OUTSIDE OF THE COMMITTEE ROOM SO
WE CAN HEAR THE TESTIMONY
PRESENTED AND HERE MEMBERS WHEN
THEY CAST VOTES.
WE HAVE TWENTY THREE MEASURES ON
THE AGENDA TODAY WE HAVE TEN
ITEMS ON CONSENT. WE HAVE
SENATOR PAN HERE SO SENATOR PAN
WOULD START WITH YOU YOU HAVE.
.
S. B. ELEVEN EIGHTY FOUR FILE
ITEM THIRTEEN. PLEASE A THANK
YOU.
SHARE US SENATOR SO FIRST OF ALL
I WANT TO THANK COMMITTEE STAFF
UP FOR WORKING CLOSE WITH MY
OFFICE ON AMENDMENTS TO THIS
BILL AND ACCEPT THE COMMITTEE
AMENDMENTS.
SO SENATE BILL ELEVEN EIGHTY
FOUR ALLOWS THE CITY OF
SACRAMENTO MAYAN. CITY HERE AND
MY DISTRICT TO CONDUCT AN
AUTONOMOUS SHUTTLE DEMONSTRATION
PROJECT BY DRESSING PROVISIONS
IN THE DMV REGULATIONS THAT
PROHIBIT. AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
MANUFACTURERS RECEIVING
COMPENSATION FOR OUR OFFERING
RIDES IN EIGHTIES UNDER THE
TESTING PERMITS.
THIS BILL WOULD SUNSET IN A
JUNE FIRST TWENTY TWENTY BE
REPEALED ON JANUARY FIRST TWENTY
TWENTY ONE.
ON APRIL SECOND TWENTY EIGHTEEN
THE DMV REGULATIONS TOOK EFFECT
ALLOW TESTING OF TIMES VEHICLES
WITHOUT DRIVER BEHIND THE WHEEL.
WE CERTAINLY APPLAUD THAT THE IN
THESE EFFORTS TO BELIEVE THAT
REGULATIONS GENERALLY SOUND
HOWEVER THERE IS A PROVISION IN
THE REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT
EIGHTY MANUFACTURING'S FROM
RECEIVING COMPENSATION FOR
OFFERING RIGHTS IN EIGHTIES.
THAT'S KILEY PURVEYING THE CITY
SACK ABOUT CONDUCTING THE PILOT
PROJECT IN WORKING ON FOR MANY
YEARS SO IRONICALLY IF THE
MANUFACTURE THEMSELVES DID THE
PILOT THERE'S NO PROBLEM BUT
BECAUSE THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO.
IS ACTUALLY ONE CHARGE OF PILOT
WE ACTUALLY NEED THIS
LEGISLATION
SO INTENSE PAIN IS REGULATIONS
IN THE GROWTH OF AB TECHNOLOGY
CITIES ACT AMOUNTS A PROACTIVE
PREPARE FOR SEATS DEVELOPMENT.
DEPLOYMENT OF EIGHTIES THROUGH
AUTHORIZATION THIS SHUTTLE PILOT
PROJECT THAT'S BILL AUTHORIZES
THE PILOT SHUTTLE SERVICE
ACTUALLY TRANSPORT STUDENTS
FACULTY AND STAFF. FROM SET US
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SACRAMENTO SEX STATE TO AND FROM
THE UNIVERSITIES QUOTE. SIXTY
FIFTH STREETLIGHT RAIL STATION
TO COLLEGE CAMPUS WOULD HAVE A
SHUTTLE BETWEEN LIGHT RAIL
STATION THE CAMPUS.
AND THE SECOND IS WORKING WITH
US A CARD OUR LOCAL COUNCIL
GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL TRANSIT AND
SEX STATE.
SO.
BIRTH I UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT
LANGUAGE THAT IS RAISING SOME
QUESTIONS ON MY DRESS SOME OF
THOSE SO FIRST OF ALL OF COURSE
TO SEE SACRAMENTO AND I A.
TO SAFETY.
SEE SEXUAL NOW OUT THE PILOT
PROJECT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A
HIGH DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE THAT
THE PART PROJECT WILL PROVE NOT
REDUCE PUBLIC SAFETY.
I WITH THE EXEMPTION OF THE
COMPENSATION FOR OPTING WRITES
ALL OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE
TESTING PERMIT WILL BE FOLLOWED
INCLUDING SAFETY REGULATIONS.
CURRENTLY MANUFACTURES
POSSESSION OF THE IN THE PERMIT
MAY TEST ON PUBLIC ROADS WITHOUT
LYRICAL AGENCY APPROVAL SO THIS
PRIVATE PILOT PROJECT LEAD
ACTIVE PARTICIPATION FROM MANY
LOCAL AGENCIES WHO HAVE THE
ABILITY TAKE MANY ACTIONS
IMPROVE SAFETY SUCH AS A.
DECIDED TO READ MARKINGS
INSTALLING SMART CONNECTED
TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS THEN ABLE TO
A COMMUNICATIONS OF THE VEHICLES
AND EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT
HOW BEST INTERACT IN AND AROUND
THE REASON OPERATIONS.
THE RICH AND WE ARE ALSO HOPING
TO BE EXEMPT FROM WAS INCLUDED
REGULATIONS PREVENT
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
COMPANIES.
LIKE UBER LIFT FOR PROVIDING
COMMERCIAL SERVICES UNDER
TESTING PERMIT SB ELEVEN A FOUR
DOES NOT ALLOW IS NOW LYING FOR
TNC PILOT PROJECT.
WE TOOK AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFY
THAT WOULD TEST THE FREE SHUTTLE
SERVICE PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERS
INTENT OF THE PROJECTS ALLOW
THIRD PARTY COVER THE COSTS
ASSOCIATED TESTING WHILE
PROVIDING FREE RIDES THAT
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. SINCE THE
CITY MUST FOLLOW ALL OF THE
REQUIREMENTS LAID OUT THE
TESTING PERMIT S. B. LEVITY FOR
WILL ALSO NOT ALLOW LARGE
AUTONOMOUS COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
LIKE BUSES ON THE ROAD. VEHICLE
CANNOT EXCEED TEN THOUSAND
POUNDS AN AMENDMENT WAS TAKING
FOR CLARIFICATION.
I ONLY REALIZE THERE'S A LARGER
DISCUSSION AROUND RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN AUTOMATION ARE LABOR
WORKERS HOWEVER THAT IS AN ISSUE
THAT DESERVES A LOVER LARGER
CONVERSATION GOES BEYOND THE
SCOPE THE NARROW SCOPE OF THIS
BILL. SO I CERTAINLY KNOW FROM
MY EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH THE
CITY SACRAMENTO THAT.
THEY'RE HAVING THOSE LARGER
DISCUSSIONS ON RETRAINING OTHER
PROGRAMS TO HELP OUR LABOR
COMMUNITY.
A FACT BY WORKING WITH SACKS
STATE ON THIS PROJECT THE GOALS
ENGAGE WITH ENGINEERING COMPUTER
SCIENCE STUDENTS WITH THE
OPPORTUNITIES TO WITNESS AND AB
PROJECT IN OPERATION. AT ELEVEN
FORCIBLY AUTHORIZES THE PILOT
PROJECT BUT STILL GIVES THE MBT
FULL DISCRETION TO DENY APPROVAL
OF THE TESTING PERMITS ROOM MAY
REVOKE AT A TIME. EXPECT WE ASK
OUR NEIGHBORS THANK YOU.
BUT FORGET THE WITNESSES BECAUSE
WE HAVE SO MANY BILLS ARE GOING
TO DO. TO WIN THIS IS A SUPPORT
TO WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION TO
MINUTES EACH AND AND NEED TO'S
AFTER THAT SO.
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
BECAUSE.
BY LUIS TO WORK TO FEDERATION
OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF
SACRAMENTO. OF VISITORS.
PART OF THE US SACRAMENTO'S
CONTINUING EFFORTS TO ENTER INTO
OF THE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
CONVERSATION AND.
SMARTS AND.
AND SAFEWAY.
TO ENGAGE THE COMMUNITY.
AND.
MAKE SURE THAT IT'S.
THERE IS NOT A GOOD ADOPTION
RATES OF FOR THE NEW TECHNOLOGY
IN THE REGION. AND WORKING WITH
PSYCHOTIC A WE WANNA MAKE SURE
THAT THERE IS NOT A.
.
BUT PATCHWORK OF REGULATIONS
THAT ARE CREATED AND SO WE WANT
TO BE THOUGHTFUL ABOUT.
HOW THIS?
THIS TECHNOLOGY IS RULED OUT.
.
HERE IS.
ACTUAL GHANI SUBJECT MATTER
EXPERTS AND OTHERS FROM WORKING
ON THIS LEGISLATION.
SO AGAIN WE'RE GOING TO DO TO
WITNESSES TWO MINUTES EACH SO.
DON'T GET TOO FAR TO HOW EXPERT
YOUARE ON THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE
SO.
TYPE GO AHEAD.
THANK YOU I MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS
OF THE COMMITTEE MY NAME IS
ASHER GOING ON WITH THE CITY OF
SACRAMENTO'S OFFICE OF
INNOVATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
AND WHERE THE SPONSORED S. B.
ELEVEN EIGHTY FOUR ON THIS BILL
WOULD HELP ADVANCE DUH THOMAS
SHUTTLE. PILOT PROJECT UNDER
DEVELOPMENT I'M IT WOULD TESTING
NEW LAST MILE MOBILITY SOLUTION
FOR STUDENTS STAFF AND FACULTY
OF THE UNIVERSITY. UMMC THIS.
PROJECT WOULD ENABLE ARE THE
CITY AND OUR PARTNER AGENCIES TO
PREPARE FOR THE EVENTUAL
DEPLOYMENT OF THE THOMAS
VEHICLES ON OUR ROADS.
AND THE CITY HAS UNDERTAKEN
SEVERAL INITIATIVES TO ADVANCE
THE SAFE DEPLOYMENT OF
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES.
WERE COLLABORATING WITH
INDUSTRY AND OUR PARTNER
AGENCIES AND REALLY WE THINK
THAT CITIES ARE WELL POSITIONED
TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY AND
RELIABILITY OF THIS TECHNOLOGY
BY. OPTIMIZING A LANE MARKINGS
SIGNAGE.
SMART AND CONNECTED TRAFFIC
SIGNALS AND REALLY PUBLIC
EDUCATION AROUND HOW TO INTERACT
WITH THESE VEHICLES.
I'M IN OTHER WORDS A S. B.
LIVING EIGHTY FOUR REFLECTS THE
CITY'S PRO ACTIVE EFFORTS TO
ENSURE THAT WE'RE DOING
EVERYTHING THAT WE CAN TO
MAXIMIZE. THE SAFETY OF THE
EVENTUAL DEPLOYMENT OF THESE
VEHICLES ARE ROADS.
AND WE APPLAUD THE DMB IS
EFFORTS TO CRAFT ITS REGULATIONS
AND LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
THE AGENCY. AND TO BE CLEAR SB
ELEVEN EIGHTY FOR MERELY
AUTHORIZES THE PILOT PROJECT TO
MOVE FORWARD HOWEVER THIS CITY
WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD UNLESS
WE'RE CONFIDENT THAT THIS.
PILOT WILL IMPROVE NINE MINIMUM
ORDER REDUCE THE PUBLIC'S FIFTY.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU VERY MUCH
OTHERS DO YOU. BRIEF COMMENT SIR
IS VERY PAINFUL GARCIA I'M
SACRAMENTO STATE AND WE'RE HERE
IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL. AT A FOR
THE REASONS THAT THE SENATOR
COVERED IN HIS REMARKS THAT
SUFFICE TO SAY. WE HAVE THE
SIXTEEN THOUSAND.
PARKING PERMITS THAT WE ISSUE
ON AVERAGE IS SEMESTER THIRTEEN
THOUSAND PARKING SPACES WE WANT
TO GET MORE OF OUR FOR STUDENTS
FACULTY AND STAFF.
OUT OF THOSE VEHICLES IN A USING
TRANSIT AND THIS PROJECT IS A.
GREAT WAY FOR US TO ADVANCE
CYCLE.
OKAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH OTHER
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT.
I SEE NOW AND.
WITNESSES IN OPPOSITION FEW
WOODEN MINE CLEARING THE TABLE
THERE TO BE GREAT THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS MAP BROUGHT
HERE ON BEHALF OF THE
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION
CALIFORNIA TEAMSTERS IN THE
CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE
MACHINISTS.
WERE AND RESPECTFUL OPPOSITION
TO THE BILL.
WITH REGARD TO.
CENTER PANTS COMMENTS ABOUT
SORT OF.
THE BIGGER QUESTION THE BIGGER
LABOR ISSUE HERE.
WE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PILOT
IS NARROW IN SCOPE I'M BUT. YOU
KNOW HERE IN SACRAMENTO LOCAL TO
FIFTY SIX PART OF THE EIGHTY
REPRESENTS OVER THIRTEEN HUNDRED
TAKE TRANSIT BUS OPERATORS.
SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS PARA TRANSIT
DRIVERS AND FOR THEM THE ISSUE
OF JOB DISPLACEMENT IS IMMINENT.
I'M AND THEY FEEL THAT THEIR
LIVELIHOOD IS THREATENED I'M AND
SO THAT'S YOU KNOW ONE THIRD OF
TWO REASONS WE OPPOSE THE BILL
THE SECOND ROOM BEING SERVED THE
PUBLIC SAFETY QUESTION.
I'M.
YOU KNOW OFTENTIMES.
OUR DRIVERS WHETHER THEY LIKE
IT OR NOT ARE SORT OF THE FIRST
LINE OF DEFENSE WHEN SOMETHING
BAD HAPPENS ON A BUS. I'M AND WE
SORT OF HOW BIGGER ISSUES ABOUT
THE POTENTIAL OF HAVING
DRIVERLESS BY YOU KNOW BY SINCE.
I'M AND I IT WITH REGARD TO THE
MILE LONG STRETCH THAT IS IN
QUESTION HERE YOU KNOW THEIR
SACKS STEED STUDENTS THERE SEEM
FRANCIS STUDENTS THERE'S LOTS OF
TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND WE THINK
THAT. IT WOULD BE BETTER TO WAIT
AND SORT OF SEE HOW THIS AB
TECHNOLOGY UNFOLDS GIVEN YOU
KNOW THE SORT OF CRASH WITH
UBER.
THAT KILLED A PASSENGER LAST
MONTH I'M HERE JOINED BY DOUG
BLOCK USE THAT POLITICAL DID
TIED DIRECTOR FOR TEAMSTERS
JOINT COUNCIL SEVEN AND HE WILL
SPEAK MORE. ON THE ISSUE THANK
YOU. PLEASE PROCURE THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE
MEMBERS.
AS WAS STATED MY NAME'S DOUG
BLOCK AND I REPRESENT.
MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND
TEAMSTERS IN THIRTY EIGHT
COUNTIES FROM BAKERSFIELD UP TO
THE OREGON BORDER. INCLUDING BUS
DRIVERS IN MANY OF YOUR
DISTRICTS PARA TRANSIT DRIVERS
ETCETERA.
AND.
TWO MONTHS AGO I THINK I CAME
BEFORE THIS COMMITTEE AND
TESTIFIED ON A THOMAS VEHICLES.
AND AS I SAID AT THE TIME THE
TEAMSTERS ARE NOT AGAINST
INNOVATION.
ARE WE ACTUALLY WANT TO BE A
PART OF IT AND TO THAT END WE
ARE CONCERNED ABOUT JOBS.
AND WE HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE
GROUPS ADVOCATING FOR MORE
THOUGHTFUL APPROACH.
AS HAS BEEN ALLUDED TO WE'VE
ACTUALLY BEEN WORKING WITH OUR
EMPLOYERS AND MANUFACTURERS THAT
REPRESENT.
PEOPLE IN PASSING TO UNDERSTAND
HOW BOTH THE PUBLIC AND WORKERS
CAN CAPTURE THE BENEFITS OF
NEW TECHNOLOGY.
WHERE JOBS CAN BE AUGMENTED
INSTEAD OF AUTOMATED? SO TO THAT
AND WE FEEL LIKE THIS BILL. GOES
AGAINST THAT EFFORT.
BECAUSE THERE ARE NO WORKERS IN
THE VEHICLE AT ALL.
MAYBE THEY'RE NOT A DRIVER BUT
ARE MEMBERS OF THE FUTURE GOING
TO BE AN AMBASSADOR AND SOMEBODY
THERE TO GUARANTEE SAFETY AS
SUCH I WOULD RESPECTFULLY URGE A
NO VOTE. THANK THE QUESTION HAVE
YOU COME UP WITH A WIN WIN SIT
SCENARIO FOR THE WORKERS AND
THEN THE AUTHORITY. I'M AS I'VE
SAID SO TALKING TO OUR OUR
LARGEST EMPLOYER IN THE BUS
INDUSTRY.
I TAKE PARA TRANSIT FOR EXAMPLE
OUR MEMBERS RIGHT NOW ARE EIGHTY
PERCENT VEHICLE OPERATOR IN
TWENTY PERCENT SOCIAL SERVICE
WORKER HELPING THE PEOPLE AND
GETTING IN AND OUT OF THE BUSES.
IN THE FUTURE THE WIN WIN. IS
THAT OUR MEMBERS ARE TWENTY
PERCENT VEHICLE OPERATOR AND
EIGHTY PERCENT SOCIAL SERVICE
WORKER.
BUT THE POINT IS THE JOBS MAY
LOOK DIFFERENT BUT THEY'RE STILL
GOING TO BE JOBS INVOLVED AND IT
MAY NOT BE ALL OF THEM BUT IT
SHOULD BE SOME OF THEM.
IT KNOW A DOCTOR PAN I'M SURE HE
AGREES WITH THAT SO VERY MUCH.
SO OTHER WITNESSES IN
OPPOSITION.
BRUCE MITCH SNIDER WITH
CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION ALSO
IN OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU OTHERS OPPOSITION.
OKAY WE BRING BACK TO COMMITTEE
I I JUST COMMENT I I'M CONCERNED
AS WELL ABOVE THE DISPLACEMENT
OF LOTS OF JOBS I THINK. THIS IS
NEW TECHNOLOGY WERE TRYING TO
REFINE IT SO I THINK. I'M TO
SUPPORT YOUR BILL TODAY BUT I AM
CONCERNED ABOUT DISPLACING.
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF WORKERS
SO I KNOW WHEN YOU DUCK JAPAN I
KNOW THAT YOU FEEL THE SAME WAY
I'M SURE YOU WORK WITH THEM TO
A.
NOVEL WORK ON SOME OF THEIR
CONCERNS
SO. WITH HILLARY BACKED
COMMITTEE OTHER QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS.
OKAY WE HAVE A YOU CLOSE BUT WE
HAVE NO QUORUM SO WE CAN'T LEARN
THE SKILL TO STUDY SO. AND I I
APPRECIATE.
THE.
THE OPPOSITION'S CONCERNS.
IS IN TERMS OF
SCOPE OF THIS BILL BUT THAT
DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE LOOK AT
THOSE ISSUES ARE NOT IMPORTANT
AND ARE NOT ONES I'LL BE WORKED
ON CERTAINLY FOR MY OFFICE IN
THE CITY SACRAMENTO.
ACCELIS.
YEAH HELPED CO CHAIR A..
HEARING WE HAD OVER LABOR
COMMITTEE ON THIS VERY ISSUE.
AND WE DEATHLY WANT TO WORK WITH
THE TEAMSTERS NAY TO NAY OTHER
ARE LOW IN OTHER LABOR PARTNERS
IN ADDRESSING.
I THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT
ISSUES AS AS WE BEFORE TOO AND I
THINK IT'S AGAIN SUPPORT
ELEMENTS TO ALSO THE SAFETY.
PIECE OF MAKING SURE THAT THIS
IS GOING TO WORK APPROPRIATE
RESPECT THE ASPIRIN AYE VOTE
WHEN YOU FINALLY HAVE A QUORUM
THANK YOU OKAY THANK YOU VERY
MUCH SHOWN PER SHIFT.
WRITE TO US INNER LARA WAS LIKE
COME UP IN THE.
IF YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF BILLS.
YOU START OFF A LOOKS LIKE.
ITEM SEVEN WHICH IS S. B. NINE
FIVE SEVEN.
WE DO HAVE A QUORUM AT THIS TIME
SO. WHOSE WILL TAKE VOTES WHEN
WE HAVE A QUORUM SO THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBERS YOU
KNOW WE OFTEN TALK ABOUT
DEMOCRATIZING ON ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICIES.
HERE.
UNDER THIS CAPITAL ENSURING
THAT EVERY CALIFORNIA CAN TAKE
ADVANTAGE OF THE DIFFERENT
POLICIES AND INCENTIVES THAT
WERE.
CREATING HERE THIS IS A BILL.
AND BY THE WAY WE WILL BE
TAKING THE STAFF AMENDMENTS WHAT
THANK THE STAFF FOR THEIR WORK
ON THIS ISSUE.
.
YOU NO WE WE SO WE TALK ABOUT
DEMOCRATIZING THESE POLICIES. A
STEADY FROM UC DAVIS SURVEYED
CONSUMERS AND THEIR ANALYSIS
SHOWED THAT MORE THAN HALF OF
THE PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE. ZERO
EMISSION CARS LISTA HOV LANE
STICKER PROGRAM AS OUR TOP
REASON FOR PURCHASING AT WE ALSO
KNOW THAT A LOT OF THE. AYE AYE
EVEY IS.
THAT ARE NOW IN.
.
IN LEASE ARE MATURING AND THIS
IS AN ATTEMPT TO GET.
LOW INCOME WORKING CLASS FOLKS
TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE THAT
THAT ARE GONNA BE OUT THERE. HAS
USED OR PREVIOUSLY OWNED AND
THEN ALLOW THEM TO GET ON HOW
THE THICKER PROGRAM SO THAT THEY
CAN BE INCENTIVIZE TO DO SO.
DOES THAT EQUITY OUT.
ESTABLISHES A PATHWAY FOR
CALIFORNIAN HOUSEHOLDS THAT MAKE
FIFTY PERCENT FIFTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS OR LESS A YEAR TO APPLY
FOR A CLEAN CAR STICKER WHEN THE
PURCHASE A USED ZERO EMISSION
VEHICLE. EXISTING LAW DOES NOT
ALLOW A SECOND THICKER FOUR ZERO
EMISSION CARS WHICH PREVIOUSLY
RECEIVED ONE WHICH BASICALLY
ELIMINATES A USED ZEV OPTION FOR
MANY WORKING FOLKS.
.
THE CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS HAVE
BROUGHT ISSUES OF CONGESTION IN
HOV LANE THIS IS WHY WE ARE TOOK
AMENDMENTS AT TO SUNSET THE BILL
AND TWENTY TWENTY THREE. TO
ALLOW US TO ASSESS THE IMPACT.
OF THIS PROGRAM.
ON THE ADOPTION OF ZERO
EMISSION VEHICLES IN ON THE
IMPACT OF HOV LANES ALSO AS A
COMEDIAN ALICE'S NOTES CALTRANS
HAS DETERMINED.
AS A CHAIRMAN THAT THE
CONNECTION BETWEEN EXAM EXEMPT
VEHICLES AND DEGRADATION HAS YET
TO BE ESTABLISHED SO WE NEED
TIME TO TEST TO FURTHER STUDY
THIS. OUR AMENDMENTS ALL OF GIVE
US THE INFORMATION WE NEED. I
PROVIDE THAT TIME NAY TO ADAPT.
TO THE PROGRAM ENFORCEMENT OF
THE LANE CAN BE IMPROVED AND
RESTART A PRINCIPAL PROP PROGRAM
BETWEEN EIGHTEEN. WHICH I WILL
ELIMINATE MANY CARS SO BETWEEN
NOW AND TWO TEN TWENTY THREE THE
BILL WILL BUILD. INTEREST AND
THESE KIND TRANSPORTATION
TECHNOLOGIES AMONG MODERATE AND
LOW INCOME DRIVERS WHICH MAKE
DISINCENTIVE MORE EQUITABLE I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR AYE VOTES.
THANK YOU SIR LARA WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT.
AFTERNOON JULIE MALINOWSKI BOBBY
HAVE CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC
TRANSPORTATION COALITION IN
SUPPORT OF THIS BILL WE THINK
IT'S A SIMPLE CHANGE TO THE
CURRENT PROGRAM. WE THINK IT'S A
IN ANOTHER NON MONETARY
INCENTIVES LIKE WHO WOULD PASS
UP A NON MONETARY INCENTIVE TO
GET THIS TYPE OF OF VEHICLES
INTO CONSUMERS HANDS. AND
FRANKLY IT'S COMPLIMENTARY THE
EQUITY PROGRAMS THAT WE HAVE OUT
THERE SERVING THESE COMMUNITIES
WE ASK YOUR I BO. BUT YOU'RE A
MUCH NEXT NEXT WITNESS IN SPORT.
ROCKY RUSSIAN FOR COLLEGE FOR
CLEAN AIR CCD SPORTS HAS BEEN
NINE FIVE SEVEN BECAUSE IT WILL
INCENTIVIZE A USED TO HAVE
MARKET WHILE ALLOWING FOR A
MEASURE OF FAIRNESS FOR LOW
INCOME DRIVERS. THANK YOU BY
OTHER WITNESSES OF YOU STATE
YOUR NAME ORGANIZATION YOUR
SUPPORT APPRECIATE IT THANK YOU
SHUTTLECOCK BEHALF THE AUTO
ALLIANCE IN SUPPORT.
RIGHT ANY ONE ELSE'S FOR. ANYONE
IN OPPOSITION.
YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME UP HERE
FOR THE PRESENTATION DID. YEAH
COMING UP.
GOOD AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIRMAN
BIRDS ARE BACK ALONG WITH THE
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE
IN OPPOSITION TO THIS BILL AND
WE HAVE A LONG STANDING TRACK
RECORD OF REALLY. SUPPORTING
CARPET POLICE BEING DEDICATED TO
CARPOOL ISN'T BEING FOCUSED ON
MOVING PEOPLE. AND NOT SINGLE
OCCUPANT VEHICLES SO WE WE ARE
CONCERNED THAT THIS BILL IS SORT
OF REOPENING THE DEBATE THAT
WAS.
HAD LAST YEAR WITH THE BLOOM
BILL AND ON THAT YOU KNOW THE
FACT THAT ARE CARPOOL LANES
ESPECIALLY IN THE BAY AREA ARE
SIGNIFICANTLY DEGRADED. AND TOM
AND SOME OF THE CORRIDORS IT'S
OVER TEN TO FIFTEEN PERCENT OF
THE VEHICLES ARE NOW CLEANER
VEHICLES SO. UNFORTUNATELY WE
ARE PUTS THE BILL WOULD LOOK FOR
TO HAVING OPPORTUNITY TO
POTENTIALLY WORK WITH THE AUTHOR
ON SENTIMENTS WERE YOU
OPPOSITION TO BLOOMS BILL LAST
YEAR. WE WERE WE OUGHT REACH AN
AGREEMENT EVENTUALLY TO.
DROP THE OPPOSITION ON THE
CONDITION THAT ASSEMBLY MEMBER
BLOOM WORK WITH US TO INCREASE
ENFORCEMENT OF HOV LANES BECAUSE
A SIGNIFICANT. CONTRIBUTOR ARE
JUST YEARS.
UNFORTUNATELY THAT HASN'T COME
TO PASS YET WE WELCOME THE
OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH ANY OF
YOU ON FUNDING FOR EACH OF THE
AND FORSMAN.
OKAY THANK YOU OTHERS IN
OPPOSITION.
I SEE NUMBER YOU BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE ETCETERA I THINK THIS
IS A GREAT BILL PERSONALLY. I
THINK OF MY FRUSTRATION IS
ALWAYS BEEN THAT PEOPLE THAT CAN
AFFORD THESE ZERO EMISSION
VEHICLES HERE TO USE THE CARPOOL
LANE SO. WHERE APPROPRIATE COULD
YOU PLEASE ADD ME AS A CO
AUTHOR?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH OTHER
COMMENTS FROM THE COMMITTEE
QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT WE'VE GOT A QUORUM YET
SO THICK YOU CENTER LARA WHEN WE
HAVE A QUORUM WILL VOTE ON YOUR
BILL A CUBE SHERMAN WERE SICK
YOU.
GRAYSON SENATOR PORTANTINO.
THIS IS A FILE ITEM NINETEEN S.
B. THIRTEEN SICK
STEVE.
THANK YOU MISTER VICE CHAIR
ENOUGH MEMBERS.
COLLEAGUES.
THANK YOU FOR HEARING S. B.
THIRTEEN SIXTY. AND I WANT TO.
GIVE A BIG SHOUT OUT TO THE
STAFF FOR WORKING SO CLOSELY
WITH MY OFFICE.
ON THIS IMPORTANT TO A MEASURE
FOR I BELIEVE THE CALIFORNIA
ECONOMY.
WILL ESTABLISH AN EXEMPTION FROM
THE TESTING PROVISION WHERE
PERSON.
CARILLO SIT.
ATTEMPTING TO GET A CALIFORNIA
DRIVER'S LICENSE.
WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL FROM A
FOREIGN COUNTRY.
A CALIFORNIA LEGALLY WITH PROPER
DOCUMENTATION.
HERE SHE HAS TO GET EITHER A
CALIFORNIA ID OR A DRIVER'S
LICENSE AS SOON AS THE RESIDENCY
IS DECLARED.
THE PROCESS ITSELF CAN BE
EXTREMELY ONEROUS.
THE TWENTY FIRST COUNSEL GENERAL
OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA HAS
BEEN WORKING INDEPENDENTLY WITH
VARIOUS STATES AROUND THE
COUNTRY HAVE TO ADOPT A
RECIPROCAL ISSUANCE OF DRIVERS
LICENSE PROGRAM.
SPECIFICALLY WHAT SOUTH KOREA.
AS OF TODAY THERE ARE TWENTY TWO
STATES AROUND THE COUNTRY THAT
HAVE ALREADY ESTABLISHED THE
RECIPROCAL.
ISSUANCE OF DRIVERS LICENSES
WITH SOUTH KOREA. THOSE STATES
ARE MARYLAND VIRGINIA WASHINGTON
MASSACHUSETTS TEXAS.
FLORIDA BARGAIN MICHIGAN IDAHO
ALABAMA WEST VIRGINIA IOWA
COLORADO GEORGIA ARKANSAS SOUTH
CAROLINA TENNESSEE HAWAII
PENNSYLVANIA WISCONSIN. OKLAHOMA
AND ARIZONA. AND I KNOW MY
ASSEMBLY COLLEAGUES. OFTEN PRIDE
THEMSELVES ON CALIFORNIA LEADING
AND HERE WE ARE WE BE TWENTY
THIRD. IN ORDER FOR THIS TO TAKE
PLACE IN WORK EACH REFERENCE
RESPECTED GOVERNMENT MUST
HAVE ESTABLISHED A SUBSTANTIALLY
SIMILAR KNOWLEDGE AND DRIVING
SKILL REQUIREMENTS THAT'S
APPLICABLES HERE. EACH DRIVER
MUST HAVE PASSED THE RESPECTIVE
COUNTRIES WRITTEN TEST
AND ROAD TEST PRIOR TO A DRIVERS
LICENSE BEING ISSUED BY EITHER
SIDE. S. B. THIRTEEN SIXTY
ESTABLISHES THE CALIFORNIA
VERSION OF THIS PROGRAM.
IF YOU HAVE A CLEAN SOUTH KOREA
DRIVING RECORD THEN YOU'RE NOT
REQUIRED TO TAKE THE DRIVING
PORTION OF THE TEST.
I BELIEVE SUCH.
SO I WILL LEAVE SUCH A WILL
ENCOURAGE THIS WILL ENCOURAGE
FRIENDSHIP AND COOPERATION AS
WELL AS PROMOTE INVESTMENT
BETWEEN EACH PUT PERSPECTIVE
COMPANY. COUNTRY MOREOVER THIS
WILL REDUCE TIME AND RESOURCES
THAT THE DMB HAS TO MAKE. IN THE
PROCESS OF APPLYING FOR A
DRIVER'S LICENSE FASTER AND
EASIER. THE BILL HAS THE SUPPORT
OF THE INLAND KOREAN AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION THE NATIONAL
UNIFICATION ADVOCACY
ALSO KOREAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE.
THE KOREAN INVESTORS AND TRADES
ASSOCIATION AND MANY MANY OTHERS
CALIFORNIA IS PERHAPS THE
LARGEST ECONOMIC PARTNER WITH
SOUTH KOREA DWARFS THOSE OTHER
TWENTY TWO.
STATES.
THIS IS GOOD FOR KOREAN
AMERICANS IT'S GOOD FOR AMERICAN
BUSINESSES IT'S GOOD FOR. KOREAN
BUSINESS PEOPLE IT'S ALL AROUND
POSITIVE FOR OUR STATE. AND
THERE'S A MODEL OF SUCCESS IN
TWENTY TWO OTHER STATES WITH ME
TODAY ON BEHALF OF THE CREAM
COUNSEL GENERAL IN LOS ANGELES
IS DEPUTY COUNSEL GENERAL. IN
SONG LONG BUT HERE TO TESTIFY
BIRTHING CENTER PLEASE THANK YOU
LIEUTENANT.
THE ONLY OPPOSED A KOREAN
GOVERNMENT AND COULD IN PEOPLE I
THINK YOU SO MUCH FOR GIVING ME
THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ABOUT.
HOW THIS BILL ON THE PRIVATE
THREATENS PROGRAM?
WILL BENEFIT BOTH CALIFORNIA AND
SOUTH KOREA.
THAT'S YOU KNOW CALIFORNIANS
SOUTH KOREA SHOW LONGSTANDING
TIES THAT CONTINUE TO SHAPE AND
BENEFIT BOTH REGIONS.
SOUTH KOREA IS THE SIXTH LARGEST
TRADING PARTNER. TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA WITH OVER ONE HUNDRED
NINETEEN BILLION DOLLARS IN BY
IT FOR TRAIT.
THE LA CUSTOMS DISTRICT IS THE
GATEWAY FOR MORE THAN ONE
SERVICE OVER KOREA US TREATING
CONFLICTS.
BUT INVESTMENT FROM KOREA TO
CALIFORNIA IS TWO POINT THREE
BILLION DOLLARS WHICH HAVE HAVE
CREATED TENS OF SUDDEN DROPS IN
CALIFORNIA SINCE TWO THOUSAND
THREE.
ACCORDING TO THE RECENT DATA.
OVER SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND KOREANS AND KOREAN
AMERICANS ARE LEAVING IN
CALIFORNIA.
AND TEN THOUSAND KOREANS DIDN'T
OUT HERE TO STUDY MORE OVER.
BUT INCREASING NUMBER OF
ACCORDIONS UP VISITING
CALIFORNIA EVERY YEAR.
FIVE HUNDRED TEN YOU THOUSAND
KOREANS VISITED CALIFORNIA IN
TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN JUST LAST
YEAR.
THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT AND THE
KOREAN PEOPLE THROWING IT
BELIEVES THAT.
DISPUTATION WITH GREATLY BENEFIT
BOTH SOUTH KOREA AND THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA FIRST.
EVEN THAT A DRIVERS LICENSE IS
THE FIRST THING TO DO CLOSER
CUTTING DOWN. AS A STATE RIGID
AND HIS BILL WOULD MAKE IT
SETTLE DOWN PROCESS EASIER AND
FASTER.
BY REDUCING TESTING REQUIREMENT
FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BETTY DRIVE
US RIGHT SINCE FROM KOREA.
SECONDLY.
THIS BILL WILL REDUCE THE TIME
AND COST FOR KIM BEEFY THE
OFFICES.
BECAUSE PEOPLE WITH BETTY
DEPRIVE RIGHT SINCE FROM SOUTH
KOREA DON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH
FULL LICENSING PROCESS. THOSE
DECREASING THE DMB UP UC'S
WORKLOAD
CERTAINLY. THIS BILL WOULD BE A
SIGNIFICANT SIGN OF CALIFORNIA'S
OPENNESS.
AND FRIENDLINESS.
FOR SOUTH KOREANS. AND THE DEVIL
YOU DON'T PROMOTE TRADE AND
INVESTMENT BY CREATING BRIDGES
FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT. INCOME
GREW JOHN I BELIEVE THAT THIS
BILL ON DRIVER'S LICENSE PROGRAM
IT'S MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL TO
KOREA AND CALIFORNIA. AND IF YOU
DO EXPAND AND THAT THE BEST
APPRENTICESHIP AND CORPORATION.
I HOPE THAT THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA WITH JOINED A TWENTY
TWO OF THE STATE
INCLUDING IDAHO OREGON ARIZONA.
THAT HAVE ALREADY MADE A SIMILAR
RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS WITH KOREA
THAT SORT IS ONE HUNDRED SO YOU
ONE COUNTRIES.
OVER THE WORK.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH ALRIGHT
OTHERS IN SUPPORT.
IS THERE ANY OPPOSITION TO THIS
BILL.
BUT SEE NONE ANY COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE.
YES SENATOR GAINES.
WAS TRYING TO KILL
CLARIFICATION.
BECAUSE AT LEAST FROM MY
ANALYSIS IT'S INDICATING THAT.
IF YOU HAVE A KOREAN LICENSE YOU
CAN. CURRENTLY DRIVE A
CALIFORNIA SET BACK IS THAT
CORRECT AND THAT IS CORRECT
MOTION. FROM MOST COUNTRIES IF
YOU COME HERE ON VACATION. AND
YOU.
THE YOU KNOW USURER. EUROPEAN OR
ASIAN.
OUR ANY OTHER COUNTRY LICENSE
YOU CAN DO AS AS A TOURIST.
BUT UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW THE
MOMENT YOU ESTABLISH A
RESIDENTS.
THAT'S WHAT TRIGGERS A SECOND
STEP AND AT THAT POINT YOU'RE
SUPPOSED TO GET A CALIFORNIA
LICENSE AND SO WHAT THIS WOULD
DO. IS IF YOU GONE THROUGH THE
KOREAN DRIVER'S LICENSE PROGRAM.
IF YOU WHICH IS SUBSTANTIALLY
SIMILAR TO CALIFORNIA'S IF YOU
HAVE A CLEAN RECORD. AT THAT
POINT YOU CAN GET YOUR
CALIFORNIA LICENSE WITHOUT
HAVING TO DO CERTAIN EXTRA HOOPS
BECAUSE YOU'VE ALREADY DONE THAT
IN YOUR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
OKAY AND THEN SO THAT'S WHAT
IT'S THAT'S WHAT IT'S HELPING TO
TO PRODUCE YA KNOW.
IT'S A THE QUESTION I HAVE
SENATOR IS.
SHOULD WE DO SOMETHING FOR FOR
ANYBODY THAT WOULD COME. I MEAN
SHE SHE WE HAVE THE SAME
STANDARD FOR ANYBODY COMING TO
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WITH.
THE DESIRE TO GET A DRIVER'S
LICENSE EXISTS THE ANSWER IS YES
AND NO. IF THAT PERSON IS COMING
FROM A PLACE THAT HAS
SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR.
DRIVING STANDARDS AND DRIVING
TEST THAT'S COMPARABLE TO
CALIFORNIA AND THEY HAVE A CLEAN
RECORD. THAT SOMETHING WE SHOULD
LOOK THROUGH IN THIS CASE KOREA
DOES OCCUR.
ACTUALLY I PERSONALLY MET WITH
THEIR.
DEPARTMENT OF.
POLICE SAID THERE WROTE FOLKS I
ACTUALLY TOOK A TRIP THERE TO TO
TO GO THROUGH THIS WITH THEM.
AND SO THAT'S WHY I FEEL
CONFIDENT IN THIS SO YES IF IF
SOMEBODY IS SUBSTANTIALLY TO OUR
STANDARDS WE SHOULD LOOK AT
DOING A MORE COMPREHENSIVE THING
IN THIS CASE SOUTH KOREA DOES.
AND GIVEN THE NUMBER OF SOUTH
KOREAN BUSINESS FOLKS IN
FAMILIES THAT ARE HERE. THIS
WILL HELP CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMY
IN THE GREEN ECONOMY.
THANK YOU CENTER PORTANTINO.
OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE
COMMITTEE.
PRICING THEN WE HAVE WE DON'T
HAVE A QUORUM SO WE HAVE A
QUORUM WILL TAKE YOUR BILL UP
FOR CONSIDERATION THANK YOU VERY
MUCH AND AGAIN I'D LIKE TO THANK
THE STAFF FOR WORKING WITH MY
OFFICE TO TO GET THIS IN A PLACE
WHERE I KNOW THE CHAIR IS. GOING
TO BE SUPPORTIVE SO THANK YOU
GREAT THANK YOU.
SENATOR GALGIANI WOULD YOU LIKE
TO RECEIVE YOUR BILL.
THIS IS A S. B. THIRTEEN OH
SEVEN UP FILE ITEM SEVENTEEN.
WELL YOU HAVEN'T.
OKAY WE'LL HAVE AN AUTHOR SO.
BUT MANY OTHER AUTHORS COME
COMING TO OF THE COMMITTEE.
WHERE SHUT DEL PROBABLY TO
THIRTY SO? WE. AUTHORS HERE THAT
WOULD BE GREAT.
OKAY
THREE.
OKAY.
SENATOR I WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE
UP A FILE AND FIVE SP NINE THREE
SIX.
WOULD YOU CONSIDER YOU COULD SIT
DOWN YOU CAN SET UP WHATEVER
YOUR PREFERENCES.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR IT'S GOOD
TO SEE YOU RUNNING SUCH AN
OFFICIALS MEETING.
.
I. LOVE TO HAVE YOU JOIN US SO
YOU CAN DO THIS MORE OFTEN.
THAT ABOUT SUMS S. B. NINE
THIRTY SIX WILL ENSURE THE
CALIFORNIA PLANS RESPONSIBLY FOR
THE POTENTIAL WHITE SKILLED
REDUCTION.
OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES TO PREVENT
HIS NEW TECHNOLOGY FROM ADDING
TO OUR SERIOUS CLIMATE CLEAN AIR
AND TRAFFIC CHALLENGES.
NOW THAT WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS
DIFFICULT ISSUE QUITE A BIT ON
OUR COMMITTEE. AND YOU KNOW WE
DO BELIEVE THAT OUT DATA EITHER
AUTOMATED VEHICLES PRINCE
REPRESENT A PIVOTAL MOMENT FOR
OUR SOCIETY SOME PEOPLE SAY
THAT.
YOU KNOW.
THE CHANGES BROUGHT ON BY THIS
NEW TECHNOLOGY WILL BE AS
IMPACTFUL SEEN INVENTION OF THE
AUTOMOBILE ITSELF.
NOW BEFORE AUTOMOBILES ARE
CITIES AND TOWNS WERE AS BIG AS
WE COULD WALK COMFORTABLY. WE
WERE CLOSE TO HOME GETTING
AROUND. WAS.
WAS WAS.
YOU KNOW CONFINED BY THE BY THE
SPACE THAT WE HAD.
I BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE THESE
VEHICLES TO TO TRAVEL AND
AGAIN EXPAND OUR CITIES.
BOB BUT INDIVIDUAL VEHICLE
OWNERSHIP HAS TRANSFORM SOCIETY
OFFERING GREATER MOBILITY
FREEDOM BUT ALSO CAUSING OTHER
IMPACTS CONGESTION AND AIR
POLLUTION AND REDUCING.
PUBLIC HEALTH ETCETERA SO
RESEARCH ALREADY UNDER WAY
AROUND THE WORLD SHOWS THAT THE
DEVELOPMENT OF OUR TIME
AUTOMATED VEHICLES WILL BE
EQUALLY REVOLUTIONARY WITH THE
POTENTIAL FOR BOTH POSITIVE. AND
NEGATIVE RESULTS ARE NEEDED.
SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT IF WE HAVE.
WIDESPREAD ADOPTION OF A VISA
COULD HELP TO REALIZE A UTOPIAN
SOCIETY WHERE AARON CLIMATE
POLLUTION FROM VEHICLES GRIDLOCK
TRAFFIC IN OUR LONG COMMUTES.
SPRAWLED BE ALL THE THINGS OF
THE PAST.
BUT SOME PEOPLE ALSO SUGGESTED
IN IF WE HAVE TOO MANY EIGHT VIS
WE COULD HAVE A NIGHTMARE
SCENARIO WHERE INDIVIDUAL
VEHICLE TRAVEL IS MADE
CONVENIENT ALL THE PROBLEMS.
RIGHT BY OUR CURRENT SYSTEM OR
WORSENED THAT THERE COULD BE WE
CAN OPEN OURSELVES UP TO.
TO HACKING THE KIDS TAKE DOWN
OUR ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION GREAT
MUCH MORE EASILY. WE CAN END UP
IN A WORLD WHERE ANTI ATVS MAKE
EXTRA GHOST TRIPS TO PICK UP
THEIR OWNER'S CIRCLE
NEIGHBORHOODS CLOGGING UP
ROADWAYS INSTEAD OF PARKING.
YOU KNOW THESE ARE ALL THESE ARE
ALL KIND OF DOOMSDAY SCENARIOS
THAT WAS TRYING TO THINK ABOUT
FUTURE SO TRY TO THINK ABOUT.
WE'VE SEEN SOME RESEARCH IN
LISBON IN SAN FRANCISCO
SIMULATING THE CONVENIENCE OF
AUTOMATED VEHICLES AND.
THOSE.
SIMULATIONS FOUND THAT ON THE
NATURAL SIMPLY AUTOMATING ARE
INDIVIDUALLY OWNED VEHICLES
WOULD RESULT. IN AN EIGHTY
PERCENT INCREASE IN VEHICLE
MILES TRAVELED.
IN OTHER WORDS DAVIES COULD
ACTUALLY POTENTIALLY UNDO THE
PROGRESS. THAT WE'VE MADE TO
DATE REDUCING POLLUTION AND AND
PROMOTING I WALK WILL BUY
CLOTHES LIKABLE COMMUNITIES IN
PUBLIC TRANSIT REDUCING VEHICLE
MILES TRAVELED ETCETERA SO.
YOU KNOW THESE ARE ALL
DISCUSSIONS.
BABIES A COURSE COULD DEFRAUD
POORLY PLANNED FOR COULD HAVE
THE POTENTIAL TO IMPROVE SOCIETY
WILL BE ON.
THE POTENTIAL SAFETY BENEFITS
THAT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED
SO THIS IS A MOMENT FOR US TO.
FIGURE OUT WHERE WE'RE GOING THE
SAFETY ISSUES THE. THAT THE CITY
PLANNING ISSUES AND WE'RE
BASICALLY ASKING FOR THE OFFICE
OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH TO
CONVENE AN AUTOMATED VEHICLES
SMART.
PLANNING TASK FORCE.
TO DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO
ENSURE THAT IS ADOPTED AT A AS
THE ADOPTION OF THIS TECHNOLOGY
GROWS THIS TRANSFORMATION
ACTUALLY HELPS TO ACHIEVE THE
BENEFITS THAT HAVE BEEN
PROMISED.
UNDER THE AVA IS WHILE AVOIDING
THE VERY REAL POTENTIALLY
PROBLEMATIC IMPACTS THAT COULD
OCCUR IF WE SIMPLY DO NOTHING.
NOW WE'RE GOING TO ACCEPT THE
AMENDMENTS OFFERED THE ANNOUNCES
IN A IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT
THAT. WILL TAKE THE OPPOSITION
OFF OF THE BILL.
THEM WITH WITH US WE HAVE RYAN
AND AND WE CAL STARTING ALSO
JASON VARGAS FROM THE MEAN
CONCERNED SCIENTISTS ONCE BEGIN
SUPPORT THE BILL. HELP ANSWER
QUESTIONS.
CENTER I'M BACK.
THE FUTURE OF.
AFTER BEING GRILLED BY SIR WEI
CHO SKIN JUDICIARY.
SO WHAT CALDERON OUT. BUT WE
HAVE A QUORUM SENATOR ABOUT YOUR
BILL PRESENT CANNELLA HERE
CANNELLA PRESENT ALLEN. ALLEN
PRESENT DODD GAINES. GAINES
PRESENT GALGIANI.
GALGIANI PRESIDENT MCGUIRE
MORALE ROCKS SKINNER BUDAK.
BUDAK PRESENT WITH ASKING HIM
BECAUSE HE PRESENT WIENER.
BELLCORE.
WITNESS SENATOR SENATOR WOULD
YOU LIKE TO.
PATERNAL WITNESSES HAL
WITNESSES IN FAVOR PLEASE.
WELCOME.
GOOD AFTERNOON MR CHAIRED THE
COMMITTEE MEMBERS I'M RANCH YARD
WITH CAL START.
WERE A CONSORTIUM OF TECH AND
CLEAN TECHNOLOGY TRANSPORTATION
COMPANIES HAVE BEEN WORKING FOR
ABOUT TWENTY FIVE YEARS.
CALIFORNIA BILL JOBS INTO THE
INDUSTRY GOT ABOUT A HUNDRED
EIGHTY AYE IN.
AND I'M IN HERE JUST TO SAY
THAT.
YOU WANT SUPPORT OF THE BILL
AND AND WHO WOULD WANT TO SHARE
A FEW THOUGHTS
NUMBER ONE.
AND WHETHER CALIFORNIA IS READY
OR NOT AUTOMATED VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGIES HERE AND IT'S
POISED TO TRANSFORM THE
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM OF
CALIFORNIA. AND THE WAY THAT
CALIFORNIA'S USE IT ON WE
RECENTLY CONVENE A ROUND TABLE
WITH A NUMBER OF INDUSTRY OTHER
STAKEHOLDERS EVER LEFT.
UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE ARE A
NUMBER OF IMPORTANT UNANSWERED
QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT IN THE
INDUSTRY. I'M NUMBER ONE WILL
AUTOMATED VEHICLES HELP OR
HINDER CALIFORNIA IN ACHIEVING
ITS CLIMATE GOALS.
HOW WILL AUTOMATED VEHICLES
AFFECT ME ANTI VEHICLE MILES
TRAVELED?
HOW WILL THEY AFFECT INDIVIDUALS
USE OF TRAIN TRANSIT AND AND
I'M?
AN ACTOR TRANSPORTATION. I'M AND
ALSO HOW WILL IT PROMOTE A SHARE
MOBILITY.
AND AND CARPOOLING.
WE WANT TO SEE AUTOMATED VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGY GROW AND DEVELOP WE
THINK POSES MANY BENEFITS FOR
THE STATE. AND WE ALSO DO WE
NEED TO STUDY THESE THESE ARE
ISSUES IN MORE DEPTH.
WE BELIEVE THAT THE OFFICE OF
PLANNING A RESEARCH ALONG WITH
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS ON AS AN
EXCEPTION STUDIES ISSUES IN AN
ORGANIZED WAY. AND FOR THESE
REASONS WE SUPPORT THE BILL AND
ASK YOU RIGHT UP BACK YOU.
HI MY NAME'S JASON BARBOSA I'M.
MUCH ARE SIX POLICY MANAGER WITH
THE UNION OF CONCERNED
SCIENTISTS AND PLEASED TO SPEAK
IN SUPPORT OF. SB NINE THIRTY
SIX I WON'T. BELABOR THE
POINTSAID OF SENATOR RYAN MADE
BUT.
JUST SAY THAT AB TECHNOLOGY MAY
BE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT
INNOVATION HERE SENSE IN
TRANSPORTATION SINCE THE
INTRODUCTION OF MASS. MASS
INTRODUCTION AUTOMOBILES EARLY
LASSEN.
BUT PUBLIC POLICY WILL NEED TO
GUIDE THE INTRODUCTION OF THIS
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY. FOR
WIDESPREAD ADOPTION TO RESULT IN
POSITIVE OUTCOMES SO. YOU JUST
EXAMINING THE POTENTIAL CLIMATE
IMPACTS OF BABIES.
THE EXISTING LITERATURE SHOWS A
WIDE RANGE OF FUTURES UP FROM A
MORE THAN DOUBLING EMISSIONS ON
THE ONE HAND TO. A REDUCTION IN
MISSION ON THE ORDER OF NINETY
PERCENT ON THE OTHER.
AND THE HIGH EMISSIONS SCENARIO
IS ONE THAT ASSUMES A LARGE
INCREASE IN VEHICLE MILES
TRAVELED RESULTING. FROM.
LOW COST AB TECHNOLOGY COUPLED
WITH INTERNAL COMBUSTION
ENGINES.
I AM SUCH A SCENARIO COULD BE
COMMONPLACE FOR PERSONALLY OWNED
AVISTA SHUTTLE INDIVIDUAL FAMILY
MEMBERS BACK AND FORTH FROM
SCHOOL WORK AND OTHER
ACTIVITIES.
ALLOWING OTHERWISE UNPRODUCTIVE
TIME SPENT VEHICLES TO BECOME
MORE VALUABLE ENCOURAGING
INCREASES IN THE AMOUNT OF
TRAVEL URBAN SPRAWL.
ANOTHER RISK OF COURSE IS THE
VEHICLE TRAVEL WITHOUT ANY
OCCUPANTS WHICH CENTER AROUND
REFER TO.
IN CONTRAST TO LOW EMISSIONS
SCENARIO VISION TO FUTURE OF
SHARED ELECTRIC AND HIGHLY
EFFICIENT AV'S.
VEHICLE CHARGING WOULD YOU
MANAGE IN ORDER TO CUT CARBON
EMISSIONS OPTIMIZE RENEWABLES
INTEGRATION AND PROVIDING US
WITH OUR ELECTRICITY GRID
SERVICES.
AND THIS SCENARIO FAMILIES TO
RELY ON ELECTRIC CAR RIDE
SHARING SERVICES THAT CAN
PROVIDE PREDICTABLE. NON DEMAND
TRANSPORTATION RATHER THAN
OWNING A CAR THEMSELVES.
SO IN SHORT IT IN ORDER TO MEET
OUR GLOBAL WARMING TARGETS WE.
MUST FIND A WAY TO REACH A LOW
MISSION SCENARIO BUT THIS BILL
IS A CRITICAL FIRST STEP TO
IDENTIFY THE CHALLENGES AND AND
POLICY SOLUTIONS TO GET US THERE
THANK.
THANK YOU.
OTHER WITNESSES PLEASE INDICATE
WHO YOU ARE IN YOUR POSITION ON
THE BILL THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SENATOR I THOUGHT RUSS
KNOW ABOUT ROBISON THE
CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSOCIATION
WE DON'T HAVE A POSITION ON THIS
BILL WE HAVE BEEN. WORKING WITH
THE AUTHOR STAFF WE REALLY
APPRECIATE THEM GETTING US
CEDARS TABLE WILL CONTINUE TO
TALK ABOUT THE BILL WITH THEM NO
FLU VACCINE WITH THE
PRISON.-THANK YOU.
JERRY MEMBERS TRUST BUT THAT THE
PERSONAL INSURANCE FEDERATION OF
THE CHURCH IS WE HAD A PROPOSAL
LESS AMENDED POSITION ON THE
BILL BUT THE WHAT THE AMENDMENTS
OUT THERE JUST AGREE TO TAKE.
AMONG HAPPY SAY THAT WE ARE
REMOVING OUR OPPOSITION AND
WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE CHAIR
DOCTOR AND THEIR STAFFS FOR ALL
THEIR HARD WORK.
OF.
PUSHES THE AUTHOR PLEASE.
BETTER GAINES.
BUT I I I'M SORRY PA I WOULD
LIKE TO US FOR OPPOSITION PEOPLE
THAT ARE OPPOSED THIS BILL COME
FOR.
SUSAN CENTER GAMES.
ANY OPPOSITION OKAY.
OKAY CENTER GAINES PLEASE.
I THANK YOU SENATOR ALLEN FOR
BRING THIS FORTNIGHT AYE
SUPPORTED AYE.
.
WAS JUST WONDERING THOUGH IT
SEEMS ACOSTA A LOT OF OTHER
ASPECTS AS IT. HAS TO DO WITH
THE OP OURS.
REGARDING SAFETY AT.
MASS TRANSIT HOUSING PATTERNS
EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS TICKET FINE
REVENUE.
SENIOR MOBILITY.
AND ON AND ON.
AND IF ANYTHING I'D LIKE YOU TO
EXPAND IT SO WE CAN EXPLORE MORE
THAN JUST.
BECAUSE THE MORE NARROW NATURE
OF THAT OF THE LEGISLATION AS IT
EXISTS ASSIGNMENT
MISINTERPRETING AGENDA WE ISHED
LITTLE.
YOU'RE THE SAME QUESTION WHERE
TIMES ARE TALKING TO BILL ABOUT
IT.
I'D YOU D. M. V. IS DOING A LOT
OF WORK IN THE SPACE ALREADY
PARTICULARLY IN THE AREA OF
SAFETY IN THE SOME OTHER
AGENCIES INVOLVED BUT I THINK.
THAT WE'RE. DEBATING DOES I MEAN
I JUST THE CONCERN WAS THAT
THAT.
THERE ARE SO MANY ISSUES WE
WOULD WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT
EVERY OF OF EVERYONE OF THE
ISSUES THAT YOU RAISE PLUS THE
ONES THAT ARE IN THIS BILL WOULD
GET. PROPER ATTENTION AND WHAT'S
THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT TO
CREATE A SECOND HAS FORCED YOU
TO DO IT ALL ON ONE TASK FORCE.
THAT REALLY INSURERS THAT
THEY'RE WILLING WILL BE ADEQUATE
ATTENTION GIVEN TO EVERYTHING.
WE'LL TRY TO FIGURE OUT.
WHAT THE MOST APPROPRIATE MODELS
AND OF COURSE CONVERSATIONS WITH
SOME FOLKS FROM THE
ADMINISTRATION TO?
BUT.
I DON'T DISAREE WITH THE I MEAN
THIS IS IT THE ISSUES RAISED BY
THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY ARE SO
ENORMOUS.
THERE JUST AS YOU SAY SAFETY
ISSUES PLANNING ISSUES SECURITY
ISSUES. PASS CYBERSECURITY
ISSUES ETCETERA.
.
SO.
WHEN I COMMIT TO WORK WITH YOUR
OFFICE AS WE GO FOR THE BILL TO
YOU TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE RIGHT
MODEL. ON A LOOK LIKE WHAT IS IN
THE SECOND TASK FORCE IS IT.
PULLING IT ON THE SAME TASK
FORCE MAYBE STRENGTHENING THE
EFFORTS THAT ARE ALREADY UNDER
WAY IN OTHER AREAS OF THE
ADMINISTRATION.
.
BUT WHAT'S CLEAR TO ME THOUGH IS
THAT WE NEED TO START PAYING
ATTENTION TO THIS ISSUE BECAUSE.
BOB. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT SOME OF
THE.
SOME OF THE FUTURE IS THAT YOU
KNOW WHO THIS IS COMING ARE UPON
US REALLY IF REALLY QUICKLY.
AND.
.
WE NEED TO BE PREPARED NOT GREAT
THANK YOU.
IT WAS BUILT OTHER GOOD
QUESTIONS.
SENATOR CHUCK CLOSE. RESPECT ASK
ABOUT THIRTY PERCENT AGAINST.
OF COLOR PLEASE PACIFIC BELL
NINE THIRTY SIX BY SENATOR ALLEN
THE MOTION IS TO PASS AS AMENDED
AND REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS. SENATOR BAO.
BELL AYE CANNELLA AYE CANNELLA
AYE ALLEN AYE ALLEN AYE DODD.
GAINES GAINES AYE GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE MCGUIRE MORALE
ROTH.
SKINNER BIDAK.
BUT I WOULD TRUST ME BECAUSE HE
AYE.
WE HAVE SOME VOTE CENTER WILL
LEAVE THE ROLL OPEN FOR ABSENT
MEMBERS ARE GALGIANI PERCENT OF
THE BILL.
AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO.
.
S. B. THIRTEEN OH SEVEN.
THIRTEEN OH SEVEN SIR YOU HAVE
THE FLOOR.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
THERE'S A CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED
RAIL AUTHORITY BLACKS THE
STATUTORY AUTHORITY NECESSARY TO
ACQUIRE PROPERTY ON ITS OWN
BEHALF. INSTEAD THE AUTHORITIES
DEPEND ON THREE EXTERNAL
AGENCIES NUMBER ONE THE STATE
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD NUMBER TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND NUMBER
THREE THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
SERVICES. TO ACQUIRE THE
THOUSANDS OF PARCELS ULTIMATELY
NECESSARY TO DELIVER THE HIGHEST
YUBA PROJECT.
NOT ONLY HAS IT RESULTED IN COST
OVERRUNS ITS GOVERNMENT WASTE AT
IT'S BEST TO HAVE THREE AGENCIES
DUPLICATING THE SAME MARK.
THE OTHERWISE SIMPLE PROCESS OF
PURCHASING A PARCEL FROM A
WILLING SELLER HAS AT TIMES BEEN
DELAYED BY MONTHS
SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE
REQUIREMENT THAT AGAIN THREE
AGENCIES DEAL F. DTS AND THE
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD. MUST EACH
SEPARATELY REVIEW AND APPROVE
THE SAME PURCHASE THE TERMS OF
THE PURCHASE CONTRACT AS WELL
SURPRISE NEGOTIATED BY THE
AUTHORITY AND SELLER FOR THE
PROPERTY.
WITHOUT A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION
IS LIKELY THAT THE AUTHORITY
WILL CONTINUE TO
EXPERIENCE-MOUNTING DELAYS AND
PROPERTY
ACQUISITION WHICH WILL TURN. IT
WHICH WILL IN TURN CONTINUE TO
INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS IN BOTH
TIME AND STATE RESOURCES. S. B.
THIRTEEN A SEVEN WHAT AUTHORIZED
HIGH SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY TO
EXERCISE INDEPENDENT ACQUISITION
POWER BY SECURING FOR IT THE
SAME SERIES OF STATUTORY
EXEMPTIONS. ENJOYED BY OTHER
STATE ENTITIES WITH SIMILAR
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE
DELIVERY OF MULTI CAR SOLD
MEGAPROJECTS.
THIS BILL WOULD PROVIDE THE SAME
SERIES OF STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS
ENJOYED BY OTHER SIMILARLY
SITUATED STATE ENTITIES SUCH AS
CALTRANS. DEPARTMENT OF WATER
RESOURCES AND THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA.
GREATER INDEPENDENCE OVER ITS
ACQUISITION POWELL WAS RESULT IN
BOTH DIRECT SAVINGS IN TIME AND
THE FREEING UP OF SIGNIFICANT
STATE RESOURCES AT OTHER STATE
OFFICES. CURRENTLY DUPLICATING
THE WORK NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ITS CONSIDERABLE PROPERTY
ACQUISITION NEEDS.
THE KEY OVERSIGHT ROLE WILL
REMAIN WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS
BOARD AS THE ENTITY RESPONSIBLE
FOR OVERSEEING AND APPROVING THE
AUTHORITIES USE OF EMINENT
DOMAIN DOMAIN. THIS BILL WILL
HELP AVOID FEATURE COST OVERRUNS
AND DELAYS AND DELIVERING THE
PROJECT BY THE AUTHORITY HAS
DONE A LOT OF WORK TO TRY TO
ADDRESS SOME OF THESE ISSUES.
THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES
THIS CHANGE IS LONG OVERDUE. I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR A AYE VOTE.
BIG.
SPEAKERS IN FAVOR.
OF CENTERS OR SOMEBODY FROM THE
HIGH SPEED RAIL THEIR.
THEY CAN COME UP IN LONG.
OKAY GOOD.
HAVE WE HAVE BORROWED MONEY
HERE WITH HIGH STRUGGLING
ALREADY.
OH OKAY SPEAKERS OPPOSING THE
BILL JUSTICE FOR.
OKAY.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS QUESTIONS.
NO.
AUG CENTER I SUPPORT THE BILL I
THINK DITTO.
THE BILL.
ADDRESSES A PARTICULAR ISSUE
THAT THE HIGH SPEED RAIL
AUTHORITY. DEFINITELY NEEDS TO
ADDRESS SO. I APPLIED FOR BRING
THIS BILL TO US.
.
THE HIGH SPEED RIO.
REPORTS THOUGH THAT WE HAD HAD
A.
.
HI VACANCY RATE.
AMONG A LOT OF EMPLOYEES AND.
.
CONTACT A OUR CALTRANS RIGHT
AWAY ATTORNEYS AND SO FORTH SO
WE NEED TO.
FIGURE OUT.
HOW WE CAN HAVE ENOUGH?
PEOPLE ACTUALLY DO THE WORK CAN
GET.
THE JOB DONE TERMS OF RIGHT
AWAY.
AND NAM.
THEY.
.
WHAT ASSURANCES WE HAVE FROM THE
HIGH SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY THAT?
THE FIRST THE PROCEDURES AND
STREAMLINE THE CENTER GO CHINESE
BILL.
THE INTEL'S WILL BE USED BY THE
AUTHORITY.
TO.
.
EXPEDITE RIGHT AWAY PROCESS.
TO IT'S GOOD BILL THAT WE NEED
TO HAVE PEOPLE ACTUALLY USE IT.
S..
ABSOLUTELY AND MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS BARBERINI WITH A
CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL
AUTHORITY I APPRECIATE. THAT
YOUR QUESTION MISCHA CHAIRMAN
BELT.
AS A. SENATOR GALGIANI POINTED
OUT THIS.
THESE EXEMPTIONS TO THE
PROPERTY ACQUISITION LAW ALREADY
EXISTS TODAY FOR.
OTHER AGENCIES FOR EXAMPLE
CALTRANS CALTRANS ALREADY HAS
THIS AND AND SO IN TERMS OF.
THE AUTHORITY MOVING FORWARD WE
ALREADY CONTRACT NOW WITH
CALTRANS WE'VE ACTUALLY HIRED
MANY OF THE CALTRANS STAFF THAT
EARLY VERY SEASONED. AYE IN
THESE PROCESSES ARE VERY
EXPERIENCED OFFICE.
SO MOVING FORWARD WE ARE NOT
GOING TO REINVENT THE WHEEL WE
PLAN TO MODEL THE AUTHORITIES
PROGRAM.
AFTER ALL THE SUCCESSFUL
PROGRAM WITH THE WITH CALTRANS.
I THINK IT.
OTHER QUESTIONS O. SINAN.
THERE WERE CLOSE.
I RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR IDOL
THANK YOU EMOTIONALISM. WE HAVE
MUCH.
OKAY.
OF CALL THE ROLL PLEASE THE
SENATE BILL THIRTEEN OF SEVEN BY
SENATOR GALGIANI MOTION IS TO
PASS AND REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR ABOUT AYE AYE BELL AYE
CANNELLA AYE AYE CANNELLA AYE
ALLEN.
ALLEN AYE DODD.
GAINES.
GAINES NO GALGIANI AYE GALGIANI
AYE MCGUIRE MORALE. ROTH
SKINNER BY DR. BUT ACT NO
BECAUSE IT WIENER.
THOSE FOUR VOTES IN FAVOR OF
LEADER ROLF PERHAPS MEMBERS.
THE CENTER NEWMAN YOU MAY
PRESENT YOUR BILL WELCOME.
SENATOR NEWMAN AYE BELIEVE YOU
HAVE.
I AM TWENTY ONE IS SPEECH
PORTANTINO SEVEN.
.
YOU MAY PRESENT VOTING QUEUE
ARAMIS CHAIRMAN SECURING
SENATORS. SP FOURTEEN OH SEVEN
WILL ALLOW CALIFORNIA DRIVERS
WHO PAY AN ADDITIONAL FEE TO
RECEIVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE PHOTO
OF WHICH THEY CAN BE DULY PROUD.
OR IF YOU HAVE ONE LIKE MINE AT
LEAST NOT ASHAMED.
THE IN DOING SO S. B. FORTINO
SEVEN WILL ALLOW US TO DO
SOMETHING IMPORTANT.
CREATING A NEW REVENUE STREAM
THAT WILL GENERATE FUNDS TO
BRING DRIVERS EDUCATION BACK TO
CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
OVER THE PAST THREE DECADES IN
THE FACE OF SHIFTING PRIORITIES
RESULTING FROM CHANGES IN
EDUCATION PRACTICE AN EVER
INCREASING FISCAL CONSTRAINTS
THE OFFERING OF DRIVERS
EDUCATION. HAS BEEN MOSTLY
ENTIRELY REMOVED FROM
CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN
OUR STATE SHAPED AS IT'S BEEN BY
THE HISTORY AND CULTURE THE
AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS EDUCATION WAS
ONCE A COURSE STAPLE. OF EVERY
CALIFORNIA'S HIGH SCHOOL
EXPERIENCE AT PRESENT HOWEVER IN
THE FACE OF SO MANY OTHER
FUNDING CHALLENGES VERY FEW
PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN CALIFORNIA CAN
CURRENTLY FOR THE STAFF OR OTHER
RESOURCES TO OFFER HIGH SCHOOL
STUDENTS. INSTRUCTION IN VEHICLE
OPERATION AND TRAFFIC SAFETY.
AND THE DISAPPEARANCE OF
DRIVER'S ED FROM SCHOOL
CURRICULA IS NO MERE HISTORICAL
WRINKLES WITH DRIVERS AT AFFECT
WHO DISAPPEARED IN THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL SYSTEM. ANYONE SEEKING TO
EARN HIS OR HER LICENSE BEFORE
THE AGE OF SEVENTEEN YEARS AND
SIX MONTHS HAVE NO CURRENT
RECOURSE OTHER THAN TURNING TO
PRIVATE DRIVING SCHOOLS FOR
TRAINING. AT A COST TYPICALLY IN
EXCESS OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS
OR MORE. THE NET EFFECT OF THIS
SHIFT TO PRIVATIZE DRIVERS
EDUCATION ARE TWO FOLD FIRST
YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE WITHOUT A
DRIVER'S LICENSE ARE FAR LESS
LIKELY TO ENTER THE WORKFORCE TO
DO THE KINDS OF TYPICAL JOBS TO
DO SO MUCH TO PREPARE THEM. FOR
THEIR NEXT STEPS IN EDUCATION
AND IN INDUSTRY. AND SECOND OF
STUDIES HAVE SHOWN IN THEIR
FIRST DECADE BEHIND THE WHEEL
YOUNG DRIVERS WHO HAVE NOT
COMPLETELY DRIVER'S EDUCATION
COURSE TEND TO BE MUCH MORE
PRONE TO ACCIDENTS. AND OTHER
SAVED UNSAFE DRIVING BEHAVIORS
AND DRIVERS WHO HAVE.
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF AS
BEFORE TO KNOW SEVEN CALIFORNIA
DRIVERS WILLING TO PAY A PREMIUM
FOR A MORE FLATTERING DRIVER'S
LICENSE PHOTO WOULD BE OFFERED
TO NEW OPTIONS AS PART OF THE
LICENSING PROCESS.
FIRST THE OPTION OF HAVING
ADDITIONAL PHOTOS TAKEN AT THE
DMV OFFICE SO AS TO ENSURE AN
AMENABLE PHOTO ON THEIR LICENSE.
AND SECOND THE OPTION OF HAVING
THE DRIVER'S LICENSE PHOTO TAKEN
BY AN ACCREDITED ENTITY SUCH AS
A PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER AND
COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS
PROVIDED PROVIDED BY DMV. IN
MUCH THE SAME MANNER ASTHE U.
S. STATE DEPARTMENT CURRENTLY
PROVIDES PASSPORT PHOTOS. THE
BILL WOULD REQUIRE THE
DEPARTMENT TO ESTABLISH A FEE
FOR EACH ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPH
REQUESTED AS SPECIFIED WOULD
REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO
DEPOSIT THE REVENUE DERIVED FROM
THE ADDITIONAL FEES INTO INTO A
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCOUNT. I IN THE
STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND MONIES
DEPOSITED INTO THAT ACCOUNT
WOULD BE USED BY THE DEPARTMENT
UPON APPROPRIATION BY THE
LEGISLATURE TO SUPPORT DRIVER
EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAMS
IN CALIFORNIA.
AS WITH OHER CRITICAL SKILLS
DRIVERS EDUCATION SHOULD BE A
FUNDING PRIORITY FOR THE STATE
IN THE ERA OF FACEBOOK AND
INSTAGRAM WHERE IMAGE SEEMS TO
BE EVERYTHING S. B. FORTINO
SEVEN. WHICH I LIKE TO REFER TO
AS PHOTO A CHOICE WILL CREATE A
SIMPLE BUT EFFECTIVE MECHANISM
FOR GENERATING REVENUES FOR
INCREASING ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE
DRIVERS ED IN CALIFORNIA. I
RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR AYE VOTE
TODAY THANK YOU WITH ME TO
TESTIFY IS MISTER JABER MALTESE
WHO'S WITH THE AUTOMOBILE
ASSOCIATION AMERICAN WITH A
CALIFORNIA. PROVE THE BILL
PLEASE THERE'S MOTIONED
WITNESSES A FAVOR PLEASE.
ALL KEEP IT SHORT THANK YOU VERY
MUCH FOR HAVING US HERE TODAY ON
BEHALF OF TRIPOLI NORTHERN
CALIFORNIAN ARE NEARLY FOUR
MILLION MEMBERS I'D LIKE TO
EXPRESS OUR SUPPORT FOR SENATOR
NEWMAN'S SP FOURTEEN OF SEVEN.
TRIPLE A BELIEVES THAT EVERYBODY
DESERVES THE RIGHT TO HAVE A
DRIVER'S LICENSE PHOTO THAT
REFLECTS THE BEST POSSIBLE
VERSION OF THEMSELVES AND WHILE
DRIVERS ARE REQUIRED TO PAY A
SINGLE DOLLAR MORE AT THE DMV
UNDER THIS BILL. THOSE WHO
CHOOSE TO PAY A SMALLER FEE FOR
EXTRA PHOTOS WILL BE SUPPORTING
DRIVERS EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR
NEW DRIVERS. COULDN'T IEEE. FOR
TRAFFIC SAFETY SIXTEEN AND
SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS ARE ALMOST
FOUR TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN
ADULTS TO BE INVOLVED IN AUTO
CRASHES.
WE APPLAUD SENATOR NEWMAN FOR
FINDING A CREATIVE SOLUTION TO
FIND DRIVERS EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
WHILE ABOUT SELFIE CAN BE
DELETED FROM FACEBOOK WITH THE
SWIPE OF THE FINGER A BAD
DRIVERS LICENSE PHOTO WILL STAY
WITH YOU FOREVER. THANK YOU
SENATOR NEWMAN AND WE ASK FOR
YOUR SUPPORT.
OKAY.
WE HAVE.
SPEAKERS OF IN FAVOR PLEASE.
ABOUT SPEAKERS OPPOSING.
SPEAKERS OPPOSING I PROBABLY.
THAT OKAY OF YOUR QUESTIONS FROM
THE COMMITTEE I HATE TO ASK BUT
GO AHEAD. SURVIVED.
BUT.
GO IT'S A WRITER AT HOW MUCH IS
THIS GOING TO COST.
I'D IT IT WILL BE A MINIMAL FEE
OR A DEMEANING SPEECH WE LIKE TO
SAY IN LATIN. GUY AT THE DMV
PERHAPS FIVE DOLLARS AND THEN.
ON THE OTHER SIDE THE OTHER
OPTION USING HEY PHOTOGRAPHER
THAT THE STATE WOULD GET A SHARE
WHATEVER.
THAT'S A TIE FOR MY CHURCH AND
THEN WITH THEIR I'M I'M MOST
CONCERNED ABOUT LINES AT THE DMV
IS THIS GOING TO I MEAN HOW DO
THEY GET FIVE PICTURES OR I MEAN
AT AT THE MOMENT CENTER VERDICT
IT DID ALLOWS FOR THREE.
AND WE HAVE BEEN CONVERSATIONS
DMV AND WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF
THAT. THAT CONCERN SO WE'RE
GONNA MAKE SURE THAT THE WORK
FLOW BY INCORPORATES IS
PROBABLY.
THANKS.
ORIGINALLY WE HAD UNLIMITED
MOVIE SAID THROUGH IT YOU KNOW.
AMANDA THOUGHT.
THREE IS ABOUT YOU BIGGER THREE
EACH SHOTS OUT OF.
IT DOESN'T WORK THAT'S THE FLOCK
AT HIP DOT ORG IT'S A PERSON
PROBABLY AROUND.
YOU CAN USE IT AND.
PICTURE OF YOURSELF AS A BEAR BY
CHANCE COULD YOU DIED BUT NOT I
DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THAT WOULD
BE ACCEPTABLE AUSTIN THERE'S NOT
ALOT DOUBLE. DECK CUSTOMS WILL
NOT ACCEPT. THAT. THANK YOU.
OKAY OF.
ALRIGHT I'M GLAD WHERE WE HAVE A
MOTION FOR THE BILL.
OTHER QUESTIONS.
SENATE ROTH DIGITAL QUESTION.
OKAY.
YOU MAY CLOSE SOONER CENTER AT
AYE AYE IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO
MY OWN DRIVERS LICENSE PHOTO AND
NOT SHOWING IT TO YOU AND I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR AN AYE VOTE
TODAY.
KALRA PLEASE.
SENATE BILL FOURTEEN NO SEVEN BY
SENATOR NEWMAN THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AND REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR BOUNCE.
YES WELL I CANNELLA I'D CANNELLA
AYE ALLEN. ALLEN AYE DODD
GAINES.
GAINES AYE GALGIANI. GALGIANI
AYE MCGUIRE MORALE ROSS
ROTH AYE SKINNER MIGHT ACT. BUT
I WILL BECAUSE HE WIENER.
OKAY THANK YOU MISTER CONSIDER.
WE GO BACK TO OF VOTE ON SOME
OTHER ITEMS THAT WOULD HAVE
LIKED WITH THE CONSENT CALENDAR
WAS SHARON THAT'S APPROPRIATE
ITEM.
WE HAVE TEN ITEMS ON THE CONSENT
CALENDAR INDICATED WITH
ASTRID'S.
AND.
IS THERE ANYBODY WILLING TO
PULL ONE ITEM ANYTHING ON THE
CONSENT CALENDAR. IF NOT WE HAVE
A MOTION SUPPORTING THAT.
WILL CALL THE ROLL PLEASE.
ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR WHICH
CONSISTS OF FILE ITEMS TO EIGHT
TEN ELEVEN TWELVE FOURTEEN
SIXTEEN EIGHTEEN TWENTY AND
TWENTY TWO. SENATORS ABOUT AYE
BELL AYE CANNELLA. CANNELLA AYE
ALLEN. ALLEN AYE DODD. GAINES
GAINES AYE GALGIANI. GALGIANI
AYE MCGUIRE MORALE. ROTH.
ROTH AYE SKINNER. BY DARK.
BUT I WILL COUNTY WIENER.
OKAY. WHAT?
NO MOVIE TOOK WILL VOTE ON SOME
OF THE OTHER ONES. OKAY WE HAVE
SOME OTHER VOTES.
.
PREVIOUSLY HEARD BY A MEMBERS
ARE LIKE TO MOVE.
ITEM NUMBER SEVEN SP NINE FIVE
SEVEN.
LARA.
IT WE HEARD THAT ONE SO.
THERE'S A MOTION.
CALL THE ROLL PLEASE
THE SENATE BILL NINE FIVE SEVEN
BY SENATOR LARA THE MOTION AS DO
PASS AND REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR ABOUT. BELL AYE CANNELLA
AYE AYE CANNELLA AYE ALLEN.
ALLEN AYE DODD. GAINES.
GAINES AYE GALGIANI GALGIANI AYE
MCGUIRE MORALE ROSS.
ROTH AYE SKINNER BITE ACT BUT I
WILL BECAUSE HE WIENER.
THAT IS SEVEN VOTES IN FAVOR
LEAVE THEIR RULE FOR ABSENT
MEMBERS LIKE TO MOVE ITEM LEFT
FILE ITEM THIRTEEN S. B. ELEVEN
EIGHTY FOUR FACE SENATOR PAM.
THEY CENTER PARENTS BILL S. B.
ELEVEN EIGHTY FOUR RULE KALRA
PLEASE SENATE BILL ELEVEN EIGHTY
FOUR BY SENATOR PANNED THE
MOTION IS DO PASS AS AMENDED AND
REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR ABOUT. BELL AYE CANNELLA
AYE CANNELLA AYE ALLEN ALLEN AYE
DODD GAINES.
GAINES AYE GALGIANI. GALGIANI
AYE MCGUIRE MORALE ROSS.
ROTH AYE SKINNER BIDAK.
THE SECOND.
THOUGH I DOT KNOW WHAT CASTING
WIENER.
WE VOTED NO SIX ONE.
HAVE SIX VOTES IN FAVOR ONE
OPPOSE SO LEAVE THE ROLE
CONTRAPTION BUT LAST ONE ON CALL
IS FILE ITEM NINETEEN S. B.
THIRTEEN SIXTY LIKE TO MOVE THAT
BILL.
CHAIRMAN.
BUT SENATOR PORTANTINO.
OKAY THIS IS I NINETEEN M..
SP THIRTEEN SIXTY WILL CALL THE
ROLL PLEASE.
SENATE BILL THIRTEEN SIXTY BY
SENATOR PORTANTINO THE MOTION IS
TO PASS AND REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR BROWN FELL AYE CANNELLA
AYE CANNELLA AYE ALLEN. ALLEN NO
DODD. GAINES.
BUT IT.
GALGIANI. MCGUIRE MORALE. ROSS.
SKINNER BUT I.
WITHOUT ASKING. WIENER.
ANYONE.
THOSE TWO VOTES WILL BE THE ROLE
EGGMAN.
F. FOR SIR PORTANTINO BUT VOTED
YES.
OKAY.
.
ONLY ONE WAY.
WAIT FOR SERVERS.
ATTY RAN
.
I'M.
OKAY. WE DON'T HAVE ANY
OFFICER-WILL TAKE A FIVE MINUTE
RECESS.
BY LIES.
THE BILL THAT I MONTEREY I'M
PRESENTED WITH CENTER SKINNER
SLIPPED AWAY FOR.
SENATE SKINNER ITEM THROUGH
SCHOOL
IT COMES ORDER PLEASE.
OKAY THERE AGO.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
.
LET'S.
TAKE OUR SEATS EVERYBODY AND
NAM. PEOPLE CALLED ME TO ORDER
AND.
WE'RE GOING TO PROCEED WHERE
THAT.
.
IT IS TIME WHERE THREE BILLS BY
SENATOR SCOTT WIENER AND SCOTT
YOU HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF
PICKING WHICH ONE YOU WANT TO GO
WITH FIRST SO. OUR VERY POWERFUL
AS YOUR CHOICE.
SO I MISTER CHAIRMAN I I'D I'D
LIKE TO START WITH. I SP NINE
THIRTY SEVEN.
LIKE TITIAN FACILITIES AND THEN
I'LL GO TO S. B. NINETY TEAM
HOMELESS YOUTH.
AND THEN.
SP TWENTY EIGHT.
RENO.
SO I. START WITH A THE NINE
THIRTY SEVEN FIVE PERSON ONE TWO
I. WANT TO THANK YOU MISTER
CHAIRMAN ALSO OF THE COMMITTEE
STAFF FOR WORKING WITH US AND
ALSO OTHER STAKEHOLDERS AND DIE
I DO ACCEPT THE COMMITTEE
AMENDMENTS.
CONTAINED IN THE ANALYSIS TACO
EXISTING NINE THIRTY SEVEN BY
INSURERS THAT ARE TWENTY FIRST
CENTURY WORKPLACE.
AT HER WORKFORCE HAS A TWENTY
FIRST CENTURY WORKPLACE BOB BY
REQUIRING EMPLOYERS TO MAKE
ACCOMMODATIONS.
FOR MOTHERS WHO WERE RETURNING
TO WORK AND WHO ARE.
LACTATING AFTER CHILDBIRTH.
BY THIS BILL HAS ALREADY BEEN TO
BOTH THE SENATE.
LABOR AND JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.
AND.
THIS COMMITTEE OF COURSE
EVALUATES THE BUILDING CODE. I'D
CHANGE FOR LACTATION ROOMS IN
NEW CONSTRUCTION.
I CURRENT CALIFORNIA AND FEDERAL
LAW A REQUIRE FLEXIBLE BREAK
TIME.
FOR MOTHERS WHO ARE LACTATING.
AND REQUIRES EMPLOYERS TO
PROVIDE SOME SORT OF SPACE OTHER
THAN A BATHROOM STALL ALTHOUGH
IT'S NOT VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT
WHAT THAT SPACES IN THIS BILL. I
WILL HELP TO FLUSH IT OUT. ONTO
THE POLICY THIS BILL DOES THE
FOLLOWING. BY IN TERMS OF THE
BUILDING CODE REQUIRES.
THAT THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING
COULD BE UPDATED OUGHT TO
INCLUDE NEW LACTATION SPACES AND
I NEW CONSTRUCTION OVER FIFTEEN
THOUSAND SQUARE FEET.
I'VE FOR.
EXISTING BUILDINGS AND
BUSINESSES.
THE BILL REQUIRES EMPLOYERS TO
MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS.
TO INSURE THAT A.
LACTATING.
MOTHER HAS A A PRIVATE SPACE.
AND IS VERY FLEXIBLE IN THE
DEFINITION OF PRIVATE SPACE.
WITHOUT THE BASICS MOTHER CHAIR
WITH A TABLE WITH THE LIGHTS.
WITH ELECTRICAL OUTLET. ó
WHERE THEY CAN.
USE FOR.
FOR EQUIPMENT.
AND.
WITHIN CLOSE DISTANCE OUT TO A
REFRIGERATOR.
I EMPLOYERS IN MULTI TENANT
BUILDINGS I WOULD THAT'S OFFICE
SPACE OR SAY A RETAIL SPACE LIKE
A SHOPPING CENTER. I CAN SHARE
SPACE AMONG THOSE EMPLOYERS AYE
WHICH IS PARTICULARLY HELPFUL
FOR RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS WITH
VERY SMALL SPACES I CAN SHARE
SPACES.
VIS A BILL OUTLINES IMPORTS
FROM PROCESS OF FOR SOME OF THE
PILOT COMPLAINT WITH THE LABOR
COMMISSIONER THERE TONIGHT
ACCESS.
TWO OCTAVES IN SPACE.
AND THEN.
PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.
BE.
BILL HAS PROTECTIONS FOR
RETALIATION AND ALSO REQUIRES
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT. TO
ESTABLISH I'M PUBLICIZE.
BEST PRACTICES THAT WE
VOLUNTARY ASA THAN PLAYERS WHO
WANT TO GO ABOVE AND BEYOND ALL
I CAN DO THAT.
.
FAMILY FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
REALLY MATTER BEAR KEYED TO.
BOTH INFANT HEALTH IN PARENTAL
HEALTH.
KEYED TO EQUITY OF BETWEEN.
THE GENDERS OUT WHEN A NEW
MOTHER HAS TO CHOOSE BETWEEN
CLOUT LACTATING AND PROVIDING
BREAST MILK UP FOR HER NEW CHILD
AND RETURNING TO WORK WERE
ALTERNATELY.
PURCHASING VERY EXPENSIVE.
FORMULA.
DOES A CHOICE.
THAT SHE AND.
HER FAMILY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO
MAKE A WE WANT PARENTS TO BE
ABLE TO A BOND WITH THE NEW
CHILD AND TO HAVE A. NON TOUCH
IDEAS HEALTHY AS POSSIBLE.
BUT WOMEN WITH ADEQUATE BREAK
TIME AND PRIVATE SPACE FOR
LACTATION. OR MORE THAN TWICE AS
LIKELY TO BE BREAST FEEDING.
EXCLUSIVELY AT SIX MONTHS
COMPARED TO WOMEN WHO DON'T HAVE
THE SUPPORT. OF COURSE LOWER
INCOME.
PARENTS ARE PARTICULARLY HARD
HIT WITH A STICK DIFFICULT
CHOICE BETWEEN TWO I GO TO WORK
AND GET PAID. OR DO I STAY AT
HOME AND.
AND.
BREASTFEED UP MY CHILD AUDIT
SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO BOTH AND.
THAT'S WITH THIS BILL. IDEAS
ABOUT.
BUT THIS IS A COMPLICATED
IMPORTANT POLICY.
AND WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH A
BROAD RANGE OF STAKE HOLDERS
INCLUDING THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY
SINCE THE VERY BEGINNING. AND WE
WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT CLOT
AND SOME OF THE AMENDMENTS THAT
WERE TAKING TODAY WHICH WE
WORKED.
WITH THE COMMITTEE ON THE
SUGGESTED TO THE COMMITTEE.
I THINK ARE HELPFUL TO THE
BUSINESS COMMUNITY BUT WE WILL
CONTINUE.
TO WORK OUT WITH EMPLOYERS NOW
WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT.
IT'S A BILL THAT WILL WORK FOR
EVERYONE.
I SO I ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT
COLLEAGUES IN WITH ME TODAY. OUR
AGENDA JERRY FROM THE FROM LEGAL
IT WORK AND ROBBIE GONZALEZ TELL
FROM THE CALIFORNIA
BREASTFEEDING COALITION. THANK
YOU OF CENTER LOW SPEAKERS AND
SUPPORT PLEASE.
THE OF THE FOR.
CHAIR BALLON MEMBERS THE
CALIFORNIA BREASTFEEDING
COALITION IS PLEASED TO BE A CO
SPONSOR OF S. B. NINE THREE
SEVEN BECAUSE IT REMOVES
BARRIERS TO BREAST FEEDING. AND
OUR VISION IS THAT THERE ARE NO
BARRIERS TO BREAST FEEDING.
MELINDA GATES RECENTLY SAID AT
THE SOUTH BY SOUTHWEST
CONFERENCE I QUOTE THE AMERICAN
WORK FORCE HAS EVOLVED
DRAMATICALLY. OVER THE COURSE OF
MY LIFETIME
BUT THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE HAS
BARELY CHANGED AT ALL. IT'S TIME
WE INSIST ON MAKING WORK WORK
BETTER FOR EVERYONE.
S. B. NINE THREE SEVEN. MOVES US
IN THE DIRECTION TO MAKE WORK
WORK BETTER FOR EVERYONE.
AND CREATES A WORKPLACE CULTURE
THAT NORMALIZES LACTATION
SUPPORT AS AN ACCEPTED PART OF
WORK LIFE BALANCE.
MOTHERS ARE THE FASTEST GROWING
SEGMENT OF THE U. S. WORKFORCE
IN SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT ARE
EMPLOYED FULL TIME.
AND MOST WANT TO BREASTFEED AND
THEY DO SO IMMEDIATELY AFTER
BIRTH.
TO CONTINUE TO MAKE THE MILK
SUPPLY WHEN CONTINUING WHEN
RETURNING TO WORK A WOMAN NEEDS
A PRIVATE SPACE WHERE SHE FELT
SAFE AND COMFORTABLE.
AND.
FOR HER TO BE ABLE TO PUMP MILK.
IF SHE DOESN'T HAVE THIS THEN
THE HORMONES. THAT ARE
RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING AND
RELEASING MILK WILL TAKE LONGER
TO BE RELEASED INTO HER
BLOODSTREAM AND THEREFORE
REQUIRE HER TO TAKE A LONGER
BREAK TIME TO PUMP.
SO REASONABLE STE SPACE IS A
VERY VERY IMPORTANT.
BUT BUSINESS IS A GAIN FROM
PROVIDING. LACTATING PARENTS
WITH WORKPLACE SUPPORT IT'S
ASSOCIATED WITH BOTTOM LINE
BENEFITS TO THE EMPLOYER SUCH AS
A THREE TO ONE RETURN ON
INVESTMENT. LOWER ABSENTEEISM
RATES LOWER HEALTH INSURANCE
CLAIMS FOR BUSINESSES.
HELPS RECRUIT AND RETAIN GOOD
EMPLOYEES AND IMPROVES
PRODUCTIVITY EMPLOYEE MORALE.
AND LOYALTY CAN I HELP SEVERAL.
FARMS.
A IMPLEMENT LACTATION
ACCOMMODATION ON THE CENTRAL
COAST AND I'VE SEEN THIS
FIRSTHAND WHERE EMPLOYERS.
SAY THAT THE EMPLOYEES ARE
RETURNING EARLIER BECAUSE
THEY'RE SUPPORTING THEM THEY
HAVE WORKER SHORTAGES AND MOMS
ARE TELLING ME THAT THEY RETURN
EARLIER BECAUSE THEY'RE BEING.
I DO NOT WORK
SO SHE'S ABLE TO MEET HER BREAST
FEEDING GOALS AND HAVE INCOME
AND WE THINK SENATOR WIENER FOR
CARRYING THIS LEGISLATION AND I
ASKED FOR YOUR I SUPPORT THINK
YOU. THE OTHER SPEAKERS PLEASE.
GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME IS KATIE
WHICH IT AND I'M AN ATTORNEY
WITH LEGAL IT OUT WORK AN
ORGANIZATION THAT ADVOCATES ON
BEHALF OF THE RIGHTS OF LOW WAGE
WORKERS. I'M HONORED TO BE HERE
TODAY AS A CO SPONSOR AND TO
EXPRESS OUR STRONG SUPPORT FOR
THE SPELL.
I ALSO WANT TO THANK SENATOR
WIENER FOR HIS LEADERSHIP ON
THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE.
SIMPLY PUT THIS BILL WOULD
ENSURE THAT ALL LACTATING
PARENTS ARE ABLE TO MEET THE
MOST BASIC NEEDS OF THEIR
CHILDREN. PROVIDING THEM WITH
VOTE.
AT LEGALLY THAT WORK WE HEAR
FROM INDIVIDUALS ALL THE TIME
WHO ARE FORCED TO CHOOSE BETWEEN
CONTINUING TO PUMP MILK AND
RISKING THEIR JOBS.
I WANT IT SHARE ONE STORY FROM A
CLIENT HOMELAND WHO WHO WORKED
AT A NEWSPAPER.
SHE CAME BACK TO WORK AFTER
HAVING HER BABY AND SHE ASKED IF
THERE IS A SPACE THAT SHE COULD
PUMP MILK. AND SHE WAS TOLD
EMPLOYEES DON'T DO THAT HERE.
SO SHE HAD TO PUMP OUT HER DESK
COVERED IN A JACKET OR USE THE
BATHROOM UNTIL SHE FINALLY
DECIDED THAT WAS TOO MUCH AND
SHE FOUND A SMALL DIRTY STORAGE
ROOM THAT SHE HAD TO CLEAN OUT
ON HER OWN.
THIS IS NEVER A CHOICE THAT SHE
SHOULD HAVE HAD TO MAKE.
S. B. NINE THREE SEVEN PROVIDES
A SIMPLE SOLUTION THAT WILL
ADDRESS CRITICAL DISPARITIES IN
HEALTH IN EQUITY BY OUTLINING
MINIMUM STANDARDS BASED AND
PRACTICES. THAT WILL ENSURE
WORKERS RECEIVE ADEQUATE SPACE
TO PUMP MILK.
STUDIES SHOW THAT AT SIX MONTHS
EMPLOYEE PARENTS WHO RECEIVE
LACTATION ACCOMMODATIONS ARE TWO
POINT THREE TIMES AS LIKELY TO
EXCLUSIVELY BREASTFEED. AND THEY
CONTINUE TO BE ONE AND A HALF
TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN OTHER
PARENTS FOR EACH MONTH AFTER
THAT TIME.
FOR THESE REASONS WE
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR I VOTE
ON THIS VERY IMPORTANT.
LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT
BREASTFEEDING WORKERS IN THEIR
CHILDREN THANK YOU YOU DO OTHER
SPEAKERS IN FAVOR PLEASE.
AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIR CARE ALSO
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE
IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
ROBINSON WE HAVE THE CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO IN
SUPPORT.
THANKYOU MISTER CHAIRMAN MURS
MUCH TIGHTER WITH CALIFORNIA
LABOR FEDERATION ALSO IN
SUPPORT.
GOOD AFTERNOON DANIEL KENDO
KAISER ON BEHALF OF COMMON SENSE
KIDS ACTION IN STRONG SUPPORT.
THE NASA TELESCOPE ORGANIZER FOR
COMMONSENSE CONNECTION AND ALSO
REPRESENTING SECOND AREA
INDIVISIBLE AND FULL SUPPORT.
MY ENGRAM ACLU OF CALIFORNIANS
SUPPORT.
RANDALL WILLIAMS CALIFORNIA BUT
HEALTH NETWORK IN SUPPORT.
EXCERPTED AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OF
THE CHIU HANDS DISTRICT NINE IN
SUPPORT.
OKAY ARM.
WE HAVE THE SPEAKERS OPPOSING
THIS BILL PLEASE COME FOR
OPPOSING.
PLEASE.
THE BILL IS ARE CONTAINING
AMENDMENTS.
YOU HAVE THE FLOOR.
THE AREA.
HELLO GOOD AFTERNOON MORE CURTIS
ON ME AFTER THE CALIFORNIA
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THANK YOU SO
MUCH FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO
TESTIFY TODAY WE ARE HERE AND OF
AN OPPOSING LOS AMENDED POSITION
ON SB. NINE THIRTY SEVEN AND WE
DO WANT TO THANK THE AUTHOR AND
HIS.
IT'S FOR WORK.
POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS AND.
SPELL HOWEVER WE DO HAVE SOME.
STE STILL HAVE SOME CONCERNS
THAT HAVEN'T BEEN IRONED OUT YET
AND DUCHESS SO THAT EVERYBODY
UNDERSTANDS CURRENTLY UNDER
FEDERAL LAW YOU DO HAVE TO
PROVIDE IS LONGER COVERED BY THE
FLSA YOU JEFF TO PROVIDE A PLACE
THAT'S AND FREE FROM OUR THAT'S
NOT A BATHROOM. AND THAT SOME
COMPLETELY PRIVATE FOR AN
EMPLOYEE TO EXPRESS BREAST MILK
SO THIS IS ALREADY COVERED IN
SOME OF THESE PROVISIONS ARE
COVERED UNDER FEDERAL LAW. AND
ADDITIONALLY WITHIN THE BILL
THERE'S BEEN SOME. THE
MOTIVATION BEHIND IT WAS TO MAKE
IT THE SAME AS A SAN FRANCISCO
ORDINANCE HOWEVER AS THEY
COMMITTEE POINTED OUT IN THE
ANALYSIS IS IT'S DIFFERENT FROM
THE OF SAN FRANCISCO ORDINANCE.
WHICH.
HAS A HARDSHIP EXEMPTION WHICH
ISN'T LIMITED TO A SPECIFIC
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AND ACTUALLY
THERE'S NO PRIVATE RIGHT OF
ACTION WITH IN THAT TO ABSENCES
ORDINANCES ARE TWO BIG ISSUES
THAT THE CHAMBER AND.
OTHER EMPLOYERS HAVE WITH THIS
BILL ADDITIONALLY AND THE. THEIR
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS THAT EVEN
IF AN EMPLOYEE OR WORK TO
PROVIDE A REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATION THAT THEY COULD
STILL BE.
THERE COULD STILL BE A CAUSE OF
ACTION AGAINST THEM FOR EXAMPLE
THE EMPLOYER MUST MAINTAIN
RECORDS FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY
THREE YEARS SO EVEN IF THEY WERE
TO WILL PROVIDE A REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATION. THEY COULD.
BE UNDER VIOLATION OF THIS
PROVISION.
THREE YOUR REQUIRE.
ADDITIONALLY THAT'S THERE'S A
ONE SIDED OWNERS REQUIRE.
TO THE EMPLOYEE I DO UNDERSTAND
SOME OF THESE WERE GOING.
MARCHERS SARS CLARITY WISE WHICH
ONES WERE GOING TO BE AND.
OUR CONCERN IS THAT THIS WOULD
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LITIGATION
AGAINST EMPLOYERS.
FINALLY THIS BILL IS PLACED IN
THE LABOR CODE UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT
HOUSING ACT ALREADY OF REQUIRES
THAT AN EMPLOYER NOT RETALIATE
OR DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AN
INDIVIDUAL WHO IS REQUESTING
LACTATION ACCOMMODATION. AND WE
FELT THIS WOULD BE A BETTER FIT
IN THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT HOUSING
ACT.
THE OTHER SPEAKERS PLEASE MISTER
CHAIR MEMBERS CHRIS MACARIA I'M
ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION AND I.
SORRY FOR CENTER WIENER HEARING
OUR COMMENTS FOR A THIRD AND
HOPEFULLY FINAL POLICY COMMITTEE
TIME.
.
WE HAVE NO ISSUE WITH THE
LACTATION ACCOMMODATION IN FACT
CALIFORNIA'S HAD AN
ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS SINCE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWO. BY YOUR
COMMITTEE ANALYSIS AT THE END A
COMMENT THREE NOTES.
BASICALLY AMENDING THE BILL TO
REFLECT THE SAN FRANCISCO
ORDINANCE AND THAT IS WHAT WE
UNDERSTAND AND HOPE WE CAN WORK
TOWARDS A WAS CENTER WIENER AND
HIS STAFF AND I WOULD ECHO MISS
CURTIS'S COMMENTS THAT.
CENTER WIENER AND HIS STAFF HAVE
BEEN VERY ACCOMMODATING.
WITH THEIR TIME HOUR ISSUE IS
COMPLIANCE.
IN PARTICULAR AND LET ME JUST
HIGHLIGHT THE FOUR SECTIONS THAT
WERE BY DISCUSSING WHICH CENTER
WIENER AND HIS STAFF THE FIRST
IS IN SECTION TWO. SUBDIVISION
G. WHICH IS THE EMPLOYEES. OF
FIVE INDIVIDUAL A LIMITATION ON
THE USE OF THE HARDSHIP
EXEMPTION WE'D LIKE TO SEE THAT
PROVISION ELIMINATED. THE SECOND
ITEM IS IN SECTION THREE OF THE
BILL SUBDIVISION WHICH
PROVIDES FOR THE PRIVATE RIGHT
OF ACTION OF COURSE THE LABOR
COMMISSIONER. AS WITH OTHER
PROVISIONS OF THE LABOR CODE
SHOULD HAVE. A THE AUTHORITY
OVER THIS AREA BUT WE DO NOT
WANT A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION
TO BE INCLUDED.
THE THIRD SAID.
ITEM IS IN SECTION FIVE WHICH
IS THE USE OF THE MODEL POLICY
AND STANDARDS. AND ARE CONERNED
THERE IS ESSENTIALLY IF THE
EMPLOYER ABIDES BY IT WILL THERE
BE SOME SORT OF LIMITATION OR.
AYE ON LIABILITY OR SOME SORT OF
IMMUNITY IF THEY ARE COMPLYING.
WITH THOSE GENERAL MODEL
STANDARDS AND SO AGAIN WE
CONTINUE TO. LOOK FOR TO WORKING
WITH SENATOR WIENER AND HIS
STAFF TO RESOLVE THESE REMAINING
CONCERNS THANK YOU.
PLEASE OTHERS SPEAKERS SUPPOSED.
A FRIEND BORDERS ON BEHALF OF
THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
JOINT POWERS AUTHORITIES
RESPECTFULLY OPPOSE UNLESS
AMENDED FOR THE REASONS STATED.
THE CHAIR MEMBERS MATTHEW HARD
WITH THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS
PROPERTY ASSOCIATION HERE TODAY
REPRESENTING THE NUMBER OF
DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
GROUPS.
WE CONCUR WITH THE EMPLOYER
ISSUES WE HOWEVER WORKING
SEPARATELY WITH OFTEN STAFF ON
SOME ISSUES HAVING TO DO WITH
HOW YOU ACTUALLY MAKE THIS WORK
PRACTICALLY HOW YOU TAKE AN
EXISTING BUILDING. AND PUT ONE
OF THESE ROOMS IN THERE NOW WHEN
YOU'RE GOING TO ATTEND AND PROVE
MEANT THAT WE HAD GREAT
CONVERSATIONS WITH THE STAFF AND
OFTEN WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING
WITH THEM IN RESOLVING THESE
ISSUES AS WE MOVE FORWARD THANK
YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON BRIAN LITTLE
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU
FEDERATION OPPOSE LIST AMENDED
FOR THE REASONS ARTICULATED BY
MY COLLEAGUE FROM CHAMBER THANK
YOU.
OKAY NAM.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH WE HAVE
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE.
CENTER ROTH PLEASE.
TING ISTER CHAIR JUST A COMMENT
XIN I'VE SPENT DECADES PRIOR TO
COMING HERE. OFTENTIMES ON THE
OTHER SIDE OF ISSUES.
FORTUNATELY NOT LIKE THIS ONE.
BUT THE.
.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS ISSUE WAS
RECENTLY BROUGHT HOME TO ME WHEN
OUR DAUGHTER HAD THE MOTHER OF
OUR TWELVE WE CALLED. GRAND
BABY.
ACTUALLY HAD RETURNED WORK.
SO THIS ISA VERY VERY IMPORTANT
ISSUE OBVIOUSLY LISTENING TO.
SOME OF THE OPPOSITION IN
READING SOME OF THE LETTERS AND
OBVIOUSLY THE THE BILL ON THE
ANALYSIS THERE.
MAY STILL BE SOME ISSUES THAT
REMAIN WHETHER THE OF THE ISSUES
WITH THE PRIVATE RIGHT OF
ACTION.
DEFINITION OF THE EXEMPTIONS OR
MAYBE EVEN THE DEFINITION OF
ADEQUACY OF A BREAK.
BUT I DO APPRECIATE THE AUTHOR
FOR NUMBER ONE BRINGING THIS
FORWARD AND I ALSO APPRECIATE
THE FACT THAT THE AUTHOR IS
WILLING TO. SIT DOWN WITH THE
BUSINESS COMMUNITY.
WHICH IS WIDE RANGING WITH A
WHOLE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT
ISSUES COMING TO IT FROM
DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS.
IT'S SITTING DOWN WITH THE
BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO TRY TO
MAKE SURE THAT THIS VERY VERY.
IMPORTANT PIECE OF LEGISLATION
THAT IMPACTS THOUSANDS.
OF OF WOMEN.
ACROSS THE WORKPLACE THAT THIS
PIECE OF LEGISLATION ACTUALLY
WORKS FOR ALL BUSINESS OF THANK
YOU VERY MUCH SENATOR THANK YOU
MR ROBBIE SUPPORTING THE BILL
OBVIOUSLY. THE QUESTIONS FROM
MEMBERS.
THANK YOU ARE LIKE TO POINT OUT
WE HAVE A FACILITY IN THE
BUILDING HERE.
KEVIN.
ON THE.
FOURTH FLOOR OF THE OLD
BUILDING.
BUT I.
SIR WINNER OF YOU ME CLOSE AT
REGULAR MIKE ON THE QUESTIONS I
DO I ONE THING I DO WANT TO.
OINT NOW IS.
AND I.
OPPOSE THOSE WITH SOME
CONFUSION ABOUT THE CONFORMITY
WITH THE SAN FRANCISCO ORDINANCE
AND OF COURSE EVEN THOUGH WE
OFTEN DO.
IF SAN FRANCISCO THAT IT MUST BE
WAY TO THE LEFT OF OVERDOING SAN
FRANCISCO WHEN THAT BILL WAS
NEGOTIATED IT ACTUALLY BROUGHT.
BROUGHT ON BROAD BUSINESS
COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES COULD
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. AND THE
BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS
ASSOCIATION ENDORSED THE BILL
AND THE NEGOTIATED FORM AND SO
WE THOUGHT IT WAS GOOD TO. ARE
REALLY STAR WITHOUT MODEL I
TURNED THERE WERE SOME
INCONSISTENCIES THAT WE BELIEVE
THAT WITH THE AMENDMENTS TAKEN
TODAY A WEAVING DEL CONFORM TO.
AND ONE OF THOSE AYE AMENDMENTS
IS ON.
I'VE FOR THE HARDSHIP EXEMPTION
IT'S NOT SIMPLY LIMITED TO FIVE
AND.
WORKERS IN UNDER FIVE IT IS A
REASONABLENESS STANDARD DIE
EMPLOYERS ARE EXPECTED TO WHAT'S
REALLY
SYMBOL.
AND NOT.
AND NOT MORE.
WHETHER THEY'RE SMALLER OR
LARGER WERE MINOR HAVE SOME
FLEXIBILITY IN THERE. OUGHT TO
SUPPORT THIS IS A. IT'S A YUBA
THIS IS YOUR MATTERS FOR A LOT
OF REASONS IT IS ABOUT THE
HEALTH OF NEWBORNS.
IT IS ABOUT THE HEALTH OF.
OF BOTTOM LEASE I AND IT IS
THAT WE KNOW WE WE IN THIS
BUILDING WE.
TALK A LOT ABOUT HOW WE WANT TO
HAVE.
I GENDER EQUITY BY IN MANY
CONTACTS BUT INCLUDING IN THE
WORKPLACE I ONE OF THE SUREST
WAYS TO.
TO UNDERMINE GENDER EQUITY IN
THE WORKPLACE CHI IS TO CONVEY
TO NEW MOTHERS THAT IF YOU
REALLY IF YOU WANT TO
BREASTFEED.
BOOK OF IT THEN YOU'RE GONNA
HAFTA SPEND LET'S SAY SIX MONTHS
AT HOME.
BEFORE YOU COME BACK EVEN IF
YOU WANT TO COME BACK TO WORK BY
NOT TO SHOULD REAL AND YOU AND
YOUR SETTING WOMEN BACK.
BICU SAT IN THE BACK AND AND
THOSE INEQUITIES ARE REMAIN THEY
DON'T CISCO WAY A ONCE SHE
RETURNS TO WORK. AYE SO WOMEN
SHOULD BE RETURNING TO WORK WHEN
THEY CHOOSE THAT RETURN TO WORK.
AND NOT BASED ON WHETHER THERE
WORKPLACE ALLOWS THEM TO.
EXPRSS.
BREAST MILK SO I RESPECTFULLY
ASK YOUR AYE VOTE.
THEY.
.
SCHOOL RIPLEY'S WITH THE SENATE
BILL NINE THIRTY SEVEN BY
SENATOR WINNER THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED TO
THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR ABOUT. BELL AYE
CANNELLA.
ALLEN. ALLEN AYE DODD GAINES
GALGIANI GALGIANI AYE MCGUIRE
MORALE ROCK.
ROTH AYE SKINNER BIDAK.
IRAQ NO WIECKOWSKI WIENER AYE.
WIENER AYE.
YOU HAVE FIVE VOTES TO ONE.
SENATOR AND BELIEVE THE ROLE
OPEN FOR ABSENT MEMBERS AND.
IF YOU COULD YOU COULD PROCEDURE
NEXT BILL PLEASE BY.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH MISTER
CHAIRMAN.
TOM AND I WOULD LIKE TO NEXT
TAKE UP THE US SENATE BILL NINE
EIGHTEEN THE HOMELESS YOUTH ACT
OF TWO THOUSAND MISTER CHAIRMAN
SAYS NO OPPOSITION ELECTED MOVE
THAT BILL.
OKAY THERE'S A MOTION. BANNER.
I'M CALLING SO I WILL BE BRIEF.
.
THE ISP NINETY TEAM OF HIS.
WILL HELP CALIFORNIA ADDRESS
WHAT IS AN ABSOLUTELY SHAMEFUL
SITUATION. ODD THAT ON ANY GIVEN
NIGHT IN OUR STATE.
FIFTEEN THOUSAND AND THIS IS A
CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE FIFTEEN
THOUSAND USE.
BETWEEN.
THE AGES OF.
THIRTEEN AND TWENTY FOUR ARE
LIVING ON THE STREETS OF
CALIFORNIA THIS IS NOT INCLUDE
YOUTH WHO ARE HOMELESS AND
LIVING WITH THEIR PARENTS.
AUDITOR'S SHELTER A CAR THIS IS
ON ACCOMPANIED YOU FIFTEEN
THOUSAND OF THEM.
MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF OUR
NATION'S HOMELESS YOUTH OF IN
CALIFORNIA THAT IS. AND WE ARE
FIFTEEN PERCENT OF THE
POPULATION OF THIS COUNTRY.
BUT I'M IN ONE IN NINE HOMELESS
PEOPLE IN CALIFORNIA IS A IS A
YOUNG PERSON.
YET TWO THIRDS OF OUR COUNTIES
DO NOT HAVE YOU SPECIFIC
HOMELESS PROGRAMS.
BUT WE KNOW THAT NATIONALLY.
.
FOR YOUTH YOUNG PEOPLE OVERALL
BETWEEN THE AGES OF EIGHTEEN AND
TWENTY FOUR. IN ANY GIVEN YEAR
ONE IN TEN WILL EXPERIENCE
HOMELESSNESS.
AND ONE IN TEN CSU STUDENTS IS
HOMELESS. ONE OUT OF FIVE LA
COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS IS
HOMELESS OUT WE SHOULD BE.
ASHAMED AND WE HAVE TO FIX THIS
IT'S A MORAL IMPERATIVE. BODIES
YOUNG PEOPLE ARE SLEEPING IN
PLACES WHERE PEOPLE SHOULDN'T BE
SLEEPING ON THE STREETS AND
WAREHOUSES.
AND RIVER BEDS IN THEIR CARS.
COUNSELOR FEIGNING WE WANT THEM
TO HAVE HOUSING.
BUT WE KNOW THAT WITH YOUNG
PEOPLE IF YOU CAN GET PEOPLE OFF
THE STREETS AND ON TRACK. BUT
HAVE A SHOT AT SUCCEEDING IN
LIFE THERE'S NO SURE WAY TO
UNDERMINE NINE. THEN TO ALLOW
YOUNG PERSON TO BECOME A LONG
TERM CHRONICALLY HOMELESS A
PERSON.
THE STATE DOES NOT DO ENOUGH
FOR HOMELESS YOUTH WE DO MORE
THAN WE USED TO DO.
IT'S NOT ENOUGH.
AND.
WE NEED TO SUPPORT PARTICULARLY
COUNTIES THAT DO NOT HAVE YOU
SPECIFIC HOMELESS SERVICES BUT
ALSO THE LARGER COUNTIES THAT
HAVE.
SO MANY HOMELESS YOUTH AND AND
THE BAY AREA AND SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA.
ON
WHAT WOULD THIS BILL WILL DO TWO
THINGS SAID ADMINISTRATIVELY
CENTRALIZES OUR APPROACH TO.
YOUTH HOMELESSNESS BY PIC
CREATING OFFICE OF HOMELESS
YOUTH.
AND IT WILL APPROPRIATE SIXTY
MILLION DOLLARS IN GRANTS.
SO THAT WE CAN INVEST IN THESE
YOUNG PEOPLE AND HELP THEM.
SUCCEED I WANT TO THANK MY.
PRINCIPLE CO AUTHOR OF THIS
BILL CHAIR OF THE ASSEMBLY HUMAN
SERVICES COMMITTEE BLANCA RUBIO.
AND.
THE NUMEROUS MEMBERS OF BOTH
HOUSES WHO HAVE SIGNED ON AS CO
AUTHORS I RESPECTFULLY ASK UP
FOR YOUR.
AYE VOTE THAT WOULD BE TODAY TO
TESTIFY ARE DESIREE BE TOUGH
WHO'S A CASE MANAGER. CLUB THE
BILL WILSON CENTER IN SANTA
CLARA ANTONIO MORA WHO IS AIDS
OP FORMER HOMELESS YOUTH SO
WELCOME.
OKAY.
WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FIRST?
FIRST.
OKAY I JUST PUSH THAT THERE.
ALRIGHT.
HI MY NAME IS DESIREE BETA.
I AM WITH THE BOSTON CENTER FROM
SANTA CLARA COUNTY WHERE WE
CURRENTLY SERVE THREE THOUSAND
NINE HUNDRED AND FOR YOU.
I MYSELF USED TO BE A CLIENT AT
BOWLES SIMPSON.
.
I WENT THROUGH OTHER PROGRAMS
AND IT'S BECAUSE OF THIS PROGRAM
THAT I WAS ABLE TO CHANGE MY
LIFE BECOME A CASE MANAGER JUST
RECENTLY. BECAME A PROGRAM
SUPERVISOR MALONE RISK. ó. I'M
HERE IN SUPPORT OF SB MAN WHEN
ME AND THE OPPORTUNITY THAT THIS
BILL ALLOWS US TO ADDRESS WHICH
IS A SYSTEMATIC ISSUES AROUND
YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS.
EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS BY
HAVING SOMEONE AT THE STATE
LEVEL RESPONSIBLE FOR SYSTEM
CORONATION IN BETTER ENVIRONMENT
OF RESOURCES. AND INVESTMENT OF
RESOURCES TO GROW SERVICES IN
LOCAL COMMUNITIES.
S. B. MY ONE MADE THE AS IT
MAKES IN THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT. OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN OFFICE
OF HOMELESS YOUTH TO BE POINT ON
THIS ISSUE.
BUT WE KNOW THAT WE. WHEN WE
INTERVENE EFFECTIVELY WHAT YOUNG
PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS
HOME WE'RE. OUR RESOURCES WELL
WE HAVE ADEQUATE RESOURCES WE'RE
ABLE TO ENSURE THAT YOUNG PEOPLE
NOT ONLY GET OFF THE STREETS.
BUT THEY GET TE SUPPORT
EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
THAT THEY NEED SO THAT THEY CAN.
BE INDEPENDENT AND SELF
SUFFICIENT.
FIFTY PERCENT OF CHRONIC
CHRONICALLY HOMELESS POPULATION
HAVE THEIR FIRST EXPERIENCE OF
HOMELESSNESS WHEN THEY WERE
UNDER THE AGE OF TWENTY FIVE.
THEREFORE IF WE EFFECTIVE IF WE
ARE EFFECTIVE AT ADDRESSING THE
NEEDS OF YOUNG PEOPLE HOW WE GO
A LONG WAY IN ADDRESSING THE
NEEDS OF ADULTS. AND REDUCING
THE NUMBER OF ADULTS WHO
EXPERIENCE CHRONIC HOMELESSNESS.
THIS BILL WITH BOTH THE
ALIGNMENT OF RESOURCES AND THE
OFFICE OF HOMELESS YOU HELP US
TO DO THAT.
SO THAT BOTH COUNTIES A
COMMUNITIES THAT DON'T HAVE ANY
RESOURCES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE CAN
IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS WHAT
SERVICES WOULD BE EFFECTIVE IN
THE COMMUNITIES.
SO THEY CAN ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF
YOUNG PEOPLE EXPERIENCING
HOMELESSNESS WHO ARE ON THE
STREETS BECAUSE OF ABUSE.
NEGLECT VIOLENCE
BECAUSE THEY WERE KICKED OUT OF
THEIR HOMES ARE BECAUSE THEY
LOST THEIR JOBS AND DON'T HAVE A
SAFETY NET.
IF WE CAN REALLY ALIGN OUR
RESOURCES DIFFERENTLY THROUGH
THIS OFFICE AND WITH THE
ADDITIONAL BUDGET ALLOCATION WE
CAN MAKE AN INCREDIBLE IMPACT ON
THE LIVES OF SO MANY YOUNG
PEOPLE ACROSS OUR CITY.
THANK YOU THANK YOU.
EXPECT HER PLEASE.
MY NAME'S TONY MORON CURRENTLY
TWENTY FOUR YEARS OLD AND I'M
RECEIVING SERVICES SANTA CLARA
COUNTY.
I'VE BEEN HOMELESS.
ON AND OFF OF HIM DUDE. FOR
SEVEN YEARS DUE TO MY TOUGH
SITUATIONS I'VE OVERCOME THESE
OBSTACLES.
THE TO THE SUPPORTING RESOURCE
OF THE BILL WILSON CENTER AND.
.
AND OTHER AGENCIES THAT HAVE
HELPED ME TO BE SUCCESSFUL. IT
IS BECAUSE THESE AGENCIES I WAS
ABLE TO GET MY LIFE BACK ON
TRACK.
AS BE NINE ONE EIGHT.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO ME MY
COMMUNITY AND THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
WITH THIS BILL THE OFFICE OF
HOMELESS YOUTH WE WILL BE ABLE
TO REACH THE YOUTH THAT DON'T
HAVE.
ANY AXES LIKE BILL WILSON
CENTER.
IN MY COMMUNITY. MY HOMELESSNESS
FEW MONTHS AGO.
WAS AT THE POINT OF NO RETURN.
GOING BACK TO THE STREETS SO I
TURNED TO THE. BILL WILSON
CENTER. AND THEY IMMEDIATELY
GAVE ME HOUSING. THEY COVERED.
HEALTHY LIVING SAY FEET SAFETY
TIPS AND ALSO FINANCIAL EARNINGS
AND SAVINGS.
NOW ARE JUST NOT.
NOW I'M NOT JUST NOT HOMELESS.
AND LIVING ON THE STREETS I'M
WORKING FULL TIME GOING TO
SCHOOL AND SAVING SO I CAN GET
MY OWN APARTMENT. AND PAY FOR
THE FIRST AND LAST MONTH'S RENT
I WANT TO GET BACK ON TRACK AND
LIVE. A NORMAL LIFE. AND NOT
WORRY ABOUT WHETHER I HAVE A
SAFE PLACE TO SLEEP AT NIGHT.
BUT THEN THAT THANK YOU.
THANK YOU.
OR SOME VERY FROM HER THE BILL
WILSON CENTER SPARKY HARLAN.
MY GOOD FRIEND SPARKY.
AND SO THEY DO A GREAT JOB IN MY
COMMUNITY.
NEXT SPEAKER PLEASE.
GOOD AFTERNOON SHARON REPORT
WITH THE CORPORATION FOR SUPPORT
OF HOUSING WERE ONE OF THE CO
SPONSORS OF THE LEGISLATION BE
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR
QUESTIONS FIRED YOUR AYE VOTE
THANK YOU DAYS SPEAKERS IN FAVOR
PLEASE.
BICKERS.
PRETTY GOOD AFTERNOON AND THANK
YOU GUYS ARE MY NAME IS ALEXIS
BERRIES YOUTH ADVOCATE HERE IN
FULL SUPPORT. AT SEVENTEEN I WAS
A HOMELESS YOUTH STRUGGLINGTO
FIND MY WAY WORKING A NINE TO
FIVE ONLY TO FIND MYSELF LIVING
OUT OF MY CAR DAY TODAY.
I SPENT A TOTAL OF EIGHTEEN
YEARS IN THE FOSTER CARE SYSTEM
AND THE HOMELESS LIFE IF THAT
WASN'T BAD ENOUGH.
LIVING HOMELESS WAS REALLY ROUGH
AND I'VE QUICKLY REALIZED THAT I
WASN'T BUILT THAT TOUGH.
MAJORITY OF MY PEERS RESORT TO
DRUGS AND ALCOHOL TO COPE I WAS
FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO NOT SLIP
DOWN THAT SLIPPERY SLOPE.
SO WITH THIS PIECE OF
LEGISLATION TOGETHER CALIFORNIA
WE. CAN MAKE.
A BRIGHTER FUTURE REALITY.
SO I THINK YOU GUYS AGAIN I URGE
YOUR AYE VOTE.
THANKS WE CAN HELP PEOPLE JUST
SAY THEIR NAME AND.
THEIR OPINION.
.
IF YOU IF YOU WANT A MY SAY A
FEW WORDS THAT'S ABOUT IT.
HI MY NAME'S KEISTER I AM A
STUDENT AT MODESTO JUNIOR
COLLEGE AND I AM A ADVOCATE WITH
JB. AND I WANT TO SAY I HAVE
BEEN.
IN FOSTER CARE BUT I'VE ALSO
BEEN HOMELESS.
AND MY BIOLOGICAL MOTHER HAD
BEEN KICKING M OUT SINCE I WAS
TWELVE.
AND THE CENTRAL VALLEY SO I
DEFINE WHAT TO ENCOURAGE MY.
MY REPRESENTATIVES.
BECAUSE I'VE BEEN HOMELESS AND
FRESNO IN MODESTO.
TO DEFINITELY.
SUPPORT THIS BILL.
TOM FOR YOUTH IN YOUR DISTRICTS
PLEASE THANK YOU XP HER.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN
ROBINSON AGAIN ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
PORT.
HE WAS CHAIRMAN KEEP DATA BEHALF
CALIFORNIA PARTNER CESSATION
SUPPORT.
DANIELLE CANADA BECAUSE OUR ON
BEHALF OF COMMON SENSE KIDS
ACTION IN STRONG SUPPORT.
TENACITY TELEX FORMERLY HOMELESS
YOU AND OUR PARENTS ORGANIZER
FOR COMMON SENSE KIDS ACTION IN
STRONG SUPPORT.
YEAH SHARE HIGH A CONTINGENT
SACRAMENTO IN STRONG SUPPORT.
I'M I MEAN WE SHOULD CLEAR ON
FROM YOU WHEN YOU SERVICES AND I
SUPPORT THIS BILL.
MY NAME'S THE READ IT.
Y. FROM WHEN YOU SERVICES AND I
SUPPORT HIS BILL.
I MY NAME IS RYAN BOARDING AND I
SUPPORT THIS BILL.
I AND MY NAME IS MELISSA SKIN
SCHOONMAKER I AM FROM THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION AND WE'RE HERE TO
SUPPORT THIS BILL.
CAN THOSE REPRESENTING THE
CALIFORNIA COALITION FOR YOUTH
WHEN THE CO SPONSORS AND SUPPORT
THE GIVE.
MICHAEL RIGHT AGAIN ON BEHALF
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SANTA CLARA COUNTY IN SUPPORT.
DOOR TOM'S ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
MARADONA CAL STATE STUDENT
ASSOCIATION AND TRANSPORT.
ALICE KESLER ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF LONG BEACH IN SUPPORT.
WILLIAM AUTUMN BURKE FROM
EQUALITY CALIFORNIANS STRONG
SUPPORT.
AB LEMLEY WHICH JOHN BURTON
ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH IN STRONG
SUPPORT.
GOOD AFTERNOON CHANTIERS TO
ANALYZE YOUR CHILDREN DROIDS IN
SUPPORT. BY.
CHRIS MARTIN HOUSING CALIFORNIA
PROD CO SPONSOR AND SUPPORT.
NICOLE KIDMAN ON BEHALF OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND SUPPORT.
LARA TABLE AND SAY REPRESENTING
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
SUPPORT.
SYLLABUS SO LISA SHAUN BEHALF
THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF CHILD
AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY AND
ALSO ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA IN STRONG SUPPORT.
RICHARD I'M ON BEHALF OF THE
COUNTY OF MARIPOSA IN SUPPORT.
TRYING TO GET SOME MATH
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE FOUNDTION IN SUPPORT.
ANOTHER WITH THE WITH CENTER ON
LAW AND POVERTY IN SUPPORT.
CHRISLEY ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTIES IN SUPPORT.
HELLO WELL HOMEOWNER HAVE FOR
THAT COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION IN
SUPPORT.
JOINT OR SOME BE HAVE THE URBAN
COUNTIES OF CALIFORNIANS
SUPPORT.
LOOK MONDAY WITH CALIFORNIA ME
IN SPORTS.
MICHAEL AND THE NONPROFIT
HOUSING ASSOCIATE ON THE
CALIFORNIA STRONG SUPPORT.
.
OTHERS BORDERS PLEASE COME
FORWARD.
WE HAVE.
ANY SPEAKERS AGAINST.
THE BILL PLEASE COME FORWARD.
OKAY.
WE HAVE QUESTIONS FROM THE
COMMITTEE.
THEY HAVE A MOTION.
SURROUND.
MANY MOTION.
NO. PUT HIM IN THE MOST.
OKAY CENTER WEARING THE CLOTHES.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN I
RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR AYE VOTE
THANK YOU.
CULTURAL PLEASE SENATE BILL
NINE EIGHTEEN BY SENATOR WIENER
IN THE MOTION IS TO PASS AND
REAR FOR TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS SENATOR ABOUT AYE
BELL AYE CANNELLA AYE AYE
CANNELLA AYE ALLEN.
ALLEN AYE DODD. GAINES GALGIANI
MCGUIRE MORALE ROTH SKINNER
BIDAK ALRIGHT BUT I WOULD
BECAUSE HE WIENER AYE WIENER
AYE.
WE'LL GO FIVE VOTES WILL LEAVE
LITTLE TRAPS AND MEMBERS. OF.
SORRY.
THE DESCRIPTIVELY. WE WOULD HAVE
SIX MINUTES.
ALRIGHT.
OKAY WE HAVE FIVE VOTES.
CENTER WE ARE ONE MORE.
YOU HAVE THE FOR EFFECT PAGE
MISTER CHAIRMAN.
MY AT THE THIRD AND FINAL BILL
HOW TO COPE DOTSON ABILITY
TWENTY X..
AND I WILL.
SORT BY AYE THANK YOU MAKE ON
MISTER CHAIRMAN THANK YOU AND
THANK YOU TO THE COMMITTEE.
FOR WORKING WITH US.
ON.
ON THE BILL NOT AND I DO ACCEPT
OF THE COMMITTEES AMENDMENTS.
AND I WILL I KNOW DIE IN
ADDITION TO THE AMENDMENTS
SUGGEST ABOUT COMMITTEE THE
COMMITTEE SUGGESTED OF VARIOUS
ADDITIONAL AVENUES OF.
CLARIFICATION AND FLUSHING SOME
THINGS OUT.
AND I MISS HIM AS YOU AND I
DISCUSSED WE MET YESTERDAY.
HOW WE WILL BE WORKING WITH YOU
BETWEEN NOW AND APPROPRIATIONS?
ON OUR OWN IN THOSE AREAS.
AND ONE THING THAT WE DID
DISCUSS IS THAT ONE OF THE
COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS IS TO
REDUCE THE TWO HUNDRED PERCENT.
ARENA IN TERMS OF.
ZONING TO ONE TWENTY FIVE.
AND THAT IS PART OF FLUSHING
THESE VARIOUS ITEMS OUT OVER THE
NEXT MONTH OR SO.
THE GOAL WOULD BE TO INCREASE
THE ONE TWENTY FIVE BACK TO ONE
FIFTIES THAT WE WOULD END UP AT
A HUNDRED AND FIFTY
SAN.
OF THE READ OUT ALLOCATION BUT
SO AGAIN THANK YOU ALL WORKING
WITH US THING IS KIND OF.
SOLVING THE. WITHOUT. INCH
INJECTING SPRAWL INTO THE.
EXACTLY.
ADVANCED PAROLE NEPHROL. AGREE
WE HAVE A SHARED GOAL OF NOT
INDUCING SPRAWL WE WANT INFILL
HOUSING SO THANK YOU FOR WORKING
WITH US IS DETERMINED.
COLLEAGUES ON THE THE RESULT
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT ARENA
UPON.
COULD BE AND SHOULD BE A
POWERFUL FOR A TOOL UP FOR THE
STATE TO ENFORCE
HOUSING LAW AND FAIR SHARE
PRINCIPLES SO THAT ALL
COMMUNITIES. ARE PARTICIPATING
IN SOLVING OUR HOUSING CRISIS.
AND IN NEARLY FOUR MILLION HOME
DEFICIT THAT WE HAVE. IN
CALIFORNIA.
UNFORTUNATELY RINA.
IS BROKEN.
AND WHEN WE DID SOME WORK LAST
YEAR THAT TOUCH ON ARENA.
ACROSS THE SPECTRUM THE ONE
THING THAT PRETTY MUCH EVERYONE
AGREED ON WHATEVER THEIR VIEW
WAS THAT WE.
NEEDED TO BE FIXED AND OUT TO WE
WANT TO DO WITH US THE TWENTY
EIGHT. PUTS A STRENGTHENS RINA.
AND MAKES IT MORE DATA DRIVEN.
AND LESS POLITICAL.
NOT SO.
SP TWENTY DOES A FEW THINGS
BOB BURST IT REQUIRES THE STATE
TO DO AN UNMET NEEDS ASSESSMENT.
TO AND TO INCORPORATE.
THE FOUR MILLION HOME SUCH YOU
MUCH THREE POINT SIX MILLION BY
DEFICIT AND SERENA.
AND ALSO RULE OVER DEFICITS
FROM CYCLE TO CYCLE SO THE
COMMUNITIES ARE NOT MEETING
THEIR ARENA.
BUT DEFICIT OF COURSE DOESN'T GO
AWAY BECAUSE IT HAS REAL LIFE
IMPLICATIONS FOR REAL PEOPLE.
I'M SO IT WOULD BE RULE OVER.
AS MENTIONED BEFORE IT WILL
REQUIRE COMMUNITIES OUGHT TO
ZONE ABOVE A HUNDRED PERCENT
ARENA. AYE BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT
IF YOU DON'T EXACTLY AT A
HUNDRED PERCENT OF YOUR ARENA
ALLOCATION BOTTOM FOR MANY
REASONS UP PROJECT MAYBE THE
LATER MAY NOT HAVE BEEN OR
PROJECT MAY GET BUILT. HAVE
LESSEN ITS FULL ZONING.
AND SO YOU'RE SETTING YOURSELF
UP NEVER TO HIT A HUNDRED
PERCENT I AND SO THAT'S WHY WE
PUT TWO HUNDRED PERCENT IT'S NOW
ONE TWENTY FIVE IN MAY BECOME.
HUNDRED FIFTY PERCENT.
TO BE.
BILL ALSO REQUIRES ON.
THE COGS TO FOCUS ON
CONCENTRATING GROWTH AND HIGH
OPPORTUNITY AREAS WITH GOOD
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BECAUSE AS
WE JUST DISCUSSED WE DON'T WANT
TO INDUCE.
SPRAWL. DOT SO IN TERMS OF
DEFICITS THE STATE'S POPULATION
FORECASTS.
DO NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT.
HISTORIC UNDER PRODUCTION OF
HOUSING.
I WAS HAS BEEN PARTICULARLY
STARK OVER THE LAST FEW DECADES.
AS COMMUNITIES.
AT TIMES STAPLE HOUSING
CONSTRUCTION. THEIR POPULATION
CAN BE LIMITED BY HOW MANY NEW
HOMES ARE BUILT. CREATING THE
ILLUSION THAT POPULATION GROWTH
IS SLOWER STAGNANT BECOMES A
SELF PERPETUATING CYCLE.
BY THIS
THE LOSING COMEY PREVALENT EVEN
IN AREAS THAT A THRIVING JOB
MARKETS. AND SKYROCKETING
HOUSING DEMANDS AN EXPLOSIVE
PRICES.
THERE'S ALSO NO RULE OVER
MECHANISM CURRENTLY IN RENO. TO
ENSURE THAT UNDERPERFORMING
COMMUNITIES ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR
THEIR REMAINING OBLIGATION.
THIS CREATES A PERVERSE
INCENTIVE FOR CITIES TO
ROUTINELY UNDERPERFORM ON RINA.
BECAUSE THE DEFICIT JUST
DISAPPEARS AND THE CURRENT LAW.
BY AND.
THERE FUTURE ALLOCATIONS WILL
PROBABLY BE REDUCED BECAUSE IT
WILL LOOK LIKE THEY'RE NOT
REALLY GROWING.
I S. B. A TWENTY EIGHT WILL FIX
US AS I HAVE JUST DESCRIBED.
IT WILL ALSO ADDRESS ZONING AS
I JUST DESCRIBED IN TERMS OF
GOING ABOVE A HUNDRED PERCENT.
AND WILL FOCUS GROWTH AN INFILL
AREAS AS OPPOSED BY TO SPRAWL.
I DO WANT TO TRUST OUR.
HE DOES SOME OF THE TRUE IN
EQUITIES AND RENA AND.
WHEN WE RECEIVED THE BLANKET
LIST OF OUR RINA COMPLIANCE.
THIS YEAR FROM A CD EYES SHOWED
IN PART OF COURSE ARE GLOBAL
LIST OF EVERY CITIES REALITIES.
AND YOU SAW SOME THE INEQUITIES
AND I COULD TELL THE WHOLE.
POINT TO HOPE WHICH ARE EXAMPLES
THE ONE THAT IS PROBABLY THE
MOST EXTREME BY CENTER ALLEN'S
DISTRICT.
IS THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH.
WHICH IS OPPOSING THIS BILL FOR
REASONS I DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
BECAUSE IT WILL HELP WITH THE
INEQUITY THAT THEY'RE
EXPERIENCING REDONDO BEACH WAS
GIVEN EVERY ALLOCATION OF ONE
THOUSAND.
SEVEN.
UNITS
IT'S TO NEIGHBORING CITIES THAT
ARE NOT DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT
IN TERMS OF POPULATION OR
MOZAMBIQUE TO MANHATTAN BEACH.
RECEIVED ALLOCATIONS OF TO.
I'M THIRTY SEVEN COMPARED TO ONE
THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED NINETY
SEVEN.
WELL WE ALSO KNOW THE CITY OF
BEVERLY HILLS RECEIVED ARENA
ALLOCATION AGAIN THIS IS ALL
OVER AN EIGHT YEAR PERIOD. OF
THREE.
THREE ONE TWO THREE UNITS OVER
AN EIGHT YEAR PERIOD.
SO I ASK YOU TWENTY EIGHT WILL
REQUIRE A MUCH MORE DATA DRIVEN
APPROACH.
AND YOUR POLITICS RIGHT NOW
RENA ALLOCATE STEVE'S CARGO
BLANK IN THE MAIL AND THE
COGBURN DAVIES UP THE NUMBERS
AMONG INDIVIDUAL CITIES.
I AND THAT CAN BECOME VERY
POLITICIZED ABOUT WILL AND EARLY
SPEAKER RADICALLY REDUCED
WITHOUT FEAR TWENTY A. I WANT TO
THANK.
THE BAY AREA COUNCIL IN THE
SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP
BECAUSE MONSTER IN THIS BILL.
AND OUT TESTIFYING WITH YOU
TODAY ARE CORNELIUS BURKE FROM
THE BAY AREA COUNCIL. AND
MICHAEL LANE OF THE NONPROFIT
HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA AND UMBRELLA
ORGANIZATION FOR AFFORDABLE
HOUSING. CREATORS ANOTHER
ADVOCATES.
SO I RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR
RIVAL.
GERMAN BELLA MEMBERS HAD OF THE
LEGISLATURE IN VARIOUS CONTEXTS.
HAS DECLARED THAT AFFORDABLE
HOUSING AMOUNT IS A MATTER
STATEWIDE CONCERN AND NOT JUST
LOCAL MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS.
IN FACT THE HOUSING ELEMENT. IS
THE ONLY ELEMENT AND LOCAL
JURISDICTIONS JOURNAL PLANET
MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE STATE.
WE DEMAND FROM RE TO BE JUST
APPLYING EXERCISE TO A
PRODUCTION REQUIREMENT THAT WE
SUPPORT.
S. B. EIGHT TWENTY EIGHT HAS
RINA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM.
THE SCARCITY OF PROPERTIES ON
MULTI FAMILY SIZE ARE
COMPETITIVE FOR STATE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING FINANCE PROGRAMS IS A
REAL PROBLEM. S. B. TWENTY IT
ADDRESSES BY REQUIRING A
JURISDICTIONS ON FOR MORE SITES
THIS APPARENTLY SOME DOWNWARD
PRESSURE.
ONE SKYROCKETING LAND PRICES IN
THIS PARTICULAR IMPORTANT IN THE
BAY AREA WHEN I CAN GO FOR TEN
MILLION DOLLARS OR MORE. AND
WILL ALSO ENSURE THAT SUFFICIENT
PARCELS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
THEIR THREE GREEN SEA TO DEVELOP
AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND TO
FUNDING AND THE POLITICAL WILL
TO GET PROJECTS APPROVED. THREE
NUMBERS THAT WERE GENERATED INTO
TWIN TWENTY TEN NOT THE GREAT
RECESSION WERE VERY LOW AND
DIDN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE
TECH SECTOR'S BOOM BOOM IN THE
BAY AREA. AND THAT JOBS HOW A
HOUSING GAP HAS CONTINUED TO
GROW APACE.
AND THAT WAS NEVER FORESEEN BY
THOSE NUMBERS THAT WERE THEN
GIVEN OUT.
FOR TARGETS OFFER HOUSING IN
THE BAY AREA.
S. B. TWENTY WILL BEGIN TO
ADDRESS THAT PARTICULAR WITH THE
ONE TIME STATEWIDE NEEDS
ASSESSMENT IS VERY IMPORTANT
WITH H. C. D. OVERSIGHT. AND THE
ROLLER BUMP UNDER PRODUCTION
FROM ONE CYCLE TO ANOTHER FOR
UNDERPERFORMING JURISDICTIONS.
WE ALSO THINK IT IS A GOOD OUR
BEST PRACTICE TO HAVE A BUFFER
INTENDED ZONE FOR MORE THAN JUST
A HUNDRED.
OTHER RINA.
THAT HAS BEEN ALLOCATED AND WE
ARE DRIVERS.
I THANK HIM SICK GOOD OFFENSIVE
CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE CORNELIUS BURKE WITH
THE BAY AREA COUNCIL WHERE
PRISON THREE HUNDRED THE TOP
EMPLOYERS IN THE NINTH. I COUNTY
BEAR REGION.
WITH EPISODE OF THE HOUSING
CRISIS THAT PROCESS
FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED A S. B. A
TO WAIT SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AND
IT HELPS TO ADDRESS THE HOUSING
PROBLEM. IT CREATES MORE DATA
DRIVEN UP OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO
THE RENO NUMBER OF RESPECTS YOU
ACTUAR AYE VOTE. TO OTHERS
SPEAKERS AND NEXT CALIFORNIA'S
LAUGHTER TIRED AMERICANS AFTER.
THREE MILLION.
HE'S GOT. IT OUT BRAINIACS
CALIFORNIA GLANCE RETIRED
AMERICANS ARE LOCAL CHAPTERS
ACTION TEAMS FROM OUR CALIFORNIA
REPORT MANY FRUSTRATIONS WERE
PLANNING PROCESSES HAS FOR YEARS
MISLED US TO BELIEVE THAT
AFFORDABLE HOUSING. TO
ACCOMMODATE THE NUMBER OF
SENIORS WOULD BE BUILT THEN
WITHOUT FAN FOR A PUBLIC
ATTENTION THE HOUSING IS NOT
BUILT REMAINING IN THE PLAN A
FALSE PROMISE THAT JURORS TO.
DELIVER MEANWHILE SENIOR SOME
WORKING PEOPLE LIKE FACE RISING
HOUSE.
RAISING COSTS HEALTHCARE CRISIS
AND GENERAL DECAY AND DID
PARTICULAR EMPLOYMENT SO.
AT THE EMERGENCY THREE THING
WITH FILED FIRES AND WE SEE
DISPLACEMENT OF THESE FOR BONTA
POPULATIONS ALTHOUGH THERE ARE
TWO COMMON OUTCOME. DAVIES
SUFFER A DAY LEAVE AND SUFFERED
A LOSS OF FAMILY FRIENDS CHURCH
IN COMMUNITIES SERVICES WE ALL
HOPE DATE COULD ENJOY THE INTENT
OF THIS LEGISLATION IS TO
HIGHLIGHT COMMUNITIES WHERE THIS
DISTRICT.
OCCURS WITH DATA AND ALLOCATION
OF HOUSING AND TARGETED
DEVELOPMENT COULD PROVE CRITICAL
AS WE TURN TO ELECTED OFFICIALS
TO PLANETS FOR BETTER SOLUTIONS
AND EIGHT TWENTY EIGHT DOES JUST
THAT THANK YOU.
OTHER SPEAKERS IN FAVOR PLEASE.
FAMOUS CHAIRMAN KEITH ON BEHALF
OF THE CALIFORNIA APARTMENT
ASSOCIATION ASKING FOR YOUR
SUPPORT.
YES SIR.
HANDLERS BRONTE FROM CALIFORNIA
INDIANS PART.
SHEPHERD REPRESENTING THE
SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP
PROUDLY AT CO SPONSOR OF THE
BILL AS WELL AS THAT CALTRAIN
ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE IN SUPPORT.
EMILY ITEM YOU HAVE THE
CALIFORNIA BILLION ISSUE
SENSATION IN SUPPORT.
BIG FAN OF HOW THE BRIDGE
HOUSING IN SUPPORT.
BUT THE HARD WITH THE CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION
IN SUPPORT.
MARKETS OF THE CALIFORNIA
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU OF WE HAVE THE OF
SPEAKERS.
HAVING CONCERN OPPOSE COME FOR
PLEASE.
I'M HAVE A SEAT.
THANK YOU.
GOOD AFTERNOON BILL HIGGINS FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION
COUNCILS OF GOVERNMENTS. AND WE
APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY SPEAK
TO TODAY AND WE APPRECIATE THE
AMENDMENTS THAT. YOU HAVE TO.
ON THE EMPTY
THE BOARD WHEN YOU WERE THERE AS
WELL.
AND IT'S ACTUALLY DOT SERVICE
ON M. T. C.'S BOARD. WHERE THEY
SERVE AS AN MP ó AND IT IN
CHARGE OF THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLAN? AND BE
CALLED FUNCTION HERE THAT I'M
HERE TO ACTUALLY TALK ABOUT
PARAGRAPH DE IN THE COMMENTS THE
ANALYSIS.
A MAKE A COMMENT THAT IT IS
ENTIRELY POSSIBLE IF YOU'RE
ASKING THE HOUSING TO BE
DISTRIBUTED ACCORDING TO AN
EQUITY SET OF PRINCIPLES.
THAT THAT DISTRIBUTION MIGHT BE
DIFFERENT.
THEN THE DISTRIBUTION YOU WOULD
USE TO REACH THE MAXIMUM GHG
REDUCTION BUT YOU COULD GET OUT
OF THAT WHEN WE MODEL IT.
SOMETIMES THOSE WILL CORRELATE A
LOT OF TIMES I THINK THAT THEY
WILL NOT MY QUESTION IS IS
YOU'VE CHARGED A OR B. WITH
GETTING THE MAXIMUM PART. OUT OF
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANS.
AND YOU'RE STARTING TO ASK EACH
CD THAT HAD SOME EQUITY.
PERFORMANCE METRICS WHAT'S GONNA
HAPPEN WHEN THOSE TO CONFLICT.
WE NEED SOME KIND OF
RECONCILIATION AND THERE'S A.
A BILL IN THE ASSEMBLY SIDE.
WHERE WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO WORK
THIS OUT AND I WOULD LIKE TO
WORK WITH THE SENATOR TO FIGURE
THIS OUT BECAUSE? I DON'T WANT
TO HELP MY MEMBERS IN THE
SITUATION WHERE.
THEY ARE SAYING WE AVE TO DO
THIS ACT WITH THE DISTRIBUTION
TO A R. B. AND THEY ARE BE
SAYING WELL YOU'RE NOT GONNA
KEEP YOUR TARGET BECAUSE A RIGHT
THERE ON THE EDGE. STOCK HAPPEN
IN ALL INSTANCES BUT I HAVE TO
PLAN FOR THAT.
AND WE NEED SOME KIND OF CROSS
WALKS FOR THE STATE TO TALK
COULD ONE POLICY PRINCIPLE TO
OTHER REALLY QUICK THINGS.
ABOUT COGS IN WHAT THEY DO FIRST
OF ALL.
DID MARINA IS ENTIRELY UNFUNDED
BY THE STATE IT'S EXPENSIVE
THERE'S A LOT OF MODELING
INVOLVED.
AND IT'S NOT FUNDED THERE'S
COMMISSION A STATE MANDATES
DECISION THAT SAYS YOUR CARDS
ARE NOT ELIGIBLE AND IT WOULD BE
REALLY NICE SUPPORT WORKING ON
THIS AND IF YOU WANT US TO DO A
BETTER JOB THAT WE FIGURE OUT A
FUNDING RESOURCE FOR THAT
SECOND.
THERE'S LIMITS TO WHAT WE CAN
DO WHAT WE DISTRIBUTE THE
NUMBERS OR STILL LOCAL AGENCIES
WE CAN'T TELL THEM WHERE TO PUT
IT.
THEY HAVE LAND USE AUTHORITY WE
WORK WITH THEM WERE ALL THERE US
WE WORK TOGETHER WE FIGURED OUT
WE TRY AND PLAN. AND AND FIGURE
OUT A WAY TO DO IT BUT WE CAN'T
MAKE THEM DO IT FOR INCREASING
HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE TWO HUNDRED
FIFTY PERCENT. I'M WE'RE NOT
SURE THOSE UNITS ARE GONNA GO
AND THAT TOO MAY AFFECT THE
TRAVEL PATTERNS IN THE
COMMUNITY.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
YOU WE APPRECIATE THE AMENDMENTS
AND.
I'VE WORKED.
FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS THANK
YOU.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
TONY GEORGE REPRESENTING THE
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
AND.
WE'VE ALSO BEEN WORKING
COOPERATIVELY WITH YOUR STAFF WE
APPRECIATE THE TIME THEY SPENT
WITH US.
WE HAVE A COUPLE OF MAJOR
CONCERNS WITH THE BILL ITSELF AS
IT'S CURRENTLY WRITTEN WE
APPRECIATE.
BUT WE ABSOLUTELY AGREE THAT
THE GREEN ALLOCATION PROCESS TO
BE REVIEWED.
WERE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT SOME
OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THAT
JURISDICTION'S AND HOW WHAT THE
NUMBERS ARE SUMMER JUSTIFIED
SOME.
DON'T IT'S NOT CLEAR WHY THEY'RE
DIFFERENT.
BUT WE DO THINK THAT THAT.
ALLOCATION PROCESS SHOULD BE
FIXED
BEFORE ADDITIONAL CHANGES ARE
MADE TO EITHER THE SITE
REQUIREMENTS. THE NUMBER OF
WIENER.
.
UNITS THAT ARE ALLOCATED A
OVERALL.
THAT REALLY DOES HURT THOSE
JURISDICTIONS THAT HAVE MORE
NUMBER HIGHER NUMBERS NOW. AND
LET'S THOSE THAT HAVE FEWER
NUMBERS GET BY WITH THOSE HERE
NUMBERS IN PERPETUITY AND WE'RE
REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT
BEING FIXED.
BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE A
REQUIREMENT FOR A HUNDRED FIFTY
PERCENT OF SITES THAT HAVE TO BE
REZONED. ADDED TO THE CURRENT
RINA.
IF YOU'VE GOT THREE HOUSING
UNITS AS OPPOSED TO TWENTY FIVE
THOUSAND UNITS THAT'S A HUGE
DISPARITY. THAT YOU CANNOT GET
BACK OVER TIME.
WERE REALLY REALLY CONCERNED
ABOUT THE IMPACTS IN THOSE
JURISDICTIONS THAT TOOK MORE
HOUSING OR TRY.
AND I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE
GOAL OF THE BILL BUT THAT'S
EXACTLY WHAT WILL HAPPEN THE
SAME WITH THE ROLL OVER AND.
UNMET NEED INCREASES IN THE
ARENA IF YOU'VE GOT THREE AND
YOU. CURRENTLY HAVE TEN MAGNET
DALY DID TO YOU HAVE TO ADD
ANOTHER TWO THAT'S NOT A BIG
DEAL AGAIN IF YOU HAVE TWENTY
FOUR THOUSAND OR MORE. AND YOU
DIDN'T WERE ABLE TO.
ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE RINA
NUMBERS MAINLY BECAUSE THERE'S
NOT ENOUGH MONEY IN THE STATE
RIGHT NOW EVEN WITH THE BILLS
FROM LAST YEAR. TO PAY FOR THE
SUBSIDIES THAT ARE NEEDED FOR
NOT ONLY LOW VERY LOW BUT FOR
MODERATE INCOME IN MANY
JURISDICTIONS YOU CAN'T NEED AT
THIS IS GONNA SET US UP FOR
FAILURE. SO INTEL THAT
ALLOCATION PROCESS FIX WE JUST
CAN'T AGREE TO THE OTHER CHANGE
THE BILL THANK YOU THANK YOU.
OTHERS SPEAKERS AGAINST GOOD
AFTERNOON MR TURKEY ARE ALSO
BEHALF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS IN
THE MARIN COUNTY COUNCIL OF
MAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS BUT
THE POST.
GOOD AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS JASON RILEY CALIFORNIA
CITIES AND WE DO NOT HAVE AN
OFFICIAL POSITION ON THIS
MEASURES YOUR* WE'VE HAD
CONVERSATIONS WITH THE SENATOR
WE'RE GONNA MEET AGAIN LATER
THIS WEEK. AND WE DO HAVE A
COUPLE CONCERNS ON THE HAVE A
MINUTE DRESS SO FOREIGN BUDGET
REMIND FOLKS OF THAT FIFTEEN A
PACKAGE THAT WENT THROUGH LAST
YEAR. I'M ONE OF THE BILLS THAT
WENT THROUGH THE WAS REALLY
IMPORTANT IS HOW WE IDENTIFY
SITES
IF THIS BILL IS GOING TO GREATLY
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SITES
THAT WE HAVE TO IDENTIFY. IT CAN
BE VERY DIFFICULT FOR US TO
IDENTIFY THOSE SITES UNDER THE
NEW PROCESS WHERE WE HAVE TO
MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE REALISTIC
IN THERE'S DEMONSTRATE WILL
POTENTIAL FOR THEM TO REDEVELOP.
I'M ADDITIONALLY IF THOSE
NUMBERS ARE REMEMBERS GET TOO
LARGE I'M WE'RE GOING TO BE
CAUGHT IN THIS PERPETUAL CYCLE
OF HAVING TO DO S. B. THIRTY
FIVE. AND ALL OVER COMMUNITIES
BECAUSE IT CAN'T POSSIBLY GET
I'M TO MEET THOSE AND THOSE
NUMBERS AND THE REASON WHY
CITIES CAN'T NECESSARILY MEET
THOSE NUMBERS. IS BECAUSE ARENA
IS NOT A PRODUCTION MANDATE
CITIES DO NOT BUILD HOMES WE
PLANNED AND WE SET THE STAGE FOR
DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEVELOPERS
COME IN AND DO THAT DEVELOPMENT
WITHOUT SUBSIDIES VERY DIFFICULT
TO TELL. THEM.
YOUR NAME AND WHAT YOUR POSITION
HAS.
I GOT THE LEAGUE OF CITIES DON'T
LIKE IT SO.
CHRIS I.
TALKED TO OWN DOOR.
SO AND SO OF ALL OF US I THINK
OKAY DIPS.
WHO'S THERE OKAY YOUR NAME.
WE ONLY HAVE HOW MANY STATE
ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES WE ALSO
DO NOT HAVE AN OPPOSE POSITION
WE'VE SHARED OUR CONCERNS WITH
THE BILL AND LOK FORWARD TO
WORKING WITH THE AUTHORS OFFICE.
ON IMPROVING AS WE SHARE A LOT
OF THE CONCERNS ALREADY
IDENTIFIED BY APA THE LEAGUE AND
CAL*. YEAH OKAY.
THREE ZERO COUNTY REPRESENTS A
CALIFORNIA WITH CONCERNS AS WELL
THANK YOU.
HUMAN OF OR TO THE URBAN CARRIES
A CALIFORNIA ALSO WITH CONCERNS.
S..
JEFF HARDY GEAR HAVE TICKETS.
ALSO EAT MEAT TO.
OKAY THANK YOU A.
SUSAN CURSE REPRESENTING LIVABLE
CALIFORNIA OPPOSED TO THIS BILL.
RIGHT.
TOM WEISSMULLER INDIVIDUAL
OPPOSED THE BILL.
ALRIGHT.
JOHN BATTLE THIS IS A RECKLESS
MANDATE WITHOUT WATER OR
INFRASTRUCTURE TIPS ON WHAT IT.
I STEVE SHARK CITY IT COUNCIL
CUPERTINO REPRESENTING ONLY
MYSELF. AND TWENTY SEVEN
THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THREE.
SUPPORTERS OF BETTER CUPERTINO
AND I HOPE THAT THERE IS A
MANDATE TO FORCE DEVELOPERS TO
BUILD THE RINA ALLOCATIONS THAT
THEY'RE GRANTED. AND THE
PROJECTS THAT ARE APPROVED
BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT DOING THAT
NOW.
THANK YOU.
GENERAL BEING OPPOSE THE BILL.
JULIE TESTA. RESIDENT CITY OF
PLEASANTON AND I REPRESENT TENS
OF THOUSANDS OF OTHER RESIDENTS
WHO ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS
BILL WE OPPOSE THE BILL.
LAUREL AND BORDERS.
REPRESENTING.
CITIZEN MORAN WE URGE YOU TO
OPPOSE THIS BILL.
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
INJURY ON TWITTER TODAY ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY
HILLS IN OPPOSITION AND SOME
SORT OF THE CITY WAS CITED. A.
IN THE AUTHOR'S OPENING
STATEMENT I HOPE THE COMMITTEE
MIGHT INDULGE JUST A SHORT
RESPONSE.
A JUST TO POINT OUT THAT THE
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS POPULATION
HAS REMAINED RELATIVELY STABLE
FOR THE LAST FIFTY YEARS AND. A
POPULATION GROWTH A MAP
PROJECTION IS A BIG FACTOR IN
THE OTHER IN A PROCESS ALSO WERE
FAIRLY LANDLOCKED CITY.
AND SO THOSE ARE TWO DRIVING
FACTORS IN THE PROCESS AND SO.
WE DID HAVE RELATIVELY LOW ARENA
TARGETS ALSO THE LAND VALUE.
FOR UNITS IN THE CITY VERA DOES
THIS DRASTICALLY HIGH AND IN
MANY CASES TO CITY. OF CITIES
LIKE BEVERLY HILLS WOULD LIKE TO
COORDINATE WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS
WHAT WAS YOUR NAME PLEASE ANDREW
AND TWEAK A THANK YOU.
OPPOSE THE BILL.
THE OTHER GUYS.
THANK YOU BEVERLY HILLS.
POLISH AND RIVERS THEIR VALET
AND LANA WALK TELL WE HAVE
CLOSED THE BILL.
POLITICOS ANY OTHER.
COMMITTEE TO DEFEND ROOSEVELT
LOS ANGELES TENANTS UNION EAST
SIDE STRONGLY OPPOSE.
AND CHRISTY BOY WITH THE CITY
REDONDO BEACH OPPOSED TO THE
BILL.
RECALL SAN FRANCISCO MISSION
ANTI GENTRIFICATION ACTIVISTS.
OPPOSE THE BILL.
MAILING STEPHENS OF FROM
SUNNYVALE BY DAY BUSH ENCOURAGED
ME TO COME TO EXPRESS OUR
OPPOSITION TO A ONE SIZE FITS
ALL BAIL. BUT DOES NOT ADDRESS
THE REAL PROBLEM SOLVED
INTEGRATED IN EQUITIES THANK
YOU.
THANK.
.
DISTURB JUST OF THE DISCUSSION
ON OUR YOU KNOW FIRST OF ALL
REGIONAL READ.
SO IN GENERAL THOUGH.
THE.
.
HAVING HAVING.
BEEN ON.
THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION FOR.
TWENTY TWO YEARS ENSURING THE
COMMISSION.
AS WELL.
.
I THINK DE YOU COULD FAIRLY SAY
THAT.
TO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING THE.
THE OF FUNDING OF
TRANSPORTATION.
.
IS.
PRETTY ROBUST.
IN TERMS OF.
THE WAY WE WORK IN CALIFORNIA
HOWEVER.
THE OTHER SIDE OF IT IS THE
HOUSING PART.
IT IS NOT.
I THINK IT'S VERY CLEAR FROM THE
CLOGS AND FROM OTHER PEOPLE. AND
FROM CENTER WINTERS BILL AND
OTHERS.
THAT THE PLANNING.
THROUGH.
RENA AND.
LOCAL GENERAL PLANS
IS NOT ROBUST IS NOT TO HOME.
IT'S NOT.
EFFECTIVE I WOULD SAY.
I WOULD HONESTLY SAY THAT IT'S
NOT EFFECTIVE. SO WE HAVE TO
HAVE A SOME KIND OF LAW.
CONNECTION.
THAT INCREASES THE.
.
ABILITY TO DO GOOD PLANNING AND
IF WE WANT TO DO THAT'S GONNA
TAKE SOME MONEY SO THAT'S THE.
FIRST THING I WOULD SAY SO WE
TALK ABOUT.
HOUSING LEGISLATION JUST LIKE
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT S. B. ONCE.
LAST YEAR.
IN S. B. ONE WE ADDED MONEY FOR
PLANNING.
WE GOT MONEY FOR PLANNING SO THE
LOCAL. PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS
COULD DO A BETTER JOB PLANNING.
TRANSPORTATION.
FACILITIES I THINK WE HAVE TO
HAVE MONEY. FOR THE LOCAL
HOUSING. REGIONAL HOUSING
ORGANIZATIONS AND ACCORDING TO
SOME OF THE CITY'S A SMALLER
CITIES ESPECIALLY.
OUGHT TO HELP THEM ONTO GOOD
JOB.
ON.
PLANNING. OF FOR FOR THE
HOUSING REQUIREMENTS IN THEIR
JOURNAL PLAN.
GENERAL PLAN SO.
JUST A COMMENT ON JOURNAL PLANS
YES GENERAL PLANS OR CONFLICT
RIDDEN DOCTOR.
I THINK WHEN WHEN PEOPLE.
INVENTED THE IDEA GENERAL PLANS
IT WAS TO REPLACE.
QUOTE UNQUOTE ZONING BECAUSE
PEOPLE FELT ZONING WILLOWS.
NOT DONE ON A.
.
REAL PLAN BASIS IN THE.
THERE WAS NO. IDEA OF HOW YOU
CAN DETERMINE HOW MANY PARTS HOW
MANY SCHOOLS.
WHAT KIND OF TRANSIT
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES WHAT
KIND OF SERVICES?
A COMMUNITY COULD HOUSE THEY
THE.
DEVELOPED THIS IDEA OF THE
GENERAL PLAN.
AND.
SINCE THAT WAS.
.
CREATED I THINK IT'S DONE. A
PRETTY GOOD JOB. IN DEVELOPING
PLANNING FOR MOST OTHER THINGS
LAND USE HOW YOU KNOW OF PARKS
RECREATION SOMEWHAT THE LATER IT
STARTED TO GET BETTER. TERMS OF
PLANNING SCHOOLS BUT IT'S NEVER
REALLY DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB ON
PLANNING THE HOUSING.
AND I THINK THAT'S.
ANOTHER.
PAYING THAT.
.
WE NEED TO WORK ON AND FORCING
AND CREATING BETTER PLANNING
FOR.
THE HOUSING SUPPLY SO I AM I
WILLING TO. WORK IN THE CONTEXT
OF. THE REGIONAL PLANNING. AND
THE LOCAL PLANNING. TO IMPROVE.
.
THE GOALS AND THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF THOSE GOALS FOR MORE HOUSING
UNIT IN THE VARIOUS COMMUNITIES
I THINK WE ALL. WE ALL SHOULD
AGREE WITH THAT SO WE CAN BE
FOUGHT. THE REGIONAL PLANS. AND
WE CAMBERLEY BEFORE THOUGH LOCAL
PLANS BY.
.
WORKING ON THIS BILL THIS BILL
HAS GENERALLY A PRETTY GOOD
DIRECTION FOR MY OPINION.
BUT I THINK THERE NEEDS TO HAVE
SOME SOME OTHER THINGS.
WHERE THERE'S SOME CONFLICTS?
AND AND IN.
THINGS THAT NEED TO BE CLEARED
UP AND I'M GOING TO CENTER
WINTERS AGREED TO WORK WITH ME.
BETWEEN NOW IN THE
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE.
TO.
KIND OF DO THOSE KINDS OF
THINGS THAT WERE MENTIONED IN
THE STAFF REPORT SPECIFICALLY.
SO. I LIKE TO INVITE OTHERS
SPEAKERS OTHER THOUGHTS FROM
MEMBERS SENATOR ALLEN SENATE
CANNELLA.
SENATORS THEN MAYBE CENTER
WINNER COMMENT ON THOSE.
ACCOUNTS I'M.
STRUGGLING WITH THIS BILL A BIT
BECAUSE.
LAST YEAR YOU KNOW UNITED
SPOKEN SENATOR ABOUT CHINA.
FIXING THESE ENORMOUS EQUITIES
AND GREEN AND I WAS HOPING THAT
THAT WOULD BE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN
WITH THE SPELL. I THINK THAT MY
UNDERSTANDING OF THE ISSUE THAT
REDONDO BEACH HAS.
IS THAT IS IS PRECISELY WHAT YOU
JUST DESCRIBED THE FACT THAT
THEY HAVE SUCH A HIGHER
ALLOCATION THAN THEIR
NEIGHBORING CITIES.
WERE BASICALLY DOUBLING DOWN
THAT FORMULA BY FORCING AT YOU
KNOW BY VICE OR TAKING THE
EXISTING ALLOCATIONS.
I UNDERSTAND RUN DOUBLING THE
MANY MORE WERE NOW DOING HER
TWENTY FIVE PERCENT. BUT THEN
WE'RE ADDING IN THIS ROLL OVER
ASPECTS. THAT I THAT BASICALLY
WILL.
PENALIZE THEM FOR NOT MEETING
THE.
THE TARGETS.
BEFORE. AND I YOU KNOW I I DO
THINK WE NEED TO GET MORE
AGGRESSIVE WITH OUR CITIES ABOUT
THIS BUT I DO THINK THAT THERE'S
AN AND A BASIC EQUITY ISSUE
HERE.
BECAUSE THEY.
THE BE BECAUSE THEY ARE AT SUCH
A SUCH A HIGHER BEING A BURDEN
YOU CAN UNDERSTAND WHY THEY
WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT
ANYTHING. THAT DOUBLES DOWN ON.
THE EXISTING RENA NUMBERS.
AS YOUR BILL SEEMS TO DO IT AYE
AYE MAY BE.
CONFUSED BUT THAT'S MY
UNDERSTANDING OF WHY WE'RE GONNA
BE TO SUPPOSE IT'S BECAUSE OF
THE FACT THAT THEY WERE.
THE DATA THERE'S SUCH A
DISPARITY BETWEEN THEIR
ALLOCATION AND THEIR NEIGHBORING
CITIES ALLOCATIONS.
THE ARE SENATE CENTER ALLEN
REYES TO RESERVE ONE HERE MALL.
NO I'M HAPPY DOING AND I UNDER
ALLEN WHO.
ONTO.
I BELIEVE SAID IN THE COMMENTS
AROUND AS WE TWENTY SEVEN LAST
WEEK THAT THE. THAT THE RIGHT
APPROACH THE HOUSING WAS YES TO
THIRTY FIVE APPROACH TO SAY
THAT.
THE METER GOLD ARE ALL GOOD YOU
KNOW METER VOSER WE'RE GOING T
HELP YOU MEET YOUR GOALS.
BY EXPEDITING IN STREAMLINED
APPROVAL PROCESS WHICH IS WHAT
IF YOU THIRTY FIVE DIES.
BUT OF COURSE SABRINA. IS OUT
OF WHACK WHICH IT IS. THAT MEANS
THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE WE'RE
NOT GONNA REALLY HAVE THE BEST
POSSIBLE. NOT RESULT AYE AND THE
REDONDO BEACH SITUATION IS A
SITUATION WHERE RENA. SHOWS HOW
RINA IS OUT OF WHACK I'D TERMS
OF THE RULE OVER A WE'RE HAPPY
TO HAVE CONVERSATIONS. ABOUT
WHAT THAT MEANS IF YOU HAVE. A
CITY TAT HAS A REALLY OUT OF
WHACK.
TO LIVE JARGON BUT OUT OF WHACK
RINA. EITHER HIGH OR LOW WHAT
WHAT THAT MEANS BETTER THAT'S
BETTER FAIRPOINT IT FOR THE. FOR
THE TRULY AL LIAR CITIES
AND THE QUESTION IS.
IT MAY BE THAT REDONDO BEACH IS
NUMBER WAS THE RIGHT NUMBER AYE
MANHATTAN AYE HERMOSA BEACH WERE
THE ONES THAT WERE OUT OF WHACK
OR MAYBE VICE VERSA.
AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE
CAN CERTAINLY TAKE A LOOK AT. BY
IN THE BILL BECAUSE IF IT'S
REALLY CLEAR THAT'S NOT A CITY
GUIDE ALLOCATION THAT WAS JUST
REALLY BIZARRELY LARGE BASED ON
NOTHING.
WHAT WE CAN TAKE THAT INTO
ACCOUNT?
BUT NOBODY FUNDO BUT YET SO WE
SAID YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE
REASON IS. RIGHT WHAT THE REASON
WE KNOW WE CAN FIND OUT THE REAL
YOU KNOW THE REASONS OFTEN.
POLITICAL THAT'S TO BE HONEST ON
HOW WE CAN'T SAY THAT UNTIL WE
LOOK INTO IT AND THAT'S WHAT I'M
SITTING ON THEIR EVERYTHING'S
POLITICAL I THINK YOU KNOW SO.
YOU KNOW WE ALL KNOW WITHOUT BUT
BUT I THINK THE REASON THAT THEY
GOT THE TWENTY FIVE VERSUS THE
OTHER ONE GETTING.
YOU KNOW.
THREE OR WHATEVER IT WAS. OF.
THERE MIGHT BE SOME EXPLANATION
BUT THERE MIGHT NOT BE.
IN A LOGICAL FRIEND OF.
I THINK THE POINT TO CENTER
WAITER HOUSES STUDENTS SET UP
SOME SIX.
SOME LOGIC BEHIND IT CORRECT BUT
THAT'S THE GOAL I TO GET A
GREAT. DISARM CUT REAL LOGIC AND
FAIRNESS AND EQUITY.
ABSOLUTE MISTER SHARON AND WERE
WERE TRYING TO I ME. WHAT IS A
VERY PROBLEMATIC PROCESS RINA A
MORE COHERENT? DATA DRIVEN
PROCESS THAT WHEN YOU'RE
STARTING OUT FROM OF STRUCTURE
THAT GOD HAS SOME ISSUES.
YOU KNOW YOU'RE NOT YOU'RE NEVER
GOING TO BE ABLE TO PERFECT IT
AND YOU'RE BUILDING OFF OF OF
TRYING TO FIX THE FOUNDATION.
BUT IT'S A CHALLENGING THING TO
DO IT'S NEVER GONNA BE PERFECT
BUT THIS BILL. WILL MOVE US IN A
VERY POSITIVE DIRECTION ON ME
YOU KNOW.
IT WILL ALSO HELP US TO
ACTUALLY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ARE
FULL HOUSING NEEDS OUT WHICH
RENO REALLY.
DOESN'T ALWAYS DO. ALL RIGHT
NOW.
YEAH BUT IS IT BUT I AYE AYES
YOU'VE HEARD WE'VE BEEN WORKING
WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT.
STAKEHOLDERS AND WE'RE GONNA
CONTINUE TO DO THAT THE BILL IS
ABSOLUTELY A WORK IN PROGRESS.
BOOK I GUESS.
MY CONCERN IS THAT.
THE BUT I I WAS HOPING THAT
THERE WOULD BE HAVE A KIND OF
ALREADY A MORE COMPREHENSIVE
APPROACH TO.
TO RETHINKING.
RINA AND AND I GUESS MY CONCERN
IS THAT THE.
I UNDERSTAND BILLS ARE WORKS IN
PROGRESS BUT. IT SEEMS AS
THOUGH.
YOUR APPROACH SO FAR HAS BEEN
TO.
DOUBLE DOWN ON A LOT OF ASPECTS
OF THE. CURRENT ALLOCATION
SYSTEM AS IT EXISTS THAT WE'VE
ALL AGREED IS.
SCREWY AT.
SO THAT'S MY.
ESSENTIAL CONCERN HERE THAT THE
GOAL MISTER CHAIRMAN IF I MAY I
IS TO.
.
IT'S TO MAKE SURE THAT
COMMUNITIES ARE GETTING A
REALISTIC ALLOCATIONS THAT
REFLECT.
POPULATION GROWTH JOB GROWTH
HOUSING NEEDS THAT THAT'S A GOAL
WHICH IS. NOT ALWAYS HAPPENING
RIGHT NOW SO ULTIMATELY WE WANT
TO HAVE REAL HOUSING GOALS.
SO THAT WE GET TO A POINT. OF
WHERE WE DON'T HAVE.
YOU KNOW. FIFTEEN THOUSAND YOUTH
LIVING ON THE STREET AND PEOPLE
LIVING IN THEIR CARS AND
FAMILIES LEAVING PLACES LIKE SAN
FRANCISCO AND SANTA MONICA IN
CUPERTINO. ODD BECAUSE THERE'S
NOWHERE FOR THEM TO LIVE THOUGHT
THAT'S THAT'S THE GOAL AND WE'RE
OPEN TO ANY IDEAS THAT PEOPLE
HAVE.
WHERE WE'RE ABSOLUTELY
EXTREMELY OPEN TO? IDEAS.
INCLUDING.
.
BUT CENTER ALLEN SAYS MENTIONED
ABOUT THAT SPECIFIC ISSUE IN HIS
DISTRICT.
AND OTHER ISSUES AS WELL BUT WE
THINK THE BILL IS A REALLY
SOLID.
A FOUNDATION TO HAVING A BETTER
SYSTEM OF SETTING HOUSING GOALS.
ARE FOR CALIFORNIA.
.
THIS HERE IF I MAY I DO WE JUST
WANNA. THERE WAS AN INTERESTING.
A COUPLE COMMENTS THAT I WHAT I
WANT TO JUST MENTION.
WE HEARD FROM THE LEAGUE OF
CITIES THAT CITIES DON'T BUILD
HOUSING WE HEAR THAT A LOT.
SO AND OF COURSE CITIES FOR THE
MOST PART DON'T PHYSICALLY BUILT
HOUSING. BUT WITH CITIES TO DO
OF COURSE.
ALLOW OTHER PEOPLE.
TO BUILD HOUSING WAR.
PREVENT OTHER PEOPLE FROM
BUILDING HOUSING AND THE PROBLEM
THAT WE HAVE THERE ARE A NUMBER
OF THE ONE OF THE PROBLEMS. IT'S
NOT THAT THE CITIES ARE NOT
THEMSELVES BECOMING DEVELOPERS
WHICH THEY GENERALLY AREN'T.
BUT THAT CITIES ARE STOPPING
OTHER PEOPLE FROM BUILDING
HOUSING. THEY'RE DOING IT IN
MANY WAYS AND WE ALL KNOW WHAT
THEY ARE. MAKING IT REALLY HARD
OR IMPOSSIBLE TO BUILD HOUSING
SUBSIDIES CAN DO NOT BUILD A
HOUSING THEMSELVES BUT CITIES
CAN EITHER MAKE IT MUCH EASIER
ARE MUCH HARDER. FOR OTHER
PEOPLE TO CREATE A HOUSING AND
IN FACT WE HEARD THAT FROM THE
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS THE
REPRESENTED OF THE STATE LIKE
COG ASSOCIATION SAID HEY.
WE CAN'T FORCE THE CITIES THE
CITY'S CONTROL AND USE WE CAN'T
FORCE IN THE BILL OF HOUSING.
AND IN THE CITY SAY WELL WE
CONTROL AND USE BUT WE DON'T
BUILD HOUSING. SO IT ENDS UP THE
CAN GETS KICKED AROUND AND WE
JUST DON'T HAVE ENOUGH HOUSING
AND SO WE WANT TO JUST MAKE SURE
SETTING. GOOD HOUSING GOALS.
AND I FULLY SUPPORT MORE MONEY
FOR PLANNING.
WE DEVELOPED HERE AND. I'M A
BIG SO ESPECIALLY FOR SMALLER
CITIES BUT DON'T HAVE BIG
REPLYING APARTMENTS ON A
THOUSAND PERCENT IN SUPPORT OF
SUPPORTING THEM FINANCIALLY.
TO HELP THEM PLAN BUT I BELIEVE
I NEGLECTED TO POINT OUT IS
SPEAK TO HAVE MONEY FOR
PLANNING.
THAT WAS CENTER ARE CONSPIRACY
SPECIFICALLY PUT MONEY AND FOR.
DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING PLAN SO
SAYS BE ONE AND SP TWO BOTH HEAD
ADDITIONAL. BEEFED UP PLANNING I
THINK. I THINK THOSE THAT'S A
CRITICAL ELEMENT IN TERMS OF
ACCOMPLISHING.
SO CEREMONY HAS MORE CLEAR SO I
GUESS.
BUILDING ON WHAT YOU JUST SAID
IF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE
BEING. INTRANSIGENT ON THIS
ISSUE.
THEN.
AND AND YOU KNOW THE CHAIR
TALKED ABOUT THE POPE THE
POLITICIZATION OF THIS PROCESS.
WHEN IT COMES TO ALLOCATION OF
ARE YOU WORK ARE WE SORT OF
DOUBLING DOWN ONCE AGAIN ON THE.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ME OF THE COGS
MAKING THESE DECISIONS
WHO ARE BASICALLY MADE UP OF
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WOULD IT NOT
BE BETTER TO HAVE.
I DON'T ALSO MOVEMENT AND
ALLEGEDLY ARE GOING LIKE THIS
BUT SINCE OUR TO STATE AGENCY.
THAT WOULD LOOK AT THE.
AT AT THESE ISSUES MORE
HOLISTICALLY. AS OPPOSED TO.
I I KIND OF WORRY THAT THE MODEL
YOU STRUCTURED.
IT IS IS JUST.
IT DIDN'T IT.
IT DOESN'T. EXTRACTED SELF FROM
THE POLITICAL PHENOMENA THAT
YOU'RE SEEKING TO ADDRESS.
WE HAD THAT LAST WEEK AND IT WAS
VOTED DOWN SO THERE ARE WAYS FOR
THE STATE OR OTHER WAYS TO
DESCRIBE ROLE AND YEAH AND WE'RE
OPEN TO THOSE IDEAS BUT THIS IS
ABOUT ONE SPECIFIC ISSUE. THAT
WHAT ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I
THINK SOMETIMES PEOPLE HESITATE
TO DO ON AND AND THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN WHAT I'M SUGGESTING WHAT
YOU HAD LAST WEEK. IS THAT WE
TWENTY SEVEN WAS A WITH. WITH
WITH AS OPPOSED TO HAVING SOME
KIND OF AGENCY LOOK.
AT A THOUGHTFUL APPROACH AROUND
THE STATE AND LOOK AT THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF EVERY COMMUNITY
IT CREATED A ONE SIZE FITS ALL
APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT IN ON.
THAT SHE DID NOT BUT WE CAN HAVE
A CONVERSATION SEVERAL A THAT
WAS A TALKING POINT THAT WAS NOT
ACCURATE BUT PUTTING THAT ASIDE.
ON YOU KNOW THIS IS A STATE.
THROUGH THE COGS IN SETTING
HOUSING GOALS BUT THE CONSUMMATE
OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
THEY ARE AND THEIR GEAR A LITTLE
GOVERNMENTS THAT RIGHT STATE
GIVES THEM THE NUMBERS AND
THAT'S WHAT ALLOCATED TO THE
GUYS WANNA GO HAVE A CUP OF
COFFEE NCLEX.
OK SO. WHERE WE ARE WITH THE
BILL IS WE'RE RECOMMENDING TO
BILLS TO BE APPROVED?
WITH SOME AMENDMENTS THAT.
EXPLICITLY ADDRESS SOME OF THE
CONCERNS THAT WE HEARD TODAY NOT
ALL OF THEM BUT THERE'S SOME
OTHER CONCERNS. CENTER WINNER
HAS AGREED TO WORK WITH ME AND
ANYBODY ELSE.
THAT WAS ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
ARE ALL LISTED IN OUR STAFF
BEFORE. AND AND WE'RE GOING TO
WORK WITH THE CARD SALINAS
CITIES AND THE COUNTIES AND.
OTHER INTERESTED TO HOUSING
ADVOCATES.
EFFORT TO GET THE BILL. OF.
IS IT TENDING TO GET A BILL.
THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED.
THROUGH THE APPROPRIATIONS
COMMITTEE AND TO THE FLOOR OF
SENATE HOPEFULLY THAT'S THE. THE
GLIDE PATH THAT WERE ON WITH
THIS BILL.
SO THAT'S THE PLAN EVERYONE
EXCEPT OF PLANETS.
YOU KNOW I I I PERSONALLY THINK.
THAT.
.
THE BILL WOULD BEEFED UP GOOD.
SOLID PLANNING GIVES PEOPLE NO
EXCUSES NOT TO COME UP WITH SOME
GOOD PLANNING FOR HOUSING.
I THINK WE CAN DO THAT. YOU CAN
GET WE WE WOULDN'T REALLY WE
WILL NOT HAVE ANY MORE EXCUSES.
THERE WILL BE CONFLICTS
BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS.
AND HOUSING GOALS.
THOSE ARE THINGS THAT THE
PROGRESS.
AND THE THE MUNICIPALITIES IF
THEY HAVE SOPHISTICATED GOOD
PLANNING CAN WORK OUT.
BIG CNN I AND I DON'T BROAD
BRUSH.
CITIES I DON'T SAY ALL THE
CITIES ARE BAD THEY DON'T DO THE
HOUSING THAT START.
THAT'S NOT EVEN RELEVANT COMMENT
MY PIN BECAUSE WE HAVE WE HAVE
ALL THESE DIFFERENT ACTORS. AND
SOME OF THEM DO A PRETTY GOOD
JOB. OTHERS
TRADITIONALLY HAVEN'T DONE A
GOOD JOB.
AND.
BUT I THINK IF WE HAD SOME
CONSISTENT PLANNING CONSISTENT
STANDARDS THAT'S WHAT DO
SENATORS.
TRYING TO ACHIEVE.
I WILL SUPPORT DEBT BECAUSE I
THINK. THAT GIVES US THOUGH.
UNEVEN PLAYING FIELD FOR ALL THE
CITIES TO CONSIDER IN MY OPINION
THAT'S.
BUT SO I THINK IT'S A FAIR WAY
OF DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE.
SO.
THAT'S A THAT'S KIND OF MY.
MY.
EFFORT TO WORK SOMETHING ON
THEIR HOUSE.
WITH THE SENATOR AND THE AND
THE CLOGS AND THE OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS.
SO I THINK WE CAN DO IT IF WE IF
WE ALL WORK TOGETHER.
CENTER. FIGURES CHAIRMAN JUST A
QUESTION FOR THE LEAGUE OF
CITIES YOU'RE NOT LISTED IN
OPPOSITION BUT IT SOUNDED LIKE
YOU WERE OPPOSING THE BILL WHAT
EXACTLY IS YOUR POSITION.
YEAH YOU CAN COME UP FROM.
YEAH. YEAH DO CENTER WINNERS
KICKS HERE WE WOULD YOU MIND
SKIPPING OVER JUST A LITTLE BIT
SORRY HAD OTHER AGO YOU WERE
DISTRACTED ME LAST TIME AS WELL.
IT'S CERTAINLY A DECENTLY
CALIFORNIA CITIES A WE DO NOT
HAVE AN OFFICIAL POSITION WE
YOU KNOW COMMIT.
AUTHOR
TO MEET A COUPLE TIMES WORK OUT
SOME OF OUR
OF OUR DIFFERENCES. BUT WE
CERTAINLY SHARE MANY OF THE
CONCERNS THAT THAT HAVE BEEN.
MENTIONED.
I THINK THE METHODOLOGY IT IS
SOMETHING THAT PERHAPS YOU KNOW
THIS SENATOR BELLS MISSION THAT
THAT WE CAN GET THERE YOU KNOW
OF MAYBE A BETTER ALLOCATION OF
AN OF NUMBERS. THEY DO SEEM A
LITTLE BIT I'M OUT OF THE
ORDINARY BORN IT COMES TO YOUR
DOUBLING DOWN TO WHAT WE HAVE
AND THE OTHER PERFORMANCE OVER
THE YEARS SELECT COMMENTS IN
OPPOSITION SO WHY ARE YOU IN
OPPOSITION. WHERE WHERE YOU
NEUTRAL ON THIS BUT THIS IS A
BIG BILL IMPORTANT COMMUNITIES
IT'S JUST INTERESTING THAT YOU
WOULD NOT TAKE A FORMAL POSITION
I KNOW IT IS A VERY BIG BILL
MAHER TAKE IT VERY SERIOUSLY I
THINK THAT THE MAIN REASON WHY
WE'RE NOT IN OPPOSITION TO?
THE SENATOR ASKED HIM TO WORK
WITH A SYMBOLIC ACT THANK YOU.
THERE MCGUIRE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
I DEAL WITH AYE THREE SPECIFIC
ISSUES CENTER WINNER AND I'M NOT
GOING TO REHASH LAST WEEK.
SO.
.
FIRST OF ALL I IN ONE IS A
COMMENT IN NOT A QUESTION I'M I
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT. AND IT
HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS WITH
INDIVIDUALS ON CITY COUNCILS.
WITHIN THE NORTH BAY ADDED THAT.
THE AMENDMENT AND THAT ARE BOTH
SENATORS HAVE WORKED THROUGH
WITH CHAIR IN CENTER WIENER. IS
REPLACING SHALL WE SHOULD.
TO DO AWAY WITH THE UNINTENDED
MANDY TO ENSURE FUTURE HOUSING
PRODUCTION AND MATT. I'M AND I
THINK THAT IS A SIGNIFICANT
EVENT. FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
CANDIDLY.
THE.
.
THE IT AND THAT'S WHERE I'VE
HEARD A LOT OF CONCERNS UP FROM
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
I DEVELOP THEORIES I KNOW YOU
HAVE A CONVERSATION EARLIER
ABOUT DEVELOPED AREAS.
AND I ALSO KNOW THIS IS A WORK
IN PROGRESS.
ONE OF THE ITEMS OBVIOUSLY WANNA
AVOID IT I KNOW THAT I DON'T PUT
WORDS INTO CENTERS HOUSE I'M
SURE HE WANTS TO AVOID IN
PERFECTLY ON A CORPORATE
COMMUNITIES ARE NINE DAY. ARE IN
NINE DEVELOPED OR SMALL
COMMUNITIES IN UNINCORPORATED
AREAS.
SO ONE OF THE AREAS AND EARLIER
WE WORK WITH BECAUSE THEY GET
CITY SEE SACRISTY OVERSEAS WELL
LOOK AT THOSE PRIORITY
DEVELOPMENT AREAS LIKE FOR
EXAMPLE IN THE COUNTY CINEMA FOR
EXAMPLE OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS. THAT HAVE ALREADY
BEEN IDENTIFIED.
OTHER UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
THAT ARE CONNECTED SOMEWHAT TO
TRANSIT CONNECTED COMPLETELY
WITH A RAIL LINE I COULD BE A
POTENTIALLY A FOCUS.
UP FOR THOSE PRIOR TO DEVELOP
AREAS AYE AND THAT'S CANDIDLY
WHERE THE VAST MAJORITY OF
UNINCORPORATED. I'M.
COUNTY UNINCORPORATED URBANIZED
AREAS YEAH BUT OLD ACKERMAN A
HOLE IN. YOUR COUNTY YEAH SO
ANYWAY AS YOU GO FORWARD.
SALMON IS I THINK THAT'S AN
AREA THAT WILL NEED TO BE OUT
FOCUSED IN ON AND NOT.
SPRAWLING OUT RIGHT NOW WITH IN
OTHER AREAS I'M.
I KNOW YOU'RE AND I DON'T KNOW
I DON'T LIKE SCHOOL YEAH SO I'M
I'M ALL I'M I'M ALL FOR.
AVOIDING SPRAWL.
IN IN THAT'S WHY I'M JUST
WONDERING UP AND NOT TRY TO PUT
ANY WORDS IN THE MOUTH BUT IT
IS.
NOT MAKING SURE. I'M AND I THINK
THE OTHER PIECES LATIN AND IT
WAS A SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT.
AGAIN GOING FROM. AYE DOWN FROM
TWO HUNDRED PERCENT.
SO I'M NOT AT ALL TRYING TO
REHASH WHAT YOU PARTY DISCUSSED.
BUT I THINK THAT THE IMPORTANT
PIECE OF.
BUT THIS IS.
FOCUSING ON WHAT THOSE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS ARE.
UNDERSTAND THEIR MOVING THE
NEEDLE.
AND THE SHALL THEY SHOULD.
I'M AND I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT
THAT'S GOING TO BE SUPPORTING
THE BILL TODAY.
THE RODIUS MORE QUESTIONS RIGHT.
GO AHEAD.
NO YES ONE WELL I. I JUST WANT
TO CLARIFY ANY SUGGESTING WAS
HAVING A STATE APPROACH THAT
WOULD ACTUALLY LOOK.
THAT WOULD LOOK SPECIFICALLY AT
THE VARIOUS ISSUES THAT HAVE
BEEN RAISED IN THE BILL.
AND AND MEN ALLOCATES OUT THE.
P. WE NUMBERS AS OPPOSED TO.
ALLEN THE COGS DO IT.
I.
I WOULD BE HAPPY TO SIT DOWN
WITH YOU AND TALK THROUGH THE
AYE. I SUSPECT THAT THERE ARE
SOME PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM MIGHT
NOT LIKE OUT BY.
CUTS THAT'S OVER A REASONABLE.
IDEA TO DISCUSS.
I THINK.
.
I THINK PART OF THE GOAL OF THIS
COULD WILL BE DONE IN THE PAST
AND I THINK YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY
RIGHT AS WE JUST CITIES BECAUSE.
THIS IS YOUR OVERALL NUMBER DO
WITH IT AS YOU WILL AND THEN
SOME OF THESE.
ODD RESULTS AND UP HAPPENING AN
INEQUITABLE RESULTS BUT
SOMETIMES HAVE TO DO WITH
INCOMES OF COMMUNITIES ARE WHO
HAS THE MOST POLITICAL CLOUT. BY
AND THE GOAL OF THE BILL. IS TO
PUT MORE GUARDRAILS AROUND WHAT
THE COGS DO. AND INSANE OKAY
STATE YOU GAVE US A TO SAVE A
MILLION HOMES ARE JUST MAKING A
NUMBER OF.
INSTEAD OF SAYING KAGYU YOU
ALLOCATE THE MILLION HOMES HOW
YOU ON. THE PART OF THE PURPOSE
OF THE BILL IT'S TOOK PLACE
STRONGER STANDARDS AND GUARD
RAILS SO THAT I'D SIR ALEC
HITTING UP THERE DOING A BASED
ON ACTUAL METHODOLOGY. AND NOT
JUST BASED ON WHO YOU KNOW.
CARRIES THE BIGGEST TECH OR
WHATEVER ON IF THERE ARE BETTER
WAYS OF DOING THAT WERE ABSOLUTE
OPEN TO THOSE IDEAS I THINK
WOULD PRICE YOU'RE THE SAME
GOAL.
AND JUST HAVING THE NINE RAN THE
NESTS OF ACOG DOING.
.
FOR HAVING THAT WE WANT TO AVOID
THE RANDOMNESS OF THE COGS DOING
WHATEVER THEY WANT NOT INSULTING
BECAUSE I WAS PART OF ONE.
THE ARENA PROCESS IS A REALLY
DIFFICULT ONE EVERYONE IS IN A
DIFFICULT POSITION BECAUSE ARE
IN A DIFFICULT POSITION THE
CITIES ARE IT'S SO MUCH PUSHING
AND PULLING NO ONE'S BAD NO
ONE'S GOOD. EVERYONE'S TRYING TO
THEIR JOB BUT WE I THINK WE CAN
SET UP A BETTER STRUCTURE NOTES
WERE TRYING TO IF THERE ARE
OTHER IDEAS WE ARE ACTUALLY ONE
CURE THEM.
SO.
CENTER CENTER OF CANNELLA YOU.
SIR WHERE OF CENTER OF.
ONE THAT'S ITEM AYE I THINK THIS
IS REALLY UNDERSTANDING
PROCESSES WE MOVE FORWARD
BECAUSE I THINK IT'S CAN BE
IMPORTANT BALDING.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CITIES COUNTIES
COGS WHO ARE CAN BE.
FOCUSED IN IMPACTED ON THE
LEGISLATION CAN YOU JUST LAY OUT
AND.
YOUR THOUGHTS AND ALSO WOULD
LIKE TO BE A ASKS SUDDENLY AND
SAME THING ABOUT WHAT IS THE
PROCESS LOOK LIKE AS FAR AS
BRINGING DEFINITION TO THE BILL.
BOND AND HOW YOU SEE THIS ROLL
OUT OVER THE NEXT FEW WEEKS.
WELL I THINK YOU'RE YOU KNOW AS
WE ALL KNOW.
HOUSING IS BEEN KIND OF.
.
WEAK PART OF THE PLANNING
PROCESS AND REGIONAL PLANNING.
IT HASN'T HAD THE STRENGTH IN
THE ATTENTION.
CA.GOV TRANSPORTATION.
PLANNING AND THE TRANSPORTATION
PLANNING SAID MONEY SO THAT
ATTRACT A LOT OF INTEREST OF
COURSE.
YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF PROJECTS
YOU'RE GONNA GET A YOU KNOW
FIGHTING FOR THE PROJECTS.
DOING THAT BUT THE HOUSING IN
THE LAND USE PLANNING OR.
DOES NOT.
HAD THE.
INFOSYS WOULD SAY IN CALIFORNIA
PLANNING.
AND MY PURPOSE IN WORKING THE
CENTER WIENER. IS TO ACTUALLY.
MAKE THE CARDS HAVE A MORE
RELEVANT CLEAR. PLANNING
CROSSES.
THAT CAN PRODUCE
WORKING WITH THE CITY'S.
MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN
CALIFORNIA MEETING OUR HOUSING
GOALS.
CREATING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR
STATE TO RECOVER FROM THE
HOUSING DEFICIT THAT WE HAVE.
PA CREATING THE OPPORTUNITY TO
SEE SOME LOGIC BEHIND FINANCING
HOUSING AND. IF THE PUBLIC CAN
SEE THAT WE HAVE A GOOD PLANNING
PROCESS A GOOD.
PALM.
A WAY OF FAIRLY.
DETERMINING WHERE THE HOUSING
SHOULD BE BUILT AND AND PLANNED.
I THINK THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE
MUCH MORE SUPPORT.
FOR.
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT'S
BUILT IN CALIFORNIA.
AND I THINK PART OF THE PROBLEM
IS WE DON'T WANT TO CREATE.
A SITUATION WHERE.
.
IT'S CA ARMED MONSTER POLITICAL
ISSUE THAT CREATES BACKLASH.
YOU KNOW CONSTANT SO.
IF YOU KNOW ME WAVES OF
DIFFERENT KINDS OF LEGISLATION
OVER THE YEARS WE WANT TO CREATE
A. LOGICAL.
CLEAR. PLAN FOR PROCESS SO
EVERYBODY CAN.
FEEL COMFORTABLE NO MATTER WHAT
PART OF THE STATE TO RAN HIM OUT
COULD BE.
I OBVIOUSLY KNOW THAT SAN
FRANCISCO.
IS.
.
YEAH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF PLACE
IN SAN JOSE I THINK GAP MISSING
SENSES A MUCH BETTER PLACE.
BUT TO HAVE.
SARAH CISCO'S A NICE PLACE TO
SENATOR WIENER FIFTY CITIES AND
YOU KNOW THEY WERE.
CITIES BUT OF SO MUCH OUT OF THE
SAND AND SAY.
HAS DIFFERENT KINDS OF.
PLANNING ISSUES.
THEN SARAH CISCO LIKE YOU
POINTED OUT SANTA ROSA HEELS
BURGERS DEFERRED.
SIZES AND AND THEN WE HAVE
CITIES THAT HAD GROWN REAL FAST.
THEN WE HAVE CITIES THAT DON'T
GROW AT ALL.
WE HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF
COMMUNITIES.
BUREAU I HATE TO ADMIT BUT THE
MAN FROM BEVERLY HILLS POINTED
OUT THAT.
THAT CITY HASN'T GROWN AT ALL.
AND.
SO.
SAN JOSE GROWS QUITE QUITE
RAPIDLY OVER THE LAST THIRTY
YEARS. AND SEVERAL OTHER CITIES
AND OTHER COMMUNITIES IN
CALIFORNIA SO SO I THINK WE HAVE
TO. GENERALLY. YOU KNOW NOT BE.
.
I WOULD SAY.
.
BROAD BRUSHING THIS TOO MUCH.
IF WE BROAD BRUSH IT TOO MUCH
THEN.
WORLD WILL NOT ACHIEVE WHAT
WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE HERE.
OKAY WHICH IS TO GET MORE
HOUSING.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACHIEVE IT.
WOULD HAVE TO BE WE HAVE TO BE
LOW MORE SOPHISTICATED IN OUR.
IN OUR APPROACH I THINK IN AND
LOOK AT THE INDIVIDUAL AREAS.
AND RESPOND TO THAT TO SEE WHAT
WE CAN DO THE.
GET THE BEST.
OPPORTUNITY FOR HOUSING IN EACH
ONE OF THOSE AREAS SO THAT TAKES
A LOT OF PLANNING A LOT OF WORK.
AND NOW MONEY.
IT NOT BE SURE TO INTO PLEASE
AND WINNERS HAVE WOULD REQUIRE
COMING AFTER CENTER WIENER DE
THANK YOU I'M THROUGH THE CHAIR.
ZERO THANK YOU FOR THAT I I I
THINK ONE THING YOU KNOW I KNOW
I THEME AND ALL THE BILLS THAT
TODAY INCLUDING THE. LACTATION
ONE WE MAP WE HAVE AN OPEN DOOR
AND WE MEET WITH.
PEOPLE WHO AGREE WITH US DON'T
AGREE WITH US AND WE. TAKE I
FEEDBACK FROM PEOPLE WHO DON'T.
AGREE EVEN IF IT'S.
IF IT'S GOOD ON I WANNA
ACTUALLY I I I I HAD MY
DISAGREEMENTS WITH EARLIER
CITIES I WANNA ACTUALLY THANK
ILLEGAL CITIES. FOR NOT COMING
OUT QUICKLY AND OPPOSING THE
BILL WE SAT DOWN.
WITH THE LEAGUE EARLY AND I
SAID YOU HAVE MY COMMITMENT THAT
WILL WORK WITH YOU.
AND.
WERE DOING THAT AND WE WILL DO
THAT AND I'M VERY APPRECIATIVE
THAT THEY HAVE AND.
QUICKLY COME OUT ON IN
OPPOSITION AND WE'RE GOING TO
CONTINUE. NOT JUST
APPROPRIATIONS BUT I'M SURE I'VE
THINGS GO WELL THEM THROUGH THE
ASSEMBLY OF WILL BE CONTINUING
TO WORK WITH STAKEHOLDERS AND I
LOOK FORWARD TO THAT PROCESS
RENA'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO.
GETS BEAT UP A LOT INCLUDING BY
ME BECAUSE IT HAS PROBLEMS.
BUT WE'RE GONNA I HOPE MAKE IT
BETTER.
AND IT'S GOING TO TAKE A LOT OF
SMART PEOPLE HELP MAKE THAT
HAPPEN.
NOT BE SHOULDN'T SO AMEND MY
LAST ITEM IS SO WHAT IT SOUNDS
LIKE IS AT THAT TO VIEW WE
MEETING WITH EACH OF THEIR.
RESPECTIVE GROUPS TO MAY
POTENTIALLY BE IMPACTED BY THIS
ROAD I THINK I'M GOING TO VOTE
ALL THE SINNERS THAN THIS
COMMITTEE ON THE. IN THE
DISCUSSION SENATORS ALL BUT
THAT'S OUR WATER AND VOTE
EVERYBODY BECAUSE I THINK
THERE'S.
THERE'S A HEIGHTENED INTEREST
RIGHT NOW WE OUGHT TO GET
TOGETHER AND.
PICTURES SOMETHING WE CAN COMMIT
TO OURSELVES AND.
PRIOR PERHAPS.
PERHAPS UNIFIED NO.
YES SIR.
AND ALL THIS FINISHES EL SHADDAI
DECK IS READY TO MOVE THE BILL.
IS THAT I. I I APPRECIATE.
TAKING INTO ACCOUNT.
WHAT MAY WORK IN A LARGE
METROPOLITAN AREA THIS TO SAY
OVER FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND?
IT MAY IT'S GOING TO BE
DIFFERENT THOSE COMMUNITIES THAT
ARE BETWEEN TEN THOUSAND AND
TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND FOR
EXAMPLE.
AND THREW THE CHAIR I I THINK
THAT THE I MEAN.
I GUARANTEE YOU IF WE TALK ABOUT
REALLOCATION TODAY FOR
HEALDSBURG VERSUS SAN FRANCISCO
TURNED DIFFERENT UNIVERSES SO
ONE OF THINGS ABOUT RINA. IS IT
IN SOME WAY THIS BUDGET
SUBCOMMITTEE HUMAN ONCE WE FIX
IT. AT SMALLER CITIES ARE GOING
TO GET SMALLER ALLOCATIONS ARE
NOT KILL BURGER TALKING TO GOD
YOU KNOW A HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS HUNDRED THOUSAND HOME.
ALLOCATION SAN FRANCISCO IS NOT
GOING TO GO TWO HUNDRED HOME
OCCASIONS ALSO
SECRET SAUCE IN THERE THAT I
THINK ALL OF US ARE
EXACTLY SURE HOW THEY DEVELOP
THE FORMULA.
BUT.
THAT I WILL GO SHARE WITH YOU
THAT CRITICISM BUT AGAIN
ALLOWING YOU TO CONTINUE TO WORK
ON THIS ISSUE.
WILL BE SUPPORTED OBVIOUSLY ONE
OF YOUR TO SEE WHAT THAT FINAL
RESORT IS RESULT WILL BE.
PRIOR TO GET ON THE FLOOR BUT I
APPRECIATE TACTLESS AND WORKING
WITH THE CHAIR AS WELL AND WE
SUPPORT THANK YOU SO MUCH THANK
YOU OF. CENTER DANGER OF A COMET
CENTER LIKE.
.
THANK YOU CENTER WIENER IF YOU
COULD JUST LE.
HELP ME A LITTLE BIT IN TERMS OF
HOUSING ELEMENT BECAUSE.
I KNOW THESE ARE ESTIMATES THERE
MADE MINUTES POLITIES BUT.
IT SEEMS LIKE THE MARKET
CONDITIONS HAVE TO BE JUST RIGHT
TO.
YOU'VE GOTTA HAVE.
INTEREST RATES.
ECONOMY HIS SPEECH GROWING AYE
I THINK.
YOU'VE GOTTA HAVE.
A LOT OF MARKET DRIVEN.
MECHANISMS IN PLACE IN ORDER TO
SATISFY ARENA REQUIREMENT SO.
MARIE FAHEY DIS RESPOND TO THAT.
THAT THE BUILDING IS RECENT
SUPPORT.
BUT I MEAN THESE ARE BASICALLY
JUST ESTIMATES THAT MAY OR MAY
NOT BE THAT HERE TO YOU BASED ON
WHAT'S HAPPENING WITHIN THE
MARKETPLACE SO ON YOU TWO THINGS
YOU NEED THE. ECONOMIC STRENGTH
FOR THE.
FOR THE PRIVATELY PRODUCE
HOUSING AND THEN YOU NEED PUBLIC
FUNDING OF FOR THE.
OF LOWER INCOME BY HOUSING AND
AND BOTH ARE IMPORTANT ELEMENTS.
AND WE DO HAVE.
SPORT IN THE CONSTRUCTION
INDUSTRY WILL ALSO SUPPORT ON
FROM NONPROFIT AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.
DEVELOPERS ALSO TO AND I NICE
NICE CARING.
AND THE WAY YOU KNOW PURSUE A
WORKS IS ARENA NUMBERS COME NOW
AND THEN. EYES ON COMMUTERS ARE
GOING TO THEIR HOUSING ELEMENT
PROCESS THEY HAVE TO ZOOM. OR
IDENTIFIED IN THEIR HOUSING
ELEMENT ALTERNATELY ZONE. FOR
WHATEVER THEY'RE REUNITED
SOMEWHERE NOT SENSIBILITY HIGHER
THAN THE ARENA US BECAUSE IT
DOESN'T ALWAYS PAN OUT ONE EVERY
PARCEL.
AND YES THERE ARE THERE ARE
TIMES WHEN YOU KNOW IF THE IF
THE ECONOMY TANKS.
YOU'LL SEE A DROP IN PRODUCTION
NOTS BEYOND ANYONE'S CONTROL BOB
THEM WHEN ECONOMY CCELERATES.
IF COMMUNITIES ARE ALLOWING THE
BILL HOUSING TO BE BILL THAT
PICKED TIMES AGO BILL. AND
COMMUNITIES WHERE FOR WHATEVER
REASON DEVELOPERS WERE FOR THE
HOUSE DEVELOPERS ARE NOT
INTERESTED IN BUILDING. ON THEN
EVEN IF THEY DON'T MEET THEIR
REUNITES IF NO ONE'S GOING TO
BILL NO ONE'S GONNA. BUILD
PRESENTED SOME THINGS WE CAN'T
CONTROL ARENA YOU KNOW.
WELL I WISH WE COULD YOU KNOW
REALLY.
JUST PERFECT HAVE PERFECT
HOUSING DELIVERY ON EVERYTHING
AT SEA AS YOU KNOW LIFE IS TOO
COMPLICATED FOR THAT. A BUT BUT
WHAT WE CAN CONTROL IS HAVING
REALLY GOOD.
HOUSING GOALS POSSIBLY HE HAD ON
A BETTER PATH FOR THOSE WHO DID
JUST BASED ON THE MARKET
CONDITIONS AS WELL PLUS EVERY
EIGHT YEARS HE HEARS EVERY YEAR
IT'S TYPICALLY.
IT'S TIME
AND.
YOU KNOW. USER AND AGAIN RIGHT
NOW EVERY COUNCIL GOVERNMENT HAD
THEY HAVE THEIR OWN SOMETIMES
THEY DO IT THEIR OWN WAY.
AND SO IT DOES NOT EVEN
COMPLETE CONSISTENCY ACROSS THE
STATE WHICH IS TRYING TO MAKE IT
A LITTLE MORE CONSISTENT BRING
UP PERFECT I'M NOT. AND NEVER
GONNA CLAIM IT'S PERFECT BUDGET.
THE QUESTIONS FROM OTHER
SENATORS WE HAVE A MOTION. ON
THE FLOOR SIR RICHARD CLOSED.
I'VE A COLLEAGUES THANK YOU THIS
I REALLY APPRECIATE THE
THOUGHTFUL DISCUSSION AND I
RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR AYE VOTE.
CALDERON.
SENATE BILL EIGHT TWENTY EIGHT
BY SENATOR WINNER THE MOTION IS
TO PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED
TO THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATE.
SENATOR ABOUT. BILL AYE CANNELLA
FIVE CANNELLA AYE ALLEN. DIED.
DOT I GAINES GAINES AYE GALGIANI
MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE MORALE.
ROCKS SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE BIDAK BUT I'VE
BECAUSE HE WIENER AYE WIENER AYE
A THANK YOU COLLEAGUES THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIRMAN.
IT'S.
WE HAVE A VOTES IN FAVOR LEAVE
THE ROLE CENTER FOR ABSENT
MEMBERS CENTER A SCANNER IS
HERE.
WELCOME SENATOR TO THE
TRANSPORTATION HOUSING COMMITTEE
WE ALL BEEN BUSY.
WELL YOU AND YOU HAVE. YOU HAVE
THREE BILLS AND THEN CENTER OWN.
WE ARE CO PRESENTING.
ITEM THREE SO. AT.
IF YOUR PLEASURE YOU COULD
PROCEED YOUR BILL THAT WILL GO
THE.
THE LAST ONE IS SET WHICH WAS
EXCELLENT YES BUT I WOULD LIKE
YOU WITH YOUR PERMISSION TO.
PRESENT FIRST ON SP FOURTEEN
SIXTY NINE SINCE IT GOES TO.
GOVERNOR FINANCE NEXT IN THE
DESK IS.
READING TO RECEIVE IT.
IF HOPEFULLY OKAY WE HAVE.
WE'RE ON ITEMTWENTY THREE. S.
B. FOURTEEN SIXTY NINE SEVENTY
OF THE FLOOR.
THANK YOU SO MUCH AND CHAIR AND
MEMBERS
SO AS AND WE ALL KNOW
CALIFORNIA'S TO SEVERE HOUSING
CRISIS WHICH WAS ONLY
EXACERBATED BY THE RECENT FIRES
AND MUD SLIDES WHERE WE LOST
EVEN MORE UNITS.
AND FORTUNATELY ONE OF THE
QUICKEST
AND IN A WAY EASIEST SOLUTIONS
THOUGH IT'S NOT THE ONLY BUT IS
IN OUR OWN HOMES IN BACKYARDS.
AND OUR COLLEAGUE FROM FREMONT
SENATOR WIECKOWSKI HAS.
HELP THE LEGISLATURE RECOGNIZED
THAT IS AUTHORED GROUNDBREAKING
LEGISLATION BEHIND THESE GRANNY
UNITS ARE ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS WHICH IS THE FOCUS OF MY
BILL ALSO.
AND.
WHAT MY BILL DOES IS AN ADDS TO
THE?
PROCESS
THE FACILITATION OF A D. USING
G. DO USE THAT THE LEGISLATURE
HAS ALREADY BEGUN.
AND WHAT IT DOES IS ADDRESSES A
FEW ADDITIONAL BARRIERS FOR
EXAMPLE IT ALLOWS UP TO ONE
EIGHTY OR ONE G. DO YOU ON AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY LIFE.
IT ALLOWS YOU TO USE WITHIN
MULTI FAMILY BUILDINGS WHICH SO
FAR HAS NOT BEEN. IT REMOVES
LOCAL FEES TO REDUCE
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
AND THAT IS SOMETHING WE ARE IN
DISCUSSION ABOUT TO.
MINIMIZE THE IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS
AND REVENUE TO SCHOOL SINCE
ACTION IT'S A.
CONVERSATION THAT SENATOR.
IN OUR BARGED I'D DEEPLY ENGAGED
IN IT WILL BE ADDRESSED FURTHER
IN HIS COMMITTEE.
AND IT FILE BUT IT ALSO ALLOWS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO CLEAN HAVE
CLEAR LIMITS REQUIREMENTS
FOR FOR EXAMPLE FIRE OR LIFE
SAFETY PURPOSES.
AND FINALLY IT DIRECTS OUR
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT. DEPARTMENT TO
ESTABLISH A SMALL BUILDING
CODES.
BY TWENTY TWENTY.
SO WITH ME TO.
PRESENT IS A.
LOCAL.
A BUILDER OF THE D. USE AND
ALSO.
I ALSO NEXT UPPER SANDERSON AND
I ALSO HAVE THE SPHINX IN HERE
FOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT SO GO
AHEAD THINK EVER OF WITNESSES
PLEASE.
WHAT'S THE FIRST OTHER GOOD
AFTERNOON MY NAME'S DEBBIE
SANDERSON I'M A RETIRED LOCAL
GOVERNMENT PLANNER. AND CO CHAIR
OF THE EIGHTY YOU TASK FORCE
WHICH IS AN ASSOCIATION OF ALL
DEAR PER.
WHO ARE WORKING TO IDENTIFY IN
REMOVES OBSTACLES TO BUILDING A
D. USE?
MY COLLEAGUES AND I ARE MOVED TO
DO THIS WORK DURING OUR FAMILY
TIME AND OUR RETIREMENT TIME
BECAUSE WE BELIEVE VERY DEEPLY.
THAT A D. USE NJ ES DE USE ARE
ESSENTIAL.
THERE ARE FAR MORE AFFORDABLE
AND FASTER TO BUILD THAT OTHER
FORMS OF HOUSING.
THEY CREATE HOUSING OPTIONS
WHERE INCREASINGLY THERE ARE
NONE.
THEY ALLOW US TO CHANGE OUR
HOMES TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF OUR
FAMILIES AND FRIENDS AND
CAREGIVERS IN STUDENTS.
AND THEY PRESERVE THE EXISTING
COMMUNITIES OP SO IT'S HOUSING
PLUS PRESERVING COMMUNITIES.
DURING THE PAST YEAR WE HAVE.
QUAN ACQUIRED SIGNIFICANT FOR.
PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE
FIELD WHEN PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO
BUILD A DO YOU USE.
THIS BILL FOCUSES ON SOLVING
THESE PROBLEMS WHICH ARE LIKE A
SECOND LAYER OF OBSTACLES THAT
COULDN'T BE SEEN PREVIOUSLY
SARAH.
SOME SPECIFICS I INCORPORATES
BEST PRACTICES FOR AB FIRE
RECOVERY ZONES AND FROM PRO A DO
YOU CITIES.
AT ALLOWS AND EIGHTY AND A
JUNIOR J. A DO YOU ON THE SAME
PARCEL.
IT ALLOWS I MORE A DO YOU
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE MULTI
FAMILY STRUCTURES WHICH IS HELP
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO A LOT.
IT ALLOWS A MODEST BY RIGHT.
EIGHTY YEAR.
WHICH GIVES HOMEOWNERS
CERTAINTY.
SO THAT MEANS THERE'S A MINIMUM
SIZE HEIGHT SIZE IT YOU CAN
BUILD IN YOUR BACKYARD.
IT CLOSES THE LOOP HOLES IN
SOME OF THE CURRENT A DO YOU
PARKING STANDARDS. A AND THAT
MEANS MORE PARCELS WILL BE
ELIGIBLE.
HE AYE REDUCES THE COST OF
BUILDING EIGHTY YEARS.
SO THE BUT THIS BILL WILL MAKE
IT FASTER AND CHEAPER TO BUILD
EIGHTY YEARS.
ESPECIALLY FOR LOW AND MODERATE
INCOME HOMEOWNERS AND HOMEOWNERS
WITH SMALL PARCELS.
THANK YOU.
BUT BY UNDERNEATH SPANKS THEN.
I TOO AM A FORMER HOOKER
PLANNING CHIEF ALTHOUGH I'M NOT
YET RETIRED. AND I I HAVE TO SAY
THAT THE FOLKS WHO DRAFTED THIS
BILL. INCLUDING MANY IN THE
RANKS OF CURRENT PLANNING CHIEF
SCAR TODAY'S CURRENT PLANNING
CHIEFS AND FORMER WHO UNDERSTAND
INTIMATELY WHAT GOES WRONG AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHEN HOMEOWNERS
GO TO THE COUNTER TO TRY AND
PULL BUILDING PERMIT. AND SOME
OF THE GAMESMANSHIP THAT CAN
HAPPEN AT THE ZONING COUNT OR AT
THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN ANGRY
NEIGHBORS WANT ONE THING AND
HOMEOWNERS ARE TRYING TO DO
SOMETHING ELSE.
IN THE CASE OF ANY USE.
THEY ARE THEY HAVE A SPECIAL
PLACE IN CALIFORNIA HOUSING
POLICY FOR THE STATE TO
INTERVENE BECAUSE THEY'RE THE
ONLY STATE ACTION THAT CAN GO
FROM POLICY TO ACTUAL PERMIT. IN
UNDER TWELVE MONTHS AND SENATOR
WHAT CASKEY.
DEMONSTRATED THAT VERY APTLY.
IT ABOVE THE THE ADVANTAGES OF
IT WERE POINTED OUT BY MY
COLLEAGUE BUT I WANT TO POINT
OUT THAT EIGHTY YOU EXPERTS
AROUND THE STATE COMPILED THEIR
KNOWLEDGE AND WORKING EXPERIENCE
WITH TRYING TO ROLL OUT CREEK
CALIFORNIA.
CURRENT LAW TO PREPARE THIS BILL
INCLUDING FOLKS AT UC BERKELEY.
UCLA LA MOSS WHICH IS A NON
PROFIT THAT BUILDS A TO USE ON
THE AFFORDABLE COMMUNITIES AND
LATINO NEIGHBORHOODS IN LOS
ANGELES. ON THE CURRENT PLANNING
CHIEF OF CINEMA COUNTY WHO'S
BEEN WORKING EIGHTEEN HOUR DAYS
TRYING TO GET UNITS BUILT THE
FIRE RECOVERY SOUND AND IS FOUND
THAT EIGHTY USE ARE THE ONLY.
QUICK TO DELIVER UNIT TYPE THAT
IS AFFORDABLE AND COME HAS BEEN
AT IT HAVE WORKED ON THE BILL
TO.
MAKE SURE THE STANDARDS WORKED
NOT SO THAT CINEMA COUNTY IS NOT
THE ONLY JURISDICTION IN THE
STATE. THAT'S TRYING TO DO
EIGHTY USE.
SO THE BILL BOTH REMOVES
BARRIERS THAT EXISTED PROMOTES
BEST PRACTICES IS W. POINTED
OUT.
HAPPEN WITH THE STATE ROLE IN
THIS IS TO CREATE ESSENTIALLY A
LEVEL PLAYING FIELD SO THAT
EVERY COMMUNITY EQUALLY
PARTICIPATES IN THE PRODUCTION
OF HOUSING
WE ALL HAVE STEEP WE ALL HAVE
TEACHERS LIVING IN OUR
COMMITMENT WHO NEED TO LIVE IN
OUR COMMUNITIES WHO WORK THERE.
WE ALL OF NURSES AND DOCTORS
WERE NOT ALL PRODUCING HOUSING
FOR THE FOLKS WE NEED IN EVERY
COMMUNITY. EIGHTY USER A WAY OF
DOING THAT ALMOST INVISIBLY
THANK YOU.
OF SPEAKERS IN FAVOR PLEASE OF
DISCONTENT FOR YOURSELF AND.
ABOUT YOUR POSITION THANK YOU.
I'M AIMS AT BACK CURRENCY I AM
HERE REPRESENTING WORKING
PARTNERSHIPS USA. I WE REPRESENT
ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND WORKING
PEOPLE IN SAN JOSE AND SANTA
CLARA COUNTY. AND WE'RE HERE TO
SPY SPEAKING SUPPORT IF AMENDED
BY TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE
HOUSING UNITS ARE ACTUALLY
HOUSING AND NOT SHORT TERM
RENTALS THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NEIGHMOND NAM YOUR POSITION ON
THE BILL PLEASE JENNIFER SPENT
ABOUT CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
REALTORS HERE IN SUPPORT.
DOESN'T MATTER NAPA PLAYHOUSE
PUBLIC AFFAIRS HERE ON BEHALF OF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CALIFORNIA
IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL THANK
YOU.
MICHAEL I'M AT THE NONPROFIT
HOUSING ASSOCIATION OTHER
CALIFORNIA AND SUPPORT.
EMILY AGDAM GAP THE CALIFORNIA
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
AND SUPPORT.
DEEPLY PHANTOM HOW THE BRIDGE
HOUSING IN SUPPORT.
LOSE MONDAY WITH CALIFORNIAN BE
IN SUPPORT.
VETERAN COVERT WITH THE BAY AREA
COUNCIL IN SUPPORT.
OKAY DOG WE HAVE OPPONENTS
PLEASE COME FORWARD.
WELCOME. TO MY BEER. ABBASI.
THANK YOU.
YES SERVICES PLEASE.
THESE OUR OPPONENTS.
GOOD AFTERNOON SENATORS ADAM CAN
UNISOM BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION
OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES WE
ARE OPPOSE. UNLESS AMENDED
HONESTY FOURTEEN SIXTY NINE. OF
FOR THE SINGLE PROVISION THE
BILL THAT WOULD. PROHIBIT ANY
FEES BEING CHARGED TO THE
SUCCESS THREE DWELLING UNITS.
I'M CURRENTLY OUR WATER AGENCIES
CHARGE CAPACITY OR CONNECTION
FEES. ON THE ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT BEING BUILT WOULD EXCEED
THE EXISTING CAPACITY OF THE
CURRENT CONNECTION.
SO.
IT DIDN'T IN SOME LOCALITIES
CONSIDERATE BECAUSE GIVEN BUT
MAKE SURE ADDRESS THAT DOES SOME
LOCALITIES TO.
CHARGE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY.
SO IT VARIES BUT I KNOW IN THE
EAST BAY THAT'S CERTAINLY HOW
THEY'RE CHARGING.
.
AND SO FOR US IT'S REALLY THOSE
PROVISIONS WE'VE BEEN WORKING
WITH SENATOR WIECKOWSKI ON A
SPEED THREE ONE. ARE HOPEFUL WE
CAN COME TO A RESOLUTION AND
SOMETHING THAT IS SO A LITTLE
BIT MORE A WORKABLE FOR FOR OUR
MEMBER AGENCIES.
WERE HOPEFUL TO SEE THOSE KINDS
AMENDMENTS IN THIS BILL AS WELL
AYE HAPPY TO WORK WITH THE
SENATOR.
TO TRAIN GET THERE BUT RIGHT
NOW WE ARE PUTS LESS MINTED.
OKAY THANK YOU OTHERS SPEAKERS.
CHRISLEY ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTIES RESPECTFULLY IN
OPPOSITION I'M I THINK IT'S
IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT WE JUST
PASS
SPILLS AND TWENTY SIXTEEN. WHICH
WENT INTO EFFECT ON JANUARY ONE
TWENTY SEVENTEEN AND NOW LOCAL
AGENCIES ARE NEARING THE PROCESS
OF COMPLETING UPDATES TO THEIR
ORDINANCES AND SO. THIS BILL HAS
TO BE VIEWED IN LIGHT OF THOSE
RECENT CHANGES ESPECIALLY ONE OF
THE PROVISIONS WHICH WOULD
REQUIRE UNLIKE EXISTING LOT THAT
WE DESIGNATE PLACES WHERE EIGHTY
YOU.
SHALL BE PERMITTED IT REVERSES
THAT FRAMEWORK IN SIZE INSTEAD
THE ORDINANCES HAVE TO SEE WHERE
THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SO
BASICALLY. EVERY LOCAL AGENCY
THAT HAS WORKED IN GOOD FAITH TO
IMPLEMENT AT SPEED TEN SIXTY
NINE AB TWENTY TWO NINETY NINE
SOME TWENTY SIXTEEN IS GOING TO
HAVE TO RE OPEN THEIR PROCESS
AGAIN AND SO I THINK WE HAVE A A
BROAD POLICY CONCERN. ABOUT
CHANGING THE ENTIRE FRAMEWORK OF
HOW THE EIGHTY YOU LA WORKS
SO CLOSE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION
DATE OF THE LAST MAJOR CHANGES.
I'M I THINK AQUA POINTED OUT THE
SOME GOOD ISSUES RELATED TO THE
FEE PROVISIONS AND WHILE WE HAVE
SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT STATUTORY
UNDERPINNINGS FOR THE FEES THAT
WE CHARGE FOR IMPACTS RELATED TO
NEW DEVELOPMENT. WE SHARE THOSE
CONCERNS AND SO I THINK IT WAS
GOOD THAT THE PROPONENTS CALLED
OUT CINEMA COUNTY IN THE END OF
THE GOOD WORK THAT THEY'RE DOING
WITH THEIR ORDINANCE.
BUT IT ALSO POINTS OUT THE FACT
THAT DESPITE THE CONCEPTION THAT
MOST OF THESE UNITS ARE GOING TO
BE VERY SMALL AND NOT HAVE A LOT
OF IMPACTS.
ESPECIALLY IN THE UNINCORPORATED
CONTEXT WHERE PARCELS ARE A LOT
BIGGER PEOPLE ARE BUILDING LARGE
EIGHTY YEARS I'VE SEEN PLANS FOR
A COMPANY THAT DOES A FOUR
BEDROOM TWO BATHROOM. LESS THAN
TWELVE HUNDRED SQUARE FOOT UNIT
SO THERE WILL BE PEOPLE THERE WE
FAMILIES LIVING IN THOSE UNITS
THERE WILL BE INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPACTS. AND TO THE EXTENT THAT
WE DON'T ALLOW AGENCIES TO
RECOUP THE INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS
OF THOSE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS I
THINK WHAT WE'RE ACTUALLY GONNA
SEE IS AN OUTCOME THAT THIS
COMMITTEE WOULDN'T WANT TO SEE.
WHICH IS THE REDUCTION IN THE
SIZE OF UNITS THAT
OTHER THAN BEING ALLOWED.
SPEAKERS OPPONENT. CLOSING.
MIGHT MICROBES IN HERE ON BEHALF
THE COW FREE MINUTES POLICE
CHILES ASSOCIATION AND REALLY
JUST I'M AYE I REITERATE
EVERYTHING THAT PREVIOUS.
SINCE THEN JUST ADD
THAT YOU KNOW PAGE NINETY%
ANNOUNCES RIGHTLY POINTS OUT THE
FACT THAT. THAT THERE THERE'S A
STUDY TO BE DONE ON LOCAL
DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR EIGHTY YOU
IT'S TWO IN AG JUNE OF TWENTY
NINETEEN. THAT THE ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDS THAT THE FACT THAT
THE IDEA THAT I MEAN MAYBE THE
FEET PROVISIONS IN THIS BILL BE
REMOVED AND TELL THAT THAT STUDY
IS COMPLETE. AND WOOD ONLY ALSO
ADD THAT YOU KNOW MUNICIPAL
UTILITIES THAT COME OUT AND
PROVIDE A SERVICE TO PROVIDING A
SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE
PUTTING IN EIGHTY YOU IN. THAT
THAT SERVICE.
IT COSTS SOMEBODY SOME MONEY AND
IT'S THERE'S IT'S NOT FREE SOME
SOMEBODY'S GONNA PAY AND IF IT'S
NOT CAN BE PAID BY THE THAT THE
PERSON.
PUTTING IN THE EIGHTY IT'S GOING
TO BE
SPREAD OUT TO BE IN THAT THE
NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS AND HAVE TO
PAY FOR SWORD JUST LOOKING FOR
SOME AT SOME. TIME SOME FAIRNESS
IN IN THE FEE PROVISIONS SO I'M
THANK YOU.
BREEDERS TRACY RYAN RURAL COUNTY
REPRESENTS OF CALIFORNIAN
OPPOSITION OKAY THANK YOU.
MISTER CHAIRMAN WAS JOINT FORCE
AGAINST URBAN CARRIES A
CALIFORNIA ALSO IN OPPOSITION.
OR ENABLE ANTI REPRESENTING THE
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
OPPOSITION.
JASON FINALLY CALIFORNIA CITIES
IN OPPOSITION.
IN PRETTY WITH THE COALITION FOR
ADEQUATE SCHOOL HOUSING IN
OPPOSITION.
OKAY.
UMPS OKAY ARM.
YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS
FROM THE.
COMMITTEE PERHAPS.
.
SENATE GAINES TO PREP CENTER
SKINNER CAN.
RESPONDING TO THOSE CONCERNS
WERE RAISED YEAH THANK YOU GOT.
SENATOR SKINNER A FIGHT YOU JUST
GET SOME CLARITY ON THIS ISSUE
OF.
PIECE.
FROM A MUNICIPALITIES
SOLICITORS CONNECTION FEE.
CAN THAT ISSUE BE ADDRESSED
BECAUSE IT SEEMS THAT.
.
THERE COULD BE A COSTS INCURRED
BY THE MUNICIPALITY.
AND I DON'T WANT TO MAKE SURE
THAT.
THEY WERE GETTING REPAID PRODUCT
SERVICES THAT WERE RENDERED.
APPRECIATE THAT A.
ON THE QUESTION OF FEES THIS
BILL NEXT GOES TO GOVERNMENT AND
FINANCE AND.
I AM WORKING WITH THE CHAIR
ENACT COMMITTEE ON THAT QUESTION
AND WE ARE.
WORKING I KNOW THAT I CENTER
WIECKOWSKI IS ALSO ON THE FEET
FEE PORTION OF HIS A BILL IN
AND.
I BELIEVE THAT IT'S OUR INTENT
THAT THEY WOULD BE THEY WOULD
MIRROR EACH OTHER AND THAT WE
WILL.
WORK CLOSELY WITH THE CHAIR OF
THE NEXT COMMITTEE TO WORK THAT
OUT.
OKAY GRIEF THANK YOU AND THEN
THE OTHER WAS THROUGH MY CASKET
BILL.
EIGHT THIRTY ONE.
DO THEY CONFLICT OR ARE THEY
COMPLEMENTARY AND COULD YOU
EXPLAIN THAT.
THERE IS.
ONE KEY DIFFERENCE WAS HIS
OWNER OCCUPANCY. AND.
MY BILL WOULD REQUIRE OWNER
OCCUPANCY. AND.
THAT IS.
DO OUR MOTIVATION THERE IS THAT
WE'VE SEEN NOW. A NUMBER OF
VERY.
LARGE CORPORATE ENTITIES BUYING
UP SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN AREAS
LIKE SACRAMENTO AND OTHERS.
AND WE DO NOT WANT OUR EFFORT TO
TRY TO INCREASE SECONDARY UNITS
TO NECESSARILY RESULTS IN ANNIE
BIG SPECULATIVE INCREASE.
AND SO THAT IS THE ONE OF THE
MOTIVATIONS FOR OWNER OCCUPANCY
REQUIREMENTS.
BUT SENATOR WHITE HOUSE CAN I
ARE WILL BE.
MEETING AND TALKING ABOUT HOW
TO. BRING SOME OF THE ISSUES
TOGETHER AND.
I'M OPTIMISTIC THAT WE WILL.
IT TRY TO LAND SOME WORKING ON
THAT BUT THAT IS ONE OF THOSE
MOTIVATION FOR OUR INCLUSION OF
THE OWNER OCCUPANCY PORTION
GREAT THANK YOU.
SO DOT.
IT'S IT'S IT'S IT'S MY
UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE'S NO
BREAK IN THE LINE LIKE A SEWER
LINE.
SO NOBODY HAS COME OUT FROM THE
SEWER DISTRICT OF THE CITY IF
THEY'RE DOING IT ALSO CITY
WATER.
OR ANY OF THOSE THINGS THAT
THERE'S.
THE OTHER CERTAINLY NO COSTS
IN I REALLY BELIEVE THAT THE
AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN.
RENDER THIS BILL A VERY
POSITIVE BILL I THINK THE.
I I THINK THE IMPACTS TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT ARE DA MINIMUS.
YOU KNOW IN THIS REGARD AND
BEYOND NOTHING THAT I'VE HEARD
I.
YEAH WITH THE THE WIECKOWSKI
BILL ON IT IN A DIFFERENT
COMMITTEE OR HERE HAS.
CONVINCE ME OTHERWISE I'LL BE
SUPPORTING THIS BILL.
THANK YOU THEIR MCGUIRE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE CHAIR
AND JUST WANNA SAY THANK YOU TO
CENTER SKINNER.
IS WELL CENTER WIECKOWSKI
POUNDS A. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF
DISCUSSION ABOUT DECISION IN
CENTER SKINNER'S BEEN VERY OPEN.
TEAM IN REGARD TO SEWER AND
WATER.
OKAY AT PEACE WHICH WILL BE
TAKEN CARE OF IN THE NEXT POLICY
COMMITTEE. AND WE HEARD A LOT OF
ISSUES ABOUT SCHOOLS.
AND SO I CENTER WIECKOWSKI IS
WELL SENATE SKINNER AGAIN NEXT
POLICY COMMITTEE MEMORY SEVEN
DISAPPEARS BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN
WE'VE HEARD SOME FOLKS TODAY. IT
THEY WILL BE CAPPED SCHOOL
IMPACT FEES WILL BE CAPPED AT
THREE THOUSAND. THE REASON BEING
IS I'M WANTING TO BE A TO GIVE
CERTAINTY TO THOSE HER
DEVELOPING AND IF YOU ACTUALLY
TAKE A LOOK AT. IT THIS WAY
INCLUDE SEWER WATER SCHOOLS AND.
ELECTRIC FOR EXAMPLE IT IS
GOING TO BE A DRASTIC DRASTIC
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT. FEE
SCHEDULE IS NOW. UP TO WHAT IT
IS.
EVEN WITH UP SEWER WATER
SCHOOLS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES
IS GOING TO BE I DON'T WANNA
MAKE UP THE PERCENTAGE BUT ABOUT
TWO THIRDS OF WHAT THE COST
WOULD BE. AT PEACE WERE LOOKING
AT A AVERAGE A DO YOU COULD BE
ANYWHERE BETWEEN SIXTY TWO
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OPINION
OVER YOUR DEVELOPING.
IF IT'S A VERY NON ATTACHED
UNIT SO.
BUT ALSO WANTING TO BE TO TAKE
CARE OF. THOSE IMPORTANT ISSUES
FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SO I'D KNOW
THAT MAY NOT MAKE. ALL LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS HAPPY READING THIS
LAD THINKS IS CENTERS CONSIDER
LIKE ASKING A COMING ON A LONG
WAY. I TO BE ABLE TO ASSIST.
BLOOM.
I GOT A QUESTION FOR THE
PLANNERS.
OKAY OF I'M FROM A BIG CITY SAN
JOSE.
AND.
WE HAVE A TO USE ALREADY THERE
CALLED ILLEGAL DWELLINGS IN THE
BACKYARDS OF PEOPLE US HERE IN
THE GARAGE THEIR ILLEGAL THEY'RE
ALL OVER THE WHOLE CITY. I MEAN
YOU KNOW BIG CITIES HAVE THESE
THINGS YOU KNOW THIS KIND OF
THING. YOU THINK THIS LAW WOULD.
CREATE A SAFER.
COMMUNITY IF WE HAD.
THIS LAW AND COULD YOU COMMENT
ON THE.
.
THE HOOKUP FEES BECAUSE I SEE
THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN HAVING.
YOU KNOW FOR A BIG CITY KIND OF
LOOK AT FROM MY STANDPOINT. SAN
JOSE.
I WOULD SAY.
THEY'RE JUST ALL OVER THE PLACE
I MEAN TO BE HONEST ABOUT IT
IT'S OUT OF CONTROL.
IS OUT OF CONTROL RIGHT NOW WITH
THE HOUSING PROBLEMS IN SAN
JOSE.
IS OUT OF CONTROL THEY'RE JUST
ALL OVER THE PLACE WE NEED TO
HAVE SOME.
BUT HE SAYS SOME OF LAWS BUT WE
CAN'T HAVE LAWS THAT ARE TOO
COMPLICATED. IF TO HAVE LAWS
THAT ARE CLEAR AND EASY FOR
SOMEBODY TO GO AND I FEEL FREE
TO GO TO DO THE JOB. OF GETTING
A GOOD QUALITY.
SIMPLE.
DWELLING UNITS BUILT WITH THE AS
OPPOSED TO HAVING SOME.
DANGEROUS FIRE TRAFFIC CANDOR IS
WE'VE HAD FIRES IN.
THESE THINGS AND PEOPLE DIED
QUITE FRANKLY I MEAN YOU KNOW
THAT'S IT'S LIKE ON THIS LIKE
SAFETY FACTOR FOR ME I'M I'M
LOOKING AT FOR ABOUT STEP. SO
MAYBE THE PLANNERS CAN COMMENT
ON THAT I THINK YOU'RE
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT WE CAN TALK
ABOUT THAT BUT IF YOU DON'T MAKE
THE ZONING RULES EVEN.
PEOPLE THE ONLY WAY FOR SOMEONE
WHO HAS TO HAVE AN EIGHTY USED
TAKE CARE OF AN OLDER FAMILY
MEMBER IS TO DO IT ILLEGALLY
WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT AND
HIDE.
AND I THE SO THERE ARE SOME
COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA THE
CITIES OF BELLE IN LOS ANGELES
WHERE MORE THAN HALF OF THE
HOUSING PRODUCED ARE ILLEGAL
EIGHTY USE. THAT THOSE OWNERS
CAN NEVER LEGALIZE BECAUSE THE
ZONING RULES DON'T ALLOW IT THEY
DON'T MEET MINIMUM LOT SIZE
WHICH THIS BILL GETS RID OF.
THEIR AND AND SO THEY EVEN IF
THEY WANTED TO GET A BUILDING
PERMIT ZONING RULES WOULD KEEP
THEM FROM PULLING A PERMIT.
SO THIS BILL CONTAINS A LOT OF
DATA AND IT DOES IT FOR
EVERYBODY SO HOMEOWNERS CAN NOW
COME FORTH. AND GET A BUILDING
PERMIT MAKE THAT UNIT SAFE AND
LEGAL. BOMB OTHER WAYS THEY JUST
CAN'T I'M IN ONE OF OUR
COLLEAGUES TO BE ON A TRIP DOWN
THE SAN DIEGO HE WAS.
HE TOOK ME TO TO LAUNCH AND
ANNIE.
TOOK ME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD WEEK
YOU GROW UP IN A BAR YOU LOGIN.
AND HE DROVE DOWN THE STREET A
SAYS WELL THERE'S WHERE I LIVE.
AND I SO THAT HOUSE HE GOES NO.
DRIVE DOWN THE STREET DOWN THE
HILL A LITTLE BIT. SO WE DROVE
DOWN THE HILL.
THIS IS IN THE BASEMENT DOWNER
BE UNDERNEATH THE HOUSE IS WHERE
I LIVE. SO THAT'S KIND OF A.
THAT WAS SENATOR DE LEóN.
AND.
SIR DALY AND SHOW ME HIS. HOUSE
CITY LIVED UNDERNEATH HE LIVED
IN A BASEMENT.
WHERE HE GREW UP?
IN A BASEMENT UNDERNEATH THE.
THE THE REGULAR HOUSE. YOU KNOW
THIS IS THIS IS THIS FOCUSES
THIS IS LIKE SOMETHING THAT
COULD HELP.
THE THE THE HEALTH AND WELFARE
FOR ITS SAFETY.
HEALTH SAFETY FOR PEOPLE SO WE
GOT IT WILL START TALKING ABOUT
THE USES.
LIKE A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE
FOR. FOR COMMUNITIES IN IN.
AND HELPING PEOPLE.
HAVE SAFE CLEAN HOUSING IN WHICH
IS WHAT WHAT OUR GOAL IS.
THAT'S WHY I SUPPORT THE BILL
ELECTIVES HERE ABOUT THE WATER
LOOK UP.
DID YOU GUYS LOOK AT DATA SAID
SOMETHIN.
SO WE'RE GONNA SENATOR.
REQUIRE POINTED OUT WE ARE. WE
ARE WORKING ON THAT.
YOU DON'T WANT TO HEAR WHAT THEY
HAVE TO SAY BUT I'M SURE SO.
.
IT IT A BOOK WATER HOOKUP FEES
TEND TO BE IMPOSED AT VERY VERY
HIGHLY VARYING RATES IN THE
STATE THOUGH SOME PLACES CHARGE
SAID.
SOME OF IN CHARGE FIVE OR SIX
AND THE HOUSES UNDER OCCUPIED
SO IF YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVE A TWO
OR THREE THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT
HOUSE AND IT'S JUST YOU AND HER
HUSBAND MIKE. YOU KNOW LIKE MY
HOUSE.
I COULD EASILY PUT AN EIGHTY
YEAR IN MY BACKYARD AND NOT PAY
A NEW WATER HOOK UP FEE AND NOT
USE ANY MORE WATER THAN HAS BEEN
USED IN THAT HOUSE FOR A HUNDRED
YEARS.
SO ON THE ONE HAND THERE'S A
FAIR ARGUMENT THAT YOU DON'T
NEED TO CHARGE WATER HOOK UP FEE
EVERY TIME YOU DO AN EIGHTY YOU.
BECAUSE SIXTY PERCENT OF
CALIFORNIA SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
ARE UNDER OCCUPIED COMPARED TO
THEIR DESIGN DENSITY SO WE GET
WE CAN BUILD SIXTY PERCENT AS
MANY HOMES AS WE HAVE NOW
WITHOUT TAPPING WATER CAPACITY
AT LEAST IN THEORY.
HOWEVER IT'S REASONABLE THAT
PEOPLE GET SOME AMOUNT OF FEES
SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT
AMENDMENTS THAT ARE BEING
PROPOSED AND TAKEN. ALLOW SOME
MODEST FEES FOR WATER AND SEWER
HOOKUPS AND A MODEST FEE FOR
SCHOOLS THAT AREN'T SO PUNITIVE.
THAT YOU TIP THE BALANCE TOWARDS
HOMEOWNERS BUILDING A WEEKLY
WITH NO PERMITS AND ALL THAT AND
THAT'S THE TIPPING POINT YOUR
TRIED IT HIT WITH THE BILL I
DON'T WANT TO GET TOO HIGH
BECAUSE IT WOULD DISCOURAGE
PEOPLE EXACTLY. DO OTHER THAN
JUST GO BACK TO YOU LEGAL THE
OLD THE OLD WAY OF.
BUT IN SOME ILLEGAL THING AND
THEREIN THAT KIND OF THIS
DEFEATS THE WHOLE THANK YOU
DOING ILLEGAL YOU DON'T PAY THE
FEES SO ANY OBSERVER SOME OF OUR
AND I WOULD ALSO ADD THAT IF THE
AT.
THE EIGHTY USE CAN BE ATTACHED
TO THE HOME THERE'D BE NO FREE
AS WELL OR HIS IN EXISTING
STRUCTURE BUT THERE'D BE NO FEE.
SO I IS CLARIFIED WITHIN THOSE
AMENDMENTS.
AS WELL BOTH OF THE BILLS.
THE REQUESTED FOR ALL THE
MEMBERS HERE SEEM DOUBLE.
THEY HAVE THE GOOD COUSINS
SENATOR FROM STE BERKELEY AND I
ARE GOING TO SIT DOWN THEIR AIR
THERE ARE DIFFERENCES THAT ARE
OUTLINED IN THE HEAD. IN THE
ANALYSIS ON PAGE THE PAC TEN FOR
THE MOMENT I'M JUST GONNA STAY
OFF OF IT BECAUSE I DON'T WANT
PEOPLE BE MORE CONFUSED.
HAVE WHAT'S GOING ON BUT WE'RE
WORKING WITH A GOVERNOR FINANCE.
WILL GET TEMPTED TO FLORIDA
EVERYBODY CAN SUPPORT.
OKAY THANK YOU CENTER SIR OTHER
QUESTIONS YOU MAY CLOSE CENTER.
AND THANK YOU AND THANK YOU DON
CHAIR FOR POINTING OUT THAT.
WE HAVE
THOUSANDS OF THESE UNITS UP AND
DOWN THE STATE THAT WERE DONE
ILLEGALLY BECAUSE OF OUR
RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AND. THAT
YOU CAN REALLY LOOK AT THIS IN
ADDITION TO BEING SOMETHING TO
ADDRESS OUR HOUSING CRISIS AS A
FAMILY MEASURE BECAUSE. MANY
FAMILIES WILL BE ABLE TO STAY IN
THEIR HOME IF THEY'RE ABLE TO DO
THESE TYPES OF UNITS OTHER.
FAMILIES WILL BE ABLE TO HAVE
FAMILY MEMBERS LIVE WITH THEM
AND IN THE.
I THINK THIS IS NOW IS THE
APPROPRIATE TIME COMPARED TO THE
TO THE. OPPOSITION WHO SAID THAT
WE SHOULD WAIT JUST BECAUSE HE'S
NEW RULES WENT INTO EFFECT.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHEN SINCE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT IS IN THE MIDDLE OF.
SINGER BIDDERS TO ADD THESE AND
MAY AND DAD THESE RULES SO THAT
THEY CAN FIX IT ALL AT ONCE.
AND.
I WILL NOTE THAT BETWEEN THE
PERIOD OF TWENTY FIFTEEN TO
TWENTY SIXTEEN HOMELESSNESS IN
CALIFORNIA GROUP BY FOURTEEN
PERCENT.
A THANK YOU CENTER OF CULTURAL
PLEASE.
SENATE BILL FOURTEEN FIFTY NINE
BY SENATOR SKINNER MOTION IS TO
PASS AND REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND
FINANCE
SENATOR BAO. BELL AYE CANNELLA.
ALLEN. DODD.
DODD AYE GAINES.
GALGIANI MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE
MORALE ROSS.
SKINNER AYE SKINNER AYE VIADUCT
BECAUSE HE WIENER.
FOURTH YEAR FOR BOTH. LEAVE THE
ROAD OPEN FOR ABSENT MEMBERS
THINKING GOING THERE NEXT BILL
SENATOR THANK YOU.
BY.
I WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO FIRST
TIME I CAN GO NEXT TO.
WHICH WE JUST STICK TO HOUSING
FOR MEN OR GO TO S. B. TWELVE
TWENTY SEVEN.
OKAY WITH THAT THAT NO
OPPOSITION I'D LIKE TO MOVE THE
BILL.
OKAY.
RIGHT I WILL NEVER SPEAK AGAINST
YES IT'S A GREAT BILL IT WILL
ALLOW FOR MORE STUDENT HOUSING
US RIGHT VOTE.
OKAY.
BUT YOU'RE ACCEPTING AMENDMENTS
TO I AM ACCEPTING THE AMENDMENTS
FROM THE COMMITTEE YES I THINK I
AM GOING TO SPEAK
IF IT.
WE HAVE A MOTION.
BY THE BILL SO GO AHEAD.
BUT HAD RICH FOLK. COULD
AFTERNOON MY NAME'S ADRIAN COVER
WITH THE BAY AREA COUNCIL.
OWN TO THINK CHAIR BELL FOR.
HEARING US TODAY A BEAR
COUNCILS THE BAY AREA'S LARGEST
MULTI SECTOR BUSINESS
ASSOCIATION AND FROM THAT
VANTAGE POINT WE KNOW THAT.
STUDENTS ARE TODAY STUDENTS ARE
TOMORROW'S ENTREPRENEURS IN
TOMORROW'S EMPLOYERS.
BUT TODAY NEARLY EIGHT HUNDRED
THOUSAND COLLEGE STUDENTS IN
CALIFORNIA ARE HOMELESS OR
HOUSING IN SECURE. AND THAT IS
AN ECONOMIC THREAT TO THE FUTURE
OF CALIFORNIA AS BE TWELVE
TWENTY SEVEN GIVES UNIVERSITIES
TOOLS TO ADD DESPERATELY NEEDED.
OF STUDENT HOUSING.
INCLUDING MORE AFFORDABLE UNITS
RESERVE FOR STUDENTS WHO ARE
EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS.
UNDER EXISTING LAW CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS MAY QUALIFY FOR DENSITY
BONUSES PROVIDED THEY MEET
CERTAIN AFFORDABILITY CRITERIA.
DENSITY BONUSES HELP REDUCE THE
OVERALL COST OF BUILDING A UNIT
OF HOUSING BY CREATING ECONOMIES
OF SCALE THAT SPEED TWELVE
TWENTY SEVEN.
EXTENDS EXISTING BONUS LAW
HOUSING BONUS LAW TO INCLUDE
HOUSING PROJECTS THAT ARE
EXCLUSIVELY FOR STUDENTS
AND ROLLED FULL TIME. AT AN
INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING
ACCREDITED EITHER BY THE WESTERN
ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND
COLLEGES OR THE ACCREDITING
COMMISSION FOR COMMUNITY AND
JUNIOR COLLEGES AND OTHER WORDS
ALL COMMUNITY COLLEGES IN
CALIFORNIA. THE CSU SYSTEM AND
THE UC SYSTEM SINCE WE HAVE A
MOTION WHAT WE.
PERHAPS I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST
DRIVER THANK YOU YOU NEXT
SPEAKER PLEASE.
AFTERNOON ARNOLD CHAIRMAN OF
THE.
INTERNET HAVING HERE I'LL BE
CONCISE GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME
IS ROGER ROBINSON I HAVE THE
PRIVILEGE OF CERTAIN THE
STUDENTS OF UC BERKELEY IS THE
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS VICE PRESIDENT.
OF THEIR STUDENT ASSOCIATION
THOUGH NOT FOR LONG HEALTH WILL
HAVE A DIPLOMA IN ABOUT TWO
WEEKS.
BUT I'M HERE BECAUSE OF THE
STORIES I HEAR EVERY.
AS STUDENTS WHO FALL THROUGH THE
CRACKS IN OUR STRUGGLING AND
SOMETIMES FAILING TO FIND
HOUSING THAT THEY CAN AFFORD
NEAR CAMPUS SUIT ORGANIZATIONS
LIKE THE HOMELESS STUDENT UNION
HAVE DEVELOPED INNOVATIVE
STRATEGIES TO DEAL WITH THE
EFFECTS OF THIS HOUSING CRISIS
AROUND CAMPUS BUT WE NEED YOUR
HELP TO DEAL. WITH THE BRITS WE
HAVE AN AFFORDABILITY AND A
SUPPLY CRISIS IN OUR CAMPUS
COMMITTEES AND WE NEED TO
ADDRESS BOTH AND I'M THRILLED
THAT THIS LEGISLATION DOES
EXACTLY THAT I RESPECTFULLY ASK
YOUR AYE VOTE. IF YOU WHOSE
SPEAKERS THANK YOU MARK MCDONALD
ON BEHALF OF THE.
PUT HELD THE ENDS A KERN AND
PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
DISTRICTS ONE IS THANK THE
AUTHOR.
THE SPONSORS AND HER AT THE
AUTHOR STAFF FOR INCLUDING
COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND THAT'S
THANK YOU. YOU.
SO AS A MATTER NOW OF WHAT HAS
PUBLIC AFFAIRS HERE ON BEHALF OF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CALIFORNIA
IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL.
BIG MYSTERY KEYSTONE BEHALF CAL
FREE APARTMENT ASSOCIATION
ASKING FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
MARY DOLAN CAL STATE STUDENT
ASSOCIATION WE DON'T HAVE AN
OFFICIAL POSITION ON THIS BILL
YOU.
OR IN CONCEPT.
EMILY I JAMIAT THE CALIFORNIA
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION IN
SPORT.
SYDNEY FAN GOT THE BRIDGE
HOUSING SUPPORT.
BRIAN MACKLIN IN BEHALF OF THE
CEOS OF CALIFORNIA'S COMMUNITY
COLLEGES IN SUPPORT.
LUIS WANTED FROM CALIFORNIA AND
IT'S PUT.
THANK YOU.
OKAY OF SPEAKERS OPPOSING THE
BILL PLEASE COME FORWARD.
I SEE NONE.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE
WE HAVE MOTION.
JERRY MAKE CLOTHES THANK YOU I'M
WITH THE AMENDMENTS WE'VE TAKEN
A ASK FOR AYE VOTE.
THANK YOU CALL THE ROLL. SENATE
BILL TWELVE TWENTY SEVEN BY
SENATOR SKINNER THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED TO
THE COMMITTE ON APPROPRIATIONS
CENTER ABOUT. AYE BELL AYE
CANNELLA AYE CANNELLA AYE ALLEN
DIED.
DODD AYE GAINES GAINES AYE
GALGIANI MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE
MORALE ROTH SKINNER AYE SKINNER
AYE BY ACT. BUT I WILL COUNTY.
WIENER.
THANK YOU.
IF SEVEN VOTES IN FAVOR CENTER.
LEAVE THE ROLE FROM FOR ABSENT
MEMBERS.
JERRY REPRESENT ZERO.
THIRD BILL.
I AM YES THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS SB TEN
FOURTEEN WE HAVE VERY.
WE'RE ALL VERY PRIVILEGE NOW TO
BE ABLE TO PULL OUT OUR PHONES
AND THROUGH AN ACT.
YEAH I GET A RIDE AT OUR
CONVENIENCE AND.
OUR RIDE HAILING SERVICE'S THE
TWO THAT WERE MOST FAMILIAR WITH
ARE UBER AND LEFT THOUGH THERE
ARE MANY OTHER COMPANIES
STARTING TO GET IN THIS SPACE.
PROVIDING THIS GREAT CONVENIENCE
SERVICE BUT THEY'RE ALSO
INCREASING THE THEIR THEY ARE A
LARGER PORTION OF THE VEHICLE
MILES TRAVELED IN OUR
COMMUNITIES.
AND STILL FOSSIL FUEL VEHICLES
REMAIN THE LARGEST SOURCE OF
POLLUTION AIR POLLUTION AND
CARBON IN OUR COMMUNITIES
SO WHAT MY BILL TEN FOURTEEN
DOES. IS RECOGNIZE THAT TNC EASE
THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
COMPANIES THAT DO THESE RIDE
HAILING SERVICE'S HAVE A ROLE TO
PLAY. IN OUR EFFORTS TO MOVE TO
ZERO EMISSION VEHICLES.
AND IN RECOGNITION THAT MANY OF
THE DRIVERS OF THESE WHO.
ARE DEPLOYED THROUGH THE APPS
ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO
SUPPLEMENT THEIR INCOME.
I DESIGNED THIS BILL.
CAREFULLY SO THAT WE WERE NOT.
PUTTING A.
A STANDARD OR A GOAL CHEST ON
THE NUMBER OF DRIVERS OR ON THE
NUMBER OF VEHICLES BUT RATHER ON
THE MILES.
AND THE REASON THAT IS BECAUSE
WE ARE TRYING TO GET AT THE HIGH
I VMT.
THAT IS USED BY MONKS IS RIGHT
SHARING. ARM AND SO THE TARGETS
THAT WE HAVE ASKED TO BECOME.
BUT THE THE POINT THE BILL IS
THAT THE TNC COMPANIES THROUGH
WHO ARE ALREADY REGULATED BY THE
QC WOULD HAVE TO MEET A CERTAIN
TARGET. OF THE PERCENT OF MILES
THAT THE DEPLOY THROUGH. STEPS
THROUGH OUR ZERO EMISSION
VEHICLES.
AND THEY CAN CHOOSE TO DO THAT
THROUGH THE VEHICLES THEY OWN
THEMSELVES RELEASE OR THROUGH A
PROGRAM WITH THEIR DRIVERS
HOWEVER THEY CHOOSE.
AND I HAVE.
SOME WITNESSES IN SUPPORT THAT
ALL OUT SPEAK TO THE BILL THANK
YOU EACH OWNERS ASSURE MEMBERS
JOHN QUITE BUT THE CLEAN POWER
CAMPAIGN WE SUPPORT THIS BILL.
BECAUSE WE SEE THAT TREND OF THE
NUMBER OF TRIPS IN THE NUMBER OF
MILES INCREASINGLY BEING TAKEN
OVER BY THE TRANSPORTATION
NETWORK AND.
IN SAN FRANCISCO ALONE.
IT'S ESTIMATED THAT TEN TO
FIFTEEN PERCENT.
OF THE VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED IN
SAN FRANCISCO ARE WITH THESE
VEHICLES.
WHEN THESE VEHICLES ALSO.
ARE ARE CONCENTRATED CERTAIN
HOURS OF THE DAY AND OUT WE
THINK THAT.
BOB BY SIGNALING THAT WE INTEND
TO HOW THIS TNC THESE.
PARTICIPATE IN ELECTRIFICATION.
OF TRANSPORTATION WE KNOW THAT
IN THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS THOUGH
AVAILABILITY OF THE NUMBER OF.
AFFORDABILITY IS IS IMPROVING
EVERY DAY THIS EXTENSIVE
AVAILABILITY OF INCENTIVES AT
THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL. AND
THERE'S A NUMBER OF BUSINESS
MODELS ALREADY AVAILABLE WHERE
TNC DRIVERS CAN LEASE.
VEHICLES ON ELECTRICS SIDE AND
OF HAVE THAT THE AFFORDABLE THIS
IS THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE
THINK EVERYBODY'S GOT TO WORK
TOGETHER ON.
BOB THE DRIVERS MANY OF THE
DRIVERS THAT LOG MOST OF THE
MILES. ó ARE RELATIVELY LOW
INCOME THAT'S WHY THEY'RE DOING
IT AND SO WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT
COMBINATIONS OF INCENTIVES AND
STRATEGIES TO HELP THAT WE'VE
BEEN WORKING ON.
CURAM
BUT WITH THE RETIRED.
GREEN WERE TERRORIST TO DELIVER
RIDE SHARING SERVICES TO THOSE
COMMUNITIES THERE'S OTHER MODELS
AVAILABLE BUT I WE THINK THIS IS
AN IMPORTANT STEP TO TAKE TO GET
STARTED. ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING
TO MOVE THIS INDUSTRY TOWARDS
ELECTRIFICATION THANK YOU OTHER
SPEAKERS WE'VE.
GOOD AFTERNOON.
THANK YOU GONNA CHAIRMAN AND.
THE COMMITTEE FOR HEARING ME.
MY NAME IS ALAN CHEN I'M A
RESEARCHER AT THE INSTITUTE OF
TRANSPORTATION STUDIES AT UC
DAVIS.
I'M SPEAKING.
FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR
THE SENATOR TODAY.
I'M SO THREE QUICK POINTS I
WANTED TO.
SO CITY.
SECONDLY THE EMISSIONS BENEFITS
OF ELECTRIFYING RIDE SHARING
SERVICES AND LASTLY I
CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHARGING
INFRASTRUCTURE.
SO FIRSTLY CALIFORNIA HAS HAD A
VERY RICH HISTORY OF.
PROVIDING AMBITIOUS GOALS
SO. S. B. THIRTY TWO S. B. THREE
FIFTY ZERO EMISSIONS VEHICLE
MANDATE TO TO NAME A FEW.
AND THESE HAVE LED TO LARGE
TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL
INNOVATIONS AND TRANSITIONS
TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GOALS
AND.
COME THE TARGET SET FOR TNC LOOK
HOPEFULLY UP PROVIDE A SIMILAR
TYPE OF TRANSITION FOR THE NEXT
TWO POINTS ARE RELATED.
NAM MORE DIRECTLY WITH THE
RESEARCH THAT I'M DOING.
SO IF YOU TAKE A GASOLINE.
VEHICLE DRIVING FOR UBER LEFT
AND YOU REPLACE IT WITH AN
ELECTRIC CAR.
VERSES TAKING AN AVERAGE CAR IN
CALIFORNIA AND REPLACING IT WITH
AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE YOU ACTUALLY
END UP GETTING ABOUT FOUR TIMES
THE EMISSIONS BENEFITS. SO IF
YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE CHOICE IN
TERMS OF.
SWITCHING LOW WHICH CAR TO
ELECTRIC.
THOSE SERVING ON TNC IS WOULD
BE SORT OF THE IDEAL CHOICE FROM
AN EMISSIONS PERSPECTIVE.
LASTLY I'M FOR CHARGING
INFRASTRUCTURE THERE'S BEEN AN
EXPLOSIVE GROWTH OF USAGE OF.
ENERGY FOR.
RIDE SHARING VEHICLES.
PARA LECTER TREACHERY VEHICLES
OF THE LAST YEAR SO ABOUT A
QUARTER PERCENT OF.
OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES.
ARE ON THE SERVICES BUT THEY'RE
USING ABOUT THIRTY PERCENT OF
THE TOTAL OF THE.
DC FAST CHARGING NETWORK.
SO AS WE HAVE FUTURE POLICIES
AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE HOPING
TO A PUSHED THE ADOPTION AND USE
OF THESE VEHICLES ON THOSE
SERVICES.
IT'S GOING TO BE A VERY
IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION TO ALSO.
SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE THAT
WOULD.
HEALTHY SERVICES THANK YOU.
SPEAKERS IN FAVOR PLEASE.
YEAH ACADEMIC.
GOOD AFTERNOON MISTER CHAIRMAN
BURRS KORABL US.
ON BEHALF OF CAL START WITH THE
SUPPORT INCOMES HAVE POSITION
ALSO HERE ON BEHALF OF THE
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING
ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT. THANK
YOU.
AND AFTERNOON CATHERINE
BRANDENBURG REPRESENTING CINEMA
CLEAN POWER IN SUPPORT.
IF.
NICKELODEON LOOKING HERE WE HAVE
THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE AND
STRONG SUPPORT THANK YOU.
PARTICULAR KARATE WITH THE
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE
COUNCIL ALSO HERE IN BEHALF OF
THE AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF
CALIFORNIANS SUPPORT WE PREACH
AT WORK WITH THE AUTHORS OFFICE
A COUPLE COUPLE OF OUTSTANDING
ISSUES THAT WERE IN SUPPORT
THINKING.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN MURS
MITCH SNYDER WITH CALIFORNIA
LABOR FEDERATION WHICH IS ONE OF
THE CLARIFIED THAT.
WERE NEUTRAL ON THE BILL.
DENOUNCES REFERENCES ARE
OPPOSITION IN THE PREVIOUS
COMMITTEE BUT WE LIFT OUR
POSITION PRIOR TO THE COMMITTEE.
THANKS TO THE MOST RECENT EVENTS
AND ARE HAPPY TO BE NEUTRAL ON
THE BILL AS IT STANDS NOW THANK
YOU.
IF.
I JUST WANNA ECHO MITCH THAT
THAT CALIFORNIA TEAMSTERS AND
THE MAN MADE TRANSIT UNIQUE
UNION HAVE ALSO GONE NEUTRAL
THANK YOU.
OF OTHER SPEAKERS IN FAVOR
PLEASE.
AND THEN.
.
OPPOSITION.
OPPOSITION TO THE BILL.
AFFORD OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU.
BUT IT.
AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN BALLOT
COMMITTEE MEMBERS THANK YOU FOR
THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TODAY
I'M LARA POSSESSED OF SENIOR
PUBLIC POLICY MANAGER FOR LEFT.
LIFT COMMEND SENATOR SCANNERS
EFFORTS TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS INTEREST TRANSITION
CALIFORNIANS TO ELECTRIFY
TRANSPORTATION FLEET.
AND FACT LIFT WAS FOUNDED WITH
THE GOAL OF MAKING CAR OWNERSHIP
OPTIONAL. AND IS COMMITTED TO
DECREASING GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS THROUGH SHARED RIDES.
WE'RE TAKING IMMEDIATE STEPS TO
DO SO LAST WEEK WE ANNOUNCED
THAT EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY ALL
RIDES GLOBALLY ON THE LIFT
PLATFORM WOULD BECOME CARBON
NEUTRAL THROUGH THE VOLUNTARY
PURCHASE OF CARBON OFFSETS.
IN ONE YEAR WE ANTICIPATE
OFFSETTING OVER MILLION METRIC
TONS OF CARBON EQUIVALENT TO
PLANTING TENS OF MILLIONS OF
TREES ARE TAKING HUNDREDS OF
THOUSANDS OF CARS OFF THE ROAD.
HOWEVER OFFSETS ARE NOT THE
ULTIMATE GOAL FOR LEFT BY
COMMITTING SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL
RESOURCES TO THESE OFFSETS WERE
BURKE BUILDING INTO OUR BUSINESS
A STRONG INCENTIVE TO PURSUE
SHARED RIDES. AND THE
DISPLACEMENT OF GASOLINE POWERED
VEHICLES.
THE MORE SHARED RIDES AND CLEAN
VEHICLES ON THE PLATFORM OF PURE
CARBON OFFSETS WE MUST PURCHASE.
WELL WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH
THE NEED TO ELECTRIFY
TRANSPORTATION CALIFORNIA WE ARE
REGRETTABLY NOT ABLE TO SUPPORT
SB TEN FOURTEEN BECAUSE AS
CURRENTLY DRAFTED IT WOULD
NEGATIVELY AND
DISPROPORTIONATELY. IMPACT LOW
INCOME DRIVERS ON TRANSPORTATION
NETWORK.
AND IT DOES NOT ADDRESS CHARGING
INFRASTRUCTURE OR THE ADDITIONAL
COST PREMIUM OF ELECTRIC
VEHICLES.
AND I WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT IN
PARTICULAR WERE CONCERNED ABOUT
THE REMOVAL. OF THE MONETARY
INCENTIVES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY
IN THE BILL THAT WOULD GO TO
HELP I TNC DRIVERS PURCHASE
THESE VEHICLES. AND ALSO TO BE
CLEAR WE DO NOT OWN VEHICLES AS
A TNC NOR ARE WE ALLOWED TO BY
REGULATION.
WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITIES
WE'VE HAD TO DISCUSS OUR SHARED
GOALS AND ISSUES WITH SENATOR
SKINNER.
HOWEVER WE CAN SIT CONTINUE TO
BE CONCERNED WITH THE ABILITY OF
OUR DRIVERS TO COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS CURRENTLY PROPOSED
SB TEN FOURTEEN. FIRST IN ORDER
FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES TO BECOME
A VIABLE OPTION FOR THE MAJORITY
OF CALIFORNIANS SIGNIFICANT
INVESTMENTS MUST BE MADE AND
FAST CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE.
AND TO BRING INITIAL PURCHASE AN
OPERATION PRICES DOWN.
SECOND RIDE SHARE DRIVERS ARE
NOT PROFESSIONALS WHO PURCHASED
THE VEHICLE TO DRIVE FOR TNC IS.
WITH DRIVERS ARE PEOPLE TRYING
TO MAKE ENDS MEET BY EARNING
EXTRA INCOME WITH THE VEHICLE
THEY ALREADY OWN DO A RAPID OF
PLEASE. YES MORE THAN FIFTY
PERCENT OF WHAT DRIVERS
IDENTIFIES LOW INCOME AND NINETY
THREE PERCENT DRY FEWER THAN
TWENTY HOURS A WEEK.
REQUIRING THESE DRIVERS TO
PURCHASE A NEW MORE EXPENSIVE
VEHICLE WOULD NOT RESULT IN MORE
ELECTRIC VEHICLES ON THE ROAD IT
WOULD SIMPLY TAKE AWAY THEIR
EARNING OPPORTUNITY.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
SENATOR SKINNER'S OFFICE.
TO TRY TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THIS
BILL AT TNC IS CONTRIBUTED VERY
SMALL PORTION OF THE ENTITIES IN
CALIFORNIA ONLY TWO PERCENT. FOR
THESE REASONS WE CAN'T SUPPORT
ABOUT THIS TIME BUT WE WANT TO
WORK TOGETHER WITH THE SENATOR
THANK YOU. OTHERS SPEAKERS.
GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR BELL
COMMITTEE MEMBERS MONNING
SKINNER KELLY ON BEHALF OF THE
NATIONAL DIVERSITY COALITION A
NATIONWIDE NETWORK OF STATE AND
LOCAL EFFORTS TO ADVANCE
DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION. WITH
OVER EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND
MEMBERS NATIONWIDE.
AS LEADERS OF GROUPS WORKING TO
ADVANCE THE SOCIAL AND.
IT'S OF CAL.
WE TESTIFIED TODAY IN OPPOSITION
TO SB TEN FOURTEEN WELL INTENDED
LEGISLATION THAT IN CURRENT FORM
MISSES THE MARK ON HELPING RIDE
SHARE DRIVERS TRANSITION DO ZERO
EMISSION VEHICLES. WELL WE
APPRECIATE EFFORTS TO SPUR
ELECTRIC VEHICLE ADOPTION IN THE
STATE S. B. TEN FOURTEEN DOES
LITTLE IN THE WAY OF HELPING
HARD WORKING CALIFORNIANS MAKE
ENDS MEET. INSTEAD IT PLEASES
UNREALISTIC DEMANDS ON DRIVERS
MOSTLY THOSE OF MODEST MEANS AND
THREATENS TO UP AND THE FLEXIBLE
EARNING OPPORTUNITIES THE
WRITERS HAVE PROVIDED. RIDE
SHARES HAVE BEEN ESPECIALLY
HELPFUL TO FOR MEMBERS OF
MINORITY COMMUNITIES.
ALLOWING THEM TO TURN PERSONAL
VEHICLES FROM LIABILITIES INTO
ASSETS THAT CAN HELP THEM A
SUPPLEMENT THEIR INCOMES.
S. B. TEN FOURTEEN WOULD PREVENT
PEOPLE FROM USING THE CARS THEY
ALREADY OWN.
AS EARLY AS TWO YEARS FROM NOW
AND COMPLETELY IN TEN YEARS
THIS RAPID TIME FRAME IS SIMPLY
NOT REALISTIC NO OTHER
CALIFORNIA ROAD USER PLACES SUCH
A TIGHT TIMEFRAME FOR SWITCHING
TO ZERO EMISSION TRAVEL. UNLESS
SIMILAR INFRASTRUCTURE CHANGES
ARE ALSO MANDATED WITHIN THE
ALLOTTED TEN YEAR TIMEFRAME PUT
FORTH. S. B. TEN FOURTEEN
UNFAIRLY PENALIZES HARD WORKING
TNC DRIVERS ESSENTIALLY PUSHING
THE VAST MAJORITY WHO DO NOT
HAVE AN CANNOT AFFORD AN
ELECTRIC VEHICLE OFF THE
PLATFORM. AND HITTING LOW INCOME
MINORITY GROUPS THE HARDEST WILL
BE STRONGLY SUPPORT GREATER
ADOPTION IF HE'S IN CALIFORNIA
WE MUST OPPOSE THE BILL AS
WRITTEN TO TO ITS
DISPROPORTIONATE AND NEGATIVE
IMPACT ON CALIFORNIA'S
COMMUNITIES OF COLOR. CORPS
WORKING HARD TO MAKE ENDS MEET
AS RIGHT CHECK DRIVERS INTERFERE
TIME AND OTHER SPEAKERS SO
PLEASE COME FOR.
ENTER YOUR POSITION THERE HAVE
ORGANIZATION. MISTER.
CHAIR MEMBERS ARE FRIGHTENED OR
REPRESENTED SILICON VALLEY
LEADERSHIP GROUP IN OPPOSITION
THANK YOU.
I AM.
JERRY MEMBERS JUST ADVANCE
ALBEIT PROTECT IT WILL CONTINUE
TO WORK WITH ALSO BEEN FORTUNATE
OPPOSITION.
KEVIN MCKINLEY WITH INTERNET
ASSOCIATION ECHOING THE SAME
COMMENTS THANK YOU.
THE SOONER YOU ARE ACCEPTING NEW
MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE YES IN
THOSE AMENDMENTS.
DO YOU CHANGE THE DATE SO THAT
THE FIRST TARGET WOULD NOT BE
UNTIL TWENTY TWENTY THREE.
SO.
TWENTY PERCENT THOUGH ELECTRIC
VEHICLES FORTY PERCENT OF THE
MILES MILES AFTER YOU'VE DRIVEN
BY THOSE TRAVELS GOAL. BITE.
TWELVE THIRTY ONE TWENTY TWENTY
THREE CORRECT AND THEN FIFTY
PERCENT.
.
BY TWELVE THIRTY ONE TWENTY SIX
THAT'S CORRECT OF THIS DATA AND
EACH YEAR OFTEN WHAT YOU WERE
SAYING.
SO SO I THINK IT'S.
.
PERHAPS A MORE MODEST BUT
CONTINUES ON THE TREND THAT THE
CENTER WANTS TO ACCOMPLISH
BECAUSE OF.
.
ZERO MISSION VEHICLES CORRECT
CENTER YES.
OF QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE.
SIR CANNELLA PLEASE.
I THINK WHAT OF A COMMENT SORT I
REPRESENT A PRETTY RURAL AREA
AND IT'S YOU KNOW HIGH POVERTY
RATE.
AN ELECTRIC VEHICLES ARE REALLY
NOT THAT AFFORDABLE RIGHT NOW
THOUGH MAYBE IN TWENTY TWENTY
THREE THEY MAY BE. BUT YOU KNOW
WHAT I THINK WE WERE HOPING FOR
THE BEST BUT WE MAY BE IN A
SITUATION WHERE. THE PEOPLE IN
MY AREA THAT ARE TRYING TO OUR
LIVING DRIVING FOR UBER LEFT OR
WHATEVER. WON'T BE ABLE TO
AFFORD A CAR AND THEN
FURTHERMORE AT THE CHARGING
TECHNOLOGY I HAVEN'T BOUGHT A
HOUSE AT GENERAL ELECTRIC
VEHICLE BECAUSE.
I DRIVE A LONG WAY TO COME UP TO
SACRAMENTO THERE'S JUST NO
CHARGING STATIONS AND IF YOU
HAPPEN TO FIND ONE THEY'RE GONNA
PUTS IT
TAKES A LONG TIME SO. WE REALLY
NEED THE FAST CHARGING
TECHNOLOGY IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS
BILL WORK SITE LOOK I THINK WE
DIDN'T CALIFORNIA'S BEEN
TERRIFIC I THINK THE BE SET
THESE GOALS. AND LARGELY WE'VE
MET THESE GOALS BECAUSE
TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES AND PEOPLE
ARE MOTIVATED BUT.
I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THIS BILL
AND THE ABILITY TO HIT THESE
TARGETS AND AND A LOT OF A LOT
OF FRIENDS THAT DRIVE FOR UBER
LIFT BUT THEY'VE. DONE FORCING
ON DRIVING ARE A WHICH IS
UNFORTUNATE I HAVE A SIX YEAR
OLD SON NOW SO THAT'S HOPEFUL.
BUT THE DRIVE TO THE BAY AREA IN
ORDER TO MAKE A LIVING DRIVING
FIFTIES THE OF. THESE COMPANIES.
BOTH WITHOUT THE FAST CHARGING
THEY'RE GONNA DRIVE THEIR THEIR
HAVE TO SIT FOR A COUPLE OF
HOURS CHARGER VEHICLE IN ORDER
TO MAKE THIS WORK SO.
I I. AGAIN I LIKE THE FACT WE'RE
SETTING TARGETS BUT JUST I'M
AFRAID THAT WITHOUT SOME OFF
RAMP TO SAY UNLESS WE HAVE.
EXPERTS SENATE CHARGING FAST
CHARGING STATIONS OR. THE
AFFORDABILITY FOR THESE CARS
HITS A CERTAIN LIMIT I'M AFRAID
THAT WE'RE REALLY GOING TO TAKE
PEOPLE OUT OF THE WORKPLACE AND
THAT IF YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS
I'M SURE YOU CAN.
THROUGH THE CHAIR.
SENATOR.
AND THANK YOU AND I HAVE VERY
MUCH AND.
I THINK WHILE IT.
MAY FEEL.
WELL THE REASON THAT I THINK
IT'S IMPORTANT TO ASK OUR TNC
COMPANIES AND THIS IS A THIS
THESE TARGETS ARE ON THE
COMPANY.
SO YES IT WILL IMPACT
THE DRIVERS FOR WHOM THE
COMPANIES TO IN EFFECT WHAT THE
TNC STEWS THEY DEPLOY VEHICLES.
AND THEY DON'T OWN THEM IN SOME
CASES YES IN SOE CASES LEASE
BUT THEY DEPLOY VEHICLE SO IN
THAT RESPECT IT'S LIKE THEY HAVE
A FLEET.
BUT THEY DON'T REALLY WANT TO
TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE
FACT THAT THEY HAVE A FLEET.
SO WHAT I TRY TO DO IS DESIGN
THIS SO WAS ON MY
SO FOR EXAMPLE THOSE DRIVERS WHO
ARE ONLY DOING VERY LIMITED.
DRIVING FOR A* LOOK RIGHT
CHAIR WOULD NOT PRIDE THE
AFFECTED AT ALL ADDITIONALLY IT
IS TO HAVE THE TNC COMPANIES BE
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE STATE
WHO IS ALREADY. INVESTING VERY
SIGNIFICANTLY IN BOTH CHARGING
AND IN REBATES FOR GETTING THE
SET OF SO JUST FOR EXAMPLE THE
BUDGET THE GOVERNOR ISN'T PUT
FORWARD RIGHT NOW WITHOUT EVEN
BEING REVISED.
HAS AN INCREASE FOR DIVIDE
CHARGING OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY
FIVE MILLION FOR CHARGING IN
STRUCTURE AND ANOTHER HUNDRED
AND SEVENTY FIVE MILLION. INTO
THE CLEAN VEHICLE REBATE PROGRAM
AND THE CLEAN VEHICLE REBATE
PROGRAM AS IT'S CURRENTLY
DESIGNED DUE TO OUR OWN ADOPTION
IN LEGISLATION HAS TWENTY FIVE
PERCENT OF IT DIRECTED TO LOW
INCOME DRIVERS.
SO WE HAVE IN PLACE MANY
POLICIES AND STATUTES THAT
COMPLEMENT THIS
AND CAN AID BOTH THE DRIVER AND
THE TNC COMPANIES BUT WE'RE
ASKING THE TNC COMPANIES NOW
THROUGH THIS BILL TO BE OUR
PARTNER. IN BRINGING ABOUT.
THESE A INCREASE IN DEPLOYING
SETS AND NOT TO PUT IT OVER
BURDEN ON THOSE LOWEST INCOME
DRIVERS THAT'S REALLY HOW I'M
TRYING TO DESIGN IT AND WHEN.
OUR.
ONE OF OUR OPPOSITION
COLLEAGUES FROM LIFT TALKS ABOUT
CARBON OFFSETS.
CARBON OFFSETS ARE GOOD BUT THEY
DO NOT ADDRESS LOCAL AIR
QUALITY.
SO ALL OF THE MILES THAT ARE
BEING DRIVEN THAT OUR FOSSIL
FUEL VEHICLES IN AND THERE'S.
BASICALLY NOWHERE IN CALIFORNIA
THAT IS AN ENTERTAINMENT AREA
WHERE IN NON ATTAINMENT ALMOST
EVERYWHERE SO SEVEN IS JUST AS
IMPORTANT FROM AN AIR QUALITY
POINT OF VIEW.
SO I AM.
BUT TO YOUR SENATORS CENTERS
LIKE SOMEBODY THAT. DOES OF.
THEY'RE DRIVING AND FROM.
MODESTO.
TO SAN FRANCISCO TO.
AND IN THE DOESN'T WORK AFTER OF
ELECTRIC BUT.
THIS THIS BILL DOESN'T REQUIRE
ALL OF THEM TO BE THOUGH IT IS
NOT SO SO MAYBE THE COMPANY'S
POLICY WOULD BE THOSE WHO LIVE
FURTHER AWAY DON'T. REALLY HAVE
TO WRITE THOSE WHO HAVE MOSTLY
ACCESS YOU THERE CAN BE.
ADJUSTMENTS TO THAT FOR ACT
WORDS CORRECT NOTS WHY DIDN'T
AND THAT'S WHY IN THE FIRST AND
COMMITTEE WE TOOK OUT THE
HUNDRED PERCENT TOOLS AND BUT
BECAUSE IT WOULD HAVE AFFECTED
ALL DRIVERS AND THEN IT WOULD
HAVE PUT TOO MUCH ONUS ON
DRIVERS.
YEAH. SO THERE'S NO RICARDO OR
REQUIREMENT FOR HER PURSE OUT BY
HIMMLER REQUIREMENTS YOU KNOW
THAT IF HE'S IS FIFTY PERCENT.
BY OF THE MILES RIGHT WRECKED
MILES MILES BY TWELVE THIRTY ONE
TWENTY TWENTY SEE HUNDRED
PERCENT ONLY REFERS TO IF IN THE
EVENT THAT OUR COMPANIES CHANGE
THEIR BUSINESS MODEL AND BEGIN
TO OWN A FLEET.
THEN IT WOULD BE THAT AND IT
WOULD BE INTO TWENTY THIRTY.
PRIOR PROJECTING WHAT PERCENTAGE
OF.
.
CALIFORNIA.
VEHICLES TO BE ELECTRIC BY.
TWENTY TWENTY SIX WEBSITE.
THIRTY TWENTY FIVE THIRTY
PERCENT OF SOME LIKE THAT BASED
ON THE.
.
THAT ARE BETTER DOING. THAT IS
WAY IF YOU LOOK AT THE POLICIES
WE PUT IN PLACE THAT IS THE AND
CALIFORNIA'S INTENT THROUGH.
CARBS AND THROUGH LEGISLATIVE
WHETHER WE MEET TAT OR NOT DISK
GIVES DIFFICULT BUT THAT IS WHY.
THERE IS ONE OF MY MOTIVATIONS
IS TO HELP PUT A LINE ALL OF OUR
DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES THAT ARE
FOCUSED ON VEHICLES TO BE
ALIGNED TO HELP US MEET THAT IN
JUST THE SAME WAY WE HAVE DONE
FOR FLEETS.
OKAY.
OKAY I WOULD HAVE A BILL OF ANY
OTHER QUESTIONS.
SO AGAINST.
HIS EYES FOR EXPRESS A CONCERN
MY CONCERN.
AND THIS WOULD BE FOR RURAL
PARTS OF MY DISTRICT.
WOULDN'T THAT HAVE TO DO WITH
THE.
ASPECT OF SOMEONE TRYING TO.
.
TO RUN A SMALL BUSINESS ON VERY
LIMITED INCOME. AND THIS WORRIED
ABOUT.
THE IMPACT OF THIS LEGISLATION
ON THEIR ABILITY TO CONTINUE TO
REMAIN IN BUSINESS.
I KNOW YOU'RE GIVING TIME LINES
AND THINGS BUT I'M STILL
CONCERNED ABOUT.
THAT ECONOMY CAN CHANGE YOUR
SUPER SOMEBODY VARIABLES IN
PLACE.
THAT.
I STILL FEAR THAT THERE COULD BE
A DISPLACEMENT. OF PEOPLE ARE
DESTROYED THAT. TO MAKE IT.
FINANCIALLY.
.
AND SO I.
THAT'S WHY I'M STRUGGLING WITH
THIS BILL.
IF YOU CENTER.
OTHER CENTERS CENTER DODD YEAH.
CENTER OUT I HOPE YOU'LL.
TAKE INTO ACOUNT SOME OF THESE
YOU KNOW CONCERNS HERE YOU AS
YOU MOVE THIS BILL ALL ON I
THINK THAT IT'S.
.
SUFFICIENTLY.
BUT THEY DID MANAGE OF TAKES%
OF MY CONCERNS AND I WILL MOVE
THE ITEM.
REGULARS MOTION ANY OTHER
QUESTIONS.
THIRD SERVE ROTH PLEASE
THANK.
FAMOUS JUDGE WANT TO MAKE A
STATEMENT I'VE I'M. VERY MUCH
APPRECIATE THE.
AUTHORS COMMITMENT TO THIS
ISSUE.
I EXPRESSED SOME CONCERNS.
AND SHE IS COMMITTED TO WORK
THOSE OF SPECIFICALLY THEY MAY
HAVE ALREADY BEEN MENTIONED WHEN
I WAS BOUNCING BETWEEN
COMMITTEES PUT. THE LOW INCOME
PART TIME DRIVERS THE.
NEAR ZERO EMISSION.
AS OPPOSED TO ZERO MISSION OR
THE ZERO MISSION PLUS THE NEAR
ZERO EMISSION. VEHICLES IS
PERHAPS THAT BEING AN IMPORTANT
THING AND WE JUST DISCUSSED A.
AS I RECALL ALLOWING.
ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY TO DRIVE
FOR THESE T. IN CITIES AND YOU
KNOW IT MAY BE THAT. SOME OF
THOSE PEOPLE ARE AT THE LOW
INCOME LEVEL AS WELL AND MAY NOT
HAVE THE ABILITY TO. ACQUIRE A
EASILY. ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE OR
EVEN A NEAR ZERO EMISSION
VEHICLES SO I LOOK FORWARD TO
YOUR WORK ON THIS ISSUE I'M
PREPARED TO HELP YOU MOVE THE
BILL OUT OF THE COMMITTEE.
THIS AFTERNOON AND.
WISH YOU WELL LISTEN THANK YOU
MISTER NADER.
WHERE MOST OF THE?
COULD WE.
NECESSARY CLOSE PLEASE. THANK
YOU I TAKE THE AMENDMENTS AND.
ALSO.
AS I'VE TALKED INDIVIDUALLY I
GIVE YOU MY FULL COMMITMENTS TO
WORK FURTHER ON THIS AND.
THROUGH AMENDED NECESSARY TO
ADDRESS THE
CERN'S THAT WERE RAISED.
TOTAL PLEASE
SENATE BILL TEN FOURTEEN BY
SENATOR SKINNER THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED TO
THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR ABOUT AYE BELL AYE
CANNELLA. NO CANNELLA KNOW ALAN
DOT. DOT AYE GAINES.
GAINES NOW GALGIANI. MCGUIRE
MORALE. ROTH.
SKINNER AYE SKINNER AYE BUT ACT.
IRAQ NO BECAUSE HE WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
ARE TWO THREE. OF THE HAS FOUR
VOTES TO THREE WILL LEAVE IT ON
CALL THANK YOU CENTER SKINNER.
NEXT UP IS GOING TO BE S. B.
NINE TWELVE BY THE CHAIRMAN HAVE
SENATOR SKINNER. MISTER CHAIRMAN
I UNDERSTAND THE DESK IS
ANXIOUSLY WAITING SP FOURTEEN
SIXTY NINE SO WAS SENATOR
GALGIANI COMES AMID A PAUSE AND
THEN LIFT THE COLUMN THAT'S WE
GET THAT BILL IF THAT'S OKAY.
YES GOOD SHE NEEDS TO PUT THAT
INTO.
.
CENTER MAGUIRE'S COMMITTEE
TOMORROW TOMORROW SO. WE HAVE TO
GET THAT OVER TO THE DESK.
WHEN I RUBBED YOU JUST DON'T BE
OFFENDED SIR ALL THE ROLE ON.
BUT WHENEVER YOU'RE READY
MISTER.
BUT WE HAVE OF MEMBERS ON BEHALF
OF SENATOR SKINNER AND I AM
PRESENTING.
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY A
BILL. THAT SPEED NINE TWELVE.
THIS IS.
S. B. NINE TWELVE. IS A JOY TO
A BILL BETWEEN CENTER SKINNER
AYE. TO PROPOSE TO INVEST TWO
BILLION DOLLARS IN ONE. TIME
FUNDS THROUGH THE PROJECTION. OF
BUDGET SURPLUS INTO HOUSING FOR
HOMELESS AND LOW INCOME FAMILIES
POSTED RISK OF BECOMING
HOMELESS.
CALIFORNIA FACES A HOUSING
SHORTAGE I DON'T NEED TOGIVE
THIS SPEECH WE ARE TO TALK ABOUT
IT SO CUT THROUGH THAT.
BUT LAST YEAR.
WE TOOK A.
GIANT STEP TO ADDRESS A HOUSING
CRISIS WAS ARGUABLY THE MOST
PRODUCTIVE LEGISLATIVE YEAR ON
HOUSING AND A LONG TIME I THINK
IN DECADES ACTUALLY. SO WE'RE
QUITE PROUD OF THAT DEFECTED TO
SENATE. LED THE CHARGE ON.
.
GETTING A LOT OF THAT WORK DONE.
HOWEVER.
WE REALIZED AT THAT TIME. THAT.
IT WAS ALWAYS A.
START IN TACKLING THE PROBLEM
BECAUSE THIS IS SUB YOU'RE GONNA
HAVE TO TACKLE. BOUGHT AND WORK
ON OVER MANY YEARS AND THAT'S
WHY YOU SEE SO MUCH HOUSING
LEGISLATION TODAY.
WE WE HAVE IN CALIFORNIA
EXPERIENCED A THIRTY FOUR
PERCENT. REDUCTION IN FEDERAL
FUNDS.
BOB SAID AGAIN THIRTY FOUR
PERCENT REDUCTION IN FEDERAL
FUNDS
IN CALIFORNIA.
SO IN TERMS OF.
THE WORK WE'RE DOING.
WE'RE MOVING AHEAD WE'RE WE'RE
PROCEEDING AHEAD WE'RE DOING ALL
THE HARD WORK ON HOUSING. BUT WE
HAVE WERE SWIMMING AGAINST THE
TIDE SORT OF SPEAK IN TERMS OF
WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS
DOING.
THE LACK OF FUNDS HAZARD A
DIRECT IMPACT ON OUR HOMELESS
PROBLEM IN CALIFORNIA.
WE'VE EXPERIENCED A LARGE
INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE
EXPERIENCE SINCE HOMELESS
ALMOST AS IN CALIFORNIA.
AND NOW WE NOW HAVE IN
CALIFORNIA TWENTY FIVE PERCENT.
OF THE NATION'S HOMELESS
POPULATION.
THE DESPITE.
S. B. TWO THREE AND ALL THE
OTHER BILLS.
THAT WE WORKED ON OVER THE LAST
THAT I YEAR. AND.
THE FACT THAT WE'RE WORKING ON
THEM THIS YEAR.
WE STILL.
HAVE THE.
A DEFICIT IN THE ACTUAL AMOUNT
OF FUNDS WE NEED TO PROVIDE WITH
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SO. THIS BILL
SP NINE ONE TO. INVEST TWO
BILLION DOLLARS IN ONE TIME
FUNDS.
FROM OF THE BUDGET SURPLUS.
WHICH WE THINK WILL RELEASE B.
SIX BILLION MAYBE FOR MAYBE
MORE.
TWO HOUSING FOR THE HOMELESS
AND LOW INCOME FAMILIES MODES
ADDRESS.
OF THE GOES TO PROVIDE.
FUNDS DIRECTLY TO CITIES AND
COUNTIES IN NON PROFITS
GET THE MONEY OUT THE DOOR FAST.
BY INVESTING IN EXISTING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS.
AND OFF SAID FEDERAL FUNDING
CUTS.
THAT I MENTIONED AND THE REDUCE
READING OF LOW INCOME HOUSING
TAX CREDIT. THAT TOOK PLACE OVER
THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS AT THE
FEDERAL LEVEL.
THE PROGRAMS.
WILL HELP US INTO HOMELESSNESS
AND.
THAT WILL. ALSO BE A MORAL
IMPERATIVE FOR US IN CALIFORNIA.
INVEST IN HOUSING OPTIONS RATHER
THAN THE HOUSING WERE ALREADY
INVESTING IN WHICH MICHAEL JAILS
AND PRISONS.
START POINT A LOT OF MONEY IN
THE JAILS AND PRISONS.
CENTER SKINNER AND I SERVE ON
THE. PUBLIC SAFETY BUDGET
SUBCOMMITTEE.
AND WE KNOW THAT NEXT YEAR WE'RE
GOING TO BE SPENDING. NINETY
THOUSAND DOLLARS PER INMATE PER
YEAR. IN CALIFORNIA TO HOUSE ONE
PRISONER.
AND THAT'S SOMETHING.
AND A A WEEK WE CANNOT CONTINUE
TO IT FAMILIES LANGUAGE ON THE
STREET. WHILE THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT CONTRA PLEASE CUT
FUNDING CUTS FOR WORKING
FAMILIES A ONE STEP AWAY FROM
HOMELESSNESS.
IT'S TIME FOR AN AGGRESSIVE
IMMEDIATE ACTION. AND NOW WE
WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS BILL
EXERTED BY THIS COMMITTEE
SUPPORTED BY THE LEGISLATURE
THANK YOU CENTER SKINNER. TURNED
IT OVER TO YOU.
THANK YOU SENATOR VAL I'M SO
PLEASED TO PARTNER WITH SENATOR
BAIL IN THIS.
AND I'LL BE BRIEF BUT.
ACROSS THE U. S. SINCE TWENTY
TEN. BELIEVE IT OR NOT THE
NUMBER OF HOMELESS HAS DECREASED
NOT SO IN CALIFORNIA AS I
MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY. SHASTA IN
THE YEARS BETWEEN SIXTEEN AND
SEVENTEEN. HOMELESSNESS IN
CALIFORNIA INCREASED BY FOURTEEN
PERCENT AND IT HAS EVERY YEAR
SINCE TWENTY TEN.
STATEWIDE.
THE POLLS SHOW THAT CALIFORNIANS
RANK HOUSING AVAILABILITY IN
HOUSING COSTS MOST IMPORTANT
ISSUE FOR THE STATE AND THEIR
CONCERN FOR HOMELESSNESS. AND
ADDRESSING IT ALSO EXTREMELY
IMPORTANT.
ARE COURTS NOW ARE TELLING OUR
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
COURTS IN LA COURTS IN ORANGE
COUNTY YOU CANNOT JUST MOVE
THESE FOLKS WHO ARE IN IT
ENCAMPMENTS YOU MUST PROVIDE
HOUSING FOR THEM. AND SO IT IS
OUR RESPONSIBILITY AS THE STATE
GOVERNMENT ESPECIALLY IN A POINT
WHERE WE HAVE SOME UNEXPECTEDLY
HIGH REVENUES TO BE THE
APPROPRIATE PARTNER WITH OUR
LOCALITIES TO TRY TO INJECT.
SIGNIFICANT FUNDS TO ASSIST THEM
IN PROVIDING THIS HOUSING. AND
OTHER SENATOR BILL DESCRIBED IT.
TOO WELL BUT LET ME GIVE YOU TWO
KEY STACKS.
ACCORDING TO A STUDY THAT UC
IRVINE DIDN'T TWENTY SEVENTEEN
ORANGE COUNTY ALONE COULD SAVE
FORTY TWO MILLION A YEAR IN
HEALTH CARE. AND DIDN'T POSE A
PUBLIC SAFETY LAW ENFORCEMENT BY
HOUSING CHEST IT'S HOMELESS.
AND THE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
ECONOMIC ROUNDTABLE STUDY FOUND
THAT.
SERVICING HOMELESS FOLKS COST LA
COUNTY FIVE TIMES MORE THAN
THEIR COST FOR THOSE WHO WERE IN
SUPPORT OF HOUSING.
I THINK ITS PORT THAT WE DO THIS
NOW AND THAT WE COMBINE IT WITH
OUR PREVIOUS ACTIONS.
S. B..
TO WAS THAT SIR S. B. TO SP
THREE. AND FORMERLY THE NO PLACE
LIKE HOME THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT OTHER WOULD THIS ISN'T
SUPPORT.
GOOD AFTERNOON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
BY THE MISMATCH SCHWARTZ AND
REPRESENT THE CALIFORNIA HOUSING
PARTNERSHIP. WE WERE CREATED BY
THIS BODY THIRTY YEARS AGO TO
PROVIDE EXPERT. ABOUT TESTIMONY
ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING FINANCE
ISSUES.
I JUST WANNA ADD TO WHAT SENATOR
SKINNER JUST MENTIONED OUR
REPORT WHICH RELEASED LAST MONTH
DOCUMENTED THAT THE FOURTEEN
PERCENT INCREASE IN
HOMELESSNESS.
IN THE ONE YEAR PERIOD CURSE
ACROSS ALL PARTS OF THE STATE IT
IS NOT JUST CONFINED TO LOS
ANGELES AND THE BAY AREA.
.
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS BILL IS
STRIKES THE RIGHT BALANCE.
BUT IN TERMS OF LOOKING AT USING
BUDGET RESOURCES BETWEEN.
PROVIDING SHORT TERM FLEXIBLE
RESOURCES THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
CAN USE TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS
WELL AT THE SAME TIME INVESTING.
IN INTERMEDIATE TERM PRODUCTION
OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO ENABLE
THE HOUSING FIRST APPROACH.
IF THIS BILL WERE TO MOVE
FORWARD WE ESTIMATE THE
FOLLOWING ECONOMIC BENEFITS.
WITH THE CREW TO CALIFORNIA IN
ADDITION.
TO PRODUCING TWENTY THOUSAND NEW
AFFORDABLE HOMES.
THERE WOULD ALSO BE FIFTY FIVE
THOUSAND NEW JOBS.
THREE POINT FIVE OR FOUR BILLION
IN LABOR INCOME. NINE POINT FOUR
BILLION IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY.
AND FOUR HUNDRED MILLION
ADDITINAL LOCAL AND STATE TAXES
AND REVENUES RESORTS WE
CONNECTED TO MINUTES WE CAN WRAP
UP COMMENTS OF A GREAT THING.
THE LAST COMMENT I WANT TO MAKE
IT.
IN ADDITION THE ECONOMIC
ROUNDTABLE THAT WAS CITED
EARLIER.
IF THEIR STATISTICS WERE TO BE
APPLIED TO THIS BILL POTENTIAL
COST SAVINGS STATE WHY WOULD BE
TWO HUNDRED FIFTEEN MILLION
DOLLARS.
THANK YOU OKAY GREAT THANKS SUB
YOU KEEP YOUR COMES TO MINISTER
THAT WOULD BE GREAT IT SIR UPON.
AT MR CHAIRING COMMITTEE MEMBERS
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
TYRONE BUCKLEY WITH HOUSING
CALIFORNIA.
PLEASE TO.
SUPPORT THISBILL VIGOROUSLY.
AFTER YEARS OF NEGLIGENT DUH
DISINVESTMENT.
LACK.
I'M TOOK THAT FIRST STEP IN.
REINVESTING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
WE GET ENOUGH HOUSING FOR FOLKS
WHO ARE STRUGGLING AT THE
MARGINS HOWEVER LAST YEAR'S
INITIATIVE REALLY DIDN'T
REQUIRE.
SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT FROM THE
STATE I'M IN WITH THE SIX POINT
ONE BILLION DOLLAR PROJECTED
SURPLUSES TIME THAT THE STATE ON
DOES ITS PART TO ADDRESS A
HOUSING CRISIS SO.
.
THE NAME MOST IMPORTANT POINT
ABOUT THIS BILL IS THAT IT
REALLY ADDRESSES THE HOUSING
CRISIS THE RIGHT WAY WILL BY
DEDICATING HOW FOR THE FUNDS. TO
ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS WHILE
ADDRESSING THE OTHER HALF TO
ADDRESSING THE OVERALL BROUGHT
HOUSING CRISIS SO I'M WITH THAT.
WE ARE DR.
ALRIGHT THANK YOU OTHERS IN
SUPPORT PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME
OR VISIT.
ANYA LAWLER BEHALF OF THE
WESTERN CENTER ON LAW AND
POVERTY THE CALIFORNIA RURAL
LEGAL IS.
FOUNDATION AND CAL
YOU COALITION FOR ALL HOUSING
AND SUPPORT.
MARINO AT THE CALIFORNIA HOUSING
CONSORTIUM IN SUPPORT.
CHRISLEY ONLY HAVE THE
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTIES IN SUPPORT.
JEREMY HAPPENED CITIES OF
GLENDALE AND SAN MARCOS IN
SUPPORT.
BIGELOW DELUCA ON CAMPUS CITIES
OF BERKELEY IN EMERYVILLE IN
SUPPORT.
THANKS VERY CITY OF LONG BEACH
IN SUPPORT.
TRACY RYAN ROGUE CHINESE.
ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
THE UNIVERSE URBAN COUNTIES OF
CALIFORNIANS SUPPORT.
MICHAEL WRITING ON BEHALF OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SANTA
CLARA COUNTY AND SPORT.
CORPORATION FOR SUPPORT HOUSING
IN STRONG SUPPORT.
HELLO WILL HOME WITH THE COUNTY
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DIRECTORS
ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT.
KEEP DONE FOR CALIFORNIA
APARTMENT ASSOCIATION SUPPORT.
I THINK WE CANNOT BRIDGE HOUSING
IN SUPPORT.
LOSE MONDAY FOR CALIFORNIA MEET
SPORT.
MICHAEL AND WITH THE NONPROFIT
HOUSING ASSOCIATION ON THE
CALIFORNIA STRONG SUPPORT.
ANYONE ELSE'S SUPPORT.
THERE WAS NO LISTEN OPPOSITION
BUT HAZAR. DIDN'T ANY OPPOSITION
SINCE THIS REPORT CAME OUT.
I SEE NO BRING BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE IN THE CALL THAT'S
QUESTION SENATOR GAINES.
VERIFICATION LIVE IS THERE ANY
ASPECT OF THIS THAT WOULD HELP
OUT MIDDLE CLASS FOLKS.
YES OF COURSE THE MULTI FAMILY
HOUSING PROGRAM.
.
WITH THAT FEDERAL TAX CREDITS
WILL PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF
p INCOME OUT LOWERING IN LOWER
INCOME. WORKING CLASS HOUSING
OKAY SIR PROVIDE THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THAT AND I THINK
THAT'S.
IT'S IT IS A BILLS WRITTEN
FIFTY PERCENT OF THE OF THE
FUNDS WILL GO THERE. OKAY LOW
IT'S A BIG CHUNK OF THE MONEY
WILL GO TO THAT PROTECT INCLUDE
OWNERSHIP TO.
ON THE MIDDLE OF THE FAMILY
HOUSING COULD INCLUDE ALL
OWNERSHIP RENTAL.
OF VARIOUS ASPECTS YOU KNOW.
WE'RE GOOD THANK YOU DEPENDING
ON THE APPLICATION ONE OF. THE
QUESTIONS COMMENTS BY THE
COMMITTEE.
BUT
SIR WHERE TIME FOR SOME PAY
BACK.
IT'S. VERY THOUGH IT'S.
IT'S SO.
FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW CENTER
CANNELLA OF THE THERAPIST BY
NATURE OF SO HE'S GOING TO BRING
VIDEOS ON THOSE CENTER A BILL
AND SKINNER WERE SHE WENT OUT OF
HIS OWN THANK YOU FOR DOING THIS
I'M A CO AUTHOR. ON IT IS LONG
PAST DUE FOR THE STATE TO STEP
UP AND.
DRAMATICALLY MORE MEANINGFUL
WAY.
IN DEALING WITH THIS SIDE HUGE
PROBLEM ABOUT ONE ONE QUESTION I
HAVE AND I KNOW THAT IT'S ALSO
THE.
I DON'T SIX COMPETING THE
COMPLEMENTARY.
BELOVED MAYORS ASKED.
WHICH IS MY DIRECTLY TO THE
CITIES I THINK THIS MONEY WOULD
GENERALLY GO. THROUGH A
COUNTIES.
I THINK BECAUSE THAT'S
TYPICALLY WHAT I.
OKAY.
WHO I I GUESS MY QUESTION IS
VON? BRAUN.
THIS IS AN ISSUE AND SAN
FRANCISCO IMPLYING OUT SO MUCH
IN LA BECAUSE LA SOUP IS SO
LARGE WITHIN LA COUNTY BUT. THAT
CITIES LIKE OAKLAND SAN JOSE AND
SACRAMENTO.
AND THERE ARE OTHERS WHO ARE
CITIES THAT ARE ABSORBING SO
MUCH OF THE HOMELESS
CHALLENGES BUT THEY'RE NOT
DOMINANT. POLITICALLY WITHIN
THEIR COUNTIES AND SO SOMETIMES
FOR EXAMPLE OAKLAND.
RECEIVES THERE IS SOME REASON
NEW FUNDING AND ALAMEDA COUNTY
PROMISES. OF OAKLAND HAS FIFTY
pHOMELESS BUT RECEIVED TWENTY
FIVE PERCENT OF THE MONEY AND WE
SOMETIMES SEE THAT. AND I'M JUST
I WANNA JUST RAISE THAT ISSUE
CLIPPING IT'S SO IMPORTANT THAT
WE MAKE SURE. THAT.
TO FIX THAT MONEY IS GOING
THROUGH THE COUNTIES WHICH HAVE
SO MUCH OF THE SOCIAL SAFETY
NET.
BUT IT'S GOING TO CITIES BETTER
REALLY ABSORBING SO MUCH OF A
PROBLEM.
AND.
OBSCURUS IF YOU HAVE ANY
THOUGHTS ON THAT.
SO WELL YEAH SURE.
.
THIS PARTICULAR PACKAGE.
A LOT OF THE MONEY WILL GO
THROUGH THE STATE DEPARTMENT
HOUSING AND THEN HAVE A
PROCESSES IN THE EXISTING
PROGRAMS ARE TRYING IT. WE'RE
NOT TRYING TO REINVENT THE WHEEL
HERE WERE WERE USING THE
EXISTING PROGRAMS THAT HAVE BEEN
SUCCESSFUL. BOUGHT IN THE PAST
AND WE CREATED.
.
THIS BILL. USING THE EXISTING
VEHICLE THE OF THOSE STATE TO A
HOUSING PROGRAM WHICH PEOPLE
APPLY FOR YOU CAN BE A CITY YOU
COULD BE A COUNTY. YOU COULD BE
OF A NONPROFIT OR PRIVATE A
DEVELOPER IF YOU HAVE A PROJECT
THAT YOU WANT TO. THOUGHT
PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND
SO YOU COULD YOU COULD APPLY.
FOR THIS PROGRAM. OF FOR MANY OF
THOSE SONGS.
ANY OF THOSE OPPORTUNITIES SO
IT'S NOT IT'S NOT LIKE THE
ASSEMBLY BILL IS SERVE A BLOCK
GRANT.
TWO CITIES BILL.
AND WHERE WERE THIS BILL THIS
PARTICULAR BILL DOESN'T GO THAT
DIRECTION.
CAN I PURCHASE PER SECOND WE'VE
GOT.
FILE ITEM TWENTY THREE SP
FOURTEEN SIXTY NINE THAT THE
DESK IS ANXIOUSLY WAITING FOR
COULD LIFT THE COLUMN THAT.
THIS IS THE BILL FOURTEEN SIXTY
NINE BY SENATOR SKINNER THE
MOTION IS TO PASS AND REFER TO
THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND
FINANCE SENATOR CANNELLA.
ALLEN GAINES.
GALGIANI.
GOT.
GALGIANI AYE. MORALE ROTH.
ROTH AYE BIDAK.
BUT I WOULD BECAUSE HE.
WIENER I'VE YOU KNOW I. GOT.
BERNIE VOTD.
IT'S KIDS EIGHT ZERO THAT BILLS
OUT.
PLUS. WE'RE GONNA CLOSE THE ROLE
IN THAT ITEM SO BACK TO YOU.
CENTER WHERE TO FOR THE
QUESTIONS AND SO THE BILL.
NO FOR RIGHT INTO THE QUESTIONS
FROM COMMITTEE ON S. B. NINE
TWELVE FILE ITEM NUMBER THREE.
ALRIGHT CNN WILL. BRING IT BACK
TO SENATOR BELL CENTER SKINNER
IF YOU'D LIKE TO CLOSE.
PROVOST ASPIRIN I VOTED TO WE
HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE THIS BILL
SENATOR DODD IS MOVE THE BILL.
SECRETARY CALL THE ROLL.
SENATE BILL NINE TWELVE BY
SENATOR FILED THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AND REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR ABOUT.
WELL I CANNELLA PI KNOW AYE
ALLEN DODD.
DODD AYE GAINES.
GAINES I GALGIANI GALGIANI AYE
MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE MORALE ROCK.
ROTH AYE SKINNER AYE SKINNER AYE
BITE ACT.
BUT I WILL BECAUSE HE WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
THANK YOU.
BUT IT HAS A TEN VOTES SERVED UP
TO THE CHAIRMAN IF YOU MUST
LEAVE THAT I CALL.
CHARACTER BACK OVER THE
CHAIRMAN.
ONCE.
THANK YOU MEMBERS WILL LIFT THE
BECAUSE.
.
ON SOME OF THE.
WILL GO THROUGH THE.
CONSENT COUNTERFEITS.
LIFT THE CONSENT CALENDAR CALLED
FOR. MEMBERS.
ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR WHICH
CONSISTS OF FILE ITEMS TO EIGHT
TEN ELEVEN TWELVE FOURTEEN
SIXTEEN EIGHTEEN TWENTY AND
TWENTY TWO.
SENATOR DODD.
DOT AYE MCGUIRE AYE MCGUIRE AYE
MORALE SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE WIECKOWSKI WIENER.
WIENER AYE.
NO. THAT'S ELEVEN ZERO.
THAT'S CLOSED.
CLOSE.
BUT FORGET.
SORT CLOSING AFTER WE LEFT CALLS
BECAUSE I HAVE TO LEAVE.
SO. I'M OUT OF HERE.
DEALS.
SO NEXT TIME.
THE TWENTY EIGHT FROM HERE.
YEAH.
THIS IS SENATE BILL EIGHT TWENTY
EIGHT BY SENATOR WINNER THE
MOTION IS TO PASS AS AMENDED AND
REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS SENATOR ALLEN.
GALGIANI GALGIANI AYE MORALE
ROSS.
ROTH AYE WIECKOWSKI.
AND THERE.
S. SYMPOSIA SO.
THIS IS SENATE BILL NINE TWELVE
BY SENATOR ABOUT THE MOTION IS
TO PASS AND YOUR EFFORT TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATE.
SENATOR ALLEN.
MORALE.
BY LACK.
WIECKOWSKI.
YEAH BUT IT WAS A.
PLEASE DON'T TELL ME TOAD
SPLINTER VOTE.
SEE.
YOU VOTER BECAUSE I DON'T THINK
I DON'T.
YOU THAT THAT WAS JUST. VOTED I
THINK YOU TO VOTE.
OKAY.
SO IF.
IT'S SINCE EARLY THAT THAT MOST
OF THE BILLS OUT.
THE SENATE BILL NINE EIGHTEEN BY
SENATOR WINNER THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AND REAR FOR TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR DODD.
DODD AYE GAINES.
GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE MCGUIRE.
MORALE ROTH.
ROTH AYE SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE WIECKOWSKI.
GAINES I.
GEN. TEN VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE
BILL IS OUT.
THIS IS AN THE BILL NINE THIRTY
SIX BY SENATOR ALLEN THE MOTION
IS TO PASS AS AMENDED AND
REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR DODD.
DODD I MCGUIRE. ACQUIRE AYE
MORRELL. ROSS. ROTH AYE SKINNER.
WIENER AYE.
YEAH.
THE US TO OPPOSE THE MOTION THAT
pSENATE BILL NINE THIRTY SEVEN
BY
SENATOR WINNER THE MOTION IS TO
PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED TO
THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR CANNELLA DODD.
DODD AYE GAINES.
MCGUIRE. MCGUIRE AYE MORALE.
SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE WIECKOWSKI.
IT IS POINT. BECAUSE A VOTE IN
FAVOR ONE OPPOSE THE BILL
ITSELF.
THIS ISN'T A BILL NINE FIFTY
SEVEN BY SENATOR LARA THE
MACHINE IS YOU PASSING REFERRED
TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS
SENATOR DODD.
DODD AYE MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE
MORALE SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE WIECKOWSKI WIENER
WIENER AYE.
THE WEATHER.
THOSE LIMOS IN FAVOR THEMSELVES.
THIS ISN'T A BILL TEN FOURTEEN
BY SENATOR SKINNER THE MOTION IS
TO PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED
TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR ALLEN.
ALLEN I.
GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE
MORALE.
ROSS.
ROTH I.
BECAUSE HE.
A DECREE.
EIGHT VOTES IN FAVOR THREE
OPPOSE THE BILL ITSELF.
THE SENATE BILL ELEVEN EIGHTY
FAR BY SENATOR PAN THE MOTION IS
TO PASS AS AMENDED AND REFERRED
TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR DODD.
DODD AYE MCGUIRE AYE MCGUIRE AYE
MORALE. SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE.
WITH ASKING.
WIENER. WHEN I.
ONE.
AND THOSE OF EVERYONE OF CLOSER
BOTH BILL ITSELF.
THIS ISN'T A BILL TWELVE TWENTY
SEVEN BY SENATOR SKINNER AND THE
MOTION IS TO PASS AS AMENDED AND
REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS. SENATOR ALLEN.
ALLEN AYE GALGIANI.
GALGIANI AYE MORALE ROSS.
ROTH AYE WIECKOWSKI WIENER. WE
ARE AYE.
RELEVANT.
THOSE LEVEL TO FAVOR THE BILL
ITSELF.
THE SENATE BILL THIRTEEN OH
SEVEN BY SENATOR GALGIANI THE
MOTION IS TO PASS AND REFERRED
TO THE COMMITTEE ON
APPROPRIATIONS. SENATOR DODD.
DODD AYE.
MCGUIRE MCGUIRE AYE MORALE.
ROSS.
SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE WIECKOWSKI. WIENER
AYE WIENER AYE.
IT.
THEY'VE ALSO FAVOR TO OPPOSE A
VOTE THE BILLS OUT.
THIS ISN'T ABOUT THIRTEEN SIXTY
BY SENATOR PORTANTINO THE MOTION
IS TO PASS AND REFERRED TO
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS.
SENATOR DODD.
DODD AYE GAINES.
GALGIANI.
BOTH.
GAINES AYE GALGIANI AYE MCGUIRE.
MCGUIRE AYE MORALE ROSS.
ROTH AYE SKINNER.
SKINNER AYE BY TAX LAWYER BUT I
WILL COUNTY WIENER. WIENER AYE.
PEDROSA FAVOR ONE OPPOSE THE
BILL ITSELF.
AS IS SENATE BILL FOURTEEN OH
SEVEN BY SENATOR NEWMAN THE
MOTION IS TO PASS AND REFERRED
TO THE COMMITTEE ON
DODD AYE MCGUIRE.
WHY I'M AROUND SKINNER? SKINNER
AYE WIECKOWSKI WIENER.
WE ARE AYE.
ELEVEN ZERO LOOKING STAFF WOMAN
DESERVE A BILLS OUT.
OKAY.
THE WITNESS WHEN THEY'RE. NOT WE
PRIORITIES ACCEPTANCE. OF THANK
EVERYBODY.
WE ARE FINISHED WITH ALL OF THE
NEW