FOR IS
AT CENTER LARA TAKES ON SOME OF
THE BIGGEST CHALLENGES THAT THE
STATE IS FACING?
WHETHER IT'S THIS ORDER STREET
VENDORS ARE PROVIDING HEALTH
CARE.
TO THOSE INNER IMMIGRANT
COMMUNITIES.
AND HE IS WILLING TO TAKE ON THE
BIG FIGHTS.
THAT WHICH IS WHY I HAVE SO MUCH
RESPECT FOR HIM.
I'M IN I THINK THAT WE CAN ALL
AGREE THAT SAFE ACCESS FOR.
PATIENCE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
CA AND I WILL ALSO SAY THAT PROP
SIXTY FOUR IS NOT A.
IT PERFECT INITIATIVE.
A IN HAVE EXPRESSED MY CONCERNS
MANY TIMES ABOUT PROP SIXTY FOUR
PARTICULAR IN THE SHORT TIME
LINE.
BUT THE SHORT TIME LINES THAT
WERE GIVEN ITS CITY CALIFORNIA
BE OF EMPLOYMENT.
.
ARE REGULATED INDUSTRY WITHIN
TWELVE MONTHS OF THE SEVEN
BILLION DOLLAR INDUSTRY AND
WE'RE FEELING THE IMPACTS OF
THAT SHORT. TIME FRAME THAT WHAT
IS NOW MANDATED. A NOW.
HOWEVER.
ABOUT SIXTY FOUR WAS VERY CLEAR.
THAT.
.
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS WOULD HAVE
THE ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO BAN
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IN THEIR
JURISDICTION.
THE COMPROMISE IS AN IMPORTANT
PART OF PASS ABOUT SIXTY FOUR IN
THIS COMPROMISE ALSO IS ADVANCE
DURING THE. EXTENSIVE
DISCUSSIONS.
I INTO THOUSAND FIFTEEN ON
MEDICAL AS WELL IN THESE ARE
HARD HARD FOUGHT BATTLES IN
COMPROMISES WERE MADE.
I DO THINK THAT LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS ARE GONNA NEED TO
CONTINUE TO.
AT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE NEED
TIME TO BE ABLE EMPLOYMENT.
.
THE SIGNIFICANT RULES AND
REGULATIONS AS WERE LITERALLY
BRINGING A SEVEN BILLION DOLLAR
INDUSTRY.
OUT OF THE DARK. THAT
UNREGULATED MARKET AND INTO THE
LIGHT OF A REGULATED TAX MARKET.
IN BY THE WAY IN AMERICA'S
LARGEST CANNABIS MARKET HERE IN
CALIFORNIA.
IT'S I DO BELIEVE THE CITIES AND
COUNTIES ARE GOING TO CONTINUE
TO REVISIT.
BUT BANDS AND.
THEY NEED TO REVISIT THE BANDS.
BECAUSE IT IS THE WILL OF THE
VOTERS IN CALIFORNIA WHO PASSED
THOUGHT RECREATIONAL.
CANNABIS.
THAT SAID. A ON THIS ITEM.
I AM. GOOD THAT I CONTINUE TO
WORK WITH THE GOOD SENATOR.
ON THIS ISSUE.
.
YOU KNOW THAT THERE IS A LOT OF
WORK STILL TO BE DONE.
I APPRECIATE THE COMPROMISING HE
IS A ADVANCING THIS TIME.
CAN BE STAYING OFF THIS ITEM IT
OUT FOR TODAY.
BUT CONTINUE TO WORK WITH HIM.
ON THIS ISSUE.
AS HAVE BEEN IN THE MIDDLE. OF
THIS SIGNIFICANT DISCUSSION THAT
VOTERS IN THIS LEGISLATURE HAS
HAD. OVER THE PAST THREE AND A
HALF YEARS I KNOW THAT WE'RE
GOING TO CONTINUE TO HAVE. A IN
THE YEARS TO COME.
I WOULD LIKE TO BE TO TURN IT
OVER TO SENATOR LARA WITH ANY
CLOSING COMMENTS ASSN WOULD HAVE
RECOGNIZED HER LARA AYE YOUR
CHIEF OF STAFF WHO'S BEEN. A
FANTASTIC TO WORK WITH ALL
THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS IS WELL
JUST WANT TO GIVE. HER THE
KNOWLEDGE OF HIS WOUND THINK YOU
SENATOR OR OTHER ONGOING
DISCUSSION
THANK YOU MISTER I DO APPRECIATE
THE TIME THAT WE'VE ACTUALLY.
MANY PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THAT YOU
AND I WERE WORKING ON A SEVERAL
THE CANNABIS YEAH AS WELL.
BUT I ALSO YOU KNOW WANT TO
JUST RESPOND TO THE COUNTIES AS
I DO RESPECT THE PINT OF VIEW
BUT AGAIN IMPROPER FIFTH SIXTY
FOUR. HE CLEARLY SAYS IT GIVES
PERSONAL RIGHTS FOR CONSUMERS TO
PURCHASE OBTAIN. OUR CONSUMER
CANNABIS THAT INCLUDES EVERYONE
IN EVERY COUNTY IN CALIFORNIA
REGARDLESS OF HOW THAT COUNTY
VOTED AND THIS IS WHY WE'RE
TRYING TO FIND THAT APPROPRIATE
BALANCE OF HOW DO WE. RESPECT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUT ALSO
RESPECT THE FACT THAT VOTERS
PASSED A PROPOSITION.
STATEWIDE.
BUT T WAS INA COUNTY MANAGER
HE WAS STATEWIDE THAT GAVE.
EVERYBODY THE RIGHT TO PURCHASE
MEDICAL AND RECREATIONAL USE OF
CANNABIS AND SO THIS IS WHERE
WE'RE TRYING TO FIND THE
APPROPRIATE BALANCE WE CANNOT
FORGET THE FACT. THAT IT ALSO
INCLUDED THE ABILITY FOR PEOPLE
TO PURCHASE THIS LEGAL THAT'S
NOW LEGAL PRODUCT SO THAT IS
ALSO EQUALLY SHOULD BE WAITED AS
WE HAVE THESE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT
LOCAL CONTROL.
HE SO MUCH AS CENTER LARA SO
MEMBERS.
WE WOULD BE LOOKING FOR EMOTION
AND AT THE MOTION WOULD BE TO
PASS TO THE FLOOR WITH THE
UNDERSTAND THAT RULES COMMITTEE
WILL PULL THE BILL IN IN HIS
SIGNED IT TO APPROPRIATIONS
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE AT THE
APPROPRIATE TIME. A AND B. TO DO
THAT CENTER LARA WILL BE.
AT INITIATING A FORMAL REQUEST
THAT THE BILL DOES ADVANCE TO
THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE TO
THE RULES COMMITTEE DO
APPRECIATE THAT SEVERAL ARE FOR
ADVANCING THAT HERE TODAY.
SO WITH THAT UNDERSTANDING IS
THERE A MOTION TO BE ABLE TO
ADVANCE THE BILL.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY SENATOR
BATTLE THIS AGAIN IS A DO PASS
OF THE FLOOR WHICH WILL THEN BE
PULLED INTO RULES OF WHICH
WITHIN AT BE ADVANCED. INTO
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE. ROLL
CALL VOTE PLEASE MISSING CHESTER
REQUIRE.
WHEN.
DEL VALLE AYE HERNANDEZ.
HERTZBERG LARA BY I'M MORE LONG.
TO PAY FOR IT HERNANDEZ AYE.
WE CURRENTLY HAVE A THREE ZERO
VOTE WE'RE GONNA KEEP THE ROLE
OPEN A AND.
AT ON THOSE HERE IN JUST DEBATE
FIGURES TURN OUR THANK YOU SO
MUCH INTO OVER WITNESSES THANK
YOU AND THANK YOU ALL. WHO
TRAVEL FAR AND WIDE TO BE HERE
TODAY
WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A QUICK?
ONE MINUTE RECESS TO ALLOW THE.
INTO
HE JUST TO BE ABLE TO EXIT THE
HEARING ROOM IN THE WORLD
RECONVENE HERE SHORTLY
FORGET EVERYONE'S ATTENTION
PLEASE THIS IS ON PROPERTY TAXES.
RIDLEY A WELFARE EXEMPTION A
QUEEN LAND TRUSTS.
SENATE BILL WE APPRECIATE ALL OF
YOUR HARD WORK.
HE DO A BIPARTISAN SUPPORT ON
THIS BILL.
THE FLOOR IS YOURS SIR.
MISTER CHAIRMAN MEMBERS SO.
THANK YOU.
I'M I'M HAPPY TO PERCENT.
SP TWO AND.
FIT
SIX SO.
PAIN ONE SECONDS IN HER
SERGEANTS WE ASK OF THAT CRAP
SO LOWER VOICES OUT
HOW JUST.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
IT'S WORKING WELL.
ALRIGHT CENTER BELLCORE'S
RESEARCH.
THANK YOU AND WE WILL ACCEPT.
THE COMMITTEES.
BUT ON THE BILL.
BECAUSE THERE ARE.
FOR TODAY AND.
.
THE BILL WILL SUPPORT A
COMMUNITY LAND TRUST TO PROVIDE.
MORE PERMANENTLY AFFORDABLE
HOUSING TO LOW AND MODERATE CAN
FAMILIES.
AND.
THERE'S NO SILVER BULLET
BECAUSE SOLVING THIS CRISIS BUT.
COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ARE PART OF
THE SOLUTION.
THESE NONPROFIT HOUSING CORP
ORGANIZATIONS PROVIDE.
PERMANENTLY AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
THE BILL WILL GROUND THE OF THE
COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTS.
WITH A WELFARE TAX EXEMPTION.
FROM THE POINT OF ACQUISITION OF
PROPERTY TO THE POINT OF SALE.
OF THE AFFORDABLE HOMES.
THIS EXEMPTION IS CURRENTLY
GRANTED.
TO.
.
SIMILAR NONPROFIT HOUSING
ORGANIZATION.
LIKE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY.
SO HERE ARE LOOKING OVER THE
BILL AND NOW.
THE THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR
CENTER BELL.
AND HELP SO OUR COMMUNITY LAND
TRUST COULD
THERE DEVELOPMENTS DIPAK TO A
MORE DISADVANTAGED FAMILIES.
WE HAVE WITNESSES ALL
TURN OVER THE WINDOWS FOR.
IS MUCH AND WE WELCOME SERVING
BUT URGES.
THAT IT COUNTY SET YOUR FIRST
AND LAST NAME AND YOU HAVE A
MOTION ON THE FLOOR AS WELL AS
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT SUBURBAN ASK.
CLICK TO KEEP YOUR TESTIMONY
BRIEF AGAIN THANK YOU SO MUCH
FOR BEING HERE TODAY.
THANK YOU CHAIRMAN.
TO A FUTURE MCGUIRE APPRECIATE
YOUR OF THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK
MARKETS SERIOUS PRESIDENT OF THE
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY INTEREST
NETWORK AND THE SPONSOR THE BILL.
WHICH IS APPRECIATED BIPARTISAN
SUPPORT.
I THINK SENATOR BELL HAS
OUTLINED CORRECTLY WHAT WE ARE
LOOKING FOR IN THE LEGISLATION
AND WE ARE JUST BASICALLY HERE
TO ANSWER ANY TECHNICAL
QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK
YOU SO MUCH MORNING MA'AM PLEASE
SEE FOR SO AS YOU DO THAT
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT WE'VE MOTION
THE FLOOR HE COMPLETES KEEP
TESTIMONY BRIEF.
MORNING MELISSA FOX IRVINE CITY
COUNCIL CHAIR OF THE IRAN
COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTS GRATEFUL
FOR THE SUPPORT AND THE
CHAMPIONSHIP WORK THAT.
SENATOR BELL IS DONE. OF WE'RE
WORKING HARD TO COMBAT
HOMELESSNESS IN OUR AREA AND I
HAVE HERE TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY ABOUT.
WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT A
COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTS THAT MIGHT
GARNER MORE SUPPORT IN THIS
INSTANCE MEANS ABOUT YOU'D COME
UP TODAY SO THANK YOU SO MUCH
FOR TAKING THE FIGHT? VERY
GRATEFUL.
WE DON'T LIKE TO GO TO SEE IF WE
HAVE ANY INDIVIDUAL THAT DID
SPEAK IN SUPPORT IF YOU PLEASE
COME FORWARD TO STATE YOUR FIRST
AND LAST NAME PLEASE.
ALONG WITH YOUR ORGANIZATION.
BRUCE WOLF PRESIDENT SAN
FRANCISCO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
SUPPORT.
DRIVE BUT THINK THINKING
THROUGH OF.
GOOD MORNING SIR MORNINGS ACT
MURRAY OAKLAND COMMITTEE LAND
TRUSTS CONSUMER THANK YOU SO
MUCH FOR BEING HERE.
LAST CALL FOR THOSE WHO ARE IN
SUPPORT OF THE BILL TO COULD
PLEASE ADVANCE.
YOU KNOW WHAT I DID A OPEN IT UP
FOR THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED.
IT'S GOING AT CERTAIN.
WE WELCOME YOU.
FOR SOURCE.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR A GOOD
MORNING MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS
ROB GROWS CLOSER WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION
I'M I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT.
PUBLICLY THAT THEY AUTHOR IN
HIS OFFICE IN THE SPONSORS REACH
OUT TO ITS EARLY THIS YEAR TO
WORK WITH US OVERHEAD VERY
FRUITFUL CONVERSATIONS AS
RECENTLY AS YESTERDAY.
OUR LETTER TO THE COMMITTEE
NOTED THAT POLICY CONCERN POWER
OR QUESTION BEFORE THE
LEGISLATURE WAS TO ENSURE THE
ACTUAL UNITS ARE BUILT AND
THERE'S NOT ESSENTIALLY LAND
BANKING. AND NOT GOING FOR THE
PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM BUT WE
ARE CONFIDENT THAT AS WE GO TO
THE PROCESS WITH THE SPONSOR AND
THE AUTHORS OFFICE THAT WE CAN
ADDRESS SOME OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE CONCERNS ALSO
POINT TO THE ASSESSORS. AS WELL
AS FOR THE LAND TRUST SUCH AS
WHAT TO DO WITH MIXED USE
PROPERTIES WHAT TO DO WITH
VACANT VERSES.
UNDEVELOPED LAND STATUE
LIMITATIONS ISSUES REPORTING
THINGS THAT NATURE SO.
WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY
TO SPEAK FOR THIS MORNING AND
LOOK FOR TO WORK WITH THEM AS A
BILL MISS FORD THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SO IT'S GOOD TO SEE
SIR THANK YOU FOR COMING
COMMITTEE WOULD LIKELY TO SEE
ANYONE ELSE WHO MAY BE OPPOSED
IF YOU COULD PLEASE ADVANCED
MICRO DISTANTE. ANYONE WHO'S
OPPOSE LAST CALL.
THAT'S BRING IT BACK TO
COMMITTEE YOU FOR QUESTIONS
COMMENTS CENTER MORE LIKE PLEASE.
COMMISSIONER I JUST HAVE ONE
QUESTION AND THAT IS.
THE BIG ISSUE ABOUT LAND BANKING
HOW LONG CAN WE HAVE VACANT LAND.
OFF THE BOOKS
USER TIME PERIOD.
YEAH AGAIN VERSE ONE TRY TO
AVOID ABUSES AND WE ARE WORKING
WITH THE ASSESSORS AND WITH THE
SENATOR TO LOOK AT ESTABLISHMENT
TIME PERIOD WITHIN THE
LEGISLATION AS AN AMENDMENT AND
THAT WOULD BE APPROXIMATE FIVE
YEARS MAXIMUM. INCLUDING THE
COURTS OF CONSTRUCTION.
AND THANK YOU MELISSA FOX FOR
COMING ALL THE WAY TO SACRAMENTO
GOOD TO SEE YOU.
YOU MISTER.
IT'S A SENATOR WITH LIKE A
SICKLY ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS.
ALRIGHT WE DO HAVE A MOTION ON
THE FLOOR BY SENATOR LARGE IS A
DO PASSES A MINUTE TO
APPROPRIATIONS CENTER BELL WOULD
YOU LIKE TO BE A TRUE OFFER SOME
CLOSING COMMENTS THANK YOU FOR
YOUR HARD WORK SIR.
THANK YOU.
WE NEED TO ATTACKED AFFORDABLE
HOUSING PRICES FROM MANY.
WAYS AND THIS IS ONE OF ON HER
CHAU THANK YOU SO MUCH CENTER
ABOUT THIS IS A DO PASS AS
AMENDED TO CORPORATIONS PRO CALL
VOTE PLEASE MISS LANE CHESSER
MCGUIRE AYE MCGUIRE AYE WITH.
DEL. THOUGH I'VE HEARD AND THEN.
DECIDE HERTZBERG LARA AYE FLORA
AYE MORE LAW.
BUDGET ONE GROUP HUG BIPARTISAN
FIVE EIGHT ZERO VOTES THANK YOU
SO MUCH.
BUT WE ARE NOW GOING TO BE TURN
IT OVER TO SENATOR WIN SO WE
NEED CENTER NGUYEN INTO THE
HEARING ROOM.
SHE IS OUR LAST BILL THE DAY.
YOU HAVE SENATOR WHEN I KNOW THE
SERGEANTS
CONTACT HERE BUT WE'RE NEED
CENTER WHEN TO THE HEARING ROOM.
SOON AS FAR
THANK YOU. FUND MEMBERS WERE
GOING TO ADD ON TO VOTE.
HERE AT THIS TIME IF YOU DON'T
MIND GIVEN THE SIX.
WE'RE GONNA DO I ADD ON
HERE MOMENTARILY
YOU.
GENTLEMEN WE ARE GRATEFUL TO BE
ABLE TO HAVE.
OUR VICE
CHEERS CENTER WIN HERE TODAY WE
WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO SOMEONE
FOR WORKING WITH THE COMMITTEE
REDUCE.
I'M AND JUST THERE WILL BE SOME
OF THEM IT'S TAKING.
AND UP WE ARE PLEASE
BE ABLE SUPPLY.
THE BILL IN APPRECIATE HER
CONTINUE PARTNERSHIP AND HARD
WORK.
VICE CHAIR THE FLOOR IS YOURS
MA'AM. THANK YOU THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND SENATORS ICE
FIRST WANT TO THANK THE
COMMITTEE AND YOU FOR YOUR FOR.
YOURS IN THEIR SYSTEM ON THIS
BILL DOESN'T AND I'M HAPPY TO
TAKE THE AMENDMENTS TO AT
TECHNICAL LANGUAGE INTO REVISED
TO PROPOSE VALUE OF THE CREDIT.
S. B. ELEVEN SEVENTY SIX WOULD
INCREASE THE VALUE OF THE
DEPENDENT EXEMPTION CREDIT BY.
TEN PERCENT FOR THREE HUNDRED
FIFTY THREE DOLLARS TO TO THREE
HUNDRED EIGHTY NINE DOLLAR BILL.
FOR THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR VICE
CHAIR AND I RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
MY VOTE. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
WE'D LIKE TO BE THAT WE THE VICE
WE HAVE THE A THE.
WE HAVE A. MOTION ON THE FLOOR
DO PASSES APPROPRIATIONS AND I
DO BELIEVE THAT.
THE VICE CHAIR WILL BE TAKING
THOSE AMENDMENTS IN OUR
APPROPRIATIONS AS WEB. HUBBELL
LIKELY TO SEE THOSE WHO MAY BE
IN SUPPORT IF YOU CAN PLEASE
ADVANCE AT THIS TIME.
LEGACY ANYONE WHO'S OPPOSED TO
PLEASE COME FORWARD MICROPHONE.
QUESTIONS COMMENTS PLEASE SEND A
WARLOCK.
FUTURE SIMILAR BILL.
SP EIGHT SEVENTY FIVE IN TWENTY
SIXTEEN.
DIED IN THE SENATE
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE.
AND SO I'M JUST CURIOUS.
WHAT WE DO THIS TIME TO MAKE
SURE THAT THAT DOESN'T OCCUR?
SINCE THE CHAIR OF HIS COMMITTEE
IS HERE.
I'M JUST CURIOUS IF THERE'S.
ANY INPUT.
WHAT WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE INPUT
AT THE TIME WE HAVE THE BILL IN
OUR POSSESSION? APPROACH.
MISTER CHAIRMAN I BROUGHT THE
FIVE YEAR OLDS BEHAVIOR YEAH I
MEAN THE LEAST I COULD DO THIS
TIME RIGHT.
HER THE ARE WEEKEND WE TAKEN
CARE OF WHAT. PREVENTED THIS
BILL FROM MOVING OUT WITH.
SENATOR WINDS BILL.
THANK YOU NEVER SPEAK FOR THE.
THE CHAIRMAN OF APPROPRIATIONS
AT LEAST FOR THIS COMMITTEE.
THAT SHE'D WHICH WERE VERY
GRATEFUL FOR SHE HAS TAKEN
ELEMENTS WITHIN WORKING
COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE SENATOR
IN HER OFFICE.
THE AMENDMENTS I MISSPOKE SHE
WILL NOT BE TAKEN AMENDMENTS IN
PROBES
THE LIMITS ARE EMBEDDED IN THE
BILL NOW. HIGH AND WE ARE
RECOMMENDING IN AYE VOTES TO BE
OF THE MOVIE. WE DO HAVE A
MOTION ON THE FLOOR CURRENTLY UP
BY THE CHAIR OF APPROPRIATIONS
CUT SENATOR LARA.
IN ADDITIONAL AYE DISCUSSION OR
DEBATE
A COMMITTEE TO SHOULD TO
ACTION OR DEBATE.
BUT THAT BID OFFER CLOSING TO
THE VICE CHAIR I RESPECTFULLY
ASK FOR MY VOTE INVESTOR IF YOU
COULD PLEASE INTRODUCE YOUR
SPECIAL GUEST.
I HAVE FUN TIMOTHY HERE WHO IS
MY FIVE YEAR OLD.
DECIDED THAT. HE'S ALMOST
GETTING TO KINDERGARTEN SO I'M
GONNA HAVE TO TAKE HIM UP HERE
MORE OFTEN BEFORE HE HEADS INTO
KINDERGARTEN NEXT YEAR SO.
THAT'S WORKING TIMOTHY DID THE
COMMITTEE WELCOME SERVE MY GOD
IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU MONEY AND.
HE IS CHILLIN OUT.
.
I THINK THAT.
MAYBE MONTH SHOULD BE GIVEN HIM
FORGET IT SO I SEE THAT. I'VE
SAID MISTER CHAIRMAN I WOULD BE
MORE THAN WILLING TO GIVEN THAT.
YEAH BUT HE'S GONE RIGHT TO YOUR
OFFICE AFTER.
BUT WE GO.
MAYBE SO MUCH VICE CHAIR
THIS IS DO PASSED YOU
APPROPRIATIONS OF MISSING JUST A
ROLL CALL VOTE PLEASE WIRE.
WHY I WAS IN HIGH
I?
YEAH I BEGAN.
HERNANDEZ AYE HERTZBERG LARA.
WELL A LOT.
MORE LIKE.
THE SOONER HERTZBERG WOULD YOU
LIKE TO BE UP AT ON ITS
CURRENTLY UNANIMOUS VOTE ITEM
NUMBER THREE SB LEVINSON.
CENTER WHEN DID TAKE THE
AMENDMENTS AND.
AND ON FOR.
ALL.
SO.
BUT WE CURRENTLY HAVE A SEAT
ZERO VOTE.
WANTED TO SEE IF.
SO IT SENATOR LARA OUT IN THE
HALL.
I READY WHEN HE LEFT.
IT THINK IT IS A SEVEN ZERO
THANK YOU SO MUCH SEVEN ZERO
VOTE ROBINSON ARE MAKING.
THE BILL IS OUT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH WE'RE GONNA
CLOSE THE ROLE THANK YOU.
MEMBERS GIVE ITS.
SIX
ITS WERE GOING TO BE ABLE T GET
OUR PAPERWORK ORGANIZED
IMMIGRANT AT ON.
PICKERS THANK YOU SO MUCH SOONER
MORE LOCKED.
A SINGLE UNIT SWELLED JOB COME
OVER TO BABYSIT MY KIDS
ZERO VOTES.
I THINK JUST BROKE UP WITH.
I AM WHEN I HEARD ABOUT IT AND
THIS.
HERNANDEZ AYE HERTZBERG BIRDS
WERE GUYS. THAT CURRENTLY IS A
SEVEN ZERO VOTE WE'RE GOING TO
CLOSE THE ROLE AS THOSE BILLS
HAVE BEEN PASSED.
YOU SO MUCH.
MEMBERS ARE NOW MOVING ON TO
ITEM NUMBER ONE S. B. TEN
EIGHTEEN CURRENTLY ENJOYS A FOUR
ZERO CHAIR VOTING AYE.
SCIENTISTS
WHEN.
WHEN I.
HERNANDEZ AYE HERNANDEZ AYE
HERTZBERG PUT YOUR GUYS.
SEVEN ZERO VOTE THAT BILL IS OUT
WITH TEMA CLOSER ROLE.
MEMBERS WERE MOVING ON TO ITEM
NUMBER TWO SENATOR BELL S. B.
TEN FIFTY SIX CURRENTLY ENJOYS A
FIVE ZERO VOTE CHAIR VOTING I
MISSED LANCASTER WHEN.
I. AYE. HERTZBERG AYE HERTZBERG
AYE.
SEVEN ZERO VOTE THAT BILLS OUT
OF HER CLOTHES IN THE ROLE THANK
YOU SO MUCH WE'RE NOW MOVING ON
TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR SP TWELVE
FOURTEEN.
THE DO PASS IS AMENDED TO
APPROPRIATIONS CURRENTLY ENJOYS
A FOUR ZERO VOTE
IT'S THEY JUST A ROLL CALL. WIN.
WIN ON HERNANDEZ AND DECIDE
HERTZBERG. RICHARD GUY.
BUT YOU KNOW THAT'S A SEVEN ZERO.
MISTER PORTANTINO'S BILL IS OUT
WORKLOADS IN THE ROLE.
ITEM NUMBER SIX S. B. THIRTEEN
NO TO SENATOR LARA THIS IS A DO
PASSED TO THE FLOOR CURRENT VOTE
IS THREE ZERO MISLAID CHESTER.
NGUYEN.
NGUYEN THOUGH.
HERTZBERG.
IF YOU WANT.
BONTA.
WOODS JOURNALISTS.
THE JEWELERS
.
YEAH RIGHT SO THAT IS IT AYE.
AYE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH THAT BILL ONE
THAT BILL IS OUT ON THE FOUR ONE
VOTE.
IN AGAIN LAYS IN GERMAN THAT IS
GOING
E. A DUPE.
FLOOR WITH THE UNDER SENATE
RULES COMMITTEE WILL PULL THE
BILL AND IN A SIGN.
OPERATIONS.
FOR SOME ADDITIONAL WORK.
KAREN.
SO LAZY DO IS UNDERMINE FOR
SO WHAT WERE IN FOR IT OR THE
NEXT TWO WEEKS.
TO BE LENGTHY HEARING
PLAIN AND THREE HOURS
WE HAVE MOVED SOME BILLS FROM
NEXT.
I'M SO WILL TAKE
STATE BILLS UP
STINK
THEN WE HAVE A VERY SMALL BILL
THAT.
CENTER HERTZ.
FOR
WITH A TIME.
IN.
ELEVEN.
I AM.
REGARDS.
SALES TAX.
SO WE DID MAKE THAT
AUTOMATICALLY LA TIME.
INTO THE MEASURE.
SORT OF LIKE A CANDY.
SO.
SO MUCH IT WILL SEE YOU NEXT
WEEK