THIS IS.
BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE NUMBER FOUR.
SO IF THIS ISN'T YOUR TRAIN
RIGHT NOW IS THE TIME TO GET OFF.
WILL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE ROLL
ESTABLISHED QUORUM WE WILL.
UNLESS.
CENTER GLAZER COMES IN THE
MIDST OF THIS WE WILL HOLD A
VOTE ONLY ITEMS.
SO I DON'T HAVE TO REVISIT
THOSE AND WE WILL PROCEED A
MEDIA LIED TO THE DISCUSSION
VOTE ITEM. THE FIRST ONE SEVEN
SEVEN SIX ZERO DEPARTMENT OF
GENERAL SERVICES BUT FIRST CALL
ROLL.
IN IRAQ.
SENATOR CLAY EITHER. CENTER WILL
CLOSE IT.
THANK YOU FOR ALL FOR JOINING US
IS IT SAID WILL MOVE FIRST TO
THE FIRST DISCUSSION VOTE ITEM
SEVEN SEVEN. ZERO DEPARTMENT
GENERAL SERVICES AND THERE ARE.
SEVERAL ISSUES WITH THE FIRST
BEING.
MODIFICATION FUNDING STRUCTURE
FOR CONTRACTED FISCAL SERVICE.
BY THE WAY MY NAME IS RICHARD
ROTH IN CASE YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN.
LET'S GO HERE HESSE AND I
FREQUENTLY FORGET.
BUT GO IN THE DEAD OF FIRE CELLS
FOR THE RECORD STARTING AT THE
FRONT TABLE TO MY LEFT YOU'RE
RIGHT SIR.
DO YOU THINK ANY ON THE DIRECTOR
HERE TGS.
THANK YOU SIR.
NANCY AND AROUND THE DEPUTY
DIRECTOR FOR SUSTAINABILITY AT
TGS.
AN INTERESTING FILLS THE ACTING
AND THEN DEPUTY FOR THE
APARTMENTS ALL SERVICES.
A GOOD.
FINANCE.
JOHNSON DEPARTMENT FINANCE. JOHN
FITZPATRICK FINANCE.
AND CHRISTINE LEGISLATIVE
ANALYST'S OFFICE THIS PERSON
COULD SEE.
WELL BEFORE WE. MOVE FORWARD
WITH THIS LASERS TREMENDOUS
LET'S DO THE.
VOTE ONLY ITEMS WILL FIX IT
RIGHT THERE.
.
AND THE ITEMS ON THE VOTE ONLY
CALENDAR IS ANY.
MEMBER WISH ANY OF THE ITEMS TO
BE REMOVED FROM THE VOTE ONLY
CALENDAR.
OKAY HEARING.
SILENCE.
THE ITEMS ARE ISSUES SEVEN SEVEN
SIX ZERO DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
SERVICES ISSUES ONE THROUGH FOUR.
CALIFORNIA MILITARY DEPARTMENT
TO ISSUE EIGHT NINE FOUR ZERO
ISSUES ONE INTO.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
ISSUE EIGHT NINE FIVE FIVE RIGHT
IN EIGHT NINE FIVE FIVE ISSUES
ONE.
THROUGH FOUR ONE THREE AND FOUR.
HE WAS MISSING. TYPE AND.
PLEASE.
SO IT'S ONE TWO AND THREE.
NEVER VERY GOOD AT NUMBERS.
A QUESTION ON WHAT'S ON THE VOTE
ONLY CALENDAR IF NOT IS OUR
MOTION SO MOVED THERE LOOK
REMOVED PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
FEDERAL.
THEY'RE GOING TO SURVIVE THINNER
WHAT KINDS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
PATIENCE NOW WHO WANTS TO START.
I'LL BE A SENATOR.
GOOD MORNING.
CENTER OFF THERE WILL CENTER
GLAZER.
WE ABOUT SIX ITEMS UNTIL BEFORE
YOU TODAY FIRST TO OUR SUPPORT
BCPL BEFORE SIGNING ON. AND IN
THE FOLLOWING FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY
BCP'S WILL PASS IT OVER TO TREAT
MISTER KENNY. TO PRESENT ON.
ALSO BEFORE I BEGIN I JUST
WANNA THANK I MISSPOKE FOR HER
EFFORTS LEADING UP TODAY'S
HEARING ASKING ALL THE QUESTIONS
ON THE FRONT END FOR HELP OUR
PREPARATIONS. ISSUE ONE IS A.
THE.
MODIFICATION FUNDING STRUCTURE
FOR CONTRACTED FISCAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT DON'T SERVICES IS
REQUESTING A PROMINENT.
DOCUMENTATION OF TWO POINT FIVE
MILLION BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN TO ENSURE THAT
WE FULLY RECOVER COSTS OF
PROVIDING FISCAL SERVICES. AND
IN ADDITION TO THAT WERE ALSO
REQUESTING MODIFICATIONS THE
FUNDING STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD
RESULT IN A NET REDUCTION OF A
LITTLE OVER THREE MILLION IN
SERVICE REVOLVING FUND OF
AUTHORITY AN INCREASE OF THREE
POINT ONE MILLION GENERAL FUND
IS ALREADY. AN INCREASE IN TWO
POINT THREE NINE SIX MILLION
INSERT A CENTRAL SERVICE COSTS
COVER FUND OF RT.
THE. STAFF REPORT DOES A NICE
JOB OF LAYING OUT THE ISSUES.
AND THEN THE GOALS BEHIND THIS
PROPOSAL I DID WANT TO POINT OUT
ONE CLARIFICATION TO THE STAFF
REPORT.
AND THAT IS THAT THE FIFTY CDS
CFS TEAM WILL CONTINUE TO WORK
WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS THAT
ARE PART OF THE CFS PROGRAM ON
AN ANNUAL BASIS TO BOTH.
DETERMINE THE WORKLOAD AND AGREE
UPON THE WORKLOAD IN THE FUNDING
THAT'S GOING TO. BE REQUIRED TO
COVER THE WORKLOAD AND ONLY.
WITH OUR HAPPY ANSWERING
QUESTIONS HAVE FINANCE.
HELLO.
NO CONCERNS.
COLLEAGUES QUESTIONS.
IF.
YEAH SING NON PUBLIC COMMENT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION ISSUE ONE
IS APPROVED AS REQUESTED IS OUR
MOTION.
THE MOVE SIR WHAT MOVES PLEASE
CALL THE ROLL.
THERE ARE FIVE. YEARS LATER.
LOOK I.
ISSUE TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE
SERVICE EQUIPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE.
THANK CENTERS ARE THIS PROPOSAL
REQUESTS A ONETIME AUGMENTATION
OF FIFTEEN POINT SIX MILLIONIN
EIGHTEEN NINETEEN AND ONE
PERMANENT POSITION TO CONTINUE
THE INSTALLATION EVEY. SERVICE
EQUIPMENT AND STATE FACILITIES
OF THAT FIFTEEN POINT SIX
MILLION THE AMOUNT WOULD BE
SPLIT SEVEN POINT EIGHT MILLION
IS RIPPING REQUESTED AND
TRANSFERRED FROM THE GENERAL
FUND. AND SEVEN POINT EIGHT
MILLION FROM THE SERVICE
REVOLVING FUND. IT'S FUNNY WHAT
SPORT FORMING APPROXIMATELY
SIXTEEN HUNDRED ASSESSMENTS AND
INSTALLING APPROXIMATE TWELVE
HUNDRED CHARTERS IN TWENTY
EIGHTEEN TWENTY NINETEEN. YOU
MAY RECALL WE DID HAVE A FIVE
YEAR PROPOSAL FOR YOU LAST YEAR
IN WHICH YOU LAST YEAR THIS
COMMITTEE AND. ULTIMATELY DID
APPROVE THE FIRST YEAR OF THE
FUNDING SO THIS IS A KIND OF A
REPEAT BRING BACK UP YOUR TWO OF
THAT FUNDING. AND WITH US WE DO
HAVE NANCY UNDER WHO RUNS A
PROGRAM HE'S HAPPY ANSWERING
QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. BEFORE WE
GET TO THAT FINANCE ANY COMMENT.
OKAY ELIO YOU HAVE SOME COMMENTS.
VIDEO I HAVE MISTER CHAIR THAT
WE RECOMMEND THAT THE
LEGISLATURE CONSIDER USING OTHER
FUNDING SOURCES IN PLACE OF THE
GENERAL FUND FOR THIS PROPOSAL.
NOTABLY THE GREENHOUSE GAS
REDUCTION FIND ANY ALTERNATIVE
AND RENEWABLE FUEL AND VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGY FIND MAYBE OTHER
ALTERNATIVE SOURCES. ARE WORTHY
OF CONSIDERATION I'M SO WE DO I
RECOMMEND DIRECTING THE
DEPARTMENT TO REPORT ON. THOSE
FUNDS AND.
WHY THEY WERE NOT SELECTED? FOR
THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSAL BY THE
REASON FOR THIS IS AS FOLLOWS
I'M IN ITS ENTIRETY THIS.
THIS WHOLE PLAN WELL THIS IS
JUST ONE YOUR PROPOSAL TIME IS
ANTICIPATED TO BE RELATIVELY
EXPENSIVE JUST THREE TWENTY.
TWENTY TWENTY ONE TWENTY TWO.
IT'S IT'S ALMOST A HUNDRED
MILLION AND AND THAT WOULD GET
US ALL THE WAY TO THE GOALS THEY
HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED SO.
THEY'RE SUBSTANTIAL COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS AND WE
THINK THAT ON TO THE EXTENT THAT
WE CAN FIND OUT ALTERNATIVE
FUNDING SOURCES IT WOULD BE
APPROPRIATE TO EXPLORE THOSE. ON
NOTABLY IN THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET
ON THEIR SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENTS
FOR OTHER EAT FOR ET FOR
STRUCTURE.
BOTH THERE'S GREENHOUSE GAS
REDUCTION FUNDS.
ONE POINT THREE BILLION IN
DISCRETIONARY FUNDS OF WHICH A
HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE MILLION
ARE PROPOSED FOR A VEHICLE
REBATES AND THEN.
THAT ALTERNATIVE AND RENEWABLE
FUEL VIEW AND DIFFICULT
TECHNOLOGY FIND IS THE MAIN
SOURCE OF ANOTHER PROPOSAL TWO
HUNDRED AND THIRTY FIVE MILLION.
I'M AN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN FOR
EVEY CHARGING STATIONS THOSE
WOULD BE JUST YOUR GENERAL
PRIVATE RECHARGING STATIONS ON
SO WE THINK IT'S WORTH AT LEAST
CONSIDERING. WHETHER IT WOULD BE
APPROPRIATE TO USE AS FUNDING
SOURCES FOR THIS ACTIVITY AS
WELL.
SO BEFORE I TURN IT OVER TO MY
COLLEAGUES FOR QUESTIONS.
.
PERHAPS YOU COULD ADDRESS THE LA
OF COMMENTS OBVIOUSLY THERE A
LOT OF.
DEMANDS AND THE GREENHOUSE GAS
REDUCTION FUND. THAT WE DEAL WAS
WHEN WE DEVELOPED THE
EXPENDITURE PLAN.
BUT IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
THERE IS A PROPOSAL TO DO SOME.
EQUIPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
INVESTMENT OUT OF THE GREENHOUSE
GAS REDUCTION FUND FOR PRIVATE
USE IN THIS OF COURSE IS.
GOVERNMENT USE CAN YOU ADDRESS
THE THE DIFFERENCE IF THERE IS A
REASON EXPLAIN WHY AND.
SO FORTH.
WHO IS THAT IS THAT SOME OF OUR
MEMBERS AT ALL IN MY ANSWERS?
DUMPS PATRICK FROM TO FINANCE
THE BROADER.
CAP AND TRADE PROPOSAL IS
OUTSIDE OF MY AREA OF PURVIEW.
CERTAINLY.
IT'S OBVIOUS THAT THIS
PARTICULAR PROPOSAL WAS NOT
INCLUDED IN THAT BROADER PLAN.
WHICH REFLECTED THE PRIORITIES
OF THE ADMINISTRATION FOR THE
THE USES OF CAP AND TRADE
FUNDING.
.
CAN'T SPEAK TO THE INDIVIDUAL
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE.
PORTIONS OF THE PROPOSAL.
THAT.
PROVIDE FUNDING FOR. PRIVATE
ENTITIES ON BUT I WOULD SAY AS
IT RELATES ESPECIALLY ALSO TO
THE.
LA OWES US SUGGESTION. IN NATURE
THE ONE TIME NATURE OF THOSE A
YEAR BY YEAR NATURE OF THIS
PROPOSAL ALLOWS FOR THAT
DISCUSSION TO OCCUR.
EIGHTY TWO POINT IN TIME THE
PROPOSAL IS.
REVISITED IN THE FALL SO
CERTAINLY THE POINT WOULD BE
WELL TAKEN BY THE LA O. TO.
CONSIDER WHETHER GOING FORWARD
IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS WHETHER. CAP
AND TRADE FUNDING OR OTHER
SOURCES OF FUNDING THAT THE
DEPARTMENT HAS INDICATED THEY'RE
SEEKING TO LEVERAGE CAN BE USED.
FOR THE THE DOWNSTREAM AND MORE
EXPENSIVE PORTIONS OF THIS
OVERALL PROJECT. FOR ME JUST ASK
YOU FOR THE QUESTION DOES THIS
HAVE TO DO WITH THE DIFFICULTY
IN. DIRECTLY EXPENDING STAY
RESOURCES IN PRIVATE
CONSTRUCTION OR PRIVATE
ENTERPRISE AS OPPOSED TO
FORMULATING A GRANT PROGRAM THAT
PEOPLE THAT APPLY FOR. WHERE IS
THIS OBVIOUSLY OR APPEARS TO BE
IS A DIRECT EXPENDITURE ON?
IN STATE BUILDINGS AS THAT OF
INTELLIGENT QUESTION.
SO I THINK WE THE WAY WITH THIS
THE PROPOSAL STRUCTURES SIR IS
HALF OF THE FUNDS WOULD BE
GENERAL FUND THAT WE COULD USE
TO IMMEDIATELY CONDUCT PROJECTS
THE OTHER HALF OF THE FUNDS
COMING FROM THE SERVICE
REVOLVING FUND WOULD BE PROJECTS
THE DEPARTMENTS. CAME TO US AND
WANTED TO DO IT USING THEIR
EXISTING BUDGET FUNDS FOR
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND AND
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AT
THE FACILITIES SO. WE HAVEN'T WE
STRUCTURED THE FUNDS AND WITH
WHICH AWAY WERE WERE USING SOME
GENERAL FRONTS TO MAXIMIZE
CAPACITY AND AND GROW THE SYSTEM
AS WE AS WE CAN BUT AT THE SAME
TIME AS DEPARTMENT OF PROJECTS
OR UPGRADING THEIR FACILITIES.
WE CREATED A SOURCE IN WHICH
THEY CAN BRING FUNDS TO THE
SERVER SERVICE REVOLVING FUND TO
DO PROJECTS. USUAL MY QUESTION
IS PROBABLY AN ARTICULATE I
GUESS IT GOES TO THE LA DOES
POINT IS IT. IS IT IS THE
EXPLANATION FOR THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN CAP AND TRADE FUNDING
VERSUS GENERAL FUND. FUNDING.
THE DIFFICULTY IN USING STATE
GENERAL FUND MONEY TO GO
DIRECTLY TO A PRIVATE
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO
CONSTRUCT ELECTRIC ELECTRIC.
VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS. SO MY
UNDERSTANDING IS CERTAINLY WE
COULD USE GENERAL FUND FOR THAT
PURPOSE THE GENERAL FUND IS
ACTUALLY THE MOST FLEXIBLE
FUNDING SOURCE WE HAVE AN IDEA
OF ANYTHING THAT WE COULD FIND
OUT OF DYED YOUR ACT WE COULD
FIND OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND.
I'M CERTAINLY SEE IF IT WAS THE
LEGISLATURE'S DESIRE ON AND IT'S
WELL YOU KNOW IF THE
ADMINISTRATION WAS COMFORTABLE
WITH THAT. I'M SO I THINK
ACTUALLY.
YOU KNOW THESE WHETHER THEY BE
PRIVATE OR PUBLIC ELECTRIC
CHARGING STATIONS.
CERTAINLY IT WOULD BE AN
ALLOWABLE USE IN OUR VIEW TO USE
EITHER GENERAL FIND OR TO USE
THESE OTHER ALTERNATIVE FUNDING
SOURCES THAT WE POINT THAT FINAL PACKAGE MIGHT LOOK
LIKE PERFECT. COLLEAGUES ANY
QUESTIONS LASERS AND LOOK.
I DONT HAVE A QUESTION THAT
I'VE GOT A COMMENT I'M NOT IN
I'M NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THE.
SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL I AGREE
WITH THAT LA A WE SHOULD BE NOT
USING GENERAL FUND DOLLARS WE
HAVE GREAT NEEDS IN THIS STATE.
AND I KNOW WHAT MY LAST YEAR IN
THE ASSEMBLY ON THE LAST DAY I
WAS ON BUDGET AND AND THEY THEY
CAME UP.
FINANCE TO ONE SPEND ONE POINT
FOUR BILLION DOLLARS OF CAP AND
TRADE FUNDS AND THEY MADE A
PRESENTATION THEN WE ASKED
MALKIN WHAT'S THE RATE OF RETURN.
FOR OUR TAXPAYERS A SO WE DON'T
KNOW JUST WHAT THE GOVERNOR ONCE
AND THAT WAS NOT A VERY GOOD
ANSWER FOR ME SO I I GOT
PROBLEMS AND NOW IT I THINK IT
SHOULD BE A CAP AND TRADE.
NUMBER TWO I'VE LOOKED AT BOTH
TECHNOLOGIES WE HAD WE DON'T
HAVE PAID ANY MORE WE HAVE YOUR
NOW WE DON'T HAVE VHS I GUESS
I'M DATING MYSELF. OB I THINK
HYDROGEN IS GONNA BE THE
TECHNOLOGY OF THE FUTURE NOT
ELECT NOT.
ELECTRIC VEHICLES I THINK
THAT'S JUST A BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY
SO TO MAKE THIS KIND OF
INVESTMENT WOULD GENERAL FUND
DOLLARS THAT COULD BE SPENT IN
THE CLASSROOM ROADS WATER
INFRASTRUCTURE I JUST NOT
COMFORTABLE WITH IT.
AND OF COURSE THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION IS TOLD US OPEN.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
PARTICULAR ISSUE ISSUE NUMBER
TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE SERVICE
EQUIPMENT.
OKAY SEEING NONE WE'RE GOING TO
HOLD THIS ISSUE OPEN WE WILL BE
REVISITING THIS ONE AT A LATER
DATE NOW BUT ISSUE NUMBER THREE
THE START OF OUR CAPITAL OUTLAY
DISCO. TAKE.
READING PLANNED DEMOLITION.
ABSOLUTELY.
THIS FIRST ITEM BEFORE YOU IS
THE.
CONTINUING THE DEMOLITION OF
THE STATE PLANT WE REQUESTING
EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTEEN THOUSAND
DOLLARS FOR THE WORKING DRAWINGS
FACE.
DOES THE SIGHT OF THAT HAS BEEN
THE TARGET FOR DEVELOPMENT IN
THE NINETEEN NINETIES.
AND THE STATE PRINTER IS
CURRENTLY VACATING.
THAT THE RELOCATION IS ENTIRELY
ON TARGET THEY'RE PLANNING ON
BEING VAGUE THAT PLANNING ON
VACATION THE SITE.
IN THIS FALL.
THE CURRENT PHASE THE TIMING
PLAN FACES PROJECT IS ON
SCHEDULE ON BUDGET.
WE HAVE ENCOUNTERED NO
ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT OR
MEDIATION ISSUES BEYOND WHAT WE
PREDICTED IN THE FIRST PLACE AND
SO WE'RE NOT SEEING ANYTHING
THAT WOULD DRIVE SCHEDULER COST.
AND.
WE ARE STILL.
RECOMMENDING THIS TO MOVE
FORWARD REGARDLESS WHAT HAPPENS
AT THE SITE REDUCING MISTER
GREENFIELD WOULD WOULD WOULD
ELIMINATE ONE SHUT DOWN COSTS SO.
AND IF WE DIDN'T DO THIS WE IF
WE WOULD HOLD THE DEMOLITION THE
STATE OF THEY CAN SIDE TO PAY
COST FOR SECURITY MAINTENANCE OF
THINGS LIKE THAT.
SINCE THIS IS A. PRETTY
STRAIGHTFORWARD.
PROPOSAL.
OKAY FINANCE A COMMENT.
SALLY LEGAL PART OF FINANCE NO
COMMENTS AT THIS TIME THANK YOU
MORNING THANKS FOR JOINING US
KALLIO. NO CONCERN TO THE
PROPOSAL WE CONCUR WITH THE
DEPARTMENT THAT WHETHER OR NOT
DEPENDS REGARDLESS OF HOW THE
STATE ALTERNATELY I DECIDE TO
USE THAT SITE YOU'RE SO.
THE QUESTIONS ANY PUBLIC COMMENT
ON THIS ITEM.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO
APPROVE HIS REQUEST IS OUR
MOTION CERTAINLY IT'S BEEN MOVED
HIS CULTURAL.
SENATOR ROBB FIVE. LATER.
SENATOR WILL FIGHT.
ISSUE NUMBER FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY
RICHARDS BOULEVARD COMPLEX.
SERVICE PEOPLE WHO WE ARE
SEEKING EIGHTEEN MILLION DOLLARS
FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR THE
ELEMENT OF OR CALLING THE
RICHARDS BOULEVARD COMPLEX THIS
WOULD BE A DEVELOPMENT ON TOP OF
THE PRINT PLANT SITE WE JUST
DISCUSSED.
IN THE TWO THOUSAND EIGHT
SACRAMENTO REGION OFFICE STATE
PLAN OFFICE PLANNING STUDY WHICH
IF THEY DID IT IN TWENTY FIFTEEN
THE LEGISLATURES REQUEST ON THE
CITY AND FIND AN ADDITIONAL
MILLION SQUARE FOOT OF SPACE
NEEDED IN SACRAMENTO.
THIS PROJECT WOULD ADDRESS THAT
NEED.
CONCEPTUALLY THE PRODUCT IS
DEFINED AS THE CONSTRUCTION OF A.
A LARGER TOWER THAT WOULD HOUSE
SIX BUSINESS CONSUMER SERVICES
AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENTS.
SEVERAL OF SMALLER FIVE STORY
BUILDINGS THAT WOULD HOUSE THE
APARTMENT TAXING FEW
MINISTRATION AND THEN A THOUSAND
TWENTY STYLE PARKING GARAGE WITH
WATER SURFACE PARKING SPACES.
THE PROJECT IS SLATED TO BE
EASIER TO ENERGY.
AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE WE WOULD
INCLUDE A CHILD CARE.
AND LIKE THE TWO CURRENT.
STUFF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS
BUILDINGS I COMMAND OF THE
TARGETING OF STREET PROJECT AND
THE NEW NATURAL RESOURCES
BUILDING.
WE WOULD BE INCLUDING.
RETAIL AND.
CORPORATE TO THE CITY DESIGN AS
BEST AS POSSIBLE I'M DOING THIS WOULD ALLOW US
TO VACATE THE FOUR FIFTY AND
STREET BUILDING WHICH IS
OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE BE A
REBUILDING.
AND THEN RENOVATE THAT SPACE.
TO BE LOCATED JUST TO THE NORTH
OF THE CITY IS REALLY OUR
PROJECT. WILL BE A POTENTIALLY
IN SUPPORT OF THAT DEPENDING HOW
WE ARRANGE THE PARKING.
AND THEN.
BASED ON OUR ANALYSIS WHICH WAS.
WILL BE WITH A FAIRLY
CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS.
BUILDING THE COST ESSENTIALLY
PENCIL OUT IN FORTY FIVE YEARS
WHICH IS WELL WITHIN THE LIFE
EXPECTANCY OF THE BUILDING.
FINANCE.
WE WHOLLY.
PROFESSOR. SUPPORT THIS
PROPOSAL AND THINK IT'S PART OF
A LONG RANGE PLAN FOR OFFICE
SPACE THE SECOND AREA OF RIGHT
NOW. STUDY SHOWED THAT OVER THE
NEXT THREE YEARS.
NOT ONLY ARE THEIR TREMENDOUS
RENOVATION NEEDS BUT THERE'S
ALSO THEY'LL BE AT ALL ALSO BE.
A LARGE DEFICIT UP ARBIL OFFICE
SPACE UP TO THIRTY.
SQUARE FEET ARE SORRY THIRTEEN
MILLION SQUARE FEET.
SO WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS.
THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT
WITH THE NEEDS OF THE STATE. TO
REFRESH ME.
ON WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR OR THE
YEAR BEFORE I FORGET. TOTAL
PROJECT COST ESTIMATED AT
APPROXIMATELY ONE BILLION
DOLLARS IS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY
THAT WE.
EASILY.
APPROPRIATED FOR THESE VARIOUS
BUILDING REMODELS IN
CONSTRUCTION.
IN PRAYER BUDGET YEARS ON THE
THE TWO PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE I
THINK THE BILLION DOLLARS YOU'RE
YOU'RE REFERRING TO RELATE TO
THE.
STREET AND THE RESOURCE
BUILDING PROJECTS. ON THOSE ARE
CURRENTLY UNDER WAY.
THIS IS A SEPARATE PROJECT THAT
IS ESTIMATED TO COST ABOUT
BILLION DOLLARS AND WE WILL HAVE
TO DEAL WITH THAT IN FUTURE
BUDGET YEARS RIGHT THIS REQUEST
IS JUST FOR THE PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA FACE WHICH IS EIGHTEEN
MILLION DOLLARS AND HOW MANY
PHASES OF THIS PROJECT DO YOU
ANTICIPATE. ITS DESIGN BUILD
THERE TOO SO.
FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA PHASE
WOULD BE EVERYTHING TO TAKE THE
BUILDING TO THE.
START DESIGNING CONSTRUCTIONS
OF SEQUEL THE WHOLE NINE YARDS.
SO THAT THIS PHASE GETS FUNDED
AND THEN THE NEXT PHASE WHICH WE
THE BALANCE OF THE FUNDS ABOUT A
BILLION DOLLARS WOULD BE THE
DESIGN BUILD FACE ITSELF.
TWO BITES OF THE APPLE.
THAT'S A BIG BITE.
HELLO.
THEY WERE RECOMMENDING REJECTING
THE* PROPOSE FUNDING FOR
THIS PROJECT ON BECAUSE WE DON'T
THINK IT'S A COST EFFECTIVE WAY
FOR THE STATE TO MEET ITS OFFICE
BUILDING NEEDS. I'M SPECIFICALLY
WE COMPARED THE ESTIMATED
SAVINGS FROM MOVING THE
DEPARTMENT'S THEY'RE CURRENTLY
AN EXISTING SPACE ON MOST ABOUT
FREE SPACE BUT SOME OF THAT.
PUBLICLY ONSPACE TIME INTO
THIS NEW PROPERTY.
COMPARED THOSE THE SETTINGS
WITH THE COSTS ABOUT
CONSTRUCTING THE BUILDING AS
WELL AS OPERATING IT AND
MAINTAINING IT AND. WE LOOKED AT
THAT WE LOOK AT HOW LONG IT
WOULD TAKE FOR A SICKLY FROM THE
SAVINGS TO OFFSET THE COST IN
OUR ESTIMATE WAS OVER EIGHTY
YEARS.
WE DO RECOGNIZE THAT TGS HAS A
DIFFERENT ESTIMATE ON COUPLE
THAT THEIR COUPLE KEY THINGS AND
MADE THINGS ARE DRIVING THOSE
DIFFERENCES.
AND THEY CAN POINT OUT TO YOU
THAT WE THINK.
WE THINK OUR ANALYSIS WAS MORE
REALISTIC. AND SO WERE THE
BIGGEST ONE IS THAT THEIR
DIDN'T DISCOUNT CASH FLOWS ARE
SO BASICALLY IT DIDN'T TAKE INTO
ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT BECAUSE
THAT MONEY TODAY IS MORE
VALUABLE THAN MONEY IN THE
FUTURE. ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU'RE
LOOKING AT ON PROJECTS THAT HAVE
SAVING IN COST OVER ME YOU KNOW
MANY YEARS IN THIS CASE MANY
DECADES. AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO
DO PER YEAR FOR THAT THE WHOLE
PERIOD ON AND WE THINK IT'S MUCH
MORE REALISTIC TO ASSUME THAT
THOSE COSTS WILL GROW IT
PROBABLY AT LEAST INFLATION
GIVEN.
GIVEN THAT THERE'S A LOT OF
COST ASSOCIATED WITH EMPLOYING
COMMON OTHER THINGS AND WE
EXPECT THOSE TO. TO.
CONTINUE TO GO OUT ON OVER THE
YEARS SO. WE WE JUST A FEW OF
THOSE ASSUMPTIONS I MAKE UP A
HIGHER ON PAY BACK PERIOD AND WE
THINK THAT'S THAT'S MORE
REALISTIC WE THINK THAT'S. YOU
KNOW LONG ENOUGH THAT.
IT'S LIKELY THAT THE BUILDING
MUST BE BEYOND ITS USEFUL LIFE.
SO.
WE WOULD.
I RECOMMEND INSTEAD OF THE
LEGISLATURE DIRECT THE
ADMINISTRATION TO PURSUE AN
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH AND THAT
COULD BE EITHER I'M SELLING THAT
PROPERTY ONCE WE DEMOLISH THE
EXISTING PRETTY PLANNER COULD BE.
REVISING HIS PROPOSAL TO MAKE
THE BUILDING.
MORE.
THAT'S WHAT COSTLY AND MORE COST
EFFECTIVE. AND WE ALSO DO
RECOMMEND THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION I'M PROVIDE SOME
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT ON
THAT LARGER STRATEGY AS WAS
POINTED OUT THIS.
THERE IS A LARGER STRATEGY
RECENTLY SAW THE OMP BUILDINGS.
LAST YEAR ON THERE'S THIS
BUILDING THERE ACTUALLY A NUMBER
OF OTHER BUILDINGS THAT ARE PART
OF STRATEGY WILL HE WILL HEAR
ABOUT A COUPLE OF THEM ACTUALLY.
I'M SUBSEQUENTLY IN THIS.
HEARING THE COUPLE THEIR
INNOVATIONS.
BUT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF THOSE
PROJECTS AND IN TOTAL.
YOU WE THINK IT'S. UNCLEAR
EXACTLY HOW MUCH THEY'RE GONNA
COST ON THERE HAS BEEN A FULL
ACCOUNTING OF THAT ON THE PART
OF THE ADMINISTRATION. THAT
COULD BE EASILY THREE OR FOUR
BILLION DOLLARS YOU KNOW IN
TOTAL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT QUITE
A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY
AND SO LEGISLATURES. NOW I THINK
ABOUT WELL HOW MUCH DO YOU WANT
TO INVEST IN SACRAMENTO AREA
STATE OFFICE BUILDINGS VERSES.
ALL THE OFFICE BUILDINGS IN THE
FEMINIST OFFICE BUILDINGS ACROSS
THE STATE IN OTHER PARTS OF THE
STATE.
AS WELL AS OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE
THAT THE STATE HAS.
THROUGHOUT THE STATE AND THIS
IS ONE AREA THAT'S.
BUT CERTAINLY A VERY. IMPORTANT
AREA BUT A BUDGET YOU MAY WISH
TO CONSIDER SORT OF WHETHER THEY
WANT TO INVEST QUITE THIS MERGER
WHETHER YOU WANT NO OTHER
ALTERNATIVES AND SO YOU COULD
THINK ABOUT ARE THERE CERTAIN.
BUILDINGS THERE YOUR PRIORITIES
AND AND.
PERHAPS HAVE THE ADMINISTRATION.
OKAY DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES THAT
WOULD MAKE SURE THAT YOU YOU GET
THE PRIORITIES THAT YOU THAT YOU
HAVE FUNDED.
.
SO THAT CONCLUDES MY COMMENTS
HAPPY TO TAKE QUESTIONS HAS
THERE NOT BEEN A STUDY OF
ALTERNATIVES BECAUSE IT'S MY
RECOLLECTION. ON THIS ISSUE THAT
IT'S A VERY COMPLICATED ONE IN
THERE A LOT OF MOVING PARTS AND
IT'S SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO
DOMINO'S WHERE YOU HAVE THESE.
LARGE OFFICE BUILDINGS.
FILLED WITH STAFF MANY OF WHOM
PROBABLY HAVE A NEED TO BE IN
SACRAMENTO AS OPPOSED TO SOME
PLACE ELSE.
AND OFTENTIMES TO SOME PLACE
ELSE HAS A HIGHER PER SQUARE
FOOT RENTAL RATE PROBABLY THAN
WE HAVE HERE IN. SACRAMENTO.
AND YOU HAVE THESE OFFICE
BUILDINGS THIS AT LEAST SOME OF
WHICH HAVE SIGNIFICANT
STRUCTURAL ISSUES OR
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND SO.
THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME WAY TO
DEAL WITH THOSE AT THE SAME TIME.
YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE A WORKING
SPACE FOR.
ALL I WOULD IMAGINE HOUSANDS.
OF STATE EMPLOYEES IF YOU WORK
ON THESE BUILDINGS.
HAS THERE BEEN ANY ANALYSIS OF
THAT IN TERMS OF ELLIE OH AND I
REALIZE THE BECAUSE THIS MAY NOT
HAVE A PAY OUT THAT. MEETS.
ACCOUNTING.
SANDERS.
BUT WHAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE
TRAILERS OR. YEAH I KNOW I THERE
I THINK THERE ARE POTENTIALLY A
NUMBER OF ALL THE ALTERNATIVES
DEPENDING ON HOW YOU SEQUENCE
THESE THINGS AND SO FOR EXAMPLE
RIGHT NOW WE'RE CONSTRUCTING THE
OPEN P. STREET BUILDINGS RIGHT.
ON AND THAT'S ACTUALLY GONNA
CREATE SIGNIFICANT NEW CAPACITY.
SO THERE'S A CURRENT PLAN FOR
SAID WHICH DEPARTMENTS ARE GONNA
GO INTO THERE AND THEY'RE SORT
OF. KIND OF A DOMINO IF YOU SAY
IT EVENTUALLY ACTUALLY END UP IN.
MOVING FOLKS FROM THE SPACE AND.
BUT THAT'S ONLY ONE ALTERNATIVE
ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE COULD BE
THAT YOU COULD HAVE.
.
YOU COULD HAVE BEEN SEQUENCED IN
A DIFFERENT WAY.
WHERE THEY SAY YOU HAVE THE
THOUGHT TO BE A WE? BUILDING
WITH YOUR TOP PRIORITY YOU COULD
POTENTIALLY FOR EXAMPLE MOVE
THEM INTO THIS NEW RESOURCES
BUILDING OR YOU COULD MOVE THE
FOLKS IN RESEARCH IS BUILDING
INTO THEIR. RESOURCES BUILDING
AND THEN MOVE FOLKS FROM THE
VIEW WE BUILDING TO RESOURCES
BUILDING OR ANY OF THEIR VARIETY
OF I MEAN THAT'S THAT'S JUST ONE
OF MANY OPTIONS. ON THEIR OTHER
YOU KNOW OTHER WAYS YOU COULD
CERTAINLY SEQUENCE AS I THINK
ONE OF OUR. HOME INITIAL
CONCERNS ABOUT THE SEQUENCING
PLAN WHAT WE THINK IT'S IT'S
REALLY GOOD THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION AND.
PUT TOGETHER THE PLAN AND THAT
DAY DID THE FACILITY CONDITION
ASSESSMENT THAT HELP THE
LEGISLATURE UNDERSTAND THE
CONDITION OF ALL THESE
FACILITIES AND WE DO THINK THAT
A NUMBER OF THEM ARE IN NEED OF
RENOVATION.
SO WE THINK THAT THOSE THINGS
ARE ALL GOOD BUT. WE THINK THAT
YOU KNOW IS THAT THERE ARE
ALTERNATIVE WAYS YOU COULD SEE
WHEN THINGS AND THAT YOU DON'T
NECESSARILY HAVE TO. JUST BUILD
NEW BUILDINGS YOU COULD ALSO USE.
THESE OTHER ALTERNATIVES
SEQUENCING STRATEGIES OR YOU
COULD EVEN USE LEASE SPACE OF
SOME OF THE SWING SPACE. ON
THERE JUST A VARIETY OF
DIFFERENT OPTIONS WE THINK
THAT'S WHY. AFTER LEGISLATURES
THINKS ABOUT WHAT ITS PRIORITIES
ARE.
AND CERTAINLY CAN INFORM THE
DAY MINISTRATION BUT WE WE THE REAL ESTATE CONSTRUCTION
THAT I AM. TO ANALYZE
ALTERNATIVES AND COME INTO US
HOPEFULLY AT SOME POINT IN TIME
WAS WITH A WITH A FURTHER PLANS.
HOPEFULLY TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE
LA THOSE CONCERNS BUT HAVING
SAID THAT COLLEAGUES ANY
QUESTIONS CENTER GLAZER.
THANK YOU AT YOUR ROTTEN THAT.
I I CONCUR WITH THE
RECOMMENDATION TO HOLD OPEN BUT
I DID WANT TO ASK A QUESTION SO
WHEN IT DOES COME BACK. WON'T BE
SURPRISED BY MY.
MY PERSPECTIVE.
FIRST THAT. THIS IS INDEED
BEING PROPOSED TO BE FINANCED BY
BONDS THIS IS SUPPOSE TO BE
FINANCED BY ENERAL FUND.
DOLLARS IS THAT CORRECT.
ON THE INITIAL DESIGN PHASE OF
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA IT IS SIX
IS PROPOSED FOR GENERAL FUND BUT
FUTURE.
THE FUTURE PHASE WHICH WILL BE
DESIGNED BUILT IS PROPOSED FOR
LEASE REVENUE FINANCING AT THIS
TIME. AND LEASE REVENUE
FINANCING IS ANOTHER WORD FOR
SAYING GENERAL FUND SUPPORT
THOUGH ISN'T IT. NOT UP
BORROWING SCHEME THAT THE.
THAT THAT. THAT THAT THAT THAT
THAT THE.
I GUESS I LEASE FINANCING DOES
IT HAS AN INCREMENTAL COSTS OVER
TIME AS WOULD A BOND FINANCING
RISE AT THIS AT RIGHT THAT'S
CORRECT TO SAY OKAY. BUT THE
PAYMENT FOR IT WOULD COME OUT OF
THE GENERAL FUND. JUST BE A
HIGHER PAYMENT.
THE PAIN THAT MADE A DIFFERENCE
BASED ON HOW THE FINANCING
SCHEME IS DONE RIGHT THAT'S
CORRECT OKAY.
I'D BE INTERESTED IN HEARING
FROM FINANCE I I CONCUR WITH ALL
THE ANALYSTS.
VIEW THAT HOW DO WE SET
PRIORITIES NOT NOT JUST AN
OFFICE.
THINGS BUT ALSO AND AND THE
OVERALL INFRASTRUCTURE PROBLEM
THAT WE'RE FCING AS A STATED
THAT THAT INCLUDES SCIENCE
BUILDINGS THAT ARE CAMPUSES
LIBRARIES CLASSROOMS AT OUR
UNIVERSITIES AND INCLUDES. UP
OUR PARKS THAT CERTAINLY HAVE
DECREPIT. CAPITAL NEEDS
THROUGHOUT THE STATE. ON HOW HOW
ARE WE EVALUATING THIS.
PROJECT FORCES OTHER THINGS AND
I RAISE THE SAME ISSUE ONE
LEGISLATIVE OFFICE BUILDING
PROPOSAL LAST YEAR. THEY DO THE
I KNOW WHY THERE'S A NEED TO
HAVE A MODERNIZATION OR NEW. IN
LOTS OF PLACES IN OUR OUR STATE.
CAPITAL WORLD BUT BUT HOW ARE WE
MAKING THESE CHOICES.
WITH THE PROJECTS BEFORE YOU
TODAY.
OUR OFFICE BUILDING PROJECTS.
THIS IS BASED ON A SEQUENCING
PLAN THAT LOOKS AT ALL OF STATE
ASSETS STATE OWNED ASSETS.
IN THE TGS PORTFOLIO.
WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
YOU'RE YOU'RE REFERENCING MAYBE
PARKS AND AND FIRE STATIONS I
MEAN THERE'S A* HOUSE
SUPPORT COUNCIL YES THERE'S A
THERE'S MANY MANY AND EACH OF
THOSE?
ARE PRIORITIZED WITHIN EACH
DEPARTMENT'S.
ACCORDING TO THEIR NEEDS AND
WHAT THEY'RE ABOUT IT AND THAT'S
WHAT WORRIES ME IS THAT THAT'S
AN ANALYSIS WITHIN SILOS. AND
YET IT'S ALL ABOUT A GENERAL
FUND IMPACT AT THE END OF THE
DAY.
AND IS THAT REALLY THE WAY THAT
WE SHOULD BE DOING IT AND I
GUESS I'D ASK.
PEOPLE SMARTER THAN ME THE
ALICE OFFICE AND OTHERS TO TO
GET OUT OF THE SILO AND DON'T
JUST LOOK AT IT IN TERMS OF
FACTS. DEPARTMENT GENERAL
SERVICES FACILITIES BUT TO LOOK
AT IT A MUCH MORE GLOBAL.
CONTEXT BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S
WHAT WE REALLY NEED TO DO AND
THAT'S WHAT OUR VOTERS WERE
EXPECTED BY SIR.
OUR CITIZENS WOULD EXPECT OF US
I THINK I JUST WOULD LIKE TO ADD
THAT.
WELL THOSE DECISIONS ARE MADE
KIND OF ON A. BIKE DEPARTMENT
BASIS WE DEPARTMENT FINANCE AND
IN OUR CAPITAL OUTLAY UNIT TO
LOOK ACROSS ALL. OF THOSE
DEPARTMENTS TO DETERMINE ON ST
OVERALL NEEDS SO I APPRECIATE
THAT THANK YOU FOR SAYING THAT
IT BE GREAT IF YOU COULD PROVIDE
THAT ANALYSIS. SUMMARY TO US SO
WE COULD SEE HOW YOU ARE DOING
THAT SO HOW YOU ARE EVALUATING
THAT SCIENCE BUILDING AT SAC
STATE. VERSUS THE SOPHISTS
PROBABILITY VERSUS THE
COURTHOUSE CHALLENGES IN THE
INLAND EMPIRE HOW DOES ALL THOSE
THINGS FIT TOGETHER WE WOULD BE
BETTER INFORMED BY THAT I
APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT YOU
HAVE DONE. IN YOUR CAPITAL UNIT
TO DO THAT. AND I THINK THAT
THAT'S WHAT MAKES IT. DIFFICULT
FOR ME TO ACT ON THESE AND SILAS
THAT'S ALL AND I'LL CONTINUE TO
HAVE THAT TROUBLE UNLESS WE CAN
HAVE A BROADER PERSPECTIVE.
ON IT.
AND THE SECOND THING.
THAT I WANTED TO UNDERSTAND
BETTER.
WAS THE WHOLE SACRAMENTO AREA
DOWNTOWN PLAN AND WHY THIS I
KNOW I UNDERSTAND THAT WE OWN
THIS PRINTING PLANTS SO THERE'S
SOME. ADVANTAGES TO TO.
BUILDING SOMETHING YOU WANT
SOMETHING THAT WE OWN TODAY. I
DON'T KNOW WHAT THE LAND COSTS
ARE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE
BUILDING COST TO KNOW HOW
SIGNIFICANT THAT SHOULD BE. BUT
HOW ARE W LOOKING AT ARE THE
WHOLE DOWNTOWN PLAN IN TERMS OF
STATE FACILITIES I DON'T. REALLY
KNOW HOW THE ACCESS POINT TO
TRANSIT THERE MAYBE IT'S VERY
CONVENIENT ON A LIGHT RAIL BUT.
BUT HOW DOES THAT FIT INTO THAT.
THE THE BUILDING BLOCKS TO A.
VIBRANT DOWNTOWN HERE IN
SACRAMENTO BOTH THE TERMS OF
ACCESS IN TERMS OF PARKING AND
WRITE ABOUT THE THINGS THAT
WOULD BE IMPORTANT AND
UNDERSTANDING THIS. GEOGRAPHIC.
DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROJECT.
TWO. QUICK QUESTIONS.
AND IF YOU ACCEPT THE MAP THE
KIND OF SHOW THE TRANSIT LINES A
BUS LINES OF YOU AFTER YOU WANT
TO SEE IT.
BUT.
ULTIMATELY. THE WAY WE'VE
ADDRESSED THIS KINDA GOES BACK
TO THE LARGER QUESTION
SEQUENCING PLAN WE ONLY LOOKED
AT FIRST OFF WITHIN THE FACILITY
CONDITION ASSESSMENTS. WE
PRIORITIZE THE BUILDINGS IN
TERMS OF.
MOST NEED OF REPAIR AND AND
EFFICIENCY.
AND THEN FROM THAT POINT TIME
YOU CAN HAVE THE SECONDARY BUT
AT THE SAME TIME VERY VERY
URGENT NEED FOR ADDITIONAL
OFFICE SPACE.
YOU CAN'T TO THE CENTER OFF
POINT YOU CAN'T.
RENOVATE BUILDINGS LESS YOU
HAVE ADDITIONAL SPACE AND PEOPLE
INTO.
THE IDEA THAT THERE'S SWING
SPACE AVAILABLE IS FLATLY UNTRUE
THERE'S NOT LEASE SPACE IN
SACRAMENTO TO START MOVING
PEOPLE INTO.
.
IT'S A BIT BUT NOT THE KIND OF
SPACE FOR TALKING ABOUT BUILDING.
.
ADDITION TO THAT. IN TERMS OF
LOOKING AT THE THE THE THE
BUILDINGS IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY
NEEDED THEN THERE'S THIS WHOLE
BIG PUZZLE PIECE OF.
THE SQUARE FOOTAGE YOU'RE GOING
TO BUILD SO YOU KNOW CURRENTLY
THE.
FOUR FIFTY AND STREET BUILDING
IS ROUGHLY TWO THIRDS OF THE
SIZE OF THE RESOURCES BUILDING
ITSELF. JUST KIND OF HAVING ALL
THESE OPTIONS WE CAN EASILY SELF
AROUND AS HIS SOMEWHAT.
AN ACCURATE AND IF THE OVERLAY
THAT WITH.
THE IDEA OF WANTING TO MAXIMIZE
EFFICIENCIES AGENT
CONSOLIDATIONS AND OVERLAY THAT
WITH THE DISTINGUISHED TERMS.
THE NUMBER OF OPTIONS YOU
ACTUALLY GET IS FAR FAR FAR
SMALLER.
IN TERMS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION
WHICH I THINK IS WHAT YOU'RE
ASKING ABOUT FOR RICHARD.
RICHARDS WAS LOOKED AT AS A
INFILL SITES IT IS JUST TO THE
NORTH OF THE RAIL YARDS PROJECT
IS THAT HE'S PLANNING ON
BUILDING. A JUST THE NORTH FOR
THE CALLS AND LAESTADIAN WOULD
BE.
KAISER HOSPITAL BUNCH OF
RESIDENTIAL HOUSING IT IS PART
OF THE CITY'S PUSH NORTH TO
RENOVATE SOME OF SACRAMENTO.
WE'RE GOING TO MOVE THE CITY
MORE NORTH IN SACRAMENTO.
WE ARE.
WE WE THINK THAT SITE IS IDEAL
CONSIDERING SIXTY AND EIGHTY CORRIDOR OF
THEIR TRANSIT LINES BUS LINES
IT'S IDEAL EYES I THINK FOR.
FOR FOR TRANSIT IN THE AREA.
COULD WELL I APPRECIATE THE.
THOUGHTFULNESS THAT YOU PUT INTO
THIS SITE SELECTION I THINK WE
WOULD BENEFIT FROM THAT. THAT
REVIEW IN OUR MATERIAL SO WE CAN
UNDERSTAND IT CLEARLY ACT LOOK I
THINK SACRAMENTO'S DONE A GREAT
JOB IN REVITALIZING MANY BLOCKS
OF UR DOWNTOWN BUT I WILL SAY
WITH RESPECT.
TO OUR CITY LEADERS HERE THAT
THERE CERTAINLY ARE BLOCKS AND
BLOCKS AND BLOCKS OF BLADES AND
AND.
DILAPIDATED BUILDINGS. AND HEY
I'M NOT A REAL ESTATE PERSON
NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S
AVAILABLE AND WHAT'S NOT.
BUT.
THIS SITE DOES SEEM TO BE A
LITTLE MORE THAN A HOP SKIP AND
A JUMP OUT OUTSIDE OF OUR
CAPITAL CORE AND MAYBE THAT'S
GOOD. FOR TRANSIT MAYBE THAT'S
GOOD FOR ACCESS POINTS FOR OUR
WORKERS SO. BUT I DO THINK THAT
WE NEED A BROADER VIEW OF HOW
THIS FITS AND I APPRECIATE THE
OPPORTUNITY MISTER CHAIR TO
BRING IT UP.
THANK YOU ANY OTHER QUESTIONS
FLOWING JUST MAKE A COMMENT.
.
NO I THINK PROVIDING AN
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE AND.
FISSION EFFECTIVE WORKPLACE FOR
OUR STATE EMPLOYEES IN THE
CAPITAL REGION HERE IS SO.
IT'S VERY VERY IMPORTANT FACT
IT'S OUR DUTY TO DO SO.
BUT AT THE SAME TIME I WANNA
FOOT STOP THE POINT THAT.
MY COLLEAGUE SENATOR GLASER
MADE YOU KNOW WE'RE.
AND THIS BUILDING UNDER THE DOME
ENGAGING IN A BUNCH OF
DISCUSSION RIGHT NOW ON. OF
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION MONEY AND
THE SIX HUNDRED MILLION VERSUS
THREE BILLION OR MORE. A WIRE
BONDS BEING SOLD WHY ISN'T THE
MONEY FLOWING OUT TO THE K.
THROUGH FOURTEEN DISTRICTS THAT
BADLY NEED THE MOUNTAIN SOME OF
THEM VERY VERY BADLY NEED THE
MONEY. BECAUSE SOME OF THEM JUST
BADLY NEED THE MONEY. AND AND
IT'S A IT'S AN INTERESTING
CONVERSATION AND.
POINTS MADE WELL PERHAPS THE
DECISION BY FINANCING THE
ADMINISTRATION IS BASED ON
POTENTIAL HIT TO THE GENERAL
FUND AND WE WANT TO KEEP THIS IN
FIVE OR SIX PERCENT OF THE.
GENERAL FUND BUDGET OR WHATEVER
THE BOND THE BOND TOTALS IN THE
SERVICING AND THIS THAT AND THE
OTHER BUT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT
THAT.
AND YOU THINK ABOUT SPENDING
THIS MONEY. ON.
THE BUILDINGS AND THE SIZE OF
THE MONEY THAT WE ULTIMATELY
WILL BE SPENDING A BILLION
DOLLARS OR MORE ON ONE
PARTICULAR PROJECT.
SENATOR GLACIERS POINT MAYBE WE
SHOULD HAVE A MORE GLOBAL LOOK.
AT THIS TO DECIDE.
HOW WE SPEND OUR MONEY IN TERMS
OF GENERAL FUND DOLLARS AND
WEARS SO I LOOK FORWARD TO THE
FURTHER CONVERSATION THIS IS A
HOLD OPEN ITEM? NOW WE WILL HAVE
MORE CONVERSATION ON IT AND I
CERTAINLY APPRECIATE ALL THE
COMMENTS SPEAKING OF COMMENTS
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
PARTICULAR. ISSUE ISSUE FOR
CAPITAL OUTLAY RICHARDS
BOULEVARD COMPLEX. GOOD TO HOLD
OPEN ITEM REVISIT ISSUE FIVE
CAPITAL OUTLAY ONCE AGAIN THE
GREGORY.
IS IT BAD SINCE FACE TO FACE AND.
THOSE WITH A GUY FROM SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA.
REBATES AND BUILDING RENOVATION.
SO. I THINK THE BASIN AND THE
UNDER PROJECT WILL TALK ABOUT
KIND OF SHOWCASE THE THE NEED
FOR THE RENOVATIONS IN THE AREA
BUT FOR THE BASIN PROJECT
REQUESTING FIVE POINT TWO
MILLION FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
TO RENOVATE THAT BUILDING.
IT WAS STARTED CONSTRUCTION
NINETEEN SEVENTIES ENDED IN THE.
EARLY EIGHTIES.
IT WAS INTENDED TO BE THE
PROTOTYPE FOR NEW A NEW WAVE OF
GREEN STATE BUILDINGS.
IT IS.
GIVEN ITS AGE AND IT'S KIND OF.
IMPORTANCE TO STATE
ARCHITECTURE IT IS QUALIFIES AS
A STORE GOAL. IN THE TWENTY
FIFTEEN.
THIS.
NO COMMENT.
IN TWENTY FIFTEEN OTHER PLANNING
STUDY OTHER BASES RANKED FOURTH
OVERALL WORK BUILDING IN OUR
SACRAMENTAL PORTFOLIO.
IT IS IN NEED OF A COMPREHENSIVE
RENOVATION NOT JUST PIECEMEAL
REPAIRS.
IT NEEDS A COMPLETE REPLACEMENT
MECHANICAL PLUMBING ELECTRICAL
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.
THERE ARE NUMEROUS FIRE LIFE
SAFETY CODE ALTERATIONS
INCLUDING THE NEED TO INSTALL
FIRE SPRINKLERS.
IT HAS A SIGNIFICANT WATER
INTRUSION ISSUE.
AS AN EXAMPLE WHEN I WORKED IN
THAT BUILDING TE CONFERENCE
ROOM THAT WAS IN MY FLOOR OUT
TWICE A WEEK HAD TO BE SHOT BACK
FOR WATER OUT OF THE
PHILOLOGICAL SOCKET.
THERE'S A THERE'S A BIG AND
FLOODING ISSUE THAT CRAP CREATE
WITH THEM THAT WAS CREATING THE
ISSUES HE HAD ELECTRICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE THE FLOOR THAT
WAS. FLOODED ESSENTIALLY.
IT HAS HAS THE TEARS ABATEMENTS.
DEFINITELY MOLD AND LEAD
POTENTIALLY AS TESTING MATERIALS.
IT.
IS COMPLETELY ADA INCOME NON
COMPLIANT AND HE'S AND MOTOR
CONTROL LIGHTING SYSTEMS.
AND THEN THERE'S A NUMBER
SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS
ESSENTIALLY ONE HALF OF THE
BUILDING ISN'T REALLY.
AGAIN ENTRANCE IS NOT USABLE.
CURRENTLY THAT BUILDING IS
OCCUPIED BY HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT ABOUT
MAIL SERVICES AND THE DEPARTMENT
OF HOSPITALS.
DAY WILL BE VACATING THAT
BUILDING WAS TO CONSTRUCT THE
TWELVE FIFTEEN STREET PROJECT.
AND THEN MOVING THERE THAT
FREES THE BUILDING UP FOR THE
FIRST TIME I THINK IN HIS LIFE
IS LIKE TIME TO ACTUALLY BE
RENOVATED FULLY.
AND THEN.
WE WOULD BE BACK FEELING THAT
BUILDING WITH A NATURAL RESOURCE
AGENCY STAFF FROM THE SPACE TO
THE NEW NATURAL RESOURCES.
A BUILDING PROJECT WE CALL THE
PEACH TREE PROJECT FOR THE TWO
PRODUCTS AUTHORIZED LAST YEAR
THAT IS KING COURT.
THE LIFE BACK FILLING IT WITH C.
ARE IN A STAFF WE KIND OF CREATE
THIS MANY CAMPUS COMPLEX FOR THE
AGENCY ALLOWS YOU TO HAVE A MAN
TIRES SACRAMENTO AREA
CONSOLIDATION FOR DISTANCE
EFFICIENCY SAKE.
IF WE DID NOT RENOVATE THIS
BUILDING.
WE WOULD HAVE TO PAY UP.
WARM SHUT DOWN BECAUSE OF A
PROXY ONE THREE POINT ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ANNUALLY UNTIL.
IT WAS IT WAS ACTUALLY TENDED.
.
AND THIS. JUST KIND OF DRESSING
SEQUENCING BY ISSUE THIS
PARTICULAR PROJECT IS WOULD NOT
TRIGGER ANYTHING ELSE THE
SEQUENCING PLAN ONCE IS
RENOVATED IT DOES NOT REQUIRE US
TO THEN DO SOME OTHER PROJECT.
ON THIS KIND OF CREATES A
STOPPING POINT IN THE PLAN FOR
FOR FOR IT. WHICH IS KIND OF
NICE WE WE DELIVER THE THAT WE
BUILT IN THESE STOPS SO THAT. IF
THERE WAS A RECESSION OR IF
THERE ARE SOME OTHER STATE MY
PRIORITIES WE HAVE THESE
BUILDINGS ON THE HOOK FOR FUTURE
INNOVATIONS THIS IS ONE OF THE
STOPS.
WE USE THE WORD PLAN REFRESH MY
RECOLLECTION WHO WE.
IS SOME ELEMENT OF THE BUDGET
COMMITTEE IN THE SENATE BEEN
BRIEFED ON THE OVERALL PLAN FOR
THESE VARIOUS BUILDINGS.
OR WE ARE WE JUST DEALING WITH
THIS ON A.
BUILDING BY BUILDING BASIS
REFRESH ME DID I SAW THROUGH
SOMETHING LAST YEAR THAT I
FORGET. I MEAN I'M OLD SO IT'S
POSSIBLE I MEAN THE THE
SEQUENCING PLAN. THAT WE JUST
TALKED ABOUT I THINK THAT AND
THAT WAS THAT WAS MENTIONED A
NUMBER OF TIMES LAST SEASON I
DON'T KNOW IF WE SPECIFICALLY
WALK THROUGH POINT BY POINT IN
APPEARING ON IT I DON'T. THINK
WE. OUGHT TO TELL YOU THE REASON
I ASK THE QUESTION IS I I
FRANKLY DO NOT REMEMBER SITTING
IN A CHAIR OR WHETHER IT'S IN
THE SUBCOMMITTEE OR IN THE BIG
BUDGET COMMITTEE. OR SOMEONE
BROUGHT MAPS IN. AND WE HAD
MATERIAL TO READ WHERE SOMEONE
WALKED US THROUGH IS A BUDGET
COMMITTEE OR EVEN A SUBCOMMITTEE
THE. THE PLAN WE KEEP TALKING
ABOUT THE SEQUENCING PLAN AND
YOU KNOW WE'RE DEALING WITH.
BITES OF THE PEANUT BUTTER AND
JELLY SANDWICH HERE WITHOUT
REALLY HAVING AN OPPORTUNITY TO
SEE WHAT THE SAME WHICH LOOKS
LIKE AN.
THAT'S SORT OF A PROBLEM FOR ME
BUT HAVING SAID THAT I DON'T
WANT TO MONOPOLIZE THE
CONVERSATION FINANCE.
HE HAVE A NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
AT THIS TIME OTHER THAN IT'S YOU
KNOW AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE
SEQUENCING PLAN.
SO WE RECOMMEND REQUIRING A
DEPARTMENT TO REPORT BUT HEARING
SUCH AS THIS ONE ON WHAT WE
THINK ARE THE CURRENT HIGH COSTS
OF TODAY'S RENOVATION PROJECTS
AND SOME POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES
TO REDUCE COSTS. TIME SISTERLY
IN OUR VIEW IT'S REASONABLE TO
REPAIR AND RENOVATE. BUILDINGS
THAT ARE REALLY IN NEED OF THAT
AND THESE BUILDINGS BOTH THIS
ONE AND MY COMMENTS ARE VERY
SIMILAR I WAS I WOULD SAY ABOUT
THE SAME ONE SO THAT YOU GUYS
DON'T GET BORED.
FOR THAT FOR THIS ONE AND UNDER
A BUILDING WHICH WOULD BE
TALKING ABOUT SUBSEQUENTLY.
BUT REALLY WE THINK THAT THOSE
BUILDINGS ARE IN NEED OF
RENOVATION THEY WERE BOTH
ASSESSED TO BE RELATIVELY
RELATIVLY POOR CONDITION. ON
AND HAVE SOME REAL NEED SO.
I THINK THAT THERE'S A PRETTY
STRONG ARGUMENT FOR INVESTING
SOME MONEY IN THOSE BUILDINGS ON.
THE RENOVATION COSTS IF YOU LOOK
AT THE TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT
BY SQUARE FOOT. ABOUT SEVEN
HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS PER NIGHT
USABLE ABOUT FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY
PER. GROSS SQUARE FOOT THOSE ARE
LARGER THAN WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN
RECENT AND HAVEN'T DONE ONE OF
THESE IN A FEW YEARS BUT THAT
THE MOST RECENT ONES THAT WE'VE
DONE. AND AND. YOU KNOW IT THAT
INCLUDES LIKE BRING COURTS
BUILDING WHICH IS.
YOU MAY BE FAMILIAR WITH IT'S A
ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL HISTORICAL
BUILDING ON THAT WE HAVE HERE
THE THE WE WE DISAGREE WITH THE
LA A ON THE.
THE THE EXCESSIVE COSTS
ULTIMATELY WIN IF USING TWO
DIFFERENT.
COST ESTIMATES.
OBJECT FOR LEBRON COURTS WHICH
WAS THE THE ICE THE PRIMER FOR
THESE COSTS AND.
IT WAS DEVELOPED PRIOR TO THE
RECESSION AND THEN BID IN THE
MIDDLE OF THE RECESSION. SO
WE'RE USING THE ESTIMATES THAT
WAS DONE PRIOR TO THOSE REALLY
REALLY UNUSUAL MARKET CONDITIONS
ALIENS USING ESTIMATE THAT WAS
DONE IN THE MIDDLE OF THOSE
MARKET CONDITIONS.
ESCALATING THAT TO THE PRESENT
DAY DOES.
SOMETHING TO GET YOU LABOR
MATERIALS COSTS.
BUT DOES NOT AFFECT IT DOESN'T
ACCOUNT FOR THOSE MARKET FACTORS
DOESN'T ACCOUNT FOR CHANGES IN
CO DOESN'T ACCOUNT FOR.
DIFFERENCES TECHNOLOGY LIKE THE
H. BASIS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO FOR US IT IS A COMPACT CABIN
APPLES AND ORANGES COMPARISON
BUT THERE MUST BE A FACTOR FOR
THAT TO PEOPLE WHO ARE SMARTER
THAN I AM. APPLY WHEN YOU'RE
TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE NET
COST FOR CONSTRUCTION.
DIFFERENCES IN CODE THE THINGS
YOU MENTIONED SO IF YOU HAVE
USED IT FOR EXAMPLE IF YOU USE
THE LAST NIGHT THAT THAT WE
UTILIZED THE LIBRARY COURTS
PROJECT IS ACTUALLY MORE
EXPENSIVE THAN THESE TWO.
WITHOUT FACTORING IN THOSE
THINGS AND.
AND SO WE WE DIDN'T WE FEEL WE
DIDN'T ACTUALLY NEED TO DO THAT
SIMPLY BECAUSE AGAIN ARE THE
COST BASIS ACTUALLY SHOW THESE
ARE UNDER THAT.
AS AN EXAMPLE.
WE ANOTHER BUILDING PROJECT.
OFFICE BUILDING EIGHT NINE
RENOVATION OF THAT WAS A OR SQUARE FOOT MORE THAN THE
PROPOSED. THERE IS A.
RENOVATION OF A SIMILAR NATURE
IN SACRAMENTO RIGHT NOW.
ONE OF THOSE FRIENDS IT'S A
COMMERCIAL KLEIN OF THEIRS THE
COST PER SQUARE FOOT IS A
HUNDRED DOLLARS MORE PER SQUARE
FOOT TO OPPOSING.
WE I THINK FUNDAMENTALLY
DISAGREE TO DISCUSS OUR OUR I
THINK THEY'RE VERY MUCH IN
KEEPING WITH THE MARKET RIGHT
NOW.
IF I COULD JUST ADD ONE POINT
FIVE I THINK IN PART OF THE
SEQUENCING PANEL WE'RE LOOKING
AT IS ONE SHOT TO TO EMPTY THESE
BUILDINGS IN AND RENOVATE THEM.
AND IN THIS CASE AND THE CASE IN
OUR ROOM. THE RENOVATIONS ARE
SUBSTANTIAL THERE'S THERE'S
REALLY NOT AN OPTION TO DO A
MODEST RESERVATION WHEN THE
ENTIRE BUILDING AND ALL SYSTEMS
NEED TO BE CUT IT. THERE'S NO
EASY WAY TO DO THAT WITHOUT
CUTTING CORNERS AND POSSIBLY NOT
DOING CERTAIN PARTS THE PROJECT
AND I. THINK FROM OUR
PERSPECTIVE WERE WERE IN ALL IN
THE PROJECT WHEN I GO AND
RENOVATED BUILDINGS WERE TO DO
IT RIGHT INTO THE BUILDING CAN
LAST A FIFTY YEARS RECOGNIZING
THAT WE PROBABLY WILL NOT BE A
KID AGAIN FOR THAT LONG. I'M SO
OUR I THINK IS THERE SOME
PERSPECTIVE DIFFERENCES THERE'S
ALSO SOME COST ACCOUNTING
DIFFERENCES THAT WE HAVE WITHOUT
LEO WE CAN WE WE AGREE ABOUT
THAT DISAGREE ABOUT AN AGREEABLY
BUT I'M. I THINK FROM OUR
PERSPECTIVE WE KIND OF SEE THIS
AS AN OPPORTUNITY AND WITH.
SUBSTANTIAL DEFICIENCIES IN THE
BUILDING FOR US TO ADDRESS THAT
AT ONE POINT IN TIME TO GET IT
ALL DONE ONCE CLOSE SINCE ISSUE
FIVE AN ISSUE SIX. TO BE ABOUT
THE SAME DIFFERENT BUILDINGS
THAT SAME KIND OF FROM THE LA ON
THE SAME ISSUES RAISED ANYTHING
ADDITIONAL WILL COVER SIX TO
ANYTHING ADDITIONAL ON THE.
ON REBUILDING SLIGHTLY.
ADDITIONAL OF SET OF ISSUES.
AND THEN.
I THINK THE OTHER PIECE TO KIND
OF ATTENDERS POINT.
THESE ARE THE FIRST TIME I THINK
IN HISTORY'S BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN
FULLY VACATE AS WAS THE ONCE IN
A BUILDING LIFETIME OPPORTUNITY.
THE WORK THAT WE'RE PLANNING ON
DOING TRIGGERS A BUNCH OF OTHER
WORK BY CODE SO EIGHTY EIGHT
TELL TWENTY FOUR UPGRADES.
SIMPLIFY LIFE SAFETY MEANT THE
ISSUES I MENTIONED THE FIRE
SPRINKLERS YOU'RE LITERALLY
DEMOLISHING EVERY CEILING IN
THAT BUILDING. DIVULGING QUITE A
BIT OF THE WALLS AS WELL HE
MIGHT AS WELL DO THAT WORK
OTHERWISE WILL HAPPEN IS IN THE
FUTURE WE HAVE TO DO THAT WORK.
YOU'RE GONNA BE ON DOING WHAT WE
JUST DID THIS RENOVATION AND
YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A HIGHER
FUTURE PROJECT COST BECAUSE
THAT'S COLLATION YOU CAN HAVE TO
ADDRESS SWING SPACE ISSUES.
DOING ANYTHING OTHER THAN A FULL
RENOVATION NOW THE BUILDING WILL
BE VACATED.
AS PART OF THE CLINTON PLAN.
IS REALLY NOT THE BEST LONG
TERM USE OF THE ASSET IS ALSO
OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE THE CARBON
WATER GREENHOUSE GAS FOOTPRINT
FOR THE BUILDING.
IT'S UP TO YOU TO MAKE SURE
THAT THESE BUILDING SYSTEMS ARE
EASIER AND SIMPLER TO MAINTAIN
SO THEY HAVE AN INCREASE
LONGEVITY.
WE THINK DOING ANYTHING LESS
THAN FULL RENOVATION IT REALLY
IS JUST NOT THE ASSETS BEST
INTERESTS.
WHEN IT'S ANYTHING ADDITIONAL
SINCE I JUMPED IN THE SIX AS
WELL.
NOTHING ADDITIONAL. LONG ELIA
ANYTHING NEW. JUST ONE OTHER
THING AND I WANTED TO NOTICE I
THINK PARTOF ALSO THE
DIFFERENCE IN THE NUMBERS THAT
WE'RE LOOKING AT IS MY
UNDERSTANDING IS TGS AND LOOKING
AT THE HAS THERE BEEN PROPOSED.
CIRCUITS ARE TECHNICAL THINGS IN
THERE I WILL GET TOO FAR INTO
THE WEEDS.%
BUT.
YEAH I THINK THERE'S JUST A
LITTLE BIT OF DISAGREEMENT.
I WOULD THINK THAT WITH RESPECT
TO COST ESTIMATING ON
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHILE
THERE CAN BE DIFFERENCES THERE'S
CERTAIN. CERTAIN COMMONLY
ACCEPTED PRACTICES SO SINCE THIS
IS A HOLD OPEN UP ITEM I WOULD
HOPE THAT.
TGS WOULD GET WITH ELIO IN
FINANCE AND SEE IF WE COULD COME
A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TOGETHER AS
TO WHAT THIS THING'S ACTUALLY
GONNA COST. AND IF THEIR
DIFFERENCES LET'S IDENTIFY WHAT
THE SPECIFIC CRITICAL COMPONENTS
ARE TO EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE
WHEN WE COME BACK AND TO. DEAL
WITH THIS COLLEAGUES QUESTIONS.
WELL MISTER CHAIRMAN I WOULD
NOTE THAT THE HONOR OF BUILDING
WAS COMPLETED IN NINETEEN TWENTY
EIGHT.
BUT THE BATES AND BUILDING WAS
COMPLETED IN NINETEEN EIGHTY ONE.
AND I I I LIKE THE ANALYSTS TO
WEIGH IN ON THE VIEW OF A THIRTY
FIVE YEAR OLD BUILDING NOW BEING
OBSOLETE. YOU KNOW TALK ABOUT
THE LIFESPAN OF A BUILDING SO
HOW DOES THAT FIT INTO WHAT OUR
EXPECTATIONS ARE TODAY.
I CERTAINLY THINK THAT'S ON THE
LOW END OF WHAT WE WOULD
ANTICIPATE.
IT IS SOMEWHAT TROUBLING THAT
THE BUILDING HAS THREE D. LEVEL
OF NEED SET THIS UP BUILDING
APPARENTLY NEEDS AFTER
RELATIVELY SHORT LIFESPAN.
WE WERE YOU KNOW I WOULD EXPECT
PROBABLY SENT ME A FEW DECADES
MORE BEFORE GETTING TO THAT
POINT. US TO CERTAINLY I THINK
IT'S IT'S TROUBLING I THINK AS
DID YES MENTIONED THERE ARE SOME
ISSUES THAT ARE PROBABLY
INTRINSIC TO THE BUILDING'S
DESIGN. IT WAS A VERY IT WAS
SEEN TO BE A VERY INNOVATIVE
BUILDING AT THE TIME AND HAD A
NUMBER OF.
SPECIFIC FEATURES SOME OF THOSE
HAVE ENDED UP BEING A
PROBLEMATIC FOR BUILDING
OPERATIONS AND HAVE LED TO SOME
OF THESE.
PROBLEMS IS MY UNDERSTANDING
WITH THE BUILDING I ALSO
UNDERSTAND THAT YOU KNOW TO SOME
SOMETIMES THE STATE.
DIFFERS MAINTENANCE ON
BUILDINGS AND THOSE KINDS OF
THINGS THAT OF COURSE CAN ALSO
CONTRIBUTE.
SO THAT ME TO SOME EXTENT AT
LEAST BE A FACTOR HERE. BUT
CERTAINLY THIS BUILDING IS.
I THINK PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT
UNUSUAL IN TERMS OF THE SCALE I
MEAN AS AS DEPARTMENT MENTION TO
ME I. I TOWARD THE BUILDING AND
SAW THE WATER LITERALLY UNDER
THE FLOOR AND THIS BUILDING.
END UP THE HATCH SAID YOU KNOW I
MEAN IT WAS IT IT WAS A QUITE
DRAMATIC I KNOW THERE'S
INTRUSION WATER INTRUSION BOTH
ALSO THROUGH THE WALLS AND THEN
THEY'RE AT LEAST ON THE CEILING
TO SERVE THIS BUILDING HAS TO.
BE WONDERFUL BENEFIT OF HAVING
WATER COMING IN FROM ALL SIDES.
SO AND I THINK THAT'S UNUSUAL
FOR BUILDING THIS AGENT DID YES
MAY BE ABLE TO SEE BUT THAT'S.
NO IT IS IT IS UNUSUAL I DON'T
DO ANYTHING THE PLAN THAT SAYS
NEW AS THIS BUILDING IS IN NEED
OF THIS KIND OF INNOVATION.
RIGHT AND WHAT THAT SAYS TO E
IS THAT WE CAN'T LET THIS HAPPEN
AGAIN YEAH. RIGHT.
COULD I APPRECIATE INNOVATION
AND I KNOW THIS BUILDING WAS A.
DESIGNED WITH THE ENERGY
EFFICIENCY ISSUES THAT WERE SEEN
AS HAPPENING AS IN ALL THE REST
BUT. YOU KNOW WE WE HEAR THAT
ALL THE TIME ABOUT.
ALL KINDS OF YOU KNOW. THE USE
OF NEW TECHNOLOGY. AND.
IN OUR SYSTEMS IN NEW
CONSTRUCTION IS. I JUST DON'T
WANT TO BE A PART OF HAVING THIS
HAPPEN AGAIN I DON'T WANT TO
APPROVE ANYTHING THAT. COULD
HAVE A THIRTY FIVE YEAR LIFESPAN
WHEN THE ANALYST SAYS WE WOULD
EXPECT SOMETHING CLOSER TO FIFTY
FIVE YEAR LIFESPAN. IS DON'T
WANT TO DO THAT. AND SO.
I APPRECIATE THE INCREASE THE.
THE FEEDBACK ON COST OF THE
RENOVATION. BUT I'M REALLY
THINKING OF A BIGGER PICTURE
HERE AS TO HOW WE MAKE BETTER
CHOICES.
SO THAT THAT WE DON'T SETTLE THE
NEXT LEGISLATURE THIRTY FIVE
YEARS FROM NOW WITH THE SAME
QUESTIONS ABOUT. WHY DO WE MAKE
THOSE CHOICES AND NOW THE STATE
TREASURY GETS RATED?
INSIGNIFICANT WAY BECAUSE OF
THE POOR CHOICES WE MAKE TODAY.
AND I WOULD JUST REITERATE TO
THE.
THE CHAIR AND THE CHAIR AT
LEAST THAT I DO THINK THAT WE
SHOULD ASK OUR BUDGET EXPERTS.
TO GIVE US PERSPECTIVE.
ON INVESTMENTS IN IT IS A
SIZEABLE INVESTMENTS ONE WITHIN
ONE PROJECT VERSUS ANOTHER AND I
GET THAT THIS IS A A
DETERIORATED SILLY I GET THAT NO
ONE WANTS OUR STAFF TO WORK IN
THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES BUT. I GOT
AB PERSPECTIVE ON THE STUFF THAT
I WANT TO MAKE DECISIONS GOOD
DECISIONS BUT WE GOT OUT
PERSPECTIVE AND WE'RE NOT
GETTING IT YET.
I'M JUST CURIOUS MAYBE YOU TOLD
ME THAT.
PASSED OVER MY HEAD. WHY DO WE
HAVE WATER COMING UP?
SO DO WE BUILD AND. NOW I MEAN
WHAT DO WE. LOOK AT ONE SECOND I
WAS STILL THE SAME THROUGHOUT
FOR THE MOST PART.
IT IS.
THE WATER THE FLOOR WAS DUE TO
REMEMBER NOW IT THINK IT WAS DUE
TO A FAILURE.
AND ONE OF THE.
THE THAT THE BASEMENT SEEMS.
I DON'T REMEMBER IF IT WAS
COMING IN FROM THE EXTERNAL IF
IT WAS COMING IN FROM THE WATER
TABLE BUT IT WAS IT WAS A
FAILURE PENETRATION ULTIMATELY.
AND THAT'S ACTUALLY TRUE FOR AS
STELLA NOTED SOME MULTIPLE AREAS
THE BUILDING COMM THE BUILDING
IS SUBJECT TO QUITE A SPALLING
WHICH IS WHERE WATER BECAUSE
HE'S INTO THE CONCRETE LOOSENS
UP THE JOINTS AND IT STARTS
CRUMBLING BREAKING APART. AS A
MASSIVELY CONCRETE BUILDING.
THE WATER RISING UP THROUGH
ELECTRICAL SOCKETS IS I THINK
THAT WAS DIFFERENT THAT WAS A
WATER LEAK WHAT I CAN POSITION
THE ACTUAL WATER TABLE ITSELF OR
IF THERE WAS OF.
PIPING ISSUE.
IT WAS ONE OF THE TWO I TO GET
BACK TO YOU ON AND HONESTLY I'M
JUST THINKING WE COULD JUST MAKE
IT A LAKE AND GIVE IT TO THE
MILITARY DEPARTMENT BECAUSE THEY
HAVE THE NAVY NOW SO.
SO. THE OTHER QUESTIONS CODES
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ISSUES FIVE
AND SIX THESE ARE BOTH HOLD OPEN
ITEMS WE WILL HAVE CONTINUED
DISCUSSION AFTER THE PARTIES.
HAVE FURTHER CONVERSATION AND
COME BACK TO IS SIMPLY WAS SOME
RESOLUTION OF THESE OUTSTANDING
ISSUES. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH
FOR A VERY INTERESTING
CONVERSATION.
CALIFORNIA MILITARY DEPARTMENT.
ITEM EIGHT NINE FOUR ZERO.
SEVERAL ISSUES THE FIRST BEING
ISSUE ONE CALIFORNIA COULD GET
CADET CORPS PROGRAM EXPANSION.
GOOD MORNING.
SENATORS FIRST.
ITEM FOR THE COMPANY CAN
ACQUIRE EXPANSION.
A SIMPLE OPERATION OF SEVEN
POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS. AND
TWELVE P. WHY IN THE FIRST YEAR
TO BEGIN A FIVE YEAR RATHER
DRAMATIC EXPANSION OF THIS
HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM.
COMPANY COULD A CORE CAME INTO
EXISTENCE IN NINETEEN ELEVEN
WHEN MY PREDECESSOR OF THE
ADJUTANT GENERAL BACK IN GENERAL
FOR BUSH. TOM SAW THAT THE
UNITED STATES WAS ABOUT TO COME
OUT OF ITS ISOLATION IS. TO GO
INTO THE GLOBAL STAGE AND HE
DIDN'T FEEL THAT. THE HIGH
SCHOOL YOUTH WERE READY TO
COMPETE ACADEMICALLY PHYSICALLY
OR DON'T HAVE THE DISCIPLINE TO
DO THAT SO AT THE TIME THEY
MANDATED THAT ALL HIGH SCHOOLS.
ARE ALL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ARE
SCHOOL MALES AT THE TIME WOULD.
HAVE TO REMEMBER THE CALIFORNIA
CADET CORPS THE PROGRAM REACHES
HEYDAY IN THE FIFTIES SIXTIES
AND SEVENTIES WHEN THE PROGRAM
WAS IN ABOUT A HUNDRED AND FIFTY
SCHOOLS.
IT'S THE PROGRAM THE JUNIOR
ROTC IS MODELED AFTER IT'S A A
PROGRAM WHERE ONE DAY PER WEEK
THE STUDENTS COMMAND WERE
UNIFORM.
THEY GO THROUGH LEADERSHIP
TRAINING WITH REALLY A FOCUS ON
ACADEMIC ENHANCEMENT. ON WHAT'S
DIFFERENT BETWEEN US ENGINE RTC
IS CHARGES HE IS MORE FOCUSED ON
EXPOSING KIDS TO MILITARY LIFE
AND MILITARY OPPORTUNITIES WARS
ARE PROGRAM. REALLY IS JUST
FOCUSED ON SUCCESS IN SCHOOL
DISCIPLINE AND PREPARING THEM
FOR FUTURE CAREERS WHETHER THEY
COME INTO THE MILITARY OR NOT.
.
THE.
AND HAS BEEN RESULT THE PROGRAM
HAS PROVEN TO BE FROM VERY VERY
EFFECTIVE IF THE DEFACED TUNES
AND ROLLED IN THE CALIFORNIA
CADET CORPS WHETHER THEY'RE. A
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT OR A
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT THERE ELEVEN
PERCENT MORE LIKELY TO GRADUATE
FROM HIGH SCHOOL SO THE STATE
RATE IS AN EIGHTY SOMETHING
PERCENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA
COURTS OVER NINETY PERCENT.
PROBABILITY THAT THE GRADUATE
AND GRADUATE ON TIME THEY'RE
MUCH MORE LIKELY TO GO INTO
COLLEGE ON THEIR. ABSENTEE RATE
IS LOWER THEIR TRUANCY RATES ARE
LOWER AND THEY JUST PERFORM
BETTER OVERALL BECAUSE OF THE
DISCIPLINE STRUCTURE THAT THE
CALIFORNIA CADET. CORPS GIVES
THESE KIDS.
THIS IS AN OPT IN A PROGRAM
GENERAL I MEAN IT IS IT'S.
AT IT AT AT THE PREPONDERANCE
OF THE SCHOOLS IT'S ENACTED SAY.
IT'S.
ELECTIVE PROGRAM LIKE SIGNING
UP FOR BAND OR SOMETHING LIKE
THAT IN MANY SCHOOLS AS AN
ALTERNATIVE TO PT RP PHYSICAL
EDUCATION.
FINANCE MORNING NO COMMON GOOD.
GO.
GOOD MORNING MISTER CHAIR AND US
SENATORS ARE WE RECOMMEND THAT
THE LEGISLATURE REJECT THE
ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSAL FOR
GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS TO
EXPAND. THE CALIFORNIA CADET
CORPS BECAUSE IT IS INCONSISTENT
WITH THE GENTLE APPROACH OF THE
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA.
FOR SUPPORTING EDUCATIONAL
ENRICHMENT INVESTMENTS WE ALSO
CONTINUE TO SEE. ISSUES WITH A
BUDGET REQUEST DETAILS
JUSTIFYING THE REQUESTED LEVEL
OF FUNDING.
UNDER THE CURRENT LOCAL CONTROL
FUNDING FORMULA. ALREADY ENABLES
SCHOOLS WITH THE AUTONOMY AND
RESPONSIBILITY TO FUND THE CADET
CORPS. UP PROGRAMS THEMSELVES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR VALUE TO
THOSE SCHOOLS RELATIVE TO OTHER
AVAILABLE EDUCATIONAL
INVESTMENTS.
CURRENT FUNDING MODEL STATUS IN
TWENTY THIRTEEN FOURTEEN MOVE
THE STATE OF OUR FUNDING FROM.
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION AWAY FROM
CATEGORICAL FUNDING. TO A BASE
FOR PEOPLE FUNDING. MODEL WITH
ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL IN
CONCENTRATION FUNDING. FOR
ENGLISH LEARNER IN LOW INCOME
STUDENTS.
THE RATIONALE FOR THIS MODEL WAS
TO PROVIDE SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITH
THE FLEXIBILITY. TO SPEND
RESOURCES ON LOCAL PRIORITIES AT
THE LEVEL THEY SEE FIT RATHER
THAN AT THE DIRECTION OF THE
STATE. AND THIS IS ACTUALLY HOW
THE CURRENT FIFTY ONE
PARTICIPATING COULD OF COURSE.
FUNDED PROGRAMS. WE WOULD ALSO
NOTE THAT IF SCHOOLS FIND THAT
THIS PROGRAM ACTUALLY CAUSES
THEIR STUDENTS TO HAVE
SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED
EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES. THEY
SHOULD BE WILLING TO PRIORITIZE
FUNDING FOR IT. JUST AS THEY
WOULD ANY OTHER ENRICHMENT
PROGRAM THAT DOES NOT RECEIVE
SPECIAL TREATMENT FROM THE STATE.
ADDITIONALLY WE NOTE THAT LOCAL
CONTROL FUNDS FOR SCHOOLS HAVE
INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY IN
RECENT YEARS. WITH US FIND THE
CURRENT FUNDING MODEL ALREADY
ALLOW SCHOOLS TO PARTICIPATE IN
THE CADET CORPS TO THE EXTENT
THAT THOSE SCHOOLS FIND IT TO BE
A WORTHWHILE INVESTMENT FOR
THEIR STUDENTS COMPARED TO OTHER
ALTERNATIVES.
BUT WE ALSO NOTE THAT THE BUDGET
REQUEST DETAILS RECENTLY
SUBMITTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION
CONTINUE TO HAVE A NUMBER OF
ISSUES. IN SOME CASES THERE IS
STILL. INSUFFICIENT DETAIL SUCH
AS A WORKLOAD JUSTIFICATION FOR
THE REQUESTED. ADDITIONAL STATE
LEVEL STAFF. IN OTHER CASES WE
WOULD TAKE ISSUE WITH THE LEVEL
OF RESOURCES REQUESTED AS IS THE
CASE WITH. FOR EXAMPLE THE
ADMINISTRATION'S REQUEST TO FUND
NINETY PERCENT OF THE COST OF A
FULL UNIFORM SET. OFF FOR EVERY
YEAR FOR EVERY CADET CORPS
COMMANDANT WHETHER THEY ARE
NEWLY RECRUITED OR RETAIN FROM
PREVIOUS YEARS.
FOR MUCH OF THE REQUESTED
RESOURCES ARE BASED ON A VERY
AGGRESSIVE MULTI YEAR PROGRAM
EXPANSION.
OF PROJECTIONS THAT. MAY NOT BE
REALIZED.
WE THEREFORE DO NOT BELIEVE A
MULTI YEAR REQUEST FOR
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES EVEN FOR
BUDGET ITEMS TRADITIONALLY
SUPPORTED BY THE MILITARY
DEPARTMENT. IS A WANTED UNTIL
THE CADET CORPS A DEMONSTRATES
WHAT ITS ACTUAL RATE OF
EXPANSION WILL BE.
CONCLUDES OUR REMARKS I WOULD BE
HAPPY TO TAKE A.
WILLOW.
LET ME JUST MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR
ON THIS WERE TALKING ABOUT SEVEN
POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS
STATEWIDE.
YES MISTER AND BUT I WOULD NOTE
THAT MOST OF US THAT SIT UNDER
THIS STONE I THINK.
I WOULD CONTEND THAT WHILE THE
LOCAL CONTROL WE'RE ALL FOR
LOCAL CONTROL AND THE LOCAL
CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA.
AND HAS BEEN WORKING. I THINK IT
IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT.
WE PAT OURSELVES ON THE BACK
BUT WE PAT OURSELVES ON THE BACK
FOR RESTORING FUNDING TO THE TWO
THOUSAND AND EIGHT LEVEL IS THAT
NOT THE CASE. YES MR WERE ABOUT
TEN YEARS BEHIND IN TERMS OF.
EDUCATION FUNDING FOR OUR CASE
TO TWELVE SCHOOLS. OF THE OTHER
THING THAT I WANT TO MAKE SURE
I'M CLEAR ABOUT IS IT SEEMS TO
ME THAT I RECALL HAVING.
BEEN SITTING IN THIS JOB NOW FOR
THIS IS MY SIX YEAR I THINK.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
SOMETHING ABOUT MY CAREER
ADVANCEMENT I DON'T KNOW.
THAT WE WHEN WE AS A
LEGISLATURE DEEM IT TO BE
IMPORTANT FROM A PUBLIC POLICY
STANDPOINT THAT. A PROGRAM.
CONCEPTUALLY ADVANCE IN THE
STATE WE WE STILL. USE THE
CATEGORICAL TO MAKE SURE THE
DISTRICT'S UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS
IS IMPORTANT AND I'M THINKING
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT SOME OF OUR
AGRICULTURE PROGRAMS.
WERE WEAK CONTINUALLY A YEAR
AFTER YEAR ENGAGE IN A
CONVERSATION WITH THE
ADMINISTRATION OVER WHETHER
THOSE SHOULD BE FOLDED INTO THE
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA.
AS OPPOSED TO MAKING SURE THAT
THE MONEY IS AVAILABLE TO THOSE
DISTRICTS WHO CHOOSE TO. HAVE AN
AG PROGRAM FOR WHATEVER REASON.
SO I GUESS YOU CAN TELL FROM MY
COMMENTS THAT I VIEW THIS IS
SOMETHING.
THAT SUPPLEMENTS AND AND IS IN
ADDITION TO. A THROUGH. G.
THOUGH BECAUSE. THE A THROUGH G.
REQUIREMENTS AND MANY OF THE
OTHER THINGS THAT MY COLLEAGUES
BOTH IN THE POLICY EDUCATION
COMMITTEE AND THE BUDGET
SUBCOMMITTEE GRAPPLE WITH.
A YEAR OVER YEAR SO IF IT IS
IMPORTANT TO US PARTICULARLY IN
THOSE DISTRICTS. WHERE WE'RE
DEALING WITH A CHALLENGE
DEMOGRAPHICS STUDENTS WHO WOULD
OTHERWISE BE ON THE STREETS? AND
NOT IN CLASS STUDENTS WHO WOULD
OTHERWISE BE DROPPING OUT AND
NOT COMPLETING IN RECEIVING A
DIPLOMA. TO HAVE A PROGRAM THAT
INSTILLS DISCIPLINE.
RESPECT FOR RULES.
THE NEED TO STAY WHERE YOU'RE
TOLD THE B. FROM EIGHT O'CLOCK
IN THE MORNING TO THREE IN THE
AFTERNOON OR WHATEVER THE TIME
IS. THAT WE OUGHT TO STEP UP AS
A STATE PERHAPS. AND AND AND
SUPPORT THE REQUEST BUT.
I'M ONLY ONE PERSON ON THE
SUBCOMMITTEE AND I WANT TO MAKE
SURE YOU. WERE I WAS COMING FROM
ON THE SUBJECT COLLEGE QUESTIONS
ABOUT FINANCE DID YOU GET AN
OPPORTUNITY.
YEAH JUST GOT AN APARTMENT
FINANCE.
NOTHING REALLY FURTHER TO ADD
WE CONCUR WITH THE COMMENTS OF
THE CHAIR WE THINK THAT IT'S.
ELIMINATES ANY RESOURCE
CONSTRAINTS THAT MAY EXIST AND
HELPS CREATE A MORE UNIFORM
PROGRAM INCENTIVIZE ADDITIONAL
EXPANSIONS BECAUSE AS WAS
MENTIONED THIS IS A ROBUST
EXPANSION WITH.
LAUDABLE AND LOFTY GOALS AND
AND WE THINK THAT IS IMPORTANT
INVESTMENT CREDIT MEAN FORGET
YOUR EARLIER.
COMMENTS SIR.
COLLEAGUES SAID LATER. THANKS TO
ARRIVE.
WELL FIRST I WANT TO
CONGRATULATE THE.
THE DEPARTMENT ON THE SUCCESS
OF THE CURRENT PROGRAM. ARE
THOSE THAT. THOSE RESULTS ARE.
IMPRESSIVE AND IMPORTANT. AND.
I CERTAINLY WOULD SUPPORT.
OUT WAYS IN WHICH WE COULD
EXPAND THE CURE WORK. BROADER
STUDENT POPULATION.
I WOULD NOTE THAT THE GOVERNOR
HAS BEEN THE CHAMPION OF THE
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA.
AND.
AND SO HIS DECISION TO GO
OUTSIDE OF IT IS NOTE WORTHY.
BUT PERHAPS SAID.
HE HIMSELF HAS A. EXPLAINED THAT
JUSTIFICATION AND PREVIOUS
COMMENTS RESET THE EXCEPTION.
JUSTIFIES THE RULE.
AND THIS PERHAPS IS THAT EXAMPLE
HERE.
.
SO I I'M VERY SYMPATHETIC TO A
FINDING A WAY TO LIVE TO.
EXPAND THIS PROGRAM I KNOW THAT
THE.
POSITIONS THAT ARE BEING
REQUESTED OR NOT BEING ARE OUT
POSITIONS THAT ARE QUESTION
WITHIN A CERTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
OR STATE POSITIONS.
SO THE ABILITY TO HAVE THOSE
FUNDED BY. INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL
DISTRICTS I WOULD IMAGINE ARE
PRETTY LIMITED TERMS OF THAT
KIND OF COORDINATION TO TO MAKE
THAT HAPPEN.
AND SO IT IS A PROGRAM THAT
GOES. OUTSIDE OF SCHOOL
DISTRICTS OPERATION IN ORDER TO
MAKE IT WORK SO I'M VERY
SYMPATHETIC TO US THE REQUEST
INTO. THE DEATH OF MY COLLEAGUES
FOR OTHER OTHER THOUGHTS ABOUT
HOW WE PROCEED.
LOOK.
BASED UPON THE STATISTICS AT THE
GATE AD JOURNAL SHARED I THINK
WE SHOULD EXPAND IT TO ALL
STUDENTS.
BECAUSE THOSE THOSE ARE
PHENOMENAL RESULTS IN A COURSE.
LONG TERM WE PAY THE BENEFIT OF
THAT RIGHT.
WE'LL GO ON TO GET ADDITIONAL
EDUCATION GET BETTER PAYING JOBS
GIVE US MORE MONEY THAT WE GET
TO SPEND. SO IT'S ALL GOOD I'M
I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THIS PROPOSAL
AS WELL.
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT YES SIR
PLEASE COME DOWN IDENTIFY
YOURSELF AND.
FOR JURORS MORE SENATOR ROTH AND
SINGERS MY NAME IS SETH READING.
US ARMY COMBAT THAT.
MY WORK WITH THREE GOVERNMENT
RELATIONS HAND WE REPRESENT
NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION. WHO
IS IN SUPPORT OF ALL THE YOUTH
PROGRAMS AT THE NATIONAL GUARD?
IS PROPOSING.
I APOLOGIZE WE DO NOT HAVE A
LETTER AND FOR OTHER VETERAN.
LANCE. WHO ARE ALSO IN SUPPORT
AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT
CALIFORNIA INVESTS DEPARTMENT
CALIFORNIA? CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY VETERANS
SERVICE OFFICERS CALIFORNIA
STATE COMMANDER VETERANS COUNCIL.
MILITARY OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF
AMERICA CALIFORNIA COUNCIL
CHAPTERS FROM VIETNAM VETERANS
ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA STATE
COUNCIL OUR OWN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR COMING
DOES THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS
ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT.
SEEING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION. TO MAKING A
MOTION AS YEAR I WOULD SAY I
APPRECIATE THE FEEDBACK FROM OUR
ANALYSTS AT. AND THAT WHILE IT
MAKES US SOME LOGICAL SENSE I
THINK THAT THE COMPELLING NATURE
THE PROGRAM FOR ME.
WOULD MOVE MADE TO REQUEST THAT
WE HAVE WE APPROVE THE PROGRAM
AND THAT.
HAS PROPOSED.
IT'S BEEN.
MOVED PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
SENATOR ALL TIME BETTER LATER
LIFE SENATOR WILL.
THANK YOU ISSUE NUMBER TWO IS
THE CALIFORNIA MILITARY
INSTITUTE AND THE PORTER VILLE
MILITARY.
INSTITUTE. CENTER I THINK I
NEGLECTED INTERVIEWS MYSELF WHEN
I STARTED I'M DAVE BALDWIN ON
WITH THE MILITARY DEPARTMENT
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US GENERAL.
SO THE ON THE SECOND ITEM LOOKS
TO EXPORT THE VERY SUCCESSFUL
MODEL THAT WE'VE DONE WITH THE
OPEN MILITARY INSTITUTE WHICH IS
A COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY
THAT THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
COUNTED. WHEN HE WAS THE MAYOR
OF OAKLAND SOME FIFTEEN PLUS
YEARS AGO.
TWO TWO OTHER.
CHARTER SCHOOLS ON ONE THAT'S
ALREADY IN EXISTENCE ONE THAT IS
GOING TO START UP THAT HAVE
EXPRESSED INTEREST IN ADOPTING
THE SAME MODEL. UNDER THE.
FROM THE MIDDLE EAST MODEL
AGAIN IT'S A COLLEGE PREPARATORY
INSTITUTE THAT FOCUSES ON
PREPARING.
STUDENTS THAT ARE IN THAT
OTHERWISE DON'T HAVE THE
RESOURCES TO BE PREPARED TO GO
TO COLLEGE TO GET THEM THROUGH
ALL THEIR AGING REQUIREMENTS SO
THEY CAN BE ACCEPTED INTO UC
SCHOOLS. THE MODEL.
USES A HOT PARTNERS THE
CALIFORNIA MILITARY DEPARTMENT
WITH THE CHARTER SCHOOL A
SPONSOR CHARTER SCHOOL WITHIN A
DISTRICT.
FOUND THAT BRINGS IN MILITARY
CADRE FROM THE MILITARY
DEPARTMENTS THAT TEACH
LEADERSHIP.
CLASSES THEY HELP INSTILL
DISCIPLINE AND THE.
ASSIST WITH ALL ASPECTS OF
CAMPUS LIFE FOR THE STUDENTS IN
THE SCHOOL IN OAKLAND CURRENTLY
IS GREAT SIX THROUGH TWELVE. AND.
THE RESULTS OF A MILITARY
DEPARTMENT OR EVEN MORE
IMPRESSIVE THAN THAT OF THE
CADET CORPS. IF.
THE.
GRADUATION RATE.
FOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES FOR
FOR FOR STUDENTS AT A ROLLING
O'CONNELL TOWARD US INSTITUTE IS
NINETY SIX PERCENT.
AS OPPOSED TO AGAIN THIS THE
STATEWIDE AVERAGE IS AN EIGHTY
PERCENT SO IF YOU SEND YOUR
CHILD AT LOCAL MILITARIES
INSTITUTE IS A NINETY SIX
PERCENT CHANCE. THAT THEY'RE
GOING TO GRADUATE ON TIME AND
THEY'RE PROBABLY GOING TO GO ON
TO COLLEGE THE COLLEGE
ACCEPTANCE RATE IS THREE TIMES
HIGHER THAN THE STATEWIDE
AVERAGE FOR THE SCHOOLS THERE'S
A LOT OF ELITE PRIVATE SCHOOLS.
THE CAN'T MEET THOSE KINDS OF
NUMBERS.
LAST YEAR WE HAD A HUNDRED
PERCENT GRADUATION RATE FOR THE
EIGHTY ODD KIDS THAT.
THEY GRADUATED OF THOSE.
ALL BUT FIVE WENT ON TO EITHER.
A FOR YOUR CALL PRIVATE IN A
FOUR YEAR UNIVERSITY YOU SEE
PUBLIC PRIVATE OR COMMUNITY
COLLEGE OF THE REMAINING FIVE
THREE WENT TO A SERVICE ACADEMY.
AND TO JOIN THE MILITARY SO ALL
EVERY SINGLE KID IN THE CLASS
WAS ON WAS SUCCESSFUL AND AND
THIS IS IN A PRETTY. I'M GREEDY
NEIGHBORHOOD AS A AS THE
GOVERNOR LIKES TO. LIKES TO
EXPLAIN IT.
WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IS THREE
POINT FIVE MILLION IN THE FIRST
YEAR THAT WOULD FIND TWENTY ONE
POSITIONS? TO RESOURCE THE
MILITARY CADRE FROM THE MILITARY
DEPARTMENT AT THESE TWO SCHOOLS.
ARM TO BE ABLE TO.
SERVICE ABOUT FIFTEEN HUNDRED
STUDENTS BETWEEN THE BETWEEN THE
TWO SCHOOLS IN THE TWO DISTRICTS.
ON ONE BEING DOWN IN THE
RIVERSIDE AREA AND THEN THE
OTHER ONE IS IN A PORTABLE.
FINANCE ANY COMMENT.
LA JOH. NA PROMISED TO BE KINDER
THIS.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR AT THE.
WE RECOMMEND TO THE LEGISLATURE
REJECTED. PROPOSAL FOR GENERAL
FUND APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE
MILITARY DEPARTMENT TO SUPPORT
THESE PUBLIC CHARTER MILITARY
ACADEMIES AND PARIS AND PORTABLE.
SILLY TO OUR PREVIOUS COMMENTS
ON THE PREVIOUS TESTIMONY
BECAUSE IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH
THE.
GENTLE APPROACH OF THE LOCAL
CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA. THAT WE
INSTEAD RECOMMEND THE
LEGISLATURE AUTHORIZE
REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORITY. TO
ENABLE THE DEPARTMENT TO SUPPORT
THOSE ACADEMIES WITH PERSONNEL
SHOULD THOSE ISSUES TO ALLOCATE
SOME OF THEIR. LOCAL CONTROL
FUNDING FORMULA. FUNDS TO A
MILITARY DEPARTMENT SPONSORED
ACTIVITIES. BEFORE THAT BASED ON
THE AVAILABLE DATA ABOUT THE
MILITARY CAN MODEL IS UNCERTAIN
TO PRODUCE. SIGNIFICANTLY
BENEFITS LITIGATION ALL OUTCOMES
RELATIVE TO OTHER.
.
AVAILABLE INVESTMENTS AND IS
THEREFORE UNCLEAR WHY SUCH
PROGRAMS DESERVE SPECIAL
TREATMENT FROM THE STATE
COMPARED TO OTHER PROGRAMS ARE
FUNDED THROUGH. A HEALTHY ABOUT
FUNDS. THE ADMINISTRATION'S
RATIONALE FOR ITS PROPOSALS TO
REPLICATE V. EDUCATIONAL OUTCOME
RESULTS. FROM ALLY. AT PERSON
PORTABLE HOWEVER DATA FROM THE
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL DASHBOARD
PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF. EDUCATION SOULS
MIXED RESULTS IN THIS REGARD FOR
EXAMPLE WHILE ALL MY DOES
OUTPERFORM THE UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT IN SOME MEASURES. SUCH
AS ATTENDANCE AND GRADUATION
RATES IN OTHER AREAS SUCH AS
ENGLISH AND MATH SCORES AND
SUSPECTS NARRATES. THE HOGAN
MILITARY INSTITUTE IS EITHER ON
PAR WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR
IN SOME CASES DOES WORSE DESPITE
HAVING SIMILAR JUST. ABOUT
DEMOGRAPHICS TO THE DISTRICT AS
A WHOLE.
FOR THE FIND.
AS PEOPLE STATED THAT THE LOCAL
CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA ALLOWS
PARIS AND PORTABLE TO DIRECTLY
FIND.
THESE MILITARY ACADEMIES IN
FACT.
CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTITUTE
ALREADY HAS A. MILITARY ACADEMY
MODEL IN PLACE.
.
THIS IS HOW ALL OTHER MILITARY
ACADEMIES SWITCH OF WHICH ARE
SEVERAL ARE CURRENTLY FUNDED AS
WELL AS ANY. NON NON MILITARY
SPECIALIZED ACADEMIES ARTS
ACADEMIES ARE CURRENTLY FUNDED.
ADDITIONALLY WE NOTE THAT BOB
FUNDS FOR THESE PARTICULAR
DISTRICTS IN PARIS AND PORTABLE.
HAVE INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY NOT
ONLY FROM THE BASE FUNDING BUT
SINCE THEY HAVE A.
HIGH LEVEL OF LOW INCOME AND
THINK A SLENDER STUDENTS. OTHER
SUPPLEMENTAL AND CONCENTRATION
FUNDING HAS INCREASED
SUBSTANTIALLY AS WELL.
WE DON'T FIND THAT FEE LVF MODEL
DOES PROVIDE THESE. SCHOOLS WITH
BOTH THE ABILITY AND PRAGUE HAVE
TO FIND THE MILITARY ACADEMY
PROGRAMS AND. THEIR VALUE TO
THOSE SCHOOLS RELATIVE TO THEIR
OTHER AVAILABLE OPTIONS.
THIS CONCLUDES OUR REMARKS I
WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE. ANY
QUESTIONS WE'VE HEARD MY
COMMENTS ABOUT THE SUFFICIENCY
OF THE LC FF BOTH WITH. THE BASS
GRANT THE SUPPLEMENTAL IN THE
CONCENTRATION.
VISITED THE SCHOOL.
CALIFORNIA WHERE.
AS A.
SINCE YOUR ENGLISH LANGUAGE
LEARNERS A LOW INCOME.
AND. THEN.
THE PICTURE THE OPTIC WHEN YOU
LOOK AT AND ON THE CADET CORPS
IS.
A LOT OF.
MINORITY STUDENTS SO THE
DEMOGRAPHICS ARE CHALLENGED.
WHEN YOU WATCH STUDENTS.
IN FORMATION.
AT EIGHT THIRTY IN THE MORNING.
AND WATCH THEM RESPOND TO THE
INSTRUCTIONS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
GIVEN AND WATCH THEM PROCEED.
AND MARCH TO THEIR CLASSROOMS.
AND THIS IS A VOLUNTARY
OPERATION THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE
THERE.
IT IS A SIGHT TO BEHOLD AND
FRANKLY IT'S EYE WATERING.
AND I DON'T THINK THERE'S ENOUGH
MONEY BUILT INTO THE LC FF THAT
FLOWS TO. THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS
IN THE PARIS COMMUNITY TO.
FOR ANY OTHER COMMUNITY FRANKLY
TO REALLY ON AN ONGOING BASIS
FULLY SUPPORT THAT KIND OF
OPERATION AND I THINK IF A.
DISTRICT WANTS TO DO THAT IN
THIS PARTICULAR CASE I THINK THE
GOVERNOR IS WILLING TO SUPPORT
THAT I THINK FRANKLY WE OUGHTA.
.
AN EXCEPTION IS THE EXCEPTION
BECOMES THE RULE TO ENCOURAGE
THAT KIND OF.
SITUATION BECAUSE I THINK IT
BUILDS BETTER YOUNG. MEN AND
WOMEN WHO ARE THE FUTURE OF OUR.
REGION DONE IN ONE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IS NOT THE FUTURE FOR
A STATE OR NATION SO HAVING SAID
THAT.
.
SO IT'S A QUESTION I'D BE HAPPY
TO MOVE THE ATOM AS CLOSE.
ANY QUESTIONS WHAT FIRST OF MAY
GET SOME PUBLIC COMMENT ANY
PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS
PARTICULAR ISSUE.
OKAY.
IT HAS BEEN MOVED SO I GUESS WE
CALL THE ROLL.
SENATOR OFF BY. SENATORS LASER.
PRINTER WILL.
THANK YOU LET'S MOVE TO ISSUE
NUMBER THREE OF CYBER NETWORK
DEFENSE TEAM IN THIS SINCE I'VE
BEEN.
IT'S MY CAREER IS STALLED OUT
AND I'VE BEEN IN THIS EAR FOR A
LONG TIME I REMEMBER THIS
CONVERSATION FROM TWO THOUSAND
AND THIRTEEN GENERAL BALDWIN SO.
PERHAPS YOU COULD BRING US UP TO
DATE ON WHAT I UNDERSTAND TO
HAVE TO BE A REMARKABLE.
TRANSFORMATION IN OUR SERVER
NETWORK COULD DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND
AND HAVING SAID THAT I WANT TO
COMMEND THE GOVERNOR AND THE
ADMINISTRATION FOR. OF THE
SUPPORT THAT HAS BEEN
FORTHCOMING OVER THE YEARS I
GUESS ARE LIMITLESS THE AGENCIES THE FOUR CORE
AGENCIES ARE FOR SCOTT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT TECHNOLOGY.
ALL YES THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS.
HAS EVOLVED DRAMATICALLY THAT I
THINK IS NOW THE GOLD STANDARD
FOR ANY STATE LEVEL PROGRAM IN
THE UNITED STATES. HOME AND THIS
IS LARGELY SUCCESSFUL TO THE
LEADERSHIP OF THE PEOPLE OVER AT
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY WHO
REALLY HAVE DONE A REMARKABLE
JOB. ON WHAT THIS PROPOSAL.
ASKS FOR IS.
CAN. MAKE PERMANENT TEN
ADDITIONAL BUMPY WISE AND TWO
POINT SIX MILLION DOLLARS IN
REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORITY THAT
ALLOW OUR CURRENT TEAM.
OF COMPUTER OF THE CYBER
WARRIORS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER
OF ASSESSMENTS THAT WE DO OF
OTHER STATE AGENCIES YOU SEE
SYSTEMS AND NOW EVEN SOME LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS. FROM THIRTY FIVE.
PER YEAR TO SEVENTY PER YEAR
AND ALSO ENABLE US TO DO.
SIMULTANEOUSLY RESPOND TO FOUR
MAJOR INCIDENTS OF INTRUSIONS OR
ON THEFT OF INFORMATION OR OR
WHAT HAVE YOU ON ON NETWORKS IN
ADDITION ALLOW US TO ASSESS.
WHAT THE CHP AND THE FBI INTO
GREATER DETAIL THAT WE'VE BEEN
DOING AND CYBER FORENSICS IN THE
WAKE OF A?
CYBER ATTACK YOU KNOW THIS IS
REALLY CRITICAL WHEN IT COMES TO
COME IN THE WORLD CYBER FOR
EVERYONE OUT THERE THAT'S ON A
COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEM WHICH IS
EVERYONE IS TWO KINDS OF PEOPLE.
THOSE LITTLE BIT HACKED AND
THOSE THAT DON'T KNOW THEY'VE
BEEN HACKED AND OUR TEAM CAN HAS
BEEN ABLE TO COME IN. AND REALLY
REALLY HELP STATE AGENCIES
IMPROVE THEIR CYBER HYGIENE
IMPROVE THEIR POSTURE IN A
SEPARATE DEFENSE POSTURE TO
PROTECT OUR INFORMATION AND
PROTECT OUR OUR NETWORKS WHICH
ARE UNDER THERE NATION STATE ACTORS
TERRORISTS CRIMINALS ARE PURE
COMPETITORS THERE IS GOOD. AT
TRYING TO GET AFTER US AS WE ARE
DEFENDING SO THIS.
EXPANSION OR CAPABILITY IS
CRITICAL TO ALLOW US TO MORE
RAPIDLY CONDUCT ASSESSMENTS FIND
VULNERABILITIES AND FIX THEM.
THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO
EXCELLENT WORK FINANCING COMMON.
BELIAU.
NO COMMENT MISTER.
BINGO THANK YOU.
OKAY SIR WHAT ANY QUESTIONS.
A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ONE.
I'M GOING TO HOLD THIS ITEM
OPEN.
FOR A FEW MINUTES INTO MY
COLLEAGUE SENATOR GLAZER COMES
BACK BUT WE WILL VOTE ON THIS.
MISSION OVER FOR STARBASE ON
THIS ISSUES INFORMATION ONLY WE
DON'T HAVE A BUDGET REQUEST AND
STARBASE IS A DEPARTMENT DEFENSE
PROGRAM THAT'S A HUNDRED PERCENT
FEDERALLY FUNDED. THAT.
IS AIMED AT EXPOSING CHILDREN.
FROM TITLE ONE SCHOOLS
PREDOMINATELY.
TO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING AND MATH SUBJECTS.
OF SOMEBODY SOMEWHERE ALONG THE
LINE FIGURED OUT THAT.
PEOPLE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
THEY WANT TO BE WHEN THEY'RE
GROWING UP WHEN THEY'RE AROUND
FOUR. EIGHT FOURTH AND FIFTH
GRADE AT ABOUT THAT AGE.
SO THE FORMER DEFENSE HAS AN
INTEREST IN HELPING TO STEER
PEOPLE TOWARDS ON CAREERS IN
STEM SUBJECTS SO THAT DOWN THE
ROAD THE UNITED STATES CAN MAKE
DAY IN ITS COMPETITIVE EDGE. NOT
ONLY IN THE DEFENSE ARENA BUT
JUST IN THE ECONOMY IN GENERAL
AND YOU KNOW AS OUR RAPIDLY
TECHNOLOGICALLY BASED ECONOMY IS
IS EXPANDING THAT BECOMES EVEN
MORE CRITICAL. WE RUN TWO
PROGRAMS IN THE STATE ONE HERE
IN SACRAMENTO ONE DOWN AND I'LL
CLOSE ON ME DOES THAT BOTH
PROGRAMS WE RUN ABOUT THREE
THOUSAND KIDS.
THROUGH OF THOSE SCHOOLS BUT WE
HAVE A VERY VERY LONG A WAITING
LIST IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA I
THINK THERE'S TWENTY FIVE
SCHOOLS. ON THE WAITING LIST AT
ANY GIVEN TIME TO COME IN
THROUGH.
WHICH IS WHICH IS HOSTED BY THE
MILITARY DEPARTMENT ON OUR
FEDERAL INSTALLATION DOWN IT
LOOKS ON ME DOES BUT IS STAFFED
BY A CIVILIAN.
TECHNOLOGY TEACHERS MATH
TEACHERS ENGINEERING TEACHERS
AND THEY USE DIFFERENT VEHICLES
SUCH AS RACKETEERING OF ROCKETRY
OR.
SPACE EXPLORATION FOR CYBER
SUBJECTS TO GET THESE KIDS
EXCITED ABOUT.
STEM SUBJECTS AND THEN THE
RESULTS ARE WE FOUND IN DOING
STUDIES AFTER THE KIDS GO
THROUGH THE PROGRAM THE STUDENTS
THAT HAVE. NOT GONE THROUGH THE
PROGRAM TEND TO HAVE AN AVERAGE
FOR ABOUT FIFTY TWO PERCENT ON
THE STATE STANDARDS FOR THEIR
SCIENCE TESTS AT THAT AGE LEVEL.
OF THE STUDENTS TO GO THROUGH
OUR PROGRAM SCORE UP IN THE
EIGHTY PERCENT OR HIGHER.
BECAUSE THEY HAVE ONCE YOU'RE
INTERESTED IN MATH OR SCIENCE
THAN THEY BECOME EXCITED ABOUT
IT AND WE HOW THEM THAT THEY
CAN DO IT BECAUSE A LOT OF
PEOPLE HAVE A FEAR OF IT.
WELL. FINANCE.
HELLO.
WELL LET ME ASK YOU QUESTIONS I REALIZE IT SAYS SERVE BASIS
DEPARTMENT DEFENSE PROGRAM. IF
WE WERE TO COME TOGETHER AND
FIND SOME ADDITIONAL MONEY IN
THIS FOR SOME FUTURE BUT.
AND PROVIDE IT IS THERE A WAY
TO EXPAND THIS PROGRAM TO REDUCE
THE WAITING. LIST WHETHER IT'S
IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
AND NORTHERN CALIFORNIA THERE IS
THE.
THE STATE'S RESPONSIBLE FOR
HOUSING THE PROGRAM. FOR FOR
PROVIDING THEFACILITIES IN OUR
FACILITIES ARE MAXED OUT WITH
THE NUMBER CLASSROOMS THAT WE
HAVE AVAILABLE SO IF THERE WERE
ADDITIONAL MONTH MONEY.
AND AGAIN I WOULD HAVE NO
OPINION ON THIS BUT IF I DID
HAVE AN OPINION MY OPINION WOULD
BE THAT WE NEED TO.
EXPAND THE PHYSICAL PLANT SO WE
COULD ADD MORE CLASSROOMS AND WE
CAN ACCOMMODATE ALL OF THE
SCHOOLS AND ALL THE STUDENTS
THAT. ARE INTERESTED FROM THESE.
OTHERWISE LOW PERFORMING
SCHOOLS BUT HELP ME UNDERSTAND
THE PHYSICAL PLANT ISSUE IN THIS
IS THAT PROBABLY OUTSIDE OF YOUR
SANDBOXING CLEARLY OUTSIDE OF
MINE SINCE I DON'T DEAL WITH
THOSE ISSUES HERE. BUT I ASSUME
LA ON FINANCE HELP ME THAT THIS
WOULD REQUIRE. DISTRICTS PUTTING
ADDITIONAL BRICK AND MORTAR.
CLASSROOMS ON DISTRICT PROPERTY
AND THAT SORT OF THE THE
STUDENTS COME TO US THAT TO YOU
WERE IN A ONE PROGRAMS HERE IN
SACRAMENTO THAT WE DO IT THE OLD.
SACRAMENTO ARMY DEPOT THAT'S.
ON OUR PROPERTY WHERE ARE ALL
THE OTHERS IT LOOKS SO MANY
OTHERS OF US ALL MADE US. SO WE
TOOK SOME OLDER BUILDINGS AND
THEN WHEN SPEAKER PRESS WAS IN
OFFICE HE PROVIDED FUNDING FOR
US TO BUILD AN ADDITIONAL
CLASSROOMS BUSHEL TO CLASSROOMS.
FOR FIVE YEARS AGO. AND.
AND RIGHT NOW THOSE CLASSROOMS
ARE BAD MAX CAPACITY
PARTICULARLY IN SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA WHERE WE.
BUT I'VE NOT BEEN ABLE TO
ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF
THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS DOWN IN SAN
DIEGO. ON WE'VE BEEN VERY
FOCUSED ON THE LA BASIN AND OUT
AND TORTURE DISTRICT OUT IN THE
RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO AREA.
WHERE THE KIDS COME IN ONE DAY
PER WEEK FOR FIVE WEEKS TO LOS
ELEMENTOS USE OUR CLASSROOMS AND
OUR FACILITIES THERE IN ORDER TO?
DO THE PROGRAM HOW DO I
APOLOGIZE I'VE FORGOTTEN THE.
THEY COME TO YOU CONCEPT SO JUST
ASKING QUESTIONS SINCE MY
COLLEAGUE IS STILL OUT FINANCE
SERVICES WORK WITH THIS P. A.
THE GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
AT LOS ADDITIONAL FACILITIES LOW
SO IT WAS AN APPEARANCE
RECOMMEND TO. ME AS WAS
MENTIONED WE HAVEN'T REVIEWED A
PROPOSAL AT THIS TIME I'M NOT
SURE THAT I COULD SPEAK TO. THE
DETAILS OF HOW IT WOULD WORK I'M
NOT SURE IF IT WOULD BE A
PHYSICAL PLANT EXPANSION OR. A
CLASSROOM SPACE AND WHETHER OR
NOT THAT WOULD BE A CAP OUTLAY
PROJECT OR A JUST A GENERAL FUND
APPROPRIATION BUT.
WE CAN CERTAINLY IF THERE'S
SOME YOU KNOW NEED FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION GO BACK AND.
GATHER ANSWERS TO ANY QUESTIONS
ON THE TOPIC THE WORLD AND. THE
GENERAL CAN. PROBABLY ANSWER
THIS BUT DO YOU KNOW WHETHER
THERE'S BEEN ANY STUDY OR
PLANNING DONE IS TO EXPANSION
PROGRAM IN TERMS OF. ADDITIONAL
FACILITIES WHETHER OR NOT MONEY
IS AVAILABLE AND HOW MUCH THOSE
FACILITIES WOULD COST. I DO NOT
KNOW I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH ANY
OF THOSE STUDIES BUT THAT'S NOT
TO SAY THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN DONE
SO WE'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT.
I'D BE INTERESTED IN AND HAVING
THAT INFORMATION IF THOSE. IF
ANY SUCH STUDIES EXIST IN ANY
ANY FUNDING.
.
CONCEPTS OF BEEN REDUCED TO
WRITING TO SEE WHAT IT WOULD
COST TO.
EXPAND THIS PROGRAM AND WHETHER%
IT'S DONE IN PHASES OR WHETHER
IT'S DONE IN ONE SHOT BOTH IN
SACRAMENTO AND.
IN LOS ELEMENTS TELLING ME THIS.
I MEAN I NDERSTAND HOW THE
PROCESS WORKS BUT IT WOULD BE
NICE TO KNOW WHAT IT WOULD COST
IF. WE CHOSE TO ENGAGE IN THAT
CONVERSATION AS A LEGISLATURE
WAS ADMINISTRATION.
THANK YOU SIR MAY QUESTIONS AND
WORKS TO ME.
I THINK WE SHOULD LOOK AT
ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS. THAN JUST
THOSE TWO.
SO THAT'S ONE IN THE NUMBER TWO
ALSO I'M ACTUALLY FAMILIAR WITH
THS PROGRAM. AND SO I THOUGHT
THIS WAS A SUSPENDED FOR AWHILE
LIKE TEN YEARS AGO BECAUSE SOME
CENTERS WIFE IS GETTING PAID. I
MEAN I MEAN I'M I'M SUPPORT THE
PROGRAM BUT THERE WAS A LITTLE
THERE IS A CONTROVERSY TEN
TWELVE YEARS AGO. BECAUSE
ACTUALLY HAD PEOPLE OUR AGE IN
THIS PROGRAM AND THEN THEY LIKE.
THEY THEY CUT IT FOR AWHILE BUT
I'M GLAD THAT IT'S BACK TO SO IF
YOU DON'T KNOW YOU DON'T KNOW
CENTER I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THAT
BUT IT IS. VERY DIFFICULT THE
THE DEPARTMENT DEFENSE WILL
OFTEN REDLINE IT OUT OF THE WEST
OFF SECTOR DEFENSE BUDGET. IN
THE PRESIDENT'S BUDGET AND THEN
CONGRESS WILL RESTORE THE
FUNDING SO THAT HAPPENS PERIODIC
YEAH I'M DESPITE THE SUCCESS OF
THE PROGRAM IS WILDLY POPULAR IN
THE HALLS OF CONGRESS THERE'S
SOME.
SUPPORT FROM ALL SIDES THE
AISLE THERE'S A CAUCUS FOR IT OM
AND THEN IT IS A VERY VERY FEW
DOUBT PROGRAM WITH RESPECT TO
THE EXPANSION TO DIFFERENT
LOCATIONS FOR EXAMPLE IN THE
CENTRAL VALLEY FOR. IS IT
DIFFICULT TO ACCEPT TO EXPAND TO
A NEW SITE THAT'S THE CHALLENGE
FOR US IS IS PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
SO IF THERE IS A FEDERAL
INSTALLATION. ON THAT WE COULD
BUILD ON OR IF THE STATE ALREADY
OWNS PROPERTY OTHERWISE IT WOULD
BE JUST LIKE BUILDING ANY OTHER.
NEW STATE OF BUILDING WE WOULD
HAVE TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY IN
ADDITION TO.
TO BUILDING UP SO THAT'S WHY
WE'VE CHOSEN TO CONCENTRATE AT
TWO SITES NORTH AND SOUTH. WE
HAVE NOT YET DONE A STUDY.
OF WHERE ELSE WE CAN GO WHETHER
ON PROPERTY THE MULTI DEPARTMENT
OWNS PROPERTY FEDERAL PROPERTY
THAT WE HAVE ACCESS TO WAR.
GOING TO ANOTHER FEDERAL
INSTALLATION LIKE LA MORE NAVAL
AIR STATION OR. CAMP PENDLETON
OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT BUT I
SUPPOSE POPULTION DENSITY
STUDENT POPULATION DENSITY
FACTORS INTO THAT AS WELL
SENSORS TRANSPORT INVOLVED RIGHT SOME PLACE LIKE EDWARDS FOR
EXAMPLE AND WHERE THAT WOULD BE
AS AN EXCELLENT SUGGESTION.
WELL.
YOU DO HAVE ACCESS TO THE SAN
FERNANDO VALLEY AND SOME OF THE
OTHER.
SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY COULD
GET THROUGH THERE YEAH. I LIKE
TO EXPLORE THIS I REALIZE
GENERAL YOU CAN'T TO PARTICIPATE
IN THIS BUT I WOULD LIKE TO
EXPLORE WITH THE ADMINISTRATION
AND WITH FINANCE.
AND WITH MY COLLEAGUES TO SEE
HOW WE CAN MOVE THIS STARBASE
PROGRAM OF.
FORWARD.
FURTHER. OKAY FOR THE QUESTIONS
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON ISSUE
NUMBER FOR STARBASE.
OKAY SEEING NONE THIS IS AN
INFORMATIONAL ITEM SO WE'LL MOVE
ON ISSUE NUMBER FIVE WORK FOR
LAWYERS THE LAST ISSUE.
IS AGAIN IT'S INFORMATIONAL WE
DON'T HAVE ANY CURRENT BUDGET
REQUEST WORKFORCE IS A PROGRAM
THAT WE DEVELOPED IN HOUSE IN
THE MILITARY APARTMENT. OUT
SEVEN YEARS AGO WHEN I FIRST
BECAME THE ADJUTANT GENERAL FROM
THE STUFF THAT WAS IN THE PRESS
NOT WITHSTANDING THE BIGGEST
CHALLENGE THAT.
WE FACED OUR LEADERS FACED WAS
THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AMONGST
OUR PART TIME SOLDIERS. MORE
SOLDIERS THAN THAN THAN AIRMAN
IN SOME UNITS PARTICULARLY
INFANTRY UNITS THE UNEMPLOYMENT
RATE. WAS AS HIGH AS FIFTY
PERCENT SO THE SOLDIERS THAT
WERE IN THOSE UNITS THE ONLY JOB
THEY HAD WAS A PART TIME
NATIONAL GUARD JOB. AND.
THIS WE FELT WAS LEADING TO A
CASCADE OF OTHER PROBLEMS.
OF DRINKING AND DRUG ABUSE
PROBLEMS OF SPOUSAL ABUSE.
.
A WALL THINGS LIKE THAT SO WE
WANTED US TO GET TO THE ROOT
CAUSE. OUR CYCLE BY PROVIDING
MECHANISM TO AVOID PEOPLE. SO WE
ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH
SEVERAL COMPANIES.
INITIALLY WHERE OF THE MILITARY
PART ONE WOULD PROVIDE THE.
.
JOB PLACEMENT. PARTNERSHIP WITH
CORPORATIONS THE CORPORATIONS
DOWN AND WE NOW HAVE FIVE
HUNDRED CORPORATIONS SIGNED UP
FOR THIS PROGRAM. WE.
PROVIDE.
THEY PROVIDE US FIRST RIGHT OF
REFUSAL ON THERE THE JOBS THAT
THEY HAVE TO OFFER SO BEFORE
THEY GO OUT AND PUT JOB
ANNOUNCEMENTS ON THE STREET.
THEY COME TO US AND ALLOW US TO
SEARCH OUR DATABASE TO SEE IF WE
HAVE CANDIDATES THAT ARE
ELIGIBLE FOR THOSE JOBS. SINCE
THAT INITIAL PROGRAM.
STARTED WE'VE PLACED OVER SIXTY
FOUR HUNDRED PEOPLE WERE THE
MOST COST EFFECTIVE JOB
PLACEMENT PROGRAM. OUT THERE OF
ANY OF THE FEDERALLY FUNDED ONES
OR STATE PROGRAMS OR ANYTHING
LIKE THAT ARE ARE PER PLACEMENT
COST IS UNDER IS ABOUT TWELVE
HUNDRED BUCKS. THE GOING RATE
AVERAGE FOR OTHER PROGRAMS IS
AROUND TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS I'M
FROM DOLLARS PER PLACEMENT. AND
WHAT MAKES US UNIQUE IS THAT WE
USE THIS MATCH DOT COM SYSTEM
WHERE. LIKE SYSTEM WHERE WE TAKE
THE.
WHAT THE EMPLOYERS LOOKING FOR
WITH THE SKILL SETS OF OUR
SOLDIERSAND AIRMEN AND NOW
SPOUSES AND NOW IT'S OPEN TO
VETERANS AND WE OPENED UP TO?
MILITARY PEOPLE TRANSITION OFF
OF ACTIVE DUTY AND MATCH THEM UP
IDENTICALLY WITH THE.
EMPLOYER BUT WE TAKE IT A STEP
FURTHER WE COACH THE POTENTIAL
APPLICANT ON. HOW TO PRESENT
THEMSELVES HOW TO DO THE RESUME
AND HOW TO PRESENT THEMSELVES TO
PREPARE FOR THE? FOR THE
INTERVIEWS.
WELL THE SAME TIME WE ALSO GET
WITH THE HR SPECIALS OF
COMPANIES AND PREPARE THEM ON
HOW TO ASK QUESTIONS OF VETERANS
TO DRAW OUT FROM THEM. THEIR
EXPERIENCES SO THEY CAN
TRANSLATE THAT EXPERIENCE THAT
THEY RECEIVED IN THE MILITARY
INTO USEFUL SKILLS IN THE WORK
IN THE CIVILIAN WORKFORCE. AND
AGAIN IT'S BEEN A VERY VERY
SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM WE'RE
CURRENTLY OPERATING OFF OF.
STATE FUNDS THAT FUNDS.
SIX PEOPLE.
OUT OF ONE POINT ABOUT SIX
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM
THE STATE AND THEN WE HAVE A
FEDERAL GRANT FOR ONE POINT ONE
MILLION THAT ALLOWS US TO HIRE
TEN CONTRACTORS. ON THAT'S
ENABLED US THE PHOTOGRAPH IS
ABLE TO EXPAND THE PROGRAM
BEYOND JUST A CALIFORNIA
MILITARY DEPARTMENT INTO ALL
BRANCHES OF SERVICES. AND THE
SPOUSES OF THOSE. SERVICE
MEMBERS.
CAN YOU PLACE CERTAINLY OVER SIX
THOUSAND OF THESE FOLKS YES OR
SIXTY FOUR HUNDRED SINCE ITS.
INCEPTION WE PLACE SOME ABOUT
EIGHT HUNDRED PER YEAR IT'S
ABOUT.
TWO AND A HALF PEOPLE PLACE PER
DAY.
SO WE'RE AGAIN IT'S A VERY VERY
SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM AND ITS
UNIQUE NOBODY ELSE DOES IT THE
WAY THAT WE DO IT.
AND WE MANAGED SOMEHOW FUN THIS
EITHER THROUGH THE SPEAKERS.
LARGESS OR THROUGH THE GENERAL
FUND BUDGET THE LAST FEW YEARS
SOME REASON IT DIDN'T MAKE THE
CUT THIS YEAR. THAT'S CORRECT.
OKAY.
FINANCE ANY COMMENT.
OBVIOUSLY IF.
PROGRAM OF MINE KNOW TO STICK
CLOSE MY BIAS RIGHT UP FRONT
ELIO.
WE HAVE NOTHING TO ADD.
YEAH THEY'RE LOOKING TO
QUESTIONS.
IT'S.
THIS IS LISTED AS AN
INFORMATIONAL ITEM.
BUT LET ME MOVE BACK SINCE THIS
IS THE LAST ITEM.
FOR THE MILITARY DEPARTMENT LET
ME TAKE A MOTION ON ISSUE NUMBER
SO. THE WITCHES CYBER NETWORK
DEFENSE TEAM SO MOVED SPIN MOVE
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. CENTER OFF.
SENATOR LATER. SENATOR WHAT HIGH
SCHOOL HOLDS THE LECTURES WILL
HOLD THE ROLE OPEN FOR SENATOR
GLAZER.
ISSUE NUMBER FIVE WORK FOR
LAWYERS. CENTER WILL KENNY
INTEREST IN MAKING A MOVE I
WOULD LOVE TO MAKE A MOTION
SYSTEM MOVES THANK YOU VERY MUCH
IT'S BEEN MOVED. THE LAST FOR
PUBLIC COMMENT IF NOT PUBLIC
COMMENT BEFORE WE VOTE. SEEING
NONE PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
THIS. ISSUE FIVE WORK FOR
WORKERS CONDITIONS WE'RE JUST
DOING IT.
IF. YOU WANT A DOLLAR FIGURE IN
THERE.
WELL THE DOLLAR FIGURE WAS.
SO I ASSUME IT'S SIX HUNDRED
SEVENTY THOUSAND GENERAL FUNDS
THAT CRRECT. THAT'S OCCURRING
DOLLAR FIGURE THAT WHY IS THAT.
IF WE COULD TAKE IS AS MUCH AS
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE IS
ALLOWING ME TO GET.
HE CAN'T SPEAK TO. SPEAK TO THE
FINANCE. GIVEN THAT IT WAS A
INFORMATIONAL ITEM AND APOLOGIZE
I DON'T HAVE.
AS ROBUST OF HISTORY ON THE
ISSUE AS I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE
TO FULLY COMMENT ON THE CURRENT
NEEDS OF THE PROGRAM IN THE
AMOUNT. THAT WAS FNDED IN PRIOR
YEARS VERSUS CARRYING FORWARD IN
THIS BUDGET CELL SO AGAIN WE
DON'T HAVE A PROPOSAL IN NOT
APPROVED FOR POSITIONS BUT. WE
CERTAINLY HIM BECAUSE TE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MONEY IS
ALWAYS TENUOUS BECAUSE IT'S A
GRANT WE COULD CERTAINLY TAKE UP
TO ONE POINT SEVEN MILLION
DOLLARS. AND A COMEDY THAT AND
SPEND THAT RIGHT AWAY EVEN IF WE
HAD TO EXPAND THE PROGRAM TO
DEMAND SIGNAL IS CERTAINLY OUT
THERE.
FOR THE NUMBER OF VETERANS
SPOUSES PEOPLE COMING OFF OF
ACTIVITY DOWN OUR OWN FORCE.
THAT.
THE BENEFITS FROM THIS PROGRAM.
THAT'S AWFUL SO I MAKE A MOTION.
FOR ONE POINT WHAT JUST GO TO
EVEN.
SAID.
WHAT'S YOUR PREFERENCE WAS TO
SHARE.
.
THAT'S FINE. WHAT YOUR MOTION IS
FINE ONE SEVEN OR IT'S FINE?
BECAUSE FOR THE OKAY.
FOR THE MOTION IS FOR ONE POINT
SEVEN MILLION FOR WORK FOR
LAWYERS I GUESS WE'LL HAVE A
FURTHER CONVERSATION IF THE
PHONE DOESN'T START TO RING
IMMEDIATELY.
EVERYBODY CLEAR ON THE MOTION.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
SENATOR ROTH.
THEY'RE GLAZER. SENATOR LOTT
FIVE.
THANK YOU SIR THINGS I MISS
BEHAVIOR WILL BE DULY NOTED.
I THINK. THAT.
OKAY.
YEAH.
THERE IS A NEGATIVE FIVE.
YEAH
.
YEAH.
IT FELT GOOD.
OKAY SO LET'S HAVE YOU IDENTIFY
YOURSELVES IN FRONT TABLE FIRST
STARTING MY LEFT OU'RE RIGHT
SIR. NAMES THOMAS MINE IN THE
SYSTEM DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR THE
VETERANS SUMS OF CAL THAT. ONE
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME IS BETH
MISSION SCAM CHIEF OF RESEARCH
AND PROGRAM REVIEW FOR THE
VETERANS HOMES DIVISION.
GOOD MORNING MY NAME'S DAVE
GERARD AND THE ASSISTANT DEPUTY
SECRETARY FOR THE FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS SERVICES
DIVISION IF YOU ALL OKAY SIR GET
HIM BACK. MA'AM.
HE HAD TRIED APARTMENT FINANCE
THANK YOU.
CHECK IN BRASILIA.
NOTICE MORALES LA OFFICE FOR US
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US OKAY
THE FIRST ISSUE IS.
DOCTOR DAM AND RESERVOIR I HAD
NO IDEA THAT CALVIN. WAS IN THE
DAMN OPERATIONS BUSINESS SO.
LET'S PROCEED AND I WELCOME THE
OPPORTUNITY TO EDUCATE
FASCINATING.
PRETERISM ARE IS A PART OF THE
YOUNG THE VETERANS HOME IT'S A
CROSS THE BELLY UP ON A HIGHWAY.
TWENTY NINE.
FOR THE SILVERADO TRAIL RATHER.
A PROPOSAL THAT YOU HAVE IN
FRONT OF YOU IS A RESULT OF A
LAWSUIT. FILED BY THE WATER ON A
GROUP.
IT SAYS THAT THE DEPARTMENT
THAT'S AFFAIRS IS IN VIOLATION
OF.
FISHING GAME CODE.
FIFTY NINE THIRTY SEVEN AS WELL
AS A VARIETY OF. FEDERAL
REGULATIONS RELATED TO
CONSERVATION AND.
FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE.
POLLS LIVE WE'RE ASKING FOR IS
ONE POINT FIVE MILLION DOLLARS
FOR A HANDFUL OF POSITIONS AND
FUNDING TO CONDUCT A INTERIM
FLOW EVALUATION ON THE RECTOR
CREEK.
STREAM. AND FISH A FISH HABITAT.
EVALUATION TO DETERMINE THE.
QUALITY OF THE HABITAT OF THE
RECTOR CREEK AND THE POTENTIAL
FOR FISH.
AND THEIR.
.
REQUISITE HABITAT.
THE POSITIONS ALLOW FOR
ALIGNMENT OF A MORE ORGANIZED
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE TO DEAL-DIRECTLY WITH THE RECTOR
RESERVOIR AND MANAGE THE
INCREASED.
REQUIREMENTS OF THE DAM AS WELL
AS THE TREATMENT PLANT WOULD
MEET ME JUST ASK A RATHER NAIVE
QUESTION WHITE WHY IS COVERED IN
THE.
RESERVOIR AND DAM MANAGEMENT
BUSINESS I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT
PROVIDES. IN PART WATER TO THE
VETERANS HOME AND I GET THAT BUT
YOU. ALSO ARE PROVIDING LETTER
TO A VARIETY OF OTHER ENTITIES
AND. WHY CALVERT AND NOT?
SOMETHING ELSE THE THE HISTORY
GOES BACK TO THE.
THE EARLY NINETEEN HUNDREDS
WHERE THEY WERE LOOKING FOR AN
ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY AND IT'S
ALWAYS BEEN A PART OF THE.
CAL THAT PROPERTY AND SO
THEREFORE BY DEFAULT WE'VE BEEN
OPERATING THE DAM EVER SINCE.
IT IS A A CONTINUOUS WATER
SUPPLY AND IT WAS IDENTIFIED AS
A CAPITAL OUT LATE PROJECT LONG
TIME AGO TO ENSURE THAT THAT.
VETERANS HOME ALWAYS HAVE WATER
BY DEFAULT WE ARE NOW OPERATING
AT. MINUTES NOT A LOT OF MONEY
IN THE TOTAL SCHEME OF THINGS
BUT WE HAVE OTHER I THINK. STATE
AGENCIES THAT OPERATE RESERVOIRS
AND DAMS AND I JUST WONDER IF
THER'S A DUPLICATION OF EFFORT
THAT COULD BE. SAID THAT I'M
TRYING THE IMPACT YOUR JOB.
NO NOT AT ALL.
WITH THIS WITH THIS.
A LAWSUIT THAT'S BEEN PLACED IN
FRONT OF US WE'VE WE ARE
EXPLORING.
THOSE TYPES OF OPPORTUNITY
UNLESS YOU ARE THAT MIGHT. BE
AVAILABLE HOWEVER WITH THE
LAWSUITS THAT WE'VE WE WE'VE
BEEN ASKED TO AT LEAST MOVE
FORWARD WITH THE. BEST SOLUTION
AT THE TIME CASTLE WITH THE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO PROVE
HIS REQUESTED BUT LET ME TURN TO
FINANCE FOR ANY COMMENTS.
BELIAU.
OUR LIBRARY TO YOUR COMMENTS BUT.
I MEAN ADDRESS THAT LATER. ON
OKAY ANY ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON
THE RECTOR DAM AND RESERVOIR
ISSUE.
SEEING NONE IS THERE A MOTION
ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS BEEN
MOVED.
IT. WAS CALL ROLE. IN IRAQ.
CLEARLY THERE THINNER WHAT LIFE.
AS WITH THE PRIOR VOTES WE WILL
HOLD THIS OPEN FOR THE ABSENT
MEMBERS. ISSUE NUMBER TWO IS THE.
YOUR BILL PRIVATE DONE MISSILE
RE ROOM.
FOR POST. OKAY SO.
AGAIN MAINE'S TOM SMART
INSISTED DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR
THE VETERANS HOMES WE'RE VERY
EXCITED PERCENT THE NEXT TO BE
SEE PLEASE THESE ARE RESULTS OF
YEARS OF HARD WORK BY OUR STAFF
BY. BOB ID DRIVE BUT THAT'S AND
BY A NUMBER OF OTHER FOLKS ON
OUR TEAM.
TO ADD TO TO MAKE SURE THAT
YOUNG THOSE PREPARED. FOR THE
FUTURE AND AND IS SO I CAN HAVE
CONTINUE EXCESS IMPLYING AND
INTO THE FUTURE. ON BOTH OF THE
NEXT TWO BCP'S WILL ALLOW US TO
PROVIDE. BETTER SERVICES AND
BETTER CARE FOR HUNDREDS OF BETS
ON THE CAMPUS.
AS YOU KNOW THE CAMPUS IS UNDER
THIRTY YEARS OLD AND. THIS IS.
INTERVIEW IT'S A SIGNIFICANT
TURNING POINT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE
READY FOR THE NEXT HUNDRED
THIRTY YEARS. IS STEP ONE GOING
THAT WAY SO THAT THE FIRST BCP.
IN THE FIRST PLACE WE WERE
REQUESTING REDUCTION OF SEVEN
HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS.
AND TWO POINT FIVE POSITIONS TO
CONVERT FROM SHARED ROOMS IN THE
AWFUL DOMICILIARY TO PRIVATE
INDIVIDUAL ROOMS FOR ALL NON
VARIED. RESIDENCE.
THE EXISTING DOMICILIARY.
HARKENS BACK TO THE OLDER STYLE
DORMITORY STYLE LIVING THAT ARRANGEMENTS.
AND IT PRESENTS A NUMBER OF
CHALLENGES FOR ON BOTH FOR OUR
STAFF AND FOR OUR RESIDENTS I
THINK THEY WOULD AGREE WITH THAT
STATEMENT.
.
SO FOR ONE THERE'S THERE'S
SIGNIFICANT INFECTION CONTROL
CONCERNS ON BEING A CONTROL THE
SPREAD OF ILLNESSES AND FACILITY
IF YOU HAVE THAT MANY PEOPLE.
SHARING ROOMS IN CLOSE QUARTERS.
EIGHT ALSO INCREASES. THE
LIKELIHOOD RESIDENT RESIDENT
CONFLICT NATURALLY IF YOU HAVE A.
GOVERNMENT THAT YOURS THAT
YOU'RE DEALING WITH.
BUT MORE IMPORTANT AND ALL THAT
IS.
IT'S.
BY EIGHT BY PROVIDING PRIVATE
ROOMS WERE GIVING RESIDENTS MORE
PRIVACY AND WHERE IT
SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASING THEIR
THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE FACILITY.
IT'S.
IF IF IF IF I'M IF I'M A
VETERAN AND I APPLY FOR VETERANS
HOME.
IF I GET INTO THE YOUNG THE HOME.
THE. I'M GONNA HAVE LESS SPACE
AND LESS PRIVACY THAN I WOULD
HAVE EVER MADE IT TO ANY OTHER
VETERANS HOME IN CALIFORNIA.
AND FUNDAMENTALLY.
YEAH THERE'S A THERE'S AN ISSUE
OF OF FAIRNESS WHEN YOU WHEN YOU
CONSIDER THAT. BEING ABLE TO
PROVIDE THEM WITH BETTER BETTER
ROOMS.
A BETTER LIVE BETTER LIVING
CONDITIONS BY GIVING THEM THEIR
OWN ROOM. IS IS A BETTER WAY TO
MEET THAT IT PROVIDES A BETTER
AND SAFER ENVIRONMENT OVERALL.
ON TOP OF THAT.
EAT SO ON PAPER THIS IS A
REDUCTION IN THE CENSUS FOR
YOUNG.
BUT IN REALITY THE REDUCTIONS
ALREADY THERE THE DEMAND FOR THE
FOR THE DUMB SILLERY IS SIMPLY
NOT WHAT IT WAS.
PRIOR YEARS.
.
THERE'S SAID OUR OUR CURRENT
NORM IS IS A HUNDRED MAYBE MORE
VACANCIES AT ANY GIVEN TIME FOR
THE FOR THE DOMICILIARY.
SO THERE'S A THERE'S ALREADY
THAT DISORDER THAT REDUCTION
THERE SO BEING ABLE TO BE ABLE
TO PROVIDE TO PRIDE CONVERTED
PRIVATE ROOMS MEANS THAT WE'RE
GETTING A BETTER CONDITIONS.
WHERE WE ARE?
GUARANTEEING THEM TO THE NOT
GONNA HAVE TO LIVE WITH A
ROOMMATE OR.
EVEN IF THEY DON'T HAVE A
ROOMMATE THAT THEY'RE STILL.
FURNITURE FOR ANOTHER PERSON IN
IN THE ROOM WAITING FOR SOMEONE
TO COME IN. CASE IT'S SIMPLY A
BETTER WAY TO TO ADDRESS THE
SITUATION SO. I KNOW IT'S A
LITTLE UNUSUAL FOR DEPARTMENT
COME IN AND ASK FOR LESS MONEY
TO DO A BETTER JOB.
BUT THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE'RE
ASKING FOR TODAY LET'S ALSO TALK
OF BECAUSE I WANTED SOME
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN
AND. THE PLAN GOING FORWARD.
HOLISTICALLY FOR THE VETERANS
HOME OPERATION CAN WE ALSO TALK
ABOUT ISSUES THREE TO SNIFF FOR
YOU PREFERRED ARE YOU PRESENTING
THAT YES.
LET'S TALK ABOUT TO SNIFF AT THE
SAME TIME AND THEN I'LL ASK FOR
COMMENTS FO I'VE I'M SORRY DID I
GET MY FELLING OF. THESE.
I'M COMING UP WE'VE GOT PLENTY
OF CHEERS YOU GONNA MINE
ACTUALLY.
I DIDN'T MEAN TO.
THAT'S UP MUSCLE LINEUP OF HERE
BUT I I THOUGHT WE MIGHT AS WELL
GET ALL THESE ON THE TABLE AND
THEN HAVE A CONVERSATION SO THE
YOUNG BILL SMITH.
SO THEY.
BACK IN TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN.
.
YEAH CAL THAT ENTERED INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH THE WITH THE NAME
THE FIRM TO DO AN EVALUATION OF
THE HEALTH BILL PROPER.
OUR FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS BASICALLY.
A BUNCH OF BAD BANDAID APPROACH.
PROPOSALS THAT WERE JUST KIND
OF FIXING THINGS AND AND DID NOT
HAVE A LONG TERM APPROACH FOR
THE PROPERTY. ON THE MASTER PLAN
THAT WAS COMPLETED AT THAT TIME
IN TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN.
IDENTIFIED AS ITS HIGHEST
PRIORITY A BRAND NEW SNIFFED
BUILDING. THE BRAND NEW STIFF
BUILDING IS TO REPLACE THE
HALDERMAN BUILDING THE HOLDER
AND BUILDING WAS BUILT IN
NINETEEN THIRTY TWO WHEN IT WAS
BUILT AS A HOSPITAL IT IS NOT A
SKILLED NURSING. BUILDING AT ALL.
SO THE THE.
SNIFF BUILDING PROPOSAL THAT YOU
HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU IS TO
REPLACE THE OLDER MEN BUILDING.
IT'S GOING TO BE A NEW ITS
PROPOSED TO BE TWO THOUSAND TWO
HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND SQUARE
FEET.
IT'S TO HAVE TWO HUNDRED AND
FORTY BEDS.
IT WILL BE BUILT TO THE CURRENT
US TV A SPACE STANDARDS WHICH IS
SIMILAR TO WHAT READING IN
FRESNO ARE BUILT TO.
IT WILL BE BUILT BY IN IN TERMS
OF NEIGHBORHOOD GUIDELINES SO
THE THE DESIGN IS STRUCTURED
VERY SIMILAR TO TO READING IN
FRESNO.
IT'LL BE BUILT TO LEED SILVER
STANDARDS.
ALL OF THE ROOMS WILL BE
DESIGNED FOR MEMORY CARE
STANDARDS SO THAT IF WE HAVE A
NEED TO DO WITH REQUIRE THE
FLEXIBILITY FOR MEMORY CARE. OF
ME IN TERMS OF GROWTH OR WHAT
HAVE YOU ALL WE CAN DO THAT
WITHOUT ANY MODIFICATION TO THE
BUILDING.
THE PROPOSAL LAST FOR FIFTEEN
MILLION DOLLARS IN PRELIMINARY
PLANS.
AND THAT'S TO BEGIN THE PROCESS.
WE ARE CURRENTLY ON THE US TV A
CONSTRUCTION GRANT LIST SO WE
DIDN'T BEEN ACCEPTED.
IN TERMS OF THIS PROPOSAL.
THE THE.
PRIORITY LIST AND DOES HAVE A A
COST THAT WAS PRELIMINARY. VOTE
WAS A PRELIMINARY COST I'M GOING
TO HAVE TO UPDATE IT WHICH WE
WILL DO BY JUNE THIRTIETH OF
THIS YEAR.
AND THE THE GOAL IS FOR THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PAY SIXTY
FIVE PERCENT OF THIS.
.
COST OF THIS NEW BUILDING.
THIRTY FIVE PERCENT WILL BE THE
STATE FUNDS.
THE BUILDING IS RECOMMENDED BY
THE HOOVER COMMISSION.
WE'VE DONE SITE EVALUATIONS TO
DETERMINE THE SIZE OF THE
FOOTPRINT AND THE.
ASSURANCE THAT IT CAN BE BUILT
ON THE THE SITE THAT WAS
IDENTIFIED WITH THE BUDGET
PACKAGE THAT WE'VE WE'VE DONE
OVER THE. LAST YEAR.
AND.
.
WE WE INTEND TO DO BOTH.
YEAH ARE IN AND SHIP ALL
RELATED.
EVALUATIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE
DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
EXISTING STRUCTURE. AND
COMMUNITY. INPUT
WELL LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION
THAT GOES BEFORE I GET COMMENTS
IT GOES TO THE MASTER.
PLANNED THE NEW MASTER PLANNING
WHICH I UNDERSTAND TO BE UNDER
WAY.
AND THE SERVICES THAT WE.
PROVIDE TO OUR VETERAN COMMUNITY
IN CALIFORNIA WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS
IN MANY CASES IT'S A VULNERABLE
VULNERABLE COMMUNITY AND. WE OWE
IT TO THAT COMMUNITY AND THAT
POPULATION TO DO THE BEST JOB
THAT WE CAN EACH AND EVERY DAY
NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT. PROVIDE
SERVICES AND FACILITIES THAT ARE
TOP NOTCH TO THE EXTENT WE STICK
A TOE IN THE WATER WE HAVE TO DO.
THE BEST JOB THAT WE POSSIBLY
CAN DO. BUT GIVEN THE FACT THAT
OUR. VETERANS HOME.
STRUCTURE WAS ESSENTIALLY.
SET UP BACK IN.
THE EIGHTEEN HUNDREDS WASN'T.
GABRIELLE'S BEEN THERE THAT
LONG YES.
AND GIVEN THE AT LEAST THE
POTENTIAL THAT THE.
NEEDS OF THIS YEAR THIS
GENERATION OF VETERANS AND THE
GENERATION THAT.
COMING OUT OF THE VIETNAM WAR
MAY BE DIFFERENT THAN THE NEEDS
OF THE VETERANS WHO CAME THROUGH
WORLD WAR TWO.
THOSE THAT ARE STILL WITH US AND
THREE OF THOSE THAT ARE STILL
WITH US.
SHOULDN'T WE BE DOING AN
ANALYSIS AS TO WHETHER THE
EXISTING VETERANS HOME STRUCTURE
MEETS THOSE NEEDS.
AND IN PARTICULAR WITH RESPECT
TO THE DOMICILIARY SITUATION
WHERE WERE ESSENTIALLY PROVIDING
ROOMS FOR VETERANS TO LIVE AND
NOT OTHER SERVICES.
AND PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO.
FACILITIES SUCH AS A SKILLED
NURSING FACILITY WHERE WE ARE
PROVIDING THE SAME TYPE OF
SERVICES THAT THE COMMERCIAL.
HEALTH CARE OPERATORS PROVIDE.
SHOULDN'T WE BE THINKING ABOUT
WHETHER WE SHOULD BE DOING AN
EXPANSION AT ALL AND IF SO HOW
MUCH OF AN EXPANSION. BECAUSE
ONCE WE BUILD A FACILITY EVEN IF
THE FEDS PAY SIXTY FIVE PERCENT
OF IT.
WE HAVE THE OPERATING COSTS
WHICH MAYBE THERE'S STILL THE
SAME SPLIT BUT WE STILL HAVE
THIRTY FIVE PERCENT THAT WE HAVE
TO PAY. AND WE COULD BE PAYING
FOR EMPTY BEDS.
AS WE ARE.
SINCE WE HAVE A HUNDRED.
VACANCIES IN YACHT FILLED TODAY
THAT MAKES SENSE. SO SHOULD I
ASK MORE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS THEY
DID TEACH ME THAT LAW SCHOOL BUT
I WANTED TO JUST GET IT ALL OUT
SO A COUPLE COMMENTS AND THEN I.
MAY BE HEADED BACK TO THOMAS AND
BATH BUT.
APPRECIATE THE THE COMMON AND
WE WOULD NOT MISS NECESSARILY
DISAGREE WITH THE THE BROADER
CONTEXT OF OF.
.
RESIDENTS ARE VETERANS AND THEIR
NEEDS INTO THE FUTURE.
THE THE CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES
THOUGH THAT WE HAVE A YELLOW
BILL IS THAT WE HAVE A BUILDING
THAT IS.
EXTREMELY UNSATISFACTORY AT ANY
GIVEN TIME.
ANY OF OUR CONTROL AGENCIES TO
DO SURVEYS AND AND SO FORTH COME
THROUGH AND POINT OUT.
THAT THAT FIRE DOORS THAT FIRE
LIFE SAFETY THAT ELEVATORS ALL
NEED TO BE REPAIRED AND AND THEY
NEED TO BE DONE IN EMERGENCY
SITUATIONS. ON AND IT HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT
WE'RE NOT MAINTAINING THAT WE
WE'VE EATEN THROUGH. AN EXAMPLE
WOULD BE THAT WE'VE EATEN
THROUGH. A FULL YEAR'S WORTH OF
VALIDATE ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
WITHIN A PERIOD OF FOUR MONTHS
WHY BECAUSE THE ELEVATORS ARE IN
SUCH POOR CONDITION.
WE WE HAVE JUST CONTINUING
PROBLEMS WITH THAT BUILDING
ITSELF. THE EVALUATIONS THAT
WE'VE DONE INTERNALLY OVER THE
HANDFUL OF. YEARS.
SHOW THAT WE STILL NEED.
SKILLEDNURSING AND YELP
THEY'LL. KEEP US HERE WHAT'S THE
OCCUPANCY RATE I MEAN THAT'S NOT
THE RIGHT TERM IN THE HEALTHCARE
INDUSTRY THAT'S HOTELS BUT.
WHAT'S OUR BED COUNT THE AND SO
DID THE SKILLED NURSING AS
SKILLED NURSING UNIT IS
CONSISTENTLY FULL OR VERY CLOSE
TO PASSED WE TRY TO KEEP SEVERAL
BEDS AVAILABLE.
AS BECAUSE PEOPLE LORDS OF
LOWER LEVELS OF CARE TO HAVE AN
EMERGENCY OF SOME SORT. AND THEY
NEED TO BE ELEVATED.
THEY CAN'T REMAIN WHERE THEY ARE
SO THERE'S THERE'S ALWAYS A FEW
BEDS WHICH FINALLY VACANT.
THE SKILLED NURSING FACILITY
RIGHT NOW HAS A HUNDRED FIFTY
SIX BEDS. ARE OCCUPIED GENERAL.
GENERALLY YES WITHIN WITHIN A
HANDFUL OF US. AND THERE'S THE
THE WAIT LIST FOR IS IS
SIGNIFICANT.
ANY AND THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY
OUTLINED IN THE MASTER PLAN IS
THE TOP PRIORITY FOR THIS FOR
THE SET FOR THE CAMPUS. OF ABOUT
FIVE YEARS AGO.
IT'S BEEN REIFORCED BY OUR OWN
INTERNAL AND REFUSES REINFORCED
BY THE VA STAFF. OF THE VA'S
PROJECTIONS AND WHAT THE STATE
SHOULD NEED. WAS REINFORCED BY
THE LOU HOOVER COMMISSION IN
THEIR ANALYSIS OF.
CALVIN GENERALLY ON THE CAMPUS
IN PARTICULAR ON THIS THIS THIS
IS A REALLY VITAL REPLACEMENT OF
EXISTING FACILITIES THAT. SIMPLY
DON'T DON'T CUT IT KRISTA TWENTY
THIRTEEN MASTER PLAN.
DATE YOUR EFFORTS THAT
PRESUMABLY WILL BE RELEASED NEXT
YEAR.
I ASSUME THAT YOU HAVE A NEW
MASTER PLAN COMING UP.
THIS IS SO THAT THE. REST OF MY
HOPE SO BECAUSE I BET. YEAH YEAH
I'VE ASKED FOR RIGHT NOW SO YOU
COVER THE VERY SO YES THERE ARE
THERE ARE TWO EFFORTS.
THAT ARE PERTINENT HERE ONE OF
THEM IS THE BUDGET LANGUAGE FROM
LAST YEAR WHICH IS WHAT YOU'RE
REFERRING TO WHERE. THE
LEGISLATURE ASKED US TO. DO AN
ASSESSMENT OF. THE FUTURE DID
PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE
GENERATIONS OF VETERANS THAT WE
WILL BE SERVING POTENTIALLY WITH
OUR PROGRAMS.
ETCETERA AND THEN ALSO AB
THIRTEEN SIXTY FIVE LAST YEAR.
ASKED US TO.
KLAY AS THE DIFFERENT VETERANS
HOME PROPERTIES REACH. THE
TWENTY YEAR.
SINCE THEY OPENED. BEGIN AN
ASSESSMENT OF EACH PROPERTY THAT
THE PHYSICAL BUILDINGS AND
PROPERTIES THAT ANSWER THE
QUESTION WHAT IS THE BEST
CONTINUED USE OF THIS PROPERTY.
SO WE ARE.
WE ARE. GIVEN THOSE THAT THAT
THAT DIRECTION IN BOTH OF THOSE
AND WE ARE HEARING THEM OUT
WE'RE STARTING WITH THE BUDGET
LANGUAGE WHICH IS WHAT YOU'RE
REFERRING TO. ON WHICH IS A OF
STUDY THAT.
IS UNDER WAY. AND IS IS THE
CENTRAL TO THAT IS IT IS A NEEDS
ASSESSMENT THAT GETS AT THESE
KINDS OF QUESTIONS THAT YOU'RE
BRINGING UP RIGHT NOW WHO WHO
WILL BE SERVING IN THE FUTURE.
ON WHAT WILL THEY NEED HOW WOULD%
THAT BE DIFFERENT FROM THAT IS A
STEP THAT WE ANTICIPATE BEING
PROBABLY THE LARGEST PART OF
THIS. AND WHAT'S THE BEST. WHO
IS BEST ABLE? TO PROVIDE THAT
SERVICE FOR EXAMPLE I WOULD HOPE
THAT YOU STUDY THIS IS A LITTLE
OFF SUBJECT SO I WILL SHUT UP
HERE PRETTY QUICKLY.
BUT I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU STUDY
ADDRESSES THE RELATIVE COST OF
OPERATION OF A STIFF SNIFF. THE
STATE VERSUS.
BUT A COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS AND
WHETHER IT'S BETTER.
BECAUSE IT'S BETTER FOR VETERANS
TO BE IN THAT ENVIRONMENT
SURROUNDED BY VETERANS THERE
COULD BE A WHOLE VARIETY OF BOTH
FINANCIAL AND NON FINANCIAL
ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED
BUT. ARE WE BETTER OFF
CONSTRUCTING A TWO HUNDRED FORTY
BEDS SNIFF AND OPERATING IT IS A
STATE.
THAT VETERANS SKILLED NURSING
FACILITY OR ARE WE BETTER OFF TO.
UTILIZE COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS
FOR TO PROVIDE CARE AT STATE
EXPENSE FOR OUR VETERAN
POPULATION ARE WE BETTER OFF TO
OPERATED DOWN THE CELERY.
SITUATION OR ARE WE BETTER OFF
TO TAKE OUR VETS AND GIVE THEM A
VOUCHER AND ALLOWS THEM TO
SELECT AN APARTMENT WHERE THEY
LIVE.
AND ENJOY THE COMFORTS OF THAT
OR IS IT IS THERE SOME NON
FINANCIAL ASPECT WERE VETERANS
WOULD PREFER TO BE WITH OTHER
VETERANS. IN A HOME TYPE SETTING
SO THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT
I HOPE YOUR. ANALYSIS ADDRESSES
WHEN WE ULTIMATELY SEE IT.
INTO IT TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE
COSTS RELATED TO THE SENATE
BUILDING.
.
SINCE TWO THOUSAND FIVE MONTHS
OF WAR WE'VE SPENT THE IN EXCESS
OF A HUNDRED AND THIRTY TWO
MILLION DOLLARS ON THE.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUILDING
MAINTENANCE THEIR YOUNG BILL
HOME FROM MY PERSPECTIVE WE'RE
WE'RE SPENDING.
GOOD MONEY AFTER BAD LOG JUST
KEEPING UP A FACILITY THAT
EVERYBODY. CAN ACKNOWLEDGE IS
SUB PAR I AGREE WITH YOU GOING.
AND TO.
I DON'T DISAGREE I JUST.
YOU KNOW THE QUESTION WAS TIMING
AND I'LL GET MY SHOULD OF ASKED
FOR INPUT BEFORE I STARTED
SPEAKING BUT THE QUESTION IS
TIMING AND IS IT. IS AT THE
RIGHT TIME TO DO IT. THIS YEAR
OR IS IT THE RIGHT TIME TO DO IT
AFTER WE. YOU COMPLETE YOUR
ANALYSIS AND WE TAKE A LOOK AT
THAT AND DECIDE THE COST ISSUES
AND THE NON COST ISSUES
ASSOCIATED WITH. OPERATING THIS
TYPE OF FACILITY. SO THE ONLY
OTHER THING THAT I WOULD SAY TO
TO YOUR YOUR COMMENT IS THAT.
TO GET TO THIS POINT TOOK AN
EXTRAORDINARY AMOUNT OF OF THE
WORK.
RESOURCES COMMITMENT FROM NOT
JUST OUR SECRETARY BUT EVERYBODY
INVOLVED AT THE DEPARTMENT. ON
TO GET FOLKS.
WITHIN THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
RECOGNIZE THE NEW FACILITY IS
NEEDED TO GET THE U. S. DEVIATE
A RECOGNIZED AND PLACES ON THE
PRIORITY LIST EXCEPT THAT.
KNOWING THAT DOWN THE LINE THAT
THEY WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY.
TO TO.
EDUCATE. OUR CONTROL AGENCIES
TO TO ALLOW THEM THE THE
APPRECIATION FOR OUR VETERANS
ARE GOING THROUGH.
WITH PROJECTS SUCH AS THESE YOU
BUILD ON MOMENTUM. AND IT'S
TAKEN A LONG TIME JUST TO GET TO
THIS POINT AND AND FROM OUR
PERSPECTIVE WE WOULD WE WOULD.
BE VERY DISAPPOINTED TO SEE
THAT.
THAT MOMENTUM STOP.
BECAUSE WERE VERY.
.
SURE TO THE FACT THAT THAT NEEDS
ASSESSMENT WILL DEMONSTRATE ONCE
AGAIN. FOR A YES MA'AM. WHAT I WAS GONNA SAY
WE ALSO?
ANTICIPATE THE SAME TYPE OF
CONCEPT AN APPROACH TO POINT TO
THE THE TWO NEW STUDIES I MEAN.
THERE'S THE BUDGET LANGUAGE ONE
THAT'S. SORT OF BASED ON A
LARGELY ON A NEEDS ASSESSMENT
AND THEN OF COURSE AB THIRTEEN
SIXTY FIVE QUESTION ABOUT THE
BEST CONTINUED USE OF THE
PROPERTIES.
WE HAVE THESE DESIGNED IN SUCH A
WAY THAT.
IT'S CRITICAL FOR EACH PHASE TO
LEAD INTO THE NEXT PHASE IN A
KIND OF A LINEAR FASHION SO THAT
THE DATA COLLECTED. ANY ANALYSIS
CAN FUEL THE NEXT PHASE OF IT
AND SO MY. MY ARM CONCERN I
GUESS TO GO ON WITH WHAT THEY
WERE SAYING IS THAT.
THIS IS A PROCESS THAT HAS TO
PLAY OUT.
IN ITS IN ITS ENTIRETY AND
THESE ARE NEEDS THAT WE HAVE
IDENTIFIED.
AS BEING.
NOW. FOR MY COLLEAGUES BENEFIT
IF I UNDERSTAND THIS CORRECTLY
THE REGION YOU'RE TAKING A LOOK
AT. FUTURE USE OF. OTHER
VETERANS HOME PROPERTIES IS THAT
THE. WORD TO THE POINT IN THE
BOND.
SITUATION WHERE WE'RE NO LONGER
RESTRICTED AS TO HOW THOSE
PROPERTIES ARE USED. CORRECT
THAT'S THE THAT'S THE KEY FACTOR
BEHIND THE.
RIGHT.
RITUALISTIC AS THIS HAPPENED.
RAISE OTHER STUDIES TAKE PLACE
RIGHT OKAY FINE IT'S APOLOGIZE
FOR CUTTING YOU OUT OF THE
CONVERSATION.
BELIAU.
DEFERRING TO YOU SO YOU MUST
HAVE A LOT TO SAY.
LIKE FAMILY.
YOUR PATIENCE.
GREAT CONVERSATIONS I'M SO OUR
OFFICE AGAIN VIEWS THE ISSUE
NUMBER TWO NUMBER THREE AROUND
THE PROPOSED CONVERSION OF THE
DOMICILIARY ROOMS AND THEN ALSO
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
REPLACEMENT NEF AND MEMBER CARE
UNIT.
AS RELATED. AND MAINLY FOR BOTH
PROPOSALS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO
THE MERITS AND WE WOULD
RECOMMEND THAT THE LEGISLATURE
NOT APPROVED MAINLY AROUND THE
ISSUE OF THE PROPOSALS COMING TO
THE LEGISLATURE PRIOR TO THE
COMPLETION OF THE MASTER PLAN.
AND THAT AS IT WAS MENTIONED
LAST YEAR THE LEGISLATURE TO
PASS THE DEPARTMENT TO WORK ON A
MASTER PLAN THAT WOULD MAINLY
LOOK AT ASSESSING CURRENT NEEDS.
PROJECTING FUTURE DEMAND AND
THEN DETERMINING HOW ON A SYSTEM
WIDE BASIS DO WE ALIGN THE
SYSTEM TO MEET THOSE CURRENT AND
FUTURE DEMANDS AND NEEDS.
I AM AND ONE OF THE INTENTS
BEHIND THAT MASTER PLAN WAS THEN
FOR THE LEGISLATURE TO BE ABLE
TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE
NECESSARY CHANGES ACROSS ALL
EIGHT BETTER IN HOMES.
ASSESS THE TRADE OFFS BUT THEN
ALSO UNDERSTAND THE ASSOCIATED
TRADE OFFS AND RISK OF
PRIORITIZING DIFFERENT PROJECTS
ACROSS THE ENTIRE VETERAN HOME
SYSTEM.
AND AS WAS MENTIONED THERE WAS
A MASTER'S PLANS SPECIFIC TO
YOUNG PEOPLE ABOUT WAS DEVELOPED
IN TWENTY THIRTEEN.
THAT DE IDENTIFIED DIVERT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT
SNIFF A MEMORY CARE FACILITY AS
ONE OF THE TOP.
RECOMMENDED PROJECTS TO BE DONE.
BUT ABSENT OF THIS NEW MASTER
PLAN THAT WOULD REALLY GIVE US
THAT HOLISTIC SYSTEM WIDE
ASSESSMENT OF WHAT ARE THE
PRIORITIZE PROJECTS ACROSS ALL
THE HOMES. AND HOW DO WE COMPARE
THOSE PROJECTS ON A SYSTEM WIDE
BASIS TO THEN KIND OF ATTACK
THAT ANY ISSUES OF MEETING
CURRENT AND FUTURE DEMAND AND A
COORDINATED AND STRATEGIC MANNER.
AND SEQUENCING PROJECTS IN THAT
WAY.
ABSENT THE SYSTEM WIDE MASTER
PLAN WE DON'T KNOW HOW TO TAKE
THIS HOME SPECIFIC MASTER PLAN
AND WHERE IT FITS IN ACROSS THE
ENTIRE SYSTEM. ARE. ANOTHER
EXAMPLE THAT YOU.
HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP IN THE
CONVERSATION IS THAT WE WERE
KIND OF DEALING WITH THAT TIMES
COMPETING PRIORITIES ONE
PRIORITY IS ENSURING THAT THE
CURRENT FACILITIES.
WERE MAINTAINING THEM TO THE
POINT THAT WERE ABLE TO PROVIDE
A HIGH LEVEL OF CARE TO
RESIDENTS BUT THEN THERE'S ALSO
THIS OTHER PRIORITY OF A
ADDRESSING THE FACT THAT THERE
IS HIGH UNMET. DEMAND FOR
SKILLED NURSING AND MEMORY ARE
BEDS CURRENTLY SO THERE'S THIS
PRIORITY OF EXPANDING CAPACITY.
I'M SO WITH THIS PROPOSAL COMING
AHEAD OF THE MASTER PLAN THAT
WOULD HELP AT LEAST THE
LEGISLATURE PROVIDE SOME
ASSISTANCE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW
DO YOU BALANCE THESE TWO
COMPETING PRIORITIES. AND THEN
PRIORITIZE PROJECTS MOVING
FORWARD.
WITHOUT THE MASTER PLAN IT
ISN'T CLEAR HOW TO ASSESS THE
POTENTIAL TRADE OFFS. OF THAT OF
PRIORITIZING MAINTAINING CURRENT
FACILITIES VERSES EXPANDING AND
VICE VERSA.
.
LASTLY I WILL MENTION.
.
WE ALSO MENTIONED AND THEY WRITE
UP THAT WE PUBLISH A FEW DAYS
AGO ON THESE TWO PROPOSALS THAT
THE LEGISLATURE MAY WANT TO
CLARIFY THE INTENT OF THE MASTER
PLAN AND TO THE EXTENT THAT
THERE ARE. BOTH NEAR TERM AND
LONG TERM COLLECT DATA ON.
TO. CLARIFY AND REINFORCE THOSE
EXPECTATIONS BUT THEN ALSO.
WELL TO THAT REASSESS THE
RESOURCES THAT CALL BUT
CURRENTLY HAS IN DEVELOPING THE
MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTING THE
MASTER PLAN AND ADJUSTING
ACCORDINGLY. AND WITH THAT HAPPY
TO TAKE ANY OTHER FOLLOW UP
QUESTIONS THANK YOU AND I
CERTAINLY WOULDN'T WANT ANYBODY
HERE ON THE DYESS.
OR OUT THERE IN.
RADIO LAND I GUESS TO
MISINTERPRET MY COMMENTS I MEAN
I AM A. ABSOLUTE. TOTAL
SUPPORTER OF CARE TO THE
VETERANS COMMUNITY AND I THINK
IF THE STATE IS GOING TO.
CONTINUE TO DO WHAT WE NEED TO
DO IT IN A WORLD CLASS WAY.
AND GIVEN CONSTRAINED RESOURCES
WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE
DIRECT OUR RESOURCES TO.
THE AREA WHERE THE RESEARCHERS
ARE NEEDED THE MOST AND IF IT'S
IN. A SKILLED NURSING AND MEMORY
CARE FACILITIES AND THAT'S THE
BEST WAY TO DELIVER CARE TO
VETERANS IN A IN A SETTING WHERE
THEY'RE SURROUNDED BY VETERANS.
THEN I'M I'M ALL IN I JUST WANT
TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO AT SOME
POINT. THAT WE DO THE ANALYSIS
THAT WE OUGHT TO BE DOING ON A
SYSTEM THAT IS.
WHAT A HUNDRED AND?
WHATEVER YEARS OLD HUNDRED AND
SOMETHING YEARS OLD THEN WE DO
ANALYSIS IF WE HAVEN'T DONE IT
BEFORE ON UP ON THE SYSTEM IS
OLD FINANCE.
SALLY WOULD COMPEL AGAIN
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.
I JUST WANTED TO COMMENT ON. IT
FIRST ECHOING WHAT.
THE OF MY.
THE FOLKS FROM DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS. MENTIONED THAT
THIS IS A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN
IN A KIND OF A LONG TIME IN THE
MAKING IT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL.
YA FEEL MASTER PLAN IT WAS
IDENTIFIED AS THAT IS NOT THE
HIGHEST PRIORITY ON THAT CAMPUS
AND AND FOR VETERANS AFFAIRS.
.
THE PROPOSAL THAT YOU HAVE
BEFORE YOU HAS BEEN A
COLLABORATIVE EFFORT BETWEEN
PARTLY FINANCED THAT'S.
YOU KNOW WE'VE SPENT A LOT OF
TIME AND I THINK IT'S WIDELY
RECOGNIZED THAT. FACILITY IS
SUBSTANDARD AND THAT NEEDS TO BE
ADDRESSED SOONER RATHER THAN
LATER.
I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT FROM
A FISCAL STANDPOINT THAT THAT.
.
EATING UNTIL AFTER THE MASTER
PLAN IS COMPLETE SO THAT WOULD
BE JULY OF TWO THOUSAND NINETEEN
WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT ON TWENTY
TWENTY ONE. BUDGET PROPOSALS AT
THAT TIME SO THAT WE DEFER THIS.
ABOUT TWO YEARS AND WE KNOW JUST
BASED ON REGULAR ESCALATION THAT
THAT ALONE WILL COST ABOUT A
TWENTY MILLION DOLLAR INCREASE
IN PROJECT COST JUST ESCALATION
ALONE NOT TO MENTION. YOU KNOW
WHATEVER HARD COSTS.
AND I DON'T KNOW HOW IT GOT
JEOPARDIZES THE AVAILABILITY OF
A FEDERAL FUNDS THAT. I HAVE TO
DEFER TO.
THAT'S AFFAIRS BUT YOU KNOW.
TIME IS MONEY AND SO THE MORE
THE LONGER WE DIFFER PROJECT
THAT IS WIDELY RECOGNIZED AS
BEING ON. AT. GREAT NEED FOR
THAT DEPARTMENT IT JUST GETS
MORE AND MORE EXPENSIVE.
AT ISSUE TOO IS A REDUCTION IN
ISSUE THREE IS ABOUT FIFTEEN
POINT SEVEN MILLION.
WHICH IS PULLING HER PLANS.
.
COLLEAGUES ANY QUESTION SURVEYS
ARE SIR WILL.
I JUST HAVE JUST HAVE ONE
COMMENT IN TERMS OF MEMORY CARE
I SO I USED TO BE IN THE SYSTEM
LIVING. FACILITY INDUSTRY. AND
SO WHEN WE DO WHEN WE DID OUR
MARKET ANALYSIS IT WAS ALWAYS.
THE DEMAND WAS ALWAYS MUCH
GREATER GREATER THAN WHAT OUR
MARKET STUDIES SHOW SO YOU PUT
USE A DIFFERENT SET OF DATA TO
DETERMINE WHAT YOUR SYSTEM NEEDS
ARE THE FUTURE FOR THESE BATS
BUT. I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE.
THERE WE ARE AND I'M GLAD YOU
BROUGHT IT UP THAT THAT'S ROBOTS
BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE. A
PROBLEM THIS IS GOING TO
CONTINUE TO TO EXPAND SO. AGAIN
I AGREE WITH THE CHAIR THAT WE
WANT TO. PROVIDE WORLD CLASS
SERVICE SO.
THE RIGHT PUBLIC COMMENT ON
THESE TWO ISSUES ANYONE.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO
HOLD BOTH OPEN.
.
I DON'T HAVE A PREFERENCE IF IF
THERE'S EMOTIONAL ENTERTAIN
OTHERWISE I'LL HOLD IT OPEN AND
WE'LL WE'LL OBVIOUSLY BRING IT
BACK HERE AT A LATER DATE.
WE'LL HOLD THESE TWO ISSUES OF.
ISSUE NUMBER FOUR IN OUR FINAL
ISSUE BEFORE WE GO BACK AND PICK
UP SOME VOTES IS A PRO POSITION
FUNDING ALIGNMENT THIS I WILL
NOTE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON
THIS IS TO APPROVE.
HER QUESTION AND IT HAS TO DO
WITH THE ECHO OF A BUILDING IN
THE FARM HALL AND HOME BUILDING
FUND.
HOW ARE YOU MA'AM?
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US SIR TO
HAVE YOU AT THE END. THAT'S ALL
RIGHT I DON'T MIND. SAVE THE
BEST FOR LAST RIGHT YES.
THE TREES AGAIN DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS.
I'M HERE ABOUT TV POSITION
FUNDING ALIGNMENT ITEM NUMBER
FOUR.
DEPARTMENTS REQUESTING AN
AUGMENTATION OF ONE POINT SIX
MILLION TO HELP CORRECTLY
ALIGNED THE FUNDING IN OUR
PROGRAM.
SPECIFICALLY.
AND THAT FUNDING NEEDS NECESSARY
FOR GENERAL FUND SOURCE PROGRAMS.
TEND TO ADJUST THE RENTAL
PAYMENTS TO THE FARM AND HOME
LOAN PROGRAM FROM.
WHERE THEY'RE CURRENTLY OUT TO
THE PRICE BOOK FOR THE GENERAL
FUND PROGRAMS THAT ARE OCCUPYING
THE HEADQUARTERS BUILDING? YOUR
STAFF. ANALYSIS.
CLEARLY LAYS OUT THE ISSUE THAT
JUST OVER TIME WE'VE KIND OF
GOTTEN. OUT OF BALANCE WITH.
BOTH THE AMOUNT OF SUPPORT THAT
THE FARM HOME FUND IS DOING AND.
POSSESSIONS.
ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS WITHIN
THE DEPARTMENT. AND AS WELL AS.
HAVE RENTAL PAYMENTS.
FOR THE HEADQUARTERS BUILDING
FOR THE GENERAL FUND PROGRAMS
THAT ARE OCCUPYING THOSE
PORTIONS NOT OCCUPIED ARE
NECESSARY FOR THE FOREMAN HOME
PROGRAM.
AND WITH THAT I'M HAPPY TO
ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHT
FORWARD FINANCING A COMMON.
BELIAU COMMENT COLLEAGUES
QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL
THE ITEM IT'S BEEN MOVED PLEASE
CALL PUBLIC COMMENT ANYBODY.
COME ON DOWN HEARING NONE SEEING
NONE CALL THE ROLL PLEASE IT'S
BEEN MOVED CENTER OFF FOR FIVE.
YEARS LATER. CENTER WELL.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH LET'S
.
WE'RE GONNA OPEN THE ROLE ON
SEVERAL ISSUES.
THE FIRST.
IF YOU WERE GOING TO OPEN THE
ROLE ON HAS TO DO WITH ITEM
EIGHTY NINE FOUR ZERO CLIFORNIA
MILITARY DEPARTMENT ISSUE NUMBER
THREE.
SERVER NETWORK DEFENSE TEAM.
.
CALL THE ABSENT MEMBERS THINNER
LAY THERE I.
MOTION CARRIES THE. SECOND ITEM
IS ISSUE NUMBER FIVE WORK FOR
LAWYERS.
CALL THE ROLL SENATOR BELIEVE
CERTIFIED.
MOTION CARRIES.
AND ITEM EIGHT NINE FIVE FIVE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS ISSUE NUMBER
ONE RECTOR DAM AND RESERVOIR
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PLEASE.
UNLESS SOMEONE HAS AN IDEA OF
SOME FURTHER BUSINESS I THINK
WE'VE COVERED THE AGENDA AND
THIS.
SUBCOMMITTEES INTERN THANK YOU
FOR YOUR PATIENCE